Systems and methods for parcel delivery to alternate delivery locations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10445682
  • Patent Number
    10,445,682
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 31, 2014
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 15, 2019
    a month ago
Abstract
A system, in various embodiments, is configured to redirect undeliverable parcels to alternate delivery locations. The parcels may be undeliverable due to an unavailability of an intended recipient of the parcels to sign for the parcels or otherwise take delivery of the parcels at the delivery address. The system may be configured to determine a suitable alternate delivery location based at least in part on: one or more parcel recipient preferences, one or more parcel shipper preferences, a location of the delivery address, etc. The system may be further configured to notify the parcel recipient of a redirection of the parcel to the alternate delivery address.
Description
SUMMARY

A computer system, according to particular embodiments, comprises at least one processor. In various embodiments, the computer system is configured for: (A) receiving, from a delivery driver, an indication that delivery of one or more parcels is not possible at a primary delivery location; (B) at least partially in response to receiving the indication, retrieving alternate delivery location information associated with the primary delivery location; (C) determining, based at least in part on the alternate delivery location information, a suitable alternate delivery location; and (D) facilitating delivery of the one or more parcels from the primary delivery location to the suitable alternate delivery location. In particular embodiments, the alternate delivery location information comprises information selected from a group consisting of (i) one or more parcel recipient alternate delivery preferences; and (ii) one or more parcel shipper alternate delivery preferences.


A computer implemented method of directing parcels to alternate delivery locations, according to particular embodiments, comprises: (a) receiving, by a processor, an indication that delivery of a parcel is not possible at a primary delivery location; (b) retrieving, by a processor, alternate delivery location information associated with the primary delivery location; (c) determining, by a processor, based at least in part on the alternate delivery location information, an appropriate alternate delivery location; and (d) redirecting, by a processor, the parcel to the appropriate alternate delivery location.


A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions, according to various embodiments, stores computer-executable instructions for: (A) receiving, from a delivery driver, an indication that delivery of a parcel to a primary delivery location is not possible; (B) at least partially in response to receiving the indication, determining a suitable alternate delivery location for the parcel; (C) at least partially in response to determining the suitable alternate delivery location, facilitating delivery of the parcel to the suitable alternate delivery location; and (D) notifying an intended recipient of the parcel of the delivery of the parcel to the suitable alternate delivery location.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of a system and method for delivering packages to alternate delivery locations are described below. In the course of this description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an alternate delivery location delivery system in accordance with an embodiment of the present system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a computer, such as the logistics server of FIG. 1, that is suitable for use in various embodiments;



FIG. 3 depicts a flow chart that generally illustrates various steps executed by an parcel redirection module that, for example, may be executed by the logistics server of FIG. 1; and



FIGS. 4-5 are transportation diagrams depicting exemplary transportation paths taken by packages that are delivered to alternate delivery locations.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS

Various embodiments now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.


Overview


In particular embodiments, a system for delivering packages to alternate delivery locations is configured to facilitate the delivery of parcels to alternate delivery locations (e.g., via a common carrier, logistics company, etc.). In particular embodiments, an alternate delivery location may include a location other than the address of the parcel's intended recipient. In various embodiments, these alternate delivery locations include retail stores (e.g., including gas stations, grocery stores, and pharmacies), stand-alone kiosks, or any other suitable locations for receiving and holding parcels for pick up by recipients. For example, a parcel originally scheduled for delivery to a primary delivery location (e.g., such as the recipient's residence) may be redirected to an alternate delivery location. In particular embodiments, the redirection of the parcel to an alternate delivery location occurs at least partially in response to a determination that delivery of the parcel to the primary delivery location is not possible (e.g., because the recipient is not home when an attempt is made to deliver the parcel, the parcel requires a signature, the person delivering the parcel determines that it would be unsafe to leave the parcel outside of the primary delivery location, and/or for any other suitable reason). In other embodiments, the redirection of the parcel to an alternate delivery location occurs at least partially in response to a request from the parcel recipient to redirect the parcel. As a particular example, when the recipient is notified via a service such as the My Choice service offered by UPS of Atlanta, Ga. that the recipient has a parcel scheduled for delivery, the recipient may elect to have the parcel delivered to an alternate delivery location instead of the scheduled delivery address.


In other embodiments, the system is configured to facilitate the delivery of parcels directly to alternate delivery locations from a business or other entity from which the shipment of the parcel originated. Direct to alternate delivery location deliveries may include business-to-retail deliveries in which items ordered by a customer from a business (e.g., such as an e-commerce web site) are shipped directly to a retail location or other suitable alternate delivery location. For such deliveries, the items may be held at the alternate delivery location until picked up by the customer (e.g., the intended recipient). In such embodiments, the system may be configured to present customers with a selection of alternate delivery locations for items that the customer orders.


In various embodiments, the system is configured to confirm whether an alternate delivery location has capacity to accept a parcel before directing (e.g., or redirecting) a parcel to the alternate delivery location. This may include, for example, ensuring that there is enough physical space at the alternate delivery location to accept the parcel or suitable systems in place at the alternate delivery location to accommodate any special handling instructions that the parcel may have (e.g., a requirement to store the parcel at a particular temperature). In such embodiments, the system may be further configured to substantially automatically (e.g., automatically) reserve space at the alternate delivery location for the parcel to ensure that the alternate delivery location will not lose capacity to accept the parcel before the parcel arrives.


In particular embodiments, shipping items directly to alternate delivery locations provides a cost savings to common carriers and other shipping and/or logistics companies by avoiding the need to deliver parcels and other items to the home addresses of individual parcel recipients. Rather, the common carriers can deliver parcels to several alternate delivery locations that service a particular area where parcel recipients can go to collect their parcels.


Exemplary Technical Platforms


As will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant field, the present invention may be, for example, embodied as a computer system, a method, or a computer program product. Accordingly, various embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, particular embodiments may take the form of a computer program product stored on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable instructions (e.g., software) embodied in the storage medium. Various embodiments may take the form of web-implemented computer software. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including, for example, hard disks, compact disks, DVDs, optical storage devices, and/or magnetic storage devices.


Various embodiments are described below with reference to block diagrams and flowchart illustrations of methods, apparatuses (e.g., systems) and computer program products. It should be understood that each block of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, respectively, can be implemented by a computer executing computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.


These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture that is configured for implementing the function specified in the flowchart block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.


Accordingly, blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations support combinations of mechanisms for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions, and program instructions for performing the specified functions. It should also be understood that each block of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and other hardware executing appropriate computer instructions.


Example System Architecture



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a System 110 according to a particular embodiment. As may be understood from this figure, the System 110 includes one or more computer networks 115, a Logistics Server 100, a Database 140, and one or more remote computing devices such as a tablet computer 152, a desktop or laptop computer 154, or a handheld computing device 156, such as a cellular phone. In particular embodiments, the one or more computer networks facilitate communication between the Logistics Server 100, Database 140, and one or more remote computing devices 152, 154, 156.


One or more computer networks 115 may include any of a variety of types of wired or wireless computer networks such as the Internet, a private intranet, a public switch telephone network (PSTN), or any other type of network. The communication link between Logistics Server 100 and Database 140 may be, for example, implemented via a Local Area Network (LAN) or via the Internet.



FIG. 2 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of a computer architecture 120 that can be used within the System 110, for example, as a client computer (e.g., one of the client computers 152, 154, 156 shown in FIG. 1), or as a server computer (e.g., Logistics Server 100 shown in FIG. 1). In particular embodiments, the computer 120 may be suitable for use as a computer within the context of the System 110 that is configured to facilitate the delivery of parcels to alternate delivery locations or facilitate the receipt and/or processing of parcels once they are delivered to the alternate delivery locations.


In particular embodiments, the computer 120 may be connected (e.g., networked) to other computers in a LAN, an intranet, an extranet, and/or the Internet. As noted above, the computer 120 may operate in the capacity of a server or a client computer in a client-server network environment, or as a peer computer in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment. The Computer 120 may be a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a set-top box (STB), a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, a server, a network router, a switch or bridge, or any other computer capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that computer. Further, while only a single computer is illustrated, the term “computer” shall also be taken to include any collection of computers that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.


An exemplary computer 120 includes a processing device 202, a main memory 204 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc.), a static memory 206 (e.g., flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), etc.), and a data storage device 218, which communicate with each other via a bus 232.


The processing device 202 represents one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor, a central processing unit, or the like. More particularly, the processing device 202 may be a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, or processor implementing other instruction sets, or processors implementing a combination of instruction sets. The processing device 202 may also be one or more special-purpose processing devices such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP), network processor, or the like. The processing device 202 may be configured to execute processing logic 226 for performing various operations and steps discussed herein.


The computer 120 may further include a network interface device 208. The computer 120 also may include a video display unit 210 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)), an alphanumeric input device 212 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 214 (e.g., a mouse), and a signal generation device 216 (e.g., a speaker).


The data storage device 218 may include a non-transitory computer-accessible storage medium 230 (also known as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium or a non-transitory computer-readable medium) on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 222) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software 222 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within main memory 204 and/or within processing device 202 during execution thereof by computer 120—main memory 204 and processing device 202 also constituting computer-accessible storage media. The software 222 may further be transmitted or received over a network 220 via network interface device 208.


While the computer-accessible storage medium 230 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “computer-accessible storage medium” should be understood to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-accessible storage medium” should also be understood to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the computer and that cause the computer to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “computer-accessible storage medium” should accordingly be understood to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, etc.


Exemplary System Platform


Various embodiments of a system for delivering parcels to alternate delivery locations may be implemented within the context of any suitable service. For example, particular embodiments may be implemented within the context of any service offered by UPS of Atlanta, Ga. Various aspects of the system's functionality may be executed by certain system modules, including a Parcel Redirection Module 300. This module is discussed in greater detail below.


Parcel Redirection Module



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of operations performed by an exemplary Parcel Redirection Module 300. In particular embodiments, the Parcel Redirection Module 300 may facilitate the redirection of parcels from a primary delivery location (e.g., such as the parcel recipient's residence or other address to which the parcel is addressed) to an alternate delivery location.


When executing the Parcel Redirection Module 300, the system begins, at Step 310, by receiving an indication that delivery of one or more parcels is not possible at a primary delivery location. In various embodiments, the system receives the indication that the one or more parcels are undeliverable from a delivery driver who was unable to perform the delivery. In particular embodiments, the system is configured to receive the indication in any suitable manner (e.g., via input on a wireless device such as a smart phone or DIAD). A delivery of a parcel may not be possible, for example, because the parcel recipient is not home to receive the parcel, because no one is present at the primary delivery location to sign for the parcel if the parcel requires signature confirmation, or for any other suitable reason.


The system continues, at Step 320, by retrieving alternate delivery location information for the one or more parcels. In various embodiments, alternate delivery location information includes the following: (1) alternate delivery location availability information; (2) parcel recipient alternate delivery location preferences; and (3) parcel shipper alternate delivery location preferences. Each of these is described below.


Alternate Delivery Location Availability Information


In particular embodiments, the alternate delivery location information retrieved by the system includes the locations of one or more alternate delivery locations as well as information relating to the ability of those one or more alternate delivery locations to receive parcels. In various embodiments, the system is configured to retrieve location information for one or more alternate delivery locations that are within a particular distance of the primary delivery location to which delivery of the one or more parcels was not possible. In particular embodiments, the particular distance from the primary delivery location for which the system retrieves alternate delivery location information depends at least in part on the primary delivery location (e.g., whether the primary delivery location is in an urban or rural setting, is a business or residential address, etc.).


As a particular example, when a primary delivery location is in an urban or more densely populated area, the system may be configured to retrieve information for one or more alternate delivery locations that are no more than a short distance from the primary delivery location (e.g., within walking distance of the primary delivery location, within 1 mile of the primary delivery location, within a particular number of stops on a public transportation system from the primary delivery location, etc.). In a different example, when a primary delivery location is in a rural area, the system may be configured to retrieve information for one or more alternate delivery locations that are farther from the primary delivery location (e.g., up to ten miles from the primary delivery location, within a fifteen minute drive of the primary delivery location, etc.). In various embodiments, the system may be configured to retrieve information associated with one or more alternate delivery locations that are within a particular travel time of the primary delivery location (e.g., via car, on foot, via public transportation, etc.).


In various embodiments, the system is configured to determine alternate delivery location information based at least in part on a location of a delivery driver, which may, for example, be determined based on a location of a mobile device (e.g., such as a smart phone or DIAD), or other GPS device, associated with the delivery driver (e.g., based on GPS co-ordinates of the mobile device, etc.). In such embodiments, the system may be configured to locate one or more alternate delivery locations that are no more than a particular distance from the delivery driver as discussed above. In other embodiments, the system may be configured to locate one or more alternate delivery locations that are no more than a particular distance from a delivery route of the delivery driver (e.g., one or more alternate delivery locations to which the delivery driver could deliver the one or more parcels without substantially deviating from their delivery route).


In particular embodiments, the one or more alternate delivery locations may include, for example, one or more retail stores (e.g., including gas stations, grocery stores, and pharmacies), stand-alone kiosks, or any other suitable location for receiving and holding parcels for pick up by recipients. In various embodiments, the one or more alternate delivery locations may have limited capacity for receiving and holding parcels (e.g., redirected parcels) until the parcels are picked up by the intended recipients. For example, an alternate delivery location that is part of a grocery store may have limited physical storage space (e.g., shelf space) for storing parcels. Other alternate delivery locations may be unable to store particular parcels that require special handling (e.g., refrigeration or other temperature storing requirements). In various embodiments, the alternate delivery location information includes information relating to the ability of a particular alternate delivery location to receive and store a parcel. In particular embodiments, the system may substantially continuously (e.g., continuously) update capacity information for a particular alternate delivery location. In other embodiments, the system may update capacity information for a particular alternate delivery location other than substantially continuously (e.g., once per day, two times per day, hourly, etc.).


Parcel Recipient Alternate Delivery Location Preferences


In particular embodiments, the system is configured to retrieve alternate delivery location information that includes one or more parcel recipient preferences related to one or more alternate delivery locations. These one or more parcel recipient preferences may be provided to the system by parcel recipients, for example, and may include preferences related to particular alternate delivery locations to which recipients would like their parcels redirected following unsuccessful deliveries. In particular embodiments, the system is configured to allow parcel recipients to provide a list of preferred alternate delivery locations that are ranked from most preferred to least preferred. In various embodiments, the system is configured to redirect parcels to the parcel recipient's most preferred alternate delivery location that is able to accept the parcel. A parcel recipient may, for example, provide a most preferred alternate delivery location that is situated between the recipient's home and place of work, so that the recipient can pick up the parcel from the alternate delivery location on the way home from work. In various embodiments, a parcel recipient's most preferred alternate delivery location may be unavailable to accept delivery of a particular parcel. In such cases, the system may be configured to redirect the parcel to the parcel recipient's second most preferred alternate delivery location (and so on).


In various embodiments, the system is configured to allow a parcel recipient to provide preferred alternate delivery locations for any parcel that the recipient may receive (e.g., for all parcels scheduled for shipment to the parcel recipient, regardless of the source of the parcel). In other embodiments, the system is configured to allow a parcel recipient to select or provide one or more preferred alternate delivery locations for specific parcels (e.g., in response to the parcel recipient receiving a notification that the parcel recipient is currently scheduled to receive a particular parcel). In particular embodiments, following an unsuccessful delivery attempt, the system may be configured to notify the parcel recipient that the carrier was unable to deliver the parcel to the primary delivery location and is further configured to provide the parcel recipient with a selection of alternate delivery locations to which the parcel can be directed. In various embodiments, the system is configured to only provide selected alternate delivery locations from which the parcel recipient may choose that have substantially current (e.g., current) availability to accept the parcel.


In various embodiments, following an unsuccessful delivery attempt, the system may be configured to provide the parcel recipient with a selection of available alternate delivery locations and a time period during which the parcel recipient may select an alternate delivery location from the selection of alternate delivery locations. In response to receiving the selection from the parcel recipient, the system may be configured to redirect the parcel to the selected alternate delivery location. If the system does not receive a selection from the parcel recipient during the time period, the system may be configured to substantially automatically determine a suitable alternate delivery location and redirect the parcel to that location.


Parcel Shipper Alternate Delivery Location Preferences


In various embodiments, the system is configured to allow a shipper to select whether parcels that the shipper sends to recipients can be redirected to alternate delivery locations following unsuccessful delivery attempts. For example, when sending a parcel, the shipper may indicate that the parcel should not be rerouted to an alternate delivery location in the event of an unsuccessful delivery attempt. In particular embodiments, shippers may opt out of allowing parcels that the shipper sends to be rerouted to alternate delivery locations for any suitable reason (e.g., because of the nature of the item being shipped, etc.).


Returning to FIG. 3, the system continues, at Step 330, by determining an appropriate alternate delivery location based at least in part on the alternate delivery location information retrieved at Step 320. The system may, for example, determine that the appropriate alternate delivery location is the alternate delivery location that is highest on the parcel recipient's list of preferred alternate delivery locations that has sufficient capacity to receive the parcel in terms of space and special handling requirements. As another example, the system may determine that no alternate delivery location is suitable to receive a parcel (e.g., because the shipper indicated a preference for the parcel not to be redirected to an alternate delivery location). In this example, the parcel may be returned to a local distribution center instead of an alternate delivery location and delivery may be attempted on the following day or at any other suitable time.


In particular embodiments, the system is configured to determine an appropriate alternate delivery location based at least in part on a size and/or weight of the parcel. For example, parcels of a particular size may be too large to leave at the primary delivery location when no one is available to accept the delivery of the parcel (e.g., because the size of the parcel may render the parcel more susceptible to theft if left outside of the primary delivery location). As a different example, parcels that are particularly large in size and/or weight may be unsuitable for redirection to an alternate delivery location due to the difficulty that a parcel recipient may face in transporting a parcel picked up at an alternate delivery location to the parcel recipient's residence. For example, parcels of a certain size or weight may be difficult for a parcel recipient to fit in the parcel recipient's vehicle or may be too heavy for the parcel recipient to carry. For such parcels, the system may be configured to direct a common carrier delivery driver to release the parcel at the primary delivery address (e.g., by leaving the parcel at the primary delivery address) rather than redirecting the parcel to an alternate delivery location.


Returning to FIG. 3, the system continues, at Step 340, by directing the parcel to the appropriate alternate delivery location determined at Step 330. In particular embodiments, directing the parcel to the appropriate delivery location comprises substantially automatically (e.g., automatically) reserving space at that alternate delivery location for the parcel (e.g., to ensure that there will be room and/or capacity for the parcel once the parcel arrives at the alternate delivery location). In various embodiments, directing the parcel to the appropriate alternate delivery location further comprises confirming that the parcel has been deposited at a particular alternate delivery location. In various embodiments, confirming that the parcel has been deposited at the alternate delivery location may include receiving a scan of an indicia associated with and located at the alternate delivery location from a delivery driver when the delivery driver deposits the parcel at the alternate delivery location. For example, when depositing a parcel at an alternate delivery location, the driver may scan the parcel and then scan an indicia (e.g., such as a bar code, QR code, or other suitable indicia) that is physically located at the alternate delivery location (e.g., on a wall, counter, etc.). At least partially in response to receiving a scan of a parcel followed by a scan of an indicia of a particular alternate delivery location, the system, in various embodiments, is configured to associate the parcel with that alternate delivery location (e.g., for the purposes of tracking the parcel, notifying the intended parcel recipient of the location of the parcel, etc.). In other embodiments, the system is configured to confirm delivery of a parcel at an alternate delivery location using any other suitable technique (e.g., GPS tracking, geocoding, etc.). In particular embodiments, the system is configured to notify the parcel recipient that parcel has been delivered to the alternate delivery location (e.g., via e-mail, SMS, text message, or any other suitable method of communication).


Alternate Embodiments


Direct to Alternate Delivery Location Shipments


In various embodiments, businesses provide customers with the option of having items scheduled for shipment to those customers (e.g., purchased by those customers) shipped directly to alternate delivery locations, rather than having the items shipped to the customer's home or office. In such embodiments, the businesses may provide a selection of alternate delivery locations to which the customer may send shipments. In other embodiments, the alternate delivery locations may be supplied by the common carrier that coordinates the shipment of the item. For example, a common carrier such as UPS may have particular alternate delivery locations associated with the common carrier in a particular city (e.g., such as Atlanta, Ga.). A customer ordering an item for shipment to that particular city may, when ordering the item, be presented with a listing of the particular alternate delivery locations associated with the common carrier. In particular embodiments, the system is configured to substantially automatically (e.g., automatically) reserve space at an alternate delivery location for an item ordered by a customer at least partially in response to the customer selecting that alternate delivery location as the shipping destination of the item the customer is to receive.


Packaging for Business-to-Retail Parcels


In particular embodiments, an alternate delivery location that accepts parcels shipped directly to the alternate delivery location may also receive parcels intended for the alternate delivery location itself. For example, a grocery store that acts as an alternate delivery location may receive parcels that are shipped to and intended for the grocery store in addition to parcels that are shipped to the grocery store but intended for storage at the alternate delivery location associated with the grocery store until the parcel can be picked up by a parcel recipient. In such instances, parcels that are direct to alternate delivery location parcels intended for a person other than the alternate delivery location itself may contain an indicia indicating that the parcel is to be picked up by the parcel recipient rather than opened by someone at the alternate delivery location. In such embodiments, the indicia can allow alternate delivery locations to differentiate between parcels intended for the alternate delivery location from parcels that have been shipped to or redirected to the alternate delivery location but are to be picked up by a different parcel recipient.


In various embodiments, the indicia may include a particular marking on parcels intended for pick up by parcel recipients (e.g., a particular color marking, sticker, label, etc.). In particular embodiments, the indicia are machine-readable indicia that are readable to update tracking information associated with the parcel (e.g., updating information to notify the parcel recipient that the parcel is ‘ready for pick up’).


Non-Guaranteed Deliveries


In particular embodiments, the system is configured to provide customers with a non-guaranteed shipping option (e.g., a shipping option that does not guarantee shipment within a particular number of days). The system may be configured to make periodic shipments from any particular business to a particular alternate delivery location. For example, a common carrier may provide a non-guaranteed shipping option for items shipped from a particular online electronics retailer to a particular alternate delivery location, and the common carrier may then only make shipments from the particular online electronics retailer to the particular alternate delivery location once per week (e.g., or once every other week, etc.). In various embodiments, a common carrier may charge less for a non-guaranteed shipping option than for other shipping options (e.g., such as two day shipping, overnight, etc.).


In other embodiments, the system is configured to release shipments placed with non-guaranteed shipping options from a particular retailer to a particular alternate delivery location only when a particular number of orders have been placed from that particular retailer for shipment to that particular alternate delivery location. For example, the system may be configured to only send a shipment of items or parcels from that particular retailer to that particular alternate delivery location once a sufficient number of orders have been placed with non-guaranteed shipping from that particular retailer to that particular alternate delivery location to substantially fill (e.g., completely fill) an entire delivery truck.


In still other embodiments, the system may be configured to hold any parcels scheduled for delivery to a particular parcel recipient until a predetermined number of parcels have been scheduled for shipment to the particular parcel recipient. For example, a logistic company's regional distribution center may contain a bin for the particular parcel recipient in which all parcels for that particular recipient are placed. The parcels would then be delivered once the bin had filled up in order to decrease the number of trips needed to deliver all of the parcels to the particular parcel recipient (e.g., to the recipients residence or an alternate delivery location selected by the recipient).


Illustrative Examples



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary transportation diagram that generally illustrates the redirection of a delivery from a primary delivery location to an alternate delivery location. As shown in this figure, a parcel 400 may be delivered from any suitable starting point (e.g., such as a local distribution center, retailer, warehouse, etc.) to a primary delivery location 404 (e.g., such as a residence, office, etc.). If it is not possible to deliver the parcel 400 to the primary delivery location 404, the system will redirect the parcel to an alternate delivery location 412, 414, 416. The alternate delivery locations may include, for example, gas stations, grocery stores, pharmacies, stand-alone kiosks, or any other suitable location for receiving and holding parcels for pick up by recipients.


