Patent Grant
9027108
The Android operating system (“Android OS”) relies on a rich inter-application messaging system called “Intents” for communication between applications. The messaging system promotes collaboration between applications by allowing applications to leverage existing data or services from each other. For example, a restaurant directory application can ask one application to launch the a restaurant website, another application to call a restaurant, another application to display directions to a restaurant, and so on.
The Intents based messaging system can pass data between applications. However, the default mechanisms for passing data between the application are generally insecure. The default mechanisms expose the data to not just the applications involved in the passing of the data but also to any other applications on the mobile device.
The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.
Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for secure file portability between mobile applications accessed via a mobile device. In one embodiment, secure file portability between mobile applications is supported by a server-based key generation service.
When a mobile operating system passes data between applications running on its platform, the default mechanism is usually insecure and exposes the data openly to any application on the system, not just the ones involved in the passing of the data. In one embodiment, the disclosed systems and methods include having a mobile application or client on the device make requests to one or more host servers (e.g., servers enabling or providing cloud services, cloud-based storage, collaboration and/or file sharing services) for individual encryption keys to be used for each transaction involving a file transfer (hereinafter “transaction”). The keys are used to encrypt packages of data before they leave the mobile application so that they are unreadable in transit. Because the keys are unique per transaction, even if one transaction is compromised, the risk does not spread to subsequent transactions.
In one embodiment, the host servers can be, for example, equipped to generate many keys for use in transactions, and the platform application programming interfaces (APIs) are augmented to provide methods to retrieve these keys on a per-transaction basis. While a server-side-only component implementation provides additional security over client-side-only solutions, in some instances, a combination of server and client side solutions can be implemented and is considered within the scope of the innovation. The uniqueness of the keys per transaction, even though there are potentially thousands of them that occur per hour, can be critical to ensuring the safety of data each time it is accessed from the system (e.g., any cloud-environment, cloud service, or cloud-based collaboration environment).
As a file is transferred between mobile applications installed on a mobile device, the file receiving mobile application (hereinafter “receiving application”) becomes the active application (or comes to the foreground), while the file sending mobile application (hereinafter “sending application”). stays in the background. In one implementation, the sending application can include a mobile application for accessing servers providing cloud services, cloud-based storage, collaboration and/or file sharing services. In a further implementation, the sending application can include mobile applications that transfer or export files or other data to another mobile application, where the files or other data are viewed, modified, processed or manipulated. In one implementation, the receiving application can include any mobile application for viewing, modifying, processing or manipulating files or other data obtained from the sending application. For example, a user may have a “Box” mobile application and a “QuickOffice” mobile application installed on his or her mobile device. In one implementation, “Box” can be a sending application providing the user access to files stored locally in Box or remotely in Box servers. “QuickOffice” can be a receiving application that allows the user to edit files (e.g., Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other documents). The user can thus open a Word document from “Box” (i.e., the sending application) in “QuickOffice” (i.e., the receiving application), edit the Word document in “QuickOffice”, and save the edited Word document in “Box” (locally in Box or remotely in Box servers).
The sending application can be running even when it is not being actively used by a user. The operating system (OS), however, can terminate the sending application when there is not enough memory or the sending application can simply crash. When the sending application crashes or is terminated, the user can be logged out of the application, and the receiving application may not be able to upload the file back to the sending application. By way of an example, the situation may also arise when the application is configured to log the user out whenever the application is not active. Mobile devices usually allow users to toggle between applications, but cannot make two applications visible at the same time. If the user tries to log back in by switching to the sending application, the user incurs the risk of the receiving application getting terminated or killed by the OS.
In one embodiment, the disclosed systems and methods can support file portability between mobile applications by running a background service that keeps in contact with the host servers to keep the user logged in to the sending application, even when it is not the active application. By re-validating the user session, any files from the receiving application can be safely transferred back into the sending application. In one implementation, the background service detects the log out event or expiration of the auth token (or authentication token) and presents a minimal user interface for the user to input login credentials such as a username, email address, password, pin code, gesture, and/or the like, without having to exit out of the receiving application user interface. The background service sends a request to the remote servers to obtain a new auth token to log the user back in, and allow transfer of files into the sending application.
Various aspects of the cloud-based platform and the systems and methods for secure file portability between mobile applications will now be described. In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or notification server 150. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102 and/or the host server 100 and/or notification server 150.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone, a PDA, a Blackberry device, a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, a Galaxy, Xoom Tablet, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console, an iPhone, and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and app server 110 are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 may be directly connected to one another.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100).
The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.
In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a work space and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a work space for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing work space or to a new work space. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a work space.
A diagrammatic illustration of the online collaboration environment and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of
In one embodiment, the host server 100 of cloud-based services and/or cloud storage such as an online or web-based collaboration environment is able to track or monitor the devices used by users to access content or activities. In one implementation, such tracking or monitoring may be performed upon receiving explicit permission or authorization from users.
In one embodiment, client devices 102 communicate with the host server 100 and/or notification server 150 over network 106. In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102, the host server 100, and/or notification server 150 communicate, may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.
The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).
In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone Service (D-Amps), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G, 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, 3G LTE, 3GPP LTE, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, UMTS-TDD, 1xRTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks or messaging protocols.
The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.
When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A-N) may be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace may have its own associate work items. For example, work space A 205 may be associated with work items 215, work space B 225 may be associated with work items 235, and work space N may be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 may be unique to each work space but need not be. For example, a particular word document may be associated with only one work space (e.g., work space A 205) or it may be associated with multiple work spaces (e.g., Work space A 205 and work space B 225, etc.).
In general, each work space has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, work space A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, work spaces deployed in an enterprise may be department specific. For example, work space B may be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 may be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.
Each user associated with a work space may generally access the work items associated with the work space. The level of access may depend on permissions associated with the specific work space, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions may be set for the work space or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a work space (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates work space B) may set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 may also set different permission settings for each work item, which may be the same for different users, or varying for different users.
In each work space A, B, . . . , N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the work space, other users in the same work space may be notified (e.g., in real time or in near real time, or not in real time). Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the work space, uploading, downloading, adding, deleting a work item in the work space, creating a discussion topic in the work space.
Specifically, items or content downloaded or edited in accordance with the techniques described in the present disclosure can be cause notifications to be generated. Such notifications can be sent to relevant users to notify them of actions surrounding a download, an edit, a change, a modification, a new file, a conflicting version, an upload of an edited or modified file.
In one embodiment, in a user interface to the web-based collaboration platform where notifications are presented, users can, via the same interface, create action items (e.g., tasks) and delegate the action items to other users including collaborators pertaining to a work item 215, for example. The collaborators 206 may be in the same workspace A 205 or the user may include a newly invited collaborator. Similarly, in the same user interface where discussion topics can be created in a work space (e.g., work space A, B or N, etc.), actionable events on work items can be created and/or delegated/assigned to other users such as collaborators of a given work space 206 or other users. Through the same user interface, task status and updates from multiple users or collaborators can be indicated and reflected. In some instances, the users can perform the tasks (e.g., review or approve or reject, etc.) via the same user interface.
Each of users 316, 318, and 320 may individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the work space 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 may be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user may access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).
Work items to be edited or viewed may be accessed from the workspace 302 in accordance with the platform and/or application independent mechanisms. Users may also be notified of access, edit, modification, and/or upload related-actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the work space 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, or not in real time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple notifications, each notification may be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).
For example, a notification of a download, access, read, write, edit, or upload related activities may be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment.
In one embodiment, a notification feed stream includes updates when an invited user accepts an invitation and/or successfully creates a new account through receipt of an invitation from an existing user. The invited user, upon creation of the new account, receives the account having enhanced features. The new user can automatically be connected to the existing user who sent the invitation. The system can also automatically prompt both users to query they wish to be collaborators in a common work space.
In one embodiment, a mobile device 400, which can be any of the client devices 102, includes a sending application 405 and a receiving application 410. The sending application 405 can be associated with the host server 100 and can be in communication with the host server 100. The sending application 405 includes a background service that requests an auth token from the host server 100 by providing the user credentials 428 input by the user. The user credentials can include a username, email address, password, pin code, gesture, and/or the like that are associated with the user and the sending application 405. In response to the request, the host server 100 sends the sending application 405 an auth token 425 to validate/re-validate the user session with the sending application 405.
The sending application 405, when instructed by a user, can send a user-selected file or files to a receiving application 410. The sending application 405 can rely on the operating system (OS) or mobile platform communication mechanism such as the Intents in the Android platform to broadcast a request to open a file in a receiving application. By using custom Intents, only sanctioned or authorized receiving applications that are qualified to interact with the sending application or participate in transactions with the sending application can be detected. Once a receiving application 410 is selected, a secure channel between the sending application 405 and the receiving application 410 can be opened to allow passage of encrypted file 422 to the receiving application 410, where the file can be decrypted and viewed, edited, or manipulated in various ways. Further details regarding the secure channel can be found in co-pending US application entitled “System and Method for Creating a Secure Channel for Inter-Application Communication Based on Intents,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In one implementation, the encrypted file 422 can be encrypted using a key that is a hash of the auth token 426. In an alternate implementation, the auth token can be hashed together with a time stamp. Any appropriate hash function such as MD5, SHA-1/2/3, and the like can be used to generate the hash. In one implementation, advanced encryption standard (AES) with a key size of 128, 192 or 256 bits can be used to encrypt the data file before it is sent to the receiving application 410. In one implementation, the key (e.g., hash of auth token) 424 can be communicated to the receiving application 410. The key is a shared (secret) key that can be used to encrypt and decrypt the file being transferred.
Once the file is received and decrypted, the receiving application 410 can display the file and allow the user to perform the desired manipulations. The receiving application becomes the “active” application, and the sending application becomes the “inactive” application. The inactive application can run on the background of the OS, but can be terminated by the OS when there are too many processes running and/or when the memory is limited. Once the user has made the desired changes or processed the file in the receiving application 410, the file can be uploaded back to the sending application 405, via the same channel or a new channel. The background service that obtains the auth token 426 to re-validate user session whenever the user is logged out of the sending application 405 (e.g., due to application crashing, application being terminated by OS for memory management, application having an auto log out setting, and the like) allows the receiving application 410 to upload the file back to the sending application. As before, the updated file 430 can be encrypted and sent as a data stream to the sending application 405. In one implementation, the encryption of the updated file 430 may be using the same key that was used to decrypt the file. In an alternate implementation, the updated file 430 can be encrypted using a hash of the new auth token if the user session was re-validated following the file transfer to the receiving application.
In one embodiment, a mobile device 500, which can be any of the client devices 102, includes a sending application 505 and a receiving application 510. In one implementation, a user using his or her mobile device 500 sends a transaction request message 515 from the sending application 505. In one implementation, the sending application 505 is associated with the host server 100 and thus communicates with the host server 100 to obtain a key 520 for the transaction request 515. The key can be used to encrypt one or more files associated with the transaction request. In one implementation, an encryption key can be derived from the key 520 obtained from the host server 100. For example, when the key 520 is an auth token, a hash of the auth token or hash of the auth token and time stamp can be determined, and the hash can be used as an encryption key.
A file 525 associated with the transaction request and encrypted with the key 520 is passed to the receiving application 510 via a secure channel. The key 530 for the transaction request 515 that the receiving application would need to decrypt the file is also passed to the receiving application 510. The receiving application 510 can decrypt the file using the key 530 and open the file for editing by the user. In one implementation, the edited or updated file 535 is encrypted using the same key 530 and then passed back to the sending application 505 over the same secure channel or a new secure channel. Alternately, the sending application 505 can obtain a new key 540 from the host server 100 and pass the new key or a hash of the new key 550 to the receiving application 510. The receiving application 510 can use the new key to encrypt the updated file, and the updated file 555 is passed back to the sending application. In yet another implementation, the receiving application 510 can obtain a new key 545 for the second leg of the transaction request directly from the host server (e.g., by making an API call) and use the new key 545 to encrypt the updated file.
The mobile device platform 600 can include an application layer 605, a framework layer 620, libraries 625, runtime engine 630 and a kernel 635. The application layer 605 includes native or core applications 610 and other applications 615 which can include, for example, the cloud-based collaboration platform application, white-listed applications, unauthorized or malicious application, and the like. The core applications 610 includes a set of applications such as email, SMS, calendar, maps, browsers, camera, alarm, media player, clock, voice dial, contacts, calculator, and the like.
The framework layer 620 includes framework application programming interfaces (APIs) that are used by the core applications, but can also be used by other applications 615 to take advantage of the mobile device hardware, access location information, store data in internal or external storage on the mobile device, run background services, add notifications (e.g., to the status bar), and the like. All applications are supported by a set of services and systems. For example, the view system can be used to build application user interface elements such as lists, text boxes, buttons, and the like. Content providers allow applications to access data from other applications or share their own data. A resource manager provides access to non-code resources such as localized strings, graphics, and layout files. A notification manager enables applications to display custom alerts in the status bar. An activity manager manages the lifecycle of applications and provides common navigation elements. The framework layer 620 may include additional components 622 that have not been specifically described.
A set of core and other libraries 625 are used by various components of the mobile device platform and provides many of the functionality. Example core libraries include media libraries that support playback and recording of audio/video and images, surface manager that manages access to the display subsystem and seamlessly compounds 2D and 3D graphic layers from multiple applications, a web browser engine that powers browsers and an embeddable web view (e.g., LibWebCore), 3D libraries (e.g., OpenGL ES 1.0 APIs), libraries for bitmap and vector font rendering, SQLite which is a powerful and lightweight relational database engine available to all applications, system C library, and the like.
Each mobile application can run in its own process with its own instance of the Virtual Machine 630 such as the Dalvik VM. The Dalvik VM, for example, executes files in the Dalvik Executable (.dex) format which is optimized for minimal memory footprint. The OS or the kernel 635 is the Linux kernel that acts as an abstraction layer between the hardware and the rest of the stack including the application layer 605, the framework layer 620, the libraries 625 and the virtual machine 630. The kernel supports core system services such as memory and process management, network stack, driver model and security. The kernel includes drivers 645 for display, camera, USB, keypad, Wi-Fi, and the like, and an inter-process communication (IPC) layer 640 that includes a binder driver to provide an IPC mechanism to facilitate communication (e.g., exchange of data) between processes within an application (intra-application communication) and between applications (inter-application communication). The IPC mechanism includes the Intent mechanism, using which the IPC layer 640 sends Intents to communicate data. The IPC layer, via the Intent mechanism, can start an activity, bring another activity to the front, start or stop a service, query and obtain results from a content provider (e.g., a data storehouse), deliver Intents to broadcast receivers, and the like.
The other applications 615 can include one or more user-installed sending and receiving applications, including the sending application 650. In one implementation, the sending application 650 can include example components such as an inter-application transaction request detector module 652, a custom Intent module 654, a secure channel creator module 660, a data stream module 662, a remote communication service 664, an authentication module 674, an encryption/decryption module 676 and other application specific modules 678. The application specific modules 678 include components such as, but not limited to: a user interface module, application logic engines, upload/download managers, notification engines, and the like that perform the various functions of the sending application.
The inter-application transaction request detector module 652 detects transaction requests initiated by a user of the mobile device. For example, a user can select a document from a user interface of the sending application 650 to open the document in another mobile application (i.e., receiving application). The user request to open the document can be detected and identified as an inter-application transaction request by the detector module 652. The detector module 652 can then notify or kick off the custom Intent module 654.
The custom Intent module 654 can include the custom Intent creator module 656 and the custom Intent broadcast module 658. The custom Intent creator module 656 can create a custom Intent to identify a receiving application and request the receiving application to perform a specific action. In some implementations, the custom Intent can include data or other extras. A custom action is different from other general actions such as ACTION_VIEW, ACTION_EDIT, ACTION_MAIN, etc., that are defined in the Android API and thus can be understood by all applications. A custom action, on the other hand, can be understood by those applications that recognize the request and know how to respond to the request. The custom Intent from the custom Intent creator module 656 can request a receiving application to perform custom actions, including, but not limited to: modify an existing file, create a new file, upload the new file, open and show contents of a file, launch application, and the like.
The custom Intent broadcast module 658 can broadcast the created Intent to all applications, including white-listed and unauthorized applications. The broadcasting may be achieved by using the broadcast method provided by the Android API.
The secure channel creator module 660 can create a secure channel between the sending application 650 and a receiving application. The secure channel creator module 660 can allocate an area on the device's storage as a staging area for data to be passed between the sending and receiving applications. The storage area can be an internal storage area that can be accessed by both sending and receiving applications. Alternately, the storage area can be an external storage area such as an SD card. The storage area is effectively the channel between the applications. The channel is secure since only the sending and receiving applications have access to it. Furthermore, the files that go into the storage area are securely encrypted, providing an added layer of security. Files that are passed between applications may be sent as whole files or as data stream to obfuscate the inter-application communication. The data stream module 662 includes methods for opening input and output streams to read and write data. The data stream module 662 can also automatically encrypt the data streams for passage through the secure channel between the sending and receiving applications. The data stream module, in one implementation, can leverage the encryption/decryption module 676 to encrypt (or decrypt) data stream using various encryption methods. In one implementation, advanced encryption standard (AES) with a key size of 128, 192 or 256 bits can be used to encrypt the data stream. Alternately, any other symmetric or asymmetric encryption/decryption methods can be implemented in other embodiments.
The remote communication service 664 is an application component including instructions/code that can run in the background as its own process. In other words, a new thread can be created within the remote communication service 664 to do the operations of the service. As the service runs in a thread that is separate from the sending application's main thread, if the sending application is terminated, the service can continue to run in the background. The remote communication service 664, in other words, can run in the background even when a user is not directly interacting with the application. The remote communication service 664 may have a small memory footprint to ensure that the service itself is not terminated by the OS for memory recovery. In one implementation, the remote communication service 664 can be made high priority, such that the OS, in the event of intense memory pressure, can terminate other, low priority processes before the remote communication service 664.
The remote communication service 664 provides secure file portability between the sending application and a receiving application. One embodiment of the remote communication service 664 can include a transaction key request module 666, a user session monitoring module 668, an authentication user interface (UI) module 670 and an auth token request module 672. Implementation of one or more of these modules may be optional in some embodiments. In some embodiments, one or more of these modules may be configured to run in the sending application's main thread instead of the thread created within the service. For example, the transaction key request module 666 may be implemented on the application's main thread. In a further implementation, instead of being implemented as a service, the transaction key request module 666 can be implemented as a process.
In one embodiment, the transaction key request module 666 maintains or establishes a connection with the host server 100 (or another server generating or providing keys for the sending application transactions). When a transaction request is detected (e.g., by the inter-application transaction request detector module 652), the transaction key request module 666 can request a key from the host server. The key obtained from the host server can be unique for each transaction request. The key obtained by the transaction key request module 666 can be provided to the encryption/decryption module 676 to encrypt files associated with the transaction request, and not any other transactions, for passage via the secure channel to a receiving application. Each transaction request can be identified by a transaction ID and/or any other information relating to the transaction request such as the user ID, file name(s), file ID, time of transfer, receiving application ID, and the like.
Alternately, the transaction key request module 666 can be configured to request a key for a transaction request only under certain conditions. For example, in one implementation, if a second transaction occurs within one hour (or any other time period) of a first transaction, the key obtained for the first transaction can be used for the second transaction and any other subsequent transactions occurring within the predefined time period. In one implementation, the number of transaction requests or file items to which the key can be applied to may be limited. In another implementation, the transaction key request module 666 can be configured to request a key for one or more transactions with a specific receiving application. For example, if the sending application performs a first transaction with a receiving application “A,” a second transaction with a receiving application “B” and third and fourth transactions with the receiving application “A”, the key requested for the first transaction with receiving application “A” can be applied to the third and fourth transactions with the same receiving application. In a further implementation, the number of transaction requests or file items associated with transactions with a specific receiving application to which the key can be applied to may be limited.
In one implementation of the transaction key request module 666, the key obtained from the host server can include a token (e.g., an auth token) and a time stamp. The key request module 666 or the encryption/decryption module 676 can hash the token, time stamp and/or other information and use the hash value as the key for encryption. Any appropriate hash function such as MD5, SHA-1/2/3, and the like can be used to generate the hash value.
One implementation of the transaction key request module 666 can also pass the key obtained (or generated) to a receiving application associated with the transaction request. The passing of the key may be via the secure channel or via an alternate mechanism (e.g., explicit Intent), for example.
File portability between mobile applications can be affected when a user is logged out of the sending application, and the file exported to the receiving application for editing or other manipulation cannot be uploaded back to the sending application because of the user being logged out. In one embodiment, the user session monitoring module 668 can monitor the user session with the sending application. In one implementation, the user session monitoring module can detect when the sending application's process is terminated for various reasons including user setting (e.g., log out when the application is not active) and low memory, or when the auth token for the sending application is expired (e.g., based on time stamp for the auth token or based on error code when auth token is used).
When the end of the user session is detected, the authentication user interface (UI) module 670 can generate and/or present a minimal UI to the user to obtain the user's credentials. The authentication UI can have one or more fields for the user to enter login credentials such as a username/password, a pin code, a gesture, and the like. Alternately, other authentication techniques, such as fingerprinting, retina scan, facial recognition, voice recognition, and the like, can also be used to identify the user. The UI that is presented is not a part of the sending application user interface, and as such, the user does not need to switch from the current application (i.e., the receiving application) to the sending application to log in. After the submission of the user credentials via the UI, the user is returned to the user interface where he or she was before the authentication UI was presented.
The user credentials input by the user can be packaged into an authentication token request message by the authentication token request module 672 and sent to the host server. The host server can receive and parse the request message and authenticate the user by comparing the user credentials against a repository. If the user credentials are correct, the host server can generate and send an auth token that is received by the auth token request module 672. The authentication module 674 can then use the auth token to revalidate the user session with the sending application. The sending application can then receive any files sent by a receiving application.
The host server 100 of the web-based or online collaboration environment can generally be a cloud-based service. The host server 100 can include, for example, a network interface 705, an upload request processor 710 having a drag-drop manager 715, an upload engine 720 having a multi-file upload manager 725 and/or a folder upload manager 730 and a user interface module 735 having a navigation manager 740 and an upload content access module 745. The host server 100 can also include, for example, an inter-application transaction processor 765 having a transaction key request detector 770 and a key generator 774, and/or an auth token request detector 772 and an auth token generator 776. One embodiment of the host server 100 can also include an authentication module 778, an SDK provisioning module 780 and a white list manager 785. Another embodiment of the host server 100 further includes a notification engine 750 having, for example, a feed stream updator 755 and/or a recipient selector 760. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 100 and each illustrated component.
The network interface 705 can be a networking module that enables the host server 100 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server 100, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface 705 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.,), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
One embodiment of the host server 100 includes the upload request processor 710 which can receive, detect, process, identify, parse, translate, and/or determine an activity request. An upload request can be submitted by a user through a user interface of the collaboration platform to upload one or multiple items.
The user can identify the files, content, or work items to be uploaded to the host server 100 one-by-one and queue up multiple items (e.g., including but not limited to files, folders, documents, images, audio, etc.) to be uploaded in a single request. The user can also select all of the items to be uploaded in a single action (e.g., via highlighting or otherwise selecting of icons corresponding to each of the items). In one embodiment, the upload request is generated via a drag-and-drop action of the multiple work items to be uploaded to the host server into a portion of a user interface. Drag-and-drop activated uploaded requests can be detected, handled, received, processed, and/or otherwise managed by the drag-drop manager 715.
In one embodiment, the upload request is generated via a drag-and-drop action of a single folder which includes the multiple work items to be uploaded to the host server 100. For example, the upload request can be generated when a folder having the multiple items on a client device that is to be uploaded is identified through the user interface. In some instances, the folder can include additional folders in a folder hierarchy of multiple items.
In some instances, the user can generate an upload request by activating the upload feature in a tab on a user interface and initiate uploading by selecting (e.g., clicking on or otherwise activating) a button/tab. Once selected, another user interface or a pop-up window may appear allowing the user to navigate through files or folders to select the items to be uploaded.
Once upload requests have been detected and processed, the upload engine 720 can upload the requested item or multiple requested items. The upload engine 720 can, in one embodiment, upload a single item or multiple items (e.g., sequentially or simultaneously) to the host server 100. A multiple item upload may be initiated via a single-step or multi-step user request. A multi-file upload request can be handled, processed, and executed, for example, through the multi-file upload manager 725.
In one embodiment, the multi-file upload manager 725 receives an identification of each of the multiple files to be uploaded (e.g., from the upload request processor 710) and sequentially prepares each individual file for uploading and uploads each file independently. For example, the upload manager 725 can compress one of the multiple files individually, upload it to the host server 100 and decompress the file when uploaded and proceed to perform the same steps with the next file. Preprocessing a file can include, for example, analyzing the file size and type to determine if it is acceptable/valid and/or to identify how best to compress the file. Post-processing can include, for example, performing one or more of, decompressing the file, validating the file size and name, checking permissions, potentially scanning for malicious software, and/or moving to permanent storage. The step of moving to storage can further include, one or more of, adding the file metadata to the database, creating thumbnails, creating previews, indexing for search, encrypting the file, and/or storing in multiple locations for redundancy. Note that the above processes can occur in any order or synchronously in any combination with one another. The process continues until all items in the request have been uploaded to the host server 100. The upload may automatically progress from one file when completed to the next one in sequence when the user initiates a multi-file upload request.
In one embodiment, the upload engine 720 uploads multiple items in a folder hierarchy based on a single request to upload a folder which has a hierarchy of folders inside, for example, via the folder upload manager 730. In one embodiment, the folder upload manager compresses the multiple items in the folder hierarchy in a single process into a single item and uploads the single item in a single upload process (rather than one by one) to the host server 100. After the merged file of multiple items has been uploaded, the folder upload manager 730 can decompress and subsequently parse the single upload of the single item into the original individual files that were stored as multiple items in the folders in the hierarchy. By merging multiple files into one and performing a single compression, and decompression step, the uploading process can be expedited since the overhead in time to compress and decompress multiple files is mostly eliminated. Some additional benefits of bulk uploading allow the following overhead to be partially or wholly eliminated: repeatedly creating TCP connections for each upload, repeatedly checking the same permissions and storage quotas when processing the files on the server.
One embodiment of the host server 100 includes a notification engine 750. The notification engine 750, can for example, update a feed stream to include an updated feed indicate that an item or multiple items have been uploaded, for example, via the feed stream updator 755. The users that are notified can be selected, for example, by the recipient selector 760, and can include collaborators or the user, or other users meeting a criterion. In some instances, the feed stream is updated in real time or near real time relative to when the upload of the item completed. For real-time updating, the notification engine 750 can utilize another server, or another engine in the same server which provides push functionality.
The notification engine 750 can generally notify users, which can be collaborators of the user who performed the activity in the work space via one or more of many mechanisms, including but not limited to, email, SMS, voice-message, text-based message, RSS, feed, etc., as described in detail with further reference to related co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,982 filed on Jun. 3, 2011. The contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In one embodiment, the notification is depicted through a web-browser used by the other user to access the web-based collaboration environment, for access in real time or near real time to when the activity was performed by the user. When notifying a user in real time through a web-browser, the notification engine 750 can utilize a push-enabled service to ensure real time notification. In one embodiment, the notification is sent by a component or another server which implements push technology (e.g., the notification server 150 shown in the example of
One embodiment of the host server 100 includes the user interface module 735, which preserves or enhances user experience before, during, or after an upload request. For example, the user interface module 735 can allow the user to engage in other activities in the collaboration platform while an upload is in progress so as to prevent the user from having to wait for the completion to work in the platform.
In one embodiment, during the upload of a single file (before completion), the user can generally navigate away from the user interface through which the upload request was submitted, for example, via the navigation manager 740 in the user interface module 735. In other words, while a file or item upload is in progress, the user can navigate to other pages to perform other actions or initiate additional actions on the current page without interrupting (stopping or pausing) the in-progress upload.
Similarly, when a multi-file or multi-item upload request is in progress, the user can also navigate away from the user interface which the upload request was submitted prior to completion of the uploading of each of the multiple items to the host server 100. Navigation between pages during an upload of multiple files can also be managed by the navigation manager 740. For example, the upload of the multiple items can continue to proceed and is not interrupted if the user accesses a link on the user interface causing another user interface to launch in a browser. To enable bulk uploading, a new browser window is opened so it operates independently of user navigation. In addition, the web application for uploading and access of the collaboration environment is “pageless,” meaning it can be updated asynchronously without a browser page refresh. This allows navigation and to start new uploads in other folders, which can be added to the upload queue.
In addition, during a multi-file upload, an item of the multiple items that has been uploaded to the host server 100 available for access through the user interface, even when some of the multiple items have not yet been uploaded to the host server, via the upload content access module 745, for example. Thus, during an active upload, individual files which have completed uploading can be accessed or interacted with by the user in the collaborative environment without having to wait for the full upload to complete.
In some instances, the item which has been uploaded to the host server is manipulatable by the user through the user interface, without a need for browser refresh. This enhances the user experience by allowing the user to work on the file or otherwise interact with it once it has been uploaded without waiting for other files to finish uploading. For example, the user can view, edit, preview, or comment on the item that has been uploaded, prior to completion of uploading all of the multiple items in an upload request. In one embodiment, buffer space in memory for storage of the individual work items are created in response to the upload request such that when individual items have been uploaded, they can be moved into the created buffer space, and subsequently permanent storage. When the file is in permanent storage, the user can then access and work on the individual item, while others are still being uploaded. In one embodiment, metadata for the file can be created before it is fully uploaded or processed, allowing faster user interaction. However, to actually interact with the file content (full content search, download or preview) the file generally needs to be processed as usual and be stored in permanent storage.
One embodiment of the host server 100 can include an SDK provisioning module 780 and a whitelist application manager 785. The SDK provisioning module 780 can provision SDKs, API keys/tokens, and the like to applications that have been approved for integration with the sending application. The SDK can include certain methods, iconography, and the like that allow inter-application communication and make the inter-application communication capability apparent to users of both applications. For example, the SDK can recognize encoded messages (e.g., custom Intents) broadcast by the sending application (e.g., the cloud-based collaboration platform application) and include response to method calls to facilitate various data access and transfer scenarios discussed above. The SDK can also include method calls to request keys from the host server, for example.
Applications that have integrated with the sending application by implementing the SDK, can be designated as a whitelisted application by the whitelist application manager 785. The whitelisted applications can receive automatic notifications of updates to SDKs, can make API calls to the host server, receive and respond to custom Intents, and the like.
In one embodiment of the host server 100, the inter-application transaction processor 765 can include a transaction key request detector 770 and a key generator 774. The transaction key request detector 770 can detect a key request for a transaction from a sending application and/or a receiving application. The detector 770 can identify a transaction request by a transaction ID and/or any other information relating to the transaction request such as the user ID, file name(s), file ID, time of transfer, receiving application ID, and the like. The transaction key request detector 770 can then trigger the key generator 774 to generate a key that can be directly used as an encryption key or that can be used to derive an encryption key for encrypting/decrypting the files associated with the transaction request. In one implementation, the transaction key request detector 770 can trigger the key generator 774 to generate a key for a transaction request only under certain conditions as discussed with respect to the transaction key request module 666. The transaction request detector 770, or another module can also send the generated key to the requesting application, and in some cases, to both applications involved in the transaction.
In one implementation, the key may be generated using a random number generator or a pseudorandom number generator that uses seed data, that can be a piece of user identifying information, for example. Alternately, any other key generation algorithms available in the art can be used. In one implementation, the encryption key may have an associated time stamp which can be used to determine the expiration date/time. In one implementation, the key generator 774 may generate a key suitable for an encryption method used. For example, if 256 bit AES encryption method is used in the mobile applications for encryption, a 256 bit key is generated.
In another embodiment, the inter-application transaction processor 765 can include an auth token request detector 772 and an auth token generator 776. The authentication token request detector 772 can receive an auth token request from a sending application and parse the request to obtain a user's credentials, such as a username/password, a pin code, a gesture, a fingerprint, retina scan, facial/voice recognition data, and the like. The authentication module 776 can obtain the parsed data and compare the data against data stored in a repository to verify that the user's credentials are correct. The authentication module 778 can trigger the token generator 776 to generate an auth token. The auth token generated by the token generator 776 can be sent to the sending application by the authentication module 778, the auth token request detector module 772 or another module. The auth token can be generated using various methods, and can be a numeric or alphanumeric string, for example. In one implementation, the auth token may be generated using a random number generator, a pseudorandom number generator with at least one piece of user identifying information as a seed, a hash, and/or the like.
At block 815, the sending application receives a transaction request that includes a request to open a file for editing in a receiving application. In response to the transaction request, the sending application creates and sends an Intent (e.g., a custom Intent) to detect and launch a receiving application qualified to handle the transaction request at block 820. For example, if the file is a PDF document, a mobile application that can open and allow editing of PDF files can be launched. By way of another example, if the file is an image file, an image processing application can be identified and/or selected as a receiving application. When a qualified receiving application is detected, at block 825, the file associated with the transaction request is sent to the receiving application for viewing and editing. The file is encrypted and sent as a data stream over a secure communication channel.
The receiving application can display the file, and allow editing and/or other manipulation on the file. The sending application can receive the edited file from the receiving application at block 830. The edited file can be a new version of the file sent, or a new file, in one implementation. At block 835, the sending application can send the edited file to a host server (e.g., host server 100) for cloud storage.
Referring to
At block 910, the background service may launch a minimal user interface to request user credentials from the user to revalidate the user's session with the sending application. The minimal user interface may have the necessary fields for the requested credential such as an email address, user name/ID, password, pin code, gesture, and the like. In one implementation, the launching of the minimal user interface is via an Intent started by the service. At block 915, the background service can use the user credentials to request a new auth token from a host server such as the host server 100. The request may be made using an API call to the host server, for example.
In one implementation, if the authentication is successful as determined at decision block 920 based on a response from the host server, the process moves to block 925, where the new auth token is received from the host server. Alternately, the minimal user interface can be presented again for the user to re-enter the login credentials at block 910. Using the new auth token, the background service can revalidate the user session with the sending application at block 930. In one implementation, the background service can invoke a module (e.g., the authentication module 674) to revalidate the user session. In one implementation, evaluation of the authentication credentials (e.g., decision block 920) may be carried out on the client side or the server side.
The sending application 1005 receives a file transfer transaction request at block 1010 from a user. In one implementation, a transaction request can include transfer of other data when commenting, assigning tasks, editing, deleting, writing, sharing, emailing, posting, and the like. The transaction request can include indications of one or more files to be transferred, an action to be performed on the files, and the like. At block 1020, the sending application 1005 can evaluate the transaction request to determine if a key should be requested from the host server for encrypting the files associated with the transaction request. In one implementation, the evaluation may be based on configurations defined by the sending application. For example, if the sending application is configured to request keys on a per transaction basis, the process moves to block 1030 where a key request is created and sent to the host server 100. Alternately, if the sending application is configured to request a key when certain conditions are met, the transaction request is evaluated at block 1020 to determine if the one or more conditions are met. For example, in one implementation, if a previously obtained key has been used a pre-defined number of times (e.g., 10 files) or for a predefined number of transaction requests (e.g., 10 transaction requests), a new key can be requested. In another implementation, a new key may be requested if the transaction request includes a receiving application with which the sending application has not transacted within a predefined time period (e.g., in the last hour). For example, a user may open a document from “Box” (i.e., sending application) in “EchoSign” (i.e., receiving application) to sign the document. The first transaction between “Box” and “EchoSign” can trigger acquisition of a new key, while subsequent transactions between the two applications occurring with an hour of the first transaction may be encrypted using the previously acquired key. Various other conditions, including those discussed with respect to the transaction key request module 666 can be implemented.
Based on the evaluation of the conditions for a key request, if a new key is required, the sending application creates and sends a key request to the host server 100 at block 1030. In one implementation, the transaction key request may be made via an API call to the host server 100. Information such as transaction ID, or other identifying information may be supplied along with the transaction key request.
At block 1035, the host server receives the transaction key request and parses the request at block 1040 to extract details of the request. The extracted information can be used as seed data when generating a new key at block 1045. In one implementation, the seed data can be any piece of data such as transaction ID, file ID, user ID, sending/receiving application ID, time stamp, and the like. As previously described with respect to the key generator module 772, various methods can be used to generate the key for the transaction. At block 1050, the generated key can be packaged and sent to the sending application 1005.
The sending application 1005 receives the key at block 1055. The sending application 1005 then encrypts the file(s) associated with the transaction request using the received key at block 1065. Alternately, if a new key was not requested, the previously obtained key may be used to encrypt the transaction file(s) at block 1065. At block 1070, the encrypted files are sent to a receiving application to complete the transaction request.
In one implementation of the method 1000, the key received from the host server 100 can be hashed to generate the encryption key for encrypting the file(s) in the transaction request. In yet another implementation of the method 1000, the host server 1000 may receive all transaction requests from the sending application, and may perform the processed of block 1020 and 1025.
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disks, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
The network interface device enables the machine 1100 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.
Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, 16, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. §112, 16 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
The present application claims priority to and benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/697,437 titled “Secure File Portability Between Mobile Applications Using A Server-based Key Generation Service”, filed on Sep. 6, 2012, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein. This application also claims priority to and benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/650,840 titled “PLATFORM AND APPLICATION AGNOSTIC METHOD FOR FILE ACCESS IN A MOBILE ENVIROMENT”. The present application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/776,535 titled “System and Method for Creating a Secure Channel for Inter-Application Communication Based on Intents”, filed on Feb. 25, 2013, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6016467 | Newsted et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6260040 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7275244 | Charles Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7401117 | Dan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7647559 | Yozell-Epstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7886287 | Davda | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7979296 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
| 8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8117261 | Briere et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8140513 | Ghods et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8527549 | Cidon | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8607306 | Bridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8849955 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194177 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115326 | Verma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102328 | Ring et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079242 | Jolley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100830 | Beedubail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118598 | Bedi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130163 | Perez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250762 | Mansfield | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266304 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091790 | Beck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119322 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150417 | Ghods et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150627 | Benhase et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158142 | Arthursson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235181 | Saliba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153835 | Xiong et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185932 | Coffman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198871 | Stiegler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318893 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325527 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325559 | Westerinen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332962 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047413 | McGill et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113320 | Neff et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289433 | Whalin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089659 | Halevi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092055 | Peschke et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110436 | Adler, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144283 | Hill et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179981 | Whalin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185355 | Kilroy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257249 | Natarajan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284664 | Zhao | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275509 | Micucci et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140013112 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140019497 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140019498 | Cidon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032616 | Nack | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150023 | Gudorf et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
| 101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
| 2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
| 2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
| 2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
| 09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 2008250944 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
| 20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
| 20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
| 20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
| 20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
| 20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
| 20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
| 20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
| 20110074096 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
| WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-0219128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-2004097681 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007113573 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
| “Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
| Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
| “How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
| “Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
| Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
| Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 Mailed Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet—forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20. |
| Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
| Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
| Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
| Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
| Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
| Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
| Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!—Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
| “PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
| “PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
| “Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
| “QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
| Google Docs, http://web. Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages. |
| Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 28, 7 pages, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
| “Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages. |
| “Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
| “Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
| “Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
| “Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
| Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
| Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
| Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
| John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
| Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
| Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
| Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages. |
| Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
| Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
| Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
| User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages. |
| Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130332723 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61650840 | May 2012 | US | |
| 61697437 | Sep 2012 | US |
