This application is related to U.S. application Ser. Nos., 12/690,859, 12/690,872, 12/690,886, 12/690,890, 12/690,896, and 12/690,898, filed on even date herewith. The entire content of each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference.
The inventions described herein relate generally to the field of food product processing. Some described embodiments relate particularly to systems and techniques for laser marking or otherwise processing eggs.
Eggs typically undergo a great deal of processing before they are ready to be sold to the consuming public. In many circumstances, for example, eggs pass through several processing stations at which they are washed, candled, weighed, graded, and packed into packages (e.g., cartons, crates, or other commercially distributed containers). Examples of such processing stations and mechanisms for conveying eggs from station to station are described, for instance, in the following U.S. patents assigned to Diamond Automations, Inc.: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,189,898; 4,195,736; 4,505,373; 4,519,494; 4,519,505; 4,569,444; 4,750,316; 5,321,491; and 6,056,341, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference. It is not uncommon for a facility in which these stations operate to output about one million eggs in a single day. Accordingly, to be commercially acceptable, the throughput of the stations needs to be quite high, with some stations typically processing on the order of 20,000 eggs per hour.
Because eggs are a perishable item susceptible to spoilage, egg packages typically (and often by law or regulation) have expiration dates marked on them. Many consumers, however, move eggs from their packages into special receptacles in their refrigerators. When this is done, the consumer is no longer able to evaluate the expiration date of individual eggs prior to using them.
Furthermore, certain governmental bodies, e.g., the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and various state governments, currently do not allow retailers to “repack” eggs, i.e., to move eggs from one package to another. This restriction can result in tremendous waste because whenever the integrity of even a single egg in a package in the hands of a retailer is compromised (e.g., is broken), the entire package of eggs must be discarded.
Several techniques for marking individual eggs with expiration dates and the like have been proposed. One such approach is to use vegetable dyes or other water-soluble ink products to mark eggs. Such products, however, have a tendency to leak into the interior of eggs and can result in undesirable ink spots within them. The tendency of such products to wash off or fade also means that such marking are susceptible to tampering and even unintentional loss of integrity (e.g., dripping and smearing from condensation and handling), and has generally limited their acceptance.
It is also known to use lasers to mark indicia onto perishable products for the purpose of tracking their pedigree and/or integrity (e.g., using date codes and/or traceability codes), as well as for allowing textual or graphical advertising messages to be disseminated via such products. An example of a system for laser marking such information on hen eggs is described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0223834 (“the '834 Application”), published on Sep. 18, 2008. The disclosure of the '834 Application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The approach described in the '834 Application is to laser mark information on eggs as they are conveyed at high speed during the grading process. Although this approach has proven effective for certain applications, the extremely high throughput of the grading machines, the lack of uniformity in the moisture content of the surface of individual eggs during the grading process, and the significant amount of dust created during the laser marking process, among other things, have made it challenging to mark individual eggs with sufficient accuracy, reliably and consistency for certain purposes.
A method for laser marking eggs is disclosed which comprises laser marking information onto one or more eggs while the eggs are in a package disposed on a conveyor of a packing station.
Additionally, an apparatus for laser marking eggs on a conveyor of a packing station is disclosed which comprises a laser source and one or more optical steering elements configured and arranged to direct energy from the laser source so as to mark information onto one or more eggs in packages of eggs disposed on the conveyor.
Further, an apparatus for laser marking eggs is disclosed which comprises a laser source and means for directing energy from the laser source so as to mark information onto one or more eggs in packages of eggs disposed on a conveyor of a packing station.
We have recognized that laser marking eggs “on the fly” at high speeds, e.g., while the eggs are in motion through a grading station at speeds of typically about 100 to 300 feet per minute (fpm), can produce a less-than-ideal result in some circumstances in terms of marking quality and reliability. “Reliability,” in this context, refers to the percentage of eggs processed by the system that have clear, legible, and consistent markings on them (whether evaluated objectively or subjectively). For example, we have recognized that in order for a means of marking eggs with indicia suitable for repacking purposes to be both widely commercially viable and economically feasible, it is important for a large percentage of the eggs processed to have clear, legible, consistent markings. One reason for this is that, in many circumstances, eggs that are mismarked with such indicia must be discarded for one reason or another.
