Systems and methods for performing spine surgery

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10485589
  • Patent Number
    10,485,589
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 24, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 26, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
A digitizer pointer is provided as part of a system for correcting a curvature or deformity in a patient's spine based on the digitized locations of implanted screws and tracking the placement of the rod as it is placed in a minimally invasive fashion. The digitizer pointer is includes an offset adjustment feature, a swivel feature, and a translation feature.
Description
FIELD

The present application pertains to spine surgery. More particularly, the present application pertains to systems and methods related to the planning, design, formation, and implantation of spinal implants.


BACKGROUND

The spinal column is a highly complex system of bones and connective tissues that provide support for the body and protect the delicate spinal cord and nerves. The spinal column includes a series of vertebral bodies stacked atop one another, each vertebral body including an inner or central portion of relatively weak cancellous bone and an outer portion of relatively strong cortical bone. Situated between each vertebral body is an intervertebral disc that cushions and dampens compressive forces exerted upon the spinal column. A vertebral canal containing the spinal cord is located behind the vertebral bodies. The spine has a natural curvature (i.e., lordosis in the lumbar and cervical regions and kyphosis in the thoracic region) such that the endplates of the upper and lower vertebrae are inclined towards one another.


There are many types of spinal column disorders including scoliosis (abnormal lateral curvature of the spine), excess kyphosis (abnormal forward curvature of the spine), excess lordosis (abnormal backward curvature of the spine), spondylolisthesis (forward displacement of one vertebra over another), and other disorders caused by abnormalities, disease, or trauma (such as ruptured or slipped discs, degenerative disc disease, fractured vertebrae, and the like). Patients that suffer from such conditions often experience extreme and debilitating pain, as well as diminished nerve function. Posterior fixation for spinal fusions, decompression, deformity, and other reconstructions are performed to treat these patients. The aim of posterior fixation in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical procedures is to stabilize the spinal segments, correct multi-axis alignment, and aid in optimizing the long-term health of the spinal cord and nerves.


Screws, hooks, and rods are devices used to stabilize the spine during a spinal fixation procedure. Such procedures often require the instrumentation of many bony elements. The devices, for example rods, can be extremely challenging to design and implant into the patient. Spinal rods are usually formed of stainless steel, titanium, cobalt chrome, or other similarly hard metal, and as such are difficult to bend without some sort of leverage-based bender. Moreover, a spinal rod needs to be oriented in six degrees of freedom to compensate for the anatomical structure of a patient's spine as well as the attachment points (screws, hooks) for securing the rod to the vertebrae. Additionally, the physiological problem being treated as well as the physician's preferences will determine the exact configuration necessary. Accordingly, the size, length, and particular bends of the spinal rod depends on the size, number, and position of each vertebrae to be constrained, the spatial relationship amongst vertebrae, as well as the screws and hooks used to hold the rods attached to the vertebrae.


The bending of a spinal rod can be accomplished by a number of methods. The most widely used method is a three-point bender called a French Bender. The French bender is a pliers-like device that is manually operated to place one or more bends in a rod. The French bender requires both handles to operate and provides leverage based on the length of the handle. The use of the French bender requires a high degree of physician skill because the determination of the location, angle, and rotation of bends is often subjective and can be difficult to correlate to a patient's anatomy. Other methods of bending a rod to fit a screw and/or hook construct include the use of an in-situ rod bender and a keyhole bender. However, all of these methods can be subjective, iterative, and are often referred to as an “art.” As such, rod bending and reduction activities can be a time consuming and potentially frustrating step in the finalization of a complex and/or long spinal construct. Increased time in the operating room to achieve optimum bending can be costly to the patient and increase the chance of the morbidity. When rod bending is performed poorly, the rod can preload the construct and increase the chance of failure of the fixation system. The bending and re-bending involved can also promote metal fatigue and the creation of stress risers in the rod.


