Systems and methods for providing shell communication in a cloud-based platform

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10110656
  • Patent Number
    10,110,656
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 25, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 23, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Yen; Syling
    • Davanlou; Soheila (Gina)
    Agents
    • Sheridan Ross P.C.
Abstract
Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for implementing an Iconizer in a cloud-based platform such as cloud based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration platform or cloud-based platform providing collaborative and/or file sharing services). The iconizer can facilitate the display on a graphical user interface (GUI) of certain features of the storage operation and synchronization to a user. Some embodiments contemplate methods for representing Unicode text in the file system operations in either Normal Form Composed (NFC) or Normal Form Decomposed (NFD). Various disclosed embodiments facilitate operations using either or both formats, or a combination of the two.
Description
BACKGROUND

The use of electronic and digital content has greatly increased in enterprise settings or other organizations as the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management, as has the need for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such an environment, multiple users share, access and otherwise perform actions or tasks on content and files in a shared workspace, where any number of users may have access to a given file or may want to or need to perform an action on the file at any given time.


The cloud-based nature of such an environment enables users/collaborators to access, view, edit content anytime, from any device, or using any number of and/or types of clients, simultaneously while other collaborators in the same group, enterprise, or other types of organizations may also be accessing, viewing, or editing the same file or content or content in the same work group. It becomes useful therefor to provide information to users/collaborators regarding the status of various files/folders hosted on a cloud-based platform. Inaccurate information provided to users/collaborators regarding the status of shared files/folders may lead to confusion and inconsistency.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present embodiments are illustrated by way of example and are not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 depicts an example diagram of a system for providing shell icon communications via a remote synchronization client at devices, the shell icon communications regarding status of items hosted on a cloud-based platform;



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting for organizing work items and workspaces;



FIG. 3A depicts an example diagram of a workspace in a cloud-based platform such as an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators through various devices;



FIG. 3B depicts an abstract diagram illustrating example icons indicating status of the folders and files in the workspace of FIG. 3A;



FIG. 4A depicts an example system block diagram showing the interaction between client-side components for providing shell communication in a cloud based environment;



FIG. 4B depicts a detail of an example system block diagram showing the interaction between client-side components for providing shell communication in a cloud based environment at a single client;



FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example system showing select components described in relation to FIGS. 1-4B on the client side of the cloud-based platform for providing shell communication in a cloud based environment;



FIG. 6 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for providing shell communication in a cloud based environment;



FIG. 7 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for providing shell communication in a cloud based environment;



FIG. 8 depicts a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed.





The same reference numbers and any acronyms identify elements or acts with the same or similar structure or functionality throughout the drawings and specification for ease of understanding and convenience.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.


Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.


The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.


Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.


Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.


Overview


Certain embodiments of a cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration platform or service) contemplate shell icon communications facilitated by an iconizer monitoring an icon repository file maintained by a remote synchronization client. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may be a thread of code in the remote synchronization client. According to some embodiments the iconizer may be a thread of code injected into a finder of a device operating system (e.g. explorer in Windows) and exist as a component of the operating system (e.g. a COM component in Windows). According to some embodiments iconizer may communicate with the remote synchronization client and using information gathered from an icon repository file, generate and/or display an icon for a work item to a collaborator indicating the status of the work item. According to some embodiments, where this code is platform specific, it may be kept as minimal as possible. In addition, according to some embodiments an iconizer may be loaded into nearly every process on an operating system (e.g. the COM component may be loaded for shared code like File Open dialogs). According to some embodiments, a remote synchronization client may determine icons for all files and folders and simply inform the iconizer of changes to icons via modification to an icon repository file. Some embodiments may allow for communication between a remote synchronization client and multiple iconizers on a particular operating system (e.g. Windows). Some embodiments may reduce data duplication in an iconizer. Some embodiments may allow for icon changes in real time or near real time.


Design



FIG. 1 illustrates an example diagram of a system for providing shell icon communications via a remote synchronization client at devices, the shell icon communications regarding status of items hosted on a cloud-based platform. As shown in FIG. 1, a host server 100 of a cloud-based service, collaboration and/or cloud storage platform can incrementally update remote synchronization clients (e.g., clients 110, 120, 130, 140, 160, 170) at devices 102 with events that occurred via the platform hosted by the server 100.


The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a communication or a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or a notification server 150. Client devices 102 typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102, the notification server 150, and/or the host server 100.


For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a PDA, a smart phone (e.g., a BlackBerry device such as BlackBerry Z10/Q10, an iPhone, Nexus 4, etc.), a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, iPad Mini, a Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Xoom Tablet, Microsoft Surface, Blackberry PlayBook, Nexus 7, 10 etc.), a phablet (e.g., HTC Droid DNA, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console (e.g., XBOX live, Nintendo DS, Sony PlayStation Portable, etc.), mobile-enabled powered watch (e.g., iOS, Android or other platform based), Google Glass, a Chromebook and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, Windows 8, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform, Google Chrome OS, and the like. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and/or the notification server 150 (e.g., a server hosting application 120) are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 and/or notification server 150 may be directly connected to one another.


The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.


Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100). The collaboration environment or platform can have one or more collective settings 125 for an enterprise or an organization that the users belong, and can provide an user interface 104 for the users to access such platform under the settings 125.


The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A work item may also refer to folders containing various combinations of digital content as previously described. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.


In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a workspace and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.


In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a workspace for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing workspace or to a new workspace. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a workspace.


In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102 and the host server 100 communicate may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination or variation thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.


The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).


In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), or any broadband network, and further enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Bluetooth, WiFi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G (e.g., WCDMA/UMTS based 3G networks), 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, HSPA+, UMTS-TDD, 1×RTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks, broadband networks, or messaging protocols.


A diagrammatic illustration of the cloud-based environment (e.g., collaboration environment) and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 2. A diagrammatic illustration of a workspace having multiple work items with which collaborators can access through multiple devices is illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 3A.


Embodiments of the present disclosure provide shell icon communications via an iconizer and remote synchronization client at devices, the shell icon communications regarding status of items hosted on a cloud-based platform. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may exist as a thread of code in a remote synchronization client (e.g. remote clients 110-170 on user devices 102). According to some embodiments, the iconizer may be injected into a finder of a device operating system (e.g. explorer in Windows) and exist as a component of the operating system. According to some embodiments iconizer may communicate with the remote synchronization client and display an icon for a work item to a collaborator indicating the status of the work item in the workspace hosted by the cloud-based platform. Examples of status may include, but are not limited to “synchronized,” “not synchronized,” “in-progress,” “locked,” un-locked,” “collaborating,” “problem,” “hidden,” etc.


In general, multiple users collaborate in the cloud-based environment hosted by server 100, and the user devices 102 of these users need to be appropriately updated such that the most current versions of data/content are synchronized with the relevant user devices and that notification of events are sent to the relevant devices/users in a timely and orderly fashion. Any given user can utilize any number and types of clients (e.g., synchronization client, real time web client, mobile synchronization client, mobile application, email client, server synchronization client, etc.) at any given time. Thus, the host server 100 and the remote synchronization clients 110-170 described herein together can implement the disclosed techniques in facilitating the orderly synchronizing or updating of the remote clients 110-170 which a given user/collaborator may use to access the cloud platform via any number of user devices 102.



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting 250 for organizing work items 215, 235, 255 and workspaces 205, 225, 245.


The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.


When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associate work items. For example, workspace A 205 can be associated with work items 215, workspace B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and workspace N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 can be unique to each workspace but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one workspace (e.g., workspace A 205) or it can be associated with multiple workspaces (e.g., Workspace A 205 and workspace B 225, etc.).


In general, each workspace has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, workspace A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, workspaces deployed in an enterprise can be department specific. For example, workspace B can be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.


Each user associated with a workspace can generally access the work items associated with the workspace. The level of access depends on permissions associated with the specific workspace, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the workspace or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a workspace (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates workspace B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 can also set different permission settings for each work item, which can be the same for different users, or varying for different users.


In each workspace A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the workspace, other users in the same workspace can be notified (e.g., in real time or in near real time, or not in real time). Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace, uploading, downloading, adding, deleting a work item in the workspace, creating a discussion topic in the workspace.


In some embodiments, items or content downloaded or edited can cause notifications to be generated. Such notifications can be sent to relevant users to notify them of actions surrounding a download, an edit, a change, a modification, a new file, a conflicting version, an upload of an edited or modified file.



FIG. 3A depicts an example diagram of a workspace 302 in an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators 322 through various devices.


Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the workspace 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user can access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).


Work items to be edited or viewed can be accessed from the workspace 302. Users may be informed of status of work items 324 via shell icon communications. For example, if a user 316 modifies a work item 324 via a remote synchronization client 340A on user device 304, the other remote synchronization clients (e.g. sync clients 340a-n) may receive the modified work item 324 in real time, near real-time, or not in real-time. In such an example, after user 316 has modified work item 324, other collaborators may view work item 324 (e.g. via sync clients 340a-n), and that work item 324 may have a status. The present teachings disclose that such status may be provided via shell icon communications. For example, work item 324 as it appears to collaborator 320 via remote synchronization client 340E on device 312 may have a status of “synchronized,” in which case an icon and/or icon overlay may indicate to collaborator 320 that work item 324 is synchronized with modification provided by user 316. Similarly where synchronization is in progress, but not yet complete, work item 324 as it appears to collaborator 320 via remote synchronization client 340E may have a status of “in-progress,” in which case an icon and/or icon overlay may indicate to collaborator 320 that work item 324 is being updated to incorporate modifications by user 316.


Users can also be notified of access, edit, modification, and/or upload related-actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the workspace 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, or not in real time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).


For example, a notification of a download, access, read, write, edit, or uploaded related activities can be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment.


In one embodiment, the notification feed stream further enables users to create or generate actionable events (e.g., as task) which are or can be performed by other users 316 or collaborators 322 (e.g., including admin users or other users not in the same workspace), either in the same workspace 302 or in some other workspace. The actionable events such as tasks can also be assigned or delegated to other users via the same user interface.


For example, a given notification regarding a work item 324 can be associated with user interface features allowing a user 316 to assign a task related to the work item 324 (e.g., to another user 316, admin user 318, creator user 320 or another user). In one embodiment, a commenting user interface or a comment action associated with a notification can be used in conjunction with user interface features to enable task assignment, delegation, and/or management of the relevant work item or work items in the relevant workspaces, in the same user interface.



FIG. 3B illustrates an example embodiment of shell icon communications associated with folders and files in the workspace 302 of FIG. 3A, as they may appear to a user (e.g. user 316 of FIG. 3A) via a remote synchronization client (e.g. sync client 380a-n of FIG. 3A) at a device (e.g. devices 304, 306, 308, 312, and 314 of FIG. 3A), according to some embodiments. As illustrated in FIG. 3B, work items 324 of FIG. 3A may be represented via a remote synchronization client 380a-n and may be organized into groups using one or more folders 342 within workspace 302. The folders 342 may have more than one levels of hierarchy including, for example, parent/ascendant folder(s), child/descendant folder(s) or subfolder(s), and/or sibling folder(s). A person having ordinary skill in the art will understand that terminologies describing the hierarchy of the folders are used in a relative sense. For example, a parent folder can be a child folder of a grandparent folder, a particular child folder can be a parent folder of a grandchild folder, and so on. It is noted that the illustration of the folders are merely exemplary; depending on the embodiments, there can be more than one level of hierarchy between the illustrated folders.


According to some of the present embodiments, the state of work items 324, including folders 342 and files 344 may be, (i) synchronized, (ii) partially synchronized, (iii) unsynchronized, (iv) in progress, (v) collaborating, (vi) locked, (vii) un-locked, (viii) hidden, or (viv) problem. For purposes of discussion herein, a file 344 may be synchronized at a remote synchronization client 380a-n when it is synchronized with the corresponding work item as hosted on an associated cloud-based platform (e.g. host server 100 of a cloud-based service, collaboration and/or cloud storage platform as illustrated in FIG. 1). A file 344 may be in-progress when an event has occurred via the cloud-based platform and the synchronization client 380a-n is in the process of updating file 344 to reflect the corresponding file as hosted on the associated cloud-based platform. A file 344 may be collaborating when two or more collaborators (e.g. collaborators 316, 318 and 320 as illustrated in FIG. 3A are concurrently modifying the same work item. A file 344 may be locked when the corresponding work item is locked for editing by other collaborators via the cloud-based platform. A file 344 may be hidden when the synchronization client 380a-n is preset by the user not to display the file. A file 344 may have a status of problem when a problem is synchronization has occurred via the cloud-based platform. Further, a folder may have a status of synchronized when all items (e.g., folders and files) under the folder are synchronized. Likewise, a folder may have a status of unsynchronized when all items (e.g., folders and files) under the folder are unsynchronized. A folder may have a status of in progress when synchronization client 380a-n is in the process of updating a file 344, and/or some but not all items (e.g. files and folders) under the folder are synchronized.


According to some embodiments information regarding status may be provided to a user via a remote synchronization client and associated iconizer. Status may be displayed as an icon or modification to an icon such as an icon overlay. For example, a status of synchronized may be indicated by an icon overlay 390, a status of in progress may be indicated by an icon overlay 392, a status of problem any be indicated by icon overlay 394, and a status of locked may be indicated by an icon overlay 396.



FIG. 4A depicts an example block diagram showing the interaction of remote clients 470a-n and 480a-n with a centralized and/or distributed core repository cluster 460 (e.g. similar to distributed repository cluster 180 as illustrated in FIG. 1) for incremental updates of events/actions which occurred at a cloud-based environment. The remote clients may include, for example real time clients 470a-n (e.g., real-time web clients launched via a web browser, mobile application), and synchronization clients 480a-n (e.g., desktop synchronization, mobile synchronization, server synchronization, etc.) that users or collaborators use to interface/access the cloud-based platform including, but not limited to, a collaboration environment. Other types of clients may also read from the repository cluster 460.


The queues in the repository 460 (e.g., the distributed repository cluster) are usually client type specific. For example, each queue is for a given client type for one given user. So, a user ‘A’ may have a synchronization client queue that all of the synchronization clients that user “A” uses reads from since user “A” may have multiple devices on which synchronization clients are installed. In general, the queues for clients in the repository 460 are read only queues such that multiple clients can read from the same queue without making modifications. In this manner, if a user utilizes multiple synchronization clients, each client can still receive and detect the respective updates such that multiple devices can be synchronized. The remote clients also typically individually track the location in the queue from which they last read such that only the most recent events are updated at the client, and that the events read from a queue is specific to a given client, dependent on what has previously been synchronized or read.


According to some embodiments, sync clients 480a-n may create and modify in real-time, icon repository files 482a-n with data entries associated with the current state of work items (e.g. work items 324 in FIGS. 3A and 3B) at remote clients. The iconizers 484a-n may monitor icon repository files 482a-n and based on the included entries, generate and display appropriate icons 486a-n (e.g. through the use of icon overlays 380, 382, 384, and 386 as illustrated in FIG. 3B) representing the current state of work items at remote clients.


According to some embodiments, icon repository files 482a-n may be created with SQLite. In some embodiments, SQLite has built in support for multiple processes reading and writing to the same repository using a read-many-write-once lock. According to some embodiments, iconizers 484a-n may use standard file watching and file presence for additional forms of communication. According to some embodiments, icon repository files 482a-n be next to the existing repository file that the core engine uses (e.g. an instantiation of core repository 460). Besides being easy to locate, such a configuration may provide the benefit of it being included in bug reports.


Icon Repository Content


As illustrated in FIG. 4B, according to some embodiments, icon repository files 482a-n may consist of rows entries 481a-n of four values: (i) version 483a-n, (ii) path 485a-n, (iii) traits flags 487a-n, and (iv) icon state 489a-n. For simplicity, FIG. 4B illustrates only the interactions between core repository 460, realtime client 470a, sync client 480a, icon repository file 482a, and iconizer 484a. In other words, at a single client device. According to some embodiments, each entry 481a may represent a work item hosted on a cloud-based platform. The version 483a, according to some embodiments, a 64-bit unsigned integer, may refer to the update when the entry 481a was last modified. According to some embodiments, a synchronization client (e.g. sync client 480a) may increment the version value 483a of each entry 481a every time it updates the entry. For any file in the sync directory, iconizer 484a may retrieve the icon state for a particular work item by reading the corresponding entry for that work item. According to some embodiments, path 485a may refer to a file path for a particular work item stored in the sync directory at sync client 480a. If the path 485a does not appear in the icon repository file 482a, that particular work item may be considered synchronized with no special traits. According to some embodiments, values of traits flags 487a, may include, but are not limited to “locked,” “locked,” “unlocked,” and “collaborating.” According to some embodiments, combinations of traits such as collaboration and unlock may be possible. Alternately, some combinations of traits may not be possible (e.g. collaboration+lock). Even where some combinations of trait flags may not be possible, the iconizer 484a may treat all flags as independent and rely on sync client 480a to set them appropriately. According to some embodiments, values of icon state may include, but are not limited to “synchronized,” “not synchronized,” “in progress,” hidden,” and “problem.” As files synchronize it may be expected that only one row in icon repository file 482a will change—to have an icon state 489a with a value of “synced” and the most recent version 483a.


Additional Information


According to some embodiments, the sync directory and its version are stored in the one-row table. When the sync_directory version increments, the iconizer can invalidate all overlays even if the sync_directory field is unchanged.


Example Embodiments—Iconizer Startup
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments an iconizer can open a mailslot for listening (windows)/broadcast notifications (mac), and may then search for a sync client, if found it may send an “iconizer-started message.” The sync client may respond by sending sync_directory name and the status of all files that are not synced one-by-one to the iconizer. Until the sync client has sent the sync_directory no icons are drawn in some embodiments. Then icons are updated as messages arrive.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, iconizer 484a-n may monitor a synchronization directory of sync client 480A-N for changes. If an icon repository file 482a-n is detected, iconizer 484a-n may open the file with SQLite. According to some embodiments, whenever iconizer 484a-n detects a change to the icon repository file 482a-n (or the file appears), iconizer 484a-n may use the file to update icons 493a-n for workspace items (e.g. files and/or folders 342 and 344 as illustrated in FIG. 3B). If the icon repository file 482a-n is not present or the sync directory is not specified in the file, no icons are drawn. This last fact can allow sync client 480a-n to turn icons on or off (for example at exit or when moving the sync point) even if other Iconizers are using the icon repository.


Embodiment Comparison—Sync Startup
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, when a sync client starts up it may attempt to open communication with an iconizer. If communication fails, the sync client may wait until a broadcast arrives indicating that iconizer has initialized and may then try again. Once established, the sync client may send the sync directory name and status of all items in-progress/hidden/problem to the iconizer.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, sync client 480a-n may write an empty icon repository file 482a-n if one does not already exist in the sync directory. That is, sync client 480A-N may write out the sync directory name and directory version of 0 to the shared file. There may be no entry rows in the icon repository file 482a-n table at startup according to some embodiments. On subsequent startups, the sync client 480a-n may increment the version of icon repository file 482a-n by one, delete all rows with synced or in progress icons, non-trait files, and set the sync directory with the current version.


Embodiment Comparison—File/Folder Transitions from Synced to in-Progress (or Hidden or Problem)
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a message to the iconizer stating that a given path has changed to a status of “in-progress.” In certain situations (for example, where files/folders are moved) two path messages may be sent by the sync client to the iconizer. For each path message, the iconizer may update its repository with the new information and invalidate the icon for the specified path.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, sync client 480a-n may increment the file version number 483a-n and add a row to the table with the current version 483a-n, path name 485a-n, traits 487a-n, and icon status 489a-N. For example, where the synch client 480a determines that a file and/or folder has transitioned from “synched” to “in-progress,” the synch client 480a may set icon state 489a for the particular work item entry to “in progress.” If there is already a row with the given path, that row may be updated with the current icon state 489a and version 483a. In certain instances (like for example, where a file/folder is moved) synch client 480a-n may add two entry rows. Iconizer 484a-n may notice the change to the icon repository file 482a-n, determine the entry rows with incremented versions 483a-n (e.g. where the entry row is greater than the corresponding entry row when last read by the iconizer 484a-n), and updates the icons 486a-n for the work items associated with the entry rows. According to some embodiments, iconizer 484a-n may update its own version of an icon repository file to match the newest version of icon repository file 482a-n read.



FIG. 6 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process 600 for displaying, by an iconizer, an icon representing a current state of a shared item stored locally on a client device with a synchronization client, the shared item shared with collaborators via a workspace hosted by a cloud-based platform. The process may be implemented, as described previously by an iconizer, for example iconizer 482a-n as described above and illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B.


At step 610 in FIG. 6, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, an iconizer 484a, may detect a change in a repository file 482a, the change including a creation or a modification of an entry that is associated with a shared item (e.g. one of the item rows 481a as illustrated in icon repository 482a in FIG. 4B). According to some embodiments, the creation and/or modification may be performed by a sync client 480a.


At step 630 in FIG. 6, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, in response to the detected change, an iconizer 484a may compare the current version (e.g. version value 483A) of the entry as it as it exists in a first (i.e. “unmodified”) state of the icon repository file 482a to the version of the entry (e.g. version value 483a) as it exists in a second (i.e. “modified”) state of the icon repository file 482a.


At step 650 in FIG. 6, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, if the value indicating the version of the entry (e.g. version value 483a) as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file 482a is different than the value indicating the version of the entry (e.g. version value 483a) as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file 482a, the iconizer 484a may identify the value indicating the state of the shared item (e.g. state value 489a) as it appears in the second state of the repository file;


At step 670 in FIG. 6, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, the iconizer 484A may generate a new icon and/or icon overlay (e.g. icon overlay 486a) representing the current state of the shared item, based on the value indicating the state of the shared item (e.g. state value 489a) as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file 482a.


At step 690 in FIG. 6, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, the iconizer 484A may display a new icon and/or icon overlay (e.g. icon overlay 486a) representing the current state of the shared item.



FIG. 7 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process 700 for informing an iconizer, by a sync client of a change in status of a shared item at a synchronization client using a repository file monitored by the iconizer, the shared item being shared with collaborators and stored in a workspace hosted by a cloud-based platform. The process may be implemented, as described previously by a remote synchronization client, for example synch client 480a-n as described above and as illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B.


At step 710 in FIG. 7, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, a sync client 480a may detect an event indicating a modification to a shared item, for example as described herein with reference to FIG. 5.


At step 730 in FIG. 7, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, the sync client 480a may create and/or modify an entry (e.g. one of the item rows 481a as illustrated in icon repository file 482a in FIG. 4B) in an icon repository file 482a, the entry corresponding to the shared item, wherein the entry comprises a value indicating a version of the entry (e.g. version value 483a) and a value indicating a state of the shared item corresponding to the entry (e.g. state value 489a).


At step 750 in FIG. 7, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, the sync client 480a may increment the value indicating the a version of the of the entry (e.g. version value 483a). For simplicity FIG. 4B illustrates version values as single digit integers, for example “1.” In this simplified example, the sync client 480a may increment a a version value from “1” to “2.” However as disclosed earlier, according to some embodiments, version values may be 64-bit unsigned integer.


At Step 770 in FIG. 7, and with reference to FIG. 4B as an example, the sync client 480a may set the value indicating the state of the shared item (e.g. state value 489a) to “in-progress.”


Embodiment Comparison—File/Folder Transitions Goes from in-Progress to Synced
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, the process may similar to that described above except that sync client may remove a row from its repository and invalidate the icon for the particular file/folder path.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A-4B and 6-7, the process may be similar to that described above except that the icon status value 489a-n for a particular entry row is changed by the sync client 480a from “in-progress” to “synched.”


Embodiment Comparison—Sync Exits
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a “quit” message to the iconizer. When the iconizer receives the message, it may clear its repository and forget the sync directory name. According to some embodiments, the iconizer may not display icons until it receives a sync startup message with the sync directory.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, sync client 480a-n may set the sync directory to empty. The iconizer 484a-n may notices the change, and with no sync directory, display no overlays for icons 486a-n. The iconizer 484a-n may close its connection with the icon repository file 482a-n. According to some embodiments, iconizer 484a-n may be unloaded by an overlay handler (not shown).


Embodiment Comparison—Item Trait Message
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, a sync client may send a trait message to the iconizer to mark a path as locked/unlocked or to mark a path as collaboration or custom link. The iconizer may then change system files or update icon overlays for files/folders as appropriate.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, sync client 480a-n may increment the version 483a-n for a particular row entry in icon repository file 482a-n. The iconizer 484a-n may notices the change to the icon repository file 482a-n and change system files and/or update the icon overlays for files/folders 486a-n as appropriate.


Embodiment Comparison—Repository Packing
Embodiments A

According to some embodiments, a synch client may remove rows for paths that are synchronized after a reasonable interval. The synch client may message the iconizer informing it of the changes. Sync client may set a timer (e.g. for 10 minutes) after which it may be very safe to remove the rows from the repository.


Embodiments B

According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, when sync client 480a-n decides to reduce the size of icon repository file 482A-n it can rewrite the file to delete all the synchronized entries that have been in the repository for long enough to be detected and painted by iconizer 484a-n. The sync client 480a-n may keep a count of all work items updated to a synchronized state. When a threshold value is passed, sync client 480a-n may schedule a deletion of all synchronized rows with a version below the current version. Sync client 480a-n may reset the count and begin a new counter, but may not schedule another repository pack if one is already scheduled. It could occur that some rows transition multiple times. A set or bloom filter may be used to reduce this, but it may be unnecessary to prevent one SQL command in reasonable interval.


Additional Considerations


According to some embodiments, and with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, the icon repository file 482a-n may be part of an Icon Manager (not shown). The Icon Manager may track the reference count of each path in progress, so it can be similar to what is present in the iconizer 484a-n.


Unicode Filenames


Within Unicode, some characters—notably those with diatrical marks—can be represented in 2 forms: Normal Form Composed (NFC) or Normal Form Decomposed (NFD). A string of Unicode characters can contain any mixture of both forms (Note that this is explicitly excluding the compatibility normal forms namely NFKC and NFKD because they are not relevant to this discussion).

















Character
NFC
NFD






















Á
Á
A
{acute over ( )}




(codepoint)
00C1
0041
0301









Because there are 2 forms for representing (some) characters in Unicode, it's possible to produce different sequences of codepoints meaning to indicate the same sequence of characters. Hence, some embodiments of the cloud-based platform may end up with more than one way to specify the same path.


The following table specifies behavior of all platforms related to handling of Unicode filenames:














Platform
Accepts
Returns







Mac
All
NFD


Windows
All
Input


Linux
All
Input


cloud-based
All
Input


platform (e.g., Box)









In some embodiments there may be two issues:


1. Some embodiments cannot generally depend on the OS to give back the exact filename that it was given.
















>>> from _future_ import unicode_literals



>>> import sys



>>> sys platform










‘darwin’
← Mac










>>> name1 = ‘Á’




>>> name1




a‘\xcl’
← NFC



>>> import os




>>> os·mkdir(name1)




>>> os·listdir(‘.’)




[u‘A\uO301’]
← NFD









2. A broader issue though is that because the same filename may be encoded in different codepoints, there can be 2 files in a directory on the remote cloud-based platform or the local Windows that represent the same name, but not on Mac.
















>>> from _future_ import unicode_literals



>>> import sys



>>> sys·platform










‘win32’
← Windows



>>> name1 = ‘Á’




>>> name1




a‘\xcl’
← NFC



>>> import os




>>> os·mkdir(name1)




>>> os·listdir(‘.’)




[a‘\xcl’]




>>> name2 = ‘Á’




>>> name2




u‘A\uO301’
← NFD



>>> os·mkdir(name2)




>>> os·listdir(‘.’)




[u‘A\uO301’, u‘\xcl’]










>>> from _future_ import unicode_literals



>>> import sys



>>> sys·platform










‘darwin’
← Mac









>>> name1 = ‘Á’



>>> name1










a‘\xcl’
← NFC



>>> import os




>>> os·mkdir(name1)




>>> os·listdir(‘.’)




[u‘A\uO301’]
← NFD









>>> name2 = ‘Á’



>>> name2



u‘A\uO301’



>>> os·mkdir(name2)



Traceback (most recent cell last):



 File “<stdin>”, line 1, in <module>



OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: ‘A\xcc\xB1’









Accordingly in some embodiments, the sync client may need to be able to sync files between the local platform and the cloud-based platform with names in any normal form.


Some embodiments do not restrict filenames to either NFC or NFD because what would require renaming all of existing files and folders, update all other clients (iOS, Android, etc.) and change the server side to reject non-conforming names.


Design


In some embodiments, the name of an item stored in the Local Shadow Item Store and Last Sync Item Store should reflect the name of the item on disk. In some embodiments, this means that all local operations that affect an item's name (Create, Rename, Move) should re-read the name from disk. This would solve the first issue identified above.


The second issue presented in some embodiments is an artifact of a platform (Mac) not supporting all capabilities provided by cloud-based platform. It can be considered similar to the cloud-based platform's ability to have multiple folders at the top-level with the same name due to collaborations. There are two possible solutions to this issue in some embodiments:


Fail the second item encountered and mark it as a Problem Item.


Sync the second item encountered locally with a different name.


Solution 1 may be a simpler implementation to an uncommon scenario. But it may provide a sub-optimal user experience. The failure to sync the item may be remote logged by the sync client.


Solution 2 may generally provide a much better user experience. The operation for the second item may fail with DestinationExistsError and be handled by the ConflictRecoveryManager in some embodiments. The ConflictRecoveryManager can rename the first item locally (which will in-turn cause the corresponding item on the cloud-based platform to be renamed) and retry the operation for the second item. In order to not rename the first item on the remote cloud-based platform in some embodiments, the conflict recover logic can be be changed to retry the failed operation for the second item with a different name.


Additional Considerations


Unit tests for the LocalFSSyncAPI can be written to ensure that the names stored in the Local Shadow Item Store and Last Sync Item Store reflect the disk names. In addition, B-Y tests can be written for this.


B-Y tests can be written to test the scenario of 2 files with the same name but different encodings.


Example Test Cases

1. Create a directory with NFC normalized name on the cloud-based platform and let it sync locally. Test that no echo back changes are made on the cloud-based platform. Make changes to the directory locally and test that they are synced to the cloud-based platform. Make changes to the directory on the cloud-based platform and test that they are synced locally.


2. Repeat 1 with NFD normalized name.


3. Repeat 1 using a file instead of a directory.


4. Repeat 2 using a file instead of a directory.


5. Create a directory with NFC normalized name on the cloud-based platform and let is sync locally. Change local monitor to full scan mode and test that no changes are made on the cloud-based platform.


6. Repeat 5 with NFD normalized name.


7. Repeat 5 using a file instead of a directory.


8. Repeat 6 using a file instead of a directory.


9. Create a directory with NFC name on the cloud-based platform and let it sync locally. Then create another directory with the same name but NFD normalized in the same directory on the cloud-based platform. Test that—


a. On Windows, the second directory syncs


b. On Mac, either the second directory fails to sync and is marked as problem (Solution #1) or the second directory is synced with a different name and the first directory is not modified (Solution #2).


10. Repeat 9 reversing the order of NFC and NFD normalization.


11. Repeat 9 using files instead of directories.


12. Repeat 10 using files instead of directories.


13. Repeat 9 and 10 with one file and one directory.


Example Client—Side System


FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example device system 500 showing select components described in relation to FIGS. 1-4B on the client side (e.g., devices 102 as shown FIG. 1) of the cloud-based platform.


Device 500 may include, for example, a bus 502, and a memory 504 among other components. The memory 504 may include, among others, a synchronization client 580 (e.g. similar to synchronization client 480a-n as described in FIGS. 4A-4B), which may include a file system monitor 590, an icon repository file 582, and iconizer 584. The file system monitor 590 may include a raw event processor 592 and an event filter pipeline 594. The raw event processor may include a listener 592a, a full scanner 592b, and a partial scanner 592C. The event filter pipeline 594 may include one or more event filters 594a, and an event buffer 594b. The memory 504 may also include a communication module 506 that facilitates communication among the mobile device 500, the host server 100, and other components discussed herein using any of the communication protocols that are supported. The memory 504 may also include other device modules (not shown in FIG. 5 for simplicity) such as a GPS module for determining and providing location information, text input module for accepting and processing inputs provided using different input mechanisms of the mobile device, and the like for handling various functions of the mobile device 500. It is noted that the aforementioned modules are intended for purposes of enabling the present embodiments, rather than limiting. As such, a person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the present disclosure covers apparent alternatives, modifications, and equivalents (e.g., combining or separating the modules) made to the techniques described herein. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the mobile device 500 and each illustrated component.


As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” an “interface,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, interface, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, interface, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all media that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. § 101), and to specifically exclude all media that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.


The bus 502 is a subsystem for transferring data between the components of the mobile device 500. For example, the bus 502 may facilitate the transfer of data between the memory 504 and other components of the mobile device such as the processor and/or the input/output components that utilize the data.


As previously mentioned, over all, the present embodiments may provide shell icon communications via a synchronization client 580, iconizer 584 and icon repository file 582.


According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, during normal operations, the synchronization client 580 may operate in one or both of two modes to gather file/folder synchronization events from host server 100. When in a listening mode, a listener module 592a (e.g., as a thread running in the operating system of device 500) may receive new events reported from the host server 100 as these events occur, and the raw event processor 592 may process these events in manners described herein. During a startup phase of the synchronization client 580, or when there is an inconsistency (e.g., resulted from a potential violation of local file system rules), the synchronization client 580 may switch into a full scan mode, in which the full scanner 592b may request that all existing files and folders, for example, be retrieved from the workspace 302 (e.g., in host server 100) and turned into events.


According to some embodiments, the raw event processor 592 may receive events from the host server 100 which represent that a modification to an item (e.g., a file or a folder) has taken place on the workspace 302, and may function together with other components to process the received raw events, such as the generating of the aforementioned icon repository file 582.


According to some embodiments, the file system monitor 590 may cause the sync client 580 to receive (e.g., using the listener 592a) or to retrieve (e.g., using the full scanner 592b) events from the workspace 302 and to normalize those events so that the events may be input into the icon repository file 582 correctly. The file system monitor 590 may operate multiple processes to, for example, receive raw events with the listener 592a, retrieve events with the full scanner 592b, generate synchronization steps with the event processor 592, normalize events with the event filter pipeline 594, and control the operating status of the file system monitor 590 itself by responding to start, stop, pause, and resume, as well as transitioning between the aforementioned listen and full scan mode.


According to some embodiments, after an event indicating a modification to an item is received from the host server 100, the file system monitor 590 may initiate the event's processing by requesting the raw event processor 592 (e.g., the full scanner 592b or the listener 592a) to send that event through the event filter pipeline 594. Then, the event filter pipeline 594 may utilize one or more filters in the event filters 594a to identify whether execution of the event can cause violation of any local file system rule. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. If the execution of the event can cause violation of any rule, the event filter pipeline can buffer the event in the event buffer 786 until a subsequent event arrives. The event filter pipeline 594 may then identify whether execution of an aggregate of the events is to violate any local file system rule. If the execution of the aggregate of the events is to violate any rule, the event filter pipeline 594 may continue to buffer the subsequent event until another subsequent event arrives. Additionally, in some implementations, if an event remains buffered in the event filter pipeline 594 for longer than a configurable maximum time limit, the event filter pipeline 594 may drop the event, and some embodiments of the synchronization client 580 may report (e.g., via the full scanner 592b) that a full scan of file/folder status within the synchronization scope is required to resolve the inconsistency.


The event filter pipeline 594 in the file system monitor 590 may be responsible for normalizing raw events received from the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302 through host server 100) into synchronization event (or synchronization steps) that are safe to apply on the local file system where the synchronization client 580 operates or to apply as repository entries into icon repository file 582. Because the cloud-based platform (e.g., workspace 302) may not provide any ordering guarantees around the delivery of events, the event filter pipeline 594 may perform the guaranteeing that, for example, a given raw event received which represents a future state of the associated item is not applied until the item can be moved into that state without violating any local file system rules. Accordingly, because iconizer 584 may be dependent on updates to the icon repository file 582 created and modified by sync client 580, the icons for files/folders generated by iconizer 584 may provide to a user true real-time communications regarding the state of locally stored files/folders with respect to work items in a given workspace (e.g. workspace 302).


Some embodiments of the event filter pipeline 594 may treat each raw event in the cloud-based platform as a state update notification for a specific item (e.g., a file or a folder). Each raw event (which is to pass through the event filter pipeline 594 may include, in some examples, the full state of the item affected by the event. This state information may be incorporated in real time into icon repository file 582 as previously discussed.


According to some embodiments, the event filter pipeline 594 then can compare the state of the item as indicated by the event against the current state of that item as stored on the local mobile device 500. The comparison may be used to determine whether the received event represents a newer version of the item, whether the newer state in the event is currently valid, and/or which synchronization steps need to be generated to move the item from its current state on the mobile device 500 to its newer state in the event, for example including updating icon repository file 582.


In addition, the event filter pipeline 594 can include one or more of the following example filter components in the event filters 594a in order to carry out the functionalities of the event filter pipeline 594 described herein:


A. Raw Retrieve Shadow Item Filter


The raw retrieve shadow item filter can retrieve the current state of the item affected by the event from (e.g., a local storage of) the local mobile device 500. This current item state can be used, for example, to update the icon repository file 582.


B. Drop Duplicate Raw Events Filter


The drop duplicate raw events filter can compare a Sequence_ID in the event item state with a Sequence_ID in the current item state to determine if the event item state is newer. In some embodiments, the drop duplicate raw events filter can drop the event if the event represents an older state of the item. In one or more embodiments, however, this check can be skipped for events originating from either the full scanner 592B or a partial scanner 592C since (a) events from the scanners are typically guaranteed to represent the current state of the item; and (b) the scanners detect item deletions through the absence of the item in the scan result, and therefore the scanners typically do not have access to an updated Sequence_ID for deletion events.


C. Folder Sync and Unsync Filter


The folder synchronization and unsynchronization filter can determine whether the received event represents a folder synchronization/unsynchronization. If the event does represent so, the event filters 594A indicates to the file system monitor 590 that a partial scan is required for the specified folder.


D. File System Conflict Filter


The local file system conflict filter can check if the event item state is consistent with the current state(s) of the rest of the local items based on local file system rules. Examples of these local file system rules can include: (1) an item cannot be added to a folder that does not exist; (2) no two items in the same folder can have the same name; and/or (3) a non-empty folder cannot be deleted. So, if the event item state indicates that the item is not deleted, the local file system conflict filter can check that the item's parent folder exists and that there is no other item with the same name in that folder. If the event item state indicates that the item is deleted and the item is a folder, the local file system conflict filter can check that the folder is empty. If any of these checks fails, the item event is buffered until the checks can pass (e.g., upon receiving further events).


E. Raw Event to Sync Event Filter


The raw event to synchronization event (or synchronization step) filter can generate the synchronization steps or synchronization events necessary to transform the item from the shadow item state to the event item state based on the differences between the shadow item state and the event item state. In some embodiments, this filter can also update the current state of the item with the new state of the item.


The event filter pipeline 594 may also include an event buffer 594b to buffer events. For example, in some particular implementations, a move event can be recorded by the local listener 592a as a delete event followed quickly by a create event. The event buffer 594b may buffer the delete event for a small amount of time and attempts to resolve it with a create event. Events can be held in the buffer until either the event resolves (e.g., when the filter pipeline 594 receives another event process operation) or until a buffer time expires (e.g., at which point the filter pipeline 594 may execute a flush buffer operation). According to some embodiments, buffering of an event by event buffer 594b may cause the sync client 580 to enter a status of “in-progress” for the particular work item in icon repository file 582.


In this way, the disclosed techniques of the sync client 580 may monitor conditions of events in the cloud-based platform, create and update an icon repository file 582, of which an iconizer 584 may monitor in which to provide shell icon communications indicating the state of file/folder stored locally at device 500. In addition, the sync client 580 may bring the benefit of resilience to out of order events so as to minimize unnecessary full scans and to provide support for lock/unlock and collaboration/uncollaboration events in the cloud-based platform.


Among other benefits, the disclosed embodiments may bring the benefit of extensibility, maintainability, and testability. For extensibility, the disclosed embodiments can be extensible to handle any additional modes of generating new events, more complicated methods of normalizing events, and more complicated transitions and inconsistency handling. For maintainability, the disclosed embodiments can be easily maintained because modularization. Additionally, minor changes to execution logic do not require substantial changes to the design. For testability, each component can be tested individually, as well as the control mechanisms, in a single threaded manner. Further, multithreaded integration tests can be easily performed and designed as well.


Additional Background Information



FIG. 8 shows a diagrammatic representation 800 of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, can be executed.


In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or can be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine can operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.


The machine can be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet, a phablet, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a thin-client device, a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed repository, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.


In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, can be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.


Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.


Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.


The network interface device enables the machine 2800 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.


The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall can additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.


Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.


Additional Remarks


In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, can be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.


Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.


Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.


Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number can also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.


The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments can perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks can be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks can be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks can instead be performed in parallel, or can be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations can employ differing values or ranges.


The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.


Any patents and applications and other references noted, including any that can be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.


These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes some embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system can vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing some features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.


While some aspects of the disclosure may be presented herein in some claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), other aspects can likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for displaying a graphical icon representative of a state of a local copy of a shared item, the shared item stored in a workspace hosted by a cloud-based collaboration platform, the shared item shared with a plurality of collaborators via the workspace, the local copy of the shared item stored on a client device with a synchronization client, the synchronization client configured to enable synchronization between the shared item in the workspace and the local copy of the shared item at the client device, the method comprising: detecting a change in an icon repository file from a first state to a second state, the change including a creation or a modification of an entry that is associated with the local copy of the shared item, wherein the entry comprises a value indicative of a version of the entry and a value indicative of a synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item, and wherein the icon repository file is stored at the client device and automatically updated by the synchronization client in response to events received from the cloud-based collaboration platform, the received events indicative of modifications to one or more shared items stored in the workspace:in response to the detected change, comparing the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file to the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file;in determining the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file is different than the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file, identifying the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file;generating a first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item, based on the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file; andcausing display, via a graphical user interface (GUI) of the client device, of the first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: if the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file is the same as the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state, ignoring the entry; and continuing to display a second graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein if the icon repository file is not detected, displaying no graphical icons.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item is selected from the group consisting of: synchronized, unsynchronized, in-progress, hidden, and problem.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the value indicative of the version of the entry is a 64-bit unsigned integer.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first state of the icon repository file corresponds with a first synchronization state of the workspace and the second state of the repository file corresponds with a second synchronization state of the workspace.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the entry in the icon repository file further comprises a value indicative of a traits tag.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: if the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file is different than the value indicating the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file, identifying the value indicative of the traits tag of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file; generating a third graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item, based on the value indicative of the traits tag of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file;causing display of the third graphical icon representative of the state of the local copy of the shared item; andmodifying a file permission to comply with the traits tag of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the value indicative of the traits tag of the local coy of the shared item is selected from the group consisting of: locked, unlocked, and collaborating.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the entry in the icon repository file further comprises a value indicative of a file path, the value indicative of the file path comprising a Normal Form Composed (NFC) or Normal Form Decomposed (NFD) file name.
  • 11. A method for informing an iconizer at a client device of a change in status of a shared item stored in a workspace of a cloud-based collaboration platform using an icon repository file stored at the client device, the icon repository file monitored by the iconizer and updated by a synchronization client at the client device, the shared item being shared with a plurality of collaborators via the workspace, the synchronization client configured to enable synchronization between the shared item in the workspace and a local copy of the shared item at the client device, the method comprising: detecting, by the synchronization client, an event received from the cloud-based collaboration platform, the event indicative of a modification to the shared item or the local copy of the shared item;creating or modifying automatically, by the synchronization client, an entry in the icon repository file, in response to detecting the event, the entry corresponding to the local copy of the shared item, wherein the entry comprises a value indicative of a version of the entry and a value indicative of a synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item corresponding to the entry, wherein the creation or modification of the entry is detectable by the iconizer;incrementing, by the synchronization client, the value indicative of the version of the of the entry; andsetting, by the synchronization client, the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item based on the event;wherein the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item is utilized by the iconizer to generate and display a graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising: detecting an event indicative of synchronization of the shared item with the local copy of the shared item; incrementing the value indicative of the version of the of the entry; and setting the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item to synchronized.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: counting a number of synchronized entries, the synchronized entries being those in which the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item is set to synchronized; deleting the synchronized entries when the number of synchronized entries reaches a threshold number; and resetting the number of synchronized entries.
  • 14. A machine readable medium having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by a processor on a client device, cause the processor to: detect a change in an icon repository file from a first state to a second state, the change including a creation or a modification of an entry that is associated with a local copy of a shared item, wherein the shared item is stored in a workspace hosted by a cloud-based collaboration platform and shared with a plurality of collaborators via the workspace, the local copy of the shared item stored at the client device, the client device including a synchronization client configured to enable synchronization between the shared item in the workspace and the local copy of the shared item at the client, wherein the entry comprises a value indicative of a version of the entry and a value indicative of a synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item, and wherein the icon repository file is stored at the client device and automatically updated by the synchronization client in response to events received from the cloud-based collaboration platform, the received events indicative of modifications to one or more shared items stored in the workspace;in response to the detected change, compare the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file to the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file;in determining the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file is different than the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file, identify the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file;generate a first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item, based on the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item as it appears in the second state of the icon repository file; andcause display, via a graphical user interface (GUI) of the client device, of the first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 15. The machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein if the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the first state of the icon repository file is the same as the value indicative of the version of the entry as it exists in the second state of the icon repository file, the processor is further caused to: ignore the entry; and continue to display a second graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 16. A client device for accessing, viewing, and/or modifying a local copy of a shared item, the shared item stored in a workspace hosted by a cloud-based collaboration platform, the shared item shared with a plurality of collaborators via the workspace, the local copy of the shared item stored on the client device, the device comprising: a processor;a display device;a network interface; anda memory unit having stored thereon:an icon repository file;a synchronization client configured to enable synchronization between the shared item in the workspace and the local copy of the shared item at the client device, the synchronization client including instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the client device to:detect, via the network interface, an event in the workspace hosted by the cloud-based collaboration platform indicative of a modification to the shared item or the local copy of the shared item;create or modify automatically an entry in the icon repository file, in response to detecting the event, the entry corresponding to the local copy of the shared item, wherein the entry comprises a value indicative of a version of the entry and a value indicative of a synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item corresponding to the entry, increment the value indicative of the version of the of the entry; andset the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item based on the event; andan iconizer including instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the client device to:detect the increment by the synchronization client of the value indicative of the version of the entry, in response to the detected increment, identify the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item;generate a first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item based on the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item; anddisplay, via the display device, the first graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
  • 17. The client device of claim 16, wherein the synchronization client further comprises instructions which, when executed by the processor, further cause the client device to: detect, via the network interface, an event in the workspace hosted by the cloud-based collaboration platform indicative of the synchronization of the shared item with the local copy of the shared item; increment the value indicative of the version of the entry; and set the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item to synchronized.
  • 18. The client device of claim 16, wherein the synchronization client further comprises instructions which, when executed by the processor, further cause the client device to: count a number of synchronized entries, the synchronized entries being those in which the value indicative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item is set to synchronized; delete the synchronized entries when the number of synchronized entries reaches a threshold number; and reset the number of synchronized entries.
  • 19. The client device of claim 16, wherein the synchronization client further comprises instructions which, when executed by the processor, further cause the client device to: detect, via the network interface, an event in the workspace hosted by the cloud-based collaboration platform indicative of a traits flag of the shared item; modify the entry in the icon repository file, wherein the entry further comprises a value indicative of the traits flag; increment the value indicative of the version of the entry; set the value indicative of the traits flag to one from the group consisting of: locked, unlocked, and collaborating; and set a file permission to reflect the set value indicative of the traits flag.
  • 20. The client device of claim 19, wherein the iconizer further comprises instructions which, when executed by the processor, further cause the client device to: detect the increment by the synchronization client of the value indicative of the version of the entry; identify the value indicative of the traits flag of the local copy of the shared item in response to the detected increment; generate a second graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item based on the value indicative of the traits flag of the local copy of the shared item; and display, via the display device, the second graphical icon representative of the synchronization state of the local copy of the shared item.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS AND EFFECTIVE FILING DATE ENTITLEMENT

This application is entitled to the benefit of and/or the right of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/839,331, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SHELL COMMUNICATIONS IN A CLOUD-BASED PLATFORM”, filed Jun. 25, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is therefore entitled to an effective filing date of Jun. 25, 2013.

US Referenced Citations (439)
Number Name Date Kind
5191645 Carlucci Mar 1993 A
5799320 Klug Aug 1998 A
5848415 Guck Dec 1998 A
5864870 Guck Jan 1999 A
5999908 Abelow Dec 1999 A
6016467 Newsted et al. Jan 2000 A
6055543 Christensen et al. Apr 2000 A
6073161 DeBoskey et al. Jun 2000 A
6098078 Gehani et al. Aug 2000 A
6233600 Salas et al. May 2001 B1
6260040 Kauffman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289345 Yasue Sep 2001 B1
6292803 Richardson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6336124 Alam et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342906 Kumar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345386 Delo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6370543 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B2
6385606 Inohara et al. May 2002 B2
6396593 Laverty et al. May 2002 B1
6493804 Soltis Dec 2002 B1
6515681 Knight Feb 2003 B1
6539381 Prasad et al. Mar 2003 B1
6584466 Serbinis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6636872 Heath et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654737 Nunez Nov 2003 B1
6662186 Esquibel et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687878 Eintracht et al. Feb 2004 B1
6714968 Prust Mar 2004 B1
6735623 Prust May 2004 B1
6742181 Koike et al. May 2004 B1
6760721 Chasen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6947162 Rosenberg et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952724 Prust Oct 2005 B2
6996768 Elo et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010752 Ly Mar 2006 B2
7020697 Goodman et al. Mar 2006 B1
7039806 Friedman et al. May 2006 B1
7069393 Miyata et al. Jun 2006 B2
7130831 Howard et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133834 Abelow Nov 2006 B1
7149787 Mutalik et al. Dec 2006 B1
7152182 Ji et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155483 Friend et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165107 Pouyoul et al. Jan 2007 B2
7222078 Abelow May 2007 B2
7275244 Charles Bell et al. Sep 2007 B1
7296025 Kung et al. Nov 2007 B2
7346778 Guiter et al. Mar 2008 B1
7353252 Yang et al. Apr 2008 B1
7370269 Prabhu et al. May 2008 B1
7543000 Castro et al. Jun 2009 B2
7581221 Lai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7620565 Abelow Nov 2009 B2
7647559 Yozell-Epstein et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650367 Arruza Jan 2010 B2
7661088 Burke Feb 2010 B2
7665093 Maybee et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676542 Moser et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698363 Dan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7734600 Wise et al. Jun 2010 B1
7756843 Palmer Jul 2010 B1
7774412 Schnepel Aug 2010 B1
7814426 Huesken et al. Oct 2010 B2
7886287 Davda Feb 2011 B1
7890964 Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. Feb 2011 B2
7937663 Parker et al. May 2011 B2
7958453 Taing Jun 2011 B1
7979296 Kruse et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996374 Jones et al. Aug 2011 B1
8027976 Ding et al. Sep 2011 B1
RE42904 Stephens, Jr. Nov 2011 E
8065739 Bruening et al. Nov 2011 B1
8090361 Hagan Jan 2012 B2
8103662 Eagan et al. Jan 2012 B2
8151183 Chen et al. Apr 2012 B2
8185830 Saha et al. May 2012 B2
8214747 Yankovich et al. Jul 2012 B1
8230348 Peters et al. Jul 2012 B2
8347276 Schadow Jan 2013 B2
8358701 Chou et al. Jan 2013 B2
8429540 Yankovich et al. Apr 2013 B1
8464161 Giles et al. Jun 2013 B2
8527549 Cidon Sep 2013 B2
8549066 Donahue et al. Oct 2013 B1
8549511 Seki et al. Oct 2013 B2
8607306 Bridge et al. Dec 2013 B1
8849955 Prahlad et al. Sep 2014 B2
20010027492 Gupta Oct 2001 A1
20020091738 Rohrabaugh et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099772 Deshpande et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020133509 Johnston et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020194177 Sherman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030041095 Konda et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030084306 Abburi et al. May 2003 A1
20030093404 Bader et al. May 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110264 Whidby et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115326 Verma et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135536 Lyons Jul 2003 A1
20030135565 Estrada Jul 2003 A1
20030154306 Perry Aug 2003 A1
20030204490 Kasriel Oct 2003 A1
20030217171 Von Stuermer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040021686 Barberis Feb 2004 A1
20040088647 Miller et al. May 2004 A1
20040103147 Flesher et al. May 2004 A1
20040111415 Scardino et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117438 Considine et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122949 Zmudzinski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128359 Horvitz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040177138 Salle et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181579 Huck et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040230624 Frolund et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246532 Inada Dec 2004 A1
20040267836 Armangau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005276 Morgan Jan 2005 A1
20050010860 Weiss et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022229 Gabriel et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028006 Leser et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050228 Perham et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063083 Dart et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050097225 Glatt et al. May 2005 A1
20050102328 Ring et al. May 2005 A1
20050108406 Lee et al. May 2005 A1
20050114305 Haynes et al. May 2005 A1
20050114378 Elien et al. May 2005 A1
20050182966 Pham et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198299 Beck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198452 Watanabe Sep 2005 A1
20050234864 Shapiro Oct 2005 A1
20050234943 Clarke Oct 2005 A1
20050261933 Magnuson Nov 2005 A1
20060005163 Huesken et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026502 Dutta Feb 2006 A1
20060026535 Hotelling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036568 Moore et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041603 Paterson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047804 Fredricksen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053088 Ali et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053380 Spataro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070083 Brunswig et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075071 Gillette Apr 2006 A1
20060123062 Bobbitt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060133340 Rybak et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060168550 Muller et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060174051 Lordi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060174054 Matsuki Aug 2006 A1
20060179070 George et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060242204 Karas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259524 Horton Nov 2006 A1
20060265719 Astl et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271510 Harward et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070016680 Burd et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038934 Fellman Feb 2007 A1
20070079242 Jolley et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070115845 Hochwarth et al. May 2007 A1
20070124460 McMullen et al. May 2007 A1
20070124737 Wensley et al. May 2007 A1
20070124781 Casey et al. May 2007 A1
20070126635 Houri Jun 2007 A1
20070130143 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070130163 Perez et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070198609 Black et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208878 Barnes-Leon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214180 Crawford Sep 2007 A1
20070220016 Estrada et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220590 Rasmussen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070240057 Satterfield et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250762 Mansfield Oct 2007 A1
20070256065 Heishi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266304 Fletcher et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282848 Kiilerich et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283443 McPherson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288290 Motoyama et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005135 Muthukrishnan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005195 Li Jan 2008 A1
20080016146 Gan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021959 Naghi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028323 Rosen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040173 Aleong et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040503 Kleks et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046828 Bibliowicz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059656 Saliba et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080063210 Goodman et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065881 Dawson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077631 Petri Mar 2008 A1
20080091763 Devonshire et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091790 Beck Apr 2008 A1
20080104277 Tian May 2008 A1
20080114720 Smith et al. May 2008 A1
20080133674 Knauerhase et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140732 Wilson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147790 Malaney et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151817 Fitchett et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154873 Redlich et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080182628 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183467 Yuan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184130 Tien et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194239 Hagan Aug 2008 A1
20080215883 Fok et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222654 Xu et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243855 Prahlad et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080250333 Reeves et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080250348 Alimpich et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263099 Brady-Kalnay et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271095 Shafton Oct 2008 A1
20080276158 Lim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090015864 Hasegawa Jan 2009 A1
20090019093 Brodersen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019426 Baeumer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030710 Levine Jan 2009 A1
20090044128 Baumgarten et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049131 Lyle et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090119322 Mills et al. May 2009 A1
20090125469 McDonald et al. May 2009 A1
20090132651 Roger et al. May 2009 A1
20090138808 Moromisato et al. May 2009 A1
20090150627 Benhase et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158142 Arthursson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164438 Delacruz Jun 2009 A1
20090171983 Samji et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193107 Srinivasan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193345 Wensley et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198772 Kim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210459 Nair et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214115 Kimura et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090235167 Boyer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235189 Aybes et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090249224 Davis et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254589 Nair et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260060 Smith et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271708 Peters et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276771 Nickolov et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282212 Peterson Nov 2009 A1
20090300356 Crandell Dec 2009 A1
20090300527 Malcolm et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327358 Lukiyanov et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327961 De Vorchik et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100011292 Marinkovich et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011447 Jothimani Jan 2010 A1
20100017262 Iyer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100036929 Scherpa et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042720 Stienhans et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057560 Skudlark et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057785 Khosravy et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076946 Barker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082634 Leban Apr 2010 A1
20100083136 Komine et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088150 Mazhar et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092126 Kaliszek et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100093310 Gbadegesin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107225 Spencer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100131868 Chawla et al. May 2010 A1
20100151431 Miller Jun 2010 A1
20100153835 Xiong et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100162365 Del Real Jun 2010 A1
20100162374 Nair Jun 2010 A1
20100179940 Gilder et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179991 Lorch Jul 2010 A1
20100185463 Noland et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185932 Coffman et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185980 Kuo Jul 2010 A1
20100191689 Cortes et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198783 Wang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198944 Ho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205537 Knighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100223378 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100229085 Nelson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235526 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235539 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241611 Zuber Sep 2010 A1
20100241972 Spataro et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250120 Waupotitsch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251340 Martin et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100257457 De Goes Oct 2010 A1
20100262582 Garcia-Ascanio et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100267588 Nelson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274765 Murphy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274772 Samuels Oct 2010 A1
20100281118 Donahue et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290623 Banks et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306004 Burtner Dec 2010 A1
20100306379 Ferris Dec 2010 A1
20100318893 Matthews et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322252 Suganthi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325155 Skinner et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325527 Estrada et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325559 Westerinen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325655 Perez Dec 2010 A1
20100332401 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332962 Hammer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100333116 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001763 Murakami Jan 2011 A1
20110016409 Grosz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022559 Andersen et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022812 van der Linden et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029883 Lussier et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040812 Phillips Feb 2011 A1
20110041083 Gabai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047413 McGill et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047484 Mount et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052155 Desmarais et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054968 Galaviz Mar 2011 A1
20110055299 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110055721 Jain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110061045 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110061046 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110065082 Gal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066951 Ward-Karet et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083167 Carpenter et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093567 Jeon et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099006 Sundararaman et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110113320 Neff et al. May 2011 A1
20110119313 Sung et al. May 2011 A1
20110137991 Russell Jun 2011 A1
20110142410 Ishii Jun 2011 A1
20110145744 Haynes et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161289 Pei et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167125 Achlioptas Jul 2011 A1
20110167353 Grosz et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110167435 Fang Jul 2011 A1
20110185292 Chawla et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202424 Chun et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202599 Yuan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208958 Stuedi et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209064 Jorgensen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213765 Cui et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219419 Reisman Sep 2011 A1
20110225417 Maharajh et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238458 Purcell et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238621 Agrawal Sep 2011 A1
20110238759 Spataro et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110239135 Spataro et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246294 Robb et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246950 Luna et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252071 Cidon Oct 2011 A1
20110252320 Arrasvuori et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258461 Bates Oct 2011 A1
20110258561 Ladouceur et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110282710 Akkiraju et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289433 Whalin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110296022 Ferris et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302113 Smith Dec 2011 A1
20110313803 Friend et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320197 Conejero et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036370 Lim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120064879 Panei Mar 2012 A1
20120072436 Pierre et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120079095 Evans et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120084672 Vonog Apr 2012 A1
20120089569 Mason, Jr. Apr 2012 A1
20120089659 Halevi et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120110005 Kuo et al. May 2012 A1
20120110436 Adler, III et al. May 2012 A1
20120117626 Yates et al. May 2012 A1
20120124306 Abercrombie et al. May 2012 A1
20120124547 Halbedel May 2012 A1
20120130900 Tang et al. May 2012 A1
20120134491 Liu May 2012 A1
20120136936 Quintuna May 2012 A1
20120144283 Hill et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150888 Hyatt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120151551 Readshaw et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158908 Luna et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159178 Lin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159310 Chang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173625 Berger Jul 2012 A1
20120179981 Whalin et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185355 Kilroy Jul 2012 A1
20120185521 Giampaolo Jul 2012 A1
20120185913 Martinez et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192055 Antebi et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192086 Ghods et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203908 Beaty et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120204032 Wilkins et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120214444 McBride et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218885 Abel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221789 Felter Aug 2012 A1
20120226767 Luna et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233155 Gallmeier et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233205 McDermott Sep 2012 A1
20120240061 Hillenius et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120257249 Natarajan Oct 2012 A1
20120263166 Cho et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120266203 Elhadad et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120284638 Cutler et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284804 Lindquist Nov 2012 A1
20120291011 Quine Nov 2012 A1
20120309540 Holme et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120311157 Erickson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317239 Mulder et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317487 Lieb et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328259 Seibert, Jr. et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120331177 Jensen Dec 2012 A1
20120331441 Adamson Dec 2012 A1
20130007245 Malik et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007471 Grab et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007894 Dang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013560 Goldberg et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130014023 Lee et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130042106 Persaud et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130055127 Saito et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067232 Cheung et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130073403 Tuchman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080919 Kiang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130117337 Dunham May 2013 A1
20130124638 Barreto et al. May 2013 A1
20130138608 Smith May 2013 A1
20130138615 Gupta et al. May 2013 A1
20130159411 Bowen Jun 2013 A1
20130163289 Kim et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130167253 Seleznev et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185347 Romano Jul 2013 A1
20130185558 Seibert et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130191339 Haden et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130198600 Lockhart et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212486 Joshi et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130239049 Perrodin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130246932 Zaveri et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130262210 Savage et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262862 Hartley Oct 2013 A1
20130268480 Dorman Oct 2013 A1
20130268491 Chung et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275398 Dorman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275429 York et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275509 Micucci et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130305039 Gauda Nov 2013 A1
20140013112 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019497 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019498 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032616 Nack Jan 2014 A1
20140033277 Xiao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140033291 Liu Jan 2014 A1
20140052939 Tseng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140068589 Barak Mar 2014 A1
20140150023 Gudorf et al. May 2014 A1
20140156373 Roberts et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172595 Beddow et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
2724521 Nov 2009 CA
101997924 Mar 2011 CN
102264063 Nov 2011 CN
0921661 Jun 1999 EP
1349088 Oct 2003 EP
1528746 May 2005 EP
2372574 Oct 2011 EP
2610776 Jul 2013 EP
2453924 Apr 2009 GB
2471282 Dec 2010 GB
09-101937 Apr 1997 JP
11-025059 Jan 1999 JP
2003273912 Sep 2003 JP
2004310272 Nov 2004 JP
09-269925 Oct 2007 JP
2008250944 Oct 2008 JP
20020017444 Mar 2002 KR
20040028036 Apr 2004 KR
20050017674 Feb 2005 KR
20060070306 Jun 2006 KR
20060114871 Nov 2006 KR
20070043353 Apr 2007 KR
20070100477 Oct 2007 KR
20100118836 Nov 2010 KR
20110076831 Jul 2011 KR
WO-0007104 Feb 2000 WO
WO-2002019128 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2004097681 Nov 2004 WO
WO-2006028850 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2007024438 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007035637 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007113573 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2008011142 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008076520 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2011109416 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2012167272 Dec 2012 WO
WO-2013009328 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013013217 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013041763 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013166520 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (101)
Entry
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages.
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages.
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages.
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48.
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages.
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages.
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages.
“QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages.
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages.
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages.
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages.
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages.
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages.
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages.
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90.
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages.
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages.
Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages.
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages.
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages.
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 26, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 28, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 31, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 23, 2013, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages.
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 6 pages.
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 dated Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 dated Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 dated Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 7, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 31, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 11 pages.
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages.
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581.
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32.
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages.
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6.
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2.
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 5 pages.
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages.
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages.
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages.
Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages.
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 7 pages.
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5.
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages.
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page.
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page.
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16.
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6.
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages.
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages.
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages.
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages.
User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages.
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140379586 A1 Dec 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61839331 Jun 2013 US