In addition, we have observed, for example, that the limited window of time and finite space available for accessing and laser marking an egg using on-the-fly techniques typically permits only a limited amount of information to be laser marked on the egg in a direction extending along the egg's long axis. The inherent lack of accuracy in tracking a high-speed moving target, as well as the orientation, inevitable vibrations, and other motion within such a moving mechanical system, can further compromise the quality of the resulting image and render it insufficient for certain purposes. Moreover, our experience has shown that attempting to laser mark eggs during the grading process can be problematic for some applications because a typical process involves washing the eggs shortly before attempting to laser mark indicia onto them. The resulting lack of uniformity in the dryness of the surface of the eggs can result in inaccurate or uneven markings. Laser marking complex information, e.g., an intricate company logo, during the grading process can be particularly problematic for the foregoing reasons.
In addition, the dust generated during the laser marking process can cause problems for both local (i.e., at the laser marking station) and downstream components. While vacuuming away excess dust can be performed, it has proven difficult in practice to accomplish effectively.
Furthermore, when eggs are marked at a particular location, e.g., on their sides, before they reach the packer, there is a risk that the packer will put the eggs into the package in an orientation that precludes or obscures visibility. Accordingly, eggs marked by components upstream of the packer frequently are packed in such a way that the marked indicia on the egg will be hidden unless and until the egg is repositioned so as to be properly oriented for clear visibility of the marking.
Additionally, when eggs are marked before they reach a packer, the ability to redirect the eggs to a needed location after they have been marked is restricted. That is, once eggs have been marked in particular way, they can be directed only to packers that are processing eggs consistent with the markings that were marked on them. For example, once an egg has been marked with a manufacturer's logo, that egg cannot thereafter be directed to a packer responsible for packing eggs for a different manufacturer.
Significantly, we have found that integrating a laser marking process into an egg packing apparatus, rather than an upstream component such as a grading station, involves a different set of constraints and can produce substantial benefits. In particular, we have determined that laser marking eggs in a packing apparatus, after they have been placed into packages, can alleviate at least some, and perhaps even all, of the various drawbacks of the grader-based laser marking process discussed above. Indeed, we have observed in practice that an embodiment of the system described herein can result in a large improvement in laser marking quality and reliability over a grader-based system. Moreover, it allows laser marking on much more of the eggs' surfaces and can do so without slowing down egg processing.
In some embodiments, a continuous conveyor that carries filled packages of eggs may slow or stop periodically as each new row of each new package of eggs is loaded. Advantageously, the eggs in a loaded package may be laser marked during one or more of the periods (after the loading period) during which the package is held stationary as the rows of eggs are loaded into another upstream package. One or more sensors (e.g., photo eyes) and/or conveyor motion monitors (e.g., a monitor that counts ticks of a conveyor belt) may be used to determine precisely when a loaded package of eggs has moved into position to be lased. The accuracy of the laser marking can therefore be increased considerably simply because the eggs remain stationary during the lasing operation. In other embodiments, the conveyor may carry packed packages of eggs at a somewhat continuous rate in front of the laser-aiming mirrors (aka “galvos”). In such embodiments, a combination of sensors and conveyor motion monitors may be used to accurately track the position of the respective eggs during the lasing process.
In some embodiments, multiple galvos may be used to laser mark the eggs in each package that passes by a laser marking station. In addition, packages of eggs typically advance on a conveyor of a packer at but a small fraction of the rate at which individual eggs move through an upstream grader. As such, using the implementations described herein, a significantly longer window of time may be available for each galvo to laser mark each individual egg. This additional available marking time may allow the galvos to increase the marking quality (e.g., contrast) significantly.