Efforts directed to computer-aided design or shaping of spinal rods have been largely unsuccessful due to the lack of bending devices as well as lack of understanding of all of the issues involved in bending surgical devices. U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,831, issued Jun. 7, 2011 to Isaacs, describes a rod bending system which includes a spatial measurement sub-system with a digitizer to obtain the three dimensional location of surgical implants (screws, hooks), software to convert the implant locations to a series of bend instructions, and a mechanical rod bender used to execute the bend instructions such that the rod will be bent precisely to custom fit within each of the screws. This is advantageous because it provides quantifiable rod bending steps that are customized to each patient's anatomy enabling surgeons to create custom-fit rods on the first pass, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of rod bending, particularly in complex cases. This, in turn, reduces the morbidity and cost associated with such procedures. However, a need still exists for improved rod bending systems that allow for curvature and deformity correction in fixation procedures, provide the user with more rod bending options, and accommodate more of the user's clinical preferences including the ability to determine the spatial orientation of the tip of the rod and the tip of the rod pusher relative to one another.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure describes a digitizer pointer configured for use as part of a surgical rod bending system. More specifically, digitizer pointer comprises a part of a spatial tracking system used to obtain the location of one or more surgical implants during a surgical procedure. The digitizer pointer includes an adjustable offset feature to allow the user to digitize a point above the actual implant, a swivel feature that allows the distal end of the and the proximal end to swivel relative to one another and a translation feature that allows the distal end to mate with any number of instrumentation types in any number of surgical procedures.


By way of example, the digitizer pointer includes a proximal portion, a middle portion, and a distal portion. The proximal portion, middle portion, and distal portion comprise separate pieces that are assembled to form a single generally cylindrical elongated instrument. The proximal portion includes an elongate tubular member and an inner piston. The inner piston includes a threaded post at the proximal end for mating with additional tracking instrumentation, for example an IR-reflective tracking array. The elongate tubular member and inner piston comprise the adjustable offset feature component of the digitizer pointer.


The swivel feature includes several elements positioned on the distal end of the elongated tubular member working in concert with several elements positioned on the proximal end of the middle portion. The distal end of the elongate tubular member comprises a smooth cylindrical post. A circumferential recess is formed within the cylindrical post, and a raised lip is positioned at the proximal end of the cylindrical post. The proximal end of the middle portion comprises a swivel housing including a cylindrical cavity sized and configured to receive the cylindrical post therein. Retention pins extend through pin apertures in the swivel housing and into the cavity. Upon assembly, the retention pins occupy space in the circumferential recess, and allow for rotational (swivel) movement of the cylindrical post while ensuring the cylindrical post remains within the cavity. The raised lip interfaces with the rim of the cavity to form a swivel interface.


By way of example, the swivel feature may be desireable, according to surgeon preference to re-orient a screw-tulip to align with the other screws (and eventual rod) within a construct. For example, after the digitizer pointer is engaged with a spinal implant (e.g bone screw), the user may manually hold the distal portion of the digitizer pointer (e.g. any suitable place distal of the swivel interface) and swivel the proximal portion of the digitizer pointer (e.g. any suitable place proximal of the swivel interface) about the swivel feature. The proximal portion of the digital pointer is then rotated until the IR array (attached to the threaded post) comes in view of the camera.


The translation feature includes several elements positioned on the middle portion working in concert with several elements positioned on the distal portion. In addition to the swivel housing, the middle portion includes an elongate shaft extending distally from the swivel housing. The elongate shaft includes a proximal segment and a distal segment. By way of example, the proximal segment may have a different width dimension (e.g. diameter) than the distal segment. In the example shown and described herein, the proximal segment has a width diameter that is greater than the width dimension of the distal segment. The proximal segment has a smooth surface to facilitate translation of the distal portion. The proximal segment further has a guide pin extending laterally away from the smooth surface positioned approximately in the middle of the proximal segment. The guide pin is received within the shaped track to help control translation of the distal portion, as will be explained. The distal segment extends distally from the proximal segment and includes a hex lobe attachment feature positioned at the distal end. The hex lobe attachment feature is configured to engage a spinal implant, for example a bone screw head. A spring is positioned about the proximal segment and is configured to exert a force on the distal portion to bias the distal portion in an extended position (in which the hex lobe attachment feature is positioned within the fork member.


The distal portion comprises an outer sleeve having a track housing at the proximal end, a fork member at the distal end, and an interior lumen extending through the entire length of the distal portion. The interior lumen is sized and configured to slideably receive the distal segment of the middle portion therein. The track housing includes a shaped track configured to receive the pin therein. The track has a first lock slot positioned at the proximal end of the shaped track and a second lock slot positioned at the distal end of the shaped track. The fork member includes a pair of parallel extensions having shaped ends configured to engage a portion of a spinal implant, for example a tulip portion of a rod-receiving bone screw.


The spring exerts a force on the distal portion that biases the distal portion in an extended position. In this position, the guide pin is positioned within the first lock slot at the proximal end of the shaped track. A user may manually engage (e.g. grab) the track housing and rotate the housing such that the guide pin is urged out of the first lock slot, along the main portion of the shaped track, and into the second lock slot. As this happens, the distal portion will be experience translation in a proximal direction. When the guide pin is fully resting in the second lock slot after translation, the hex lobe attachment feature of the middle portion will extend beyond the fork member.


The translating feature allows the surgeon to perform two digitizing methods depending on the surgical procedure and the goals of the surgical procedure. In the first setting (in which the guide pin is in the first lock slot), the hex lobe attachment feature is in a retracted position (since the distal portion is extended), and the digitizer pointer can digitize all open, fixed, and connector tulips via engagement between the implanted device and the fork member. In the second setting (in which the pin is in the second lock slot), the hex lobe attachment feature extends past the distal ends of the fork member, and the digitizer pointer can digitize when there has been a lock screw placed. The hex lobe attachment feature mates with a lock screw and allows the surgeon to digitize the location of the temporary rod placement. Thus, the surgeon can digitize where the spine is during the temporary rod placement and when final rod bending is being achieved, for example during a pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an example of a digitizer pointer according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of the digitizer pointer of FIG. 1; and



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the digitizer pointer of FIG. 1 in a translated position.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implantation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The systems and methods disclosed herein boast a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.


The digitizer pointer 10 of the present disclosure is configured to be used as part of a surgical rod bending system, for example the surgical rod bending systems shown and described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,539,888, issued Oct. 8, 2013 and entitled “System and Device for Designing and Forming a Surgical Implant,” and commonly-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/815,643, filed Mar. 12, 2013 and entitled “System and Method for Performing Spinal Surgery,” the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein. More specifically, digitizer pointer comprises a part of a spatial tracking system used to obtain the location of one or more surgical implants during a surgical procedure. In addition to the spatial tracking system, the surgical bending systems described in the '888 patent and '643 application also include a control unit containing software to convert the implant locations to a series of bend instructions, and a mechanical rod bender to receive the bend instructions and effect precise bends in the rod. In addition to the adjustable offset feature previously disclosed (and incorporated by reference into this disclosure), the digitizer pointer 10 of the present disclosure includes a swivel feature that allows the distal end and the proximal end to swivel relative to one another and a translation feature that allows the distal end to mate with any number of instrumentation types in any number of surgical procedures.


Generally, the spatial tracking system includes an IR sensor, a digitizer pointer, as well as other components including Host USB converter. The spatial tracking system is in communication with control unit. The control unit has spatial relation software and is communicatively linked to the display so that information relevant to the surgical procedure may be conveyed to the user in a meaningful manner. By way of example, the relevant information includes, but is not limited to, spatial positioning data acquired by the IR sensor (e.g., translational data in the x, y, and z axes and orientation/rotational data Rx, Ry, and Rz). A neuromonitoring system may be communicatively linked to the spatial tracking system via the control unit. By way of example only, the neuromonitoring system may be the neuromonitoring system shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,255,045, entitled “Neurophysiologic Monitoring System” and filed on Apr. 3, 2008, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. Once the user has digitized the implant locations and selected the desired rod solution, the user then executes the bends using a mechanical rod bender.



FIGS. 1-3 illustrate an example of a digitizer pointer 10 according to one implementation. The digitizer pointer 10 may be an all-in-one combination digitizer pointer for so-called “open” spine surgeries. By way of example, the digitizer pointer 10 includes a proximal portion 12, a middle portion 14, and a distal portion 16. By way of example, the proximal portion 12, middle portion 14, and distal portion 16 comprise separate pieces that are assembled to form a single generally cylindrical elongated instrument. The proximal portion 12 includes an elongate tubular member 18 and an inner piston 20. The inner piston 20 includes a threaded post 22 at the proximal end for mating with additional tracking instrumentation, for example an IR-reflective tracking array such as one shown and described in the above-referenced '643 application (incorporated by reference). The elongate tubular member 18 and inner piston 20 comprise the adjustable offset feature component of the digitizer pointer 10. The adjustable offset feature allows the surgeon to add correction in the sagittal plane, and specific elements germane to the adjustable offset feature component are identical in form and function to the corresponding elements shown and described in the above-referenced '643 application (incorporated by reference) and will not be repeated here.


The swivel feature will now be described in more detail. In the example shown and described herein, the swivel feature includes several elements positioned on the distal end 24 of the elongated tubular member 18 working in concert with several elements positioned on the proximal end 26 of the middle portion 14. The distal end 24 of the elongate tubular member 18 comprises a smooth cylindrical post 28. A circumferential recess 30 is formed within the cylindrical post 28, and a raised lip 32 is positioned at the proximal end of the cylindrical post 28. The proximal end 26 of the middle portion 14 comprises a swivel housing 34 including a cylindrical cavity 36 sized and configured to receive the cylindrical post 28 therein. Retention pins 38 extend through pin apertures 40 in the swivel housing 34 and into the cavity 36. Upon assembly, the retention pins 38 occupy space in the circumferential recess 30, and allow for rotational (swivel) movement of the cylindrical post 28 while ensuring the cylindrical post 28 remains within the cavity 36. The raised lip 32 interfaces with the rim of the cavity 36 to form a swivel interface location.


By way of example, the swivel feature may be desireable, according to surgeon preference to re-orient a screw-tulip to align with the other screws (and eventual rod) within a construct. For example, after the digitizer pointer 10 is engaged with a spinal implant (e.g bone screw), the user may manually hold the distal portion of the digitizer pointer 10 (e.g. any suitable place distal of the swivel interface) and swivel the proximal portion of the digitizer pointer 10 (e.g. any suitable place proximal of the swivel interface) about the swivel feature. The proximal portion of the digital pointer 10 is then rotated until the IR array (attached to the threaded post 22) comes in view of the camera.


The translation feature will now be described in more detail. In the example shown and described herein, the translation feature includes several elements positioned on the middle portion 14 working in concert with several elements positioned on the distal portion 16. In addition to the swivel housing 34 previously described, the middle portion 14 includes a elongate shaft 42 extending distally from the swivel housing 34. The elongate shaft 42 includes a proximal segment 44 and a distal segment 46. By way of example, the proximal segment 44 may have a different width dimension (e.g. diameter) than the distal segment 46. In the example shown and described herein, the proximal segment 44 has a width diameter that is greater than the width dimension of the distal segment 46. The proximal segment 44 has a smooth surface to facilitate translation of the distal portion 16, as will be explained below. The proximal segment 44 further has a guide pin 48 extending laterally away from the smooth surface positioned approximately in the middle of the proximal segment 44. The guide pin 48 is received within the shaped track 62 to help control translation of the distal portion 16, as will be explained. The distal segment 46 extends distally from the proximal segment 44 and includes a hex lobe attachment feature 50 positioned at the distal end. The hex lobe attachment feature 50 is configured to engage a spinal implant, for example a bone screw head (not shown). A spring 52 is positioned about the proximal segment 46 and is configured to exert a force on the distal portion 16 to bias the distal portion 16 in an extended position (in which the hex lobe attachment feature 50 is positioned within the fork member 58.


The distal portion 16 comprises an outer sleeve 54 having a track housing 56 at the proximal end, a fork member 58 at the distal end, and an interior lumen 60 extending through the entire length of the distal portion 16. The interior lumen 60 is sized and configured to slideably receive the distal segment 46 of the middle portion 14 therein. The track housing 56 includes a shaped track 62 configured to receive the pin 48 therein. The track 62 may have any shape that facilitates self-locking, for example such the “C”-shape shown by way of example in FIGS. 1-3. The track 62 has a first lock slot 64 positioned at the proximal end of the shaped track 62 and a second lock slot 66 positioned at the distal end of the shaped track 62. The fork member 58 includes a pair of parallel extensions 68 having shaped ends 70 configured to engage a portion of a spinal implant, for example a tulip portion of a rod-receiving bone screw (not shown).


As previously mentioned, the spring 52 exerts a force on the distal portion 16 that biases the distal portion 16 in an extended position. In this position, the pin 48 is positioned within the first lock slot 64 at the proximal end of the shaped track 62. A user may manually engage (e.g. grab) the track housing 56 and rotate the housing 56 such that the guide pin 48 is urged out of the first lock slot 64, along the main portion of the shaped track 62, and into the second lock slot 66. As this happens, the distal portion 16 will be experience translation in a proximal direction. When the pin 48 is fully resting in the second lock slot 66 after translation, the hex lobe attachment feature 50 of the middle portion 14 will extend beyond the fork member 58, as shown in FIG. 3.


The translating feature allows the surgeon to perform two digitizing methods depending on the surgical procedure and the goals of the surgical procedure. In the first setting (in which the pin 48 is in the first lock slot 64), the hex lobe attachment feature 50 is in a retracted position (since the distal portion 16 is extended), and the digitizer pointer 10 can digitize all open, fixed, and connector tulips via engagement between the implanted device and the fork member 58. In the second setting (in which the pin 48 is in the second lock slot 66), the hex lobe attachment feature 50 extends past the distal ends 70 of the fork member 58, and the digitizer pointer 10 can digitize when there has been a lock screw placed. The hex lobe attachment feature 50 mates with a lock screw (not shown) and allows the surgeon to digitize the location of the temporary rod placement. Thus, the surgeon can digitize where the spine is during the temporary rod placement and when final rod bending is being achieved, for example during a pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedure.


While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown, by way of example only, in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed. On the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined herein.

Claims
  • 1. A device for positioning an infrared tracking member relative to implanted surgical implants, comprising: a first elongated element comprising a proximal portion of the device, the first elongated element comprising a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end comprising an attachment element for attaching the infrared tracking member to the device, the distal end comprising a recess;a second elongated element linearly aligned with the first elongated element and comprising a middle portion of the device, the second elongated element having a proximal elongated shaft segment and a distal elongated shaft segment and a guide pin extending laterally away from the second elongated element, the proximal elongated shaft segment having a proximal end comprising a cavity formed within the proximal end and a retention element, the retention element configured to engage the recess, the distal elongated shaft segment having a distal end comprising an attachment feature configured to engage a surgical implant; wherein the first elongated element is independently rotatable of the second elongated element; anda third elongated element linearly aligned with the second elongated element and comprising a distal portion of the device, wherein the third elongated element has a track housing configured to receive the guide pin on the second elongated element, and wherein the second and third elongated elements are slideably associated with one another through movement of the guide pin in the track housing.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the attachment element is a threaded post.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the first elongated element further comprises a smooth post.
  • 4. The device of claim 3, wherein the cavity is configured to receive the smooth post.
  • 5. The device of claim 4, wherein the retention element is configured to prevent the smooth post from ejecting from the cavity.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the second elongated element is translationally associated with the third elongated element.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the third elongated element comprises a tubular member including a central lumen extending longitudinally therethrough.
  • 8. The device of claim 7, wherein the second elongated element is slideably received within the central lumen.
  • 9. The device of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the third elongated element comprises a shaped end configured to engage a surgical implant.
  • 10. A device for positioning an infrared tracking member relative to implanted surgical implants, comprising: a first elongated element comprising a proximal portion of the device, the first elongated element comprising a proximal end, a distal end, a helical slot, a plurality of offset depth slots located around the helical slot, and a helical pin extending laterally away from the first elongated element, the proximal end includes an inner piston comprising an attachment element for attaching the infrared tracking member to the device, wherein the inner piston comprises a slot configured to receive the helical pin, wherein the plurality of offset depth slots are configured to receive the helical pin, wherein the proximal end and the inner piston are slideably associated with one another through movement of the helical pin in the helical slot, the distal end comprising a recess;a second elongated element linearly aligned with the first elongated element and comprising a middle portion of the device, the second elongated element having a proximal elongated shaft segment and a distal elongated shaft segment and a guide pin extending laterally away from the second elongated element, the proximal elongated shaft segment having a proximal end comprising a cavity formed within the proximal end and a retention element, the retention element configured to engage the recess, the distal elongated shaft segment having a distal end comprising an attachment feature configured to engage a surgical implant;wherein the first elongated element is independently rotatable of the second elongated element; anda third elongated element linearly aligned with the second elongated element and comprising a distal portion of the device, wherein the third elongated element has a track housing configured to receive the guide pin on the second elongated element, and wherein the second and third elongated elements are slideably associated with one another through movement of the guide pin in the track housing.
  • 11. The device of claim 10, wherein the third elongated element further comprises a tubular member including a central lumen extending longitudinally therethrough.
  • 12. The device of claim 11, wherein the second elongated element is slideably received within the central lumen.
  • 13. The device of claim 10, wherein the first elongated element is independently rotatable relative to the second elongated element.
  • 14. The device of claim 10, wherein the first elongated element has a distal end including a smooth post extending distally therefrom.
  • 15. The device of claim 14, wherein the second elongated element has a proximal end including a cavity formed within the proximal end, the cavity configured to receive the smooth post.
  • 16. The device of claim 10, the distal end of the third elongated element comprises a shaped end configured to engage a surgical implant.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/887,246 filed Oct. 19, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/065,531 filed on Oct. 17, 2014 and entitled “Systems and Methods of Performing Spine Surgery,” the complete disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference into this application as if set forth fully herein.

US Referenced Citations (207)
Number Name Date Kind
3365804 Fjellstrom Jan 1968 A
4282737 Maples Aug 1981 A
4474046 Cook Oct 1984 A
4773402 Asher Sep 1988 A
5113685 Asher May 1992 A
5161404 Hayes Nov 1992 A
5257184 Mushabac Oct 1993 A
5290289 Sanders Mar 1994 A
5365996 Crook Nov 1994 A
5389099 Hartmeister Feb 1995 A
5490409 Weber Feb 1996 A
5548985 Yapp Aug 1996 A
5658286 Sava Aug 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5682886 Delp Nov 1997 A
5704937 Martin Jan 1998 A
5768134 Swaelens Jun 1998 A
5806521 Morimoto Sep 1998 A
5819571 Johnson Oct 1998 A
5819580 Gauthier Oct 1998 A
5901600 Decker May 1999 A
6006581 Holmes Dec 1999 A
6035691 Lin Mar 2000 A
6205411 Digioia, III Mar 2001 B1
6226548 Foley May 2001 B1
6236875 Bucholz May 2001 B1
6301495 Gueziec Oct 2001 B1
6327491 Franklin Dec 2001 B1
6332780 Traxel Dec 2001 B1
6347240 Foley Feb 2002 B1
6529765 Franck Mar 2003 B1
6578280 Kinoshita Jun 2003 B2
6644087 Ralph Nov 2003 B1
6701174 Krause Mar 2004 B1
6906724 Lake Jun 2005 B2
6978188 Christensen Dec 2005 B1
7206626 Quaid, III Apr 2007 B2
7454939 Garner Nov 2008 B2
7837467 Butscher Nov 2010 B2
9526537 Meyer Dec 2016 B2
9913669 Scholl Mar 2018 B1
20020007294 Bradbury Jan 2002 A1
20020133097 Leitner Sep 2002 A1
20020183610 Foley Dec 2002 A1
20030055435 Barrick Mar 2003 A1
20030055502 Lang Mar 2003 A1
20030149351 Nowinski Aug 2003 A1
20030205075 Strippgen Nov 2003 A1
20030215122 Tanaka Nov 2003 A1
20040068187 Krause Apr 2004 A1
20040097952 Sarin May 2004 A1
20040122549 Otsuki Jun 2004 A1
20040133276 Lang Jul 2004 A1
20040147927 Tsougarakis Jul 2004 A1
20040152972 Hunter Aug 2004 A1
20040158260 Blau Aug 2004 A1
20040167637 Biscup Aug 2004 A1
20050054917 Kitson Mar 2005 A1
20050074304 Couture Apr 2005 A1
20050101966 Lavallee May 2005 A1
20050119593 Gallard Jun 2005 A1
20050149050 Stifter Jul 2005 A1
20050182320 Stifter Aug 2005 A1
20050192575 Pacheco Sep 2005 A1
20050203511 Wilson-MacDonald Sep 2005 A1
20050245817 Clayton Nov 2005 A1
20050251139 Roh Nov 2005 A1
20050262911 Dankowicz Dec 2005 A1
20050288809 Spaeth Dec 2005 A1
20060005601 Widmayer Jan 2006 A1
20060015030 Poulin Jan 2006 A1
20060094951 Dean May 2006 A1
20060120583 Dewaele Jun 2006 A1
20060150699 Garner Jul 2006 A1
20060212158 Miller Sep 2006 A1
20060235338 Pacheco Oct 2006 A1
20060247864 Tamez-Pena Nov 2006 A1
20060264934 Fallin Nov 2006 A1
20060264973 Abdelgany Nov 2006 A1
20060282020 Bertagnoli Dec 2006 A1
20070066917 Hodorek Mar 2007 A1
20070093824 Hestad Apr 2007 A1
20070093998 El-Baroudi Apr 2007 A1
20070118055 McCombs May 2007 A1
20070118243 Schroeder May 2007 A1
20070142751 Kang Jun 2007 A1
20070198022 Lang Aug 2007 A1
20070227216 Schalliol Oct 2007 A1
20070233246 Trieu Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac Oct 2007 A1
20070250169 Lang Oct 2007 A1
20070276501 Betz Nov 2007 A1
20080009945 Pacheco Jan 2008 A1
20080039717 Frigg Feb 2008 A1
20080065067 Steinberg Mar 2008 A1
20080154120 Von Jako Jun 2008 A1
20080167547 Bova Jul 2008 A1
20080208080 Ichikawa Aug 2008 A1
20080269596 Revie Oct 2008 A1
20080269898 Carls Oct 2008 A1
20080269906 Iannotti Oct 2008 A1
20080288229 Arvizo Nov 2008 A1
20080306490 Lakin Dec 2008 A1
20090022382 Feilkas Jan 2009 A1
20090024164 Neubardt Jan 2009 A1
20090043556 Axelson Feb 2009 A1
20090082666 Geist Mar 2009 A1
20090089034 Penney Apr 2009 A1
20090093852 Hynes Apr 2009 A1
20090099605 Fallin Apr 2009 A1
20090132050 Holm May 2009 A1
20090149977 Schendel Jun 2009 A1
20090157083 Park Jun 2009 A1
20090157185 Kim Jun 2009 A1
20090209851 Blau Aug 2009 A1
20090209884 Van Vorhis Aug 2009 A1
20090226055 Dankowicz Sep 2009 A1
20090226068 Fitz Sep 2009 A1
20090249851 Isaacs Oct 2009 A1
20090254097 Isaacs Oct 2009 A1
20090276045 Lang Nov 2009 A1
20100030231 Revie Feb 2010 A1
20100030232 Zehavi Feb 2010 A1
20100076563 Otto Mar 2010 A1
20100100011 Roche Apr 2010 A1
20100101295 Miller Apr 2010 A1
20100111631 Trieu May 2010 A1
20100145663 Skalli Jun 2010 A1
20100177946 De Bruijne Jul 2010 A1
20100191071 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100191088 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100191100 Anderson Jul 2010 A1
20100234725 Geist Sep 2010 A1
20100292795 Jensen Nov 2010 A1
20100292963 Schroeder Nov 2010 A1
20100329530 Lang Dec 2010 A1
20100332197 Melton Dec 2010 A1
20100332248 Pettersson Dec 2010 A1
20110010187 Andersson Jan 2011 A1
20110015514 Skalli Jan 2011 A1
20110040340 Miller Feb 2011 A1
20110066193 Lang Mar 2011 A1
20110071802 Bojarski Mar 2011 A1
20110093023 Lee Apr 2011 A1
20110093108 Ashby Apr 2011 A1
20110094278 Caporusso Apr 2011 A1
20110107270 Wang May 2011 A1
20110144752 Defelice Jun 2011 A1
20110196426 Peukert Aug 2011 A1
20110245871 Williams Oct 2011 A1
20110257653 Hughes Oct 2011 A1
20110265538 Trieu Nov 2011 A1
20110266265 Lang Nov 2011 A1
20110268325 Teichman Nov 2011 A1
20110270262 Justis Nov 2011 A1
20110295378 Bojarski Dec 2011 A1
20110305379 Mahfouz Dec 2011 A1
20110307020 Geist Dec 2011 A1
20110319745 Frey Dec 2011 A1
20120010710 Frigg Jan 2012 A1
20120016423 Hua Jan 2012 A1
20120047980 Harper Mar 2012 A1
20120063655 Dean Mar 2012 A1
20120116203 Vancraen May 2012 A1
20120141034 Iannotti Jun 2012 A1
20120178069 McKenzie Jul 2012 A1
20120186411 Lodahi Jul 2012 A1
20120191192 Park Jul 2012 A1
20120209394 Bojarski Aug 2012 A1
20120230566 Dean Sep 2012 A1
20120247173 Paris Oct 2012 A1
20120274631 Friedland Nov 2012 A1
20120290272 Bryan Nov 2012 A1
20120310364 Li Dec 2012 A1
20120323279 Tsuang Dec 2012 A1
20120325363 Knebl Dec 2012 A1
20130053854 Schoenefeld Feb 2013 A1
20130072982 Simonson Mar 2013 A1
20130073315 Cardamone Mar 2013 A1
20130090692 Nuckley Apr 2013 A1
20130091921 Wilcox Apr 2013 A1
20130110174 Marik May 2013 A1
20130123850 Schoenefeld May 2013 A1
20130131486 Copf May 2013 A1
20130166256 Wirx-Speetjens Jun 2013 A1
20130211531 Steines Aug 2013 A1
20130218163 Frey Aug 2013 A1
20130238096 Kotlus Sep 2013 A1
20130245803 Lang Sep 2013 A1
20130268007 Rezach Oct 2013 A1
20130296954 Skaggs Nov 2013 A1
20130304217 Recber Nov 2013 A1
20130307955 Deitz Nov 2013 A1
20130325069 Pereiro De Lamo Dec 2013 A1
20130332128 Miles Dec 2013 A1
20130345757 Stad Dec 2013 A1
20140025181 Vanasse Jan 2014 A1
20140066994 Dominik Mar 2014 A1
20140074438 Furrer Mar 2014 A1
20140076883 Brailovski Mar 2014 A1
20140081400 Azernikov Mar 2014 A1
20140137618 Isaacs May 2014 A1
20140213889 Macht Jul 2014 A1
20140244220 McKinnon Aug 2014 A1
20140257508 Bojarski Sep 2014 A1
20140311203 Crawford Oct 2014 A1
20140364916 Lorio Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
202982181 Jun 2013 CN
10314882 Oct 2004 DE
102004008870 Oct 2004 DE
1413257 Oct 2002 EP
1426023 Oct 2003 EP
1657681 May 2006 EP
2017785 Jan 2009 EP
2522295 Nov 2012 EP
2013230221 Nov 2013 JP
WO-2003030787 Apr 2003 WO
WO-2004070581 Aug 2004 WO
WO-2006055998 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2007009263 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2008021494 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008101090 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2008130355 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2009035358 Mar 2009 WO
WO-2009140294 Nov 2009 WO
WO-2010099231 Sep 2010 WO
WO-2012061452 May 2012 WO
WO-2012062464 May 2012 WO
WO-2012135653 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2012152900 Nov 2012 WO
WO-2013087082 Jun 2013 WO
WO-2013134623 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013150233 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2014016824 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2013041618 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014037093 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014048448 Apr 2014 WO
WO-2014070889 May 2014 WO
WO-2014079812 May 2014 WO
WO-2014088801 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014107144 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Ames, C et al., “Impact of Spinopelvic Alignment on Decision Making in Deformity Surgery in Adults: A Review,” J Neurosurg Spine 16: 547-564, 2012.
Aubin, C et al., “Preoperative Planning Simulator for Spinal Deformity Surgeries,” Spine vol. 33, No. 20, pp. 2143-2152, 2008.
Langlotz et al. “A Pilot Study on Computer-Assisted Optimal Contouring of Orthopedic Fixation Devices”. Computer Aided Surgery vol. 4 (1999): 305-313.
Le Huec, J et al., “Equilibrium of the Human Body and the Gravity Line: The Basics,” Eur Spine J (2011) 20 (Suppl 5):S558-S563.
Roussouly, P et al., “Sagittal Parameters of the Spine: Biomechanical Approach,” Eur Spine J (2011) 20 (Suppl 5):S578-S585.
Schwab, F et al., “Adult Spinal Deformity—Postoperative Standing Imbalance, How Much Can You Tolerate? An Overview of Key Parameters in Assessing Alignment and Planning Corrective Surgery,” Spine vol. 35, No. 25, 2224-2231, 2010.
Terran, J et al., “The SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: Assessment and Clinical Correlations Based on a Perspective Operative and Nonoperative Cohort,” Neurosurgery 73: 559-568, 2013.
Goodrich and Volcan, eds., “Spinal Alignment and Correction in Adults,” eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®), 2nd Edition, 2013, Chapter 9, 91-115, Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180161078 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62065531 Oct 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14887246 Oct 2015 US
Child 15879397 US