Field
Various embodiments relate to electronic circuits and, particularly, to circuits, systems, and methods for starting up analog circuits.
Description of the Related Art
Contemporary startup circuits utilize operational amplifiers with very large, high current devices that generate a large tail current to source or sink a maximum amount of current for driving the load and generating the desired analog voltage on the output in the specified time. One disadvantage of these startup circuits is that the operational amplifiers are part of a closed loop system and therefore, even high speed operational amplifiers can only respond as fast as the feedback loop will allow. Therefore, contemporary startup circuit require large operational amplifiers that source large amounts of current, which results in relatively slow startup during standby to active conditions.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference in the description to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The phrase “in one embodiment” located in various places in this description does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.
In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter of the present application. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the disclosed embodiments, the claimed subject matter, and their equivalents may be practiced without these specific details.
The detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show illustrations in accordance with example embodiments. These embodiments, which may also be referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments of the claimed subject matter described herein. The embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, or structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the claimed subject matter. It should be understood that the embodiments described herein are not intended to limit the scope of the subject matter but rather to enable one skilled in the art to practice, make, and/or use the subject matter.
Various embodiments provide startup circuits. One startup circuit comprises an output node including an output voltage (VOUT), a comparator comprising a first input configured to be coupled to a reference voltage (VREF), a second input, and an output. The startup circuit further comprises a feedback loop coupling the output node to the second input and a turbo circuit coupled between the output and the output node and configured to be coupled to a supply voltage (VPWR). The turbo circuit is configured to increase VOUT, the comparator is configured to compare VOUT and VREF, and the turbo circuit is enabled and disabled based on the comparison of VOUT and VREF.
Other embodiments provide electronics systems. One electronic system comprises VREF, an analog device, and a startup circuit coupled to the analog device and to VREF. The startup circuit comprises VOUT, a startup portion, and a driver portion. The startup circuit is configured to enable the startup portion to start up the driver portion when VOUT is less than a predetermined voltage of VREF, disable the startup portion when VOUT is within the predetermined voltage of VOUT, and enable the driver portion to drive the analog device subsequent to disabling the startup portion.
Methods for starting an analog device via a startup circuit including a startup portion and a driver portion are further provided. One method comprises enabling the startup portion to start up the driver portion when VOUT of the startup circuit is outside a predetermined voltage of VREF, disabling the startup portion when VOUT is within the predetermined voltage of VREF, and enabling the driver portion to drive the analog device subsequent to disabling the startup portion.
Turning now to the figures,
Comparator 110 may be a comparator, comparing device, and/or comparing system known in the art or developed in the future. In various embodiments, comparator 110 is disabled by a signal from control logic 120 to eliminate and/or reduce any unnecessary power consumption.
Comparator 110 is configured with minimal hysteresis (e.g., +/−5 mV) so that comparator 110 disables turbo circuit 130 within a desired analog output voltage (VOUT). That is, comparator 110 is configured to “trip” at a voltage within a predetermined voltage of VREF. In one embodiment, VREF may be any voltage in the range of about 0.6 volts to about 1.2 volts. For example, comparator 110 may be configured to trip at a voltage (e.g., hysteresis) in the range of about 5 mV to about 50 mV of VREF, although other ranges of hysteresis may be utilized depending on the application of circuit 100. In one embodiment, comparator 110 is configured to trip at a voltage of about 5 mV of VREF.
As illustrated in
Control logic 120 may be any control logic, circuit, and/or system capable of providing a control signal (e.g., a logic high signal or logic low signal) in response to receiving an input from comparator 110. In one embodiment, control logic 120 is configured to output the logic low signal (e.g., a logic 0 signal or 0 volt signal) in response to receiving a signal from comparator 110 indicating that VREF is the larger voltage and output the logic high signal (e.g., a logic 1 signal or a 1.2 volt signal) in response to receiving a signal from comparator 110 indicating that VOUT is the larger voltage. Control logic 120 is coupled to turbo circuit 130 and is configured to output the control signal to turbo circuit 130.
Turbo circuit 130, in one embodiment, comprises a p-channel metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (pMOSFET) 1310, a pMOSFET 1320, and an nMOSFET 1330. The gate of pMOSFET 1310 is coupled to the output of control logic 120 and is configured to receive the control signal generated by control logic 120. The source and bulk of pMOSFET 1310 are coupled to a supply voltage (VPWR) and the drain of pMOSFET 1310 is coupled to the source of pMOSFET 1320.
The bulk of pMOSFET 1320 is coupled to VPWR and the gate of pMOSFET 1320 is coupled to ground (VGND). The drain of pMOSFET 1320 is coupled to the source of nMOSFET 1330.
The gate of nMOSFET 1330 is coupled to a node 170 that is coupled to the positive input of comparator 110. The bulk and drain of nMOSFET 1330 are coupled to a node 175 that is coupled to a node 180.
Node 180 is coupled to the gate of nMOSFET 140 (i.e., the n-follower device) and the drain of nMOSFET 140 is coupled to VPWR. The bulk and source of nMOSFET 140 are coupled to a node 185.
Node 185 is coupled to a node 190 that is coupled to the output (OUT) of circuit 100 and to node 160, which is coupled to the negative terminal of op amp 150. Op amp 150 may be any operational amplifier known in the art or developed in the future. In various embodiments, op amp 150 is a high gain amplifier rated at less than 10 μA. In one embodiment, op amp 150 is a 5 μA high gain operational amplifier. The output of op amp 150 is coupled to node 180 and the positive input of op amp 150 is coupled to a node 195 that is coupled to VREF and to node 170.
VOUT being coupled to the negative terminal of comparator 110 and the negative terminal of op amp 150 forms a feedback loop 197. That is, VOUT is provided to both comparator 110 and op amp 150 so that VOUT can be compared to VREF by comparator 110 and used as for a unity gain amplifier by op amp 150.
Various embodiments of circuit 100 utilize smaller electronic devices than previous startup circuits. Specifically, turbo circuit 130 enables circuit to use a smaller operational amplifier (i.e., op amp 150) and smaller amounts of current than previous startup circuits.
Below is a description of the operation of one embodiment of circuit 100. However, the various embodiments of circuit 100 are not limited to the following operational description of circuit 100.
When circuit 100 is enabled (e.g., when the voltage at the positive terminals of comparator 110 and op amp 150 are at VREF and the gate of nMOSFET 140 and OUT is at VGND), comparator 110 turns ON, which results in control logic 120 providing a logic low signal to turbo circuit 130. Specifically, the logic low signal from control logic 120 causes pMOSFET 1310 to turn ON. pMOSFET being ON causes pMOSFET 1320 to turn ON.
pMOSFET 1320 being ON results in the source of nMOSFET 1330 being at VPWR, the gate of nMOSFET 1330 being a VREF, and the drain of nMOSFET 1330 goes to VREF since this nMOSFET 1330 is a native or zero threshold device. In this situation, the output of op amp 150 goes to approximately VREF via the negative feedback 155, which supplies the gate to nMOSFET 140. Here, pMOSFET 1310 and pMOSFET 1320 operate in the linear region emulating a resistor, in series with a zero threshold voltage (depletion) n-follower device (i.e., nMOSFET 1330). Since the gate of nMOSFET 140 is coupled to VREF, when enabled, turbo circuit 130 quickly forces the source of nMOSFET 140 to VREF.
When the source of nMOSFET 140 goes to VREF, the output (OUT) rises until the voltage equals VREF. When VOUT is within a predetermined voltage of VREF (e.g., within about 20 mV of VREF), comparator 110 trips.
Comparator 110 tripping results in control logic 120 providing a logic high signal to turbo circuit 130. Specifically, the logic high signal causes pMOSFET 1310 to turn OFF, which causes each of pMOSFET 1320 and nMOSFET 1330 to also turn OFF. With turbo circuit 130 OFF, the output of op amp 150 takes over operation of the feedback loop system maintaining the gate of nMOSFET 140 at a stable voltage to provide output (OUT) with a buffered voltage equal to VREF. Consequently, op amp 150 is able to drive current loads coupled to the output of circuit 100.
In one embodiment, analog devices 210 are each the same type of analog device. In another embodiment, at least two of analog devices 210 are different types of analog devices. In yet another embodiment, analog devices 210 are each different types of analog devices.
Reference voltage generator 220 may be any type of device and/or system capable of generating a stable reference voltage over process voltage and temperature. In one embodiment, reference voltage generator is configured to generate a band gap reference voltage. In other embodiments, reference voltage generator is configured to generate a reference voltage in the range of about 0.6 volts to about 1.2 volts. Reference voltage generator 220 is configured to provide the generated voltage as an input to startup circuit 100.
As discussed above, startup circuit 100 is configured to enable startup portion 25 to start up driver portion 50 when VOUT is less than the predetermined voltage of VREF and disable startup portion 25 when VOUT is within the predetermined voltage of VREF. Furthermore, startup circuit 100 is configured to enable driver portion 50 to drive analog device 210 subsequent to disabling startup portion 25.
Startup portion 25 is enabled when VOUT is outside the range of about 5 mV to about 50 mV of VREF. In one embodiment, startup portion 25 is enabled when VOUT is outside of about 5 mV of VREF.
Startup portion 25 is disabled when VOUT is within the range of about 5 mV to about 50 mV of VREF. In one embodiment, startup portion 25 is disabled when VOUT is within about 5 mV of VREF.
Startup circuit 100 is configured to generate a buffered voltage (e.g., a voltage in the range of about 0.6 volts to about 1.2 volts) that is equal to the reference voltage received as an input from reference voltage generator 220. The buffered voltage is then utilized as an input to analog device(s) 210 to drive analog device(s) 210.
Method 300 includes comparing the voltage (VOUT) in a feedback loop (e.g., feedback loop 197) to VREF (block 320) to determine if VOUT is less than a predetermined voltage (e.g., 5 mV) of VREF (block 325). If VOUT is less than a predetermined voltage (e.g., 5 mV) of VREF, method 300 comprises increasing VOUT via a turbo circuit (e.g., turbo circuit 130) (block 330) and again comparing VOUT and VREF (block 320). If VOUT is within the predetermined voltage of VREF, method 300 comprises disabling the startup portion (e.g., the turbo circuit) (block 340).
After the turbo circuit is disabled, enabling a driver portion (e.g., driver portion 50) of the startup circuit (block 350). Method 300 further comprises utilizing the gain from the driver portion (op amp 50) to drive the analog device (block 360).
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description of the invention, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in an exemplary embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as an apparatus, system, or method. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment or an embodiment combining hardware and software aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module,” or “system.”
Aspects of the present invention are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus, and systems according to various embodiments. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the above figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of apparatus, systems, and methods according to various embodiments. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
While one or more embodiments have been illustrated in detail, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that modifications and adaptations to those embodiments may be made without departing from the scope of the various embodiments as set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of and priority to the U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/566,233 filed Dec. 2, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4061987 | Nagahama | Dec 1977 | A |
4075536 | Stevens | Feb 1978 | A |
4242604 | Smith | Dec 1980 | A |
4272760 | Prazak et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4344067 | Lee | Aug 1982 | A |
4571507 | Collings | Feb 1986 | A |
4684824 | Moberg | Aug 1987 | A |
4689581 | Talbot | Aug 1987 | A |
4689740 | Moelands et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4692718 | Roza et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4692760 | Unno et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4736123 | Miyazawa et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4797580 | Sunter | Jan 1989 | A |
4839636 | Zeiss | Jun 1989 | A |
4855683 | Troudet et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4868525 | Dias | Sep 1989 | A |
4882549 | Galani et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4947169 | Smith et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4980653 | Shepherd | Dec 1990 | A |
4988983 | Wehrer | Jan 1991 | A |
5019729 | Kimura et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036300 | Nicolai | Jul 1991 | A |
5043655 | Anholm, Jr. et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5073757 | George | Dec 1991 | A |
5095280 | Wunner et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111081 | Atallah | May 1992 | A |
5140197 | Grider | Aug 1992 | A |
5142247 | Lada, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144254 | Wilke | Sep 1992 | A |
5150079 | Williams et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5175884 | Suarez | Dec 1992 | A |
5200751 | Smith | Apr 1993 | A |
5268599 | Matsui | Dec 1993 | A |
5289138 | Wang | Feb 1994 | A |
5304955 | Atriss et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5319370 | Signore et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321319 | Mahmood | Jun 1994 | A |
5345195 | Cordoba et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349544 | Wright et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355033 | Jang | Oct 1994 | A |
5381116 | Nuckolls et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5408191 | Han et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420543 | Lundberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428319 | Marvin et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432665 | Hopkins | Jul 1995 | A |
5440305 | Signore et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446867 | Young et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451912 | Torode | Sep 1995 | A |
5473285 | Nuckolls et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481179 | Keeth | Jan 1996 | A |
5495205 | Parker et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5506875 | Nuckolls et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511100 | Lundberg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525933 | Matsuki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546433 | Tran et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552748 | O'Shaughnessy | Sep 1996 | A |
5554942 | Herr et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559502 | Schutte | Sep 1996 | A |
5563553 | Jackson | Oct 1996 | A |
5565819 | Cooper | Oct 1996 | A |
5583501 | Henrion et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589783 | McClure | Dec 1996 | A |
5594612 | Henrion | Jan 1997 | A |
5604466 | Dreps et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608770 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610550 | Furutani | Mar 1997 | A |
5610955 | Bland | Mar 1997 | A |
5614869 | Bland | Mar 1997 | A |
5642027 | Windes et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644254 | Boudry | Jul 1997 | A |
5666118 | Gersbach | Sep 1997 | A |
5668506 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670915 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673004 | Park | Sep 1997 | A |
5675813 | Holmdahl | Oct 1997 | A |
5682049 | Nguyen | Oct 1997 | A |
5684434 | Mann et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5686863 | Whiteside | Nov 1997 | A |
5689196 | Schutte | Nov 1997 | A |
5699024 | Manlove et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703537 | Bland et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703540 | Gazda et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726597 | Petty et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729165 | Lou et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739700 | Martin | Apr 1998 | A |
5796312 | Hull et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805909 | Diewald | Sep 1998 | A |
5818370 | Sooch et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825317 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5845151 | Story et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845181 | Bartscher | Dec 1998 | A |
5867015 | Corsi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870004 | Lu | Feb 1999 | A |
5870345 | Stecker | Feb 1999 | A |
5872464 | Gradinariu | Feb 1999 | A |
5877656 | Mann et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5898345 | Namura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5949408 | Kang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6040707 | Young et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6118439 | Ho et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124840 | Kwon | Sep 2000 | A |
6141007 | Lebling et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157266 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6191660 | Mar et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199969 | Haflinger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211739 | Synder et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215835 | Kyles | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219736 | Klingman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225992 | Hsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266715 | Loyer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294962 | Mar | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297705 | Williams et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357011 | Gilbert | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6407641 | Williams et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433645 | Mann et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466036 | Philipp | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515551 | Mar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525616 | Williams et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6646514 | Sutliff et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6701508 | Bartz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708233 | Fuller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708247 | Barret et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710788 | Freach et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6742076 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6753739 | Mar et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6807109 | Tomishima | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812678 | Brohlin | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6909414 | Tsuchi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922063 | Heger | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946920 | Williams et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6960953 | Ichihara | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6961665 | Slezak | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966039 | Bartz et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6989659 | Menegoli et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010773 | Bartz et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7139999 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170257 | Oh | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7212183 | Tobita | May 2007 | B2 |
7276977 | Self | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7319999 | Evans | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7348861 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7375593 | Self | May 2008 | B2 |
7391204 | Bicking | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397226 | Mannama et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7439777 | Wood | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446747 | Youngblood et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7576582 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7600156 | Thornley et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612527 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631111 | Monks et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7932774 | Bonaccio et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8085020 | Bennett | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8164365 | Wright et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010040569 | Liang | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020033804 | Liang et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035618 | Mendez et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030112215 | Hector et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122734 | Chien et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030233631 | Curry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046724 | Woo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056833 | Kitagawa et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070559 | Liang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040145551 | Tobita | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040189573 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201627 | Maddocks et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217799 | Ichihara | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250231 | Killian et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050057482 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050140659 | Hohl et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060033474 | Shum | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060244739 | Tsai | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255860 | Moussavi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002007 | Tam | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024544 | Chung et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029975 | Martin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070139338 | Lin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170931 | Snyder | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080036473 | Jansson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080123238 | Campos et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131145 | Tao et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080203977 | Raimar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224667 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080258740 | Wright et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258797 | Wright et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259017 | Wright et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259065 | Wright et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259070 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263243 | Wright et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263260 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090054129 | Yoshimura et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110234264 | Wright et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248692 | Shehu et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120013322 | Dearborn | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1625506 | Feb 2006 | EP |
287113 | Nov 1988 | JP |
291161 | Nov 1990 | JP |
297223 | Dec 1991 | JP |
5041651 | Feb 1993 | JP |
WO8906456 | Jul 1989 | WO |
PCTUS9617305 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO9736230 | Oct 1997 | WO |
PCTUS9834376 | Aug 1998 | WO |
PCTUS9909712 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jinbin Zhao, et al.—Steady-State and Dynamic Analysis of a Buck Converter Using a Hysteretic PWM Control—Dated 2004—5 pages. |
Mohammad Al-Shyoukh and Hot Lee—A Compact Fully-Integrated Extremum-Selector-Based Soft-Start Circuit for Voltage Regulators in Bulk CMOS Technologies—Oct. 2010—5 pages. |
Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,038; Dated Mar. 2012, 12 pages. |
L. Richard Carley, “Trimming Analog Circuits Using Floating-Gate Analog MOS Memory,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, No. 6, Dec. 1989, pp. 1569-1575; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,578 dated Mar. 14, 2013; 10 pages. |
“An Analog PLL-Based Clock and Data Recovery Circuit with High Input Jitter Tolerance”, by Sam Yinshang Sun, Reprinted from IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-24, pp. 325-330, Apr. 1989, pp. 383-385. |
“PSoC Mixed Signal Array,” Final Data Sheet, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Apr. 24, 2007, Document No. 001-05356; 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/843,216 “Non-Resistive Load Driver,” David Wright et al., filed Aug. 22, 2007; 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 “Reducing Power Consumption in a Liquid Crystal Display,” David Wright et al., filed Sep. 14, 2007; 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 “Active Liquid Crystal Display Drivers and Duty Cycle Operation,” Warren Snyder et al., filed Dec. 27, 2007; 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,578: “Boost Buffer Aid for Reference Buffer” Nandakishore Raimar et al., filed Nov. 09, 2007; 48 pages. |
Bakker et al., “Micropower CMOS Temperature Sensor with Digital Output,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jul. 1996; 3 pages. |
Cacharelis et al., “A Fully Modular 1 um CMOS Technology Incorporating EEPROM, EPROM and Interpoly Capacitors,” 20th European Solid State Device Research Conference, Nottingham, Sep. 1990, pp. 547-550; 4 pages. |
Cacharelis et al., “A Modular 1 um CMOS Single Polysilicon EPROM PLD Technology,” Aug. 1988 IEEE, pp. 60-IEDM 88 to 63-IEDM 88; 4 pages. |
Cuppens et al., “An EEPROM for Microprocessors and Custom Logic,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-20, No. 2, Apr. 1985, pp. 603-608; 6 pages. |
CY7C63722/23 CY7C63742/43 enCoRe USB Combination Low-Speed USB & PS/2 Peripheral Controller, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Revised May 2000; 48 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Marketing Brochure, “Timing Technology Products,” Published Nov. 1993, a publication of Cypress Semiconductor in San Jose, CA, pp. 5-7; 5 pages. |
Electronic Engineering Times, “TI's Quantum Leap,” Issue 517, Dec. 19, 1988, pp. 1 and 86; 2 pages. |
Frake et al., “A 9ns, Low Standby Power CMOS PLD with a Single-Poly EPROM Cell,” 1989 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 17, 1989, pp. 230-231 and 346; 3 pages. |
Hoe et al., “Cell and Circuit Design for Single-Poly EPROM,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1989, pp. 1153-1157; 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/60699 dated Jun. 18, 2009; 6 pages. |
Jan Axelson, “USB Complete: Everything You Need to Develop USB Peripherals,” 3rd Edition, Copyright 1999-2005, ISBN 978-1-931448-03-1, pp. 51-59, 85-91, 225; 20 pages. |
Kazerounian et al., “A Single Poly EPROM for Custom CMOS Logic Applications,” IEEE 1986 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1986, pp. 59-62; 4 pages. |
Kim et al- “A 30-MHz Hybrid Analog/Digital Clock Recovery Circuit in 2-um CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, No. 6, Dec. 1990, pp. 1385-1394; 10 pages. |
Kim et al., “Low-Power High-Slew-Rate CMOS Buffer Amplifier for Flat Panel Display Drivers,” Electronic Letters, Feb. 16, 2006, vol. 42, No. 4, <http://circuit.kaist.ac.kr/upload—files.pdf>; 2 pages. |
Miyamoto et al., “An Experimental 5-V-Only 256-kbit CMOS EEPROM with a High-Performance Single-Polysilicon Cell,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. SC-21, No. 5, Oct. 1986, pp. 852-860; 9 pages. |
Ohsaki et al., “A Planar Type EEPROM Cell Structure by Standard CMOS Process and Applications,” VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers, May 1993, pp. 55-66; 2 pages. |
Ohsaki et al., “A Planar Type EEPROM Cell Structure by Standard CMOS Process for Integration with GATE Array, Standard Cell, Microprocessor and for Neural Chips,” IEEE 1993 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1993, pp. 23.6.1-23.6.4; 4 pages. |
Ohsaki et al., “A Single Poly EEPROM Cell Structure for Use in Standard CMOS Processes,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 29, No. 3, Mar. 1994, pp. 311-316; 6 pages. |
Ohsaki et al., “SIPPOS (Single Poly Pure CMOS) EEPROM Embedded FPGA by News Ring Interconnection and Highway Path,” IEEE 1994 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1994, pp. 189-192; 4 pages. |
Robert A. Blauschild, “WP 3.5: An Integrated Time Reference,” ISSCC94/Session 3, Analog Techniques/Paper WP 3.5, Feb. 1994, pp. 56-58; 4 pages. |
Robert Jania, “Cypress' CapSense Successive Approximation Algorithm,” Whiat Paper CSA RJO.doc, Jan. 17, 2007; 6 pages. |
S.M. Sze, “Physics of Semiconductor Devices,” 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981, pp. 496-506; 13 pages. |
Sugino et al., “Analysis of Writing and Erasing Procedure of Flotox EEPROM Using the New Charge Balance Condition (CBC) Model,” NUPAD IV, May and Jun. 1992, pp. 65-69; 5 pages. |
T.J. Giles, “A University Frequency Synthesizer IC,” Aug. 1979, Philips Telecommunication Review, vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 177-181; 6 pages. |
Takebuchi et al., “A Novel Integration Technology of EEPROM Embedded CMOS LOGIC VLSI Suitable for ASIC Applications,” IEEE 1992 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1992, pp. 9.6.1-9.6.4; 4 pages. |
Universal Serial Bus Specification, Chapter 7—Electrical, Version 1.0; Jan. 15, 1996, pp. 111-143; 34 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Mar. 3, 2011; 4 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,485 dated Nov. 21, 2012; 3 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Aug. 23, 2011; 3 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Oct. 17, 2012; 2 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,876 dated Oct. 4, 2012; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Dec. 16, 2010; 13 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Jun. 8, 2011; 14 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Aug. 6, 2012; 13 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,578 dated May 8, 2012; 11 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,876 dated Jul. 19, 2012; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/843,216 dated Oct. 6, 2009; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Jan. 22, 2013; 8 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Jul. 1, 2010; 10 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Sep. 29, 2010; 11 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Dec. 18, 2012; 13 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Sep. 11, 2013; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Mar. 26, 2014; 13 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Jul. 5, 2013; 9 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Jul. 8, 2013; 10 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Dec. 7, 2011; 11pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,578 dated Oct. 7, 2011; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,876 dated Dec. 7, 2011; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/843,216 dated Feb. 22, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,578 dated Jul. 25, 2012; 10 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,876 dated May 17, 2013; 8 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/60699 dated Jun. 18, 2009; 4 pages. |
Yoshikawa et al., “An EPROM Cell Structure for EPLD's Compatible with Single Poly-Si Gate Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 37, No. 3, Mar. 1990, pp. 675-679; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Nov. 25, 2013; 13 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,520 dated Nov. 18, 2013; 7 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,263 dated Oct. 22, 2014; 15 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Nov. 5, 2014; 14 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,263 dated Sep. 25, 2014; 13 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Apr. 17, 2015; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,263dated Mar. 6, 2015; 9 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,263 dated Apr. 14, 2015; 8 pages. |
SIPO Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201210321742.5 dated May 25, 2015; 3 pages. |
SIPO Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201210321742.5 dated Jan. 28, 2016; 3 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Mar. 12, 2015; 16 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,281 dated Mar. 30, 2016; 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130265089 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61566233 | Dec 2011 | US |