Patent Application
20210094024
The present disclosure relates generally to method of synthesizing and compositions for platinum based nanomaterials, particularly platinum nickel and platinum cobalt nanoparticle structures.
In the last few decades, significant efforts have been devoted to improving the activity and durability of Pt-based nanomaterials for oxygen reduction reaction (“ORR”) aiming to overcome the high price and scarcity problems of Pt-based catalysts for fuel cell application in stationary and automobile sectors. Since the discovery of the 90-fold activity improvements of nano-segregated Pt3Ni(111) surface in comparison to commercially available platinum on carbon (“Pt/C”) catalysts, a variety of nanocrystals with different shapes and significant improved activities have been developed, in most cases, using solution-phase synthesis methods. In contrast to a Pt/C catalyst prepared by impregnation method, these nanocrystals made by solution-phase synthesis usually have well controlled shape and composition and monodispersed particle size; thus, their surfaces could be fine-tuned to give much higher catalytic activities. However, these highly active nanocrystals can usually only be made in milligram scale because great attention has to be paid to the synthesis and post-treatment processes in order to keep the desired morphologies, particle sizes, and surface composition profiles. This is barely enough for physical characterizations and electrocatalytic activity testing on rotating disk electrode (“RDE”), and their performances in real fuel cell membrane electrode assembly (“MEA”) have rarely been investigated, which greatly hinders the commercialization of fuel cell technology. Gram scale of high quality nanocrystal catalyst should be made available for MEA testing in order to bridge the gap between fundamental researches and real device investigations.
It is generally very challenging to scale up nanomaterials because their formation processes are very sensitive to different reaction parameters, which usually inevitably change with the increase of the reaction volume. Sometimes, even trace amount of impurities in the precursors or solvents will result in total different morphologies. This critical information for scale up is usually not known when the material synthesis is discovered, and extensive research is required to reveal the true factors governing the nanomaterial formation, especially if these factors can be controlled at larger scale. Only at this point can one tell if this material is scalable and what is the best way to scale it up: either using traditional batch synthesis or in a microfluidic chip or tubular channel of continuous flow reactors where the reaction parameters can be controlled in a more precise way. When it comes to electrocatalytic materials, synthesis of nanocrystals is only the start of the electrocatalyst preparation. These nanocrystals should be uniformly loaded onto conducting materials, such as high-surface-area carbon particles. In most cases, the surfactant used to stabilize the growth of nanocrystals should be removed, and desired surface structures will be created by chemical or electrochemical leaching and/or further annealing processes. The electrocatalyst can only be scaled up when every single step of the multi-step process is proven to be scalable. In this regard, recent shape-controlled synthesis of nanocrystals using solid-state chemistry methods significantly simplify the electrocatalyst preparation process. However, the control of nanocrystal shape and size and the composition of solution-phase synthesis is superior to solid-state reactions and usually results in much higher catalytic activities.
Multi-layered Pt-skin nanoparticle catalysts have been synthesized by solution-phase synthesis and recently by a one-pot synthesis (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/996,297). However, the synthesis conditions at larger scale in batch mode is time- and material-consuming, complicating scale-up. Furthermore, for nanomaterials whose formation mechanisms are sensitive to reaction parameter changes, it would be very challenging to scale up the synthesis in batch because the heat transfer and mass transfer in a batch reactor will inevitably change with scale.
While these advanced materials have been produced on a small scale and through laboratory batch production, there remains a need for a feasible process capable of producing desirable nanocatalysts in a scalable or industrial scale process.
Embodiments described herein relate generally to a method of synthesizing Pt nanoparticle catalyst. The method comprises forming, at an initial temperature of 18-28° C., a reaction mixture. The reaction mixture comprises a nickel precursor, a reducing agent, and a surfactant comprising one part oleic acid to two parts oleylamine, a platinum precursor, and a polar solvent. The method further includes injecting a segment of reaction mixture into a continuous flow reactor at a temperature of at least 190° C. for 5 minutes to 1 hour, forming a PtNi nanoparticle solution, the segment having a segment length of at least 3 mm. The PtNi/substrate nanoparticles are isolated by: sonicating the PtNi nanoparticle solution with substrate in chloroform solution, adding hexane to the sonicated chloroform solution, precipitating PtNi/substrate nanoparticles, and collecting the PtNi/substrate nanoparticles by filtration. The PtNi/substrate undergo acid leaching by: sonicating the collected PtNi/substrate nanoparticles in water, mixing an acid with the sonicated PtNi/substrate sonicated in water for 60 minutes, and collecting the leached PtNi/substrate nanoparticles by filtration. The leached PtNi/substrate nanoparticles are annealed, forming a Pt-skin on the PtNi/substrate nanoparticles.
Other embodiments described herein relate generally to a method of forming Pt nanoparticle. The method comprises forming, at a temperature of 18-28° C., a reaction mixture. The reaction mixture comprises a nickel precursor, a reducing agent, a surfactant comprising one part oleic acid to two parts oleylamine, a platinum precursor, and a polar solvent. The method further includes injecting a segment of reaction mixture into a continuous flow reactor at a temperature of at least 190° C. for 5 minutes to 1 hour, forming a Pt nanoparticle solution. The segment has a segment length of at least 3 mm.
It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the subject matter disclosed herein.
The foregoing and other features of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only several implementations in accordance with the disclosure and are therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope, the disclosure will be described with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings.
Reference is made to the accompanying drawings throughout the following detailed description. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative implementations described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other implementations may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here. It will be readily understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are explicitly contemplated and made part of this disclosure.
Described herein is a scalable process to manufacture nanoparticle in a reactor with continuous flow of reagents, which has been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry and offers the opportunity to control the key parameters of nanocrystal synthesis even for the most complicated nanostructures. The problem of batch-to-batch variation often seen in batch synthesis can be eliminated in a flow reactor. More importantly, the process developed in a flow reactor can be readily scalable by numbering up without changing the reaction conditions.
Prior processes suffered from the low solubility of the PtNi nanoparticle metal precursors in organic solvents at room temperature (e.g., 18-28° C. or, preferably, 20-24° C.). The precipitation of precursors from the liquid phase is a major limitation that previously has restricted such PtNi synthesis to a batch approach due to non-uniform reaction and clogging of the flow reactor if a continuous approach were to be attempted.
One embodiment relates to a synthesis process scalable to industrial scale production (i.e., greater than 5 g, 100 g, 10 kg, 100 kg batches) to enable production of tons to kilotons of material per year. In one embodiment, the synthesis process forms the PtNi nanoparticle in a flow reactor. In one implementation, the process utilizes a one-pot process (see, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/996,297, incorporated herein by reference) that begins at room temperature rather than utilize a hot injection process and proceeds through a flow reactor.
As illustrated in
In accordance with some embodiments, a continuous flow synthesis process is described. In one embodiment, a reaction mixture is formed, such as at room temperature (20-24° C.), for use with the continuous flow reactor as the feedstock. In one embodiment of the reaction mixture, the materials may be added to form the reaction mixture without order requirement. In one embodiment, a nickel precursor (e.g., nickel acetate tetrahydrate), a reducing agent (e.g., 1,2-tetradecanediol), a surfactant (e.g., oleic acid and/or oleylamine), platinum precursors (e.g., platinum(II) acetylacetonate), and a polar solvent (e.g., 1,2-dichlorobenzene and/or diphenyl ether) are included in the reaction mixture. Using 1,2-dichlorobenzene results in increased uniformity in particle size. In some embodiments, 1,2-dichlorobenzene and/or diphenyl ether are included; the diphenyl either provides the basic solvent environment and the dichlorobenzene contributes to the uniformity of nanoparticle (without dichlorobenzene, particles are less uniform). The ratio of oleic acid to oleylamine may be varied to control particle size, with increasing ratio of oleic acid associated with smaller particle size.
In one embodiment, a synthesis proceeds with 1.336 g nickel acetate tetrahydrate, 1.04 g platinum acetylacetonate, 0.68 g 1,2-tetradecanediol, 8 mL oleylamine, 4 mL oleic acid, 24 mL 1,2-dichlorobenzene, and 160 mL diphenyl ether that are mixed together, such as by magnetic bar stirring at ˜400 rpm for 20 minutes under argon flow. It should be appreciated that these amounts may be scaled up where the relative amounts of each component remain the same.
In order to remove any residual water, the reaction mixture may be heated to above 100° C. In one embodiment, the reaction mixture is held at 110° C. for 2 hours to remove water. The reaction mixture is then transferred to a feedstock system for the flow reactor, for example to a syringe for injection in segmented continuous flow reactor. PtNi nanoparticle synthesis was performed by pumping/injecting the reaction mixture into a reaction vessel of the reactor, such as a fused silica capillary tube (or PTFE tube or glass tube coil). The reaction vessel may be heated to the reaction temperature by conventional means, such as heated inside an oil batch or a convection oven. The reaction time, or residence time, was controlled by the length of the reactor and flow rate of material through the reactor. The particle composition can be changed by changing the ratios of the Pt and Ni precursors, for example 1.2-1.4 g of nickel acetate tetrahydrate per 0.95-1.15 g platinum acetylacetonate.
In one embodiment, the synthesis occurs in a flow reactor system for use as described herein. The above described solvent system provided to the reactor as the reaction mixture. Prior approaches have used batch reactions and failed to produce monodispersed particles. Attempts at a continuous flow reaction failed to produce an acceptable particle due to failure of the nickel to sufficiently integrate into the formed particles. For a segmented flow reactor, the reaction mixture is provided in segments or drops to a continuous flow (e.g., with the segment or drop having a volume based on a segment length and the diameter of the reactor and moving through the reactor with a transport solvent). In one embodiment, the reaction mixture is chemically and physically isolated to the defined segment/droplet by an immiscible solvent or atmosphere spacer. The transport solvent may be present as a segment between two immiscible solvent or atmosphere spacers to aid in flow of the material through the reactor. The reaction mixture is at an initial temperature, such as room temperature, and is pumped into the reactor at a selected rate to form the segment/droplet. In one embodiment, the range of rates and pressures are 0.1 ml/h to 100 ml/min depending on the diameter of the flow reactor, pressure can be from atmosphere pressure to 20 bar. The reactor has a reaction temperature (e.g., 190° C. to 220° C.). The reaction proceeds for a reaction time (e.g., 5 minutes to 1 hour). It should be appreciated that the reaction time is controlled by the length of the flow reactor and the flow rate of the reaction mixture (i.e., how long the reaction mixture stays in the flow reactor).
In batch synthesis, Pt and Ni precursors are dissolved in organic solvents at elevated temperature before reaching reaction temperature. In contrast, in one embodiment of a flow reactor, all the metal precursors, solid reducing agents, and surfactants should be dissolved at room temperature in order to achieve uniform and consistent reaction. For example, the dissolution of nickel acetate in the reaction mixture is controlled by the coordination of the Ni ion with oleylamine and the amount of oleylamine surprisingly controls the solubility of Ni precursor. In one embodiment, the oleylamine is present in a 2:1 ratio with the oleic acid. In one embodiment, all of the reaction materials are dissolved at room temperature (20-24° C.), including the metal precursors.
In addition, the utilization of a flow reactor requires adaptation of the synthesis to address the issue that continuous flow may result in poly-dispersed nanoparticle because of the laminar flow nature in the flow reactor and disruptions to that flow condition due to changes in the materials in the reaction mixture, including phase changes. It was discovered that for PtNi nanoparticle synthesis in flow reactor, monodispersed, such as about 5 nm diameter, PtNi nanoparticle are obtained with large segments/droplets but not obtained with small segments/droplets flow at different temperatures with different residence times (
Indeed, monodispersed PtNi nanoparticle is obtained with a continuous flow mode (
Note that experiments demonstrated the synthesis of PtNi nanoparticle in flow reactor in tubes of different materials (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene, fused silica, quartz, and glass) with different tube diameters (a few hundred micrometers to several millimeters), different reaction temperatures, and residence times. The particle size could be tuned by changing the amount of oleic acid (
For a flow reactor process it is critical to provide an unchanged particle quality through the operation time. As shown in
More importantly, the unchanged particle size and composition at different operation times indicate that future scale up is feasible by increasing operating time. Further, the formation of the PtNi material may also include a scaled up loading and acid leaching procedures.
†WANG, et al., “Design and Synthesis of Bimetallic Electrocatalyst with Multilayered Pt-Skin Surfaces,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133(36), pp. 14396-14403 (2011).
‡U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/996,297.
In general, while there are several parameters to the synthesis of the catalysts, not all parameters were shown to be relevant to solving the problem of the low solubility of the precursors. In particular, increasing the reaction time/temperature, decreasing the precursor concentrations, increasing the dichlorobenzene amount, changing the timing for the water removal, and using different precursors did not yield a scalable synthesis process. However, positive results were experienced when the surfactant amount was changed and when the droplet size was changed.
The reaction materials may be purged with an inert gas at greater than room temperature to remove hydrate water, such as from the nickel precursor.
In one embodiment, PtNi nanoparticles from continuous flow process have surfactants removed. For example, the surfactants on the surface of PtNi nanoparticles are removed by annealing in a furnace, such as at 185° C. for 20 hours in air. Preferably, the thickness of the catalyst layer should be less than a few millimeters (2-3 mm) to avoid ignition of the catalyst by excess heat generated during the oxidation of surfactant on the surface of PtNi nanoparticles.
Following PtNi nanoparticle synthesis by the continuous flow reactor methods described, the nanoparticles may be “loaded” on a substrate, for example a carbon substrate. The PtNi nanoparticles and carbon are dispersed in an organic dispersant, such as in chloroform by sonication to form a slurry. The slurry is the mixed with a precipitant, such as hexane, to form a precipitate of the PtNi nanoparticles. The precipitated materials are collected by filtration or other collection means and, preferably, vacuum dried.
Following the synthesis in the flow reactor, the particles are collected and undergo a post synthesis treatment. For example, the particles undergo an acid leaching.
Following loading of the PtNi on carbon and collection of the resultant PtNi/C, the material maybe further treated such as by acid leaching. The carbon supported PtNi nanoparticles are dispersed in dispersant, such as water by sonication, and an acid, such as an equal volume of acid (e.g., HClO4) is added. The material is acid leached for 10 minutes to 24 hours and collected, such as by filtration and washed by water. The collected materials may be dried in a vacuum oven at 80° C. overnight.
The PtNi/C materials may be further, such as after acid leaching, treated, such as by thermal treatment (e.g., annealing). The annealing may be on an alumina boat and annealed at 400° C. for 1 hour in a tube furnace under flow of 3% H2/Ar.
In a further embodiment, PtCo particles may be formed. The same method is utilized as described above, but using Cobalt(II) acetate stead of Ni acetate tetrahydrate. This embodiment otherwise uses the same precursor/surfactant/reducing agent ratio. Oleic acid concentrations were changed in order to see if particle size could be controlled. However, in contrast to PtNi, same PtCo particle size were obtained despite difference oleic acid concentrations. It is believed that PtCo particle size may be controlled by changing reducing agent amount or increase reaction temperature.
The above described results were obtain based upon the following samples.
Synthesis of PtNi nanoparticles in flow reactor. In a 250 mL 3-neck round bottom flask, 1.336 g nickel acetate tetrahydrate, 1.04 g platinum acetylacetonate, 0.68 g 1,2-tetradecanediol, 8 mL oleylamine, 4 mL oleic acid, 24 mL 1,2-dichlorobenzene, and 160 mL diphenyl ether were mixed together by magnetic bar stirring at ˜400 rpm for 20 minutes under argon flow. The solution was heated up to 110° C. to speed up dissolution and remove H2O. The solution was held at 110° C. for 2 hours to remove water and then cooled down to room temperature before being transferred to a syringe with a long needle. PtNi nanoparticle synthesis was performed by pumping the reaction mixture into a fused silica capillary tube (or polytetrafluoroethylene tube) which was heated inside an oil batch or a convection oven at specific temperature. The reaction time, or residence time, was controlled by the length of the reactor and flow rate. To investigate the effect of oleic acid amount, the solutions with double amount of oleic acid and that without oleic acid were prepared separately and mixed in different volume ratios in a syringe before pumping into the flow reactor. PtNi nanoparticles were collected by centrifuging at 8000 rpm and further washed with hexane and ethanol.
Loading of PtNi nanoparticles on carbon. The proper amount of carbon was dispersed in chloroform by sonication to form a uniform slurry. PtNi nanoparticles dispersed in chloroform were mixed with carbon slurry and sonicated for 20 min. Carbon supported PtNi nanoparticles were precipitated from chloroform by adding the same volume of hexane. The precipitated materials were collected by filtration and dried in vacuum oven at 80° C. overnight.
Removing surfactant. The surfactants on the surface of PtNi nanoparticles were removed by annealing in a furnace at 185° C. for 20 hours in air. The thickness of the catalyst layer should be less than a few millimeters (2-3 mm) to avoid ignition of the catalyst by excess heat generated during the oxidation of surfactant on the surface of PtNi nanoparticles.
Acid leaching. Carbon supported PtNi nanoparticles were dispersed in water by sonication and the same volume of 0.1 M HClO4 was added. The material was soaked in the acid for different times and collected by filtration and washed by water. The collected materials were dried in a vacuum oven at 80° C. overnight.
Annealing. Acid leached PtNi nanoparticles supported on carbon were loaded in an alumina boat and annealed at 400° C. for 1 hour in a tube furnace under flow of 3% H2/Ar. The activity of the catalyst was not affected by the thickness of the catalyst (from ˜1 mm to ˜1 cm) in the alumina boat during annealing.
Electrochemistry. All the electrochemical testing was performed at room temperature in 0.1 M HClO4 electrolyte in a three-electrode configuration. The electrochemical cell and all its components were cleaned in concentrated H2SO4/HNO3 and washed in boiling water (18.2 MΩ) before each measurement. A commercially available Ag/AgCl electrode was connected to the electrochemical cell with a salt bridge and used as the reference electrode. The potential of reference electrode was calibrated with hydrogen evolution/oxidation reaction in each experiment. The catalyst was loaded onto a glassy carbon rotating disk electrode with diameter of 6 mm and used as the working electrode. A Pt wire coil was used as the counter electrode. Catalyst ink with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was made before each measurement. Depending on the Pt mass loading of the catalyst, 15-2 5 μL of ink was loaded onto the glassy carbon electrode. The exact loading of Pt on glassy carbon electrode was determined with ICP measurement from the same ink, and this was used to determine Pt mass activity. A stable state of the electrode was achieved after 20 cyclic voltammetry (“CV”) cycles between 0.06 B and 1.00 V with 50 mV/s scan rate. The ORR was measured using a 20 mV/s scan rate. Double layer capacitance under Ar purging, also measured at 20 mV/s scan rate, was subtracted and electrolyte resistance was corrected by iR compensation. Pt electrochemical surface area (“ECSA”) specific activity was obtained by normalizing the current to ECSA from carbon monoxide stripping.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, the term “a member” is intended to mean a single member or a combination of members, “a material” is intended to mean one or more materials, or a combination thereof.
As used herein, the terms “about” and “approximately” generally mean plus or minus 10% of the stated value. For example, about 0.5 would include 0.45 and 0.55, about 10 would include 9 to 11, about 1000 would include 900 to 1100.
It should be noted that the term “exemplary” as used herein to describe various embodiments is intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, and/or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such term is not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
The terms “coupled,” “connected,” and the like as used herein mean the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being attached to one another.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any inventions or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations of particular inventions. Certain features described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 awarded by the United States Department of Energy to UChicago Argonne, LLC, operator of Argonne National Laboratory. The government has certain rights in the invention.
