Patent Grant
8572587
This invention relates generally to software provisioning. In particular, the invention relates to systems and methods for providing, maintaining, and provisioning virtual images in a software provisioning environment.
Software provisioning is the process of selecting a target machine, such as a server, loading the appropriate software (operating system, device drivers, middleware, and applications), and customizing and configuring the system and the software to make it ready for operation. Software provisioning can entail a variety of tasks, such as creating or changing a boot image, specifying parameters, e.g. IP address, IP gateway, to find associated network and storage resources, and then starting the machine and its newly-loaded software. Typically, a system administrator will perform these tasks using various tools because of the complexity of these tasks. Unfortunately, there is a lack of provisioning control tools that can adequately integrate and automate these tasks.
For most software provisioning, the software being installed must be customized and configured for each system in order to make it ready for operation. This installation processes must be repeated multiple times for a large network of systems. Often, the same or identical software is the subject of the installation process and must be installed in, and configured for, each system.
Various features of the embodiments can be more fully appreciated, as the same become better understood with reference to the following detailed description of the embodiments when considered in connection with the accompanying figures, in which;
For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the present invention are described by referring mainly to exemplary embodiments thereof. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize that the same principles are equally applicable to, and can be implemented in, all types of information and systems, and that any such variations do not depart from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Moreover, in the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying figures, which illustrate specific embodiments. Electrical, mechanical, logical and structural changes may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Embodiments of the present teachings relate to systems and methods for providing and provisioning virtual images in a software provisioning environment. More particularly, a provisioning server can maintain a library of virtual images and perform provisioning process on target machines utilizing the virtual images.
According to embodiments, the provisioning server can be configured to maintain a library of virtual images. The virtual images can be a disk image of software that has been previously installed according to metadata. The metadata can represent parameters utilized to create the virtual image and the parameters required to provision the virtual image on a target machine. The provisioning server can be configured to maintain the metadata for a virtual image in a virtual image record associated with the virtual image.
According to embodiments, the provisioning server can be configured to provision a virtual image to one or more target machines. To provision the virtual image, the provisioning server can be configured to copy the virtual image to a storage device on the one or more target machines and configure the target machine according to metadata in the associated virtual image record. The provisioning server can be configured to provision and instantiate the virtual image directly or instruct a helper client to provision and instantiate the virtual image.
According to embodiments, the provisioning server can be configured to generate the virtual images and store the virtual images in the library of virtual images. Additionally, the provisioning server can be configured to create the virtual image record from the metadata associated with the virtual image. Likewise, the provisioning server can be configured to receive the virtual image, metadata, and/or virtual image record from an external source.
By utilizing a virtual image to deliver software, the provisioning server can install an instance of software once, create the virtual image, and clone the virtual image on any number of target machines. Because the virtual image includes the software in an installed state, the time for provisioning duplicate or similar software can be reduced by copying the virtual image to a target machine, thereby eliminating the need to re-install duplicate or similar software on each target machine.
In particular, the provisioning environment 100 can manage software provisioning using a hierarchy of commands. In exemplary embodiments, the hierarchy can include at least four levels of commands. The lowest level in the hierarchy can comprise distribution commands, which primarily handle base operating system specific tasks of provisioning. The second level can comprise profile commands, which associate a configuration file, such as a kickstart file for Linux or other operating system, with a distribution and optionally allow for customization. The third level comprises system commands, which associate remote systems that are involved with the provisioning of the software. The fourth level comprises repository commands, which address configurations and tasks related to updating the software, remote installation procedures, and optionally customizing the software.
The provisioning environment 100 provides several capabilities and advantages over the known provisioning solutions. For example, the present invention is capable of handling a variety of forms of installations, such as preboot execution environment (“PXE”), virtualization, re-installations, and image installations.
In exemplary aspects, the provisioning environment 100 enables integrating virtualization into a PXE provisioning infrastructure and provides several options to reinstall running machines as well. The provisioning environment 100 can integrate mirroring of package repositories with the provisioning process, so that a provisioning server may serve as a central mirror point of contact for all of an organization's software needs. In aspects, a set of remote mirrored repositories can automatically be used by provisioned systems without additional setup.
Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary aspects the provisioning environment 100. The provisioning environment 100 can be applied to provisioning any form of software, such as Windows systems, UNIX systems, and Linux systems. In the exemplary description that follows,
In provisioning of software such as Linux, many system administrators use what is known as the “kickstart” installation method. Kickstart files are files that specify the intended configuration of the software being provisioned. Kickstart files can be kept on a server and can be read by individual computers during the installation. This installation method allows the use of a single or relatively few standard kickstart files to install Linux on multiple machines, making it ideal for network and system administrators.
