The field of the invention generally relates to orthopedic implants, including spinal implants, and methods for designing and producing them.
Orthopedic implants are used to correct a variety of different maladies. Orthopedic surgery utilizing orthopedic implants may include one of a number of specialties, including: hand surgery, shoulder and elbow surgery, total joint reconstruction (arthroplasty), skull reconstruction, pediatric orthopedics, foot and ankle surgery, spine surgery, musculoskeletal oncology, surgical sports medicine, and orthopedic trauma. Spine surgery may encompass one or more of the cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine, or the sacrum, and may treat a deformity or degeneration of the spine, or related back pain, leg pain, or other body pain. Irregular spinal curvature may include scoliosis, lordosis, or kyphosis (hyper or hypo), and irregular spinal displacement may include spondylolisthesis. Other spinal disorders include osteoarthritis, lumbar degenerative disc disease or cervical degenerative disc disease, lumbar spinal stenosis or cervical spinal stenosis.
Spinal fusion surgery may be performed to set and hold purposeful changes imparted on the spine. Spinal fusion procedures include PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion), ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion), TLIF (transverse or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion), or LLIF (lateral lumbar interbody fusion), including DLIF (direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion) or XLIF (extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion).
One goal of interbody fusion is to grow bone between vertebra in order to seize (e.g., lock) the spatial relationships in a position that provides enough room for neural elements, including exiting nerve roots. An interbody implant (interbody device, interbody implant, interbody cage, fusion cage, or spine cage) is a prosthesis used in spinal fusion procedures to maintain relative position of vertebra and establish appropriate foraminal height and decompression of exiting nerves. Each patient may have individual or unique disease characteristics, but most implant solutions include implants (e.g. interbody implants) having standard sizes or shapes (stock implants).
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, an interbody implant system for use in the spine includes a base having two or more bone contacting surfaces, at least one recess in at least one of the two or more bone contacting surfaces, the recess configured for containing a tooth, a deployable tooth to provide fixation between the base and the anatomy of a subject, a break-away bridge between the tooth and the base for providing a first relative position between the tooth and the base, and a locking mechanism for providing a second relative position between the tooth and the base.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for implanting an implant within the spine of a subject includes providing an interbody implant system for use in the spine includes a base having two or more bone contacting surfaces, at least one recess in at least one of the two or more bone contacting surfaces, the recess configured for containing a tooth, a deployable tooth to provide fixation between the base and the anatomy of a subject, a break-away bridge between the tooth and the base for providing a first relative position between the tooth and the base, and a locking mechanism for providing a second relative position between the tooth and the base, inserting the interbody implant between two vertebrae of the spine of the subject with the tooth and the base in the first relative position, and moving the tooth and the base into the second relative position.
An interbody implant and an efficient method of producing the patient-specific implant are described in the embodiments herein. Implants according to embodiments described herein may include interbody implants or fusion cages. The interbody implants are typically intended to be placed between two vertebral bodies. Oftentimes, the intervertebral disc is removed prior to the placement of the interbody implant. The lower side of an interbody implant is intended to abut at least a portion of an upper side (endplate) of a first vertebral body and the upper side of the interbody implant is intended to abut at least a portion of a lower side (endplate) of a second vertebral body.
Insufficient contact and load transfer between the vertebral body and the interbody implant can produce inadequate fixation and can allow the cage to move relative to the vertebral body. Furthermore, insufficient contact area or fixation between the interbody implant and the vertebral bodies can result in micro-motions and/or macro-motions that can reduce the opportunity for bone growth and fusion to occur. If enough motion occurs, expulsion of the interbody implant can result.
Presently, fixation elements (including teeth, barbs, or screws) can be used to provide fixation of the interbody implant to the adjacent vertebral bodies. These fixation elements can be static features, such as teeth, on the opposing surfaces of the interbody that are designed to contact the vertebral endplates. Additionally, screws or barbs can be delivered following delivery and placement of the interbody implant. In these cases, these screws and barbs are driven through openings in the interbody implant and into the adjacent vertebral bodies. Each of these elements and features are designed to create fixation between the implant and adjacent anatomy.
