The present disclosure relates generally to performance analytics dashboards and, more specifically to breakdown element selection for widgets within a performance analytics dashboard.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Organizations, regardless of size, rely upon access to information technology (IT) and data and services for their continued operation and success. A respective organization's IT infrastructure may have associated hardware resources (e.g. computing devices, load balancers, firewalls, switches, etc.) and software resources (e.g. productivity software, database applications, custom applications, and so forth). Over time, more and more organizations have turned to cloud computing approaches to supplement or enhance their IT infrastructure solutions.
Cloud computing relates to the sharing of computing resources that are generally accessed via the Internet. In particular, a cloud computing infrastructure allows users, such as individuals and/or enterprises, to access a shared pool of computing resources, such as servers, storage devices, networks, applications, and/or other computing based services. By doing so, users are able to access computing resources on demand that are located at remote locations, which resources may be used to perform a variety computing functions (e.g., storing and/or processing large quantities of computing data). For enterprise and other organization users, cloud computing provides flexibility in accessing cloud computing resources without accruing large up-front costs, such as purchasing expensive network equipment or investing large amounts of time in establishing a private network infrastructure. Instead, by utilizing cloud computing resources, users are able redirect their resources to focus on their enterprise's core functions.
In modern communication networks, examples of cloud computing services a user may utilize include so-called infrastructure as a service (IaaS), software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) technologies. IaaS is a model in which providers abstract away the complexity of hardware infrastructure and provide rapid, simplified provisioning of virtual servers and storage, giving enterprises access to computing capacity on demand. In such an approach, however, a user may be left to install and maintain platform components and applications. SaaS is a delivery model that provides software as a service rather than an end product. Instead of utilizing a local network or individual software installations, software is typically licensed on a subscription basis, hosted on a remote machine, and accessed by client customers as needed. For example, users are generally able to access a variety of enterprise and/or information technology (IT)-related software via a web browser. PaaS acts an extension of SaaS that goes beyond providing software services by offering customizability and expandability features to meet a user's needs. For example, PaaS can provide a cloud-based developmental platform for users to develop, modify, and/or customize applications and/or automating enterprise operations without maintaining network infrastructure and/or allocating computing resources normally associated with these functions.
A performance analytics dashboard may include multiple widgets, customizable by a user to generate and display visualizations of data. Breakdown elements may be available for selection by the user to filter and/or sort data for the visualizations. However, existing breakdown element selection capabilities may result in the user toggling between multiple widgets, and thus missing a complete understanding of the underlying data.
A summary of certain embodiments disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
The disclosed subject matter includes techniques for receiving selection of multiple breakdown elements and updating a visualization within the widget based on the selected breakdown elements. The widget may have an aggregate view type or a separate view type. In the aggregate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is combined into a single plot. In the separate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is kept separate and shown in separate respective plots. The widget may be part of a dashboard having multiple widgets. The dashboard may include some widgets having an aggregate view type and other widgets having a separate view type.
Various refinements of the features noted above may exist in relation to various aspects of the present disclosure. Further features may also be incorporated in these various aspects as well. These refinements and additional features may exist individually or in any combination. For instance, various features discussed below in relation to one or more of the illustrated embodiments may be incorporated into any of the above-described aspects of the present disclosure alone or in any combination. The brief summary presented above is intended only to familiarize the reader with certain aspects and contexts of embodiments of the present disclosure without limitation to the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects of this disclosure may be better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and enterprise-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
As used herein, the term “computing system” refers to an electronic computing device such as, but not limited to, a single computer, virtual machine, virtual container, host, server, laptop, and/or mobile device, or to a plurality of electronic computing devices working together to perform the function described as being performed on or by the computing system. As used herein, the term “medium” refers to one or more non-transitory, computer-readable physical media that together store the contents described as being stored thereon. Embodiments may include non-volatile secondary storage, read-only memory (ROM), and/or random-access memory (RAM). As used herein, the term “application” refers to one or more computing modules, programs, processes, workloads, threads and/or a set of computing instructions executed by a computing system. Example embodiments of an application include software modules, software objects, software instances and/or other types of executable code. As used herein, the terms alerts, incidents (INTs), changes (CHGs), and problems (PRBs) are used in accordance with the generally accepted use of the terminology for CMDBs. Moreover, the term “issues” with respect to a CI of a CMDB collectively refers to alerts, INTs, CHGs, and PRBs associated with the CI.
A performance analytics systems may include a dashboard having multiple widgets, customizable by a user to generate and display visualizations of data. Breakdown elements may be selectable by the user to filter and/or sort data for the visualizations. The disclosed techniques include receiving selection of multiple breakdown elements and updating a visualization within the widget based on the selected breakdown elements. The widget may have an aggregate view type or a separate view type. In the aggregate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is combined into a single plot. In the separate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is kept separate and shown in separate respective plots. The widget may be part of a dashboard having multiple widgets. The dashboard may include some widgets having an aggregate view type and other widgets having a separate view type.
With the preceding in mind, the following figures relate to various types of generalized system architectures or configurations that may be employed to provide services to an organization in a multi-instance framework and on which the present approaches may be employed. Correspondingly, these system and platform examples may also relate to systems and platforms on which the techniques discussed herein may be implemented or otherwise utilized. Turning now to
For the illustrated embodiment,
In
To utilize computing resources within the platform 16, network operators may choose to configure the data centers 18 using a variety of computing infrastructures. In one embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-tenant cloud architecture, such that one of the server instances 26 handles requests from and serves multiple customers. Data centers 18 with multi-tenant cloud architecture commingle and store data from multiple customers, where multiple customer instances are assigned to one of the virtual servers 26. In a multi-tenant cloud architecture, the particular virtual server 26 distinguishes between and segregates data and other information of the various customers. For example, a multi-tenant cloud architecture could assign a particular identifier for each customer in order to identify and segregate the data from each customer. Generally, implementing a multi-tenant cloud architecture may suffer from various drawbacks, such as a failure of a particular one of the server instances 26 causing outages for all customers allocated to the particular server instance.
In another embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-instance cloud architecture to provide every customer its own unique customer instance or instances. For example, a multi-instance cloud architecture could provide each customer instance with its own dedicated application server and dedicated database server. In other examples, the multi-instance cloud architecture could deploy a single physical or virtual server 26 and/or other combinations of physical and/or virtual servers 26, such as one or more dedicated web servers, one or more dedicated application servers, and one or more database servers, for each customer instance. In a multi-instance cloud architecture, multiple customer instances could be installed on one or more respective hardware servers, where each customer instance is allocated certain portions of the physical server resources, such as computing memory, storage, and processing power. By doing so, each customer instance has its own unique software stack that provides the benefit of data isolation, relatively less downtime for customers to access the platform 16, and customer-driven upgrade schedules. An example of implementing a customer instance within a multi-instance cloud architecture will be discussed in more detail below with reference to
Although
As may be appreciated, the respective architectures and frameworks discussed with respect to
By way of background, it may be appreciated that the present approach may be implemented using one or more processor-based systems such as shown in
With this in mind, an example computer system may include some or all of the computer components depicted in
The one or more processors 202 may include one or more microprocessors capable of performing instructions stored in the memory 206. Additionally or alternatively, the one or more processors 202 may include application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and/or other devices designed to perform some or all of the functions discussed herein without calling instructions from the memory 206.
With respect to other components, the one or more busses 204 include suitable electrical channels to provide data and/or power between the various components of the computing system 200. The memory 206 may include any tangible, non-transitory, and computer-readable storage media. Although shown as a single block in
With the foregoing in mind,
The discussion now turns to a mechanism for displaying system data via one or more visualizations, enabling interactivity with the system data, and reporting on the system data.
In some embodiments, dashboard 302 may be it may be configured to enable customized positioning and/or sizing of widgets 304. As used herein, the term “dashboard” refers to a graphical-user-interface (GUI) screen where data-driven widgets 304 may be placed on the screen without being constrained to pre-defined containers 306 and/or static placement and/or size. In other words, for the dashboard 302, the widgets 304 may be dynamically moved to any location on the dashboard 302 without being constrained to pre-defined locations, as indicated by arrows 308. Further, the size of the widgets 304 may be dynamically altered in the dashboard 302, as indicated by sizing indicators 310 and arrows 312.
As there may be more flexibility in configuring a dashboard 302 over a homepage 300, it may be desirable in certain situations to convert a homepage 300 to a dashboard 302. Indeed, it may be burdensome to generate dashboards 302 from scratch after time and effort may have already been afforded to creating a homepage 300. Accordingly, in some embodiments, a conversion process 314 may be implemented to convert a homepage 300 to a dashboard 302.
The conversion process 314 may identify the widgets 304 found on the homepage 300 (block 316). For example, a computer-readable representation of the homepage 300 (e.g., a homepage object) may be traversed to identify each of the widgets 304 on the homepage 300.
Further, the conversion process 314 may identify the containers 306 and their associated sizes and placements for the identified widgets 304 found on the homepage 300 (block 318). For example, the computer-readable representation of the homepage 300 (e.g., a homepage object) may be traversed to identify each of the containers 306 containing the widgets 304 on the homepage 300. Position and/or size attributes of the containers 306 may be identified by accessing object attributes of the computer-readable representation of the homepage 300.
Once the widgets 304 and the containers 306 and their attributes are identified, a corresponding dashboard 302 may be generated (block 320). For example, computer instructions may generate a computer-readable representation of the homepage 300, inserting the widgets 304 at the position and/or size identified by the container 306 attributes. Once the dashboard 302 is generated, it may be accessed and the size and position of the widgets 304 may be modified dynamically.
The widgets 304 may be independent data-driven software that perform particular tasks. For example, the widgets 304 may provide visualizations generated based upon datasets of the system, such as those present within database. The widgets 304 may be selected, for example, from a library (e.g., a visualization library).
In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, the widgets 304 are generated according to a guided workflow presented as a part of a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to facilitate generation of analytics and/or reporting widgets on an embodiment of the homepage or an embodiment of the dashboard. Though widgets may be created for a wide range of functions, the instant embodiments are focused on tracking incidents. Depending on the data being tracked, an “incident” may be any occurrence that a user is interested in tracking. For example, in some embodiments, an incident may be the opening of a service ticket, the number of open service tickets on a given day, a network outage, a hardware failure, a software failure, a login failure, a request for action, an unfulfilled purchase request, a security breach, a virus or malware warning, an event, a filed complaint, or any other occurrence or metric a user is interested on monitoring.
Once generated, the dashboard may receive inputs manipulating one or more of the widgets and/or visualizations. For example, the inputs may include selection of one or more breakdown elements. The breakdown elements may include various categories of the underlying data, such that selection of breakdown elements gives the user a more nuanced and comprehensive view of the underlying data. In response to the inputs, the dashboard may update the widgets and/or visualizations to reflect selection of one or more breakdown elements.
In the instant embodiment, the first widget 400 is a visualization showing a time series plot of the number of open incidents by day, wherein a line 406 indicates the total number of open incidents on a given day. The second widget 402 is a visualization showing the total number of incidents that have not been updated in the previous 5 days. The third widget 404 displays the number of open incidents on a given day, broken out by priority. Within the third widget 404, for each day, a column is shown. The height of the column indicates the total number of open incidents on that day. Each block of color within the column indicates the number of open incidents given a specific priority designation. As shown, moving a cursor or a mouse icon over parts of the widgets 400, 402, 404 may cause a pop-up window 407 to open, displaying additional information about this part of the widget 400, 402, 404.
Further, the dashboard 302 may include tabs, selectable by the user to display various sets of widgets. In the illustrated embodiment, the incident daily 408 tab is selected and first, second, and third widgets 400, 402, 404 are shown. However, selection of an incident 7d tab 410 or an incident 28d tab 412 may cause other sets of widgets to be displayed. As with the widgets, the names and orders of the tabs 408, 410, 412 may be customizable by a user.
The dashboard 302 may also include a breakdown element group field 414 and a breakdown element field 416. Breakdown elements are categories by which the underlying data may be broken down. These breakdown elements may be separated into groups. For example, in the instant embodiment, incident category has been selected in the breakdown element group field 414. These incident categories may include, for example, breakdown elements of inquiry, software, hardware, network, database, etc. Other breakdown element groups may include, for example, age of incident, priority of incident, team assigned to incident, etc. Once a breakdown element group has been selected from a drop down menu, upon selecting the breakdown element field 416, the options for breakdown elements may be displayed.
It should be understood that each of the widgets 400, 402, 404 may be set to display as a separate view or an aggregate view as multiple breakdown elements are selected. For example, the first widget 400 is set to display an aggregate view, so as multiple breakdown elements are selected, the widget displays the total number of open incidents that fall into one or more of the selected categories. That is, the line 406 indicates the total number of open incidents on a given day that are related to software or networks.
Alternatively, the second widget 402 is set to display a separate view, so as multiple breakdown elements are selected, the widget displays a separate column for each of the selected categories. That is, second widget includes a first column 552 that represents that number of software-related incidents that have not been updated in the 5 previous days and a second column 554 that represents the number of network-related incidents that have not been updated in the 5 previous days.
As illustrated, the drop down menu 450 appears and displays the remaining unselected breakdown elements within the selected breakdown elements group. The user may select one of the remaining breakdown elements from the drop down menu 450 in order to add another breakdown element.
As previously discussed, each of the widgets 400, 402, and 404 may be set to display an aggregate view or a separate view when multiple breakdown elements are selected.
The disclosed techniques include receiving selection of multiple breakdown elements and updating a visualization within the widget based on the selected breakdown elements. The widget may have an aggregate view type or a separate view type. In the aggregate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is combined into a single plot. In the separate view type, data associated with the selected breakdown elements is kept separate and shown in separate respective plots. The widget may be part of a dashboard having multiple widgets. The dashboard may include some widgets having an aggregate view type and other widgets having a separate view type.
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
The techniques presented and claimed herein are referenced and applied to material objects and concrete examples of a practical nature that demonstrably improve the present technical field and, as such, are not abstract, intangible or purely theoretical. Further, if any claims appended to the end of this specification contain one or more elements designated as “means for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ” or “step for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ”, it is intended that such elements are to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f). However, for any claims containing elements designated in any other manner, it is intended that such elements are not to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f).