The embodiments described herein relate generally to medical devices. More particularly, the embodiments described herein relate to systems and methods for phlebotomy through an intravenous catheter.
The typical hospitalized patient encounters a needle every time a doctor orders a lab test. The standard procedure for blood extraction involves using a metal needle (“butterfly needle”) to “stick” patients' veins in their arms or hands. Blood drawing is a manual, labor-intensive process, with the average patient requiring hours of direct skilled labor during a typical hospital stay. This needle stick is not only painful and a major source of patient dissatisfaction, but the nurses or specialized blood drawing personnel (phlebotomists) often have difficulty finding the vein in approximately 10-15% of patients, resulting in multiple, painful “stick” attempts. This results in significantly higher material and labor costs (needles and tubing must be disposed of after every attempt) and increased patient pain and bruising.
The current process for drawing blood is inefficient, taking on average 7-10 minutes, and more than 21 minutes for 10% of patients. These 10% of patients are referred to as Difficult Intra-Venous Access or more commonly as “tough stick” patients. If superficial veins are not readily apparent, blood can be forced into the vein by massaging the arm from wrist to elbow, tapping the site with the index and middle finger, applying a warm, damp washcloth to the site for 5 minutes, or by lowering the extremity over the bedside to allow the veins to fill. Each of these methods is time consuming and therefore costly.
Peripheral IV catheters (PIVs) are inserted into most patients while they are hospitalized and used for infusing fluids and medications. However, they are not designed for blood extractions. The failure rates for aspiration reach 20-50% when PIVs have been left inserted for more than a day. Blood extracted from PIVs is often hemolyzed, defined as the rupture of red blood cells and the release of their contents into surrounding fluid, resulting in a discarded sample and need to repeat the blood collection.
There are several mechanical barriers that can contribute to the shortcomings of extracting blood from a NV. First, most catheters are formed from a soft bio-reactive polymer, the use of this material has led to a potential narrowing or collapse of the catheter as the negative pressure is applied for aspiration. Additionally, with longer indwelling times comes an increase in debris (e.g., fibrin/platelet clots) that build up on the tip of the catheter and within the lumen. This explains the relationship between failure rate and indwelling time. A third significant barrier is attributed to a “suction cup” effect, wherein the negative pressure created by aspiration through the catheter and the possible curved path of a vein result in the tip of the catheter adhering to the wall of the vein. As the negative pressure increases the vein can rupture resulting in “blowing the vein”, a major concern for phlebotomists during aspiration through a PIV.
Thus, a need exists for an improved system and method for phlebotomy.
Systems and methods for phlebotomy are described herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes an introducer, and a catheter. The catheter includes a proximal end and a distal end defining a lumen. The introducer includes a proximal end and a distal end defining a lumen and is configured to receive the catheter. An actuator, operatively coupled to the catheter, is configured to move the catheter between a first configuration, in which the catheter is substantially within the introducer, and a second configuration, in which the catheter is substantially outside the introducer. A locking mechanism, coupled to the distal end of the introducer, is configured to couple the introducer to a peripheral intravenous line. The catheter extends past an end of the peripheral intravenous line when in the second configuration.
Systems and methods for phlebotomy are described herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes an introducer, and a catheter. The catheter includes a proximal end and a distal end defining a lumen. The introducer includes a proximal end and a distal end defining a lumen and is configured to receive the catheter. An actuator, operatively coupled to the catheter, is configured to move the catheter between a first configuration, in which the catheter is substantially within the introducer, and a second configuration, in which the catheter is substantially outside the introducer. A locking mechanism, coupled to the distal end of the introducer, is configured to couple the introducer to a peripheral intravenous line. The catheter extends past an end of the peripheral intravenous line when in the second configuration.
In some embodiments, a method includes coupling an introducer sheath to a peripheral intravenous line (e.g., saline locked device, heparin locked device, or the like), the introducer sheath having a proximal end and a distal end. The method further includes advancing a catheter from a first position inside the introducer sheath and outside the peripheral intravenous line to a second position substantially outside the introducer sheath and inside the peripheral intravenous line. In some embodiments, the catheter has a length greater than a length of the peripheral intravenous line, while in other embodiments, the catheter; in the second position, is shorter than the peripheral intravenous line. A container is then coupled to the proximal end of the introducer sheath, the container being fluidically coupled to the catheter. The catheter is later withdrawn from the second position to the first position.
In some embodiments, a catheter has a proximal end and a distal end and defines a lumen therethrough. An introducer has a proximal end and a distal end and defines a lumen therethrough. The introducer is configured to receive the catheter therein. An adapter is coupled to the introducer. The adapter has a distal end configured to be coupled to a peripheral intravenous line. The adapter defines a first lumen and a second lumen. The first lumen has a first diameter and is configured to receive the catheter therethrough. The second lumen is orthogonal to the first lumen. An actuator is operatively coupled to the catheter and is configured to move the catheter between a first configuration and a second configuration. The catheter extends past the distal end of the adapter in the second configuration.
As used in this specification, the words “proximal” and “distal” refer to the direction closer to and away from, respectively, a user who would place the device into contact with a patient. Thus, for example, the end of a device first touching the body of the patient would be the distal end, while the opposite end of the device (e.g., the end of the device being manipulated by the user) would be the proximal end of the device.
As used herein, the term “stiffness” relates to an object's resistance to deflection, deformation, and/or displacement by an applied force. Stiffness can be characterized in terms of the amount of force applied to the object and the resulting distance through which a first portion of the object deflects, deforms, and/or displaces with respect to a second portion of the object. When characterizing the stiffness of an object, the deflected distance may be measured as the deflection of a portion of the object different from the portion of the object to which the force is directly applied. Said another way, in some objects, the point of deflection is distinct from the point where force is applied.
Stiffness is an extensive property of the object being described, and thus is dependent upon the material from which the object is formed as well as certain physical characteristics of the object (e.g., shape and boundary conditions). For example, the stiffness of an object can be increased or decreased by selectively including in the object a material having a desired modulus of elasticity, flexural modulus, and/or hardness. The modulus of elasticity is an intensive property of (i.e., is intrinsic to) the constituent material and describes an object's tendency to elastically (i.e., non-permanently) deform in response to an applied force. A material having a high modulus of elasticity will not deflect as much as a material having a low modulus of elasticity in the presence of an equally applied stress. Thus, the stiffness of the object can be increased, for example, by introducing into the object and/or constructing the object of a material having a high modulus of elasticity.
Similarly, a material's hardness is an intensive property of the constituent material and describes the measure of how resistant the material is to various kinds of permanent shape change when a force is applied. In discussing the hardness and the subsequent effect on the stiffness of a catheter, the Shore durometer scale is generally used. There are several scales for durometers with two commonly used in describing plastics, polymers, elastomers, and/or rubbers, namely, type A and type D, where type A is generally used for softer materials and type D is generally used for harder materials. The Shore durometer of a material is denoted by a number between 0 and 100, with higher numbers indicating a harder material, followed by the type of scale. For instance, a first material can be measured as having a Shore durometer of 40 Shore A and a second material can be measured as having a Shore durometer of 60 Shore D. Therefore, according to the Shore durometer scale, the second material is harder and thus, more stiff than the first material.
In some embodiments, the catheter 1200 can be moved to a third configuration in which it is retracted back into the introducer 1100. The third configuration is substantially similar to the first configuration (
The proximal end 2220 of the catheter 2200 is fluidically coupled to a locking mechanism 2221, as shown in
The distal end 4130 of the introducer 4100 includes a locking mechanism 4131 configured to fluidically couple a peripheral intravenous line (not shown in
The sheath 4110 has a given stiffness such that when a force is applied to the proximal end 4120 the sheath 4110 compresses along an axis BBB advancing the catheter 4200 to a second configuration (
The catheter 4200 includes a distal end 4230 and tapered portion 4203. The tapered portion is such that the diameter of the catheter 4200 is reduced at a given location, as shown in
The distal end 4230 of the catheter 4200 includes a set of openings 4231 such that when in the second configuration (i.e., when the distal end 4230 of the catheter 4200 is in the vein and outside the intravenous line) the openings 4231 act to transport a bodily fluid (i.e., blood) to a volume outside the catheter 4200. The set of openings 4231 can be of any arrangement on the circumference of the catheter 4200 and can include the end of the catheter 4200. Similarly stated, the catheter 4200 having the distal end 4230 can be substantially open at the tip surface. Although
In some embodiments, a blood collection system consists of two elements: (1) the introducer/catheter blood collection assembly described above; and (2) a y-adapter that is configured to attach to a standard 16 g or 22 g peripheral IV catheter. The y-adapter includes a dedicated port for the blood collection device and another standard port for conventional medicine and fluid infusion.
The first lumen 5422 defined by the first port 5420 and the second lumen 5432 defined by the second port 5430 converge to a common lumen 5401 before the distal end 5410 of the y-adapter 5400, as shown in
In some embodiments, the distal end 5410 of the y-adapter 5400 is coupled to a peripheral intravenous line 5440 such as, for example, a conventional peripheral intravenous line. In some embodiments, the y-adapter 5400 is monolithically formed with the peripheral intravenous line 5440. In some embodiments, the distal end 5410 of the y-adapter 5400 can be coupled to a peripheral intravenous line using any suitable locking mechanism. Similarly, the second port 5420 of the locking mechanism 5431 configured to couple the y-adapter 5400 to the introducer 5100 can monolithically formed with the introducer 5100. Said another way, in some embodiments, a separate introducer is not required, but rather a portion of the y-adapter can serve as the introducer.
As shown in
While catheters are described herein as including a distal end of a particular configuration (i.e., with circumferential openings, etc.), in some embodiments the distal end of the catheter can include a different structure configured to facilitate the drawing of blood through the catheter. For example,
In some embodiments, for example those shown in
In some embodiments, the wireframe tip 7241 can be connected to a guide wire 7243 and used without an additional catheter, as shown in
The components of the blood draw apparatus and the y-Adapter can be packaged together or separately. The y-adapter can also be sold in a package with other IV dressing materials. In some embodiments, the y-adapter can remain on the IV as long as the IV is in the patient.
The blood draw apparatus can be used with a variety of peripheral IVs. The apparatus allows efficient blood draw while still maintaining the integrity of the sample. In some embodiments, for example, the apparatus will facilitate 20 ml of blood to be drawn in approximately 1-2 minutes. While extracting blood, the blood flow can be laminar to avoid turbulence in the catheter to minimize hemolysis.
While the blood draw apparatus can be used in a variety of settings (ER, in-patient, etc.), two examples of scenarios are described herein. In the first scenario, the patient has a single peripheral IV. In the second scenario, which is typically less common, the patient has a dedicated second peripheral IV just for phlebotomy purposes. Only one y-adapter is required per patient, and can be attached for the life of the IV, for example, which is typically 3-4 days. A new catheter can be used for each blood draw.
The assembly of the blood draw apparatus can be the same in either scenario. First, the apparatus is coupled to the y-adapter. Second, the catheter is advanced through the y-adapter and pushed through the peripheral IV catheter into the patient's vein. Once in the vein, a syringe or a negative pressure collection container/tube (e.g., a Vacutainer® tube) is connected to the rear port and fluidically coupled to the catheter to draw and store blood.
The following scenario is provided by way of example. The nurse or phlebotomist inserts a peripheral IV into a patient's arm. The peripheral IV is inserted following standard guidelines and the y-adapter is attached. When it is time to draw blood, the provider can turn off the IV, if it is on, for approximately 1-5 minutes to allow medicine or IV fluids to disperse from the blood-drawing site. To draw the blood sample, the provider attaches the blood draw apparatus to the blood draw port on the y-adapter, advances the internal catheter through the peripheral IV and into the vein. Next, the provider can attach the negative pressure collection container(s)/tube(s) to the apparatus (i.e., place the tube in fluid communication with the blood draw apparatus) to extract the blood sample. In use, a user can discard, for example, the first 3-6 ml of the fluid or blood sample as “waste” then using the next tube(s) as the intended sample. This “wasting” procedure ensures all of the dead space fluid, like saline or medications, are cleared from the vein, peripheral IV and y-adapter as to not contaminate the testing sample being drawn.
In the scenario in which there is a dedicated peripheral IV line for blood draw purposes, the provider inserts a peripheral IV into one arm to administer medicine and another peripheral IV into the opposite arm specifically for blood drawing purposes. When it is time to draw blood, the provider simply follows the steps mentioned above and there is no need to wait the 2-3 minutes to allow fluid or medicine dispersal as in the first scenario.
Each of the components discussed herein can be monolithically constructed or can be a combination of parts. For example, in reference to
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Where methods and/or schematics described above indicate certain events and/or flow patterns occurring in certain order, the ordering of certain events and/or flow patterns may be modified. Additionally certain events may be performed concurrently in parallel processes when possible, as well as performed sequentially. While various embodiments have been described as having particular features and/or combinations of components, other embodiments are possible having a combination of any features and/or components from any of embodiments as discussed above.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/479,223 entitled “Systems and Methods for Phlebotomy Through a Peripheral IV Catheter,” filed on Apr. 26, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4192319 | IIargens et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4790830 | Hamacher | Dec 1988 | A |
4808158 | Kreuzer et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5013304 | Russell et al. | May 1991 | A |
5100390 | Lubeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5147334 | Moss | Sep 1992 | A |
5201722 | Moorehead et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203771 | Melker et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5270003 | Bernes et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5360407 | Leonard | Nov 1994 | A |
5368029 | Holcombe et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5552118 | Mayer | Sep 1996 | A |
5553625 | Rao | Sep 1996 | A |
5562631 | Bogert | Oct 1996 | A |
5611782 | Haedt | Mar 1997 | A |
5658263 | Dang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
D384741 | Musgrave et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
5749857 | Cuppy | May 1998 | A |
5755709 | Cuppy | May 1998 | A |
5848996 | Eldor | Dec 1998 | A |
5853393 | Bogert | Dec 1998 | A |
5897537 | Berg et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911715 | Berg et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5944695 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6036677 | Javier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6080138 | Lemke et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093177 | Javier et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6126618 | Bischof | Oct 2000 | A |
6197001 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6652507 | Pepin | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6692473 | St Cyr et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712790 | Prestidge et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719726 | Meng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719781 | Kim | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6755812 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6858024 | Berg et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6908459 | Harding et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7135008 | O'Mahony et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7252654 | VanTassel et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7311689 | Levin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316678 | Nash et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7462161 | O'Mahony et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7615033 | Leong | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625367 | Adams et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670320 | Iwase et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691088 | Howell | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713250 | Harding et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717882 | Harding | May 2010 | B2 |
7717899 | Bowe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7762977 | Porter et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766961 | Patel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771394 | Shue et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7972294 | Nash et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8062226 | Moore | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092374 | Smith et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114057 | Gerdts et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8251978 | Nash et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8361013 | Wood | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361014 | Wood | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366685 | Devgon | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372032 | Wood | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425532 | Flom et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444605 | Kuracina et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8491568 | Schertiger et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8523801 | Nash et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8696639 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721546 | Belson | May 2014 | B2 |
8728035 | Warring et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8728058 | Schertiger | May 2014 | B2 |
8753312 | Bowe et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020120215 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040138622 | Palasis | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181192 | Cuppy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050015048 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070219460 | Goldenberg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070282280 | Tennican | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080045862 | Dalebout et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080287918 | Rosenman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300574 | Belson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090156963 | Noble et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100210934 | Belson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100286657 | Heck | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305519 | McKennon et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120046648 | Scheckel | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053523 | Harding | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109079 | Asleson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191010 | Cabot | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130289537 | Schertiger et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012085 | Smith et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046214 | Devgon | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140107800 | Flom et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140128774 | Andreae et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140128775 | Andreae et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140171803 | Van Hoven et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180127 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188003 | Belson | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140364766 | Devgon | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378867 | Belson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2504054 | Sep 2013 | EP |
WO 9621393 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 0041617 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0049939 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 2008097949 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008130077 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008138351 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2010089154 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011011436 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2013174381 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014093472 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,900, mailed Sep. 5, 2012. |
Himberger Jr., “Accuracy of drawing blood through infusing intravenous lines,” 2001 [retrieved on Mar. 16, 2011] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Accuracy%20of%20drawing%20blood%20through%20infusing%20intravenous%20lines>. |
Cox, et al. “Blood Samples Drawn from IV Catheters Have Less Hemolysis When 5-mL (vs 10-mL) Collection Tubes Are Used,” 2004 [retrieved on Mar. 16, 2011] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.jenonline.org/article/S0099-1767(04)00634-8/fulltext> , 2 pgs. |
Jagger, et al., “Drawing Venous Blood With Syringes: A Risky Use of Injection Equipment,” Advances in Exposure Prevention, vol. 5, No. 3, 2000, 3 pgs. |
WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy, © World Health Organization 2010, 125 pgs. |
“Needleless IV Access Devices,” BD Q-Syte™, Luer Access Split-Septum, 2007, 1 pg. |
“Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Guideline Drawing Labs from Peripheral IV Sites,” Nursing Research Council of United Hospital—Developed 4/04; Revised 3/09, 3 pgs. |
Frey, “Drawing Blood Samples From Vascular Access Devices: Evidence-based Practice,” Journal of Infusion Nursing: Sep./Oct. 2003, vol. 26, Issue 5, pp. 285-293, Article: CE, Abstract, [retrieved on Mar. 16, 2011], I pg. |
“Blood Sampling Hemolysis Study for the MaxPlus™ Positive Flow Connector,” Maximus Medical Products, Inc. © 2003, 1 pg. |
“Vascular Access Procedures,” Vascular Access Procedures, [retrieved on Mar. 16, 2011] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=vasc—access> 7 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,900, mailed Nov. 2, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US12/35122, mailed Feb. 14, 2014. |
“Connect and Protect with BD Diagnostics—Preanalytical Systems,” BD Vacutainer®, Luer-Lok™, Access Device, © 2006, 2 pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. EP 12776089.0, mailed May 13, 2015. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280029672.2, mailed May 26, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/758,585, mailed Jun. 10, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120277630 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61479223 | Apr 2011 | US |