Patent Grant
8150959
The present invention generally relates to industrial control systems, and more particularly, to systems and methods that notify one or more hosts from controllers in an industrial controller environment.
Industrial controllers (e.g., Programmable Logic Controllers, or PLCs) are special purpose processing devices used for controlling (e.g., automated and semi-automated) industrial processes, machines, manufacturing equipment, plants, and the like. A typical controller executes a control program or routine in order to measure one or more process variables or inputs representative of the status of a controlled process and/or effectuate outputs associated with control of the process. Such inputs and outputs can be digital and/or analog, assuming a continuous range of values. A typical control routine can be created in a controller configuration environment that has various tools and interfaces whereby a developer can construct and implement a control strategy using industrial and conventional programming languages or graphical representations of control functionality. Such control routine can be downloaded from the configuration system into one or more controllers for implementation of the control strategy in controlling a process or machine.
Measured inputs received from a controlled process and outputs transmitted to the process can pass through one or more input/output (I/O) modules in a control system. Such modules can serve in the capacity of an electrical interface between the controller and the controlled process and can be located local or remote from the controller. Inputs and outputs can be recorded in an I/O memory. The input values can be asynchronously or synchronously read from the controlled process by one or more input modules and output values can be written directly to memory by a processor for subsequent communication to the process by specialized communications circuitry. An output module can interface directly with a controlled process by providing an output from memory to an actuator such as a motor, drive, valve, solenoid, and the like.
During execution of the control routine, values of the inputs and outputs exchanged with the controlled process can pass through memory. The values of inputs in memory can be asynchronously or synchronously updated from the controlled process by dedicated and/or common scanning circuitry. Such scanning circuitry can communicate with input and/or output modules over a bus on a backplane or network. The scanning circuitry can also asynchronously or synchronously write values of the outputs in memory to the controlled process. The output values from the memory can be communicated to one or more output modules for interfacing with the process. Thus, a controller processor can simply access the memory rather than needing to communicate directly with the controlled process.
In distributed control systems, controller hardware configuration can be facilitated by separating the industrial controller into a number of control elements, each of which performs a different function. Particular control modules needed for the control task can then be connected together on a common backplane within a rack and/or through a network or other communications medium. The control modules can include processors, power supplies, network communication modules, and I/O modules exchanging input and output signals directly with the controlled process. Data can be exchanged between modules using a backplane communications bus, which can be serial or parallel, or via a network. In addition to performing I/O operations based solely on network communications, smart modules exist which can execute autonomous logical or other control programs or routines. Various control modules of a distributed industrial control system can be spatially distributed along a common communication link in several locations. Certain I/O modules can thus be located proximate a portion of the controlled equipment, and away from the controller. Data can be communicated with these remote modules over a common communication link, or network, wherein all modules on the network communicate via standard communication protocols.
In a typical distributed control system, one or more I/O modules are provided for interfacing with a process. The outputs derive their control or output values in the form of a message from a master or peer device over a network or a backplane. For example, an output module can receive an output value from a processor via a communications network or a backplane communications bus. The desired output value is generally sent to the output module in a message. The output module receiving such a message will provide a corresponding output (analog or digital) to the controlled process. Input modules measure a value of a process variable and report the input values to another device over a network or backplane. The input values can be used by a processor for performing control computations.
In such systems, alerts can be generated in the controller and conveyed to particular host systems. Such alerts can be defined in the controller and raised under particular conditions. Conventional techniques utilized to notify a host system when an alert occurs include polling and messaging. With polling, the host periodically or continuously polls the controller and determines when an alert occurs at the host. Such polling consumes bandwidth and, thus, this technique can increase bandwidth consumption, which can decrease performance and increase delay times. With messaging, the controller determines when an event occurs and transmits an alert notification to the host. The technique increases complexity by requiring the controller to know host addresses ahead of time. In addition, when host configuration changes or new host systems is added, the controller has to be updated with the updated or new host configuration and addresses.
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the invention nor delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The subject invention provides systems and methods that facilitate providing a subscriber with alert information, wherein a subscriber is a device that is capable of receiving and treating alerts and an alert is any possible instantaneous occurrence detectable by a publisher that can be of interest to one or more subscribers. In one example, the subscriber can be a host system and the alert can be a state, related information, an acknowledgment, an event or alarm associated with an industrial controller. Such alert can be an instantaneous occurrence that is significant to the host system and/or other application and the alarm can be an alert that is deemed abnormal and that requires special attention and handling.
As noted above, in conventional systems a host typically obtains alert information through polling and messaging techniques, wherein the host periodically or continuously polls the controller and determines the occurrence of an alert at the host or the controller determines the occurrence of the alert and transmits a message instruction to the host to notify the host of the alert. Such techniques commonly require the controller to know host's addresses ahead of time such that the controller can include a configuration and specific address of a destination host in an instruction. The systems and methods described herein can mitigate the foregoing deficiencies with conventional alert notification systems. In general, this is achieved through a set of objects (e.g., notify objects) that implement a notification and dynamic subscription process. Alerts are defined in the controller through a combination of data table structures and user instructions and declared upon execution under selected conditions. A host system can instantiate an associated notify object, subscribe to an alert, and be notified about the alert
The invention enables multiple hosts to subscribe to the same alert, allows each host to select alerts of interest, and enables the alerts to be queued if the alerts occur faster than can be sent. One of the advantages provided by the subject invention is that it does not require the controller to know the destination addresses of the host messages in advance. This makes it possible to build macros and reusable groups of instructions. With conventional systems, each time an alert detection instruction is inserted into the controller configuration and specific addresses of the host must be inserted into an appropriate instruction, which makes reusable blocks of code very difficult. With the subject invention, the configuration of which host systems would like to be notified about which alerts is established at run time. In general, the host systems create a notify object and subscribe to the alerts of interest. If the configuration or number of hosts is changed the controllers do not have to be modified or altered, which is an improvement over competing solutions, wherein each change in the host configuration required subsequent changes to the controller programs.
The subject invention can also provide the following improvements over conventional systems: improved efficiency, reduced bandwidth consumption, reduced complexity, and improved performance. For example, bandwidth can be reduced through eliminating the need to continually poll the controller and receive the same data in order to check for an alert condition. With the subject invention, a message is conveyed to the host(s) only when an alert is detected. In another example, complexity of configuring systems can be reduced by not requiring the controller to contain the addresses of the host systems, and the configuration of the host systems can be changed and new host systems added without any change to the controller. In yet another example, performance can be improved by reducing the delay between detection of an alert and notification of the host. In conventional systems, when the host polls the controller for data and detects an alert, the maximum response time, or delay from the alert occurring to alert detection, is the time of one poll. With the subject invention, the message is sent as soon as the alert is detected in the controller, which means that on average the delay will be much less than one poll time and in the worst case when all alerts occur at the same time, the delay will be no worse than the delay of a single poll. In addition, the subject invention enables multiple alerts to be combined into a single packet, which can increase efficiency over systems that use message instructions with specific addresses to deliver alerts.
In one aspects of the invention, a system that includes a subscription component, a notification component, and an interface component is provided. The subscription component is utilized to accept requests for alert notifications, for example, from a subscribing system such as a host. The interface component provides a communications mechanism to receive alert notifications for distribution by the notification component, which distributes the alert notifications to subscribers. In one instance, the subscription component, the notification component, and the interface component can be implemented as an object (e.g., a notify object), wherein instances of the object can be initiated by one or more subscribers subscribing to receive alert notifications. By way of example, a host can instantiate an instance and subscribe via the subscription component to be notified when an alert occurs. Such alert can be associated with an entity such as an industrial controller and defined through a combination of data table structures and user instructions, wherein the alert can be declared upon execution under selected conditions. The system can further be utilized to unsubscribe from being notified when the alert occurs.
