Systems and methods for selecting stimulation sites and applying treatment, including treatment of symptoms of Parkinson's disease, other movement disorders, and/or drug side effects

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7908009
  • Patent Number
    7,908,009
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 18, 2006
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 15, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Methods and systems for treating movement disorders are disclosed. A method in accordance with one embodiment can include determining that the movement disorder affects the patient's gait, oral functioning, and/or other functioning, and applying electrical stimulation proximate to the interhemispheric fissure, the Sylvian fissure, or between the two fissures, respectively. In another embodiment, the method can include selecting at least one neural process from among a plurality of processes sequentially carried out by a patient to cause a muscle movement in the patient (e.g., a planning process, an initiation process, and an execution process), and applying electrical stimulation to a location of the patient's brain associated with the at least one neural process.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is directed generally toward systems and methods for selecting stimulation sites and treating symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders, and/or drug side effects, for example, via electrical stimulation at the selected sites.


BACKGROUND

A wide variety of mental and physical processes are controlled or influenced by neural activity in particular regions of the brain. For example, various physical or cognitive functions are directed or affected by neural activity within the sensory or motor cortices. Across most individuals, particular areas of the brain appear to have distinct functions. In the majority of people, for example, the areas of the occipital lobes relate to vision; the regions of the left interior frontal lobes relate to language; portions of the cerebral cortex appear to be consistently involved with conscious awareness, memory, and intellect; and particular regions of the cerebral cortex, the basal ganglia, the thalamus, and the motor cortex cooperatively interact to facilitate motor function control.


Many problems or abnormalities with body functions can be caused by damage, disease, and/or disorders in the brain. For example, Parkinson's Disease (PD) is related to the degeneration or death of dopamine producing neurons in the substantia nigra region of the basal ganglia in the brain. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that transmits signals between areas of the brain. As the neurons in the substantia nigra deteriorate, the reduction in dopamine causes abnormal neural activity that results in a chronic, progressive deterioration of motor function control. Conservative estimates indicate that PD may affect more than one million individuals in the United States alone.


PD patients typically exhibit one or more of four primary symptoms. One primary symptom is a tremor in an extremity (e.g., a hand) that occurs while the extremity is at rest. Other primary symptoms include a generalized slowness of movement (bradykinesia); increased muscle rigidity or stiffness (rigidity); and gait or balance problems (postural dysfunction). In addition to or in lieu of these primary symptoms, PD patients may exhibit secondary symptoms including: difficulty initiating or resuming movements; loss of fine motor skills; lack of arm swing on the affected side of the body while walking; foot drag on the affected side of the body; decreased facial expression; voice and/or speech changes; cognitive disorders; feelings of depression or anxiety; and/or other symptoms.


Effectively treating PD or other movement disorders related to neurological conditions can be very difficult. Current treatments for PD symptoms include drugs, ablative surgical intervention, and/or neural stimulation. Drug treatments or therapies may involve, for example, the administration of a dopamine precursor that is converted to dopamine within the central nervous system (i.e., Levodopa (L-dopa)). Other types of drug therapies are also available. Unfortunately, drug therapies frequently become less effective or ineffective over time for an undesirably large patient population. A PD patient may require multiple drugs in combination to extend the time period of efficacy of drug therapies. Drug treatments additionally have a significant likelihood of inducing undesirable physical side effects; motor function complications such as uncontrollable involuntary movements (dyskinesias) are a particularly common side effect. Furthermore, drug treatments may induce undesirable cognitive side effects such as confusion and/or hallucinations.


Ablative surgical intervention for PD typically involves the destruction of one or more neural structures within the basal ganglia or thalamus that have become overactive because of the lack of dopamine. Unfortunately, such neural structures reside deep within the brain, and hence ablative surgical intervention is a very time consuming and highly invasive procedure. Potential complications associated with the procedure include risk of hemorrhage, stroke, and/or paralysis. Moreover, because PD is a progressive disease, multiple deep brain surgeries may be required as symptoms progressively worsen over time. Although ablative surgical intervention may improve a PD patient's motor function, it is not likely to completely restore normal motor function. Furthermore, since ablative surgical intervention permanently destroys neural tissue, the effects of such intervention cannot be readily adjusted or “fine tuned” over time.


Neural stimulation treatments have shown promising results for reducing some of the symptoms associated with PD. Neural activity is governed by electrical impulses or “action potentials” generated in and propagated by neurons. While in a quiescent state, a neuron is negatively polarized and exhibits a resting membrane potential that is typically between −70 and −60 mV. Through chemical connections known as synapses, any given neuron receives excitatory and inhibitory input signals or stimuli from other neurons. A neuron integrates the excitatory and inhibitory input signals it receives, and generates or fires a series of action potentials in the event that the integration exceeds a threshold potential. A neural firing threshold, for example, may be approximately −55 mV. Action potentials propagate to the neuron's synapses and are then conveyed to other synaptically connected neurons.


Neural activity in the brain can be influenced by neural stimulation, which involves the application of electrical and/or magnetic stimuli to one or more target neural populations within a patient using a waveform generator or other type of device. Various neural functions can thus be promoted or disrupted by applying an electrical current to one or more regions of the brain. As a result, researchers have attempted to treat certain neurological conditions, including PD, using electrical or magnetic stimulation signals to control or affect brain functions.


Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a stimulation therapy that has been used as an alternative to drug treatments and ablative surgical therapies. In DBS, one or more electrodes are surgically implanted into the brain proximate to deep brain or subcortical neural structures. For treating PD or other movement disorders, the electrodes are positioned in or proximate to the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus; basal ganglia structures such as the globus pallidus internalis (GPi); or the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN). The location of the stimulation site for the electrodes depends upon the symptoms that a patient exhibits and the severity of the symptoms.


In a typical DBS system, a pulse generator delivers a continuous or essentially continuous electrical stimulation signal having a pulse repetition frequency of approximately 100 Hz to each of two deep brain electrodes. The electrodes are may be positioned bilaterally on the left and right sides of the brain relative to particular neural structures such as those indicated above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,709 discloses one conventional DBS system for treating movement disorders.


Although DBS therapies may significantly reduce one or more PD symptoms, particularly when combined with drug treatments, they are highly invasive procedures. In general, configuring a DBS system to properly function within a patient requires two time consuming, highly invasive surgical procedures for implanting the DBS electrodes. Each such surgical procedure has essentially the same risks as those described above for ablative surgical intervention. Moreover, DBS may not provide relief from some movement disorders.


Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) is another type of brain stimulation treatment that has been proposed for treating Parkinson's Disease. MCS involves the application of stimulation signals to the motor cortex of a patient. One MCS system includes a pulse generator connected to a strip electrode that is surgically implanted over a portion of only the motor cortex (precentral gyrus). The use of MCS to treat PD symptoms is described in Canavero, Sergio, Extradural Motor Cortex Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Case Report, Movement Disorders (Vol. 15, No. 1, 2000).


Because MCS involves the application of stimulation signals to surface regions of the brain rather than deep neural structures, electrode implantation procedures for MCS are significantly less invasive and time consuming than those for DBS. As a result, MCS may be a safer and simpler alternative to DBS for treating PD symptoms. Present MCS techniques, however, fail to address or adequately consider a variety of factors that may enhance or optimize the extent to which a patient experiences short term and/or long term relief from PD symptoms.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1B are flow charts illustrating methods for treating movement disorders in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 1C is a flow chart illustrating a method for treating drug side effects, in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a partially schematic, left side illustration of a human brain indicating stimulation areas associated with addressing gait-related movement disorder symptoms in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a partially schematic, left side illustration of the human brain indicating stimulation areas for addressing oral-related movement disorder symptoms, in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a partially schematic, left side illustration of the human brain illustrating stimulation locations for addressing movement disorder symptoms other than those related to a patient's gait and oral activity.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for addressing dysfunction in sequentially-related processes associated with patient movement, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a partially schematic, left side illustration of the human brain illustrating sites at which electrical stimulation is provided to address dysfunctions associated with planning, initiating, and executing movements in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 is a left side illustration of the brain illustrating another arrangement of electrodes for stimulating brain regions associated with sequentially-related movement processes.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following disclosure describes several embodiments of methods and systems for treating movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's Disease (PD)) and/or associated symptoms, and/or symptoms associated with drug side effects, using cortical stimulation. Several methods and systems for applying treatment in accordance with embodiments of the invention are set forth and described in FIGS. 1A-7. It will be appreciated that other embodiments can include additional procedures and/or different features than those shown in FIGS. 1A-7. Additionally, methods and systems in accordance with several embodiments of the invention may not include all of the features shown in these Figures.


A method for treating movement disorders in accordance with one embodiment of the invention includes determining that the movement disorder affects a patient's gait, and applying electrical stimulation to a region of the patient's brain that is proximate to the interhemispheric fissure of the patient's brain. In another embodiment, the method can include determining that the movement disorder affects the patient's oral functioning, and can further include applying electrical stimulation to a region of the patient's brain that is proximate to the Sylvian fissure of the patient's brain. In still another embodiment, the method can include determining that the movement disorder affects an aspect of the patient's movement other than the patient's gait and oral functioning, and can further include applying electrical stimulation to a region of the patient's brain that is located between the interhemispheric fissure and the Sylvian fissure of the patient's brain.


Methods in accordance with further aspects of the invention can further include applying electrical stimulation to both sides of the central sulcus of the patient's brain, or on a single side of the central sulcus of the patient's brain. Stimulation can be applied ipsilaterally or contralaterally, in a unipolar manner, and/or in a bipolar manner.


In a still a further aspect of the invention, a method for treating movement disorders includes selecting at least one neural process from among a plurality of processes sequentially carried out by a patient to cause a muscle movement in the patient. The method can further include applying electrical stimulation to a location of the patient's brain associated with the at least one neural process. For example, the method can include selecting the at least one neural process from among a planning process, an initiation process, and an execution process. The method can further include applying electrical stimulation to the patient's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, interhemispheric fissure, primary motor strip, or premotor cortex of the patient's brain.


In yet another embodiment, electrical stimulation can be used to address aspects of a patient's functioning that are attributed to drug intake (e.g., drug side effects). A method in accordance with one such embodiment includes determining what aspect of a patient's functioning is affected by the patient's drug intake, and applying electrical stimulation to a region of the brain that is associated with the aspect of the patient's functioning. In particular embodiments, this method can be used to address cognitive and/or motor dysfunctions resulting as side effects from the patient's intake of drugs that target Parkinson's disease and/or other movement disorders.



FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating a method 100 for treating a patient's movement disorder(s) and/or associated symptoms. The movement disorder may be associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) and/or other conditions, including other pathological conditions. In process portion 102, the method 100 includes determining what aspect of a patient's motion the movement disorder affects. For example, the movement disorder may primarily affect the patient's gait, or the patient's oral functions, (e.g., the patient's speech, chewing, and/or swallowing activities). Other patients may have other aspects of their motion affected. For example, other patients may experience tremors at an extremity, and/or difficulties with arm movement, and/or midline symptoms, including difficulties with postural stability. Most, if not all, of the foregoing symptoms can be diagnosed and distinguished from each other in a relatively straightforward manner using clinical examinations and/or patient reports.


In process portion 104, the method 100 includes applying electrical stimulation to a region of the patient's brain that is associated with the particular aspect of the patient's motion identified in process portion 102. In particular, different parts of the brain may be associated with different aspects of the patient's movements, and the method 100 can include stimulating or preferentially stimulating those areas most closely associated with the particular symptoms experienced by the patient. Further details of the brain areas that can be stimulated in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to FIG. 1B.


Referring now to FIG. 1B, process portion 102 can include determining whether or not the patient's gait is affected (process portion 106) and, if it is, stimulating the patient's brain closer to the interhemispheric fissure than to the Sylvian fissure (process portion 108). In process portion 110, the process 100 can include determining if the patient's oral activity is affected and, if it is, stimulating the patient's brain closer to the Sylvian fissure than to the interhemispheric fissure (process portion 112). If a practitioner determines that activities other than the patient's gait and oral functions are affected (process portion 114), the practitioner can stimulate the patient's brain between the Sylvian fissure and the interhemispheric fissure, with a reduced preference for proximity to either fissure.


In other embodiments, methods similar in part to those described above with reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B can be used to address additional and/or other types of symptoms. For example, FIG. 1C illustrates a process 117 that includes determining what aspect of a patient's functioning is affected by the patient's chemical substance or drug intake (process portion 118). The process can further include applying electrical stimulation to one or more regions of the patient's brain that are associated with the aspect of the patient's functioning (process portion 119).


In further particular examples, the drug or drugs taken by the patient can include drugs taken to address movement disorders (e.g., PD) but that have side effects on the patient's cognitive and/or motor functioning. L-dopa is one such drug that can induce unwanted dyskinesias (e.g., chorea and/or dystonia). The dyskinesias can include peak-doses dyskinesias (associated with peak levels of L-dopa in the brain), “off” dyskinesias (which occurs when the effects of L-dopa wear off), and/or diphasic dyskinesias (associated with changes in the plasma level of L-dopa, typically at the beginning and/or end of a dose). Other drugs or chemical substances that may produce unwanted side effects can include Sinemet, Mirapex and glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF).


The site(s) of the patient's brain selected for stimulation can depend on the aspects of the patient's functioning to be addressed. For example, if the effects of the drug are related to the patients motion, the stimulation can be applied to the primary motor cortex, premotor cortex and/or supplemental motor area. If the effects relate to the patient's cognitive abilities, the stimulation can be applied to the prefrontal cortex. Illustrations of representative stimulation systems and stimulation sites associated with the foregoing method are described below with reference to FIGS. 2-4.



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a neural stimulation system 230 for treating symptoms of PD and/or other neurologic dysfunction (e.g., movement, cognitive and/or emotional dysfunction) in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The neural stimulation system 230 can include a pulse generator 235 configured to deliver stimulation signals to a patient 200 via one or more electrode devices 231 implanted in the patient 200. Accordingly, the pulse generator 235 can be coupled to the electrode device 231 by one or more leads 233. The pulse generator 235 may further be configured for wireless and/or wire-based communication with a control system 234, which can in turn include one or more controllers 240 (shown in FIG. 2 as a first controller 240a and a second controller 240b). Depending upon embodiment details, the system 230 may further include one or more patient monitoring units 250 configured to detect, monitor, indicate, measure, and/or assess the severity of particular types of patient symptoms or deficits. Further details of the foregoing system components are described below.


The electrode device 231 may include one or more electrically conductive contacts 232 carried by one or more substrates 236, for example, in a manner described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/742,579, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Applying Electrical Stimulation and Manufacturing Same,” filed on Dec. 18, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. The contacts 232 are configured to provide, deliver, and/or apply stimulation signals to particular cortical regions of the patient's brain 210 and/or neural populations synaptically connected and/or proximate thereto. The electrode device 231 may alternatively or additionally include one or more penetrating, depth, deep brain, and/or nerve cuff electrodes. One or more of the contacts 232 may be configured as a signal return contact (i.e., a contact that provides a current return path for electrical continuity), and may be positioned relative to a variety of locations within and/or upon the patient's body to facilitate unipolar stimulation. This function may also be provided by other structures (e.g., a housing or other portion of the electrode device 231). In another embodiment, one or more of the contacts 232 can be configured to provide bipolar signals (e.g., the return contact can be positioned at or proximate to the stimulation site).


The characteristics and/or placement of the electrode device 231 may depend upon the nature of patient's underlying disorder(s), functional deficit(s), and/or the type and/or severity of symptoms that the patient 200 experiences or exhibits. In a particular embodiment, one or more portions of the electrode device 231 may be surgically implanted to apply, deliver, and/or direct stimulation signals to target neural populations within the patient's brain, for example, in a manner identical, essentially identical, or analogous to that described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/732,731, entitled “System and Method for Treating Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement Disorders,” filed on Dec. 9, 2003, and/or U.S. application Ser. No. 09/802,808, filed on Mar. 8, 2001, both incorporated herein by reference.


The electrode device 231 receives stimulation signals from the pulse generator 235, which may include hardware and/or software for generating and outputting stimulation signals in accordance with internal instruction sequences and/or in response to control signals, commands, instructions, and/or other information received from the controller(s) 240. The pulse generator 235 may include a power supply and a pulse unit, a programmable computer medium, and a communication unit. The power supply may include a battery or other type of power storage device. The pulse unit may include circuitry for generating pulse sequences that may be defined or characterized in accordance with various stimulation signal parameters. Stimulation can be provided at a current of from between 2 and 20 milliamps and at a frequency of 0.5 Hz, 1-2 Hz, or higher. In some embodiments, a generally low frequency signal (e.g., from about 0.5-10 Hz) can result in longer lasting beneficial effects and/or greater relief from adverse symptoms. In some embodiments, it is also beneficial to have a “reset” period. For example, the patient can undergo stimulation for a period of seconds, minutes, hours or days, followed by a period of no stimulation (e.g., for a number of seconds, minutes or hours) before stimulation begins again.


In a particular embodiment, the frequency of the stimulation signal can be varied in a random, aperiodic manner centered, for example, at a mean frequency of 5 Hz. The voltage or amplitude of the signal can be constant or can be varied in a variety of manners, including random variation and/or occasional high amplitude bursts. The range of frequencies may focus on the lower frequency ranges (e.g., from 1-2 Hz) and, for biphasic pulses, the first phase pulse width can be varied. In particular embodiments, the frequency can be varied in a manner indicated to break up oscillatory patterns that may exist between cortical and subcortical structures. Such signal patterns have been associated with Parkinson's disease and may be associated with other movement disorders as well. Aspects of these patterns are described by Timmermann et al. in an article titled, “The Cerebral Oscillatory Network of Parkinsonian Resting Tremor” (Brain (2003), 126, 199-212), incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. Further aspects of applicable signal parameters are described in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/782,526, filed Feb. 19, 2004 and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.


Each element of the pulse generator 235 may be incorporated or embedded in a surgically implantable case or housing. Depending upon embodiment details, the pulse generator 235 may be surgically implanted in the patient 200 at a subclavicular location 202. Alternatively, the pulse generator 235 may be surgically implanted above the patient's neck, for example, in the patient's skull at a location posterior to the patient's ear and/or proximate to an electrode implantation site. A surgically formed tunnel or path may route the lead or leads 233 that couple the pulse generator 235 to the electrode device 231, in a manner understood by those skilled in the art. Additionally, one or more electrically conductive portions of the pulse generator case or housing may serve as a return electrode for electrical current.


The controllers 240 may comprise hardware and/or software configured to direct and/or manage the local operation of the pulse generator 235. For example, the controllers may be configured to communicate control signals, commands, instructions, parameter settings and/or ranges, and/or other information to the pulse generator 235. Accordingly, the controllers 240 may each include a processing unit 241, a programmable or other computer-readable medium 242, and a communications unit 243. The communications unit 243 may include a user interface that facilitates communication with devices external to the pulse generator 235, for example, through telemetric signal transfer. The computer-readable medium 242 may comprise hardware and/or memory resident software. The computer-readable medium 242 may store operational mode information and/or program instruction sequences that may be selected and/or specified by a practitioner. The pulse generator 235 may be configured to deliver stimulation signals to particular electrode devices 231 and/or to specific electrical contacts 232 of the electrode device 231 on a selective basis at any given time, e.g., in a manner identical, essentially identical, or analogous to that described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/978,134, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Optimizing Stimulation. Parameters and Electrode Configurations for Neuro-Stimulators,” filed on Oct. 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.


The first controller 240a can include a “full functionality” controller, configured for operation by a medical professional. The second controller 240b can include a limited or “partial functionality” controller configured for operation by a patient. The second controller 240b may facilitate patient-based selection and/or adjustment of particular preprogrammed operating modes and/or neural stimulation settings. In some embodiments, the first and second controllers 240a, 240b may be configured for wire-based or wireless communication with each other. One or both of the controllers 240 may be configured to receive information from the pulse generator 235 (e.g., the overall status and/or performance level of the pulse generator 235). Communication between the control system 234 and the pulse generator 235 may facilitate or effectuate specification, selection, and/or identification of operational modes, instruction sequences, and/or procedures for treating one or more patient conditions, states, and/or symptoms associated with PD, other movement disorders, and/or other types of neurologic dysfunction in a variety of manners.


The patient monitoring unit 250 may be used to determine the effects of the stimulation signals provided by the controller(s) 240, the pulse generator 235, and the electrode device(s) 231. Accordingly, the patient monitoring unit can include any type of device configured to detect, monitor, indicate, estimate, characterize, measure, calculate, and/or assess neural pathway characteristics and/or the nature, level, intensity, magnitude and/or severity of one or more types of patient states, conditions, deficits, and/or symptoms associated with PD and/or other neurological dysfunctions. For example, a patient monitoring unit 250 may include a motion detection system configured to detect patient movement associated with tremor. A motion detection system may include light emitting and/or detecting devices and/or accelerometers coupled to particular patient extremities. In another example, the patient monitoring unit 250 includes an Electromyography (EMG) system that has one or more sets of surface or depth electrodes positioned relative to particular muscle groups for detecting electrical signals corresponding to muscle fiber innervation. In still another example, the patient monitoring unit 250 includes an Electroencephalography (EEG), an Electrocorticography (ECoG) system, and/or a Magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. In yet another embodiment, the patient monitoring unit 250 includes one or more electrode contacts 232 and, optionally, software and/or hardware (e.g., signal processing software and/or circuitry) within the pulse generator 235.


In other arrangements, the patient monitoring unit 250 includes a neural imaging system, for example, a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a functional MRI (fMRI), a Positron Emission Tomography (PET), and/or other type of system. As another example, the patient monitoring unit 250 may include one or more electrodes and/or probes (e.g., cerebral bloodflow monitors) positioned upon, proximate, and/or within given target neural populations, and associated hardware and/or software for detecting, presenting, and/or analyzing signals received therefrom. Still further examples of patient monitoring units are described in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/782,526, previously incorporated herein by reference.


In addition to illustrating a representative stimulation system 230, FIG. 2 also illustrates a representative placement for the electrode device 231. The electrode device 231 shown in FIG. 2 is positioned to provide stimulation to a patient 200 experiencing a gait-related neural dysfunction symptom (e.g., foot dragging). In one aspect of this embodiment, the electrode device 231 is positioned at a selected region 217 of the brain 210 located closer to the interhemispheric fissure 211 (located behind the plane of FIG. 2) than to the Sylvian fissure 212. The contacts 232 of the electrode device 231 can be located at the precentral gyrus 214 and/or the postcentral gyrus 215. In some cases, it may be advantageous to position the electrode device 231 to span the central sulcus 213, allowing the practitioner to selectively stimulate either or both of the precentral gyrus 214 and the postcentral gyrus 215. In other cases, the electrode device 231 can be positioned to extend posterior to the post-central sulcus 216. In any of these cases, the contacts 232 can be positioned subdurally or epidurally, depending on which is most effective for the patient 200. The contacts 232 can be located ipsilaterally and/or contralaterally with regard to the side of the patient 200 exhibiting the targeted symptoms. In at least one embodiment (e.g., when the patient 200 exhibits gait-related symptoms on both sides of the body), the practitioner can identify the brain hemisphere primarily associated with the patient's speech, and then stimulate that hemisphere so as to reduce or even prevent speech-related symptoms while at the same time addressing gait-related symptoms.


The electrode device 231 can include a plurality of contacts 232 that provide stimulation at one or more stimulation sites 218. Accordingly, the practitioner can sequentially stimulate at a different site (a) when it is not clearly evident, except by trial, where stimulation is most effective, and/or (b) when the patient 200 benefits from stimulation at multiple sites. In the latter case, stimulation may also be applied simultaneously to multiple sites.


In one aspect of this embodiment, the contacts 232 can be arranged in a 2×3 array, and in other embodiments, the contacts 232 can be arranged in arrays having other dimensions, including a single row of contacts 232. Each contact 232 can have a surface area and spacing selected to provide stimulation in the desired fashion. For example, in one embodiment, the contacts 232 have a surface area of about 5 mm2, and each contact 232 can be spaced apart from its nearest neighbor by about 2.5 mm. In other embodiments, the size of the contacts 232 and the spacing between the contacts 232 can be different.


In any of the foregoing embodiments, the electrical stimulation provided by the electrode device 231 can reduce and/or eliminate gait-related symptoms experienced by the patient 200. The electrical stimulation provided by the electrode device 231 can be selected by the practitioner to provide unipolar and/or bipolar stimulation. As used herein, unipolar stimulation refers generally to stimulation provided by one or more contacts proximate to a given stimulation site 218 while all the contacts 232 are at or near the same electrical potential. In this case, a return electrode or contact is provided at a site distal the stimulation site 218, for example, at the implanted pulse generator 235. Conversely, bipolar stimulation, as used herein, refers generally to stimulation provided by at least two contacts 232 positioned proximate to the stimulation site 218 with one of the contacts at a higher electrical potential than the other. Multiple contacts 232 can be arranged in bipolar pairs, with each pair including one contact 232 at a higher potential than its pair mate. The pulse control system 234 can be configured to provide both unipolar and bipolar stimulation signals to the electrode device 231. Accordingly, the same electrode device 231 and pulse control system 234 can be used for patients receiving bipolar and unipolar stimulation. Furthermore, the pulse control system 234 can be programmed or reprogrammed during treatment to switch between bipolar and unipolar stimulation, when this type of alternation provides or is expected to provide an additional benefit to the patient.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of the brain 210 with the electrode device 231 positioned at a selected region 317 to address oral-related movement disorder symptoms. Accordingly, the selected region 317 is positioned closer to the Sylvian fissure 212 than to the interhemispheric fissure 211. The contacts 232 can be located proximate to multiple stimulation sites 318, and can provide bipolar and/or unipolar stimulation, in a manner generally similar to that described above. As was also described above, the electrode device 231 can be sized, shaped and positioned in a manner that allows the practitioner to selectively stimulate multiple sites, sequentially and/or simultaneously. In one aspect of this embodiment, the electrode device 231 positioned at or near the Sylvian fissure 212 can have the same size and shape as the electrode device 231 positioned at or near the interhemispheric fissure 211 (FIG. 2). In other embodiments, the size and/or shape of the electrode device 231, and/or the arrangement of contacts 232 can be different depending on whether the electrode device 231 is selected to address primarily gait-related or oral-related symptoms.



FIG. 4 is an illustration of the brain 210 with the electrode device 231 positioned at a selected region 417 to address symptoms other than gait-related symptoms and oral-related symptoms. Accordingly, the electrode device 231 can be positioned between the interhemispheric fissure 211 and the Sylvian fissure 212. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, the electrode device 231 and the contacts 232 it carries can be located approximately midway between the interhemispheric fissure 211 and the Sylvian fissure 212, and in other embodiments, the contacts 232 can be located more toward one fissure than the other. In any of these embodiments, the contacts 232 tend not to be located as close to the interhemispheric fissure 211 as was shown in FIG. 2, or as close to the Sylvian fissure 212 as was shown in FIG. 3.


In still further embodiments, aspects of the arrangements described above with reference to FIGS. 2-4 can be combined. For example, if the patient 200 suffers from multiple symptoms (e.g., gait-related symptoms, oral-related symptoms and other symptoms), then a single electrode device 231 can be located over multiple selected regions. In another embodiment, the practitioner can implant multiple electrode devices 231 at each of the corresponding regions expected to provide aid to the patient 200. In either arrangement, the electrode(s) 231 expected to be necessary for addressing the patient's symptoms can be implanted in a single procedure, whether or not all the associated contacts 232 are ultimately used.



FIGS. 5-7 illustrate methods for applying electrical stimulation to a patient's brain in accordance with further aspects of the invention. Referring first to FIG. 5, a method 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention includes selecting at least one neural process from among a plurality of sequential neural processes associated with causing a muscle movement in the patient (block 502). The neural processes can include a planning process, an initiation process, and/or an execution process. As used herein, the planning process refers generally to the neurological process of forming instructions for carrying out a movement. Initiation refers generally to beginning the planned movement, and execution refers to fully carrying out the planned movement. Each movement executed by a patient generally results from the patient performing the foregoing three processes in sequence.


In block 504, electrical stimulation is applied to a location of the patient's brain associated with the at least one neural process selected in block 502. For example, in many cases, a different specific area of the brain is associated with each of the planning, initiation, and execution processes. Accordingly, the electrical stimulation can be applied to the location of the patient's brain associated with one or more of the foregoing processes.


Once the (at least one) target neural process has been selected the practitioner can implant an electrode device at least proximate to the area of the patient's brain associated with the target neural process. FIG. 6 illustrates the brain 210 along with three selected regions 617 (shown as a first selected region 617a, second selected region 617b, and third selected region 617c), each associated with one of the target neural processes. For example, the first selected region 617a can include the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex 619, which has been shown to be associated with motor task planning. The second selected region 617b can include areas proximate to the interhemispheric fissure 211 and anterior to the motor strip 620 (e.g., the supplementary motor area 621). In a particular embodiment, the second selected region 617b can extend into the interhemispheric fissure 211. The third selected region 617c can include the motor strip 620 and can accordingly extend laterally from the interhemispheric fissure 211 to the Sylvian fissure 212. The third selected region 617c can also include the premotor cortex, a portion of the supplementary motor area 621. The motor strip 620 may be stimulated to address symptoms associated with fine motor control, and the premotor cortex may be stimulated to address symptoms associated with general motor control.


A stimulation system 630 for stimulating the brain 210 can include a pulse generator 635 coupled to one or more pulse control systems (not shown in FIG. 6) generally similar to those described above with reference to FIG. 2. In a particular embodiment in which it is desired to stimulate areas associated with all three neural processes (planning, initiation, and execution), the stimulation system 630 can include electrode devices 631 (shown as first, second, and third electrode devices 631a, 631b, and 631c, respectively) having electrical contacts 632 located at each of the three selected regions 617a-617c, respectively. When the second selected region 617b extends into the interhemispheric fissure 211, the second electrode device 631b can be placed in the interhemispheric fissure 211 as well. Alternatively, the second electrode device 631b can be located external, (but proximate to) the interhemispheric fissure 211, while still providing stimulation to neural structures located within the interhemispheric fissure 211, e.g., in a manner generally similar to that described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/987,118, entitled “Electrode Configurations for Reducing Invasiveness and/or Enhancing Neural Stimulation Efficacy,” filed concurrently herewith and incorporated herein by reference. Corresponding leads 633a-633c can be coupled between the pulse generator 635 and the electrode devices 631a-631c. In other embodiments, for example, when it is clear that only one or two of the regions 617a-617c would benefit from stimulation, fewer electrode devices 631 can be implanted in a single procedure at fewer than three regions.


Stimulation signals may be provided to the brain 210 in accordance with any of the parameters described above with reference to FIGS. 2-4. For example, the stimulation site can be located on the ipsilateral or contralateral side of the brain 210 with respect to the location of the impediment. In some embodiments, the practitioner can stimulate sites at both hemispheres, either sequentially or simultaneously, depending (for example) on the particular symptoms exhibited by the patient, and/or the particular process (e.g., planning, initiation, and/or execution) the practitioner wishes to address. The frequency, amplitude, pulse width and other signal parameters can also be varied in manners generally similar to those described above to provide effective treatment for the patient.


In some patients, a defect associated with one of the foregoing sequential processes may predominate. Once the defect associated with this process has been addressed, defects associated with other processes may become more evident. In other cases, it may be impossible or impracticable to identify which process is primarily responsible for the patient's symptoms, for example, because the processes are typically executed by the patient in very rapid succession. In any of these cases, the practitioner may implant multiple electrode devices and/or multiple contacts covering a range of target regions of the brain, and then stimulate a particular region until the problem with that region is addressed (or eliminated as a source of symptoms), then move to another region if symptoms associated with that region become evident, or if stimulation at the first region does not have the desired effect. Stimulation can be provided at multiple sites in a sequential, simultaneous, alternating, random, pseudorandom, and/or intermittent manner. The multiple electrode devices can be implanted simultaneously or serially (e.g., after stimulation with an initial electrode device has been completed or determined to be ineffective).


As described above with reference to FIG. 1C, stimulation can also be applied to the brain to address side effects associated with the patient's drug intake. Stimulation can be applied to the premotor cortex 622, the supplemental motor area 621, and/or the primary motor cortex 623 (for motion-related symptoms), and/or the prefrontal cortex 619 (for cognitive symptoms). The benefits of stimulation in these areas can include a reduction in drug side effects and/or a reduction in conventional drug doses (so as to produce essentially the same, the same, or greater therapeutic effect with fewer side effects). The patient may also have an increased “on time” (e.g., an increased period of time during which the drug is providing therapeutic effects) while exhibiting no side effects or reduced side effects.



FIG. 7 illustrates another arrangement of electrode devices that may be suitable for use when it is not certain which of the foregoing processes the patient has the most difficulty with, and/or when it is known that the patient has difficulty with more than one process. The arrangement can include two strip-type electrode devices, shown as a first electrode device 717a and a second electrode device 717b. The first electrode device 717a can be positioned to extend over both the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex 619 (e.g., the first selected region 617a), and the supplementary motor area 621 (e.g., the second selected region 617b). The second electrode device 717b can extend over the motor strip 620 (e.g., the third selected region 617c). In one aspect of this embodiment, each electrode device 717a, 717b can include a single row of contacts 732, and in other embodiments, each electrode device 717a, 717b can include multiple rows or other arrangements of contacts 732. In any of these embodiments, both electrode devices 717a, 717b can be coupled to one or more pulse generators and controllers (not shown in FIG. 7) to selectively provide electrical stimulation to target areas either simultaneously or sequentially, depending, for example, on whether the patient exhibits symptoms sequentially or simultaneously.


In other embodiments, the systems described above can be implanted and operated in still further manners. For example, one or more electrode devices can be implanted in a manner that places first and second electrical contacts proximate to different areas of the patient's brain. Electrical stimulation can then be applied simultaneously or sequentially to these areas to treat one or more neural dysfunctions, and the implantation site can be selected in a manner that does not necessarily require identifying the functional manifestation of the neural dysfunction. In a particular embodiment, the stimulation can be applied to any two (or more) of the motor cortex, the prefrontal cortex and the supplementary motor area. As used herein, the term motor cortex can include the primary motor cortex and/or the premotor cortex. The stimulation can be applied to one or both of the patient's brain hemispheres. In other embodiments, the stimulation can be applied to other multiple locations.


From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, aspects of the invention described in the context of particular embodiments can be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Many of the steps are described above in a particular order for purposes of illustration, but can be carried out in other orders as well. Further details of electrode system, techniques for visualizing target implant areas, and techniques for implanting electrodes are disclosed in the following corresponding U.S. applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference: Ser. No. 10/731,731, filed Dec. 9, 2003; Ser. No. 10/910,775, filed Aug. 2, 2004; Ser. No. 10/877,830, filed Jun. 25, 2004; and Ser. No. 10/731,852, filed Dec. 9, 2003. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating movement disorders, comprising: selecting at least a first neural process and a second neural process from among a planning process that is associated with the prefrontal cortex, an initiation process that is associated with the supplemental motor cortex and an execution process that is associated with the motor cortex sequentially carried out by a patient to cause a muscle movement in the patient;positioning at least one electrode device having a plurality of electrical contacts such that at least a first of the plurality of electrical contacts is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over a first target cortical location selected from the group of cortical locations consisting of prefrontal cortex, supplemental motor cortex, and motor cortex associated with the first neural process and positioning at least a second of the plurality of electrical contacts below the patient's skull and on the dura over a second target cortical location selected from the group of cortical locations consisting of prefrontal cortex, supplemental motor cortex, and motor cortex associated with the second neural process; andapplying electrical signals to at least a first of the plurality of electrical contacts to stimulate the first location of the patient's brain associated with the first neural process, and applying electrical signals to at least a second of the plurality of electrical contacts to stimulate the second location of the patient's brain associated with the second neural process.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein applying electrical signals includes applying electrical signals to a location of the brain ipsilateral to the location of the muscle movement.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein applying electrical signals includes applying electrical signals to a location of the brain contralateral to the location of the patient's muscle movement.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the first neural process includes selecting a planning process, and wherein applying electrical signals to the first location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex of the patient's brain.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the first or second neural process includes selecting an initiation process, and wherein applying electrical signals to the first or second location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is closer to the interhemispheric fissure than the Sylvian fissure of the patient's brain.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein applying the electrical signals includes applying the electrical signals to one hemisphere of the patient's brain.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein applying electrical signals includes applying electrical signals to the hemisphere that is ipsilateral to the location of the muscle movement.
  • 8. The method of claim 6 wherein applying electrical signals includes applying electrical signals to the hemisphere that is contralateral to the location of the muscle movement.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein applying the electrical signals includes applying the electrical signals to both hemispheres of the patient's brain.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the method further comprises: positioning at least one electrode in the first location in a first procedure; andpositioning at least one second electrode in the second location associated with the second one of the neural processes in a second procedure subsequent to the first procedure.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein applying electrical signals to a first and second location of the patient's brain, in at least one of a sequential, simultaneous, alternating, random, pseudorandom and intermittent manner.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the motor cortex is further defined as the primary motor cortex, the premotor cortex or a combination thereof.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 wherein selecting the first neural process includes selecting a planning process, and wherein applying electrical signals to the first location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex of the patient's brain; andselecting a second process includes selecting an execution process associated with fine motor control, and wherein applying electrical signals to the second location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the primary motor cortex of the patient's brain.
  • 14. The method of claim 12 wherein selecting the first neural process includes selecting a planning process, and wherein applying electrical signals to the first location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex of the patient's brain; andselecting a second process includes selecting an execution process associated with general motor control, and wherein applying electrical signals to the second location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the premotor cortex of the patient's brain.
  • 15. The method of claim 12 wherein selecting a second process includes selecting an execution process associated with fine motor control, and wherein applying electrical signals to the second location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact that is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the primary motor strip of the patient's brain.
  • 16. The method of claim 12 wherein selecting a second process includes selecting an execution process associated with general motor control, and wherein applying electrical signals to the second location includes applying electrical signals to the at least one electrical contact is positioned below the patient's skull and on the dura over the premotor cortex of the patient's brain.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the movement disorder comprises Parkinson's disease.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the movement disorder comprises Parkinson's disease and related symptoms.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of Ser. No. 10/986,614, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,565,200, filed Nov. 12, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (277)
Number Name Date Kind
2716226 Jonas Aug 1955 A
2721316 Shaw Oct 1955 A
3628193 Collins Dec 1971 A
3650276 Burghele et al. Mar 1972 A
3918461 Cooper Nov 1975 A
4030509 Heilman et al. Jun 1977 A
4125116 Fischell Nov 1978 A
4140133 Kastrubin et al. Feb 1979 A
4214804 Little Jul 1980 A
4245645 Picard et al. Jan 1981 A
4308868 Jhabvala Jan 1982 A
4328813 Ray May 1982 A
4340038 McKean Jul 1982 A
4431000 Butler et al. Feb 1984 A
4474186 Ledley et al. Oct 1984 A
4542752 Dehaan et al. Sep 1985 A
4590946 Loeb May 1986 A
4607639 Tanagho et al. Aug 1986 A
4646744 Capel Mar 1987 A
4702254 Zabara Oct 1987 A
4844075 Liss et al. Jul 1989 A
4865048 Eckerson Sep 1989 A
4869255 Putz Sep 1989 A
4903702 Putz Feb 1990 A
4969468 Byers et al. Nov 1990 A
5002053 Garcia-Rill et al. Mar 1991 A
5024226 Tan Jun 1991 A
5031618 Mullett Jul 1991 A
5044368 Putz Sep 1991 A
5054906 Lyons, Jr. Oct 1991 A
5063932 Dahl et al. Nov 1991 A
5092835 Schurig et al. Mar 1992 A
5121754 Mullett Jun 1992 A
5143089 Alt Sep 1992 A
5169384 Bosniak et al. Dec 1992 A
5184620 Cudahy et al. Feb 1993 A
5193540 Schulman et al. Mar 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5215088 Normann et al. Jun 1993 A
5224491 Mehra Jul 1993 A
5255678 Deslauriers et al. Oct 1993 A
5263967 Lyons, III et al. Nov 1993 A
5271417 Swanson et al. Dec 1993 A
5282468 Klepinski Feb 1994 A
5299569 Wernicke et al. Apr 1994 A
5303705 Nenov Apr 1994 A
5304206 Baker, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5314458 Najafi et al. May 1994 A
5358513 Powell, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5370672 Fowler et al. Dec 1994 A
5405375 Ayers et al. Apr 1995 A
5406957 Tansey Apr 1995 A
5411540 Edell et al. May 1995 A
5417719 Hull et al. May 1995 A
5423864 Ljungstroem Jun 1995 A
5441528 Chang et al. Aug 1995 A
5447166 Gevins Sep 1995 A
5464446 Dreessen et al. Nov 1995 A
5520190 Benedict et al. May 1996 A
5522864 Wallace et al. Jun 1996 A
5537512 Hsia et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5540736 Haimovich et al. Jul 1996 A
5549655 Erickson Aug 1996 A
5562708 Combs et al. Oct 1996 A
5575813 Edell et al. Nov 1996 A
5591216 Testerman et al. Jan 1997 A
5593432 Crowther Jan 1997 A
5601611 Fayram et al. Feb 1997 A
5611350 John Mar 1997 A
5618531 Cherksey Apr 1997 A
5628317 Starkebaum et al. May 1997 A
5674251 Combs et al. Oct 1997 A
5676655 Howard, III et al. Oct 1997 A
5683422 Rise Nov 1997 A
5702429 King Dec 1997 A
5707334 Young Jan 1998 A
5711316 Elsberry et al. Jan 1998 A
5713922 King Feb 1998 A
5713923 Ward et al. Feb 1998 A
5716377 Rise et al. Feb 1998 A
5722401 Pietroski et al. Mar 1998 A
5735814 Elsberry et al. Apr 1998 A
5750376 Weiss et al. May 1998 A
5752979 Benabid May 1998 A
5769778 Abrams et al. Jun 1998 A
5772591 Cram Jun 1998 A
5782798 Rise Jul 1998 A
5782873 Collins Jul 1998 A
5792186 Rise Aug 1998 A
5797970 Pouvreau Aug 1998 A
5814014 Elsberry et al. Sep 1998 A
5814092 King Sep 1998 A
5824021 Rise Oct 1998 A
5824030 Yang et al. Oct 1998 A
5832932 Elsberry et al. Nov 1998 A
5833709 Rise et al. Nov 1998 A
5843148 Gijsbers et al. Dec 1998 A
5843150 Dreessen et al. Dec 1998 A
5865842 Knuth et al. Feb 1999 A
5871517 Abrams et al. Feb 1999 A
5885976 Sandyk Mar 1999 A
5886769 Zolten Mar 1999 A
5893883 Torgerson et al. Apr 1999 A
5904916 Hirsch May 1999 A
5913882 King Jun 1999 A
5916171 Mayevsky Jun 1999 A
5925070 King et al. Jul 1999 A
5928144 Real Jul 1999 A
5938688 Schiff Aug 1999 A
5938689 Fischell et al. Aug 1999 A
5941906 Barreras, Sr. et al. Aug 1999 A
5964794 Bolz et al. Oct 1999 A
5975085 Rise Nov 1999 A
5978702 Ward et al. Nov 1999 A
5983140 Smith et al. Nov 1999 A
6006124 Fischell et al. Dec 1999 A
6011996 Gielen et al. Jan 2000 A
6016449 Fischell et al. Jan 2000 A
6018682 Rise Jan 2000 A
6021352 Christopherson et al. Feb 2000 A
6026326 Bardy Feb 2000 A
6035236 Jarding et al. Mar 2000 A
6040180 Johe Mar 2000 A
6042579 Elsberry et al. Mar 2000 A
6052624 Mann Apr 2000 A
6055456 Gerber Apr 2000 A
6057846 Sever, Jr. May 2000 A
6057847 Jenkins May 2000 A
6058331 King May 2000 A
6060048 Cherksey May 2000 A
6061593 Fischell et al. May 2000 A
6066163 John May 2000 A
6095148 Shastri et al. Aug 2000 A
6104956 Naritoku et al. Aug 2000 A
6104960 Duysens et al. Aug 2000 A
6122548 Starkebaum et al. Sep 2000 A
6126657 Edwards et al. Oct 2000 A
6128527 Howard, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6128537 Rise Oct 2000 A
6128538 Fischell et al. Oct 2000 A
6134474 Fischell Oct 2000 A
6152143 Edwards Nov 2000 A
6161044 Silverstone Dec 2000 A
6161045 Fischell et al. Dec 2000 A
6176242 Rise Jan 2001 B1
6190893 Shastri et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198958 Ives et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205360 Carter et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210417 Baudino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221908 Kilgard et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230049 Fischell et al. May 2001 B1
6236892 Feler May 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263225 Howard, III Jul 2001 B1
6280462 Hauser et al. Aug 2001 B1
6301493 Marro et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304787 Kuzma et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319241 King et al. Nov 2001 B1
6339725 Naritoku et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353754 Fischell Mar 2002 B1
6354299 Frischell Mar 2002 B1
6356784 Lozano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356792 Errico Mar 2002 B1
6360122 Fischell Mar 2002 B1
6366813 DiLorenzo Apr 2002 B1
6375666 Mische Apr 2002 B1
6405079 Ansarinia Jun 2002 B1
6418344 Rezai Jul 2002 B1
6427086 Fischell Jul 2002 B1
6456886 Howard, III et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459936 Fischell Oct 2002 B2
6463328 John Oct 2002 B1
6464356 Sabel Oct 2002 B1
6466822 Pless Oct 2002 B1
6473639 Fischell Oct 2002 B1
6480743 Kirkpatrick Nov 2002 B1
6484059 Gielen Nov 2002 B2
6487450 Chen Nov 2002 B1
6499488 Hunter et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505075 Weiner Jan 2003 B1
6507755 Gozani et al. Jan 2003 B1
6529774 Greene Mar 2003 B1
6539263 Schiff et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549814 Strutz et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556868 Naritoku et al. Apr 2003 B2
6569654 Shastri et al. May 2003 B2
6591138 Fischell et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597954 Pless et al. Jul 2003 B1
6615065 Barrett et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622048 Mann Sep 2003 B1
6633780 Berger Oct 2003 B1
6647296 Fischell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658299 Dobelle Dec 2003 B1
6665562 Gluckman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6684105 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687525 Llinas Feb 2004 B2
6690974 Archer et al. Feb 2004 B2
6708064 Rezai Mar 2004 B2
6725094 Saberski Apr 2004 B2
6764498 Mische Jul 2004 B2
6782292 Whitehurst Aug 2004 B2
6788975 Whitehurst et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795737 Gielen et al. Sep 2004 B2
6810286 Donovan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6839594 Cohen et al. Jan 2005 B2
6873872 Gluckman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6892097 Holsheimer May 2005 B2
6895280 Meadows et al. May 2005 B2
6907296 Doan et al. Jun 2005 B1
6934580 Osorio et al. Aug 2005 B1
6944497 Stypulkowski Sep 2005 B2
6944501 Pless Sep 2005 B1
6959215 Gliner et al. Oct 2005 B2
6990377 Gliner et al. Jan 2006 B2
7006859 Osorio et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010351 Firlik et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024247 Gliner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7107097 Stern et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110820 Tcheng et al. Sep 2006 B2
7184840 Stolz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7236831 Firlik et al. Jun 2007 B2
20020091419 Firlik et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099412 Fischell Jul 2002 A1
20020138101 Suda et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020169485 Pless Nov 2002 A1
20030074032 Gliner Apr 2003 A1
20030078633 Firlik et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088274 Gliner et al. May 2003 A1
20030097161 Firlik et al. May 2003 A1
20030125772 Olson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030125786 Gliner et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130706 Sheffield et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149457 Tcheng et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030176901 May Sep 2003 A1
20030187490 Gliner Oct 2003 A1
20030187491 Greenberg et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195602 Boling Oct 2003 A1
20040073270 Firlik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082847 McDermott Apr 2004 A1
20040088024 Firlik et al. May 2004 A1
20040092809 DeCharms May 2004 A1
20040102828 Lowry et al. May 2004 A1
20040111127 Gliner et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040131998 Marom et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138550 Hartlep et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040158298 Gliner et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176831 Gliner et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181263 Balzer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040215287 Swoyer et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236388 Gielen et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243205 Keravel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249422 Gliner et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004620 Singhal et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015129 Mische Jan 2005 A1
20050021104 DiLorenzo Jan 2005 A1
20050021105 Firlik et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021106 Firlik et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021107 Firlik et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021118 Genau et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033378 Sheffield et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050070971 Fowler et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075679 Gliner et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075680 Lowry et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050096701 Donovan et al. May 2005 A1
20050113882 Cameron et al. May 2005 A1
20050119712 Shafer Jun 2005 A1
20050154425 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154426 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060015153 Gliner et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060106430 Fowler et al. May 2006 A1
20060106431 Wyler et al. May 2006 A1
20060129205 Boveja et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060173522 Osorio Aug 2006 A1
20060217782 Boveja et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241717 Whitehurst et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070088403 Wyler et al. Apr 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
19750043 May 1999 DE
0214527 Mar 1987 EP
0319844 Jun 1989 EP
0998958 Oct 2000 EP
1145736 Oct 2001 EP
1180056 Nov 2003 EP
WO 8707511 Dec 1987 WO
WO 9407564 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9521591 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9806342 Feb 1998 WO
WO 0197906 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0209811 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0236003 May 2002 WO
WO 0238031 May 2002 WO
WO 0238217 May 2002 WO
WO 03082402 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03043690 May 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060253168 A1 Nov 2006 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10986614 Nov 2004 US
Child 11489024 US