Low bone mineral density index, overaggressive discectomies, or decortications of the endplate can reduce the strength of the anatomic endplate and reduce the ability to provide sufficient fixation to the interbody implant and reduce the transfer load from one vertebral body to another. To reduce or eliminate these risks, surgeons carefully prepare the opposing vertebral endplates. The surgeon aims to insert an interbody implant having as large a footprint (coverage area) as possible, in order to maximize the contact surface between implant and anatomy. When appropriate, the surgeon also places the interbody implant on the apophyseal rings to provide as much support and load transfer as possible for spinal distraction. The surgeon must also ensure the interbody implant is securely positioned within the disc space.
In one embodiment, implant 200 contains static fixation features 204, and dynamic fixation features 202 extending from a base portion 226 of the implant 200. Static teeth 204 are configured to provide temporary fixation between the interbody implant 200 and a first adjacent vertebral body. Dynamic teeth 202 are deployed after delivery of the implant 200 to a desired location within the intervertebral space, and configured to provide fixation to a second adjacent vertebral body. During implantation, implant 200 is inserted into the intervertebral space and adjusted to the location using insertion and adjustment tools. The tools can be designed to mate with features 208a, 208b on the interbody implant 200. Features 208a, 208b may comprise indentations, grooves, ribs, bumps, or other geometric designs to which tools may be engaged.
For example, some embodiments utilize a system for producing patient-specific implants. In some embodiments, scan data is obtained from a CT scan of a patient, for example, a CT scan that includes the spine of the patient, or at least the portion of interest in the spine. In other embodiments the scan data may comprise MRI scan data or x-ray data. The CT scan data is converted into a three-dimensional image through software manipulation of the data. Typically, CT scan data is presented in a DICOM format, which includes individual slices of imaging data. A common slide thickness is one mm, though other thickness may be used, such as 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.5 mm, 3.0 mm and greater thicknesses. Spine segments may be selected for analysis. For example, a user interface that is associated with at least one computer memory that is not a transitory signal and which comprises instructions executable by at least one processor may be utilized to select a region of interest. In some cases, the region of interest may be a diseased or deformed portion of the spine, including a particular number of successive vertebrae and their surrounding soft tissue. In some cases, the entire spine may be selected. In some cases, only sacral and lumbar vertebrae and their surrounding soft tissue are selected. In some cases, only lumbar and thoracic vertebrae and their surrounding soft tissue are selected. In some cases, only cervical vertebrae and their surrounding soft tissue are selected.
The system may contain a memory and a processor, and may include any number of custom stand-alone devices, or any mobile device, such as an iPhone, smart phone, iPAD, smart watch, laptop or desktop computer. The system may also include a user interface. The system may also be configured to access the memory remotely, for example, via internet browser access or other wireless means. The three-dimensional image can be converted into a form such that it can be manipulated by a user to measure anatomical deformities related to the disease (e.g., spine disease). The information can then be used by a medical professional, or technical or engineering professional in conjunction or collaboration with a medical professional, to design the optimized geometry of the corrected spine, thus allowing the design of an implant to treat the particular disease or malady.
In one embodiment, the teeth 202 can be temporarily affixed to the base portion 226 of the implant body 200 (e.g., via the bridges 224 which extend between each tooth 224 and the base portion 206 of the implant 200). During insertion of the implant 200 into the desired location within the intervertebral space, the tip 228 of each tooth 202 is positioned within recess 229 and opening 231 at or near the surface 206 of the implant 200. In one embodiment, tips 228 of teeth 202 are positioned below the surface 206 of implant 200 (sub-flush). In this embodiment, tips 228 are protected and are not subjected to loads during insertion and positioning of the implant 200. Furthermore, tips 228 can be made sharp and can remain sharp in order to penetrate adjacent anatomy and provide fixation.
Following placement of implant 200 in the desired location, a tool 211 can be used to deploy teeth 202 to a position that is super-flush relative to the surface 206. For example, the tool 211 may have a tip 213 configured to insert into feature 208a to apply a force to cause both separation of the tooth 202 from the base portion 206 of the implant 200, and to cause the tooth 202 to be extended from its flush or sub-flush position (e.g., the first, undeployed position). In some embodiments, an axial force 220 can be delivered to tooth 202 with the tool 221. In some embodiments, the tool 221 may be configured to apply a torque, as does a screwdriver, that in turn places an axial force 220 on the tooth 202. In some embodiments, the tool 221 may be configured to apply a force along an axis extending between two surfaces (e.g., along an axis extending between the anterior surface 205 and the posterior surface 207) in order to release a spring element or other element that transversely applies an axial force 220 on the tooth 202. In use, the axial force 220 causes the tooth 202 to move in an axial direction 222 to extend from the surface 206 and penetrate the adjacent vertebral endplate. In one embodiment, tooth 202 may be connected to implant 200 with a break-away bridge 224 or a series of break-away bridges 224. Axial force 220 can fracture bridge 224 and allow axial translation 222 of tooth 202. Locking features 230, 232 can be positioned on tooth 202 and implant 200 to provide fixation between implant 200 and tooth 202. Locking features 230, 232 may comprise protrusions 230 and indentations 232, configured to fit into each other. In some embodiments, the protrusions 230 may be configured to permanently snap permanently into the indentations 232. In some embodiments, the protrusions 230 may be configured to removably fit into the indentations 232. The protrusions 230, when snapped into the indentations 232 may have a minimum unsnapping force of at least about 50 pounds. In some embodiments, the protrusions 230 and indentations 232 may each have lead-ins (e.g. tapers) that each the snapping of the protrusion 230 into the indentation 232, but not have lead-ins on the opposite sides of the protrusions 230 and indentations 232, such that unsnapping is not possible, or is at least very difficult or requires an unlikely high force to achieve.
The post-deployment relationship between tooth 202 and implant 200 is preserved using interference fits between locking features 230, 232 and/or surfaces 235, 236. In some embodiments, the locking features 230, 232 are absent, and instead, the tooth 202 frictionally engages within the recess 229 (via surfaces 230, 232) at the base portion 226 when the tooth 202 is axially extended. In other embodiments, flash (remaining material) from the broken break-away bridges 224 may provide the slight interference with which the tooth 202 frictionally engages with the recess 229. The features 230, 232 may include bumps, recesses, annual grooves, ridges, rings, incomplete rings, split rings, buttons, springs, or other three-dimensional features to provide secure engagement between tooth 202 and implant 200. Other mechanisms, such as friction, interference, and deformation between surfaces of tooth 202 and opening 231 can seize the relationship between components. In other embodiments, the bridge 224 may comprise a break-away adhesive joint, a break-away tack or weld, or a magnetic coupling. In other embodiments, the bridge 224 may comprise a flexible joint, an over-center mechanism, a linkage, any of which may include a locked condition and an unlocked condition. The locked condition may be the condition when delivered and the unlocked condition may be achieved by the application of a substantially axially-directed force placed upon the tooth 202 or upon the bridge 224 or upon the tooth 202 and the bridge 224. In other embodiments, a non-axially directed force or a moment (e.g., torque) may be applied to the tooth 202 and/or the bridge 224 in order to change the bridge from a locked condition to an unlocked condition.
Interbody 200 can be manufactured of materials typical of medical implants, including, but not limited to, titanium, titanium alloy, Ti6Al4V, polymers, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), etc.
