Systems and methods for processing images with edge detection and snap-to feature

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11003943
  • Patent Number
    11,003,943
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 13, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 11, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A method for creating image products includes the following steps. Image data and positional data corresponding to the image data are captured and processed to create geo-referenced images. Edge detection procedures are performed on the geo-referenced images to identify edges and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images. The geo-referenced, edge-detected images are saved in a database. A user interface to view and interact with the geo-referenced image is also provided such that the user can consistently select the same Points of Interest between multiple interactions and multiple users.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention

The inventive concepts disclosed and claimed herein relate generally to digital image processing and, more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to finding and selecting points of interest on an edge of interest in a digital image.


2. Brief Description of Related Art

In the remote sensing/aerial imaging industry, imagery is used to capture views of a geographic area to be able to measure objects and structures within the images as well as to be able to determine geographic locations of points within the image. Such imagery is described in, for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0231700. Photogrammetry is the science of making measurements of and between objects depicted within photographs, especially aerial photographs. A person, or User, may interact with the image to select Points of Interest that may be used to perform other functions such as: determine distance between two points; determine the area outlined by a set of points; determine the volume of a 3-dimensional shape, or other functions. Usually, the greatest error induced into the calculation of the function is the human error introduced by the User selecting the Points of Interest. For example, if a measurement from a building to the edge of a curb is desired and the User selects a point that is close to the edge of the building, but not the actual edge of the building, then the measurement will differ from the actual measurement by the distance the User selected away from the building. In the projected image, several pixels could significantly impair the accuracy of the measurement. Additionally, when multiple Users perform the same measurement, their results can differ significantly.


In light of the foregoing, there is a need for a system and process for allowing a User to select Points of Interest based on the edge elements that exist in a geo-referenced image, wherein the Points of Interest are determined without the error caused by human determination of the position of the edge of an element in an image.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method for creating image products includes the following steps. Image data and positional data corresponding to the image data are captured and processed to create geo-referenced images. Edge detection procedures are performed on the geo-referenced images to identify edges and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images.


In one embodiment, a computerized system includes a computer system for storing a database of captured oblique images with corresponding geo-location data and corresponding detected edge data. The computer system has computer executable logic that, when executed by a processor, causes the computer system to receive a selection of a geographic point from a User, search the database to find images that contain the selected point, and make the images that contain the selected point available to the User.


In another embodiment a method of providing images to a User includes the following steps. A database stores captured oblique images having corresponding geo-location data and corresponding detected edge data. A selection of a geographic point is received from a user and the database is then searched to find images that contain the selected geographic point. The images that contain the selected geographic point are then made available to the User.


In yet another embodiment a sequence of instructions is stored on at least one non-transitory computer readable medium for running on a computer system capable of displaying and navigating imagery. The sequence of instructions includes instructions for causing the computer system to display a pixel representation of a georeferenced, edge-detected image, wherein the pixel representation includes one or more detected edges in the geo-referenced, edge-detected image; instructions for causing the computer system to allow the User to select one of the one or more detected edges by moving a cursor over a region of interest (which may be magnified), wherein the cursor is caused to snap-to a selected detected edge when the cursor is within a predetermined distance from the selected detected edge; instructions for causing the computer system to allow the User to accept the selected detected edge as an edge of interest; and instructions for causing the computer system to allow the User to determine and store one or more points of interest along the edge of interest.


In yet another embodiment, a system for preparing and utilizing geo-referenced images includes one or more image and data files accessible by a computer system capable of displaying and navigating digital imagery, the image and data file including a plurality of image files, detected edge information corresponding to the plurality of image files, and positional data corresponding to the plurality of image files; and image display and analysis software stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium and executable by the computer system. The image display and analysis software causes the computer system to allow a user to download and display, from the image and data file, a pixel representation of an image having a plurality of detected edges within the image, and to select a detected edge within the pixel representation by moving a cursor over the pixel representation, wherein the cursor is caused to snap-to a selected detected edge when the cursor is within a predetermined distance from the selected detected edge. The image display and analysis software also causes the computer system to allow the user to accept the selected detected edge as an edge of interest; and to allow the user to determine and store one or more points of interest along the edge of interest.


Thus, utilizing (1) the technology known in the art; (2) the above-referenced general description of the presently claimed and disclosed inventive concept(s); and (3) the drawings and detailed description of the inventive concepts that follows, the advantages and novelties of the presently claimed and disclosed inventive concept(s) are readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Like reference numerals in the figures represent and refer to the same element or function. Implementations of the disclosure may be better understood when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed pictorial illustrations, schematics, graphs, drawings, and appendices. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a flow chart showing an exemplary process for selecting a Point of Interest on an edge element in a digital photographic image.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary selection of a region of interest on an image.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary magnification of the region of interest on an image such that the magnified region of interest is a subset of the entire image and unmagnified surrounding areas are still visible to the User.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary image showing numerous detected edges.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart describing a User selection of an edge of interest in an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart describing a User selection of a point of interest in an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates an image showing a selected edge of interest and selected points of interest.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the inventive concepts(s) disclosed herein in detail, it is to be understood that the inventive concept(s) is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components or steps or methodologies set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The inventive concept(s) disclosed herein is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.


In the following detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the concepts within the disclosure can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description.


The inventive concept(s) disclosed herein is directed to methods and systems of creating image products, wherein image data is captured, along with positional data corresponding to the image data. The image and positional data are processed to create a plurality of geo-referenced images. In one embodiment disclosed herein, edge detection procedures are performed on the plurality of geo-referenced images to identify edges and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images, which are saved in a database. A computer system storing such a database of captured oblique images having corresponding geo-location data and corresponding detected edge data, has computer executable logic that when executed by a processor causes the computer system to receive a selection of a geographic point from a user, search the database to find images that contain the selected point, and make the images that contain the selected point available to the user. Alternatively, the database may store captured oblique images without the detected edge data, and the edges within such images can be detected in real-time as the user is viewing the image(s).


In one embodiment, a sequence of instructions is stored on at least one non-transitory computer readable medium for running on a computer system capable of displaying and navigating imagery. Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to FIG. 1, in general, a User downloads a geo-referenced image as in step 10. The sequence of instructions optionally includes instructions for locating and selecting a user-requested region of interest (ROI) from a downloaded geo-referenced image as in step 12. Further instructions can be provided for magnifying the user-requested region of interest (ROI) to provide a magnified region of interest (MROI) and for performing edge detection procedures on the region of interest (ROI) to provide a detected edge DE as in step 14. However, detected edge data indicative of the detected edge DE can be provided in the downloaded image. The detected edge DE can be either a linear edge or a non-linear edge. In step 16, instructions cause the cursor to snap-to a detected edge (DE) when the User moves the curser over the MROI and the cursor nears the DE. Further instructions allow the User to determine points of interest (POI) on a selected DE as in step 18. It is known that accuracy of selection of a POI of an element in a digital photographic image can be improved by magnifying the ROI so that the User may select a point as close as humanly possible to the actual edge of the element. However, computerized edge detection is more accurate for determination of an edge of an element and it provides consistency between multiple Users and interactions with the image. It has been discovered that by combining magnification of the ROI with edge detection, ED, and a snap-to utility for the cursor to snap to the detected edge, one can obtain synergistic improvements in the accuracy, precision and consistency of measurements of and between objects depicted within the digital photographic image as in step 20.


Referring now to FIG. 2, the User preferably interacts with a first computer system 21 to view and download one or more geo-referenced images to a second computer system 22 (although the geo-referenced images can be stored locally). The first and second computer system 21 and 22 can be a stand-alone computer, one or more computing device(s) and/or a distributed computing system. The stand-alone computer can be a personal computer such as a conventional desktop personal computer, laptop computer or tablet, or a mobile computer terminal. The second computer system 22 preferably includes one or more processor 23, communication connections 24, input devices 26a and 26b, output devices 28a and 28b including a display device 28a, and at least one computer readable medium 30a and 30b. The first computer system 21 can be constructed in a similar manner as the second computer system 22. While the geo-referenced image is often provided by downloading from an Internet site, the geo-referenced image can be provided by accessing any source of data files having image files and positional data corresponding to the images. Image-capturing and geo-locating systems can include image capturing devices, such as, for example, conventional cameras, digital cameras, digital sensors, charge-coupled devices, or other suitable image-capturing devices capable of capturing images photographically or electronically, and positioning information provided by, for example, a global positioning system and/or an inertial navigation unit. These systems and devices are well known to those skilled in the art.


The image display and analysis software can be stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium and/or executed by the first and/or the second computer systems 21 and 22 Software providing instructions for displaying a pixel representation of image are available commercially and well known to those skilled in the art. Image display and analysis software can include methods for utilizing oblique images such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,787,659, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.


The computer readable mediums 30a and/or 30b includes, for example, non-volatile read only memory, random access memory, hard disk memory, removable memory cards and/or other suitable memory storage devices and/or media. Input devices 26a and 26b, such as, for example, a mouse, keyboard, joystick, or other such input device, enable the input of data and interaction of a User with image display and analysis software being executed by the first and/or the second computer systems 21 and 22. In one embodiment, the first computer system 21 executes the image display and analysis software, and the second computer system 22 executes a communication software package, such as a web browser, to communicate with the first computer system 21 and display the geo-referenced images. An output device such as display device 28a can include, for example, a liquid crystal display or cathode ray tube, and displays information to the User of the second computer system 22. Additional output devices 28b can include a second display device, printer, speaker, etc. Communication connections 24 connect the second computer system 22 to a network 32, such as, for example, a local-area network, a wide-area network, the Internet and/or the World Wide Web for establishing communication with the first computer system 21.


The second computer system 22 typically uses a computer monitor as a display device 28a. These display devices often cannot display an entire image with the detail necessary. This may be due to the resolution of the information in the image and the resolution and size of the display surface. When a full image is not displayable on the monitor in its entirety, the displayable image which is substituted for the full image is often a global image, i.e. the full image with resolution removed to allow the entire image to fit onto the display surface of the display device. Referring now to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, to obtain the detail necessary to select a point of interest (POI), algorithms and software have been developed to allow the User to box out a sub-region or region of interest ROI 50 of a photograph or full image 52 and zoom-in or enlarge that sub-region as a magnified region of interest MROI 54, thus allowing the User to select points and lines from an enlarged detail image with greater ease and accuracy.


The detail image or magnified region of interest MROI 54 shows the details of the region of interest ROI 50, but when shown alone the global contexts of the details are lost. Thus, in one embodiment, instructions and algorithms known to those skilled in the art are utilized for magnifying a user-requested region of interest (ROI) 50 from the image 52 and displaying the full image or a portion thereof, along with a subsection of the display screen showing a linear magnification of the user-requested ROI 50. This allows for magnification of a particular ROI in an image while preserving visibility of the larger image as shown in FIG. 4.


In some applications, a non-linear magnification of the user-selected ROI 50 may be provided so that the connection between the detail image and the immediately surrounding portion of the global image is not obscured. Such methods are also known to those skilled in the art. While non-linear magnification creates a “lens” like distortion to the original image, it still provides increased detail for the ROI 50 while maintaining the connection to the immediately surrounding portion of the global image.


The User typically interprets the image and decides which features are to be measured. By positioning, for example, a mouse cursor, the approximate location of the features can be pointed out to an algorithm. Semi-automatic feature extraction is known to those skilled in the art and is used for measuring height points as well as for measuring specific object corners. A User positions the cursor at some position in the image 52 and the cursor snaps-to the desired surface or object corner. However, the image around this selected point will usually contain gray value gradients caused by the object edges. Thus the snap-to feature may be limited by the size and quality of the pixels.


The extraction of lines from digital images has also been researched for many years. Semi-automatic algorithms have been developed, for example, for the extraction of roads. Most algorithms of this kind are based on so-called “snakes”. Extraction of objects like house roofs can be improved by algorithms that extract homogeneous gray value. The algorithms used to find the boundaries of a homogeneous area are usually based on a “region growing algorithm”. A common interactive approach is to allow the User to select an appropriate object model, and approximately align the object model with the image. A fitting algorithm can then be used to find the best correspondence between edges of the object model and the location of high gradients in the image.(1)


In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the sequence of instructions stored on at least one computer readable medium 30a, 30b and/or computer readable medium 55 of the first computer system 21 for running on the first and/or second computer systems 21 and 22 capable of displaying and navigating digital imagery includes instructions for performing edge detection procedures on the user-requested region of interest and/or on the entire pixel representation of the image. Referring now to FIG. 5, detected edges 56 can include linear edges 58 as well as curved edges 60. Edge detection is a tool in image processing which identifies discontinuities in a digital image such as points at which the image brightness or color changes sharply. Techniques, procedures and algorithms for edge detection are available commercially and known to those skilled in the art.


Referring now to FIG. 6, the sequence of instructions stored on the computer readable mediums 30a, 30b and/or 55 forms a process 98 as discussed below. The process 98 includes instructions for allowing the User to interact with the magnified region of interest MROI 54 as shown in a step 100 to determine points of interest by moving the cursor over the MROI 54. The User interaction can be accomplished with a mouse, touchpad, stylus or other means. Then the first and/or the second computer systems 21 and 22 detect a cursor position as indicated at a step 102. Once the first and/or the second computer systems 21 and 22 detects the cursor position, instructions cause the one or more processor 23 to determine the distance between the cursor and a detected edge DE 56 at a step 104. If the distance is less than a predetermined distance, for example, within 3 pixel lengths, the cursor is caused to snap-to that detected edge DE 56 at a step 106. Snap-to algorithms are known to those skilled in the art.


In an embodiment, instructions are provided at a step 108 to hold the cursor at the detected edge DE 56 until the User indicates acceptance or rejection of the detected edge DE 56 as an edge of interest EOI 110 at a step 112. Upon rejection, the cursor is allowed to move freely at a step 114 and the process 98 branches to the step 100 until the cursor position is detected again within a predetermined distance of the same or another detected edge DE 56, at which point the cursor will again snap-to the detected edge DE 56. Upon acceptance of the detected edge DE 56 as an edge of interest EOI 110, the process 98 includes instructions at a step 116 to indicate, mark and store the accepted edge of interest EOI 32 on the image 52 as shown, for example, in FIG. 8. Acceptance can be indicated by any means of communication with the second computer system 22, such as, for example, by clicking the mouse or by selecting “Accept” from an opened dialog box. Rejection can be indicated similarly or by lack of acceptance for a specified time.


Referring now to FIG. 7, the sequence of instructions stored on the computer readable mediums 30a, 30b and/or 55 forms a process 118 as discussed below for proceeding once the User has accepted an edge of interest EOI 110. The process 118 includes instructions for allowing the User to move the cursor along the edge of interest EOI 110 as in a step 121 in order to select a point of interest POI 120. The first and/or the second computer systems 21 and 22 detects the cursor position, and determines whether the cursor is more or less than a predetermined distance from the edge of interest EOI 110 as in a step 122. If the cursor has moved more than the predetermined distance from the edge of interest EOI 110, the process 118 branches back to step 100 in process 98. If the cursor has moved less than the predetermined distance from the edge of interest EOI 110, the User may select a point of interest POI 120 along the detected edge DE forming the edge of interest 110. At a step 124 the User may select a point of interest POI 120 and accept or reject the POI by, for example, double clicking a mouse or by any means of communication with the second computer system 22 as described above for accepting or rejecting the edge of interest EOI 110. If the point of interest POI 120 is rejected, the process 118 braches back to step 122. Upon acceptance of the point of interest POI 120, instructions are provided in a step 126 to indicate, mark and store the accepted point of interest POI 120 on the image as shown, for example, in FIG. 8.


The User is then allowed to move the cursor in a step 128 in order to select additional points of interest POI 120. The process 118 queries the User at a step 130 regarding whether all of the points of interest POI 120 have been selected. The User can indicate by any means of communication with the second computer system 22, such as, for example, by selecting “All Done” or “Continue” from an opened dialog box. If additional points of interest POI 120 are desired, process 118 branches back to step 100 of process 98 and additional points of interest POI 120 can be identified using the procedure described above until the User has selected all of the points of interest POI 120 necessary to perform a desired function. If in fact, the User has selected all the necessary points of interest POI 120, the User may select a function to be performed or exit out of the magnified region of interest MROI 54 as in a step 132.


Often, the User takes measurements of and between objects depicted in the image 52 by selecting one of several available measuring modes provided within the image display and analysis software. The User selects the desired measurement mode by accessing, for example, a series of pull-down menus or toolbars or via keyboard commands. The measuring modes provided by image display and analysis software may include, for example, a distance mode that enables measurement of the distance between two or more selected points, an area mode that enables measurement of the area encompassed by several selected and interconnected points, a height mode that enables measurement of the height between two or more selected points, and an elevation mode that enables the measurement of the change in elevation of one selected point relative to one or more other selected points.


After selecting the desired measurement mode, the User selects a starting point of interest POI 120 and an ending point of interest POI 120′ on the image 52, and image display and analysis software automatically calculates and displays the quantity sought. The accuracy, precision and consistency of these measurements depend in great part on the procedure used to select the points of interest POI 120. By combining edge detection procedures with a snap-to function in a magnified region of interest, edges of interest can be identified and individual points of interest along those edges can be selected in a much more accurate and consistent manner than is currently available.


In one embodiment disclosed herein, edge detection procedures are performed on the plurality of geo-referenced images to identify edges and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images which are saved in a database on one or more of the computer readable mediums 30a, 30b and 55. Either the first and/or the second computer system 21 and 22 storing such a database of captured oblique images having corresponding geo-location data and corresponding detected edge data, has computer executable logic that when executed by a processor causes the computer systems 21 and/or 22 to receive a selection of a geographic point from a user, search the database to find images that contain the selected point, and make the images that contain the selected point available to the user. Alternatively, the database may store captured oblique images without the detected edge data, and the edges within such images can be detected in real-time as the user is viewing the image(s) and/or when the MROI 54 is showing details of a region of interest 50.


As it will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, changes may be made in the construction and the operation of the various components, elements and assemblies described herein or in the steps or the sequence of steps of the methods described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventive concept(s) disclosed herein.


From the above description, it is clear that the inventive concept(s) disclosed herein is well adapted to carry out the objects and to attain the advantages mentioned herein as well as those inherent in the inventive concept(s) disclosed herein. While presently preferred embodiments of the inventive concept(s) disclosed herein have been described for purposes of this disclosure, it will be understood that numerous changes may be made which will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and which are accomplished within the spirit of the inventive concept(s) disclosed and claimed herein.


REFERENCES



  • (1) George Vosselman, “Cartographic Feature Extraction”, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.


Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising the steps of: performing, with a computer system, edge detection procedures on a plurality of geo-referenced images to identify edges in the plurality of geo-referenced images and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images and detected edge data;displaying one or more pixel representation of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images to a user, wherein a detected edge of the detected edge data is superimposed on the geo-referenced, edge-detected images;receiving a selection of one or more points on the detected edge from the user selecting the one or more points on the detected edge on a display device displaying the detected edge superimposed on the one or more pixel representation of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images; andmeasuring one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points on the detected edge.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving the selection of one or more points on the detected edge comprises receiving input from the user indicative of two or more points of interest along the detected edge; and wherein measuring one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points comprises measuring a distance between the two or more points of interest utilizing image data and positional data of the geo-referenced, edge-detected image.
  • 3. A method, comprising the steps of: performing edge detection procedures on a plurality of geo-referenced images to identify edges in the plurality of geo-referenced images and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images and detected edge data;displaying the geo-referenced, edge-detected images to a user;receiving input from the user of a selection of one or more of the identified edges, the input determined by the user moving a cursor over a pixel representation of one or more of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images having a detected edge of the detected edge data superimposed on the pixel representation, wherein the cursor is caused to snap-to the detected edge when the cursor is within a predetermined distance from the detected edge;receiving input from the user to affirmatively accept the detected edge as an edge of interest;receiving a selection of one or more points on the edge of interest; andmeasuring one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of holding the cursor at the detected edge until the user has indicated acceptance or rejection of the detected edge as an edge of interest.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, further comprising the steps of indicating, marking, and storing the edge of interest on the pixel representation of the one or more of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein receiving the selection of one or more points on the edge of interest comprises receiving input from the user indicative of two or more points of interest along one or more of the edges of interest; and wherein measuring one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points comprises measuring a distance between the two or more points of interest utilizing image data and positional data of the geo-referenced, edge-detected image.
  • 7. A system for preparing and utilizing geo-referenced images, the system comprising: image display and analysis software stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium and executable by a computer system to cause the computer system to: perform edge detection procedures on a plurality of geo-referenced images to identify edges in the plurality of geo-referenced images and produce geo-referenced, edge-detected images and detected edge data;make the geo-referenced, edge-detected images available to a user;receive input from the user of a selection of one or more of the identified edges, the input determined by the user moving a cursor over a pixel representation of one or more of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images having a detected edge of the detected edge data superimposed on the pixel representation, wherein the cursor is caused to snap-to the detected edge when the cursor is within a predetermined distance from the detected edge;receive input from the user to affirmatively accept the detected edge as an edge of interest;receive a selection of one or more points on the edge of interest; andmeasure one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points on the edge of interest.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, further comprising image display and analysis software stored on the non-transitory computer readable medium and executable by the computer system to cause the computer system to hold the cursor at the detected edge until the user has indicated acceptance or rejection of the detected edge as an edge of interest.
  • 9. The system of claim 7, image display and analysis software stored on the non-transitory computer readable medium and executable by the computer system to cause the computer system to indicate, mark, and store the edge of interest on the pixel representation of the one or more of the geo-referenced, edge-detected images.
  • 10. The system of claim 7, wherein to receive a selection of one or more points on the edge of interest comprises to receive input from the user indicative of two or more points of interest along one or more of the edges of interest; and wherein to measure one or more objects or between one or more objects within the geo-referenced, edge-detected image using the selected one or more points comprises to measure a distance between the two or more points of interest utilizing image data and positional data of the geo-referenced, edge-detected image.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The present patent application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/341,213, filed Jul. 25, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/972,088, filed Dec. 17, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (186)
Number Name Date Kind
2273876 Lutz et al. Feb 1942 A
3153784 Petrides et al. Oct 1964 A
3594556 Edwards Jul 1971 A
3614410 Bailey Oct 1971 A
3621326 Hobrough Nov 1971 A
3661061 Tokarz May 1972 A
3716669 Watanabe et al. Feb 1973 A
3725563 Woycechowsky Apr 1973 A
3864513 Halajian et al. Feb 1975 A
3866602 Furihata Feb 1975 A
3877799 O'Donnell Apr 1975 A
4015080 Moore-Searson Mar 1977 A
4044879 Stahl Aug 1977 A
4184711 Wakimoto Jan 1980 A
4240108 Levy Dec 1980 A
4281354 Conte Jul 1981 A
4344683 Stemme Aug 1982 A
4360876 Girault et al. Nov 1982 A
4382678 Thompson et al. May 1983 A
4387056 Stowe Jun 1983 A
4396942 Gates Aug 1983 A
4463380 Hooks Jul 1984 A
4489322 Zulch et al. Dec 1984 A
4490742 Wurtzinger Dec 1984 A
4491399 Bell Jan 1985 A
4495500 Vickers Jan 1985 A
4527055 Harkless et al. Jul 1985 A
4543603 Laures Sep 1985 A
4586138 Mullenhoff et al. Apr 1986 A
4635136 Ciampa et al. Jan 1987 A
4653136 Denison Mar 1987 A
4653316 Fukuhara Mar 1987 A
4673988 Jansson et al. Jun 1987 A
4686474 Olsen et al. Aug 1987 A
4688092 Kamel et al. Aug 1987 A
4689748 Hofmann Aug 1987 A
4707698 Constant et al. Nov 1987 A
4758850 Archdale et al. Jul 1988 A
4805033 Nishikawa Feb 1989 A
4807024 Mclaurin et al. Feb 1989 A
4814711 Olsen et al. Mar 1989 A
4814896 Heitzman et al. Mar 1989 A
4843463 Michetti Jun 1989 A
4899296 Khattak Feb 1990 A
4906198 Cosimano et al. Mar 1990 A
4953227 Katsuma et al. Aug 1990 A
4956872 Kimura Sep 1990 A
5034812 Rawlings Jul 1991 A
5086314 Aoki et al. Feb 1992 A
5121222 Endoh et al. Jun 1992 A
5138444 Hiramatsu Aug 1992 A
5155597 Lareau et al. Oct 1992 A
5164825 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1992 A
5166789 Myrick Nov 1992 A
5191174 Chang et al. Mar 1993 A
5200793 Ulich et al. Apr 1993 A
5210586 Grage et al. May 1993 A
5231435 Blakely Jul 1993 A
5247356 Ciampa Sep 1993 A
5251037 Busenberg Oct 1993 A
5265173 Griffin et al. Nov 1993 A
5267042 Tsuchiya et al. Nov 1993 A
5270756 Busenberg Dec 1993 A
5296884 Honda et al. Mar 1994 A
5335072 Tanaka et al. Aug 1994 A
5342999 Frei et al. Aug 1994 A
5345086 Bertram Sep 1994 A
5353055 Hiramatsu Oct 1994 A
5369443 Woodham Nov 1994 A
5381338 Wysocki Jan 1995 A
5402170 Parulski et al. Mar 1995 A
5414462 Veatch May 1995 A
5467271 Abel et al. Nov 1995 A
5481479 Wight et al. Jan 1996 A
5486948 Imai et al. Jan 1996 A
5506644 Suzuki et al. Apr 1996 A
5508736 Cooper Apr 1996 A
5555018 von Braun Sep 1996 A
5604534 Hedges et al. Feb 1997 A
5617224 Ichikawa et al. Apr 1997 A
5633946 Lachinski et al. May 1997 A
5668593 Lareau et al. Sep 1997 A
5677515 Selk et al. Oct 1997 A
5798786 Lareau et al. Aug 1998 A
5835133 Moreton et al. Nov 1998 A
5841574 Willey Nov 1998 A
5844602 Lareau et al. Dec 1998 A
5852753 Lo et al. Dec 1998 A
5894323 Kain et al. Apr 1999 A
5899945 Baylocq et al. May 1999 A
5963664 Kumar et al. Oct 1999 A
6037945 Loveland Mar 2000 A
6088055 Lareau et al. Jul 2000 A
6094215 Sundahl et al. Jul 2000 A
6097854 Szeliski et al. Aug 2000 A
6108032 Hoagland Aug 2000 A
6130705 Lareau et al. Oct 2000 A
6157747 Szeliski et al. Dec 2000 A
6167300 Cherepenin et al. Dec 2000 A
6222583 Matsumura et al. Apr 2001 B1
6236886 Cherepenin et al. May 2001 B1
6256057 Mathews et al. Jul 2001 B1
6373522 Mathews et al. Apr 2002 B2
6421610 Carroll et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434280 Peleg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6448964 Isaacs et al. Sep 2002 B1
6597818 Kumar et al. Jul 2003 B2
6639596 Shum et al. Oct 2003 B1
6711475 Murphy Mar 2004 B2
6731329 Feist et al. May 2004 B1
6747686 Bennett Jun 2004 B1
6810383 Loveland Oct 2004 B1
6816819 Loveland Nov 2004 B1
6826539 Loveland Nov 2004 B2
6829584 Loveland Dec 2004 B2
6834128 Altunbasak et al. Dec 2004 B1
6876763 Sorek et al. Apr 2005 B2
7009638 Gruber et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018050 Ulichney et al. Mar 2006 B2
7046401 Dufaux et al. May 2006 B2
7061650 Walmsley et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065260 Zhang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7123382 Walmsley et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127348 Smitherman et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133551 Chen Nov 2006 B2
7142984 Rahmes et al. Nov 2006 B2
7184072 Loewen et al. Feb 2007 B1
7233691 Setterholm Jun 2007 B2
7262790 Bakewell Aug 2007 B2
7348895 Lagassey Mar 2008 B2
7509241 Guo Mar 2009 B2
7728833 Verma Jun 2010 B2
7832267 Woro Nov 2010 B2
7844499 Yahiro Nov 2010 B2
8031947 Jacobsen Oct 2011 B2
8078396 Meadow Dec 2011 B2
8103445 Smith et al. Jan 2012 B2
8150617 Manber et al. Apr 2012 B2
8422825 Neophytou et al. Apr 2013 B1
8452125 Schultz et al. May 2013 B2
8531472 Freund et al. Sep 2013 B2
8705843 Lieckfeldt Apr 2014 B2
20020041328 LoCompte et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020041717 Murata et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020114536 Xiong et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030014224 Guo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030043824 Remboski et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088362 Melero et al. May 2003 A1
20030103682 Blake et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030164962 Nims et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030214585 Bakewell Nov 2003 A1
20040105090 Schultz et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040167709 Smitherman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050073241 Yamauchi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088251 Matsumoto Apr 2005 A1
20050169521 Hel-Or Aug 2005 A1
20060028550 Palmer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060061566 Verma et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060089792 Manber et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060092043 Lagassey May 2006 A1
20060238383 Kimchi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250515 Koseki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070024612 Balfour Feb 2007 A1
20070046448 Smitherman Mar 2007 A1
20070237420 Steedly et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080120031 Rosenfeld et al. May 2008 A1
20080123994 Schultz et al. May 2008 A1
20080158256 Russell et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080247663 Jacobsen Oct 2008 A1
20090177458 Hochart et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090202101 Nielsen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090208095 Zebedin Aug 2009 A1
20090249257 Bove Oct 2009 A1
20090271719 Clare et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090300553 Pettigrew et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090304227 Kennedy et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100085350 Mishra Apr 2010 A1
20100205575 Arora et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205576 Majumder et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100278424 Warner Nov 2010 A1
20100296693 Thornberry et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110033110 Shimamura et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110109719 Wilson et al. May 2011 A1
20110196610 Waldman et al. Aug 2011 A1
20130212537 Hall Aug 2013 A1
20130246204 Thornberry et al. Sep 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
331204 Jul 2006 AT
0316110 Sep 2005 BR
2402234 Sep 2000 CA
2505566 May 2004 CA
1735897 Feb 2006 CN
60017384 Mar 2006 DE
60306301 Nov 2006 DE
1418402 Oct 2006 DK
1010966 Feb 1999 EP
1180967 Feb 2002 EP
1418402 May 2004 EP
1696204 Aug 2006 EP
S2266704 Mar 2007 ES
11328378 Nov 1999 JP
2003317089 Nov 2003 JP
2007149046 Jun 2007 JP
PA05004987 Feb 2006 MX
WO9918732 Apr 1999 WO
WO2000053090 Sep 2000 WO
WO20040044692 May 2004 WO
WO2005088251 Sep 2005 WO
WO2008028040 Mar 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (153)
Entry
Ackermann, Prospects of Kinematic GPS Aerial Triangulation, ITC Journal, 1992.
Ciampa, John A., “Pictometry Digital Video Mapping”, SPIE, vol. 2598, pp. 140-148, 1995.
Ciampa, J. A., Oversee, Presented at Reconstruction After Urban earthquakes, Buffalo, NY, 1989.
Dunford et al., Remote Sensing for Rural Development Planning in Africa, The Journal for the International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences, 2:99-108, 1983.
Gagnon, P.A., Agnard, J. P., Nolette, C., & Boulianne, M., “A Micro-Computer based General Photogrammetric System”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, No. 5., pp. 623-625, 1990.
Konecny, G., “Issues of Digital Mapping”, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, GIS Ostrava 2008, Ostrava 27.-30.1.2008, pp. 1-8.
Konecny, G., “Analytical Aerial Triangulation with Convergent Photography”, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, pp. 37-57, 1966.
Konecny, G., “Interior Orientation and Convergent Photography”, Photogrammetric Engineering, pp. 625-634, 1965.
Graham, Lee A., “Airborne Video for Near-Real-Time Vegetation Mapping”, Journal of Forestry, 8:28-32, 1993.
Graham, Horita TRG-50 SMPTE Time-Code Reader, Generator, Window Inserter, 1990.
Hess, L.L, et al., “Geocoded Digital Videography for Validation of Land Cover Mapping in the Amazon Basin”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1527-1555, 2002.
Hinthorne, J., et al., “Image Processing in the Grass GIS”, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4:2227-2229, 1991.
Imhof, Ralph K., “Mapping from Oblique Photographs”, Manual of Photogrammetry, Chapter 18, 1966.
Jensen, John R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall, 1986; 399 pages.
Lapine, Lewis A., “Practical Photogrammetric Control by Kinematic GPS”, GPS World, 1(3):44-49, 1990.
Lapine, Lewis A., Airborne Kinematic GPS Positioning for Photogrammetry—The Determination of the Camera Exposure Station, Silver Spring, MD, 11 pages, at least as early as 2000.
Linden et al., Airborne Video Automated Processing, US Forest Service Internal report, Fort Collins, CO, 1993.
Myhre, Dick, “Airborne Video System Users Guide”, USDA Forest Service, Forest Pest Management Applications Group, published by Management Assistance Corporation of America, 6 pages, 1992.
Myhre et al., “An Airborne Video System Developed Within Forest Pest Management—Status and Activities”, 10 pages, 1992.
Myhre et al., “Airborne Videography—A Potential Tool for Resource Managers”—Proceedings: Resource Technology 90, 2nd International Symposium on Advanced Technology in Natural Resource Management, 5 pages, 1990.
Myhre et al., Aerial Photography for Forest Pest Management, Proceedings of Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Slidell, Louisiana, 153-162, 1988.
Myhre et al., “Airborne Video Technology”, Forest Pest Management/Methods Application Group, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 1-6, at least as early as Jul. 30, 2006.
Norton-Griffiths et al., 1982. “Sample surveys from light aircraft combining visual observations and very large scale color photography”. University of Arizona Remote Sensing Newsletter 82-2:1-4.
Norton-Griffiths et al., “Aerial Point Sampling for Land Use Surveys”, Journal of Biogeography, 15:149-156, 1988.
Novak, Rectification of Digital Imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 339-344, 1992.
Slaymaker, Dana M., “Point Sampling Surveys with GPS-logged Aerial Videography”, Gap Bulletin number 5, University of Idaho, http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/Bulletins/5/PSSwGPS.html, 1996.
Slaymaker, et al., “Madagascar Protected Areas Mapped with GPS-logged Aerial Video and 35mm Air Photos”, Earth Observation magazine, vol. 9, No. 1, http://www.eomonline.com/Common/Archives/2000jan/00jan_tableofcontents.html, pp. 1-4, 2000.
Slaymaker, et al., “Cost-effective Determination of Biomass from Aerial Images”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1737:67-76, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=648004.743267&coll=GUIDE&dl=, 1999.
Slaymaker, et al., “A System for Real-time Gerneration of Geo-referenced Terrain Models”, 4232A-08, SPIE Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement Boston, MA, ftp://vis-ftp.cs.umass.edu/Papers/schultz/spie2000.pdf, 2000.
Slaymaker, et al.,“Integrating Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography, and a Laser Profiler for Environmental Monitoring”, In ISPRS WG III/1 Workshop on Integrated Sensor Calibration and Orientation, Portland, Maine, 1999.
Slaymaker, et al., “Calculating Forest Biomass With Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography and a Profiling Laser”, In Proceedings of the 17th Biennial Workshop on Color Photography and Videography in Resource Assessment, Reno, NV, 1999.
Slaymaker et al., Mapping Deciduous Forests in Southern New England using Aerial Videography and Hyperclustered Multi-Temporal Landsat TM Imagery, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, 1996.
Star et al., “Geographic Information Systems an Introduction”, Prentice-Hall, 1990.
Tomasi et al., “Shape and Motion from Image Streams: a Factorization Method”—Full Report on the Orthographic Case, pp. 9795-9802, 1992.
Warren, Fire Mapping with the Fire Mousetrap, Aviation and Fire Management, Advanced Electronics System Development Group, USDA Forest Service, 1986.
Welch, R., “Desktop Mapping with Personal Computers”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1651-1662, 1989.
Westervelt, James, “Introduction to Grass 4”, pp. 1-25, 1991.
“RGB Spectrum Videographics Report, vol. 4, No. 1, McDonnell Douglas Integrates RGB Spectrum Systems in Helicopter Simulators”, pp. 1-6, 1995.
RGB “Computer Wall”, RGB Spectrum, 4 pages, 1995.
“The First Scan Converter with Digital Video Output”, Introducing . . . The RGB/Videolink 1700D-1, RGB Spectrum, 2 pages, 1995.
Erdas Field Guide, Version 7.4, A Manual for a commercial image processing system, 1990.
“Image Measurement and Aerial Photography”, Magazine for all branches of Photogrammetry and its fringe areas, Organ of the German Photogrammetry Association, Berlin-Wilmersdorf, No. 1, 1958.
“Airvideo Analysis”, MicroImages, Inc., Lincoln, NE, 1 page, Dec. 1992.
Zhu, Zhigang, Hanson, Allen R., “Mosaic-Based 3D Scene Representation and Rendering”, Image Processing, 2005, ICIP 2005, IEEE International Conference on 1(2005).
Mostafa, et al., “Direct Positioning and Orientation Systems How do they Work? What is the Attainable Accuracy?”, Proceeding, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO, Apr. 24-27, 2001.
“POS AV” georeferenced by Applanix aided inertial technology, http://www.applanix.com/products/posav_index.php.
Mostafa, et al., “Ground Accuracy from Directly Georeferenced Imagery”, Published in GIM International vol. 14 N. 12 Dec. 2000.
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne Direct Georeferencing of Frame Imagery: An Error Budget”, The 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Cairo, Egypt, Jan. 3-5, 2001.
Mostafa, M.R. and Hutton, J., “Airborne Kinematic Positioning and Attitude Determination Without Base Stations”, Proceedings, International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics, and Navigation (KIS 2001) Banff, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 4-8, 2001.
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne DGPS Without Dedicated Base Stations for Mapping Applications”, Proceedings of ION-GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Sep. 11-14.
Mostafa, “ISAT Direct Exterior Orientation QA/QC Strategy Using POS Data”, Proceedings of OEEPE Workshop: Integrated Sensor Orientation, Hanover, Germany, Sep. 17-18, 2001.
Mostafa, “Camera/IMU Boresight Calibration: New Advances and Performance Analysis”, Proceedings of the ASPRS Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Apr. 21-26, 2002.
Hiatt, “Sensor Integration Aids Mapping at Ground Zero”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Sep. 2002, p. 877-878.
Mostafa, “Precision Aircraft GPS Positioning Using CORS”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Nov. 2002, p. 1125-1126.
Mostafa, et al., System Performance Analysis of INS/DGPS Integrated System for Mobile Mapping System (MMS), Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Commission VI, WG VI/4, Mar. 2004.
Artes F., & Hutton, J., “GPS and Inertial Navigation Delivering”, Sep. 2005, GEOconnexion International Magazine, p. 52-53, Sep. 2005.
“POS AV” Applanix, Product Outline, airborne@applanix.com, 3 pages, Mar. 28, 2007.
POSTrack, “Factsheet”, Applanix, Ontario, Canada, www.applanix.com, Mar. 2007.
POS AV “Digital Frame Camera Applications”, 3001 Inc., Brochure, 2007.
POS AV “Digital Scanner Applications”, Earthdata Brochure, Mar. 2007.
POS AV “Film Camera Applications” AeroMap Brochure, Mar. 2007.
POS AV “LIDAR Applications” MD Atlantic Brochure, Mar. 2007.
POS AV “OEM System Specifications”, 2005.
POS AV “Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications”, Overview, Orbisat Brochure, Mar. 2007.
“POSTrack V5 Specifications” 2005.
“Remote Sensing for Resource Inventory Planning and Monitoring”, Proceeding of the Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Slidell, Louisiana and NSTL, Mississippi, Apr. 11-15, 1988.
“Protecting Natural Resources with Remote Sensing”, Proceeding of the Third Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Apr. 9-13, 1990.
Heipke, et al, “Test Goals and Test Set Up for the OEEPE Test—Integrated Sensor Orientation”, 1999.
Kumar, et al., “Registration of Video to Georeferenced Imagery”, Sarnoff Corporation, CN5300, Princeton, NJ, 1998.
McConnel, Proceedings Aerial Pest Detection and Monitoring Workshop—1994.pdf, USDA Forest Service Forest Pest Management, Northern Region, Intermountain region, Forest Insects and Diseases, Pacific Northwest Region.
“Standards for Digital Orthophotos”, National Mapping Program Technical Instructions, US Department of the Interior, Dec. 1996.
Tao, “Mobile Mapping Technology for Road Network Data Acquisition”, Journal of Geospatial Engineering, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2000.
“Mobile Mapping Systems Lesson 4”, Lesson 4 Sure 382 Geographic Information Systems II, pp. 1-29, Jul. 2, 2006.
Konecny, G., “Mechanische Radialtriangulation mit Konvergentaufnahmen”, Bildmessung and Luftbildwesen, 1958, Nr. 1.
Myhre, “ASPRS/ACSM/RT 92” Technical papers, Washington, D.C., vol. 5 Resource Technology 92, Aug. 3-8, 1992.
Rattigan, “Towns get new view from above,” The Boston Globe, Sep. 5, 2002.
Mostafa, et al., “Digital image georeferencing from a multiple camera system by GPS/INS,” ISP RS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 56(I): I-12, Jun. 2001.
Dillow, “Grin, or bare it, for aerial shot,” Orange County Register (California), Feb. 25, 2001.
Anonymous, “Live automatic coordinates for aerial images,” Advanced Imaging, 12(6):51, Jun. 1997.
Anonymous, “Pictometry and US Geological Survey announce—Cooperative Research and Development Agreement,” Press Release published Oct. 20, 1999.
Miller, “Digital software gives small Arlington the Big Picture,” Government Computer NewsState & Local, 7(12), Dec. 2001.
Garrett, “Pictometry: Aerial photography on steroids,” Law Enforcement Technology 29(7):114-116, Jul. 2002.
Weaver, “County gets an eyeful,” The Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), May 18, 2002.
Reed, “Firm gets latitude to map O.C. In 3D,” Orange County Register (California), Sep. 27, 2000.
Reyes, “Orange County freezes ambitious aerial photography project,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 16, 2000.
Aerowest Pricelist of Geodata as of Oct. 21, 2005 and translations to English 3 pages.
www.archive.org Web site showing archive of German AeroDach Web Site http://www.aerodach.de. from Jun. 13, 2004 (retrieved Sep. 20, 2012) and translations to English 4 pages.
AeroDach®Online Roof Evaluation Standard Delivery Format and 3D Data File: Document Version 01.00.2002 with publication in 2002, 13 pages.
Noronha et al., “Detection and Modeling of Building from Multiple Aerial Images,” Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Southern California, Nov. 27, 2001, 32 pages.
Applicad Reports dated Nov. 25, 1999-Mar. 9, 2005, 50 pages.
Applicad Online Product Bulletin archive from Jan. 7, 2003, 4 pages.
Applicad Sorcerer Guide, Version 3, Sep. 8, 1999, 142 pages.
Xactimate Claims Estimating Software archive from Feb. 12, 2010, 8 pages.
Bignone et al, Automatic Extraction of Generic House Roofs from High Resolution Aerial Imagery, Communication Technology Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 12 pages, 1996.
Geospan 2007 Job proposal.
Greening et al., Commercial Applications of GPS-Assisted Photogrammetry, Presented at GIS/LIS Annual Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 1994.
Pictometry International Corp., Patent Owner's Response in inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, Filed Nov. 16, 2016.
Bajaj, Declaration of Dr. Chandrajit Bajaj, as filed as Exhibit-2006 in inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, on Nov. 16, 2016.
Deposition of Mr. Harold Schuch of Nov. 2, 2016, as filed as Exhibit-2005 in inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, on Nov. 16, 2016.
Pictometry International Corp. et al.; Metropolitan Area Planning Council License Agreement; 2009; as filed as Exhibit-2009 in inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, on Nov. 16, 2016.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., Petition for inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, Mail Date Feb. 8, 2016.
Able Software Corp., R2V for Windows User's Manual (as filed as Exhibit-1003 in IPR2016-00593), Sep. 16, 2000.
Pictometry International Corp., Electronic Field Study User Guide Version 2.7 (as filed as Exhibit-1004 in IPR2016-00593), Jul. 2007.
Gleicher, Michael, Image Snapping (as filed as Exhibit-1005 in IPR2016-00593), 1995.
Schuch, Harold, Declaration in support of Petition for inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593 (as filed as Exhibit-1006 in IPR2016-00593), Mail Date Feb. 8, 2016.
Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp; Complaint for infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court District of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filed Sep. 23, 2015.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc., Answer to Complaint for infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court District of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filed Nov. 12, 2015.
Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp; Amended Complaint for infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court District of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filed Nov. 30, 2015.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc., Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims to Amended Complaint for infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court District of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filed Dec. 14, 2015.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc., Motion to Dismiss Complaint for infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 under 35 U.S.C. 101 and supporting Memorandum in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filing date Feb. 9, 2016.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc., Invalidity Contentions regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court District of New Jersy, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filing date Feb. 9, 2016.
Mexican Patent Office, Official Action regarding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/014451 and English translation, dated Nov. 2015.
Bertan et al., Automatic 3D Roof Reconstruction Using Digital Cadastral Map, Architectural Knowledge and an Aerial Image; 2006 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS, 2006.
Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp., Response with Claim Charts to Invalidity Contentions regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 in litigation (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, dated Mar. 10, 2016.
Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp., Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732 under 35 U.S.C. 101 (Eagle View Technologies, Inc., and Pictometry International Corp. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc., and Verisk Analytics, Inc.) in the United States District Court of New Jersey, case No. njd-1-15-cv-07025-RBK-JS, filing date Mar. 22, 2016.
Pictometry International Corp., Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to petition for inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, Filed Jun. 2, 2016.
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Institution Decision for inter partes review of claims 12-15, 21-23, 25-27, 33-38, 44, and 45 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, Paper 13, Aug. 31, 2016.
Unknown; Cohasset Town Report for the year ending Dec. 31, 2008; 2009; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2616-00593).
Pictometry International Corp., EFS 2.7 Getting Started Guide, Jul. 2007 (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Asimonye, Bernard; Geospatial Information Systems Council—Pictometry: Oblique Imagery Training—Announcement; Apr. 6, 2009; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Genesee County GIS Working Group Meeting Minutes; 2007; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Los Angeles Region Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LAR-IAC2) Product Guide 2; Feb. 2009; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; LARIAC1 Pictometry Training Announcement; Feb. 2009; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Los Angeles County Extends its License Agreement with Pictometry for New Oblique Aerial Photos; Directions Magazine—Press Releases; Mar. 2006; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Screen shot of properties page for “TXWILMAdministrative Training” PowerPoint File; Sep. 2008; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Pictometry Training Descriptions, Unknown date; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Horan, Mike; Pictometry Administrative Training PowerPoint; Unknown date; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Pictometry Announces Technical Advancements for GIS Professionals; GISuser; Dec. 2006 (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Unknown; Pictometry Announces Technical Advancements for GIS Professionals; Directions Magazine—Press Releases; Dec. 2006; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning; PowerPoint slides titled “Pictometry”; Apr. 19, 2007; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Office of Transportation Planning; Pictometry License Guidelines; Jan. 26, 2005; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Lanctot, Corey; Welcome to Your End User Training; Unknown date; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence regarding Pictometry Electronic Field Study Guide Version 2.7 during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Association for Computing Machinery; Screenshots from ACM Digital Library regarding reference “Image Snapping” by Michael Gleicher; Sep. 2016; (provided to Pictometry International Corp. as supplemental evidence “Image Snapping” by Michael Gleicher during the inter partes review of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593).
Canadian Patent Office, Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166, dated Oct. 17, 2017.
Mexican Patent Office, Office Action regarding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2016/003154, dated Oct. 22, 2017.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., Appellant Brief filed in Xactware Solutions, Inc. v. Pictometry International Corp., Fed. Cir. Case 18/1094 (consolidated with Case 18/1093) (Appeal of USPTO PTAB Final Written Decision in inter partes review of claims 12-15, 21-23, 25-27, 33-38, 44, and 45 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593), Mar. 5, 2018.
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Canadian Patent Office's Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166, dated Oct. 17, 2017.
Canadian Patent Office, Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166, dated Sep. 26, 2018.
Pictometry International Corp., Appellee Brief (corrected) filed in Xactware Solutions, Inc. v. Pictometry International Corp., Fed. Cir. Case 18/1094 (consolidated with Case 18/1093) (Appeal of USPTO PTAB Final Written Decision in inter partes review of claims 12-15, 21-23, 25-27, 33-38, 44, and 45 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593), Apr. 18, 2018.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., Reply Brief filed in Xactware Solutions, Inc. v. Pictometry International Corp., Fed. Cir. Case 18/1094 (consolidated with Case 18/1093) (Appeal of USPTO PTAB Final Written Decision in inter partes review of claims 12-15, 21-23, 25-27, 33-38, 44, and 45 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593), May 30, 2018.
European Patent Office, Search Report and Written Opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 11849260.2, dated Aug. 18, 2017.
Pictometry International Corp, Response to Aug. 18, 2017 Search Report and Written Opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 11849260.2, dated Mar. 8, 2018.
European Patent Office, Examination Report regarding European Patent Application No. 11849260.2, dated Jun. 21, 2018.
Carpendale et al., “Achieving Higher Magnification in Context”, UIST 04. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Santa Fe, NM, Oct. 24-27, 2004, New York, NY: ACM Press, US, ISBN 978-1-58113-957-0, Oct. 24, 2004.
Xactware Solutions, Inc., Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,823,732, IPR2016-00593, Filed Jan. 27, 2017.
Mexican Patent Office, Official Action regarding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/014451 and English summary, Jun. 2015.
International Search Authority Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/US11/065418, dated May 30, 2012.
International Bureau, Preliminary Report on Patentability regarding PCT/US11/065418, dated Jun. 27, 2013.
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Sep. 26, 2018 Canadian Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166; dated Mar. 26, 2019.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166; dated Aug. 19, 2019.
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Aug. 19, 2019 Canadian Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166; dated Feb. 14, 2020.
Pictometry International Corp., Voluntary Amendment and Response to Jul. 20, 2020 telephone conversation with Canadian Office regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,166; dated Jul. 24, 2020.
Pictometry International Corp., Response dated Jul. 3, 2018 European Patent Office Action regarding European Patent Application No. 11849260.2 ; dated Dec. 20, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200311461 A1 Oct 2020 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14341213 Jul 2014 US
Child 16846527 US
Parent 12972088 Dec 2010 US
Child 14341213 US