The present invention relates generally to information networks and specifically to transmitting information such as media information over communication lines such as coaxial cable (hereinafter “coax”), thereby to form a communications network.
Home network technologies using coax are known generally. The Multimedia over Coax Alliance (MoCA™), at its website mocalliance.org, provides an example of a suitable specification (MoCA 1.0) for networking of digital video and entertainment through existing coaxial cable in the home which has been distributed to an open membership. MoCA 1.0 specification is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Home networking over coax taps into the vast amounts of unused bandwidth available on the in-home coax. More than 70% of homes in the United States have coax already installed into the home infrastructure. Many have existing coax in one or more primary entertainment consumption locations such as family rooms, media rooms and master bedrooms—ideal for deploying networks. Home networking technology allows homeowners to utilize this infrastructure as a networking system and to deliver other entertainment and information programming with high QoS (Quality of Service).
The technology underlying home networking over coax provides high speed (270 mbps), high QoS, and the innate security of a shielded, wired connection combined with state of the art packet-level encryption. Coax is designed for carrying high bandwidth video. Today, it is regularly used to securely deliver millions of dollars of pay per view and premium video content on a daily basis. Home networking over coax can also be used as a backbone for multiple wireless access points used to extend the reach of wireless network throughout a consumer's entire home.
Home networking over coax provides a consistent, high throughput, high quality connection through the existing coaxial cables to the places where the video devices currently reside in the home. Home networking over coax provides a primary link for digital entertainment, and may also act in concert with other wired and wireless networks to extend the entertainment experience throughout the home.
Currently, home networking over coax works with access technologies such as ADSL and VDSL services or Fiber to the Home (FTTH), that typically enter the home on a twisted pair or on an optical fiber, operating in a frequency band from a few hundred kilohertz to 8.5 MHz for ADSL and 12 MHZ for VDSL. As services reach the home via xDSL or FTTH, they may be routed via home networking over coax technology and the in-home coax to the video devices. Cable functionalities, such as video, voice and Internet access, may be provided to homes, via coaxial cable, by cable operators, and use coaxial cables running within the homes to reach individual cable service consuming devices locating in various rooms within the home. Typically, home networking over coax type functionalities run in parallel with the cable functionalities, on different frequencies.
It would be desirable to reduce reservation request overhead in a MoCA home network.
A system and/or method for reducing latency and reservation request overhead associated with MoCA devices connected by a MoCA home network, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
The objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
In the following description of the various embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration various embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments than those described herein may be utilized and structural and functional modifications may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art upon reading the following disclosure, various aspects described herein may be embodied as a method, a data processing system, or a computer program product. Accordingly, those aspects may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, such aspects may take the form of a computer program product stored by one or more computer-readable storage media having computer-readable program code, or instructions, embodied in or on the storage media. Any suitable computer readable storage media may be utilized, including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, and/or any combination thereof.
In addition, various signals representing data or events as described herein may be transferred between a source and a destination in the form of electromagnetic waves traveling through signal-conducting media such as metal wires, optical fibers, and/or wireless transmission media (e.g., air and/or space).
MoCA networks are typically contention free networks. Transmission access to the media may be controlled by a single entity called “Network Controller” (NC). Nodes controlled by the NC are referred to for the purposes of this application as “Existing Nodes” (EN).
In certain embodiments of the invention, the NC controls the timing of the respective accesses of each of the ENs to the media. Such control may be implemented by broadcasting to all the ENs a mapping of the media access plan (“MAP”) for the next period of time. Such period of time is typically referred to as “MAP cycle.”
MoCA Version 1.x Media Access Sequence
In the MoCA version 1.x, an EN may be provided access to the network according to the following steps:
1) In each MAP cycle, the NC schedules opportunities (Reservation Request Allocation Unit (RRAU)) for EN nodes to request a transmission slot.
