Systems and methods for real-time validation of check image quality

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8433127
  • Patent Number
    8,433,127
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 10, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 30, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for real-time validation of check image quality and readability of MICR line data are provided. A check image received by a financial institution can be assessed during a customer on-line session, so that the customer is informed in real-time whether the image is acceptable. Received check images are used to produce images in another format, which are then analyzed for specified requirements.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related by subject matter to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/747,219 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/747,223, both filed on even date herewith.


BACKGROUND

A variety of high-speed, special purpose check deposit systems for commercial use are available on the market today. Using such technologies, businesses can initiate deposits of large volumes of checks from remote non-bank locations. However, such technologies require specialized equipment, such as equipment that magnetically reads the Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line printed across the bottom of checks. At present, individuals do not typically make use of such specialized equipment. Instead, most individuals deposit checks by presenting them at their bank, Automated Teller Machine (ATM), or by mail.


In the future, deposit at home systems may emerge, allowing individuals the flexibility and time savings of remote deposit. One such system is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/321,025. Such a system allows individuals to remotely deposit checks using a customer controlled general purpose computer with an Internet connection, and an image capture device such as a scanner or digital camera. A digital image of a check is made using the image capture device, and the customer computer sends the image to financial institution servers. The financial institution then processes the transaction using the received image.


Remote deposit systems adapted for personal use may prove advantageous for banks and bank customers alike, in part because they are well suited for today's mobile lifestyles experienced by individuals in military, government, and private sector careers, and in part because they successfully leverage electronic communications advances allowing unprecedented automation, speed, and security in deposit transactions.


However, technologies for automatically processing deposit transactions accurately and swiftly are in their infancy. Accuracy and speed are important to the financial institution, which is motivated by a desire for efficient, cost effective operation. They are equally important to the consumer, however, because consumers want to know with certainty at the time of deposit that the check was in fact received, meets the bank's requirements, and that the funds will be made available in their account in due course.


SUMMARY

The described embodiments contemplate a system, method and computer-readable medium with computer-executable instructions for real-time validation of check image quality. A check image received by a financial institution can be assessed during a customer on-line session, so that the customer is informed whether the image is acceptable in real-time.


In one embodiment, a method is provided for validating that a digital image of a check can be used in a deposit transaction. A digital image of a check in a first image format, such as the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) format, is received from a customer computer by financial institution electronics. Upon receiving the image, a series of automated steps may be triggered. The financial institution may produce a digital image of said check in a second image format, for example the Tag Image File Format (TIFF) that is presently required for inter-bank image transfer purposes by Check 21 legislation. Next, the financial institution may validate, in real time, that the digital image meets at least one image requirement, such as a requirement that the image is properly formatted, bitonal, has appropriate pixel density, is appropriately sized, of appropriate clarity, and the like. This may be done by the financial institution itself or outsourced to a 3rd party service provider that exposes an appropriate Application Programming Interface (API). If the image meets the requirements, the financial institution electronically communicates an approval of the deposit transaction to the customer computer.


In another embodiment, a sequence of attempts to recognize a check MICR line are performed in real time, the sequence being optimized for greatest speed in the majority of instances, while generating as few failures as practical. A first attempt includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in a second image format and comprising a white border. A second attempt includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in said second image format and comprising a black border. A third attempt includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in a first image format and comprising a white border. A fourth attempt includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in said first image format and comprising a black border. If any attempt is successful, subsequent attempts can be foregone and an approval can be sent to the customer. An error is sent to the customer only if all attempts fail.


In another embodiment, a 3rd party service is provided for validating check image quality. The third party may receive a digital image of a check from a financial institution server, for example a server that calls a 3rd party API as described in the first embodiment above. In response to said receiving, the 3rd party may automatically initiate an image validation process to ensure said digital image of a check meets an image requirement. A confirmation or an error is returned, in real time, to the financial institution. A confirmation is sent if the digital image of a check meets the image requirements. An error is sent if it does not.


Additional advantages and features of the invention are described below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. Exemplary embodiments are provided for the purposes of illustration; however the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a broad view of a system in which the described embodiments may be employed.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method for facilitating deposit of a check from a customer-controlled general purpose computer.



FIG. 3 illustrates a method for processing a check deposit.



FIG. 4 illustrates a generalized process for real-time validation of check image quality.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary process for performing a real-time validation step in a method such as the method of FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative embodiment for performing a real-time validation step in which check image validation is outsourced to a third party.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary process for real-time repairing and re-validating a check image.



FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary process for making a plurality of sequential attempts to read a check MICR line in real time, the attempts arranged in a sequence for maximizing speed and accuracy.



FIG. 9 illustrates a real-time validation process that may be performed by a third party that provides a check validation service to one or more financial institutions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and figures to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the invention. Certain well-known details often associated with computing and software technology are not set forth in the following disclosure, however, to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the various embodiments of the invention. Further, those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments of the invention without one or more of the details described below. Finally, while various methods are described with reference to steps and sequences in the following disclosure, the description as such is for providing a clear implementation of embodiments of the invention, and the steps and sequences of steps should not be taken as required to practice this invention.


In general, it is contemplated that the various systems, methods, and computer readable media disclosed herein will be implemented within a system for processing remote deposit of checks. Such a system will generally include subsystems for electronically receiving check images from customers, said check images corresponding to at least one payor check, and for automatically initiating a deposit of funds associated with said payor check into a customer account. Such a system may also beneficially automatically initiate a process for clearing the payor check with a payor bank.



FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are generally directed to a variety of aspects of a system for processing remote deposit of checks as contemplated for use in connection with various embodiments of the invention. FIG. 1 illustrates an example system in which the described embodiments may be employed. System 100 may include account owner 110, e.g., a bank customer who may be located, for example, at the customer's private residence. The account owner 110 may be utilizing a customer-controlled, general purpose computer 111. A general purpose computer 111 is generally a Personal Computer (PC) running one of the well-known WINDOWS® brand operating systems made by MICROSOFT® Corp., or a MACINTOSH® (Mac) brand computer, running any of the APPLE® operating systems. General purpose computers are ubiquitous today and the term should be well understood. A general purpose computer 111 may be in a desktop or laptop configuration, and generally has the ability to run any number of applications that are written for and compatible with the computer's operating system. The term “general purpose computer” specifically excludes specialized equipment as may be purchased by a business or other commercial enterprise, for example, for the specialized purpose of high-speed, high-volume check deposits. A particular advantage of a system as illustrated in FIG. 1 is its ability to operate in conjunction with electronics that today's consumers actually own or can easily acquire, such as a general purpose computer, a scanner, and a digital camera.


General purpose computer 111 may also be “customer-controlled.” A common example of a customer-controlled computer would be a typical computer located in a private residence. The owner of such a computer typically has the power to install programs and configure the computer as they wish, subject to certain security restrictions that may be imposed by the hardware or software manufacturers. A customer-controlled computer need not be located in a private residence, however. For example, computers in college dormitories, in workplace offices, and so forth may also be considered “customer-controlled.”


An example of a computer that would not be considered customer-controlled would be an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) that is typically controlled by a bank or other business. Although a customer may access and utilize an ATM machine, the ATM machine is not customer-controlled because the allowed uses of the ATM machine are highly restricted. Relevant factors in determining whether a computer is customer controlled are thus the scope of operations that a customer may perform using the computer, and extent to which the customer can reconfigure the machine in some way by adding software and/or hardware components. In general, any customer ability to add software and/or hardware components is adequate to qualify a computer as customer-controlled.


One of the applications that may run on a general purpose computer 111 in connection with the invention is a browser. Common browsers in use today are, for example, the popular INTERNET EXPLORER® line of browsers made by MICROSOFT® Corp., the FIREFOX® browsers distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project, and the NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR® browsers also distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project. Browsers generally allow users to point to a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), and thereby retrieve information such as a web page. For example, a browser application on computer 111 could retrieve a web page that is kept at server 131, and display the web page to the account owner 110, as is generally known and appreciated in the industry and by the general public.


Another application, or set of applications, that may run on a general purpose computer 111 in connection with the invention comprises “virtual machine” technologies such as the JAVA® virtual machine software distributed by SUN MICROSYSTEMS® Corp, and .NET® Framework distributed by MICROSOFT® Corp. In general, such applications facilitate execution of computer programs in a variety of computing environments. For example, a JAVA® applet is a computer program (which may be alternatively referred to herein as a “software component”) that can execute on any computer running the JAVA® virtual machine software. The applet may be provided to virtual machine software in a “source code” format, and may be compiled by a “just in time” compiler, so as to put the applet in a form that can be executed by the hardware associated with the particular computing device. These technologies are known in the art and may be utilized in connection with a system as illustrated in FIG. 1.


An image capture device 112 may be communicatively coupled to the computer 112. Image capture device may be, for example, a scanner or digital camera. Computer 111 may comprise software that allows the user to control certain operations of the image capture device 112 from the computer 111. For example, modern scanner users may be familiar with the TWAIN software often used to control image capture from a computer 111. Similarly, digital cameras often ship with software that allows users to move images from the camera to a computer 111, and may also provide additional functions, such as photo editing functions crop and rotate.


Financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may be any type of entity capable of processing a transaction involving a negotiable instrument. For example, financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may be retail banks, investment banks, investment companies, regional branches of the Federal Reserve, clearinghouse banks and/or correspondent banks. A negotiable instrument is usually a type of contract that obligates one party to pay a specified sum of money to another party. By way of example, and not limitation, negotiable instruments may include a check, draft, bill of exchange, promissory note, and the like.


Financial institution 130 is illustrated as associated with a server 131. Financial institution 130 may maintain and operate server 131 for the purposes of communicating with customers such as 110. Alternatively, such server may be maintained and operated by one or more third party vendors who act under the instructions of the financial institution 130, but possess skills and resources that may be more effective in competent operation of electronics. Such arrangements are well known in the industry and in this case the server 131 is nonetheless considered to be “associated” with the financial institution 130.


Furthermore, one or more third parties may provide electronic services to a financial institution. For example, a third party image validation service provider 135 may expose an API 136 to financial institution server 131. By appropriately calling the API 136, the server 131 can cause the third party 135 to perform requested functions and return results. For example, the financial institution may request the third party to inspect check images to determine if they meet specified requirements. Server 131 may then pass images to third party 135, which will automatically perform the requested tasks, and return errors/approvals and the like to the server 131. This arrangement has advantages in that third party 135 may specialize in performing certain operations that financial institution 130 would prefer not to invest in. It will be appreciated that the third party 135 may also expose its API 136 to a network such as 120 and 125, and thereby make it more generally available to other financial institutions 140, 150.


Account owner 110 may be an individual who owns account 160, which may be held at financial institution 130. As such, account owner 110 may be described as a customer of financial institution 130. Account 160 may be any type of account for depositing funds, such as a savings account, checking account, brokerage account, and the like. Account owner 110 may communicate with financial institution 130 by way of communication network 120, which may include an intranet, the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a cellular network, a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network, and the like. Account owner 110 may communicate with financial institution 130 by phone, email, instant messaging, facsimile, and the like.


In one contemplated embodiment, network 120 is a publicly accessible network such as the Internet, which can presently be accessed from many private residences and many public places such as college campuses, airports, coffee shops, and restaurants throughout the United States as well as many other countries of the world. A variety of technologies are available to establish secure connections over such a public network, so that data transmitted between computer 111 and a server 131 associated with the institution 130 remains either inaccessible or indecipherable by third parties that may intercept such data. The invention may make use of any such security technologies.


Financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may communicate with each other via a network 125. Network 125 may be a publicly accessed network such as 120. Alternatively, network 125 may have certain characteristics that differ from network 120, due to the different requirements of bank-to-bank communications. For example, one might envision certain security features and access restrictions being more important in bank-to-bank communications.


In an embodiment, account owner 110 may wish to deposit a check that is drawn from payor account 170 at financial institution 150. Account owner 110 may deposit the check into customer account 160 by converting the check into electronic data, e.g., a digital image, and sending the data to financial institution 130. Various embodiments of the invention described herein may be carried out by financial institution 130 electronics such as server 131 upon receipt of a check image from computer 111. However, those of skill in computing and software technologies will appreciate that functionality can be distributed across a variety of devices and therefore some of the method steps, subsystems, and computer readable media associated with the invention may in some embodiments be located outside of the range of what would be considered financial institution 130 electronics, e.g., might be located at computer 111, elsewhere in the networks 120 and 125, or at third party electronics 135.


Account owner 110 may convert the check into a digital image by scanning the front and/or back of the check using image capture device 112. Account owner 110 may then send the image to financial institution 130. Sending the image may be referred to as “presenting” the check. Upon receipt of the image, financial institution server 131 may conduct a variety of automated operations to establish authenticity and quality of the received image, communicate with the customer, initiate a check clearing operation, and credit the customer's account. One aspect of the invention described in greater detail below comprises operations for establishing check image quality and authenticity in real-time, i.e. with sufficient speed to allow communication of results to a depositing customer during a same on-line session.


Financial institution 130 may credit the funds to account 160 in a “soft post” operation. In a soft post operation, the funds appear to be available for use by a customer, and may in fact be available for use, but at least some indication is retained to note that the funds have not actually been received from the payor bank. When the funds are received from the payor bank, the “soft post” is converted to a “hard post” and the indication is removed, along with any further restriction on the use of the funds. Financial institution 130 may clear the check by presenting the digital image to an intermediary bank, such as a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, a correspondent bank and/or a clearinghouse bank.


For example, the check may be cleared by presenting the digital image to financial institution 140, which may be a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, along with a request for payment. Financial institution 130 and 150 may have accounts at the regional branch of the Federal Reserve 140. As will be discussed in greater detail below, financial institution 130 may create a substitute check by converting an image provided by account owner 110 into a second format, and may present the substitute check to financial institution 140 for further processing. Upon receiving the substitute check, financial institution 140 may identify financial institution 150 as the paying bank (e.g., the bank from which the check is drawn). This may be accomplished using a nine-digit routing number located on the bottom left hand corner of the check. A unique routing number is typically assigned to every financial institution in the United States. Financial institution 140 may present the substitute check to financial institution 150 and request that the check be paid. If financial institution 150 verifies the check (i.e., agrees to honor the check), financial institution 140 may then settle the check by debiting funds from financial institution 150 and crediting funds to financial institution 130. Financial institution 150 may then debit funds from account 170.


It will be appreciated that the preceding examples are for purposes of illustration and explanation only, and that an embodiment is not limited to such examples. For example, financial institution 150 may be a correspondent bank (i.e., engaged in a partnership with financial institution 130). Thus, financial institution 130 may bypass the regional branch of the Federal Reserve and clear the check directly with financial institution 150. In addition, account 160 and account 170 may both be held at financial institution 130, in which case the check may be cleared internally.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method for facilitating deposit of a check from a customer-controlled general purpose computer. The various steps of FIG. 2 may be viewed as performed by a server computer associated with a financial institution, in conjunction with a software component that operates from a customer-controlled general purpose computer. Various of the steps are contemplated as performed by the server, while various other steps are contemplated as performed by the software component.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the darker boxes indicate steps that are performed by the server, for example by delivering information to the user through the user's browser application. Making information available on a server to customers with a browser is considered to be effectively “delivering” such information for the purposes of this document. The lighter boxes inside 211 indicate steps that are performed by the software component as it executes on the customer computer. Those of skill will recognize that alternative configurations are readily achievable by moving functions from server to software component or vice-versa.


The server may first deliver a software component to the customer-controlled general purpose computer 200. This may be done in response to a customer request for the capability of making deposits from his computer. In one embodiment, the financial institution may provide such capability only to customers that meet predetermined criteria of trustworthiness. For example, it can be required that the customer's accounts are in good standing, that the customer relationship has lasted a predetermined amount of time, that the customer has a predetermined number of financial service products with the financial institution (e.g. bank accounts, mortgages, insurance policies, etc.), that the customer has a predetermined level of assets with the financial institution, and so forth.


The software component may be configured to facilitate the deposit transaction. In one embodiment, the software component may be compatible with the JAVA® or .NET® technologies described above. Such configurations allow for widespread dissemination and successful operation in a wide variety of computing environments as may exist on customer-controlled general purpose computers.


Where the software component is written for JAVA®, .NET®, or any other such technology, it is useful in step 200 to first determine whether the customer-controlled general purpose computer has an appropriate virtual machine application installed, e.g. JAVA® Virtual Machine (JVM) or .NET® framework. If the computer does not have the appropriate application installed, such application may be automatically installed, or the customer may be directed to a location from which such application may be downloaded and installed. The software component may then be delivered 200, and should work as intended. The various other steps of FIG. 2 may now take place, or may take place at some subsequent time using the software component as previously downloaded.


After downloading or otherwise accepting the software component, and assuming the customer has an appropriate image capture device, the customer now has the capability to make deposits from his general purpose computer. For example, the customer points his browser to a bank website, where a link may be available that causes the bank server to initiate a deposit transaction 201. The customer may be asked to log in using a user name and password.


The customer may next be instructed to identify an account into which the deposit will be made 202. This can be done, for example, by providing a webpage that lists the available accounts, along with an instruction to select an account. Alternatively, a box may be provided into which the customer may type an account number, along with an appropriate instruction to type the number of the desired account. The account may be any account, and need not necessarily be the customer's own account, although it is contemplated that a large number of customer deposits may be made into the transacting customer's account, and embodiments may find it useful to restrict the allowed accounts to the customer's own accounts. In such embodiments, if the customer has just one account with the financial institution, step 202 may be eliminated because the only available allowed account would be the customer's single account.


The customer may next be instructed to identify an amount of a check or other negotiable instrument he wishes to deposit into the selected account 203. In one embodiment, this can be done similarly to step 202 by providing a webpage with a box into which the customer may type an amount, along with an appropriate instruction to type the amount of the check. The customer may also be instructed to endorse the check 204, e.g., by signing his or her name on the back of the check.


The customer may next be instructed to provide an image of a front side of a check 205, for example, by using an image capture device. In one embodiment, the customer may be instructed to place the check face down on a flatbed scanner, and may further be instructed as to the location and orientation of the check on the scanner. If the customer is instructed to take a digital photograph of the check using a digital camera, the customer may be instructed as to the position and orientation of the check, lighting, angle of camera, distance and focal length (zoom) of camera, and so forth. The software component may be useful at this point in providing a graphical illustration of just how the customer should provide the image. The customer may further be given instructions as to how to activate the image capture device and/or move the image from the device to the general purpose computer.


In one embodiment, it is contemplated that the software component allows for control of the transaction and transaction data throughout the various aspects thereof. For example, the software component may open a folder in a storage location, such as the hard drive of the general-purpose computer, and may work in conjunction with any software that interfaces with the image capture device to deposit the image in such folder. This may advantageously be conducted in a secure manner to prevent any unwanted image diversion or tampering. The hard drive of the general-purpose computer is considered to be a storage location that is controlled by said customer-controlled general purpose computer, but other storage locations such as disk drives, networked drives, and so forth may also be effectively controlled by the general purpose computer.


The software component may itself perform operations such as opening a folder and placing the images therein, or may effectively achieve such operations by instructing the customer and/or other applications to do so. All software operates to some extent under the control and with the support of an operating system running on the general purpose computer, and such support is of course appropriate in embodiments of the invention.


The software component may next cause the image of the check to be presented to the customer for editing, e.g. by asking the customer to crop and/or rotate the check image to a predetermined orientation 206. In embodiments using a scanner, an image of the entire scanner bed, or some otherwise too large image may be generated. If the check was placed in the top left corner of the scanner bed, the customer may be asked to indicate the bottom right corner of the check image, and the image may be cropped to contain only the check image, thereby removing a portion of the originally obtained image.


An appropriately edited image of the check may be placed in the storage location 207. If further images are necessary 208, steps 205-207 may be repeated as necessary. For example, the customer may be instructed to endorse and provide an image of the back side of a check. To ensure the check is appropriately voided, the customer may be asked to write “void” on the check and re-scan the front of the check.


A log file may be generated 209 to collect data for processing or troubleshooting the deposit transaction. The log file may be placed in the storage location along with the various images of the check.


Once the desired images are collected and edited, they may be delivered to the server for processing the deposit 210. The log file may also be delivered at this time. Once such files are delivered, they may be deleted from the customer's general purpose computer. If the server determines that the delivered images and any corresponding data are sufficient to go forward with the deposit, the customer's account may be provisionally credited with a soft post, and a confirmation page may be delivered to the customer via the customer's browser application 212. The customer may be instructed to destroy, e.g. by shredding, the actual physical check or other negotiable instrument. Under the current check handling procedures in the United States, the physical check is not necessary in processing a deposit, nor is it necessary to keep the original check in bank or customer records.



FIG. 3 illustrates a method for processing a check deposit. The method of FIG. 3 is designed to complement that of FIG. 2 and to illustrate exemplary steps that may be carried out by a server or other electronics operated by a financial institution before, during, and after the various steps of FIG. 2 are carried out.


In general, as illustrated in FIG. 3, such server may receive a request for deposit at home capability 300A, and in response to such request may deliver a software component to the requesting customer 300B. As with FIG. 2, intermediate steps may comprise determining if the customer is in fact eligible for a remote deposit program, and ensuring the customer has an appropriate virtual machine environment installed on their general purpose computer—in embodiments where the software component requires such an environment.


A transaction may be initiated 301 upon receiving a customer indication that a deposit transaction is desired. The customer is instructed to identify an account per FIG. 2, and as a result the financial institution electronics receive an account identifier (ID) 302. Similarly, financial institution electronics receive check amount 303. At this juncture the software component handles image capture processes, which may or may not involve the server until such time as check image(s) are received 304.


Upon receipt of check images, an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) process may be invoked to determine certain information about the check. For example, OCR may be performed on the check's MICR line location 305 to determine information such as payor bank routing number, account number, and check number. In one embodiment, multiple attempts may be made to read a check MICR line as described further below. Once the MICR line is established, the bank routing number may then be validated against a list of valid routing numbers to ensure that it corresponds to a legitimate bank, and in some embodiments, to ensure it corresponds to a United States bank. In one embodiment, the OCR is conducted in real time, i.e. during a same on-line session in which the customer initiated the deposit, so as to validate some initial deposit information immediately, and provide a customer with an on-the-spot error or approval of the transaction.


In one embodiment, additional OCR operations may be performed, such as upon other aspects of the front side of the check (drafter's name, amount, etc.) and upon an image of a back side of a check. One problem that occurs involves customer submission of two front images, instead of one front image and one back image. OCR may be performed on a MICR line location of an alleged image of a back side of said check to confirm that said alleged image of a back side of said check does not bear a MICR line. If no MICR line is present in such location then it is more likely that the alleged image of a back side of said check is in fact the back, and not the front, of the check.


Another advantageous use of OCR is on the endorsement location on the back of a check. By performing OCR, it may be possible in some embodiments to determine that the signature matches that of the payor or drafter of the check. However, often signatures are illegible. Thus in one embodiment it is advantageous to determine that some mark or signature is present in the endorsement location on the back of the check, without conducting any further signature identification procedures.


If the routing number determined using OCR cannot be validated, an error may result 317, and the deposit transaction can be aborted. An error message can be delivered to the customer 314, explaining a reason that the transaction could not be processed.


Real-time validation of check image quality may also be performed 306. In this step, bank electronics may automatically convert the received digital image into a format that will be used for presenting the check, such as TIFF. The TIFF image may then be analyzed to ensure it meets any of a variety of requirements. This analysis may be performed by the financial institution's own electronics, or may be outsourced to a third party as discussed with element 135 in FIG. 1. If the image in a second format meets all requirements, the process continues, and may lead to ultimate approval delivery 314. If the image in a second format does not meet requirements, an error 317 may be sent to the customer, or the image may be repaired and validation may be re-attempted. Further description of this aspect is provided below.


Representment and kiting detection processes may be carried out to determine whether the check was previously deposited or is suspected to be part of a kiting operation 307.


There are numerous possibilities for false positives in representment and kiting detection 307. Because of this, it is advantageous in some embodiments to proceed with a deposit transaction regardless of the fact that a representment may be initially identified in 307. As illustrated in FIG. 3, if a representment or kiting operation is detected in 307, the transaction may be either flagged for further scrutiny at a later time, delayed, or terminated 315. If the transaction is flagged, it will be allowed to proceed through the various other steps and result in a soft post 313 to the customer account. If it is delayed or terminated, the soft post 313 will be made only after further scrutiny of the transaction, or will be avoided entirely. If a representment or kiting indicator is not detected, the transaction need not be flagged, delayed, or terminated, and step 315 is unnecessary.


OCR may further be performed on a check amount location 306, and the amount as determined using OCR may be compared against the customer-entered amount received pursuant to step 303. If the amounts do not match, an error 316 can result, terminating the transaction and delivering appropriate information concerning the error to the customer 314. OCR may further be performed on any other aspects of the check image at this time if it is advantageous in specific embodiments to do so.


The server may further receive and modify a deposit transaction log file 310. Alternative versions of the images received may be generated an placed in the log file. Check 21 regulations require a bi-tonal TIFF formatted image, which is generally a low-quality image format as compared to other available image formats. Therefore, it is desirable in some embodiments to retain both a “good” image in an initial format, e.g., in a JPEG format, as well as the modified bi-tonal TIFF required by Check 21. This way, if any troubleshooting is necessary, a good image of the check remains available.


In some embodiments, a bank stamp may be overlaid on the image of the back of the check 311, just as if the check was physically deposited at a bank. Appropriate images may be forwarded to the payor bank for payment 312, and meanwhile, the customer's account may be provisionally credited in the amount of the check 313. A confirmation can be delivered to the customer 314.


At 312, in one embodiment, the bank may forward an image or images to a payor bank. Provisionally crediting the customer account 513 with a “soft post” and delivering a confirmation to the customer-controlled general purpose computer 514 may be done before, after, or contemporaneously with step 312.


In one embodiment, forwarding an image or images to a payor bank 512 may be performed pursuant to an Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) transaction. ACH transactions typically include payment instructions to debit and/or credit an account. Banks often employ ACH service providers to settle ACH transactions. Examples of ACH service providers include regional branches of the Federal Reserve and the Electronic Payments Network (EPN).


In an ACH transaction, the payee's (customer's) bank may be referred to as the originating depository financial institution (ODFI). Upon receipt of appropriate check information, the payee's bank may credit funds to the payee's account and generate an ACH debit entry to the payor's account, which may be presented to the ACH service provider for processing.


The ACH service provider may process the debit entry by identifying the account and bank from which the check is drawn. The bank from which the check is drawn (i.e., the payor's bank) may be referred to as a receiving depository financial institution (RDFI). If the payor's bank verifies the transaction, the ACH service provider may settle the transaction by debiting the payor's bank and crediting the payee's bank. The payor's bank may then debit the payor's account.


A substitute check is typically a paper reproduction of an original check and may be the legal equivalent of the original check. Substitute checks were authorized under The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, commonly known as Check 21. The Act was enacted to facilitate the check clearing process by allowing banks to transmit electronic images of checks (e.g., substitute checks) to other banks rather than physically sending the original paper checks. Check 21 does not require that banks use substitute checks. In fact, many banks may have voluntary agreements to accept certain electronic images of checks even though the images may not qualify as substitute checks under Check 21. If a bank does not have a voluntary agreement and/or refuses to accept an electronic image, the financial institution is required under Check 21 to accept a substitute check in lieu of the original check.


The bank may process the ACH debit entry, substitute check, and/or electronic image. As noted above, the bank may present the ACH debit entry to an ACH service provider (e.g., EPN), which may be responsible for settling the transaction between the payee's bank and the payor's bank. The bank also may convert the digital image into a substitute check and present the substitute check to an intermediary bank (e.g., a regional branch of the Federal Reserve) to complete the check clearing process. If the payor's bank and the payee's bank are the same, the transaction can be handled internally at the payor bank by simply debiting the account of one customer and crediting the account of another. Thus, an intermediate step may comprise identifying if the payor bank and the payee bank are one and the same, or otherwise operating in a closely cooperative manner.


Each of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 provide exemplary methods for real-time validation of a check MICR line and/or check image quality as may be carried out in a system comprising features as disclosed in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, and in particular as part of steps 305 and 306 in FIG. 3. However, it should be emphasized that while the various aspects of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 provide useful context for FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, the disclosed aspects of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are in no way required to carry out the steps of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6.


Furthermore, while FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 are illustrated and discussed as methods, it will be acknowledged that they also disclose corresponding systems and computer readable media designed to carry out such methods. FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 may be carried out by electronic subsystems within financial institution electronics such as server 131, which may comprise a variety of other electronics such as routers, switches, and modems. The steps of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 may also be recorded as instructions on computer readable media designed for causing financial institution electronics to carry out the disclosed methods.


Referring now to FIG. 4, in one embodiment, a method is provided for validating that a digital image of a check can be used in a deposit transaction. A digital image of a check in a first image format, such as the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) format, is received 401 from a customer computer by financial institution electronics.


Upon receiving the image, a series of automated steps may be triggered. The financial institution may produce a digital image of said check in a second image format 402, for example the Tag Image File Format (TIFF) that is presently required by Check 21 legislation for inter-bank image transfer purposes. Next, the financial institution may validate, in real time, that the digital image meets at least one image requirement 403, such as a requirement that the image is properly formatted, bitonal, has appropriate pixel density, is appropriately sized, of appropriate clarity, and the like. This may be done by the financial institution itself or outsourced to a 3rd party service provider that exposes an appropriate Application Programming Interface (API).


If the image meets the requirements, the financial institution electronically communicates an approval 404 of the deposit transaction to the customer computer. If an image repair is necessary, it can be performed by 404. If no repair is possible, and the image does not meet requirements, an error may be sent to the customer 405.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary process for performing a real-time validation step 403 in a method such as the method of FIG. 4. A goal of a process such as FIG. 5 is to establish that a check image meets one or more requirements. To this end, a plurality of tests may be available, each test comprising computer software or hardware configured to analyze a digital image and determine whether it meets a requirement. A test 501 may fail, in which case an error 504 can be thrown. The error 504 may indicate the failed test. A test 501 may also pass, in which case a determination can be made regarding whether additional tests must be applied 502. If so, a next test is run 501. If not, an approval is generated 503.


One requirement presently imposed by Check 21 legislation is that images must be bitonal. A first test 501 may thus ensure that a check image is bitonal. Such a test may, in one embodiment, analyze the information in an image file to ensure that the file does not contain grayscale or color data. Additional tests may be performed in similar fashion to determine whether the image is properly formatted (present embodiments require TIFF), has appropriate pixel density, is appropriately sized, and of appropriate clarity.



FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative embodiment for performing a real-time validation step in which check image validation is outsourced to a third party. In FIG. 6, validating comprises sending the digital image of a check in a second image format to a third party real time image quality validation service 601. This may be accomplished, for example, by calling an API for a web-enabled application exposed by third party electronics. A function call generated by financial institution electronics may indicate a storage location associated with financial institution electronics and comprising the image to be validated, so the image does not have to be sent across a network. Instead, it can be operated upon by third party agent software located executed by financial institution servers. This approach reduces security concerns.


Alternatively, a call to the third party API may include the image to be validated, thereby sending the image to the third party electronics. Third party electronics may specialize in performing validation, for example, by performing a series of tests as described in connection with FIG. 5. Utilizing a third party service in this manner allows for increased specialization and concomitant optimization of image requirements and testing operations.


The third party may supply the financial institution with either an approval 602, or an error 603. When approval is received 602, the financial institution may relay the approval to the customer in real-time. An error may, in one embodiment, also be relayed in real-time to the customer. In preferred embodiments, however, repair operations may be attempted prior to delivering the error. To this end, the third party may itself attempt a repair, or may supply the financial institution with an error code to facilitate repair by said financial institution.



FIG. 7 illustrates repair processing. In general, repair processing may comprise the following steps: an image error is identified during validation processing 701. Error identification may comprise a part of local image validation processing, or receiving an error code from a third party real-time image quality validation service. In one embodiment, the error code corresponds to an image requirement that the analyzed image did not meet. In another embodiment, it identifies a specific and addressable error in the analyzed image. Financial institution electronics may then utilize the error code to determine a repair operation, and perform the repair for example by passing a check image along with the error code to an error processing computer program loaded onto financial institution electronics.


Repairing the digital image of a check in a second image format is accomplished, in one embodiment, by first repairing the digital image of a check in a first image format 702, e.g. repairing a JPEG image received from the customer computer. A repaired image in said first image format is thereby produced. Returning to the first format (JPEG) image in this manner facilitates repair because the JPEG image is higher quality than the second format (TIFF) image, and repairs are easier and more accurate when additional digital image data is present.


Once the repaired image in a first format is available, a repaired image in the second image format is produced 703. In one embodiment, this is accomplished by converting the repaired image in a first format into a repaired image in a second format. Said repaired image in said second image format may now be re-validated 704 locally, or sent to said real time image quality validation service, in similar fashion as before. An approval is then received indicating said repaired image in said second image format meets applicable image requirements. Alternatively, if the repaired image again fails to meet all requirements, another error may instead be received. Another repair may be attempted if sufficient time remains without degrading customer experience.


As an example of the above, consider a customer attempt to deposit a check with a torn corner. The customer scans the check and produces a JPEG image. The JPEG is sent to the financial institution. The financial institution then generates a bi-tonal TIFF, and validates the TIFF, either locally or using a third party service. An error is identified. The error may identify, for example, a torn upper left corner. In response, a repair process performs an automated upper left corner repair process on the original JPEG. For example, image data may be copied from the upper right corner, rotated 90 degrees, and pasted onto the upper left corner of the image. The repaired JPEG is then converted into a repaired bitonal TIFF, and the repaired TIFF is again validated. All of the above occurs in real-time, i.e. while the customer is waiting for approval of the transaction or error.


In another embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 8, a sequence of attempts to recognize a check MICR line are performed in real time, the sequence being optimized for greatest speed in the majority of instances, while generating as few failures as practical. FIG. 8 thus provides a more detailed illustration of an embodiment of step 305 in FIG. 3.


A digital image of a check is received from a customer computer 801, as explained above. The image may be received in a first format, e.g., JPEG, and an image in a second format, e.g., TIFF, may be produced.


We note that OCR processing of a MICR line in a digital image can be frustrated by several factors. First, OCR processing is faster, but more error prone, on a low quality TIFF image than on a high-quality JPEG. Second, OCR processing can be optimized for white border images or for black border images.


Thus, the process illustrated in FIG. 8 is optimized for speed of OCR processing of a MICR line, so that such processing is adapted for real-time use. A first MICR read attempt includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in a second image format, e.g., TIFF, and comprising a white border 802. If the first attempt is a success, an approval is generated 807 and the illustrated process ends.


If the first attempt fails, a second MICR read attempt may be performed which includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in said second image format, e.g., TIFF, and comprising a black border 803. If the second attempt is a success, an approval is generated 808 and the illustrated process ends.


If the second attempt fails, a third MICR read attempt may be performed which includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in a first image format, e.g., JPEG, and comprising a white border 804. If the third attempt is a success, an approval is generated 809 and the illustrated process ends.


If the third attempt fails, a fourth MICR read attempt may be performed which includes digital image analysis that is optimized for a digital image in said first image format, e.g., JPEG, and comprising a black border 805. If the fourth attempt is a success, an approval is generated 809 and the illustrated process ends. Otherwise, an error may be sent 806 to the customer when all attempts fail.


As with image quality validation discussed above, the processes of FIG. 8 may be performed by financial institution electronics or by a third party who exposes an API to the financial institution. Where the third party API is utilized, the steps of FIG. 8 may further comprise electronically communicating an approval of said digital image to financial institution computers. In either embodiment, electronically receiving the original check image and electronically communicating an approval to the customer are performed during a same online customer session with the financial institution.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment in which a 3rd party service is provided for validating check image quality. The third party may receive a digital image of a check from a financial institution server 901, for example a server that calls a 3rd party API as described in the embodiment of FIG. 4 above.


In response to said receiving, the 3rd party may automatically initiate a rea-time image validation process 902 to ensure said digital image of a check meets an image requirement. Repair processing may be conducted 905 if necessary. Once an image meets all requirements 903, an approval 904 is returned, in real-time, to the calling financial institution. An error is sent 906 if the image does not meet all pertinent requirements.


In connection with performing the process of FIG. 9 in real-time, it can be said that receiving 901, automatically initiating 902, and sending approval 904 are performed during a first time interval. Said first time interval is contained within a second time interval, i.e. it starts after the start of said second time interval and ends before the end of the second time interval. Said second time interval corresponds to an online customer session comprising communications between the financial institution server and a customer computer. This is more formal way of stating that the processing occurs during a same customer on-line session in which the customer initiated the deposit transaction.


The various techniques described herein may be implemented with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the disclosed embodiments, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the disclosed embodiments. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computer will generally include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device and at least one output device. One or more programs are preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.


The described methods and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of program code that is transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via any other form of transmission, wherein, when the program code is received and loaded into and executed by a machine, such as an EPROM, a gate array, a programmable logic device (PLD), a client computer, a video recorder or the like, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code combines with the processor to provide a unique apparatus that operates to perform the processing of the disclosed embodiments.


In addition to the specific implementations explicitly set forth herein, other aspects and implementations will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and illustrated implementations be considered as examples only, with a true scope and spirit of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A processor-implemented method for validating that a digital image of a check can be used in a deposit transaction, comprising: producing, via a processor, from a digital image of a check in a first format, a digital image of said check in a second format;performing a first digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read a string of numbers, said string of numbers corresponding to a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line on said check, wherein said first digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a white border;performing a second digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read said string of numbers, wherein said second digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing a third digital image analysis, wherein said third digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said third digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said third digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a white border.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising performing a fourth digital image analysis, wherein said fourth digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising electronically receiving said digital image of said check from a customer computer.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising electronically communicating an approval of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, further comprising electronically communicating an error of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 7. The method of claim 3, wherein said second format is a Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) image format.
  • 8. The method of claim 3, wherein said second format is a Tag Image File Format (TIFF).
  • 9. The method of claim 3, further comprising electronically receiving said digital image of said check from a financial institution computer.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising electronically communicating an approval of said digital image to said financial institution computer, and wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed during a same online customer session with a financial institution.
  • 11. A system for validating that a digital image of a check can be used in a deposit transaction, comprising: a memory containing a plurality of processing instructions;a processor in communication with said memory, and configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to: produce, from a digital image of a check in a first format, a digital image of said check in a second format;perform a first digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read a string of numbers, said string of numbers corresponding to a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line on said check, wherein said first digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a white border; andperform a second digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read said string of numbers, wherein said second digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to perform a third digital image analysis, wherein said third digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said third digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said third digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a white border.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to perform a fourth digital image analysis, wherein said fourth digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to electronically receive said digital image of said check from a customer computer.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to electronically communicate an approval of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to electronically communicate an error of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 17. The system of claim 13, wherein said second format is a Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) image format.
  • 18. The system of claim 13, wherein said second format is a Tag Image File Format (TIFF).
  • 19. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to electronically receive said digital image of a check from a financial institution computer.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured to execute the plurality of processing instructions to electronically communicate an approval of said digital image to said financial institution computer, and wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed during a same online customer session with a financial institution.
  • 21. A computer readable non-transitory medium having stored instructions for validating that a digital image of a check can be used in a deposit transaction, comprising: instructions for producing, from a digital image of a check in a first format, a digital image of said check in a second format;instructions for performing a first digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read a string of numbers, said string of numbers corresponding to a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line on said check, wherein said first digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a white border;instructions for performing a second digital image analysis on said digital image of said check in said second format, in order to read said string of numbers, wherein said second digital image analysis is optimized for said second format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 22. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 21, further comprising instructions for performing a third digital image analysis, wherein said third digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said third digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said third digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a white border.
  • 23. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 22, further comprising instructions for performing a fourth digital image analysis, wherein said fourth digital image analysis operates on said digital image of said check in said first format, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is performed in order to read said string of numbers, and wherein said fourth digital image analysis is optimized for said first format and for an image comprising a black border.
  • 24. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 23, further comprising instructions for electronically receiving said digital image of said check from a customer computer.
  • 25. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 24, further comprising instructions for electronically communicating an approval of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 26. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 24, further comprising instructions for electronically communicating an error of said deposit transaction to said customer, wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed in a same online customer session.
  • 27. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 23, wherein said second format is a Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) image format.
  • 28. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 23, wherein said second format is a Tag Image File Format (TIFF).
  • 29. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 23, further comprising instructions for electronically receiving said digital image of a check from a financial institution computer.
  • 30. The computer readable non-transitory medium of claim 29, further comprising instructions for electronically communicating an approval of said digital image to said financial institution computer, and wherein said electronically receiving and said electronically communicating are performed during a same online customer session with a financial institution.
US Referenced Citations (661)
Number Name Date Kind
3341820 Grillmeier, Jr. et al. Sep 1967 A
3576972 Wood May 1971 A
3593913 Bremer Jul 1971 A
3620553 Donovan Nov 1971 A
3648242 Grosbard Mar 1972 A
3800124 Walsh Mar 1974 A
3816943 Henry Jun 1974 A
4002356 Weidmann Jan 1977 A
4060711 Buros Nov 1977 A
4070649 Wright, Jr. et al. Jan 1978 A
4128202 Buros Dec 1978 A
4136471 Austin Jan 1979 A
4205780 Burns Jun 1980 A
4264808 Owens Apr 1981 A
4305216 Skelton Dec 1981 A
4321672 Braun Mar 1982 A
4433436 Carnes Feb 1984 A
4454610 Sziklai Jun 1984 A
RE31692 Tyburski et al. Oct 1984 E
4523330 Cain Jun 1985 A
4636099 Goldstone Jan 1987 A
4640413 Kaplan Feb 1987 A
4644144 Chandek Feb 1987 A
4722444 Murphy et al. Feb 1988 A
4722544 Weber Feb 1988 A
4727435 Otani et al. Feb 1988 A
4774663 Musmanno Sep 1988 A
4790475 Griffin Dec 1988 A
4806780 Yamamoto Feb 1989 A
4837693 Schotz Jun 1989 A
4890228 Longfield Dec 1989 A
4927071 Wood May 1990 A
4934587 McNabb Jun 1990 A
4960981 Benton Oct 1990 A
4975735 Bright Dec 1990 A
5022683 Barbour Jun 1991 A
5053607 Carlson Oct 1991 A
5146606 Grondalski Sep 1992 A
5157620 Shaar Oct 1992 A
5159548 Caslavka Oct 1992 A
5191525 LeBrun Mar 1993 A
5220501 Lawlor Jun 1993 A
5227863 Bilbrey et al. Jul 1993 A
5229589 Schneider Jul 1993 A
5237159 Stephens Aug 1993 A
5257320 Etherington et al. Oct 1993 A
5265008 Benton Nov 1993 A
5321816 Rogan Jun 1994 A
5347302 Simonoff Sep 1994 A
5350906 Brody Sep 1994 A
5373550 Campbell Dec 1994 A
5419588 Wood May 1995 A
5422467 Graef Jun 1995 A
5475403 Havlovick et al. Dec 1995 A
5504538 Tsujihara Apr 1996 A
5504677 Pollin Apr 1996 A
5528387 Kelly et al. Jun 1996 A
5583759 Geer Dec 1996 A
5590196 Moreau Dec 1996 A
5594225 Botvin Jan 1997 A
5598969 Ong Feb 1997 A
5602936 Green et al. Feb 1997 A
5610726 Nonoshita Mar 1997 A
5611028 Shibasaki Mar 1997 A
5630073 Nolan May 1997 A
5631984 Graf et al. May 1997 A
5668897 Stolfo Sep 1997 A
5673320 Ray et al. Sep 1997 A
5677955 Doggett Oct 1997 A
5678046 Cahill et al. Oct 1997 A
5679938 Templeton Oct 1997 A
5680611 Rail Oct 1997 A
5691524 Josephson Nov 1997 A
5699452 Vaidyanathan Dec 1997 A
5734747 Vaidyanathan Mar 1998 A
5737440 Kunkler Apr 1998 A
5748780 Stolfo May 1998 A
5751842 Riach May 1998 A
5784503 Bleecker, III et al. Jul 1998 A
5830609 Warner Nov 1998 A
5832463 Funk Nov 1998 A
5838814 Moore Nov 1998 A
5863075 Rich Jan 1999 A
5870456 Rogers Feb 1999 A
5870724 Lawlor Feb 1999 A
5870725 Bellinger et al. Feb 1999 A
5878337 Joao Mar 1999 A
5893101 Balogh et al. Apr 1999 A
5897625 Gustin Apr 1999 A
5901253 Tretter May 1999 A
5903878 Talati May 1999 A
5903881 Schrader May 1999 A
5910988 Ballard Jun 1999 A
5917931 Kunkler Jun 1999 A
5924737 Schrupp Jul 1999 A
5926548 Okamoto Jul 1999 A
5930778 Geer Jul 1999 A
5937396 Konya Aug 1999 A
5940844 Cahill Aug 1999 A
5982918 Mennie Nov 1999 A
5987439 Gustin Nov 1999 A
6012048 Gustin Jan 2000 A
6014454 Kunkler Jan 2000 A
6021202 Anderson Feb 2000 A
6021397 Jones Feb 2000 A
6029887 Furuhashi Feb 2000 A
6030000 Diamond Feb 2000 A
6032137 Ballard Feb 2000 A
6038553 Hyde Mar 2000 A
6053405 Irwin, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6073119 Bornemisza-Wahr Jun 2000 A
6085168 Mori Jul 2000 A
6097834 Krouse Aug 2000 A
6097885 Rayner Aug 2000 A
6105865 Hardesty Aug 2000 A
6145738 Stinson Nov 2000 A
6151426 Lee Nov 2000 A
6159585 Rittenhouse Dec 2000 A
6170744 Lee Jan 2001 B1
6188506 Kaiserman Feb 2001 B1
6189785 Lowery Feb 2001 B1
6192165 Irons Feb 2001 B1
6195694 Chen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199055 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6236009 Emigh et al. May 2001 B1
6243689 Norton Jun 2001 B1
6278983 Ball Aug 2001 B1
6282826 Richards Sep 2001 B1
6293469 Masson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304860 Martin, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6314452 Dekel Nov 2001 B1
6317727 May Nov 2001 B1
6328207 Gregoire et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330546 Gopinathan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6339658 Moccagatta Jan 2002 B1
6363164 Jones et al. Mar 2002 B1
6390362 Martin May 2002 B1
6397196 Kravetz May 2002 B1
6408084 Foley Jun 2002 B1
6411725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411737 Wesolkowski et al. Jun 2002 B2
6411938 Gates et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413305 Mehta Jul 2002 B1
6417869 Do Jul 2002 B1
6425017 Dievendorff Jul 2002 B1
6429952 Olbricht Aug 2002 B1
6439454 Masson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449397 Che-Chu Sep 2002 B1
6450403 Martens et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464134 Page Oct 2002 B1
6470325 Leemhuis Oct 2002 B1
6505178 Flenley Jan 2003 B1
6546119 Ciolli et al. Apr 2003 B2
6574377 Cahill et al. Jun 2003 B1
6574609 Downs Jun 2003 B1
6578760 Otto Jun 2003 B1
6587837 Spagna Jul 2003 B1
6606117 Windle Aug 2003 B1
6609200 Anderson et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611598 Hayosh Aug 2003 B1
6614930 Agnihotri et al. Sep 2003 B1
6643416 Daniels Nov 2003 B1
6654487 Downs, Jr. Nov 2003 B1
6661910 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672452 Alves Jan 2004 B1
6682452 Quintus Jan 2004 B2
6695204 Stinson Feb 2004 B1
6711474 Treyz et al. Mar 2004 B1
6726097 Graef Apr 2004 B2
6728397 McNeal Apr 2004 B2
6738496 Van Hall May 2004 B1
6742128 Joiner May 2004 B1
6745186 Testa et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755340 Voss Jun 2004 B1
6763226 McZeal Jul 2004 B1
6781962 Williams Aug 2004 B1
6786398 Stinson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789054 Makhlouf Sep 2004 B1
6796491 Nakajima Sep 2004 B2
6806903 Okisu et al. Oct 2004 B1
6813733 Li Nov 2004 B1
6829704 Zhang Dec 2004 B2
6844885 Anderson Jan 2005 B2
6856965 Stinson Feb 2005 B1
6863214 Garner et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870947 Kelland Mar 2005 B2
6883140 Acker Apr 2005 B1
6898314 Kung et al. May 2005 B2
6902105 Koakutsu Jun 2005 B2
6913188 Wong Jul 2005 B2
6931591 Brown Aug 2005 B1
6934719 Nally Aug 2005 B2
6957770 Robinson Oct 2005 B1
6961689 Greenberg Nov 2005 B1
6970843 Forte Nov 2005 B1
6973589 Wright Dec 2005 B2
6983886 Natsukari et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993507 Meyer Jan 2006 B2
6996263 Jones et al. Feb 2006 B2
6999943 Johnson Feb 2006 B1
7003040 Yi Feb 2006 B2
7004382 Sandru Feb 2006 B2
7010155 Koakutsu et al. Mar 2006 B2
7010507 Anderson Mar 2006 B1
7016704 Pallakoff Mar 2006 B2
7039048 Monta May 2006 B1
7058036 Yu Jun 2006 B1
7062099 Li et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062456 Riehl et al. Jun 2006 B1
7062768 Kubo Jun 2006 B2
7072862 Wilson Jul 2006 B1
7076458 Lawlor et al. Jul 2006 B2
7086003 Demsky Aug 2006 B2
7092561 Downs, Jr. Aug 2006 B2
7104443 Paul et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113925 Waserstein Sep 2006 B2
7114649 Nelson Oct 2006 B2
7139594 Nagatomo Nov 2006 B2
7140539 Crews Nov 2006 B1
7163347 Lugg Jan 2007 B2
7178721 Maloney Feb 2007 B2
7181430 Buchanan Feb 2007 B1
7184980 Allen-Rouman et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197173 Jones et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200255 Jones Apr 2007 B2
7204412 Foss, Jr. Apr 2007 B2
7216106 Buchanan et al. May 2007 B1
7219082 Forte May 2007 B2
7219831 Murata May 2007 B2
7249076 Pendleton Jul 2007 B1
7252224 Verma Aug 2007 B2
7266230 Doran Sep 2007 B2
7290034 Budd Oct 2007 B2
7299970 Ching Nov 2007 B1
7299979 Phillips Nov 2007 B2
7313543 Crane Dec 2007 B1
7314163 Crews et al. Jan 2008 B1
7321874 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7321875 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7325725 Foss, Jr. Feb 2008 B2
7328190 Smith et al. Feb 2008 B2
7330604 Wu et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336813 Prakash et al. Feb 2008 B2
7343320 Treyz Mar 2008 B1
7349566 Jones et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356505 March Apr 2008 B2
7377425 Ma May 2008 B1
7379978 Anderson May 2008 B2
7385631 Maeno Jun 2008 B2
7386511 Buchanan Jun 2008 B2
7391897 Jones Jun 2008 B2
7391934 Goodall et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392935 Byrne Jul 2008 B2
7401048 Rosedale Jul 2008 B2
7403917 Larsen Jul 2008 B1
7406198 Aoki et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421107 Lugg Sep 2008 B2
7421410 Schechtman et al. Sep 2008 B1
7433098 Klein et al. Oct 2008 B2
7437327 Lam Oct 2008 B2
7440924 Buchanan Oct 2008 B2
7447347 Weber Nov 2008 B2
7455220 Phillips Nov 2008 B2
7455221 Sheaffer Nov 2008 B2
7460108 Tamura Dec 2008 B2
7461779 Ramachandran Dec 2008 B2
7461780 Potts Dec 2008 B2
7471818 Price Dec 2008 B1
7475040 Buchanan Jan 2009 B2
7477923 Wallmark Jan 2009 B2
7480382 Dunbar Jan 2009 B2
7480422 Ackley et al. Jan 2009 B2
7489953 Griffin Feb 2009 B2
7490242 Torres Feb 2009 B2
7497429 Reynders Mar 2009 B2
7503486 Ahles Mar 2009 B2
7505759 Rahman Mar 2009 B1
7506261 Satou Mar 2009 B2
7509287 Nutahara Mar 2009 B2
7512564 Geer Mar 2009 B1
7519560 Lam Apr 2009 B2
7520420 Phillips Apr 2009 B2
7520422 Robinson et al. Apr 2009 B1
7536354 deGroeve et al. May 2009 B1
7536440 Budd May 2009 B2
7539646 Gilder et al. May 2009 B2
7540408 Levine Jun 2009 B2
7542598 Jones Jun 2009 B2
7545529 Borrey et al. Jun 2009 B2
7548641 Gilson et al. Jun 2009 B2
7566002 Love et al. Jul 2009 B2
7571848 Cohen Aug 2009 B2
7587066 Cordery et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587363 Cataline Sep 2009 B2
7590275 Clarke et al. Sep 2009 B2
7599543 Jones Oct 2009 B2
7599888 Manfre Oct 2009 B2
7602956 Jones Oct 2009 B2
7606762 Heit Oct 2009 B1
7609873 Foth et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619721 Jones Nov 2009 B2
7620231 Jones Nov 2009 B2
7620604 Bueche, Jr. Nov 2009 B1
7644043 Minowa Jan 2010 B2
7647275 Jones Jan 2010 B2
7668363 Price Feb 2010 B2
7672940 Viola Mar 2010 B2
7676409 Ahmad Mar 2010 B1
7680735 Loy Mar 2010 B1
7689482 Lam Mar 2010 B2
7697776 Wu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698222 Bueche, Jr. Apr 2010 B1
7702588 Gilder et al. Apr 2010 B2
7734545 Fogliano Jun 2010 B1
7743979 Fredman Jun 2010 B2
7753268 Robinson et al. Jul 2010 B1
7766244 Field Aug 2010 B1
7769650 Bleunven Aug 2010 B2
7792752 Kay Sep 2010 B1
7792753 Slater et al. Sep 2010 B1
7810714 Murata Oct 2010 B2
7818245 Prakash et al. Oct 2010 B2
7856402 Kay Dec 2010 B1
7873200 Oakes, III et al. Jan 2011 B1
7876949 Oakes, III et al. Jan 2011 B1
7885451 Walls et al. Feb 2011 B1
7885880 Prasad et al. Feb 2011 B1
7894094 Nacman et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896232 Prasad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7900822 Prasad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7912785 Kay Mar 2011 B1
7949587 Morris et al. May 2011 B1
7962411 Prasad et al. Jun 2011 B1
7970677 Oakes, III et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974899 Prasad et al. Jul 2011 B1
7978900 Nepomniachtchi et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996314 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996315 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996316 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
8001051 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
8046301 Smith et al. Oct 2011 B1
20010014881 Drummond Aug 2001 A1
20010018739 Anderson Aug 2001 A1
20010027994 Hayashida Oct 2001 A1
20010042171 Vermeulen Nov 2001 A1
20010042785 Walker Nov 2001 A1
20010043748 Wesolkowski et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047330 Gephart Nov 2001 A1
20010054020 Barth Dec 2001 A1
20020001393 Jones Jan 2002 A1
20020016763 March Feb 2002 A1
20020016769 Barbara et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032656 Chen Mar 2002 A1
20020038289 Lawlor et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020052841 Guthrie May 2002 A1
20020052853 Munoz May 2002 A1
20020065786 Martens et al. May 2002 A1
20020072974 Pugliese Jun 2002 A1
20020075524 Blair Jun 2002 A1
20020084321 Martens Jul 2002 A1
20020087467 Mascavage, III et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107809 Biddle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116329 Serbetcioglu Aug 2002 A1
20020116335 Star Aug 2002 A1
20020118891 Rudd Aug 2002 A1
20020120562 Opiela Aug 2002 A1
20020129249 Maillard et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133409 Sawano et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138522 Muralidhar Sep 2002 A1
20020147798 Huang Oct 2002 A1
20020150279 Scott Oct 2002 A1
20020152160 Allen-Rouman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152161 Aoike Oct 2002 A1
20020152164 Dutta Oct 2002 A1
20020152165 Dutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152169 Dutta Oct 2002 A1
20020171820 Okamura Nov 2002 A1
20020178112 Goeller Nov 2002 A1
20020188564 Star Dec 2002 A1
20020195485 Pomerleau et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005326 Flemming Jan 2003 A1
20030023557 Moore Jan 2003 A1
20030038227 Sesek Feb 2003 A1
20030055756 Allan Mar 2003 A1
20030055776 Samuelson Mar 2003 A1
20030074315 Lam Apr 2003 A1
20030075596 Koakutsu Apr 2003 A1
20030075916 Gorski Apr 2003 A1
20030081824 Mennie May 2003 A1
20030093367 Allen-Rouman et al. May 2003 A1
20030093369 Ijichi et al. May 2003 A1
20030105688 Brown et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105714 Alarcon-Luther et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139999 Rowe Jul 2003 A1
20030159046 Choi et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167225 Adams Sep 2003 A1
20030191615 Bailey Oct 2003 A1
20030191869 Williams Oct 2003 A1
20030200174 Star Oct 2003 A1
20030212904 Randle et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217005 Drummond et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225705 Park et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233278 Marshall Dec 2003 A1
20030233318 King et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010466 Anderson Jan 2004 A1
20040012496 De Souza Jan 2004 A1
20040013284 Yu Jan 2004 A1
20040024626 Bruijning Feb 2004 A1
20040024708 Masuda Feb 2004 A1
20040030741 Wolton et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040057697 Renzi Mar 2004 A1
20040058705 Morgan Mar 2004 A1
20040066031 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040069841 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040071333 Douglas et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076320 Downs, Jr. Apr 2004 A1
20040078299 Down-Logan Apr 2004 A1
20040080795 Bean Apr 2004 A1
20040089711 Sandru May 2004 A1
20040093303 Picciallo May 2004 A1
20040093305 Kight May 2004 A1
20040103057 Melbert et al. May 2004 A1
20040103296 Harp May 2004 A1
20040109596 Doran Jun 2004 A1
20040110975 Osinski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117302 Weichert Jun 2004 A1
20040122754 Stevens Jun 2004 A1
20040133511 Smith et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138974 Shimamura Jul 2004 A1
20040148235 Craig Jul 2004 A1
20040158549 Matena Aug 2004 A1
20040165096 Maeno Aug 2004 A1
20040170259 Park Sep 2004 A1
20040210515 Hughes Oct 2004 A1
20040210523 Gains et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040228277 Williams Nov 2004 A1
20040236647 Acharya Nov 2004 A1
20040236688 Bozeman Nov 2004 A1
20040240722 Tsuji et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245324 Chen Dec 2004 A1
20040247199 Murai et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040248600 Kim Dec 2004 A1
20040252679 Williams Dec 2004 A1
20040260636 Marceau Dec 2004 A1
20040267666 Minami Dec 2004 A1
20050001421 Luth et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010108 Rahn et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021466 Buchanan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033645 Duphily Feb 2005 A1
20050033685 Reyes Feb 2005 A1
20050033695 Minowa Feb 2005 A1
20050035193 Gustin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038746 Latimer et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038754 Geist Feb 2005 A1
20050044042 Mendiola Feb 2005 A1
20050044577 Jerding Feb 2005 A1
20050071283 Randle et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075969 Nielson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075974 Turgeon Apr 2005 A1
20050078336 Ferlitsch Apr 2005 A1
20050080725 Pick Apr 2005 A1
20050082364 Alvarez et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086140 Ireland Apr 2005 A1
20050086168 Alvarez Apr 2005 A1
20050091161 Gustin Apr 2005 A1
20050096992 Geisel May 2005 A1
20050097046 Singfield May 2005 A1
20050108164 Salafia May 2005 A1
20050108168 Halpin May 2005 A1
20050115110 Dinkins Jun 2005 A1
20050127160 Fujikawa Jun 2005 A1
20050131820 Rodriguez Jun 2005 A1
20050149436 Elterich Jul 2005 A1
20050168566 Tada Aug 2005 A1
20050171899 Dunn Aug 2005 A1
20050171907 Lewis Aug 2005 A1
20050177499 Thomas Aug 2005 A1
20050177518 Brown Aug 2005 A1
20050182710 Andersson Aug 2005 A1
20050188306 Mackenzie Aug 2005 A1
20050205661 Taylor Sep 2005 A1
20050209961 Michelsen Sep 2005 A1
20050228733 Bent et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252955 Sugai Nov 2005 A1
20050267843 Acharya Dec 2005 A1
20050268107 Harris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050269412 Chiu Dec 2005 A1
20050273368 Hutten et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278250 Zair Dec 2005 A1
20050281448 Lugg Dec 2005 A1
20050281471 LeComte Dec 2005 A1
20050281474 Huang Dec 2005 A1
20050289030 Smith Dec 2005 A1
20050289182 Pandian et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002426 Madour Jan 2006 A1
20060004660 Pranger Jan 2006 A1
20060025697 Kurzweil Feb 2006 A1
20060039628 Li et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060039629 Li Feb 2006 A1
20060041506 Mason et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045321 Yu Mar 2006 A1
20060047593 Naratil Mar 2006 A1
20060053056 Alspach-Goss Mar 2006 A1
20060059085 Tucker Mar 2006 A1
20060064368 Forte Mar 2006 A1
20060080245 Bahl Apr 2006 A1
20060085357 Pizarro Apr 2006 A1
20060102704 Reynders May 2006 A1
20060106691 Sheaffer May 2006 A1
20060106717 Randle May 2006 A1
20060110063 Weiss May 2006 A1
20060112013 Maloney May 2006 A1
20060115110 Rodriguez Jun 2006 A1
20060115141 Koakutsu Jun 2006 A1
20060118613 McMann Jun 2006 A1
20060144924 Stover Jul 2006 A1
20060144950 Johnson Jul 2006 A1
20060161501 Waserstein Jul 2006 A1
20060164682 Lev Jul 2006 A1
20060167818 Wentker et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060182331 Gilson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060182332 Weber Aug 2006 A1
20060206506 Fitzpatrick Sep 2006 A1
20060210138 Hilton et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060214940 Kinoshita Sep 2006 A1
20060215204 Miyamoto et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060215230 Borrey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060222260 Sambongi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229976 Jung Oct 2006 A1
20060229986 Corder Oct 2006 A1
20060238503 Smith Oct 2006 A1
20060242062 Peterson Oct 2006 A1
20060242063 Peterson Oct 2006 A1
20060249567 Byrne Nov 2006 A1
20060274164 Kimura et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279628 Fleming Dec 2006 A1
20060282383 Doran Dec 2006 A1
20060291744 Ikeda et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016796 Singhal Jan 2007 A1
20070019243 Sato Jan 2007 A1
20070022053 Waserstein Jan 2007 A1
20070027802 VanDeburg et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031022 Frew Feb 2007 A1
20070038561 Vancini et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041629 Prakash et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050292 Yarbrough Mar 2007 A1
20070053574 Verma et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058851 Quine Mar 2007 A1
20070063016 Myatt Mar 2007 A1
20070064991 Douglas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065143 Didow et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070075772 Kokubo Apr 2007 A1
20070076940 Goodall et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070076941 Carreon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070077921 Hayashi Apr 2007 A1
20070080207 Williams Apr 2007 A1
20070082700 Landschaft Apr 2007 A1
20070084911 Crowell Apr 2007 A1
20070086642 Foth Apr 2007 A1
20070086643 Spier Apr 2007 A1
20070094088 Mastie Apr 2007 A1
20070100748 Dheer May 2007 A1
20070110277 Hayduchok et al. May 2007 A1
20070118472 Allen-Rouman et al. May 2007 A1
20070122024 Haas et al. May 2007 A1
20070127805 Foth et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129955 Dalmia Jun 2007 A1
20070136198 Foth et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140545 Rossignoli Jun 2007 A1
20070140594 Franklin Jun 2007 A1
20070143208 Varga Jun 2007 A1
20070150337 Hawkins et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156438 Popadic Jul 2007 A1
20070168265 Rosenberger Jul 2007 A1
20070171288 Inoue Jul 2007 A1
20070172107 Jones et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070172148 Hawley Jul 2007 A1
20070179883 Questembert Aug 2007 A1
20070183000 Eisen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194102 Cohen Aug 2007 A1
20070198432 Pitroda et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203708 Polcyn et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208816 Baldwin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070235518 Mueller et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070235520 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241179 Davis Oct 2007 A1
20070244782 Chimento Oct 2007 A1
20070246525 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070251992 Sharma et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255652 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070255653 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070255662 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070258634 Simonoff Nov 2007 A1
20070271182 Prakash et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278286 Crowell et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288380 Starrs Dec 2007 A1
20070288382 Narayanan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070295803 Levine et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002911 Eisen Jan 2008 A1
20080021802 Pendleton Jan 2008 A1
20080040280 Davis Feb 2008 A1
20080052182 Marshall Feb 2008 A1
20080059376 Davis Mar 2008 A1
20080063253 Wood Mar 2008 A1
20080068674 McIntyre Mar 2008 A1
20080071721 Wang Mar 2008 A1
20080080760 Ronca Apr 2008 A1
20080086420 Gilder et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086421 Gilder Apr 2008 A1
20080091599 Foss, Jr. Apr 2008 A1
20080097899 Jackson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103790 Abernethy May 2008 A1
20080103967 Ackert et al. May 2008 A1
20080113674 Baig May 2008 A1
20080114739 Hayes May 2008 A1
20080117991 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080119178 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080133411 Jones et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147549 Rathbun Jun 2008 A1
20080156438 Stumphauzer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162350 Allen-Rouman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162371 Rampell et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177659 Lacey et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080180750 Feldman Jul 2008 A1
20080208727 McLaughlin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214180 Cunningham et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219543 Csulits Sep 2008 A1
20080245869 Berkun et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247629 Gilder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247655 Yano Oct 2008 A1
20080249931 Gilder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249951 Gilder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262953 Anderson Oct 2008 A1
20080275821 Bishop et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080316542 Mindrum et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090024520 Drory et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090046938 Yoder Feb 2009 A1
20090060396 Blessan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090108080 Meyer Apr 2009 A1
20090110281 Hirabayashi Apr 2009 A1
20090141962 Borgia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171819 Emde et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090171825 Roman Jul 2009 A1
20090173781 Ramachandran Jul 2009 A1
20090190823 Walters Jul 2009 A1
20090192938 Amos Jul 2009 A1
20090236413 Mueller et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090252437 Li Oct 2009 A1
20090281904 Pharris Nov 2009 A1
20090313167 Dujari Dec 2009 A1
20100007899 Lay Jan 2010 A1
20100027679 Sunahara et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100047000 Park et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057578 Blair et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100061446 Hands et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082470 Walach et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100165015 Barkley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100260408 Prakash et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262522 Anderson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100312705 Caruso et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110112967 Anderson et al. May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
984 410 Mar 2000 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (219)
Entry
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act Effective Oct. 28, 2004: Banks No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org/initiatives/content/check21—content.html, downloaded Dec. 2005, 20 pages.
Heckenberg, D., “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing,” 2003, 10, 1-10.
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures,” http://www.imphotorepair.com/, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 1 page.
OnlineChck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit,” Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck.com/wach/rcareal.htm, 2006, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 3 pages.
RemoteDepositCapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” RDC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/Overview/RDC—Overview.htm, 2006, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 4 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,219, dated Nov. 26, 2010 (59 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,219, dated May 6, 2011 (56 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223, dated Dec. 8, 2010 (10 pages).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223, dated Jun. 1, 2011 (10 pages).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,219, filed May 10, 2007, entitled “Systems and Methods for Real-Time Validation of Check Image Quality”, inventor: Harpel et al. (35 pages).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223, filed May 10, 2007, entitled “Systems and Methods for Real-Time Validation of Check Image Quality”, inventor: Harpel et al. (34 pages).
Whitney et al., “Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37/2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services”, American Bankers Association, May 18, 2004, http://www.aba/com/NR/rdonlyres/CBDC1A5C-43E3-43CC-B733-BE417C638618/35930/DSTUFormat.pdf (2 pages).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223 on Nov. 18, 2011 (9 pages).
White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. Res. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pages).
Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 page).
Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pages).
Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pages).
Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is—n7—v47/ai—14466034/print, 1993 (2 pages).
Zhang, C.Y., “Robust Estimation and Image Combining” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, Asp Conference Series, 1995 (5 pages).
Kornai Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwritting Recognition, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pages).
De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pages).
Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pages).
Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, in ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pages).
Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pages).
“Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/dirdepform.pdf. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pages).
Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pp.).
Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pages).
Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pages).
“Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pages).
Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pages).
Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167. No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pages).
Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pages).
Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing, Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss 6, (4 pages).
“Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pages).
“Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker-vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pages).
Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services; “Check Clearing For The 21st Century Act”, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132, Jun. 2003 (20 pages).
Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pages).
Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pages).
Oxley, Michael G., from the committee of conference; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (27 pages).
Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 STAT. 1177 (18 pages).
Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC; “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pages).
Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pages).
The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Settlement: The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)”, www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/retailretail—02d.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Dec. 2005 (3 pages).
“Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon—rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pages).
Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005—check21Year=2005 (1 page).
Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures A New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbanker.com/btn—article.html?id=20050502YQ50FSYG (2 pages).
German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pages).
Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 page).
BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pages).
BankServ, Product Overview, patent No. 7,970,677, as http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pages).
Blue Mountain Consulting, from URL: www.bluemontainconsulting.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Apr. 26, 2006 (3 pages).
Remotedepositcapture, URL:www.remotedepositcapture.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (5 pages).
Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (3 pages).
“Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pages).
Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ... Feb. 1, 2006 (2 pages).
Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 page).
Fest, Glen., “Patently Unaware” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, Retrieved from the internet at URL:http://banktechnews.com/article.html?id=2006403T7612618 (5 pages).
Bank Systems & Technology, Untitled Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml?—articleID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pages).
Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal for Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pages).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankServ Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pages).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, “PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Businesses”, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 24, 2006, (2 pages).
Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Checks”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pages).
“Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 page).
“What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html , Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pages).
“Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 page).
“Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pages).
“Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running—yourbusiness/businessbits/d908484987.brc, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pages).
Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pages).
“It's the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inbky.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf Cited in patent No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pages).
“Lesson 38—More Bank Transactions”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pages).
“Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pages).
“Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pages).
“Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps—user—guide—005.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pages).
“Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check21/solutions.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pages).
“Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pages).
Accept “Customer Not Present,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 page).
“Customer Personalized Bank Checks and address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web—pages/faq.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pages).
“Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office Form 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/directdepositapplication.pclf, Jul. 2007 (2 pages).
“Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www/bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-lc—fact—bymail, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pages).
“Refractive index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com, Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pages).
Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pages).
Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pages).
“Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pages).
Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform Payment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banker ev (42 pages).
Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 page).
“Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 page).
Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issue 43, (3 pages).
Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pages).
Creativepaymentsolutions.com, “Creative Payment Solutions—Websolution”, www.creativepaymentsolution.com/cps/ financialservices/websolution/default.html, Copyright 2008, Creative Payment Solutions, Inc. (1 page).
“How to Digitally Deposit a Check Image”, Smart Money Daily, Copyright 2008 (5 pages).
DCU Member's Monthly—Jan. 2008, “PC Deposit—Deposit Checks from Home!”, http://www.mycreditunionnewslettercom/dcu/0108/page1.html, Copyright 2008 Digital Federal Credit Union (2 pages).
Mitek Systems: Mitek Systems Launches First Mobile Check Deposit and Bill Pay Application, San Diego, CA, Jan. 22, 2008 (3 pages).
Windowsfordevices.com, “Software lets camera phone users deposit checks, pay bills”, www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS3934956670.html, Jan. 29, 2008 (3 pages).
Bruene, Jim; “Check Free to Enable In-Home Remote Check Deposit for Consumers and Small Business”, NetBanker. Corn, Financial Insite, Inc., http://www.netbanker.com/2008/02/checkfree—to—enable—inhome—rem.html, Feb. 5, 2008 (3 pages).
CNN.com/technology, “Scan, deposit checks from home”, www.cnn.com/2008ITECH/biztech/02/07/check.scanning.ap/index.html, Feb. 7, 2008 (3 pages).
“WallStreetGrapevine.com” Stocks on the Rise: JADG, BKYI, MITK; Mar. 3, 2008 (4 pages).
The Green Sheet 2.0: Newswire, “CO-OP adds home deposit capabilities to suite of check imaging products”, www.greensheet.com/newswire.php?newswire—id=8799, Mar. 5, 2008 (2 pages).
Matthews, Deborah, “Advanced Technology Makes Remote Deposit Capture Less Risky”, Indiana Bankers Association, Apr. 2008 (2 pages).
Bruene, Jim; “Digital Federal Credit Union and Four Others Offer Consumer Remote Deposit Capture Through EasCorp”, NetBanker—Tracking Online Finance, www.netbanker.com/2008/04/digital—federal credit union—a.html, Apr. 13, 2008 (3 pages).
Credit Union Journal, “The Ramifications of Remote Deposit Capture Success”, www.cujournal.com/printthis.html?id=20080411E0DZT57G, Apr. 14, 2008 (1 page).
Wells Fargo Commercial, “Remote Deposit”, www.wellsfargo.com/com/treasury—mgmtlreceivables/electronic/remote—deposit, Copyright 2008 (1 page).
Online Deposit: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.depositnow.com/faq.html, Copyright 2008 (1 page).
“Adjusting Brightness and Contrast”, www.eaglesoftware.com/adjustin.htm, retrieved on May 4, 2009 (4 pages).
Mitek systems, “Imagenet Mobile Deposit”, San Diego, CA, downloaded 2009 (2 pages).
Fisher, Dan M., “Home Banking in the 21st Century: Remote Capture Has Gone Retail”, May 2008 (4 pages).
“Best practices for producing quality digital image files,” Digital Images Guidelines, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40247/1/Images-Best—Practice.pdf, downloaded 2007 (2 pgs).
“ImageNet Mobile Deposit Provides Convenient Check Deposit and Bill Pay to Mobile Consumers,” Miteksystems, 2008 (2 pgs).
“Mitek Systems Announces Mobile Deposit Application for Apple iPhone,” http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories/pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-01-..., Nov. 25, 2008 (2 pgs).
Albrecht, W. Steve, “Check Kiting: Detection, Prosecution and Prevention,” The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Nov. 1, 1993 (6 pgs).
Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs).
Amber Avalona-Butler/Paraglide, “At Your Service: Best iPhone Apps for Military Lifestyle,” Jul. 9, 2010 (2 pgs).
Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs).
Automated Merchant Systems, Inc., “Electronic Check Conversion,” http://www.automatedmerchant.com/electronic—check—conversion.cfm, 2006, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
BLM Technologies, “Case Study: Addressing Check 21 and RDC Error and Fraud Threats,” Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jun. 11, 2007, Retrieved from http://www.remotedepositcapture.com/News/june—11—2007.htm on Feb. 19, 2008 (5 pgs).
Bruno, M., “Instant Messaging,” Bank Technology News, Dec. 2002 (3 pgs).
Carrubba, P. et al., “Remote Deposit Capture: A White Paper Addressing Regulatory, Operational and Risk Issues,” NetDeposit Inc., 2006 (11 pgs).
Century Remote Deposit High-Speed Scanner User's Manual Release 2006, (Century Manual), Century Bank, 2006, (32 pgs).
De Jesus, A. et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment: An educational overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing distributed check imaging and processing solutions,” Panini, 2004, pp. 1-22.
Debello, James et al., “RDM and Mitek Systems to Provide Mobile Check Deposit,” Mitek Systems, Inc., San Diego, California and Waterloo, Ontario, (Feb. 24, 2009), 2 pgs.
DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16pgs).
eCU Technologies, “Upost Remote Deposit Solution,” Retrieved from the internet https://www.eutechnologies.com/products/upost.html, downloaded 2009 (1 pg).
EFT Network Unveils FAXTellerPlus, EFT Network, Inc., www.eftnetwork.com, Jan. 13, 2009 (2 pgs).
ElectronicPaymentProviders, Inc., “FAQs: ACH/ARC, CheckVerification/Conversion/Guarantee, RCK Check Re-Presentment,” http://www.useapp.com/faq.htm, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act effective Oct. 28, 2004: Bank No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org.initiatives/content/check21—content.html, Cited in patent No. 7,873,200, as dated Dec. 2005 (20 pgs).
Federal Reserve System, “12 CFR, Part 229 [Regulation CC;]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks,” Federal Registrar, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 1-50.
Federal Reserve System, “Part IV, 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC;]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks; Final Rule,” Federal Registrar, vol. 69, No. 149, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 47290-47328.
Fidelity Information Services, “Strategic Vision Embraces Major Changes in Financial Services Solutions: Fidelity's long-term product strategy ushers in new era of application design and processing,” Insight, 2004, pp. 1-14.
Garry, M., “Checking Options: Retailers face an evolving landscape for electronic check processing that will require them to choose among several scenarios,” Supermarket News, vol. 53, No. 49, 2005 (3 pgs).
Gupta, Maya R. et al., “OCR binarization and image pre-processing for searching historical documents,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 389-397.
Hale, J., “Picture this: Check 21 uses digital technology to speed check processing and shorten lag time,” Columbus Business First, http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2005/03/14focusl.html, downloaded 2007 (3 pgs).
Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs).
Hildebrand, C. et al., “Electronic Money,” Oracle, http://www.oracle.com/oramag/profit/05-feb/p15financial.html, 2005, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (5 pgs).
Hillebrand, G., “Questions and Answers About the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, Check 21,” ConsumersUnion.org, http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm, Jul. 27, 2004, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (6 pgs).
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg).
Investment Systems Company, “Portfolio Accounting System,” 2000, pp. 1-32.
JBC, “What is a MICR Line?,” eHow.com, retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about—4684793—what-micr-line.html on May 4, 2009 (2 pgs).
Kendrick, Kevin B., “Check Kiting, Float for Purposes of Profit,” Bank Security & Fraud Prevention, vol. 1, No. 2, 1994 (3 pgs).
Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs).
Levitin, Adam J., Remote Deposit Capture: A Legal and Transactional Overview, Banking Law Journal, p. 115, 2009 (RDC).
Metro 1 Credit Union, “Remote Banking Services,” hltp://ww\\i.metro1cu.org/metro1cu/remote.html, downloaded Apr. 17, 2007 (4 pgs).
Moreau, T., “Payment by Authenticated Facsimile Transmission: a Check Replacement Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises,” CONNOTECH Experts-conseils, Inc., Apr. 1995 (31 pgs).
Nelson, B. et al., “Remote deposit capture changes the retail landscape,” Northwestern Financial Review, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi qa3799/is200607/ai—n16537250, 2006 (3 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Branch Out: Annual Report 2004,” 2004 (150 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Quick Post: Deposit and Payment Forwarding Service,” 2005 (1 pg).
NetDeposit Awarded Two Patents for Electronic Check Process, NetDeposit, Jun. 18, 2007, (1 pg).
Nixon, Julie et al., “Fiserv Research Finds Banks are Interested in Offering Mobile Deposit Capture as an,” Fiserv, Inc. Brookfield, Wis., (Business Wire), (Feb. 20, 2009), 2 pgs.
Rao, Bharat; “The Internet And The Revolution in Distribution: A Cross-Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs).
Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC—overview.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs).
Richey, J. C. et al., “EE 4530 Check Imaging,” Nov. 18, 2008 (10 pgs).
SoyBank Anywhere, “Consumer Internet Banking Service Agreement,” Dec. 6, 2004 (6 pgs) .
Teixeira, D., “Comment: Time to Overhaul Deposit Processing Systems,” American Banker, Dec. 10, 1998, vol. 163, No. 235, p. 15 (3 pgs).
Thailandguru.com: How and where to Pay Bills @ www.thailandguru.com/paying-bills.html (2 pgs).
Valentine, Lisa, “Remote Deposit Capture Hot Just Got Hotter,” ABA Banking Journal, Mar. 2006, pg. 1-9.
Wikipedia ®, “Remote Deposit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote—deposit, 2007 (3 pgs).
Wolfe, Daniel, “Check Image Group Outlines Agenda,” American Banker, New York, N.Y.: Feb. 13, 2009, vol. 174, Iss. 30, p. 12. (2 pgs).
Woody Baird Associated Press, “Pastors Wife got Scammed—She Apparently Fell for Overseas Money Scheme,” The Commercial Appeal, Jul. 1, 2006, p. A. 1.
Zions Bancorporation, “Moneytech, the technology of money in our world: Remote Deposit,” http://www.bankjunior.com/pground/moneytech/remote—deposit.jsp, 2007 (2 pgs).
Application as filed on Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,143 (27 pgs).
Application as filed on Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,741 (235 pgs).
Application as filed on Aug. 21, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,723 (38 pgs).
Application as filed on Aug. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,127 (45 pgs).
Application as filed on Aug. 28, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,443 (41 pgs).
Application as filed on Dec. 20, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,656 (21 pgs).
Application as filed on Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,494 (280 pgs).
Application as filed on Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,561 (275 pgs).
Application as filed on Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,578 (274 pgs).
Application as filed on Dec. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,594 (275 pgs).
Application as filed on Feb. 18, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,005 (37 pgs).
Application as filed on Jul. 13, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/487,537 (23 pgs).
Application as filed on Jul. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,613 (48 pgs).
Application as filed on Jul. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,680 (41 pgs).
Application as filed on Jun. 11, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/137,051 (29 pgs).
Application as filed on Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,976 (352 pgs).
Application as filed on Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,007 (356 pgs).
Application as filed on Jun. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,018 (353 pgs).
Application as filed on Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,924 (34 pgs).
Application as filed on Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,928 (36 pgs).
Application as filed on Mar. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,671 (40 pgs).
Application as filed on Mar. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,930 (37 pgs).
Application as filed on May 10, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,222 (35 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 17, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,278 (42 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,925 (36 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 (29 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 25, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,839 (22 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 29, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/926,388 (23 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 30, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,297 (26 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,974 (31 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,008 (27 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,227 (58 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,273 (56 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,537 (27 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,670 (47 pgs).
Application as filed on Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,884 (30 pgs).
Application as filed on Sep. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,569 (35 pgs).
Application as filed on Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/205,996 (30 pgs).
Claims as filed on Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,163 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,175 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,752 (5 pgs).
Claims as filed on Dec. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,478 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Dec. 20, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,671 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Dec. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,513 (7 pgs).
Claims as filed on Feb. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,477 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Jan. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/010,644 (9 pgs).
Claims as filed on Jan. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,865 (11 pgs).
Claims as filed on Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,925 (5 pgs).
Claims as filed on May 10, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on May 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/110,077 (9 pgs).
Claims as filed on May 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,566 (10 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 (6 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 24, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/257,471 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,963 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,995 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,998 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,804 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,878 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Sep. 2, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,781 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed on Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,001 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed on Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,007 (3 pgs).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223, dated Apr. 11, 2012 (8 pages).