Patent Grant
8025680
The present invention is directed towards the treatment of spinal disorders and pain. More particularly, the present invention is directed to systems and methods of treating the spine, which eliminate pain and enable spinal motion, which effectively mimic that of a normally functioning spine.
Extending between each inferior facet joint 10a and 10b and the spinous process 18 are lamina 5a and 5b, respectively. Similarly, inferior vertebra 4 has superior facet joints 12a and 12b, superior pedicles 9a and 9b, transverse processes 11a and 11b, inferior facet joints 14a and 14b, lamina 15a and 15b, posterior arch 20, spinous process 22.
The superior vertebra with its inferior facets, the inferior vertebra with its superior facets, the intervertebral disc, and seven spinal ligaments (not shown) extending between the superior and inferior vertebrae together comprise a spinal motion segment or functional spine unit. Each spinal motion segment enables motion along three orthogonal axes, both in rotation and in translation. The various spinal motions are illustrated in
Traumatic, inflammatory, metabolic, synovial, neoplastic and degenerative disorders of the spine can produce debilitating pain that can affect a spinal motion segment's ability to properly function. The specific location or source of spinal pain is most often an affected intervertebral disc or facet joint, and in particular the nerves in and around the intervertebral disc or facet joint. Often, a disorder in one location or spinal component can lead to eventual deterioration or disorder, and ultimately, pain in another.
Spine fusion (arthrodesis) is a procedure in which two or more adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together once the natural height of the degenerated disc has been restored. It is one of the most common approaches to alleviating various types of spinal pain, particularly pain associated with one or more affected intervertebral discs. However, fusion is only as good as the ability to restore disc height to relieve the pain by taking pressure off the nerves, nerve roots, and/or articulating surfaces—i.e., facet joints and end plates of the vertebral bodies. While spine fusion generally helps to eliminate certain types of pain, it has been shown to decrease function by limiting the range of motion for patients in flexion, extension, rotation and lateral bending. Furthermore, fusion creates increased stresses on adjacent non-fused motion segments and accelerated degeneration of the motion segments. Additionally, pseudarthrosis (resulting from an incomplete or ineffective fusion) may not provide stability of the degenerative spine or the expected pain-relief for the patient. Also, the device(s) used for fusion, whether artificial or biological, may migrate out of the fusion site creating significant new problems for the patient. In addition, fusion of the spine causes the increased transfer of stresses to the anatomical structures above and below the site of fusion. The additional stresses may cause the accelerated degeneration of anatomical structures above and below the original site of fixation, thus necessitating further surgical intervention in order to arrest the degeneration of these levels, to restore stability of the degenerated spine, and to relieve the pain associated with this process.
Various technologies and approaches have been developed to treat spinal pain without fusion in order to maintain or recreate the natural biomechanics of the spine. To this end, significant efforts are being made in the use of implantable artificial intervertebral discs. Artificial discs are intended to replace the natural disc while restoring articulation between vertebral bodies so as to recreate the full range of motion normally allowed by the elastic properties of the natural disc. Unfortunately, the currently available artificial discs do not adequately address all of the mechanics of motion for the spinal column.
It has been found that the facet joints can also be a significant source of spinal disorders and debilitating pain. For example, a patient may suffer from arthritic facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, otherwise deformed facet joints, facet joint injuries, etc. These disorders lead to spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolithesis, and/or isthmic spondylotlisthesis, pinching the nerves which extend or exit the foramen, i.e., the space between the intervetebral bodies, and between the affected vertebrae.
Current interventions for the treatment of facet joint disorders have not been found to provide completely successful results. One reason may be that facet disorders and degenerative disease are usually preceded by degenerative problems associated with the disc that may result in stensosis, etc. As the disc degenerates, the height of the vertebral disc starts to collapse which increases the stresses on the facet joint, which in turn causes degeneration of the facet joint. Degeneration of the structures in the spine leads to increased stresses on the structures. As a natural response the body attempts to build bone that typically leads to stenosis of the spinal canal or the foramen. Facetectomy (removal of the facet joints) may provide some pain relief, but as the facet joints help to support axial, torsional, and shear loads (approximately 20% of the total load) that act on the spinal column in addition to providing a sliding articulation and mechanism for load transmission, their removal may undesiredly allow hypermobility of the spine. Laminectomy (removal of the lamina, including the spinal arch and the spinous process) may also provide pain relief associated with facet joint disorders; however, the spine is made less stable and is subject to hypermobility. Problems with the facet joints can also complicate treatments associated with other portions of the spine. In fact, contraindications for disc replacement include arthritic facet joints, absent facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, or otherwise deformed facet joints due to the inability of the artificial disc (when used with compromised or missing facet joints) to properly restore the natural height of the disc while allowing natural biomechanics of the spinal motion segment.
While various attempts have been made at facet joint replacement, they have been inadequate. This is due to the fact that prosthetic facet joints preserve existing bony structures and therefore do not address pathologies which affect facet joints themselves. Certain facet joint prostheses, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,464, are intended to be supported on the lamina or the posterior arch. As the lamina is a very complex and highly variable anatomical structure, it is very difficult to design a prosthesis that provides reproducible positioning against the lamina to correctly locate the prosthetic facet joints. In addition, when facet joint replacement involves complete removal and replacement of the natural facetjoint, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,319, the prosthesis is unlikely to endure the loads and cycling experienced by the vertebra. Thus, the facet joint replacement may be subject to long-term displacement. Furthermore, when facet joint disorders are accompanied by disease or trauma to other structures of a vertebra (such as the lamina, spinous process, and/or transverse processes), facet joint replacement is insufficient to treat the problem(s).
Most recently, surgical-based technologies, referred to as “dynamic posterior stabilization,” have been developed to address spinal pain resulting from more than one disorder, when more than one structure of the spine have been compromised. An objective of such technologies is to provide the support of fusion-based implants while maximizing the natural biomechanics of the spine. This approach helps reduce the amount of stress transmitted or shifted to the level above or below that which is being treated to reduce the acceleration of the degenerative process typically seen in rigid devices used to fuse the spine. Dynamic posterior stabilization systems typically fall into one of two general categories: (1) interspinous spacers and (2) posterior pedicle screw-based systems.
Examples of interspinous spacers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. Re. 36,211, 5,645,599, 6,695,842, 6,716,245 and 6,761,720. The spacers, which are made of either a hard or compliant material, are placed between adjacent spinous processes. Because the interspinous spacers involve attachment to the spinous processes, use of these types of systems is limited to applications where the spinous processes are uncompromised and healthy.
Examples of pedicle screw-based systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,015,247, 5,484,437, 5,489,308, 5,609,636 and 5,658,337, 5,741,253, 6,080,155, 6,096,038, 6,264,656 and 6,270,498. These types of systems involve the use of screws which are positioned in the vertebral body through the pedicle. Certain types of these pedicle screw-based systems may be used to augment compromised facet joints, while others require removal of the spinous process and/or the facet joints for implantation. One such system, the Zimmer Spine Dynesys® employs a cord which is extended between the pedicle screws and a fairly rigid spacer which is passed over the cord and positioned between the screws. While this system is able to provide load sharing and restoration of disc height, because it is so rigid, it is not effective in preserving the natural motion of the spinal segment into which it is implanted. Other pedicle screw-based systems employ articulating joints between the vertebral bodies which are intended to replace the facet joints, and are anchored to the veterbral bodies via the pedicle screws.
With the limitations of current spine stabilization technologies, there is clearly a need for an improved means and method for dynamic posterior stabilization of the spine which address the drawbacks of prior devices. In particular, it would be highly beneficial to have a dynamic stabilization system that enables the spine to mimic the motion of one or more healthy and uncompromised vertebral segments without limiting natural extension/flexion, axial rotational and lateral bending movements. It would be additionally beneficial if such a system could be used to treat all spinal indications regardless of pain source, prevent or slow the deterioration of the intervertebral discs, or even restore disc height, and be used in conjunction with prosthetic intervertebral discs.
The present invention provides methods, systems and devices for dynamically stabilizing the spine. The systems include a superior component for attachment to a superior vertebra of a spinal motion segment and an inferior component for attachment to an inferior vertebra of a spinal motion segment. The interconnection between the two components enables the spinal motion segment to move in a manner that mimics the natural motion of the spinal motion segment. In various embodiments, the superior and/or inferior components are connected by one or more strut members which interface or adjustably interconnect between the two components. In certain embodiments, the strut or struts include at least one joint which may be compressible and/or distractable. In other embodiments, the length, stiffness or shape of the strut may be adjustable. The systems may be configured to include additional components for the treatment of more than one spinal segment. Moreover, certain of the implementation methods may be configured for implantation without the removal of any portion of the spinal motion segment.
The present invention also includes methods for stabilizing at least one spinal motion segment where the methods involve implantation of the subject systems. attaching the components to the vertebrae.
Certain embodiments of the invention provide a sustaining force to distract the facets to offload the joint which reduces or eliminates facet pain, while allowing maximum mobility of the natural movement of the spine. Targeted and predetermined limitations to mobility may also be provided. The load may be shared with an existing facet or the load may be fully supported by devices according to the invention, which may include axial, torsional, and shearing loads. Devices according to the invention may provide stiffness, e.g., resistance to motion or hypermobility, to limit previous physiological stiffness, e.g., after bone removal, or to further resist motion from current stiffness, e.g., to prevent pain.
Advantages of certain embodiments of the invention may include one or more of the following. The natural biomechanics and motion of the spine are maintained to a greater degree than in prior systems, including fusion. Load on the facet joints may be offloaded. Spinal motion is preserved, including at least four degrees of freedom including forward flexion and extension, axial rotation, lateral bending and translation. Devices according to the invention may have a low profile and be minimally invasive and they may be conveniently delivered through a cannula. In other words, devices according to embodiments of the invention may be delivered in a minimally invasive way, or in a “mini-open” procedure, or in an open procedure, or all three. The degrees of freedom of certain embodiments of the invention are such that accidental loosening of the pedicle screws over time in use is minimized over that encountered in prior systems.
Systems according to the invention may be employed to treat various spinal disorders and pain, including those involving arthritic facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, facetjoint injuries, deformed facetjoints, scoliosis, etc.
These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the invention as more fully described below.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawings are not to-scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawings are the following figures:
Before the subject devices, systems and methods are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Thus, for example, reference to “a spinal segment” may include a plurality of such spinal segments and reference to “the screw” includes reference to one or more screws and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limits of that range is also specifically disclosed. Each smaller range between any stated value or intervening value in a stated range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention.
The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included or excluded in the range, and each range where either, neither or both limits are included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.
All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.
The present invention will now be described in greater detail by way of the following description of exemplary embodiments and variations of the systems and methods of the present invention. While more fully described in the context of the description of the subject methods of implanting the subject systems, it should be initially noted that in certain applications where the natural facet joints are compromised, as illustrated in
It should also be understood that the term “system”, when referring to a system of the present invention, most typically refers to a set of components which includes a superior, cephalad or rostral (towards the head) component configured for implantation into a superior vertebra of a vertebral motion segment and an inferior or caudal (towards the feet) component configured for implantation into an inferior vertebra of a vertebral motion segment. A pair of such component sets includes one set of components configured for implantation into and stabilization of the left side of a vertebral segment and another set configured for the implantation into and stabilization of the right side of a vertebral segment. The left set of components may move independently of the right set of components or their motions may be coordinated via an attachment between the two. In other words, they may move in conjunction with one another, with both moving relative to the more fixed attachment between the two. Where multiple spinal segments or units are being treated, the term “system” may refer to two or more pairs of component sets, i.e., two or more left sets and/or two or more right sets of components. Such a multilevel system involves stacking of component sets in which each set includes a superior component, an inferior component, and one or more medial components therebetween. These multilevel systems may include cross member components or strut systems having differing properties, e.g., lengths, limits on travel or other limited range of motion; resistance to motion or other forces, attachment locations, etc.
The superior and inferior components (and any medial components therebetween), when operatively implanted, are engaged or interface with each other in a manner that enables the treated spinal motion segment to mimic the function and movement of a natural healthy segment. The interconnecting strut system, or interface means, includes one or more structures or members which enable, limit and/or otherwise selectively control spinal motion. The structures may perform such functions by exerting various forces on the system components, and thus on the target vertebrae. The manner of coupling, interfacing, engagement or interconnection between the subject system components may involve compression, distraction, rotation or torsion, or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the extent or degree of these forces or motions between the components may be intraoperatively selected and/or adjusted to address the condition being treated, to accommodate the particular spinal anatomy into which the system is implanted, and to achieve the desired therapeutic result, such as to restore disc height and offset the facet joints.
In certain embodiments, the superior and inferior components are mechanically coupled to each other by one or more interconnection or interfacing means. In other embodiments, the superior and inferior components interface in an engaging manner which does not necessarily mechanically couple or fix the components together but rather constrains their relative movement and also enables the treated spinal motion segment to mimic the natural function and movement of a healthy segment. Typically, the interconnecting means is a posteriorly positioned component, i.e., one positioned posteriorly of the superior and inferior components, or it may be a laterally positioned component, i.e., one positioned to the outer side of the posterior and inferior components. The structures may involve one or more strut systems and/or joints which provide for dynamic movement of a stabilized spinal motion segment.
Referring now to
Of course it should be noted that the system may be applied to multi-level segments as well, and various embodiments of this are disclosed below. In some cases, however, it may be undesired or contraindicated to install a pedicle screw in a particular vertebral segment, e.g., the segment may be too diseased for a pedicle screw installation. In this case, one segment of a multilevel system may be skipped, with the segments adjacent to the skipped segment being used to secure the pedicle screw systems. In this case, the strut systems employed may be, e.g., twice as long as for a single segment facet augmentation.
The system 30 includes a superior pedicular cross member component 34 and an inferior pedicular cross member component 32. The lengths of superior pedicular cross member component 34 and inferior pedicular cross member component 32 are generally chosen to accommodate the geometry of a patient's vertebrae and also to accommodate various pedicle screw systems which may affix the cross member components and accompanying systems to the spine. The pedicular cross member components may be chosen to fit closely between the spinous processes, such that removal of parts of the spinous processes is unnecessary. The pedicular cross member components may also be made very small in extent, such that they provide a platform for, e.g., attaching a component, but do not even extend over to another pedicle screw.
The superior pedicular cross member component 34 is connected to the inferior pedicular cross member component 32 by a strut system 40, only one of which is shown in
The cross member components may be installed in, e.g., a top-loading, drop-down method in the context of an open or semi-open procedure. The cross-member components may be gripped with a number of different tools and a number of different methods, including laterally, medially, etc., and the gripping tool may be configured such that the same can grasp non-parallel and/or non-linear cross member components. Moreover, the same should be capable of accommodating different spacings, from screw to screw, as screws are seldom parallel.
The strut system 40 includes a cylinder 42 coupled at one end to a spherical swivel or spherical element 44. In this way, the strut system can rotate about its longitudinal axis relative to the pedicular cross member components. The cylinder 42 is separated from the spherical swivel 44 by a stem 43. The spherical swivel 44 may be retained within the void, e.g., void 32b, by retaining ring 36 which may be disposed on the side of the spherical swivel 44 facing the stem 43. Moreover, the spherical swivel 44 may be somewhat flattened at its extremity, i.e., the extremity 36′ opposite an extremity 45, so that the same does not extend beyond or out of the void 32b in the inferior pedicular cross member component 32. The retaining ring 36 engages a corresponding groove within the void. A similar retaining ring (not shown) may be disposed on the side of the spherical swivel 44 opposite the stem 43. However, generally, the spherical swivel 44 may be configured to rotatably sit within the void, and be constrained within the same once the retaining ring 36 is engaged.
The spherical swivel, which is a partially spherically shaped element, may allow for, e.g., about 8 o of polyaxial movement from the vertical, or a total of about 16 o from one side to another. Of course, even within the same device, different spherical elements or swivels may have differing degrees of movement as dictated by the requirements of the treatment. In one exemplary installation technique, the spherical swivel or element may be captured by the void such that the former may be initially installed in, or removed from, the latter at a predetermined angle, and then at other angles the former is prohibited from being removed from the latter. The predetermined angle may be chosen such that it is not an angle that is encountered in normal physical motion.
Within the cylinder 42 is disposed a cylindrical bushing 46 having a lip 47 annularly depending therefrom. The lip 47 engages a groove within the cylinder 42, where the groove is generally adjacent an extremity 45 of the cylinder 42. In this way, the cylindrical bushing 46 is secured within the cylinder 42. The cylindrical bushing 46 may be made, e.g., of a polymer material such as polyethylene, and provides an intermediate surface such that other elements do not deleteriously rub against the cylinder 42. One type of appropriate polymer material is Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE). PEEK may also be used, as may Acetal Copolymer (Delrin® and Polyethylene. The material for the cylinder 42 may be, e.g., titanium or titanium alloy, stainless steel, or other such high-strength material.
Slidably disposed within the cylindrical bushing 46 is a strut assembly 50. The strut assembly 50 includes a grooved rod 48, which has parallel grooves 49 along at least a portion of an end. The grooves allow for a variety of sizes to be accommodated. The grooved rod 48 is partially disposed and concentric to an assembly 60. The grooved rod 48 is rotatably disposed within the assembly 60, i.e., is free to rotate about its longitudinal axis within the assembly 60.
The assembly 60 includes two attachment rings 62 and 64 as well as a spherical swivel section 52 which is configured to be disposed within the void, e.g., void 34a, in the superior pedicular cross member component 34. The spherical swivel section 52 may be constrained within void 34a by a retaining ring 56 which fits into the void 34a on one side of the superior pedicular cross member component 34, e.g., on the side facing the grooves on the rod 48. The spherical swivel section 52 is constrained within the void 34a translationally but only partially angularly, i.e., the section 52 may rotate and swivel, allowing for a variety of angles to be accommodated.
The operative length of the strut assembly 50 is set by placement of the cap 58 on one of the grooves. Cap 58 is shown in more detail in
Besides a cap locking onto a groove, other method of securing the system may be employed. For example, a nut and screw threads may be employed in some embodiments, in which case rotation of the nut adjusts the maximum extension. In another embodiment, a plurality of through holes may be provided in the rod. A collar and/or pin, e.g., a cotter pin, may then be employed to lock the collar onto a particular through hole to set the length. Other such embodiments may also be envisioned. As noted, the minimum operative length of the strut assembly 50, and thus the minimum distance between the pedicular cross members (when the grooved strut 48 is within the bushing 46 as far as the same will go), is set by placement of the cap 58 on one of the grooves. This minimum distance should be set such that, when installed, the associated superior and inferior facet joints are not in contact or are in contact only by a predetermined amount. The maximum distance should be set such that, when installed and at the point of maximum extension, the grooved strut and the bushing should remain at least partially overlapping. This maximum extension may vary, but is chosen so as to limit the amount of extension according to the patient condition being treated. One way to limit the amount of extension is shown in
On the strut assembly or on the spherical swivels or elements may be disposed stops, such as eccentric stops, which allow more motion in one direction than another. Similarly, the opening in the void may be machined to limit motion in one or more different directions as well, e.g., by use of a slot -shaped opening, etc. In this way, the full rotatability of the system is compromised, but the resulting allowed motion better simulates typical patient back motion.
The stops or other motion-limiting features may also be made operator adjustable. That is, various operator-adjustable mechanisms such as operator-adjustable stops may be employed to vary the length or other dimension of the system, limit the resistance to motion, the limits on travel, etc. These types of mechanisms may allow adustability either pre-, peri-, or post-implantation procedure, and allow the system to be significantly customized for a given patient's anatomy.
Another feature of
Shock absorbers 88a and 88b may provide one or more functions. First, they may provide damped resistance to axial and/or torsional loads. They may also be operator-adjustable, either pre-, peri-, or post-implantation, both of their size and of their resistance to loading. Furthermore, they may accommodate length adjustments and/or range of motion adjustments.
Details of the clamp 100 are shown in
As in embodiments above, the ball end and socket may be such that the ball end may be initially installed in, or removed from, the socket at a predetermined angle, and then at other angles the former cannot be removed from the latter. In other words, the predetermined angle is chosen such that it is not an angle that will be encountered in normal physical motion. It should be noted that the ball end and socket, or other such attachment devices, can be disposed on opposite elements to those disclosed above. Moreover, the strut system in this embodiment has features similar to the strut systems in other embodiments, including use of a shock absorber. If two strut systems are employed, one on each side of an interspinous process, a cross-member component may be employed to connect the strut systems together.
Depending upwardly from wall 108 is a hinge assembly, which includes slots 109 which engage pins 107 attached at an end of a strut system, such as pivoting rod 114. The hinge assembly allows rotation of the pivoting arm relative to the wall 108 and other fixed components.
The pivoting rod 114 includes a straight section 118 and an adjustment element 116. The adjustment element 116 may allow for length adjustment, may act as a shock absorber such as a component configured to resist axial and/or torsional motion, may include a hydraulic assembly with a needle injection port to control the level of shock absorption, etc.
Depending upwardly from socket assembly 132 is hinge assembly 138 which is similar to the hinge assembly in
As above, the pivoting rod includes a straight section 136 and an adjustment element 144. The adjustment element 144 is similar to the adjustment element 116 discussed above. A hole 142 may be provided in the pivoting rod opposite the hinged end to receive a set screw securing the pivoting rod to a receiving assembly (not shown but similar to the assembly of
The embodiment of
First, the placement of set screw 199 determines the travel of piston 182 since detent 186 cannot move past set screw 199. Second, the placement of set screw 204 determines the travel of piston 182 since the piston itself cannot move past set screw 204. A first spring 194, always attached to piston 182, directly determines the force on the piston 182. A second spring 192, shorter in its rest length than the entire travel of the piston and not attached at the end of the piston opposite ball 184, only engages when and after the piston moves a predetermined distance into the housing. In this way, the second spring 192 provides a heightened restoring force when the system is highly compressed. This in turn leads to a “two-step” resistance force indicated by the inset graph. While the springs in
The pedicle screw systems which may be employed in embodiments of the present invention may include those disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/362,366, filed on Feb. 23, 2006, entitled “Systems and Methods for Stabilization of Bone Structures” and assigned to the assignee of the present invention. However, other systems may also be employed.
Referring in particular to
At one end of rod 238 is ball end 245, which is rotationally received and captured by a coupler 228. In particular, “U”-shaped grooves 229 are provided which mate with corresponding pins 242 on rod 238 to allow the rod 238 to be pivoted in a perpendicular (or other angular) fashion relative to the rest of the system. Referring to
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
Returning to the embodiment of
The rod 238 can be inserted into the saddle of coupler 228, which is assembled to the seat 226, by an operator, or may be provided in a pre-attached state. The arm 238 can be removable from coupler 228 which is assembled to the seat 226, or may be permanently, though rotatably, attached, whether provided in a “to-be-assembled” or a pre-assembled state. The ball and socket design of
After the rod has been pivoted to a position for use in a patient, the rod may be held in that position by use of the closure element or cap 232 and a set screw 234. The closure element 232 may be snap-fitted into the seat 226 by interaction and engagement of closure element tabs 231 and seat grooves 233. Instead of grooves and tabs, lugs may also be employed. Lugs have the benefit of preventing the seat from splaying and releasing the rod. Furthermore, besides the snap-fit of closure element 232, the same may also be dropped in and captured with set screws or other capture devices. One particular other such capture device includes an integral locking nut/plug combination, which eliminates the need for a plug and set screw set.
A closure element slot 235 may be disposed in the closure element 232 so that the same may be further tightened along the groove 233 if the groove 233 is provided with a ramp system. Of course, various other techniques may also be used to keep closure element 232 within seat 226. The set screw 234 may then be tightened to secure the rod 238 against movement.
Except in arrangements such as that shown in
In one method of use, the screw 222, the coupler 228, the seat 226, the rod 238, and the corresponding intermediate elements are assembled prior to implantation in the patient. The device is inserted over the guidewire. The screw is then driven into the desired bone by use of a driver (not shown) generally having one or more protrusions which are long enough to pass through the seat 226, through intermediate elements, and to cooperatively engage with the flats 249. Any number of protrusions and flats may be employed. In certain embodiments, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 (for hex) flats and a corresponding number of protrusions on the driver may be employed. The flats may be equidistantly disposed about the screw head or may be otherwise disposed arbitrarily. Once the screw is driven into the bone, the rod is pivoted and the closure element and set screw applied.
In another method of use, the screw 222, the coupler 228, the seat 226, and the corresponding intermediate elements are assembled prior to implantation in the patient. The screw is driven into the desired bone by use of a driver which cooperatively engages with the hole 304 (see
After installation, the pivoting rod 264 may be broken away from the head 258 at the breakaway stem 270. To perform this breaking away, the rod may be rotated about its axis while the screw is held (e.g., by the bone) or angled away from the axis of the screw 252. Once broken away, the pivoting rod 264 and seat 262 may move relative to the screw head 258, and in particular may be rotated such that a neck 257 disposed between screw head 258 and a lip 256 is disposed substantially within a void 274 formed in the seat 262. The void 274 has a smaller area than the cross-sectional area of the screw head 258 so that the seat 262 is substantially affixed to the screw head 258, at least within a normal or typical range of motion. By use of another void diametrically opposed to void 274, shown in
In all cases, upon implant, the strut system can be selectively distracted or compressed to achieve the desired intervertebral spacing or distraction. As such, the length of the portion of the strut between the components may be adjusted to accommodate the natural and/or desired vertebral spacing, and provides sufficient flexibility, compression and distraction to accommodate and facilitate spinal motion.
Moreover, in this embodiment as well, the strut system may include a dynamic element along its length, e.g., to resist axial and/or torsional forces, and this dynamic element may be adjustable by the operator pre-, peri-, or post-implantation. The strut system may have a variable length or variable other dimension.
It is additionally noted that the break-away embodiment may be replaced with a frictional-engagement embodiment, in which the rod or strut system is frictionally engaged to the pedicle screw, but it not integral therewith. In this embodiment, the pivoting of the rod may cause the frictional engagement to be reduced or eliminated, e.g., via an eccentric feature that maximizes frictional engagement when the rod is aligned with the screw but reduces this frictional engagement as the rod becomes oriented at a 90 degree angle or pivot with respect to the screw.
Besides the pedicle screws disclosed above, other pedicle screws may be used with the present invention. For example, the screws may have a polyaxial configuration, as is commonly used in affixing implanted devices within the spine—e.g., rods and plates for fusion. These types of screw allow for customizing the position of the implants for the particular spinal anatomy. While conventional pedicle screws are suitable for use with the systems of the present invention, use of such screws may result in complications when used with dynamic stabilization systems that may not otherwise occur with fusion based systems since the former allows motion which, when repetitive, may result in complications at the screw bone interface, along the screw itself, or at the screw rod interface.
The subject devices and systems may be provided in the form of a kit which includes at least one pair of components that can be used on the left or right sides of the above described dynamic stabilization systems. As numerous applications require the treatment of more than one spinal segment or unit, the subject kits may include as many sets of components of the subject systems that may be used to treat the application hand. Typically, however, no more than about two to three sets are implanted in any one surgical application. The kits may further include pedicle screws for securing the above-described systems to the vertebral bodies as well as other instrumentation for implanting the systems. The screws may be pre-fixed to the respective superior and inferior components, or may be provided separate from these components and subsequently fixed to the components upon implantation into the vertebrae. Instructions for implanting the various devices and systems may also be provided with the kits. Such instructions may include, for example, the manner in which the interconnecting members of the system components are secured to the respective base members, and may further provide protocols for determining the most suitable length, stiffness/flexibility, shape or the compressive/distractive forces imposed on a strut member of the various system, and making adjustments to these characteristics accordingly. Such kits will also typically include strut systems of various sizes, and may further include devices such as guidewires, cannula, trocars, scopes, drug delivery devices, inflation devices, distraction devices, expandable devices, cutting instruments, holding devices for delivery, screwdrivers, or expansion media.
The devices and systems of the present invention may be implanted through open surgical approaches, limited open surgical approaches, minimally invasive approaches as well as percutaneous approaches. Generally, open placement or implantation of pedicle screw-based systems involves dissection of the tissue and fascia and may involve the removal of all of the posterior element or elements if not some of the posterior elements of the affected spinal segments—including the lamina, the spinous process, facet complex, and transverse processes. However, removal of some or all of these parts may not be necessary and is determined by the physician on a case-by-case basis.
With any approach, e.g., open, minimally invasive or percutaneous approach, after insertion of the pedicle screws, the stabilization system is inserted. The engagement between the system components and their respective screws may be accomplished in one of two ways. The connection between the screw and the system components may be prefabricated where the two are provided as an integral unit or the screws may be provided as modular components discrete from the system components.
For systems in which the length, stiffness, shape and/or positioning of the interface or strut member are not adjustable, fixation of the superior and inferior components to the vertebrae on both the left and right sides of the spinal motion segment substantially completes the implantation procedure. For those systems including such an adjustable interconnecting or strut member, the member is engaged with the superior and inferior components (as described above in the respective descriptions of these various systems) and its length, stiffness, shape and/or position is adjusted accordingly. A separate tool may be used to facilitate the adjustments. For example, a device may be employed to selectively tighten the strut segments. After the strut characteristics and features are confirmed, the strut is locked into place.
Distraction may occur prior to locking, such as via patient flexion or via a distraction device. The distraction device may be a balloon being inflated, and the same may be secured to portions of the superior and inferior vertebra or may be secured to installed pedicle screws or secured to other components between the pedicle screws.
The implantation procedure may be combined with other procedures, including fusion, dynamic stabilization, disk repair, disk augmentation, disk replacement, spinal stenosis repair, laminectomy, spondylolisthesis repair, fracture repair, tumor resection, and vertebral repair. The devices according to embodiments of the present invention may also be used to replace prior-installed devices, or stabilization rods may be employed to replace prior-installed embodiments of the present invention.
The preceding merely illustrates the principles of the invention. It will be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. For example, while a rotatable strut system is shown, the same type of rotatable segment may be accomplished using a universal joint system. Moreover, the strut system and cross member components disclosed herein may be made entirely adjustable as described, and may be adjusted before, during, or after implantation. While the strut systems have been disclosed to be straight, they may also be curved to more closely simulate the curvature of the spine to help facilitate the alignment of the screw heads for rod insertion, and may accommodate shock-absorber type constructions. In most cases, the strut systems should be made to allow flexion and extension of vertebra. The strut systems have been disclosed as having the potential to act as shock absorbers, and it should be understood that such shock absorber designs may include spring-loading, multiple springs to provide different distraction forces, torsional springs, and may also be provided with an elastic memory alloy that is sensitive to temperature change where the shape changes to a preformed shape to “close” or “tighten up”, or other types of temperature sensitive materials, e.g., a Nitinol alloy, so that the same “warms up” over time, similar to the way a natural bone and ligament would. Other structures may be attached to either the cross member components or the strut systems, such as artificial facets or artificial interspinous processes, etc. Coatings or reservoirs or radioactive seeds may be provided on or in the cross member components or the strut systems to promote or prevent ingrowth, prevent infection, provide an anti-rejection functionality, etc. Threaded holes may be provided in the cross member components or the strut systems to allow the same to interconnect to other systems and devices, including another facet augmentation device. While the cross member components have been shown herein as having a length so as to traverse at least the width of a vertebra, such length is not required. The cross member components may be very small, e.g., defining only one void, and in this case only one strut system would be required. While the rod has been disclosed as being cannulated to allow attachment of the rod to the coupler prior to implantation, in many situations it is desired to attach the rod following implantation. In this case, no cannulation is then required.
Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventors to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents and equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is not intended to be limited to the exemplary embodiments shown and described herein. Rather, the scope and spirit of present invention is embodied by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,452, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/006,495, filed on Dec. 6, 2004, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/970,366, filed Oct. 20, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 602580 | Haskins et al. | Apr 1898 | A |
| 802844 | Covell et al. | Oct 1905 | A |
| 2051248 | Dunn | Aug 1936 | A |
| 3807394 | Attenborough | Apr 1974 | A |
| 4611582 | Duff | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4743260 | Burton | May 1988 | A |
| 5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
| 5092866 | Breard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5129388 | Vignaud et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180393 | Commarmond | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5282863 | Burton | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5368594 | Martin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5375823 | Navas | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5387212 | Yuan et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
| 5437669 | Yuan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5437672 | Alleyne | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443467 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480401 | Navas | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489308 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5522843 | Zang | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527312 | Ray | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5540688 | Navas | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5571191 | Fitz | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5609636 | Kohrs et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616142 | Yuan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658337 | Kohrs et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5720751 | Jackson | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5738586 | Arriaga | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5776135 | Errico et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| RE36211 | Nonomura | May 1999 | E |
| 5964761 | Kambin | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6014588 | Fitz | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6033406 | Mathews | Mar 2000 | A |
| RE36758 | Fitz | Jun 2000 | E |
| 6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080157 | Cathro et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083224 | Gertzbein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096038 | Michelson | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6132464 | Martin | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264656 | Michelson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267764 | Elberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267765 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270498 | Michelson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273914 | Papas | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287764 | Hildebrand et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6419703 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6485518 | Cornwall et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540747 | Marino | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6547795 | Schneiderman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6558390 | Cragg | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6562038 | Morrison | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6562046 | Sasso | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565605 | Goble et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6579319 | Goble et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6610091 | Reiley | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6626904 | Jammet et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626905 | Schmiel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626944 | Taylor | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6645248 | Casutt | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6669697 | Pisharodi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6669729 | Chin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6695842 | Zucherman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6716245 | Pasquet et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6749613 | Conchy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6749614 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6761720 | Senegas | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6783527 | Drewry et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6802845 | Shirado et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6805697 | Helm et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6811567 | Reiley | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6821277 | Teitelbaum | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6835205 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6875212 | Shaolian et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6899716 | Cragg | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902580 | Fallin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6949123 | Reiley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6966910 | Ritland | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966930 | Arnin et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974478 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986771 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6989011 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991632 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7011660 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7011685 | Arnin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7029475 | Panjabi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7051451 | Augostino et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052497 | Sherman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056321 | Pagliuca et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7060068 | Tromanhauser et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066957 | Graf et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7074238 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7079883 | Marino et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083621 | Shaolian et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7083622 | Simonson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7083649 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7090698 | Goble et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7108705 | Davison et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7125410 | Freudiger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137985 | Jahng | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7182783 | Trieu | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188626 | Foley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7207992 | Ritland | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7229441 | Trieu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7252673 | Lim | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7282065 | Kirschman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7294129 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7306603 | Boehm, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7329258 | Studer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335200 | Carli et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7341587 | Molz, IV et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7354453 | McAfee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361196 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7377921 | Studer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7377942 | Berry | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7406775 | Funk et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7476238 | Panjabi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7691131 | Graf | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7776071 | Fortin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7828823 | Rogeau et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7935134 | Reglos et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 20010037111 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020065557 | Goble et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068975 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072800 | Goble et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082600 | Shaolian et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095154 | Atkinson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120270 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123806 | Reiley | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133155 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151895 | Soboleski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198526 | Shaolian et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004572 | Goble et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028250 | Reiley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032965 | Schneiderman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040797 | Fallin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055427 | Graf | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093078 | Ritland | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171749 | Le Couedic et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171750 | Chin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208202 | Falahee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208203 | Lim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220642 | Freudiger | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220643 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229347 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236520 | Lim et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002708 | Ritland | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040006341 | Shaolian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040006344 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039384 | Boehm et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049189 | Le Couedic et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064140 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073215 | Carli | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080418 | Dahlborn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082954 | Teitelbaum et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087947 | Lim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092931 | Taylor et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116927 | Graf | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127989 | Dooris et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138662 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143265 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143270 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147928 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193158 | Lim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215190 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225289 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230201 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230304 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236328 | Paul et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236329 | Panjabi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267260 | Mack et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010217 | Dalton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010953 | Carney et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010954 | Binder | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010956 | Moon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021031 | Foley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027361 | Reiley | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033295 | Wisnewski | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033434 | Berry | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033439 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038432 | Shaolian et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038440 | Larson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043742 | Bruneau et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043797 | Lee | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043799 | Reiley | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049705 | Hale et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049708 | Atkinson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055096 | Serhan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056979 | Studer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065514 | Studer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065515 | Jahng | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065516 | Jahng | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065517 | Chin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070917 | Justis | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080418 | Simonson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080486 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085813 | Spitler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085815 | Harms et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085912 | Arnin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101953 | Simonson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101956 | Simonson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102028 | Arnin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113927 | Malek | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119748 | Reiley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124991 | Jahng | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125066 | McAfee | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131405 | Molz, IV et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131406 | Reiley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131407 | Sicvol et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131408 | Sicvol et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131409 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131422 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131537 | Hoy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131538 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131545 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143737 | Pafford et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143823 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149020 | Jahng | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154390 | Biedermann et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154461 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154464 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154465 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154466 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154467 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165396 | Fortin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171543 | Timm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171608 | Peterman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171609 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171610 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177156 | Timm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177157 | Jahng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177164 | Walters et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177166 | Timm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177240 | Blain | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182400 | White | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182401 | Timm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182409 | Callahan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187548 | Butler | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192574 | Blain | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197700 | Boehm, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197705 | Arnin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203511 | Wilson-MacDonald et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203513 | Jahng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203514 | Jahng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203517 | Jahng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209593 | Kolb | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209694 | Loeb | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215999 | Birkmeyer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216000 | Colleran et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222569 | Panjabi | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234551 | Fallin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235508 | Augostino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240264 | Tokish, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240265 | Kuiper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245928 | Colleran et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245930 | Timm et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249697 | Uhrich et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261682 | Ferree | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261685 | Fortin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273167 | Triplett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277921 | Eisermann et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277922 | Trieu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288670 | Panjabi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060015100 | Panjabi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036240 | Colleran et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036244 | Spitler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036255 | Pond et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052785 | Augostino et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058791 | Broman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079894 | Colleran et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084976 | Borgstrom et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084982 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084984 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084987 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084991 | Borgstrom et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085072 | Funk et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106380 | Colleran | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106394 | Colleran | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142759 | Arnin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149238 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149239 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149254 | Lauryssen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149272 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149289 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149373 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149374 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149375 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149383 | Arnin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149389 | Romagnoli | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173454 | Spitler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189983 | Fallin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189984 | Fallin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190083 | Arnin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195086 | Sybert | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195088 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200137 | Soboleski | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217718 | Chervitz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217719 | Albert et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235388 | Justis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235414 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241642 | Arnin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241758 | Peterman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241759 | Trieu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241768 | Trieu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241769 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247623 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247632 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247633 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247637 | Colleran et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247650 | Yerby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247769 | Molz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247773 | Stamp | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060260483 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264934 | Fallin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264962 | Chin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265074 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271198 | McAfee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276801 | Yerby et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276897 | Winslow et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282075 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282077 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282078 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282079 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282080 | Albert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293657 | Hartmann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005062 | Lange et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005063 | Bruneau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016191 | Culbert et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016193 | Ritland | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016195 | Winslow et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016196 | Winslow et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016218 | Winslow et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016296 | Triplett et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043358 | Molz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043359 | Altarac | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049931 | Justis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055257 | Vaccaro et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073289 | Kwak et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100341 | Reglos et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118122 | Butler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161988 | Drewry et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161997 | Thramann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239159 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045951 | Fanger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097441 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154307 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262554 | Reglos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090030465 | Altarac et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228045 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100036423 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 767636 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 0951246 | Oct 1999 | EP |
| 0986339 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1056408 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1138268 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1145602 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1303225 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1399078 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1415602 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1415603 | Jul 2005 | EP |
| 1810624 | Jul 2007 | EP |
| 2728454 | Jun 1996 | FR |
| WO-9116018 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO-9426192 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-9600049 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO-9848717 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO-9855038 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-0062684 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO-0130248 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO-0141681 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0238060 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO-02065954 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02067793 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO-02102259 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO-03047442 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO-03075805 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-03094699 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO-03101350 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004008949 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004047617 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005030029 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005030031 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005030066 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005030067 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005041799 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005044152 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005046515 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005053572 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005055874 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| 2005065516 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005067824 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070278 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070349 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070350 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070351 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070352 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070353 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070354 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005077113 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005079426 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005079672 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005079711 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005084590 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005087121 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005092223 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005094704 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006016371 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006017507 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006045091 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006042188 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006042189 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006047363 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006063107 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006102443 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006108067 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006125142 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007014119 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007021588 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007075375 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007117366 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007136612 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008069835 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008153747 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009042489 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009100190 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2010019791 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080097441 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11033452 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Child | 11436407 | US | |
| Parent | 11006495 | Dec 2004 | US |
| Child | 11033452 | US | |
| Parent | 10970366 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Child | 11006495 | US |