The allocation for RRAU within a MAP cycle is bound—i.e., time-limited—to preserve the data bandwidth. If the number of ENs does not permit the NC to allocate an RRAU for every node within a single MAP cycle, the NC may allocate RRAU to nodes over multiple MAP cycles on a round-robin base or in some other suitable distribution.
2) Whenever an EN node has an outstanding frame(s) to transmit, it can send a Reservation Request frame (RR) in the RRAU to request a data transmission opportunity (“TxOP”).
3) The NC can grant the TxOP request generally within the next MAP following the receipt of the RR.
4) The EN generally transmits its outstanding frame(s) in the MAP cycle following receipt of grant.
The scope of the invention relates to methods to reduce the access latency of the EN with respect to the network and to reduce the overhead of reservation requests. It should be noted that the overhead attributable to reservation requests linearly increases with the number of EN nodes.
Such methods can dynamically optimize the occurrence of RRAU and Forward Reservation (“FR”) based at least on part on ingress—i.e., Ethernet to MoCA network—traffic monitoring.
Traffic Monitoring and Analysis
In some exemplary systems and method according to the invention, each EN preferably monitors its respective ingress traffic, or some other suitable traffic characteristic, over a periodic observation interval (“POI”) or some other suitable time period.
Each EN can keep a sliding window of the last n POIs from which statistics, such as average arrival rate (“FR_Rate”) and standard deviation, or other suitable statistics, can be generated.
FR Request
Based on the learned traffic patterns and based on predicted subsequent ingress data or based on other data transmission characteristics (such as preferably predetermined data transmission characteristics provided by system-set parameters), a requesting node can, according to the invention, predict its future transmission requests—i.e., for data that has not been received yet at the node—and can reserve in advance TX opportunities in view of the expected traffic. This preferably reduces the media access latency of the RRAU-RR-TxOP sequence.
For example, in such systems and methods, outstanding packets could be transmitted in the next TxOP preferably immediately following their reception by the ingress node.
It should be noted that there may be a trade-off, with respect to systems and methods according to the invention, between latency and aggregation level. Accordingly, a transmitted frame could be either transmitted in each MAP cycle, without waiting for the RRAU-RR-TxOP cycle to occur, or aggregated and sent every n MAP cycles.
Preference is preferably given to latency—i.e., transmitting a frame each MAP cycle—unless the aggregated forward reservation requests for all the nodes are higher than the available data bandwidth. In this case, the NC may concatenate multiple requests in a single burst.
The FR may carry the following parameters:
TxOP duration for odd and even occurrence;
The FR occurrence (number of times this FR should be applied);
The start network time from which this FR should be applied; and
Reservation Request Interval—the time elapsed between the beginning of each TxOP to the beginning of the next TxOP;
Furthermore, if a new learned pattern (or system-set parameter) triggers new FR parameters, a new FR may be required. The new FR can preferably overwrite the current FR parameters.
Based on the learned traffic patterns (or the system-set parameter), a requesting EN could also preferably predict the average bandwidth and arrival rate steadiness for its expected ingress traffic or for some other suitable traffic characteristic.
These two parameters, the average bandwidth and arrival rate steadiness, may be used to specify a Reservation Request Rate (an “RR Rate”) that the EN could indicate to the NC. Instead of scheduling an RRAU every node—e.g., in every MAP cycle or round robin periodicity—the NC could schedule the RRAU at the rate indicated by the EN.
Certain embodiments of the invention may include methods for managing transmission of data over a MoCA network. Such methods may include monitoring data transmission requirements at a node on the network; generating statistics of the data transmission requirements; predicting transmission requirements from the statistics; and reserving future transmission opportunities in view of the predicted transmission requirements.
Such methods may further include using statistics that represent an average rate of certain, preferably predetermined, data transmission requirements. Such statistics may include the standard deviation of ingress data into the node and/or the standard deviation of other representative data transmission requirements. Such statistics may also include the average latency of ingress data into and/or out of the node. Such statistics may also include average latency of the data transmission requirements.
