1. Field of the Invention
This description generally relates to the field of gaming, and more particularly to systems and methods of automating table gaming, for example, games played with playing cards such as blackjack, baccarat, and poker.
2. Description of the Related Art
Existing devices store playing cards in a stack, which is supported at an angle to simultaneously expose portions of each of the playing cards. A reader images or scans an exposed portion of each of the playing cards to read one or more markings carried by the playing cards. The markings may take a variety of forms, for example the markings may take the form of standard rank and suit markings such as the ranks two-ten, Jack, Queen, King, Ace, or the suits Clubs, Hearts, Spades, Diamonds. The markings may alternatively or additionally take the form of one or more machine-readable symbols carried on a portion of the playing cards, for example, carried along one or more edges of the playing cards. One possible drawback to this approach is that adjacent playing cards may be stuck together for any number of reasons, which prevents the exposure and consequently the successful reading of the markings from all of the playing cards. Consequently, it is estimated that the read accuracy associated with these type of discard readers may be as low as approximately 80%.
In one aspect, a system operable with a gaming table includes a first card receiving compartment for placing a plurality of playing cards; a first unit located under the gaming table to receive the playing cards from the compartment, and a second, modular unit. The first unit includes a first reader to successively read each of the playing cards of the plurality of playing cards and a controllable elevator moveable to a card-loading position to receive at least some of the plurality of playing cards that have been read by the reader and further moveable to a card-accessible position above the gaming table where at least some of the playing cards within the elevator are made accessible for game play. The second, modular unit is detachably coupleable to the first unit and includes a second card receiving compartment, an erasing device, and a printing device, wherein the erasing device is operable to erase at least a portion of the playing card passing thereby and the printing device is operable to provide an amount of printed matter to the at least the erased portion of the playing card.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the invention. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the invention may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures associated with computers, computer networks, readers and machine-vision have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments of the invention.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Further more, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
The headings provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the claimed invention.
The playing cards are directed from the input compartment along a media path via a conveyor system 14 (
The playing cards carry markings, for example, machine-readable symbols such as barcode symbols. The conveyor system 14 moves the playing cards one-by-one past a reader 16 (
In one embodiment, the reader 16 is a point scanner. In this embodiment, the machine-readable symbol may include two tracks, a first track encoding an identifier and a second track encoding timing information, allowing the reader to determine or compensate for variations in the velocity of the playing card(s) as the playing card(s) moves past the reader 16. One advantage of reading the playing cards individually is to achieve a greater read rate of the cards, as compared to current discard readers that image only a small exposed edge portion of the playing cards arranged in a sloped stack.
In one embodiment, the playing cards each have more than one machine-readable symbol. In such an embodiment, multiple readers (e.g., point scanners) or a two-dimensional imager could be used to read the multiple machine-readable symbols carried by the playing cards. Using multiple symbols can provide a more robust system 10 in the event that one of the machine-readable symbols is unreadable.
After each playing card is read by the reader 16, the conveyor system 14 directs the playing card into an output compartment, which can store up to eight decks of playing cards. An elevator mechanism 18 guides the output compartment vertically with respect to the surface of the gaming table. The input compartment may be mounted on guide shafts 20. A stepper motor 22 incrementally controls the vertical position of the output compartment 18. The stepper motor 22 is capable of moving the output compartment 18 up or down by approximately the thickness of one playing card. After a desired amount of playing cards have been placed in the output compartment or by command of the dealer, the stepper motor 22 drives the elevator 18 up through an opening 24 located in a frame 26 of the device 10, in which the opening 24 coincides with an opening in the gaming table. The elevator mechanism 18 moves all the playing cards in the output compartment above the surface of the gaming table and makes them accessible (e.g., accessible to the dealer so the dealer can remove the playing cards, and for example, shuffle the playing cards for the start of a new hand).
The information read from the playing cards can be processed through the casino computing system. For example, when a dealer collects the playing cards from the patrons in a selected order and then places the playing cards into the system 10, the information obtained from reading the cards can be used to determine a collected, discarded, or final sequence. The collected, discarded, or final sequence can be used to determine identity of playing cards forming each participant's hand, for example allowing the determination of the number and identity of hit cards taken by each player. The collected, discarded, or final sequence allows the collection of statistics, analysis of playing patterns, and recreation of the card game. A knowledge of the collected, discarded, or final sequence may be used with or without a knowledge of the starting sequence to, for example, detect cheating.
The card management device 102 may be similar in form and function to the device 10 described above and in view of
The modular erasing and printing device 104 includes an opening 116 to receive a second set of playing cards. One purpose for the modular erasing and printing device 104 is to erase at least a portion of a playing card and then re-print that portion. By way of example, as the playing cards are fed into the modular erasing and printing device 104, each card is routed along a card path 118 to an erasing device 120. The erasing device 120 may be operated to erase the symbols, barcode elements, or backing designs from the second set of playing cards. In one embodiment, a special ink used on the playing cards can be activated when the special ink is exposed to a certain wavelength (e.g., infrared, ultraviolet) of light, exposed to an amount of heat, or exposed to an amount of pressure to neutralize the ink and thus create a “clean” or “bare” region on at least a portion of each playing card. Alternatively, the erasing device 120 may employ electronic reusable paper technology, which is commonly referred to as “e-paper” or “smart paper,” where the card is subjected to a voltage as it passes by the erasing device 102.
The Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) developed e-paper, which comprises a thin layer of transparent plastic in which millions of small beads, somewhat like toner particles, are randomly dispersed. Each of the beads are contained in an oil-filled cavity and each bead is free to rotate within its respective cavity. The beads are “bichromal,” with hemispheres of two contrasting colors (e.g. black and white, red and white), and charged so they exhibit an electrical dipole.
In the illustrated embodiment, the playing cards shall be referred to as e-cards. The erase device 120 applies a voltage to a surface of the e-card to get the beads to rotate and make one of the two possible colors visible. Voltages can be applied to the surface to create visible images such as text, symbols, or pictures. The visible image will persist until new a voltage pattern is applied. It is appreciated that there are many ways that an image can be created using e-paper technology. For example, the e-cards can be fed into the erasing device 120 where the current visible images are erased and then fed into a printing device 122 where a new voltage pattern is applied to the e-card and a substantially new e-card is created (e.g., the e-card could be quickly changed from a 2♥ to a J).
The printing device 122 may operate via well known printing technology, such as liquid ink jet or laser printing, which are two of the most common printing technologies existing in the present marketplace. Additionally or alternatively, the printing device 122 may operate in a manner similar to the erasing device 120 described above. In one embodiment, the printing device 122 re-activates the special ink by exposing it at an adjusted wavelength (e.g., infrared, ultraviolet) of light, an adjusted amount of heat, or an adjusted amount of pressure to generate an image on at least the “clean” or “bare” region of the playing card.
Once the playing card has been re-printed, the playing card is directed past a second reader 124. Re-printing the playing card may entail printing any portion of a front or a back of the playing card. The second reader 124 is located just after the printing device 122 in the illustrated embodiment. The second reader 122 may be a point scanner, CMOS or CCD imager, or some other type of optical reader capable of reading symbols and barcodes from a playing card.
Additionally or alternatively, the printing device 122 can sequentially print playing cards from card blanks or from previously erased cards according to a generated sequence. The newly printed or re-printed playing cards are then directed past the reader 124 where the printed matter on the playing card can be verified against a known, generated sequence and to further quality check the playing card to insure that the printed symbols and machine-readable symbols are readable. Generated sequences can be produced and the appropriate cards printed for each hand, for an entire deck of fifty-two playing cards, for a number of decks, or for any number of cards. One advantage of the printing device 122 is that the system 100 may replace the combination of a card shoe, an automatic shuffler, and a discard reader. In the game of Baccarat, for example, where the playing cards are routinely disposed of after only one hand of game play, these cards instead may be fed into the modular erasing and printing device 104 of the system 100 and be re-used for later-played hands. By reusing the playing cards, the casino may be able to save money by having to purchase fewer decks of playing cards and may be able to reduce their inventory of decks of playing cards.
Advantages
The reader 16 of the system 10 provides for an improved read accuracy of the playing cards by selectively moving the playing cards past the reader 16, one-by-one. The reader can be set to read one edge of the playing card or several edges of the playing card. This latter approach provides redundancy in reading the machine-readable symbol, which increases the accuracy.
Another advantage is that friction rollers are used to selectively route the playing cards past the optical reader, one-by-one. The friction rollers have the ability to force one playing card to move relative to an adjacent playing card, even if there is some amount of stickiness between adjacent playing cards. Thus, this type of card feeding configuration greatly increases the likelihood that each playing card will be read and that none of the playing cards will be hidden or covered by an adjacent playing card during the reading process.
Yet another advantage is that the collected playing cards, after they have been routed to the elevator, can be commanded to the table surface and readily presented for reshuffling. The elevator further provides a clandestine method of storing the collected playing cards under the gaming table.
Another advantage is that the playing cards end up in the elevator in an ending sequence that is reversed from the starting sequence. The reversed sequence provides another means for monitoring activities at the gaming table to determine if any of the playing cards have been tampered with (e.g., removed, added, etc.).
One problem addressed by the above described approach is to make the playing cards reusable. In many casinos, playing cards are used only a few times to mitigate the chance that marked cards are being recirculated into the games. In addition, some casinos use the playing cards only once before disposing of the playing cards. Used playing cards are typically re-sorted by hand and resold as used. A large casino may use about 400,000 decks of playing cards per month. In short, hundreds of millions of barely used playing cards are discarded every year.
The system 10 provides an opportunity to make the playing cards reusable by erasing and reprinting. This process also generates playing cards with new values, thus subverting the attempts of card markers to track cards that they believed are being recycled in the casino. The system provides the ability to generate sequences of playing cards according to a predetermined set of odds because the sequence can be generated virtually and stored in the printer memory.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the above U.S. Patents, patent applications, Provisional Patent Applications and publications referred to in this specification, to include, but not limited to U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,460,848; 6,712,696; 6,520,857; 6,517,436; 6,530,836; 6,579,180; 6,530,837; 6,663,490; 6,527,271; 6,579,181; 6,517,435; 6,533,662; 6,595,857; 6,533,276; 6,758,751; 6,688,979; 6,652,379; 6,685,568; 6,857,961; and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/862,222; 11/030,609; 10/756,044; 10/360,846; 10/358,999; 10/823,051; 10/934,785; 10/966,835; 10/981,132; 10/703,414; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/562,772 are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Aspects of the invention can be modified, if necessary, to employ various systems, devices and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments of the invention.
These and other changes can be made to the invention in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all card reading systems and methods that operate in accordance with the claims. Accordingly, the invention is not limited by the disclosure, but instead its scope is to be determined entirely by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2567223 | Maher | Sep 1951 | A |
2731271 | Brown | Jan 1956 | A |
3222071 | Lang | Dec 1965 | A |
3312473 | Friedman et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3339223 | Laby | Sep 1967 | A |
3377070 | Nottoli | Apr 1968 | A |
3493728 | Braden, Jr. et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3561756 | Barnett | Feb 1971 | A |
3690670 | Cassady et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3751041 | Seifert | Aug 1973 | A |
3752962 | Greskovics | Aug 1973 | A |
3814436 | Boren | Jun 1974 | A |
3897954 | Erickson et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3907282 | Hunter | Sep 1975 | A |
3929339 | Mattioli | Dec 1975 | A |
3937311 | Gehrke | Feb 1976 | A |
3937312 | Gehrke | Feb 1976 | A |
3942616 | Elmore | Mar 1976 | A |
3972573 | Marola | Aug 1976 | A |
3990555 | Carullo | Nov 1976 | A |
3993176 | Marola et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3993177 | Gehrke | Nov 1976 | A |
3994377 | Elmore | Nov 1976 | A |
4135663 | Nojiri et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4241921 | Miller | Dec 1980 | A |
4310160 | Willette et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4373726 | Churchill et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4457512 | Stevenson | Jul 1984 | A |
4497488 | Plevyak et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4512580 | Matviak | Apr 1985 | A |
4531909 | Takeshita | Jul 1985 | A |
4534562 | Cuff et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4586712 | Lorber et al. | May 1986 | A |
4636846 | Villarreal | Jan 1987 | A |
4659082 | Greenberg | Apr 1987 | A |
4662637 | Pfeiffer | May 1987 | A |
4667959 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1987 | A |
4693480 | Smith | Sep 1987 | A |
4725079 | Koza et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4750743 | Nicoletti | Jun 1988 | A |
4770421 | Hoffman | Sep 1988 | A |
4807884 | Breeding | Feb 1989 | A |
4822050 | Normand et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4832341 | Muller et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832342 | Plevyak et al. | May 1989 | A |
4889367 | Miller | Dec 1989 | A |
4951950 | Normand et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4969648 | Hollinger et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4995615 | Cheng | Feb 1991 | A |
4998737 | Lamle | Mar 1991 | A |
5000453 | Stevens et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5053612 | Pielemeier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067713 | Soules et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5096197 | Embury | Mar 1992 | A |
5110134 | Laughlin et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114153 | Rosenwinkel et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121921 | Friedman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5186464 | Lamle | Feb 1993 | A |
5199710 | Lamle | Apr 1993 | A |
5216234 | Bell | Jun 1993 | A |
5240140 | Huen | Aug 1993 | A |
5259907 | Soules et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261667 | Breeding | Nov 1993 | A |
5275411 | Breeding | Jan 1994 | A |
5283422 | Storch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5303921 | Breeding | Apr 1994 | A |
5319181 | Shellhammer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5343028 | Figarella et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344146 | Lee | Sep 1994 | A |
5356145 | Verschoor | Oct 1994 | A |
5382024 | Blaha | Jan 1995 | A |
5397133 | Penzias | Mar 1995 | A |
5431399 | Kelley | Jul 1995 | A |
5445377 | Steinbach | Aug 1995 | A |
5518249 | Sines et al. | May 1996 | A |
5548110 | Storch et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575475 | Steinbach | Nov 1996 | A |
5584483 | Sines et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586936 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5669816 | Garczynski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676372 | Sines et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683085 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5685543 | Garner | Nov 1997 | A |
5690324 | Otomo et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692748 | Frisco et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695189 | Breeding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707287 | McCrea, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718427 | Cranford et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720484 | Hsu | Feb 1998 | A |
5780831 | Seo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791988 | Nomi | Aug 1998 | A |
5934866 | Redden | Aug 1999 | A |
5944310 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5989122 | Roblejo | Nov 1999 | A |
6019368 | Sines et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042150 | Daley | Mar 2000 | A |
6062481 | Storch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068258 | Breeding et al. | May 2000 | A |
6139014 | Breeding et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145838 | White | Nov 2000 | A |
6149154 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161476 | Yoneoka | Dec 2000 | A |
6220960 | Kryzhanovsky | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234898 | Belamant et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250632 | Albrecht | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254096 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267248 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276267 | Yoneoka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293546 | Hessing et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299167 | Sines et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299536 | Hill | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325373 | Breeding et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361044 | Block et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6439425 | Masek | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6502116 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6543770 | Kaji et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561897 | Bourbour et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568678 | Breeding et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6588750 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588751 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638161 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651981 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651982 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655684 | Grauzer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659460 | Blaha et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698756 | Baker et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719288 | Hessing et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726205 | Purton | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6746330 | Cannon | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6889979 | Blaha et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896618 | Benoy et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912812 | Inage | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6955599 | Bourbour et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6991540 | Marlow | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011309 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7073791 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7137627 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7255344 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7322576 | Grauzer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338044 | Grauzer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7390256 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7510186 | Fleckenstein | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20020063389 | Breeding et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020163125 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187921 | Rubeinstein | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036425 | Kaminkow et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030073498 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090059 | Grauzer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040005920 | Soltys et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040067789 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108255 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108654 | Grauzer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040169332 | Grauzer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224777 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259618 | Soltys et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012270 | Schubert et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023752 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040594 | Krenn et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059479 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062227 | Grauzer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073102 | Yoseloff et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093230 | Grauzer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050156318 | Douglas | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060001217 | Soltys et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060205519 | Soltys | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211481 | Soltys et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070004500 | Soltys et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080113781 | Soltys et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090115133 | Kelly et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090117994 | Kelly et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118001 | Kelly et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118006 | Kelly et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170594 | Delaney et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 39 502 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0 327 069 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 790 848 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 700 980 | Nov 1999 | EP |
530732 | Dec 1921 | FR |
24238 | Mar 1922 | FR |
WO 02051512 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 2006039308 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060205519 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60652115 | Feb 2005 | US |