The present application is related to co-pending, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/862,058 entitled “Virtual Security Device,” filed Jun. 4, 2004, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to conducting transactions for the generation of postage indicia and, more particularly, to providing localized functionality in browser based postage transactions.
Computer based systems for generating and printing postage indicia have been available for a number of years, see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,992 entitled “System and Method for Automatically Printing Postage on Mail” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,739 entitled “System and Method for Remote Postage Metering,” assigned to Stamps.com, Inc. the assignee of the present application. Such computer based systems have largely replaced more traditional postage meters in many market segments because of the widespread availability of appropriate host systems, ease of use, etc. However, there remains room for advancement with respect to the operation and use of such computer based systems in performing postage transactions.
Client server computer based postage indicia generation and printing systems typically invoke a series of server calls from the client in order to generate and print postage indicia. For example, a postage client may operate to collect data about a postal item and desired postal service from a user and issue a postage server call, transmitting the collected postal item information to the postage server, to obtain a postal rate for the postal item. If the user wishes to change an aspect of the desired postal service (e.g., request first class rather than overnight) or alters an aspect of the postal item (e.g., size or weight), another postage server call, transmitting the revised postal item information to the postage server, is made to obtain a revised postal rate for the postal item. Thereafter, the postage client may issue additional postage server calls for completing postage indicia generation, such as a postage server call to have the addressee information validated, a postage server call to obtain an insurance rate, etc. Upon completing the postage indicia generation processing to the user's satisfaction, a postage server call may be made by the postage client to request generation of the postage indicia and transmission of the postage indicia to the postage client for printing.
Each of the foregoing postage server calls requires appreciable time to complete (e.g., up to seconds or longer). Nevertheless, the client server model typically implements such centralized functionality to facilitate the use of a relatively thin postage client, thereby facilitating its widespread distribution and operation, to avoid issues with maintaining software and database updates throughout the network, etc.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods which implement localized functionality in a client server system using a technique of caching one or more functional objects for access in response to an appropriate server call. For example, embodiments of the invention provide a browser based postage indicia generation and printing solution in which a browser (upon which a postage client is operable) is controlled to cache one or more functional objects in the form of script files, such as may comprise postage rating scripts, postage insurance rate scripts, address validation scripts, etc. Such functional objects are preferably accessed by an appropriate postage server call, such as through the use of a corresponding uniform resource locator (URL) or other resource identifier, which is redirected to the cache by the browser. Accordingly, a client may be provided functionality associated with the functional object without experiencing the latency associated with communication to and from the corresponding server.
Embodiments of the invention operate to facilitate transparent management of the localized functional objects, to thereby provide appropriate updating of functional objects without requiring express user interaction or even knowledge of the updating. For example, when the data of any such functional object becomes out of date, or otherwise requires updating, the resource identifier for an updated functional object is provided to the client according to embodiments, and thus the previously cached functional object is no longer utilized by the client. Upon initially accessing the updated functional object, the updated functional object is preferably cached for subsequent use by the client.
Various functional objects may be optimized for caching by clients according to embodiments of the invention. For example, postal rating tables may be divided by zones (e.g., shipper location zones) and postage rating scripts created for each such zone. A postage client may thus access and cache a postage rating script for a zone appropriate to the user thereof, thereby avoiding transfer of the complete rating table information to the cache. Accordingly, in addition to avoiding latency associated with communication to and from a postage server for rating information during subsequent postage transactions, embodiments operate to minimize latency associated with initially caching the functional objects.
Embodiments of the invention implement security and/or accuracy verification with respect to the use of localized functionality herein. For example, functional objects provided for use by clients may be subject to malicious or inadvertent alteration, or otherwise be improperly used. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention implement verification by a server of the results of use of the use of functional objects by a client prior to completing a transaction. For example, a postage server may operate to independently verify the rate calculation for a postage indicium requested to be generated by a postage client having implemented a postage rating script. Such verification may be done in conjunction with another server call to facilitate efficiencies with respect to client server communications provided through the use of localized functional objects of embodiments of the invention.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
The illustrated embodiment of system 100 comprises client system 120 in communication with server system 110 via network 150. Client system 120 of embodiments is operable as a postage client and correspondingly server system 120 of embodiments is operable as a postage server. Accordingly, client system 120 and server system 110 of embodiments cooperate to generate and print postage indicia 102, such as may be utilized with respect to postal item 101.
Server system 110 may comprise one or more processor-based systems operable to provide server side operation as described herein. For example, server system 110 may comprise a computer having a processor (e.g., processors from the PENTIUM and/or XEON line of processors available from Intel Corporation), memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), magnetic memory, optical memory, flash memory, etc.), input/output apparatuses (e.g., display, keyboard, mouse, printer, etc.), and network interface (e.g., Ethernet interface, optical interface, T1 interface, etc.) operable under control of an instruction set defining operation as described herein.
Client system 120 may likewise comprise one or more processor-based systems operable to provide client side operation as described herein. For example, client system 120 may comprise a computer having a processor (e.g., processors from the PENTIUM and/or XEON line of processors available from Intel Corporation), memory (e.g., RAM, ROM, magnetic memory, optical memory, flash memory, etc.), input/output apparatuses (e.g., display, keyboard, mouse, printer, etc.), and network interface (e.g., Ethernet interface, optical interface, T1 interface, etc.) operable under control of an instruction set defining operation as described herein. The illustrated embodiment of client system 120 includes memory 122, operable to provide a cache memory utilized as described below, and printer 123, operable to provide printing of postage indicia 102.
Network 150 may comprise one or more networks suitable for facilitating communication between server system 110 and client system 120. For example, network 150 may comprise a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), wireless network, the public switched telephone network (PSTN), the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, etc.
It should be appreciated that network 150 may include systems in addition to server system 110 and client system 120, whether utilized in providing functionality associated with server system 110 and client system 120 or separate therefrom. For example, network 150 may comprise additional servers and clients in addition to routers, gateways, bridges, repeaters, switches, caches, etc. The illustrated embodiment of system 100 shows system 130, such as may comprise a proxy server utilized by client system 120, as representative of such additional systems.
In operation according to embodiments of the invention, server system 110 functions as a web-based postage server (postage web server) providing postage indicia generation web services to clients. Accordingly, server system 110 may serve various web pages, such as may comprise platform independent hypertext mark-up language (HTML), extensible mark-up language (XML), or JAVA based web pages, to clients for performing postage indicia generation. Correspondingly, client system 120 of embodiments functions as a web-based postage client (postage web client) providing a postage indicia generation user interface to users. Accordingly, embodiments of client system 120 operate as a browser-based client, wherein platform independent code is operable within browser software executing upon client system 120. Examples of browser software as may be utilized according to embodiments of the invention include INTERNET EXPLORER available from Microsoft Corporation, FIREFOX available from Mozilla Corporation, SAFARI available from Apple Inc., and NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR available from Netscape communications Corporation.
At block 201 of the illustrated embodiment raw data (e.g., data 103 of
Raw data from which a functional object is created may comprise an amount of data in excess to that which can be communicated efficiently via network 150. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention operate to parse the raw data for creating useful functional objects adapted for network communication and caching as discussed herein. For example, raw data in the form of a table of postage rates throughout the nation may be parsed into smaller, useful blocks of data, such as to provide individual rate tables for each shipper zone in the nation. Such individual rate tables may thus be converted into a plurality of functional objects, each of a size conducive to communication via network 150.
Other forms of data, such as insurance rates, address databases, etc. may be similarly parsed into a plurality of functional objects. For example, an address database used for verifying recipient address information, as is required for particular services offered by the United States Postal Service (USPS), is on the order of several gigabytes. Thus, such an address database is not generally suitable for efficient communication to a client in a typical client server scenario. Embodiments of the present invention operate to parse the address database to a reduced database sufficient for verifying that the city, state, and zip code information of recipient addresses are correct (e.g., omitting additional detail with respect to the addresses), which is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of many services of the USPS. The reduced database may further be parsed into smaller collections of data, such as commercial addresses, residential addresses, geographic regions, etc. The resulting reduced address database functional objects are each preferably of a size conducive to communication via network 150.
Functional objects of embodiments of the invention comprise script files which are executable within a browser operable upon client system 120. For example, functional objects of an embodiment of the invention may comprise a JAVA script file executable by a browser of client system 120. It should be appreciated that such a script file may not only include appropriate data from the aforementioned raw data, but also includes appropriate instructions (e.g., executable code) to define operation by the host browser to perform desired functionality with respect to the data.
One or more of such functional objects may be relevant to any particular user or situation. Thus, appropriate ones of the functional objects may be provided to clients according to embodiments of the invention, as discussed below.
At block 202 of the illustrated embodiment unique or substantially unique resource identifiers are created by server system 110 for each of the functional objects. For example, unique uniform resource locators (URLs) may be assigned to each such functional object, whereby the corresponding functional object is served by server system 110 to client system 120 upon the browser of client system 120 accessing the unique URL. The resource identifiers utilized according to embodiments of the invention may include designators indicative of the type of data included in the functional objects, the valid date or dates for the data included in the functional objects, or other attributes regarding the use or contents of the functional objects. Alternatively, the resource identifiers utilized according to embodiments of the invention may be arbitrary with respect to the functional objects.
As previously mentioned, and as will be better appreciated from the discussion which follows, the resource identifiers provide unique or substantially unique identification of an associated functional object. By substantially unique, it is meant that within the typical operation of system 100 a resource identifier is unique. Although resource identifiers may ultimately be repeated, and thus not truly unique, such repetition is provided such that disambiguation between two or more functional objects is not required. The foregoing unique identification not only facilitates operation of appropriate functionality through access of a functional object using its resource identification, but also facilitates updating, replacement, revision, etc. of the functional objects without express user interaction or even knowledge of the updating and without actively flushing out of date functional objects from cache, all within the normal operational framework of host browser software.
At block 203 of the illustrated embodiment client code for performing postage indicia generation operation is provided by server system 110 to client system 120. For example, a user of client system 120 may launch browser software thereon and navigate to a web page served by server system 110 for postage indicia generation services. This may result in code, such as in the form of a web page, applets, etc., being provided by server system 110 to client system 120. The foregoing code preferably includes resource identifiers (e.g., URLs) for appropriate functional objects useful to the user's generation of postage indicia for implementing one or more functional objects as desired for postage indicia generation.
At block 204 of the illustrated embodiment, client system 120 executes the code within a host browser thereof to provide postage indicia generation operation in cooperation with server system 110. Details with respect to client server operation to provide postage indicia generation and printing is provided in aforementioned patent application entitled “Virtual Security Device.”
Execution of postage indicia generation code provided to client system 120 of embodiments of the invention operates to implement one or more of the foregoing functional objects, as appropriate. Moreover, such execution implements localized functionality, within the normal operational framework of host browser software, using a technique of caching one or more such functional objects for access in response to an appropriate server call.
In operation according to embodiments of the invention, where execution of the postage indicia generation code by client system 120 is to implement functionality provided by a particular functional object, the resource identifier for a current instance of the functional object is present in the code. The browser of client system 120 then accesses the functional object using the resource identifier. If the current instance of the functional object, as indicated by its unique or substantially unique resource identifier, has not been previously accessed by client system 120, the resource identifier will direct the browser to server system 110, or other resource server, to provide the functional object to client system 120. Operation of the host browser of client system 120, perhaps in accordance with instructions of the postage indicia generation code, causes the current instance of the functional object to be cached, such as within memory 122 by a browser cache of client system 120. Accordingly, if the current instance of the functional object has been previously accessed by client system 120, the functional object will be accessed from cache (e.g., from memory 122) when the resource identifier directs the browser to server system 110, or other resource server.
The foregoing operation facilitates providing only those functional objects actually utilized by a client system to that client system. Accordingly, where a client system only utilizes a limited amount of data, such as associated with a single shipping zone, only the functional object containing that data need be provided to the client system. If the client system should subsequently need additional data, such as associated with another shipping zone, the functional object containing that data may be provided to the client system when needed. Each such functional object is preferably cached for subsequent use by the client system. However, embodiments of the invention may operate to cache only particular functional objects, such as those expected to receive repeated use, those historically receiving repeated use, etc.
It should be appreciated that caching of functional objects according to embodiments of the present invention differs significantly from mere automatic caching of data. For example, embodiments of the invention operate to cache a parsed subset of data and code for its use as an object for future performing functions in the future (e.g., future calculations). Automated caching merely caches the information provided to the client. Where postage rating functionality is performed, such caching would result in only the particular rate determination for a mail piece being cached (which is generally not useful with respect to future mail pieces). A server would not generally provide a postage rate table to the client in prior client server models due to the size of the rate table being too large to efficiently communicate and too large for caching/storage by the client. Moreover, the foregoing unique or substantially unique resource identifiers facilitates updating, replacement, revision, etc. of the functional objects without express user interaction or even knowledge of the updating and without actively flushing out of date functional objects from cache, all within the normal operational framework of host browser software. That is, as the data of a functional object becomes out of date, and thus an updated functional object is created, an updated unique resource identifier is used to direct the client to the updated functional object rather than using a cached instance of the functional object.
As previously mentioned, the functional objects of embodiments of the invention comprise script files which are executable within the browser operable upon client system 120. Such script files according to embodiments includes appropriate instructions (e.g., executable code) and data to define operation by the host browser to perform desired functionality. For example, the postage indicia generation code may operate to solicit information regarding a mail piece, a destination address, the class of service desired, etc. and invoke a functional object providing postage rating functionality. Thus the functional object may be executed by client system 120 to determine a postage rate appropriate to the postal item. Where the user has previously invoked this postage rating functionality, communication with server system 110 may be avoided and client system 120 may autonomously operate to provide the rating functionality. Should the user wish to view various postage rating options, multiple instances of server calls may likewise be avoided.
A plurality of functional objects may be invoked, one or more of which may itself be invoked a plurality of times, throughout execution of the postage indicia generation code. Continuing with the above example, after operation to provide postal item rating using a first functional object, an embodiment of the present invention may invoke a second functional object, such as to calculate an insurance rate for the postal item appropriate to the postal service selected, verify recipient address information (e.g., ensure the city, state, and zip code for the intended recipient are correct and up to date), etc.
After operation of the postage indicia generation code and appropriate functional objects, the illustrated embodiment of block 204 operates to make a transaction completion server call from client system 120 to server system 110. For example, having collected postal item information, determined a postal rate for the selected postal service, and verified the city, state, and zip code of a recipient address is accurate, client system 120 may provide the appropriate information to server system 110 to request generation of a postage indicium, preferably associated with debiting a postal security device (e.g., postage vault) by an amount suitable for the postage indicium and/or the postage indicia generation service.
At block 205 of the illustrated embodiment, server system 110 operates to independently verify proper implementation of the functional objects. Functional objects provided for use by clients may be subject to malicious or inadvertent alteration, or otherwise be improperly used. Accordingly, server system 110 of the illustrated embodiment implements verification of the results of use of the use of functional objects by client system 120 prior to completing a transaction (e.g., prior to generating a requested postage indicium). For example, server system 110 may operate to independently verify the rate calculation for a postage indicium requested to be generated by client system 120 having implemented a postage rating script. Such verification may be accomplished using mail piece data provided by client system 120 and rating table information available at server system 110. Such verification not only prevents instances of functional object tampering or alternation, but may also be used to ensure that the most up to date information has been used with respect to the related functions.
At block 206 of the illustrated embodiment a determination is made as to whether the foregoing verification has detected an error. If an error is detected, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 209 for performing error processing. For example, client system 120 may be prevented from further postage indicia generation operation until a source of the error can be determined. Alternatively, a functional object associated with the detected error may be pushed to client system 120 and postage indicia generation operation repeated in an attempt to correct the error.
If, however, no error is detected at block 206, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 207 for completion of the transaction. For example, server system 110 may generate the requested postage indicium, preferably debiting a postal security device (e.g., postage vault) associated with the user, and providing a data packet comprising the generated postage indicium to client system 120. Client system 120 may utilize the data packet comprising the generated postage indicium to print postage indicium 102 on mail piece 101 using printer 123.
Upon completion of the transaction at block 207, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 208 wherein a determination is made as to whether any of the raw data of the functional objects has changed (e.g., data has been updated, has expired, etc.). If the raw data has not changed, processing according to the illustrated embodiment returns to block 203 to facilitate performing repeated transactions using the current instance of the functional objects. However, if the raw data, or a portion thereof, has changed, processing according to the illustrated embodiment returns to block 201 to facilitate conversion of the changed raw data to a revised (then to be current) instance of a functional object. As previously mentioned, the use of resource identifiers according to embodiments facilitates operation of the clients to use up to date functional objects provided by such processing.
It should be appreciated that operation according to the embodiment of
It should be appreciated that, although embodiments have been discussed herein with reference to providing functional objects to clients by server 110, embodiments of the invention may implement various techniques for distributing functional objects to clients. For example, a copy and distribute network may be implemented wherein various servers which are geographically dispersed are provided with functional objects. Resource identifiers utilized according to embodiments of the invention may operate to obtain a functional object from a particular server disposed geographically most near a client system, thereby further optimizing network communications utilized in the client server processing.
Although embodiments have been discussed with respect to caching functional objects in a memory of the client system, the localized functionality provided herein need not be cached in such a memory to achieve benefits as discussed herein. For example, functional objects may be cached by server 130, such as may comprise a proxy server, disposed more near client system 120 (e.g., on a same LAN, geographically more near, etc.) than is server system 110 and latency may be reduced as discussed above.
It should be appreciated that the concepts herein are not limited in applicability to the exemplary postage indicia generation processing. For example, embodiments of the present invention may be implemented with respect to client server services implementing amortization tables, tax rate tables, regulations, etc. Similarly, the concepts herein are not limited in applicability to the exemplary postal items. For example, embodiments of the present invention may be implemented with respect to items transported by services such as Federal Express, United Parcel Service, trucking services, rail services, air carrier services, etc.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1684756 | Close | Sep 1928 | A |
1988908 | MacKinnon | Jan 1935 | A |
2825498 | Alves | Mar 1958 | A |
2887326 | Kramer | May 1959 | A |
3221980 | Mecur | Dec 1965 | A |
3380648 | De Lyra | Apr 1968 | A |
3658239 | Foutz | Apr 1972 | A |
3747837 | Wilson | Jul 1973 | A |
3978457 | Check, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4024380 | Gunn | May 1977 | A |
4245775 | Conn | Jan 1981 | A |
4253158 | McFiggans | Feb 1981 | A |
4271481 | Check, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4306299 | Check, Jr. et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4376299 | Rivest | Mar 1983 | A |
4511793 | Racanelli | Apr 1985 | A |
4565317 | Kranz | Jan 1986 | A |
4629871 | Scribner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641347 | Clark et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649266 | Eckert | Mar 1987 | A |
4661001 | Takai et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4709850 | Wagner | Dec 1987 | A |
4725718 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743747 | Fougere et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757537 | Edelmann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760532 | Sansone et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763271 | Field | Aug 1988 | A |
4775246 | Edelmann et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784317 | Chen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800506 | Axelrod et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802218 | Wright et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812994 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821195 | Baer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831554 | Storace et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831555 | Sansone et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837701 | Sansone et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4853865 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858138 | Talmadge | Aug 1989 | A |
4862386 | Axelrod et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864618 | Wright et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868757 | Gil | Sep 1989 | A |
4873645 | Hunter et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4900903 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900904 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900941 | Barton et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4901241 | Schneck | Feb 1990 | A |
4908770 | Breault et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910686 | Chang et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919325 | Culver | Apr 1990 | A |
4933849 | Connell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934846 | Gilham | Jun 1990 | A |
4941091 | Breault et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947333 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4993752 | Juszak | Feb 1991 | A |
4998204 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025141 | Bolan | Jun 1991 | A |
5058008 | Schumacher | Oct 1991 | A |
5065000 | Pusic | Nov 1991 | A |
5079714 | Manduley et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085470 | Peach et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091771 | Bolan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5111030 | Brasington et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119306 | Metelits et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136647 | Haber et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5150407 | Chan | Sep 1992 | A |
5200903 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202834 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5233657 | Gunther et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237506 | Horbal et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239168 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5280531 | Hunter | Jan 1994 | A |
5289540 | Jones | Feb 1994 | A |
5316208 | Petkovsek | May 1994 | A |
5319562 | Whitehouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5323323 | Gilham et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323465 | Avarne | Jun 1994 | A |
5341505 | Whitehouse | Aug 1994 | A |
5375172 | Chrosny | Dec 1994 | A |
5388049 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5423573 | de Passille | Jun 1995 | A |
5437441 | Tuhro et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439721 | Pedroli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454038 | Cordery et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468945 | Huggett et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471925 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476420 | Manning | Dec 1995 | A |
5490077 | Freytag | Feb 1996 | A |
5501393 | Walz | Mar 1996 | A |
5510992 | Kara | Apr 1996 | A |
5573277 | Petkovsek | Nov 1996 | A |
5583779 | Naclerio et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598970 | Mudry et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600562 | Guenther | Feb 1997 | A |
5602743 | Fraytag | Feb 1997 | A |
5606507 | Kara | Feb 1997 | A |
5606508 | Thiel | Feb 1997 | A |
5606613 | Lee et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615123 | Davidson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615312 | Kohler | Mar 1997 | A |
5617519 | Herbert | Apr 1997 | A |
5619571 | Sandstrom et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623546 | Hardy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5649118 | Carlisle et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650934 | Manduley | Jul 1997 | A |
5655023 | Cordery et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666284 | Kara | Sep 1997 | A |
5675650 | Cordery et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696829 | Cordery et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717596 | Bernard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717597 | Kara | Feb 1998 | A |
5742683 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745887 | Gargiulo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774554 | Gilham | Jun 1998 | A |
5774886 | Kara | Jun 1998 | A |
5778076 | Kara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791553 | Fabel | Aug 1998 | A |
5796834 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799290 | Dolan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801364 | Kara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801944 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5805810 | Maxwell | Sep 1998 | A |
5812991 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5819240 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5822739 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5825893 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5860068 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5902439 | Pike et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923406 | Brasington et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923885 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929415 | Berson | Jul 1999 | A |
5946671 | Herring et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983209 | Kara | Nov 1999 | A |
6005945 | Whitehouse | Dec 1999 | A |
6010156 | Block | Jan 2000 | A |
6026385 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6061670 | Brand | May 2000 | A |
6098057 | Dlugos | Aug 2000 | A |
D434438 | Kara | Nov 2000 | S |
6155476 | Fabel | Dec 2000 | A |
6173888 | Fabel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202057 | Pierce | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208980 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233565 | Lewis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6442525 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470327 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6721717 | Kramer | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6820065 | Naclerio | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6865561 | Allport et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7433849 | Cordery et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7774284 | Williams et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8000988 | Bezanson et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8078293 | Campagna et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8150781 | McCall et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8195579 | Kara | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8412641 | Zeisset et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8630912 | Seki et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010007086 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010032278 | Brown et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037320 | Allport et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032668 | Kohler et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020152127 | Hamilton et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004824 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030144972 | Cordery et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040083189 | Leon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089711 | Sandru | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122779 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133438 | Zeisset et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040243523 | Herbert | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258089 | Derechin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050256811 | Pagel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070011023 | Silverbrook | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070174213 | Whitehouse et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070233754 | Baeuerle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080127139 | Skaistis | May 2008 | A1 |
20080178162 | Sanford et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228669 | Harris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080298568 | Karandikar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090144230 | Fant | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090241030 | von Eicken et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090319395 | Chandaria | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110071954 | McCall et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0137737 | May 1991 | EP |
0 927 963 | Dec 1997 | EP |
926632 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 927 958 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2580844 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2251210 | Jul 1992 | GB |
05-132049 | May 1993 | JP |
09-508220 | Aug 1997 | JP |
02000105845 | Apr 2000 | JP |
04284558 | Jun 2009 | JP |
WO-8801818 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO-199519016 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-9814909 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9814907 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9857302 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9857460 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Avery, Susan, “With new postage meters buyers can stamp out costs,” Purchasing, 132, 11, Jul. 17, 2003, pp. 98-99. |
Davis Brad L.; “Printing System for Preventing Injustice by Delivering Print Data from Postal Charge Meter to Printer,” Jan. 2001, 1 page. |
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2007 for JP 515,253/97; with English language translation (4 pages). |
Minnick, Robert, “Postage Imprinting Apparatus and Methods for Use With a Computer Printer”, Apr. 27, 1995, 71 pgs. |
Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 515,253/1997, dated Apr. 21, 2009; 5 pages (with English language translation). |
“Service contracts: profit center or necessary evil. (heating and air conditioning maintenance contracts)”, Whitaker, Bert, Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News, v192, n3, p22(2); 3 pages. |
“Information-Based Indicia Program (IBIP): Performance Criteria for Information-Based Indicia and Security Architecture for Open IBI Postage Evidencing Systems,” Feb. 23, 2000, The United States Postal Service (USPS), 79 pages. |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/606,579 to Ogg, filed Jun. 26, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail.” |