The present application relates to crankcase ventilation (CV) systems that utilize rotating coalescing devices. In particular, the field of the invention relates to CV systems employing rotating coalescing devices that create a positive recirculation effect.
During operation of an internal combustion engine, a fraction of combustion gases can flow out of the combustion cylinder and into the crankcase of the engine. These gases are often called “blowby” gases. Typically, the blowby gases are routed out of the crankcase via a CV system. The CV system passes the blowby gases through a coalescer (i.e., a coalescing filter element) to remove a majority of the aerosols and oils contained in the blowby gases. The filtered blowby gases are then either vented to the ambient (in open CV systems) or routed back to the air intake for the internal combustion engine for further combustion (in closed CV systems).
Many CV systems utilize rotating coalescers. Rotating coalescers may include fibrous filters as well as centrifugal separation devices. Performance attributes of rotating coalescer devices may be measured in terms of pressure drop (or rise) through the device and efficiency of oil removal. In rotating coalescers, the oil droplets (e.g., aerosol) suspended and transported by the blowby gases are separated inside the coalescer media through the particle capture mechanisms of inertial impaction, interception, and diffusion onto the fibers. By rotating the media, inertial impaction is enhanced by the additional centrifugal force. In addition to this aspect, after the oil droplets coalesce to form larger drops, the centrifugal force removes the larger drops by overcoming the surface drag force of the media fibers. This aspect increases the collection of and the discharge of oil from the coalescer by providing improved drainage compared to a stationary coalescer. In turn, the improved drainage from the rotating coalescing filter aids in improving the filtration efficiency as well as greatly reducing the pressure drop across the filter.
Because a rotating coalescer is positioned within a static filter housing, there is typically a slight gap between the rotating components and the stationary housing. For example, a gap may exist between the static inlet of the housing and the rotating inlet opening of the rotating coalescer. This gap can allow unfiltered aerosol contained in the blowby gases to bypass the rotating coalescer if the downstream pressure on the clean side of the rotating media in the radial vicinity of the gap is lower than the upstream pressure on the dirty side of the rotating media in the radial vicinity of the gap. Example gaps are shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,189,310, entitled “APPARATUS FOR REMOVING OIL MIST,” by Hotta (see, e.g., the gaps in
One example embodiment relates to a CV system. The CV system includes a housing, an inlet configured to receive blowby gases from an internal combustion engine and to provide the blowby gases to the housing, and an outlet configured to provide filtered blowby gases from the housing and to at least one of an intake of the internal combustion engine and the surrounding ambient. The CV system further includes a rotating coalescer positioned within the housing such that a gap exists between the rotating coalescer and the housing. The rotating coalescer includes a first endcap and a filter media. The gap permits gas flow between a clean side of the filter media and a dirty side of the filter media. The CV system includes a central shaft coupled to the rotating coalescer. The central shaft is rotatable such that when the central shaft rotates, the rotating coalescer rotates and creates a pumping pressure that causes a high pressure within the housing on the clean side of the filter media and a low pressure on the dirty side of the filter media. The pressure differential causes a positive recirculation of the blowby gases in which a portion of already filtered blowby gas from the clean side of the filter media returns through the gap to the dirty side of the filter media.
Another example embodiment relates to a CV system. The CV system includes a housing, an inlet configured to receive blowby gases from an internal combustion engine and to provide the blowby gases to the housing, and an outlet configured to provide filtered blowby gases from the housing and to at least one of an intake of the internal combustion engine and the surrounding ambient. The CV system further includes a rotating separating element positioned within the housing such that a gap exists between the rotating separating element and the housing. The gap permits gas flow between a clean side of the rotating separating element and a dirty side of the rotating separating element. The CV system includes a central shaft coupled to the rotating separating element. The central shaft is rotatable such that when the central shaft rotates, the rotating separating element rotates and creates a pumping pressure that causes a high pressure within the housing on the clean side of the rotating separating element and a low pressure on the dirty side of the rotating separating element. The pressure differential causes a positive recirculation of the blowby gases in which a portion of already filtered blowby gas from the clean side of the rotating separating element returns through the gap to the dirty side of the rotating separating element.
These and other features, together with the organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements have like numerals throughout the several drawings described below.
Referring to the figures generally, rotating coalescer CV systems are described. The described CV systems utilize a pumping pressure created by the porous media and/or internal radial ribs or spiral vanes of a rotating separating element, such as a rotating coalescer, to maintain positive recirculation of filtered blowby gases through a potential leak gap between a static housing inlet and a spinning component of the rotating coalescer. In some arrangements, the porous media is fibrous media. The filter media may be pleated or non-pleated. The positive recirculation caused by the pressure balance prevents unfiltered blowby gases from bypassing the media of the rotating coalescer from the upstream side to the downstream side of the filter media through the gap. During operation, the pressure balance between the upstream side and downstream side of the filter media maintains the positive recirculation, which in turn maintains a high filtration efficiency.
Referring to
During operation, the rotating coalescer 108 is rotated along its central axis 118 by a central shaft 120 coupled to the rotating coalescer. The first and second endcaps 110 and 112 are secured to the central shaft 120 such that when the central shaft 120 rotates, the filter media 114 rotates. As shown in
Referring to
The rotating coalescer 108 can have filter media arrangements that include a single layer or multiplayer construction, in which different physical properties (e.g., fiber diameter, porosity, etc.) are combined in a series. For arrangements that utilize a single layer of media, the intrinsic permeability of the filter media 114 is defined below in equation 1.
In equation 1, κ has dimensional units of length squared, V is the superficial fluid velocity through the media 114, μ is the fluid viscosity, t is the media thickness, and ΔP is the pressure drop across the media 114 from an upstream position to a downstream position.
For single and multilayer media constructions, the average intrinsic permeability through the media 114 is defined by equation 2.
In equation 2, n is the number of layers of media, ti is the thickness of layer “i”, and κi is the intrinsic permeability of layer “i”.
A simple numeric example of the average intrinsic permeability calculation for a three layer multilayer media construction is shown below in Table 1.
Experimentally, the average intrinsic permeability can simply be measured by maintaining air flow through a flat sample of the multilayer porous media under controlled conditions of gas viscosity (μ) and superficial velocity (v) while measuring the pressure drop from the upstream side of the media to the downstream side of the media. The average intrinsic permeability is calculated using equation 1 above.
As illustrated in
As noted above, positive recirculation of the blowby gas through the gap 202 is achieved when P2>P1 (alternatively stated as P2/P1>1). This situation can be achieved by intentionally selecting an optimum combination of the following critical parameters for the rotating coalescer 108 and the CV system 100. Table 2 describes the various design parameters that are utilized in calculating the optimal CV system 100 design to achieve the positive recirculation.
As described in further detail below, different design parameter optimizations are utilized depending on whether the filter media 114 is comprised of a pleated porous media or a non-pleated porous media.
In arrangements where the filter media 114 is an annular porous non-pleated media, if the condition of equation 3 is met, P2>P1 is maintained and positive gas recirculation occurs.
In other arrangements, the filter media 114 is an annular porous pleated media. For example, a cross-sectional view of a pleated annular filter element 400 is shown according to an example embodiment. As shown in
As shown in equations 3 and 4, different CV system 100 designs having a widely different sizes, operating speeds, and/or flow rates may require filtering media with significantly different intrinsic characteristics. For example, diesel engine CV applications for on-highway and off-highway equipment are typically constrained by practical considerations such as space available in the vicinity of the engine, energy available for inducing rotation of the rotating coalescer, and the strength of economically available materials of construction. Accordingly, it is preferable to design rotating porous or fibrous medium coalescers that may be utilized across multiple different applications and that share a range of common filtering medium properties across a very broad range of engine sizes and rotating coalescer operating speeds and sizes.
A narrower range of values for preferred arrangements of rotating porous medium coalescers can be defined utilizing a dimensionless parameter of
which represents the average number of hydraulic radii through the thickness of the media in the flow direction. Example design parameters and approximate maximum preferred values of Nhyd for annular non-pleated coalescers are set forth below in tables 3 through 6.
Example design parameters and approximate maximum preferred values of Nhyd for annular pleated coalescers are set forth below in tables 7 through 10.
As shown above in Tables 3-10, particular embodiments of rotating coalescers for diesel engine crankcase ventilation applications generally indicate that values of Nhyd less than approximately 3000 are required to avoid bypassing unfiltered flow though the clearance seal, with several cases requiring lesser values than 3000. These embodiments, listed for engine displacements ranging from 3-30 liters and blowby flowrates of 75-750, respectively, are applicable across a wide range of commercial gasoline, diesel, natural gas, or other alternatively fueled engine applications.
Preferred values of Nhyd tend to depend on the thickness of the employed media. In many arrangements of annular non-pleated media, preferential maximum values for Nhyd include: 500 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 700 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 1000 for 1-2 mm thick media, 1300 for 2-4 mm thick media, 1800 for 4-8 mm thick media, 2300 for 8-15 mm thick media, 3000 for 15-30 mm thick media, and 4000 for >30 mm thick media. In many arrangements of annular pleated media, preferential maximum values for Nhyd include: 800 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 950 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 1400 for 1-2 mm thick media, 1700 for 2-4 mm thick media, and 2000 for 4-8 mm thick media, and somewhat larger values for media thicker than 8 mm. Nevertheless, it is possible that certain applications with very different amount of physical installation space available and other competing design objectives would maintain the efficiency benefits from positive recirculation at higher or lower values than those taught above, thus it can be beneficial to simply maintain adherence to criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular non-pleated porous filter elements and pleated porous filter elements, respectively, such that recirculation flow is maintained.
Equation 5 defines the criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular non-pleated porous filter elements, and equation 6 defines the criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular pleated porous filter elements, above which unfiltered gas would be expected to bypass the dynamic clearance seal.
Furthermore, fibrous coalescing filtering efficiency is typically higher for elements with media having greater total hydraulic radii count in the flow direction, due to smallness of pore or fiber, or number of opportunities for aerosol droplets and particulate matter to become captured within the medium as flow proceeds through the media from upstream to downstream. Thus, optimum designs for overall aerosol filtering efficiency can be found in the vicinity of the aforementioned maximum hydraulic radii count values. However, allowance for variation in application conditions (e.g., engine wear resulting in blow-by flow rate increases, solid or semi-solid contaminants becoming captured by the filtering medium that further restricts flow through the media, etc.) suggest that optimum values of hydraulic radii count may be less than the maximum values listed above. While designs with filter media having significantly lower hydraulic radii count values, such as 10, will almost certainly result in positive recirculation, their overall aerosol filtering efficiencies are not as high as those optimized according to the above-described methodologies. Thus, for certain products that are designed primarily for the objective of highest efficiency, a range of suitable values for the Nhyd can be defined. In many arrangements, preferential ranges of the parameter for annular non-pleated media elements include: 75-500 for 0-0.5 mm thick media, 100-700 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 130-1000 for 1-2 mm thick media, 160-1300 for 2-4 mm thick media, 200-1800 for 4-8 mm thick media, 300-2200 for 8-15 mm thick media, 400-3000 for 15-30 mm thick media, and 600-4000 for >30 mm thick media. For annular pleated media elements, preferential ranges of values for Nhyd include: 120-800 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 140-950 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 180-1400 for 1-2 mm thick media, 240-1700 for 2-4 mm thick media, and 300-2000 for 4-8 mm thick media, and somewhat larger values for media thicker than 8 mm. These ranges establish values where there exists an optimum tradeoff between: (a) the inefficiency of porous media due to small aerosol size, excessive size of pores or fibers, or excessive porosity and (b) the inefficiency of the rotating coalescing filter system overall due to potential bypass of flow, unfiltered through the dynamic clearance seal.
The relationships set forth in equations 5 and 6 are derived by considering the positive pumping pressure versus the negative pressure drop (dP) across the filter element as set forth below in equations 7 through 11. In equations 7-11, R corresponds to the radius of the noted diameter as defined above.
Accordingly, the objective for annular media rotating CV systems is to maintain the relationship set forth above in equation 11.
Referring to
The above-described systems and methods are not limited to separating oil and aerosols from crankcase blowby gases. The same or similar arrangements and principles can be used in other filtration systems that utilize porous coalescer technology to separate liquid from a gas-liquid mixture.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different configurations, systems and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other configurations, systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible.
It should be noted that any use of the term “example” herein to describe various embodiments is intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, and/or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such term is not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
The use of the term “approximately” in relation to numbers, values, and ranges thereof refers to plus or minus five percent of the stated of numbers, values, and ranges thereof.
The terms “coupled” and the like as used herein mean the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being attached to one another.
References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” etc.) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other example embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the various example embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments, and elements from different embodiments may be combined in a manner understood to one of ordinary skill in the art. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various example embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application is a National Phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/036432, filed Jun. 8, 2016, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/173,149 filed Jun. 9, 2015. The contents of both applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/036432 | 6/8/2016 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/200928 | 12/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2788125 | Webb | Apr 1957 | A |
2905327 | Phillps | Sep 1959 | A |
2937755 | Szwargulski | May 1960 | A |
3234716 | Sevin | Feb 1966 | A |
3362155 | Driscoll | Jan 1968 | A |
3451551 | Sample et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3531897 | Weimar | Oct 1970 | A |
4189310 | Hotta | Feb 1980 | A |
4279630 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4482365 | Roach | Nov 1984 | A |
4487618 | Mann | Dec 1984 | A |
4502956 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4514193 | Booth | Apr 1985 | A |
4516994 | Kocher | May 1985 | A |
4981502 | Gottschalk | Jan 1991 | A |
5056935 | Singh | Oct 1991 | A |
5401706 | Fischer | Mar 1995 | A |
5462658 | Sem | Oct 1995 | A |
5466385 | Rogers et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5716423 | Krul et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5863317 | Smith et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6033450 | Krul et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6123061 | Baker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139595 | Herman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183407 | Hallgren et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6499285 | Snyder | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517612 | Crouch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6640792 | Harvey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652439 | Herman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6876760 | Vaisberg et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7235177 | Herman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7811347 | Carlsson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824458 | Borgstrom et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824459 | Borgstrom et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8172917 | Kup et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8231752 | Janikowski et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8268033 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8794222 | Schwandt et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8974567 | Verdegan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
10927730 | Barreteau et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20030034016 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040016345 | Springett et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020839 | Kato et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040071328 | Vaisberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040214710 | Herman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060096263 | Kahlbaugh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060242933 | Webb | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070039300 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070175191 | Ziebold et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070249479 | Eliasson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271884 | Pearson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080280777 | Bittner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000258 | Carlsson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020486 | Barnwell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044702 | Adamek et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056292 | Fornof et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067986 | Mignano | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090101013 | Moredock | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090263238 | Jarrah | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100126145 | He et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100180854 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192529 | Schuster | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229511 | Steins et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100285101 | Moore et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110180051 | Schwandt et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110198280 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247309 | Smith | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252974 | Verdegan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263496 | Fineman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120034083 | Shoji et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120118200 | Howell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120315225 | Porbeni et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130037481 | Lalouch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056407 | Parikh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130167816 | Dawar | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140033668 | Kleynen | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140069432 | Mebasser et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096683 | Azwell et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140326661 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150047582 | Dawar et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075377 | Gorbach et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150173577 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160030875 | Parikh et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160245157 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180030868 | Elsaesser et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180117512 | Janakiraman et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190153635 | Ikejiri et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101491793 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101784325 | Jul 2010 | CN |
104334284 | Feb 2015 | CN |
100 44 615 | Apr 2002 | DE |
203 02 824 | Aug 2004 | DE |
10 2006 024 816 | Dec 2007 | DE |
1 532 352 | May 2005 | EP |
1 645 320 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2933626 | Jan 2010 | FR |
H11-141325 | May 1999 | JP |
WO 2011100712 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012106659 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013025445 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2016046944 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016159951 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017189516 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2018002244 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action from corresponding CN Application No. 2016800326319, dated Mar. 18, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Holdich, R.G., “Fundamentals of Particle Technology,” Chapter 8, Midland Information Technology and Publishing, Jan. 1, 2002, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/036384, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/036432, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 24 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent App. No. 17790235.0 dated Oct. 25, 2019, 9 pages. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 16/096,585, dated Oct. 16, 2019, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/047755, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/U2017/029315, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2015/023290, dated Jun. 29, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/048912, dated Nov. 10, 2016, 12 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent App. No. 2015800784030 dated Mar. 1, 2019, 19 pages (with translation). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/561,170 dated Mar. 14, 2019, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued for U.S. Appl. No. 15/753,778 dated Feb. 10, 2020. |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 201847007059 dated May 5, 2020, 6 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent App. No. 201780024820.6 dated Mar. 31, 2020, 22 pages (with translation). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/746,973 dated Jul. 8, 2020, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued for U.S. Appl. No. 17/164,369, dated Jun. 21, 2021, 21 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180140986 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62173149 | Jun 2015 | US |