The systems and methods described herein are configured to provide a three-dimensional shape that represents the ideal implant to fit into the negative space of the spine, once the spine receives the appropriate manipulation in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. In other words, the custom shape of the implant will at least partially provide and maintain the desired correction to the spine. Thus, the coronal, sagittal, and axial plane deformities of the spine are corrected, allowing restoration of the anatomical function of the spine. The correction may include both rotation and/or linear displacement along the degrees of freedom. For example, positive displacement along the x-axis, negative displacement along the x-axis, positive rotation around the x-axis, negative rotation around the x-axis, positive displacement along the y-axis, negative displacement along the y-axis, positive rotation around the y-axis, negative rotation around the y-axis, positive displacement along the z-axis, negative displacement along the z-axis, positive rotation around the z-axis, negative rotation around the z-axis.
The ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all overlap, sub-ranges, and combinations thereof. Language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” “between,” and the like includes the number recited. Numbers preceded by a term such as “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” as used herein include the recited numbers (e.g., about 10%=10%), and also represent an amount close to the stated amount that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than 10% of, within less than 5% of, within less than 1% of, within less than 0.1% of, and within less than 0.01% of the stated amount.
While embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts disclosed herein.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/643,046, filed on Mar. 14, 2018, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Priority is claimed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4704686 | Aldinger | Nov 1987 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
6696073 | Boyce | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6772026 | Bradbury | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6932842 | Litschko et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6978188 | Christensen | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6988241 | Guttman | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7174282 | Hollister et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187790 | Sabol et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D548242 | Viegers | Aug 2007 | S |
7747305 | Dean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756314 | Karau et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7799077 | Lang | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8246680 | Betz | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265949 | Haddad | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275594 | Lin | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8337507 | Lang | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8394142 | Bertagnoli | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8457930 | Shroeder | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8532806 | Masson | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8556983 | Bojarski et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8644568 | Hoffman | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8735773 | Lang | May 2014 | B2 |
8758357 | Frey | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8775133 | Schroeder | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781557 | Dean | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8843229 | Vanasse | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855389 | Hoffman | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8870889 | Frey | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9020788 | Lang | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9198678 | Frey et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208558 | Dean | Dec 2015 | B2 |
D761842 | Johnson | Jul 2016 | S |
9411939 | Furrer | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9445907 | Ridew | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9452050 | Miles et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9542525 | Arisoy et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9642633 | Frey et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9693831 | Mosnier et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9707058 | Bassett | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9715563 | Schroeder | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9757245 | O'Neil et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9775680 | Bojarski et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9782228 | Mosnier et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9993341 | Vanasse | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10034676 | Donner | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10089413 | Wirx-Speetjens et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
D841675 | Hoffman | Feb 2019 | S |
10213311 | Mafhouz | Feb 2019 | B2 |
D845973 | Jaycobs | Apr 2019 | S |
D845974 | Cooperman | Apr 2019 | S |
D847165 | Kolbenheyer | Apr 2019 | S |
D848468 | Ng | May 2019 | S |
D849029 | Cooperman | May 2019 | S |
D849773 | Jiang | May 2019 | S |
10292770 | Ryan | May 2019 | B2 |
10299863 | Grbic et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10390958 | Maclennan | Aug 2019 | B2 |
D860237 | Li | Sep 2019 | S |
D860238 | Bhardwaj | Sep 2019 | S |
D867379 | Ang | Nov 2019 | S |
D867389 | Jamison | Nov 2019 | S |
10463433 | Turner et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
D870762 | Mendoza | Dec 2019 | S |
10512546 | Kamer et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10517681 | Roh et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
D872117 | Kobayashi | Jan 2020 | S |
D872756 | Howell | Jan 2020 | S |
D874490 | Dodsworth | Feb 2020 | S |
D875761 | Heffernan | Feb 2020 | S |
D876454 | Knowles | Feb 2020 | S |
D877167 | Knowles | Mar 2020 | S |
D879112 | Hejazi | Mar 2020 | S |
10588589 | Bregman-Amitai et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10603055 | Donner et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
D880513 | Wang | Apr 2020 | S |
D881908 | Sunil | Apr 2020 | S |
D881910 | Lin | Apr 2020 | S |
10621289 | Schroeder | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10631988 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10646236 | Donner et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10646258 | Donner et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10736698 | Bohl | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10751188 | Guo et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10806597 | Sournac et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10902944 | Casey et al. | Jan 2021 | B1 |
11000334 | Young | May 2021 | B1 |
20020007294 | Bradbury et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040171924 | Mire et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050049590 | Alleyne | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050271996 | Sporbert et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009780 | Foley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070118243 | Schroeder | May 2007 | A1 |
20070276501 | Betz | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080161680 | von Jako | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195240 | Martin | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100191088 | Anderson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100292963 | Schroeder | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110218545 | Catanzarite et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110301710 | Mather et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010710 | Frigg | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084064 | Dzenis et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116203 | Vancraen | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150243 | Crawford | Jun 2012 | A9 |
20120191192 | Park | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120287238 | Onishi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296433 | Farin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130211531 | Steines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140072608 | Karagkiozaki | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074438 | Furrer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081659 | Nawana et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086780 | Miller | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140164022 | Reed | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140350614 | Frey | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150105891 | Golway et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150305878 | O'Neil | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150324490 | Page | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150328004 | Mafhouz | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160015465 | Steines et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160074048 | Pavlovskaia | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160117817 | Seel | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160143744 | Bojarski et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160210374 | Mosnier et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217268 | Otto | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160242857 | Scholl | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160300026 | Bogoni et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160354039 | Soto et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378919 | McNutt et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170000566 | Gordon | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170014169 | Dean | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170035514 | Fox et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061375 | Laster | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068792 | Reiner | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170135706 | Frey et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143494 | Mahfouz | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143831 | Varanasi et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170216047 | Hawkes et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170220740 | D'Urso | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252107 | Turner et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262595 | Vorhis | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170367645 | Klinder | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180008349 | Gillman | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180116727 | Caldwell et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180168499 | Bergold | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180168731 | Reid | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180185075 | She | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180233222 | Daley | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233225 | Experton | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250075 | Cho | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180303552 | Ryan | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180303616 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180338841 | Miller | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190029757 | Roh et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190146458 | Roh et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190167435 | Cordonnier | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190201106 | Siemionow | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190262084 | Roh et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190321193 | Casey et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200078180 | Casey et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200085509 | Roh et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200170802 | Casey et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200315708 | Mosnier et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210059822 | Casey et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210210189 | Casey et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210382457 | Roh et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104318009 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104353121 | Feb 2015 | CN |
204468348 | Jul 2015 | CN |
105796214 | Jul 2016 | CN |
108670506 | Oct 2018 | CN |
110575289 | Dec 2019 | CN |
111281613 | Jun 2020 | CN |
112155792 | Jan 2021 | CN |
3120796 | Jan 2017 | EP |
2004110309 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2010151564 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2014180972 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2016172694 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2019112917 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019148154 | Aug 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Endo, Kenji et al. “Measurement of whole spine sagittal alignment using the SLOT radiography of the SONIALVISION satire series clinical application.” Medical Now, No. 78; Aug. 2015, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Patent Application PCT/US2018/063530, dated Feb. 12, 2019, 16 pages. |
Pimenta, Dr. Luiz, “Current Surgical Strategies to Restore Proper Sagittal Alignment,” Journal of Spine 2015, vol. 4, Issue 4, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US19/50885, dated Jan. 28, 2020 (21 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US19/63855, dated Feb. 14, 2020 (15 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/958,409 for Ryan, filed Apr. 21, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18885367.5, dated Aug. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US21/44878, dated Nov. 16, 2021 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US21/12065, dated Apr. 29, 2021 (19 pages). |
Majdouline et al., “Preoperative assessment and evaluation of instrumentation strategies for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: computer simulation and optimization.” Scoliosis 7, 21 (2012), pp. 1-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190282367 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62643046 | Mar 2018 | US |