The present invention is related to systems and methods for data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for noise predictive filtering in data processing.
Data processing circuits often include a data detector circuit including noise predictive filtering. The noise predictive filtering includes a number of pattern dependent filters that use a common output from the data detector circuit to select one target used by all of the pattern dependent filters. In some cases, the identified target is less than ideal resulting in a degraded operation of the associated data processing circuit.
Hence, for at least the aforementioned reasons, there exists a need in the art for advanced systems and methods for data processing.
The present invention is related to systems and methods for data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for noise predictive filtering in data processing.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide data processing circuits that include: a noise predictive filter circuit, a data detector circuit, and a first and a second pattern dependent adaptive target circuits. The noise predictive filter circuit includes at least a first pattern dependent filter circuit operable to perform noise predictive filtering on a data input for a first pattern using a first adaptive target to yield a first noise predictive output, and a second pattern dependent filter circuit operable to perform noise predictive filtering on the data input for a second pattern using a second adaptive target to yield a second noise predictive output. The data detector circuit is operable to apply a data detection algorithm to the first noise predictive output and the second noise predictive output to yield a detected output. The first pattern dependent adaptive target circuit is operable to adaptively calculate the first adaptive target based at least in part on the first noise predictive output and a training sequence. The second pattern dependent adaptive target circuit operable to adaptively calculate the second adaptive target based at least in part on the second noise predictive output and the training sequence.
In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the training sequence is a portion of the detected output corresponding to the data input. In other instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the training sequence is a known data set stored in a memory. The data detection algorithm may be, but is not limited to, a Viterbi data detection algorithm or a maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm. Of note, the general phrase “Viterbi data detection algorithm” is used in its broadest sense to mean any Viterbi detection algorithm or variations thereof including, but not limited to, bi-direction Viterbi detection algorithm. Also, the general phase “maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm” is used in its broadest sense to mean any maximum a posteriori detection algorithm or variations thereof including, but not limited to, simplified maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm and a max-log maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm.
In various instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing circuit further includes a data decoding circuit operable to apply a data decode algorithm to the detected output to yield a decoded output. In some cases, the data decode algorithm is a low density parity check algorithm. In particular cases, the data processing circuit further includes: an analog to digital converter circuit operable to convert an analog input into a series of digital samples; and an equalizer circuit operable to receive the series of digital samples and to equalize the series of digital samples to yield the data input.
In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, adaptively calculating the first adaptive target based at least in part on the first noise predictive output and a training sequence includes multiplying an ideal output by a programmable adaptation gain. In some such instances, the ideal output is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
where D is the depth of a pattern, T is the adaptive target, and b is the training sequence.
Other embodiments of the present invention provide methods that include: receiving a data input; pattern dependent filtering the data input using a first pattern dependent filter for a first pattern using a first adaptive target to yield a first noise predictive output; pattern dependent filtering the data input using a second pattern dependent filter for a second pattern using a second adaptive target to yield a second noise predictive output; applying a data detection algorithm to the first noise predictive output and the second noise predictive output to yield a detected output; calculating in a first pattern dependent adaptive target circuit the first adaptive target based at least in part on the first noise predictive output and a training sequence; and calculating in a second pattern dependent adaptive target circuit the second adaptive target based at least in part on the second noise predictive output and the training sequence.
Yet other embodiments of the present invention provide A storage devices that include: a storage medium; a head assembly disposed in relation to the storage medium and operable to provide a sensed signal corresponding to information on the storage medium; and a read channel circuit. The read channel circuit includes: an analog to digital converter circuit operable to sample an analog signal derived from the sensed signal to yield a series of digital samples; an equalizer circuit operable to equalize the digital samples to yield an equalized output; a noise predictive filter circuit including at least a first pattern dependent filter circuit operable to perform noise predictive filtering on the equalized output for a first pattern using a first adaptive target to yield a first noise predictive output, and a second pattern dependent filter circuit operable to perform noise predictive filtering on the equalized output for a second pattern using a second adaptive target to yield a second noise predictive output; a data detector circuit operable to apply a data detection algorithm to the first noise predictive output and the second noise predictive output to yield a detected output; a first pattern dependent adaptive target circuit operable to adaptively calculate the first adaptive target based at least in part on the first noise predictive output and a training sequence; and a second pattern dependent adaptive target circuit operable to adaptively calculate the second adaptive target based at least in part on the second noise predictive output and the training sequence.
