The use of electronic and digital content has greatly increased in enterprise settings or other organizations as the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management, as has the need for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such an environment, multiple users share, access and otherwise perform actions or tasks on content and files in a shared workspace, where any number of users may have access to a given file or may want to or need to perform an action on the file at any given time.
The cloud-based nature of such an environment enables users/collaborators to access, view, edit content anytime, from any device, or using any number of and/or types of clients, simultaneously while other collaborators in the same group, enterprise, or other types of organizations may also be accessing, viewing, or editing the same file or content or content in the same work group. It becomes useful therefor to provide information to users/collaborators regarding the status of various files/folders hosted on a cloud-based platform. Inaccurate information provided to users/collaborators regarding the status of shared files/folders may lead to confusion and inconsistency.
The present embodiments are illustrated by way of example and are not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
The same reference numbers and any acronyms identify elements or acts with the same or similar structure or functionality throughout the drawings and specification for ease of understanding and convenience.
The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.
Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Overview
Certain embodiments of a cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration platform or service) contemplate shell icon communications facilitated by an iconizer monitoring an icon repository file maintained by a remote synchronization client. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may be a thread of code in the remote synchronization client. According to some embodiments the iconizer may be a thread of code injected into a finder of a device operating system (e.g. explorer in Windows) and exist as a component of the operating system (e.g. a COM component in Windows). According to some embodiments iconizer may communicate with the remote synchronization client and using information gathered from an icon repository file, generate and/or display an icon for a work item to a collaborator indicating the status of the work item. According to some embodiments, where this code is platform specific, it may be kept as minimal as possible. In addition, according to some embodiments an iconizer may be loaded into nearly every process on an operating system (e.g. the COM component may be loaded for shared code like File Open dialogs). According to some embodiments, a remote synchronization client may determine icons for all files and folders and simply inform the iconizer of changes to icons via modification to an icon repository file. Some embodiments may allow for communication between a remote synchronization client and multiple iconizers on a particular operating system (e.g. Windows). Some embodiments may reduce data duplication in an iconizer. Some embodiments may allow for icon changes in real time or near real time.
Design
The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a communication or a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or a notification server 150. Client devices 102 typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102, the notification server 150, and/or the host server 100.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a PDA, a smart phone (e.g., a BlackBerry device such as BlackBerry Z10/Q10, an iPhone, Nexus 4, etc.), a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, iPad Mini, a Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Xoom Tablet, Microsoft Surface, Blackberry PlayBook, Nexus 7, 10 etc.), a phablet (e.g., HTC Droid DNA, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console (e.g., XBOX live, Nintendo DS, Sony PlayStation Portable, etc.), mobile-enabled powered watch (e.g., iOS, Android or other platform based), Google Glass, a Chromebook and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, Windows 8, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform, Google Chrome OS, and the like. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and/or the notification server 150 (e.g., a server hosting application 120) are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 and/or notification server 150 may be directly connected to one another.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100). The collaboration environment or platform can have one or more collective settings 125 for an enterprise or an organization that the users belong, and can provide an user interface 104 for the users to access such platform under the settings 125.
The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A work item may also refer to folders containing various combinations of digital content as previously described. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.
In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a workspace and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a workspace for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing workspace or to a new workspace. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a workspace.
In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102 and the host server 100 communicate may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination or variation thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.
The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).
In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), or any broadband network, and further enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Bluetooth, WiFi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G (e.g., WCDMA/UMTS based 3G networks), 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, HSPA+, UMTS-TDD, 1×RTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks, broadband networks, or messaging protocols.
A diagrammatic illustration of the cloud-based environment (e.g., collaboration environment) and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide shell icon communications via an iconizer and remote synchronization client at devices, the shell icon communications regarding status of items hosted on a cloud-based platform. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may exist as a thread of code in a remote synchronization client (e.g. remote clients 110-170 on user devices 102). According to some embodiments, the iconizer may be injected into a finder of a device operating system (e.g. explorer in Windows) and exist as a component of the operating system. According to some embodiments iconizer may communicate with the remote synchronization client and display an icon for a work item to a collaborator indicating the status of the work item in the workspace hosted by the cloud-based platform. Examples of status may include, but are not limited to “synchronized,” “not synchronized,” “in-progress,” “locked,” un-locked,” “collaborating,” “problem,” “hidden,” etc.
In general, multiple users collaborate in the cloud-based environment hosted by server 100, and the user devices 102 of these users need to be appropriately updated such that the most current versions of data/content are synchronized with the relevant user devices and that notification of events are sent to the relevant devices/users in a timely and orderly fashion. Any given user can utilize any number and types of clients (e.g., synchronization client, real time web client, mobile synchronization client, mobile application, email client, server synchronization client, etc.) at any given time. Thus, the host server 100 and the remote synchronization clients 110-170 described herein together can implement the disclosed techniques in facilitating the orderly synchronizing or updating of the remote clients 110-170 which a given user/collaborator may use to access the cloud platform via any number of user devices 102.
The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.
When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associate work items. For example, workspace A 205 can be associated with work items 215, workspace B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and workspace N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 can be unique to each workspace but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one workspace (e.g., workspace A 205) or it can be associated with multiple workspaces (e.g., Workspace A 205 and workspace B 225, etc.).
In general, each workspace has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, workspace A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, workspaces deployed in an enterprise can be department specific. For example, workspace B can be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.
Each user associated with a workspace can generally access the work items associated with the workspace. The level of access depends on permissions associated with the specific workspace, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the workspace or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a workspace (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates workspace B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 can also set different permission settings for each work item, which can be the same for different users, or varying for different users.
In each workspace A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the workspace, other users in the same workspace can be notified (e.g., in real time or in near real time, or not in real time). Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace, uploading, downloading, adding, deleting a work item in the workspace, creating a discussion topic in the workspace.
In some embodiments, items or content downloaded or edited can cause notifications to be generated. Such notifications can be sent to relevant users to notify them of actions surrounding a download, an edit, a change, a modification, a new file, a conflicting version, an upload of an edited or modified file.
Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the workspace 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user can access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).
Work items to be edited or viewed can be accessed from the workspace 302. Users may be informed of status of work items 324 via shell icon communications. For example, if a user 316 modifies a work item 324 via a remote synchronization client 340A on user device 304, the other remote synchronization clients (e.g. sync clients 340a-n) may receive the modified work item 324 in real time, near real-time, or not in real-time. In such an example, after user 316 has modified work item 324, other collaborators may view work item 324 (e.g. via sync clients 340a-n), and that work item 324 may have a status. The present teachings disclose that such status may be provided via shell icon communications. For example, work item 324 as it appears to collaborator 320 via remote synchronization client 340E on device 312 may have a status of “synchronized,” in which case an icon and/or icon overlay may indicate to collaborator 320 that work item 324 is synchronized with modification provided by user 316. Similarly where synchronization is in progress, but not yet complete, work item 324 as it appears to collaborator 320 via remote synchronization client 340E may have a status of “in-progress,” in which case an icon and/or icon overlay may indicate to collaborator 320 that work item 324 is being updated to incorporate modifications by user 316.
Users can also be notified of access, edit, modification, and/or upload related-actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the workspace 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, or not in real time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).
For example, a notification of a download, access, read, write, edit, or uploaded related activities can be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment.
In one embodiment, the notification feed stream further enables users to create or generate actionable events (e.g., as task) which are or can be performed by other users 316 or collaborators 322 (e.g., including admin users or other users not in the same workspace), either in the same workspace 302 or in some other workspace. The actionable events such as tasks can also be assigned or delegated to other users via the same user interface.
For example, a given notification regarding a work item 324 can be associated with user interface features allowing a user 316 to assign a task related to the work item 324 (e.g., to another user 316, admin user 318, creator user 320 or another user). In one embodiment, a commenting user interface or a comment action associated with a notification can be used in conjunction with user interface features to enable task assignment, delegation, and/or management of the relevant work item or work items in the relevant workspaces, in the same user interface.
According to some of the present embodiments, the state of work items 324, including folders 342 and files 344 may be, (i) synchronized, (ii) partially synchronized, (iii) unsynchronized, (iv) in progress, (v) collaborating, (vi) locked, (vii) un-locked, (viii) hidden, or (viv) problem. For purposes of discussion herein, a file 344 may be synchronized at a remote synchronization client 380a-n when it is synchronized with the corresponding work item as hosted on an associated cloud-based platform (e.g. host server 100 of a cloud-based service, collaboration and/or cloud storage platform as illustrated in
According to some embodiments information regarding status may be provided to a user via a remote synchronization client and associated iconizer. Status may be displayed as an icon or modification to an icon such as an icon overlay. For example, a status of synchronized may be indicated by an icon overlay 390, a status of in progress may be indicated by an icon overlay 392, a status of problem any be indicated by icon overlay 394, and a status of locked may be indicated by an icon overlay 396.
The queues in the repository 460 (e.g., the distributed repository cluster) are usually client type specific. For example, each queue is for a given client type for one given user. So, a user ‘A’ may have a synchronization client queue that all of the synchronization clients that user “A” uses reads from since user “A” may have multiple devices on which synchronization clients are installed. In general, the queues for clients in the repository 460 are read only queues such that multiple clients can read from the same queue without making modifications. In this manner, if a user utilizes multiple synchronization clients, each client can still receive and detect the respective updates such that multiple devices can be synchronized. The remote clients also typically individually track the location in the queue from which they last read such that only the most recent events are updated at the client, and that the events read from a queue is specific to a given client, dependent on what has previously been synchronized or read.
According to some embodiments, sync clients 480a-n may create and modify in real-time, icon repository files 482a-n with data entries associated with the current state of work items (e.g. work items 324 in
According to some embodiments, icon repository files 482a-n may be created with SQLite. In some embodiments, SQLite has built in support for multiple processes reading and writing to the same repository using a read-many-write-once lock. According to some embodiments, iconizers 484a-n may use standard file watching and file presence for additional forms of communication. According to some embodiments, icon repository files 482a-n be next to the existing repository file that the core engine uses (e.g. an instantiation of core repository 460). Besides being easy to locate, such a configuration may provide the benefit of it being included in bug reports.
Icon Repository Content
As illustrated in
Additional Information
According to some embodiments, the sync directory and its version are stored in the one-row table. When the sync_directory version increments, the iconizer can invalidate all overlays even if the sync_directory field is unchanged.
According to some embodiments an iconizer can open a mailslot for listening (windows)/broadcast notifications (mac), and may then search for a sync client, if found it may send an “iconizer-started message.” The sync client may respond by sending sync_directory name and the status of all files that are not synced one-by-one to the iconizer. Until the sync client has sent the sync_directory no icons are drawn in some embodiments. Then icons are updated as messages arrive.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
According to some embodiments, when a sync client starts up it may attempt to open communication with an iconizer. If communication fails, the sync client may wait until a broadcast arrives indicating that iconizer has initialized and may then try again. Once established, the sync client may send the sync directory name and status of all items in-progress/hidden/problem to the iconizer.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a message to the iconizer stating that a given path has changed to a status of “in-progress.” In certain situations (for example, where files/folders are moved) two path messages may be sent by the sync client to the iconizer. For each path message, the iconizer may update its repository with the new information and invalidate the icon for the specified path.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
At step 610 in
At step 630 in
At step 650 in
At step 670 in
At step 690 in
At step 710 in
At step 730 in
At step 750 in
At Step 770 in
According to some embodiments, the process may similar to that described above except that sync client may remove a row from its repository and invalidate the icon for the particular file/folder path.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a “quit” message to the iconizer. When the iconizer receives the message, it may clear its repository and forget the sync directory name. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may not display icons until it receives a sync startup message with the sync directory.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a trait message to the iconizer to mark a path as locked/unlocked or to mark a path as collaboration or custom link. The iconizer may then change system files or update icon overlays for files/folders as appropriate.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
According to some embodiments, a synch client may remove rows for paths that are synchronized after a reasonable interval. The synch client may message the iconizer informing it of the changes. Sync client may set a timer (e.g. for 10 minutes) after which it may be very safe to remove the rows from the repository.
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
Additional Considerations
According to some embodiments, and with reference to
Unicode Filenames
Within Unicode, some characters—notably those with diatrical marks—can be represented in 2 forms: Normal Form Composed (NFC) or Normal Form Decomposed (NFD). A string of Unicode characters can contain any mixture of both forms (Note that this is explicitly excluding the compatibility normal forms namely NFKC and NFKD because they are not relevant to this discussion).
Because there are 2 forms for representing (some) characters in Unicode, it's possible to produce different sequences of codepoints meaning to indicate the same sequence of characters. Hence, some embodiments of the cloud-based platform may end up with more than one way to specify the same path.
The following table specifies behavior of all platforms related to handling of Unicode filenames:
In some embodiments there may be two issues:
1. Some embodiments cannot generally depend on the OS to give back the exact filename that it was given.
2. A broader issue though is that because the same filename may be encoded in different codepoints, there can be 2 files in a directory on the remote cloud-based platform or the local Windows that represent the same name, but not on Mac.
Accordingly in some embodiments, the sync client may need to be able to sync files between the local platform and the cloud-based platform with names in any normal form.
Some embodiments do not restrict filenames to either NFC or NFD because what would require renaming all of existing files and folders, update all other clients (iOS, Android, etc.) and change the server side to reject non-conforming names.
Design
In some embodiments, the name of an item stored in the Local Shadow Item Store and Last Sync Item Store should reflect the name of the item on disk. In some embodiments, this means that all local operations that affect an item's name (Create, Rename, Move) should re-read the name from disk. This would solve the first issue identified above.
The second issue presented in some embodiments is an artifact of a platform (Mac) not supporting all capabilities provided by cloud-based platform. It can be considered similar to the cloud-based platform's ability to have multiple folders at the top-level with the same name due to collaborations. There are two possible solutions to this issue in some embodiments:
Fail the second item encountered and mark it as a Problem Item.
Sync the second item encountered locally with a different name.
Solution 1 may be a simpler implementation to an uncommon scenario. But it may provide a sub-optimal user experience. The failure to sync the item may be remote logged by the sync client.
Solution 2 may generally provide a much better user experience. The operation for the second item may fail with DestinationExistsError and be handled by the ConflictRecoveryManager in some embodiments. The ConflictRecoveryManager can rename the first item locally (which will in-turn cause the corresponding item on the cloud-based platform to be renamed) and retry the operation for the second item. In order to not rename the first item on the remote cloud-based platform in some embodiments, the conflict recover logic can be be changed to retry the failed operation for the second item with a different name.
Additional Considerations
Unit tests for the LocalFSSyncAPI can be written to ensure that the names stored in the Local Shadow Item Store and Last Sync Item Store reflect the disk names. In addition, B-Y tests can be written for this.
B-Y tests can be written to test the scenario of 2 files with the same name but different encodings.
1. Create a directory with NFC normalized name on the cloud-based platform and let it sync locally. Test that no echo back changes are made on the cloud-based platform. Make changes to the directory locally and test that they are synced to the cloud-based platform. Make changes to the directory on the cloud-based platform and test that they are synced locally.
2. Repeat 1 with NFD normalized name.
3. Repeat 1 using a file instead of a directory.
4. Repeat 2 using a file instead of a directory.
5. Create a directory with NFC normalized name on the cloud-based platform and let is sync locally. Change local monitor to full scan mode and test that no changes are made on the cloud-based platform.
6. Repeat 5 with NFD normalized name.
7. Repeat 5 using a file instead of a directory.
8. Repeat 6 using a file instead of a directory.
9. Create a directory with NFC name on the cloud-based platform and let it sync locally. Then create another directory with the same name but NFD normalized in the same directory on the cloud-based platform. Test that—
a. On Windows, the second directory syncs
b. On Mac, either the second directory fails to sync and is marked as problem (Solution #1) or the second directory is synced with a different name and the first directory is not modified (Solution #2).
10. Repeat 9 reversing the order of NFC and NFD normalization.
11. Repeat 9 using files instead of directories.
12. Repeat 10 using files instead of directories.
13. Repeat 9 and 10 with one file and one directory.
Device 500 may include, for example, a bus 502, and a memory 504 among other components. The memory 504 may include, among others, a synchronization client 580 (e.g. similar to synchronization client 480a-n as described in
As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” an “interface,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, interface, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, interface, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all media that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. § 101), and to specifically exclude all media that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.
The bus 502 is a subsystem for transferring data between the components of the mobile device 500. For example, the bus 502 may facilitate the transfer of data between the memory 504 and other components of the mobile device such as the processor and/or the input/output components that utilize the data.
As previously mentioned, over all, the present embodiments may provide shell icon communications via a synchronization client 580, iconizer 584 and icon repository file 582.
According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, during normal operations, the synchronization client 580 may operate in one or both of two modes to gather file/folder synchronization events from host server 100. When in a listening mode, a listener module 592a (e.g., as a thread running in the operating system of device 500) may receive new events reported from the host server 100 as these events occur, and the raw event processor 592 may process these events in manners described herein. During a startup phase of the synchronization client 580, or when there is an inconsistency (e.g., resulted from a potential violation of local file system rules), the synchronization client 580 may switch into a full scan mode, in which the full scanner 592b may request that all existing files and folders, for example, be retrieved from the workspace 302 (e.g., in host server 100) and turned into events.
According to some embodiments, the raw event processor 592 may receive events from the host server 100 which represent that a modification to an item (e.g., a file or a folder) has taken place on the workspace 302, and may function together with other components to process the received raw events, such as the generating of the aforementioned icon repository file 582.
According to some embodiments, the file system monitor 590 may cause the sync client 580 to receive (e.g., using the listener 592a) or to retrieve (e.g., using the full scanner 592b) events from the workspace 302 and to normalize those events so that the events may be input into the icon repository file 582 correctly. The file system monitor 590 may operate multiple processes to, for example, receive raw events with the listener 592a, retrieve events with the full scanner 592b, generate synchronization steps with the event processor 592, normalize events with the event filter pipeline 594, and control the operating status of the file system monitor 590 itself by responding to start, stop, pause, and resume, as well as transitioning between the aforementioned listen and full scan mode.
According to some embodiments, after an event indicating a modification to an item is received from the host server 100, the file system monitor 590 may initiate the event's processing by requesting the raw event processor 592 (e.g., the full scanner 592b or the listener 592a) to send that event through the event filter pipeline 594. Then, the event filter pipeline 594 may utilize one or more filters in the event filters 594a to identify whether execution of the event can cause violation of any local file system rule. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. If the execution of the event can cause violation of any rule, the event filter pipeline can buffer the event in the event buffer 786 until a subsequent event arrives. The event filter pipeline 594 may then identify whether execution of an aggregate of the events is to violate any local file system rule. If the execution of the aggregate of the events is to violate any rule, the event filter pipeline 594 may continue to buffer the subsequent event until another subsequent event arrives. Additionally, in some implementations, if an event remains buffered in the event filter pipeline 594 for longer than a configurable maximum time limit, the event filter pipeline 594 may drop the event, and some embodiments of the synchronization client 580 may report (e.g., via the full scanner 592b) that a full scan of file/folder status within the synchronization scope is required to resolve the inconsistency.
The event filter pipeline 594 in the file system monitor 590 may be responsible for normalizing raw events received from the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302 through host server 100) into synchronization event (or synchronization steps) that are safe to apply on the local file system where the synchronization client 580 operates or to apply as repository entries into icon repository file 582. Because the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302) may not provide any ordering guarantees around the delivery of events, the event filter pipeline 594 may perform the guaranteeing that, for example, a given raw event received which represents a future state of the associated item is not applied until the item can be moved into that state without violating any local file system rules. Accordingly, because iconizer 584 may be dependent on updates to the icon repository file 582 created and modified by sync client 580, the icons for files/folders generated by iconizer 584 may provide to a user true real-time communications regarding the state of locally stored files/folders with respect to work items in a given workspace (e.g. workspace 302).
Some embodiments of the event filter pipeline 594 may treat each raw event in the cloud-based platform as a state update notification for a specific item (e.g., a file or a folder). Each raw event (which is to pass through the event filter pipeline 594 may include, in some examples, the full state of the item affected by the event. This state information may be incorporated in real time into icon repository file 582 as previously discussed.
According to some embodiments, the event filter pipeline 594 then can compare the state of the item as indicated by the event against the current state of that item as stored on the local mobile device 500. The comparison may be used to determine whether the received event represents a newer version of the item, whether the newer state in the event is currently valid, and/or which synchronization steps need to be generated to move the item from its current state on the mobile device 500 to its newer state in the event, for example including updating icon repository file 582.
In addition, the event filter pipeline 594 can include one or more of the following example filter components in the event filters 594a in order to carry out the functionalities of the event filter pipeline 594 described herein:
A. Raw Retrieve Shadow Item Filter
The raw retrieve shadow item filter can retrieve the current state of the item affected by the event from (e.g., a local storage of) the local mobile device 500. This current item state can be used, for example, to update the icon repository file 582.
B. Drop Duplicate Raw Events Filter
The drop duplicate raw events filter can compare a Sequence_ID in the event item state with a Sequence_ID in the current item state to determine if the event item state is newer. In some embodiments, the drop duplicate raw events filter can drop the event if the event represents an older state of the item. In one or more embodiments, however, this check can be skipped for events originating from either the full scanner 592B or a partial scanner 592C since (a) events from the scanners are typically guaranteed to represent the current state of the item; and (b) the scanners detect item deletions through the absence of the item in the scan result, and therefore the scanners typically do not have access to an updated Sequence_ID for deletion events.
C. Folder Sync and Unsync Filter
The folder synchronization and unsynchronization filter can determine whether the received event represents a folder synchronization/unsynchronization. If the event does represent so, the event filters 594A indicates to the file system monitor 590 that a partial scan is required for the specified folder.
D. File System Conflict Filter
The local file system conflict filter can check if the event item state is consistent with the current state(s) of the rest of the local items based on local file system rules. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. So, if the event item state indicates that the item is not deleted, the local file system conflict filter can check that the item's parent folder exists and that there is no other item with the same name in that folder. If the event item state indicates that the item is deleted and the item is a folder, the local file system conflict filter can check that the folder is empty. If any of these checks fails, the item event is buffered until the checks can pass (e.g., upon receiving further events).
E. Raw Event to Sync Event Filter
The raw event to synchronization event (or synchronization step) filter can generate the synchronization steps or synchronization events necessary to transform the item from the shadow item state to the event item state based on the differences between the shadow item state and the event item state. In some embodiments, this filter can also update the current state of the item with the new state of the item.
The event filter pipeline 594 may also include an event buffer 594b to buffer events. For example, in some particular implementations, a move event can be recorded by the local listener 592a as a delete event followed quickly by a create event. The event buffer 594b may buffer the delete event for a small amount of time and attempts to resolve it with a create event. Events can be held in the buffer until either the event resolves (e.g., when the filter pipeline 594 receives another event process operation) or until a buffer time expires (e.g., at which point the filter pipeline 594 may execute a flush buffer operation). According to some embodiments, buffering of an event by event buffer 594b may cause the sync client 580 to enter a status of “in-progress” for the particular work item in icon repository file 582.
In this way, the disclosed techniques of the sync client 580 may monitor conditions of events in the cloud-based platform, create and update an icon repository file 582, of which an iconizer 584 may monitor in which to provide shell icon communications indicating the state of file/folder stored locally at device 500. In addition, the sync client 580 may bring the benefit of resilience to out of order events so as to minimize unnecessary full scans and to provide support for lock/unlock and collaboration/uncollaboration events in the cloud-based platform.
Among other benefits, the disclosed embodiments may bring the benefit of extensibility, maintainability, and testability. For extensibility, the disclosed embodiments can be extensible to handle any additional modes of generating new events, more complicated methods of normalizing events, and more complicated transitions and inconsistency handling. For maintainability, the disclosed embodiments can be easily maintained because modularization. Additionally, minor changes to execution logic do not require substantial changes to the design. For testability, each component can be tested individually, as well as the control mechanisms, in a single threaded manner. Further, multithreaded integration tests can be easily performed and designed as well.
Additional Background Information
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or can be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine can operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine can be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet, a phablet, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a thin-client device, a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed repository, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, can be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
The network interface device enables the machine 2800 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall can additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.
Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.
Additional Remarks
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, can be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number can also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments can perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks can be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks can be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks can instead be performed in parallel, or can be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations can employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted, including any that can be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes some embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system can vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing some features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While some aspects of the disclosure may be presented herein in some claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), other aspects can likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
This application is entitled to the benefit of and/or the right of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/839,331, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SHELL COMMUNICATIONS IN A CLOUD-BASED PLATFORM”, filed Jun. 25, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is therefore entitled to an effective filing date of Jun. 25, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5191645 | Carlucci | Mar 1993 | A |
5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6016467 | Newsted et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098078 | Gehani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260040 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6493804 | Soltis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539381 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7275244 | Charles Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647559 | Yozell-Epstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7886287 | Davda | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979296 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103662 | Eagan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8527549 | Cidon | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8607306 | Bridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8849955 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194177 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115326 | Verma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028006 | Leser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242204 | Karas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079242 | Jolley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130163 | Perez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250762 | Mansfield | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266304 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063210 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065881 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091790 | Beck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090119322 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150627 | Benhase et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158142 | Arthursson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300356 | Crandell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153835 | Xiong et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179991 | Lorch | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185932 | Coffman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185980 | Kuo | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290623 | Banks et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306004 | Burtner | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318893 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325527 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325559 | Westerinen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332962 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047413 | McGill et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113320 | Neff et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289433 | Whalin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302113 | Smith | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084672 | Vonog | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089569 | Mason, Jr. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089659 | Halevi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110436 | Adler, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144283 | Hill et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179981 | Whalin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185355 | Kilroy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185521 | Giampaolo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257249 | Natarajan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284804 | Lindquist | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275509 | Micucci et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140013112 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019497 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019498 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032616 | Nack | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140150023 | Gudorf et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008250944 | Oct 2008 | JP |
20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-2002019128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2004097681 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007113573 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013166520 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
“QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 28, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 dated Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 dated Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 dated Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 11 pages. |
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32. |
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages. |
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages. |
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140379586 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61839331 | Jun 2013 | US |