The present invention relates generally to playing multimedia files over a network and more specifically to the progressive playback of multimedia files as they are downloaded over a network.
Progressive playback is the idea of playing back remote content as it is being downloaded. With this feature a user can select a remote movie and commence watching it before it is fully downloaded. Even with a fast Internet connection, waiting for a movie to fully download can range from minutes to hours depending on the size of the media file. With progressive playback a user only has to wait a couple of seconds before playback can begin.
Current implementations of receiver or player driven progressive playback, while suitable for the short video clips that are dominant in many current applications, are typically limited in the scope and flexibility of the progressive playback they provide. Players typically download files linearly from the beginning to the end. Playback then begins when the player has buffered enough data to provide a likelihood that the media will play without interruption. The buffering requirement can either be a fixed amount suitable for a large percentage of content, or a dynamic amount, where the player infers how much data is required to play the entire content without suffering buffer under-run. Although suitable for playback of short video clips, these methods typically do not support random seeking, trick-play and playback of remotely stored longer content such as feature length movies.
Some systems are implemented with a server driven approach. Examples of server driven approaches include the systems described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/323,044, 11/323,062, 11/327,543, and 11/322,604, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In these systems, the server parses the data file and determines which data to send. Network efficiency and flexibility in playback becomes a much easier task. Standard HTTP web servers however do not typically provide this functionality, and custom web servers providing this functionality often scale poorly when called upon to deliver content simultaneously to a large number of players.
Browser based players often implement receiver driven playback by parsing the video file as it is downloaded linearly. When a long clip is started, it is impossible to seek or fast-forward to a point in the file that has not already been downloaded. Samba (open source software available at http://us2.samba.org/samba/) can be used to give any application access to a remote file as if it were a local file. It tries to minimize the access latency by pre-caching data from the current file position, which can be randomly set. This may be insufficient when trying to perform “trick play” functions (e.g. performing functions such as rewinding, fast forwarding and skipping between scenes that require non-sequential access of media content). The video frames to be delivered to the player in these scenarios can be spaced far apart or require more complex ordering, greatly diminishing the utility of traditional pre-caching methods which are based on assumptions regarding the subsequent video frames to be viewed.
Systems and methods are described for performing progressive playback and “trick play” functions on partially downloaded media files. Many embodiments of the invention include a receiver or player driven system supporting features such as the maintenance at all times of a full capacity download stream of only certain required data, including data in certain byte ranges, the discarding of previous requests, and the issuing of new requests for data at the highest priority. Additionally, several embodiments of the invention include features such as random file access at any point in a file, and asynchronous requests, which provide users flexibility in the playback of a file. In a number of embodiments, the systems and processes support scalability for implementation on Internet servers that store files that can contain multiple titles, titles that include multiple audio tracks, and/or titles that include one or more subtitle tracks.
In several embodiments, the ability to provide full featured progressive playback is due in part to the tight coupling of the playback engine for the media sequence (i.e., the system that decodes and plays back the encoded media) with a transport protocol that provides random access to the remote file. Interfacing of the playback engine with the transport protocol via a file parser can reduce latency and enable the client and media server to operate in parallel improving download efficiency and interactivity. In a number of embodiments, the system and processes are configured for use with files that are formatted to include an index to the data within the file and a transport protocol that allows for downloading specific byte ranges within a file.
One embodiment of the method of the invention includes, obtaining information concerning the content of the media file from the remote server, identifying a starting location within the media sequence, identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to media required to play the media sequence from the starting location, requesting the byte ranges required to play the media sequence from the starting location, buffering received bytes of information pending commencement of playback, playing back the buffered bytes of information, receiving a user instruction, identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to media required to play the media sequence in accordance with the user instruction, flushing previous byte range requests, and requesting the byte ranges required to play the media in accordance with the user instruction.
A further embodiment of the method of the invention includes, maintaining a mask of the portions of the media file that have been downloaded, identifying that at least a portion of a byte range required to play the media in accordance with the user instruction has already been downloaded using the mask, and requesting only the portions of byte ranges that have not already been downloaded from the media server.
Another embodiment of the method of the invention includes storing downloaded bytes in a data file, and outputting the downloaded media file when all bytes of the media file have been downloaded.
In a still further embodiment of the method of the invention, the data file is a sparse data file.
In still another embodiment of the method of the invention, the media file contains a plurality of media sequences and menu information, and identifying a starting location within the media sequence further includes displaying menu information, receiving a user instruction indicative of the selection of the media sequence, and receiving a user instruction indicative of a starting location within the media sequence.
In a yet further embodiment of the method of the invention, the media sequence includes a plurality of interchangeable audio tracks, identifying a starting location within the media sequence further comprises selecting an audio track, and identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to media required to play the media sequence from the starting location further comprises selecting byte ranges that do not include the audio tracks that were not selected.
In yet another embodiment of the method of invention, the media sequence includes a plurality of interchangeable subtitle tracks, identifying a starting location within the media sequence further comprises selecting a subtitle track, and identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to media required to play the media sequence from the starting location further includes selecting byte ranges that do not include the subtitle tracks that were not selected.
In a further embodiment again of the method of the invention, the sequence includes key frames, and identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to media required to play the media in accordance with the user instruction further includes identifying a sequence of key frames in response to a predetermined user instruction, and identifying byte ranges of the media file corresponding to the identified key frames.
One embodiment of the invention includes a media server, a client, and a network. In addition, the client and the media server are configured to communicate via the network, the client is configured to send requests for at least one portion of the media file to the media server, the server is configured to provide requested portions of the media file to the client, and the client is configured to receive user instructions concerning the playback of the media file and to request portions of the media file that have not been downloaded and that are required to comply with the playback instructions from the media server.
In a further embodiment of the invention, proximate portions of the media file grouped and the groups are requested on an earliest deadline first basis.
In another embodiment of the invention, the client is configured to maintain a queue of requested portions of the media file.
In a still further embodiment of the invention, the client and the server are configured to communicate via at least one connection, and the client is configured to flush the queue of requested portions of the media file and break at least one of the connections in response to the receipt of a predetermined user instruction.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the client is configured to store a file map and a data file, the file map contains a mask indicating the portions of the media file that have been downloaded, and the data file contains the downloaded portions of the media file.
In a yet further embodiment of the invention, the data file is a sparse file.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the media file includes a media sequence and an index, and the client includes a playback engine configured to obtain the index and determine the portions of the media sequence required to comply with user playback instructions, a file parser configured to use the index to map the portions of the media sequence to portions of the media file and a download manager configured to communicate with the media server to download portions of the media file.
A further embodiment again of the invention includes a user interface configured to receive user instructions, a storage device configured to store at least one media file, a network connection, a download manager configured to asynchronously request at least one byte range of a file from a remotely stored media file via the network connection, a playback engine configured to determine portions of a remotely stored media file that must be downloaded in response to user instructions received via the user interface, and a file parser configured to translate requests for portions of a remotely stored media file to byte ranges and to provide the byte ranges to the download manager.
In another embodiment again of the invention, the download manager is configured to create a status file containing a map of blocks of a media file that have been downloaded, and the download manager is configured to create a data file in which to store blocks of a downloaded media file.
In a further additional embodiment of the invention, the download manager is configured to maintain a queue of requested byte ranges.
In another additional embodiment of the invention, the download manager is configured to flush the queue.
In a still yet further embodiment of the invention, the playback engine is configured to generate a menu using menu information obtained from a remote media file.
In still yet another embodiment of the invention, the playback engine is configured to receive a selection of one of a plurality of media sequences in a remote media file via the menu.
In a still further embodiment again of the invention, the playback engine is configured to receive a selection of one of a plurality of audio tracks for a media sequence in a remote media file via the menu.
In still another embodiment again of the invention, the playback engine is configured to receive a selection of a subtitle track for a media sequence in a remote media file via the menu.
Turning now to the drawings, a system for progressively downloading and playing media is shown. In many embodiments, the media is stored in a file on a remote server and a device configured with a client application retrieves portions of the media file and plays the media. The client application typically does not possess the entire media file when it commences playing and can request non-sequential portions of the media file. In this way, the client application can support “trick play” functions. “Trick play” functions impact the playing of a media file such as non-sequential functions including pausing, rewinding, fast forwarding and skipping between scenes. Instead of sequentially downloading a media file and waiting until the required information has been downloaded to perform a “trick play” function, client applications in accordance with embodiments of the invention can determine portions of a media file that are required to support a specific “trick play” function and request those portions of the file from the remote server. When a “trick play” function involves skipping to portions of the media that have not been downloaded, such as fast forwarding and skipping between chapters, latency can be significantly reduced compared to sequential download.
The configuration of a progressive playback system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention can depend upon the container formats supported by the progressive playback system. Examples of container formats include the AVI 1.0 file format specified by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., the OpenDML AVI or AVI 2.0 format, container formats similar to the formats specified in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/016,184 and 11/198,142, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, MPEG-4 Part 15 (MP4) and the open source format known as Matroska (see www.matroska.org). Depending upon the container file format used, a media file can include multiple titles (i.e. media sequences) and each title can include multiple audio tracks and/or one or more subtitle tracks. The container format of a media file influences the manner in which media information within a media file is located. Therefore, the configuration of a progressive playback system is typically determined based upon the container formats supported in a specific application. Although numerous embodiments are discussed below, other variations appropriate to different container formats can be constructed in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
A progressive playback system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
The devices are configured with client applications that can request portions of media files from the media server 12 for playing. The client application can be implemented in software, in firmware, in hardware or in a combination of the above. In many embodiments, the device plays media from downloaded media files. In several embodiments, the device provides one or more outputs that enable another device to play the media. When the media file includes an index, a device configured with a client application in accordance with an embodiment of the invention can use the index to determine the location of various portions of the media. Therefore, the index can be used to provide a user with “trick play” functions. When a user provides a “trick play” instruction, the device uses the index to determine the portion or portions of the media file that are required in order to execute the “trick play” function and requests those portions from the server. In a number of embodiments, the client application requests portions of the media file using a transport protocol that allows for downloading of specific byte ranges within the media file. One such protocol is the HTTP 1.1 protocol published by The Internet Society or BitTorrent available from www.bittorrent.org. In other embodiments, other protocols and/or mechanisms can be used to obtain specific portions of the media file from the media server.
A flow chart showing a process for requesting media from a media server in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
Media servers in accordance with embodiments of the invention can support progressive playback and trick play functions by simply storing media files and receiving requests for specific byte ranges within the media file. The client application can determine the appropriate byte ranges and the media server simply responds to the byte range requests. A client application that is configured to determine appropriate byte ranges in response to user instructions can be implemented in a variety of ways.
A client application implemented using three abstraction layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
A download manager in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The temporary data path 75 includes a data file 78 and a status file 76. The data file 76 contains data received from the media server. The status file contains a mask of the data file, where each bit within the mask corresponds to a block of fixed size within the data file. As blocks are downloaded, bits within the mask are set. A status file can also include a region for external data, which can include information, such as the last modified server timestamp, that can be used by the download manager to determine if any partially downloaded data has expired. When the entire media file has been downloaded, the download manager creates an output file path 80 and fully downloaded version of the remote file 82 is output to the download path. At which point, the client application can use the local file to play the media and support “trick play” functions in a conventional manner.
Depending upon the size of the file being downloaded, the data file can be several gigabytes in length. A common file allocation approach is to allocate zeros for every byte within the file, which can take several minutes to complete for large files. Latency during data file allocation can be reduced by allocating the file as a sparse file that only uses the number of bytes actually written to the file. When a sparse file is used, the file allocation process requires very little time. In other embodiments, other file allocation approaches can be used that weight latency against the needs of the download manager.
The block size of the data file (as represented in the status file) determines the granularity by which data can be downloaded. A small block size is typically more efficient in terms of downloading only needed bytes. However small block sizes can lead to a large mask size. In many embodiments, a block size of 128 is used to compromise between efficiency and mask size. In other embodiments, other block sizes determined based upon the requirements of the application are utilized.
A process for requesting data using the download manager in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
When a download manager similar to that shown in
When a determination (100) is made that there are no more byte ranges in the request queue, the process determines (102) whether the entire file has been downloaded. In the event that the entire file has not been downloaded, the process requests missing bytes from the partially downloaded file object. Once the entire file is downloaded, the downloaded file is exported to its output directory and the connection with the remote server is closed (104) and the process is complete. In many embodiments, the data file is exported only after playback is complete.
Although a specific process for downloading byte ranges is shown in
When a user provides a “trick play” instruction, previously requested byte ranges may no longer be required in order to continue playing media in the manner instructed by the user. Download managers in accordance with a number of embodiments of the invention possess the ability to flush the queue of pending byte range requests and establish a new queue of byte range requests. An advantage of flushing a request queue is that there is no latency associated with waiting until previously requested byte ranges have been requested prior to downloading the now higher priority byte ranges. In a number of embodiments, closing the connection with the remote server and opening a new connection further reduces latency. Closing the connection can remove latency associated with waiting for the media server to respond to pending download requests prior to the media server responding to new download requests.
A process for flushing a request queue in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
When data is received by the download manager, the status file and the data file are both updated to reflect the received bytes. A process for handling receiving bytes from a remote media server in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
A file parser in accordance with embodiments of the invention is used to convert high level requests from a playback engine into byte range requests for the download manager and to pass byte ranges downloaded by the download manager to the playback engine. When a device commences progressively playing a media file stored on a remote media server, the file parser accesses the file and downloads information concerning the content of the media file. Media files such as the media files described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/016,184 and 11/198,142, incorporated by reference above include menu information and/or information from multiple media sequences (i.e. distinct media presentations). The file parser obtains menu information and information concerning the media sequences. When a media sequence is selected by the user, the file parser obtains an index to the selected media sequence and the index is used to identify the byte ranges within the remote media file to request as the media sequence is played.
A process in accordance with an embodiment of the invention for determining the media sequences contained within a remote media file and extracting selected media in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in
The primary goal of the playback engine, when progressively playing a remote file, is to always maintain a queue of media information required to play the file in the manner requested by the user. When a media file includes an index, the playback engine can refer to the index to determine the media information required to play the media file in the manner requested by the user. A process in accordance with an embodiment of the invention that is used to obtain media from a file that is formatted to represent the media as chunks of information is shown in
The chunk selection process described above with respect to
When a “trick play” instruction is received, the playback engine selects media information appropriate to the “trick play” instruction. For example, a playback engine that receives a fast-forward or rewind instruction can request only key frames (i.e. complete frames) that are spaced throughout the media sequence at a timing determined by the rate of the trick play function. In many embodiments, the spacing in time is 0.1×the trick frame rate to provide a playback rate during trick play of 10 key frames per second. In other embodiments, various other algorithms are used to determine the media to request. Once the chunks containing the key frames have been identified, the playback engine requests the chunks using the file parser and download manager.
While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. Much of the discussion provided above assumes a media file having an index identifying the location of different pieces of media information within the media file. In many embodiments, hierarchical indexes and/or other index formats are included in media files and the playback engine and file parser are configured to accommodate the particular index structure. In several embodiments, the client application is configured to accommodate multiple file formats including file formats that do not possess indexes, but utilize other information to describe the content of the media file. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
The current application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/565,375, entitled “Systems and Methods for Seeking Within Multimedia Content During Streaming Playback”, filed Sep. 9, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/136,149, entitled “Systems and Methods for Seeking Within Multimedia Content During Streaming Playback”, filed Sep. 19, 2018 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,412,141 on Sep. 10, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/682,379, entitled “Video Distribution System Including Progressive Playback”, filed Aug. 21, 2017 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,574,716 on Feb. 25, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/632,670, entitled “Video Distribution System Including Progressive Playback”, filed Feb. 26, 2015 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,794,318 on Oct. 17, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/982,413, entitled “Video Distribution System Including Progressive Playback”, filed Dec. 30, 2010 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,768 on Mar. 10, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/970,493, entitled “Video Distribution System Including Progressive Playback”, filed Jan. 7, 2008 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,886,069 on Feb. 8, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/883,659, entitled “Video Distribution System Including Progressive Playback”, filed Jan. 5, 2007, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3609227 | Kuljian | Sep 1971 | A |
4694491 | Horne et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5132992 | Yurt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5341474 | Gelman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5400401 | Wasilewski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5477263 | Ocallaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5544318 | Schmitz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550863 | Yurt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574785 | Ueno et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600721 | Kitazato | Feb 1997 | A |
5614940 | Cobbley et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621794 | Matsuda et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630005 | Ort | May 1997 | A |
5642338 | Fukushima et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5761417 | Henley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805700 | Nardone et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813010 | Kurano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828370 | Moeller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838791 | Torii et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852664 | Iverson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854873 | Mori et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874986 | Gibbon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878135 | Blatter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907658 | Murase et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923869 | Kashiwagi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973679 | Abbott et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002834 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009237 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016381 | Taira et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038316 | Dwork et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057832 | Lev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065050 | DeMoney | May 2000 | A |
6108422 | Newby et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151634 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6199107 | Dujari | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6266483 | Okada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282320 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320905 | Konstantinides | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347145 | Kato et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6351538 | Uz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373803 | Ando et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389473 | Carmel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415031 | Colligan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445877 | Okada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453116 | Ando et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504873 | Vehvilaeinen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512883 | Shim et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516064 | Osawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535920 | Parry et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6578200 | Takao et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594699 | Sahai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6633688 | Nixon | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654933 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671408 | Kaku | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690838 | Zhou | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6721794 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724944 | Kalevo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742082 | Lango et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751623 | Basso et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754715 | Cannon et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6810131 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813437 | Ando et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6871006 | Oguz et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912513 | Candelore | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931531 | Takahashi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931543 | Pang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957350 | Demos | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965646 | Firestone | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970564 | Kubota et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983079 | Kim | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006757 | Ando et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007170 | Morten | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020287 | Unger | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023992 | Kubota et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7043021 | Graunke et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051110 | Hagai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058177 | Trimberger et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073191 | Srikantan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110542 | Tripathy | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120250 | Candelore | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124303 | Candelore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130908 | Pecus et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139868 | Parry et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143289 | Denning et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143433 | Duan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151832 | Fetkovich et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167560 | Yu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188183 | Paul et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203313 | England et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212726 | Zetts | May 2007 | B2 |
7231516 | Sparrell et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233669 | Candelore | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7242772 | Tehranchi | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7274861 | Yahata et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295673 | Grab et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302490 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315829 | Tagawa et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7346163 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349886 | Morten et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349976 | Glaser et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352956 | Winter et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363647 | Fakharzadeh | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7376233 | Candelore et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7382879 | Miller | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7397853 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400679 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406176 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418132 | Hoshuyama | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443449 | Momosaki et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457415 | Reitmeier et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7499930 | Naka et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539213 | Guillemot et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546641 | Robert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577980 | Kienzle et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7623759 | Shimoda | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624337 | Sull et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627750 | Chan | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7627888 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639921 | Seo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640358 | Deshpande | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640435 | Morten | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644172 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653686 | Yoneda | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664872 | Osborne et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697686 | Puiatti et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702925 | Hanko et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711052 | Hannuksela et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734806 | Park | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756270 | Shimosato et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756271 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787622 | Sprunk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797720 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840693 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853980 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864186 | Robotham et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877002 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881478 | Derouet | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885405 | Bong | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7886069 | Osborne | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895311 | Juenger | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7907833 | Lee | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7945143 | Yahata et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962942 | Craner | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7970835 | St | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974714 | Hoffberg | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001471 | Shaver et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015491 | Shaver et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8073900 | Guedalia et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8131875 | Chen | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135041 | Ramaswamy | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160157 | Lamy-Bergot et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169916 | Pai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8170210 | Manders et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8213607 | Rose et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213768 | Morioka et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218439 | Deshpande | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243924 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8286213 | Seo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311094 | Kamariotis et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8312079 | Newsome et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8369421 | Kadono et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380041 | Barton et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8397265 | Henocq et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8438297 | Chen | May 2013 | B1 |
8472792 | Butt et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514926 | Ro et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526610 | Shamoon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543842 | Ginter et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555329 | Fröjdh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571993 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8649669 | Braness et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8650599 | Shindo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8683066 | Hurst et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8731369 | Li et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8782268 | Pyle et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8818896 | Candelore | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819116 | Tomay et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8849950 | Stockhammer et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8977768 | Osborne | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9015782 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9038116 | Knox et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9038121 | Kienzle et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9485469 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9615061 | Carney et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9674254 | Pare et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9761274 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9794318 | Osborne | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9967521 | Kahn et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10171873 | Krebs | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10412141 | Osborne | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10574716 | Osborne | Feb 2020 | B2 |
11050808 | Osborne | Jun 2021 | B2 |
20010021276 | Zhou | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052077 | Fung et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052127 | Seo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053222 | Wakao et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020048450 | Zetts | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020067432 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075572 | Boreczky et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107802 | Philips | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114330 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135607 | Kato et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138619 | Ramaley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141503 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154779 | Asano et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161797 | Gallo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164024 | Arakawa et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169926 | Pinckney et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169971 | Asano et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002577 | Pinder | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043847 | Haddad | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044080 | Frishman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051237 | Sako et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053541 | Sun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061369 | Aksu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063675 | Kang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077071 | Lin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079222 | Boykin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081776 | Candelore | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135633 | Dror et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135742 | Evans | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142594 | Tsumagari et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152224 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169815 | Aggarwal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206717 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236907 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001594 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003008 | Wasilewski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022391 | Obrien | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028227 | Yu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034870 | Obrien et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037421 | Truman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047592 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047607 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049690 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049694 | Candelore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073917 | Pedlow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076237 | Kadono et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081333 | Grab et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088557 | Malcolm et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093494 | Nishimoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101142 | Nasypny | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107356 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040213094 | Suzuki | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243714 | Wynn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267952 | He et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005143 | Lang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013494 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050063541 | Candelore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066063 | Grigorovitch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076232 | Kawaguchi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102371 | Aksu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120132 | Hutter | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138655 | Zimler et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144468 | Northcutt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177741 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190911 | Pare et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192904 | Candelore | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198364 | Val et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207442 | Zoest et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207578 | Matsuyama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216752 | Hofmeyr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227773 | Lu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243912 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262257 | Major et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265555 | Pippuri | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013568 | Rodriguez | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026654 | An et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037057 | Xu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059223 | Klemets et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060093318 | Cohen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095472 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109856 | Deshpande | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129909 | Butt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165163 | Burazerovic et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168291 | van Zoest et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168298 | Aoki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174021 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174026 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195884 | van Zoest et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200744 | Bourke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210245 | Mccrossan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212370 | Shear et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218251 | Tanabe | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235883 | Krebs | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294212 | Kikkawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070044010 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047645 | Takashima | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055982 | Spilo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067472 | Maertens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083467 | Lindahl et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083663 | Tanabe et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106863 | Bonwick et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157267 | Lopez-Estrada | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162568 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162611 | Yu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162981 | Morioka et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166000 | Nallur et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180051 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201502 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204003 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204011 | Shaver et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204115 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209005 | Shaver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220118 | Loyer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250536 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080008455 | De Lange et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022005 | Wu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080071838 | Moriya et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082576 | Bodin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086570 | Dey et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101718 | Yang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137847 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155615 | Craner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160911 | Chou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168133 | Osborne | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177793 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090010622 | Yahata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013195 | Ochi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090067367 | Buracchini et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077143 | Macy, Jr. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106082 | Senti et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132599 | Soroushian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090178090 | Oztaskent | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090249081 | Zayas | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282162 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310819 | Hatano | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100142915 | Mcdermott et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185854 | Burns et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198943 | Harrang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110010466 | Fan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035517 | Minnick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058675 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083009 | Shamoon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096828 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099225 | Osborne | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103374 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110135090 | Chan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145858 | Philpott et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158470 | Martin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170687 | Hyodo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173345 | Knox et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179185 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197261 | Dong et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246661 | Manzari et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296048 | Knox et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314130 | Strasman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005312 | Mcgowan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120042090 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047542 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120110120 | Willig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167132 | Mathews et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120311174 | Bichot et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331167 | Hunt | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013803 | Bichot et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130080267 | McGowan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140140253 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149557 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150172351 | Osborne | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150288530 | Oyman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170011055 | Pitts | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170353520 | Osborne | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180046949 | Kahn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180255366 | Lockett et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190020704 | Osborne | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200007601 | Osborne | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2237293 | Jul 1997 | CA |
2306524 | Sep 2001 | CA |
1575595 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1581971 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1596403 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1801929 | Jul 2006 | CN |
10636726 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101636726 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103559165 | Feb 2014 | CN |
103561278 | Feb 2014 | CN |
103559165 | Aug 2016 | CN |
103561278 | Apr 2017 | CN |
1158799 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1453319 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1534013 | May 2005 | EP |
1536646 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1283640 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2122482 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2180664 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2360923 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2122482 | Nov 2018 | EP |
3467666 | Apr 2019 | EP |
3467666 | Mar 2021 | EP |
2398210 | Aug 2004 | GB |
H1175178 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2003504984 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003111048 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003111048 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004295568 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004362099 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005149029 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005173241 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005518726 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005284041 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005341334 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006074511 | Mar 2006 | JP |
4516082 | May 2010 | JP |
2010516123 | May 2010 | JP |
2014197879 | Oct 2014 | JP |
5894220 | Mar 2016 | JP |
20040039852 | May 2004 | KR |
20060030164 | Apr 2006 | KR |
20060106250 | Oct 2006 | KR |
20060116967 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070020727 | Feb 2007 | KR |
2328040 | Jun 2008 | RU |
153621 | May 2012 | SG |
9424625 | Oct 1994 | WO |
199800973 | Jan 1998 | WO |
199834405 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998047290 | Oct 1998 | WO |
2000049762 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2000049763 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2001006788 | Jan 2001 | WO |
200223315 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2003028293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002035832 | May 2002 | WO |
2002054776 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002073437 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002087241 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03046750 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003046750 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003047262 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003061173 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003071800 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003088665 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004012378 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004100158 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005008385 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005015935 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005057906 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005125214 | Dec 2005 | WO |
20060045334 | May 2006 | WO |
2007072257 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007093923 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007101182 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008032908 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008086313 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009006302 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009109976 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011087449 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011101371 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011103364 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Standard, Information technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems, ISO/IEC 13818-1:2000(E), Dec. 1, 2000 174 pgs. |
Adobe—Development Center: Flash video learning guide, printed Jan. 13, 2009 from http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/video_guide_02.html, 5 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 08705745.1, Search completed Dec. 16, 2011, dated Dec. 28, 2011, 09 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18206048.3, Search completed Feb. 8, 2019, dated Feb. 21, 2019, 11 Pgs. |
Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies—Part 7: Common Encryption in ISO Base Media File Format Files (ISO/IEC 23001-7), Apr. 2015, 24 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/050440, Report Completed Aug. 7, 2009, dated Aug. 11, 2009, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/050440, International Filing Date Jan. 7, 2008, Search completed Apr. 23, 2008, dated May 16, 2008, 2 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12 Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 12: ISO base media file format, Feb. 2004 (“MPEG-4 Part 12 Standard”), 62 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008(E) Informational Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Part 12: ISO Base Media File Format, Oct. 2008, 120 pgs. |
ISO/IEC FCD 23001-6 MPEG systems technologies Part 6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Jan. 28, 2011, 86 pgs. |
Microsoft Corporation, Advanced Systems Format (ASF) Specification, Revision 01.20.03, Dec. 2004, 121 pgs. |
MPEG-DASH presentation at Streaming Media West 2011, Nov. 2011, 14 pgs. |
Order No. 40: Construing Certain Terms of the Asserted Claims of the Patent at Issue (Markman Claim Construction), Inv. No. 337-TA-1222, Mar. 12, 2021, 97 pgs. |
Pomelo, LLC Tech Memo, Analysis of Netflix's Security Framework for ‘Watch Instantly’ Service, Mar.-Apr. 2009, 18 pgs. |
RedOrbit News, New DivX Web Player Hits 1 Milling Downloads in One Week, printed Jan. 13, 2009 from http://www.redorbit.com/modules/news/tools.php?tool=print&id=421307, 2 pgs. |
Server-Side Stream Repackaging (Streaming Video Technologies Panorama, Part 2), Jul. 2011, 15 pgs. |
Text of ISO/IEC 23001-6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Oct. 2010, 71 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), ETSI TS 126 233 V9.1.0 (Jun. 2011) 3GPP TS 26.233 version 9.1.0 Release 9, 18 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); ETSI TS 126 244 V9.4.0 (May 2011) 3GPP TS 26.244 version 9.4.0 Release 9, 58 pgs. |
Vuze HD Network, printed Jun. 1, 2009 from http://www.vuze.com/Index.html, 1 pg. |
Written Opinion of international Application No. PCT/US2008/050440 International filing date Jan. 7, 2008, Opinion completed Apr. 23, 2008, dated May 16, 2008, 9 pgs. |
“Apple HTTP Live Streaming specification”, Aug. 2017, 60 pgs. |
“Common Interface Specification for Conditional Access and other Digital Video Broadcasting Decoder Applications”, European Standard, EN 50221, Feb. 1997, 86 pgs. |
“Data Encryption Decryption using AES Algorithm, Key and Salt with Java Cryptography Extension”, Available at https://www.digizol.com/2009/10/java-encrypt-decrypt-jce-salt.html, Oct. 200, 6 pgs. |
“Delivering Live and On-Demand Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, 2009, 28 pgs. **check for duplicate **. |
“HTTP Based Adaptive Streaming over HSPA”, Apr. 2011, 73 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Mar. 2011, 24 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Sep. 2011, 33 pgs. |
“Information Technology—Coding of Audio Visual Objects—Part 2: Visual”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Third Edition, Jun. 1, 2004, pp. 1-724, (presented in three parts). |
“Java Cryptography Architecture API Specification & Reference”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html, Jul. 25, 2004, 68 pgs. |
“Java Cryptography Extension, javax.crypto.Cipher class”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/crypto/Cipher.html, 2004, 24 pgs. |
“JCE Encryption—Data Encryption Standard (DES) Tutorial”, Available at https://mkyong.com/java/jce-encryption-data-encryption-standard-des-tutorial/, Feb. 25, 2009, 2 pgs. |
“Live and On-Demand Video with Silverlight and IIS Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, Windows Server Internet Information Services 7.0, Feb. 2010, 15 pgs. |
“Microsoft Smooth Streaming specification”, Jul. 22, 2013, 56 pgs. |
“OpenDMLAVI File Format Extensions Version 1.02”, OpenDMLAVI MJPEG File Format Subcommittee. Last revision: Feb. 28, 1996. Reformatting: Sep. 1997, 42 pgs. |
“Server ‘Trick Play’ support for MPEG-2 Transport Stream Files”, www.live555.com/liveMedia/transport-stream-trick-play.html, 2006, Dec. 31, 2020, 1 pg. |
“Single-Encode Streaming for Multiple Screen Delivery”, Telestream Wowza Media Systems, 2009, 6 pgs. |
“The LIVE555 Media Server”, www.live555.com/mediaServer/#about, 2006, printed Dec. 31, 2020, 3 pgs. |
“The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, 7 pgs. |
“Windows Media Player 9”, Microsoft, Mar. 23, 2017, 3 pgs. |
Abomhara et al., “Enhancing Selective Encryption for H.264/AVC Using Advanced Encryption Standard”, International Journal of computer Theory and Engineering, Apr. 2010, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-229. |
ADB, “ADB-3800W Datasheet”, 2007, 2 pgs. |
Agi et al., “An Empirical Study of Secure MPEG Video Transmissions”, IEEE, Mar. 1996, 8 pgs., DOI: 10.1109/NDSS.1996.492420. |
Alattar et al., A.M., “Improved selective encryption techniques for secure transmission of MPEG video bit-streams”, In Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348), vol. 4, IEEE, 1999, pp. 256-260. |
Antoniou et al., “Adaptive Methods for the Transmission of Video Streams in Wireless Networks”, 2015, 50 pgs. |
Apostolopoulos et al., “Secure Media Streaming and Secure Transcoding”, Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management, 2006, 33 pgs. |
Asai et al., “Essential Factors for Full-Interactive VOD Server: Video File System, Disk Scheduling, Network”, Proceedings of Globecom '95, Nov. 14-16, 1995, 6 pgs. |
Beker et al., “Cipher Systems, The Protection of Communications”, 1982, 40 pgs. |
Bocharov et al, “Portable Encoding of Audio-Video Objects, The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF)”, Microsoft Corporation, First Edition Sep. 8, 2009, 30 pgs. |
Bulterman et al., “Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0)”, W3C Recommendation, Dec. 1, 2008, https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SMIL3-20081201/, 321 pgs., (presented in five parts). |
Cahill et al., “Locally Adaptive Deblocking Filter for Low Bit Rate Video”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs. |
Candelore, U.S. Appl. No. 60/372,901, filed Apr. 17, 2002. |
Chaddha et al., “A Frame-work for Live Multicast of Video Streams over the Internet”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs. |
Cheng, “Partial Encryption for Image and Video Communication”, Thesis, Fall 1998, 95 pgs. |
Cheng et al., “Partial encryption of compressed images and videos”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 33 pgs. |
Cheung et al., “On the Use of Destination Set Grouping to Improve Fairness in Multicast Video Distribution”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, IEEE, 1996, 23 pgs. ** check duplicate**. |
Collet, “Delivering Protected Content, An Approach for Next Generation Mobile Technologies”, Thesis, 2010, 84 pgs. |
Conklin et al., “Video coding for streaming media delivery on the Internet”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Mar. 2001, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 269-281. |
Deshpande et al., “Scalable Streaming of JPEG2000 Images Using Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, Multimedia '01: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 2001, pp. 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1145/500141.500197. |
Diamantis et al., “Real Time Video Distribution using Publication through a Database”, Proceedings SIBGRAPI'98. International Symposium on Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision (Cat. No. 98EX237), Oct. 1990, 8 pgs. |
Dworkin, “Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods and Techniques”, NIST Special Publication 800-38A, 2001, 66 pgs. |
ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Support for use of scrambling and Conditional Access (CA) within digital broadcasting systems”, Oct. 1996, 13 pgs. |
ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Implementation guidelines for the use of Video and Audio Coding in Contribution and Primary Distribution Applications based on the MPEG-2 Transport Stream”, ETSI TS 102 154 V1.2.1, May 2004, 73 pgs. |
Fahmi et al., “Proxy Servers for Scalable Interactive Video Support”, Computer, Sep. 2001, vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 54-60, https://doi.org/10.1109/2.947092. |
Fang et al., “Real-time deblocking filter for MPEG-4 systems”, Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Oct. 28-31, 2002, Bail, Indonesia, 4 pgs. |
Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Jan. 2010, 38 pgs. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP1.1”, **check duplicate** Network Working Group, RFC 2616, Jun. 1999, 114 pgs. |
Fitzek et al., “A Prefetching Protocol for Continuous Media Streaming in Wireless Environments”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Oct. 2001, vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 2015-2028, DOI:10.1109/49.957315. |
Fukuda et al., “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts by Adaptive DCT Coefficient Estimation in Block-Based Video Coding”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs. |
Ho, “Digital Video Broadcasting Conditional Access Architecture”, Report prepared for CS265—Section 2, Fall 2002, Prof Stamp, 7 pgs. |
Huang, U.S. Pat. No. 7,729,426, U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,794, filed Sep. 20, 2005. |
Huang et al., “Adaptive MLP post-processing for block-based coded images”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 463-473. |
Huang et al., “Architecture Design for Deblocking Filter in H.264/JVT/AVC”, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo., Jul. 6-9, 2003, Baltimore, MD, 4 pgs. |
ISMA, “ISMA Encryption and Authentication, Version 1.1, AREA / Task Force: DRM”, Internet Streaming Media Alliance, Sep. 15, 2006, pp. 1-64. |
ITU-T, “Series J: Cable Networks and Transmission of Television, Sound Programme and Other Multimedia Signals”, Technical method for ensuring privacy in long-distance international MPEG-2 television transmission conforming to ITU-T J.89, ITU-T Recommendation J.96, Mar. 2001, 34 pgs. |
Jain et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/522,623, filed Aug. 11, 2011. |
Jung et al., “Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Personal Video Recorder for DTV”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Nov. 2001, 6 pgs. |
Kabir, “Scalable and Interactive Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, Thesis, 2005, 207 pgs. |
Kalva, Hari, “Delivering MPEG-4 Based Audio-Visual Services”, 2001, 113 pgs. |
Kang et al., “Access Emulation and Buffering Techniques for Steaming of Non-Stream Format Video Files”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 43, No. 3, Aug. 2001, 7 pgs. |
Kim et al, “A Deblocking Filter with Two Separate Modes in Block-Based Video Coding”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 9, No. 1, 1999, pp. 156-160. |
Kim et al., “Tree-Based Group Key Agreement”, Feb. 2004, 37 pgs. |
Laukens, “Adaptive Streaming—A Brief Tutorial”, EBU Technical Review, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Legault et al., “Professional Video Under 32-bit Windows Operating Systems”, SMPTE Journal, vol. 105, No. 12, Dec. 1996, 10 pgs. |
Li et al., “Layered Video Multicast with Retransmission (LVMR): Evaluation of Hierarchical Rate Control”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century, Cat. No. 98, vol. 3, 1998, 26 pgs. |
Lian et al., “Selective Video Encryption Based on Advanced Video Coding”, PCM, Nov. 2005, Part II, LNCS 3768, pp. 281-290. |
Lievaart, “Characteristics that differentiate CA Systems”, Irdeto access, Nov. 2001, 5 pgs. |
List et al., “Adaptive deblocking filter”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 614-619. |
Lloyd, “Supporting Trick Mode Playback Universally Across the Digital Television Industry”, Thesis, 2005, 111 pgs. |
Macaulay et al., “Whitepaper—IP Streaming of MPEG-4: Native RTP vs MPEG-2 Transport Stream”, Envivio, Oct. 2005, 12 pgs. |
Massoudi et al., “Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video: Challenges and Perspectives”, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, Nov. 2008, 18 pgs. |
McCanne et al., “Receiver-driven Layered Multicast”, Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, Aug. 1996, 14 pgs. |
Meier, “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in Image and Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 3, Apr. 1999, pp. 490-500. |
Meyer et al., “Security mechanisms for Multimedia-Data with the Example MPEG-I-Video”, SECMPEG, 1992, 10 pgs. |
Molavi et al., “A Security Study of Digital TV Distribution Systems”, Thesis, Jun. 2005, 112 pgs. |
NCITS/ISO/IEC, “Information Technology—Generic Coding Of Moving Pictures And Associated Audio Information: Video (Formerly ANSI/ISO/IEC 13818-2-2000)”, Second edition, Dec. 15, 2000, 220 pgs. |
Nelson, “Smooth Streaming Deployment Guide”, Microsoft Expression Encoder, Aug. 2010, 66 pgs. |
Nelson, “The Data Compression Book”, M&T Publishing, 1992, 533 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Newton et al., “Preserving Privacy by De-identifying Facial Images”, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, Technical Report, CMU-CS-03-119, Mar. 2003, 26 pgs. |
O'Brien, U.S. Appl. No. 60/399,846, filed Jul. 30, 2002. |
O'Rourke, “Improved Image Decompression for Reduced Transform Coding Artifacts”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 5, No. 6, Dec. 1995, pp. 490-499. |
Park et al., “A postprocessing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 161-171. |
Qiao et al., “Comparison of MPEG Encryption Algorithms”, Comput. & Graphics, 1998, vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 437-448. |
Richardson, “H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression”, Wiley, 2003, 306 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Senoh et al., “DRM Renewability & Interoperability”, IEEE Xplore, Conference: Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2004, Feb. 2004, pp. 424-429, DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2004.1286899, Conference: Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2004. CCNC 2004. First IEEE. |
Shojania et al., “Experiences with MPEG-4 Multimedia Streaming”, CiteSeer, Jan. 2001, 3 pgs., DOI: 10.1145/500141.500221. |
Sima et al., “An Efficient Architecture for Adaptive Deblocking Filter of H.264 AVC Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 292-296. |
Spanos et al., “Performance Study of a Selective Encryption Scheme for the Security of Networked, Real-Time Video”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, IC3N'95, Sep. 20-23, 1995, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 2-10. |
Srinivasan et al., “Windows Media Video 9: overview and applications”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2004, 25 pgs. |
Stockhammer, “Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP—Standards and Design Principles”, Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia, Feb. 2011, pp. 133-145. |
Symes, “Video Compression Demystified”, McGraw-Hill, 2001, 353 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Taymans et al., “GStreamer Application Development Manual (1.6.0)”, 2007, 159 pgs. |
Thomas et al., “A Novel Secure H.264 Transcoder Using Selective Encryption”, Proceedings in International Conference on Image Processing, Jan. 2007, vol. 4, pp. IV-85-IV-88, DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2007.4379960. |
Timmerer et al., “HTTP Streaming of MPEG Media”, Proceedings of Streaming Day, 2010, 4 pgs. |
Tiphaigne et al., “A Video Package for Torch”, Jun. 2004, 46 pgs. |
Tosun et al., “Efficient multi-layer coding and encryption of MPEG video streams”, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No. 00TH8532), Jul. 30-Aug. 2, 2000, pp. 119-122, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2000.869559. |
Trappe et al., “Key Management and Distribution for Secure Multimedia Multicast”, IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 2003, pp. 544-557. |
Um, “Selective Video Encryption of Distributed Video Coded Bitstreams and Multicast Security over Wireless Networks”, Thesis, Aug. 2006, 142 pgs. |
Van Deursen et al., “On Media Delivery Protocols in the Web”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Jul. 19-23, 2010, 6 pgs. |
Ventura, Guillermo Albaida, “Streaming of Multimedia Learning Objects”, AG Integrated Communication System, Mar. 2003, 101 pgs. |
Waggoner, “Compression for Great Digital Video”, 2002, 184 pgs. |
Wang, “Lightweight Encryption in Multimedia”, Thesis, Jun. 2005, 184 pgs. |
Watanabem et al., “MPEG-2 decoder enables DTV trick plays”, esearcher System LSI Development Lab, Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan, Jun. 2001, 2 pgs. |
Wiegand, “Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG”, Jan. 2002, 70 pgs. |
Willig et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/409,285, filed Nov. 2, 2010. |
Wong, “Web Client Programming with Perl”, 1997, printed Jan. 8, 2021 from: https://www.oreilly.com/openbook-webclientch03.html, 31 pgs. |
Wu, “A Fast MPEG Encryption Algorithm and Implementation of AES on CAM”, Thesis, Oct. 6, 2003, 91 pgs. |
Yang et al., “Projection-Based Spatially Adaptive Reconstruction of Block-Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 896-908. |
Yang et al., “Regularized Reconstruction to Reduce Blocking Artifacts of Block Discrete Cosine Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 6, Dec. 1993, pp. 421-432. |
Yu et al., “Video deblocking with fine-grained scalable complexity for embedded mobile computing”, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2004, pp. 1173-1178. |
Yuksel, “Partial Encryption of Video for Communication and Storage”, Thesis, Sep. 2003, 78 pgs. |
Zakhor, “Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1992, pp. 91-95. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21160147.1, Search completed Aug. 6, 2021, dated Aug. 16, 2021, 5 Pgs. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC for European Application No. 18206048.3, Dated Jun. 25, 2022, 31 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 22199792.7, Search completed Apr. 14, 2023, dated Apr. 25, 2023, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 23156805.6, Search completed Apr. 18, 2023, dated May 2, 2023, 7 Pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210273985 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60883659 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16565375 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17326056 | US | |
Parent | 16136149 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16565375 | US | |
Parent | 15682379 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16136149 | US | |
Parent | 14632670 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15682379 | US | |
Parent | 12982413 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14632670 | US | |
Parent | 11970493 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12982413 | US |