Another potential benefit to laser marking eggs in packages is that the eggs may be manipulated so as to be oriented in the packages in a particular (uniform) manner in advance of the lasing process. For example, in some embodiments, eggs in the packages on the conveyor of a packer may be manipulated so that all of the eggs are centered and tilted slightly backwards, uniformly. As such, a relatively large surface area of the egg will be immediately visible to a consumer (or an inspector, vendor, or other person) who opens the package. By so orienting the eggs in the package prior to the lasing process, the amount of “visible” surface area made available to the laser, for marking, may be increased. In addition, the information that is actually marked on the eggs (expiration dates, tracking codes, advertisements, etc.) will be readily communicated to the consumer (or an inspector, vendor, or any other person who might subsequently open the package) immediately upon opening the package. As an example, a consumer opening a carton of eggs may immediately be presented with neatly arranged, uniformly oriented rows of eggs, each having information such as a company's logo and/or an expiration date prominently displayed at the same location and directly facing the customer.
In addition to the above, laser marking eggs after they have been placed in packages can further be advantageous because of the limited number of components located downstream of the laser marking station and the reduced likelihood that the dust created during the laser marking process will interfere with the operation of any mechanical or optical components. In some embodiments, for example, the only operation performed by the packer following the laser marking process described herein is the closing of the package. Any dust generated by the laser marking process that escapes the vacuuming process described below (if employed) is unlikely to have a significant adverse affect on the operation of the package closing station.
Furthermore, laser marking eggs after they have been placed in packages minimizes the risk that the marked section of the egg will end up hidden from view by a consumer opening the package. That is, when an egg is marked prior to being put in a package, there is a good chance that the egg will be placed in the package by the packer in such a way that the image marked on the egg will be obscured or not visible at all unless the egg is rotated, flipped end-to-end, or otherwise reoriented. Laser marking eggs after they have been placed in packages can minimize the risk that an egg will be so oriented when a consumer (or anyone else) opens a given package.
Additionally, laser marking eggs after they have reached a particular packer ensures that only the eggs being processed by that packer will be marked with the desired information. Accordingly, laser marking eggs after they have been placed in packages allows eggs to be directed to any of numerous packers, or perhaps redirected to a different packer, at any time, without a concern that a given packer will receive an egg with inappropriate or unintended markings.
An example of a laser marking apparatus embodying various inventive features described herein is illustrated in
As shown in
In the embodiment shown, the laser marking apparatus 100 comprises a pair of identical laser marking systems, one to service each of the two portions 200a, 200b of the egg packer 200. The frame 101 in the illustrated example may, for example, be used to support both portions of the laser marking apparatus 100. Alternatively, separate frames could be used. Because the configuration and operation of the two laser marking systems are essentially the same, only one of the two systems will be described. It should be understood, however, that the following description applies equally to both portions of the laser marking apparatus 100. In should also be appreciated that the existence of two side-by-side laser marking systems is not a requirement of the invention, and that different embodiments may employ fewer or greater numbers of such systems.
In the illustrated embodiment, a main housing 102 of one of the laser marking systems (shown in
Electronic control boards 111 contained within the lower housing 108 may include conventional circuitry (analog, digital, etc.) to control the operation of the laser sources 104 and the galvos 110. One or more sensors (not shown in
In the example shown, the conveyor 202 first moves the package 204 to a primary location A within the egg loading section 206 of the egg packing apparatus 200. As shown, when the package 204 stops at this section, a number of eggs 205 corresponding to the number of receptacles in the package 204 (e.g., twelve, eighteen, or more) are disposed into the package 204. As noted above, the eggs may be loaded one row (e.g., six eggs) at a time, with the conveyor 202 advancing the package 204 slightly to allow for subsequent rows to be loaded.
Next, the conveyor moves the package 204 to a location B where an operation is performed to orient the eggs to a desired position for laser marking as well as for display to a consumer who ultimately opens the package 204, or perhaps to an inspector or an employee of a retailer or distributor who later examines the eggs for inspection and/or repacking purposes. As shown, the eggs 205 may be oriented in a somewhat haphazard manner within the package at the time they reach the location B. Once they reach the location B, however, an egg orienter 112 may be operated so as to reorient the eggs into the desired position. The egg orienter 112 may be any of numerous devices capable reorienting the eggs within the package, and the invention is not limited to any particular device or structure for performing such a function. One illustrative example of an egg orienter 112 suitable for this purpose is shown in
As illustrated by arrows 113 adjacent the egg orienter 112 in
As illustrated by arrows 115 in
As shown in
An example of a driving mechanism 122 that may be used to move the egg orienter 112 in a desired manner (e.g., as indicated by the arrows 113, 115 in
As shown in
As shown in
In the embodiment shown, the egg orienter 112 further includes a set of tubes 120 disposed between nooks of the scallop shaped aluminum member 118 and the frame 114. As shown, the tubes 120 may be arranged such that a pair of them straddles each egg 205 as the egg orienter 112 is swept across the tops of the eggs 205 in the package 204. Advantageously, a high-velocity air source (not shown) may be connected to the tubes 120 such that air may be blown onto and around the eggs 205 as the egg orienter 112 sweeps over the eggs 205 to reposition them. Blowing air over and around the eggs in such a fashion can help dry the surface of the eggs 205 uniformly prior to laser marking them and may also help overcome the friction between the bottoms of the eggs 205 and the package receptacles by creating a slight cushion of air between them.
In the illustrative embodiment shown, after the egg orienter 112 has repositioned the eggs 205 within the package 204, the conveyor 202 moves the package 204 to a location C at which a laser marking operation may be performed.
As shown, as a result of the processing by the egg orienter 112, the eggs 205 may be arranged uniformly within the package 204, with each egg 205 being tilted slightly toward the back 228 of the package 204 (see
As shown in
When the eggs 205 are oriented within the package 204 in such a manner, the surface of the egg 205 that is immediately apparent to someone opening the package is neither an end nor the middle of the egg 205, but rather a section of the egg somewhere between those two points.
In some embodiments, eggs may be oriented in each package and information may be marked on the eggs in such a way that the information marked on all of the eggs in each package can be viewed immediately upon opening the package, without requiring a human being to manipulate any of the eggs to allow such information to be viewed. It is known that a significant percentage the eggs that are produced have the salmonella virus on them. For this and other reasons, various regulations exist governing when and how eggs may be manipulated. Allowing inspection of laser marked information on all of the eggs in a given package without needing to manipulate any of the eggs in the package can thus provide significant advantages.
In the illustrative embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, a vector-based process may be used to laser mark on the eggs 205. In other embodiments, however, a dot matrix, raster, or other laser marking process may additionally or alternatively be employed. In some embodiments, each egg 205 may be marked during the available marking interval of approximately 1-2 seconds.
In some embodiments, the image to be marked on the eggs may be digitally processed (e.g., pre-distorted) in advance of lasing the eggs 205 to account for the actual or expected curvature of the eggs in question. Taking such a step may result in an image that does not appear distorted in spite of being marked onto a non-planar surface.
In some implementations, one or more additional laser sources and/or galvos may be also be arranged and configured to mark on one or more different portions of the egg, e.g., a back side, in addition to the front-side location discussed above. In some embodiments, for example, it may be desirable to mark certain information of immediate importance to a consumer, e.g., an expiration date and/or brand identification, on a front portion of the eggs so that such information is immediately visible to a consumer upon opening the box, and to mark other information of less immediate importance, e.g., tracking codes or the like, on the back side of the eggs.
As shown in
In some implementations, a machine vision system 146, 148 (shown in
The egg processing system in question could, for example, be stopped if the machine vision system determines that the mark quality has fallen below a certain threshold. Such a system may be closed-loop in some embodiments, such that feedback from the machine vision system may be used to control the galvos 110 and/or the laser sources 104 so as to improve the quality and reliability of the process. For example, feedback from a machine vision system might adjust the number of passes made by the galvos, the rate at which the galvos scan, the power level of the laser, etc., in order to ensure a desired contrast level is achieved during the laser marking process. Additionally or alternatively, a machine vision system may examine the size, color, or other perceptible properties of the eggs to be marked and make appropriate adjustments to the laser marking components and/or process to account for such variables and thereby ensure that image quality stays consistent in spite of such variations.