The kickstart file can be a simple text file, containing a list of items, each identified by a keyword. In general, a kickstart file can be edited with any text editor or word processor that can save files as ASCII text. One skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be applied to non-kickstart files in software provisioning. For example, configuration files such as AutoYAST Answer files used in Novell SuSe Linux and Sun Solaris Jumpstart files may also be used by the provisioning environment 100.
Typically, a kickstart file can be copied to the boot disk, or made available on the network. The network-based approach is most commonly used, as most kickstart installations for software provisioning, such as Linux systems, tend to be performed via a network using NES, FTP, or HTTP on networked computers. Administrators also find it desirable that kickstart installations can be performed using a local CD-ROM, or a local hard drive.
Using kickstart files, a system administrator can create a single file containing the parameters that are needed to complete a typical software installation. For example, kickstart files specify parameters related to: language selection; mouse configuration; keyboard selection; boot loader installation; disk partitioning; network configuration; NIS, LDAP, Kerberos, Hesiod, and Samba authentication; firewall configuration; and package selection.
According to exemplary aspects illustrated in
The provisioning server (from herein referred to as a “cobbler”) 102 is responsible for: serving as an extensible markup language remote procedure call (XMLRPC) handler, linking to or mirroring install distribution trees and a configuration database; hosting kickstart templates; hosting plugins; generating installation images, and the like. The cobbler server 102 can be implemented as software, such as Python code, installed on a boot server machine and provide a command line interface for configuration of the boot server. In addition, the cobbler server 102 can make itself available as a Python application programming interface (API) for use by higher level management software (not shown). The cobbler server 102 supports provisioning via PXE, image (ISO) installation, virtualization, re-provisioning. As will be described later, the last two modes are performed with the assistance of a helper client 114.
The code repository 104 is responsible for hosting distributions 106 and 108. The code repository 104 can be implemented using well known components of hardware and software. Additionally, the code repository 104 can include one or more repositories hosting distributions. The distributions 106 and 108 can include bundles of software that are already compiled and configured. The distributions 106 and 108 may be in the form of either rpm, deb, tgz, msi, exe formats, and the like. For example, as Linux distributions, the distributions 106 and 108 are bundles of software that comprise the Linux kernel, the non-kernel parts of the operating system, and assorted other software. The distributions 106 and 108 can take a variety of forms, from fully-featured desktop and server operating systems to minimal environments.
In exemplary aspects, the installation templates 110 are any data structure or processing element that can be combined with a set of installation configurations and processed to produce a resulting configuration file, such as a kickstart file.
In exemplary aspects, exception plugins 112 are software that interact with cobbler server 102 to customize the provisioning of software. In general, the exception plugins 112 are intended to address infrequent customization needs.
In exemplary aspects, the helper client (known as “koan”, which stands for “kickstart-over-a-network”) 114 can assist the cobbler server 102 during the provisioning processes. The koan 114 can allow for both network provisioning of new virtualized guests and destructive provisioning of any existing system. When invoked, the koan 114 can request profile information from a remote boot server that has been configured with the cobbler server 102. In some aspects, what the koan 114 does with the profile data depends on whether it was invoked with -virt or replace-self.
In exemplary aspects, the koan 114 can enable replacing running systems as well as installing virtualized profiles. The koan 114 can also be pushed out to systems automatically from the boot server. In some aspects, the koan client 114 is also written in Python code to accommodate a variety of operating systems, machine architectures, etc.
In exemplary aspects, the network 115 can include a number of the target machines 116. The target machines 116 can represent the particular machines to which software provisioning is directed. The target machines 116 can represent a wide variety of computing devices, such as personal computers, servers, laptop computers, personal mobile devices, and the like. In some aspects, the target machines 116 can represent distributed computing environments such as cloud computing environments. Although
In exemplary aspects, the provisioning database 120 can serve as a data storage location for holding data used by the cobbler server 102. For example, as shown, the provisioning database 120 can comprise the distribution tree list 122 and the template list 124. The distribution tree list 122 can provide an inventory of the distributions 106 and 108 that are hosted or mirrored by the cobbler server 102. The template list 124 can provide an inventory of the templates 110 that are hosted by the cobbler server 102.