In various embodiments, a system for directing parcels to alternate delivery locations will determine the most suitable alternate delivery location to which the parcel should be delivered. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the parcel recipient may have provided the parcel carrier (e.g., the company responsible for delivering the parcel to the recipient) with an ordered list of preferred alternate delivery locations, such as a preference for alternate delivery locations A, B, and C in that order. The system, when determining the most suitable alternate delivery location for the undeliverable parcel, may determine which alternate delivery location is most preferable to the parcel recipient that also has availability to receive and hold the parcel until the recipient can pick the parcel up from the alternate delivery location. If, for example, alternate delivery location A 412 is completely full and cannot accept any more parcels, but alternate delivery location B 414 has space to receive the parcel 400, the system would determine that alternate delivery location B 414 is the most suitable alternate delivery location. The system may then redirect the parcel to alternate delivery location B 414. In various embodiments, the system is configured to substantially automatically reserve space for the parcel 400 at the alternate delivery location determined to be most suitable (e.g., in this case, the system would reserve space for the parcel at alternate delivery location B 414). In such embodiments, reserving space may avoid a problem where an alternate delivery location was determined to have availability, but when the parcel finally reached the alternate delivery location, there was no longer availability.



FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary transportation diagram that generally illustrates the delivery of a parcel 500 directly from a retailer to an alternate delivery location 512, 514, 516. As may be understood from this figure, parcel recipients may elect to have parcels delivered directly to alternate delivery locations 512, 514, 516. In various embodiments, logistics companies or common carriers may limit the frequency with which they make deliveries to a particular alternate delivery location or for a particular parcel recipient. In such embodiments, the logistics company or common carrier may make no guarantee as to how much time it will take to ship the parcel to its ultimate destination as discussed above.


