The invention generally relates to automated programmable motion control systems, e.g., robotic, sortation and other processing systems, and relates in particular to programmable motion control systems intended for use in environments requiring that a variety of objects (e.g., articles, packages, consumer products etc.) be processed and moved to a number of processing destinations.
Many object distribution systems, for example, receive objects in a disorganized stream or bulk transfer that may be provided as individual objects or objects aggregated in groups such as in bags, arriving on any of several different conveyances, commonly a conveyor, a truck, a pallet a Gaylord, or a bin etc. Each object must then be distributed to the correct destination location (e.g., a container) as determined by identification information associated with the object, which is commonly determined by a label printed on the object. The destination location may take many forms, such as a bag, a shelf, a container, or a bin.
The processing (e.g., sortation or distribution) of such objects has traditionally been done, at least in part, by human workers that scan the objects, for example with a hand-held barcode scanner, and then place the objects at assigned locations. Many order fulfillment operations, for example, achieve high efficiency by employing a process called wave picking. In wave picking, orders are picked from warehouse shelves and placed at locations (e.g., into bins) containing multiple orders that are sorted downstream. At the sorting stage, individual articles are identified, and multi-article orders are consolidated, for example, into a single bin or shelf location, so that they may be packed and then shipped to customers. The process of sorting these articles has traditionally been done by hand. A human sorter picks an article, and then places the article in the so-determined bin or shelf location where all articles for that order or manifest have been defined to belong. Automated systems for order fulfillment have also been proposed. See, for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0244026, which discloses the use of a robotic arm together with an arcuate structure that is movable to within reach of the robotic arm.
The identification of objects by code scanning generally either require manual processing, or require that the code location be controlled or constrained so that a fixed or robot-held code scanner (e.g., a barcode scanner) can reliably detect the code. Manually operated barcode scanners are therefore generally either fixed or handheld systems. With fixed systems, such as those at point-of-sale systems, the operator holds the article and places it in front of the scanner, which scans continuously, and decodes any barcodes that it can detect. If the article's code is not immediately detected, the person holding the article typically needs to vary the position or orientation of the article with respect to the fixed scanner, so as to render the barcode more visible to the scanner. For handheld systems, the person operating the scanner may look at the barcode on the article, and then hold the article such that the barcode is within the viewing range of the scanner, and then press a button on the handheld scanner to initiate a scan of the barcode.
Further, many distribution center sorting systems generally assume an inflexible sequence of operation whereby a disorganized stream of input objects is provided (by a human) as a singulated stream of objects that are oriented with respect to a scanner that identifies the objects. An induction element or elements (e.g., a conveyor, a tilt tray, or manually movable bins) transport the objects to desired destination locations or further processing stations, which may be a bin, a chute, a bag or a conveyor etc.
In conventional object sortation or distribution systems, human workers or automated systems typically retrieve objects in an arrival order, and sort each object or objects into a collection bin based on a set of given heuristics. For example, all objects of a like type might be directed to a particular collection bin, or all objects in a single customer order, or all objects destined for the same shipping destination, etc. may be directed to a common destination location. Generally, the human workers, with the possible limited assistance of automated systems, are required to receive objects and to move each to their assigned collection bin. If the number of different types of input (received) objects is large, then a large number of collection bins is required.
Such a system however, has inherent inefficiencies as well as inflexibilities since the desired goal is to match incoming objects to assigned collection bins. Such systems may require a large number of collection bins (and therefore a large amount of physical space, large investment costs, and large operating costs), in part, because sorting all objects to all destinations at once is not always most efficient. Additionally, such break-pack systems must also monitor the volume of each like object in a bin, requiring that a human worker continuously count the items in a bin.
Further, current state-of-the-art sortation systems also rely on human labor to some extent. Most solutions rely on a worker that is performing sortation, by scanning each object from an induction area (chute, table, etc.) and placing each object at a staging location, conveyor, or collection bin. When a bin is full, another worker empties the bin into a bag, box, or other container, and sends that container on to the next processing step. Such a system has limits on throughput (i.e., how fast can human workers sort to or empty bins in this fashion) and on number of diverts (i.e., for a given bin size, only so many bins may be arranged to be within efficient reach of human workers).