As noted above, the cobbler server 102 can manage provisioning using a hierarchical concept of distribution commands, profile commands, system commands, and repository commands. This framework enables the cobbler server 102 to abstract the differences between multiple provisioning types (installation, reinstallation, and virtualization) and allows installation of all three from a common platform. This hierarchy of commands also permits the cobbler server 102 to integrate software repositories 126 with the provisioning process, thus allowing systems to be configured as a mirror for software updates and third party content as well as distribution content.
Distributions can contain information about base operating system tasks, such as what kernel and initial ramdisk (“initrd”) are used in the provisioning, along with other information, such as required kernel parameters. Profiles associate one of the distributions 106 and 108 with a kickstart file and optionally customize it further, for example, using plugins 112. System commands associate a hostname, IP, or (machine access control) MAC with a distribution and optionally customize the profile further. Repositories contain update information, such as yum mirror information that the cobbler server 102 uses to mirror repository 104. The cobbler server 102 can also manage (generate) dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) configuration files using the templates 110.
In exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can use a provisioning environment that is fully templated, allowing for kickstarts and PXE files to be customized by the user. The cobbler server 102 uses the concept of “profiles” as an intermediate step between the operating system and the installed system. A profile is a description of what a system does rather than the software to be installed. For instance, a profile might describe a virtual web server with X amount of RAM, Y amounts of disk space, ruling a Linux distribution Z, and with an answer file W.
In exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can provide a command line interface to configure a boot server in which it is installed. For example, the format of the cobbler server 102 commands can be generally in the format of: cobbler command [subcommand][-arg1=][-arg2=]. Thus, a user can specify various aspects of software provisioning via a single interface, such as a command line interface or other known interface. Examples of exemplary cobbler commands can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/763,315, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008-0288938 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/763,333, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008-0288939, all assigned to Red Hat Corporation, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein, in their entirety, by reference.
According to exemplary aspects, a user can use various commands of the provisioning environment 100 to specify distributions and install trees hosted by the code repository 104, such as a distribution from the distributions 106 or 108. A user can add or import a distribution or import it from installation media or an external network location.
According to exemplary aspects, in order to import a distribution, the cobbler server 102 can auto-add distributions and profiles from remote sources, whether this is an installation media (such as a DVD), an NFS path, or an rsync mirror. When importing an rsync mirror, the cobbler server 102 can try to detect the distribution type and automatically assign kickstarts. By default in some embodiments, the cobbler server can provision by erasing the hard drive, setting up eth0 for DHCP, and using a default password. If this is undesirable, an administrator may edit the kickstart files in /etc/cobbler to do something else or change the kickstart setting after the cobbler server 102 creates the profile.
According to exemplary aspects, a user may map profiles to the distributions and map systems to the profiles using profile commands and systems commands of the provisioning environment 100. A profile associates a distribution to additional specialized options, such as a kickstart automation file. In the cobbler server 102, profiles are the unit of provisioning and at least one profile exists for every distribution to be provisioned. A profile might represent, for instance, a web server or desktop configuration.
According to exemplary aspects, a user can map systems to profiles using system commands. System commands can assign a piece of hardware with cobbler server 102 to a profile. Systems can be defined by hostname, Internet Protocol (IP) address, or machine access control (MAC) address. When available, use of the MAC address to assign systems can be preferred.
According to exemplary aspects, the user can map repositories and profiles using repository commands. Repository commands can address configurations and tasks related to updating the software, remote installation procedures, and optionally customizing the software. These repository commands can also specify mirroring of the provisioned software to remote servers. Repository mirroring can allow the cobbler server 102 to mirror not only the trees 106 and 108, but also optional packages, third party content, and updates. Mirroring can be useful for faster, more up-to-date installations and faster updates, or providing software on restricted networks. The cobbler server 102 can also include other administrative features, such as allowing the user to view their provisioning configuration or information tracking the status of a requested software installation.
According to exemplary aspects, a user can utilize commands to create a provisioning infrastructure from a distribution mirror. Then a default PXE configuration is created, so that by default, systems will PXE boot into a fully automated install process for that distribution. The distribution mirror can be a network rsync mirror or a mounted DVD location.
According to exemplary aspects, the administrator uses a local kernel and initrd file (already downloaded), and shows how profiles would be created using two different kickstarts—one for a web server configuration and one for a database server Then, a machine can be assigned to each profile.
According to exemplary aspects, a repo mirror can be set up for two repositories, and create a profile that will auto install those repository configurations on provisioned systems using that profile.
According to exemplary aspects, in addition to normal provisioning, the cobbler server 102 can support yet another option, called “enchant”. Enchant takes a configuration that has already been defined and applies it to a remote system that might not have the remote helper program installed. Users can use this command to replace a server that is being repurposed, or when no PXE environment can be created. Thus, the enchant option allows the remote the koan client 114 to be executed remotely from the cobbler server 102.
According to aspects, if the cobbler server 102 is configured to mirror certain repositories, the cobbler server 102 can then be used to associate profiles with those repositories. Systems installed under those profiles can be auto configured to use these repository mirrors in commands and, if supported, these repositories can be leveraged. This can be useful for a large install base, when fast installation and upgrades for systems are desired, or software not in a standard repository exists and provisioned systems desire to know about that repository.
According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can also keep track of the status of kickstarting machines. For example, the “cobbler status” will show when the cobbler server 102 thinks a machine started kickstarting and when it last requested a file. This can be a desirable way to track machines that may have gone inactive during kickstarts. The cobbler server 102 can also make a special request in the post section of the kickstart to signal when a machine is finished kickstarting.
According to exemplary aspects, for certain commands, the cobbler server 102 will create new virtualized guests on a machine in accordance with orders from the cobbler server 102. Once finished, an administrator can use additional commands on the guest or other operations. The cobbler server 102 can automatically name domains based on their MAC addresses. For re-kickstarting, the cobbler server 102 can reprovision the system, deleting any current data and replacing it with the results of a network install.
According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can configure boot methods for the provisioning requested by the user. For example, the cobbler server 102 can configure a PXE environment, such as a network card BIOS. Alternatively, the cobbler server 102 can compile and configure information for koan client 104. The cobbler server 102 can also optionally configure DHCP and DNS configuration information.
According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can serve the request of the koan client 114. The koan client 114 can acknowledge the service of information of the cobbler server 102 and can then initiate installation of the software being provisioned. Additionally, the koan client 114 can either install the requested software, e.g., replace the existing operating system, or install a virtual machine.
As shown in
In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provide provisioning processes for software distributions utilizing provisioning objects as described above. In the provisioning processes for software distributions, the cobbler server 102 installs a particular software distribution on a target machine 205 utilizing the provisioning objects such as profiles and templates.
In embodiments, the provisioning objects can include all the data required by a cobbler server to perform the software provisioning processes, such as the process described above, supported by the cobbler server For example, the provisioning objects can include software distributions; configuration templates (templates for generating configuration files, such as kickstart files); distribution profile information (mapping a distribution to profile; a configuration template or a configuration file, and additional preferences, such as kernel options, template variables, or virtual machine settings); target machine information (information representing the mapping of a physical piece of hardware, plus hardware specific customizations, to a profile that it should run); repos information (information representing external or internal software repositories stored on the cobbler server); images (such as distributions representing an undefined executable image (like “memtest”); a virtual machine to be cloned, or an ISO file for use in installing a virtual machine); and the like.
In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to maintain a library 210 of virtual images 215 and configured to perform provisioning processes utilizing virtual images 215 from the library 210 on the target machines 205. Each virtual image 215 can be a disk image of software that has been previously installed according to metadata. As such, the virtual image 215 can consist of the bits of the installed software. The software, contained in the virtual image 215, can include any number and type of applications and portions of an OS to support the applications. The cobbler server 102 can be configured to maintain the virtual images 215 in the library 210, a location of the virtual images 215 in the library 210 (if the virtual images 215 are stored remotely), or combinations thereof. The cobbler server 102 can be configured to maintain the library 210 in any type of storage device or system (CD, DVD, hard drive, portable storage memory, database etc.) whether local to the cobbler server 102 or remotely located.
In embodiments, the metadata, associated with a virtual image 215, can include parameters such as types of hardware or resources associated with the virtual image (processors, memory, storage, network interfaces, etc.), amount of hardware or resources associated with the virtual image (the amount of memory associated with the virtual image, the amount storage associated with the virtual image, etc.), configuration of the hardware or resources (the network settings for the virtual image, etc.), and the like. These parameters, contained in the metadata, can represent the parameters utilized to create the virtual image 215 and the parameters required to provision the virtual image 215 on a target machine 205.
