Systems and methods for stimulating and/or monitoring loci in the brain to treat inflammation and to enhance vagus nerve stimulation

Abstract
Described herein are methods and systems for using EEG recordings to improve vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy. In particular, described herein are methods and systems for using EEG recordings to detect P300 and/or activation of the nucleus basalis and/or the locus coeruleus to determine the efficacy of VNS. The EEG recordings can be used to provide feedback control to help optimize stimulation parameters and to screen for patients that respond well to VNS therapy.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


For example, the following reference are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties:

  • 1. Cheyuo, C., et al., The parasympathetic nervous system in the quest for stroke therapeutics. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2011. 31(5): p. 1187-95.
  • 2. Engineer, N. D., A. R. Moller, and M. P. Kilgard, Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus. Hear Res, 2013. 295: p. 58-66.
  • 3. Groves, D. A., E. M. Bowman, and V. J. Brown, Recordings from the rat locus coeruleus during acute vagal nerve stimulation in the anaesthetised rat. Neuroscience Letters, 2005. 379(3): p. 174-179.
  • 4. Don, A. E. and G. Debonnel, Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on serotonergic and noradrenergic transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2006. 318(2): p. 890-8.
  • 5. Clark, K. B., et al., Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects. Nat Neurosci, 1999. 2(1): p. 94-8.
  • 6. Engineer, N. D., et al., Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature, 2011. 470(7332): p. 101-4.
  • 7. Diamond, B. and K. J. Tracey, Mapping the immunological homunculus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011. 108(9): p. 3461-2.
  • 8. Swick, D., et al., Locus coeruleus neuronal activity in awake monkeys: relationship to auditory P300-like potentials and spontaneous EEG. Experimental Brain Research, 1994. 101(1): p. 86-92.
  • 9. Neuhaus, A. H., et al., P300 is enhanced in responders to vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord, 2007. 100(1-3): p. 123-8.


FIELD

Embodiments of the invention relate generally to neuromodulation of the vagus nerve for the treatment of inflammation, and more specifically to neuromodulation of the vagus nerve involving feedback and/or stimulation from the central nervous system.


BACKGROUND

Some neuromodulation devices have the ability to modulate their own stimulation settings quickly based on immediate feedback from target tissue (e.g. muscle) that they are stimulating, since the target tissue responds quickly to stimulation. For example, electromyography (EMG) can be used to record and evaluate the electrical activity of muscles, which provides information regarding the activation level and/or recruitment of the muscles. This information can be processed and used to modulate the neurostimulation parameters applied to the muscles, thereby improving the efficacy of the stimulation device.


Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, on the other hand, is not easily programmed for optimal result, as decreases in inflammation take hours to days to manifest. Consequently, it would be desirable to identify alternative markers or surrogates that indicate activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway by VNS. In addition, it would be desirable to use these alternative markers or surrogates to identify patients that may be suitable for receiving VNS therapy. Furthermore, it would be desirable to directly modulate these markers or surrogates as an alternative or supplemental way to treat inflammation.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present invention relates generally to neuromodulation of the vagus nerve for the treatment of inflammation, and more specifically to neuromodulation of the vagus nerve involving feedback and/or stimulation from the central nervous system.


In some embodiments, a method for inducing long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex in a patient is provided. The method can include stimulating the vagus nerve of the patient according to a set of stimulation parameters; recording an EEG after the step of stimulating the vagus nerve; determining from the recorded EEG whether at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated by the vagus nerve stimulation; and adjusting the set of stimulation parameters based on the determination from the recorded EEG whether at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated.


In some embodiments, the step of adjusting the set of stimulation parameters includes increasing a stimulation amplitude.


In some embodiments, the method further includes recording a baseline EEG.


In some embodiments, the step of determining from the recorded EEG whether at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated by the vagus nerve stimulation comprises comparing the recorded EEG with the baseline EEG.


In some embodiments, a method for inducing long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex in a patient is provided. The method can include stimulating the vagus nerve according to a set of stimulation parameters sufficient for activating at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus.


In some embodiments, the set of stimulation parameters includes an amplitude between about 0.1 and 3 mA, a frequency between about 1 Hz and 30 Hz, a pulse width between about 100 uS and 500 uS, and a duration between about 0.5 second to 10 minutes.


In some embodiments, a method for prescreening a patient is provided. The method can include noninvasively stimulating the vagus nerve; recording an EEG; and determining whether the patient will be responsive to an invasive vagus nerve stimulation based on an analysis of the EEG.


In some embodiments, the step of determining whether the patient will be responsive to an invasive vagus nerve stimulation based on an analysis of the EEG includes determining whether P300 is present in the EEG.


In some embodiments, the step of determining whether the patient will be responsive to an invasive vagus nerve stimulation based on an analysis of the EEG includes determining with the EEG whether at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus was activated by the noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation.


In some embodiments, the step of noninvasively stimulating the vagus nerve includes noninvasively stimulating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve.


In some embodiments, the noninvasive stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is electrical.


In some embodiments, the noninvasive stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is mechanical.


In some embodiments, the step of recording the ECG takes place after the step of noninvasively stimulating the vagus nerve.


In some embodiments, the step of recording the ECG takes place during the step of noninvasively stimulating the vagus nerve.


In some embodiments, a method for providing feedback control during vagus nerve stimulation of a patient is provided. The method can include stimulating the vagus nerve with a vagus nerve stimulator; recording an EEG to detect at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basilis, and activation of the locus coeruleus; and adjusting an amplitude of the stimulation to the vagus nerve until at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basilis, and activation of the locus coeruleus is detected in the EEG.


In some embodiments, the method further includes programming the vagus nerve stimulator with a set of stimulation parameters based on the step of adjusting the amplitude of the stimulation to the vagus nerve until at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basilis, and activation of the locus coeruleus is detected in the EEG.


In some embodiments, the step of adjusting the amplitude includes increasing the amplitude when the patient is not responding to the stimulation of the vagus nerve.


In some embodiments, the step of adjusting the amplitude includes decreasing the amplitude when the patient is responding well to the stimulation of the vagus nerve.


In some embodiments, the method further includes increasing a stimulation interval after the step of adjusting the amplitude of the stimulation to the vagus nerve until at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basilis, and activation of the locus coeruleus is detected in the EEG.


In some embodiments, a system for stimulating a nerve of a patient is provided. The system can include an implantable nerve stimulator configured to stimulate the nerve of the patient according to a set of programmed stimulation parameters; an EEG recording device configured to record an EEG of the patient; and a controller in communication with both the EEG recording device and the implantable nerve stimulator, the controller programmed to determine whether at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basalis, and activation of the locus coeruleus is indicated by the EEG, and adjust the set of programmed stimulation parameters based on the determination of whether at least one of P300, activation of the nucleus basalis, and activation of the locus coeruleus is indicated by the EEG.


In some embodiments, the controller is located in a prescription pad.


In some embodiments, the controller is located in an energizer configured to provide power to the implantable nerve stimulator.


In some embodiments, the controller is located in the EEG recording device.


In some embodiments, the set of programmed stimulation parameters includes a pulse amplitude, a pulse width, and a pulse frequency.


In some embodiments, a method for treating a patient suffering from inflammation is provided. The method can include stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus with an electrode implanted within the patient's brain; and reducing a level of inflammation in the patient.


In some embodiments, the step of stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus with an electrode implanted within the patient's brain includes delivering an electrical stimulus having a current between 10 to 100 uA, a frequency of 1 to 500 Hz, and a duration of up to 120 minutes.


In some embodiments, a method for treating a patient suffering from inflammation is provided. The method can include stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus with a focused magnetic field; and reducing a level of inflammation in the patient.


In some embodiments, the step of stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and locus coeruleus with the focused magnetic field includes generating the focused magnetic field with a transcranial magnetic coil.


In some embodiments, the step of stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and locus coeruleus with the focused magnetic field includes generating the magnetic field with a frequency below 3 Hz, a field strength below 3 Tesla, and a duration between 5 to 60 minutes.


In some embodiments, the step of stimulating at least one of the nucleus basalis and locus coeruleus with the focused magnetic field includes generating the magnetic field with a frequency between 3 to 25 Hz, a field strength below 3 Tesla, and a duration between 5 to 60 minutes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1A shows one variation of a system for modulating chronic inflammation including a leadless microstimulator (shown connected to the vagus nerve) and an external charger/controller.



FIG. 1B shows another variation of a system for modulating chronic inflammation, including a microstimulator, charger (“energizer”), and system programmer/controller (“prescription pad”).



FIG. 1C shows another variations of a system for modulating chronic inflammation, including a microstimulator, a securing device (POD) for securing the leadless stimulator to the nerve, an external charger, a system programmer/controller (“prescription pad”) and an optional surgical tester.



FIG. 1D is a block diagram schematically illustrating the microstimulator and the charger.



FIG. 2 illustrates one variation of an external system programmer/controller wirelessly connected to a microstimulator.



FIG. 3A shows one variation of a microstimulator in a POD configured to surround a nerve of the inflammatory reflex. FIG. 3B shows an enlarged view of the microstimulator and POD. FIG. 3C shows another variation of a microstimulator; FIG. 3D shows the microstimulator of FIG. 3C within a POD. FIG. 3E shows another variation of the microstimulator.



FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of a microstimulator and POD around vagus nerve.



FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an EEG recording system for detecting P300 and/or activation of the locus coeruleus and/or nucleus basalis.



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart that describes a method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings.



FIG. 7 illustrates a flow chart that describes another method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings.



FIG. 8 illustrates a flow chart that describes yet another method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a deep brain stimulator with electrodes positioned at the nucleus basalis and locus coeruleus.



FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of a transcranial magnetic stimulator.



FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various regions or neural groups in the brain and central nervous system are linked to the vagus nerve through sympathetic and/or efferent neural pathways. Consequently, activation or stimulation of these regions or neuronal groups may initiate and/or modulate vagus nerve activity. Alternatively, activation or stimulation of the vagus nerve may initiate and/or modulate activity in these various regions or neural groups. Because activation of the vagus nerve may result in activation of the these regions or neural groups, these regions or neural groups can be monitored as surrogates or proxies for determining whether the vagus nerve has been successfully activated by the VNS.


For example, the nucleus basalis (NB) is composed of a neural group in the substantia innominata of the basal forebrain, next to the hypothalamus, and is a source of much of the acetylcholine in the brain. The degradation of the NB has been shown to play a role in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. The NB receives noradrenergic innervation from the locus coeruleus and has neural projections to the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, thalamus, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and the brainstem. NB activity drives efferent vagal output [1] and activation of the NB increases attention and cortical plasticity.


Another region, the locus coeruleus (LC), is composed of a neural group located in the pons within the brainstem and is the principle source of norepinephrine (NE) in the brain. The LC has neural inputs from the nucleus tractus solitaries (NTS), dorsal raphe nucleus and projects to the NTS, dorsal raphe nucleus, thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, cortex, and the nucleus basalis. Activation of LC increases attention and cortical plasticity. LC coordinates VNS input with sympathetic output.


VNS can be used to activate both NB [2] and LC [3]. VNS causes increased firing within LC that can last for days [4]. VNS enhances recognition memory in humans [5]. Paired VNS (30 Hz, 0.8 mA, 100 uS, 0.5 S, 2.5 hr duration) with tonal training results in reduction of rat tinnitus for more than 24 h [6]. These data show an increase in auditory cortical plasticity in topographically mapped brain regions with synchronous activation of NB and LC by VNS with training.


P300 describes an event-related potential (ERP) component that occur at latencies of about 250-700 msec and can be quantified by EEG recording as a positive voltage deflection. LC activity correlates with P300, as P300 is enhanced when LC activity is enhanced, and LC lesion or inhibition decreases P300 in monkeys [8]. There is a correlation between P300 activation and VNS responders in depression[9].


Therefore, during and/or after VNS, electrical activity from the NB and/or LC, including the P300, can be measured with EEG in order to provide immediate feedback or feedback within seconds or minutes after stimulation, rather than obtaining feedback from reduction in inflammation levels, which may take hours or longer to manifest. In some variations simply detecting the P300 during VNS and/or afterwards is sufficient to provide feedback and/or information. Alternatively, in some variations, the P300 may be detected based on a criterion (e.g., at or above a threshold such as a reference amplitude) before indicating a positive reading (e.g., triggering feedback). If electrical activity and/or the P300 is not detected or does not meet threshold values, the stimulation parameters, such as amplitude, can be adjusted until the electrical activity and/or P300 is detected and meets the threshold values that indicate NB and/or LC activation. It may not be necessary to provide a stimulus other than the VNS to elicit NB or LC activity; for example, any of the methods or apparatuses (systems and devices) described herein may examine the EEG during and/or just after the VNS.


Since P300 is an ERP, a predetermined stimulus can be provided to the patient to elicit P300. In some embodiments, the stimulus is the VNS itself. In other embodiments, the patient can be given a specific sensory, cognitive, or motor stimulus, and the EEG recording between about 250 msec and 700 msec after the stimulus can be analyzed for a positive voltage deflection that represents P300. Examples of a stimulus include an auditory stimulus provided using an auditory oddball paradigm and/or a visual stimulus provided using a visual oddball paradigm. The oddball paradigm presents a series of repetitive audio and/or visual stimuli that are interrupted by a deviant target stimulus, which the patient is asked to detect. Any of these stimuli can also be used to elicit electrical activity from the NB and/or LC.


Vagus Nerve Stimulation System


Systems for electrically stimulating one or more nerves to treat chronic inflammation may include an implantable, wireless microstimulator such as those described herein and an external charging device (which may be referred to as a charging wand, charger, or energizer). In some variations the system also includes a controller such as a “prescription pad” that helps control and regulate the dose delivered by the system. The microstimulator may be secured in position using a securing device (which may be referred to as a “POD”) to hold the microstimulator in position around or adjacent to a nerve. These microstimulators are designed and adapted for treatment of chronic inflammation, and may be configured specifically for such use. Thus, an implantable microstimulator may be small, and adapted for the low duty-cycle stimulation to modulate inflammation. For example, the implantable microstimulator may hold a relatively small amount of power over weeks or even months and discharge it at a rate sufficient to modulate the anti-inflammatory pathway without significantly depressing heart rate or triggering any number of unwanted effects from the vagus nerve or other neural connections. Any of the nerves of the inflammatory reflex, including the vagus nerve, may be treated as described herein using the systems described.


For example, FIG. 1A illustrates one variation of a system for treating chronic inflammation that includes a microstimulator contained in POD that is mounted on cervical vagus nerve and charged a programmed by an external charger/programmer unit. This variation of a system includes a microstimulator 103 that has been implanted to contact the vagus nerve as shown. The implant may be programmed, controlled and/or charged by a charger/controller 105 device. In this variation the charger/controller is a loop with a wand region.



FIG. 1B shows another variation of a system for treating chronic inflammation that also includes an implantable microstimulator 103 (shown inserted into a POD to hold it in position relative to a nerve) and a charging device (“energizer” 105) configured as a collar to be worn around the subject's neck and charge the implant. Optionally, the system may include a prescription pad 107 which may be a separate dedicated device or part of a mobile or other handheld device (e.g., an application to run on a handheld device).



FIG. 1C shows another variation of a system for treating chronic inflammation. The systems described herein may also be referred to as systems for the neural stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (NCAP). These systems may be configured as chronic implantable systems. In some variations, the systems are configured to treat acutely (e.g., acute may 8 hours or less), sub-acutely (expected to occur for fewer than 30 days), or chronically (expected to occur for more than 30 days).


In general, the systems described herein may be configured to apply electrical stimulation at a minimum level necessary to modulate the inflammatory reflex (e.g., modulating cytokine release) characterized by the Chronaxie and rheobase. Chronaxie typically refers to the minimum time over which an electric current double the strength of the rheobase needs to be applied in order to stimulate the neuron. Rheobase is the minimal electrical current of infinite duration that results in an action potential. As used herein, cytokines refer to a category of signaling proteins and glycoproteins that, like hormones and neurotransmitters, are used extensively in cellular communication.


The NCAP Systems described herein are typically intended for the treatment of chronic inflammation through the use of implanted neural stimulation devices (microstimulators) to affect the Neural Stimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway (NCAP) as a potential therapeutic intervention for rheumatologic and other inflammation-mediated diseases and disorders. Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway (NCAP) has been shown to modulate inflammation. Thus, the treatment and management of symptoms manifested from the onset of disease (e.g., inflammatory disease) is based upon the concept of modulating the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway. The NCAP pathway normally maintains precise restraint of the circulating immune cells. As used herein, the CAP is a reflex that utilizes cholinergic nerve signals traveling via the Vagus nerve between the brain, chemoreceptors, and the reticuloendothelial system (e.g., spleen, liver). Local release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor or TNF) from resident immune cells is inhibited by the efferent, or indirectly by afferent vagus nerve signals. NCAP causes important changes in the function and microenvironment of the spleen, liver and other reticuloendothelial organs. Leukocytes which circulate systemically become “educated” as they traverse the liver and spleen are thereby functionally down regulated by the affected environment of the reticuloendothelial system. This effect can potentially occur even in the absence of an inflammatory condition.


Under this model, remote inflammation is then dampened by down-regulated cytokine levels. Stimulation of the vagus nerve with a specific regiment of electrical pulses regulates production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In-turn, the down regulation of these cytokines may reduce localized inflammation in joints and other organs of patients with autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.


The NCAP System includes a neurostimulator that may trigger the CAP by stimulating the cervical vagus nerve. The NCAP System issues a timed burst of current controlled pulses with sufficient amplitude to trigger the CAP at a particular interval. These two parameters, Dose Amplitude and Dose Interval, may be used by a clinician to adjust the device. For example, the clinician may set the Dose Amplitude by modifying the current level. The Dose Interval may be set by changing the duration between Doses (e.g. 12, 24, 48 hours).


In some variations, dose amplitude may be set to within the Therapy Window. The Therapy window is defined as the lower limit of current necessary to trigger the CAP, and the upper limit is the level at which the Patient feels uncomfortable. The lower limit is called the Threshold (T), and the uncomfortable level is called Upper Comfort Level (UCL).


Dose Amplitude thresholds are nonlinearly dependent upon Current (I), Pulse width (PW), Pulse Frequency (PF), and Burst Duration (BD). Amplitude is primarily set by charge (Q), that is Current (I)×Pulse width (PW). In neurostimulation applications current has the most linear relationship when determining thresholds and working within the therapy window. Therefore, the clinician may modify Dose Amplitude by modifying current. The other parameters are held to experimentally determined defaults. Pulse width is selected to be narrow enough to minimize muscle recruitment and wide enough to be well above the chronaxie of the targeted neurons. Stimulus duration and pulse frequency was determined experimentally in Preclinical work.


Dose Interval may be specific for particular diseases and the intensity of diseases experienced by a patient. Our initial research has indicated that the cervical portion of the vagus nerve may be an ideal anatomic location for delivery of stimulation. The nerve runs through the carotid sheath parallel to the internal jugular vein and carotid artery. At this location, excitation thresholds for the vagus are low, and the nerve is surgically accessible. We have not found any significant difference in biomarker modulation (e.g., modulation of cytokines) between right and left. Even though the right vagus is thought to have lower thresholds than the left in triggering cardiac dysrythmias, the thresholds necessary for NCAP are much lower than those expected to cause such dysrythmias. Therefore a device delivering NCAP can safely be applied to either the right or left vagus.


We have also found, surprisingly, that the Therapy Window is maximized on the cervical vagus through the use of a bipolar cuff electrode design. Key parameters of the cuff may be: spacing and shielding of the contacts. For example, the contact points or bands may be spaced 1-2 diameters of the vagus nerve apart, and it may be helpful to shield current from these contacts from other nearby structures susceptible to inadvertent triggering. The cuff may be further optimized by using bands which are as long and wide as possible to reduce neurostimulator power requirements.


Thus, any variations of the systems described herein (e.g., the NCAP system) may be implemented with a Cuff, Lead and Implantable Pulse Generation (IPG), or a Leadless Cuff. The preferred implementation is a leadless cuff implemented by a microstimulator with integral electrode contacts in intimate contact with the nerve and contained within a Protection and Orientation Device (POD). This is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B. The POD 301 may form a current shield, hold the microstimulator into place against the vagus nerve, and extend the microstimulator integral contacts with integral contacts in the POD itself. The POD is typically a polymer shell that encapsulates a microstimulator implant and that allows a nerve to run through the interior against the shell wall parallel to the length of the microstimulator implant. Within the shell of the POD, the microstimulator implant remains fixed against the Vagus nerve so the electrodes remain in contact with the nerve. The POD anchors the implant in place and prevents the implant from rotating or separating from the nerve, as well as maintaining contact between the electrodes and the nerve and preserving the orientation as necessary for efficient external charging of the microstimulator battery.


Referring back to FIG. 1C, the system may include an implantable microstimulator contained in a POD, a Patient Charger, and a prescription pad that may be used by the clinician to set dosage parameters for the patient. This system may evaluate the efficacy, safety, and usability of an NCAP technology for chronic treatment of clinical patients. The system can employ a Prescription Pad (external controller) that may include the range of treatment options.


As described in more detail in U.S. Ser. No. 12/874,171 (titled “PRESCRIPTION PAD FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS”), previously incorporated by reference in its entirety, the Prescription Pad may incorporate workflows in a simplified interface and provide data collection facilities that can be transferred to an external database utilizing commercially robust and compliant methods and procedures. In use, the system may be recommended for use by a clinician after assessing a patient; the clinician may determine that treatment of chronic inflammation is warranted. The clinician may then refer the patient to an interventional doctor to implant the microstimulator. Thereafter then clinician (or another clinician) may monitor the patient and adjust the device via a wireless programmer (e.g. prescription pad). The clinician may be trained in the diagnosis and treatment procedures for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders; the interventional placement of the system may be performed by a surgeon trained in the implantation of active neurostimulation devices, with a sufficient depth of knowledge and experience regarding cervical and vagal anatomy, experienced in performing surgical dissections in and around the carotid sheath.


The system may output signals, including diagnostics, historical treatment schedules, or the like. The clinician may adjust the device during flares and/or during routine visits. Examples of implantation of the microstimulator were provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/874,171, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. For example, the implant may be inserted by making an incision in the skin (e.g., ≈3 cm) along Lange's crease between the Facial Vein and the Omohyoid muscle, reflecting the Sternocleidomastoid and gaining access to the carotid sheath. The IJV may be displaced, and the vagus may be dissected from the carotid wall (≤2 cm). A sizing tool may be used to measure the vagus, and an appropriate Microstimulator and POD Kit (small, medium, large) may be selected. The POD may then be inserted under nerve with the POD opening facing the surgeon, so that the microstimulator can be inserted inside POD so that the microstimulator contacts capture the vagus. The POD may then be sutured shut. In some variations a Surgical Tester may be used to activate the microstimulator and perform system integrity and impedance checks, and shut the microstimulator off, during or after the implantation. In other variations the surgical tester may be unnecessary, as described in greater detail below.


A physician may use the Patient Charger to activate the microstimulator, perform integrity checks, and assure sufficient battery reserve exists. Electrodes may be conditioned with sub-threshold current and impedances may be measured. A Physician may charge the microstimulator. In some variations a separate charger (e.g., an “energizer”) may be used by the patient directly, separate from the controller the physician may use. Alternatively, the patient controller may include controls for operation by a physician; the system may lock out non-physicians (e.g., those not having a key, code, or other security pass) from operating or modifying the controls.


In general, a physician may establish safe dosage levels. The physician may slowly increment current level to establish a maximum limit (Upper Comfort Limit). This current level may be used to set the Dosage Level. The exact procedure may be determined during this clinical phase.


The Physician may also specify dosing parameters that specify dosage levels and dosage intervals. The device may contain several concurrent dosing programs which may be used to acclimate the patient to stimulus, gradually increase dosage until efficacy is achieved, reset tachyphylaxis, or deal with unique patient situations.


In some variations, the Prescription Pad may be configured to handle multiple patients and may index their data by the microstimulator Serial Number. For example, a Prescription Pad may handle up to 100,000 patients and 10,000 records per patient, and may store the data in its local memory and may be backed up on an external database. In some variations, during each charging session, accumulated even log contents will be uploaded to the Patient Charger for later transfer to Prescription Pad. The data may or may not be cleared from the microstimulator. For example, FIG. 2 shows the addition of a prescription pad 203 wirelessly connected to the charger/programmer 207.


The microstimulators described herein are configured for implantation and stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, and especially the vagus nerve. In particular the microstimulators described herein are configured for implantation in the cervical region of the vagus nerve to provide extremely low duty-cycle stimulation sufficient to modulate inflammation. These microstimulators may be adapted for this purpose by including one or more of the following characteristics, which are described in greater detail herein: the conductive capsule ends of the microstimulator may be routed to separate electrodes; the conductive capsule ends may be made from resistive titanium alloy to reduce magnetic field absorption; the electrodes may be positioned in a polymer saddle; the device includes a suspension (e.g., components may be suspended by metal clips) to safeguard the electronics from mechanical forces and shock; the device may include an H-bridge current source with capacitor isolation on both leads; the device may include a built in temperature sensor that stops energy absorption from any RF source by detuning the resonator; the device may include a built-in overvoltage sensor to stop energy absorption from any RF source by detuning resonator; the system may include DACs that are used to calibrate silicon for battery charging and protection; the system may include DACs that are used to calibrate silicon for precision timing rather than relying on crystal oscillator; the system may include a load stabilizer that maintains constant load so that inductive system can communicate efficiently; the system may include current limiters to prevent a current rush so that the microstimulator will power up smoothly from resonator power source; the system may extract a clock from carrier OR from internal clock; the device may use an ultra-low power accurate RC oscillator that uses stable temperature in body, DAC calibration, and clock adjustment during charging process; the device may use a solid state UPON battery that allows fast recharge, supports many cycles, cannot explode, and is easy to charge with constant voltage; and the device may include a resonator that uses low frequency material designed not to absorb energy by high frequency sources such as MRI and Diathermy devices.


Many of these improvements permit the device to have an extremely small footprint and power consumption, while still effectively modulating the vagus nerve.



FIG. 3A is a perspective drawing of the Pod containing the microstimulator. Sutures (not shown) are intended to be bridged across one to three sets of holes. Electrodes integrated into the pod are not shown but would extend as bands originating and ending on the two outer pairs of suture holes.


In some variations, including those described above, the microstimulator consists of a ceramic body with hermetically sealed titanium-niobium ends and integral platinum-iridium electrodes attached. The microstimulator may be designed to fit within a POD 309, as shown in FIGS. 3A-3D. As described above, the POD is a biocompatible polymer with integrated electrodes that may help the microstimulator to function as a leadless cuff electrode. In some variations, such as the variation shown in FIG. 3E, contained within the hermetic space of the microstimulator 301 is an electronic assembly that contains a rechargeable battery 321, solenoid antenna 323, hybrid circuit 325 and electrode contacts (Ti Alloy braze ring and end cap) 327 at each end to make contact with the titanium/platinum case ends.


In some embodiments, the microstimulator can be batteryless. The batteryless microstimulator can be powered inductively by an external power source to deliver an electrical stimulus to the nerve. In some embodiments, the batteryless microstimulator can have a capacitor or supercapacitor instead of a battery for storing energy which can be released as an electrical stimulus.


As mentioned above, some of the device variations described herein may be used with a POD to secure the implant (e.g., the leadless/wireless microstimulator implant) in position within the cervical region of the vagus nerve so that the device may be programmed and recharged by the charger/programmer (e.g., “energizer”). For example, FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of a POD containing a microstimulator. The cross section in FIG. 4 shows the ceramic tube containing electronic assembly that includes the hybrid, battery and coil. The rigid or semi-rigid contacts are mounted on the tube and surround the oval vagus nerve. The POD surrounds the entire device and includes a metal conductor that makes electrical contact with the microstimulator contacts and electrically surrounds the nerve.


In some variations, the microstimulator may have a bipolar stimulation current source that produce as stimulation dose with the characteristics shown in table 1, below. In some variation, the system may be configured to allow adjustment of the “Advanced Parameters” listed below; in some variations the parameters may be configured so that they are predetermined or pre-set. In some variations, the Advanced Parameters are not adjustable (or shown) to the clinician. All parameters listed in Table 1 are ±5% unless specified otherwise.









TABLE 1







Microstimulator parameters









Property
Value
Default












Dosage
0-5,000 μA in 25 μA steps
0


Amplitude


(DA)


Intervals
Minute, Hour, Day, Week,
Day



Month


Number of
N = 60 Maximum
1


Doses per


Interval







Advanced Parameters









Pulse width
100-1,000 μS in 50 μS
200


Range (PW)
increments


Stimulus
0.5-1000 seconds per
60


Duration (SD)
dose


Pulse
1-50 Hz
10


Frequency


(PF)


Stimulus
±3.3 or ±5.5 ±1 Volts
Automatically set


Voltage (SV)

by software


Constant
±15% over supported range


Current
of load impedances (200-2000 Ω)


Output


Specific Dose
Set a specific time between
Driven by default


Time
12:00 am-12:00 am in one
table (TBD)



minute increments for each



Dose Issue


Number of
4 maximum
1


Sequential


Dosing


Programs









The Dosage Interval is defined as the time between Stimulation Doses. In some variations, to support more advanced dosing scenarios, up to four ‘programs’ can run sequentially. Each program has a start date and time and will run until the next program starts. Dosing may be suspended while the Prescription Pad is in Programming Mode. Dosing may typically continue as normal while charging. Programs may be loaded into one of four available slots and can be tested before they start running. Low, Typical, and High Dose schedules may be provided. A continuous application schedule may be available by charging every day, or at some other predetermined charging interval. For example, Table 2 illustrates exemplary properties for low, typical and high dose charging intervals:









TABLE 2







low typical and high dose charging intervals








Property
Value





Low Dose Days
30 days max: 250 μA, 200 μS, 60 s, 24 hr,


Charge Interval
10 Hz, ±3.3 V


Typical Dose
30 days max: 1,000 μA, 200 μS, 120 s, 24 hr,


Charge Interval
10 Hz, ±3.3 V


High Dose Charge
3.5 days max: 5,000 μA, 500 μS, 240 s,


Interval
24 hr, 20 Hz, ±5.5 V,









The system may also be configured to limit the leakage and maximum and minimum charge densities, to protect the patient, as shown in Table 3:









TABLE 3







safety parameters










Property
Value















Hardware DC Leakage
<50
nA



Protection



Maximum Charge
30
μC/cm2/phase



Density



Maximum Current
30
mA/cm2



Density










In some variations, the system may also be configured to allow the following functions (listed in Table 4, below):









TABLE 4







Additional functions of the microstimulator and/or controller(s)










Function
Details







Charging
Replenish Battery



Battery Check
Determine charge level



System Check
Self Diagnostics



Relative
Temperature difference from



Temperature
baseline



Program
Read/Write/Modify a dosage



Management
parameter programs



Program
Transfer entire dosage parameter



Up/Download
programs



Electrode
Bipolar Impedance (Complex)



Impedances



Signal Strength
Strength of the charging signal to




assist the patient in aligning the




external Charge to the implanted




Microstimulator.



Patient Parameters
Patient Information



Patient History
Limited programming and




exception data



Implant Time/Zone
GMT + Time zone, 1 minute




resolution, updated by Charger




each charge session



Firmware Reload
Boot loader allows complete




firmware reload



Emergency Stop
Disable dosing programs and




complete power down system until




Prescription Pad connected










In some embodiments as shown in FIG. 11, a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator 50 can be used to stimulate the vagus nerve. An example of a transcutaneous electrocial nerve stimulator is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,843,210 to Simon et al., which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator can be used in place of the implanted microstimulator, or it can be used along with the implanted microstimulator. FIG. 11 illustrates one placement of the stimulator 50 to a target location on the patient's neck. For reference, locations of the following vertebrae are also shown: first cervical vertebra 71, the fifth cervical vertebra 75, the sixth cervical vertebra 76, and the seventh cervical vertebra 77.


EEG Recording System



FIG. 5 illustrates an EEG recording device 500 with electrodes 502 placed proximate the brain regions of interest, such the NB and/or LC, can be used to record the patient's EEGs. For example, one or more electrodes can be placed on the patient's forehead over the basal forebrain to record EEGs from the NB, while one or more electrodes can be placed on the lower back portion of the patient's head over the brainstem to record EEGs from the LC. P300 can be measured from electrodes being used to measure the NB and/or LC, and/or can be measured from electrodes placed over the parietal lobe. A baseline EEG can be recorded before VNS to serve as a comparison for EEGs measured after VNS.


In some embodiments, the EEG recording device may be programmed to detect and analyze P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC. In some embodiments, the analysis of the data from the EEG recording device can be accomplished with a separate computing device programmed to do the task. In some embodiments, the results of this analysis can be communicated to a controller that can adjust one or more stimulation parameters based on the analysis of P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC. The controller can be located on the microstimulator, the prescription pad, the energizer, the EEG recording device, or a separate computing device.


Prescreening Patients Using EEG


Activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus and/or detection of P300, all of which can be detected and/or measured with an EEG, can be used to prescreen subjects likely respond to VNS treatment prior to implantation. EEG recordings can be measured during or following stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, or independent of any additional stimulus. The stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve can be accomplished through electrical stimulation or mechanical stimulation. In some embodiments, the stimulation can be noninvasive. For example, the electrical stimulation or mechanical stimulation can be delivered through the skin by a stimulation device placed on the skin surface of the ear. Alternatively, the stimulation can be invasive using, for example, a needle electrode to deliver electrical stimulation directly to the nerve.


During or after stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, EEG recordings can be taken of the NB and/or LC and the presence of P300 can be detected in the EEG recordings. In some embodiments, at least some of the EEG recordings can be taken after VNS without providing any other additional stimulation to elicit P300 or activity in the NB and/or LC. In some embodiments, at least some of the EEG recordings can be taken while eliciting P300 using a predetermined protocol, such as the auditory and/or visual stimulation oddball protocol. If the EEG recordings show activation of the NB and/or the LC and/or P300 is detected in the EEG recordings, then it is likely that the vagus nerve responded to the stimulation and the patient is a suitable candidate for VNS therapy. In some embodiments, for the analysis, a comparison can be made with reference to EEG recordings taken before VNS therapy.


Use case example: A subject with rheumatoid arthritis is being screened for likelihood of response VNS treatment. The physician will record P300 and EEG measurements of activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus during electrical stimulation of the subject's auricular branch of the vagus nerve at maximum tolerated current intensity. The subject will pass the screen should P300 and/or activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus be detected.


Long Term Potentiation


It has been postulated that analogous to somatotopically organized brain regions that sense pain, there exists an immunological homunculus, whereby the immune system acts as a sensory organ that maps to specific regions within the central nervous system at the terminal of the afferent arm of the inflammatory reflex [7]. As activity within the NB and LC can be induced by VNS, and VNS induces long lasting plasticity within the auditory cortex via activation of the NB and LC, we reasoned that plasticity within the central neural reflexes, in part by this immunological homunculus may be induced by VNS activation of the NB and LC as well.


Therefore, VNS activation of the NB and/or the LC can induce long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex. Typical VNS parameters include an amplitude of 0.1-3 mA, frequency of 1 Hz-30 Hz, pulse width of 100 uS-500 uS, duration of 0.5 second to 10 minutes in duration. The off time between stimulations can be greater than 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours. These parameters are suitable for use in any of the embodiments described herein. For example, a 100 us charge balanced biphasic pulse can be delivered with a current of 0.8 mA as a train of 15 pulses at 30 Hz with a 500 ms train duration. The amplitude and other parameters can be ramped up over time, maintained at a constant level, or be modulated based on feedback, which can be based on NB and/or LC activity and/or detection of P300, for example. NB and/or LC and/or P300 activity can be detected by monitoring, measuring, and/or quantifying electrical activity from those brain regions with EEG recordings.


Feedback Control of VNS


EEG measurements of P300, and/or EEG measurements to detect activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus can be used to provide immediate or rapid feedback on stimulation parameters during programming or reprogramming of an implanted VNS device. Various stimulation parameters may be increased, decreased or otherwise adjusted until activation of NB, LC or P300 is detected. Feedback control can be used in an open loops system or a closed loop system as described below.



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart that describes a method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings. For example, this flow chart can be used to treat a patient that is not responding well to VNS treatment. The vagus nerve can be stimulated in step 600 and then EEG recordings can be taken in step 602. The EEG recordings can be taken during the VNS, and can also be taken after the VNS. Next, in step 604, the EEG is analyzed for P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC. In some embodiments, the analysis can be performed by a physician, while in other embodiments, the analysis can be performed by a computing device with filters and algorithms tailored to detecting those specific EEG features. At step 606, a decision is made based on the analysis in step 604 whether P300 is detected and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC is detected from the EEG recordings. If P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC is not detected, then the VNS parameters are adjusted, by for example increasing the amplitude and/or the duration of the stimulation in step 608. After the VNS parameters are adjusted, the process loops back to step 600. If at step 606 it is determined that P300 is detected and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is detected, then the VNS parameters can be set to the current stimulation parameters. In some embodiments, this can be performed manually by the physician or health care provider, while in other embodiments, the parameters can be set automatically by a computing device performing the analysis of the EEG recordings.



FIG. 7 illustrates a flow chart that describes another method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings. This flow chart is particularly suited for reducing the intensity of the VNS treatment in a patient that is responding well to VNS. By reducing the intensity of the VNS treatment, the patient's pain can be reduced and comfort can be improved. In step 700, the patient's response to VNS treatment is determined. If the patient is not responding well to VNS, then this treatment protocol is not suitable and the process ends in step 702. If the patient is responding well to VNS, then the process proceeds to step 704 where EEG recordings are taken. Next, in step 706, the physician or a computing device analyzes and characterizes the EEG recordings for P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC. Then, in step 708, the VNS parameters can be adjusted, by for example, decreasing the amplitude or the duration of the stimulation. In step 710, the vagus nerve is stimulated using the adjusted parameters. In step 712, another set of EEG recordings are taken. In step 714, the EEG recordings can be analyzed and characterized to determine whether P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC are present and/or are above thresholds. The thresholds can be predetermined or can be based on the initial characterization of the EEG recordings performed in step 706. If P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is still detected and/or are still above the thresholds, then the process loops back to step 708 wherein the stimulation parameters can be further adjusted, for example, by again decreasing amplitude and/or duration. If in step 714, P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is not detected and/or falls below the threshold, then the stimulation parameters can be set to a previous set of stimulation parameters, as shown in step 716, wherein P300 and/or activation of NB and/or LC were detected and/or above the threshold.



FIG. 8 illustrates a flow chart that describes yet another method for modulating vagus nerve stimulation using feedback from EEG recordings. This flow chart is particularly suitable for a patient that is responding well to VNS therapy who wishes to increase the interval between stimulations (the off time). In step 800, the patient is checked to determine whether the patient is responding well to VNS. If not, the process is not suitable and is ended in step 802. If the patient is responding well to VNS, the process proceeds to step 804 where EEG recordings are taken. In step 806, the EEG recordings are analyzed and characterized for P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC. In step 808, the vagus nerve stimulation parameters are adjusted by, for example, increasing the amplitude and/or duration. In step 810, the vagus nerve can be stimulated using the adjusted parameters, and EEG recordings can be taken in step 812. In step 814, the EEG recordings are analyzed and characterized to determine whether P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC is detected and/or above threshold values. The threshold values can be predetermined or can be determined based on a comparison with a baseline EEG, such as the EEG recordings taken in step 804 and analyzed and characterized in step 806. If the determination in step 812 is that P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC is not detected and/or falls below the threshold values, then the process loops back to step 808 where the VNS parameters are adjusted by, for example, further increasing the amplitude and/or duration. If the determination in step 812 is that P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or the LC is detected and/or falls above the threshold values, then the VNS parameters can be set to the current stimulation parameters and the off time between stimulations can be increased, as shown in step 816. In some embodiments, the off time can be increased by at least 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, or 48 hours.


Use case example A: A subject with rheumatoid arthritis is not responding to VNS treatment. The physician will record P300 and EEG measurements of activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus during delivery of test doses. Stimulation dose will increase in intensity, such as amplitude, until change in P300 and activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus is detected. The physician will then program the applicable stimulation parameters for scheduled dosing.


Use case example B: A subject with rheumatoid arthritis is responding well to once daily VNS treatment. The physician will record P300 and EEG measurements of activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus during delivery of test doses. Stimulation dose will decrease in intensity, such as amplitude, until change in P300 and activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus is detected. The physician will then program the applicable stimulation parameters for scheduled dosing.


Use case example C: A subject with rheumatoid arthritis is responding well to once daily VNS treatment. The physician intends to decrease the weekly frequency of stimulation. The physician will record P300 and EEG measurements of activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus during delivery of test doses. Stimulation dose will increase in intensity, such as amplitude, until change in P300 and activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus is detected. The physician will then program a greater interval between doses of stimulation.


A closed loop system can include an EEG device, an implantable nerve stimulator (e.g. vagus nerve), a prescription pad and an energizer. The EEG device can measure intracranial potentials and interpret P300, and/or activation of the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus. The EEG device can communicate through wire or wirelessly, e.g. by Bluetooth protocol, to the prescription pad or energizer which programs stimulation parameters into the implantable nerve stimulator. A controller within the prescription pad, energizer, or EEG device can adjust one or more stimulation parameters, e.g. pulse width, pulse amplitude, pulse frequency, which can be programmed and carried out by the nerve stimulator. For example, the controller can be programmed to increase various stimulation parameters, such as amplitude, until P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is detected by the EEG device. In some embodiments, the controller can be programmed to increase the interval, e.g. the off time, between doses of VNS when P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is detected. In some embodiments, the controller can be programmed to decrease various stimulation parameters, such as amplitude, when P300 and/or activation of the NB and/or LC is detected.


Deep Brain Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation


In some embodiments, deep brain stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation of Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus can be used to treat chronic inflammatory disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. As described above, stimulation of the NB and LC can be used to induce long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex. In some variations, the deep brain stimulation and trans-cranial magnetic stimulation directly activates the anti-inflammatory reflex. In some embodiments, the deep brain stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used in conjunction of VNS, while in other embodiments, it can be used without VNS to directly activate the inflammatory reflex through stimulation of the NB and LC. In some embodiments, if used with VNS, the deep brain stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation can be delivered prior to the VNS to first potentiate the inflammatory reflex before delivering the VNS. In other embodiments, if used with VNS, the deep brain stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation can be delivered concurrently with the VNS to potentiate the inflammatory reflex while delivering the VNS.



FIG. 9 illustrates a deep brain stimulator 900 that can be implanted with electrodes 902, 904 positioned at the NB and/or LC, thereby allowing the stimulator 900 to deliver electrical stimulation to the NB and/or LC. The stimulation can be delivered using stimulation parameters of about 10-10,000 uA, 50-500 Hz for 5-120 minutes per session. Sessions can be given at a frequency of twice/day, once/day, once/two days, once/three days, once/four days, once/five days, once/six days, and once/seven days, once/14 days, and once/month.


In some embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 10, a transcranial magnetic stimulator 1000 can be used to stimulate the NB and/or LC. The transcranial magnetic stimulator can have one or more coils 1002, 1004 that generate a magnetic field for stimulating the NB and/or LC. The depth of penetration of the magnetic field can be tailored to focus the magnetic field on the NB and/or LC. The stimulation can be provided at either low frequency (<3 Hz) or high frequency (3-25 Hz) for 5 minutes to 120 minutes per session with a magnetic field of up to about 3 Tesla. Sessions can be given at a frequency of twice/day, once/day, once/two days, once/three days, once/four days, once/five days, once/six days, and once/seven days, once/14 days, and once/month.


Use case example A: At least one electrode is implanted into the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus of a subject with a chronic inflammatory disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. The brain, specifically the NB and/or LC, is stimulated with electrical current, eg. 10-100 uA, 50-500 Hz for 5 minutes to 1 hr per session.


Use case example B: A trans-cranial magnetic coil is oriented for stimulation into the Nucleus Basalis and/or the Locus coeruleus of a subject with a chronic inflammatory disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. The brain, specifically the NB and/or the LC, is stimulated with at either low frequency (<3 Hz) or high frequency (3-25 Hz) for 5 minutes to 1 hr per session with a magnetic field of up to about 3 Tesla.


It is understood that this disclosure, in many respects, is only illustrative of the numerous alternative device embodiments of the present invention. Changes may be made in the details, particularly in matters of shape, size, material and arrangement of various device components without exceeding the scope of the various embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the exemplary embodiments and descriptions thereof are merely illustrative of the invention as a whole. While several principles of the invention are made clear in the exemplary embodiments described above, those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications of the structure, arrangement, proportions, elements, materials and methods of use, may be utilized in the practice of the invention, and otherwise, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, while certain features and elements have been described in connection with particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that those features and elements can be combined with the other embodiments disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method of titrating a vagus nerve stimulation dosage of an implanted vagus nerve stimulator for inducing long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex in a patient, the method comprising: stimulating the vagus nerve of the patient according to a dosage of stimulation parameters to stimulate an anti-inflammatory pathway;recording an electroencephalogram (EEG) while stimulating the vagus nerve;analyzing the recorded EEG to detect activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus indicating stimulation of the anti-inflammatory pathway;adjusting the dose of the implanted vagus nerve stimulator, wherein adjusting comprises decreasing one or more of an amplitude, a pulse width, a pulse frequency and a duration of the stimulation parameters if the recorded EEG indicates activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus, further wherein adjusting comprises increasing one or more of the amplitude, the pulse width, the pulse frequency and the duration of the stimulation parameters if the recorded EEG does not indicate activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus; andrepeating the steps of stimulating, recording, analyzing and adjusting until the dose of the implanted vagus nerve stimulator is at a minimum level necessary to modulate the inflammatory reflex.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the dose comprises increasing a current amplitude if the recorded EEG indicates activation.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising recording a baseline EEG.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein analyzing the recorded EEG to detect activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus by the vagus nerve stimulation comprises comparing the recorded EEG with the baseline EEG.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the dose comprises decreasing a time between stimulations if the recorded EEG indicates activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the dose comprises increasing a time between stimulations and decreasing a current intensity if the recorded EEG does not indicate activation of at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the recorded EEG to detect activation of one or more of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus comprises detecting a P300 signal.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the recorded EEG to detect activation of one or more of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus comprises detecting activation of both of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus.
  • 9. A method of titrating a vagus nerve stimulation dosage of an implanted vagus nerve stimulator for inducing long term potentiation of the inflammatory reflex in a patient, the method comprising: recording a baseline electroencephalogram (EEG) before stimulating the vagus nerve to stimulate an anti-inflammatory pathway;recording a second EEG while stimulating the vagus nerve with a dose of vagus nerve stimulation;determining from the baseline EEG and the second EEG if at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated indicating that the anti-inflammatory pathway has been stimulated by the vagus nerve stimulation; andadjusting the dose of the implanted vagus nerve stimulator, wherein adjusting comprises decreasing one or more of an amplitude, pulse width, pulse frequency and duration of stimulation parameters if at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated, wherein adjusting comprises increasing one or more of the amplitude, pulse width, pulse frequency and duration of the stimulation parameters if at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has not been activated; andrepeating the steps of recording the second EEG, determining and adjusting until the dosage of the implanted vagus nerve stimulator is at a minimum level necessary to modulate the inflammatory reflex.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the stimulation parameters are adjusted between an amplitude of between 0.1 and 3 mA, a frequency of between 1 Hz and 30 Hz, a pulse width of between 100 microseconds and 500 microseconds, and a duration of between about 0.5 second to 10 minutes.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising waiting an off time between the stimulation and re-stimulation of greater than two hours when repeating the steps of recording the second EEG, determining and adjusting.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the stimulation is sufficient to modulate cytokine release when at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus have been activated.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, wherein determining from the baseline EEG and the second EEG if at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated comprises detecting a P300 signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein determining from the baseline EEG and the second EEG if at least one of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus has been activated comprises determining from the baseline EEG and the second EEG that both of the nucleus basalis and the locus coeruleus have been activated.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/068,473, titled “EXTREMELY LOW DUTY-CYCLE ACTIVATION OF THE CHOLINERGIC ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PATHWAY, AND TRAINING THEREOF, TO TREAT CHRONIC INFLAMMATION,” filed Oct. 24, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Some variations of the methods and apparatuses described in this patent application may be related to the following U.S. patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/620,413, filed on Nov. 17, 2009 and titled, “DEVICES AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR ANTI-INFLAMATORY STIMULATION” (US-2010-0125304); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/874,171, filed on Sep. 1, 2010 and titled, “PRESCRIPTION PAD FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS” (US-2011-0054569); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/917,197, filed on Nov. 1, 2010 and titled, “MODULATION OF THE CHOLINERGIC ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PATHWAY TO TREAT PAIN OR ADDICTION” (US-2011-0106208); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/978,250, filed on Dec. 23, 2010 and titled, “NEURAL STIMULATION DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC INFLAMMATION” (US-2011-0190849); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/797,452, filed on Jun. 9, 2010 and titled, “NERVE CUFF WITH POCKET FOR LEADLESS STIMULATOR” (US-2010-0312320); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/467,928, filed on May 9, 2012 and titled, “SINGLE-PULSE ACTIVATION OF THE CHOLINERGIC ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PATHWAY TO TREAT CHRONIC INFLAMMATION” (US-2012-0290035); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/338,185, filed on Dec. 27, 2011 and titled, “MODULATION OF SIRTUINS BY VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION.” Each of these patent applications is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Some variations of the methods and apparatuses described in this patent application may be related to the following PCT application: International Application No. PCT/US2014/033690, filed Apr. 10, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (624)
Number Name Date Kind
2164121 Pescador Jun 1939 A
3363623 Atwell Jan 1968 A
3631534 Hirota et al. Dec 1971 A
4073296 McCall Feb 1978 A
4098277 Mendell Jul 1978 A
4305402 Katims Dec 1981 A
4503863 Katims Mar 1985 A
4573481 Bullara Mar 1986 A
4590946 Loeb May 1986 A
4632095 Libin Dec 1986 A
4649936 Ungar et al. Mar 1987 A
4702254 Zabara Oct 1987 A
4840793 Todd, III et al. Jun 1989 A
4867164 Zabara Sep 1989 A
4929734 Coughenour et al. May 1990 A
4930516 Alfano et al. Jun 1990 A
4935234 Todd, III et al. Jun 1990 A
4979511 Terry, Jr. Dec 1990 A
4991578 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5019648 Schlossman et al. May 1991 A
5025807 Zabara Jun 1991 A
5038781 Lynch Aug 1991 A
5049659 Cantor et al. Sep 1991 A
5073560 Wu et al. Dec 1991 A
5106853 Showell et al. Apr 1992 A
5111815 Mower May 1992 A
5154172 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 1992 A
5175166 Dunbar et al. Dec 1992 A
5179950 Stanislaw Jan 1993 A
5186170 Varrichio et al. Feb 1993 A
5188104 Wernicke et al. Feb 1993 A
5203326 Collins Apr 1993 A
5205285 Baker, Jr. Apr 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5215089 Baker, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5222494 Baker, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5231988 Wernicke et al. Aug 1993 A
5235980 Varrichio et al. Aug 1993 A
5237991 Baker et al. Aug 1993 A
5251634 Weinberg Oct 1993 A
5263480 Wernicke et al. Nov 1993 A
5269303 Wernicke et al. Dec 1993 A
5299569 Wernicke et al. Apr 1994 A
5304206 Baker, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5330507 Schwartz Jul 1994 A
5330515 Rutecki et al. Jul 1994 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5344438 Testerman et al. Sep 1994 A
5351394 Weinberg Oct 1994 A
5403845 Dunbar et al. Apr 1995 A
5458625 Kendall Oct 1995 A
5472841 Jayasena et al. Dec 1995 A
5487756 Kallesoe et al. Jan 1996 A
5496938 Gold et al. Mar 1996 A
5503978 Schneider et al. Apr 1996 A
5531778 Maschino et al. Jul 1996 A
5540730 Terry, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5567588 Gold et al. Oct 1996 A
5567724 Kelleher et al. Oct 1996 A
5571150 Wernicke et al. Nov 1996 A
5580737 Polisky et al. Dec 1996 A
5582981 Toole et al. Dec 1996 A
5604231 Smith et al. Feb 1997 A
5607459 Paul et al. Mar 1997 A
5611350 John Mar 1997 A
5618818 Ojo et al. Apr 1997 A
5629285 Black et al. May 1997 A
5637459 Burke et al. Jun 1997 A
5651378 Matheny et al. Jul 1997 A
5654151 Allen et al. Aug 1997 A
5683867 Biesecker et al. Nov 1997 A
5690681 Geddes et al. Nov 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5705337 Gold et al. Jan 1998 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. et al. Jan 1998 A
5709853 Lino et al. Jan 1998 A
5712375 Jensen et al. Jan 1998 A
5718912 Thompson et al. Feb 1998 A
5726017 Lochrie et al. Mar 1998 A
5726179 Messer, Jr. et al. Mar 1998 A
5727556 Weth et al. Mar 1998 A
5733255 Dinh et al. Mar 1998 A
5741802 Kern et al. Apr 1998 A
5773598 Burke et al. Jun 1998 A
5786462 Schneider et al. Jul 1998 A
5788656 Mino Aug 1998 A
5792210 Wamubu et al. Aug 1998 A
5824027 Hoffer et al. Oct 1998 A
5853005 Scanlon Dec 1998 A
5854289 Bianchi et al. Dec 1998 A
5902814 Gordon et al. May 1999 A
5913876 Taylor et al. Jun 1999 A
5916239 Geddes et al. Jun 1999 A
5919216 Houben et al. Jul 1999 A
5928272 Adkins et al. Jul 1999 A
5964794 Bolz et al. Oct 1999 A
5977144 Meyer et al. Nov 1999 A
5994330 El Khoury Nov 1999 A
6002964 Feler et al. Dec 1999 A
6006134 Hill et al. Dec 1999 A
6017891 Eibl et al. Jan 2000 A
6028186 Tasset et al. Feb 2000 A
6051017 Loeb et al. Apr 2000 A
6083696 Biesecker et al. Jul 2000 A
6083905 Voorberg et al. Jul 2000 A
6096728 Collins et al. Aug 2000 A
6104956 Naritoku et al. Aug 2000 A
6110900 Gold et al. Aug 2000 A
6110914 Phillips et al. Aug 2000 A
6117837 Tracey et al. Sep 2000 A
6124449 Gold et al. Sep 2000 A
6127119 Stephens et al. Oct 2000 A
6140490 Biesecker et al. Oct 2000 A
6141590 Renirie et al. Oct 2000 A
6147204 Gold et al. Nov 2000 A
6159145 Satoh Dec 2000 A
6164284 Schulman et al. Dec 2000 A
6166048 Bencherif Dec 2000 A
6168778 Janjic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171795 Korman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6205359 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6208894 Schulman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208902 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6210321 Di Mino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224862 Turecek et al. May 2001 B1
6233488 Hess May 2001 B1
6266564 Hill et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269270 Boveja Jul 2001 B1
6304775 Iasemidis et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308104 Taylor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6337997 Rise Jan 2002 B1
6339725 Naritoku et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341236 Osorio et al. Jan 2002 B1
6356787 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356788 Boveja Mar 2002 B2
6381499 Taylor et al. Apr 2002 B1
6405732 Edwards et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407095 Lochead et al. Jun 2002 B1
6428484 Battmer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429217 Puskas Aug 2002 B1
6447443 Keogh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449507 Hill et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473644 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479523 Puskas Nov 2002 B1
6487446 Hill et al. Nov 2002 B1
6511500 Rahme Jan 2003 B1
6528529 Brann et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532388 Hill et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542774 Hili et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556868 Naritoku et al. Apr 2003 B2
6564102 Boveja May 2003 B1
6587719 Barrett et al. Jul 2003 B1
6587727 Osorio et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602891 Messer et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609025 Barrett et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610713 Tracey Aug 2003 B2
6611715 Boveja Aug 2003 B1
6615081 Boveja Sep 2003 B1
6615085 Boveja Sep 2003 B1
6622038 Barrett et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622041 Terry, Jr. et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622047 Barrett et al. Sep 2003 B2
6628987 Hill et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633779 Schuler et al. Oct 2003 B1
6656960 Puskas Dec 2003 B2
6668191 Boveja Dec 2003 B1
6671556 Osorio et al. Dec 2003 B2
6684105 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690973 Hill et al. Feb 2004 B2
6718208 Hill et al. Apr 2004 B2
6721603 Zabara et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735471 Hill et al. May 2004 B2
6735475 Whitehurst et al. May 2004 B1
6760626 Boveja Jul 2004 B1
6778854 Puskas Aug 2004 B2
6804558 Haller et al. Oct 2004 B2
RE38654 Hill et al. Nov 2004 E
6826428 Chen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6832114 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2004 B1
6838471 Tracey Jan 2005 B2
RE38705 Hill et al. Feb 2005 E
6879859 Boveja Apr 2005 B1
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6901294 Whitehurst et al. May 2005 B1
6904318 Hill et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920357 Osorio et al. Jul 2005 B2
6928320 King Aug 2005 B2
6934583 Weinberg et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937903 Schuler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6961618 Osorio et al. Nov 2005 B2
6978787 Broniatowski Dec 2005 B1
7011638 Schuler et al. Mar 2006 B2
7054686 MacDonald May 2006 B2
7054692 Whitehurst et al. May 2006 B1
7058447 Hill et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062320 Ehlinger, Jr. Jun 2006 B2
7069082 Lindenthaler Jun 2006 B2
7072720 Puskas Jul 2006 B2
7076307 Boveja et al. Jul 2006 B2
7142910 Puskas Nov 2006 B2
7142917 Fukui Nov 2006 B2
7149574 Yun et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155279 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155284 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 B1
7167750 Knudson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167751 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2007 B1
7174218 Kuzma Feb 2007 B1
7184828 Hill et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184829 Hill et al. Feb 2007 B2
7191012 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 B2
7204815 Connor Apr 2007 B2
7209787 DiLorenzo Apr 2007 B2
7225019 Jahns et al. May 2007 B2
7228167 Kara et al. Jun 2007 B2
7238715 Tracey et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242984 DiLorenzo Jul 2007 B2
7269457 Shafer et al. Sep 2007 B2
7345178 Nunes et al. Mar 2008 B2
7373204 Gelfand et al. May 2008 B2
7389145 Kilgore et al. Jun 2008 B2
7454245 Armstrong Nov 2008 B2
7467016 Colborn Dec 2008 B2
7544497 Sinclair et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561918 Armstrong et al. Jul 2009 B2
7711432 Thimineur et al. May 2010 B2
7729760 Patel et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751891 Armstrong et al. Jul 2010 B2
7776326 Milbrandt et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797058 Mrva et al. Sep 2010 B2
7819883 Westlund et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822486 Foster et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829556 Bemis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7869885 Begnaud et al. Jan 2011 B2
7937145 Dobak May 2011 B2
7962220 Kolafa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7974701 Armstrong Jul 2011 B2
7974707 Inman Jul 2011 B2
7996088 Marrosu et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996092 Mrva et al. Aug 2011 B2
8019419 Panescu et al. Sep 2011 B1
8060208 Kilgore et al. Nov 2011 B2
8103349 Donders et al. Jan 2012 B2
8165668 Dacey, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8180446 Dacey, Jr. et al. May 2012 B2
8180447 Dacey et al. May 2012 B2
8195287 Dacey, Jr. et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214056 Hoffer et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233982 Libbus Jul 2012 B2
8391970 Tracey et al. Mar 2013 B2
8412338 Faltys Apr 2013 B2
8571654 Libbus et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577458 Libbus et al. Nov 2013 B1
8600505 Libbus et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612002 Faltys et al. Dec 2013 B2
8630709 Libbus et al. Jan 2014 B2
8688212 Libbus et al. Apr 2014 B2
8700150 Libbus et al. Apr 2014 B2
8729129 Tracey et al. May 2014 B2
8788034 Levine et al. Jul 2014 B2
8843210 Simon et al. Sep 2014 B2
8855767 Faltys et al. Oct 2014 B2
8886339 Faltys et al. Nov 2014 B2
8914114 Tracey et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918178 Simon et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918191 Libbus et al. Dec 2014 B2
8923964 Libbus et al. Dec 2014 B2
8983628 Simon et al. Mar 2015 B2
8983629 Simon et al. Mar 2015 B2
8996116 Faltys et al. Mar 2015 B2
9114262 Libbus et al. Aug 2015 B2
9162064 Faltys et al. Oct 2015 B2
9174041 Faltys et al. Nov 2015 B2
9211409 Tracey et al. Dec 2015 B2
9211410 Levine et al. Dec 2015 B2
9254383 Simon et al. Feb 2016 B2
9272143 Libbus et al. Mar 2016 B2
9358381 Simon et al. Jun 2016 B2
9399134 Simon et al. Jul 2016 B2
9403001 Simon et al. Aug 2016 B2
9409024 KenKnight et al. Aug 2016 B2
9415224 Libbus et al. Aug 2016 B2
9452290 Libbus et al. Sep 2016 B2
9504832 Libbus et al. Nov 2016 B2
9511228 Amurthur et al. Dec 2016 B2
9533153 Libbus et al. Jan 2017 B2
20010002441 Boveja May 2001 A1
20010034542 Mann Oct 2001 A1
20020026141 Houben et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020040035 Myers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020077675 Greenstein Jun 2002 A1
20020086871 O'Neill et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095139 Keogh et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099417 Naritoku et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020138075 Edwards et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138109 Keogh et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020193859 Schulman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198570 Puskas Dec 2002 A1
20030018367 DiLorenzo Jan 2003 A1
20030045909 Gross et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088301 King May 2003 A1
20030191404 Klein Oct 2003 A1
20030194752 Anderson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195578 Perron et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212440 Boveja Nov 2003 A1
20030229380 Adams et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236557 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236558 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002546 Altschuler Jan 2004 A1
20040015202 Chandler et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015205 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024422 Hill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024428 Barrett et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024439 Riso Feb 2004 A1
20040030362 Hill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039427 Barrett et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040048795 Ivanova et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049121 Yaron Mar 2004 A1
20040049240 Gerber et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059383 Puskas Mar 2004 A1
20040111139 McCreery et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138517 Osorio et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138518 Rise et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138536 Frei et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146949 Tan et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153127 Gordon et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158119 Osorio et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162584 Hill et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172074 Yoshihito Sep 2004 A1
20040172085 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172086 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172088 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040172094 Cohen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176812 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178706 D'Orso Sep 2004 A1
20040193231 David et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199209 Hill et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199210 Shelchuk Oct 2004 A1
20040204355 Tracey et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215272 Haubrich et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215287 Swoyer et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236381 Dinsmoor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236382 Dinsmoor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240691 Grafenberg Dec 2004 A1
20040243182 Cohen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254612 Ezra et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267152 Pineda Dec 2004 A1
20050021092 Yun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021101 Chen et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027328 Greenstein Feb 2005 A1
20050043774 Devlin Feb 2005 A1
20050049655 Boveja et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065553 Ben Ezra et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065573 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050065575 Dobak Mar 2005 A1
20050070970 Knudson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070974 Knudson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075701 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050075702 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050095246 Shafer May 2005 A1
20050096707 Hill et al. May 2005 A1
20050103351 Stomberg et al. May 2005 A1
20050113894 Zilberman et al. May 2005 A1
20050131467 Boveja Jun 2005 A1
20050131486 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131487 Boveja Jun 2005 A1
20050131493 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137644 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137645 Voipio et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143781 Carbunaru et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143787 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149126 Libbus Jul 2005 A1
20050149129 Libbus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050149131 Libbus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050153885 Yun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154425 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154426 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165458 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177200 George et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182288 Zabara Aug 2005 A1
20050182467 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187584 Denker et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187586 David et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187590 Boveja et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050191661 Gatanaga et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192644 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197600 Schuler et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197675 David et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197678 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203501 Aldrich et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209654 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216064 Heruth et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216070 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216071 Devlin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240229 Whitehurst et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240231 Aldrich et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240241 Yun et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240242 DiLorenzo Oct 2005 A1
20050251220 Barrett et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251222 Barrett et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267542 David et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267547 Knudson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277912 John Dec 2005 A1
20050283198 Haubrich et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009815 Boveja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015151 Aldrich Jan 2006 A1
20060025828 Armstrong et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036293 Whitehurst et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052657 Zabara Mar 2006 A9
20060052831 Fukui Mar 2006 A1
20060052836 Kim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058851 Cigaina Mar 2006 A1
20060064137 Stone Mar 2006 A1
20060064139 Chung et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074450 Boveja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074473 Gertner Apr 2006 A1
20060079936 Boveja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085046 Rezai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095081 Zhou et al. May 2006 A1
20060095090 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060100668 Ben-David et al. May 2006 A1
20060106755 Stuhec May 2006 A1
20060111644 Guttag et al. May 2006 A1
20060111754 Rezai et al. May 2006 A1
20060111755 Stone et al. May 2006 A1
20060116739 Betser et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060122675 Libbus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129200 Kurokawa Jun 2006 A1
20060129202 Armstrong Jun 2006 A1
20060135998 Libbus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136024 Cohen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142802 Armstrong Jun 2006 A1
20060142822 Tulgar Jun 2006 A1
20060149337 John Jul 2006 A1
20060155495 Osorio et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161216 John et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161217 Jaax et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167497 Armstrong et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167498 DiLorenzo Jul 2006 A1
20060167501 Ben-David et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173493 Armstrong et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173508 Stone et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178691 Binmoeller Aug 2006 A1
20060178703 Huston et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178706 Lisogurski et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190044 Libbus et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200208 Terry, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200219 Thrope et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206155 Ben-David et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206158 Wu et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229677 Moffitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229681 Fischell Oct 2006 A1
20060241699 Libbus et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247719 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247721 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247722 Maschino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259077 Pardo et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259084 Zhang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259085 Zhang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259107 Caparso et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271115 Ben-Ezra et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282121 Payne et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282131 Caparso et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282145 Caparso et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287678 Shafer Dec 2006 A1
20060287679 Stone Dec 2006 A1
20060292099 Milburn et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293720 DiLorenzo Dec 2006 A1
20060293721 Tarver et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293723 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016262 Gross et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016263 Armstrong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021785 Inman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021786 Parnis et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021814 Inman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025608 Armstrong Feb 2007 A1
20070027482 Parnis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027483 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027484 Guzman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027486 Armstrong Feb 2007 A1
20070027492 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027496 Parnis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027497 Parnis Feb 2007 A1
20070027498 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027499 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027500 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027504 Barrett et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055324 Thompson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067004 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083242 Mazgalev et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093434 Rossetti et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093870 Maschino Apr 2007 A1
20070093875 Chavan et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100263 Merfeld May 2007 A1
20070100377 Armstrong et al. May 2007 A1
20070100378 Maschino May 2007 A1
20070100380 Fukui May 2007 A1
20070100392 Maschino et al. May 2007 A1
20070106339 Errico et al. May 2007 A1
20070112404 Mann et al. May 2007 A1
20070118177 Libbus et al. May 2007 A1
20070118178 Fukui May 2007 A1
20070129767 Wahlstrand Jun 2007 A1
20070129780 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135846 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135856 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135857 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135858 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142870 Knudson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142871 Libbus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142874 John Jun 2007 A1
20070150006 Libbus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150011 Meyer et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150021 Chen et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150027 Rogers Jun 2007 A1
20070156180 Jaax et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198063 Hunter et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070239243 Moffitt et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244522 Overstreet Oct 2007 A1
20070250145 Kraus et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255320 Inman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255333 Giftakis Nov 2007 A1
20070255339 Torgerson Nov 2007 A1
20080021517 Dietrich Jan 2008 A1
20080021520 Dietrich Jan 2008 A1
20080046055 Durand et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051852 Dietrich Feb 2008 A1
20080058871 Libbus et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080103407 Bolea et al. May 2008 A1
20080140138 Ivanova et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080183226 Buras et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183246 Patel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195171 Sharma Aug 2008 A1
20080208266 Lesser et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080213331 Gelfand et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234790 Bayer et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249439 Tracey et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281365 Tweden et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281372 Libbus et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090012590 Inman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090048194 Aerssens et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090082832 Carbunaru et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088821 Abrahamson Apr 2009 A1
20090105782 Mickle et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112291 Wahlstrand et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090123521 Weber et al. May 2009 A1
20090125079 Armstrong et al. May 2009 A1
20090143831 Huston et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171405 Craig Jul 2009 A1
20090177112 Gharib et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187231 Errico et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090210942 Kowalczewski Aug 2009 A1
20090248097 Tracey et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254143 Tweden et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090275997 Faltys et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090276019 Perez et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281593 Errico et al. Nov 2009 A9
20090312817 Hogle et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003656 Kilgard et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010556 Zhao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010571 Skelton et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010581 Goetz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010603 Ben-David et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016746 Hampton et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100042186 Ben-David et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100063563 Craig Mar 2010 A1
20100074934 Hunter Mar 2010 A1
20100191304 Scott Jul 2010 A1
20100215632 Boss et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100241183 DiLorenzo Sep 2010 A1
20100241207 Bluger Sep 2010 A1
20100249859 DiLorenzo Sep 2010 A1
20100280562 Pi et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100280569 Bobillier et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110004266 Sharma Jan 2011 A1
20110054569 Zitnik et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066208 Pasricha et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082515 Libbus et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092882 Firlik et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110144717 Burton et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110190849 Faltys Aug 2011 A1
20110224749 Ben-David et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110247620 Armstrong et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110275927 Wagner et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110307027 Sharma et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120053657 Parker et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065706 Vallapureddy et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120179219 Kisker et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185009 Kornet et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185020 Simon et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130013016 Diebold Jan 2013 A1
20130066392 Simon Mar 2013 A1
20130066395 Simon et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079834 Levine Mar 2013 A1
20130245718 Birkholz et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253413 Levine et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130317580 Simon et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140046407 Ben-Ezra et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140206945 Liao Jul 2014 A1
20140257425 Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288551 Bharmi et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140330335 Errico et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150018728 Gross et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150100100 Tracey et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119956 Libbus et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150233904 Nayak Aug 2015 A1
20150241447 Zitnik et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160051813 Faltys et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160096016 Tracey et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160096017 Levine et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160367808 Simon et al. Dec 2016 A9
20170304613 Faltys et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180001096 Faltys et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180021217 Tracey et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180021580 Tracey et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180117320 Levine et al. May 2018 A1
20180289970 Faltys et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190046799 Levine et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190111263 Levine et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190117979 Tracey et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190192847 Faltys et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190275328 Zitnik et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200330760 Levine et al. Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
201230913 May 2009 CN
101528303 Sep 2009 CN
101578067 Nov 2009 CN
101868280 Oct 2010 CN
104220129 Dec 2014 CN
2628045 Jan 1977 DE
3736664 May 1989 DE
20316509 Apr 2004 DE
0438510 Aug 1996 EP
0726791 Jun 2000 EP
1001827 Jan 2004 EP
2213330 Aug 2010 EP
2073896 Oct 2011 EP
04133 Feb 1910 GB
20050039445 Apr 2005 KR
WO9301862 Feb 1993 WO
WO9730998 Aug 1997 WO
WO9820868 May 1998 WO
WO0027381 May 2000 WO
WO0047104 Aug 2000 WO
WO0100273 Jan 2001 WO
WO0108617 Feb 2001 WO
WO0189526 Nov 2001 WO
WO0244176 Jun 2002 WO
WO02057275 Jul 2002 WO
WO2003072135 Sep 2003 WO
WO2004000413 Dec 2003 WO
WO2004064918 Aug 2004 WO
WO2006073484 Jul 2006 WO
WO2006076681 Jul 2006 WO
WO2007133718 Nov 2007 WO
WO2010005482 Jan 2010 WO
WO2010067360 Jun 2010 WO
WO2010118035 Oct 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (251)
Entry
US 6,184,239 B1, 02/2001, Puskas (withdrawn)
Pongratz et al. (The sympathetic nervous response in inflammation; Arthritis Research & Therapy 2014, 16:504).
Manta et al. (Optimization of vagus nerve stimulation parameters using the firing activity of serotonin neurons in the rat dorsal raphe; European Neuropsychopharmacology (2009) 19, 250-255 ).
Cavaillon et al.; The pro-inflammatory cytokine casade; Immune Response in the Critically Ill; Springer-Verlag Berlin Hiedelberg; pp. 37-66; Jan. 21, 2002.
Abraham, Coagulation abnormalities in acute lung injury and sepsis, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., vol. 22(4), pp. 401-404, Apr. 2000.
Aekerlund et al., Anti-inflammatory effects of a new tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-Alpha) inhibitor (CNI-1493) in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in rats, Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 32-41, Jan. 1, 1999.
Anderson et al.; Reflex principles of immunological homeostasis; Annu. Rev. Immunol.; 30; pp. 313-335; Apr. 2012.
Antonica, A., et al., Vagal control of lymphocyte release from rat thymus, J. Auton. Nerv. Syst., vol. 48(3), pp. 187-197, Aug. 1994.
Asakura et al., Non-surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis, Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 431-437, Apr. 1997 (abstract only).
Beliavskaia et al.,“On the effects of prolonged stimulation of the peripheral segment of the vagus nerve . . . ,” Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR Imeni I.M. Sechenova., vol. 52(11); p. 1315-1321, Nov. 1966.
Ben-Noun et al.; Neck circumference as a simple screening measure for identifying overweight and obese patients; Obesity Research; vol. 9; No. 8; pp. 470-477; Aug. 8, 2001.
Benoist, et al., “Mast cells in autoimmune disease” Nature., vol. 420(19): pp. 875-878, Dec. 2002.
Benthem et al.; Parasympathetic inhibition of sympathetic neural activity to the pancreas; Am.J.Physiol Endocrinol.Metab; 280(2); pp. E378-E381; Feb. 2001.
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates cardiac TNF production in endotoxic shock, (supplemental to Shock, vol. 15, 2001, Injury, inflammation and sepsis: laboratory and clinical approaches, Shock, Abstracts, 24th Annual Conference on Shock, Marco Island, FL, Jun. 9-12, 2001), Abstract No. 81.