CONCLUSION

Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. While examples discussed above cover the use of the invention in the context a document management service, the invention may be used in any other suitable context. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purposes of limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A method for redirecting undeliverable parcels to an alternate delivery location utilizing a logistics server, a server associated with one or more potential alternate delivery locations, a database, a wireless computing device, a delivery vehicle, a scanning device, and at least one processor, the method comprising: receiving, at said logistics server, from said wireless computing device, an indication that delivery of one or more parcels is not possible at a primary delivery location during a first delivery attempt of said one or more parcels to said primary delivery location;based on receiving the indication, determining, via a processor at the logistics sever, that the one or more parcels are suitable for redirection to an alternate delivery location based on a predetermined weight and a predetermined size, wherein the one or more parcels are prevented from redirection if a weight and size of the one or more parcels exceed the predetermined weight and the predetermined size;at least partially in response to determining the one or more parcels are suitable for redirection, retrieving, via the processor from said database, preferred alternate delivery location information associated with said primary delivery location, said preferred alternate delivery location information comprising information selected from a group consisting of:
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: said at least one processor is further configured for receiving, from an intended recipient of said one or more parcels, said one or more parcel recipient alternate delivery preferences; andsaid preferred alternate delivery location information comprises said one or more parcel recipient alternate delivery preferences.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein: said one or more parcel recipient alternate delivery preferences comprise:a first preferred alternate delivery location and;a second preferred alternate delivery location.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein: determining said suitable alternate delivery location comprises determining an availability of said first preferred alternate delivery location to accept delivery of said one or more parcels; andsaid at least one processor is further configured for:at least partially in response to determining that said first preferred alternate delivery location has said availability, facilitating delivery of said one or more parcels to said first preferred alternate delivery location; andnotifying said intended recipient of said delivery of said one or more parcels to said first preferred alternate delivery location.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said at least one processor is further configured for: at least partially in response to determining that said first preferred alternate delivery location does not have said availability to accept delivery of said one or more parcels, determining whether said second preferred alternate delivery location has availability to accept delivery of said one or more parcels;at least partially in response to determining that said second preferred alternate delivery location has said availability to accept delivery of said one or more parcels, facilitating delivery of said one or more parcels to said second preferred alternate delivery location; andnotifying said intended recipient of said delivery of said one or more parcels to said second preferred alternate delivery location.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said at least one processor is further configured for: at least partially in response to determining that said second preferred alternate delivery location does not have said availability to accept delivery of said one or more parcels, automatically determining said suitable alternate delivery location, said suitable alternate delivery location being a location other than said first preferred alternate delivery location or said second preferred alternate delivery location.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein: said preferred alternate delivery location information comprises said one or more parcel shipper alternate delivery preferences;said one or more parcel shipper alternate delivery preferences comprise a preference to not deliver said one or more parcels to a particular alternate delivery location;facilitating said delivery of the one or more parcels from said primary delivery location to said suitable alternate delivery location comprises facilitating delivery of said one or more parcels to a temporary holding location; andsaid at least one processor is further configured for facilitating delivery of said one or more parcels from said temporary holding location to said primary delivery location.
  • 8. A method of directing parcels to alternate delivery locations, comprising: receiving at a logistics server from a mobile computing device an indication that delivery of a parcel is not possible at a primary delivery location following a first delivery attempt of said parcel to said primary delivery location of a parcel recipient;based on receiving the indication, determining, via a processor, that the parcel is suitable for redirection based on a predetermined size and a predetermined weight, wherein the parcel is prevented from redirection if a weight and a size of the parcel exceeds the predetermined weight and the predetermined size;determining, by the processor, a current location of a delivery driver by determining a location of said mobile computing device;based on determining the parcel is suitable for redirection, receiving alternate delivery location information associated with said primary delivery location, said alternate delivery location information comprising one or more potential alternate delivery locations within a particular distance of (i) said primary delivery location; (ii) the current location of said delivery driver; and (iii) a delivery route of said delivery driver, such that said one or more of potential alternate delivery locations comprise one or more alternate delivery locations to which said delivery driver could deliver said parcel;based on receiving the indication, determining, by the processor, based at least in part on said alternate delivery location information, an appropriate alternate delivery location;after determining the appropriate alternate delivery location, requesting, from a server associated with the appropriate alternate delivery location, availability information for the appropriate alternate delivery location, the availability information comprising available physical space; anddelivering the parcel to the appropriate alternate delivery location through the use of a delivery vehicle comprising: delaying a delivery of the parcel while the parcel is located at a distribution center along a shipment route;determining whether a predetermined number of parcels have been scheduled for delivery to the appropriate alternate delivery location; andbased on the predetermined number of parcels being satisfied, modifying the delivery route of the delivery vehicle to include delivery of the parcel and the predetermined number of parcels to the appropriate alternate delivery location.
  • 9. The computer implemented method of claim 8, wherein said alternate delivery location information comprises locations of one or more potential alternate delivery locations within the particular distance of said primary delivery location.
  • 10. The computer implemented method of claim 8, wherein said alternate delivery location information comprises a capacity of alternate delivery locations to accept redirected parcels.
  • 11. The computer implemented method of claim 8, wherein said alternate delivery location information comprises alternate delivery location preferences of the parcel recipient.
  • 12. The computer implemented method of claim 8, wherein said alternate delivery location information comprises alternate delivery location preferences of a shipper of said parcel.
  • 13. The computer implemented method of claim 8, further comprising automatically reserving space at said appropriate alternate delivery location, by the processor, for said parcel.
  • 14. The computer implemented method of claim 8, wherein said determining said appropriate alternate delivery location is further based at least in part on the size of said parcel, the weight of said parcel, or the size and the weight of said parcel.
  • 15. The method of claim 8, further comprising restricting one or more potential alternate delivery locations for delivering the parcel based on a population density of an area associated with said primary delivery location.
  • 16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer executable instructions for: receiving, at a logistics server, via a mobile computing device, an indication of an attempted delivery where the delivery of a parcel to a primary delivery location is not possible where the said step of receiving is executed after a delivery driver is unable to perform said delivery of said parcel to said primary delivery location of an intended recipient;at least partially in response to receiving said indication;determining that the parcel is suitable for redirection to an alternate delivery location based on a predetermined size and a predetermined weight, wherein the parcel is prevented from redirection if a weight and a size of the one or more parcels exceed the predetermined weight and the predetermined size;determining a current location of said delivery driver by determining a location of said mobile computing device;determining a plurality of potential alternate delivery locations for said parcel, said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations comprising a plurality of potential alternate delivery locations that are each within a particular distance of (i) said current location of said delivery driver; and (ii) a delivery route of said delivery driver;at least partially in response to determining said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations:notifying the intended recipient that said delivery was not possible at said primary delivery location;providing said intended recipient with a listing of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations and a designated time period during which said intended recipient may select a particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations in order to have said parcel delivered to the particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations;enabling said intended recipient to select said particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations during said designated time period;determining whether said intended recipient has selected said particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations during said designated time period;at least partially in response to determining that said intended recipient has selected said particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations during said designated time period, facilitating delivery of said parcel to said particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations;at least partially in response to determining that said intended recipient has not selected said particular one of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations during said designated time period: (i) determining which of said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations are most proximate to the delivery route of said delivery driver and (ii) selecting a suitable alternate delivery location from said plurality of potential alternate delivery locations that are most proximate to said delivery route;initiating a delivery of said parcel to said suitable alternate delivery location through the use of a delivery vehicle, wherein initiating the delivery of the parcel comprises:delaying a delivery of the parcel while the parcel is located at a distribution center along a shipment route;determining whether a predetermined number of parcels have been scheduled for delivery to the suitable alternate delivery location;based on the predetermined number of parcels being satisfied, rerouting the delivery route of the delivery vehicle to deliver the parcel and the predetermined number of parcels to the suitable alternate delivery location.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein: said non-transitory computer-readable medium further stores computer-executable instructions for:at least partially in response to receiving said indication that said delivery of said parcel is not available, providing a selection of one or more alternate delivery locations to said intended recipient;receiving a selection of said one or more alternate delivery locations from said intended recipient; andat least partially in response to receiving said selection, facilitating delivery of said parcel to said selected alternate delivery location.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein determining said suitable alternate delivery location comprises determining said suitable alternate delivery location based at least in part on a population density of an area associated with said primary delivery location.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein determining said suitable alternate delivery location comprises determining said suitable alternate delivery location based at least in part on one or more delivery preferences associated with a shipper of said parcel.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, further wherein facilitating delivery of said parcel to said suitable alternate delivery location comprises confirming that said parcel has been delivered to said suitable alternate delivery location by: receiving a scan of an indicia physically associated with and located at said suitable alternate delivery location from said delivery driver via said mobile computing device when said delivery driver deposits said parcel at said suitable alternate delivery location; andupdating tracking information for said parcel to associate said parcel with said suitable alternate delivery location.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/759,800, filed Feb. 1, 2013, entitled, “Systems and Methods for Parcel Delivery to Alternate Delivery Locations,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (494)
Number Name Date Kind
3712468 Wenner et al. Jan 1973 A
5153842 Dlugos, Sr. et al. Oct 1992 A
5168444 Cukor et al. Dec 1992 A
5375240 Grundy Dec 1994 A
5400020 Jones et al. Mar 1995 A
5444444 Ross Aug 1995 A
5623260 Jones Apr 1997 A
5648770 Ross Jul 1997 A
5656799 Ramsden et al. Aug 1997 A
5657010 Jones Aug 1997 A
5668543 Jones Sep 1997 A
5726435 Hara et al. Mar 1998 A
5774053 Porter Jun 1998 A
5786748 Nikolic et al. Jul 1998 A
5831220 Ramsden et al. Nov 1998 A
5831860 Foladare et al. Nov 1998 A
5979750 Kindell Nov 1999 A
6010064 Umeda et al. Jan 2000 A
6026375 Hall et al. Feb 2000 A
6028517 Sansone et al. Feb 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6085170 Tsukuda Jul 2000 A
6208980 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6211781 McDonald Apr 2001 B1
6220509 Byford Apr 2001 B1
6236972 Shkedy May 2001 B1
6278936 Jones Aug 2001 B1
6285916 Kadaba et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289323 Gordon et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304856 Soga et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313760 Jones Nov 2001 B1
6317060 Jones Nov 2001 B1
6323254 Weikard et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323782 Stephens et al. Nov 2001 B1
6343275 Wong Jan 2002 B1
6344796 Ogilvie et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356196 Wong et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363323 Jones Mar 2002 B1
6411891 Jones Jun 2002 B1
6433732 Dutta et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442589 Takahashi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456900 Kakuta Sep 2002 B1
6463420 Guidice et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480758 Stevens Nov 2002 B2
6486801 Jones Nov 2002 B1
6492912 Jones Dec 2002 B1
6510383 Jones Jan 2003 B1
6536659 Hauser et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539360 Kadaba Mar 2003 B1
6570488 Kucharczyk et al. May 2003 B2
6595342 Maritzen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606604 Dutta Aug 2003 B1
6612489 McCormick et al. Sep 2003 B2
6615092 Bickley et al. Sep 2003 B2
6618668 Laird Sep 2003 B1
6634551 Barta et al. Oct 2003 B2
6683542 Jones Jan 2004 B1
6688435 Will et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690997 Rivalto Feb 2004 B2
6694217 Bloom Feb 2004 B2
6700507 Jones Mar 2004 B2
6701299 Kraisser et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714859 Jones Mar 2004 B2
6725127 Stevens Apr 2004 B2
6741927 Jones May 2004 B2
6748295 Tilles et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748318 Jones Jun 2004 B1
6748320 Jones Jun 2004 B2
6756879 Shuster Jun 2004 B2
6763299 Jones Jul 2004 B2
6763300 Jones Jul 2004 B2
6772130 Karbowski et al. Aug 2004 B1
6791450 Gokcebay et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804606 Jones Oct 2004 B2
6820805 Stevens Nov 2004 B2
6845909 Bong et al. Jan 2005 B2
6859722 Jones Feb 2005 B2
6862576 Turner et al. Mar 2005 B1
6882269 Moreno Apr 2005 B2
6902109 Barta et al. Jun 2005 B2
6904359 Jones Jun 2005 B2
6933832 Simms et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950803 Tiley et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952645 Jones Oct 2005 B1
6961711 Chee Nov 2005 B1
6967575 Dohrmann et al. Nov 2005 B1
6974928 Bloom Dec 2005 B2
6975998 Jones Dec 2005 B1
6976090 Ben-Shaul et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978929 Buie et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985871 Simon et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990467 Kwan Jan 2006 B1
6994253 Miller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7020623 Tiley et al. Mar 2006 B1
7028895 Ashaari Apr 2006 B2
7030781 Jones Apr 2006 B2
7031959 Garner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7055741 Bong et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068149 Lee et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075451 Yamada Jul 2006 B2
7110958 Yang Sep 2006 B2
7133743 Tilles et al. Nov 2006 B2
7158941 Thompson Jan 2007 B1
7158948 Rodriguez et al. Jan 2007 B1
7177825 Borders et al. Feb 2007 B1
7212829 Lau et al. May 2007 B1
7212984 Wolfe et al. May 2007 B2
7222081 Sone May 2007 B1
7225983 Park et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233907 Young Jun 2007 B2
7248160 Mangan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249044 Kumar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249087 Sharp et al. Jul 2007 B2
7254549 Bansal et al. Aug 2007 B1
7257552 Franco Aug 2007 B1
7267920 Nakazawa et al. Sep 2007 B2
7312702 Willms et al. Dec 2007 B1
7337944 Devar Mar 2008 B2
7341186 Mrozik et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358857 White Apr 2008 B1
7376598 Estes et al. May 2008 B2
7385499 Horton et al. Jun 2008 B2
7422149 Aptekar Sep 2008 B2
7426484 Joyce et al. Sep 2008 B2
7479899 Horstemeyer Jan 2009 B2
7501946 Lanigan et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509228 Bielefeld et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511617 Burman et al. Mar 2009 B2
7528722 Nelson May 2009 B2
7574366 Burman et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580845 Burman et al. Aug 2009 B2
7617133 Antony et al. Nov 2009 B1
7624024 Levis et al. Nov 2009 B2
7636696 Sigler, Jr. et al. Dec 2009 B1
7647231 Kuebert et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653457 Bloom Jan 2010 B2
7653603 Holtkamp, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B1
7657466 Klingenberg et al. Feb 2010 B2
7693723 Wade Apr 2010 B2
7711654 Schmidtberg et al. May 2010 B2
7712670 Sauerwein, Jr. et al. May 2010 B2
7742928 Reynolds et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752134 Spear Jul 2010 B2
7765131 Klingenberg et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769778 Snapp et al. Aug 2010 B2
7815112 Volpe et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822618 Kaneko Oct 2010 B2
7831439 Bryar et al. Nov 2010 B1
7848961 Estes et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853481 Johnson Dec 2010 B1
7868753 Jenkins et al. Jan 2011 B2
7925524 Florence Apr 2011 B2
7962422 Melechko et al. Jun 2011 B1
7969306 Ebert et al. Jun 2011 B2
7984289 Orbke et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996328 Lundberg et al. Aug 2011 B1
8010430 Chase et al. Aug 2011 B1
8010462 Kinory et al. Aug 2011 B2
8015023 Lee et al. Sep 2011 B1
8027933 Lou et al. Sep 2011 B2
8036993 Estes Oct 2011 B2
8073723 Bilibin et al. Dec 2011 B1
8086546 Spiegel et al. Dec 2011 B2
8103521 Kuebert et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103716 Boyce et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108265 Bonner et al. Jan 2012 B2
8117462 Snapp et al. Feb 2012 B2
8131652 Gullo et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140551 Garner et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140592 Scott et al. Mar 2012 B2
8156007 Anthony et al. Apr 2012 B1
8204799 Murray et al. Jun 2012 B1
8219490 Hammad et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225388 Vogel et al. Jul 2012 B2
8234275 Grant et al. Jul 2012 B2
8249998 Reynolds et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255235 Aldstadt Aug 2012 B2
8255339 Andrew Aug 2012 B2
8265947 Kuebert et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280824 Vermeulen et al. Oct 2012 B1
8291234 Snapp et al. Oct 2012 B2
8306923 Roache et al. Nov 2012 B1
8311895 Murugan et al. Nov 2012 B1
8340978 Wade Dec 2012 B2
8352551 Campbell et al. Jan 2013 B2
8356187 Cook et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364953 Bullard, Jr. Jan 2013 B2
8380641 Bennett et al. Feb 2013 B1
8392262 Mallick et al. Mar 2013 B2
8437742 Garskof May 2013 B2
8468062 Kamdar Jun 2013 B1
8489520 Kuebert et al. Jul 2013 B2
9141931 Ackerman Sep 2015 B2
9195950 Schenken Nov 2015 B2
9692738 Wenneman et al. Jun 2017 B1
9798999 Schenken Oct 2017 B2
9916557 Gillen et al. Mar 2018 B1
9984351 Antony et al. May 2018 B1
10007712 Williams et al. Jun 2018 B1
20010040422 Gramlich Nov 2001 A1
20010042001 Goto et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042024 Rogers Nov 2001 A1
20010051885 Nardulli et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007299 Florence Jan 2002 A1
20020007353 Komacki Jan 2002 A1
20020010634 Roman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013744 Tsunenari et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020016726 Ross Feb 2002 A1
20020019761 Lidow Feb 2002 A1
20020019777 Schwab et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029194 Lewis et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032612 Williams et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032613 Buettgenbach et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035515 Moreno Mar 2002 A1
20020038266 Tuttrup et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040350 Shinzaki Apr 2002 A1
20020046056 Demarco et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020070882 Jones Jun 2002 A1
20020073039 Ogg et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080030 Inomata Jun 2002 A1
20020082770 Jones Jun 2002 A1
20020087371 Abendroth Jul 2002 A1
20020103653 Huxter Aug 2002 A1
20020103724 Huxter Aug 2002 A1
20020107820 Huxter Aug 2002 A1
20020111914 Terada et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120475 Morimoto Aug 2002 A1
20020128915 Haseltine Sep 2002 A1
20020130065 Bloom Sep 2002 A1
20020138173 Barta et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143670 Cushing et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147919 Gentry Oct 2002 A1
20020156645 Hansen Oct 2002 A1
20020156846 Rawat et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165729 Kuebert et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177922 Bloom Nov 2002 A1
20020178016 McLellan Nov 2002 A1
20020178074 Bloom Nov 2002 A1
20020184497 Gage et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003936 Tighe Jan 2003 A1
20030023963 Birkholz et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025590 Gokcebay et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037009 Tobin et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040931 De Mol Van Otterloo et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040980 Nakajima et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046173 Benjier et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030093180 Stevens May 2003 A1
20030097287 Franz et al. May 2003 A1
20030110170 Matsuoka Jun 2003 A1
20030114206 Timothy et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030160097 Steiner Aug 2003 A1
20030171996 Chen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030193414 Jones Oct 2003 A1
20030195784 Smith, Jr. Oct 2003 A1
20030225625 Chew et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040015393 Fong et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040030604 Young Feb 2004 A1
20040039712 Tartal et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044582 Chowdhary et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073449 Yang Apr 2004 A1
20040073499 Martin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088225 Foth et al. May 2004 A1
20040093312 Cordery et al. May 2004 A1
20040117276 Kettler, III Jun 2004 A1
20040117278 Dutta et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117326 Amato Jun 2004 A1
20040133446 Myrick et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134690 Norris et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143518 Siegel Jul 2004 A1
20040149822 Stevens et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040149824 Miller et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153370 Yang Aug 2004 A1
20040158351 Rivalto Aug 2004 A1
20040172260 Junger et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181310 Stashluk, Jr. et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199284 Hara Oct 2004 A1
20040199656 Pintsov Oct 2004 A1
20040211834 Fleckenstein et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215480 Kadaba Oct 2004 A1
20040215588 Cornelius Oct 2004 A1
20040254802 Miller et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254811 Horstemeyer Dec 2004 A1
20040260470 Rast Dec 2004 A1
20050004877 McLellan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050006470 Mrozik et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027607 Pearson Feb 2005 A1
20050038758 Hilbush et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060164 Eli Berl Illion Mar 2005 A1
20050060228 Woo Mar 2005 A1
20050061877 Stevens Mar 2005 A1
20050068178 Lee et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071258 Kumakawa Mar 2005 A1
20050075989 Baisi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080635 Groff et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080638 Maseruka Apr 2005 A1
20050104716 Simms et al. May 2005 A1
20050116033 Moore Jun 2005 A1
20050119786 Kadaba Jun 2005 A1
20050120003 Drury et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131774 Huxter Jun 2005 A1
20050137901 Siegel Jun 2005 A1
20050138382 Hougaard et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149372 Kite et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050216553 Mallonee et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050218222 Nark et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234911 Hess et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251402 Olsen, III et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060010037 Angert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010077 Dohrmann et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020366 Bloom Jan 2006 A1
20060020489 Rivalto Jan 2006 A1
20060041481 Stowe Feb 2006 A1
20060047610 Parkos et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069601 Simon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085273 Mayer et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060097896 Jones May 2006 A1
20060149577 Stashluk et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060224512 Kurakata Oct 2006 A1
20060229895 Kodger, Jr. Oct 2006 A1
20060235739 Levis et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238334 Mangan Oct 2006 A1
20060282277 Ng Dec 2006 A1
20060287870 Mayer et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005452 Klingenberg et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016538 Bielefeld et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070036117 Taube et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047459 Kadaba Mar 2007 A1
20070062851 Schulz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078797 Won et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070083410 Hanna Apr 2007 A1
20070095904 Barta et al. May 2007 A1
20070124295 Forman et al. May 2007 A1
20070143281 Smirin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150533 Krause et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156415 Foth et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185598 Ortega Aug 2007 A1
20070192191 Neal et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198290 Kinory et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070266081 Murchison, III et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080004928 Trellevik et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080004957 Hildreth et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080004967 Gillen Jan 2008 A1
20080004995 Klingenberg et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040246 Fukamachi Feb 2008 A1
20080051995 Lokshin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080061966 Nelson Mar 2008 A1
20080082346 Hoopes et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080109246 Russell May 2008 A1
20080121682 Grim et al. May 2008 A1
20080133261 Ray Jun 2008 A1
20080154781 Kumar Jun 2008 A1
20080172305 Estes et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080210749 Skaaksrud et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221913 Cook et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249830 Gilman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080313018 Kamm, IV et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319970 Garner et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320092 Campbell et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090001153 Lim Jan 2009 A1
20090012802 Pinney Jan 2009 A1
20090043552 Tomlinson, Jr. et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046892 Avant et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090063215 Heise et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076888 Oster et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090106124 Yang Apr 2009 A1
20090138730 Cook et al. May 2009 A1
20090146832 Ebert et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164295 Sion Jun 2009 A1
20090173672 Avant et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187489 Mallick et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090240597 Oswald Sep 2009 A1
20090259509 Landvater Oct 2009 A1
20090281929 Boitet et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090314835 Jackson Dec 2009 A1
20090319078 Jackson Dec 2009 A1
20090326971 Piccinini et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004960 Frankenberg et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011238 Nakamura et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012769 Alber et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100049536 Quine et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057592 Moir et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057593 Moir et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076903 Klingenberg et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100100497 Kuebert et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114678 Axe et al. May 2010 A1
20100121689 Wallace et al. May 2010 A1
20100138281 Zhang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100162149 Sheleheda et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185565 Wade Jul 2010 A1
20100211444 Spear Aug 2010 A1
20100223127 Bettez et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100223134 Lunenfeld Sep 2010 A1
20100235290 Junger et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250291 Walker et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280955 Ross et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110004562 Hennessy et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110084162 Goossen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093361 Morales Apr 2011 A1
20110125665 Kadaba May 2011 A1
20110153513 Erie et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110191697 Sumner et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110246323 Mehta et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270714 Myrick et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287748 Angel et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110288896 Dewey, Jr. et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120016948 Sinha Jan 2012 A1
20120030124 Cronkright, II et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120030133 Rademaker Feb 2012 A1
20120047084 Naghshineh et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120047085 Naghshineh et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120062362 Rudduck et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120089532 Kuebert et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095934 Klingenberg et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120130625 Srivastava May 2012 A1
20120130916 Neal et al. May 2012 A1
20120166320 Junger Jun 2012 A1
20120179622 Amato Jul 2012 A1
20120185363 Gilbert Jul 2012 A1
20120235786 Rudduck et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120246077 Skaaksrud et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120303539 Marcus et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303541 Marcus et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303542 Marcus et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310853 Aldstadt Dec 2012 A1
20120330774 Sadot et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130006731 Cook et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130006885 Kuebert et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013101 Bonnell et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013102 Bonnell et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013350 McCullough et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130016636 Berger et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018894 Qiao Jan 2013 A1
20130018999 Merrill et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024307 Fuerstenberg et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130054054 Tollenaere et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130061337 Zimberoff et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130073336 Heath Mar 2013 A1
20130073605 Fosburgh et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130088323 Ryan Apr 2013 A1
20130144428 Irwin et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151419 Hitchcock et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130166067 Irwin et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130202185 Irwin, Jr. et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130238599 Burris Sep 2013 A1
20130238658 Burris Sep 2013 A1
20130246396 Clare et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130262311 Buhrmann et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262336 Wan et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130268437 Desai et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130338822 Gibson, Jr. et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140034727 Hancock et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140035721 Heppe et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140052661 Shakes et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140081677 Craig et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140180959 Gillen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140236688 Minter et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140258098 Felix et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278602 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278603 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278843 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279648 Whitehouse Sep 2014 A1
20140279650 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279654 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279658 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279663 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279664 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279665 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279666 Lievens et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279667 Gillen Sep 2014 A1
20140330407 Corder et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150058163 Lenahan et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150088694 Ackerman Mar 2015 A1
20150088731 Ackerman Mar 2015 A1
20150106291 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106292 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106293 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106294 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106295 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106296 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120602 Huffman et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150138382 Xiao et al. May 2015 A1
20150193731 Stevens et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150356801 Nitu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160140486 Tibbs et al. May 2016 A1
20160140487 Tibbs et al. May 2016 A1
20160189466 Gibson et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170148059 Minter et al. May 2017 A1
20170150304 Baldasare et al. May 2017 A1
20170154483 Cordiner et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170353943 Skaaksrud Dec 2017 A1
20180060800 Robinson Mar 2018 A1
20180060812 Robinson et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180253688 Schenken et al. Sep 2018 A1
20190172011 Robinson et al. Jun 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (92)
Number Date Country
2893502 Apr 2004 CA
2551885 Aug 2005 CA
1317758 Oct 2001 CN
1432946 Jul 2003 CN
1571975 Jan 2005 CN
1666214 Sep 2005 CN
1795461 Jun 2006 CN
101203873 Jun 2008 CN
101329752 Dec 2008 CN
101491051 Jul 2009 CN
101971201 Feb 2011 CN
102609783 Jul 2012 CN
102930655 Feb 2013 CN
202720725 Feb 2013 CN
1152356 Nov 2001 EP
1365198 Nov 2003 EP
2469291 AL Jun 2012 EP
2528818 Feb 2016 GB
62-121108 Jul 1987 JP
5-211684 Aug 1993 JP
10-207956 Aug 1998 JP
11-139540 May 1999 JP
H11151154 Jun 1999 JP
2000-339373 Dec 2000 JP
2001-014393 Jan 2001 JP
2001-022678 Jan 2001 JP
2001-282974 Oct 2001 JP
2001291027 Oct 2001 JP
2001338030 Dec 2001 JP
2002-042008 Feb 2002 JP
2002-056307 Feb 2002 JP
2002092505 Mar 2002 JP
2002-109409 Apr 2002 JP
2002157541 May 2002 JP
2002259553 Sep 2002 JP
2002288562 Oct 2002 JP
2003196354 Jul 2003 JP
2003263599 Sep 2003 JP
2003321124 Nov 2003 JP
2004-30159 Jan 2004 JP
2004280468 Oct 2004 JP
2004338824 Dec 2004 JP
2005-043974 Feb 2005 JP
2006-512635 Apr 2006 JP
2006277199 Oct 2006 JP
2007153618 Jun 2007 JP
2008-542886 Nov 2008 JP
2008303069 Dec 2008 JP
2010128535 Jun 2010 JP
2011118611 Jun 2011 JP
2012-138000 Jul 2012 JP
2001-0093768 Oct 2001 KR
2011074500 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0019170 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0019171 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0030014 May 2000 WO
WO 0046726 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0046728 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0052422 Sep 2000 WO
0108071 Feb 2001 WO
0120423 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116889 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0129778 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0135344 May 2001 WO
WO 0139031 May 2001 WO
WO 0165451 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0165454 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0165523 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0165524 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0167344 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0172109 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0184359 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0188831 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0197101 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0207104 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0217045 Feb 2002 WO
WO 02052378 Jul 2002 WO
02073369 Sep 2002 WO
WO02073369 Sep 2002 WO
02080436 Oct 2002 WO
WO02080436 Oct 2002 WO
WO03023688 Mar 2003 WO
03040979 May 2003 WO
WO 2004015518 Feb 2004 WO
2004042523 May 2004 WO
2007055769 May 2007 WO
WO 2010123611 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2012129529 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2013106940 Jul 2013 WO
2014031691 Feb 2014 WO
WO14164853 Oct 2014 WO
2016027178 Feb 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (132)
Entry
Chung, Kun-Jen, and Yung-Fu Huang. “Optimal replenishment policies for EOQ inventory model with limited storage capacity under permissible delay in payments.” Opsearch 41.1 (2004): 16-34.
SEP leads €26 million funding round for Kiala, http://www.sep.co.uk/news/story/sep-leads-e26-million-funding-round-for-kiala-2/, Nov. 30, 2007, SEP Scottish Equity Partners.
ASP V16-System Walker List Works Manual (relevant part); p. 88, line 5, 3.4 Start up and termination of ListWORKS writer; one page.
Brewin, Bob and Rosencrance, Linda, Follow That Package!, Article, Mar. 19, 2001 (Retrieved from the Internet Apr. 25, 2003), p. 1-p. 5, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2001/0,4814,58696,00.html, Computer World.
Caminiti et al., United Parcel Service Introduces Advanced Label Imaging System, Published by Business Wire on Nov. 29, 1989, Section 1, p. 1, Downloaded from the Internet on Sep. 19, 2005, 2 pages.
De Marco, Donna, E-Tail Presents Can Be Tougher to Send Back Than Order, Journal, Dec. 28, 1999, Downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 3, 2002, Accession No. 08891512, Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, The Dialog Corporation, United States.
Descartes, Scheduling Software Helps Webvan Meet 30-Minute Delivery Window, www.stores.org, Jul. 2000.
El Portal Del Transporte, FedEx Insight Empowers Customers with Enhanced Shipment Visibility and Control, Article, Apr. 11, 2001 (Retrieved on Apr. 25, 2003), p. 9, Paragraph 4—p. 10, Line 7, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.transportando.net/newsabri1_completa.htm>.
FedEx, “RPS Adds Automated Package Pick-Up to Redesigned Web Site,” www.fedex.com/us/about/gound/pressreleases/pressrelease111198.html?link=4, retrieved Sep. 10, 2003.
Frontline Solutions, FedEx Improves Internal, External Operations, Article, Apr. 5, 2001 (Retrieved from the Internet Apr. 25, 2003), p. 1 (last line) through p. 2, Paragraph 9, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.frontlinemagazine.com/art_th/o4052001.htx>, Fairfax, Virginia and Memphis, Tennessee.
Harrington, Lisa, The U.S. Postal Service Gets Serious About Serving Business in the New Economy, Journal, May 2000, Downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 3, 2002, p. 2, vol. 41, No. 5, Accession No. 01167257, Penton Publishing, Inc., United States of America.
Henderson, Timothy, Buy.com Boosts Returns Process Efficiency With New Solution, Periodical, Nov. 2000, Downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 3, 2002, pp. 72-76, vol. 82n11, Accession No. 02102731, ProQuest Info&Learning, United States of America.
iPventure, “Schedule Distribution Routes and Timeslots,” http://www.ipventure.com/onlineorder/distribution.php, retrieved on Apr. 16, 2008.
Kihon Kara Jissen Made Business Seikou No Tameno Kanpeki Guide—How to E-Commerce (relevant part); p. 60; one page.
Many Happy Returns—UPS Unvels Advanced Outline Returns Solution, Journal, Sep. 20, 2000, Downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 3, 2002, Accession No. 12921102, Business Wire, United States of America.
Outlook 2000 Handbook First Edition (relevant part); p. 95, last 9 lines; one page.
Pender, Lee, Hard Times are the Best Times, Magazine, Aug. 15, 2001 (Retrieved on Apr. 25, 2003), p. 3, Paragraph 3, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.cio.com/archive/081501/besttimes_content.html>.
Van Huzien, Gordon, Messaging: The Transport Part of the XML Puzzle, Article, Jul. 2000 (Retrieved from the Internet Apr. 25, 2003: <URL:http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/xml-messaging/>.
Raco Industries, “Increase Delivery Visibility and Simplify Your Process,” retrieved from <http://www.racointeractive.com/media/834/raco_interactive-pd.pdf>, on Sep. 25, 2013, 2 pages.
FedEx, “FedEx Mobile Ship”, retrieved from <http://www.fedex.com/us/mobile/label.html, redirected to http://mobilesolutions.fedex.com/shipping-label.html > on Sep. 25, 2013, 2 pages.
Gao, Huiji, et al., “Cyber-Physical-Social Systems: Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Copyright 2011, pp. 10-14, IEEE Computer Society.
Lindsay, Bruce R., “Congressional Research Service, Social Media and Disasters: Current Uses, Future Options, and Policy Considerations,” CRS Report for Congress, Sep. 6, 2011, 10 pages, Congressional Research Service.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,228, filed Oct. 14, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Establishing an Account of a User at a Locker Bank.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,787, filed Mar. 6, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Delivering Parcels using Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,830, filed Mar. 6, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Suggesting Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,267, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Reserving Space Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,301, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Managing the Capacity of Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,432, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Re-Routing Parcels Intended for Delivery to Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,328, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Flexibly Activating Temporary Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,528, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Managing Item Pickup at Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,681, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Managing Signatures of Documents.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,724, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Returning Items to Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,029, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Managing Item Pickup at Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,114, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods of Locating and Selling Items at Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,241, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Defining Attributes of Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,306, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Determining Charges Related to the Delivery of a Parcel.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,354, filed Mar. 7, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Ranking Potential Attended Delivery/Pickup Locations.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155, filed Oct. 14, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Facilitating Delivery of a Parcel to a Suitably Sized Locker.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,000, filed Oct. 14, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Conveying a Parcel to a Consignee, for Example, After an Unsuccessful Delivery Attempt.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/561,062, filed Dec. 4, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Conveying a Parcel to a Consignee, for Example, After an Unsuccessful Delivery Attempt.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,276, filed Oct. 14, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Confirming an Identity of an Individual, for Example, at a Locker Bank.
Related Case—U.S. Appl. No. 14/561,041, filed Dec. 4, 2014, entitled Systems and Methods for Confirming an Identity of an Individual, for Example, at a Locker Bank.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 4, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060517.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 14, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/014280.
PCT International Search Report, dated Nov. 17, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/014280.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 17, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/014280.
PCT International Search Report, dated Apr. 22, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023538.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Apr. 22, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023538.
Office Action, dated Jun. 24, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,830.
PCT International Search Report, dated Jun. 10, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023554.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 10, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023554.
Office Action, dated Jun. 17, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,301.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 17, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023575.
PCT International Search Report, dated Nov. 25, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023575.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 25, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023575.
Office Action, dated May 6, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,432.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 8, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023583.
PCT International Search Report, dated Dec. 9, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023583.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 9, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023583.
PCT International Search Report, dated Jun. 9, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023597.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 9, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023597.
PCT International Search Report, dated Jan. 6, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023610.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 6, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023610.
PCT International Search Report, dated Dec. 8, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023629.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 8, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023629.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 22, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023629.
PCT International Search Report, dated Dec. 4, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023638.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 4, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023638.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 22, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023638.
PCT International Search Report, dated Jun. 15, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023643.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 15, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023643.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Apr. 22, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023649.
PCT International Search Report, dated Dec. 22, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023649.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 22, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023649.
Office Action, dated Jan. 28, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,241.
PCT International Search Report, dated Dec. 31, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023658.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 31, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023658.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 5, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023658.
PCT International Search Report, dated Nov. 25, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023665.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 25, 2014, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023665.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Apr. 23, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023665.
Office Action, dated Apr. 24, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,354.
PCT International Search Report, dated Feb. 3, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060503.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 3, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060503.
PCT International Search Report, dated Feb. 3, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060482.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 3, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060482.
Office Action, dated Mar. 11, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/561,062.
PCT International Search Report, dated Feb. 17, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060525.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 17, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060525.
Office Action, dated Feb. 23, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/561,041.
PCT International Search Report, dated Feb. 4, 2015, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060517.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Apr. 28, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/060482.
PCT International Search Report, dated May 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2015/0060757.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2015/0060757.
Office Action, dated Dec. 18, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,830.
Office Action, dated Jan. 14, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,328.
PCT International Search Report, dated Jan. 18, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023618.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 18, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023618.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 19, 2016, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/023597.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,000, dated Feb. 12, 2018, 43 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 18 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/060525, completed on Dec. 10, 2015, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 23 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/561,041, dated Mar. 30, 2018, 57 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/935,257, dated Apr. 20, 2017, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,681, dated Jul. 25, 2016, 17 pages.
Office Action received for European Patent Application No. 14714534.6, dated May 26, 2017, 5 pages.
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-501276, dated Nov. 1, 2016, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Official Copy).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-501287, dated Aug. 30, 2016, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Official Copy).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-501288, dated Nov. 1, 2016, 7 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Official copy).
Search Report and Written Opinion received for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201507531R, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 11 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion received for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201507549S, dated May 31, 2016, 11 pages.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings received for European Patent Application No. 14854011.5, dated Apr. 3, 2018, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,757, dated Jul. 19, 2018, 25 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 29 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201507536Q, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,432, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 22 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,276, dated Oct. 3, 2018, 11 pages.
Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,905,338, dated Oct. 2, 2018, 8 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,757, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 26 pages.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480067863.9, dated Dec. 24, 2018, 39 pages (15 pages of English Translation and 24 pages of Official Copy).
McNamara, Paul, “‘Doorman’ Kiosk Accepts Package Deliveries When You're Not Home”, Network world, Available at: <https://www.networkworld.com/article/2348365/data-cented-doorman--kiosk-accepts-package-deliveries-when-you-re-not-home.html>, Aug. 8, 2007, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201507531R, dated Jul. 19, 2018, 7 pages.
“Mobile Shipping Label”, Available online at: <www.mobilesolutions.fedex.com/shipping-label.html>, Retrieved on Sep. 25, 2013, pp. 1-2.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,697, dated Apr. 24, 2019, 18 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/514,155, dated Jun. 21, 2019, 28 pages.
Guler, N., “Containerization and Terminal Area Requirements”, Istanbul Technical University, Maritime Faculty, Available online at <URL:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/82785>, Jul. 2002, 20 pages.
Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,905,763, dated Jun. 18, 2019, 7 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/253,473, dated Jul. 25, 2019, 33 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/252,629, dated Jul. 23, 2019, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,442, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 9 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140222711 A1 Aug 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61759800 Feb 2013 US