In some embodiments, it may be useful to allow for centralized control and monitoring of the operation of multiple different laser marking apparatuses 100 distributed throughout one or more facilities.
Central server 224 may, in turn, be coupled via a network cloud 226 to the group of facility computers 222 to allow the central server 224 to distribute laser marking jobs to the various facility computers 222 and to monitor the status of those jobs. The network cloud 226 may comprise any of a number of network types, and may be distributed either over a local or wide area. In some embodiments, the network cloud 226 may, for example, comprise the Internet. When facilities are located in different geographic regions, different laser marking jobs may, for example, be distributed to the facility computers 222 at the different facilities depending on the region. If, for example, Major League Baseball decided to contract to have team logos marked on eggs, instructions could be sent to the facilities that distribute eggs to the New England area to mark the logo of the Boston Red Sox on a given number of eggs at those facilities whereas instructions could be sent to facilities that distribute eggs in the state of Florida to mark the logo of the Florida Marlins on a certain number of eggs at those facilities.
In some embodiments, the galvos 110 may be independently controlled such that different images may be marked on different eggs in the same package. For example, the galvos 110 could be controlled such two eggs in a first row of a package have the letters “G” and “O” marked on them and six eggs in the second row of the package have the letters “R,” “E,” “D,” “S,” “O,” and “X” marked on them. In some embodiments, each egg 205 may even be marked with a unique identifier that allows it to be differentiated from every other egg that is laser marked using the system.
Having thus described certain embodiments of systems and methods for practicing aspects of this invention, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, in embodiments wherein open egg packages are fed in the opposite direction onto the conveyor 202 shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1796872 | Markey et al. | Mar 1931 | A |
1906094 | Powell | Apr 1933 | A |
2039486 | Lincoln | May 1936 | A |
2843026 | Burger | Jul 1958 | A |
3094920 | Priesmeyer | Jun 1963 | A |
3242008 | Kurtz | Mar 1966 | A |
3244349 | Randles, Jr. | Apr 1966 | A |
3392414 | Cathcart | Jul 1968 | A |
3501083 | Lake | Mar 1970 | A |
3548435 | Comber et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3556387 | Trimble | Jan 1971 | A |
3567107 | Artz | Mar 1971 | A |
3595164 | Hovekamp | Jul 1971 | A |
3598300 | Katz | Aug 1971 | A |
3625413 | Medendorp | Dec 1971 | A |
3661320 | Donaldson | May 1972 | A |
3670952 | Venuti et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3712532 | Alroy | Jan 1973 | A |
3730420 | Burkett | May 1973 | A |
3767103 | Reifers | Oct 1973 | A |
3779159 | Rose et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3817441 | Jackson | Jun 1974 | A |
3848730 | Niederer et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3916143 | Farrell | Oct 1975 | A |
3917152 | Burkett | Nov 1975 | A |
3950208 | Pavuk et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4043105 | Cochran | Aug 1977 | A |
4081123 | Reifers | Mar 1978 | A |
4189898 | Moulds et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4195736 | Loeffler | Apr 1980 | A |
4240575 | Tange | Dec 1980 | A |
4382536 | Congleton | May 1983 | A |
4394214 | Bixler et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4419068 | Congleton | Dec 1983 | A |
4480781 | Emery et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4505373 | Thomas | Mar 1985 | A |
4519494 | McEvoy et al. | May 1985 | A |
4519505 | Thomas | May 1985 | A |
4569444 | McEvoy et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4578329 | Holsappel | Mar 1986 | A |
4636043 | Bellar | Jan 1987 | A |
4652722 | Stone et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4720618 | Stamer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727235 | Stamer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4750316 | Bliss | Jun 1988 | A |
4795080 | McIntyre | Jan 1989 | A |
4839181 | MacMurray | Jun 1989 | A |
4843958 | Egosi | Jul 1989 | A |
4872608 | Lake | Oct 1989 | A |
4900617 | Smith | Feb 1990 | A |
5021631 | Revellat | Jun 1991 | A |
5102034 | Amabili | Apr 1992 | A |
5120631 | Kanbayashi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5120928 | Piliero | Jun 1992 | A |
5142976 | Roulleau | Sep 1992 | A |
5164009 | Chandler | Nov 1992 | A |
5198843 | Ito | Mar 1993 | A |
5285750 | Molian et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5316397 | Robertson | May 1994 | A |
5321491 | Summers et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335003 | Sugden | Aug 1994 | A |
5477179 | Takada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478990 | Montanari et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5494164 | Ramirez | Feb 1996 | A |
