Systems and methods for performing an intraocular procedure for treating an eye condition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12318330
  • Patent Number
    12,318,330
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 29, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 3, 2025
    7 days ago
Abstract
The invention provides an excimer laser system including a means for calibrating laser output to compensate for increased variation in laser optical fibers.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates to medical devices, and, more particularly, to an excimer laser system including a means for calibrating laser output to compensate for increased variation in laser optical fibers.


BACKGROUND

In the medical industry, there are many surgical devices, instruments, and systems comprised of individual components that must work together properly to ensure treatment is performed safely and effectively. It is critical that any given component falls within an acceptable tolerance to ensure that the component physically fits and interacts appropriately with other components and functions as intended.


The actual production of any product (or operation of any system) involves some inherent variation of input and output. Measurement error and statistical uncertainty are also present in all measurements. Accordingly, tolerance is an inherent aspect when designing a device, instrument, or system. The concept of tolerance, sometimes referred to as engineering tolerance, relates to the permissible limit or limits of variation in a physical dimension of the component, a measured value or physical property of the component, spacing between the component and another component, and the like. Accordingly, if a component falls outside of a permissible tolerance (i.e., the component is too small, too large, fails to have acceptable properties, etc.), then the overall device, instrument, or system will fail to perform as designed.


One example of a surgical system composed of multiple components is a medical laser system. The medical laser system generally consists of a laser unit and a separate laser probe having an optical fiber for directing laser radiation from the laser unit to a treatment area. Laser units provide laser light at specific wavelengths and, as a result, may be designed to perform specific procedures. For example, certain procedures may require photocoagulation of a target tissue, which occurs upon delivery of laser radiation at a first wavelength, while other procedures may require photoablation of a target tissue, which occurs upon delivery of laser radiation at a second wavelength. In turn, optical fibers to be used with these laser systems may have specific dimensions, material compositions, and/or functional properties (i.e., operation at specific temperatures and wavelengths) so as to function as intended with the corresponding laser unit.


While current laser units allow for some tolerance (i.e., optical fiber dimensions, properties, or conditions may have some variation without significantly affecting functioning of the laser system), the range of permissible tolerance is exceedingly tight. For example, optical fibers have a very small diameter which is generally measured on the micron scale. The diameter of the optical fiber may impact the transmission of laser radiation through the optical fiber and thus may impact the laser radiation emitted from the delivery tip of the optical fiber. As such, there is very little room for variation in the manufacture of optical fibers. Manufacturing costs are increases as a result of the high degree of precision required to make sure the diameter of an optical fiber falls within the permissible tolerance. Furthermore, if a given optical fiber falls outside of a permissible tolerance (i.e., the diameter is too be or too small), use of the noncompliant optical fiber may result in transmission of laser radiation that is not at the desired wavelength. In turn, use of a noncompliant optical fiber runs the risk of providing an ineffective treatment and, in some instance, can cause additional unintended damage and harm.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides a system for calibrating output from a laser source to compensate for increased variation in laser optical fibers. In such a system, the elements generally include a laser source for generating laser energy to be provided to one of a plurality of laser probes couplable thereto. Each laser probe includes an optical fiber, including a fiber optic core, adapted to direct laser radiation from the laser source, through the fiber, and to a desired the treatment area. The system further includes a laser management system for managing the laser source. The management system includes a control system configured to adjust laser energy output from the laser source to any given laser probe to maintain a consistent level of laser radiation delivered to the target area, despite variation in the fiber optic core of any given laser probe.


More specifically, as part of the initial setup, the control system receives data associated with a laser probe coupled to the laser source. The data may include one or more dimensions of the fiber optic core of the laser probe, including fiber optic core diameter. The data is then analyzed by the controller and, based on the analysis, a determination of an optimum level of laser energy output from the laser source is made. The optimum level of laser energy output from the laser source is based on a correlation of the laser probe data, such as specific dimensions of the fiber optic core, with calibration data. The calibration data may generally include a plurality of sets of values, wherein each set of values may include a laser energy output level from the laser source, a diameter of a fiber optic core of a laser probe to receive the laser energy output level, and the resulting wavelength value of laser radiation emitted from the delivery tip of the laser probe. In a preferred embodiment, the resulting wavelength value of laser radiation to be emitted from the delivery tip remains constant, regardless of the diameter of the fiber optic core. In such an embodiment, the laser management system (i.e., the control system) automatically adjusts the laser energy output level from the laser source (i.e., increases or decreases output level) for any given diameter of a fiber optic core so as to maintain the emission of laser radiation upon a target area at a consistent wavelength, despite variation in the diameter of fiber optic cores from the plurality of laser probes.


Accordingly, the system of the present invention is able to compensate for wide range of variations across a plurality of laser probes by simply adjusting output of the laser source to account for such variations. In turn, the manufacture tolerance for optical fibers improves as less precision is required during the manufacturing process, which reduces overall costs. Furthermore, by fine tuning of the laser output, the laser radiation is maintained at a consistent wavelength, ensuring that the target area is treated as intended and patient safety is maintained.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 diagrams an excimer laser system of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 diagrams the excimer laser system of the present disclosure and a means for calibrating laser output to compensate for increased variation in optical fibers of laser probes.



FIG. 3 diagrams a process of calibrating laser output, including adjustment of laser energy output from the laser source to a laser probe to account for variation in the fiber optic core of the laser probe.



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment an excimer laser unit.



FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a probe for use with the excimer laser system.



FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of the probe taken along line A-A of FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional view of the probe taken along line B-B of FIG. 5.



FIG. 8 shows an embodiment a laser probe attached to an excimer laser unit.



FIG. 9 shows an enlarged view of a connection between the laser probe and the excimer unit and delivery of an adjusted laser energy output level to the laser probe based on calibration techniques.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention provides a system for calibrating output from a laser source to compensate for increased variation in laser optical fibers. In such a system, the elements generally include a laser source for generating laser energy to be provided to one of a plurality of laser probes couplable thereto. Each laser probe includes an optical fiber, including a fiber optic core, adapted to direct laser radiation from the laser source, through the fiber, and to a desired the treatment area. The system further includes a laser management system for managing the laser source. The management system includes a control system configured to adjust laser energy output from the laser source to any given laser probe to maintain a consistent level of laser radiation delivered to the target area, despite variation in the fiber optic core of any given laser probe.


Accordingly, the system of the present invention is able to compensate for wide range of variations across a plurality of laser probes by simply adjusting output of the laser source to account for such variations. In turn, the manufacture tolerance for optical fibers improves as less precision is required during the manufacturing process, which reduces overall costs. Furthermore, by fine tuning of the laser output, the laser radiation is maintained at a consistent wavelength, ensuring that the target area is treated as intended and patient safety is maintained.


The system of the present invention is particularly well suited for intraocular procedures in which laser treatment of target tissues is desired. In particular, the laser source, laser management system, and laser probes of the present invention are preferably used for treating glaucoma and useful in performing a laser trabeculostomy. However, it should be noted that the system consistent with the present disclosure can be used in any laser treatment of various conditions, including other eye conditions (i.e., diabetic eye diseases, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular oedema, cases of age-related macular degeneration, retinal tears, and retinopathy of prematurity, and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive errors, such as short-sightedness (myopia) or astigmatism) as well as other conditions in general and other practice areas (non-ocular practice areas).



FIG. 1 diagrams an excimer laser system, including a laser unit system 100 and a laser probe 200 to be attached to the laser unit system 100. The system 100 includes a laser source 102, and a laser management system 108. The laser probe 200 includes a fiber core 204. As will be described in greater detail herein, many of the components of the laser unit system 100 may be contained in a housing, such as a moveable platform, to be provided in a setting in which the procedure is to be performed (e.g., operating room, procedure room, outpatient office setting, etc.) and the probe 200 may connect to the housing for use during treatment. Upon coupling the probe 200 to the housing, the fiber core 202 is coupled to the laser source 102 and adapted to direct laser radiation from the laser source 102, through the fiber, and to the treatment area.


The laser source 102 includes an excimer laser 104 and a gas cartridge 108 for providing the appropriate gas combination to the laser 104. The excimer laser 104 is a form of ultraviolet laser that generally operates in the UV spectral region and generates nanosecond pulses. The excimer gain medium (i.e., the medium contained within the gas cartridge 106) is generally a gas mixture containing a noble gas (e.g., argon, krypton, or xenon) and a reactive gas (e.g., fluorine or chlorine). Under the appropriate conditions of electrical stimulation and high pressure, a pseudo-molecule called an excimer (or in the case of noble gas halides, exciplex) is created, which can only exist in an energized state and can give rise to laser light in the UV range.


Laser action in an excimer molecule occurs because it has a bound (associative) excited state, but a repulsive (dissociative) ground state. Noble gases such as xenon and krypton are highly inert and do not usually form chemical compounds. However, when in an excited state (induced by electrical discharge or high-energy electron beams), they can form temporarily bound molecules with themselves (excimer) or with halogens (exciplex) such as fluorine and chlorine. The excited compound can release its excess energy by undergoing spontaneous or stimulated emission, resulting in a strongly repulsive ground state molecule which very quickly (on the order of a picosecond) dissociates back into two unbound atoms. This forms a population inversion. The excimer laser 104 of the present system 100 is an XeCl excimer laser and emits a wavelength of 308 nm.


The laser management system 108 manages the laser source 102. In particular, as shown in FIG. 2, the laser management system 108 includes a controller 110 (also referred to herein as a “control system 110”). The controller 110 provides an operator (i.e., surgeon or other medical professional) with control over the output of laser signals (from the laser source 102 to the fiber core 202) and, in turn, control over the transmission of laser energy from the fiber core 202 of the probe 200. However, prior to providing an operator with control over laser output, the laser management system 108 provides a calibration process in which laser energy output from the laser source 102 to the laser probe 200 is calibrated to maintain a consistent level of laser radiation delivered from the probe 200 to the target area, despite any variation in the fiber optic core 202 of the probe 200.



FIG. 2 diagrams the laser unit system 100 and calibration of laser output to a laser probe 200 to be used with the system 100 to account for variation in the fiber optic core of the laser probe 200. FIG. 3 diagrams a process of calibrating laser output, including adjustment of laser energy output from the laser source to a laser probe to account for variation in the fiber optic core 202 of the laser probe 200.


As part of the initial setup, the controller 110 receives data associated with a laser probe coupled to the laser source 102. In this instance, data from laser probe 200 is provided to the controller 110. This data may be manually entered (via a user interface provided on the system 100) or may be automatically read from readable device or label on the probe 200 via an associated reader of the system 100. The data may include physical characteristics of the probe 200, including, but not limited to, physical dimensions of the fiber optic core 202, one or more measured values or physical properties of the fiber optic core 202, and physical dimensions and/or measured values or physical properties of other components of the probe 200. In one embodiment, the data includes a diameter of the fiber optic core 202.


The data is then analyzed by the controller 110 and, based on the analysis, a determination of an optimum level of laser energy output from the laser source 102 is made. The analysis is based on a correlation of the laser probe data, such as specific dimensions of the fiber optic core, with calibration data. The calibration data is stored in a database, either a local database (i.e., calibration database 112) forming part of the laser unit system 100, or a remote database hosted via a remote server 300 (i.e., calibration database 302). For example, in some embodiments, the system 100 may communicate and exchange data with a remote server 300 over a network. The network may represent, for example, a private or non-private local area network (LAN), personal area network (PAN), storage area network (SAN), backbone network, global area network (GAN), wide area network (WAN), or collection of any such computer networks such as an intranet, extranet or the Internet (i.e., a global system of interconnected network upon which various applications or service run including, for example, the World Wide Web).


The calibration data may generally include a plurality of sets of values, wherein each set of values may include a laser energy output level from the laser source, a diameter of a fiber optic core of a laser probe to receive the laser energy output level, and the resulting wavelength value of laser radiation emitted from the delivery tip of the laser probe. In a preferred embodiment, the resulting wavelength value of laser radiation to be emitted from the delivery tip remains constant, regardless of the diameter of the fiber optic core. In such an embodiment, the laser management system (i.e., the control system) automatically adjusts the laser energy output level from the laser source (i.e., increases or decreases output level) for any given diameter of a fiber optic core so as to maintain the emission of laser radiation upon a target area at a consistent wavelength, despite variation in the diameter of fiber optic cores from the plurality of laser probes.


The controller 110 may include software, firmware and/or circuitry configured to perform any of the aforementioned operations. Software may be embodied as a software package, code, instructions, instruction sets and/or data recorded on non-transitory computer readable storage medium. Firmware may be embodied as code, instructions or instruction sets and/or data that are hard-coded (e.g., nonvolatile) in memory devices. “Circuitry”, as used in any embodiment herein, may comprise, for example, singly or in any combination, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry such as computer processors comprising one or more individual instruction processing cores, state machine circuitry, and/or firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry. For example, the controller 104 may include a hardware processor coupled to non-transitory, computer-readable memory containing instructions executable by the processor to cause the controller to carry out various functions of the laser system 100 as described herein, including the calibration process. For example, the controller 110 may include custom, proprietary, known and/or after-developed statistical analysis code (or instruction sets), hardware, and/or firmware that are generally well-defined and operable to receive two or more sets of data and identify, at least to a certain extent, a level of correlation and thereby associate the sets of data with one another based on the level of correlation.



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment an excimer laser unit 100 provided in an instrument 400. As previously described, one or more components of the system 100 can be contained within the instrument 400. In the present embodiment, the laser source 102 (including the excimer laser 104 and gas cartridge 106) and laser management system 108, including the controller 110, are contained within a housing 402. The housing 402 has wheels 404 and is portable. The instrument 400 further includes a push-pull handle 405 which assists with portability of the instrument 400. The instrument 400 further includes a connection port 406 for receiving a connecting end of the laser probe 200 to establish a connection between the fiber core 202 and the laser source 102. The instrument 400 further includes various inputs for the operator, such as a fiber probe cap holder 408, an emergency stop button 410, and a power switch 412. The instrument 400 further includes a foot pedal 414 extending from the housing 402 and is operable to provide control over the delivery of shots from the excimer laser 104 to the fiber core 202 of the probe 200. The instrument 400 further includes a display 416, which may be in the form of an interactive user interface. In some examples, the interactive user interface displays patient information, machine settings, and procedure information. As previously described, an operator may manually input the laser probe data via the interactive user interface to thereby provide such data to the laser management system 108 and controller 110. However, in some embodiments, the data may be automatically read from a readable device or label on the probe 200 via an associated reader of the system 100.



FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a probe 500 for use with the excimer laser system 100. The probe 500 is a single use, disposable unit. The probe 500 generally includes a fiber core coupled to the laser source 102 by way of a connector 502 (elongated cord) extending from the body of the probe 500 and having a connection assembly 504 configured to be received within the connection port 406 of the instrument 400. The probe 500 further includes a delivery tip 506 from which laser energy (from the fiber core) may be emitted. The probe 500 includes a handheld body 508, which may include a finger grip 510 with ridges or depressions 512. The body 508 of the handheld probe 500 may be metal or plastic.



FIGS. 6 and 7 show cross-sectional views of the probe 500 taken along line A-A and line B-B of FIG. 5, respectively. As shown, a fiber optic core 518 runs through the probe 500 and forms part of the connector 502. A protective sheath 516 surrounds the fiber optic core 518. In some examples, the protective sheath 516 is a protective plastic or rubber sheath. The fiber optic core 518 further form part of the delivery tip 506 of the probe 500. A metal jacket 520 surrounds the fiber optic core 518 and optical fiber 520. In some instances, a stainless steel jacket 520 surrounds and protects the fiber optic core 518.



FIG. 8 shows an embodiment a laser probe 500 attached to a laser unit system 100. As previously described, upon attachment of the laser probe 500 to the system 100 (i.e., coupling between the connection assembly 504 of the probe 500 and connection port 406 of the system 400), the laser management system 108 (including the controller 110) perform calibration processes prior to use of the probe 500. In particular, data associated with characteristics of the probe 500, such as the diameter of the fiber optic core, is provided to the laser management system 108. The data is then analyzed by the controller 110 and, based on the analysis, a determination of an optimum level of laser energy output from the laser source is made. FIG. 9 shows an enlarged view of a connection between the laser probe 500 and the system 100 and delivery of an adjusted laser energy output level to the laser probe based on calibration techniques. The optimum level of laser energy output from the laser source is based on a correlation of the laser probe data, such as specific dimensions of the fiber optic core, with calibration data. The controller 110 automatically adjusts the laser energy output level from the laser source (i.e., increases or decreases output level) for any given diameter of a fiber optic core so as to maintain the emission of laser radiation upon a target area at a consistent wavelength, despite variation in the diameter of fiber optic cores from the plurality of laser probes.


Accordingly, the system of the present invention is able to compensate for wide range of variations across a plurality of laser probes by simply adjusting output of the laser source to account for such variations. In turn, the manufacture tolerance for optical fibers improves as less precision is required during the manufacturing process, which reduces overall costs. Furthermore, by fine tuning of the laser output, the laser radiation is maintained at a consistent wavelength, ensuring that the target area is treated as intended and patient safety is maintained.


As used in any embodiment herein, the term “module” may refer to software, firmware and/or circuitry configured to perform any of the aforementioned operations. Software may be embodied as a software package, code, instructions, instruction sets and/or data recorded on non-transitory computer readable storage medium. Firmware may be embodied as code, instructions or instruction sets and/or data that are hard-coded (e.g., nonvolatile) in memory devices. “Circuitry”, as used in any embodiment herein, may comprise, for example, singly or in any combination, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry such as computer processors comprising one or more individual instruction processing cores, state machine circuitry, and/or firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry. The modules may, collectively or individually, be embodied as circuitry that forms part of a larger system, for example, an integrated circuit (IC), system on-chip (SoC), desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, servers, smart phones, etc.


Any of the operations described herein may be implemented in a system that includes one or more storage mediums having stored thereon, individually or in combination, instructions that when executed by one or more processors perform the methods. Here, the processor may include, for example, a server CPU, a mobile device CPU, and/or other programmable circuitry.


Also, it is intended that operations described herein may be distributed across a plurality of physical devices, such as processing structures at more than one different physical location. The storage medium may include any type of tangible medium, for example, any type of disk including hard disks, floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic and static RAMs, erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), flash memories, Solid State Disks (SSDs), magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions. Other embodiments may be implemented as software modules executed by a programmable control device. The storage medium may be non-transitory.


As described herein, various embodiments may be implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or any combination thereof. Examples of hardware elements may include processors, microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic devices (PLD), digital signal processors (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), logic gates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets, and so forth.


Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.


The term “non-transitory” is to be understood to remove only propagating transitory signals per se from the claim scope and does not relinquish rights to all standard computer-readable media that are not only propagating transitory signals per se. Stated another way, the meaning of the term “non-transitory computer-readable medium” and “non-transitory computer-readable storage medium” should be construed to exclude only those types of transitory computer-readable media which were found in In Re Nuijten to fall outside the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.


The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described (or portions thereof), and it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the claims. Accordingly, the claims are intended to cover all such equivalents.


Incorporation by Reference

References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.


EQUIVALENTS

Various modifications of the invention and many further embodiments thereof, in addition to those shown and described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the full contents of this document, including references to the scientific and patent literature cited herein. The subject matter herein contains important information, exemplification and guidance that can be adapted to the practice of this invention in its various embodiments and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A system configured to determine an output energy level for a fiber probe comprising: a processor;a memory;a calibration database stored on the memory, wherein: the calibration database comprises a plurality of fiber probe diameter values and a plurality of output energy levels associated with possible output energy levels of an excimer laser source, andeach one of the plurality of fiber diameter values is associated with one of the possible output energy levels of the excimer laser source; andnon-transitory computer readable instructions stored on the memory that, upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a diameter of the fiber probe connected to the excimer laser source; anddetermine, based on the calibration database, one of the possible output energy levels associated with the diameter of the fiber probe connected to the excimer laser source.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to control the excimer laser source to output energy through the fiber probe based on the one of the possible output energy levels associated with the diameter of the fiber probe.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to transmit a signal indicative of the one of the possible output energy levels associated with the diameter of the fiber probe to a controller of the excimer laser source.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a server in communication with a controller of the excimer laser source, wherein the server comprises the memory and the processor.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further receives a signal indicative of the diameter of the fiber probe from the fiber probe.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further receives a signal indicative of the diameter of the fiber probe from a controller of the excimer laser source.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the fiber probe is one of a plurality of excimer laser probes that are each coupleable, one at a time, to the excimer laser source.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein each of the plurality of excimer laser probes are single use and disposable.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the diameter of the fiber probe is a diameter of a fiber core of the fiber probe.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein each one of the plurality of fiber diameter values in the calibration database refers to a possible diameter of a fiber core of one of a plurality of fiber probes.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: a memory;a calibration database stored on the memory, wherein: the calibration database comprises a plurality of fiber core diameter values,the calibration database further comprises a plurality of output energy levels associated with possible output energy levels of an excimer laser source, andeach one of the plurality of fiber core diameter values is associated in the calibration database with one of the possible output energy levels of the excimer laser source.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the calibration database is accessible to a controller of the excimer laser source.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the controller of the excimer laser source is configured to determine, based on a determined fiber core diameter of a fiber probe connected to the excimer laser source, one of the possible output energy levels for operating the excimer laser source using the calibration database.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the controller of the excimer laser source is further configured to receive a signal indicative of the fiber core diameter of the fiber probe.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the controller determines the fiber core diameter after the fiber probe is connected to the excimer laser source.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the memory is part of a computing system that is remote to the excimer laser source.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the computing system and a laser management system comprising the excimer laser source are configured to communicate over a network.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the network comprises at least one of a private local area network (LAN), a non-private LAN, a personal area network (PAN), a storage area network (SAN), a backbone network, a global area network (GAN), a wide area network (WAN), an intranet, an extranet, or the internet.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the memory is part of a laser management system comprising the excimer laser source.
  • 20. A system configured to determine an output energy level for a fiber probe comprising: an excimer laser source;a plurality of fiber probes, each of the plurality of fiber probes connectable one at a time to the excimer laser source;a processor;a memory;a calibration database stored on the memory, wherein: the calibration database comprises a plurality of fiber probe diameter values and a plurality of output energy levels associated with possible output energy levels of an excimer laser source, andeach one of the plurality of fiber diameter values is associated with one of the possible output energy levels of the excimer laser source; andnon-transitory computer readable instructions stored on the memory that, upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a diameter of a core of a first fiber probe of the plurality of fiber probes while the first fiber probe is connected to the excimer laser source; anddetermine, based on the calibration database, one of the possible output energy levels associated with the diameter of the core of the first fiber probe connected to the excimer laser source.
  • 21. A method of determining an output energy level for a fiber probe connected to an excimer laser source comprising: determining, by a processor of a computing device, a diameter of a fiber core of the fiber probe connected to the excimer laser source; anddetermining, by the processor, the output energy level for outputting energy from the excimer laser source via the fiber probe, wherein the determining of the output energy level comprises: locating, in a calibration database, one of a plurality of possible output energy levels associated with the diameter of the fiber core, wherein the calibration database comprises: a plurality of fiber core diameter values; andthe plurality of possible output energy levels for the excimer laser source,wherein each one of the plurality of fiber core diameter values is associated in the calibration database with one of the plurality of possible output energy levels for the excimer laser source.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/971,102, filed Oct. 21, 2022, which is a continuation patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/400,191, filed Aug. 12, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,529,260, which is a continuation patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/389,359, filed Apr. 19, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,103,382, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (131)
Number Name Date Kind
4607622 Fritch et al. Aug 1986 A
4846172 Berlin Jul 1989 A
4862888 Yessik Sep 1989 A
5281241 Patel Jan 1994 A
5323766 Uram Jun 1994 A
5681307 McMahan Oct 1997 A
5738677 Colvard et al. Apr 1998 A
5755716 Garito et al. May 1998 A
5865831 Cozean et al. Feb 1999 A
6197056 Schachar Mar 2001 B1
6283974 Alexander Sep 2001 B1
6743221 Hobart et al. Jun 2004 B1
6807205 Albrecht et al. Oct 2004 B1
7443296 Mezhinsky Oct 2008 B2
7568619 Todd Aug 2009 B2
7801271 Gertner et al. Sep 2010 B2
8679089 Berlin Mar 2014 B2
9489785 Klammer Nov 2016 B2
9642746 Berlin May 2017 B2
10383689 Berlin Aug 2019 B2
11076933 Junger et al. Aug 2021 B2
11076992 Junger et al. Aug 2021 B2
11103382 Junger et al. Aug 2021 B2
11234866 Junger et al. Feb 2022 B2
11389239 Junger et al. Jul 2022 B2
11464677 Junger et al. Oct 2022 B2
11529260 Junger et al. Dec 2022 B2
11633234 Junger et al. Apr 2023 B2
11666482 Junger et al. Jun 2023 B2
11672475 Junger et al. Jun 2023 B2
11865045 Junger et al. Jan 2024 B2
11877951 Junger et al. Jan 2024 B1
11903876 Junger et al. Feb 2024 B1
11918516 Junger et al. Mar 2024 B1
11974890 Junger et al. May 2024 B2
11992264 Junger et al. May 2024 B2
20020013572 Berlin Jan 2002 A1
20020111608 Baerveldt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020183726 Elbrecht et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040082939 Berlin Apr 2004 A1
20040114879 Hiereth et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040147985 MacFarland et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050192480 Toriya et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050283148 Janssen Dec 2005 A1
20060100613 McArdle et al. May 2006 A1
20060111699 Neuberger May 2006 A1
20060241580 Mittelstein et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244652 Tethrake et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264918 Cook et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070027443 Rose et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070122096 Temelkuran et al. May 2007 A1
20070147752 Weisberg et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070219601 Neuberger Sep 2007 A1
20070265602 Mordaunt et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080054073 Charles Mar 2008 A1
20080082078 Berlin Apr 2008 A1
20080097415 Zimare et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108981 Telfair et al. May 2008 A1
20080108983 Nadolski May 2008 A1
20080161781 McArdle et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080269734 Vila Echague et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090030300 Hhaboussi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090118715 Mansour May 2009 A1
20090157064 Hodel Jun 2009 A1
20100019125 Stefani et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100068141 Kaushal et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100324543 Kurtz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110295243 Peyman Dec 2011 A1
20110301507 Romano et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120275481 Riggs Nov 2012 A1
20130041357 Neuberger Feb 2013 A1
20130085484 Van Valen et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130090636 Patton Apr 2013 A1
20140058367 Dantus Feb 2014 A1
20140121653 Abe et al. May 2014 A1
20140188096 Chia et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140276603 Magee et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140316388 Hipsley Oct 2014 A1
20150051607 Hajishah et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150080783 Berlin Mar 2015 A1
20150148615 Brennan et al. May 2015 A1
20150217133 Angeley et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150297408 Dolzan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305811 Neuberger Oct 2015 A1
20150366706 Belkin et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150374549 Scott Dec 2015 A1
20170100041 Kasamatsu et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170202708 Berlin Jul 2017 A1
20170304001 Searle et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180000337 Chen et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180042772 Mansour Feb 2018 A1
20180263647 Aljuri et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180271703 Hallen Sep 2018 A1
20180303667 Peyman Oct 2018 A1
20180353328 Bacher et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180360310 Berlin Dec 2018 A1
20190105200 Hipsley Apr 2019 A1
20190117459 Berlin Apr 2019 A1
20190254746 Block et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190262071 Thom et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200078216 Raksi Mar 2020 A1
20200078217 Raksi Mar 2020 A1
20200188173 Berlin Jun 2020 A1
20200330157 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330181 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330266 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330274 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330275 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330279 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330280 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330281 Junger et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200390600 Perera et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210235986 Juhasz et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210259880 Newton et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210298945 Juhasz et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210304590 Rezaie Sep 2021 A1
20220022997 Junger et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220023098 Junger et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220031513 Junger et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220151828 Junger et al. May 2022 A1
20220183882 Mosaed et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220183887 Junger et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220280343 Junger et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220387107 Junger et al. Dec 2022 A1
20220387218 Junger et al. Dec 2022 A1
20230329635 Junger et al. Oct 2023 A1
20230346475 Junger et al. Nov 2023 A1
20230363947 Junger et al. Nov 2023 A1
20240065893 Junger et al. Feb 2024 A1
20240261140 Junger et al. Aug 2024 A1
20240261150 Junger et al. Aug 2024 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
1235886 Nov 1999 CN
1360486 Jul 2002 CN
1300123 Feb 2007 CN
1976732 Jun 2007 CN
106794043 May 2017 CN
109414291 Mar 2019 CN
19920615 Dec 2000 DE
10023176 Nov 2001 DE
10138984 Mar 2003 DE
1835862 Jun 2011 EP
2120760 Sep 2015 EP
2005192924 Jul 2005 JP
WO 1999024796 May 1999 WO
2012152496 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2019060756 Mar 2019 WO
WO 2020215062 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215064 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215066 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215067 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215068 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215069 Oct 2020 WO
WO 2020215071 Oct 2020 WO
WO 20200215073 Oct 2020 WO
2024050363 Mar 2024 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Berlin, et al., “Excimer Laser Trabeculostomy: An Effective Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Procedure for Open-Angle Glaucoma”, published Dec. 19, 2013 Third Party Submission in 010503.
Crandall, Alan, “Combining Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery”, Review of Ophthalmology, 1-4, Jun. 13, 2008.
Dietlein et al., “Erbium: YAG Laser Trabecular Ablation (LTA) in the Surgical Treatment of Glaucoma”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Jan. 6, 1999, vol. 23, pp. 104-110.
ExTra Operating Instructions, Manufacturer: MLase AG, published prior to Jan. 1, 2018. Third Party Submission in 010402.
Francis et al., “Combined Cataract Extraction and Trabeculotomy by the Internal Approach for Coexisting Cataract and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Initial Results”, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Jul. 1, 2008, vol. 34, pp. 1096-1103.
Grover, Davinder S. “When You Have Cataracts and Glaucoma”, Glaucoma Research Foundation, Oct. 29, 2017.
Investigation Testing Authorization Application, YUI Laser AG Published Jan. 1, 2016. Third Party Submission in 010302.
Leung et al., “Anterior Chamber Angle Measurement with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: A Comparison between Slit Lamp OCT and Visante OCT”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, No. 8, pp. 3469-3474, Aug. 2008.
Taliaferro, Kevin et al. “Excimer Laser Trabeculostomy Normalizing IOP and Restoring Physiologic Outflow in Glaucoma.” Glaucoma Today, 2009, pp. 45-47 (Year: 2009).
Toteberg-Harms, et al., “Cataract surgery combined with excimer laser trabeculotomy to lower intraocular pressure: effectiveness dependent on preoperative IOP.” BMC ophthalmology, vol. 13, No. 1, p. 24 (2013).
Tsai, James C. “High Eye Pressure and Glaucoma”, Glaucoma Research Foundation, Oct. 29, 2017.
Wilmsmeyer et al., “Excimer Laser Trabeculotomy: A New, Minimally Invasive Procedure for Patients With Glaucoma”, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Oct. 19, 2005, vol. 244, pp. 670-676.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/842,933 2022-0387218, filed Jun. 17, 2022 Dec. 8, 2022, Combination Treatment Using Phaco and ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/579,803 2022-0280343, filed Jan. 20, 2022 Sep. 8, 2022, Excimer Laser Fiber Illumination.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,346 US20200330181A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,076,933, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Aug. 3, 2021, Authentication Systems and Methods for an Excimer Laser System.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,656 US20220022997A1, filed Jun. 30, 2021 Jan. 27, 2022, Authentication Systems and Methods for an Excimer Laser System.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,359 US20200330279A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,103,382, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Aug. 31, 2021, Systems and Methods for Performing an Intraocular Procedure for Treating an Eye Condition.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/400,191 US20220031513A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,529,260, filed Aug. 12, 2021 Feb. 3, 2022 Dec. 20, 2022, Systems and Methods for Performing an Intraocular Procedure for Treating an Eye Condition.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/971,102 US20230122205A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,865,045, filed Oct. 21, 2022 Apr. 20, 2023 Jan. 9, 2024, Systems and Methods for Performing an Intraocular Procedure for Treating an Eye Condition.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,446 US20200330266A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,672,475, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Jun. 13, 2023, Combination Treatment Using ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/592,027 US20220151828A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,464,677, filed Feb. 3, 2022 May 19, 2022 Oct. 11, 2022, Combination Treatment Using ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/140,415 US20230329635A1, filed Apr. 27, 2023 Oct. 19, 2023, Combination Treatment Using ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,460 US20200330274A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,076,992, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Aug. 3, 2021, Methods of Transverse Placement in ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,726 US20220023098A1, filed Jun. 30, 2021 Jan. 27, 2022, Methods of Transverse Placement in ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,425 US20200330280A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,234,866, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Feb. 1, 2022, Personalization of Excimer Laser Fibers.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/644,930 US20220183887 U.S. Pat. No. 11,666,482, filed Dec. 17, 2021 Jun. 16, 2022 Jun. 6, 2023, Personalization of Excimer Laser Fibers.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/140,158 US20230363947A1, filed Apr. 27, 2023 Oct. 16, 2023, Personalization of Excimer Laser Fibers.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,386 US20200330157A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,389,239, filed Apr. 19, 2019 Oct. 22, 2020 Jul. 19, 2022, Enhanced Fiber Probes for ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/842,971 US20220387107A1 U.S. Pat. No. 11,633,234, filed Jun. 17, 2022 Dec. 8, 2022 Apr. 25, 2023, Enhanced Fiber Probes for ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/139,139 US20230346475, filed Apr. 25, 2023 Nov. 2, 2023, Enhanced Fiber Probes for ELT.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/899,285, filed Aug. 30, 2022, Systems And Methods For Prophylactic Treatment Of An Eye Using An Excimer Laser Unit.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/899,310, filed Aug. 30, 2022, Systems And Methods For Treating Patients With Closed-Angle Or Narrow-Angle Glaucoma Using An Excimer Laser Unit.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/899,330, filed Aug. 30, 2022, Systems and Methods for a Combined Excimer Laser and Phacoemulsification Unit.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20240164944 A1 May 2024 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 17971102 Oct 2022 US
Child 18522525 US
Parent 17400191 Aug 2021 US
Child 17971102 US
Parent 16389359 Apr 2019 US
Child 17400191 US