Flow cytometers function by passing individual particles, such as cells, within a stream of fluid past a detector, which measures certain characteristics of each particle and takes actions based on that evaluation. To do that, the flow cytometer must regulate the flow of the sample so that the particles in the sample move into a substantially single-file particle stream, which enables each particle to be measured individually by the detector.
One area where flow cytometers have found practical use is in connection with sexing sperm cells, such as bovine sperm, according to sperm cell characteristics for use by the animal reproduction industry to preselect the sex of animal offspring. The most common method for sexing sperm cells is to discriminate based on DNA content. In this context, sperm is combined with an extender and a luminescent dye to stain the DNA inside the sperm cell. The stained sperm cells are then placed in a sample fluid which is introduced into a channel of a microfluidic chip that uses focusing techniques to orient the sperm cell into a substantially single-file stream. After being properly oriented, the sperm cells are illuminated with a light source (e.g., a laser), which excites the luminescent dye in the DNA, giving off a fluorescent luminescence which is detected by a detector (e.g., a photomultiplier tube (“PMT”) or an avalanche photodiode (APD)). A sperm containing the X chromosome has more DNA than a Y chromosome-bearing sperm, resulting in the X chromosome-bearing sperm producing more luminescence in response to the detection light source. The detected luminescence is monitored and the system takes selective action, e.g., sorting or killing non-selected sexed sperm with a kill laser, on the individual sperm cells to achieve an end product with the desired characteristics, e.g., a sample with a high concentration of either X or Y chromosome-bearing sperm. For example, if female calves are desired (e.g., for dairy production), then the system is calibrated to collect cells having detected luminescence parameters that are what would be expected of an X chromosome-bearing sperm cell. Alternatively, if male calves are desired (e.g., for beef production), then the system is calibrated to collect cells having detected luminescence parameters that are what would be expected of a Y chromosome-bearing sperm cell.
Sperm cells may also be distinguished based on DNA content by other methods that do not utilize a DNA dye. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,941,062 describes systems and methods of cytometry involving presenting a single sperm cell to at least one laser source configured to deliver light to the sperm cell in order to induce bond vibrations in the sperm cell DNA and detecting the signature of the bond vibrations. Sperm cells may also be analyzed and distinguished based on the presence or absence of cell surface markers or protein, through binding of a fluorescently labeled ligand, such as an antibody. Other methods for discriminating sperm cells may utilize other features of sperm cells, such as mass or volume, to differentiate between those that contain X-chromosomes and those that contain Y-chromosomes. These discrimination and detection methods similarly permit the cells to be selectively differentiated and for the sample to be sexed.
Sexing techniques include a variety of methods to sort, separate, eliminate, or inactivate unwanted cells. For example, so-called laser kill methods involve exposure of particular cells to a laser with sufficient energy to inactivate the cells. Cells may also be separated into populations through sorting, for example, through droplet formation and deflection as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,700,692.
In cell discrimination techniques, including sperm cell sexing applications, proper orientation, ordering, and location of the cells within the microfluidic system is essential to effective operation. For example, positioning and orientation are both essential for being able to effectively detect the difference in fluorescence of X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm cells stained with a DNA-intercalating dye, as both the positioning of cells within the beam of the detection laser and the orientation of the cells with respect to the detector significantly impact the amount of fluorescence detected. Alterations in the fluorescence, in turn, directly affect the ability to distinguish differences in the fluorescence signal between X-chromosome and Y-chromosome bearing cells. Further, during the sexing process, the various techniques used depend on the ability to accurately locate the cells within the fluid stream. For example, in laser kill sexing, the kill laser is narrowly focused in a particular spot and requires that the cells be positioned properly for the exposure to be effective to be inactivating the cell. Positioning of cells within the flow stream (i.e., up, down, left, and right, with respect to the axis of travel) and ordering (i.e., the distance between cells along the axis of travel) are also important for sorting techniques (i.e., droplet formation and deflection, thermal bubble sorting, etc.). Ordering of cells in a sample flow may be non-deterministic (i.e., follows a Poisson distribution) or deterministic (i.e., spacing). Ordering, therefore, refers to control of cell incidence in the sample flow.
Hydrodynamic focusing has been utilized to align cells, including sperm cells, in flow cytometry applications for many years, but it may have drawbacks. First, hydrodynamic focusing may involve multiple fluid streams, including one or more sheath fluid streams. Sheath fluid is consumable in the flow cytometric process and can be a significant cost. In addition, hydrodynamic focusing may involve microfluidic chips being designed and produced with complex sample and sheath flow channels, leading to relatively high costs for the microfluidic chips. The number of flow controllers required for each number of fluid inlets may also impact the cost. Further, hydrodynamic focusing relies on a consistent flow rate of the sheath flow, and fluctuations in flow rate, for example, due to a loss of pressure or occlusion of a sheath channel, can have adverse effects on cytometer performance.
Inertial flow focusing has been utilized for cell types, such as white blood cells and cancer cells. Those cells are significantly larger than sperm cells and are uniformly shaped (i.e., substantially spherical). In contrast, sperm cells are significantly smaller, non-uniform, and have a tail. As a result, the balance of forces acts differently on sperm cells than on other cell types.
Certain embodiments of the claimed invention are summarized below. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention, but rather serve as brief descriptions of possible forms of the invention. The invention may encompass a variety of forms which differ from these summaries.
According to an embodiment, particle focusing is achieved using a microchannel, wherein the ratio of the particle diameter (a) to the hydraulic diameter of the channel (Dh), defined by the formula a/Dh, is between about 0.03 and about 0.06, and/or wherein the ratio of curvature (radius “r” or “critical parameter”) to the hydraulic diameter of the channel, defined by the formula 2ra2/Dh3, is less than about 0.03.
As used herein, “focusing” refers to the spatial organization of cells into a desired formation, in particular, into a defined spatial width with reference to an axis along which the cells are moving in a microfluidic channel, and/or relative to a defined point of reference, such as the detection or kill laser focus point or both). In an embodiment, a focused flow of cells will all be within 3-5 times a given cell dimension (i.e., width, height, or length) of the center line of the axis of travel. In other embodiments, a focused flow of cells will all be within 2-3 times the cell dimension and in other embodiments within 1-2 times the cell dimensions.