5526119 | Blit et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5608429 | Hayashihara et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5653900 | Clement et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660747 | Drouillard et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5691757 | Hayashihara et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5767477 | Sutter, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792807 | Hayashihara et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798843 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835911 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5897797 | Drouillard et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5928842 | Shinmoto et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6029424 | McEvoy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6056341 | Bliss | May 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6180914 | Jones et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6421159 | Sutter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429889 | Murokh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6584982 | Clay et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6678094 | Sator | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6732928 | Lawlor | May 2004 | B1 |
6791592 | Assa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796241 | Catalan et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810796 | Catalan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829000 | Assa et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
D525535 | Rathbone | Jul 2006 | S |
7255231 | Andrews et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258234 | Aardema et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7353951 | Vovan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7951409 | Parker | May 2011 | B2 |
8084712 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8148259 | Arai et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010030179 | Knieb et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020011311 | Carignan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020179580 | Costin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030080191 | Lubow et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030200300 | Melchione | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206227 | Assa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226835 | Bell et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040088348 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040130612 | Assa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040220855 | Carignan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050226975 | Drouillard | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060012821 | Franklin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060087686 | Anderson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060138105 | Parker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060251769 | Rathbone | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070108092 | Minuto et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080223834 | Griffiths et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080279991 | Kwon | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090020395 | Accettura | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110175974 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176901 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177206 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177207 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177208 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177217 | Chait et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110258171 | Parker | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120180436 | Chait et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130017296 | Chait et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
247831 | Jul 1987 | DE |
3601913 | Jul 1987 | DE |
3722176 | Jan 1989 | DE |
3836821 | May 1990 | DE |
0291471 | Jul 1991 | DE |
4125007 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4322252 | Jan 1995 | DE |
10109109 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0421837 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0684144 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0908313 | Apr 1999 | EP |
2 319 653 | May 2011 | EP |
2033185 | Apr 1994 | ES |
2621529 | Apr 1989 | FR |
2654662 | May 1991 | FR |
2131767 | Jun 1984 | GB |
55034966 | Mar 1980 | JP |
58-090985 | May 1983 | JP |
61206692 | Sep 1986 | JP |
1108940 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1196259 | Aug 1989 | JP |
2-60552 | Mar 1990 | JP |
3211068 | Sep 1991 | JP |
5-146887 | Jun 1993 | JP |
7011183 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2000168157 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001136859 | May 2001 | JP |
WO 0115678 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0156789 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2004064530 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086166 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2007087116 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008115367 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2011091011 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Examination Report of Application PCT/US2011/021680 mailed on Feb. 20, 2012. |
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority of Application PCT/US2011/021680 mailed on May 29, 2012. |
Examiner's report No. 2 on patent application No. AU2005294770 mailed on May 24, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021680 mailed Jul. 12, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/021680, mailed May 11, 2011 (2 pages). |
Durand-Wayland Labeling Systems, http://www.durand-wayland.com/label/8/7/2006. |
European Search Report from related application, PCT/US 08/03160, mailed Aug. 12, 2008. |
Horenstein, How Lasers Could Print Ads on Food, Daily Mail, Mar. 4, 1999. |
Stiles, Laser Labeling, Mail Tribune Sep. 19, 2004. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of Application PCT/US2011/021680 mailed on Jul. 25, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110174223 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |