The present invention generally relates to digital cameras and more specifically to systems and methods for evaluating imaging conditions.
The quality of an image captured by a digital camera can be influenced by factors including the exposure and focal plane settings of the camera and the dynamic range within a scene. The exposure (duration of time which light is sampled by pixels in an image sensor) impacts the color shades and tone and the focal plane settings impact a captured image's sharpness.
The dynamic range within a scene is the difference in brightness from the darkest to brightest sections of the scene. Likewise, the dynamic range of an image sensor is the difference in brightness from the darkest to brightest sections that the image sensor is able to capture. Depending on the dynamic range within a particular scene, the maximum dynamic range of an image sensor can be many times smaller than the scene's dynamic range. Thus, digital cameras may not be able to accurately capture the full range of brightness in any given scene. Various techniques including auto-exposure, autofocus and high dynamic range imaging have been developed to improve the quality of images captured using digital cameras.
In many image capture devices the sensitivity of the device to light intensity can be adjusted by manipulating pixel integration time, pixel gain, and/or iris/lens aperture. Further, metering and auto-exposure algorithms can be used to optimize the above parameters (some of these parameters may be specified or fixed). Auto-exposure algorithms utilize methods to capture images at optimal mean brightness levels by adjusting the exposure time (or focal plane settings). Such algorithms generally perform an iterative process that captures an image at a known exposure time and based on the characteristics of the captured image, sets the exposure time (or focal plane settings) to capture following images at more optimal mean brightness levels.
Most surfaces reflect incident light with some amount of scattering. Thus, the light intercepted by a camera is roughly isotropic with a small region around the vantage point of the camera. Thus, individual imaging components of an array camera should ideally provide the same numerical representation of an object in the individual images captured by each of the imaging components. However, non-idealities exist in an array camera and its individual imaging components due to manufacturing tolerances and other aberrations.
As such, the numerical representation for the same point in space as captured in the image data of each individual imaging component may differ. The differences may be subtle such as those differences caused by among other things, the differences in focal length, aperture ratios, and image sensor sensitivity in the individual imaging components. Some of these differences can be treated as constants and may be accounted for by correction factors determined through a calibration process.
However, there are some differences that are introduced by the scene being imaged that cannot be compensated for ahead of time by correction factors. One example is veiling glare. Veiling glare occurs when the image projected onto the pixels or sensors of an imaging component by a lens system includes the intended image and an erroneous internally scattered set of photons. The internally scattered set of photons may originate from anywhere in front of the imaging component including both within and outside the Field of View (FoV) of the imaging component. This causes the image projected onto the pixels or sensors of the imaging component at a given point to have more than or less than the expected photons. Additional non-idealities may also exist including, but not limited to, contaminants on a protective window over the array camera installed in a device. The contaminants may change the photo-response function for each of the individual imaging components by scattering or absorbing some of the photons entering the optical system.
It is a problem if the individual imaging components of the array camera do not report the same value for a given point in scene space in their image data. If the values for the same point in space differ in the image data of individual imaging components, the parallax detection between the different images may fail or become erroneous. Also, a noise signal may be introduced into fused images from the local differences in the numerical values of the image data from different imaging components.
The above and other problems are solved an advance in the art is made by systems and methods for providing photometric normalization for an array camera in accordance with embodiments of this invention. In accordance with embodiments of this invention, one or more of the imaging components of the array camera are designated as a reference imaging component and each of the remaining imaging components in the array camera is an alternate imaging component. Each of the alternate imaging components is associated with at least one of the reference imaging components. In accordance with embodiments of this invention, a photometric normalization process is performed after a scene has been captured by the array camera generating image data from each of the individual imaging components of the array camera.
The following process is performed for each reference imaging component and the alternate imaging components associated with each of the reference imaging components in accordance with embodiments of this invention. A nominal parallax shift is determined to translate pixel information in the imaging data of each alternate imaging component to corresponding pixel information in the imaging data of the associated reference imaging component. A low pass filter is then applied to image data of the reference camera and each of the associated translated imaging components. For each associate imaging device, the pixel information from the translated and low-pass filtered image data of the associate imaging device is compared to the corresponding pixel information of the low-pass filtered reference image to compute a gain and offset parameter transformation, which, when applied to the alternate images will photometrically match the two images, thereby reducing or eliminating the photometric imbalance among the images in the array. The computed gain and offset parameters may then applied to the image data of the associate imaging device to photometrically normalize the image data with respect to the reference imaging device.
One embodiment of the method of the invention includes: receiving image data for a scene captured by the reference imaging component; receiving image data for a scene captured by each of plurality of alternate imaging components; determining a nominal parallax for image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components that translate information for a particular pixel in the image data of a particular alternate imaging component to a corresponding pixel in the reference imaging component; applying the nominal parallax of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data of the particular alternate imaging component; applying a low pass filter to the image data from the reference imaging component and the shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component; and computing gain and offset parameters for each particular alternate imaging components from the low pass filtered shifted image data of the particular alternate imaging component and the low pass filtered image data of the reference imaging component.
A further embodiment also includes applying the gain and offset parameters of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data captured by the particular alternate imaging component to form photometrically normalized image data for each particular alternate imaging component.
Another embodiment also includes determining regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component.
A still further embodiment includes storing determined the regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered image data of each particular alternate imaging component for further correction processing.
In still another embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on a pixel by pixel basis for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
In a yet further embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on regions of pixels for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
Yet another embodiment also includes: comparing each gain parameter and each offset parameter for each of the plurality of alternate imaging component to a threshold value; and setting each gain parameter and each offset parameter determined to at least meet the threshold value to a predetermined value.
An embodiment of a system of the invention includes: an array camera including a plurality of imaging components that capture image data of a scene including a reference imaging component and plurality of alternate imaging components; a memory; and a processor that is configured by instructions stored in the memory to: receive image data for a scene captured by the reference imaging component, receive image data for a scene captured by each of plurality of alternate imaging components, determine a nominal parallax for image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components that translate information for a particular pixel in the image data of a particular alternate imaging component to a corresponding pixel in the reference imaging component, apply the nominal parallax of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data of the particular alternate imaging component, apply a low pass filter to the image data from the reference imaging component and the shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component, and compute gain and offset parameters for each particular alternate imaging components from the low pass filtered shifted image data of the particular alternate imaging component and the low pass filtered image data of the reference imaging component.
In a further embodiment, the processor is further configured by the instructions to apply the gain and offset parameters of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data captured by the particular alternate imaging component to form photometrically normalized image data for each particular alternate imaging component.
In another embodiment, the processor is further configured by the instructions to determine regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component.
In a still further embodiment, the processor is further configured by the instructions to store the determined regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered image data of each particular alternate imaging component for further correction processing.
In still another embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on a pixel by pixel basis for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
In a yet further embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on regions of pixels for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
In yet another embodiment, the processor is further configured by the instructions to: compare each gain parameter and each offset parameter for each of the plurality of alternate imaging component to a threshold value; and set each gain parameter and each offset parameter determined to at least meet the threshold value to a predetermined value.
Another further embodiment of the invention includes: receiving image data for a scene captured by the reference imaging component; receiving image data for a scene captured by each of plurality of alternate imaging components; determining a nominal parallax for image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components that translate information for a particular pixel in the image data of a particular alternate imaging component to a corresponding pixel in the reference imaging component; applying the nominal parallax of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data of the particular alternate imaging component; applying a low pass filter to the image data from the reference imaging component and the shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component; and computing gain and offset parameters for each particular alternate imaging components from the low pass filtered shifted image data of the particular alternate imaging component and the low pass filtered image data of the reference imaging component.
In still another further embodiment, the method further comprises applying the gain and offset parameters of each particular alternate imaging component to the image data captured by the particular alternate imaging component to form photometrically normalized image data for each particular alternate imaging component.
In yet another further embodiment, the method further comprises determining regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered shifted image data of each particular alternate imaging component.
In another further embodiment again, the method further comprises storing determined the regions of high contrast in the low pass filtered image data of each particular alternate imaging component for further correction processing.
In another further additional embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on a pixel by pixel basis for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
In still yet another further embodiment, the computing of the gain and offset parameters is performed on regions of pixels for the image data of each of the plurality of alternate imaging components.
In still another further embodiment again, the method further comprises: comparing each gain parameter and each offset parameter for each of the plurality of alternate imaging components to a threshold value; and setting each gain parameter and each offset parameter determined to at least meet the threshold value to a predetermined value.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for measuring scene information while capturing images using array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. Array cameras including camera modules that can be utilized to capture image data from different viewpoints (i.e. light field images) are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 entitled “Capturing and Processing of Images using Monolithic Camera Array with Heterogeneous Imagers” to Venkataraman et al. In many instances, fusion and super-resolution processes such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 entitled “Systems and Methods for Synthesizing High Resolution Images Using Super-Resolution Processes” to Lelescu et al., can be utilized to synthesize a higher resolution 2D image or a stereo pair of higher resolution 2D images from the lower resolution images in the light field captured by an array camera. The terms high or higher resolution and low or lower resolution are used here in a relative sense and not to indicate the specific resolutions of the images captured by the array camera. The disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In accordance with embodiments of this invention, a photometric normalization is performed on image data captured by an array camera. The photometric normalization is performed to determine local offset and gain coefficients for the image data from alternate imaging components with respect to a reference imaging component. The gain and offset coefficients correct the image data of the alternate imaging component to account for differences introduced by the scene being imaged. In particular, the gain coefficient corrects for the resultant attenuation of photons caused by veiling glare and other scene related issues and the offset coefficient corrects for the resultant spurious or additional photons introduced by veiling glare or other scene independent issues. Systems and methods for performing photometric normalization of image data captured by an array camera in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Array Cameras
Array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention can include a camera module and a processor. An array camera in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Array Camera Modules
Camera modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be constructed from an imager array and an optic array. A camera module in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In several embodiments, color filters in individual imaging components can be used to pattern the camera module with π filter groups as further discussed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/641,165 entitled “Camera Modules Patterned with pi Filter Groups” filed May 1, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The use of a color filter pattern incorporating π filter groups in a 4×4 array is illustrated in
In several embodiments, an array camera generates image data from multiple focal planes and uses a processor to synthesize one or more images of a scene. In certain embodiments, the image data captured by a single focal plane in the sensor array can constitute a low resolution image (the term low resolution here is used only to contrast with higher resolution images), which the processor can use in combination with other low resolution image data captured by the camera module to construct a higher resolution image through Super Resolution processing.
Although specific array cameras are discussed above, many different array cameras are capable of utilizing π filter groups in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Imager arrays in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Imager Arrays
An imager array in which the image capture settings of a plurality of focal planes or imaging components can be independently configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, a single self-contained chip imager includes focal plane framing circuitry 312 that packages the data captured from the focal planes into a container file and can prepare the captured image data for transmission. In several embodiments, the focal plane framing circuitry includes information identifying the focal plane and/or group of pixels from which the captured image data originated. In a number of embodiments, the imager array also includes an interface for transmission of captured image data to external devices. In the illustrated embodiment, the interface is a MIPI CSI 2 output interface (as specified by the non-profit MIPI Alliance, Inc.) supporting four lanes that can support read-out of video at 30 fps from the imager array and incorporating data output interface circuitry 318, interface control circuitry 316 and interface input circuitry 314. Typically, the bandwidth of each lane is optimized for the total number of pixels in the imager array and the desired frame rate. The use of various interfaces including the MIPI CSI 2 interface to transmit image data captured by an array of imagers within an imager array to an external device in accordance with embodiments of the invention is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,305,456, entitled “Systems and Methods for Transmitting Array Camera Data”, issued Nov. 6, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Although specific components of an imager array architecture are discussed above with respect to
Independent Focal Plane Control
Imager arrays in accordance with embodiments of the invention can include an array of focal planes or imaging components that can independently be controlled. In this way, the image capture settings for each focal plane in an imager array can be configured differently. As is discussed further below, the ability to configure active focal planes using difference image capture settings can enable different cameras within an array camera to make independent measurements of scene information that can be combined for use in determining image capture settings for use more generally within the camera array.
An imager array including independent control of image capture settings and independent control of pixel readout in an array of focal planes in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Although specific imager array configurations are discussed above with reference to
Photometric Normalization for an Array Camera
In accordance with many embodiments of this invention, a photometric normalization is performed on image data captured by an array camera. The photometric normalization is performed to determine local offset and gain coefficients for the image data from alternate imaging components with respect to a reference imaging component. The gain and offset coefficients correct the image data of the alternate imaging component to account for differences introduced by the scene being imaged. In particular, the gain coefficient corrects for the resultant attenuation of photons caused by veiling glare and other scene related issues and the offset coefficient corrects for the resultant spurious or additional photons introduced by veiling glare or other scene independent issues.
The normalization performed is based on the fact the one of the properties of the veiling glare phenomenon and other scene related errors is that its effect on the photo-response of each of the individual imaging components is typically low in spatial frequency. Thus, the photo-response of the imaging component does not change rapidly within an image area. Instead, the photo-response is relatively slow changing. As the scene related errors may cause the image projected on the imaging components to include either more or less photons than predicted by a flat-field calibration, some areas of the image of the individual image sensor may be brighter or darker versus the image from other imaging components.
These scene related errors may be corrected for or normalized out by computing the above described gain and offset coefficients. These coefficients can be determined because the response of an imaging component in the raw domain is designed to be linear. Thus, the typical y=mx+c formula may be used to define the response in the following manner:
yi,j=mi,jxi,j+c
Where:
Scene related errors can be thought of as resulting in the following modification to the formula:
yi,j=mi,jxi,j(Gvgi,j)+C+(Ovgi,j)
Where:
To normalize the image data from alternate imaging components with respect to the image data of a reference imaging component, the gain and offset coefficients for the alternate imaging components with respect to the reference imaging component can be computed and applied to the imaging data of the alternate imaging component to negate their effects. The use of a color filter pattern incorporating it filter groups in a 4×4 array is illustrated in
Process 600 includes obtaining the image data for a scene from a reference imaging component and the alternate imaging components associated with the reference imaging component (605). This may be done by capturing an image of the scene with an array camera causing the reference and alternate imaging components to each generate image data of the scene. Alternatively, the image data may have been previously captured and is read from a memory.
If the array camera includes more than one reference imaging component, a reference imaging component is selected to perform the normalization (605). A low pass filter is then applied to the image data of the reference imaging component (610). The low pass filter removes any high frequency components in the reference image data.
The following process is then performed to normalize the image data from each of the alternate imaging components associated with reference imaging component. An alternate imaging component is selected (615) and the image data for the alternate imaging component is retrieved. A nominal parallax between the selected alternate imaging component and the reference imaging component is determined (620). The nominal parallax may be read from memory if it was previously stored or may be computed at the time of use.
In accordance with some embodiments of this invention, the nominal parallax may be determined by metering a region-of-interest within the field of view and performing a coarse parallax estimate to determine a parallax shift that satisfies the metered region-of-interest. In accordance with some other embodiments, a nominal parallax shift corresponding to typical shooting distances may be used. In accordance with still other embodiments, the depth map from a previously fully computed frame may be used to specify the nominal parallax shift.
The nominal parallax shift is then applied to the image data of the alternate camera to translate the pixel information in the image data to correspond with corresponding pixel information in the image data of the reference imaging component (625). A low pass filter is then applied to the shifted image data of the alternate imaging component (630). The shifted, low passed filtered image data of the alternate image component is aligned with the low passed filtered image data from the reference imaging component in a “strong” blurred alignment. A “strong” blurred alignment is when the images are aligned on surviving high-gradient edges in low frequency such that the images appear be aligned even if there some spatial misalignment due to error in the alignment information. Errors in alignment information may be due to many factors, including, but not limited tom, taking the parallax at an incorrect fixed distance.
In accordance with some embodiments, high contrast components in the image data from the alternate imaging component may be detected. The high contrast components in the shifted image data are typically in areas where alignment errors caused by using the nominal parallax shift between the shifted image data from the alternate imaging component and the image data from the reference imaging component are apparent. These high-contrast edges may still cause differences even after the low pass filter is applied. Thus, these high contrast components are optionally detected and stored as a data set, map, or other data structure (635). As these components have a greater probability of being erroneous even after the subsequent correction values are applied, the data set or map may be used to indicate components of the shifted image data from the alternate imaging component where later correction processes can be applied modulate the corrected data if needed and/or desired.
The low pass filtered shifted image data of the alternate imaging component is then compared to the low pass filtered image data of the reference imaging component to compute the gain and offset parameters for the image data from the alternate imaging component (640). The low passed filtered shifted image data is used to determine the gain and offset parameter because most photometric imbalances occur in low frequency. Thus, the gain and offset parameters to locally correct the photometric imbalance determined using the low pass filtered image data will correct photometric imbalance in the original image data as the photometric imbalance if in the lower frequency.
In accordance with some embodiments, the gain and offset parameters are calculated on a per pixel basis. In accordance with these embodiments, the gain and offset parameters are calculated based on a region surrounding each pixel. For example, a region of 9×9 pixels surrounding a pixel may be analyzed to determine the distribution of values within the region. In other embodiments, any of a variety of fixed or adaptive regions can be utilized including regions that have different shapes in different regions of the image. A level of contrast exists in the region within the image data of the alternate imaging component. The goal of the computation is to determine gain and offset parameters for the pixel in shifted image data that matches the value of the pixel data to the value of the pixel data of the reference imaging component. This may be achieved by comparing the mean and variance of the data for the pixel area to the mean and variance of the data for a corresponding pixel area in the reference image data.
In accordance with some embodiments of this invention, the following equation may be used to perform the comparisons and determine the gain and offset parameters:
Where:
x=the image to be corrected
y=the reference image
N1, N2=number of pixels horizontally and vertically of the analyzed region around the pixel being computed.
i,j are indices into the images within the bounds defined by N1 and N2.
â=Gvgi,j, gain coefficient computed for a specific value of i and j.
{circumflex over (b)}=Ovgi,j, offset term computed for a specific value of i and j.
In accordance with some embodiments, limits may be applied to the computation such that values computed for the gain and offset parameters are constrained in some way. In accordance with some of these embodiments, the gain and offset parameters may be prevented from being too large by being compared to a threshold and being set to a predetermined value if the threshold is at least met.
In accordance with other embodiments, the gain and offset parameters may be determined for regions of the associate image data instead of a per pixel basis by using a sparse grid. The subsequent spatially varying values of the gain and offset parameters may be interpolated to yield the correct value for each pixel. One skilled in the art will recognize that still other methods of determining the gain and offset parameters may be used without departing from the embodiments of this invention.
The determined gain and offset parameters for each pixel are then applied to the corresponding information for each pixel in the original image data of the associate reference component (645). In accordance with some embodiments, the map or data set of high contrast regions may be used to determine regions where the calculations may be erroneous and additional processes may need to be performed to normalize the data.
The process (615-645) for alternate imaging components associated the selected reference is then repeated until normalization is performed for each alternate imaging component associated with the selected reference imaging component (650). The process is likewise repeated for each reference imaging component in the array camera (655).
While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
The current application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/785,797, filed Mar. 14, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4124798 | Thompson | Nov 1978 | A |
4198646 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4323925 | Abell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4460449 | Montalbano | Jul 1984 | A |
4467365 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
5005083 | Grage | Apr 1991 | A |
5070414 | Tsutsumi | Dec 1991 | A |
5144448 | Hornbaker | Sep 1992 | A |
5327125 | Iwase et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5629524 | Stettner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5808350 | Jack et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832312 | Rieger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880691 | Fossum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5933190 | Dierickx et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973844 | Burger | Oct 1999 | A |
6002743 | Telymonde | Dec 1999 | A |
6005607 | Uomori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6069351 | Mack | May 2000 | A |
6069365 | Chow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124974 | Burger | Sep 2000 | A |
6137535 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6141048 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6160909 | Melen | Dec 2000 | A |
6163414 | Kikuchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175379 | Uomori et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205241 | Melen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239909 | Hayashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6358862 | Ireland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6477260 | Shimomura | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502097 | Chan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525302 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6563537 | Kawamura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6603513 | Berezin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611289 | Yu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627896 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628330 | Lin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635941 | Suda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657218 | Noda | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671399 | Berestov | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6750904 | Lambert | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765617 | Tangen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771833 | Edgar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774941 | Boisvert et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795253 | Shinohara | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819358 | Kagle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6879735 | Portniaguine et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6903770 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909121 | Nishikawa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6958862 | Joseph | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161614 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7199348 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7262799 | Suda | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292735 | Blake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295697 | Satoh | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7369165 | Bosco et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391572 | Jacobowitz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408725 | Sato | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7606484 | Richards et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7633511 | Shum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646549 | Zalevsky et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657090 | Omatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675080 | Boettiger | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675681 | Tomikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706634 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7782364 | Smith | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7826153 | Hong | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840067 | Shen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7912673 | Hébert et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7986018 | Rennie | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990447 | Honda et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000498 | Shih et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027531 | Wilburn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8044994 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077245 | Adamo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098304 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106949 | Tan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126279 | Marcellin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130120 | Kawabata et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131097 | Lelescu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8164629 | Zhang | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8180145 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev | May 2012 | B1 |
8212914 | Chiu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213711 | Tam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231814 | Duparre | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8242426 | Ward et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244027 | Takahashi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254668 | Mashitani et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280194 | Wong et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289409 | Chang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294099 | Blackwell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305456 | McMahon | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8360574 | Ishak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8400555 | Georgiev | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8406562 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8446492 | Nakano et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8514491 | Duparre | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8541730 | Inuiya | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553093 | Wong et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559756 | Georgiev et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8655052 | Spooner et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682107 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8692893 | McMahon | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8773536 | Zhang | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8780113 | Ciurea et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8804255 | Duparre | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830375 | Ludwig | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831367 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854462 | Herbin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861089 | Duparre | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866912 | Mullis | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866920 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878950 | Lelescu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885059 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8896594 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896719 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8902321 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928793 | McMahon | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20010005225 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010019621 | Hanna et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010038387 | Tomooka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012056 | Trevino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027608 | Johnson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039438 | Mori et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063807 | Margulis | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087403 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089596 | Suda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094027 | Sato et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101528 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113867 | Takigawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113888 | Sonoda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163054 | Suda et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167537 | Trajkovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177054 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025227 | Daniell | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086079 | Barth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124763 | Fan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140347 | Varsa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179418 | Wengender et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190072 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211405 | Venkataraman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008271 | Hagimori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027358 | Nakao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047274 | Amanai | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050104 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056966 | Schechner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066454 | Otani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100570 | Shizukuishi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114807 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151401 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169617 | Yelton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040170340 | Tipping et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174439 | Upton | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179834 | Szajewski | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207836 | Chhibber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213449 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218809 | Blake et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234873 | Venkataraman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240052 | Minefuji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251509 | Choi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264806 | Herley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012035 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036778 | DeMonte | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047678 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048690 | Yamamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068436 | Fraenkel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128595 | Shimizu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132098 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134712 | Gruhlke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147277 | Higaki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151759 | Gonzalez-Banos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175257 | Kuroki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185711 | Pfister et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205785 | Hornback et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219363 | Kohler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225654 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275946 | Choo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286612 | Takanashi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002635 | Nestares et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023197 | Joel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023314 | Boettiger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033005 | Jerdev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034003 | Zalevsky | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038891 | Okutomi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049930 | Zruya et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054780 | Garrood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054782 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055811 | Frtiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069478 | Iwama | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072029 | Miyatake et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087747 | Ohzawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098888 | Morishita | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125936 | Gruhike et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138322 | Costello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152803 | Provitola | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157640 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159369 | Young | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176566 | Boettiger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187338 | May et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197937 | Bamji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203113 | Wada et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210186 | Berkner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239549 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243889 | Farnworth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251410 | Trutna | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274174 | Tewinkle | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278948 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279648 | Senba et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002159 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024614 | Tam | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036427 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040828 | Zalevsky et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040922 | McKee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041391 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052825 | Cho | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083114 | Yang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085917 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102622 | Olsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126898 | Feldman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127831 | Venkataraman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139333 | Sato et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146511 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158427 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159541 | Sparks et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160310 | Tanida et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165931 | Higaki | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171290 | Kroger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206241 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211164 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216765 | Wong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228256 | Mentzer | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257184 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258006 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258706 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263114 | Gurevich et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268374 | Robinson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296835 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019611 | Larkin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025649 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030597 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043095 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043096 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054518 | Ra et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079805 | Takagi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080028 | Bakin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084486 | Enge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088793 | Sverdrup et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095523 | Schilling-Benz et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112635 | Kondo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118241 | Tekolste et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131019 | Ng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080131107 | Ueno | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151097 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152296 | Oh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158259 | Kempf et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158375 | Kakkori et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158698 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218610 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219654 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239116 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240598 | Hasegawa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247638 | Tanida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247653 | Moussavi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272416 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273751 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278591 | Barna et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298674 | Baker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090050946 | Duparre et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052743 | Techmer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060281 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086074 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091806 | Inuiya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096050 | Park | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109306 | Shan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090128833 | Yahav | May 2009 | A1 |
20090167922 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179142 | Duparre et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180021 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200622 | Tai et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201371 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207235 | Francini et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225203 | Tanida et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237520 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263017 | Tanbakuchi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268192 | Koenck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268970 | Babacan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268983 | Stone | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274387 | Jin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284651 | Srinivasan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297056 | Lelescu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302205 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2009 | A9 |
20090323195 | Hembree et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323206 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324118 | Maslov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002126 | Wenstrand et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002313 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002314 | Duparre | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013927 | Nixon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100053342 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100053600 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060746 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2010 | A9 |
20100085425 | Tan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086227 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091389 | Henriksen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097491 | Farina et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103259 | Tanida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103308 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111444 | Coffman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118127 | Nam et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133230 | Henriksen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141802 | Knight et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157073 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165152 | Lim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177411 | Hegde et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194901 | van Hoorebeke et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195716 | Klein Gunnewiek et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201834 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208100 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2010 | A9 |
20100220212 | Perlman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231285 | Boomer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244165 | Lake et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281070 | Chan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302423 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001037 | Tewinkle | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018973 | Takayama | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032370 | Ludwig | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043661 | Podoleanu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043665 | Ogasahara | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043668 | McKinnon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069189 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080487 | Venkataraman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108708 | Olsen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121421 | Charbon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122308 | Duparre | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128412 | Milnes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149408 | Hahgholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149409 | Haugholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153248 | Gu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157321 | Nakajima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176020 | Chang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211824 | Georgiev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221599 | Högasten | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221658 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221939 | Jerdev | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234841 | Akeley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241234 | Duparre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242342 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242355 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242356 | Aleksic et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255592 | Sung et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255745 | Hodder et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267348 | Lin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273531 | Ito et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274366 | Tardif | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279721 | McMahon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285866 | Bhrugumalla et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298917 | Yanagita | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300929 | Tardif et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310980 | Mathew | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317766 | Lim, II et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012748 | Pain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026297 | Sato | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120026342 | Yu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039525 | Tian et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044249 | Mashitani et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044372 | Côté et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120069235 | Imai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120105691 | Waqas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113413 | Miahczylowicz-Wolski et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147139 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153153 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154551 | Inoue | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170134 | Bolis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176479 | Mayhew et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188634 | Kubala et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198677 | Duparre | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200734 | Tang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229628 | Ishiyama et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262607 | Shimura et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287291 | McMahon | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293695 | Tanaka | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314033 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002828 | Ding et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003184 | Duparre | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010073 | Do | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022111 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027580 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033579 | Wajs | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050504 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050526 | Keelan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057710 | McMahon | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076967 | Brunner et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077882 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130088637 | Duparre | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113888 | Koguchi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113899 | Morohoshi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128068 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128069 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128121 | Agarwala et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147979 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222556 | Shimada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229540 | Farina et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259317 | Gaddy | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265459 | Duparre et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130335598 | Gustavsson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140009586 | McNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076336 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079336 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092281 | Nisenzon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140118493 | Sali et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132810 | McMahon | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192253 | Laroia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198188 | Izawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218546 | McMahon | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232822 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240528 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240529 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253738 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267286 | Duparre | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267633 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267762 | Mullis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267890 | Lelescu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285675 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140321712 | Ciurea et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333731 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333764 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333787 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340539 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347509 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347748 | Duparre | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354773 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354843 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354844 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354853 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354854 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354855 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140355870 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368662 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368683 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368684 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368685 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368686 | Duparre | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369612 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369615 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376825 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376826 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150003752 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003753 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009353 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009354 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009362 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150015669 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035992 | Mullis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036014 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036015 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042766 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042767 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042833 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049915 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049916 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049917 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055884 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
840502 | May 1998 | EP |
1201407 | May 2002 | EP |
1734766 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2336816 | Jun 2011 | EP |
11142609 | May 1999 | JP |
11223708 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2002205310 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003094445 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2005116022 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005181460 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006033493 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006047944 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006258930 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007520107 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008055908 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009132010 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2011109484 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2013526801 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014521117 | Aug 2014 | JP |
1020110097647 | Aug 2011 | KR |
2007083579 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008108271 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009151903 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011055655 | May 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | May 2011 | WO |
2011116203 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011143501 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012057619 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057621 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057622 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057623 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012074361 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012078126 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012082904 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012155119 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013003276 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013043751 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013043761 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013049699 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013055960 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013119706 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013126578 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014052974 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014032020 | May 2014 | WO |
2014078443 | May 2014 | WO |
2014130849 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014133974 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138695 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138697 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014144157 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014145856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014149403 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014150856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014153098 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014159721 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014159779 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014160142 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164550 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164909 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014165244 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Borman, “Topics in Multiframe Superresolution Restoration”, Thesis of Sean Borman, Apr. 2004, 282 pgs. |
Borman et al, “Image Sequence Processing”, Source unknown, Oct. 14, 2002, 81 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Block-Matching Sub-Pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—An Empirical Performance Evaluation”, Proc SPIE, Dec. 1998, 3653, 10 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Image Resampling and Constraint Formulation for Multi-Frame Super-Resolution Restoration”, Proc. SPIE, Jun. 2003, 5016, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Linear models for multi-frame super-resolution restoration under non-affine registration and spatially varying PSF”, Proc. SPIE, May 2004, vol. 5299, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Nonlinear Prediction Methods for Estimation of Clique Weighting Parameters in NonGaussian Image Models”, Proc. SPIE, 1998. 3459, 9 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Simultaneous Multi-Frame MAP Super-Resolution Video Enhancement Using Spatio-Temporal Priors”, Image Processing, 1999, ICIP 99 Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 469-473. |
Borman et al., “Super-Resolution from Image Sequences—A Review”, Circuits & Systems, 1998, pp. 374-378. |
Bruckner et al., “Artificial compound eye applying hyperacuity”, Optics Express, Dec. 11, 2006, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 12076-12084. |
Bruckner et al., “Driving microoptical imaging systems towards miniature camera applications”, Proc. SPIE, Micro-Optics, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Bruckner et al., “Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes”, Optics Express, Nov. 22, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24379-24394. |
Capel, “Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution”, [online], Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.226.2643&rep=rep1 &type=pdf>, Title pg., abstract, table of contents, pp. 1-263 (269 total pages). |
Chan et al., “Extending the Depth of Field in a Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, Proceedings—International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 623-626. |
Chan et al., “Investigation of Computational Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE, ISASSP 2006, pp. 1177-1180. |
Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim Syst Sign Process, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101. |
Chen et al., “Interactive deformation of light fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH I3D 2005, pp. 139-146. |
Chen et al., “KNN Matting”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2013, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2175-2188. |
Drouin et al., “Fast Multiple-Baseline Stereo with Occlusion”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Drouin et al., “Geo-Consistency for Wide Multi-Camera Stereo”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Drouin et al., “Improving Border Localization of Multi-Baseline Stereo Using Border-Cut”, International Journal of Computer Vision, Jul. 2009, vol. 83, Issue 3, 8 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial apposition compound eye fabricated by micro-optics technology”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 2004, vol. 43, No. 22, pp. 4303-4310. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eye zoom camera”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eyes—different concepts and their application to ultra flat image acquisition sensors”, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems IV, Proc. SPIE 5346, Jan. 2004, pp. 89-100. |
Duparre et al., “Chirped arrays of refractive ellipsoidal microlenses for aberration correction under oblique incidence”, Optics Express, Dec. 26, 2005, vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 10539-10551. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optical artificial compound eyes”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, vol. 1, pp. R1-R16. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical Artificial Compound Eyes—Two Different Concepts for Compact Imaging Systems”, 11th Microoptics Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical telescope compound eye”, Optics Express, Feb. 7, 2005, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 889-903. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optically fabricated artificial apposition compound eye”, Electronic Imaging—Science and Technology, Prod. SPIE 5301, Jan. 2004, pp. 25-33. |
Duparre et al., “Novel Optics/Micro-Optics for Miniature Imaging Systems”, Proc. of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6196, pp. 619607-1-619607-15. |
Duparre et al., “Theoretical analysis of an artificial superposition compound eye for application in ultra flat digital image acquisition devices”, Optical Systems Design, Proc. SPIE 5249, Sep. 2003, pp. 408-418. |
Duparre et al., “Ultra-Thin Camera Based on Artificial Apposistion Compound Eyes”, 10th Microoptics Conference, Sep. 1-3, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Fanaswala, “Regularized Super-Resolution of Multi-View Images”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/-edubois/theses/Fanaswala—thesis.pdf>, 163 pgs. |
Farrell et al., “Resolution and Light Sensitivity Tradeoff with Pixel Size”, Proceedings of the SPIE Electronic Imaging 2006 Conference, 2006, vol. 6069, 8 pgs. |
Farsiu et al., “Advances and Challenges in Super-Resolution”, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 47-57. |
Farsiu et al., “Fast and Robust Multiframe Super Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1327-1344. |
Farsiu et al., “Multiframe Demosaicing and Super-Resolution of Color Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2006, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 141-159. |
Feris et al., “Multi-Flash Stereopsis: Depth Edge Preserving Stereo with Small Baseline Illumination”, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 2006, 31 pgs. |
Fife et al., “A 3D Multi-Aperture Image Sensor Architecture”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, pp. 281-284. |
Fife et al., “A 3MPixel Multi-Aperture Image Sensor with 0.7Mu Pixels in 0.11Mu CMOS”, ISSCC 2008, Session 2, Image Sensors & Technology, 2008, pp. 48-50. |
Goldman et al., “Video Object Annotation, Navigation, and Composition”, In Proceedings of UIST 2008, pp. 3-12. |
Gortler et al., “The Lumigraph”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 43-54. |
Hacohen et al., “Non-Rigid Dense Correspondence with Applications for Image Enhancement”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 30, 4, 2011, pp. 70:1-70:10. |
Hamilton, “JPEG File Interchange Format, Version 1.02”, Sep. 1, 1992, 9 pgs. |
Hardie, “A Fast Image Super-Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2007, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 2953-2964. |
Hasinoff et al., “Search-and-Replace Editing for Personal Photo Collections”, Computational Photography (ICCP) 2010, pp. 1-8. |
Horisaki et al., “Irregular Lens Arrangement Design to Improve Imaging Performance of Compound-Eye Imaging Systems”, Applied Physics Express, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 022501-1-022501-3. |
Horisaki et al., “Superposition Imaging for Three-Dimensionally Space-Invariant Point Spread Functions”, Applied Physics Express, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 112501-1-112501-3. |
Horn et al., “LightShop: Interactive Light Field Manipulation and Rendering”, In Proceedings of I3D 2007, pp. 121-128. |
Isaksen et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Jarabo et al., “Efficient Propagation of Light Field Edits”, In Proceedings of SIACG 2011, pp. 75-80. |
Joshi et al., “Synthetic Aperture Tracking: Tracking Through Occlusions”, ICCV IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision; Publication [online]. Oct. 2007 [retrieved Jul. 28, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: http:I/ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4409032&isnumber=4408819>; pp. 1-8. |
Kang et al., “Handling Occlusions inn Dense Multi-View Stereo”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 1-103-1-110. |
Kitamura et al., “Reconstruction of a high-resolution image on a compound-eye image-capturing system”, Applied Optics, Mar. 10, 2004, vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1719-1727. |
Krishnamurthy et al., “Compression and Transmission of Depth Maps for Image-Based Rendering”, Image Processing, 2001, pp. 828-831. |
LensVector, “How LensVector Autofocus Works”, printed Nov. 2, 2012 from http://www.lensvector.com/overview.html, 1 pg. |
Levin et al., “A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting”, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 2008, vol. 30, 8 pgs. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
Levoy et al., “Light Field Rendering”, Proc. ADM SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 1-12. |
Li et al., “A Hybrid Camera for Motion Deblurring and Depth Map Super-Resolution,” Jun. 23-28, 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8 pgs. Retrieved from www.eecis.udel.edu/˜jye/lab—research/08/deblur-feng.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014. |
Liu et al., “Virtual View Reconstruction Using Temporal Information”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2012, pp. 115-120. |
Lo et al., “Stereoscopic 3D Copy & Paste”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, No. 6, Article 147, Dec. 2010, pp. 147:1-147:10. |
Muehlebach, “Camera Auto Exposure Control for VSLAM Applications”, Studies on Mechatronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Autumn Term 2010 course, 67 pgs. |
Nayar, “Computational Cameras: Redefining the Image”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 30-38. |
Ng, “Digital Light Field Photography”, Thesis, Jul. 2006, 203 pgs. |
Ng et al., “Super-Resolution Image Restoration from Blurred Low-Resolution Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2005, vol. 23, pp. 367-378. |
Nitta et al., “Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative backprojection method”, Applied Optics, May 1, 2006, vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2893-2900. |
Nomura et al., “Scene Collages and Flexible Camera Arrays”, Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2007, 12 pgs. |
Park et al., “Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 2003, pp. 21-36. |
Pham et al., “Robust Super-Resolution without Regularization”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 124, 2008, pp. 1-19. |
Protter et al., “Generalizing the Nonlocal-Means to Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2009, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 36-51. |
Radtke et al., “Laser lithographic fabrication and characterization of a spherical artificial compound eye”, Optics Express, Mar. 19, 2007, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 3067-3077. |
Rander et al., “Virtualized Reality: Constructing Time-Varying Virtual Worlds From Real World Events”, Proc. of IEEE Visualization '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Oct. 19-24, 1997, pp. 277-283, 552. |
Rhemann et al, “Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 2013, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 504-511. |
Robertson et al., “Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures”, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1999, 5 pgs. |
Robertson et al., “Estimation-theoretic approach to dynamic range enhancement using multiple exposures”, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Apr. 2003, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 219-228. |
Roy et al., “Non-Uniform Hierarchical Pyramid Stereo for Large Images”, Computer and Robot Vision, 2007, pp. 208-215. |
Sauer et al., “Parallel Computation of Sequential Pixel Updates in Statistical Tomographic Reconstruction”, ICIP 1995, pp. 93-96. |
Shum et al., “Pop-Up Light Field: An Interactive Image-Based Modeling and Rendering System,” Apr. 2004, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143-162. Retrieved from http://131.107.65.14/en-us/um/people/jiansun/papers/PopupLightField—TOG.pdf on Feb. 5. |
Stollberg et al., “The Gabor superlens as an alternative wafer-level camera approach inspired by superposition compound eyes of nocturnal insects”, Optics Express, Aug. 31, 2009, vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 15747-15759. |
Takeda et al., “Super-resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, Sep. 2009, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1958-1975. |
Tallon et al., “Upsampling and Denoising of Depth Maps Via Joint-Segmentation”, 20th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 27-31, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Tanida et al., “Color imaging with an integrated compound imaging system”, Optics Express, Sep. 8, 2003, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2109-2117. |
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification”, Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2001, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1806-1813. |
Vaish et al., “Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces Using Synthetic Apertures: Stereo, Focus and Robust Measures”, Proceeding, CVPR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—vol. 2, pp. 2331-2338. |
Vaish et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform”, IEEE Workshop on A3DISS, CVPR, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Vaish et al., “Using Plane + Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, 8 pgs. |
Veilleux, “CCD Gain Lab: The Theory”, University of Maryland, College Park-Observational Astronomy (ASTR 310), Oct. 19, 2006, pp. 1-5 (online], [retrieved on May 13, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.astro.umd.edu/˜veilleux/ASTR310/fall06/ccd—theory.pdf, 5 pgs. |
Vuong et al., “A New Auto Exposure and Auto White-Balance Algorithm to Detect High Dynamic Range Conditions Using CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2008, WCECS 2008, Oct. 22-24, 2008. |
Wetzstein et al., “Computational Plenoptic Imaging”, Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2397-2426. |
Wheeler et al., “Super-Resolution Image Synthesis Using Projections Onto Convex Sets in the Frequency Domain”, Proc. SPIE, 2005, 5674, 12 pgs. |
Wilburn, “High Performance Imaging Using Arrays of Inexpensive Cameras”, Thesis of Bennett Wilburn, Dec. 2004, 128 pgs. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging Using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Jul. 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 765-776. |
Wilburn et al., “High-Speed Videography Using a Dense Camera Array”, Proceeding, CVPR'04 Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 294-301. |
Wilburn et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002, SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2002, 8 pgs. |
Wippermann et al., “Design and fabrication of a chirped array of refractive ellipsoidal micro-lenses for an apposition eye camera objective”, Proceedings of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, Oct. 15, 2005, 59622C-1-59622C-11. |
Yang et al., “A Real-Time Distributed Light Field Camera”, Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (2002), pp. 1-10. |
Zhang et al., Depth estimation, spatially variant image registration, and super-resolution using a multi-lenslet camera, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7705, Apr. 23, 2010, pp. 770505-770505-8, XP055113797 ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI: 10.1117/12.852171. |
Zhang et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Camera Array”, Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2004, 12 pgs. |
Zomet et al., “Robust Super-Resolution”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
US 8,957,977, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn). |
US 8,964,053, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn). |
US 8,965,058, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12782935.6, report completed Aug. 28, 2014 Mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12804266.0, Report Completed Jan. 27, 2015, Mailed Feb. 3, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12835041.0, Report Completed Jan. 28, 2015, Mailed Feb. 4, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/059813, Search Completed Apr. 15, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/024987, Mailed Aug. 21, 2014, 13 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/027146, Completed Apr. 2, 2013, Issued Aug. 26, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/039155, completed Nov. 4, 2014, Mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/046002, completed Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/048772, completed Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/46002, completed Nov. 13, 2013, Mailed Nov. 29, 2013, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/56065, Completed Nov. 25, 2013, Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/59991, Completed Feb. 6, 2014, Mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/044687, date completed Jan. 5, 2010, date mailed Jan. 13, 2010, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/64921, Completed Feb. 25, 2011, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 17 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Completed Mar. 27, 2013, Mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, completed Apr. 2, 2013, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/039155, Search completed Jul. 1, 2013, Mailed Jul. 11, 2013, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/048772, Search Completed Oct. 21, 2013, Mailed Nov. 8, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Completed Feb. 18, 2014, Mailed Mar. 19, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, Completed Mar. 14, 2014, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US11/36349, mailed Aug. 22, 2011, 11 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US13/62720, completed Mar. 25, 2014, Mailed Apr. 21, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/024903 completed Jun. 12, 2014, Mailed, Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/17766, completed May 28, 2014, Mailed Jun. 18, 2014, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18084, completed May 23, 2014, Mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18116, Report completed May 13, 2014, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/22118, completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed, Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/22774 report completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed Jul. 14, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/24407, completed Jun. 11, 2014, Mailed Jul. 8, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/25100, report completed Jul. 7, 2014, Mailed Aug. 7, 2014 5 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/25904 report completed Jun. 10, 2014, Mailed Jul. 10, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, completed Mar. 9, 2011, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/044014, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/056151, completed Nov. 14, 2012, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/059813, Report completed Dec. 17, 2012, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/37670, Mailed Jul. 18, 2012, Completed Jul. 5, 2012, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/58093, Report completed Nov. 15, 2012, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/024947, Completed Jul. 8, 2014, Mailed Aug. 5, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/028447, completed Jun. 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 21, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, completed Jul. 28, 2014, Mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 7 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/23762, Completed May 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 3, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/029052, completed Jun. 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 24, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US13/56065, Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 4 Pgs4 Pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/056502, Report Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar 5, 2015, 7. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,106, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 12 pgs. |
Baker et al., “Limits on Super-Resolution and How to Break Them”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2002, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1167-1183. |
Bertero et al., “Super-resolution in computational imaging”, Micron, 2003, vol. 34, Issues 6-7, 17 pgs. |
Bishop et al., “Full-Resolution Depth Map Estimation from an Aliased Plenoptic Light Field”, ACCV 2010, Part II, LNCS 6493, pp. 186-200. |
Bishop et al., “The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, May 2012, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 972-986. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140267829 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61785797 | Mar 2013 | US |