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates endotoxic shock and cardiac TNF production, 87th Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 9, 2001.
Bernik et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates LPS-induced cardiac TNF production and myocardial depression IN shock, New York Surgical Society, New York, NY, Apr. 11, 2001.
Bernik, et al.. Pharmacological stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, No. 6, pp. 781-788, Mar. 18, 2002.
Besedovsky, H., et al., Immunoregulatory feedback between interleukin-1 and glucocorticoid hormones, Science, vol. 233, No. 4764, pp. 652-654, Aug. 1986.
Bhattacharya, S.K. et al., Central muscarinic receptor subtypes and carrageenin-induced paw oedema in rats, Res. Esp. Med. vol. 191(1), pp. 65-76, Dec. 1991.
Bianchi et al., Suppression of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes by a tetravalent guanylhydrazone, Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 183, pp. 927-936, Mar. 1996.
Biggio et al.; Chronic vagus nerve stimulation induces neuronal plasticity in the rat hippocampus; Int. J. Neurpsychopharmacol.; vol. 12; No. 9; pp. 1209-1221; Oct. 2009.
Blackwell, T. S. et al., Sepsis and cytokines: current status, Br. J. Anaesth., vol. 77(1), pp. 110-117, Jul. 1996.
Blum, A. et al., Role of cytokines in heart failure, Am. Heart J., vol. 135(2), pp. 181-186, Feb. 1998.
Boldyreff, Gastric and intestinal mucus, its properties and physiological importance, Acta Medica Scandinavica (journal), vol. 89, Issue 1-2, pp. 1-14, Jan./Dec. 1936.
Borovikova et al., Acetylcholine inhibition of immune response to bacterial endotoxin in human macrophages, Abstracts, Society for Neuroscience, 29th Annual Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, Oct. 23-28, 1999, Abstract No. 624.6.
Borovikova et al., Efferent vagus nerve activity attenuates cytokine-mediated inflammation, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, vol. 26, No. 102, Nov. 4-9, 2000 (abstract only).
Borovikova et al., Intracerebroventricular CNI-1493 prevents LPS-induced hypotension and peak serum TNF at a four-log lower dose than systemic treatment, 21st Annual Conference on Shock, San Antonio, TX, Jun. 14-17, 1998, Abstract No. 86.
Borovikova et al., Role of the efferent vagus nerve signaling in the regulation of the innate immune response to LPS, (supplemental to Shock, vol. 13, 2000, Molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobiological aspects and therapeutic approaches, abstracts, 5th World Congress on Trauma, Shock inflammation and sepsis-pathophysiology, immune consequences and therapy, Feb. 29, 2000-Mar. 4, 2000, Munich, DE), Abstract No. 166.
Borovikova et al., Role of the vagus nerve In the anti-inflammatory effects of CNI-1493, the FASEB journal, vol. 14, No. 4, 2000 (Experimental Biology 2000, San Diego, CA, Apr. 15-18, 2000, Abstract No. 97.9).
Borovikova et al., Vagotomy blocks the protective effects of I.C.V. CNI-1493 against LPS-induced shock, (Supplemental to Shock, vol. 11, 1999, Molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobioloigal aspects and therapeutic approaches, abstacts and program, Fourth International Shock Congress and 22nd Annual Conference on Shock, Philadelphia, PA, Jun. 12-16, 1999), Abstract No. 277.
Borovikova, L. V., et al., Role of vagus nerve signaling in CNI-1493-mediated suppression of acute inflammation, Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 85, No. 1-3, pp. 141-147, Dec. 20, 2000.
Borovikova, L. V., et al., Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin, Nature, vol. 405, No. 6785; pp. 458-462, May 25, 2000.
Bruchfeld et al.; Whole blood cytokine attenuation by cholinergic agonists ex vivo and relationship to vagus nerve activity in rheumatoid arthritis; J. Int. Med.; 268(1); pp. 94-101; Jul. 2010.
Bulloch et al.; Characterization of choline O-acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the BALB/C mouse spleen; Int.J.Neurosci.; 76(1-2); pp. 141-149; May 1994.
Bumgardner, G. L. et al., Transplantation and cytokines, Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 189-204, (year of pub. Sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Burke et al., Bent pseudoknots and novel RNA inhibitors of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 264(4); pp. 650-666, Dec. 1996.
Bushby et al; Centiles for adult head circumference; Archives of Disease in Childhood; vol. 67(10); pp. 1286-1287; Oct. 1992.
Cano et al.; Characterization of the central nervous system innervation of the rat spleen using viral transneuronal tracing; J.Comp Neurol.; 439(1); pp. 1-18; Oct. 2001.
Carteron, N. L., Cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: trials and tribulations, Mol. Med. Today, vol. 6(8), pp. 315-323, Aug. 2000.
Cheyuo et al.; The parasympathetic nervous system in the quest for stroke therapeutics; J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.; 31(5); pp. 1187-1195; May 2011.
Cicala et al., “Linkage between inflammation and coagulation: An update on the molecular basis of the crosstalk,” Life Sciences, vol. 62(20); pp. 1817-1824, Apr. 1998.
Clark et al.; Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects; Nat. Neurosci.; 2(1); pp. 94-98; Jan. 1999.
Cohen, “The immunopathogenesis of sepsis,” Nature., vol. 420(6917): pp. 885-891, Dec. 2002.
Corcoran, et al., The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in humans: a preliminary report, NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 12(5), pp. 307-309, Sep. 2005.
Dake; Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: Hostory and background; Techniques Vasc. Intervent. Radiol.; 15(2); pp. 94-100; Jun. 2012.
Das, Critical advances in spticemia and septic shock, Critical Care, vol. 4, pp. 290-296, Sep. 7, 2000.
Del Signore et al; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the rat sympathetic ganglion: pharmacological characterization, subcellular distribution and effect of pre- and postganglionic nerve crush; J.Neuropathol.Exp.Neurol.; 63(2); pp. 138-150; Feb. 2004.
Diamond et al.; Mapping the immunological homunculus; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 108(9); pp. 3461-3462; Mar. 1, 2011.
Dibbs, Z., et al., Cytokines in heart failure: pathogenetic mechanisms and potential treatment, Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians, vol. 111, No. 5, pp. 423-428, Sep.-Oct. 1999.
Dinarello, C. A., The interleukin-1 family: 10 years of discovery, FASEB J., vol. 8, No. 15, pp. 1314-1325, Dec. 1994.
Dorr et al.; Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on serotonergic and noradrenergic transmission; J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.; 318(2); pp. 890-898; Aug. 2006.
Doshi et al., Evolving role of tissue factor and its pathway inhibitor, Crit. Care Med., vol. 30, suppl. 5, pp. S241-S250, May 2002.
Elenkov et al.; Stress, corticotropin-releasing hormone, glucocorticoids, and the immune / inflammatory response: acute and chronic effects; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.; 876; pp. 1-13; Jun. 22, 1999.
Ellington et al., In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands, Nature, vol. 346, pp. 818-822, Aug. 30, 1990.
Ellrich et al.; Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; Eur. Neurological Rev.; 6(4); pp. 254-256; 2011 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Engineer et al.; Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus; Hear. Res.; 295; pp. 58-66; Jan. 2013.
Engineer et al.; Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity; Nature; 470(7332); pp. 101-104; Feb. 3, 2011 (Author Manuscript).
Esmon, The protein C pathway, Crit. Care Med., vol. 28, suppl. 9, pp. S44-S48, Sep. 2000.
Fields; New culprits in chronic pain; Scientific American; pp. 50-57; Nov. 2009.
Fleshner, M., et al., Thermogenic and corticosterone responses to intravenous cytokines (IL-1? and TNF-?) are attenuated by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 86(2), pp. 134-141, Jun. 1998.
Fox, D. A., Cytokine blockade as a new strategy to treat rheumatoid arthritis, Arch. Intern. Med., vol. 160, pp. 437-444, Feb. 28, 2000.
Fox, et al., Use of muscarinic agonists in the treatment of Sjorgren' syndrome, Clin. Immunol., vol. 101, No. 3; pp. 249-263, Dec. 2001.
Fujii et al.; Simvastatin regulates non-neuronal cholinergic activity in T lymphocytes via CD11a-mediated pathways; J. Neuroimmunol.; 179(1-2); pp. 101-107; Oct. 2006.
Gao et al.; Investigation of specificity of auricular acupuncture points in regulation of autonomic function in anesthetized rats; Autonomic Neurosc.; 138(1-2); pp. 50-56; Feb. 29, 2008.
Gattorno, M., et al., Tumor necrosis factor induced adhesion molecule serum concentrations in henoch-schoenlein purpura and pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus, J. Rheumatol., vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 2251-2255, Sep. 2000.
Gaykema, R. P., et al., Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy suppresses endotoxin-induced activation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons and ACTH secretion, Endocrinology, vol. 136, No. 10, pp. 4717-4720, Oct. 1995.
Ghelardini et al., S-(−)-ET 126: A potent and selective M1 antagonist in vitro and in vivo, Life Sciences, vol. 58, No. 12, pp. 991-1000, Feb. 1996.
Ghia, et al., The vagus nerve: a tonic inhibitory influence associated with inflammatory bowel disease in a murine model, Gastroenterology, vol. 131, No. 4, pp. 1122-1130, Oct. 2006.
Giebelen, et al., Stimulation of ?7 cholinergic receptors inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophil recruitment by a tumor necrosis factor ?-independent mechanism, Shock, vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 443-447, Apr. 2007.
Goyal et al., Nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter, Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 55, pp. 1119-1126, May 1975.
Gracie, J. A., et al., A proinflammatory role for IL-18 in rheumatoid arthritis, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 104, No. 10, pp. 1393-1401, Nov. 1999.
Granert et al., Suppression of macrophage activation with CNI-1493 increases survival in infant rats with systemic haemophilus influenzae infection, Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, No. 9, pp. 5329-5334, Sep. 2000.
Green et al., Feedback technique for deep relaxation, Psycophysiology, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 371-377, Nov. 1969.
Gregory et al., Neutrophil-kupffer-cell interaction in host defenses to systemic infections, Immunology Today, vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 507-510, Nov. 1998.
Groves et al.; Recordings from the rat locus coeruleus during acute vagal nerve stimulation in the anaesthetised rat; Neuroscience Letters; 379(3); pp. 174-179; May 13, 2005.
Guarente, Leonard, Ph. D.; Sirtuins, Aging, and Medicine; N Engl J Med ; vol. 364:pp. 2235-2244; Jun. 2011.
Guslandi, M., Nicotine treatment for ulcerative colitis, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 48(4), pp. 481-484, Oct. 1999.
Hansson, E.; Could chronic pain and spread of pain sensation be induced and maintained by glial activation?. Acta Physiologica, vol. 187, Issue 1-2; p. 321R327, May/Jun. 2006.
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 13th Ed., pp. 511-515 and 1433-1435, Mar. 1994.
Hatton et al.; Vagal nerve stimulation: overview and implications for anesthesiologists; Int'l Anesthesia Research Society; vol. 103; No. 5; pp. 1241-1249; Nov. 2006.
Hirano, T., Cytokine suppresive agent improves survival rate in rats with acute pancreatitis of closed duodenal loop, J. Surg. Res., vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 224-229, Feb. 1999.
Hirao et al., The limits of specificity: an experimental analysis with RNA aptamers to MS2 coat protein variants, Mol. Divers., vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 75-89, 1999 (Accepted Jan. 13, 1999).
Hoffer et al.; Implantable electrical and mechanical interfaces with nerve and muscle; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; vol. 8; pp. 351-360; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1980.
Holladay et al., Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as targets for drug discovery, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 40(26), pp. 4169-4194, Dec. 1997.
Hommes, D. W. et al., Anti- and Pro-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of tissue damage in Crohn's disease, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 3(3), pp. 191-195, May 2000.
Hsu, et al., Analysis of efficiency of magnetic stimulation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50(11), pp. 1276-1285, Nov. 2003.
Hsu, H. Y., et al., Cytokine release of peripheral blood monoculear cells in children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol., vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 540-545, Nov. 1999.
Hu, et al., The effect of norepinephrine on endotoxin-mediated macrophage activation, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 31(1), pp. 35-42, Jan. 1991.
Huston et al.; Splenectomy inactivates the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway during lethal endotoxemia and polymicrobial sepsis; J. Exp. Med. 2006; vol. 203, No. 7; pp. 1623-1628; Jun. 19, 2006.
Huston et al.; Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation reduces serum high mobility group box 1 levels and improves survival in murine sepsis; Crit. Care Med.; 35(12); pp. 2762-2768; Dec. 2007.
Hutchinson et al.; Proinflammatory cytokines oppose opioid induced acute and chronic analgesia; Brain Behav Immun.; vol. 22; No. 8; pp. 1178-1189; Nov. 2008.
Ilton et al., “Differential expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules during coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mosby—Year Book, inc., St. Louis, Mo, US, pp. 930-937, Nov. 1, 1999.
Jaeger et al., The structure of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an RNA pseudoknot inhibitor, The EMBO Journal, 17(15), pp. 4535-4542, Aug. 1998.
Jander, S. et al., Interleukin-18 is induced in acute inflammatory demyelinating polymeuropathy, J. Neuroimmunol., vol. 114, pp. 253-258, Mar. 2001.
Joshi et al., Potent inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replection by template analog reverse transcriptase , J. Virol., 76(13), pp. 6545-6557, Jul. 2002.
Kawahara et al.; SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span.; Cell. ; vol. 136; No. 1; pp. 62-74; Jan. 2009.
Kalishevskaya et al. “The character of vagotomy-and atropin-induced hypercoagulation,” Sechenov Physiological Journal of the USSR, 65(3): pp. 398-404, Mar. 1979.
Kalishevskaya et al.; Nervous regulation of the fluid state of the blood; Usp. Fiziol. Nauk;,vol. 13; No. 2; pp. 93-122; Apr.-Jun. 1982.
Kanai, T. et al., Interleukin-18 and Crohn's disease, Digestion, vol. 63, suppl. 1, pp. 37-42, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2001.
Katagiri, M., et al., Increased cytokine production by gastric mucosa in patients with helicobacter pylori infection, J. Clin, Gastroenterol., vol. 25, Suppl. 1, pp. S211-S214, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1997.
Kawashima, et al., Extraneuronal cholinergic system in lymphocytes, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 86, pp. 29-48, Apr. 2000.
Kees et al.; Via beta-adrenoceptors, stimulation of extrasplenic sympathetic nerve fibers inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF secretion in perfused rat spleen; J.Neuroimmunol.; 145(1-2); pp. 77-85; Dec. 2003.
Kensch et al., HIV-1 reverse transcriptase-pseudoknot RNA aptamer interaction has a binding affinity in the low picomolar range coupled with high specificity, J. Biol. Chem., 275(24), p. 18271-18278, Jun. 16, 2000.
Khatun, S., et al., “Induction of hypercoagulability condition by chronic localized cold stress in rabbits,” Thromb. and Haemost., 81(3): pp. 449-455, Mar. 1999.
Kimball, et al., Levamisole causes differential cytokine expression by elicited mouse peritoneal macrophases, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vo. 52, No. 3, pp. 349-356, Sep. 1992 (abstract only).
Kimmings, A. N., et al., Systemic inflammatory response in acute cholangitis and after subsequent treatment, Eur. J. Surg., vol. 166, pp. 700-705, Sep. 2000.
Kirchner et al.; Left vagus nerve stimulation suppresses experimentally induced pain; Neurology; vol. 55; pp. 1167-1171; Oct. 2000.
Kokkula, R. et al., Successful treatment of collagen-induced arthritis in mice and rats by targeting extracellular high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 activity, Arthritis Rheum., 48(7), pp. 2052-2058, Jul. 2003.
Koopman et al.; Pilot study of stimulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway with an implantable vagus nerve stimulation device in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; Arth. Rheum.; 64(10 suppl.); pp. S195; Oct. 2012.
Krarup et al.; Conduction studies in peripheral cat nerve using implanted electrodes: I. methods and findings in controls; Muscle & Nerve; vol. 11; pp. 922-932; Sep. 1988.
Kudrjashov, et al. “Reflex nature of the physiological anticoagulating system,” Nature, vol. 196(4855): pp. 647-649; Nov. 17, 1962.
Kumins, N. H., et al., Partial hepatectomy reduces the endotoxin-induced peak circulating level of tumor necrosis factor in rats, Shock, vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 385-388, May 1996.
Kuznik, “Role of the vascular wall in the process of hemostatis,” Usp Sovrem Biol., vol. 75(1): pp. 61-85, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “Blood Coagulation in stimulation of the vagus nerve in cats,” Biull. Eskp. Biol. Med., vol. 78(7): pp. 7-9, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1974.
Kuznik, et al., “Heart as an efferent regulator of the process of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis,” Kardiologiia, vol. 13(3): pp. 10-17, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “Role of the heart and vessels in regulating blood coagulation and fibrinolysis,” Kagdiologiia, vol. 13(4): pp. 145-154, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “Secretion of blood coagulation factors into saliva under conditions of hypo-and hypercoagulation,” Voprosy Meditsinskoi Khimii, vol. 19(1): pp. 54-57; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1973.
Kuznik, et al., “The dynamics of procoagulatible and fibrinolytic activities during electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves,” Sechenov Physiological Journal of the USSR, vol. 65; No. 3: pp. 414-420, Mar. 1979.
Kuznik, et al., “The role of the vascular wall in the mechanism of control of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis on stimulation of the vagus nerve,” Cor Vasa, vol. 17(2): pp. 151-158, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1975.
Lang, et al., “Neurogienic control of cerebral blood flow,” Experimental Neurology, 43(1): pp. 143-161, Apr. 1974.
Lee, H. G., et al., Peritoneal lavage fluids stimulate NIH3T3 fibroblast proliferation and contain increased tumour necrosis factor and IL6 in experimental silica-induced rat peritonitis, Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 100, pp. 139-144, Apr. 1995.
LeNovere, N. et al., Molecular evolution of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: an example of multigene family in excitable cells, J. Mol. Evol., 40, pp. 155-172, Feb. 1995.
Leonard, S. et al., Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to function, Nicotine & Tobacco Res. 3:203-223, Aug. 2001.
Lips et al.; Coexpression and spatial association of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits alpha7 and alpha10 in rat sympathetic neurons; J.Mol.Neurosci.; 30; pp. 15-16; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2006.
Lipton, J. M. et al.; Anti-inflammatory actions of the neuroimmunomodulator ?-MSH, Immunol. Today, vol. 18, pp. 140-145, Mar. 1997.
Loeb et al.; Cuff electrodes for chronic stimulation and recording of peripheral nerve activity; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; vol. 64; pp. 95-103; Jan. 1996.
Madretsma, G. S., et al., Nicotine inhibits the in vitro production of interleukin 2 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha by human monocuclear cells, Immunopharmacology, vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 47-51, Oct. 1996.
Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia; 28th Ed. London; The pharmaceutical press; pp. 446-485; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1982.
Martiney et al., Prevention and treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by CNI-1493, a macrophage-deactivating agent, Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, No. 11, pp. 5588-5595, Jun. 1, 1998.
McGuinness, P. H., et al., Increases in intrahepatic CD68 positive cells, MAC387 positive cells, and proinflammatory cytokines (particulary interleukin 18) in chronic hepatitis C infection, Gut, vol. 46, pp. 260-269, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2000.
Miguel-Hidalgo, J.J.; The role of glial cells in drug abuse; Current Drug Abuse Reviews; vol. 2; No. 1; pp. 76-82; Jan. 2009.
Milligan et al.; Pathological and protective roles of glia in chronic pain; Nat Rev Neurosci.; vol. 10; No. 1; pp. 23-26; Jan. 2009.
Minnich et al.; Anti-cytokine and anti-inflammatory therapies for the treatment of severe sepsis: progress and pitfalls; Proceedings of the Nutrition Society; vol. 63(3); pp. 437-441; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2004.
Mishchenko, et al., “Coagulation of the blood and fibrinolysos in dogs during vagal stimulation,” Sechenov Physiological Journal of the USSR, vol. 61(1): pp. 101-107, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1975.
Mishchenko, “The role of specific adreno-and choline-receptors of the vascular wall in the regulation of blood coagulation in the stimulation of the vagus nerve,” Biull. Eskp. Biol. Med., vol. 78(8); pp. 19-22, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1974.
Molina et al., CNI-1493 attenuates hemodynamic and pro-inflammatory responses to LPS, Shock, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 329-334, Nov. 1998.
Nadol et al., “Surgery of the Ear and Temporal Bone,” Lippinkott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd Ed., 2005, (Publication date: Sep. 21, 2004), p. 580.
Nagashima et al., Thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) deficiency is compatible with murine life, J. Clin. Invest., 109, pp. 101-110, Jan. 2002.
Nathan, C. F., Secretory products of macrophages, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 79 (2), pp. 319-326, Feb. 1987.
Navalkar et al.; Irbesartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibitor, regulates markers of inflammation in patients with premature atherosclerosis; Journal of the American College of Cardiology; vol. 37; No. 2; pp. 440-444; Feb. 2001.
Navzer et al.; Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity; Nature; 470(7332); pp. 101-104; Feb. 3, 2011.
Neuhaus et al.; P300 is enhanced in responders to vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of major depressive disorder; J. Affect. Disord.; 100(1-3); pp. 123-128; Jun. 2007.
Noguchi et al., Increases in Gastric acidity in response to electroacupuncture stimulation of hindlimb of anesthetized rats, Jpn. J. Physiol., 46(1), pp. 53-58, Feb. 1996.
Norton, Can ultrasound be used to stimulate nerve tissue, BioMedical Engineering Online, 2(1), pp. 6, Mar. 4, 2003.
Olofsson et al.; Rethinking inflammation: neural circuits in the regulation of immunity; Immunological Reviews; 248(1); pp. 188-204; Jul. 2012.
Oshinsky et al.; Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation as treatment for trigeminal allodynia; Pain; 155(5); pp. 1037-1042; May 2014.
Palmblad et al., Dynamics of early synovial cytokine expression in rodent collagen-induced arthritis: a thereapeutic study unding a macrophage-deactivation compound, American Journal of Pathology, vol. 158, No. 2, pp. 491-500, Feb. 2, 2001.
Pateyuk, et al..“Treatment of Botkin's disease with heparin,” Klin. Med., vol. 51(3): pp. 113-117, Mar. 1973.
Pavlov et al; Controlling inflammation: the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; Biochem. Soc. Trans.; 34(Pt 6); pp. 1037-1040; Dec. 2006.
Payne, J. B. et al., Nicotine effects on PGE2 and IL-1 beta release by LPS-treated human monocytes, J. Perio. Res., vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 99-104, Feb. 1996.
Peuker; The nerve supply of the human auricle; Clin. Anat.; 15(1); pp. 35-37; Jan. 2002.
Prystowsky, J. B. et al., Interleukin-1 mediates guinea pig gallbladder inflammation in vivo, J. Surg. Res., vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 123-126, Aug. 1997.
Pulkki, K. J., Cytokines and cardiomyocyte death, Ann. Med., vol. 29(4), pp. 339-343, Aug. 1997.
Pullan, R. D., et al., Transdermal nicotine for active ulceratiive colitis, N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 330, No. 12, pp. 811-815, Mar. 24, 1994.
Pulvirenti et al; Drug dependence as a disorder of neural plasticity:focus on dopamine and glutamate; Rev Neurosci.; vol. 12; No. 2; pp. 141-158; Apr./Jun. 2001.
Rahman et al.; Mammalian Sirt 1: Insights on its biological functions; Cell Communications and Signaling; vol. 9; No. 11; pp. 1-8; May 2011.
Rayner, S. A. et al., Local bioactive tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in corneal allotransplantation, Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 122, pp. 109-116, Oct. 2000.
Reale et al.; Treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor in alzheimer patients modulates the expression and production of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines; J. Neuroimmunology; 148(1-2); pp. 162-171; Mar. 2004.
Rinner et al.; Rat lymphocytes produce and secrete acetylcholine in dependence of differentiation and activation; J.Neuroimmunol.; 81(1-2); pp. 31-37; Jan. 1998.
Robinson et al.; Studies with the Electrocardiograph on the Action of the Vagus Nerve on the Human Heart; J Exp Med; 14(3):217-234; Sep. 1911.
Romanovsky, A. A., et al.,The vagus nerve in the thermoregulatory response to systemic inflammation, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 273, No. 1 (part 2), pp. R407-R413, Jul. 1, 1997.
Saghizadeh et al.; The expression of TNF? by human muscle; J. Clin. Invest.; vol. 97; No. 4; pp. 1111-1116; Feb. 15, 1996.
Saindon et al.; Effect of cervical vagotomy on sympathetic nerve responses to peripheral interleukin-1beta; Auton.Neuroscience Basic and Clinical; 87; pp. 243-248; Mar. 23, 2001.
Saito, Involvement of muscarinic M1 receptor in the central pathway of the serotonin-induced bezold-jarisch reflex in rats, J. Autonomic Nervous System, vol. 49, pp. 61-68, Sep. 1994.
Sandborn, W. J., et al., Transdermal nicotine for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis, Ann. Intern. Med, vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 364-371, Mar. 1, 1997.
Sato, E., et al., Acetylcholine stimulates alveolar macrophages to release inflammatory cell chemotactic activity, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 274, pp. L970-L979, Jun. 1998.
Sato, K.Z., et al., Diversity of mRNA expression for muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in human mononuclear ieukosytes and leukemic cell lines, Neuroscience Letters, vol. 266, pp. 17-20, Apr. 30, 1999.
Scheinman, R. I., et al., Role of transcriptional activation of I?B? in mediation of immunosuppression by glucocorticoids, Science, vol. 270, No. 5234, pp. 283-286, Oct. 13, 1995.
Schneider et al., High-affinity ssDNA inhibitors of the review transcriptase of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus, Biochemistry, 34(29), pp. 9599-9610, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1995.
Shafer, Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 247-277, Apr. 2002.
Shapiro et al.; Prospective, randomised trial of two doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery; Thromb Haemost; vol. 80(5); pp. 773-778; Nov. 1998.
Sher, M. E., et al., The influence of cigarette smoking on cytokine levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, Inflamm. Bowel Dis., vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 73-78, May 1999.
Shi et al.; Effects of efferent vagus nerve excitation on inflammatory response in heart tissue in rats with endotoxemia; vol. 15, No. 1; pp. 26-28; Jan. 2003 (Eng. Abstract).
Snyder et al., Correction of hemophilia B in canine and murine models using recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors; Nature Medicine, 5(1), pp. 64-70, Jan. 1999.
Sokratov, et al. “The role of choline and adrenegic structures in regulation of renal excretion of hemocoagulating compounds into the urine,” Sechenov Physiological Journal of the USSR, vol. 63(12): pp. 1728-1732, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1977.
Stalcup et al., Endothelial cell functions in the hemodynamic responses to stress, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 401, pp. 117-131, Dec. 1982.
Steinlein, New functions for nicotine acetylcholine receptors?, Behavioural Brain Res., vol. 95, pp. 31-35, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1998.
Sternberg, E. M., Perspectives series: cytokines and the brain ‘neural-immune interactions in health and disease,’ J. Clin. Invest., vol. 100, No. 22, pp. 2641-2647, Dec. 1997.
Stevens et al.; The anti-inflammatory effect of some immunosuppressive agents; J. Path.; 97(2); pp. 367-373; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1969.
Strojnik et al.; Treatment of drop foot using and implantable peroneal underknee stimulator; Scand. J. Rehab. Med.; vol. 19(1); p. 37R43; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1987.
Sugano et al., Nicotine inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators in U937 cells through modulation of nuclear factor-kappaß activation, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 252, No. 1, pp. 25-28, Nov. 9, 1998.
Suter et al.; Do glial cells control pain?; Neuron Glia Biol.; vol. 3; No. 3; pp. 255-268; Aug. 2007.
Swick et al.; Locus coeruleus neuronal activity in awake monkeys: relationship to auditory P300-like potentials and spontaneous EEG. Exp. Brain Res.; 101(1); pp. 86-92; 1994 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Sykes, et al., An investigation into the effect and mechanisms of action of nicotine in inflammatory bowel disease, Inflamm. Res., vol. 49, pp. 311-319, Jul. 2000.
Takeuchi et al., A comparision between Chinese blended medicine “Shoseiryuto” tranilast and ketotifen on the anit-allergic action in the guinea pigs, Allergy, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 387-393, Jun. 1985 (eng. abstract).
Tekdemir et al.; A clinico-anatomic study of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and arnold's ear-cough reflex; Surg. Radiol. Anat.; 20(4); pp. 253-257; Mar. 1998.
Toyabe, et al., Identification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on lymphocytes in the periphery as well as thymus in mice, Immunology, vol. 92(2), pp. 201-205, Oct. 1997.
Tracey et al., Mind over immunity, Faseb Journal, vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1575-1576, Jul. 2001.
Tracey, K. J. et al., Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia; Nature, 330: pp. 662-664, Dec. 23, 1987.
Tracey, K. J. et al., Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway; J Clin Invest.; vol. 117: No. 2; pp. 289-296; Feb. 2007.
Tracey, K. J.; Reflex control of immunity; Nat Rev Immunol; 9(6); pp. 418-428; Jun. 2009.
Tracey, K. J. et al., Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin, Science, vol. 234, pp. 470-474, Oct. 24, 1986.
Tracey, K.J., The inflammatory reflex, Nature, vol. 420, pp. 853-859, Dec. 19-26, 2002.
Tsutsui, H., et al., Pathophysiolocical roles of interleukin-18 in inflammatory liver diseases; Immunol. Rev., 174:192-209, Apr. 2000.
Tuerk et al., RNA pseudoknots that inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, pp. 6988-6992, Aug. 1992.
Tuerk et al., Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase; Science, 249(4968), pp. 505-510, Aug. 3, 1990.
Van Dijk, A. P., et al., Transdermal nictotine inhibits interleukin 2 synthesis by mononuclear cells derived from healthy volunteers, Eur. J. Clin. Invest, vol. 28, pp. 664-671, Aug. 1998.
Van Der Horst et al.; Stressing the role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease; Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.; vol. 8; No. 6; pp. 440-450; Jun. 2007.
Vanhoutte, et al., Muscarinic and beta-adrenergic prejunctional modulation of adrenergic neurotransmission in the blood vessel wall, Gen Pharmac., vol. 14, pp. 35-37, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1983.
VanWesterloo, et al., The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway regulates the host response during septic peritonitis, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 191, pp. 2138-2148, Jun. 15, 2005.
Ventureyra, Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for partial onset seizure therapy, Child's Nerv Syst, vol. 16 (2), pp. 101-102, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2000.
Vijayaraghavan, S.; Glial-neuronal interactions-implications for plasticity anddrug addictionl AAPS J.; vol. 11; No. 1; pp. 123-132; Mar. 2009.
Villa et al., Protection against lethal polymicrobial sepsis by CNI-1493, an inhibitor of pro-inflammatory cytokine synthesis, Journal of Endotoxin Research, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 197-204, Jun. 1997.
Von Känel, et al., Effects of non-specific ?/-adrenergic stimulation and blockade on blood coagulation in hypertension, J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 94, pp. 1455-1459, Apr. 2003.
Von Känel, et al., Effects of sympathetic activation by adrenergic infusions on hemostasis in vivo, Eur. J. Haematol., vol. 65: pp. 357-369, Dec. 2000.
Walland et al., Compensation of muscarinic brochial effects of talsaclidine by concomitant sympathetic activation in guinea pigs; European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 330(2-3), pp. 213-219, Jul. 9, 1997.
Wang et al; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation; Nature; 421; 384-388; Jan. 23, 2003.
Wang, H., et al., HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice, Science, vol. 285, pp. 248-251, Jul. 9, 1999.
Waserman, S. et al., TNF-? dysregulation in asthma: relationship to ongoing corticosteroid therapy, Can. Respir. J., vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 229-237, May-Jun. 2000.
Watanabe, H. et al., The significance of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels for rejection of joint allograft, J. Reconstr. Microsurg., vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 193-197, Apr. 1997.
Wathey, J.C. et al., Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses; Biophys. J., vol. 27: pp. 145-164, Jul. 1979.
Watkins, L.R. et al.. Blockade of interleukin-1 induced hyperthermia by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy: evidence for vagal mediation of immune-brain communication, Neurosci. Lett., vol. 183(1-2), pp. 27-31, Jan. 1995.
Watkins, L.R. et al., Implications of immune-to-brain communication for sickness and pain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 96(14), pp. 7710-7713, Jul. 6, 1999.
Webster's Dictionary, definition of “intrathecal”, online version accessed Apr. 21, 2009.
Weiner, et al., “Inflammation and therapeutic vaccination in CNS diseases,” Nature., vol. 420(6917): pp. 879-884, Dec. 19-26, 2002.
Westerheide et al.; Stress-inducible regulation of heat shock factor 1 by the deacetylase SIRT1.; Science; Vo. 323; No. 5717; pp. 1063-1066; Feb. 2009.
Whaley, K. et al., C2 synthesis by human monocytes is modulated by a nicotinic cholinergic receptor, Nature, vol. 293, pp. 580-582, Oct. 15, 1981.
Woiciechowsky, C. et al., Sympathetic activation triggers systemic interleukin-10 release in immunodepression induced by brain injury, Nature Med., vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 808-813, Jul. 1998.
Yeh, S.S. et al., Geriatric cachexia: the role of cytokines, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., vol. 70(2), pp. 183-197, Aug. 1999.
Yu et al.; Low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve: a non-invasive approach to treat the initial phase of atrial fibrillation; Heart Rhythm; 10(3); pp. 428-435; Mar. 2013.
Zamotrinsky et al.; Vagal neurostimulation in patients with coronary artery disease; Auton. Neurosci.; 88(1-2); pp. 109-116; Apr. 2001.
Zhang et al., Tumor necrosis factor, The Cytokine Handbook, 3rd ed., Ed. Thompson, Academic Press, pp. 517-548, Jul. 1, 1998.
Zhang et al.; Roles of SIRT1 in the acute and restorative phases following induction of inflammation.; J Biol Chem.; vol. 285; No. 53; pp. 41391-41401; Dec. 2010.
Zhang et al.; Chronic vagus nerve stimulation improves autonomic control and attenuates systemic inflammation and heart failure progression in a canine high-rate pacing model; Circulation Heart Fail.; 2; pp. 692-699; Nov. 2009.
Zhao et al.; Transcutaneous auricular vagus stimulation protects endotoxemic rat from lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation; Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.; vol. 2012; Article ID 627023; 10 pages; Dec. 29, 2012.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/782,715 entitled “Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation,” filed Oct. 6, 2015.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,192 entitled “Neural stimulation devices and systems for treatment of chronic inflammation,” filed Oct. 19, 2015.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,615 entitled “Devices and methods for modulation of bone erosion,” filed Jan. 4, 2017.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/406,619 entitled “Systems and methods for establishing a nerve block,” filed Jan. 13, 2017.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/411,933 entitled “Control of vagal stimulation,” filed Jan. 20, 2017.
Zitnik et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/411,936 entitled “Implantable microstimulators and inductive charging systems,” filed Jan. 20, 2017.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/415,764 entitled “Implantable neurostimulator having power control and thermal regulation and methods of use,” filed Jan. 25, 2017.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/153,639 entitled “External programmer,” filed May 12, 2016.
Tracey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/616,855 entitled “Inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production by cholinergic agonists and vagus nerve stimulation,” filed Jun. 7, 2017.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,805 entitled “Nerve cuff with pocket for leadless stimulator,” filed Aug. 19, 2019.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,882 entitled “Neural stimulation devices and systems for treatment of chronic inflammation,” filed Aug. 19, 2019.
Crusz et al.; Inflammation and cancer; advances and new agents; Nature reviews Clinical Oncology; 12(10); pp. 584-596; doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.105; Jun. 30, 2015.
Strowig et al.; Inflammasomes in health and disease; Nature; vol. 481; pp. 278-286; doi: 10.1038/nature10759; Jan. 19, 2012.
Manogue; U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,726 entitled “Methods and apparatuses for reducing bleeding via coordinated trigeminal and vagal nerve stimulation,” filed Sep. 25, 2019.
Katsavos et al.; Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: an up-to-date overview; Multiple Sclerosis International; vol. 2013, Article ID 340508, 20 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2013.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/728,880 entitled “Implantable neurostimulator having power control and thermal regulation and methods of use,” filed Dec. 27, 2019.
Faltys et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/785,400 entitled “Systems and methods for establishing a nerve block,” filed Feb. 7, 2020.
Levine et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 17/337,292 entitled “Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation,” filed Jun. 2, 2021.
Palov et al.; The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: a missing link in neuroimmunomodulation; Molecular Medicine; 9(5); pp. 125-134; May 2003.
Tracey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 17/170,772 entitled “Treatment of bleeding by non-invasive stimulation,” filed Feb. 8, 2021.
Koopman et al., Pilot study of stimulation of the cholinergic anti-infammatory pathway with an implantable vagus nerve stimulation device in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting; Abstract No. 451; 4 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://acrabstracts.org/abstfact/pilot-study-of-stimuiation-of-the-cholinergic-anti-inflammatory-pathway-with-an-impiantable-vagus-nerve-stimulation-device-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis); (Abstract Only); on Sep. 24, 2020.
Pavlov et al.; The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; Brain, Behavior, and Immunity; 19; p. 493-499; Nov. 2005.
Zitnik et al.; Treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases with implantable medical devices; Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine; 78(Suppl 1); pp. S30-S34; Aug. 2011.
Koopman et al.; THU0237 first-in-human study of vagus nerve stimulation for rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and biomarker results through day 84; Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases; 72(Suppl 3):A245; Jun. 1, 2013 (Abstract Only).
Koopman et al.; Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 113(29); pp. 8284-8289; Jul. 19, 2016.
Mayo Clinic; The factsheet of vagus nerve stimulation from the Mayo Clinic website: www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/vagus-nerve-stimulation/about/pac-20384565; retrieved from the internet on Sep. 28, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160114165 A1 Apr 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62068473 Oct 2014 US