In certain methods according to the invention, reservations may be made in a Forward Reservation Request packet. Such methods may include transmitting a reservation in a Forward Reservation Request packet. Such methods may also include receiving permission to send future—i.e., not yet received—data. Additionally, such methods may include aggregating data packets when using the future transmission opportunity.
In addition, such methods may include receiving a permission to transmit data at a future time; concatenating multiple data packets into a single packet; and transmitting the concatenated packet at the future time.
In certain methods according to the invention, the future reservation opportunity may be for transmission in the next Media Access Plan (“MAP”) cycle or over a plurality of Media Access Plan (“MAP”) cycles. In addition, the statistics may be gathered over one or a plurality of Media Access Plan (“MAP”) cycles.
Some methods for managing transmission of data over a MoCA network via a network controller according to the invention may include receiving a request to transmit data at future time; allocating a future time for transmission of data; and sending a permission to transmit data at the future time. Such methods may further include allocating a future time only if the aggregate rate of all of the nodes in the network does not exceed an allowed rate.
A network according to the invention may be configurable to monitor data transmission requirements; generate statistics of the data transmission requirements; predict transmission requirements from the statistics; and reserves future transmission opportunities in view of the predicted transmission requirements.
A MAP cycle 206 may include numerous reservation requests (208, 214, and 220) and data transmission opportunities (210, 212, 216, 218, and 222). In the exemplary MAP cycle shown in
When data frames were not requested or granted opportunities either by the FR or in response to the FR, these data frames should be requested by “conventional” RR. Packets should be preferably transmitted in the same order that they arrive. A node should preferably pad residual duration if there is insufficient data to fill a predetermined duration.
Preferably, the nodes can predict their respective reservation requirements based on information derived from ingress data statistics or other relevant traffic statistics. Such information can be mined from the data flow that passes through the node.
The network controller operation may grant FR data transmission opportunities according to the forward reservation requests using a MAP/DAU (“Data Allocation Unit”) message. Preferably, the network controller should schedule FR_Intervals as close as possible. However, the network controller may skip or delay some requested allocation units when the aggregated network throughput exceeds a predetermined threshold.
The following is an exemplary algorithm for predicting the FR interval and the FR duration. The algorithm preferably derives the FR interval and the FR duration using statistical analysis of ingress data flow measurements. In other embodiments of the invention, any suitable data transmission measurements at the node may be statistically analyzed to obtain FR interval and FR duration information.
First, an average number of bits in a 10 millisecond sliding window can be determined. The standard deviation of the average number of bits can also be determined. The average number of packets (which can be either a relatively large or small number of bits) in a 10 millisecond (or other suitable duration) sliding window can also be determined. An FR is implemented if the average number of bits and/or the average number of packets exceeds a predetermined threshold.
Based on the statistical analysis of the data transmission flow measurements, the FR duration and FR interval can be calculated. Thus, the algorithm may set an FR_Interval and an FR_Duration according to the average bit rate of the ingress flow and the standard deviation from the average bit rate of the ingress flow or from statistically-derived information based on any other suitable data transmission characteristics.
Table 1 below sets forth a Forward Reservation Request Element according to the invention:
Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”) throughput is highly dependent on the average roundtrip delay latency and application line delay. Table 2 below sets forth the Total Round Trip Delay associated with an exemplary MoCA network. The network includes the following parameters: user data is 1460 bytes, Ethernet overhead is 58 bytes, Ethernet size is 1580 bytes, and TCP Win is 65536 bytes. The MoCA PHY rate for this exemplary network is 600 Mbps.
When the Application Line Rate (the Application Line Rate is between the PC and the node; the PHY rate is between two nodes) is at 100 Mbps and the total round trip delay is 4.5 ms, the TCP throughput is 107 Mbps. When the Application Line Rate is 1 Gbps, and the total round trip delay is 5 ms, the TCP throughput is 103 Mbps.
With respect to TCP handling in the emerging MoCA 2.0 standard, a maximum roundtrip delay is provided. In order to obtain 100 Mbps, the required maximum roundtrip delay is about 5 milliseconds (including application delay) for a window size of 64 KB. This latency threshold cannot be met by MoCA 1.1's request-grant mechanism. The average one-way delay with MoCA 1.1's parameters is 2.8 milliseconds. The maximum available TCP throughput cannot exceed 80 Mbps. Latency should be below a 2.5 milliseconds roundtrip, including application latency 1-2 milliseconds. Systems and methods according to the invention preferably use FR to reduce latency on flows where average data rate or average packet rate is above a predetermined threshold.
The following conditions apply to a real-time simulation using FR. The simulation preferably determined FR durations and FR intervals by statistics measurement. The simulation used an averaged number of bits in a 10 millisecond sliding window, and the standard deviation of the bits. The simulation also used an averaged number of packets in a 10 millisecond sliding window, and the standard deviation of the bits. FR was applied when one or both of the average number of bits and the average number of packets exceeded a predetermined threshold.
Based on the foregoing statistics, the simulation calculated FR duration and FR intervals. The FR duration and FR interval were set according to the standard deviation of packet rate and the standard deviation of the bit rate. In one exemplary simulation, the average MAP cycle size=1000 Micro seconds, the FR was set for the next 3 MAP cycles and the PHY rate was set at 600 Mbps. The RR was assumed as given for each 3 MAP cycles.
A MoCA MAC Real Time simulator 306 was used to simulate the network. Another ECL 308 and server 310 was used on the second side of the simulation to simulate the delay involved with receiving and a second transmission. As stated above, the test conditions were as follows:
Average MAP cycle size=1000 uSec
FR for 3 future MAP Cycles
(assume RR given each 3 MAP cycle)
PHY Rate=600 Mbps
Generally, as described in detail below, the system of
Typically, each node comprises a modem having a CL (Convergence) layer, a Media Access Control layer and a PHY layer and the packet aggregation functionality is performed at the CL layer (at the ECL layer, if the packets are Ethernet packets, abbreviated “Epkts” in
Each aggregation frame 630A, 630F typically comprises at least some of the following information: an indication that the frame is an aggregation frame rather than a single-packet frame and an indication of the size of at least some of the packets in the frame. This information is typically stored in the header 632 of the aggregation frame. Each packet 640 in each frame typically has a header having CRC (cyclic redundancy check) code for the header itself and CRC code for the content of the packet.
A network access coordinator 650, which may be a node itself, is operative to coordinate the access of the plurality of nodes 620 to the network of channels 610 by granting or refusing transmission requests or by granting unsolicited transmission permission. At least one of the nodes 620 is operative to inform the network access coordinator 650 when it has formed an aggregation frame 630 comprising at least one aggregated packet 640. The network access coordinator 650 is operative responsively to determine which portion, if any, of the aggregated packets 640 can be transmitted.
Typically, as shown, at least one node 620 is operative to send a transmission request and the network access coordinator 650, responsively, selectively grants or refrains from granting permission to transmit. In 1_A, Epkt2_A and Epkt3_A.
Node 620E also requests permission to transmit three Ethernet packets to node 620C which is located in the kitchen (as shown in slot IV). However, coordinator 650 grants permission to transmit only two of these (as shown in slot V). Therefore, packet Epkt3 remains at node 620E for the time being. Nodes 620B and 620C each de-aggregate the frames 630A and 630E that they respectively receive as shown.
Packets 640 may comprise packets of different classes and at least one Tx node 620 may be operative to aggregate packets accumulating at the node, as a function of the class to which the packets belong. For example, in
Individual nodes 640 may be operative to aggregate all packets which have accumulated at the node between each of the node's transmission requests. This optional aggregation “rule” may refer to any transmission request or may be specific to transmission requests pertaining to a particular class of node.
In the system of
The system of
Thus, systems and methods for reducing reservation request overhead in a communications network have been described.
Aspects of the invention have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. A person having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that numerous additional embodiments, modifications, and variations may exist that remain within the scope and spirit of the appended claim. For example, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the steps illustrated in the figures may be performed in other than the recited order and that one or more steps illustrated may be optional. The methods and systems of the above-referenced embodiments may also include other additional elements, steps, computer-executable instructions, or computer-readable data structures. In this regard, other embodiments are disclosed herein as well that can be partially or wholly implemented on a computer-readable medium, for example, by storing computer-executable instructions or modules or by utilizing computer-readable data structures.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/638,038 filed on Dec. 15, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,309, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING LATENCY AND RESERVATION REQUEST OVERHEAD IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK” (hereinafter, the “038 application”), which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The '038 application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/140,057, filed Dec. 22, 2008, entitled “Systems and Methods to Reduce the Reservation Request Overhead in a Communication Network,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and 61/149,085, filed Feb. 2, 2009, entitled “Systems and Methods to Reduce Reservation Request Overhead in a Communication Network,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3836888 | Boenke et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4413229 | Grant | Nov 1983 | A |
4536875 | Kume et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4608685 | Jain et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4893326 | Duran et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5052029 | James et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5170415 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5343240 | Yu | Aug 1994 | A |
5367517 | Cidon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421030 | Baran | May 1995 | A |
5440335 | Beveridge | Aug 1995 | A |
5570355 | Dail et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5638374 | Heath | Jun 1997 | A |
5671220 | Tonomura | Sep 1997 | A |
5796739 | Kim et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802173 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805591 | Naboulsi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805806 | McArthur | Sep 1998 | A |
5815662 | Ong | Sep 1998 | A |
5822677 | Peyrovian | Oct 1998 | A |
5822678 | Evanyk | Oct 1998 | A |
5845190 | Bushue et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850400 | Eames et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854887 | Kindell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856975 | Rostoker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5877821 | Newlin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886732 | Humpleman | Mar 1999 | A |
5896556 | Moreland et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917624 | Wagner | Jun 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963844 | Dail | Oct 1999 | A |
5982784 | Bell | Nov 1999 | A |
6009465 | Decker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6028860 | Laubach et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055242 | Doshi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069588 | O'Neill, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6081519 | Petler | Jun 2000 | A |
6111911 | Sanderford, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118762 | Nomura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157645 | Shobatake | Dec 2000 | A |
6167120 | Kikinis | Dec 2000 | A |
6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219409 | Smith et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229818 | Bell | May 2001 | B1 |
6243413 | Beukema | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6304552 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307862 | Silverman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6434151 | Caves et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466651 | Dailey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481013 | Dinwiddie et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6526070 | Bernath et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553568 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563829 | Lyles et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567654 | Coronel Arredondo et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611537 | Edens et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622304 | Carhart | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637030 | Klein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650624 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6745392 | Basawapatna et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763032 | Rabenko et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785296 | Bell | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6816500 | Mannette et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6831899 | Roy | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836515 | Kay et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6859899 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862270 | Ho | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6877043 | Mallory et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6877166 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898210 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6930989 | Jones, IV et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940833 | Jonas et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950399 | Bushmitch et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961314 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985437 | Vogel | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996198 | Cvetkovic | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7035270 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065779 | Crocker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7089580 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7116685 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127734 | Amit | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133697 | Judd et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142553 | Ojard et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146632 | Miller | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149220 | Beukema et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7194041 | Kadous | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7292527 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296083 | Barham et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327754 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7372853 | Sharma et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7453855 | Madhow | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7460543 | Malik et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487532 | Robertson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7532642 | Peacock | May 2009 | B1 |
7532693 | Narasimhan | May 2009 | B1 |
7555064 | Beadle | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574615 | Weng et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606256 | Vitebsky et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7652527 | Ido et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653164 | Lin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7675970 | Nemiroff et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7783259 | Dessert et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7916756 | Atsumi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8213309 | Kliger et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8483080 | Quigley et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20010039660 | Vasilevsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010562 | Schleiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020021465 | Moore et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020059623 | Rodriguez et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059634 | Terry et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069417 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078247 | Lu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078249 | Lu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097821 | Hebron et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105970 | Shvodian | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118699 | McKinnon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020136231 | Leatherbury et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141347 | Harp et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150155 | Florentin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174423 | Fifield et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194605 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013453 | Lavaud et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016751 | Vetro et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030063563 | Kowalski | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066082 | Kliger et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099253 | Kim | May 2003 | A1 |
20030152059 | Odman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169769 | Ho et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193619 | Farrand | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198244 | Ho et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004934 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037366 | Crawford | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047284 | Eidson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040107445 | Amit | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040163120 | Rabenko et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172658 | Rakib et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177381 | Kliger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224715 | Rosenlof et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258062 | Narvaez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015703 | Terry et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050097196 | Wronski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152350 | Sung et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152359 | Giesberts et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175027 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050204066 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | A9 |
20050213405 | Stopler | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060059400 | Clark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062250 | Payne | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078001 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104201 | Sundberg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060256799 | Eng | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256818 | Shvodian et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268934 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280194 | Jang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025317 | Bolinth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040947 | Koga | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070127373 | Ho et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160213 | Un et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171919 | Godman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183786 | Hinosugi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206551 | Moorti et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253379 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286121 | Kolakowski et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037589 | Kliger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080369 | Sumioka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089268 | Kinder et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080117919 | Kliger et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117929 | Kliger et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130779 | Levi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178229 | Kliger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189431 | Hyslop et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212591 | Wu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238016 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259957 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271094 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273591 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279219 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298241 | Ohana et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010263 | Ma et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090063878 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092154 | Malik et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122901 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090165070 | McMullin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090217325 | Kliger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252172 | Hare | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254794 | Malik et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257483 | French et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279643 | Shusterman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090316589 | Shafeeu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031297 | Klein et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080312 | Moffatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150016 | Barr | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158015 | Wu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158021 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158022 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162329 | Ford et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174824 | Aloni et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100238932 | Kliger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246586 | Ohana et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254278 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100254402 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281195 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284474 | Kliger et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110013633 | Klein et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110080850 | Klein et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110205891 | Kliger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110310907 | Klein et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1422043 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1588827 | Mar 2005 | CN |
0385695 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0622926 | Nov 1994 | EP |
1501326 | Jan 2005 | EP |
60160231 | Aug 1985 | JP |
WO-9827748 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9831133 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9935753 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9946734 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-0031725 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0055843 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0180030 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0219623 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Multichannel News , MoCA Brewing Up Bigger Bandwidth, Dec. 15, 2008 Interview with CTO Anton Monk, http://www.multichannel.com/article/160878-MoCa.sub.--Brewing.sub.--Up.su- b.--bigger.sub.--Bandwidth.php downloaded on Mar. 29, 2009. |
Ovadia S., “MoCA: Ubiquitous Multimedia Networking in the Home,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering USA, [Online] 2007, XP002584642 ISSN: 0277-786X, Retrieved on Jul. 28, 2010 from the Internet: URL: http://spiedl.aip.org//getpdf/servlet/getPDFServlet?filetype=pdf&id=PSISD-G00677600000167760C00000&idtype=cvips&prog=normal>. |
“Home Networking on Coax for Video and Multimedia, Overview for IEEE 802.1AVB”, Shlomo Ovadia, San Ramon/California, May 30, 2007. |
“Microtune Introduces Industry's First 1-GHZ Cable Tuners Compatible with MoCA—Home Networking Standard”, Business Wire, San Francisco, California, Mar. 19, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120269090 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61140057 | Dec 2008 | US | |
61149085 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12638038 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13535755 | US |