Current steering wheel designs may include one or more sensor mats around a rim of the steering wheel frame that are configured for detecting the presence of a driver's hand using capacitive-type sensing. Known sensor mats include a wire loop that is sewn to a fabric or foam substrate.
The steering wheel frame is typically made of metal, such as a magnesium alloy or steel and can be a source of interference for the signal(s) in the sensing mat.
Thus, existing sensor mats may be time consuming to manufacture, which includes designing a wire stitch layout for the sensor and designing the wire stitch layout for the shield, each being on separate mats that must fit correctly over the complex curve shape of the steering wheel rim. In addition, the pattern may need to be redesigned depending on which areas should provide sensing and the vehicle manufacturer's steering wheel specifications, which can be time consuming. Furthermore, the manufacturing process and available materials limits the ability to use the available space on the base substrate.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for an improved sensor mat and method for making the same.
Systems and methods of printing sensor loops, or circuits, on a sensor mat for use in a steering wheel are disclosed herein. In particular, a sensor mat according to various implementations includes a base substrate, one or more printed sensing loops, and a dielectric or insulating material. The printed sensing loops are made with conductive ink that is disposed upon the base substrate or the insulating layer from a print head, for example, and adheres thereto. These sensor mats are versatile with respect to the type of base substrate and insulating material used and the shape of the sensing loops and the area each loop occupies. In addition, in certain implementations, the sensor mats include one or more printed shielding loops adjacent the sensing loops and separated from the sensing loops by a layer of insulating material. The thickness of the insulating material, which separates the sensor from the shield, can be specified based on the sensor/shield layout configuration. Increasing the thickness can help reduce noise effects between the sensor and shield and also prevent ‘effective shorting’ due to construction variation. This configuration allows shielding for the sensing loops as part of the sensing mat, which may reduce unwanted electrical interference with the electrical signal(s) carried by the sensor mat caused by the sensor mats proximity with the steering wheel rim, the thickness of the steering wheel rim, and manufacturing and installation times.
According to various implementations, the conductive ink may include silver, carbon, carbon nanotube (CNT), graphene, or copper. In addition, the base substrate may include a polymer foam, a polymer film, leather, vinyl, felt, or non-woven material. The insulating materials may include any suitable dielectric or insulating material, such as polyamides, or other printable dielectric inks.
In one implementation, the one or more sensing loops are printed onto the base substrate. The insulating material is a first insulating material, and one or more shielding loops are printed with the conductive ink onto the first insulating material. A second insulating material is disposed over the one or more shielding loops. The one or more sensing loops include a first sensing loop and a second sensing loop, and the one or more shielding loops include a first shielding loop and a second shielding loop. The first shielding loop is disposed adjacent the first sensing loop, and the second shielding loop is disposed adjacent the second sensing loop. However, in an alternative implementation, the first shielding loop may be disposed adjacent the first and second sensing loops.
The sensor mat may further include one or more shielding feed traces printed with conductive ink onto the first insulating material. Each shielding feed trace extends from a corresponding shielding loop toward an edge of the first insulating material. The sensor mat may also include one or more sensor return traces printed with conductive ink onto the base substrate. The sensor return traces extend from a corresponding sensing loop toward an edge of the base substrate.
In an alternative implementation, one or more shielding loops are printed with conductive ink onto a second insulating material disposed over the base substrate. The insulating material disposed over the sensing loops is a first insulating material, and a third insulating material is disposed over the one or more shielding loops. The one or more sensing loops are printed onto the third insulating material.
In addition, according to various implementations, a system for hand sensing on a steering wheel includes a sensor mat, such as the sensor mats described above, and an electronic control unit (ECU) that is in communication with the sensor mat. The ECU includes a processor and a power source. The processor is configured for receiving a signal from at least one of the one or more sensing loops and determining an indication associated with the signal.
In certain implementations in which the sensor mat includes one or more shielding loops and shielding feed traces, the system includes shielding feed wires that extend between the ECU and the respective shielding feed traces. The processor is configured for instructing the power source to selectively generate a voltage signal through the one or more shielding loops via the shielding feed wires and the shielding feed traces. The system may also include sensor return wires that extend between the ECU and the respective sensor return traces. The signal received from at least one of the sensing loops is received by the processor via the sensor return wire and the sensor return trace.
According to other various implementations, a method of manufacturing a sensor mat includes (1) printing one or more sensing loops with conductive ink adjacent a base substrate that is configured for being installed around the steering wheel frame rim and (2) disposing a layer of insulating material over the one or more sensing loops. In one implementation, printing the one or more sensing loops includes printing the one or more sensing loops on the base substrate. In this implementation, the insulating material is a first layer of insulating material, and the method also includes printing one or more shielding loops with conductive ink onto the first insulating layer and disposing a second layer of insulating material over the one or more shielding loops.
In an alternative implementation, the layer of insulating material is a first layer of insulating material, and the method includes printing one or more shielding loops with conductive ink onto a second insulating material disposed on the base substrate and disposing a third layer of insulating material over the one or more shielding loops. The one or more sensing loops are printed onto the third layer of insulating material.
The method may also include selectively generating a voltage signal through one or more of the shielding loops that are disposed adjacent the sensing loops. The voltage signal is sufficient to shield the adjacent sensing loop from electrical interference from a metal steering wheel frame.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Systems and methods of printing sensor loops, or circuits, on a sensor mat for use in a steering wheel are disclosed herein. In particular, a sensor mat according to various implementations includes a base substrate, one or more printed sensing loops, and a dielectric or insulating material. The printed sensing loops are made with conductive ink that is disposed upon the base substrate or the insulating layer from a print head, for example, and adheres thereto. These sensor mats are versatile with respect to the type of base substrate and insulating material used and the shape of the sensing loops and the area each loop occupies. In addition, in certain implementations, the sensor mats include one or more printed shielding loops made with conductive ink adjacent the sensing loops and separated from the sensing loops by a layer of insulating material. The thickness of the insulating material, which separates the sensor from the shield, can be specified based on the sensor/shield layout configuration. Increasing the thickness can help reduce noise effects between the sensor and shield and also prevent ‘effective shorting’ due to construction variation. This configuration allows shielding for the sensing loops as part of the sensing mat, which may reduce unwanted electrical interference with the electrical signal(s) carried by the sensor mat caused by the sensor mats proximity with the steering wheel rim, the thickness of the steering wheel rim, and manufacturing and installation times.
To date, printed conductive inks have not been used in steering wheel sensor or heating mats because of the complex three-dimensional geometry of the steering wheel and the possibility of visual read-through on the top surface of the steering wheel. In addition, there is concern about the ink patterns breaking when the mat is stretched and/or wrapped tightly around the steering wheel frame rim and adjacent to spokes in the steering wheel frame. However, applicants have discovered various solutions for avoiding these issues. For example, according to one implementation, conductive inks having suitable elongation and flexibility characteristics may be printed onto a sufficiently stretchable base substrate, which allows the sensor mat to be stretched more evenly around the steering wheel frame rim and avoid undesirable bunching of the base substrate. According to another implementation, a polymeric foam layer may be disposed between the mat and the skin, which prevents read through. This implementation may be particularly useful when the stretchable ink and base substrate cannot be used for the particular steering wheel rim configuration and some bunching of the base substrate is unavoidable. And, according to yet another implementation, the base substrate onto which the conductive ink is printed may be the underside of the leather skin that is installed as the outermost layer of the steering wheel, which alleviates concerns about read through and further reduces the materials used in the manufacturing and installation process and the time and costs associated with installation. These and other implementations are discussed in more detail below in relation to
Each wire loop having its own return trace (or return wire connected thereto) defines a discrete sensing circuit, or zone.
For example,
In addition, in other implementations, there may be one or more zones, and these areas or circuit patterns may be shaped differently or disposed on other portions of the base substrate 12. The number, shape, and relative positions of the zones on the base substrate may be determined based on the sensing needs for the sensor mat 10 and the shape of the steering wheel for the particular vehicle. Furthermore, the conductive ink circuits that make up sensing loops 14a, 14b, 14c may extend over a portion of the general area of the zone but not necessarily cover substantially all of the zone.
As shown in
In addition, as shown in
The printing system used may include screen printing, ink jet printing, or pad printing, for example. The conductive ink may include conductive materials such as silver, carbon, CNT, graphene, copper, or other suitable conductive material. For example, according to various implementations, the conductive ink is able to elongate a minimum of about 10% without significant characteristic changes. In certain implementations, silver or carbon based inks (e.g., graphene) may be used because they can withstand at least 10% elongation without breakage or significant characteristic changes, such as changes in resistance. In addition, the conductive ink used for printing the sensing loops may be the same conductive ink used for printing the shielding loops, or different inks may be selected. Furthermore, the conductive material may be modified with additives, such as a polymer such as polyurethane, to affect the resistance.
Dielectric materials used may include polyamide-based material or other suitable insulating materials. In certain implementations, the insulating material may be the base substrate or a dielectric layer printed thereon and/or over printed sensing or shielding loops. In addition, the thickness of the insulating material may vary based on the density of the loop configuration adjacent to the insulating material. For example, the thickness may range from about 0.5 mm to about 1.0 mm or may be greater than or less than this range. Increasing the thickness can help reduce noise effects between the sensor and shield and also prevent ‘effective shorting’ due to construction variation. The base substrate may include felt, leather, a foam or film (e.g., polyurethane, polyethylene, or other suitable polymer), or other suitable non-woven materials capable of receiving and holding the printed conductive ink thereon. In various implementations, the base substrate has the ability to elongate between about 5% to about 20%. Substrates having a lower elongation tend to be more difficult to wrap around a steering wheel. As an example, top grain leather has an elongation characteristic of about 13±5% using a reference force (e.g., about 9 kg), and split grain leather has an elongation characteristic of about 5±3%.
The amount of stretching allowed by the substrate and the ink is taken into consideration when selecting the substrate, conductive ink, and the pattern of the loop(s) to prevent damage to the ink when the substrate is stretched around the steering wheel. In certain implementations, the conductive ink and the base substrate are selected such that the maximum elongation of the base substrate is substantially the same as the minimum elongation of the conductive ink. For example, in one implementation, a relatively stretchable non woven material, such as a non woven material having a maximum elongation of about 10% may be selected for the base substrate 12, and a graphene based ink having a minimum elongation of about 10% may be selected for the conductive ink. Also, depending on the shape to be wrapped around the steering wheel frame rim, the printed pattern may be selected to increase the robustness of the wrapping, elongation, and stretch processes required of the application. As a particular example, cross-hatching or zigzag patterns may be useful for this purpose.
As shown in
The processor 41 is configured for detecting input from a driver, such as presence of a hand, adjacent each sensing loop 14a-14c. In one implementation, signals from one or more sensing loops 14a-14c are communicated to the processor 41 through sensor return traces 16a-16c, respectively, and sensor return wires (not shown separately) that extend from each sensor return trace 16a-16c to the ECU 40. For example, the signal may be generated through capacitance-type sensing in one or more of the sensing loops 14a-14c and received by the processor 41. The processor 41 may compare the signal to a range of signals that indicate various inputs. For example, the signals may be associated with various types of user input, such as a presence of a hand, a touch, a grip, a swipe motion, a tap motion, a double tap, a tap and hold, or a combination thereof from the signal received by the processor 41. The processor 41 may also control the level of current and/or frequency of the voltage signal generated by the power source 42 and when the level of current and/or the frequency of the voltage signal may be increased or decreased.
The power source 42 is configured for generating a voltage signal through the one or more shielding loops 19a-19c via one or more shielding feed wires that are connected to each of the one or more shielding feed traces 17a-17c, respectively. The voltage signal is configured for shielding the one or more sensor loops 14a, 14b, 14c that are adjacent the shielding loop(s) 19a, 19b, 19c. The shielding voltage signal may be a frequency-specific signal to shield the area adjacent the shielding loops 19a-19c. The frequency-specific signal of the shielding loops is configured for matching, as close as possible, the capacitance voltage signal generated for the respective sensing loops 14a-14c.
An electric current in the shielding loops may be less than about 200 microamperes. In certain implementations, the current may be between around 9 and around 11 microamperes, and in one implementation, the electrical current may be around 10 microamperes.
When installed in a steering wheel system, the sensor mat 10 is oriented such that the one or more shielding loops 19a-c are disposed between the steering wheel frame and the one or more sensing loops 14a-c.
The implementation shown in
Having multiple, separate circuits of shielding loops 29a-29c allows the shielding loops 29a-29c to selectively shield one or more sensing zones. The shielding loops 29a-c receive voltage signals that prevent the steering wheel frame from interfering with the signals in the respective sensing loops 24a, 24b, 24c and the sensor return traces 26a, 26b, 26c. In other implementations (not shown), there may be other combinations of shielding loops and sensing loops.
In alternative implementations (not shown), sensor return wires may be connected to printed sensor loops directly. In addition, the sensor return wires may be disposed in different dielectric or insulating layers from other sensor return wires. Furthermore, shield feed wires may be connected to the printed shielding feed traces or connected directly to the shielding loops. The shield feed wires may also be disposed in one or more dielectric or insulating layers that are separate from the shielding loops and other shield feed wires.
Sensor mats having sensor loops defined by an area of printed conductive ink and, optionally, shielding loops defined by an area of printed conductive ink, allow manufacturers more flexibility with the type of substrates that may be used, may reduce the thickness of the steering wheel rim, may be less time consuming to manufacture and install, and allow for some level of automation and customization in the shape of the sensing loops and the number of sensing loops that is not as easily achievable with current sensor mats. For example, the pattern of sensing loops to be printed may be repeated on multiple substrates, or it may be scaled up or down depending on the size of the substrates and needs of the vehicle manufacture. According to certain implementations, this technology allows custom patterns to be tuned from common stock print patterns, which reduces the time for design and production and increases the reliability of the production of the product.
In certain implementations in which a film base substrate is used, the total thickness of the sensor mat 20, 30, 50 may be between about 60 and about 185 microns. For example, the sensor layer, the dielectric layer for the sensor layer, the shield layer, and the dielectric layer for the shield layer each may be about 10 microns thick and the film substrate may be about 20 microns thick, resulting in a mat having an overall thickness of around 60 microns. In another implementation, the sensor layer and the shield layer each may be about 20 microns thick, the dielectric layers for the sensor and shield layers each may be about 10 microns thick, and the film substrate may be about 125 microns, resulting in a mat having an overall thickness of around 185 microns. In other implementations, a foam or a fabric substrate may be used. In such implementations, the foam substrate may have a thickness of up to about 1.5 mm and the fabric substrate may have a thickness of up to about 1 mm.
In various implementations, the sensor loops may be printed on materials that are already a part of the steering wheel assembly, which can reduce the overall thickness of the steering wheel rim and the materials used in the rim. For example, the sensor loops may be printed on the back of the leather or vinyl skin that makes up the outer layer of the steering wheel rim, for example. Or, the sensor loops may be printed on a surface of an over-molded polymeric foam layer included in the rim, as another example. In other implementations, sensor mats may be produced separately and installed by gluing or otherwise adhering the mats to the inside surface of the outer skin, which may reduce the time for installing the materials in the steering wheel rim and may increase the accuracy of the location of the one or more sensing zones along the steering wheel rim.
In addition, this technology may be applied to manufacturing heater mats for use in steering wheels. For example,
The power source 75 may be part of the same ECU, such as ECU 40 shown in
In addition, according to some implementations, the power source 75 may be the same power source used to generate the voltage signal for the shielding layer. In such an implementation, the power source is configured for selectively generating a voltage signal for the shielding layer and a heating current for the heater layer. The voltage signal may be configured to match, as close as possible, the voltage signal of the sensing loops, and a shielding current may be less than about 200 microamperes. The heating current may be between about 4 and about 8 amperes. For example, the power source may be configured for generating the heating current for one or more conductive loops of the heater layer in response to receiving an “on” signal for the heater. The on signal may be received from a presence signal from the one or more sensing loops indicating presence of a hand adjacent the one or more sensing loops or may be received from a button or other input device in the vehicle. In addition, the power source may be configured for generating the shielding voltage signal for one of the conductive zones of the shielding layer in response to receiving a signal (e.g., an override signal) indicating that sensing in one or more sensing zones, respectively, takes priority over heating. The power source may also configured for ceasing to generate the heating current for the one or more conductive loops of the heater layer in response to a temperature of a respective sensing zone reaching a set temperature. In addition, the power source may be configured for alternately generating the heating current and the shielding voltage signal periodically, such as every about 10 to about 50 milliseconds. In other implementations, the period may be every about 10 to about 100 millieseconds.
Furthermore, in certain implementations (not shown), an additional layer of conductive zones for heating the steering wheel may be printed adjacent the same base substrate as the sensing and shielding layers and is separated from the shielding or sensing layer by a dielectric material.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure. As used in the specification, and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “comprising” and variations thereof as used herein is used synonymously with the term “including” and variations thereof and are open, non-limiting terms. While implementations will be described for steering wheel hand detection systems, it will become evident to those skilled in the art that the implementations are not limited thereto.
As utilized herein, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “substantially”, and similar terms are intended to have a broad meaning in harmony with the common and accepted usage by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter of this disclosure pertains. It should be understood by those of skill in the art who review this disclosure that these terms are intended to allow a description of certain features described and claimed without restricting the scope of these features to the precise numerical ranges provided. Accordingly, these terms should be interpreted as indicating that insubstantial or inconsequential modifications or alterations of the subject matter described and claimed are considered to be within the scope of the invention as recited in the appended claims.
It should be noted that the term “exemplary” as used herein to describe various embodiments is intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, and/or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such term is not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
The terms “coupled,” “connected,” and the like as used herein mean the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being attached to one another.
References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” etc.) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other exemplary embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the sensing system for a steering wheel as shown in the various exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting or layering arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present embodiments.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/728,366 filed on Jun. 2, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,114,513, which, in turn, claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/006,312, entitled “Systems and Methods for Printing Sensor Circuits on a Sensor Mat for a Steering Wheel,” filed Jun. 2, 2014, the contents of both earlier applications noted above incorporated by reference in their entireties as if set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3585626 | Tartarini | Jun 1971 | A |
4484026 | Thornburg | Nov 1984 | A |
4540979 | Gerger | Sep 1985 | A |
4556845 | Strope et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4631976 | Noda et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4801771 | Mizuguchi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4929934 | Ueda et al. | May 1990 | A |
5398962 | Kropp | Mar 1995 | A |
5423569 | Reighard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5453941 | Yoshikawa | Sep 1995 | A |
5463258 | Filion et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5539259 | Filion et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5563354 | Kropp | Oct 1996 | A |
5793297 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5871063 | Young | Feb 1999 | A |
5914658 | Arakawa | Jun 1999 | A |
5965952 | Podoloff et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5964478 | Stanley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6016103 | Leavitt | Jan 2000 | A |
6172610 | Prus | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6239409 | Bonn | May 2001 | B1 |
6326593 | Bonn | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333736 | Sandbach | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365875 | Kreuzer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378384 | Dahley et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392542 | Stanley et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6495799 | Pillsbury | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6590499 | D'Agosto | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6661345 | Bevan | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6703845 | Stanley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6906700 | Armstrong | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6918610 | Song et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7126583 | Breed | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7321311 | Reith | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7649278 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7687747 | Lee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688213 | Power | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7763187 | Veedu | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7830265 | Power | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908941 | Mealdo | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928341 | Ito et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8011234 | Kandler | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8095270 | Bossler et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8203454 | Knight et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214105 | Daly et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8269731 | Molne | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8461957 | Haag | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8564424 | Evarts et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8698764 | Karakotsios et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8952907 | Brown et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8970231 | Kandler | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8970232 | Kandler | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983732 | Bosch et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007190 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9643560 | Honmatsu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10114513 | Staszak | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010030182 | Haag | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020036119 | Bonn et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020024060 | Schena | May 2002 | A1 |
20030043014 | Nakazawa et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074092 | Carrabis | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076968 | Rast | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083131 | Armstrong | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111453 | Haag et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040144197 | Grady | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155020 | Worrell | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040212189 | Kachu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267422 | Bossler | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050052426 | Hagermoser et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067889 | Chernoff et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050260492 | Tucholski | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273218 | Breed et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025897 | Shostak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054479 | Iisaka et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066085 | Durocher | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060109256 | Grant et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113880 | Pei et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177212 | Lamborghini et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231320 | Kamizono et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248478 | Liau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262103 | Hu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284839 | Breed et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029768 | Clos et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070062753 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100523 | Trachte | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187134 | Detian | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210050 | Choi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070278214 | Weiss | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080042856 | Power | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080021954 | Kulas | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079604 | Madonna et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085021 | Shim | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080202912 | Boddie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210048 | Yoneyama et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090001855 | Lipton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009480 | Heringlack | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032524 | Li | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090140994 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151447 | Jin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160529 | Lamborghini et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090241378 | Ellis | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100045612 | Moline | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053087 | Dai et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071502 | Yasuda | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100096159 | Abe | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102972 | Middlekauff et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130808 | Hattori | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168998 | Matsunaga | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200268 | Suzuki | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231239 | Tateishi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250071 | Pala et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268426 | Pathank et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277186 | Bieck et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315267 | Chung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016868 | Oda | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110037721 | Cranfill | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046788 | Daly et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054359 | Sazonov et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073384 | Osoinach | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115617 | Bennett | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133919 | Evarts et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175844 | Berggren | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189890 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210926 | Pasquero et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216015 | Edwards | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241850 | Bosch et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110245992 | Stahlin et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246028 | Lisseman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257846 | Bennett | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110290038 | Hoshino et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038468 | Provancher | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120126965 | Sanma et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179328 | Goldman-Shenhar | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120232751 | Guspan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120296528 | Wellhoefer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326735 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130027065 | Stanley et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130120052 | Siska | May 2013 | A1 |
20130277351 | Lamesch | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140054880 | Feinstein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140076063 | Lisseman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092025 | Pala et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140151356 | Maquire et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140224040 | V Alan'tzelfde et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253151 | Kandler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331815 | Rispoli | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150054317 | Fortune et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150205421 | Lin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160176037 | Hirai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1988055 | Jun 2007 | CN |
201371849 | Dec 2009 | CN |
102745231 | Oct 2012 | CN |
202004020425 | Aug 2005 | DE |
102009058138 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102005024432 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102007024141 | Nov 2008 | DE |
102011006448 | Oct 2011 | DE |
102012000572 | Jul 2013 | DE |
61-146671 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-146670 | Sep 1986 | JP |
09226597 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000228126 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002538044 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2007114122 | May 2007 | JP |
2008-059459 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2010-026610 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2011-063103 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011219085 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2013505865 | Feb 2013 | JP |
9638325 | Dec 1996 | WO |
2011016868 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2014130188 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued for Chinese Application No. 201580027253, dated Jun. 27, 2018. |
Office Action issues in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,480, dated Apr. 26, 2018. |
Comeford, “Proximity Sensing Solutions, Part 1: Capacitive Sensors”, DigiKey Electronics, Sep. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued for International Application No. PCT/US15/32116, dated Nov. 22, 2016. |
AInternational Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US15/33708, dated Dec. 6, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 22, 2014, in connection with corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2012/070777. |
“Modellierung und Realisierung eines digitalen Tragerfrequenzmesssystems zur Messung von kapazitiven Sensoren im Umfeld einer Ultraprazisionsdrehmaschin” Dipl.-Ing. Jonas Bluth aus Rutesheim “Modeling and realization of a digital Carrier frequency measuring system for the measurement of capacitive sensors in the Environment of an ultra-precision turning machine”—Dissertation by Jonas Bluth—English abstract included. |
Office Action issued in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/353,109, dated Apr. 21, 2016. |
Office Action issued in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/353,109, dated Sep. 15, 2016. |
Office Action issued in co=pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/353,109, dated Feb. 23, 2017. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 201480008587.9, dated Oct. 9, 2016, English translation included. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,480, filed May 22, 2015. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2015, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2015/033708. |
Written Opinion, dated Sep. 2, 2015, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2015/033708. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 28, 2015, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2015/032116. |
Written Opinion, dated Aug. 28, 2015, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2015/032116. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2015, received in connection with PCT/US2014/016023. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 23, 2014, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/016023. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 30, 2015, received in connection JP Application No. 2011-082736. (English Translation). |
Office Action, dated Nov. 4, 2014, received in connection with JP Application No. 2011-082736. (English Translation). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,578, filed Feb. 12, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 25, 2015, received in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,578, filed Feb. 12, 2014. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,578 dated May 11, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793, filed Apr. 1, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,983,732, dated Mar. 17, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 3, 2014, received in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793, filed Apr. 1, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,983,732, dated Mar. 17, 2015). |
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793 dated May 6, 2014. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793 dated Dec. 16, 2013. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793 dated Dec. 6, 2012. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,793 dated Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,226, filed Mar. 30, 2011 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,009,190, dated Apr. 14, 2015). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 20, 2015, received in connection with U.S. Appl. No, 13/076,226. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 23, 2014, received in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,226. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,226 dated Sep. 11, 2014. |
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,226 dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,226 dated Mar. 11, 2013. |
Office Action issued for Chinese Application No. 201580029042.0, dated Jun. 19, 2018. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 15, 2016, received in connection with PCT/US2015/33708. |
Office Action issued in co-pending Japanese Application No. 2017-513616, dated May 7, 2019. |
Office Action issued in co-pending Chinese Application No. 201580028042, dated Mar. 1, 2019. |
Office Action issued in co-pending Chinese Application No. 201580027253, dated Mar. 5, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190073058 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62006312 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14728366 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 16172940 | US |