This summary provides only a general outline of some embodiments of the invention. Many other objects, features, advantages and other embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
A further understanding of the various embodiments of the present invention may be realized by reference to the figures which are described in remaining portions of the specification. In the figures, like reference numerals are used throughout several figures to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sub-label consisting of a lower case letter is associated with a reference numeral to denote one of multiple similar components. When reference is made to a reference numeral without specification to an existing sub-label, it is intended to refer to all such multiple similar components.
The present invention is related to systems and methods for data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for noise predictive filtering in data processing.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide a noise predictive filter including a bank of pattern dependent filter circuits each operating based upon a respective pattern and governed at least in part by an adaptive target. A respective adaptive target is calculated for each of the pattern dependent filter circuits. Such an approach provides target values adapted for individual pattern dependent filter circuits. By allowing the target values to adjust for a particular pattern dependent filter circuit independent of target values for other pattern dependent filter circuits, the target values more closely adapt actual conditions.
Turning to
Analog to digital converter circuit 114 converts processed analog signal 112 into a corresponding series of digital samples 116. Analog to digital converter circuit 114 may be any circuit known in the art that is capable of producing digital samples corresponding to an analog input signal. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of analog to digital converter circuits that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. Digital samples 116 are provided to an equalizer circuit 120. Equalizer circuit 120 applies an equalization algorithm to digital samples 116 to yield an equalized output 125. In some embodiments of the present invention, equalizer circuit 120 is a digital finite impulse response filter circuit as are known in the art.
Equalized output 125 is provided to a buffer circuit 140 that provides a buffered output 142 to noise predictive filter circuit 130. In particular, buffered output 142 is provided in parallel to a number of pattern dependent filter circuits (P.D.F. Circuit A 132, P.D.F. Circuit B 134, P.D.F. Circuit A 136, P.D.F. Circuit A 138) that are included as part of noise predictive filter circuit 130. Each of the pattern dependent filter circuits is tuned to perform noise predictive filtering for a particular pattern and using an adaptive target. In particular, operation of pattern dependent filter circuit 132 is tuned to a particular pattern and governed at least in part by an adaptive target 179; operation of pattern dependent filter circuit 134 is tuned to another particular pattern and governed at least in part by an adaptive target 177; operation of pattern dependent filter circuit 136 is tuned to another particular pattern and governed at least in part by an adaptive target 175; and operation of pattern dependent filter circuit 138 is tuned to another particular pattern and governed at least in part by an adaptive target 173.
Pattern dependent filter circuit 132 filters buffered output 142 according to a first pattern and governed by adaptive target 179 to yield a noise predictive output 133. Similarly, pattern dependent filter circuit 134 filters buffered output 142 according to a second pattern and governed by adaptive target 177 to yield a noise predictive output 135; pattern dependent filter circuit 136 filters buffered output 142 according to a first pattern and governed by adaptive target 175 to yield a noise predictive output 137; and pattern dependent filter circuit 138 filters buffered output 142 according to a first pattern and governed by adaptive target 173 to yield a noise predictive output 139. Pattern dependent filter circuits 132, 134, 136, 138 may be any filter circuits known in the art that are capable of providing a pattern dependent filtered output using an target input. In one particular embodiment, noise predictive filter circuit 130 includes eight pattern dependent filter circuits each tuned to a different three bit pattern (i.e., ‘000’, ‘001’, ‘010’, ‘011’, ‘100’, ‘101’, ‘110, and ‘111’), and a corresponding number of noise predictive outputs.
Noise predictive outputs 133, 135, 137, 139 are provided to a data detector circuit 150. Data detector circuit 150 applies a data detection algorithm to a selected one of noise predictive outputs 133, 135, 137, 139 to yield a detected output 152. The data detection algorithm may be any data detection algorithm known in the art. In some embodiments of the present invention, the data detection algorithm is a Viterbi algorithm data detection as is known in the art. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of data detection algorithms that may be implemented as part of data detector circuit 150 in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention. Detected output 152 is provided to data decoder circuit 160 that applies a decode algorithm to detected output 152 to yield a decoded output 162. The data decode algorithm may be any data decode algorithm known in the art. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the data decode algorithm is a low density parity check (LDPC) algorithm as are known in the art.
Where data decoder circuit 160 does not converge (i.e, fails to result in the properly decoded data set), decoded output 162 is fed back to data detector circuit 150 where it is used to guide a subsequent data detection of buffered output 142 by data detector circuit 150. Alternatively, where data decoder circuit 160 converges (i.e, results in the properly decoded data set), decoded output 162 is provided as an output from data processing circuit 100.
As shown in
Returning to
error=(noise predictive output−ideal output)2.
The ideal output is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
where i corresponds to a particular one of pattern dependent adaptive target circuits (pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 178, pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 176, pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 174, or pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 172); D is the depth of the path (i.e., the number of bits in the pattern). T is the adaptive target that is provided by the particular pattern dependent adaptive target circuit provided to the corresponding pattern dependent filter circuit. b is the corresponding portion of training bit sequence 190. Using this ideal output, the error is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
A scaled derivative of the error is set forth in the following equation:
η is a programmable adaptation gain. Adaptively resolving this equation results in values of an adaptive target provided to a corresponding pattern dependent filter circuit. Adaptive resolution is done using the following equation:
In some cases, initially T1 may be set to a value of ‘1’, and T2 and T3 are each initially set to a value of ‘0’.
As set forth above, the target adaptation is pattern dependent. As an example, the adaptation of the respective target values may proceed as:
Using pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 178 as an example, the following equation is used to adaptively calculate adaptive target 179 (T1, T2, T3):
adaptive target 179=T1,T2,T3(Next Period)=
Similarly, using pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 176 as an example, the following equation is used to adaptively calculate adaptive target 177 (T1, T2, T3):
adaptive target 177=T1,T2,T3(Next Period)=
using pattern dependent adaptive target circuit 174 as an example, the following equation is used to adaptively calculate adaptive target 177 (T1, T2, T3):
adaptive target 175=T1,T2,T3(Next Period)=
and
adaptive target 173=T1,T2,T3(Next Period)=
Such an approach provides target values adapted for individual pattern dependent filter circuits. By allowing the target values to adjust for a particular pattern dependent filter circuit independent of target values for other pattern dependent filter circuits, the target values more closely adapt actual conditions.
Turning to
Noise predictive filtering is applied to the equalized output (block 320). In particular, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a first pattern (e.g., ‘000’) using a first target to yield a first noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a second pattern (e.g., ‘001’) using a second target to yield a second noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a third pattern (e.g., ‘010’) using a third target to yield a third noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a fourth pattern (e.g., ‘011’) using a fourth target to yield a fourth noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a fifth pattern (e.g., ‘100’) using a fifth target to yield a fifth noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a sixth pattern (e.g., ‘101’) using a sixth target to yield a sixth noise predictive output, pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a seventh pattern (e.g., ‘110’) using a seventh target to yield a seventh noise predictive output, and pattern dependent filtering on the equalized output is performed for a eighth pattern (e.g., ‘111’) using an eighth target to yield an eighth noise predictive output. Of note, flow diagram 300 is described as including eight pattern dependent filter circuits, but other embodiments of the present invention may be implemented to include more or fewer than eight pattern dependent filter circuits.
A data detection is performed using the eight noise predictive outputs to yield a detected output (block 325). In some embodiments of the present invention, the data detection is a Viterbi algorithm data detection as is known in the art. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize other data detection algorithms that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. Data decoding is applied to the detected output to yield a decoded output (block 335). The decoding algorithm may be, but is not limited to, a low density parity check decoding algorithm as are known in the art. It is determined whether the decoding converged (block 340). Where the decode algorithm converged (i.e., there are no remaining unsatisfied checks)(block 340), the decoded output is provided as a data output (block 345). Alternatively, where the data decoding algorithm failed to converge (i.e., there are remaining unsatisfied checks) (block 340), the decoded output is provided to guide a subsequent performance of the data detection algorithm to yield an updated detected output (block 325).
The detected output and the eight noise predictive outputs are used to calculate updated target values (block 330). In particular, an updated first target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated second target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated third target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated fourth target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated fifth target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated sixth target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
an updated seventh target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
and an updated eighth target is calculated in accordance with the following equation:
These updated target values are used to perform a subsequent noise predictive filtering (block 320). In some cases, initially T1 may be set to a value of ‘1’, and T2 and T3 are each initially set to a value of ‘0’.
As set forth above, the target adaptation is pattern dependent. As an example, the adaptation of the respective target values may proceed as:
Turning to
In a typical read operation, read/write head assembly 476 is accurately positioned by motor controller 468 over a desired data track on disk platter 478. Motor controller 468 both positions read/write head assembly 476 in relation to disk platter 478 and drives spindle motor 472 by moving read/write head assembly to the proper data track on disk platter 478 under the direction of hard disk controller 466. Spindle motor 472 spins disk platter 478 at a determined spin rate (RPMs). Once read/write head assembly 478 is positioned adjacent the proper data track, magnetic signals representing data on disk platter 478 are sensed by read/write head assembly 476 as disk platter 478 is rotated by spindle motor 472. The sensed magnetic signals are provided as a continuous, minute analog signal representative of the magnetic data on disk platter 478. This minute analog signal is transferred from read/write head assembly 476 to read channel circuit 410 via preamplifier 470. Preamplifier 470 is operable to amplify the minute analog signals accessed from disk platter 478. In turn, read channel circuit 410 decodes and digitizes the received analog signal to recreate the information originally written to disk platter 478. This data is provided as read data 403 to a receiving circuit. A write operation is substantially the opposite of the preceding read operation with write data 401 being provided to read channel circuit 410. This data is then encoded and written to disk platter 478.
During a read operation, data received from preamplifier circuit 470 is converted from an analog signal to a series of corresponding digital samples, and the digital samples are equalized to yield an equalized output. The equalized output is then provided to a noise predictive filter circuit that includes a number of pattern dependent filter circuits. The output from the pattern dependent filter circuits are used in relation to a data detection algorithm to yield a detected output. The multi-pattern noise predictive filter adaptation circuitry is operable to adaptively train a respective target for each of the pattern dependent filter circuits. The multi-pattern noise predictive filter adaptation circuitry may be implemented similar to that described above in relation to
It should be noted that storage system 400 may be integrated into a larger storage system such as, for example, a RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks or redundant array of independent disks) based storage system. It should also be noted that various functions or blocks of storage system 100 may be implemented in either software or firmware, while other functions or blocks are implemented in hardware.
Turning to
It should be noted that the various blocks discussed in the above application may be implemented in integrated circuits along with other functionality. Such integrated circuits may include all of the functions of a given block, system or circuit, or only a subset of the block, system or circuit. Further, elements of the blocks, systems or circuits may be implemented across multiple integrated circuits. Such integrated circuits may be any type of integrated circuit known in the art including, but are not limited to, a monolithic integrated circuit, a flip chip integrated circuit, a multichip module integrated circuit, and/or a mixed signal integrated circuit. It should also be noted that various functions of the blocks, systems or circuits discussed herein may be implemented in either software or firmware. In some such cases, the entire system, block or circuit may be implemented using its software or firmware equivalent. In other cases, the one part of a given system, block or circuit may be implemented in software or firmware, while other parts are implemented in hardware.
In conclusion, the invention provides novel systems, devices, methods and arrangements for data processing. While detailed descriptions of one or more embodiments of the invention have been given above, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents will be apparent to those skilled in the art without varying from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5278703 | Rub | Jan 1994 | A |
5278846 | Okayama et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5317472 | Schweitzer, III | May 1994 | A |
5325402 | Ushirokawa | Jun 1994 | A |
5392299 | Rhines et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5471500 | Blaker et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5513192 | Janku et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523903 | Hetzler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550870 | Blaker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5612964 | Haraszti | Mar 1997 | A |
5701314 | Armstrong et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710784 | Kindred et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712861 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717706 | Ikeda | Feb 1998 | A |
5768044 | Hetzler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5802118 | Bliss et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844945 | Nam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5898710 | Amrany | Apr 1999 | A |
5923713 | Hatakeyama | Jul 1999 | A |
5978414 | Nara | Nov 1999 | A |
5983383 | Wolf | Nov 1999 | A |
6005897 | McCallister et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023783 | Divsalar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029264 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041432 | Ikeda | Mar 2000 | A |
6065149 | Yamanaka | May 2000 | A |
6097764 | McCallister et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6145110 | Khayrallah | Nov 2000 | A |
6216249 | Bliss et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216251 | McGinn | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229467 | Eklund et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266795 | Wei | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317472 | Choi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351832 | Wei | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377610 | Hagenauer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381726 | Weng | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438717 | Butler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473878 | Wei | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476989 | Chainer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6625775 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657803 | Ling et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671404 | Kawatani et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748034 | Hattori et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757862 | Marianetti, II | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785863 | Blankenship et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788654 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810502 | Eidson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6889154 | Ashley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6980382 | Hirano et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986098 | Poeppelman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010051 | Murayama et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047474 | Rhee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058873 | Song et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073118 | Greenberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093179 | Shea | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113356 | Wu | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7136244 | Rothberg | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7173783 | McEwen et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184486 | Wu et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191378 | Eroz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203015 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203887 | Eroz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7236757 | Raghaven et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257764 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7310768 | Eidson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313750 | Feng et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7370258 | Iancu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7403752 | Raghaven et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430256 | Zhidkov | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7502189 | Sawaguchi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505537 | Sutardja | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523375 | Spencer | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7587657 | Haratsch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590168 | Raghaven et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590927 | Shih et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7702989 | Graef et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712008 | Song et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738201 | Jin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743314 | Stockmanns et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752523 | Chaichanavong | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7801200 | Tan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802163 | Tan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7944639 | Wang | May 2011 | B1 |
8027409 | Aziz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8184390 | Xia et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
20030063405 | Jin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081693 | Raghavan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087634 | Raghavan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112896 | Raghavan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134607 | Raghavan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040071206 | Takatsu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098659 | Bjerke et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050010855 | Lusky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050078399 | Fung | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111540 | Modrie et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157780 | Werner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195749 | Elmasry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216819 | Chugg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050249318 | Minemura | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273688 | Argon | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020872 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031737 | Chugg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060123285 | De Araujo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140311 | Ashley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168493 | Song et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176947 | Lim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195772 | Graef et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210002 | Yang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248435 | Haratsch | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256670 | Park et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259263 | Ashley et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011569 | Casado et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047121 | Eleftheriou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047635 | Stojanovic et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110200 | Mergen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070230407 | Petrie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286270 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049825 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055122 | Tan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065970 | Tan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069373 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080168330 | Graef et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080276156 | Gunnam | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301521 | Gunnam | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100101578 | Zhongwang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090161245 | Mathew et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161747 | Aziz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185643 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199071 | Graef | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235116 | Tan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235146 | Tan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259915 | Livshitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268575 | Tan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273492 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274247 | Galbraith et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100002795 | Raghaven et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042877 | Tan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042890 | Gunnam | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050043 | Savin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061492 | Noeldner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070837 | Xu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100164764 | Nayak | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185914 | Tan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110075569 | Marrow et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080211 | Yang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110167246 | Yang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0522578 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0631277 | Dec 1994 | EP |
1814108 | Aug 2007 | EP |
WO 2006016751 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006134527 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007091797 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2010126482 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010101578 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,198, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,283, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/540,283, filed Aug. 12, 2009, Liu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,201, filed Jan. 5, 2010, Mathew, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/763,050, filed Apr. 19, 2010, Ivkovic, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,555, filed Jun. 2, 2010, Liu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,317, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Xia, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,330, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Zhang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,369, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Liu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,816, filed Oct. 11, 2010, Li, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,742, filed Oct. 11, 2010, Yang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,756, filed Nov. 2, 2010, Miladinovic, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,931, filed Nov. 17, 2010, Yang, Shaohua. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,947, filed Nov. 17, 2010, Ivkovic, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/972,942, filed Dec. 20, 2010, Liao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/992,948, filed Nov. 16, 2010, Yang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,814, filed Feb. 7, 2011, Jin, Ming, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/031,818, filed Feb. 22, 2011, Xu, Changyou, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,129, filed Mar. 17, 2011, Tan, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,765, filed Mar. 17, 2011, Yang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,119, filed Apr. 15, 2011, Zhang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,146, filed Apr. 15, 2011, Li, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,178, filed Apr. 15, 2011, Sun, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/126,748, filed Apr. 28, 2011, Tan. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/167,764, filed Jun. 24, 2011, Li, Zongwang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/167,771, filed Jun. 24, 2011, Li, Zongwang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/167,775, filed Jun. 24, 2011, Li, Zongwang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,146, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Mathew, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,213, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Mathew, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,234, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,251, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,174, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Mathew, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,197, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Mathew, George et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,751, filed Aug. 19, 2011, Zhang, Fan, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,808, filed Aug. 19, 2011, Jin, Ming. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,142, filed Aug. 29, 2011, Chang, Wu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,538, filed Sep. 8, 2011, Yang, Shaohua, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,544, filed Sep. 8, 2011, Yang, Shaohua, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,683, filed Sep. 22, 2011, Xu, Changyou. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,719, filed Sep. 22, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,342, filed Oct. 2, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,832, filed Oct. 10, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,852, filed Oct. 10, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,819, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Tan, Weijun, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,730, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Zhang, Fan, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,754, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Zhang, Fan, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,767, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Zhang, Fan, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,826, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Tan, Weijun, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/295,150, filed Nov. 14, 2011, Li, Zongwang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/295,160, filed Nov. 14, 2011, Li, Zongwang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,340, filed Oct. 3, 2011, Xia, Haitao, et al. |
Amer et al “Design Issues for a Shingled Write Disk System” MSST IEEE 26th Symposium May 2010. |
Bahl, et al “Optimal decoding of linear codes for Minimizing symbol error rate”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 20, pp. 284-287, Mar. 1974. |
Casado et al., Multiple-rate low- denstiy parity-check codes with constant blocklength, IEEE Transations on communications, Jan. 2009, vol. 57, pp. 75-83. |
Collins and Hizlan, “Determinate State Convolutional Codes” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Dec. 1993. |
Eleftheriou, E. et al., “Low Density Parity-Check Codes for Digital Subscriber Lines”, Proc ICC 2002, pp. 1752-1757. |
Fisher, R et al., “Adaptive Thresholding”[online] 2003 [retrieved on May 28, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/adpthrsh.htm. |
Fossnorier, Marc P.C. “Quasi-Cyclic Low-Density Parity-Check Codes From Circulant Permutation Maricies” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 8 Aug. 8, 2004. |
Gibson et al “Directions for Shingled-Write and Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording System” Architectures: Synergies with Solid-State Disks Carnegie Mellon Univ. May 1, 2009. |
K. Gunnam et al., “Next Generation iterative LDPC solutions for magnetic recording storage”, invited paper. The Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 2008. |
K. Gunnam et al., “Value-Reuse Properties of Min-Sum for GF(q)” (dated Oct. 2006) Dept. of ECE, Texas A&M University Technical Note, published about Aug. 2010. |
K. Gunnam et al., “Value-Reuse Properties of Min-Sum for GF(q)”(dated Jul. 2008) Dept. of ECE, Texas A&M University Technical Note, published about Aug. 2010. |
K. Gunnam “Area and Energy Efficient VLSI Architectures for Low-Density Parity-Check Decoders Using an On-The-Fly Computation” dissertation at Texas A&M University, Dec. 2006. |
Han and Ryan, “Pinning Techniques for Low-Floor Detection/Decoding of LDPC-Coded Partial Response Channels”, 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes &Related Topics, 2008. |
Hagenauer, J. et al A Viterbi Algorithm with Soft-Decision Outputs and its Applications in Proc. IEEE Globecom, pp. 47. 11-47 Dallas, TX Nov. 1989. |
Lee et al., “Partial Zero-Forcing Adaptive MMSE Receiver for DS-CDMA Uplink in Multicell Environments” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech. vol. 51, No. 5, Sep. 2002. |
Lin et al “An efficient VLSI Architecture for non binary LDPC decoders”—IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems II vol. 57, Issue 1 (Jan. 2010) pp. 51-55. |
Mohsenin et al., “Split Row: A Reduced Complexity, High Throughput LDPC Decoder Architecture”, pp. 1-6, printed from www.ece.ucdavis.edu on Jul. 9, 2007. |
Moon et al, “Pattern-dependent noise prediction in signal-dependent Noise,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 19, No. 4 pp. 730-743, Apr. 2001. |
Perisa et al “Frequency Offset Estimation Based on Phase Offsets Between Sample Correlations” Dept. of Info. Tech. University of ULM 2005. |
Sari H et al., “Transmission Techniques for Digital Terrestrial TV Broadcasting” IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Service Center NY, NY vol. 33, No. 2 Feb. 1995. |
Selvarathinam, A.: “Low Density Parity-Check Decoder Architecture for High Throughput Optical Fiber Channels” IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD '03) 2003. |
Shu Lin, Ryan, “Channel Codes, Classical and Modern” 2009, Cambridge University Press, pp. 213-222. |
Unknown, “Auto threshold and Auto Local Threshold” [online] [retrieved May 28, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.dentristy.bham.ac.uk/landinig/software/autoth. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Low-Density Parity-Check Codes Based on Anti-Pasch Affine Geometries,” Proc ICC 2002, pp. 1332-1336. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Girth-Eight Codes on Rectangular Integer Lattices”, IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 52, Aug. 2004, pp. 1248-1252. |
Wang Y et al., “A Soft Decision Decoding Scheme for Wireless COFDM With Application to DVB-T” IEEE Trans. on Consumer elec., IEEE Service Center, NY,NY vo. 50, No. 1 Feb. 2004. |
Weon-Cheol Lee et al., “Vitierbi Decoding Method Using Channel State Info. in COFDM System” IEEE Trans. on Consumer Elect., IEEE Service Center, NY, NY vol. 45, No. 3 Aug. 1999. |
Xia et al, “A Chase-GMD algorithm of Reed-Solomon codes on perpendicular channels”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42 pp. 2603-2605, Oct. 2006. |
Xia et al, “Reliability-based Reed-Solomon decoding for magnetic recording channels”, IEEE International Conference on Communication pp. 1977-1981, May 2008. |
Yeo et al., “VLSI Architecture for Iterative Decoders in Magnetic Storage Channels”, Mar. 2001, pp. 748-755, IEEE trans. Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 2. |
Youn, et al. “BER Perform. Due to Irrreg. of Row-Weight Distrib. of the Parity-Chk. Matirx in Irreg. LDPC Codes for 10-Gb/s Opt. Signls” Jrnl of Lightwave Tech., vol. 23, Sep. 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Area-Efficient Min-Sum Decoder VLSI Architecture for High-Rate QC-LDPC Codes in Magnetic Recording”, pp. 1-15, Submitted 2006, not yet published. |
Zhong, “Block-LDPC: A Practical LDPC Coding System Design Approach”, IEEE Trans. On Circuits, Regular Papers, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 766-775, Apr. 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Design of VLSI Implementation-Oriented LDPC Codes”, IEEE, pp. 670-673, 2003. |
Zhong et al., “High-Rate Quasi-Cyclic LDPC Codes for Magnetic Recording Channel with Low Error Floor”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 3546-3549, May 2006. |
Zhong et al., “Iterative MAX-LOG-MAP and LDPC Detector/Decoder Hardware Implementation for Magnetic Read Channel”, SRC TECHRON, pp. 1-4, Oct. 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Joint Code-Encoder Design for LDPC Coding System VLSI Implementation”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 389-392, May 2004. |
Zhong et al., “Quasi Cyclic LDPC Codes for the Magnetic Recording Channel: Code Design and VLSI Implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, v. 43, pp. 1118-1123, Mar. 2007. |
Zhong, “VLSI Architecture of LDPC Based Signal Detection and Coding System for Magnetic Recording Channel”, Thesis, RPI, Troy, NY, pp. 1-95, May 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130077186 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |