Systems and methods for performing excessive negative pitch alert and for biasing a sink rate alert

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9261883
  • Patent Number
    9,261,883
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 23, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 16, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods that alert the pilot of the unusual negative pitch attitude. Additionally, the system can bias a “sink rate” envelope toward a more sensitive direction, such that the pilot can be alerted while (or before) a large sink rate is built up during an unusual negative pitch attitude condition.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In many helicopter accidents, pilots get disoriented, and often drop the helicopter's nose (negative pitch) without noticing it. Sometimes pilots get confused and in some cases, pilots don't realize what is going on and end up crashing into the ocean or ground.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An unusual negative pitch attitude (e.g., −20 degrees) is the first sign that the helicopter is about to dive and accelerate. The present invention provides systems and methods that alert the pilot of the unusual negative pitch attitude.


Additionally, the system can bias a “sink rate” envelope toward a more sensitive direction, such that the pilot can be alerted while (or before) a large sink rate is built up during an unusual negative pitch attitude condition.


The present invention includes a processing device that receives a current pitch angle value and generates an alert if the received pitch angle value is more negative than a predefined pitch angle threshold value. An output device outputs the generated alert.


The processing device is further configured to adjust the pitch angle threshold value based on altitude.


In one aspect of the invention, a system includes a processing device that receives a current pitch angle value, adjusts a sink rate alert envelope if the received pitch angle value is more negative than a pitch angle threshold value, and generates an alert if sink rate is within the sink rate alert envelope. A output device outputs the generated alert.


In another aspect of the invention, the processing device adjusts the sink rate alert envelope only if the sink rate alert envelope was previously at a default position.


In still another aspect of the invention, the processing device returns the pitch rate alert envelope to the default position if the received pitch angle value is not more negative than a pitch angle threshold value.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a system on a rotary-wing aircraft formed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of a helicopter in an excessive negative pitch attitude;



FIG. 3 is a flowchart identifying a potentially hazardous negative pitch condition;



FIG. 4 illustrates a graph associated with the process shown in FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary process for biasing a sink rate alert envelope; and



FIG. 6 illustrates a sink rate alert envelope adjusted according to the process shown in FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a rotary-wing aircraft 20 that includes a processor 30, such as an enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS) processor. The aircraft 20 also includes a radio altimeter (RADALT) 32 and an air data system 34, a gyroscope 36, and an alerting device 38 that are all in signal communication with the processor 30, and a user interface device 40.


The processor 30 includes instructions for alerting the pilot of the aircraft 20 if the pitch attitude is beyond a threshold negative value and/or adjusting a prestored sink rate envelope based on a pitch attitude received from the gyroscope 36. If the processor 30 determines that either a “nose-too-low” or a pitch rate alert is necessary, then a corresponding alert signal is sent to the alerting device 38 that outputs a corresponding alert audibly and/or visually.



FIG. 2 illustrates the rotary-wing aircraft 20 that is presently at a pitch angle θ 42 that is below the pitch angle threshold value. In such a situation, the processor 30 will alert the pilot that the nose is too low and that an acceleration condition may exist.



FIG. 3 illustrates a process 60 performed by the processor 30 for alerting the flight crew of an excessive pitch angle attitude. First, at a block 62, a pitch angle value is received from the gyroscope 36. Next, at a decision block 64, the processor 30 determines if the received pitch angle value is more negative than a pitch angle threshold value θ 42. If the received pitch angle value is not more negative than the pitch angle threshold value, the process returns to block 62. If, however, the received pitch angle value is more negative than the pitch angle threshold value, the processor 30 generates and outputs an audible or visual “nose-too-low” alert.



FIG. 4 illustrates a graph 80 that shows a change in the pitch angle threshold value based on altitude. For example, the graph 80 shows that below 100 feet the pitch angle threshold value is −15 degrees but is a graduated scale to between 100 feet and 300 feet, up to a threshold of −18 degrees. This provides more sensitivity to this condition when the aircraft is lower to the ground.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary process 100 performed by the processor 30 for adjusting a sink rate alert envelope. First, at a block 102, just like in block 62 of FIG. 3, the pitch angle value is received from the gyroscope 36. Next, at a decision block 104, the processor 30 determines if the received pitch angle value is more negative than a pitch angle threshold value. If not, the process 100 returns to the block 102. If the pitch angle value is determined to be more negative than the pitch angle threshold value, then at a block 108, a sink rate alert envelope is made more sensitive if the sink rate alert envelope is presently at its default position. In other words, the sink rate alert envelope is not made more sensitive if it has previously been made more sensitive. Next, at a decision block 110, the processor 30 determines if the pitch angle value is not more negative than the pitch angle threshold value. What is occurring here is a determination as to whether the state is still active. If the state is of a pitch angle value greater negative than the pitch angle threshold value, then the process 100 stays in its current state. However, if the pitch angle value becomes not more negative than the pitch angle threshold value, then, at a block 112, the sink rate alert envelope defaults or returns to its default position.



FIG. 6 illustrates a graph 130 that shows the sink rate alert envelope plotted with vertical speed (feet per minute (FPM)) on an x axis and an altitude (radio altitude (H)) along the y axis. The solid line indicates the existing or default sink rate envelope. When the condition is met where the pitch angle value of the aircraft 20 is more negative than the pitch angle threshold value, then the sink rate envelope becomes modulated to a more sensitive position, as indicated by the dashed line to the left along the x axis within the graph 130.


While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A system located on an aircraft, the system comprising: a processing device configured to: receive a current pitch angle value, and a current aircraft altitude;set a pitch angle threshold value based on the current aircraft altitude;generate a first alert if the received pitch angle value is more negative than the pitch angle threshold value;adjust a sink rate alert envelope if the received pitch angle value is more negative than the pitch angle threshold value;receive a sink rate value; andgenerate a second alert if sink rate is within the sink rate alert envelopean output device configured to output the generated alerts,wherein the pitch angle threshold value is set to: a first value when the current altitude is below a first altitude,a second value when the current altitude is above a second altitude, anda value that varies linearly between the first value and the second value when the current altitude is between the first altitude and the second altitude, andwherein the second value is greater in magnitude than the first value, and the second altitude is greater than the first altitude.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the processing device adjusts the sink rate alert envelope only if the sink rate alert envelope was previously at a default position.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the processing device returns the sink rate alert envelope to the default position if the received pitch angle value is not more negative than a pitch angle threshold value.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/332,564 filed on May 7, 2010 and is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
4189777 Kuntman Feb 1980 A
4551723 Paterson Nov 1985 A
4567483 Bateman et al. Jan 1986 A
5001476 Vermilion Mar 1991 A
5038141 Grove Aug 1991 A
5136518 Glover Aug 1992 A
5153588 Muller Oct 1992 A
5166682 Bateman Nov 1992 A
5377937 LaMay Jan 1995 A
5677685 Coirier Oct 1997 A
6341248 Johnson Jan 2002 B1
6906641 Ishihara Jun 2005 B2
6940427 Bateman Sep 2005 B2
7403133 He et al. Jul 2008 B2
20020030607 Conner Mar 2002 A1
20020089433 Bateman Jul 2002 A1
20030016145 Bateman Jan 2003 A1
20030225492 Cope et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040044446 Staggs Mar 2004 A1
20040075586 Glover Apr 2004 A1
20070085705 He Apr 2007 A1
20090319105 Conner Dec 2009 A1
20100023264 G. Jan 2010 A1
20100141482 Wyatt Jun 2010 A1
20110202207 Louise Aug 2011 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
CN Office Action for Application 201110159236.6 dated Jun. 26, 2014.
CN Office Action for CN 2011 10159236.6; Date of Issuance May 29, 2015.
CN Office Action for Application 201110159236.6 dated Dec. 1, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110276200 A1 Nov 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61332564 May 2010 US