In the late 1950s and 1960s, with the advent of the aerospace era and advanced weapons development, came the requirement for high-frequency pressure sensors to make shock wave, blast, rocket combustion instability, and ballistic measurements. Products developed for this area consist of piezo-electric gauges made of materials such as quartz, tourmaline or polarized ferroelectric ceramics whose electrical resistance changes when the material is subjected to a force.
Current dynamic pressure gauges are prone to inaccuracies due to interference from RF waves and external electric or magnetic fields. Such methods are also costly and rely on electro-dynamic (piezoelectric or peizoresistive) material response, which limits detection to one plane.
Embodiments of the present invention may be better understood, and their numerous objects, features, and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
Embodiments of pressure gauges disclosed herein use optical technology such as Photonic Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) to offer improvements in temporal and spatial resolution over existing electrodynamic pressure gauges. PDV is a particularly attractive diagnostic for experiments involving significant quantities of radiated electromagnetic energy or high-explosives because the PDV components exposed in the experimental environment are immune to electromagnetic interference. Additionally, PDV requires no direct mechanical contact with the measurement surface, and does not require electrical connections on or near the measured surface. Optical pressure gauges are significantly less expensive than existing electrodynamic pressure gauges and can therefore be considered expendable in certain experiments. Possible applications include, among others, measurements of ground shock and air shock from explosions, evaluating shock waves for deflagration/detonation assessment, and understanding and controlling the combustion process in gas turbine engines to achieve increased efficiency, reduced emissions, and lower operating costs.
Housing 112 includes an opening to expose a surface of object 114 to the ambient environment at one end 118. An opposite end 120 of housing 112 where optical sensor 110 can be positioned can be open, partially sealed, or completely sealed.
Object 114 is configured to move in an inner portion of housing 112 when a pressure force is applied to object 114. Object 114 can be initially positioned in housing 112 at or near the opening at end 118 and moves toward optical sensor 110 at the opposite end 120 of housing 112 when a pressure force in the ambient environment is applied to the exposed surface of object 114. Housing 112 and object 114 can be dimensioned to allow object 114 to move without reaching end 120 of the housing before the pressure force acting on object 114 has stopped.
In some embodiments, housing 112 is a hollow cylinder and object 114 is a piston positioned in cylindrical housing. 112. One end of housing 112 is at least partially open to the pressure force and the piston is configured to move in housing 112 when the pressure force is applied to the piston. In further embodiments, housing 112 is configured to provide an air cushion around object 114 to reduce friction between the housing and the object. Other mechanisms for reducing friction between housing 112 and object 114 can be used. Reducing or eliminating friction between the surfaces of housing 112 and object 114 improves consistency in performance of different pressure sensors 110 during measurement. Additionally, consistent performance of sensors 110 allows the same calibration data 106 to be used for pressure sensors 110 that are configured with similar housings 112, objects 114, and optical sensors 110.
In some embodiments, housing 112 is cylindrical, and object 114 is a cylindrical piston positioned in the cylindrical housing. Other suitable shapes for housing 112 and object 114 can used. For example, object 114 can be an elastic membrane positioned over an opening of housing 112 that deflects inwardly in the housing when the membrane is subject to a pressure force. Optical sensor 110 can be configured to measure the velocity of deflection instead of translational movement of object 114. The deflection of the membrane and return to initial position can be taken into account in determining the pressure force.
Although gravity may cause object 114 to rest on the inner surface of housing 112, the resulting friction will be insignificant compared to the pressure accelerating forces in transient, high-pressure applications. In low-pressure applications, low friction, low mass piston materials can be used to minimize the fiction between housing 112 and object 114.
In some embodiments, sliding friction will be eliminated completely by using flexible membrane material rather than a sliding piston/cylinder. In such embodiments, the position and velocity of the flexing material will be carefully calibrated to pressure.
Optical sensor 110 is positioned to emit an optical signal on object 114. In some configurations, optical sensor 110 is configured at one end of housing 112 to emit the optical signals toward object 114. Components of optical sensor 110 can be configured in other suitable location(s) in system 100 to emit and detect optical signals to and from object 114 when object 114 is stationary and in motion.
PDV is a Doppler-heterodyne procedure that measures the beat frequency between an unshifted, near-infrared reference light wave that propagates at wavelength λ0 (or frequency f0=c/λ0, where c is the speed of light) and the Doppler-shifted light reflected off a moving surface. Mixing the unshifted reference laser signal at frequency f0 with the Doppler-shifted reflected signal at instantaneous frequency f1 produces a beat frequency
f(t)=|f0−f1|=2v(t)/λ0,
where v(t) is the time-varying speed of object 114. A detector converts the optical signal to an electrical signal (voltage) that is proportional to the instantaneous beat frequency. The detected signal power is proportional to the time-averaged output intensity
I(t)≅I0+I1+2·√{square root over (I0·I1)} cos(2π·f(t))·t+φ,
where I0 and I1 are the transmitted and received laser signal intensities, respectively, and φ is a phase constant. Short-time Fourier transforms can be used to calculate the spectral content of the instantaneous frequency and instantaneous velocity, since both are effectively constant over the small time interval needed to measure velocities.
In some embodiments, a four-channel PDV system designed by David Holtkamp et al. of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) of Los Alamos, N. Mex. and constructed by National Security Technologies of Las Vegas, Nev. can be used as optical sensor 110. The PDV system can be excited with an IPG Photonics ELR-Series, narrow-band (<30 kHz), single-mode laser (λ=1549.44 nm) at a power level of 1.6 W (0.4 W/PDV-channel). The high-resolution PDV signals are digitally recorded at constant digital sample rate, for example, of fs=1/Δt=6.25 GHz. Other suitable sample rates can be used.
PDVs were developed as an alternative velocimetry diagnostic technique to the velocity interferometer system for any reflector (VISAR) and Fabry-Pérot [4] interferometers for short-range, high-velocity shock experiments. The PDV uses a heterodyne method that has many of the advantages of the VISAR and other optical systems while avoiding many of their disadvantages. The PDV is compact, relatively inexpensive, and can be assembled fairly easily from commercially available parts. (See, for example, O.T. Strand, et. al, Compact System For High-Speed Velocimetry Using Heterodyne Techniques, Review Of Scientific Instruments 77, 083208 (2006)). The derived velocity time history is directly related to the frequency of the beat wave form, so there is no need for extra components in the system to resolve velocity ambiguities. The data are recorded on digital data recorder 108, which can provide recording lengths sufficient to capture the amount of data required to determine the pressure profile. Data analyses with Fourier transform techniques allow the heterodyne method to observe multiple discrete velocities and even velocity dispersion. The PDV is robust against high-intensity fluctuations of light reflected from object 114 moving at high-speed. The PDV system does not suffer from data ambiguity due to short-time signal loss, since the velocity information is encoded in the frequency of the recorded signal. This is in contrast with a VISAR, where continuous measurement of the phase is required for a true velocity record.
Referring again to
Computer processor 102 can include components and execute logic instructions including data analysis module 104 to receive data from recorder 108 based on optical signals from optical sensor 110. The optical signals include signals that are reflected off object 114 and the data represents velocity of object 114 after object 114 is exposed to a pressure force. Analysis module 104 can further determine the velocity of object 114 from the data 114 and determine the pressure force applied to object 114 based on the velocity of object 114.
As an example of functions performed by analysis module 104, the frequency and velocity spectral content of the signal can be obtained by short-time Fourier transforms of the digitized beat signal. The signal frequency is directly proportional to the projectile velocity
The signal frequency can be treated as a constant in the small time-subinterval nΔt, over which each of a series of fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) are calculated. A user-selectable integer n determines the frequency (or velocity) interval size: Δf=1/(nΔt). The sample rate fs is typically several times the highest frequency component (at least twice to avoid aliasing), which is proportional to the highest projectile velocity during a launch.
Temporal and velocity resolution can be adjusted during data processing after the measurements are taken. As n increases, so does the frequency resolution—with smaller and more (=n/2) frequent (velocity) components obtained. The direct tradeoff is decreased time resolution, where an increased time subinterval nΔt corresponds to fewer and sparser time measurements. A series of 50% overlapping, Hamming windowed, short-time Fourier transforms x(v)=ℑ(I(v(t)) of the digitized PDV signal records can be used to calculate the spectral content of the instantaneous velocity v. The spectral content can be calculated and displayed in decibels as a two-dimensional spectrogram
S(vi,Tk)=10 log 10[|x(vi,Tk|2],
where x(vi, Tk) is the fast Fourier transform of the kth subrecord of the beat signal intensity I(Δfi, Tk) centered about time Tk and velocity vi.
Once a velocity profile of object 114 is calculated over the time period when the pressure force is applied, analysis module 104 can access and use calibration data 102 that maps different velocities to corresponding pressure forces to determine the pressure force applied to the object 114. Calibration data 106 can be derived from pressure measurements taken with electrodynamic pressure sensors or other suitable pressure sensors in the vicinity of housing 112. With regard to housing 112, when end 120 of housing 112 is closed, backpressure can build up between object 114 and end 120 as object 114 moves toward end 120. The backpressure force typically prevents object 114 from moving as far or as quickly through housing 112 as object 114 would move if end 120 were open or at least partially open to relieve the backpressure. When end 120 is closed, an isentropic correction can be applied to account for the backpressure in determining the pressure force acting on object 114 at open end 118.
Referring to
P(t)=ρL(dv/dt) Equation (1)
where ρ is the mass density of object 114, L is the axial length of object 114, and dv/dt is the piston acceleration over time based on the velocity profile determined from the optical data from optical sensor 110.
The pressure profile when end 120 of housing 112 is sealed can be determined using the Equation (1) above with an isentropic correction to account for the backpressure:
Pi=ρL(dv/dt)/(1−(x0/x(t))γ) Equation (2)
where γ is the specific heat ratio of air and is equal to 1.4 at standard day conditions, x0 is the initial position of object 114 in housing 112, and x is the position of object 114 in housing 112 after the pressure force has acted on object 114.
Optical pressure gauge system 100 can use a variety of different optical sensors 110 in addition to or instead of a PDV as long as the optical sensor 110 is capable of providing Doppler-shifted frequency data at intervals that are sufficient for determining the velocity and acceleration of object 114 over the time period that pressure is applied to object 114.
In another embodiment, sensor system 100 includes housing 112, a first opening in one end 118 of housing 112 and object 114 positioned in an inner portion of housing 112. The opening in end 118 allows object 114 to be exposed to a pressure force. Object 114 is configured to move in the inner portion of housing 112 when the pressure force is applied to object 114. Optical sensor 110 is positioned to emit optical signals on object 114 and to detect reflected optical signals from object 114. The velocity of object 114 and the pressure force exerted on object 114 are determined from frequency changes between the optical signals and the reflected optical signals. The frequency changes in the optical signals are proportional to changes in corresponding surface velocities of object 114. The optical frequency measurements are insensitive to radiofrequency waves, as well as external electric or magnetic fields.
Referring to
Process 404 can include accessing calibration data to determine the velocity of the object from the data received in process 402. The calibration data can be implemented in data tables, as an equation, or other suitable format for deriving velocity from the data from the optical sensor. The calibration data will typically be the same for systems using the same dimensions and types of physical components. Note that systems with different dimensions and types of physical components will require a set of calibration data that was generated for the particular configuration.
Process 406 includes determining the first pressure force applied to the object based on the velocity of the object, as further described in the discussion of
Once a velocity profile of object 114 is calculated over the time period when the pressure force is applied, analysis module 104 can access and use calibration data 106 that maps different velocities to corresponding pressure forces to determine the pressure force applied to the object 114. Calibration data 106 can be derived from pressure measurements taken with electrodynamic pressure sensors or other suitable pressure sensors in the vicinity of housing 112. For example,
Note that although gauge mount 504 is shown with three piezoelectric sensors 512 and two PDV sensors 514 in a specific configuration, additional or fewer numbers of sensors can be used in different configurations. Further, calibration data 106 generated for specific types and arrangements of optical sensor systems 100 can be used for all systems 100 having the same characteristics.
Referring to
The various functions, processes, methods, and operations performed or executed by the system 600 can be implemented as the program instructions 630 (also referred to as software or computer programs) that are executable by the processor 610 and various types of computer processors, controllers, central processing units, microprocessors, digital signal processors, state machines, programmable logic arrays, and the like. In an exemplary, non-depicted embodiment, the computer system 600 may be networked (using wired or wireless networks) with other computer systems.
In various embodiments the program instructions 630 may be implemented in various ways, including procedure-based techniques, component-based techniques, object-oriented techniques, rule-based techniques, among others. The program instructions 630 can be stored on the memory 620 or any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with any computer-related system or method. A computer-readable medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, or other physical device or means that can contain or store a computer program for use by or in connection with a computer-related system, method, process, or procedure. Programs can be embodied in a computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, device, component, element, or apparatus, such as a system based on a computer or processor, or other system that can fetch instructions from an instruction memory or storage of any appropriate type. A computer-readable medium can be any structure, device, component, product, or other means that can store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The illustrative block diagrams and flow charts depict process steps or blocks that may represent modules, segments, or portions of code that include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Although the particular examples illustrate specific process steps or acts, many alternative implementations are possible and commonly made by simple design choice. Acts and steps may be executed in different order from the specific description herein, based on considerations of function, purpose, conformance to standard, legacy structure, and the like.
While the present disclosure describes various embodiments, these embodiments are to be understood as illustrative and do not limit the claim scope. Many variations, modifications, additions and improvements of the described embodiments are possible. For example, those having ordinary skill in the art will readily implement the processes necessary to provide the structures and methods disclosed herein. Variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein may also be made while remaining within the scope of the following claims. The functionality and combinations of functionality of the individual modules can be any appropriate functionality. Additionally, limitations set forth in publications incorporated by reference herein are not intended to limit the scope of the claims. In the claims, unless otherwise indicated the article “a” is to refer to “one or more than one”.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61374710 | Aug 2010 | US |