Currently, Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) bearing is determined from a TCAS interrogation response signal, by a 4-element antenna array. The elements are spaced equally about the circumference of the antenna array, geometrically at 90-degree intervals. The relative bearing is determined by measuring the phase difference of the response signal between opposite element pairs.
The length between opposite elements is short (within ½ wave length of the 1090 MHz XPDR signal), thus the TCAS bearing measurements are vulnerable to noise and susceptible to coupling. Thus, TCAS II (recommends evasive maneuvers) bearing measurement can be inaccurate. Usually, the error is no more than 5 degrees but it can be greater than 30 degrees. The low bearing accuracy introduces a large uncertainty in the TCAS position that increases with range. Thus, a displayed TCAS target symbol can appear to jump, due to these errors/inaccuracies.
The invention includes systems and methods for improving bearing accuracy in a Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) environment. In an exemplary method an interrogation signal is transmitted from an array of antenna elements. A response to the transmitted interrogation signal from a target is received at a first pair of elements of the array of antenna elements. The first pair of elements are separated by at most ½λ of the response signal. A processor determines coarse bearing of the received response. A second pair of elements of the array of antenna elements receives a response to the transmitted interrogation signal. The second pair of elements is separated by approximately Nλ of the response signal. N is an integer not equal to zero. A first bearing value for the target is determined based on the determined coarse bearing and the received response at the second pair of elements.
In other aspects of the invention, the array of antenna elements is mounted on an aircraft or on a ground installation.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
In one embodiment, the aircraft 20 includes only one of the two four-element antennas 30, 32. The TCAS processor 24 reduces error in a more accurate bearing value produced by a first pair of the four-element antenna using information associated with a coarse bearing value determined by the other three elements (two pairs) of the four element antenna 30, 32. Thus, a highly accurate bearing is produced using only a single four-element antenna 30, 32. Further errors may be reduced by using both top and bottom four-element antennas 30, 32. This will be described in more detail below.
The spacing between top antenna elements ET1, ET2 and ET1, ET4 is identical (½λ or less). λ is the wavelength of XPDR response signal carrier in 1090 MHz. Lines connecting ET1, ET2 and ET1, ET4 are perpendicular to each other. In one embodiment, the elements ET1, ET2, and ET4 are integrated into one directional antenna and ET3 is an omniblade antenna. ET3 is located Nλ spacing to ET1, and has the same spacing to ET2 and ET4.
The bottom antenna elements have the similar setup with the top elements, and with axes determined by ET1, ET3 and EB1, EB3 that are perpendicular to each other.
In this configuration, frequency drift introduced error, and elevation angle error contributed by attitude, range and altitude errors can be removed from fine bearing by utilizing perpendicular unambiguous determination of φT13 and φB13.
The idea for improving the TCAS bearing measurement is to modify the existing directional antenna by extending the distance between one pair of its elements (EB1 and EB3; ET1 and ET3) with one antenna being a directional antenna and one being an omni-blade non-directional antenna.
EB1 and EB2 (or ET1 and ET2) determine phase deviation in sine component φ12=K sin(β); EB1 and EB4 (or ET1 and ET4) determine phase deviation in cosine component φ14=K cos(β); a coarse bearing can thus be determined, β=tan−1(K sin(β)/K cos(β)). U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,808 discloses similar bearing determinations and is hereby incorporated by reference.
By example, EB1 and EB3 measure phase difference φ13mε(−π, π). When considering the solutions in the first bearing quadrant (−π/4, π/4), the actual phase difference can be,
φ13={2πn+φ13m,(2n+1)π+φ13m},
n=0, 1, 2 . . . N−1.
N is the number of wavelengths between E1 and E3.
Within the plane of the aircraft 20, the fine bearing resolutions determined by φ13 can have very high accuracy and the final unambiguity is provided by the coarse bearing value. The same method can apply to the other three quadrants.
The following equations are simplified for fine bearing determination when the target aircraft and antenna array are on the same plane (elevation angle=0).
For bottom antenna,
β=π/4−sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (−π/4,3π/4),
β=5π/4+sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (3π/4,π),
β=−3π/4+sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (−π,−π/4).
For top antenna,
β=−π/4+sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (−3π/4,π/4),
β=3π/4−sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (π/4,π),
β=−5π/4−sin−1(φ13/2πN) when coarse bearing falls in (−π,−3π/4).
In practice, elevation angle should be involved in the calculation of fine bearing, if the fine bearing determination process only associate to top or bottom antenna alone.
If φT1T3 or (φB1B3) is available at the same time (through dual interrogation or from different interrogation cycles spaced by short interval), fine bearing can be further determined with φB1B3 and φT1T3, and elevation angle is no longer involved in the solution.
β=π/4−tan−1(φB1B3/φT1T3) where coarse bearingε(−π/4,3π/4),
β=5π/4−tan−1(φB1B3/φT1T3) where coarse bearingsε(3π/4,π),
β=−3π/4−tan−1(φB1B3/φT1T3) where coarse bearingε(−π,−π/4).
Target elevation angle e=f(α, β, γ, r, Δalt),
Other methods for determining fine bearing, such as by calculating every possible fine bearing by φT1T3 or φB1B3 or both, correlating the fine bearings with coarse bearing and finally determining the fine bearing.
In one embodiment, a TCAS 110 (
The TCAS 110 includes a processor 112 that is in data communication with an RF Module 114 and a display 116 or other output device. The RF Module 114 is connected to all the elements of a four-element inner antenna array 118 and four-element outer antenna array 120.
The outer antenna array 120 includes four omniblade (or comparable) antenna elements EO1-4 that surround the inner antenna array 118 on the same plane. The inner antenna array 118 includes elements EI1-4. Spaces between the antenna elements EO1 and EO3, EO2 and EO4 are Nλ. The axes determined by the elements EO1 and EO3, EO2 and EO4 are perpendicular to each other. The inner antenna array 118 may be a conventional TCAS directional finding antenna.
At a block 136, a response to the interrogation signal is received at the first set of antenna elements. Next, at a block 138, a coarse bearing value is determined based on the received response at the inner antenna array 118. Then, at block 142, an interrogation signal is transmitted from the inner antenna array 120. At a block 144, a response to the interrogation signal is received at the outer antenna array 120. Finally, at a block 150, a fine bearing value is determined (disambiguated) from the response received at the outer antenna array 120 based on the coarse bearing value associated with the inner antenna array 118.
In another embodiment, the fine bearing is determined by calculating every possible fine bearing by φB1B3 and φB2B4, correlating the fine bearings with coarse bearing and finally determining the fine bearing. Also, the phase measurement pairs are not limited to φO1O3 and φO2B4, φO1O4 and φO1O2, EO2O1 and EO2O3, EO2O3 and EO4O3, and EO1O4 and EO3O4 can also be used for calculation. Higher precision of antenna mounting and less deformation for ground installation will further elevate the accuracy and alleviate coupling bias.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2011/000293 | 2/25/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/13/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/113101 | 8/30/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5122808 | Kyriakos | Jun 1992 | A |
5469172 | Schleder et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
6169519 | Holecek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6222480 | Kuntman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285313 | Wahab et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6392598 | Jones et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7006032 | King et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7380455 | Workman | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7436350 | Maloratsky et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7439901 | Needham et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7576686 | Needham et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7825858 | Blessing et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20060267829 | Brandao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101375176 | Feb 2009 | CN |
1901087 | Mar 2008 | EP |
8904002 | May 1989 | WO |
2010009906 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of international application No. PCT/CN2011/000293, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 5 pp. |
International Search Report of international application No. PCT/CN2011/000293, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 4 pp. |
International Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/CN2011/000293, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 4 pp. |
First Office Action, and translation thereof, from Counterpart Chinese Patent Application No. 201180068474.4, dated Aug. 22, 2014, 14 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130325314 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |