Systems and methods for performing spine surgery

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10433893
  • Patent Number
    10,433,893
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 19, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A mechanical rod bender is provided for correcting a curvature or deformity in a patient's spine based on the digitized locations of implanted screws and tracking the placement of the rod as it is placed in a minimally invasive fashion. The mechanical rod bender includes a fixed die and a movable die, the movable die having multiple rod contact channels to accommodate spinal rods of different sizes.
Description
FIELD

The present application pertains to spine surgery. More particularly, the present application pertains to systems and methods related to the planning, design, formation, and implantation of spinal implants.


BACKGROUND

The spinal column is a highly complex system of bones and connective tissues that provide support for the body and protect the delicate spinal cord and nerves. The spinal column includes a series of vertebral bodies stacked atop one another, each vertebral body including an inner or central portion of relatively weak cancellous bone and an outer portion of relatively strong cortical bone. Situated between each vertebral body is an intervertebral disc that cushions and dampens compressive forces exerted upon the spinal column. A vertebral canal containing the spinal cord is located behind the vertebral bodies. The spine has a natural curvature (i.e., lordosis in the lumbar and cervical regions and kyphosis in the thoracic region) such that the endplates of the upper and lower vertebrae are inclined towards one another.


There are many types of spinal column disorders including scoliosis (abnormal lateral curvature of the spine), excess kyphosis (abnormal forward curvature of the spine), excess lordosis (abnormal backward curvature of the spine), spondylolisthesis (forward displacement of one vertebra over another), and other disorders caused by abnormalities, disease, or trauma (such as ruptured or slipped discs, degenerative disc disease, fractured vertebrae, and the like). Patients that suffer from such conditions often experience extreme and debilitating pain, as well as diminished nerve function. Posterior fixation for spinal fusions, decompression, deformity, and other reconstructions are performed to treat these patients. The aim of posterior fixation in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical procedures is to stabilize the spinal segments, correct multi-axis alignment, and aid in optimizing the long-term health of the spinal cord and nerves.


Screws, hooks, and rods are devices used to stabilize the spine during a spinal fixation procedure. Such procedures often require the instrumentation of many bony elements. The devices, for example rods, can be extremely challenging to design and implant into the patient. Spinal rods are usually formed of stainless steel, titanium, cobalt chrome, or other similarly hard metal, and as such are difficult to bend without some sort of leverage-based bender. Moreover, a spinal rod needs to be oriented in six degrees of freedom to compensate for the anatomical structure of a patient's spine as well as the attachment points (screws, hooks) for securing the rod to the vertebrae. Additionally, the physiological problem being treated as well as the physician's preferences will determine the exact configuration necessary. Accordingly, the size, length, and particular bends of the spinal rod depends on the size, number, and position of each vertebrae to be constrained, the spatial relationship amongst vertebrae, as well as the screws and hooks used to hold the rods attached to the vertebrae.


The bending of a spinal rod can be accomplished by a number of methods. The most widely used method is a three-point bender called a French Bender. The French bender is a pliers-like device that is manually operated to place one or more bends in a rod. The French bender requires both handles to operate and provides leverage based on the length of the handle. The use of the French bender requires a high degree of physician skill because the determination of the location, angle, and rotation of bends is often subjective and can be difficult to correlate to a patient's anatomy. Other methods of bending a rod to fit a screw and/or hook construct include the use of an in-situ rod bender and a keyhole bender. However, all of these methods can be subjective, iterative, and are often referred to as an “art.” As such, rod bending and reduction activities can be a time consuming and potentially frustrating step in the finalization of a complex and/or long spinal construct. Increased time in the operating room to achieve optimum bending can be costly to the patient and increase the chance of the morbidity. When rod bending is performed poorly, the rod can preload the construct and increase the chance of failure of the fixation system. The bending and re-bending involved can also promote metal fatigue and the creation of stress risers in the rod.


Efforts directed to computer-aided design or shaping of spinal rods have been largely unsuccessful due to the lack of bending devices as well as lack of understanding of all of the issues involved in bending surgical devices. U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,831, issued Jun. 7, 2011 to Isaacs, describes a rod bending system which includes a spatial measurement sub-system with a digitizer to obtain the three dimensional location of surgical implants (screws, hooks), software to convert the implant locations to a series of bend instructions, and a mechanical rod bender used to execute the bend instructions such that the rod will be bent precisely to custom fit within each of the screws. This is advantageous because it provides quantifiable rod bending steps that are customized to each patient's anatomy enabling surgeons to create custom-fit rods on the first pass, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of rod bending, particularly in complex cases. This, in turn, reduces the morbidity and cost associated with such procedures. However, a need still exists for improved rod bending systems that allow for curvature and deformity correction in fixation procedures, provide the user with more rod bending options, and accommodate more of the user's clinical preferences including the ability to determine the spatial orientation of the tip of the rod and the tip of the rod pusher relative to one another.


Commercially-available benders currently use only one channel for rods. Benders that can accommodate multiple sizes do so by opening the mandrel and roller (moving die) to the required size. Although many benders can accommodate multiple rods, their geometry may only be ideal for one size or may be broad and not be particularly ideal for any size. If a rod with a diameter larger than the channel gets bent using these benders, notching will occur on the two contacting points lengthwise on the rod. If a smaller than ideal rod is used, the rod will be more flat on bent surfaces. If a larger than ideal rod is used, it can also create notching or depression across the width of the rod due to smaller surface contact. The rod bender described below overcomes these disadvantages by providing multiple-sized rod channels and, in doing so, affords the user the ability to create more acute bend angles on multiple sized rods with the same bender. It also reduces non-desired deformation (depressions, flattening, notching) in rod by distributing the forces on the rod more evenly.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure describes a rod bender that enables a user (e.g., surgeon) to customize bending of a spinal rod to suit the desired correction of a patient's spinal condition. According to a broad aspect, the rod bender includes a base and a lever with a lever handle designed for grabbing the lever manually. The lever is maneuverable relative to the base, which acts as a static second lever. The base further includes a slide block slideably coupled with the base by way of a slide track. The slide block has a rod holder including a rod pass through configured to accommodate an infinitely long rod as well as steady the rod during the bending process. A collet on the distal end of the rod holder holds the rod in place relative to the rod holder. By sliding slide block along the base, the rod can be moved proximally and distally within the mechanical rod bender. The rod holder further includes a collet knob that is rotatable (both clockwise and counterclockwise) by a user to set a particular rotation angle. The rod holder further includes rotation interval markings to give the user a visual indication of the degree of rotation. When turning the collet knob, the user can set the collet knob at a particular interval marking or in between several interval markings to determine a particular angle rotation to a high degree of accuracy. The slide block further includes a lock switch that toggles between an unlocked position that allows free rotation of the collet handle (and associated rod) and a locked position that prevents rotation of the collet handle (and associated rod) during bending.


The rod bender further includes a fulcrum block positioned at the distal end of the base. The fulcrum block includes a fixed die and a housing. The fixed die includes a first rod channel. The housing is pivotally coupled with the fulcrum block and includes an angle gauge and a moveable die. The bend angle is measured by using angle gauge. The angle gauge has ratchet teeth spaced at regular intervals. By way of example, each ratchet stop represents five degrees of bend angle with the particular bend angle gauge as the lever is opened and closed. However, it is to be appreciated that each ratchet step may represent any suitable degree increment (e.g., between 0.25 degrees to 10 degrees). The angle gauge may further include a series of angle markings and an angle indicator that gives the user visual feedback about the bend angle.


The moveable die is positioned at one end of the housing and moves relative to the base (and fixed die) when the housing is caused to pivot about the fulcrum block during use. This movement ultimately effects the desired bend in the rod. The moveable die includes multiple rod channels. Each rod channel has a diameter and height specific to a corresponding rod size. The first rod channels are positioned parallel to one another. The moveable die can be actuated with a switch to align the desired rod channel with the rod channel on the fixed die. By way of example, the actuation switch includes buttons positioned on either side of the moveable die. Alternate implementations for the actuation switch are also contemplated and are within the scope of this disclosure. The user may input the appropriate rod diameter by pressing the button corresponding to the diameter of the rod to be bent and implanted into the patient. The moveable die then slides into appropriate bending position by aligning one of the rod channels with the rod channel on the fixed die. One or more mechanisms may be employed to maintain the moveable die in the desired position. The rod bender is then ready to bend the surgical rod.


The lever is pivotally coupled to the fulcrum block and is able to pivot independently of the housing. The distal end of the lever includes ratchet teeth configured to engage the ratchet teeth of the angle gauge to enable the lever to be manipulated to cause the housing to pivot.


Additional bends can be formed in the rod without removing the from the rod holder. The user can translate the slide block and/or rotate the collet knob without adjusting the position of the rod within the rod holder to alter the position of the spinal rod relative to the fixed die and moveable die. Alternatively, the rod may be adjusted relative to the rod holder prior to effecting additional bends in the rod. Once all the desired bends are formed in the rod, the user removes the spinal rod from the rod holder.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a mechanical rod bender according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 is an alternative perspective view of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a side plan view of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a front plan view of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a close-up view of the front of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 is a further close-up view of the front of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1 with the actuation switch in a first position;



FIG. 7 is a further close-up view of the front of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1 with the actuation switch in a second position;



FIG. 8 is a side plan view of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1 after bending of a spinal rod; and



FIG. 9 is a front plan view of the mechanical rod bender of FIG. 1 after bending of a spinal rod.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implantation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The systems and methods disclosed herein boast a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.


The accompanying FIGS. 1-9 illustrate an example of a mechanical rod bender 10 according to one embodiment. The mechanical rod bender 10 of the present disclosure is configured to be used as part of a surgical bending system, for example the surgical bending systems shown and described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,888, issued Oct. 8, 2013 and entitled “System and Device for Designing and Forming a Surgical Implant,” and commonly-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/815,643, filed Mar. 12, 2013 and entitled “System and Method for Performing Spinal Surgery,” the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein. In addition to a mechanical rod bender, the surgical bending systems described in the '888 patent and '643 application also include a spatial tracking system to obtain the location of one or more surgical implants and a control unit containing software to convert the implant locations to a series of bend instructions. The mechanical rod bender 10 of the present disclosure differs from the examples described in the incorporated references in that it includes multiple sized rod channels to accommodate respective rod sizes.


Generally, the spatial tracking system includes an IR sensor, a digitizer pointer, as well as other components including Host USB converter. The spatial tracking system is in communication with control unit. The control unit has spatial relation software and is communicatively linked to the display so that information relevant to the surgical procedure may be conveyed to the user in a meaningful manner. By way of example, the relevant information includes, but is not limited to, spatial positioning data acquired by the IR sensor (e.g., translational data in the x, y, and z axes and orientation/rotational data Rx, Ry, and Rz). A neuromonitoring system may be communicatively linked to the spatial tracking system via the control unit. By way of example only, the neuromonitoring system may be the neuromonitoring system shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,255,045, entitled “Neurophysiologic Monitoring System” and filed on Apr. 3, 2008, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. Once the user has selected the desired rod solution, the user then executes the bends using a mechanical rod bender 10. The mechanical rod bender 10 takes into account six degrees of freedom information as it effects bends onto a spinal rod.



FIGS. 1-7 illustrate an example of a rod bender 10 having multiple rod channels according to one implementation. By way of example, the rod bender 10 includes a base 12 and a lever 14 including a lever handle 16 designed for grabbing the lever 14 manually. The lever 14 is maneuverable relative to the base 12, which acts as a static second lever. The base further includes a slide block 18 slideably coupled with the base 12 by way of a slide track 20. The slide block 18 further has a rod holder 22 including a rod pass through 24 configured to accommodate an infinitely long rod as well as steady the rod during the bending process. A collet 26 on the distal end of the rod holder 22 holds the rod in place relative to the rod holder 22. By sliding slide block 18 along the base 12, the rod can be moved proximally and distally within the mechanical rod bender 10. The position of the rod may be measured by click stops 28 (or other markings) positioned at regular intervals along base 12 on either side of the slide track 20. Each click stop 28 is a measured distance along the base 12 and thus moving a specific number of click stops 28 gives one a precise location for the location of a desired rod bend. A location indicator 30 is attached to the slide block 18 and functions to indicate the precise click stop 28 at which the slide block 18 is located. The rod holder 22 further includes a collet knob 32 that is rotatable (both clockwise and counterclockwise) by a user to set a particular rotation angle. The rod holder 22 further includes rotation interval markings 34 to give the user a visual indication of the degree of rotation. When turning the collet knob 32, the user can set the collet knob 32 at a particular interval marking 34 or in between several interval markings 34 to determine a particular angle rotation to a high degree of accuracy. The rotation interval markings 34 may be located on any portion of the rod holder 22 and/or collet knob 32. In the example shown in FIG. 2, the rotation interval markings 34 are located on a portion of the rod holder 22 that extends through the slide block 18, and therefore are viewable through an aperture 36 formed within the slide block 18. The slide block 18 further includes a lock switch 38 that toggles between an unlocked position that allows free rotation of the collet handle 32 (and associated rod) and a locked position that prevents rotation of the collet handle 32 (and associated rod) during bending. Additionally the base 12 may have ruler-type markings 40 along its length to aid the user in measuring a rod intraoperatively.


The rod bender 10 further includes a fulcrum block 42 positioned at the distal end of the base 12. The fulcrum block 42 includes a fixed die 44 and a housing 46. The fixed die 44 includes a first rod channel 48. The housing 46 is pivotally coupled with the fulcrum block 42 and includes an angle gauge 50 and a moveable die 52. The bend angle is measured by using angle gauge 50. The angle gauge 50 has ratchet teeth 54 spaced at regular intervals. By way of example, each ratchet stop represents five degrees of bend angle with the particular bend angle gauge 50 as the lever 14 is opened and closed. However, it is to be appreciated that each ratchet step may represent any suitable degree increment (e.g., between 0.25 degrees to 10 degrees). The angle gauge 50 may further include a series of angle markings 56 and an angle indicator 58 that gives the user visual feedback about the bend angle.


The moveable die 52 is positioned at one end of the housing 46 and moves relative to the base 12 (and fixed die 44) when the housing 46 is caused to pivot about the fulcrum block 42 during use. This movement ultimately effects the desired bend in the rod. As best viewed in FIGS. 4-7, the moveable die 52 includes multiple rod channels, for example first and second rod channels 60, 62. It is possible that the moveable die 52 may include additional rod channels without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Each rod channel 60, 62 has a diameter and height specific to a corresponding rod size. By way of example only, the first rod channel 60 is sized to accommodate 5.5 mm rods, and the second rod channel 62 is sized to accommodate 6.0 mm rods. However, first and second rod channels 60, 62 (and/or any additional rod channels) may be sized to accommodate rods of any particular diameter. The first and second rod channels 60, 62 are positioned parallel to one another. The moveable die 52 can be actuated with a switch 64 to align the desired rod channel 60, 62 with the rod channel 48 on the fixed die 44. By way of example, the actuation switch 64 includes first and second buttons 66, 68 positioned on either side of the moveable die 52. Alternate implementations for the actuation switch are also contemplated and are within the scope of this disclosure. The user may input the appropriate rod diameter by pressing the button corresponding to the diameter of the rod to be bent and implanted into the patient. The moveable die 52 then slides into appropriate bending position by aligning one of the first and second rod channels 60, 62 with the rod channel 48 on the fixed die 44. For example, when the first button 66 is depressed, the moveable die 52 is positioned such that the first rod channel 60 is aligned with the rod channel 48 on the fixed die 44 (FIG. 6). When the second button 68 is depressed, the moveable die 52 is positioned such that the second rod channel 62 is aligned with the rod channel 48 on the fixed die 44 (FIG. 7). One or more mechanisms may be employed to maintain the moveable die 52 in the desired position. As shown in FIG. 7, a cap 70 may extend from the second button 68 through an aperture in the housing 46 (not shown). When the second button 68 is fully depressed, the cap 70 is maximally positioned adjacent the moveable die 52 such that the moveable die 52 is prohibited from translating laterally once the channel size is selected. The rod bender 10 is then ready to bend the surgical rod.


The lever 14 is pivotally coupled to the fulcrum block 42 and is able to pivot independently of the housing 46. The distal end of the lever 14 includes ratchet teeth (not shown) configured to engage the ratchet teeth 54 of the angle gauge 50 to enable the lever 14 to be manipulated to cause the housing 46 to pivot.


To use the rod bender 10 of the present disclosure, a user first selects the appropriate spinal rod for the procedure. For the purpose of illustration, the user may select a 5.5 mm spinal rod. Once a 5.5 mm rod is selected, the user ensures that the first button 66 is depressed thus aligning the first rod channel 60 (configured for a 5.5 mm rod in the present example) of the moveable die 52 with the rod channel 48 of the fixed die 44. The spinal rod is inserted longitudinally through the rod pass through 24 of the rod holder 22, and further inserted distally such that a portion of the spinal rod interacts with both the rod channel 48 of the fixed die 44 and the first rod channel 60 of the moveable die 52. The user then manually engages the lever handle 16 and pivots the lever 14 away from the base 12. As the lever 14 is pivoting, the lever ratchet teeth positively engage the ratchet teeth 54 on the angle gauge 50. Once the lever 14 has been pivoted to the point where the desired angle marking 56 is shown within the angle indicator 58, the user then closes the handle 16 (by exerting a downward force on the lever 14) such that the lever 14 and base 12 are brought closer together. The rod is bent between the fixed die 44 and the moveable die 52. The mechanical rod bender 10 could be modified to bend the rod during the handle opening movement as well, as shown with other embodiments shown and described in the above-referenced '888 patent and/or '643 application. Various gauges on the rod bender 10 allow the user to manipulate the rod in order to determine bend position, bend angle, and bend rotation. FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate the relative positioning of the housing 50, as well as the fixed die 44 and moveable die 52 after the rod has been bent. The rod bender 10 may be reset to the original position by engaging a release button 72 near the lever handle 16. The release button 72 causes the lever ratchet teeth to disengage from the ratchet teeth 54, enabling the housing 50 to be rotated back to the initial position.


Additional bends can be formed in the rod without removing the from the rod holder 22. The user can translate the slide block 18 and/or rotate the collet knob 32 without adjusting the position of the rod within the rod holder 22 to alter the position of the spinal rod relative to the fixed die 44 and moveable die 52. Alternatively, the rod may be adjusted relative to the rod holder 22 prior to effecting additional bends in the rod. Once all the desired bends are formed in the rod, the user removes the spinal rod from the rod holder 22.


The rod bender 10 of the present application may include additional features shown and described in the above-referenced '888 patent and/or the '643 application without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. For example, the rod bender 10 may be a pneumatic or motor-driven device that automatically adjusts the location, rotation and bend angle of the rod. The bend calculations could be converted into an interface program that would run to power and control the motors. The automated bender would lessen the possibility of user error in following the manual bend instructions. It would also increase the resolution or number of bends that can be imparted in the rod making for a smoother looking rod.


While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown, by way of example only, in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed. On the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined herein.

Claims
  • 1. A device for effecting at least one bend in a spinal rod, comprising: a fixed die having a first spinal rod contacting surface;a moving die having a first rod channel including a second spinal rod contacting surface and a second rod channel including a third spinal rod contacting surface, the first rod channel sized to accommodate a portion of a first spinal rod having a first diameter, the second rod channel sized to accommodate a portion of a second spinal rod having a second diameter that is different than the first diameter, the moving die spaced apart from the fixed die to receive the first spinal rod or the second spinal rod between the fixed die and moving die;an actuation switch coupled to the moving die, wherein the actuation switch comprises a first button and a second button, wherein the first button and the second button are positioned on opposite sides of the moveable die along an axis, wherein depression of the first button or the second button enables a translation of the moving die along the axis between (i) a first position in which the second spinal rod contacting surface is in alignment with the first spinal rod contacting surface and (ii) a second position in which the third spinal rod contact surface is in alignment with the first spinal rod contacting surface;an elongated base member supporting the fixed die;a housing member supporting the moving die and pivotably engaged to the elongated base member; andan elongated pivot member pivotably engaged to the elongated base member and releasably engageable to the housing member to pivot the moving die relative to the fixed die to impart a bend to the spinal rod upon pivoting of the moving die.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, further including an angle gauge positioned on the housing member, the housing member configured for initially supporting the elongated pivot member relative to the elongated base member in one of a plurality of pre-determined angular positions, wherein the one of the plurality of pre-determined angular positions is determined according to the angle gauge.
  • 3. The device of claim 2, wherein the angle gauge includes a plurality of ratchet teeth.
  • 4. The device of claim 3, wherein the elongated pivot member is releasably engageable to the housing member by interacting with the ratchet teeth of the angle gauge.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, further comprising a clamp member mounted to the elongated base member and configured to engage the spinal rod with the rod in position between the fixed and moving dies.
  • 6. The device of claim 5, wherein the clamp member is translatable along at least a portion of the length of the elongated base.
  • 7. The device of claim 5, wherein the clamp member includes a knob configured to rotate the clamp about a longitudinal axis of the spinal rod to a pre-determined angular orientation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/065,531 filed on Oct. 17, 2014 and entitled “Systems and Methods of Performing Spine Surgery,” the complete disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference into this application as if set forth fully herein.

US Referenced Citations (217)
Number Name Date Kind
1964550 Abramson Jun 1934 A
2232819 Abramson Feb 1941 A
3018818 Swanson Jan 1962 A
3365804 Fjellstrom Jan 1968 A
4282737 Maples Aug 1981 A
4474046 Cook Oct 1984 A
4691555 Vaughan Sep 1987 A
4773402 Asher Sep 1988 A
5113685 Asher May 1992 A
5161404 Hayes Nov 1992 A
5257184 Mushabac Oct 1993 A
5290289 Sanders Mar 1994 A
5365996 Crook Nov 1994 A
5389099 Hartmeister Feb 1995 A
5490409 Weber Feb 1996 A
5548985 Yapp Aug 1996 A
5615572 Johnson Apr 1997 A
5658286 Sava Aug 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5682886 Delp Nov 1997 A
5704937 Martin Jan 1998 A
5761950 Chiu Jun 1998 A
5768134 Swaelens Jun 1998 A
5806521 Morimoto Sep 1998 A
5819571 Johnson Oct 1998 A
5819580 Gauthier Oct 1998 A
5901600 Decker May 1999 A
6006581 Holmes Dec 1999 A
6035691 Lin Mar 2000 A
6205411 Digioia, III Mar 2001 B1
6226548 Foley May 2001 B1
6236875 Bucholz May 2001 B1
6301495 Gueziec Oct 2001 B1
6327491 Franklin Dec 2001 B1
6332780 Traxel Dec 2001 B1
6347240 Foley Feb 2002 B1
6487889 Bates Dec 2002 B1
6529765 Franck Mar 2003 B1
6578280 Kinoshita Jun 2003 B2
6644087 Ralph Nov 2003 B1
6701174 Krause Mar 2004 B1
6906724 Lake Jun 2005 B2
6978188 Christensen Dec 2005 B1
7206626 Quaid, III Apr 2007 B2
7454939 Garner Nov 2008 B2
7837467 Butscher Nov 2010 B2
7957831 Isaacs Jun 2011 B2
8255045 Gharib et al. Aug 2012 B2
8539888 Hernandez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8549888 Isaacs Oct 2013 B2
20020007294 Bradbury Jan 2002 A1
20020133097 Leitner Sep 2002 A1
20020183610 Foley Dec 2002 A1
20030055435 Barrick Mar 2003 A1
20030055502 Lang Mar 2003 A1
20030149351 Nowinski Aug 2003 A1
20030205075 Strippgen Nov 2003 A1
20030215122 Tanaka Nov 2003 A1
20040068187 Krause Apr 2004 A1
20040097952 Sarin May 2004 A1
20040122549 Otsuki Jun 2004 A1
20040133276 Lang Jul 2004 A1
20040147927 Tsougarakis Jul 2004 A1
20040152972 Hunter Aug 2004 A1
20040158260 Blau Aug 2004 A1
20040167637 Biscup Aug 2004 A1
20050054917 Kitson Mar 2005 A1
20050101966 Lavallee May 2005 A1
20050119593 Gallard Jun 2005 A1
20050149050 Stifter Jul 2005 A1
20050182320 Stifter Aug 2005 A1
20050192575 Pacheco Sep 2005 A1
20050203511 Wilson-MacDonald Sep 2005 A1
20050245817 Clayton Nov 2005 A1
20050251139 Roh Nov 2005 A1
20050262911 Dankowicz Dec 2005 A1
20050288809 Spaeth Dec 2005 A1
20060005601 Widmayer Jan 2006 A1
20060015030 Poulin Jan 2006 A1
20060094951 Dean May 2006 A1
20060120583 Dewaele Jun 2006 A1
20060150699 Garner Jul 2006 A1
20060212158 Miller Sep 2006 A1
20060235338 Pacheco Oct 2006 A1
20060247864 Tamez-Pena Nov 2006 A1
20060264934 Fallin Nov 2006 A1
20060264973 Abdelgany Nov 2006 A1
20060282020 Bertagnoli Dec 2006 A1
20070066917 Hodorek Mar 2007 A1
20070093824 Hestad Apr 2007 A1
20070093998 El-Baroudi Apr 2007 A1
20070118055 McCombs May 2007 A1
20070118243 Schroeder May 2007 A1
20070142751 Kang Jun 2007 A1
20070198022 Lang Aug 2007 A1
20070227216 Schalliol Oct 2007 A1
20070233246 Trieu Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac Oct 2007 A1
20070250169 Lang Oct 2007 A1
20070276501 Betz Nov 2007 A1
20080009945 Pacheco Jan 2008 A1
20080039717 Frigg Feb 2008 A1
20080065067 Steinberg Mar 2008 A1
20080154120 Von Jako Jun 2008 A1
20080167547 Bova Jul 2008 A1
20080208080 Ichikawa Aug 2008 A1
20080269596 Revie Oct 2008 A1
20080269898 Carls Oct 2008 A1
20080269906 Iannotti Oct 2008 A1
20080288229 Arvizo Nov 2008 A1
20080306490 Lakin Dec 2008 A1
20090022382 Feilkas Jan 2009 A1
20090024164 Neubardt Jan 2009 A1
20090043556 Axelson Feb 2009 A1
20090082666 Geist Mar 2009 A1
20090089034 Penney Apr 2009 A1
20090093852 Hynes Apr 2009 A1
20090099605 Fallin Apr 2009 A1
20090132050 Holm May 2009 A1
20090149977 Schendel Jun 2009 A1
20090157083 Park Jun 2009 A1
20090157185 Kim Jun 2009 A1
20090209851 Blau Aug 2009 A1
20090209884 Van Vorhis Aug 2009 A1
20090226055 Dankowicz Sep 2009 A1
20090226068 Fitz Sep 2009 A1
20090249851 Isaacs Oct 2009 A1
20090254097 Isaacs Oct 2009 A1
20090276045 Lang Nov 2009 A1
20100030231 Revie Feb 2010 A1
20100030232 Zehavi Feb 2010 A1
20100076563 Otto Mar 2010 A1
20100100011 Roche Apr 2010 A1
20100101295 Miller Apr 2010 A1
20100111631 Trieu May 2010 A1
20100145663 Skalli Jun 2010 A1
20100177946 De Bruijne Jul 2010 A1
20100191071 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100191088 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100191100 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100234725 Geist Sep 2010 A1
20100292795 Jensen Nov 2010 A1
20100292963 Schroeder Nov 2010 A1
20100329530 Lang Dec 2010 A1
20100332197 Melton Dec 2010 A1
20100332248 Pettersson Dec 2010 A1
20110010187 Andersson Jan 2011 A1
20110015514 Skalli Jan 2011 A1
20110040340 Miller Feb 2011 A1
20110066193 Lang Mar 2011 A1
20110071802 Bojarski Mar 2011 A1
20110093023 Lee Apr 2011 A1
20110093108 Ashby Apr 2011 A1
20110094278 Caporusso Apr 2011 A1
20110107270 Wang May 2011 A1
20110144752 Defelice Jun 2011 A1
20110196426 Peukert Aug 2011 A1
20110245871 Williams Oct 2011 A1
20110257653 Hughes Oct 2011 A1
20110265538 Trieu Nov 2011 A1
20110266265 Lang Nov 2011 A1
20110268325 Teichman Nov 2011 A1
20110270262 Justis Nov 2011 A1
20110295378 Bojarski Dec 2011 A1
20110305379 Mahfouz Dec 2011 A1
20110307020 Geist Dec 2011 A1
20110319745 Frey Dec 2011 A1
20120010710 Frigg Jan 2012 A1
20120016423 Hua Jan 2012 A1
20120047980 Harper Mar 2012 A1
20120063655 Dean Mar 2012 A1
20120116203 Vancraen May 2012 A1
20120141034 Iannotti Jun 2012 A1
20120178069 McKenzie Jul 2012 A1
20120186411 Lodahi Jul 2012 A1
20120191192 Park Jul 2012 A1
20120209394 Bojarski Aug 2012 A1
20120230566 Dean Sep 2012 A1
20120247173 Paris Oct 2012 A1
20120274631 Friedland Nov 2012 A1
20120290272 Bryan Nov 2012 A1
20120310364 Li Dec 2012 A1
20120323279 Tsuang Dec 2012 A1
20120325363 Knebl Dec 2012 A1
20130053854 Schoenefeld Feb 2013 A1
20130072982 Simonson Mar 2013 A1
20130073315 Cardamone Mar 2013 A1
20130090692 Nuckley Apr 2013 A1
20130091921 Wilcox Apr 2013 A1
20130110174 Marik May 2013 A1
20130123850 Schoenefeld May 2013 A1
20130131486 Copf May 2013 A1
20130166256 Wirx-Speetjens Jun 2013 A1
20130211531 Steines Aug 2013 A1
20130218163 Frey Aug 2013 A1
20130238096 Kotlus Sep 2013 A1
20130245803 Lang Sep 2013 A1
20130268007 Rezach Oct 2013 A1
20130296954 Skaggs Nov 2013 A1
20130304217 Recber Nov 2013 A1
20130307955 Deitz Nov 2013 A1
20130325069 Pereiro De Lamo Dec 2013 A1
20130332128 Miles Dec 2013 A1
20130345757 Stad Dec 2013 A1
20140025181 Vanasse Jan 2014 A1
20140066994 Dominik Mar 2014 A1
20140074438 Furrer Mar 2014 A1
20140076883 Brailovski Mar 2014 A1
20140081400 Azernikov Mar 2014 A1
20140137618 Isaacs May 2014 A1
20140213889 Macht Jul 2014 A1
20140244220 McKinnon Aug 2014 A1
20140257508 Bojarski Sep 2014 A1
20140311203 Crawford Oct 2014 A1
20140364916 Lorio Dec 2014 A1
20160001346 Holder Jan 2016 A1
20170143426 Isaacs et al. May 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
202982181 Jun 2013 CN
10314882 Oct 2004 DE
102004008870 Oct 2004 DE
1413257 Oct 2002 EP
1426023 Oct 2003 EP
1657681 May 2006 EP
2017785 Jan 2009 EP
2522295 Nov 2012 EP
2013230221 Nov 2013 JP
WO-2003030787 Apr 2003 WO
WO-2004070581 Aug 2004 WO
WO-2006055998 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2007009263 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2008021494 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008101090 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2008130355 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2009035358 Mar 2009 WO
WO-2009140294 Nov 2009 WO
WO-2010099231 Sep 2010 WO
WO-2012061452 May 2012 WO
WO-2012062464 May 2012 WO
WO-2012135653 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2012152900 Nov 2012 WO
WO-2013087082 Jun 2013 WO
WO-2013134623 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013150233 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2014016824 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2013041618 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014037093 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014048448 Apr 2014 WO
WO-2014070889 May 2014 WO
WO-2014079812 May 2014 WO
WO-2014088801 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014107144 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Ames, C et al., “Impact of Spinopelvic Alignment on Decision Making in Deformity Surgery in Adults: A Review,” J Neurosurg Spine 16: 547-564, 2012.
Aubin, C et al., “Preoperative Planning Simulator for Spinal Deformity Surgeries,” Spine vol. 33, No. 20, pp. 2143-2152, 2008.
Langlotz et al. “A Pilot Study on Computer-Assisted Optimal Contouring of Orthopedic Fixation Devices”. Computer Aided Surgery vol. 4 (1999): 305-313.
Le Huec, J et al., “Equilibrium of the Human Body and the Gravity Line: The Basics,” Eur Spine J (2011) 20 (Suppl 5):S558-S563.
Roussouly, P et al., “Sagittal Parameters of the Spine: Biomechanical Approach,” Eur Spine J (2011) 20 (Suppl 5):S578-S585.
Schwab, F et al., “Adult Spinal Deformity—Postoperative Standing Imbalance, How Much Can You Tolerate? An Overview of Key Parameters in Assessing Alignment and Planning Corrective Surgery,” Spine vol. 35, No. 25, 2224-2231, 2010.
Terran, J et al., “The SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: Assessment and Clinical Correlations Based on a Perspective Operative and Nonoperative Cohort,” Neurosurgery 73: 559-568, 2013.
Goodrich and Volcan, eds., “Spinal Alignment and Correction in Adults,” eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®), 2nd Edition, 2013, Chapter 9, 91-115, Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62065531 Oct 2014 US