Upon entering the microfluidic system, cells are initially unfocused (i.e., not within the desired spatial parameters); various forces can act on the cells within the flow stream to bring them within the desired spatial parameters (i.e., the cells are focused).
Other aspects will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the description and exemplary aspects and embodiments that follow.
For the purpose of illustrating the disclosure, there are depicted in the drawings certain features of the aspects and embodiments of the disclosure. However, the disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities of the aspects depicted in the drawings.
Before continuing to describe various aspects and embodiments in further detail, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to specific compositions or process steps and may vary. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular form “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges expressed herein are inclusive.
An embodiment of the microfluidic chip may be used in connection with sexing sperm cells such as bovine sperm, for example. In particular, the chip may be used in an apparatus that uses flow cytometry for sexing sperm cells according to DNA characteristics for use by the animal reproduction industry to preselect the sex of animal offspring. Briefly, sperm is combined with an extender and a luminescent dye to stain the DNA inside the sperm cell. The dye-stained sperm cells are then placed in a sample fluid which is introduced into a channel of the microfluidic chip. As the sperm cells are not spherical, the microfluidic chip substantially orients the sperm cells to reduce differences in detecting luminescence that may otherwise be caused by differences in the cell's orientation with respect to the detector.
The oriented sperm cells are then illuminated with a light source (e.g., detection laser), which excites the luminescent dye in the DNA, giving off a fluorescent luminescence which is detected by a detector (e.g., a photomultiplier tube (PMT) or an avalanche photodiode (APD)). The sperm containing the X chromosome has more DNA than the Y chromosome-bearing sperm, resulting in the X chromosome-bearing sperm producing more luminescence in response to the original illumination. The difference in total DNA content varies by species; for example in Bos taurus, the X chromosome has approximately 3.8% more DNA than the Y chromosome, which results in approximately a 3.8% difference in fluorescence.
In order to determine which cells to kill, an output signal of the detector representing the amplitude of detected luminescence is monitored. When the detected luminescence value exceeds a set threshold value, an event is considered to have begun. The luminescence value is monitored, and when an inflection point or “peak” is detected, the peak is considered to be the center of the cell, and the peak luminescence value is considered the luminescence value for that cell. If more than one peak is detected in a single event, the peak with the greatest amplitude is considered to be the center of the cell and the peak luminescence value is considered to be the luminescence value for that cell and the other peaks are disregarded.
The luminescence value for each sperm cell is compared to a gate, which has been previously defined, to determine whether the cell displays the desired luminescence. For example, if female calves are desired (e.g., for dairy production), then the gate is selected to include cells having detected luminescence parameters that are what would be expected of an X chromosome-bearing sperm cell. Alternatively, if male calves are desired (e.g., for beef production), then the gate is selected to include cells having detected luminescence parameters that are what would be expected of a Y chromosome-bearing sperm cell.
After passing through the detection laser and having their luminescence detected, the stained sperm cells, still in the stream, then pass into the kill zone. A second light source, e.g., the kill laser, is selectively activated to kill cells that fall outside of the selected gate as they pass through the kill zone.
In other embodiments, particle focusing according to the present invention can be utilized to distinguished sperm cells based on DNA content by methods that do not utilize a DNA dye. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,941,062 describes systems and methods of cytometry involving presenting a single sperm cell to at least one laser source configured to deliver light to the sperm cell in order to induce bond vibrations in the sperm cell DNA and detecting the signature of the bond vibrations. In other embodiments, sperm cells may be analyzed and distinguished based on the presence or absence of cell surface markers or protein, through binding of a fluorescently labeled ligand, such as an antibody. Other methods for discriminating sperm cells may utilize other features of sperm cells, such as mass or volume, to differentiate between those that contain X-chromosomes and those that contain Y-chromosomes. These discrimination and detection methods similarly permit the cells to be selectively differentiated and for the sample to be sexed. In further embodiments, sperm cells may be differentiated based on characteristics other than sex. For example, sperm cells may be differentiated on the basis of the presence or absence of a genetic marker or combination of markers, or cell surface protein.
In other embodiments, particle focusing as described herein may be used for semen sexing techniques to sort, separate, eliminate, or inactivate unwanted cells. For example, so-called laser kill methods involve exposure of particular cells to a laser with sufficient energy to inactivate the cells. Cells may also be separated into populations through sorting, for example, through droplet formation and deflection as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,700,692. Other sorting techniques for use in the present invention include, for example, bubble sort, acoustic, photonic pressure, holographic laser steering, and optical trapping.
The microfluidic chip according to the present design uses a repetitively curved microchannel for ordering and focusing particles in sample fluid mixture. The chip may be composed of one or more substrates in which the channel, or a portion of the channel, is formed. The substrate may be composed of one or more layers. The channel is a three-dimensional structure within the assembled one or more layers of the one or more substrates. In one embodiment, the chip may include two layers, a bottom layer and a top layer, that are stacked together to form the chip. In an embodiment, a repetitively curved portion of the microchannel is formed entirely on the bottom layer, while inlets and outlets to the microchannel may be formed on either or both chip layers. In other embodiments, the microchannel may be formed in two or more layers of a substrate, or multiple substrates. The repetitively curved portion consists of a repeating series of identically-shaped turns as is illustrated in
In use, a sample fluid is introduced into the microchannel through a sample inlet. In the context of bovine semen, the sample includes an ejaculate and a buffer. Upon entering the microchannel, the particles are randomly dispersed within the sample fluid. As the sample flows through, the microchannel of the particles are longitudinally ordered such that, upon exiting the curved portion, the particles are aligned longitudinally in a row. The microchannel may include horizontal/lateral and/or vertical tapering downstream of the curved portion to provide additional focusing of the particles before the fluid moves through a detection region (not shown).
The channels depicted above which permit only a single focusing position due to the regulating effect of Dean flows comprise 1.5 turns (
As shown in
According to an aspect, particle focusing is achieved using a repetitively curved microchannel:
wherein the ratio of the particle diameter (a) to the hydraulic diameter of the channel (Dh), defined by the formula a/Dh is between about 0.03 and about 0.06, and/or
wherein the ratio of curvature (radius “r” or “critical parameter”) to the hydraulic diameter of the channel) defined by the formula 2ra2/Dh3 is less than about 0.03.
In an another aspect, the particle may be bovine sperm cells. Bovine sperm cells are irregularly shaped and sperm cells are smaller, non-uniform (˜3 μm thick×5 μm wide×10 μm long) and have a tail. In this context, the diameter of the cell is considered to be on the order of about 3 μm to about 5 μm. Substantial particle focusing of bovine sperm cells is observed when the microfluidic channel geometries meet one or both of the above conditions. However, if the physical geometries fall outside these ranges, for example, if a/Dh is greater than about 0.06 or less than about 0.03, bovine sperm cells do not focus.
Any number of microfluidic system configurations can be designed to achieve certain specific results and/or properties associated with particle focusing within the various channel geometries. In the examples below, certain properties associated with the systems described herein will now be discussed in more detail. While certain experimental conditions may be discussed in reference to certain properties or parameters, it is to be understood that the properties and parameters are widely applicable to any of the channel geometries.
In one aspect, the inertial focusing design (
Core stream width (e.g., W_68, W_95, W_100) is the measured width of a certain percentage of the core stream, as measured using images taken by a stroboscope of the sample flowing through the microfluidic chip. For instance, W_68 is the measured width of the 68% of the core stream.
Flat percent, which is measured on a stroboscope, is the measurement of cells that are oriented with the broadest cross-section parallel to the top of the channel and therefore also perpendicular to the detector and ablation laser beam paths.
Edge-on percentage, which is measured on a stroboscope, is the measurement of cells with the narrowest cross-section perpendicular to the top of the channel, and therefore parallel to the laser beam paths.
In another aspect, a modified inertial focusing design (
In another aspect, the different modified design was tested, which incorporated a downstream element that includes a curvature in the channel without any on-chip dilution (
While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3390449 | Fox | Jul 1968 | A |
3649829 | Randolph | Mar 1972 | A |
3661460 | Elking et al. | May 1972 | A |
3710933 | Fulwyler et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3764901 | Kachel | Oct 1973 | A |
3791517 | Friedman | Feb 1974 | A |
4175662 | Zold | Nov 1979 | A |
4325706 | Gershman et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4395397 | Shapiro | Jul 1983 | A |
4409106 | Furuta et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4424132 | Iriguchi | Jan 1984 | A |
4660971 | Sage et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4667830 | Nozaki, Jr. et al. | May 1987 | A |
4765737 | Harris et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4885473 | Shofner et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4919817 | Schoendorfer et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4983038 | Ohki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5007732 | Ohki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030002 | North, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5100627 | Buican et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5125749 | Leugers et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5135759 | Johnson | Aug 1992 | A |
5180065 | Touge et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194909 | Tycko | Mar 1993 | A |
5229297 | Schnipelsky et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5483469 | Van den engh et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491550 | Dabbs | Feb 1996 | A |
5620857 | Weetall et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5674743 | Ulmer | Oct 1997 | A |
5689109 | Schultze | Nov 1997 | A |
5752606 | Wilson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5800690 | Chow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837115 | Austin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849178 | Holm et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858187 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5879625 | Rosianiec et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5966457 | Lemelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5985216 | Rens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008010 | Greenberger et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053856 | Hlavinka | Apr 2000 | A |
6071442 | Dean et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6146897 | Cohenford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159739 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159749 | Yagang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171865 | Weigl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185664 | Jeddeloh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213151 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
H1960 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2001 | H |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416190 | Grier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416959 | Giuliano et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451264 | Bhullar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494230 | Chow | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506609 | Wada | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519032 | Kuebler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519954 | Prien et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524860 | Seidel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540895 | Spence et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549275 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592821 | Wada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6637463 | Lei et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6727451 | Fuhr et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6808075 | Böhm et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833542 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838056 | Foster | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841388 | Dukor et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853654 | Mcdonald et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877528 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6944324 | Tran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976590 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7029430 | Hlavinka et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069943 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092154 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104405 | Böhm et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7208265 | Schenk | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7195920 | Seidel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7241988 | Gruber et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7276701 | Lendl | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298478 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300803 | Lin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311476 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312085 | Chou et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7355696 | Mueth et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355699 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7466734 | Day et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472794 | Oakey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482577 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492522 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7524681 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7569788 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576861 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584857 | Böhm et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611309 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7670471 | Quake et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697576 | Maier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760351 | Cox et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7820425 | Schenk | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826509 | Belkin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7956328 | Sundaram et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963399 | Böhm et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997831 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032200 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8080422 | Neas et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8123044 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8149402 | Rich | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158122 | Hampson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8173001 | Quake et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8174394 | Ridder et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8198092 | Durack et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206987 | Durack et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209987 | Hautman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8210209 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277764 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8388822 | Quake et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408399 | Böhm et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8502148 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529161 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8563325 | Bartsch et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8567608 | Deshpande et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569069 | Durack | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8623295 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8727131 | Deshpande et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731860 | Charles et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8784012 | Toner et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8863962 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8941062 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961904 | Xia et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8964184 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8981298 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000357 | Mueth et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9003869 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011797 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9109195 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9140690 | Mueth et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9255874 | Sharpe et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9260693 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9335247 | Sharpe et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9335295 | Mueth et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9339850 | Deshpande et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9365822 | Seidel et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9377400 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9446912 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9485984 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550215 | Deshpande et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9588100 | Appleyard et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618442 | Sharpe et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9683922 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
D791338 | Morkos et al. | Jul 2017 | S |
9752976 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9781918 | Zimmermann et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9802767 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823252 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9835552 | Wagner | Dec 2017 | B2 |
D815754 | Morkos et al. | Apr 2018 | S |
9943847 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9964968 | Sharpe et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10025322 | Lofstrom et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10029283 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10175159 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10180388 | Wagner | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10216144 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10315194 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
11187224 | Xia et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
1119387 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
11243494 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
20020027649 | Chudner | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042042 | Fahy | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020106716 | Leboeuf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115208 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020176069 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198928 | Bukshpan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007894 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032204 | Walt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047676 | Grier et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054365 | Xu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054558 | Kurabayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068646 | Singh et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030113709 | Alivisatos et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030175944 | Yang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186426 | Brewer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040043506 | Haussecker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079893 | Dietz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089798 | Gruber et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144648 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161772 | Bohm et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166504 | Rossier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040206399 | Heller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217297 | Moses et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229349 | Daridon | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266022 | Sundararajan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037471 | Liu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061962 | Mueth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050103690 | Kawano et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112541 | Durack et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050121604 | Mueth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050123450 | Gilbert | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124869 | Hefti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148085 | Larsen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153354 | Gilmanshin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190372 | Dogariu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196876 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207940 | Butler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207943 | Puzey | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013270 | Yumoto et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035273 | Quake et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043301 | Mantele et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058167 | Regusa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078888 | Griffiths | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105453 | Brenan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152707 | Kanda | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170912 | Mueth et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060252047 | Ekstrom et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257089 | Mueth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263829 | Evans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009386 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078348 | Holman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114172 | Mueth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128082 | Yang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070207551 | Glensbjerg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070247620 | Koo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248958 | Jovanovich et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255362 | Levinson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003685 | Goix et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014574 | Viator et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080069733 | Maltezo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080144037 | Mueth et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080166188 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195020 | Cabuz et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213821 | Liu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248966 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261295 | Butler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080292555 | Ye et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299013 | Trieu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309919 | Birmingham et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311005 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090029870 | Ward et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032449 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042241 | Yu-Chong et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051912 | Salazar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090114285 | Hashimoto et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125242 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141279 | Hillmer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156932 | Zharov | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170149 | Viator et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090176271 | Durack et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201504 | Ho et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225319 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281250 | DeSimone et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290156 | Popescu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044570 | McGill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100068723 | Jovanovich et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079516 | Nakazawa | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100171954 | Quake et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100216208 | Mueth et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100248362 | Durack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100330693 | Chapin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001963 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003303 | Pagano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003324 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003325 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003330 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008764 | Silva et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008767 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008817 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008818 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110075928 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076712 | Gilligan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090500 | Hu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110190146 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223654 | Holman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256523 | Mendele et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263747 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294139 | Takeda | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009619 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028366 | Krager et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033220 | Kotidis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033697 | Goyal et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120081709 | Durack | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120082362 | Diem et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120107805 | Neas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120122084 | Wagner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138152 | Villarruel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120183947 | Mueth et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196356 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120199741 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120199742 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202237 | Sedoglavich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202277 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202278 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204628 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120225474 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225475 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273054 | Lou et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287419 | Sharpe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307244 | Lou et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130121877 | Ono | May 2013 | A1 |
20130164773 | Bardell et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130200277 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224843 | Evans et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252237 | Wagner | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130295602 | Fowler | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313170 | Bohm et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140033808 | Ding et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050540 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140091014 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140224710 | Di Carlo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273192 | Sharpe | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287243 | Weber et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318645 | Koksal | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140339446 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361148 | Popescu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150064694 | Sadri | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150114093 | Appleyard et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150192511 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198517 | Simpson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276588 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160004060 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160123858 | Kapur et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160199835 | Tachibana et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170016813 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170333902 | Masaeli | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180266937 | de Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190025212 | Evans | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190040356 | Durack et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190160439 | Muto et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190187044 | Appleyard et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190390164 | Morjal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20220026341 | Appleyard et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1341328 | Dec 2001 | CA |
1482369 | Mar 2004 | CN |
1886315 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101189504 | May 2008 | CN |
0057907 | Aug 1982 | EP |
0282994 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0679325 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0471758 | Sep 1996 | EP |
2798557 | Mar 2001 | FR |
502971 | May 1939 | GB |
2507959 | May 2014 | GB |
57-131451 | Aug 1982 | JP |
58090513 | May 1983 | JP |
S 64-26125 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64074451 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02105041 | Apr 1990 | JP |
03297385 | Dec 1991 | JP |
H0526799 | Feb 1993 | JP |
06265452 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06327494 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07024309 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07286953 | Oct 1995 | JP |
2552582 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H10512952 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H11508182 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000146819 | May 2000 | JP |
2000512541 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001504936 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002503334 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002153260 | May 2002 | JP |
2003106980 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003515738 | May 2003 | JP |
2004093553 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005502482 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005530986 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006524054 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-514522 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007148981 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007514522 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007515936 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008533440 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008261295 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009085872 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009115672 | May 2009 | JP |
2010117197 | May 2010 | JP |
2010151777 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010190680 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2011145185 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2014503195 | Feb 2014 | JP |
WO9622521 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO9700442 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO9739338 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO9747390 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9810267 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9939223 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO20000070080 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0118400 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0131315 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2001040766 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0185913 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO200241906 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2002081183 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02087792 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03024163 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03062867 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO03078065 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2003078065 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004012133 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004029221 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004043506 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004088283 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO20040088283 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005023391 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005075629 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO20050075629 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2006119806 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO20060119806 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007008495 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007133710 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008114458 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008130977 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008126064 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008130977 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009032449 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009134395 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2010129441 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2012068287 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012112641 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO20120112641 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO20130018273 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2013173446 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO2005037471 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2015063552 | May 2015 | WO |
2017201546 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO2018047011 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO2018047011 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018151680 | Aug 2018 | WO |
WO2020092321 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Di Carlo et al. “Equilibrium Separation and Filtration of Particles Using Differential Inertial Focusing” Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2204-2211 (Year: 2008). |
“Hydraulic Diameter”, Neutrium, Apr. 1, 2012, https://neutrium.net/fluid-flow/hydraulic-diameter/ (Year: 2012). |
Gossett et al. “Particle Focusing Mechanisms in Curving Confined Flows” Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8459-8465 (Year: 2009). |
Di Carlo et al. “Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels” PNAS Nov. 27, 2007 vol. 104 No. 48 18893 (Year: 2007). |
Di Carlo, D. “Inertial microfluidics” Lab Chip, 2009, 9, 3038-3046 (Year: 2009). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/033557, dated Jul. 11, 2019, 13 pages. |
Japan Patent Office; “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-088655, dated Feb. 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
Sell, “Cellular Origin of Cancer: Dedifferentiation or Stem Cell Maturation Arrest?”, Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 101, Suppl. 5, 1993, p. 15-26. |
Shapiro et al., “Pratical Flow Cytometry,” Fourth Edition, New Jersey: John W. Wiley & Sons, 2003, 733 pages. |
Sharpe et al.,“Advances in Flow Cytometry for Sperm Sexing,” Theriogenology, vol. 71, 2009, pp. 4-10. |
Short, “Raman Spectroscopy Detects Biochemical Changes Due to Proliferation in Mammalian Cell Cultures,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, Jun. 2005, pp. 427 4-4288. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Apr. 12, 2018, 14 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Sep. 20, 2018, 6 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Jan. 2, 2018, 15 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 17 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated May 4, 2017, 13 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with US Patent Application 15/174,681, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 16 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Nov. 27, 2018, 10 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Oct. 18, 2013, 46 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 66 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 9 pages. |
USPTO, “Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Sep. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Jun. 15, 2017, 19 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Dec. 23, 2014, 11 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 17 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 8 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 9 pages. |
Wang et al., Detection of endogenous biomolecules in Barrett's esophagus by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, PNAS, vol. 104, No. 40, Oct. 2, 2007, p. 15864-15869. |
Webster, Merriam, “Definition of “successive,” Merriam Webster's Online Dictionary, accessed at http://www.merriamwebster com/dictionary/successive,” Jun. 18, 2013, 1 page. |
Weida et al., “Quantum Cascade Laser Based Replacement for FTIR Microscopy,” http://www.daylightsolutions. :: om/assets/003/5308.pdf, accessed online Aug. 2, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2017/001289, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application Serial No. PCT/IP2017/001289, dated Apr. 3, 2018, 21 pages. |
Mehrnoush Malek et al: flowDensity: reproducing manual gating of flow cytometry data by automated density-based cell population identification11 , BIOINFORMATICS., vol. 31, No. 4, Oct. 16, 2014 (Oct. 16, 2014), pp. 306-607. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application Serial No. PCT/IB2018/001641, dated Jun. 25, 2020 4 pages. |
China Patent Office, “The Fourth Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Jan. 3, 2021, 25 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japan Patent Application No. 2019-088655, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 5 pages. |
Johnson LA et al., Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations, Gamete Research. Jan. 1987. 16(1):1-9. (Johnson 1987). |
Paape et al., Flow Cytometry: A Versatile Tool for Studies on Cells From Domestic Animals, National Cytometry Symposium, Abstract Only, Dec. 14, 1997, https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=86408. |
Keij, J.F. et al., “High-Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using a Frequency-Doubled Argon Ion Laser.” Cytometry 19 (1995): 209-216. (Keij 1995). |
Keij, J.F., “Introduction to High-Speed Flow Sorting.” Flow and Image Cytometry. Series H: Cell Biology, 95 (1996) 213-227. (Keij 1996). |
Johnson LA, Welch GR, Rens W. “The Beltsville sperm sexing technology: high-speed sperm sorting gives improved sperm output for in vitro fertilization and AI.” J Anim Sci 1999. 77:213-220. |
Counterclaim Defendants Abs Global Inc.'s and Genus PLC's Invalidity Contentions. Abs Global, Inc., v.Inguran, LLC D/B/A Sexing Technologies and. XY, LLC v. Genus PLC. Case No. 14-cv-503 United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; pp. 1, 43-114, and 168-177. |
ABS Global, Inc. And Genus PLC's Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law That The Asserted Claims Of The '987 Patent Are Invalid For Lack Of Enablement And, In The Alternative, For A New Trial. ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC & XY, LLC v. Genus PLC. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed on Jul. 3, 2020. |
Brief in Support of ABS Global, Inc. And Genus PLC's Motion for Judgment as A Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims Of The '987 Patent Are Not Enabled. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a STGENETICS, XY, LLC, and CYTONOME/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v.ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, and PREMIUM GENETICS (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc. Filed Sep. 6, 2019. |
ABS Global, Inc. And Genus Plc Renewed Motion for Judgment As A Matter Of Law That The Asserted Claims Of The 987 Patent Are Invalid For Lack Of Enablement And, In The Alternative, For A New Trial. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a STGENETICS, XY, LLC, and CYTONOME/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v.ABS GLOBAL, INC., 3ENUS PLC, and PREMIUM GENETICS (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc. filed Jul. 3, 2020. |
ABS Global, Inc. And Genus PLC's Reply In Support Of Their Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law That The Asserted Claims Of The '987 Patent Are Invalid For Lack Of Enablement And, In The Alternative, For A New Trial. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a STGENETICS, XY, LLC, and CYTONOME/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v. ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, and PREMIUM GENETICS (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: :17-cv-00446-wmc. Filed Aug. 17, 2020. |
ABS GLOBAL, INC. and GENUS PLC's Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law That The Asserted Claims Of The 987 And '092 Patents Are Invalid. ABS GLOBAL, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a SEXING TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. GENUS PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Aug. 9, 2016. |
ABS GLOBAL, INC. and GENUS PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law And Rule 59 Motion For A New Trial. ABS GLOBAL, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a SEXING TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. 3ENUS PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Sep. 2, 2016. |
Opinion and Order of the United States District Court For The Western District Of Wisconsin. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. INGURAN, LLC d/b/a SEXING TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. GENUS PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. riled Mar. 31, 2017. |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 14-CV-503. ABS GLOBAL, NC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and GENUS PLC, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. INGURAN, LLC, doing business as SEXING TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee, and XY, LLC, Intervening Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed: Mar. 8, 2019. |
Judge's Opinion & Order in Case No. 14-cv-503-wmc. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. INGURAN, LLC di b/a Sexing TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. GENUS PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Jul. 21, 2016. |
ABS Global Inc. and GENUS PLC's Reply in Support of Their Motion for Claim Construction and Partial Summary Judgment, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Mar. 7, 2016. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608, dated Oct. 21, 2021, 11 pages. |
Trial Transcript, Sep. 5, 2019 (a.m.); ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case Nos. 17-cv-446 and 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. |
Brief in Support of ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Filed Sep. 2, 2016. |
Inguran, LLC and XY, LLC's Response To ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion Fof Judgment as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for New Trial, pp. 9-28, 33-36, 73-74. Filed Sep. 23, 2016. |
ST's Response To ABS's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of The '987 Patent Are Invalid for Lack of Enablement and, in the Alternative, for a New Trial, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Filed: Jul. 24, 2020. |
Clinical Laboratory Instruments and In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents, Personnel Department of the State Food and Drug Administration, et al., pp. 17-21, China Medical Science and Technology Publishing House, Oct. 31, 2010). |
Dicarlo “Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Nov. 27, 2007, PNAS, 18892-18897, vol. 104, No. 48. |
Dicarlo “Equilibrium Separation and Filtration of Particles Using Differential Inertial Focusing” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Anal Chem 2008, 8, 2204-2211. |
Dicarlo “Inertial Microfluidics: High-Throughput Focusing and Separation of Cells and Particles” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Twelfth International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, Oct. 12-16, 2008, San Diego, California, USA. |
Altendorf et al., “Results Obtained Using a Prototype Microfluidics-Based Hematology Analyzer,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 1998 Symposium, 73-76 (Oct. 1998). |
Nieuwenhuis et al., “Particle-Shape Sensing-Elements for Integrated Flow Cytometer,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2001 Symposium, 357-358 (Oct. 21, 2001). |
Nieuwenhuis et al. “Virtual Flow Channel: A Novel Micro-fluidics System with Orthogonal, Dynamic Control of Sample Flow Dimensions,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2002 Symposium, vol. 1, 103-105 (Nov. 3, 2002). |
Nieuwenhuis, J., et al. “Integrated flow-cells for novel adjustable sheath flows.” Lab Chip, 2003, 3, 56-61 (Mar. 2003. |
Shoji, S., et al. “Design and fabrication of micromachined chemical/biochemical systems.” RIKEN Rev., vol. 36, pp. 8-11, 2001. |
Lin, C., et al. “A Novel Microflow Cytometer with 3-dimensional Focusing Utilizing Dielectrophoretic and Hydrodynamic Forces.” The Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2003. MEMS-03 Kyoto. IEEE, Kyoto, Japan, 2003, pp. 439-442. |
Miyake et al., “A Development of Micro Sheath Flow Chamber,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Workshop 1991, 265-270 (Jan. 1991). |
Tashiro et al., “Design and Simulation of Particles and Biomolecules Handling Micro Flow Cells with Three-Dimensional Sheath Flow,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2000 Symposium, 209-212 (May 14, 2000). |
Weigl, B. et al. “Design and Rapid Prototyping of Thin-Film Laminate-Based Microfluidic Devices.” Biomedical Microdevices, 3:4, pp. 267-274, 2001. |
Blankenstein, G. et al. “Modular concept of a laboratory on a chip for chemical and biochemical analysis.” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 13. No. 3-4, pp. 427-438, 1998. |
Shapiro, Practical Flow Cytometry, 15-17, 133-135 (3rd ed. 1995). |
Shapiro, Practical Flow Cytometry, 55-57, 166-169 (4th ed. 2003). |
International Search Report for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2014/001425 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
Herweijer, H. et al., “High Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using Bromodeoxyuridine/Hoechst 33342 Photosensitized Cell Killing”, Radiobiological Institute TNO, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Jun. 1, 1987. |
Johnson, L.A., et al., “Sex Preselection: High-Speed Flow Cytometric Sorting of X and Y Sperm for Maximum Efficiency” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, Sep. 23, 1999. |
Bazyer H., et al., “Views and Reviews—Compact 151W Green Laser with U-Type Resonator for Prostate Surgery”, Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 47, Apr. 27, 2013, 237-241. |
Keij, J. et al., “High-Speed Photodamage Cell Sorting: An Evaluation of the ZAPPER Prototype”, Methods in Cell Biology, 1994; pp. 371-386, vol. 42, Chapter 22, Academic Press, Inc. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014 in connection with PCT/US2013/050669. |
Kachel, V, et al., “Uniform Lateral Orientation, caused by Flow Forces, of Flat Particles in Flow-Through Systems”, The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 774-780, 1977. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/943,322 dated Sep. 12, 2014. |
Fulwler, M., “Hydrodynamic Orientation of Cells”, The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 781-783, 1977. |
Khodjakov A., et al., “A Synergy of Technologies: Combining Laser Microsurgery with Green Fluorescent Protein Tagging”, Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 38:311-317 (1997), Division of Molecular Medicine and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Albany, New York. |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,929,275, dated May 4, 2020, 8 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2019202882, dated Mar. 26, 2020, 3 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR122017012966-0, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Reconsideration Report by Examiner before Appeal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-551082, dated Jul. 12, 2019, 17 pages. 20090114285. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015, dated Jan. 20, 2020, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with patent application No. 19182993.6, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 11 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 34 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 19 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2014343391, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued in connection with application PCT/IB/001425, dated May 3, 2016, 11 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Non Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-551082, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 5 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 720575, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 5 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “Further Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 720575, dated Apr. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification of First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Mar. 16, 2018, 31 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “Further Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 735496, dated Aug. 31, 2018, 2 pages. |
Drobnis et al., Cold Shock Damage is due to Lipid Phase Transitions in Cell Membranes: A Demonstration Using Sperm as a Model, The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1993, 265:432-437. |
Way et al., Comparison of four staining methods for evaluating acrosome status and viability of ejaculated and cauda epididymal bull spermatozoa, Theriogenology, 1995, 43(8): 1301-1316. |
Marian et al., Hypo-osmotic Shock Induces an Osmolality-dependent Permeabilization and Structural Changes in the Membrane of Carp Sperm, 1993, 41(2):291-297. |
Molecular Probes Inc., Product Information, Influx Pinocy1ic Cell-Loading Reagent (1-14402), Revised Feb. 1, 2001, 1-7. |
Parks, Processing and Handling Bull Semen for Artificial Insemination—Don't Add Insult to Injury!, Department of Animal Sciences, Cornell University, 2001, retrieved on May 29, 2015, retrieved from the internet: http://www/ansci.cornell.edu/bullsemen.pdf. |
Mammal (Online Datasheet), Wikipedia, 2003, retrieved on Aug. 13, 2018, retrieved from internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20031230110838/hllps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammal. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000295, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 19 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000295, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 14 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-543990, dated Jul. 31, 2019, 23 pages. |
Al-Holy et al., “The Use of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to Differentiate Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Other Bacteria Inoculated Into Apple Juice,” Food Microbiology, vol. 23, 2006, 162-168. |
Alberts et al., “Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th edition,” New York: Garland Science, 2008, p. 1293. |
Barcot et al., “Investigation of Spermatozoa and Seminal Plasma by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 61, No. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 309-313. |
Bassan et al; “Reflection Contributions to the Dispersion Artefact in FIIR Spectra of Single Biological Cells,” Analyst, vol. 134, Apr. 9, 2009, pp. 1171-1175. |
Bassan et al; “Resonant Mie Scattering in Infrared Spectrascopy of Biological Materials—Understanding the Dispersion Artefact,” Analyst, vol. 134, 2009, pp. 1586-1593. |
Bassan et al; “Resonant Mie Scattering {RMieS) Correction of Infrared Spectra From Highly Scattering Biological Samples,” Analyst, vol. 135, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 268-277. |
Belkin et al.; “Intra-Cavity Absorption Spectroscopy with Narrow-Ridge Microfluidic Quantum Cascade Lasers,” Applies Express, vol. 15, No. 18, Sep. 3, 2007, pp. 11262-11271. |
Boustany et al.; “Microscopic Imaging and Spectroscopy with Scattered Light,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 12, 2010, pp. 285-314. |
Chan et al.; “Nondestructive Identification of Individual Leukemia Cells by Laser Trapping Raman Spectroscopy,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, No. 6, Mar. 15, 2008, 8 pages. |
Chan et al.; “Label-Free Biochemical Characterization of Stem Cells Using Vibrational Spectroscopy,” Journal of Biophotonics vol. 2, No. 11, Aug. 5, 2009, pp. 656-668. |
Chan et al.; “Label-Free Separation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells {hESCs) and their Cardiac Derivatives using Raman Spectroscopy,” Lawrence Livermore Journal, LLNL-JRNL-406938, Sep. 11, 2008, 30 pages. |
Chen et al,; “Synchrotron Infrared Measurements of Protein Phosphorylation in Living Single PC12 Cells during Neuronal Differentiation,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 84, 2012, pp. 4118-4125. |
Cheng et al., “Laser-Scanning Coherent Anti-Strokes Raman Scattering Microscopy and Applications to Cell Biology,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 83, Jul. 2002, pp. 502-509. |
Cho et al., “Passively Driven Integrated Microfluidic System for Separation of Motile Sperm,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 75, Apr. 1, 2003, Abstract. |
Cho et al., A Microfluidic Device For Separating Motile Sperm From Nonmotile Sperm Via Inter-Streamline. |
Cleary et al., “Infrared Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor,” OSA Biomed, Miami, Florida, Apr. 2010, 6 pages. |
Dousseau et al., “On the Spectral Subtraction of Water from the FT-IR Spectra of Aqueous Solutions of Proteins,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 43, No. 3, 1989, pp. 538-542. |
Downes et al., “Optical Spectroscopy for Noninvasive Monitoring of Stem Cell Differentation,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2010, Article ID 101864, 2010, 10 pages. |
Ege, “Organic Chemistry: Structure and Reactivity,” Fifth Edition, Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004, pp. 453-457. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11841869.8, dated Feb. 15, 2018, 9 pages. |
Fu et al., “A Microfabricated Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, Nov. 1999, pp. 1109-1111. |
Green et al., “Flow Cytometric Determination of Size and Complex Refractive Index for Marine Particles: Comparison with Independent and Bulk Estimates,” Applied Optics, vol. 42, No. 3, Jan. 20, 2003, pp. 526-541. |
Harvey et al., “Discrimination of Prostate Cancer Cells by Reflection Mode FTIR Photoacoustic Spectroscopy,” The Analyst, vol. 132, 2007, pp. 292-295. |
Herzenberg et al., “Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting,” Scientific American, vol. 234, Mar. 1976, pp. 108-117. |
Holman et al., “Synchrotron-Based FTIR Spectromicroscopy: Cytotoxicity and Heating Considerations,” Journal of Biological Physics, vol. 29, 2003, pp. 275-286. |
Holman et al., “IR Spectroscopic Characteristics of Cell Cycle and Cell Death Probed by Synchrotron Radiation Based Fourier Transform IR Spectromicroscopy,” Biopolymers (Biospectroscopy) vol. 57, 2000, pp. 329-335. |
Holman et al., “Tracking Chemical Changes in a Live Cell: Biomedical Applications of SR-FTIR Spectromicroscopy,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9k185794, Berkeley, CA Jul. 25, 2002, 34 pages. |
Huser et al., “Raman Spectroscopy of DNA Packaging in Individual Human Sperm Cells Distinguishes Normal From Abnormal Cells,” Journal of Biophotonics, vol. 2, No. 5, 2009, pp. 322-332. |
Intel, “Intel C-bank Tunable Laser, Performance and Design,” White Paper, May 2003, 14 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/41123, dated Aug. 19, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/061046, dated May 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/041123, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-539983, dated Jul. 8, 2015, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-539983, dated Jul. 2, 2016, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-198323, dated Oct. 2, 2017, 3 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-198323, dated Jul. 25, 2018, 9 pages. |
Lee et al., “DFB Quantum Cascade Laser Arrays,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 45, No. 5, May 9, pp. 554-565. |
Ibbus et al., “Incidence of Chromosome Aberrations in Mammalian Sperm Stained with Hoechst 33342 and UV-aser Irradiated During Flow Sorting,” Mutation Research, vol. 182, 1987, pp. 265-274. |
Malone, Jr., “Infrared Microspectroscopy: A Study of the Single Isolated Bread Yeast Cell,” Thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010, 162 pages. |
Meister et al., “Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy as an Analytical Tool to Assess the Mitochondral Status in Human Spermatozoa,” Analyst, vol. 135, 2010, pp. 1370-1374. |
Miyamoto et al., “Label-free Detection and Classification of DNA by Surface Vibration Spectroscopy in Conjugation with Electrophoresis,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, No. 053902, 2005, 3 pages. |
Mohlenhoff et al., “Mie-Type Scattering and Non-Beer-Lambert Absorption Behavior of Human Cells in Infared Microspectroscopy,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, May 2005, pp. 3635-3640. |
Montag et al., “Laser-induced Immobilization and Plasma Membrane Permeabilization in Human Spermatozoa,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp. 846-852. |
Mourant et al., “Methods for Measuring the Infrared Spectra of Biological Cells,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 48, 2003, pp. 243-257. |
Van Munster, “Interferometry in Flow to Sort Unstained X-and Y-Chromosome-Bearing Bull Spermatozoa,” Cytometry, vol. 47, 2002, pp. 192-199. |
Rajagopalan et al., “Aneuploidy and Cancer,” Nature, vol. 432, Nov. 2004, pp. 338-341. |
Ropcke et al., “Application of Mid-Infrared Tuneable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy to Plasma Diagnostics: A Review,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, vol. 15, 2006, S148-S168. |
Schaden et al., “Quantum Cascade Laser Modulation for Correction of Matrix-Induced Background Changes in Aqueous Samples,” Applied Physics B, vol. 86, 2007, pp. 347-351. |
Sandt et al., “Identification of Spectral Modifications Occurring during Reprogramming of Somatic Cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Issue 4, e30743, Apr. 2012, 7 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Nov. 29, 2021, 13 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 201917009874, dated Nov. 25, 2021, 6 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2017323502, dated Oct. 22, 2021, 6 pages. |
Jokinen, Ville, et al. “Durable superhydrophobicity in embossed CYTOP fluoropolymer micro and nanostructures”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 434, 2013, pp. 207-212. |
Forsberg, Pontus, Fredrik Nikolajeff, and Mikael Karlsson, “Cassie-Wenzel and Wenzel-Cassie transitions on immersed superhydrophobic surfaces under hydrostatic pressure”, Soft Matter, vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 104-109. |
Lu, Hang, Martin A. Schmidt, and Klavs F. Jensen, “Photochemical reactions and on-line UV detection in microfabricated reactors”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 1, No. 1, 2001, pp. 22-28. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-513891, dated Jun. 24, 2021, 11 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR112019004727-1, dated Jul. 6, 2021, 4 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2017323502, dated Jun. 28, 2021, 6 pages. |
China Office Action, Application No. 201780056064.5, dated Apr. 26, 2021, 8 pages. |
China Office Action, Application No. 201780056064.5, dated Nov. 4, 2020 11 pages. |
Europe Office Action, Application No. 17808998.3, dated Jul. 21, 2020. |
Pedreira Carlos E et al: “Overview of clinical flow cytometry data analysis: recent advances and future challenges”, Trends in Biotechnology, Elsevier Publications, Cambridge, GB, vol. 31, No. 7, Jun. 5, 2013. |
China Patent Office, “The Third Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 23 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 3429/DELNP/2015, dated Mar. 26, 2018, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office,“European Search Report,” issued in connection with patent application No. 20167363.9, dated Jul. 21, 2020, 9 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japan Patent Application No. 2018-220397, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 16723498.8, dated Oct. 12, 2020, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14168200.5, dated Mar. 20, 2015, 12 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 17172322.4, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 15160613.4, dated Jul. 24, 2015, 14 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 17172322.4, dated Aug. 14, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11193936.9, dated Dec. 11, 2015, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 15160613.4, dated Jul. 11, 2016, 4 pages. |
Hori et al., “Cell fusion by optical trapping with laser-involves contacting different cells with each other then imparting high voltage pulse to cells,” WPI/Thompson, Dec. 27, 1991, Abstract, 1 page. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-185743, dated Jul. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Final Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-256171, dated Oct. 28, 2014, 5 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Decision for Grant,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-091320, dated May 6, 2017, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Final Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-091320, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 22 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-185743, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 2 pages. |
Smith et al., “Inexpensive Optical Tweezers for Undergraduate Laboratories,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 67, No. 1, Jan. 1999, 10 pages. |
Takayama et al., “Patterning Cells and Their Environments Using Multiple Laminar Fluid Flows in Capillary Networks,” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, 1999, 4 pages. |
Ts'O, Basic Principles in Nucleic Acid Chemistry, National Library of Medicine, 1974, pp. 311-387. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/050669, dated Jan. 28, 2016, 15 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 13889551, dated May 22, 2017, 12 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 14 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-168904, dated Jul. 6, 2018, 3 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Third Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Nov. 1, 2018, 20 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2016-527978 dated Mar. 28, 2017, 8 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 18 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, dated Dec. 4, 2020, 138 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, dated Jul. 21, 2020, 59 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, dated Jul. 21, 2020, 96 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 137 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/458,947, dated Dec. 15, 2021, 9 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,514, dated Jan. 3, 2022, 24 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/852,303, dated Jan. 6, 2022, 27 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 202147003036, dated Jan. 4, 2022, 5 pages. |
China Patent Office, “The Fifth Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 2014800719520, dated Oct. 20, 2021, 7 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 202017054203, dated Jan. 7, 2022, 5 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2021200818, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 3 pages. |
Kang, et al. “Effect of an osmotic differential on the efficiency of gene transfer by electroporation offish spermatozoa.” Aquaculture 173.1-4 (1999): 297-307. (Year: 1999). |
Rieth et al. “Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry DNA containing highly repetitive sequences into oocytes and detection of homologous recombination events.” Molecular Reproduction and Development: Incorporating Gamete Research 57.4 (2000): 338-345. |
Chamberland et al. “The effect of heparin on motility parameters and protein phosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation. ”Theriogenology 55.3 (2001): 823-835. (Year: 2001). |
Chan, et al. “Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging.” Current opinion in biotechnology 13.1 (2002): 40-46. (Year: 2002). |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/561,146, dated Jan. 21, 2022, 14 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/496,469, dated Jan. 28, 2022, 13 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190358634 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62675512 | May 2018 | US |