In embodiments, to support provisioning the virtual images 215, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to maintain a set of virtual image records 220. The set of virtual image records 220 contains one or more virtual image records 225 associated with each virtual image 215 in the library 210. A virtual image record 225 can be configured to contain an identification of a particular virtual image 215, with which it is associated, and the metadata associated with the particular virtual image 215. Additionally, a particular virtual image 215 can be associated with multiple virtual image records 225. Each of the multiple virtual image records 225, associated with a particular virtual image 215, can contain different metadata representing different parameters utilized to create the particular virtual image 215 and the different parameters required to provision the particular virtual image 215 on a target machine 205. The cobbler server 102 can be configured to utilize the set of virtual image records 220 for provisioning the virtual image 215 on the target machines 205.
In embodiments, the virtual images 215 contained in the library 210 can originate from a variety of sources. The cobbler server 102 can be configured to generate the virtual images 215 and the virtual image records 225 associated with the generated virtual images 215. For example, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to communicate with a storage device 230. The storage device 230 can be any type of storage device or system (CD, DVD, hard drive, portable storage memory, database etc.) whether local to the cobbler server 102 or remotely located. To generate the virtual image 215, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to select a particular software distribution to install and determine the metadata for the virtual image 215. The metadata can be based on the parameters required by the particular software distribution. Once selected, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to install the particular software distribution on the storage device 230 according to the metadata.
In embodiments, after installation of the particular software distribution, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to copy the data (e.g. image of the bits) for the installed software distribution and configured to store the copy in the library 210 as the virtual image 215. Alternatively, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to store a location of the virtual image 215 in the library 210, if the virtual image is stored remotely. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to store the metadata as a virtual image record 225 in the set of virtual image records 220.
In the embodiments as described above, the cobbler server 102 can generate the virtual image 215. Also, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to receive a virtual image 215 from an external source and store the virtual image 215 in the library 210. Also, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to receive metadata or a virtual image record 225 from an external source in order to generate a virtual image 215 or to associate with a received virtual image 215.
In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provision any of the virtual images 215 stored in the library 210 to any of the target machines 205. To achieve this, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to select a virtual image 215 from the library 210. After selecting the virtual image 215, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to determine the associated virtual image record 225 from the set of virtual image records 220. To determine the associated virtual image record 225, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to search the set of virtual image records 220 in order to locate the virtual image records 225 that contain the identification of the selected virtual image 215.
In embodiments, after selecting the virtual image 215 and determining the associated virtual image record 225, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provided the selected virtual image 215 and the associated virtual image record 225 to the target machine 205 subject to the provisioning. To provide both, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to instruct the koan client 114 to retrieve the virtual image 215 and the associated image record 225. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provide the virtual image 215 and associated virtual image record 225 directly to the koan client 114.
In embodiments, after the virtual image 215 and the associated virtual image record 225 has been provided, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to instruct the koan client 114 to instantiate the virtual image 215 on the target machine 205. The koan client 114 can be configured to examine the associated virtual image record 225 to determine the metadata for the virtual image 215. Then, the koan client 114 can be configured to copy the virtual image 215 to a storage device that meets the parameters of the metadata. Additionally, the koan client 114 can configure the target machine 205, as necessary, according to the metadata of the virtual image record 225 in order to facilitate proper operation of the virtual image 215.
In the embodiments, as described above, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to operate in conjunction with the koan client 114 to provision the virtual image 215. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provision the virtual image, independently. To achieve this, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to examine the associated virtual image record 225 to determine the metadata for the virtual image 215. Then, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to copy the virtual image 215 to a storage device that meets the parameters of the metadata. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can configure the target machine 205, as necessary, according to the metadata of the virtual image record 225 in order to facilitate proper operation of the virtual image 215.
In embodiments as described above, the virtual image 215 can be instantiated according to the virtual image record 225, as stored in the set of virtual image records 220. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to alter the metadata of the virtual image record 225 prior to instantiating the virtual image 215. As such, the cobbler server 102 can tailor the instantiation of the virtual image 215 for the target machines 205.
In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can initiate provisioning a virtual image 215 upon the occurrence of a number of events. The cobbler server 102 can be configured to receive a request to provision a particular virtual image 215. The request can originate from any source such as a target machine 205, a user of a target machine 205, an operator of the cobbler server 102, or any other source. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to automatically initiate provisioning a virtual image 215. For example, the cobbler server 102 can initiate provisioning of a virtual image 215 when a new target machine 205 is added to the network 115, when a target machine 205 experiences errors or catastrophic failure, and the like. For instance, the cobbler server 102 can provide a virtual image 215, comprising a basic OS and applications, so that the new target machine 205 will include basic software to operate.
In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to associate the virtual images 215 and the associated virtual image records 225 with other provisioning objects. For example, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to associate a particular virtual image 215 and associated virtual image records 225 with the a system record for a particular target machine 205. As such, when a provisioning process is initiated for the virtual image 215 associated with the system record, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to utilize the information in the system record (identification of the target machine 205, resources of the target machine 205, etc.) in the provisioning process.
Processor 302 further communicates with network interface 306, such as an Ethernet or wireless data connection, which in turn communicates with one or more networks 115, such as the Internet or other public or private networks. Processor 302 also communicates with the provisioning database 120, and the cobbler server 102, to execute control logic and perform the virtual image processes described above and below.
As illustrated, the cobbler server 102 can be implemented as a software application or program capable of being executed by a conventional computer platform. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can also be implemented as a software module or program module capable of being incorporated in other software applications and programs. In either case, the cobbler server 102 can be implemented in any type of conventional proprietary or open-source computer language.
After installation of the particular software distribution, the cobbler server 102 can copy the data (e.g. image of the bits) for the installed software distribution and store the copy in the library 210 as the virtual image 215. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can store the metadata as a virtual image record 225 in the set of virtual image records 220.
In 406, the cobbler server 102 can optionally receive one or more virtual images 215 from external sources and store the virtual images 215 in the library 210. For example, the cobbler server 102 can receive a virtual image 215 from an external source and store the virtual image 215 in the library 210. Also, the cobbler server 102 can receive metadata or a virtual image record 225 from an external source in order to generate a virtual image 215 or associate with a received virtual image 215.
In 408, the cobbler server 102 can initiate provisioning a virtual image 215 on a target machine 205. The cobbler server 102 can initiate provisioning a virtual image 215 upon the occurrence of a number of events. For example, the cobbler server 102 can receive a request to provision a particular virtual image 215. The request can originate from any source such as a target machine 205, a user of a target machine 205, an operator of the cobbler server 102, or any other source. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can automatically initiate provisioning a virtual image 215.
In 410, the cobbler server 102 can determine a virtual image record 225 associated with the virtual image 215 to be provisioned. For example, to determine the associated virtual image record 225, the cobbler server 102 can search the set of virtual image records 220 in order to locate the virtual image records 225 that contain the identification of the virtual image 215.
In 412, the cobbler server 102 can provide the virtual image 215 to the target machine 205. For example, the cobbler server 102 can instruct the koan client 114 to retrieve the virtual image 215 and associated virtual image record 225. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to provide the virtual image 215 and associated virtual image record 225 directly to the koan client 114. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can provide the virtual image 215 to the target machine without utilizing the koan client 114.
In 414, the cobbler server 102 can instantiate the virtual image 215 on the target machine 205. For example, the cobbler server 102 can instruct the koan client 114 to instantiate the virtual image 215 on the target machine 205. The koan client 114 can examine the associated virtual image record 225 to determine the metadata for the virtual image 215. Then, the koan client 114 can copy the virtual image 215 to a storage device that meets the parameters of the metadata. Additionally, the koan client 114 can configure the target machine 205, as necessary, according to the metadata of the virtual image record 225 in order to facilitate proper operation of the virtual image 215.
Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can instantiate the virtual image 215, independently. The cobbler server 102 can examine the associated virtual image record 225 to determine the metadata for the virtual image 215. Then, the cobbler server 102 can to copy the virtual image 215 to a storage device that meets the parameters of the metadata. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can configure the target machine 205, as necessary, according to the metadata of the virtual image record 225 in order to facilitate proper operation of the virtual image 215.
In 416, the process can end, but the process can return to any point and repeat.
While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments without departing from the true spirit and scope. The terms and descriptions used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. In particular, although the method has been described by examples, the steps of the method may be performed in a different order than illustrated or simultaneously. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.” As used herein, the term “one or more of” with respect to a listing of items such as, for example, A and B, means A alone, B alone, or A and B. Those skilled in the art will recognize that these and other variations are possible within the spirit and scope as defined in the following claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5787246 | Lichtman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5835719 | Gibson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5948062 | Tzelnic et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6105100 | Dean et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6212585 | Chrabaszcz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6243747 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6272536 | van Hoff et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6381742 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6415289 | Williams et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6438711 | Woodruff | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6516427 | Keyes et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526442 | Stupek et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6550021 | Dalphy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6557169 | Erpeldinger | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6594664 | Estrada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6625742 | Owhadi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6678888 | Sakanishi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6686838 | Rezvani et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691225 | Suffin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6751659 | Fenger et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757837 | Platt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6769022 | DeKoning et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6779004 | Zintel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6845464 | Gold | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6865737 | Lucas et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6941518 | French et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947939 | Fujibayashi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6966058 | Earl et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6986033 | Miyamoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7013461 | Hellerstein et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7051101 | Dubrovsky et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058797 | Miyamoto et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7107330 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7133822 | Jacobson | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7165109 | Chiloyan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7185071 | Berg et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7200845 | Morrison et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7207039 | Komarla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7340637 | Nagoya | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350112 | Fox et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7395322 | Harvey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7506040 | Rabe et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7506151 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7516218 | Besson | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7519691 | Nichols et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7574481 | Moore et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7600005 | Jamkhedkar et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606868 | Le et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7640325 | DeKoning et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7673130 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681080 | Abali et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7716316 | Nichols et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7734717 | Saarimaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7827261 | Griswold et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7831692 | French et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831997 | Eldar et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7937437 | Fujii | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8103776 | DeHaan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8132166 | DeHaan | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8185891 | DeHaan | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8244836 | DeHaan | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8271975 | DeHaan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20020062259 | Katz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078186 | Engel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138567 | Ogawa | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162028 | Kennedy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005097 | Barnard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055919 | Fong et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069884 | Nair et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069946 | Nair et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070110 | Aija et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074549 | Paul et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110173 | Marsland | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119480 | Mohammed | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126585 | Parry | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195921 | Becker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212992 | Ronning et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233648 | Earl et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006616 | Quinn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015831 | Bowhill | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015957 | Zara et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019876 | Dravida et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024984 | Lanzatella et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044643 | deVries et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054789 | Breh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059703 | Chappell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064501 | Jan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128375 | Rockwell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143664 | Usa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167975 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215755 | O'Neill | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223469 | Bahl et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050028025 | Zalewski et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050175 | Fong et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114474 | Anderson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125525 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177829 | Vishwanath | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182796 | Chu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198629 | Vishwanath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223374 | Wishart et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060041767 | Maxwell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080659 | Ganji | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095230 | Grier et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095702 | Hickman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155857 | Feenan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173912 | Lindvall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174018 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190575 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190773 | Rao et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200658 | Penkethman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215575 | Horton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218544 | Chakraborty et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230165 | Zimmer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282479 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015538 | Wang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067419 | Bennett | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101118 | Raghunath et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118654 | Jamkhedkar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168721 | Luiro et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070169093 | Logan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192158 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204338 | Aiello et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226810 | Hotti | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234337 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244996 | Ahmed et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276905 | Durand et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288612 | Hall | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294376 | Ayachitula et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299951 | Krithivas | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080028048 | Shekar et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040452 | Rao et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046708 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059959 | Chen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130639 | Costa-Requena et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189693 | Pathak | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196043 | Feinleib et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235266 | Huang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235361 | Crosbie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080244325 | Tyulenev | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270674 | Ginzton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288938 | DeHaan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288939 | DeHaan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294777 | Karve et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301666 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313716 | Park | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320110 | Pathak | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090007091 | Appiah et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055901 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064132 | Suchy et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089567 | Boland et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089852 | Randolph et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106291 | Ku et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129597 | Zimmer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132682 | Counterman | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132710 | Pelley | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158148 | Vellanki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158272 | El-Assir et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164522 | Fahey | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165099 | Eldar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172430 | Takenouchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240835 | Adelman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259665 | Howe et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265707 | Goodman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282404 | Khandekar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285199 | Strahs et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023740 | Moon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049838 | DeHaan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100050169 | DeHaan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054156 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057833 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057890 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057913 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057930 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058307 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058327 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058328 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058330 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058332 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058444 | DeHaan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083245 | DeHaan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100876 | Glover et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128639 | DeHaan | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131648 | DeHaan | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138521 | DeHaan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138526 | DeHaan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138696 | DeHaan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217840 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217843 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217848 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217944 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100218243 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220584 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223367 | DeHaan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223504 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223607 | DeHaan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223608 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223609 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250907 | DeHaan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306337 | DeHaan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306380 | DeHaan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333084 | DeHaan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110131304 | Henson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131384 | Henson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120151470 | DeHaan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Novak, Judit, “Automatic Installation and Configuration for Large Scale Farms”, 2005. |
| Quintero et al., “Introduction to pSeries Provisioning”, 2004. |
| Maghraoui et al., “Model Driven Provisioning: Bridging the Gap Between Declarative Object Models and Procedural Provisioning Tools”, 2006. |
| USPTO Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,315. |
| USPTO Office Action mailed Apr. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,315. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,315. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed May 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,998. |
| USPTO Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,333. |
| USPTO Office Action mailed Apr. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,333. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 27, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,333. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Providing Configuration Management Services from a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,941, filed Mar. 31, 2009. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Retiring Target Machines by a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,427, filed May 29, 2009. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Centrally Managing Multiple Provisioning Servers”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,193, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Assigning Provisioning Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,646, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Remote Software Provisioning to Machines”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,633, filed Aug. 21, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Storage Allocation in Provisioning of Virtual Machines”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,178, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Customized Actions Related to Software Provisioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,552, filed Aug. 28, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Automatically Locating a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,290, filed Aug. 26, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Managing Access in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,832, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Importing Software Distributions in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,631, filed Aug. 28, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Managing Network Connections Associated with Provisioning Objects in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,690, filed Sep. 26, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Monitoring Software Provisioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,378, filed Aug. 26, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Software Provisioning in Multiple Network Configuration Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,194, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Differential Software Provisioning on Virtual Machines Having Different Configurations”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,019, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Automatically Registering New Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/194,754, filed Aug. 20, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Software Provisioning Machines Having Virtual Storage Resources”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,189, filed Aug. 29, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Managing Network Connections in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,681, filed Sep. 26, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Providing a Rescue Environment in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,007, filed Nov. 28, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Monitoring Hardware Resource in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,056, filed Nov. 28, 2008. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Power Management Services in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/277,518, filed Nov. 25, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Providing Hardware Updates in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,991, filed Nov. 28, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Supporting Multiple Name Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,572, filed Nov. 26, 2008. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Secure Gated File Deployment Associated with Provisioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,754, filed Feb. 26, 2009. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Integrating Software Provisioning and Configuration Management”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,379, filed Feb. 27, 2009. |
| DeHaan, Systems and Methods for Abstracting Software Content Management in a Software Provisioning Environment, U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,273, filed Feb. 27, 2009. |
| DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Inventorying Un-Provisioned Systems in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,588, filed Feb. 24, 2009. |
| DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Managing Configurations of Storage Devices in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,613, filed Feb. 26, 2009. |
| DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Collecting and Altering Firmware Configurations of Target Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,319, filed Feb. 26, 2009. |
| DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Replicating Provisioning Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,508, filed Feb. 25, 2009. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Cloning Target Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,014, filed May 27, 2009. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Provisioning Software”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,315, filed Jun. 14, 2007. |
| DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Provisioning Software”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,333, filed Jun. 14, 2007. |
| HP Storage Essentials SRM 6.0 Installation Guide. Jan. 2008. HP. 1st ed. Part No. T4283-96113. pp. 1-5, 97-136, 219-228. |
| HP Storage Essentials SRM 6.0 User Guide. Jan. 2008. HP. 1st ed. Part No. T4238-96114. pp. 1-83. |
| Michael DeHaan. “Unfiled Provisioning”, 2007. |
| Michael DeHaan. “Provisioning With Cobbler”. 2007. |
| Tan et al. “A WBEM Basked Disk Array Management Provider”. 2005, IEEE. 2005 International Conference on Cyberworlds. |
| Lovelace et al. Managing Disk Subsystems using IBM TotalStorage Productivity Center. Sep. 2005. IBM. 2nd ed, SG24-7097-01. pp. 1-42. |
| DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Message-Based Installation Management Using Message Bus”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,077, filed Jun. 30, 2009. |
| Henson, “Systems and Methods for Integrating Storage Resources from Storage Area Network in Machine Provisioning Platform”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/628,041, filed Nov. 30, 2009. |
| Henson, “Systems and Methods for Mounting Specified Storage Resources from Storage Area Network in Machine Provisioning Platform”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/627,988, filed Nov. 30, 2009. |
| Doc Searls “Linux for Suits”, 2005, Specialized System Consultants Inc., vol. 2005. |
| eBook “Microsoft System Management Server 2003 Administrator's companion”, Microsoft Press, c2004, Ch. 13, Patch Management, pp. 471-507. |
| Butt et al., “Automated Installation of Large-Scale Linux Networks”, 2000. |
| Agarwalla, “Automating Provisioning of Complete Software Stack in a Grid Environment”, 2004. |
| Anderson et al., “Technologies for Large-Scale Configuration Management”, Dec. 9, 2002. |
| Grosse, “Repository Mirroring”, 1995. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100223610 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