Unfortunately, these systems do not address the limitations of the total number of system bins. The system is simply diverting an equal share of the total objects to each parallel manual cell. Thus, each parallel sortation cell must have all the same collection bin designations; otherwise, an object may be delivered to a cell that does not have a bin to which the object is mapped. There remains a need, therefore, for a more efficient and more cost-effective object processing system that processes objects of a variety of sizes and weights into appropriate collection bins or trays of fixed sizes, yet is efficient in handling objects of varying sizes and weights.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a processing system for processing objects using a programmable motion device. The processing system includes a plurality of supply bins providing supply of a plurality of objects, with the plurality of supply bins being provided with a bin conveyance system, a programmable motion device in communication with the bin conveyance system, where the programmable motion device includes an end effector for grasping and moving a selected object out of a selected supply bin, and a movable carriage for receiving the selected object from the end effector of the programmable motion device, and for carrying the selected object to one of a plurality of destination containers.
In accordance with another embodiment, the invention provides a processing system for processing objects using a programmable motion device, where the processing system includes a programmable motion device including an end effector for grasping and moving a selected object from a plurality of objects, a movable carriage for receiving the selected object from the end effector of the programmable motion device, and for carrying the selected object to one of a plurality of destination containers, and a destination container displacement system for urging a selected destination container onto an output conveyor.
In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention provides a method of processing of objects. The method includes the steps of providing a plurality of supply bins including a plurality of objects, with the plurality of supply bins being provided with a bin conveyance system, grasping and moving a selected object out of a selected supply bin using a programmable motion device, providing the selected object to a reciprocating carriage, and carrying the selected object to one of a plurality of destination containers using the reciprocating carriage.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a processing system for processing objects using a programmable motion device. The processing system includes a plurality of supply bins, a programmable motion device, and a movable carriage. The plurality of supply bins provide supply of a plurality of objects, and the plurality of supply bins are provided with a bin conveyance system. The programmable motion device is in communication with the bin conveyance system, and the programmable motion device includes an end effector for grasping and moving a selected object out of a selected supply bin. The movable carriage is for receiving the selected object from the end effector of the programmable motion device, and is used for carrying the selected object to one of a plurality of destination containers.
With reference to
The inner conveyors 49 (also shown in
With reference to
The system 30 may also include one or more perception units 33 located on or near the input conveyor 34 for identifying indicia on an exterior of each of the bins 32, providing perception data from which the contents of the bin may be identified, and then knowing its relative position on the conveyor 34, track its location. It is assumed that the bins of objects are marked in one or more places on their exterior with a visually distinctive mark such as a barcode (e.g., providing a UPC code) or radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag or mailing label so that they may be sufficiently identified with a scanner for processing. The type of marking depends on the type of scanning system used, but may include 1D or 2D code symbologies. Multiple symbologies or labeling approaches may be employed. The types of scanners employed are assumed to be compatible with the marking approach. The marking, e.g. by barcode, RFID tag, mailing label or other means, encodes a identifying indicia (e.g., a symbol string), which is typically a string of letters and/or numbers. The symbol string uniquely associates the vendor bin with a specific set of homogenous objects.
The operations of the system described above are coordinated with a central processing system 70 as shown in
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a system 30′ may include input conveyor 34 on which supply bins 32 (e.g., decanted vendor bins) are provided, a processing section 36′ that includes a programmable motion device 40, and a destination section 44 that includes one or more shuttle carriers 42. The programmable motion device 40 is able to service two carriages 42 and two sets of destination bins 46. Again, supply bins 32 are selectively provided to and from the processing section 36′ by a diverter conveyor 35 that moves bins of objects to the processing section 36. The programmable motion device 40 then moves objects from a selected supply bin 32 and places or drops them into one of the two carriage 42 of the destination section for delivery to one of a plurality of destination containers 46. When a destination bin is complete, the completed bin 51 is urged onto an output conveyor 48 for further processing or transport. The conveyor 34 may be motion controlled so that both the speed and the direction of the conveyor (e.g., rollers or belt) may be controlled. In certain embodiments, the conveyors 48 may be gravity biased to cause any destination container 46 on a conveyor 48 to be delivered to an output end without active control of the conveyors 48. The sensors 33 may track each of the supply bins 32 as they are passed on the conveyor 34, and the system may thereby know where each supply bin 32 is located at all times.
Again, the inner conveyors 49 on which the destination containers 46 ride, may also be gravity biased sloping downward in the opposite direction (with the lower end biased toward the processing section 36). In further embodiments, one or both sets of conveyors 48, 49 may be biased in either direction. The biasing of the completed conveyors 51 ensures that the destination containers 46 remain next to each other, and when a container 49 is removed, the remaining containers 46 are brought together. The sensors 53, for example, may track each of the containers 46 as they are loaded onto the conveyors 51, and the processing system 70 may thereby know where each container 46 is located. The biasing of the conveyors 48 ensures that completed bins 51 are removed from the destination section 44.
With reference to
The system of various embodiments includes a perception system (e.g., 50) that is mounted above a bin of objects to be processed next to the base of the articulated arm 40, looking down into a bin 32. The perception system 50, for example and as shown in
If an object cannot be fully perceived by the detection system, the perception system considers the object to be two different objects, and may propose more than one candidate grasps of such two different objects. If the system executes a grasp at either of these bad grasp locations, it will either fail to acquire the object due to a bad grasp point where a vacuum seal will not occur, or will acquire the object at a grasp location that is very far from the center of mass of the object and thereby induce a great deal of instability during any attempted transport. Each of these results is undesirable.
If a bad grasp location is experienced, the system may remember that location for the associated object. By identifying good and bad grasp locations, a correlation is established between features in the 2D/3D images and the idea of good or bad grasp locations. Using this data and these correlations as input to machine learning algorithms, the system may eventually learn, for each image presented to it, where to best grasp an object, and where to avoid grasping an object.
As shown in
The invention provides therefore in certain embodiments that grasp optimization may be based on determination of surface normal, i.e., moving the end effector to be normal to the perceived surface of the object (as opposed to vertical picks), and that such grasp points may be chosen using fiducial features as grasp points, such as picking on a barcode, given that barcodes are almost always applied to a flat spot on the object.
In accordance with various embodiments therefore, the invention further provides a processing system that may learn object grasp locations from experience (and optionally human guidance). Systems designed to work in the same environments as human workers will face an enormous variety of objects, poses, etc. This enormous variety almost ensures that the robotic system will encounter some configuration of object(s) that it cannot handle optimally; at such times, it is desirable to enable a human operator to assist the system and have the system learn from non-optimal grasps.
The system optimizes grasp points based on a wide range of features, either extracted offline or online, tailored to the gripper's characteristics. The properties of the suction cup influence its adaptability to the underlying surface, hence an optimal grasp is more likely to be achieved when picking on the estimated surface normal of an object rather than performing vertical gantry picks common to current industrial applications.
In addition to geometric information the system uses appearance-based features as depth sensors may not always be accurate enough to provide sufficient information about graspability. For example, the system can learn the location of fiducials such as barcodes on the object, which can be used as an indicator for a surface patch that is flat and impermeable, hence suitable for a suction cup. One such example is the use of barcodes on consumer products. Another example is shipping boxes and bags, which tend to have the shipping label at the object's center of mass and provide an impermeable surface, as opposed to the raw bag material, which might be slightly porous and hence not present a good grasp.
By identifying bad or good grasp points on the image, a correlation is established between features in the 2D/3D imagery and the idea of good or bad grasp points; using this data and these correlations as input to machine learning algorithms, the system can eventually learn, for each image presented to it, where to grasp and where to avoid.
This information is added to experience based data the system collects with every pick attempt, successful or not. Over time the robot learns to avoid features that result in unsuccessful grasps, either specific to an object type or to a surface/material type. For example, the robot may prefer to avoid picks on shrink wrap, no matter which object it is applied to, but may only prefer to place the grasp near fiducials on certain object types such as shipping bags.
This learning can be accelerated by off-line generation of human-corrected images. For instance, a human could be presented with thousands of images from previous system operation and manually annotate good and bad grasp points on each one. This would generate a large amount of data that could also be input into the machine learning algorithms to enhance the speed and efficacy of the system learning.
In addition to experience based or human expert based training data, a large set of labeled training data can be generated based on a detailed object model in physics simulation making use of known gripper and object characteristics. This allows fast and dense generation of graspability data over a large set of objects, as this process is not limited by the speed of the physical robotic system or human input.
The system of an embodiment may also employ motion planning using a trajectory database that is dynamically updated over time, and is indexed by customer metrics. The problem domains contain a mix of changing and unchanging components in the environment. For example, the objects that are presented to the system are often presented in random configurations, but the target locations into which the objects are to be placed are often fixed and do not change over the entire operation.
One use of the trajectory database is to exploit the unchanging parts of the environment by pre-computing and saving into a database trajectories that efficiently and robustly move the system through these spaces. Another use of the trajectory database is to constantly improve the performance of the system over the lifetime of its operation. The database communicates with a planning server that is continuously planning trajectories from the various starts to the various goals, to have a large and varied set of trajectories for achieving any particular task. In various embodiments, a trajectory path may include any number of changing and unchanging portions that, when combined, provide an optimal trajectory path in an efficient amount of time.
In certain embodiments, the system may include a plurality of base locations, as well as a plurality of predetermined path portions associated with the plurality of base locations. The trajectories taken by the articulated arm of the robot system from the input bin to the base location are constantly changing based in part, on the location of each object in the input bin, the orientation of the object in the input bin, and the shape, weight and other physical properties of the object to be acquired.
Once the articulated arm has acquired an object and is positioned at the base location, the paths to each of the plurality of destination carriers 46 are not changing. In particular, each destination bin is associated with a unique destination bin location, and the trajectories from the base location to each of the destination bin locations individually is not changing. A trajectory, for example, may be a specification for the motion of a programmable motion device over time. In accordance with various embodiments, such trajectories may be generated by experience, by a person training the system, and/or by automated algorithms. For a trajectory that is not changing, the shortest distance is a direct path to the target destination bin, but the articulated arm is comprised of articulated sections, joints, motors etc. that provide specific ranges of motion, speeds, accelerations and decelerations. Because of this, the robotic system may take any of a variety of trajectories between, for example, base locations and destination bin locations.
The risk factor may be determined in a number of ways including whether the trajectory includes a high (as pre-defined) acceleration or deceleration (linear or angular) at any point during the trajectory. The risk factor may also include any likelihood that the articulated arm may encounter (crash into) anything in the robotic environment. Further, the risk factor may also be defined based on learned knowledge information from experience of the same type of robotic arms in other robotic systems moving the same object from a base location to the same destination location.
As shown in the table at 96 in
The choice of fast time vs. low risk factor may be determined in a variety of ways, for example, by choosing the fastest time having a risk factor below an upper risk factor limit (e.g., 12 or 14), or by choosing a lowest risk factor having a maximum time below an upper limit (e.g., 1.0 or 1.2). Again, if the risk factor is too high, valuable time may be lost by failure of the robotic system to maintain acquisition of the object. An advantage of the varied set is robustness to small changes in the environment and to different-sized objects the system might be handling: instead of re-planning in these situations, the system iterates through the database until it finds a trajectory that is collision-free, safe and robust for the new situation. The system may therefore generalize across a variety of environments without having to re-plan the motions.
Overall trajectories therefore, may include any number of changing and unchanging sections. For example, networks of unchanging trajectory portions may be employed as commonly used paths (roads), while changing portions may be directed to moving objects to a close-by unchanging portion (close road) to facilitate moving the object without requiring the entire route to be planned. For example, the programmable motion device (e.g., a robot) may be tasked with orienting the grasped object in front of an automatic labeler before moving towards the destination. The trajectory to sort the object therefore, would be made up of the following trajectory portions: First, a grasp pose to a home position (motion planned). Then, from home position to an auto-labeler home (pulled from a trajectory database). Then, from the auto-labeler home to a labelling pose (motion planned). Then, from the labelling pose to an auto-labeler home (either motion planned or just reverse the previous motion plan step). Then, from the auto-labeler home to the intended destination (pulled from the trajectory database). A wide variety of changing and unchanging (planned and pulled from a database) portions may be employed in overall trajectories. In accordance with further embodiments, the object may be grasped from a specific pose (planned), and when the object reaches a destination bin (from the trajectory database), the last step may be to again place the object in the desired pose (planned) within the destination bin.
In accordance with further embodiments, the motion planning may also provide that relatively heavy items (as may be determined by knowing information about the grasped object or by sensing weight—or both—at the end effector) may be processed (e.g., moved in trajectories) and placed in boxes in very different ways than the processing and placement of relatively light objects. Again, the risk verses speed calculations may be employed for optimization of moving known objects of a variety of weights and sizes as may occur, for example, in the processing of a wide variety of consumer products. The system, therefore, provides means that interface with the customer's outgoing object conveyance systems. When a bin (or package) is full as determined by the system (in monitoring system operation), a human operator may pull the bin from the processing area, and place the bin in an appropriate conveyor. When a bin is full and gets removed to the closed/labelled location, another empty bin is immediately placed in the location freed up by the removed full bin, and the system continues processing as discussed above.
The movable carriage 42 is therefore reciprocally movable between the destination bins, and the/each carriage moves along a track, and may be actuated to drop an object into a desired destination bin 24. The destination bins may be provided in a conveyor (e.g., rollers or belt), and may be biased (for example by gravity) to urge all destination bins toward one end (for example, the distal end. When a destination bin is selected for removal (e.g., because the bin is full or otherwise ready for further processing), the system will urge the completed bin onto an output conveyor to be brought to a further processing or shipment station. The conveyor may be biased (e.g., by gravity) or powered to cause any bin on the conveyor to be brought to an output location.
Following displacement of the bin onto the conveyor (as shown in
As noted above, the bins 46 may be provided as boxes, totes, containers or any other type of device that may receive and hold an item. In further embodiments, the bins may be provided in uniform trays (to provide consistency of spacing and processing) and may further include open covers that may maintain the bin in an open position, and may further provide consistency in processing through any of spacing, alignment, or labeling.
For example,
As also shown in
The box 132 is thus maintained securely within the box tray 134, and the box cover 136 provides that the flaps 138 remain down along the outside of the box permitting the interior of the box to be accessible through the opening 142 in the box cover 136.
With reference to
Systems of the invention are highly scalable in terms of sorts-per-hour as well as the number of storage bins and destination bins that may be available.
Control of each of the systems 30, 30′, 200 and 300 may be provided by the computer system 70 that is in communication with the storage conveyors and displacement mechanism(s), the processing conveyors and displacement mechanism(s), and the programmable motion device(s). The computer system 70 also contains the knowledge (continuously updated) of the location and identity of each of the storage bins, and contains the knowledge (also continuously updated) of the location and identity of each of the destination bins. The system therefore, directs the movement of the storage bins and the destination bins, and retrieves objects from the storage bins, and distributes the objects to the destination bins in accordance with an overall manifest that dictates which objects must be provided in which destination boxes for shipment, for example, to distribution or retail locations.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/830,877, filed Mar. 26, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/935,835, filed Mar. 26, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,646,991, issued May 12, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/476,310, filed Mar. 24, 2017, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4722653 | Williams et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4846335 | Hartlepp | Jul 1989 | A |
4895242 | Michel | Jan 1990 | A |
5190162 | Hartlepp | Mar 1993 | A |
5595263 | Pignataro | Jan 1997 | A |
5794788 | Massen | Aug 1998 | A |
5839566 | Bonnet | Nov 1998 | A |
6011998 | Lichti et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6059092 | Jerue et al. | May 2000 | A |
6208908 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246023 | Kugle | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6323452 | Bonnet | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377867 | Bradley | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390756 | Isaacs et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401936 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6579053 | Grams et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6688459 | Bonham et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762382 | Danelski | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6897395 | Shiibashi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7728244 | De Leo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8776694 | Rosenwinkel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9102336 | Rosenwinkel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9346083 | Stone | May 2016 | B2 |
9364865 | Kim | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9481518 | Neiser | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9751693 | Battles | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9878349 | Crest et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9926138 | Brazeau et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9962743 | Bombaugh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9975148 | Zhu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10646991 | Wagner | May 2020 | B2 |
11472022 | Wagner | Oct 2022 | B2 |
20020092801 | Dominguez | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020157919 | Sherwin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020179502 | Cerutti et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038065 | Pippin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060045672 | Maynard | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070929 | Fry et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070209976 | Worth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080113440 | Gurney | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181753 | Bastian | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090047178 | Chojnacki | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100122942 | Harres et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100318216 | Faivre et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110144798 | Freudelsperger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110243707 | Dumas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120118699 | Buchmann et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130110280 | Folk | May 2013 | A1 |
20140086709 | Kasai | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086714 | Malik | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140244026 | Neiser | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150073589 | Khodl et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098775 | Razumov | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160221762 | Schroader | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160228921 | Doublet et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244262 | O'Brien | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160347545 | Lindbo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170043953 | Battles et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170136632 | Wagner et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170157648 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170157649 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170349385 | Moroni et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180085788 | Engel | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180273298 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190022702 | Vegh | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200223058 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006204622 | Mar 2007 | AU |
3057334 | Oct 2023 | CA |
202279447 | Jun 2012 | CN |
110691742 | Jan 2020 | CN |
115339805 | Nov 2022 | CN |
957200 | Jan 1957 | DE |
19510392 | Sep 1996 | DE |
102004001181 | Aug 2005 | DE |
102004013353 | Oct 2005 | DE |
102005061309 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102007023909 | Nov 2008 | DE |
102007038834 | Feb 2009 | DE |
102010002317 | Aug 2011 | DE |
102012102333 | Sep 2013 | DE |
0613841 | Jul 1994 | EP |
1995192 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2233400 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2650237 | Oct 2013 | EP |
3112295 | Jan 2017 | EP |
2084531 | Apr 1982 | GB |
S54131278 | Oct 1979 | JP |
S63310406 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H0395001 | Apr 1991 | JP |
2002028577 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003150230 | May 2003 | JP |
2007182286 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008037567 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2010202291 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2014141313 | Aug 2014 | JP |
2005118436 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006105446 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007009136 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2010017872 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010034044 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011038442 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2012024714 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2015118171 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2016198565 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017044747 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018176033 | Sep 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 18719343.8 on Nov. 29, 2022, 4 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 18719343.8 on Nov. 11, 2021, 5 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 18719343.8 on Oct. 31, 2019, 3 pages. |
Decision on Rejection (along with its English translation) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880032353.6 on Jan. 24, 2022, 29 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,057,334 on Mar. 18, 2022, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued by the International Searching Authority, the European Patent Office, in related International Patent Application PCT/US2018/024335 mailed Oct. 3, 2019, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority, the European Patent Office, in related International Patent Application PCT/US2018/024335 mailed Jun. 29, 2018, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/830,877 on May 13, 2022, 11 pages. |
Notice on the First Office Action and the First Office Action (along with its English translation) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880032353.6 on Oct. 20, 2020, 28 pages. |
Notice on the Second Office Action and the Second Office Action (along with its English translation) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880032353.6 on Jun. 10, 2021, 42 pages. |
U.S. Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,835 mailed May 22, 2019, 23 pages. |
Webb et al., Atlas of Automated Assembling Workhead Mechanisms, pp. 112-113, 5 pages, Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishing House, Jul. 1983 (translated by Hu Chaozeng. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220355467 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62476310 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16830877 | Mar 2020 | US |
Child | 17874337 | US | |
Parent | 15935835 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16830877 | US |