In another aspect of the invention, the system is employed in connection with an alert and subscription architecture. Such architecture can be designed and layered for utilization with the alarms and alerts features and/or other features that support such communication. In one instance, the system is utilized with an alert and alarm infrastructure that is applicable on a Control and Information Protocol (CIP). Such infrastructure can be a three-layer architecture, with a CIP Layer that corresponds to specification of the Control and Information Protocol; a CIP Dynamic Publisher/Subscriber Layer that defines general dynamic publisher/subscriber mechanisms that allow an arbitrary set of devices (subscribers) to register themselves to be notified about information published by another device (publisher); and a CIP Notification Layer that specifies behavior of notifications such as CIP alarms and alerts. The infrastructure can allow devices supporting the CIP protocol to be notified about occurrence of some specific alerts (e.g., events, alarms, state, acknowledgments, messages, information, etc.) generally called alerts published by a CIP publisher. Consequently, CIP alert publishers can send alert data to registered CIP subscribers. The infrastructure also provides services which allow subscribers to register and acknowledge (if necessary) alerts published by CIP publisher, and to obtain their current status.
In yet other aspects of the invention, exemplary state diagram are provided that reflects a notify object's behavior. In one instance, the state diagram provides general states and behavior, and in another instance the diagram is associated with a digital alarm. In still other aspects of the invention, various Graphical User Interfaces, instructions, and methods are provided.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the present invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject invention relates to systems and methods that facilitate alert notification in an industrial control environment. The systems and methods enable subscribing devices, such as hosts, to receive alerts associated with industrial controllers. Suitable alerts include phase manager state changes, events, alarms, alert notification related information, alert notification acknowledgments, etc. The foregoing can be achieved through a set of objects (e.g., notify objects, subscription objects, alert objects, etc.) that form a notification and dynamic subscription process. By way of example, a subscribing system can instantiate an instance of a notify object, subscribe through an instance of a subscription object to receive an alert generated by an alert object and subsequently be notified about that alert when it occurs. The invention enables multiple subscribers to subscribe to the same alert, allows each subscriber to select alerts of interest, and enables the alerts to be queued if the alerts occur faster than they can be sent. One advantage of the subject invention over conventional systems is that it does not require the controller to know a destination address of the subscriber system in advance. This makes it possible to build macros and reusable groups of instructions, reduce bandwidth consumption, which can improve performance, and reduce complexity. Moreover, if the configuration or number of subscribers is changed the controllers do not have to be modified or altered. Another advantage of the subject invention over conventional systems is reduced delay between detection of an alert and notification of the subscriber since an alert notification is sent as soon as the alert is detected in the controller. In addition, the subject invention enables multiple alerts to be combined into a single packet, which can increase efficiency over systems that use message instructions with specific addresses to deliver alerts.
The term “alert” generally refers to any possible instantaneous occurrence detectable by a publisher that can be of interest of one or more subscribers; the term “subscriber” refers to a device capable of receiving and treating alerts; and the term “publisher” refers to a device capable of detecting and informing interested subscribers about Alerts. In addition, the terms such as “component,” “model,” “object,” and variations thereof are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution as applied to an automation system for industrial control. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program and a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be components. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers (e.g., via data packets and signals between the computers), industrial controllers, and/or modules communicating therewith.
In one aspect of the invention, the system 100 can be implemented as an object (e.g., a notify object as described herein), wherein respective instances of the object can be initiated by one or more subscribers subscribing to receive alert notifications. By way of example, a subscriber, such as a host, can instantiate an instance of the system 100 and subscribe via the subscription component 110 to be notified when an alert occurs. Such alerts can be associated with an industrial controller and defined through a combination of data table structures and user instructions, wherein the alert can be declared upon execution under selected conditions. When the alert occurs, a message or other notification can be conveyed to the system 100 and provided to the subscriber by the distribution component 120. The system 100 can further be utilized to unsubscribe from a subscription to receive an alert notification.
It is to be appreciated that the system 100 can be employed in connection with an alert and subscription architecture, for example, as described in connection with
The infrastructure can allow devices supporting the CIP protocol to be notified about occurrence of some specific events generally called alerts published by a CIP publisher. Consequently, CIP alert publishers can send alert data to registered CIP subscribers. The infrastructure also provides services which allow subscribers to register and acknowledge (if necessary) alerts published by CIP publisher, and to obtain their current status. As noted previously, an alert is a general abstract term representing a possible occurrence detectable by a publisher which can be of interest to subscribers. Generally, publisher/subscriber communication is based on a model where nodes are publishing and subscribing to data. A network device can be a publisher, a subscriber, or both, and a publisher can send the same data to many registered subscribers.
The subscription can be through an associated notify object. For example, the host 2101 can instantiate an instance of a notify object 2301 residing within the controller 2201 and employ the instance to subscribe to be notified when an alert associated with the controller 2201 occurs. This subscription is depicted by the dashed line at reference numeral 240. In addition, the subscription can be configured such that a notification is received only for particular alerts (e.g., alerts of interest). When multiple alerts occur, the alerts can be queued, for example, when the alerts occur faster than they can be sent. It is to be understood that this example is illustrative and does not limit the invention. For example, any of the hosts 210 can instantiate a notify object to subscribe to receive alert notifications associated with an industrial controller. By way of example, the host 2102 can instantiate a notify object 2302 and employ an instance thereof to subscribe to receive an alert notification from the controller 2201. This subscription is depicted by the dashed line at reference numeral 250. A subscription between the host 2103 and a notify object 2304 is illustrated by the dashed line at reference numeral 260, wherein the host 2103 instantiates an instance of the object 2304 and employs this instance to subscribe to receive an alert notification from the controller 220M. The host 210N can instantiate a notify object 2303 to subscribe to receive an alert notification associated with the controller 2201 (as illustrated by the dashed line at 270) and a notify object 2305 to subscribe to receive an alert notification associated with the controller 220M (as illustrated by the dashed line at 280). It is to be appreciated that the notify objects 2301, 2302, 2303, 2304, and 2305 can collectively be referred to as notify objects 230.
By employing the notify objects 230, the controllers 220 are not required to know destination addresses of the hosts 210. This makes it possible to build macros and reusable groups of instructions. With conventional systems, each time an alert detection instruction is inserted into the controller configuration and specific addresses of the host must be inserted into an appropriate instruction, which makes reusable blocks of code very difficult. By using the notify objects 230, host configuration can occur at run time. In addition, if the configuration or number of hosts 210 is changed the controllers 220 do not have to be modified or altered, which is an improvement over competing solutions, wherein each change in the host configuration required subsequent changes to the controller programs.
Moreover, the notify objects 230 can provide for improved efficiency, reduced bandwidth consumption, reduced complexity, and improved performance. For example, bandwidth can be reduced through eliminating the need to continually poll the controller and receive the same data in order to check for an alert condition and, instead, conveying an alert notification only when an alert is detected at the controllers 220. In another example, complexity of configuring systems can be reduced by not requiring the controllers 220 to contain host addresses. In yet another example, performance can be improved by reducing the delay between detection of an alert and notification of the host issuing notifications as soon as an alert is detected in the controller. Moreover, the notify objects 230 enable multiple alerts to be combined into a single packet, which can increase efficiency over systems that use message instructions with specific addresses to deliver alerts. It is to be appreciated that respective notify objects 230 can subscribe with one or more subscription objects (not shown) to receive alert notifications generated by corresponding alert objects (not shown) as described in connection with system 300 of
The following illustrate exemplary class attributes.
The following illustrate exemplary instance attributes.
The following illustrate exemplary common services.
The following illustrate exemplary create requests.
The following illustrate exemplary create responses.
The following illustrate exemplary object specific services.
The following illustrate exemplary acknowledge alert requests.
The following illustrate exemplary acknowledge alert responses.
The following illustrate exemplary subscribe requests.
The following illustrate exemplary subscribe responses.
The following illustrate exemplary unsubscribe requests.
The following illustrate exemplary unsubscribe responses.
The following illustrate exemplary subscribe to multiple requests.
The following illustrate exemplary subscribe to multiple responses.
The following illustrate exemplary unsubscribe from multiple requests.
The following illustrate exemplary unsubscribe from multiple responses.
In one aspect of the present invention, various state machines or controls can exist on or in accordance with the batch server 630 which is illustrated at reference numeral 644, whereby a state machine can be provided for each step (or a subset of steps) within a recipe. For example, a state machine can be provided for each instance of an equipment module, the operation recipe step the module belongs to, the unit procedure recipe step the operation belongs to, the procedure (e.g., the recipe) the unit procedure step belongs to, and so forth which can all interact with the equipment phase object 610. Thus, multi-level state machines 644 can be provided that control/interact objects within the controller 608 and/or objects outside the controller. Thus, by not rigidly tying a single state machine in the controller 608 with a single state machine in the batch server 630, batch execution can be distributed over multiple controllers and/or other components in an efficient and scalable manner.
It is noted that an upper level component can “download” the logic to be used by lower level recipe elements. For example, if the “upper level” is a Unit Operation running inside of a batch server, it could download the “ING” or Active routines to be used by the equipment phase for this recipe execution. If the “upper level” were a batch procedure, it could download the recipe structure for the Unit Procedure and Unit Operations to be run inside of the Unit.
The equipment phase object 610 generally exists in the controller 608 and maintains pertinent information related to configuration, state, and execution of an associated process. From a high-level, the equipment phase object is generally responsible for such aspects as:
The controller 608 can also include other aspects such as an interface 650 that enable users to easily configure and monitor the object 610 or other components within the controller. This can also include such aspects as providing one or more instructions to facilitate internal and/or external control operations. Additionally, one or more dynamic controls 660 can be provided to facilitate operations within the system 600. Such controls can include phase controls, routine controls, external/internal sequencing controls, and such aspects as handling of internal or external notifications and events, for example. Such interfaces 650 and controls 660 are described in more detail below.
Referring now to
The above model provides several advantages to a user such as:
The equipment phase state machine 700 facilitates that phase logic exhibits the behavior characteristics to be controllable by a sequencing engine. This machine is typically an integral part of the equipment phase object, however, other implementations are possible. The equipment phase object generally determines state transitions, the validity of phase commands, and/or other aspects related to the state machine 700. The object is also responsible for managing concurrent access from multiple clients that may try to affect the state of the object. For example, if a phase command from an internal sequencing engine (in a user task) occurs at a similar time as the phase logic sets the state to done (in the phase task), the equipment phase object should predictably and reliably manage these concurrencies.
The Resetting state 710 can be added to the equipment phase's state machine 700 for at least the following reasons: Adding this state provides support for a PackML state machine (Package Machinery Language Team of the Open Modular Architecture Controller (OMAC) group). The S88 state machine is somewhat inconsistent in that phase logic code can be written to respond to most commands except for Reset. A user may require some phase logic to properly return the object to an Idle state. If the phase's Running state is implemented as an Sequential Function Chart (SFC), upon completion the SFC resides at the terminal step. In order to direct the SFC back to the initial step, either some logic resets the SFC (using an SFR instruction), the user codes the SFC with a “loopback” from the end back to the initial step, or the Equipment Phase itself has to “fix-up” the SFC. The last option is generally not desirable—the phase cannot generally account for all the potential permutations and combinations of the user's logic. The state machine 700 of an equipment phase can be configured utilizing the following attributes:
Generally, an Equipment Phase is associated with a Program, in a firmware execution engine, whereby a Program is usually considered as a “Non-Phase-Program” if there is no Equipment Phase associated with it, or a “Phase-Program” if there is an Equipment Phase associated with it. For a Phase-Program, generally no Main Routine exists; the execution engine calls the associated Equipment Phase via the Equipment Phase's entry point service. In order to achieve this behavior, the following modifications to a controller's logic engine may be provided:
Equipment Phase instances typically have an entry point interface that the execution engine calls at runtime to execute the phase. This service executes a Pre-state routine and the implemented state routines during pre-scan. For regular execution (after pre-scan), this service executes the Pre-state routine and the current active state routine. This service also updates the internal executing-state value at the beginning of each scan of the active state routine, in order that this value can be utilized by an instruction to complete the active state routine. The execution engine is generally updated to distinguish a Non-Phase-Program from a Phase-Program and execute it accordingly. The execution engine binds the Equipment Phase and the Program at runtime for execution if the Program has an Equipment Phase associated with. The changes to the function up_execProg( ) may appear as:
If (the program is a Non-Phase-Program) {
} Else {
}
At runtime, the execution vehicle: Program, which is scheduled in a user task, is scanned to execute repeatedly. During a scan (or before/after), the execution engine invokes the Equipment Phase's entry point interface service: up_execPhase( ). This service executes the Prestate/state routines based on the current state of the Equipment Phase, and the internal execState variable is updated accordingly. Also, an Equipment Phase sequencer can issue commands (via CIP messages, Instructions, etc.) to attempt to change the state of the phase. The Equipment Phase object generally executes decisions on the state transition. On the next scan, a new state change is captured and the corresponding state routine is executed. The execution of an Equipment Phase is configurable using the following attributes:
From a controller, other programs and routines can be defined that use specialized instructions to command phases (from within the controller) in simple operations (recipes)—referred to as Internal Sequencing. The phases can also be commanded by an external application that establishes a connection to the controller (such as a Batch Server)—referred to as External Sequencing. In addition, an operator, via an HMI, or control engineer, can manually sequence an Equipment Phase.
The applications described above generally fall into two types—Sequencing applications and Manual applications. As the name suggests, Sequencing applications manipulate Equipment Phase objects as a part of sequence (typically a higher-level recipe that includes the phase). These applications are programs; they programmatically interact with the phase based on a given set of data such as a recipe, for example. Typically, the applications determine if a phase is available for use (e.g., a Batch Server arbitrates for the use of a phase) before sequencing begins. Manual applications provide human operators the ability to manually control an Equipment Phase. Operators use these applications to command a phase during commissioning and/or troubleshooting scenarios, typically when there is a problem with a sequencing application that is using the same phase. The operator typically desires to take control of the Equipment Phase during manual operations even if another application owns it. Moreover, when taking control, the Equipment Phase should no longer accept commands from the sequencing application—only the operator should control it. In effect, the operator is overriding the sequencer.
Due to the possibility of multiple sequencing applications, another item can be introduced to the Equipment Phase associated with attaching to the phase before utilizing it. In essence, the sequencing application queries the phase: “Is the phase being used now?” If the phase is available, it reserves itself for the sequencer. If not, it returns a busy error to the caller (which can happen if another sequencing engine is executing). When the sequencing application attaches to the phase, the Equipment Phase accepts commands from that sequencer. When the sequencing application is finished commanding the phase, it detaches from it, thus allowing other sequencers the opportunity to attach to the phase. In a similar manner, manual applications make a request to the Equipment Phase to override a sequencing application that is already attached to it. When it is overridden, the Equipment Phase notifies the sequencer that its ownership has changed. Now that the phase is overridden, the overriding application is able to command the phase. Again, similar to a sequencer, the manual application detaches from the Equipment Phase after it finishes commanding the phase.
Referring now to
At 930, the Equipment Model provides the ability to execute separate and different state routines based on a phase state model described above. An equipment phase also has an associated program object that allows it to be scheduled similar to how a program is scheduled, and allows it to run state routines as well as normal subroutines.
Some of the advantages of these features and others are:
Generally, only state routines defined in the state machine above (for “Active” states) can be defined and implemented, wherein names are fixed. This can reduce errors and debugging time as well as allow systems to be more familiar to users.
Turning to
It is noted that the graphical interfaces described herein are exemplary in nature and it is to be appreciated that various other implementations are possible. For instance, such interfaces can include a display output having one or more display objects that can include such aspects as configurable icons, buttons, sliders, input boxes, selection options, menus, tabs and so forth having multiple configurable dimensions, shapes, colors, text, data and sounds to facilitate operations with the interface. In addition, user inputs associated with the interface can also include a plurality of other inputs or controls for adjusting and configuring one or more aspects of the present invention. This can include receiving user commands from a mouse, keyboard, speech input, web site, browser, remote web service and/or other device such as a microphone, camera or video input to affect or modify operations of the user interfaces described herein.
Referring now to
Embedding an equipment phase in a controller as a native object allows external sequencers at 1120 to use Control and Information Protocol (CIP) messaging (or other network protocols) to communicate with the sequencer or object at 1150. Currently external sequencers (e.g., a Batch Server) use various tags via OLE for Process Control (OPC) to communicate to a controller although other techniques may be employed. The object mechanism of the present invention on the other hand provides a more reliable solution for communicating to a controller. In addition, the performance should be faster since handshaking and assurance of delivery is handled by Control and Information Protocol (CIP). Conventionally, integrity of data had to be ensured by multiple handshakes through tags, which required many more iterations. A PXRQ instruction, for example, allows phase logic to communicate to a Batch Server (or other external sequencer). The execution of this instruction uses a publish/subscribe/notify architecture described below. The following example provides a description of an external phase request instruction. It is to be appreciated that present invention is not limited to the example data structures shown.
PHASE_INSTRUCTION Control Structure Definition
Turning now to
An external or internal sequencer can send a state transition command to the Equipment Phase. The phase determines if the command is valid for its current state, and if it is, transitions to the appropriate/next state based on its state machine. Controller programming software provides manual commanding of an Equipment Phase. When online with an opened routine that belongs to an Equipment Phase, an Equipment Phase Command toolbar 1400 can be displayed. Using this toolbar, users can command the Equipment Phase owning the online routine. To command an Equipment Phase, users first take ownership of the Equipment Phase. This is achieved by depressing a button at 1430. Until then, other buttons are disabled. The following provides an exemplary functional description of various buttons appearing on the toolbar 1400:
It is noted that Equipment Phases in the Equipment Model should be “owned” before they can be commanded (sequenced). In past Batch implementations, ownership was a single bit value for either a Batch Server or an HMI. Since this value is a tag, there are no mechanisms to enforce rules regarding the ownership or commanding. With the Equipment Model, the ownership rules are intrinsic to the Equipment Phase object and it can enforce these rules. The equipment phase enforces priorities as shown in the table below.
The controller programming software has the highest priority and can “Override” an application that is currently commanding the phase. This is to support operator troubleshooting needs. In contrast, sequencers are lowest priority and cannot override HMI's or controller programming software. The equipment phase enforces these priorities, and tracks which application has been overridden, so that when a higher priority application has detached, the lower priority application can begin to command the phase again. A controller programming software user takes ownership of a phase by using the Phase commanding toolbar 1400, whereas an HMI generally takes ownership of a phase via CIP messaging (or other type). An external sequencer takes ownership via CIP or other type messaging as well. Internal Sequencers employ PATT and PDET to attach (own) and detach (stop owning) instructions as shown below:
In addition, the ability to employ internal sequencing allows sequencing of simple batch recipes directly into the controller.
From the system design perspective, each tool—the Equipment Editor and controller programming software—generally continues to manage its own data store. The Equipment Editor controls an Area Model, whether it is in a binary file, an XML file, or an electronic directory, for example. The controller programming software controls its project file and data maintained within it. The tools communicate via programmatic interfaces, and thus, the internal design and architecture of each application is minimally impacted by the synchronization functions.
At 1630, an event and subscription architecture can be provided. The ability for a phase to communicate with an external sequencer can built upon Publish/Subscribe/Notify infrastructure. This infrastructure can be designed and layered as such so as to be common and be used by the Equipment Model feature and Alarms & Events features, and/or and other features that may need such communication schema. In one aspect a general dynamic publisher/subscriber mechanism is provided which can be used for a variety of applications such as a part of an overall event and alarm infrastructure that is applicable on CIP or other network devices. For example, a CIP event and alarm infrastructure, one of the first applications of a dynamic publisher/subscriber mechanism can be described as a three-layer architecture having:
The infrastructure allows devices supporting the CIP protocol to be notified about occurrence of some specific events (i.e., controller events, alarms) generally called alerts published by a CIP publisher. Consequently, CIP alert publishers can send alert data to registered CIP subscribers. The infrastructure also provides services which allow the subscribers to register and acknowledge (if necessary) alerts published by CIP publisher, and to obtain their current status. Alert is a general abstract term representing a possible occurrence detectable by a publisher which can be of interest to the subscribers. Generally, publisher/subscriber communication is based on a model where nodes are publishing and subscribing to data. A network device can be a publisher, a subscriber, or both. A publisher can send the same data to many registered subscribers.
Proceeding to 1710 of the process 1700, one or more equipment phase objects are defined. Such objects can include various functionalities as previously described for managing associated states and interacting with various processes. At 1720, one or more internal and/or external controls are provided for the equipment phase object to enable internal process and/or external processes to control the object. For example, such controls can include instructions that cause the object to transition from one state to a subsequent state. At 1730, one or more internal and/or external interfaces can be defined for the object. Such interfaces allow entities such as users and/or machine to manipulate the object. This can include graphical user interfaces for controlling, configuring, and/or monitoring a respective object. At 1740, one or more communications options are provided to interact with the object and associated state machine. Such communications can include factory protocols such as CIP or more general protocols such as TCP/IP. Also, respective protocols can be employed in the framework of a general notification architecture, wherein events are published by a provider and subscribed to from a recipient. At 1750, after the above communications, controls, and interfaces are defined, the object can be controlled from instructions internal to a controller and/or controlled from a sequencer or other type machine that communicates over a network to the controller wherein the object resides.
With the Equipment Phase Monitor toolbar described above, users are generally allowed to monitor and command an Equipment Phase from within an open Equipment Phase State routine. Launched from a top-level menu or Controller Organizer's context menu, an Equipment Phase Monitor window such as depicted by the interface 500 allows users to monitor and command all Equipment Phases within the opened project.
What have been described above are preferred aspects of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/860,870 filed Jun. 4, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,721,273 and entitled “CONTROLLER EQUIPMENT MODEL SYSTEMS AND METHODS” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/520,699 filed Nov. 17, 2003 and entitled “LOGIX EQUIPMENT MODEL SYSTEMS AND METHODS.” The entireties of the above-noted applications are incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4975865 | Carrette | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5131092 | Sackman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5997167 | Crater et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6105072 | Fischer | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6138049 | McLaughlin | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6289252 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6321272 | Swales | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6414594 | Guerlain | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6505247 | Steger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6782351 | Reichel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788980 | Johnson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6947917 | Mathur et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6999992 | Deen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7065714 | Theel et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7096465 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7242991 | Budinger et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7290030 | Edwards | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 20020012321 | Rune et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012323 | Petite | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029266 | Tse et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009711 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050986 | Matthews et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115122 | Slater et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196122 | Wesinger et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040153552 | Trossen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050073402 | Denyer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187987 | Lim | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237183 | Lamb | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1414215 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 0199078 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 03103264 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60520699 | Nov 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10860870 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Child | 10990432 | US |
