The present disclosure relates generally to pressure measurement systems for use in ophthalmic treatments. In some instances, embodiments of the present disclosure are configured to be part of an intraocular implant comprising an intraocular pressure control system.
Glaucoma, a group of eye diseases affecting the retina and optic nerve, is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Most forms of glaucoma result when the intraocular pressure (IOP) increases to pressures above normal for prolonged periods of time. IOP can increase due to high resistance to the drainage of the aqueous humor relative to its production. Left untreated, an elevated IOP causes irreversible damage to the optic nerve and retinal fibers resulting in a progressive, permanent loss of vision.
The eye's ciliary body continuously produces aqueous humor, the clear fluid that fills the anterior segment of the eye (the space between the cornea and lens). The aqueous humor flows out of the anterior chamber (the space between the cornea and iris) through the trabecular meshwork and the uveoscleral pathways, both of which contribute to the aqueous humor drainage system. The delicate balance between the production and drainage of aqueous humor determines the eye's IOP.
As part of a method for treating glaucoma, a doctor may implant a device in a patient's eye. The device may monitor the pressure in a patient's eye and facilitate control of that pressure by allowing excess aqueous humor to flow from the anterior chamber of the eye to a drainage site, relieving pressure in the eye and thus lowering IOP. To exert appropriate control, an accurate measurement of the pressure about the patient's eye may be made. However, accurately monitoring the pressure in the eye or pressure around the eye poses a number of difficulties. For example, pressure at locations spaced apart from the sensor location may be difficult to obtain, yet these may be useful in order to exert appropriate IOP regulation.
The system and methods disclosed herein overcome one or more of the deficiencies of the prior art.
In one exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring device for implantation in an eye of a patient. The IOP monitoring device includes a pressure sensor and a pressure sensor cap. The pressure sensor cap includes a recess that has an inner surface and is configured to receive the pressure sensor such that a chamber is formed by the pressure sensor and the inner surface. At least one chamber inlet permits a fluid to communicate with the chamber. The IOP monitoring device further includes at least one tube coupled to at least one chamber inlet to allow fluid communication between an anterior chamber of the eye and the chamber.
In another exemplary aspect, a microfluidic pressure sensor system includes a housing having an inner surface that is configured to receive a pressure sensor, thereby forming a chamber. The housing is also configured to facilitate removal of gas bubbles from the chamber during introduction of a liquid into the chamber. An inlet portion of the housing permits fluid to enter the chamber; and a tube attachment portion of the housing allows a near end of a tube to attach to the inlet portion, thereby permitting a fluid at a far end of the tube to exert a pressure inside the chamber.
In yet another exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method of treating an ocular condition. The method may include steps of priming a chamber in which a pressure sensor is located with a first liquid. The method also includes implanting an IOP monitoring device in an ocular space, the device having the pressure sensor in the chamber; and detecting a pressure exerted by a second liquid with the pressure sensor, the pressure being representative of a pressure of an anterior chamber of an eye.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following drawings and detailed description are exemplary and explanatory in nature and are intended to provide an understanding of the present disclosure without limiting the scope of the present disclosure. In that regard, additional aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be apparent to one skilled in the art from the following.
The accompanying drawings illustrate embodiments of the devices and methods disclosed herein and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present disclosure.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is intended. Any alterations and further modifications to the described devices, instruments, methods, and any further application of the principles of the present disclosure are fully contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates. In particular, it is fully contemplated that the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to one embodiment may be combined with the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to other embodiments of the present disclosure. For simplicity, in some instances the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The present disclosure relates generally to a method and system for monitoring the intraocular pressure in a patient's eye and priming a pressure sensor for use in an intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring device, such as a glaucoma drainage device (GDD). GDDs are used to alleviate excess pressure caused by aqueous humor accumulation in a patient's eye. The disclosed methods and systems may facilitate accurate pressure monitoring at a site removed from the pressure sensor. A pressure sensor cap may form a chamber with a pressure sensor. A tube connected to the pressure sensor cap may have an opening exposed to pressure at such sites. The pressure inside the chamber may correspond to the pressure at the tube opening, even though the chamber is disposed at a location spaced apart from the region being measured. Thus, the pressure measurement taken inside the chamber by the pressure sensor may correspond to the pressure at the site where the tube opening is placed. The systems and methods disclosed herein may thereby enable more accurate IOP determinations resulting in better information for determining treatment, potentially providing more effective treatment and greater customer satisfaction.
The plate 202 is configured to fit at least partially within the subconjunctival space and is sized within a range between about 15 mm×12 mm to about 30 mm×15 mm and has a thickness less than about 2 mm thick, preferably less than about 1 mm thick. The plate 202 may be formed to the radius of the eye globe (about 0.5 inches). It may be rigid and preformed with a curvature suitable to substantially conform to the globe or it may be flexible and can flex to conform to the globe. Some embodiments are small enough that conforming to the globe provides little benefit in comfort or implantation technique. The above dimensions are exemplary only, and other sizes and arrangements are contemplated herein.
In some embodiments, the pressure tube 204 extends from an anterior side of the plate 202 and is sized and arranged to extend into the anterior chamber of the eye through a surgically formed opening 208 in the sclera. In other embodiments, the pressure tubes extend to other locations about the eye where pressure measurements may be desired. The pressure tube 204 includes a first open end that may be disposed at a location where pressure measurements may be desired, and at least one lumen that extends to a second open end that may be disposed within or connected to the plate 202.
In some embodiments, the drainage tube 206 may also extend from an anterior side of the plate 202 of the IOP monitoring device 200. In such embodiments, the drainage tube 206 is used to allow excess aqueous humor to drain out of the anterior chamber of the eye, thereby relieving excess pressure. In some embodiments, the exterior surfaces of the pressure tube 204 and the drainage tube 206 are physically attached, thus providing little or no change to the surgical procedure for implantation of tube/plate glaucoma drainage devices. For the IOP monitoring device 200 to determine the pressure exerted by the aqueous humor within the anterior chamber, it may be advantageous to measure the pressure from outside the anterior chamber.
The chamber-access hole 310 serves as an inlet to the chamber permitting a fluid to communicate with the chamber 306. A tube 312 with a single lumen is depicted as attached to the tube attachment protrusion 308, with the lumen of the tube fluidically coupled to the chamber-access hole 308. In order for tube 312 to be coupled to the tube attachment protrusion 308, an attachment counterbore 314 may be provided therein, the counterbore 314 being sized relative to the tube attachment protrusion 308 so as to permit a seal to be formed therebetween. The seal may be a press-fit seal or may be formed by a biocompatible adhesive. Thus, access to the chamber 306 may be provided to a fluid only through the lumen of tube 312 and the chamber-access hole 310. Other embodiments have a lumen without the attachment counterbore 314. The tube 312 may be the same tube as tube 204 in
The chamber 306 may be formed substantially by a bottom surface 316 (provided by the top of the pressure sensor 302) and a top surface 318 (provided by a bottom surface of the pressure sensor cap 304). As depicted in
The pressure sensor system 300 may allow a pressure exerted by a gas at a remote end of the tube 312 to be measured inside the chamber 306 by the pressure sensor 302. For example, proper monitoring of a patient's eye disorder can require determining the IOP using an atmospheric reference pressure taken at a “dry” subconjunctival location. A “dry” location is a location spaced apart from an aqueous humor drainage site such that it is not influenced by the presence of aqueous humor at the drainage site. The dry location may be isolated from the drainage location by a patch graft, suturing down the conjunctiva or by some other means.
In the example shown, the pressure sensor cap 304 is depicted as being generally rectangular, however the pressure sensor cap 304 may be any shape, such as circular or ovoid. The pressure sensor 302 and the temperature sensor 322 may communicate data to other components of the IOP monitoring system 200. Using temperature sensor 322, the pressure sensor reading may be calibrated for temperature compensation increasing the precision and accuracy of the sensor readings. This data may be processed to provide information regarding the pressure being exerted at the distal end of the tube 312, and may be used by other components of the IOP monitoring device 200 to affect the pressure being exerted at another location. For example, the tube 312 may extend into the anterior chamber of the eye, into a drainage location, or to a location where a pressure representative of atmospheric pressure may be found. Since the tube opening is exposed in these areas, the pressure inside the chamber 306 corresponds to the pressure at the tube opening, even though the chamber 306 is disposed at a location spaced apart from the region being measured. Thus, the pressure measurement taken inside the chamber 306 by the pressure sensor 302 may correspond to the pressure at the opening of the tube 312.
In the embodiment shown, the dual-lumen tube 404 is a pair of tubes joined or formed together and sharing a common outer surface. In the example shown, the dual-lumen tube 404 has a cross-section of two overlapping circles. Other embodiments may have two tubes attached at, or near, a tangent configuration. The dual-lumen tube 404 may be formed in a variety of configurations having dual lumens, referenced herein as a first lumen 410A and a second lumen 410B. For example, in some embodiments, the dual-lumen tube 404 is a single tube structure, having two equally-sized lumens 410A and 410B, and in other embodiments, the dual-lumen tube 404 is a single tube with differently-sized lumens 410A and 410B therein. Furthermore, the exterior surface shape of the dual lumen may vary. In some embodiments, the outer surface is as shown, as two overlapping circles, while in other embodiments, the outer surface is formed as a single circle or some other shape. Regardless of the tube shape, the tube may be formed in a manner allowing it to mate with the tube attachment portion 408 of the pressure sensor cap 402.
In the embodiment in
The inner surface of the pressure sensor cap 402 is shaped to provide accurate pressure readings when the cap 402 is cooperatively combined with a pressure sensor, such as the pressure sensor 302. In the embodiment depicted, the pressure sensor cap 402 has a substantially cylindrical portion 414, which may have a cylindrical or ovoid cross-section. Pressure sensor cap 402 may also have a substantially hemispherical portion 416 at a side of the pressure sensor cap opposite that of the tube attachment portion 408. In general, neither hemispherical portion 416 nor cylindrical portion 414 may be perfectly hemispherical or cylindrical. Rather these features may have shapes similar to that of a hemisphere or cylinder. The intersection of these two portions is smooth and un-interrupted by sharp angles or acute angles.
The shape of the inner surface 406 is designed to minimize or eliminate sites at which small or microscopic bubbles of gas may adhere when a liquid is circulated through the chamber, by avoiding sharp corners in the chamber. That is, the shape of the inner surface 406 of the pressure sensor cap 402 is designed to prevent small gas bubbles from remaining inside the chamber. The gas bubbles are compressible and can act as a buffer to the pressures exerted outside the chamber and may decrease the accuracy of pressure measurements made within the cap 402. By preventing the small gas bubbles from adhering to surfaces of the chamber, substantially all of the gas may be removed, thereby providing more accurate measurements of the pressure exerted by the liquid at the distant end of the dual-lumen tube 404.
In operation, a saline or other sterile, biocompatible solution may be injected into the chamber formed by a pressure sensor cap 402 and a pressure sensor 302 through one lumen, either 410A or 410B of the dual-lumen tube 404. As the volume of liquid injected into the chamber through the lumen increases, gas will be forced from the chamber through the other lumen of the dual-lumen tube 404. The pressure sensor cap 402 may be made of a biocompatible plastic such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) to prevent adverse biochemical reactions from occurring. Additionally, the pressure sensor 302 may be coated with a biocompatible coating, such as a thin layer of vapor deposited parylene C, parylene HT, or parylene X.
As depicted in
As can be seen, an attachment insert 514A extends within the tube 510A and the tube attachment portion 508. The inner diameter of the counterbore 512A is, in this embodiment, equal to an outer diameter of the attachment insert 514A, which is positioned partially within the counterbore, with the rest of the attachment insert positioned within the lumen of tube 510A. An additional attachment insert (referenced herein as “514B”, but not shown in
A nozzle 516A or 516B connects each of the counterbores in the tube attachment portion 508 to one of the pair of flow directing recesses 506A and 506B. The nozzles 516A and 516B may be circular in cross-section, and may taper toward the chamber. That is, the nozzles may have a larger diameter on the end close to the attachment tubes 510A and 510B and a smaller diameter close to the flow directing recesses 506A and 506B. One embodiment includes one of the nozzles 516A, 516B tapering toward the chamber and the other nozzle of 516A, 516B tapering toward the tubes 510A or 510B (not shown). Fluid may travel through tube 510A, then through the tube attachment insert 514A, which may ensure the flow is properly directed, and finally through the nozzle 516A before reaching the flow directing recess 506A.
Flow directing recess 506B has a shape that contacts top surface 504 at four main edges. The edges 520A, 520B, 520C, and 520D may meet each other at significantly rounded vertices, rather than abrupt angles. Edges 520A and 520B may be curved edges with respect to top surface 504, meaning that the associated sides of flow directing recess 506B curve into top surface 504. Edges 520C and 520D are sharp edges with respect to top surface 504, meaning that the associated sides of flow directing recess 506B do not curve into top surface 504, but meet it at an angle. In other embodiments, all the edges 520A-D may be curved, all the edges 520A-D may be straight, or some of edges 520A-D may be curved while others are straight.
The four edges 520A, 520B, 520C, and 520D form four angles at their vertices. As shown in
In use, pressure sensor cap 502 may receive the pressure sensor 302 within the large recess formed by the top surface and the sidewalls. In addition to or in place of the plurality of tabs like tab 518, a biocompatible adhesive may be used to connect the pressure sensor cap 502 to the pressure sensor 302. In some embodiments, pressure sensor 302 may not be insertable into a pressure sensor cap, like pressure sensor cap 502. Instead, the pressure sensor 302 may be formed in a limited area on a substrate, which may include an application specific integration circuit (ASIC) or a system-on-chip device. The substrate may include pressure sensor 302, as well as a power source, a processor, memory, a data transmission module, and/or other components. When attached to the substrate, the pressure sensor cap 502 may not receive pressure sensor 302 into its large recess formed by the top surface and its four sidewalls. Instead, the pressure sensor cap 502 may be coupled to the surface of the substrate by an adhesive. In such embodiments, pressure sensor cap 502 may not have sidewalls, but may be a substantially flat surface, adhesively joined to the surface of the substrate above the limited area occupied by pressure sensor 302. The flat surface may be substantially similar to top surface 504, having two flow directing recesses 506A and 506B. The pressure sensor caps 402 and 302 may likewise be modified for use with a pressure sensor 302 incorporated in an ASIC. In such embodiments, the top surface of the pressure sensor cap is otherwise as described.
The pressure sensor 302 may be able to determine different pressures depending on the positioning of the tubes connected to it by pressure sensor caps 304, 402, or 502. For instance, if the tubes are inserted through the sclera 170 into the anterior chamber 180 of the eye as shown in
In embodiments using multiple tubes or multiple lumens, the pressure tube may also be used as the drainage tube. In such embodiment, the drainage may flow through one of the two tubes or lumens from the anterior chamber of the eye to the pressure chamber 306 that houses the pressure sensor 302. The fluid may continue to flow out of the chamber 306 through the other of the two tubes or lumens and then through valves, pumps, or through an exit port from the GDD to a drainage site. Since there is flow present, appropriate fluid algorithms may be used to calculate the true pressure in the anterior chamber.
In practice, the method 600 may be performed in the following manner using pressure sensor cap 502 of
After priming the chamber, the pressure sensor system may be implanted as part of an IOP monitoring device or GDD, as indicated at 604. An exemplary implantation technique may include forming a small opening 208 in the eye to allow the ends of tube 510A and 510B to be inserted into an anterior chamber 180 of a patient's eye as discussed in connection with
In other embodiments, one lumen of the tube connects to a pressure location and the second lumen is redirected to an alternate location, such a fluid flow drainage path or a drainage site for example. In yet other embodiments, after the pressure sensor system is primed, one of the lumens or tubes may be sealed, leaving only a single tube or lumen extending to the desired pressure site. Sealing the tube may be performed, for example, by cutting the tube and sealing or closing it with heated forceps, plugging it with a cement or adhesive, ligating with a suture or other method.
The systems and methods disclosed herein may be used to provide increased accuracy in pressure measurements by permitting a user to obtain pressure data from a location spaced apart from the sensor location. Therefore, pressure at sensitive or difficult to access areas can be obtained and measured without implanting the entire sensor at that location. In addition, priming of the sensors can be more easily accomplished using dual lumen embodiments, including dual tube embodiments to remove bubbles that may affect the accuracy of the pressure readings. This may result in more effective treatment and more accurate data, thereby improving the overall clinical result.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the embodiments encompassed by the present disclosure are not limited to the particular exemplary embodiments described above. In that regard, although illustrative embodiments have been shown and described, a wide range of modification, change, and substitution is contemplated in the foregoing disclosure. It is understood that such variations may be made to the foregoing without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the present disclosure.
In some embodiments, a microfluidic pressure sensor system may include a housing having an inner surface configured to receive a pressure sensor, (thereby forming a chamber) and to facilitate removal of gas bubbles from the chamber during introduction of a liquid into the chamber. In some embodiments, a pressure sensor may be received in the housing. The microfluidic pressure sensor system may further include an inlet portion of the housing permitting fluid to enter the chamber and a tube attachment portion of the housing allowing a near end of a tube to attach to the inlet portion (thereby permitting a fluid at a far end of the tube to exert a pressure inside the chamber). The tube attachment portion may protrude from a side of the housing away from the recess. The microfluidic pressure sensor system may also include a temperature sensor recess in the inner surface, the sensor recess configured to receive a temperature sensor. In some embodiments, the tube attachment portion may have a hole therethrough. The hole may have an overlapping-circles-shaped cross-section (the cross-section being viewed orthogonally to an axis running through the center of the tube attachment portion). In some embodiments, the tube attachment portion has a hole therethrough, the hole being shaped to fittingly receive two circular tubes joined together at an outer surface the tubes. In some embodiments, the inner surface may have a substantially cylindrical portion connected to a substantially hemispherical portion. In some embodiments, the tube attachment portion includes two cylindrical tube connectors, the tube connectors each having a circular hole therethrough. A distal end of a first tube connector of the two cylindrical tube connectors may be configured to abut a proximal end of a first tube, and a distal end of a second tube connector may be configured to abut a proximal end of a second tube. Each of the tube connectors may include a circular recess extending partway along the circular hole therethrough. In some embodiments, the inlet portion may include two flow directors, the two flow directors being situated on the top surface. Each flow director may be a recess on the top surface coupled to the tube attachment portion on a side through a nozzle. In some embodiments, each flow director may have four edges at the top surface—a first adjacent two of the four edges may be rounded and form an acute angle with respect to each other and a second adjacent two of the four edges may not be rounded but form a generally right angle with respect to each other with one of the second adjacent edges being the closet of the four edges to the nozzle.
In some embodiments, a method of treating an ocular condition may include priming, with a first liquid, a chamber in which a pressure sensor is located, implanting an intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring device in an ocular space (the device having the pressure sensor in the chamber) and detecting a pressure exerted by a second liquid with the pressure sensor (the pressure being representative of a pressure of an anterior chamber of an eye). In some embodiments, priming the chamber may include forcing the first liquid into the chamber through a tube connected to the chamber. The method may further include removing gas from the chamber through a second tube as the first liquid is forced into the chamber. Priming the chamber may include forcing the first liquid into the chamber through a first lumen of a dual lumen tube and removing gas from the chamber through a second lumen of the dual lumen tube. The method may further include connecting the tube to the anterior chamber of the eye (the anterior chamber containing the second liquid). Priming the chamber may include connecting a syringe to a distal end of a tube (a proximate end of the tube being connected to the chamber) and injecting the first liquid into the chamber through the tube until any gas present in the chamber has been removed through a second tube.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/737,966 titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRIMING AN INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE SENSOR IN AN INTRAOCULAR IMPLANT,” filed on Dec. 17, 2012, whose inventors are Robert Sanchez, Michael Morelli, Alex G. Fermin, Michael LeRoy Gelvin, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4089329 | Couvillon, Jr. et al. | May 1978 | A |
4206762 | Cosman | Jun 1980 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4560375 | Schulte et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4656827 | Puillet | Apr 1987 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4869282 | Sittler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4922913 | Waters, Jr. et al. | May 1990 | A |
5005577 | Frenkel | Apr 1991 | A |
5083742 | Wylie et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5179953 | Kursar | Jan 1993 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5466233 | Weiner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573646 | Saito et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5681275 | Ahmed | Oct 1997 | A |
5702618 | Saaski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707643 | Ogura et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722948 | Gross | Mar 1998 | A |
5891097 | Saito et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6048328 | Haller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6056269 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6251090 | Avery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6443893 | Schnakenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447449 | Fleischman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6533733 | Hylton et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579235 | Abita et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589198 | Soltanpour et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6682500 | Soltanpour et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712764 | Jeffries et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719750 | Varner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749568 | Fleischman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6939299 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6962573 | Wilcox | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976982 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7025740 | Ahmed | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7137952 | Leonardi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7169106 | Fleischman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7252006 | Tai et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304334 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354416 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7409863 | Bateman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7544176 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7612328 | Kaiser | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648465 | Gordon | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7756559 | Abreu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7824699 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8123687 | Dacquay et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8182435 | Dacquay et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206440 | Guarnieri | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257295 | Rickard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8419673 | Rickard | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8545431 | Rickard | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549925 | Tai et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579848 | Field et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585631 | Dacquay | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585664 | Dos Santos et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8603024 | Bohm et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8652085 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8721580 | Rickard et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753305 | Field et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8814820 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840578 | Dos Santos et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858491 | Field et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864701 | Dos Santos et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8986240 | Dos Santos et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9072588 | Bohm et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9125721 | Field | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9132034 | Dos Santos | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010000527 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020013545 | Soltanpour et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber Hans R. et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019607 | BUI | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049374 | Abreu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020087111 | Ross et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099359 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103412 | Trimmer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139947 | Wang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156461 | Joshi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165478 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169468 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175191 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193674 | Fleischman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014036 | Varner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078487 | Jeffries et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030225318 | Montegrande et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234376 | Cabuz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040013702 | Glover | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059248 | Messner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073137 | Lloyd John R. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073156 | Brown | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116794 | Fink et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040186367 | Fresco | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228734 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254438 | Chuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254517 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016866 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067029 | Henning et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050159660 | Montegrande et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273033 | Grahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041220 | Boukhny et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060131350 | Schechter et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189916 | Bas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070019156 | Fink | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032757 | Medow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070077270 | Wen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106199 | Krivoy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106200 | Levy | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109117 | Heitzmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123767 | Montegrande et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129623 | Fleischman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156079 | Brown | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212397 | Roth | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243111 | Momose | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255262 | Haase | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015421 | Penner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027478 | Connors et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077127 | Gao et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097276 | Bertrand et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125691 | Yaron et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129486 | Jeckelmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147021 | Jani | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257915 | Wold | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090069648 | Irazoqui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076367 | Sit et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090143713 | Van Dam et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196903 | Kliman | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227933 | Karageozian | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240215 | Humayun et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275924 | Lattanzio et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312742 | Pang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010416 | Juan, JR. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042209 | Guarnieri | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100114006 | Baerveldt | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121248 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121348 | van der Burg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100174272 | Weiner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100222769 | Meng et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222770 | Gordon et al, | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234717 | Wismer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249691 | Van Der Mooren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253167 | Charnley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280349 | Dacquay et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305550 | Meng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007454 | Tang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046536 | Stegmann et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071454 | Dos Santos et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071456 | Rickard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071458 | Rickard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071459 | Rickard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071505 | Rickard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077626 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082385 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110144617 | Meng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203700 | Scholten et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248671 | Dos Santos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282328 | Ambati et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004528 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022505 | Dacquay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022506 | Rickard et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039770 | Namkoong et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120296258 | Rickard et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302861 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316492 | Chappel | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000765 | Fernandes et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085440 | Bohm et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144202 | Field et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150774 | Field et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150775 | Dos Santos et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150777 | Bohm et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150778 | Dos Santos | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158381 | Rickard | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204177 | Field et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211311 | Field | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211312 | Gelvin | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218064 | Rickard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130317413 | Field et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130338564 | Rickard et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140039374 | Dos Santos et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140107557 | Dos Santos et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140163448 | Lind et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166140 | Santos et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140171777 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172090 | Gunn | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150057523 | Gunn | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057592 | Gunn | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057593 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057595 | Gunn et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057596 | Lind et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150150720 | Gunn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230982 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230984 | Gunn | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101360523 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101466299 | Jun 2009 | CN |
4438201 | May 1996 | DE |
0102747 | Mar 1984 | EP |
1195523 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1917987 | May 2008 | EP |
03049775 | Aug 1992 | JP |
2005535392 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007512866 | May 2007 | JP |
WO9303665 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO9803665 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9803809 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9938470 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO0174427 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0194784 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO02056758 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO03001991 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO03102632 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004014218 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2005079204 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005088417 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2007127305 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007136993 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008060649 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008061043 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008084350 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2008094672 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2009010799 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009026499 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009049686 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009081031 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2010129446 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2010136071 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2011034727 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034738 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034740 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034742 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011035218 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2012012017 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2013052332 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013058943 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013085894 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013085895 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013090006 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013090231 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013123142 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2012/66709, Apr. 19, 2013, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/66709, Apr. 19, 2013, 5 pages. |
Byunghoon Bae, Hongseok Kee, Seonho Kim, Yeon Lee, Taeseok Sim, Yongkweon Him and Kyihwan Park; “In Vitro Experiment of the Pressure Regulating Valve for a Glaucoma Impact”; Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 13 (2003); pp. 613-619. |
Eggers, T., et al, “Wireless Intra-Ocular Pressure Monitoring System Integrated Into an Artificial Lens,” 1st Annual Intl IEEE-Embs Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Oct. 12-14, 2000, pp. 466-469, Lyon, France. |
Greene, M.E. and Gilman, B.G., “Intraocular Pressure Measurement With Instrumented Contact Lenses,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), Apr. 1974, pp. 299-302, vol. 13, No. 4, IVOS. |
Hjortdal, Jesper and Jensen, Peter, “In Vitro Measurement of Corneal Strain, Thickness, and Curvature Using Digital Image Processing,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 1995, pp. 5-11, vol. 73, Denmark. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/033329, Jul. 13, 2010, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/033329, Jul. 13, 2010, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047429, Nov. 1, 2010, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047429, Nov. 1, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047600, Dec. 14, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047600, Dec. 14, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/049424, Nov. 26, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/049424, Nov. 26, 2010, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2011/036742, Aug. 17, 2011, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2011/036742, Aug. 17, 2011, 5 pages. |
Lam, Andrew K.C. and Douthwaite, William A., “The Effect of an Artificially Intraocular Pressure on the Central Corneal Curvature,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1997, pp. 18-24, vol. 17, No. 1, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Great Britain. |
Leonardi, Matteo, et al., “A Soft Contact Lens With a Mems Strain Gage Embedded for Intraocular Pressure Monitoring,” In Proc. 12th Int'l Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Jun. 8-12, 2003, pp. 1043-1046, vol. 2, Boston, MA. |
Leonardi, Matteo, et al., “First Steps Toward Noninvasive Intraocular Pressure Monitoring with a Sensing Contact Lens,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), 2004, pp. 3113-3117, vol. 45, No. 9, IVOS. |
McLaren, Jay W., et al, “Continuous Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Rabbits by Telemetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), May 1996, pp. 966-975, vol. 37, No. 6, IVOS. |
Puers, Robert, “Linking Sensors with Telemetry: Impact on the System Design,” In Proc. 8th Int'l Conference of Solid State Sensors, Actuators, Eurosens, Jun. 25-29, 1995, pp. 169-174, Stockholm, Sweden. |
Schnakenberg, U., et al, “Initial Investigations on Systems for Measuring Intraocular Pressure,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, p. 287-291, vol. 85, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Stangel, Karsten, et al, “A Programmable Intraocular CMOS Pressure Sensor System Implant,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jul. 2001, pp. 1094-1100, vol. 36, No. 7, IEEE, Germany. |
Ullerich, Stella, et al, “Micro Coils for an Advanced System for Measuring Intraocular Pressure,” 1st Annual Int'l IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Oct. 12-14, 2000, pp. 470-474, Lyon, France. |
Van Schuylenbergh, K., et al, “An Implantable Telemetric Tonometer for Direct Intraocular Pressure Measurements,” 1st European Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 1991, pp. 194-195, vol. 17, No. 20, Nice, France. |
Walter, Peter; Intraocular Pressure Sensor: Where Are We—Where Will We Go? Journal Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology; Publisher Springer Berline/Heidelberg; ISSN 0721-832X (Print) 1435-702X (Online); Issue vol. 240, No. 5/May. 2002 DOI 10.1007/s00417-002-0474-y; pp. 335-336; Subject Collection Medicine. |
Neagu Cristina R.; “A Medical Microactuator Based on an Electrochemical Principle”; Thesis at the Twente University,the Netherlands, Enschede; Aug. 28, 1998; pp. 1-162. |
Saloomeh Saati M.D., et al.; “Mini Drug Pump for Ophthalmic Use”; TRANS Am Ophthalmol Soc 2009; 107; pp. 60-71. |
Stemme et al.; “A Valveless Diffuser/Nozzle-Based Fluid Pump”; ScienceDirect; Sensors and Actuators A, 39; pp. 159-167 (1993). |
Nisar, et al.; MEMS-Based Micropumps in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; ScienceDirect; Sensors and Actuators B 130; pp. 917-942 (2008). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT US2010/047605; Dec. 16, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT US2010/047605; Dec. 16, 2010, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047612; Dec. 21, 2010, 7 pages. |
Internationl Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047612; Dec. 21, 2010, 10 pages. |
Kuppermann B D et al., 2006, “Efficacy and safety of a novel intravitreous dexamethasone drug-delivery system after applicator or incisional placement in patients with macular edema”, IOVS, 47 ARVO E-Abs 5913. |
Miyamoto H et al., 1997, Biodegradable scleral implant for intravitreal controlled release of fluconazole, Curr Eye Res, 16(9), 930-935. |
Mruthyunjaya P et al., 2003, “An intravitreal sustained release fluocinolone acetonide device to treat severe experimental uveitis”, IOVS, 44, ARVO E-Abs 4215. |
Ratanapakorn T et al., 2005, “Helical intravitreal triamcinolone implant: An explanation survival study”, IVOS 46 E-Abs 484. |
Rego MGR et al., 2004, “In vitro evaluation of sustained-release intravitreal dexamethasone implants”, IOVS, 45 E-Abs 5060. |
Sakurai E et al., 2001, “Scleral plug of biodegradable polymers containing ganciclovir for experimental cytomegalovirus retinitis”, IOVS, 42(9), 2043-2048. |
See R F et al., 2006, “Safety and drug release profile of injectable intravitreal sustained-release fluocinolone acetonide device”, IOVS, 47, ARVO E-Abs 5119. |
Tano R et al., 2005, Helical intravitreal implant: surgical method development and outcomes, IOVS, 46, ARVO E-Abs 483. |
Varner S E et al., 2003, “Development of a minimally invasive intravitreal implant for drug delivery”, IOVS, 44, ARVO E-Abs 4214. |
Weiner A L, 2007, “Drug Delivery Systems in Ophthalmic Applications, In: Ocular Therapeutics; Eye on New Discoveries; T. Yorio, A. Clark, M.Wax, Eds, Elsevier Press/Academic Press, New York”, pp. 7-43. |
Yasukawa T et al., 2001, “Biodegradable scleral plugs for vitreoretinal drug delivery”, Adv. Drug Del Rev., 52(1), 25-36. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2013/026066, Apr. 17, 2013, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2013/026066, Apr. 17, 2013, 8 pages. |
Parkhutik, Vitali, et al., The Role of Hydrogen in the Formation of Porous Structures in Silicon, Materials Science & Engineering, 1999, B58, 95-99, Elsevier Science, S.A. |
Dacquay, Bruno, Intraocular Pressure Sensor, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/434,709, filed May 4, 2009, 566 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew J.A., Lumen Clearing Valve for Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,043, filed Oct. 30, 2009, 1507 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,244, filed Sep. 21, 2009, 562 pages. |
Dos Santos, Cesario, Power Generator for Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,772, filed Jan. 12, 2010, 517 pages. |
Dacquay, Bruno, Closed Loop Glaucoma Drug Delivery System, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/109,155, filed May 17, 2011, 238 pages. |
Field, Leslie, Active Drainage Systems with Pressure-Driven Valves and Electronically-Driven Pump, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/315,329, filed Dec. 9, 2011, 1620 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew J.A., Power Saving Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/837,803, filed Jul. 16, 2010, 1725 pages. |
Dos Santos, Cecario P., Multilayer Membrane Actuators, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/315,905, filed Dec. 9, 2011, 1652 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 14/267,443, filed May 1, 2014, 53 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,907, filed Aug. 3, 2012, 1652 pages. |
Barton, Keith, et al., “The Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, Jul. 15, 2010, vol. 118, No. 3, Elsevier, Inc., USA. |
International Searching Authority, Search Report of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/057261, Jan. 23, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/057261, Jan. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2014/039582, Oct. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/039582, Oct. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
Mokwa et al., “Mircro-Transponder Systems for Medical Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, No. 6, Dec. 2001, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2013/074148 dated Mar. 6, 2014, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140171777 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61737966 | Dec 2012 | US |