Systems and methods for suppressing sound leakage

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This application relates to a bone conduction device, and more specifically, relates to methods and systems for reducing sound leakage by a bone conduction device.

BACKGROUND

A bone conduction speaker, which may be also called a vibration speaker, may push human tissues and bones to stimulate the auditory nerve in cochlea and enable people to hear sound. The bone conduction speaker is also called a bone conduction headphone.

An exemplary structure of a bone conduction speaker based on the principle of the bone conduction speaker is shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 110, a vibration board 121, a transducer 122, and a linking component 123. The transducer 122 may transduce electrical signals to mechanical vibrations. The vibration board 121 may be connected to the transducer 122 and vibrate synchronically with the transducer 122. The vibration board 121 may stretch out from the opening of the housing 110 and contact with human skin to pass vibrations to auditory nerves through human tissues and bones, which in turn enables people to hear sound. The linking component 123 may reside between the transducer 122 and the housing 110, configured to fix the vibrating transducer 122 inside the housing 110. To minimize its effect on the vibrations generated by the transducer 122, the linking component 123 may be made of an elastic material.

However, the mechanical vibrations generated by the transducer 122 may not only cause the vibration board 121 to vibrate, but may also cause the housing 110 to vibrate through the linking component 123. Accordingly, the mechanical vibrations generated by the bone conduction speaker may push human tissues through the bone board 121, and at the same time a portion of the vibrating board 121 and the housing 110 that are not in contact with human issues may nevertheless push air. Air sound may thus be generated by the air pushed by the portion of the vibrating board 121 and the housing 110. The air sound may be called “sound leakage.” In some cases, sound leakage is harmless. However, sound leakage should be avoided as much as possible if people intend to protect privacy when using the bone conduction speaker or try not to disturb others when listening to music.

Attempting to solve the problem of sound leakage, Korean patent KR10-2009-0082999 discloses a bone conduction speaker of a dual magnetic structure and double-frame. As shown in FIG. 2, the speaker disclosed in the patent includes: a first frame 210 with an open upper portion and a second frame 220 that surrounds the outside of the first frame 210. The second frame 220 is separately placed from the outside of the first frame 210. The first frame 210 includes a movable coil 230 with electric signals, an inner magnetic component 240, an outer magnetic component 250, a magnet field formed between the inner magnetic component 240, and the outer magnetic component 250. The inner magnetic component 240 and the out magnetic component 250 may vibrate by the attraction and repulsion force of the coil 230 placed in the magnet field. A vibration board 260 connected to the moving coil 230 may receive the vibration of the moving coil 230. A vibration unit 270 connected to the vibration board 260 may pass the vibration to a user by contacting with the skin. As described in the patent, the second frame 220 surrounds the first frame 210, in order to use the second frame 220 to prevent the vibration of the first frame 210 from dissipating the vibration to outsides, and thus may reduce sound leakage to some extent.

However, in this design, since the second frame 220 is fixed to the first frame 210, vibrations of the second frame 220 are inevitable. As a result, sealing by the second frame 220 is unsatisfactory. Furthermore, the second frame 220 increases the whole volume and weight of the speaker, which in turn increases the cost, complicates the assembly process, and reduces the speaker's reliability and consistency.

SUMMARY

The embodiments of the present application disclose methods and system of reducing sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker.

In one aspect, the embodiments of the present application disclose a method of reducing sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker, including: providing a bone conduction speaker including a vibration board fitting human skin and passing vibrations, a transducer, and a housing, wherein at least one sound guiding hole is located in at least one portion of the housing; the transducer drives the vibration board to vibrate; the housing vibrates, along with the vibrations of the transducer, and pushes air, forming a leaked sound wave transmitted in the air; the air inside the housing is pushed out of the housing through the at least one sound guiding hole, interferes with the leaked sound wave, and reduces an amplitude of the leaked sound wave.

In some embodiments, one or more sound guiding holes may locate in an upper portion, a central portion, and/or a lower portion of a sidewall and/or the bottom of the housing.

In some embodiments, a damping layer may be applied in the at least one sound guiding hole in order to adjust the phase and amplitude of the guided sound wave through the at least one sound guiding hole.

In some embodiments, sound guiding holes may be configured to generate guided sound waves having a same phase that reduce the leaked sound wave having a same wavelength; sound guiding holes may be configured to generate guided sound waves having different phases that reduce the leaked sound waves having different wavelengths.

In some embodiments, different portions of a same sound guiding hole may be configured to generate guided sound waves having a same phase that reduce the leaked sound wave having same wavelength. In some embodiments, different portions of a same sound guiding hole may be configured to generate guided sound waves having different phases that reduce leaked sound waves having different wavelengths.

In another aspect, the embodiments of the present application disclose a bone conduction speaker, including a housing, a vibration board and a transducer, wherein: the transducer is configured to generate vibrations and is located inside the housing; the vibration board is configured to be in contact with skin and pass vibrations; at least one sound guiding hole may locate in at least one portion on the housing, and preferably, the at least one sound guiding hole may be configured to guide a sound wave inside the housing, resulted from vibrations of the air inside the housing, to the outside of the housing, the guided sound wave interfering with the leaked sound wave and reducing the amplitude thereof.

In some embodiments, the at least one sound guiding hole may locate in the sidewall and/or bottom of the housing.

In some embodiments, preferably, the at least one sound guiding sound hole may locate in the upper portion and/or lower portion of the sidewall of the housing.

In some embodiments, preferably, the sidewall of the housing is cylindrical and there are at least two sound guiding holes located in the sidewall of the housing, which are arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles. Alternatively, the housing may have a different shape.

In some embodiments, preferably, the sound guiding holes have different heights along the axial direction of the cylindrical sidewall.

In some embodiments, preferably, there are at least two sound guiding holes located in the bottom of the housing. In some embodiments, the sound guiding holes are distributed evenly or unevenly in one or more circles around the center of the bottom. Alternatively or additionally, one sound guiding hole is located at the center of the bottom of the housing.

In some embodiments, preferably, the sound guiding hole is a perforative hole. In some embodiments, there may be a damping layer at the opening of the sound guiding hole.

In some embodiments, preferably, the guided sound waves through different sound guiding holes and/or different portions of a same sound guiding hole have different phases or a same phase.

In some embodiments, preferably, the damping layer is a tuning paper, a tuning cotton, a nonwoven fabric, a silk, a cotton, a sponge, or a rubber.

In some embodiments, preferably, the shape of a sound guiding hole is circle, ellipse, quadrangle, rectangle, or linear. In some embodiments, the sound guiding holes may have a same shape or different shapes.

In some embodiments, preferably, the transducer includes a magnetic component and a voice coil. Alternatively, the transducer includes piezoelectric ceramic.

The design disclosed in this application utilizes the principles of sound interference, by placing sound guiding holes in the housing, to guide sound wave(s) inside the housing to the outside of the housing, the guided sound wave(s) interfering with the leaked sound wave, which is formed when the housing's vibrations push the air outside the housing. The guided sound wave(s) reduces the amplitude of the leaked sound wave and thus reduces the sound leakage. The design not only reduces sound leakage, but is also easy to implement, doesn't increase the volume or weight of the bone conduction speaker, and barely increase the cost of the product.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B are schematic structures illustrating a bone conduction speaker of prior art;

FIG. 2 is a schematic structure illustrating another bone conduction speaker of prior art;

FIG. 3 illustrates the principle of sound interference according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4C is a schematic structure of the bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4D is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of the bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4E is a schematic diagram illustrating exemplary two-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the equal-loudness contour curves according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary method of reducing sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 7A and 7B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 8A and 8B are schematic structure of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 8C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 9A and 9B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 9C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 10A and 10B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 10C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 10D is a schematic diagram illustrating an acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 10E is a schematic diagram illustrating another acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 10F is a schematic diagram illustrating a further acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 11A and 11B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 11C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure; and

FIGS. 12A and 12B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 13A and 13B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram illustrating variations of hearing sounds and leaked sounds of a dual-point sound source with a certain distance and a single point sound source with frequency according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 15A is a graph illustrating variations of a hearing sound and a leaked sound of a dual-point sound source with an amplitude ratio of the two-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 15B is a graph illustrating variations of a hearing sound and a leaked sound of a dual-point sound source with a phase difference between two point sound sources of the dual-point sound source according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram illustrating two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 18A is a graph illustrating variations of parameters of a sound guiding tube for different sound frequencies according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 18B is a graph illustrating variations of parameters of a sound guiding tube for different sound frequencies according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 19 is a graph illustrating variations of sound output relative to the length and the diameter of the sound guiding tube according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 20 is a graph illustrating a change of a sound pressure of sound output by a sound guiding tube with different lengths according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram illustrating two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 22A is an exemplary graph of leaked sounds of a speaker with two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 22B is an exemplary graph of leaked sounds of a speaker with two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 22C is an exemplary graph of leaked sounds of a speaker with two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 22D is an exemplary graph of leaked sounds of a speaker with two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram illustrating a mobile phone with a plurality of sound guiding holes according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

The meanings of the mark numbers in the figures are as followed:

110, open housing; 121, vibration board; 122, transducer; 123, linking component; 210, first frame; 220, second frame; 230, moving coil; 240, inner magnetic component; 250, outer magnetic component; 260; vibration board; 270, vibration unit; 10, housing; 11, sidewall; 12, bottom; 21, vibration board; 22, transducer; 23, linking component; 24, elastic component; 30, sound guiding hole.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Followings are some further detailed illustrations about this disclosure. The following examples are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as limitations of the claimed invention. There are a variety of alternative techniques and procedures available to those of ordinary skill in the art, which would similarly permit one to successfully perform the intended invention. In addition, the figures just show the structures relative to this disclosure, not the whole structure.

To explain the scheme of the embodiments of this disclosure, the design principles of this disclosure will be introduced here. FIG. 3 illustrates the principles of sound interference according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Two or more sound waves may interfere in the space based on, for example, the frequency and/or amplitude of the waves. Specifically, the amplitudes of the sound waves with the same frequency may be overlaid to generate a strengthened wave or a weakened wave. As shown in FIG. 3, sound source 1 and sound source 2 have the same frequency and locate in different locations in the space. The sound waves generated from these two sound sources may encounter in an arbitrary point A. If the phases of the sound wave 1 and sound wave 2 are the same at point A, the amplitudes of the two sound waves may be added, generating a strengthened sound wave signal at point A; on the other hand, if the phases of the two sound waves are opposite at point A, their amplitudes may be offset, generating a weakened sound wave signal at point A.

This disclosure applies above-noted the principles of sound wave interference to a bone conduction speaker and disclose a bone conduction speaker that can reduce sound leakage.

Embodiment One

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker. The bone conduction speaker may include a housing 10, a vibration board 21, and a transducer 22. The transducer 22 may be inside the housing 10 and configured to generate vibrations. The housing 10 may have one or more sound guiding holes 30. The sound guiding hole(s) 30 may be configured to guide sound waves inside the housing 10 to the outside of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the guided sound waves may form interference with leaked sound waves generated by the vibrations of the housing 10, so as to reducing the amplitude of the leaked sound. The transducer 22 may be configured to convert an electrical signal to mechanical vibrations. For example, an audio electrical signal may be transmitted into a voice coil that is placed in a magnet, and the electromagnetic interaction may cause the voice coil to vibrate based on the audio electrical signal. As another example, the transducer 22 may include piezoelectric ceramics, shape changes of which may cause vibrations in accordance with electrical signals received.

Furthermore, the vibration board 21 may be connected to the transducer 22 and configured to vibrate along with the transducer 22. The vibration board 21 may stretch out from the opening of the housing 10, and touch the skin of the user and pass vibrations to auditory nerves through human tissues and bones, which in turn enables the user to hear sound. The linking component 23 may reside between the transducer 22 and the housing 10, configured to fix the vibrating transducer 122 inside the housing. The linking component 23 may include one or more separate components, or may be integrated with the transducer 22 or the housing 10. In some embodiments, the linking component 23 is made of an elastic material.

The transducer 22 may drive the vibration board 21 to vibrate. The transducer 22, which resides inside the housing 10, may vibrate. The vibrations of the transducer 22 may drives the air inside the housing 10 to vibrate, producing a sound wave inside the housing 10, which can be referred to as “sound wave inside the housing.” Since the vibration board 21 and the transducer 22 are fixed to the housing 10 via the linking component 23, the vibrations may pass to the housing 10, causing the housing 10 to vibrate synchronously. The vibrations of the housing 10 may generate a leaked sound wave, which spreads outwards as sound leakage.

The sound wave inside the housing and the leaked sound wave are like the two sound sources in FIG. 3. In some embodiments, the sidewall 11 of the housing 10 may have one or more sound guiding holes 30 configured to guide the sound wave inside the housing 10 to the outside. The guided sound wave through the sound guiding hole(s) 30 may interfere with the leaked sound wave generated by the vibrations of the housing 10, and the amplitude of the leaked sound wave may be reduced due to the interference, which may result in a reduced sound leakage. Therefore, the design of this embodiment can solve the sound leakage problem to some extent by making an improvement of setting a sound guiding hole on the housing, and not increasing the volume and weight of the bone conduction speaker.

In some embodiments, one sound guiding hole 30 is set on the upper portion of the sidewall 11. As used herein, the upper portion of the sidewall 11 refers to the portion of the sidewall 11 starting from the top of the sidewall (contacting with the vibration board 21) to about the ⅓ height of the sidewall.

FIG. 4C is a schematic structure of the bone conduction speaker illustrated in FIGS. 4A-4B. The structure of the bone conduction speaker is further illustrated with mechanics elements illustrated in FIG. 4C. As shown in FIG. 4C, the linking component 23 between the sidewall 11 of the housing 10 and the vibration board 21 may be represented by an elastic element 23 and a damping element in the parallel connection. The linking relationship between the vibration board 21 and the transducer 22 may be represented by an elastic element 24.

Outside the housing 10, the sound leakage reduction is proportional to

(∫∫_S_holePds−∫∫_S_housingP_dds), (1)

wherein S_holeis the area of the opening of the sound guiding hole 30, S_housingis the area of the housing 10 (e.g., the sidewall 11 and the bottom 12) that is not in contact with human face.

The pressure inside the housing may be expressed as

P=P_a+P_b+P_c+P_e, (2)

wherein P_a, P_b, P_cand P_eare the sound pressures of an arbitrary point inside the housing 10 generated by side a, side b, side c and side e (as illustrated in FIG. 4C), respectively. As used herein, side a refers to the upper surface of the transducer 22 that is close to the vibration board 21, side b refers to the lower surface of the vibration board 21 that is close to the transducer 22, side c refers to the inner upper surface of the bottom 12 that is close to the transducer 22, and side e refers to the lower surface of the transducer 22 that is close to the bottom 12.

The center of the side b, O point, is set as the origin of the space coordinates, and the side b can be set as the z=0 plane, so P_a, P_b, P_cand P_emay be expressed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} P_{a} (x, y, z) = - j ω ρ_{0} \int \int_{S_{a}} W_{a} (x_{a}^{'}, y_{a}^{'}) \cdot \frac{e^{j k R (x_{a}^{'}, y_{a}^{'})}}{4 π R (x_{a}^{'}, y_{a}^{'})} d x_{a}^{'} d y_{a}^{'} - P_{a R}, & (3) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{b} (x, y, z) = - j ω ρ_{0} \int \int_{S_{b}} W_{b} (x^{'}, y^{'}) \cdot \frac{e^{j k R (x^{'}, y^{'})}}{4 π R (x^{'}, y^{'})} d x^{'} d y^{'} - P_{b R}, & (4) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{c} (x, y, z) = - j ω ρ_{0} \int \int_{S_{c}} W_{c} (x_{c}^{'}, y_{c}^{'}) \cdot \frac{e^{j k R (x_{c}^{'}, y_{c}^{'})}}{4 π R (x_{c}^{'}, y_{c}^{'})} d x_{c}^{'} d y_{c}^{'} - P_{c R}, & (5) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{e} (x, y, z) = - j ω ρ_{0} \int \int_{S_{e}} W_{e} (x_{e}^{'}, y_{e}^{'}) \cdot \frac{e^{j k R (x_{e}^{'}, y_{e}^{'})}}{4 π R (x_{e}^{'}, y_{e}^{'})} d x_{e}^{'} d y_{e}^{'} - P_{e R}, & (6) \end{matrix}$

wherein R(x′, y′)=√{square root over ((x−x′)²+(y−y′)²+z²)} is the distance between an observation point (x, y, z) and a point on side b (x′, y′, 0); S_a, S_b, S_cand S_eare the areas of side a, side b, side c and side e, respectively;

R(x_a′, y_a′)=√{square root over ((x−x_a′)²+(y−y_a′)²+(z−z_a)²)} is the distance between the observation point (x, y, z) and a point on side a (x_a′, y_a′, z_a);

R(x_c′, y_c′)=√{square root over ((x−x_c′)²+(y−y_c′)²+(z−z_c)²)} is the distance between the observation point (x, y, z) and a point on side e (x_c′, y_c′, z_c);

R(x_e′, y_e′)=√{square root over ((x−x_e′)²+(y−y_e′)²+(z−z_e)²)} is the distance between the observation point (x, y, z) and a point on side e (x_e′, y_e′, z_e);

k=ω/u(u is the velocity of sound) is wave number, ρ₀is an air density, ω is an angular frequency of vibration;

P_aR, P_bR, P_cRand P_eRare acoustic resistances of air, which respectively are:

$\begin{matrix} P_{a R} = A \cdot \frac{z_{a} \cdot r + j ω \cdot z_{a} \cdot r^{'}}{φ} + δ, & (7) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{b R} = A \cdot \frac{z_{b} \cdot r + j ω \cdot z_{b} \cdot r^{'}}{φ} + δ, & (8) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{c R} = A \cdot \frac{z_{c} \cdot r + j ω \cdot z_{c} \cdot r^{'}}{φ} + δ, & (9) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} P_{e R} = A \cdot \frac{z_{e} \cdot r + j ω \cdot z_{e} \cdot r^{'}}{φ} + δ, & (10) \end{matrix}$

wherein r is the acoustic resistance per unit length, r′ is the sound quality per unit length, z_ais the distance between the observation point and side a, z_bis the distance between the observation point and side b, z_cis the distance between the observation point and side c, z_eis the distance between the observation point and side e.

W_a(x, y), W_b(x, y), W_c(x, y), W_e(x, y) and W_d(x, y) are the sound source power per unit area of side a, side b, side c, side e and side d, respectively, which can be derived from following formulas (11):

F_e=F_a=F−k₁cos ωt−∫∫_S_aW_a(x,y)dxdy−∫∫_S_eW_e(x,y)dxdy−f
F_b=−F+k₁cos ωt+∫∫_S_bW_b(x,y)dxdy−∫∫_S_eW_e(x,y)dxdy−L
F_c=F_d=F_b−k₂cos ωt−∫∫_S_c,W_c(x,y)dxdy−f−γ
F_d=F_b−k₂cos ωt−∫∫_S_dW_d(x,y)dxdy (11)

wherein F is the driving force generated by the transducer 22, F_a, F_b, F_c, F_d, and F_eare the driving forces of side a, side b, side c, side d and side e, respectively. As used herein, side d is the outside surface of the bottom 12. S_dis the region of side d, f is the viscous resistance formed in the small gap of the sidewalls, and f=ηΔs(dv/dy).

L is the equivalent load on human face when the vibration board acts on the human face, γ is the energy dissipated on elastic element 24, k₁and k₂are the elastic coefficients of elastic element 23 and elastic element 24 respectively, η is the fluid viscosity coefficient, dv/dy is the velocity gradient of fluid, Δs is the cross-section area of a subject (board), A is the amplitude, φ is the region of the sound field, and δ is a high order minimum (which is generated by the incompletely symmetrical shape of the housing);

The sound pressure of an arbitrary point outside the housing, generated by the vibration of the housing 10 is expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} P_{d} = - j ω ρ_{0} \int \int W_{d} (x_{d}^{'}, y_{d}^{'}) \cdot \frac{e^{j k R (x_{d}^{'}, y_{d}^{'})}}{4 π R (x_{d}^{'}, y_{d}^{'})} d x_{d}^{'} d y_{d}^{'}, & (12) \end{matrix}$

wherein R(x′_d, y′_d)=√{square root over ((x−x_d′)²+(y−y_d′)²+(z−z_d)²)} is the distance between the observation point (x, y, z) and a point on side d (x_d′, y_d′, z_d).

P_a, P_b, P_c, and P_e, are functions of the position, when we set a hole on an arbitrary position in the housing, if the area of the hole is S_hole, the sound pressure of the hole is ∫∫_S_holePds.

In the meanwhile, because the vibration board 21 fits human tissues tightly, the power it gives out is absorbed all by human tissues, so the only side that can push air outside the housing to vibrate is side d, thus forming sound leakage. As described elsewhere, the sound leakage is resulted from the vibrations of the housing 10. For illustrative purposes, the sound pressure generated by the housing 10 may be expressed as ∫∫_S_housingP_dds.

The leaked sound wave and the guided sound wave interference may result in a weakened sound wave, i.e., to make ∫∫_S_holePds and ∫∫_S_housingP_dds have the same value but opposite directions, and the sound leakage may be reduced. In some embodiments, ∫∫_S_holePds may be adjusted to reduce the sound leakage. Since ∫∫_S_holePds corresponds to information of phases and amplitudes of one or more holes, which further relates to dimensions of the housing of the bone conduction speaker, the vibration frequency of the transducer, the position, shape, quantity and/or size of the sound guiding holes and whether there is damping inside the holes. Thus, the position, shape, and quantity of sound guiding holes, and/or damping materials may be adjusted to reduce sound leakage.

According to the formulas above, a person having ordinary skill in the art would understand that the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is related to the dimensions of the housing of the bone conduction speaker, the vibration frequency of the transducer, the position, shape, quantity and size of the sound guiding hole(s) and whether there is damping inside the sound guiding hole(s). Accordingly, various configurations, depending on specific needs, may be obtained by choosing specific position where the sound guiding hole(s) is located, the shape and/or quantity of the sound guiding hole(s) as well as the damping material.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the equal-loudness contour curves according to some embodiments of the present disclose. The horizontal coordinate is frequency, while the vertical coordinate is sound pressure level (SPL). As used herein, the SPL refers to the change of atmospheric pressure after being disturbed, i.e., a surplus pressure of the atmospheric pressure, which is equivalent to an atmospheric pressure added to a pressure change caused by the disturbance. As a result, the sound pressure may reflect the amplitude of a sound wave. In FIG. 5, on each curve, sound pressure levels corresponding to different frequencies are different, while the loudness levels felt by human ears are the same. For example, each curve is labeled with a number representing the loudness level of said curve. According to the loudness level curves, when volume (sound pressure amplitude) is lower, human ears are not sensitive to sounds of high or low frequencies; when volume is higher, human ears are more sensitive to sounds of high or low frequencies. Bone conduction speakers may generate sound relating to different frequency ranges, such as 1000 Hz˜4000 Hz, or 1000 Hz˜4000 Hz, or 1000 Hz˜3500 Hz, or 1000 Hz˜3000 Hz, or 1500 Hz˜3000 Hz. The sound leakage within the above-mentioned frequency ranges may be the sound leakage aimed to be reduced with a priority.

FIG. 4D is a diagram illustrating the effect of reduced sound leakage according to some embodiments of the present disclosure, wherein the test results and calculation results are close in the above range. The bone conduction speaker being tested includes a cylindrical housing, which includes a sidewall and a bottom, as described in FIGS. 4A and 4B. The cylindrical housing is in a cylinder shape having a radius of 22 mm, the sidewall height of 14 mm, and a plurality of sound guiding holes being set on the upper portion of the sidewall of the housing. The openings of the sound guiding holes are rectangle. The sound guiding holes are arranged evenly on the sidewall. The target region where the sound leakage is to be reduced is 50 cm away from the outside of the bottom of the housing. The distance of the leaked sound wave spreading to the target region and the distance of the sound wave spreading from the surface of the transducer 20 through the sound guiding holes 30 to the target region have a difference of about 180 degrees in phase. As shown, the leaked sound wave is reduced in the target region dramatically or even be eliminated.

According to the embodiments in this disclosure, the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage after setting sound guiding holes is very obvious. As shown in FIG. 4D, the bone conduction speaker having sound guiding holes greatly reduce the sound leakage compared to the bone conduction speaker without sound guiding holes.

In the tested frequency range, after setting sound guiding holes, the sound leakage is reduced by about 10 dB on average. Specifically, in the frequency range of 1500 Hz-3000 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by over 10 dB. In the frequency range of 2000 Hz-2500 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by over 20 dB compared to the scheme without sound guiding holes.

A person having ordinary skill in the art can understand from the above-mentioned formulas that when the dimensions of the bone conduction speaker, target regions to reduce sound leakage and frequencies of sound waves differ, the position, shape and quantity of sound guiding holes also need to adjust accordingly.

For example, in a cylinder housing, according to different needs, a plurality of sound guiding holes may be on the sidewall and/or the bottom of the housing. Preferably, the sound guiding hole may be set on the upper portion and/or lower portion of the sidewall of the housing. The quantity of the sound guiding holes set on the sidewall of the housing is no less than two. Preferably, the sound guiding holes may be arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles with respect to the center of the bottom. In some embodiments, the sound guiding holes may be arranged in at least one circle. In some embodiments, one sound guiding hole may be set on the bottom of the housing. In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole may be set at the center of the bottom of the housing.

The quantity of the sound guiding holes can be one or more. Preferably, multiple sound guiding holes may be set symmetrically on the housing. In some embodiments, there are 6-8 circularly arranged sound guiding holes.

The openings (and cross sections) of sound guiding holes may be circle, ellipse, rectangle, or slit. Slit generally means slit along with straight lines, curve lines, or arc lines. Different sound guiding holes in one bone conduction speaker may have same or different shapes.

A person having ordinary skill in the art can understand that, the sidewall of the housing may not be cylindrical, the sound guiding holes can be arranged asymmetrically as needed. Various configurations may be obtained by setting different combinations of the shape, quantity, and position of the sound guiding. Some other embodiments along with the figures are described as follows.

In some embodiments, the leaked sound wave may be generated by a portion of the housing 10. The portion of the housing may be the sidewall 11 of the housing 10 and/or the bottom 12 of the housing 10. Merely by way of example, the leaked sound wave may be generated by the bottom 12 of the housing 10. The guided sound wave output through the sound guiding hole(s) 30 may interfere with the leaked sound wave generated by the portion of the housing 10. The interference may enhance or reduce a sound pressure level of the guided sound wave and/or leaked sound wave in the target region.

In some embodiments, the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave may be regarded as a first sound source (e.g., the sound source 1 illustrated in FIG. 3), and the sound guiding hole(s) 30 or a part thereof may be regarded as a second sound source (e.g., the sound source 2 illustrated in FIG. 3). Merely for illustration purposes, if the size of the sound guiding hole on the housing 10 is small, the sound guiding hole may be approximately regarded as a point sound source. In some embodiments, any number or count of sound guiding holes provided on the housing 10 for outputting sound may be approximated as a single point sound source. Similarly, for simplicity, the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave may also be approximately regarded as a point sound source. In some embodiments, both the first sound source and the second sound source may approximately be regarded as point sound sources (also referred to as two-point sound sources).

FIG. 4E is a schematic diagram illustrating exemplary two-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The sound field pressure p generated by a single point sound source may satisfy Equation (13):

$\begin{matrix} p = \frac{j ω ρ_{0}}{4 π r} Q_{0} \exp j (ω t - k r), & (13) \end{matrix}$

where ω denotes an angular frequency, ρ₀denotes an air density, r denotes a distance between a target point and the sound source, Q₀denotes a volume velocity of the sound source, and k denotes a wave number. It may be concluded that the magnitude of the sound field pressure of the sound field of the point sound source is inversely proportional to the distance to the point sound source.

It should be noted that, the sound guiding hole(s) for outputting sound as a point sound source may only serve as an explanation of the principle and effect of the present disclosure, and the shape and/or size of the sound guiding hole(s) may not be limited in practical applications. In some embodiments, if the area of the sound guiding hole is large, the sound guiding hole may also be equivalent to a planar sound source. Similarly, if an area of the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave is large (e.g., the portion of the housing 10 is a vibration surface or a sound radiation surface), the portion of the housing 10 may also be equivalent to a planar sound source. For those skilled in the art, without creative activities, it may be known that sounds generated by structures such as sound guiding holes, vibration surfaces, and sound radiation surfaces may be equivalent to point sound sources at the spatial scale discussed in the present disclosure, and may have consistent sound propagation characteristics and the same mathematical description method. Further, for those skilled in the art, without creative activities, it may be known that the acoustic effect achieved by the two-point sound sources may also be implemented by alternative acoustic structures. According to actual situations, the alternative acoustic structures may be modified and/or combined discretionarily, and the same acoustic output effect may be achieved.

The two-point sound sources may be formed such that the guided sound wave output from the sound guiding hole(s) may interfere with the leaked sound wave generated by the portion of the housing 10. The interference may reduce a sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the surrounding environment (e.g., the target region). For convenience, the sound waves output from an acoustic output device (e.g., the bone conduction speaker) to the surrounding environment may be referred to as far-field leakage since it may be heard by others in the environment. The sound waves output from the acoustic output device to the ears of the user may also be referred to as near-field sound since a distance between the bone conduction speaker and the user may be relatively short. In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the two-point sound sources may have a same frequency or frequency range (e.g., 800 Hz, 1000 Hz, 1500 Hz, 3000 Hz, etc.). In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the two-point sound sources may have a certain phase difference. In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole includes a damping layer. The damping layer may be, for example, a tuning paper, a tuning cotton, a nonwoven fabric, a silk, a cotton, a sponge, or a rubber. The damping layer may be configured to adjust the phase of the guided sound wave in the target region. The acoustic output device described herein may include a bone conduction speaker or an air conduction speaker. For example, a portion of the housing (e.g., the bottom of the housing) of the bone conduction speaker may be treated as one of the two-point sound sources, and at least one sound guiding holes of the bone conduction speaker may be treated as the other one of the two-point sound sources. As another example, one sound guiding hole of an air conduction speaker may be treated as one of the two-point sound sources, and another sound guiding hole of the air conduction speaker may be treated as the other one of the two-point sound sources. It should be noted that, although the construction of two-point sound sources may be different in bone conduction speaker and air conduction speaker, the principles of the interference between the various constructed two-point sound sources are the same. Thus, the equivalence of the two-point sound sources in a bone conduction speaker disclosed elsewhere in the present disclosure is also applicable for an air conduction speaker.

In some embodiments, when the position and phase difference of the two-point sound sources meet certain conditions, the acoustic output device may output different sound effects in the near field (for example, the position of the user's ear) and the far field. For example, if the phases of the point sound sources corresponding to the portion of the housing 10 and the sound guiding hole(s) are opposite, that is, an absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources is 180 degrees, the far-field leakage may be reduced according to the principle of reversed phase cancellation.

In some embodiments, the interference between the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave at a specific frequency may relate to a distance between the sound guiding hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10. For example, if the sound guiding hole(s) are set at the upper portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 (as illustrated in FIG. 4A), the distance between the sound guiding hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10 may be large. Correspondingly, the frequencies of sound waves generated by such two-point sound sources may be in a mid-low frequency range (e.g., 1500-2000 Hz, 1500-2500 Hz, etc.). Referring to FIG. 4D, the interference may reduce the sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the mid-low frequency range (i.e., the sound leakage is low).

Merely by way of example, the low frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range below a first frequency threshold. The high frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range exceed a second frequency threshold. The first frequency threshold may be lower than the second frequency threshold. The mid-low frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range between the first frequency threshold and the second frequency threshold. For example, the first frequency threshold may be 1000 Hz, and the second frequency threshold may be 3000 Hz. The low frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range below 1000 Hz, the high frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range above 3000 Hz, and the mid-low frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range of 1000-2000 Hz, 1500-2500 Hz, etc. In some embodiments, a middle frequency range, a mid-high frequency range may also be determined between the first frequency threshold and the second frequency threshold. In some embodiments, the mid-low frequency range and the low frequency range may partially overlap. The mid-high frequency range and the high frequency range may partially overlap. For example, the mid-high frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range above 3000 Hz, and the mid-low frequency range may refer to frequencies in a range of 2800-3500 Hz. It should be noted that the low frequency range, the mid-low frequency range, the middle frequency range, the mid-high frequency range, and/or the high frequency range may be set flexibly according to different situations, and are not limited herein.

In some embodiments, the frequencies of the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave may be set in a low frequency range (e.g., below 800 Hz, below 1200 Hz, etc.). In some embodiments, the amplitudes of the sound waves generated by the two-point sound sources may be set to be different in the low frequency range. For example, the amplitude of the guided sound wave may be smaller than the amplitude of the leaked sound wave. In this case, the interference may not reduce sound pressure of the near-field sound in the low-frequency range. The sound pressure of the near-field sound may be improved in the low-frequency range. The volume of the sound heard by the user may be improved.

In some embodiments, the amplitude of the guided sound wave may be adjusted by setting an acoustic resistance structure in the sound guiding hole(s) 30. The material of the acoustic resistance structure disposed in the sound guiding hole 30 may include, but not limited to, plastics (e.g., high-molecular polyethylene, blown nylon, engineering plastics, etc.), cotton, nylon, fiber (e.g., glass fiber, carbon fiber, boron fiber, graphite fiber, graphene fiber, silicon carbide fiber, or aramid fiber), other single or composite materials, other organic and/or inorganic materials, etc. The thickness of the acoustic resistance structure may be 0.005 mm, 0.01 mm, 0.02 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, etc. The structure of the acoustic resistance structure may be in a shape adapted to the shape of the sound guiding hole. For example, the acoustic resistance structure may have a shape of a cylinder, a sphere, a cubic, etc. In some embodiments, the materials, thickness, and structures of the acoustic resistance structure may be modified and/or combined to obtain a desirable acoustic resistance structure. In some embodiments, the acoustic resistance structure may be implemented by the damping layer.

In some embodiments, the amplitude of the guided sound wave output from the sound guiding hole may be relatively low (e.g., zero or almost zero). The difference between the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave may be maximized, thus achieving a relatively large sound pressure in the near field. In this case, the sound leakage of the acoustic output device having sound guiding holes may be almost the same as the sound leakage of the acoustic output device without sound guiding holes in the low frequency range (e.g., as shown in FIG. 4D).

Embodiment Two

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of an exemplary method of reducing sound leakage of a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. At 601, a bone conduction speaker including a vibration plate 21 touching human skin and passing vibrations, a transducer 22, and a housing 10 is provided. At least one sound guiding hole 30 is arranged on the housing 10. At 602, the vibration plate 21 is driven by the transducer 22, causing the vibration 21 to vibrate. At 603, a leaked sound wave due to the vibrations of the housing is formed, wherein the leaked sound wave transmits in the air. At 604, a guided sound wave passing through the at least one sound guiding hole 30 from the inside to the outside of the housing 10. The guided sound wave interferes with the leaked sound wave, reducing the sound leakage of the bone conduction speaker.

The sound guiding holes 30 are preferably set at different positions of the housing 10.

The effectiveness of reducing sound leakage may be determined by the formulas and method as described above, based on which the positions of sound guiding holes may be determined.

A damping layer is preferably set in a sound guiding hole 30 to adjust the phase and amplitude of the sound wave transmitted through the sound guiding hole 30.

In some embodiments, different sound guiding holes may generate different sound waves having a same phase to reduce the leaked sound wave having the same wavelength. In some embodiments, different sound guiding holes may generate different sound waves having different phases to reduce the leaked sound waves having different wavelengths.

In some embodiments, different portions of a sound guiding hole 30 may be configured to generate sound waves having a same phase to reduce the leaked sound waves with the same wavelength. In some embodiments, different portions of a sound guiding hole 30 may be configured to generate sound waves having different phases to reduce the leaked sound waves with different wavelengths.

Additionally, the sound wave inside the housing may be processed to basically have the same value but opposite phases with the leaked sound wave, so that the sound leakage may be further reduced.

Embodiment Three

FIGS. 7A and 7B are schematic structures illustrating an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21, and a transducer 22. The housing 10 may cylindrical and have a sidewall and a bottom. A plurality of sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged on the lower portion of the sidewall (i.e., from about the ⅔ height of the sidewall to the bottom). The quantity of the sound guiding holes 30 may be 8, the openings of the sound guiding holes 30 may be rectangle. The sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged evenly or evenly in one or more circles on the sidewall of the housing 10.

In the embodiment, the transducer 22 is preferably implemented based on the principle of electromagnetic transduction. The transducer may include components such as magnetizer, voice coil, and etc., and the components may locate inside the housing and may generate synchronous vibrations with a same frequency.

FIG. 7C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. In the frequency range of 1400 Hz˜4000 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 5 dB, and in the frequency range of 2250 Hz˜2500 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 20 dB.

In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole(s) at the lower portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 may also be approximately regarded as a point sound source. In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole(s) at the lower portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 and the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave may constitute two-point sound sources. The two-point sound sources may be formed such that the guided sound wave output from the sound guiding hole(s) at the lower portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 may interfere with the leaked sound wave generated by the portion of the housing 10. The interference may reduce a sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the surrounding environment (e.g., the target region) at a specific frequency or frequency range.

In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the two-point sound sources may have a same frequency or frequency range (e.g., 1000 Hz, 2500 Hz, 3000 Hz, etc.). In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the first two-point sound sources may have a certain phase difference. In this case, the interference between the sound waves generated by the first two-point sound sources may reduce a sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the target region. When the position and phase difference of the first two-point sound sources meet certain conditions, the acoustic output device may output different sound effects in the near field (for example, the position of the user's ear) and the far field. For example, if the phases of the first two-point sound sources are opposite, that is, an absolute value of the phase difference between the first two-point sound sources is 180 degrees, the far-field leakage may be reduced.

In some embodiments, the interference between the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave may relate to frequencies of the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave and/or a distance between the sound guiding hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10. For example, if the sound guiding hole(s) are set at the lower portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 (as illustrated in FIG. 7A), the distance between the sound guiding hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10 may be small. Correspondingly, the frequencies of sound waves generated by such two-point sound sources may be in a high frequency range (e.g., above 3000 Hz, above 3500 Hz, etc.). Referring to FIG. 7C, the interference may reduce the sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the high frequency range.

Embodiment Four

FIGS. 8A and 8B are schematic structures illustrating an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21, and a transducer 22. The housing 10 is cylindrical and have a sidewall and a bottom. The sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged on the central portion of the sidewall of the housing (i.e., from about the ⅓ height of the sidewall to the ⅔ height of the sidewall). The quantity of the sound guiding holes 30 may be 8, and the openings (and cross sections) of the sound guiding hole 30 may be rectangle. The sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles on the sidewall of the housing 10.

In the embodiment, the transducer 21 may be implemented preferably based on the principle of electromagnetic transduction. The transducer 21 may include components such as magnetizer, voice coil, etc., which may be placed inside the housing and may generate synchronous vibrations with the same frequency.

FIG. 8C is a diagram illustrating reduced sound leakage. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz˜4000 Hz, the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is great. For example, in the frequency range of 1400 Hz˜2900 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 10 dB; in the frequency range of 2200 Hz˜2500 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 20 dB.

It's illustrated that the effectiveness of reduced sound leakage can be adjusted by changing the positions of the sound guiding holes, while keeping other parameters relating to the sound guiding holes unchanged.

Embodiment Five

FIGS. 9A and 9B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21 and a transducer 22. The housing 10 is cylindrical, with a sidewall and a bottom. One or more perforative sound guiding holes 30 may be along the circumference of the bottom. In some embodiments, there may be 8 sound guiding holes 30 arranged evenly of unevenly in one or more circles on the bottom of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the shape of one or more of the sound guiding holes 30 may be rectangle.

FIG. 9C is a diagram illustrating the effect of reduced sound leakage. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz˜3000 Hz, the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is outstanding. For example, in the frequency range of 1700 Hz˜2700 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 10 dB; in the frequency range of 2200 Hz˜2400 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 20 dB.

Embodiment Six

FIGS. 10A and 10B are schematic structures of an exemplary bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21 and a transducer 22. One or more perforative sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged on both upper and lower portions of the sidewall of the housing 10. The sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles on the upper and lower portions of the sidewall of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the quantity of sound guiding holes 30 in every circle may be 8, and the upper portion sound guiding holes and the lower portion sound guiding holes may be symmetrical about the central cross section of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the shape of the sound guiding hole 30 may be circle.

The shape of the sound guiding holes on the upper portion and the shape of the sound guiding holes on the lower portion may be different; One or more damping layers may be arranged in the sound guiding holes to reduce leaked sound waves of the same wave length (or frequency), or to reduce leaked sound waves of different wave lengths.

FIG. 10C is a diagram illustrating the effect of reducing sound leakage according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz˜4000 Hz, the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is outstanding. For example, in the frequency range of 1600 Hz˜2700 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 15 dB; in the frequency range of 2000 Hz˜2500 Hz, where the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is most outstanding, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 20 dB. Compared to embodiment three, this scheme has a relatively balanced effect of reduced sound leakage on various frequency range, and this effect is better than the effect of schemes where the height of the holes are fixed, such as schemes of embodiment three, embodiment four, embodiment five, and so on.

In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole(s) at the upper portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 (also referred to as first hole(s)) may be approximately regarded as a point sound source. In some embodiments, the first hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave may constitute two-point sound sources (also referred to as first two-point sound sources). As for the first two-point sound sources, the guided sound wave generated by the first hole(s) (also referred to as first guided sound wave) may interfere with the leaked sound wave or a portion thereof generated by the portion of the housing 10 in a first region. In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the first two-point sound sources may have a same frequency (e.g., a first frequency). In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the first two-point sound sources may have a certain phase difference. In this case, the interference between the sound waves generated by the first two-point sound sources may reduce a sound pressure level of the leaked sound wave in the target region. When the position and phase difference of the first two-point sound sources meet certain conditions, the acoustic output device may output different sound effects in the near field (for example, the position of the user's ear) and the far field. For example, if the phases of the first two-point sound sources are opposite, that is, an absolute value of the phase difference between the first two-point sound sources is 180 degrees, the far-field leakage may be reduced according to the principle of reversed phase cancellation.

In some embodiments, the sound guiding hole(s) at the lower portion of the sidewall of the housing 10 (also referred to as second hole(s)) may also be approximately regarded as another point sound source. Similarly, the second hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave may also constitute two-point sound sources (also referred to as second two-point sound sources). As for the second two-point sound sources, the guided sound wave generated by the second hole(s) (also referred to as second guided sound wave) may interfere with the leaked sound wave or a portion thereof generated by the portion of the housing 10 in a second region. The second region may be the same as or different from the first region. In some embodiments, the sound waves output from the second two-point sound sources may have a same frequency (e.g., a second frequency).

In some embodiments, the first frequency and the second frequency may be in certain frequency ranges. In some embodiments, the frequency of the guided sound wave output from the sound guiding hole(s) may be adjustable. In some embodiments, the frequency of the first guided sound wave and/or the second guided sound wave may be adjusted by one or more acoustic routes. The acoustic routes may be coupled to the first hole(s) and/or the second hole(s). The first guided sound wave and/or the second guided sound wave may be propagated along the acoustic route having a specific frequency selection characteristic. That is, the first guided sound wave and the second guided sound wave may be transmitted to their corresponding sound guiding holes via different acoustic routes. For example, the first guided sound wave and/or the second guided sound wave may be propagated along an acoustic route with a low-pass characteristic to a corresponding sound guiding hole to output guided sound wave of a low frequency. In this process, the high frequency component of the sound wave may be absorbed or attenuated by the acoustic route with the low-pass characteristic. Similarly, the first guided sound wave and/or the second guided sound wave may be propagated along an acoustic route with a high-pass characteristic to the corresponding sound guiding hole to output guided sound wave of a high frequency. In this process, the low frequency component of the sound wave may be absorbed or attenuated by the acoustic route with the high-pass characteristic.

FIG. 10D is a schematic diagram illustrating an acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 10E is a schematic diagram illustrating another acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 10F is a schematic diagram illustrating a further acoustic route according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, structures such as a sound tube, a sound cavity, a sound resistance, etc., may be set in the acoustic route for adjusting frequencies for the sound waves (e.g., by filtering certain frequencies). It should be noted that FIGS. 10D-10F may be provided as examples of the acoustic routes, and not intended be limiting.

As shown in FIG. 10D, the acoustic route may include one or more lumen structures. The one or more lumen structures may be connected in series. An acoustic resistance material may be provided in each of at least one of the one or more lumen structures to adjust acoustic impedance of the entire structure to achieve a desirable sound filtering effect. For example, the acoustic impedance may be in a range of 5 MKS Rayleigh to 500 MKS Rayleigh. In some embodiments, a high-pass sound filtering, a low-pass sound filtering, and/or a band-pass filtering effect of the acoustic route may be achieved by adjusting a size of each of at least one of the one or more lumen structures and/or a type of acoustic resistance material in each of at least one of the one or more lumen structures. The acoustic resistance materials may include, but not limited to, plastic, textile, metal, permeable material, woven material, screen material or mesh material, porous material, particulate material, polymer material, or the like, or any combination thereof. By setting the acoustic routes of different acoustic impedances, the acoustic output from the sound guiding holes may be acoustically filtered. In this case, the guided sound waves may have different frequency components.

As shown in FIG. 10E, the acoustic route may include one or more resonance cavities. The one or more resonance cavities may be, for example, Helmholtz cavity. In some embodiments, a high-pass sound filtering, a low-pass sound filtering, and/or a band-pass filtering effect of the acoustic route may be achieved by adjusting a size of each of at least one of the one or more resonance cavities and/or a type of acoustic resistance material in each of at least one of the one or more resonance cavities.

As shown in FIG. 10F, the acoustic route may include a combination of one or more lumen structures and one or more resonance cavities. In some embodiments, a high-pass sound filtering, a low-pass sound filtering, and/or a band-pass filtering effect of the acoustic route may be achieved by adjusting a size of each of at least one of the one or more lumen structures and one or more resonance cavities and/or a type of acoustic resistance material in each of at least one of the one or more lumen structures and one or more resonance cavities. It should be noted that the structures exemplified above may be for illustration purposes, various acoustic structures may also be provided, such as a tuning net, tuning cotton, etc.

In some embodiments, the interference between the leaked sound wave and the guided sound wave may relate to frequencies of the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave and/or a distance between the sound guiding hole(s) and the portion of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the portion of the housing that generates the leaked sound wave may be the bottom of the housing 10. The first hole(s) may have a larger distance to the portion of the housing 10 than the second hole(s). In some embodiments, the frequency of the first guided sound wave output from the first hole(s) (e.g., the first frequency) and the frequency of second guided sound wave output from second hole(s) (e.g., the second frequency) may be different.

In some embodiments, the first frequency and second frequency may associate with the distance between the at least one sound guiding hole and the portion of the housing 10 that generates the leaked sound wave. In some embodiments, the first frequency may be set in a low frequency range. The second frequency may be set in a high frequency range. The low frequency range and the high frequency range may or may not overlap.

In some embodiments, the frequency of the leaked sound wave generated by the portion of the housing 10 may be in a wide frequency range. The wide frequency range may include, for example, the low frequency range and the high frequency range or a portion of the low frequency range and the high frequency range. For example, the leaked sound wave may include a first frequency in the low frequency range and a second frequency in the high frequency range. In some embodiments, the leaked sound wave of the first frequency and the leaked sound wave of the second frequency may be generated by different portions of the housing 10. For example, the leaked sound wave of the first frequency may be generated by the sidewall of the housing 10, the leaked sound wave of the second frequency may be generated by the bottom of the housing 10. As another example, the leaked sound wave of the first frequency may be generated by the bottom of the housing 10, the leaked sound wave of the second frequency may be generated by the sidewall of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the frequency of the leaked sound wave generated by the portion of the housing 10 may relate to parameters including the mass, the damping, the stiffness, etc., of the different portion of the housing 10, the frequency of the transducer 22, etc.

In some embodiments, the characteristics (amplitude, frequency, and phase) of the first two-point sound sources and the second two-point sound sources may be adjusted via various parameters of the acoustic output device (e.g., electrical parameters of the transducer 22, the mass, stiffness, size, structure, material, etc., of the portion of the housing 10, the position, shape, structure, and/or number (or count) of the sound guiding hole(s) so as to form a sound field with a particular spatial distribution. In some embodiments, a frequency of the first guided sound wave is smaller than a frequency of the second guided sound wave.

A combination of the first two-point sound sources and the second two-point sound sources may improve sound effects both in the near field and the far field.

Referring to FIGS. 4D, 7C, and 10C, by designing different two-point sound sources with different distances, the sound leakage in both the low frequency range and the high frequency range may be properly suppressed. In some embodiments, the closer distance between the second two-point sound sources may be more suitable for suppressing the sound leakage in the far field, and the relative longer distance between the first two-point sound sources may be more suitable for reducing the sound leakage in the near field. In some embodiments, the amplitudes of the sound waves generated by the first two-point sound sources may be set to be different in the low frequency range. For example, the amplitude of the guided sound wave may be smaller than the amplitude of the leaked sound wave. In this case, the sound pressure level of the near-field sound may be improved. The volume of the sound heard by the user may be increased.

Embodiment Seven

FIGS. 11A and 11B are schematic structures illustrating a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21 and a transducer 22. One or more perforative sound guiding holes 30 may be set on upper and lower portions of the sidewall of the housing 10 and on the bottom of the housing 10. The sound guiding holes 30 on the sidewall are arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles on the upper and lower portions of the sidewall of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the quantity of sound guiding holes 30 in every circle may be 8, and the upper portion sound guiding holes and the lower portion sound guiding holes may be symmetrical about the central cross section of the housing 10. In some embodiments, the shape of the sound guiding hole 30 may be rectangular. There may be four sound guiding holds 30 on the bottom of the housing 10. The four sound guiding holes 30 may be linear-shaped along arcs, and may be arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles with respect to the center of the bottom. Furthermore, the sound guiding holes 30 may include a circular perforative hole on the center of the bottom.

FIG. 11C is a diagram illustrating the effect of reducing sound leakage of the embodiment. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz˜4000 Hz, the effectiveness of reducing sound leakage is outstanding. For example, in the frequency range of 1300 Hz˜3000 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 10 dB; in the frequency range of 2000 Hz˜2700 Hz, the sound leakage is reduced by more than 20 dB. Compared to embodiment three, this scheme has a relatively balanced effect of reduced sound leakage within various frequency range, and this effect is better than the effect of schemes where the height of the holes are fixed, such as schemes of embodiment three, embodiment four, embodiment five, and etc. Compared to embodiment six, in the frequency range of 1000 Hz˜1700 Hz and 2500 Hz˜4000 Hz, this scheme has a better effect of reduced sound leakage than embodiment six.

Embodiment Eight

FIGS. 12A and 12B are schematic structures illustrating a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21 and a transducer 22. A perforative sound guiding hole 30 may be set on the upper portion of the sidewall of the housing 10. One or more sound guiding holes may be arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles on the upper portion of the sidewall of the housing 10. There may be 8 sound guiding holes 30, and the shape of the sound guiding holes 30 may be circle.

After comparison of calculation results and test results, the effectiveness of this embodiment is basically the same with that of embodiment one, and this embodiment can effectively reduce sound leakage.

Embodiment Nine

FIGS. 13A and 13B are schematic structures illustrating a bone conduction speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The bone conduction speaker may include an open housing 10, a vibration board 21 and a transducer 22.

The difference between this embodiment and the above-described embodiment three is that to reduce sound leakage to greater extent, the sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged on the upper, central and lower portions of the sidewall 11. The sound guiding holes 30 are arranged evenly or unevenly in one or more circles. Different circles are formed by the sound guiding holes 30, one of which is set along the circumference of the bottom 12 of the housing 10. The size of the sound guiding holes 30 are the same.

The effect of this scheme may cause a relatively balanced effect of reducing sound leakage in various frequency ranges compared to the schemes where the position of the holes are fixed. The effect of this design on reducing sound leakage is relatively better than that of other designs where the heights of the holes are fixed, such as embodiment three, embodiment four, embodiment five, etc.

Embodiment Ten

The sound guiding holes 30 in the above embodiments may be perforative holes without shields.

In order to adjust the effect of the sound waves guided from the sound guiding holes, a damping layer (not shown in the figures) may locate at the opening of a sound guiding hole 30 to adjust the phase and/or the amplitude of the sound wave.

There are multiple variations of materials and positions of the damping layer. For example, the damping layer may be made of materials which can damp sound waves, such as tuning paper, tuning cotton, nonwoven fabric, silk, cotton, sponge or rubber. The damping layer may be attached on the inner wall of the sound guiding hole 30, or may shield the sound guiding hole 30 from outside.

More preferably, the damping layers corresponding to different sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged to adjust the sound waves from different sound guiding holes to generate a same phase. The adjusted sound waves may be used to reduce leaked sound wave having the same wavelength. Alternatively, different sound guiding holes 30 may be arranged to generate different phases to reduce leaked sound wave having different wavelengths (i.e., leaked sound waves with specific wavelengths).

In some embodiments, different portions of a same sound guiding hole can be configured to generate a same phase to reduce leaked sound waves on the same wavelength (e.g., using a pre-set damping layer with the shape of stairs or steps). In some embodiments, different portions of a same sound guiding hole can be configured to generate different phases to reduce leaked sound waves on different wavelengths.

The above-described embodiments are preferable embodiments with various configurations of the sound guiding hole(s) on the housing of a bone conduction speaker, but a person having ordinary skills in the art can understand that the embodiments don't limit the configurations of the sound guiding hole(s) to those described in this application.

In the past bone conduction speakers, the housing of the bone conduction speakers is closed, so the sound source inside the housing is sealed inside the housing. In the embodiments of the present disclosure, there can be holes in proper positions of the housing, making the sound waves inside the housing and the leaked sound waves having substantially same amplitude and substantially opposite phases in the space, so that the sound waves can interfere with each other and the sound leakage of the bone conduction speaker is reduced. Meanwhile, the volume and weight of the speaker do not increase, the reliability of the product is not comprised, and the cost is barely increased. The designs disclosed herein are easy to implement, reliable, and effective in reducing sound leakage.

In some embodiments, when the user wears a speaker as described elsewhere in the present disclosure (e.g., the speaker as described in 4A through 13B), the speaker may be located at least on one side of the user's head, close but not blocking the user's ear. The speaker may be worn on the head of the user (for example, a non-in-ear open headset worn with glasses, a headband, or other structural means), or worn on other body parts of the user (such as the neck/shoulder region of the user), or placed near the ears of user by other means (such as the way the user holds it). The speaker may further include at least two groups of acoustic drivers, including at least one group of high-frequency acoustic drivers and one group of low-frequency acoustic drivers. Each group of acoustic driver may be used to generate a sound with a certain frequency range, and the sound may be transmitted outward through at least two sound guiding holes acoustically coupled with it.

In order to further explain the effect of the setting of the sound guiding holes on the speaker on the acoustic output effect of the speaker, and considering that the sound may be regarded as propagating outwards from the sound guiding holes, the present disclosure may describe the sound guiding holes on the speaker as sound sources for externally outputting sound.

Just for the convenience of description and for the purpose of illustration, when sizes of the sound guiding holes on the speaker are small, each sound guiding hole may be approximately regarded as a point sound source. In some embodiments, any sound guiding holes provided on the speaker for outputting sound may be approximated as a single point sound source on the speaker. The sound field pressure p generated by a single point sound source may satisfy Equation (13) as described in FIG. 4E. Further, for those skilled in the art, without creative activities, it may be known that the acoustic effect achieved by “acoustic driver outputs sound from at least two first sound guiding holes” described in the present disclosure may also achieve the same effect by other acoustic structures, for example, “at least two acoustic drivers each of which outputs sound from at least one acoustic radiation surface”. According to actual situations, other acoustic structures may be selected for adjustment and combination, and the same acoustic output effect may also be achieved. The principle of radiating sound outward with structures such as surface sound sources may be similar to that of point sound sources, and may not be repeated here.

As mentioned above, at least two sound guiding holes corresponding to the same acoustic driver may be set on the speaker provided in the specification. In this case, two-point sound sources (also referred to as a dual-point sound source, or two point sound sources) may be formed, which may reduce sound transmitted to the surrounding environment. For convenience, the sound output from the speaker to the surrounding environment may be referred to as far-field leakage since it may be heard by others in the environment. The sound output from the speaker to the ears of the user wearing the speaker may also be referred to as near-field sound since a distance between the speaker and the user may be relatively short. In some embodiments, the sound outputs from two sound guiding holes (i.e., the dual-point sound source) have a certain phase difference. When the position and phase difference of the two-point sound sources meet certain conditions, the speaker may output different sound effects in the near-field (for example, the position of the user's ear) and the far-field. For example, if the phases of the point sound sources corresponding to the two sound guiding holes are opposite, that is, an absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be 180 degrees, the far-field leakage may be reduced according to the principle of reversed phase cancellation.

Further refer to FIG. 4E for illustration purposes, a sound pressure p in the sound field generated by two-point sound sources may satisfy the following Equation (14):

$\begin{matrix} p = \frac{A_{1}}{r_{1}} \exp j (ω t - k r_{1} + φ_{1}) + \frac{A_{2}}{r_{2}} \exp j (ω t - k r_{2} + φ_{2}), & (14) \end{matrix}$

where, A₁and A₂denote intensities of the two-point sound sources, φ₁and φ₂denote phases of the two-point sound sources, respectively, d denotes a distance between the two point sound sources, and r₁and r₂may satisfy Equation (15);

$\begin{matrix} {\begin{matrix} r_{1} = \sqrt{r^{2} + {(\frac{d}{2})}^{2} - 2 \times r \times \frac{d}{2} \times \cos θ} \\ r_{2} = \sqrt{r^{2} + {(\frac{d}{2})}^{2} - 2 \times r \times \frac{d}{2} \times \cos θ} \end{matrix}, & (15) \end{matrix}$

where, r denotes a distance between any target point and the center of the two-point sound sources in the space, and θ denotes an angle between a line connecting the target point and the center of the two-point sound sources and another line on which the two-point sound sources may be located.

According to Equation (15), the sound pressure p of the target point in the sound field may relate to the intensity of each point sound source, the distance d, the phases of the two-point sound sources, and the distance to the two-point sound sources.

Two-point sound sources with different output effects may be formed through different settings of sound guiding holes. In this case, the volume of near-field sound may be improved, and the leakage of the far-field may be reduced. For example, an acoustic driver may include a vibration diaphragm. When the vibration diaphragm vibrates, sounds may be transmitted from the front and rear sides of the vibration diaphragm, respectively. The front side of the vibration diaphragm in the speaker may be provided with a front chamber for transmitting sound. The front chamber may be coupled with a sound guiding hole acoustically. The sound transmitted from the front side of the vibration diaphragm may be transmitted to the sound guiding hole through the front chamber and further transmitted outwards. The rear side of the vibration diaphragm in the speaker may be provided with a rear chamber for transmitting sound. The rear chamber may be coupled with another sound guiding hole acoustically, and the sound transmitted from the rear side of the vibration diaphragm may be transmitted to the sound guiding hole through the rear chamber and propagate further outwards. It should be noted that, when the vibration diaphragm vibrating, the front side and the rear side of the vibration diaphragm may generate sound with opposite phases, respectively. In some embodiments, the structures of the front chamber and rear chamber may be specially set so that the sound output by the acoustic driver at different sound guiding holes may meet specific conditions. For example, lengths of the front chamber and the rear chamber may be specially designed such that sound with a specific phase relationship (e.g., opposite phases) may be output at the two sound guiding holes. As a result, problems that the speaker has a low volume in the near-field and the sound leaks in the far-field may be effectively resolved.

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram illustrating variations of sound leakage of two-point sound sources with a certain distance and a single point sound source as a function of frequency according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

Under certain conditions, compared to a volume of the far-field leakage of a single point sound source, the volume of the far-field leakage of the two-point sound sources may increase with the frequency. In other words, the leakage reduction capability of the two-point sound sources in the far-field may decrease with the frequency increases. For further description, a curve of far-field leakage with frequency may be described in connection with FIG. 14.

Distance between the two point sound sources in FIG. 14 may be fixed, and the two-point sound sources may have a same amplitude and opposite phases. The dotted line may indicate a variation curve of a volume of the single point sound source at different frequencies. The solid line may indicate a variation curve of a volume of the leaked sound of the two-point sound sources at different frequencies. The abscissa of the diagram may represent the frequency (f) of the sound, and the unit may be Hertz (Hz). The ordinate of the diagram may use a normalization parameter a to evaluate the volume of the leaked sound. The calculation equation of parameter a may be as follows:

$\begin{matrix} α = \frac{{❘ P_{far} ❘}^{2}}{{❘ P_{ear} ❘}^{2}}, & (16) \end{matrix}$

where P_fardenotes the sound pressure of the speaker in the far-field (i.e., the sound pressure of the far-field sound leakage). P_eardenotes the sound pressure around the user's ears (i.e., the sound pressure of the near-field sound). The larger the value of a, the larger the far-field leakage relative to the near-field sound heard may be, indicating that the capability of the speaker for reducing the far-field leakage may be worse.

As shown in FIG. 14, when the frequency is below 6000 Hz, the far-field leakage produced by the two-point sound sources may be less than the far-field leakage produced by the single point sound source, and may increase as the frequency increases. When the frequency is close to 10000 Hz (for example, about 8000 Hz or above), the far-field leakage produced by the two-point sound sources may be greater than the far-field leakage produced by the single point sound source. In some embodiments, a frequency corresponding to an intersection of the variation curves of the two-point sound sources and the single point sound source may be determined as an upper limit frequency that the two-point sound sources can reduce the leakage.

In connection with FIG. 14, a frequency division point of the frequency may be determined through the variation tendency of the capability of the two-point sound sources in reducing the sound leakage. Parameters of the two-point sound sources may be adjusted according to the frequency division point so as to reduce the sound leakage of the speaker. For example, the frequency corresponding to a of a specific value (e.g., −60 dB, −70 dB, −80 dB, −90 dB, etc.) may be used as the frequency division point. Parameters of the two-point sound sources may be determined by setting the frequency band below the frequency division point to improve the near-field sound, and setting the frequency band above the frequency division point to reduce far-field sound leakage. For the purpose of illustration, the frequency 1000 Hz corresponding to a of a value of −80 dB may be used as the frequency division point. When the frequency is relatively small (for example, in a range of 100 Hz to 1000 Hz), the capability of reducing sound leakage of the two-point sound sources may be relatively strong (i.e., the value of a may be small which is below −80 dB). In such a frequency band, an increase of the volume of the heard sound may be determined as an optimization goal. When the frequency is relatively great, (for example, in a range of 1000 Hz to 8000 Hz), the capability of reducing sound leakage of the two-point sound sources may be relatively weak (i.e., the value of a may be large which is above −80 dB). In such a frequency band, a decrease of the sound leakage may be determined as the optimization goal.

In some embodiments, a high-frequency band with relatively high sound frequencies (e.g., a sound output by a high-frequency acoustic driver) and a low-frequency band with relatively low sound frequencies (e.g., a sound output by a low-frequency acoustic driver) may be determined based on the frequency division point. As used herein, a low-frequency band in the embodiments of the present disclosure refers to a first frequency range with relatively low frequencies, and a high-frequency band refers to a second frequency range with relatively high frequencies. The first frequency range and the second frequency range may include or not include overlapping frequency ranges. The second frequency range may include frequencies higher than the first frequency range. Merely by way of example, the first frequency range may include frequencies lower than a first frequency threshold, and the second frequency range may include frequencies higher than a second frequency threshold. The first frequency threshold may be lower than, equal to, or higher than the second frequency threshold. For example, the first frequency threshold may be less than the second frequency threshold (for example, the first frequency threshold may be 600 Hz and the second frequency range may be 700 Hz), which indicates that there is no overlap between the first frequency range and the second frequency range. As another example, the first frequency threshold may be equal to the second frequency threshold (for example, both the first frequency threshold and the second frequency threshold may be 650 Hz or other arbitrary frequency values). As a further example, the first frequency threshold may be greater than the second frequency threshold, which indicates that there is an overlap between the first frequency range and the second frequency range. In such cases, a difference between the first frequency threshold and the second frequency threshold may not exceed a third frequency threshold. The third frequency threshold may be a constant value (for example, 20 Hz, 50 Hz, 100 Hz, 150 Hz, 200 Hz), or may be a value related to the first frequency threshold and/or the second frequency threshold (for example, 5%, 10%, 15%, etc. of the first frequency threshold), or a value flexibly set by the user according to the actual scene, which is not limited here. It should be noted that the first frequency threshold and the second frequency threshold may be flexibly set according to different situations, which are not limited here.

As described above, the frequency division point may be a signal frequency that distinguishes the first frequency range from the second frequency range. For example, when there is an overlapping frequency range between the first frequency range and the second frequency range, the frequency division point may be a feature point in the overlapping frequency range (for example, a low-frequency boundary point, a high-frequency boundary point, or a center frequency point, etc., of the overlapping frequency range). In some embodiments, the frequency division point may be determined according to a relationship between the frequency and the sound leakage of the speaker. For example, considering that the leaked sound of the speaker changes with the frequency, a frequency point corresponding to a volume of the leaked sound that meets a certain condition may be designated as the frequency division point, such as 1000 Hz in FIG. 2. In some alternative embodiments, the user may directly designate a specific frequency as the frequency division point. For example, considering that a human ear may hear the sound frequency range of 20 Hz-20 kHz, the user may select a frequency point in the range as the frequency division point. For example, the frequency division point may be 600 Hz, 800 Hz, 1000 Hz, 1200 Hz, etc. In some embodiments, the frequency division point may be determined according to the performance of the acoustic driver. For example, considering that a low-frequency acoustic driver and a high-frequency acoustic driver have different frequency response curves, the frequency division point may be determined from a frequency range that is higher than ½ of the upper limit frequency of the low-frequency acoustic driver and lower than 2 times the lower limit frequency of the high-frequency acoustic driver.

In some embodiments, the method for measuring and calculating the sound leakage may be adjusted according to the actual conditions. For example, an average value of amplitudes of the sound pressure of a plurality of points on a spherical surface centered by the dual-point sound source with a radius of 40 cm may be determined as the value of the sound leakage. As another example, one or more points of the far-field position may be taken as the position for measuring the sound leakage, and the sound volume of the position may be taken as the value of the sound leakage. As another example, a center of the dual-point sound source may be used as a center of a circle, and sound pressure amplitudes of two or more points evenly sampled according to a certain spatial angle in the far-field may be averaged, the average value may be taken as the value of the sound leakage. These measurement and calculation methods may be adjusted by those skilled in the art according to actual conditions and may be not intended to be limiting.

According to FIG. 14, it may be concluded that in the high-frequency band (higher frequency band determined according to the frequency division point), the dual-point sound source may have a weak capability to reduce sound leakage, and in the low-frequency band (lower frequency band determined according to the frequency division point), the dual-point sound source may have a strong capability to reduce sound leakage. At a certain sound frequency, the amplitudes, phase differences, etc., of the two-point sound sources may be different, and the capability of the two-point sound sources to reduce sound leakage may be different, and the difference between the volume of the heard sound and volume of the leaked sound may also be different. For a better description, the curve of the far-field leakage as a function of the distance between the two point sound sources may be described with reference to FIGS. 15A and 15B.

In some embodiments, a hearing sound and a leaked sound produced by a dual-point sound source may be related to amplitudes of two point sound sources of the dual-point sound source. FIG. 15A is a graph illustrating variations of a hearing sound and a leaked sound of a dual-point sound source with an amplitude ratio of the two-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. As used herein, the amplitude ratio refers to a ratio of a greater amplitude to a less amplitude of the sounds output from the two-point sound sources. It should be noted that an amplitude ratio of two sounds output from two sound guiding holes in the present disclosure may also be referred to as an amplitude ratio of the two sound guiding holes, or an amplitude ratio of two point sources corresponding to the two sound guiding holes, or an amplitude ratio of a dual-point sound source. As shown in FIG. 15A, the solid line represents a variation curve of the near-field hearing sound of the dual-point sound source with amplitude, and the dotted line represents a variation curve of the far-field leaked sound of the dual-point sound source with the amplitude. The abscissa represents the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources, and the ordinate represents the sound volume. In order to better reflect the relative variations of the hearing sound and the leaked sound, the hearing sound volume may be normalized based on the leaked sound volume, that is, the ordinate reflects the ratio of the actual sound volume to the leakage sound volume (i.e., |P|/|Pfar|).

According to FIG. 15A, the hearing sound and the leaked sound of the dual-point sound source may be at a specific frequency. At the specific frequency, when the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources increases within a certain range, the increase of the hearing sound volume of the dual-point sound source may be significantly greater than the increase of the leaked sound volume. As shown in FIG. 15A, when the amplitude ratio A2/A1 between the two-point sound sources changes within a range of 1-1.5, the increase of the hearing sound volume may be obviously greater than the increase of the leaked sound volume. That is, in such cases, the greater the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources, the more better for the dual-point sound source to produce a higher near-field hearing sound volume and reduce the far-field leaked sound volume. In some embodiments, as the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources further increases, the slope of the normalized curve of the hearing sound volume gradually tends to 0, and the normalized curve of the hearing sound volume gradually tends to be parallel with the normalized curve of the leaked sound volume, which indicates that the increase of the hearing sound volume is substantially the same as the increase of the leaked sound volume. As shown in FIG. 15A, when the amplitude ratio A2/A1 between the two-point sound sources changes within a range greater than 2, the increase of the hearing sound volume may be substantially the same as the increase of the leaked sound volume.

In some embodiments, in order to ensure that the dual-point sound source may produce a larger near-field hearing sound volume and a smaller far-field leaked sound volume, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-5. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-4.5. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-4. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-3.5. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-3. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-2. In some embodiments, the amplitude ratio between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range of 1-1.5.

In some embodiments, a hearing sound and a leaked sound produced by a dual-point sound source may be related to phases of the two-point sound sources. FIG. 15B is a graph illustrating variations of a hearing sound and a leaked sound of a dual-point sound source with a phase difference between two point sound sources of the dual-point sound source according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Similar to FIG. 15A, as shown in FIG. 15B, the solid line represents a variation curve of the near-field hearing sound of the dual-point sound source with the phase difference, and the dotted line represents a variation curve of the far-field leaked sound of the dual-point sound source with the phase difference. The abscissa represents the phase difference between the two-point sound sources, and the ordinate represents the sound volume. In order to better reflect the relative variations of the hearing sound and the leaked sound, the hearing sound volume may be normalized based on the leaked sound volume, that is, the ordinate reflects the ratio of the actual sound volume to the leaked sound volume (i.e., |P|/|Pfar|).

According to FIG. 15B, the hearing sound and the leaked sound of the dual-point sound source may be at a specific frequency. At the specific frequency, as the phase difference between the two-point sound sources changes, the normalized curve corresponding to the hearing sound volume of the dual-point sound source may form a peak. As shown in FIG. 15B, an absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources corresponding to the peak may be about 170 degrees. At the peak, the dual-point sound source has a largest normalized hearing sound volume, which indicates that the dual-point sound source may produce a greater hearing sound volume while keeping the leaked sound volume unchanged, or the dual-point sound source may produce a smaller leaked sound volume while maintaining the hearing sound volume.

It should be noted that at different frequencies, the phase difference corresponding to the peak of the normalized curve of the hearing sound volume may be shifted or change. In some embodiments, in order to ensure that within a certain sound frequency range (for example, within the audible frequency range of the human ear), the dual-point sound source may produce a larger near-field hearing sound volume and a smaller far-field leaked sound volume, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be set to in a certain range. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range from 180 degrees to 120 degrees. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range from 180 degrees to 140 degrees. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range from 180 degrees to 150 degrees. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two-point sound sources may be set in the range from 180 degrees to 160 degrees.

According to the above descriptions, it may be seen that by adjusting the parameters of the dual-point sound source by certain means, the increase of the near-field hearing sound volume may be greater than the increase of the far-field leaked sound volume. In practical applications, the amplitudes and/or phase difference of the dual-point sound source may be limited or adjusted to better improve the sound output effect of the dual-point sound source based on sound characteristics of the dual-point sound source at different frequencies. For example, a high-frequency dual-point sound source and a low-frequency dual-point sound source may be set. By adjusting an amplitude ratio of two sound sources of each dual-point sound source by certain means, the amplitude ratio between the two sound sources of the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be different from the amplitude ratio between the two sound sources of the low-frequency dual-point sound source. Specifically, considering that the low-frequency dual-point sound source has less sound leakage (i.e., with stronger leakage reduction ability), and the high-frequency dual-point sound source has greater sound leakage (i.e., with weak leakage reduction ability), the amplitude ratio between the two sound sources of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be set to be greater than the amplitude ratio between the two sound sources of the high-frequency dual-point sound source to increase the hearing sound volume of the low-frequency dual-point sound source. As another example, a high-frequency dual-point sound source and a low-frequency dual-point sound source may be set. By adjusting a phase difference of the two sound sources of each dual-point sound source by certain means, an absolute value of the phase difference between the two sound sources of the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be different from an absolute value of the phase difference between the two sound sources of the low-frequency dual-point sound source. Specifically, considering that the normalized hearing sound curves corresponding to the low-frequency dual-point sound source and the high-frequency dual-point sound source are different, the absolute value of the phase difference between the two sound sources of the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be greater or less than the absolute value of the phase difference between the two sound sources of the low-frequency dual-point sound source.

FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary speaker according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 16, the speaker 1600 may include an electronic frequency division module 1610, an acoustic driver 1640, at least one acoustic driver (e.g., an acoustic driver 1650, an acoustic route 1645, etc.), an acoustic route 1655, at least two first sound guiding holes 1647, and at least two second sound guiding holes 1657. In some embodiments, the speaker 1600 may further include a controller (not shown in the figure). The electronic frequency division module 1610, as part of the controller, may be configured to generate electrical signals that are input into different acoustic drivers. The connection between different components in the speaker 1600 may be wired or wireless. For example, the electronic frequency division module 1610 may send signals to the acoustic driver 1640 and/or the acoustic driver 1650 through a wired transmission or a wireless transmission.

The electronic frequency division module 1610 may divide the frequency of a source signal. The source signal may come from one or more sound source apparatuses (for example, a memory storing audio data) integrated in the speaker 1600. The source signal may also be an audio signal that the speaker 1600 received by a wired or wireless means. In some embodiments, the electronic frequency division module 1610 may decompose the input source signal into two or more frequency-divided signals containing different frequencies. For example, the electronic frequency division module 1610 may decompose the source signal into a first frequency-divided signal (or frequency-divided signal 1) with high-frequency sound and a second frequency-divided signal (or frequency-divided signal 2) with low-frequency sound. For convenience, a frequency-divided signal with high-frequency sound may be referred to as a high-frequency signal, and a frequency-divided signal with low-frequency sound may be directly referred to as a low-frequency signal.

In some embodiments, the electronic frequency division module 1610 may include a frequency divider 1615, a signal processor 1620, and a signal processor 1630. The frequency divider 1615 may be used to decompose the source signal into two or more frequency-divided signals containing different frequency components, for example, a frequency-divided signal 1 with a high-frequency sound component and a frequency-divided signal 2 with a low-frequency sound component. In some embodiments, the frequency divider 1615 may be an electronic device that may implement the signal decomposition function, including but not limited to one of a passive filter, an active filter, an analog filter, a digital filter, or any combination thereof.

The signal processors 1620 and 1630 may further process the frequency-divided signals, respectively, to meet the requirements of subsequent sound output. In some embodiments, the signal processor 1620 or 1630 may include one or more signal processing components. For example, the signal processor may include, but not limited to, an amplifier, an amplitude modulator, a phase modulator, a delayer, or a dynamic gain controller, or the like, or any combination thereof. Merely by way of example, the processing of the sound signal by the signal processor 1620 and/or the signal processor 1630 may include adjusting the amplitude corresponding to some frequencies in the sound signal. Specifically, in a case where the first frequency range and the second frequency range overlap, the signal processors 1620 and 1630 may adjust the intensity of the sound signal corresponding to the frequency in the overlapping frequency range (for example, reduce the amplitude of the signal corresponding to the frequency in the overlapping frequency range). This is to avoid excessive volume in the overlapping frequency range in the subsequent output sound caused by the superposition of multiple sound signals. In some embodiments, the processing of the sound signal by the signal processor 1620 and/or the signal processor 1360 may include adjusting the phase corresponding to some frequencies in the sound signal.

After the processing operations are performed by the signal processor 1620 or 1630, the frequency-divided signals may be transmitted to the acoustic drivers 1640 and 1650, respectively. In some embodiments, the sound signal transmitted into the acoustic driver 1640 may be a sound signal including a lower frequency range (e.g., the first frequency range). Therefore, the acoustic driver 1640 may also be referred to as a low-frequency acoustic driver. The sound signal transmitted into the acoustic driver 1650 may be a sound signal including a higher frequency range (e.g., the second frequency range). Therefore, the acoustic driver 1650 may also be referred to as a high-frequency acoustic driver. The acoustic driver 1640 and the acoustic driver 1650 may convert sound signals into a low-frequency sound and a high-frequency sound, respectively, then propagate the converted signals outwards.

In some embodiments, the acoustic driver 1640 may be acoustically coupled to at least two first sound guiding holes (such as two first sound guiding holes 1647) (for example, connected to the two first sound guiding holes 1647 via two acoustic routes 1645 respectively). Then the acoustic driver 1640 may propagate sound through the at least two first sound guiding holes. The acoustic driver 1650 may be acoustically coupled to at least two second sound guiding holes (such as two second sound guiding holes 1657) (for example, connected to the two second sound guiding holes 1657 via two acoustic routes 1655, respectively). Then the acoustic driver 1650 may propagate sound through the at least two second sound guiding holes. In some embodiments, in order to reduce the far-field leakage of the speaker 1600, the acoustic driver 1640 may be used to generate low-frequency sounds with equal (or approximately equal) amplitude and opposite (or approximately opposite) phases at the at least two first sound guiding holes, respectively. The acoustic driver 1650 may be used to generate high-frequency sounds with equal (or approximately equal) amplitude and opposite (or approximately opposite) phases at the at least two second sound guiding holes, respectively. In this way, the far-field leakage of low-frequency sounds (or high-frequency sounds) may be reduced according to the principle of acoustic interference cancellation. In some embodiments, according to FIG. 14, FIG. 15A, and FIG. 15B, further considering that the wavelength of the low-frequency sound is longer than that of the high-frequency sound, and in order to reduce the interference cancellation of the sound in the near-field (for example, the position of the user's ear), the parameters of the sound output from the two first sound guiding holes and the parameters of the sound output from the two second sound guiding holes may be set to be different values. For example, assuming that there is a first amplitude ratio between the two first sound guiding holes and a second amplitude ratio between the two second sound guiding holes, the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. As another example, assuming that there is an absolute value of a first phase difference between the two first sound guiding holes and an absolute value of a second phase difference between the two second sound guiding holes, the absolute value of the first phase difference may be less than the absolute value of the second phase difference. More details of the parameters of the dual-point sound source may be disclosed elsewhere in the present disclosure (such as FIG. 17 and FIG. 9, and the descriptions thereof).

As shown in FIG. 16, the acoustic driver 1640 may include a transducer 1643. The transducer 1643 may transmit sound to the first sound guiding holes 1647 through the acoustic route 1645. The acoustic driver 1650 may include a transducer 1653. The transducer 1653 may transmit sound to the second sound guiding holes 1657 through the acoustic route 1655. In some embodiments, the transducer may include, but not limited to, a transducer of a gas-conducting speaker, a transducer of a bone-conducting speaker, a hydroacoustic transducer, an ultrasonic transducer, or the like, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the transducer may be of a moving coil type, a moving iron type, a piezoelectric type, an electrostatic type, or a magneto strictive type, or the like, or any combination thereof.

In some embodiments, the acoustic drivers (such as the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640, the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650) may include transducers with different properties or numbers. For example, each of the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 and the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may include a transducer having different frequency response characteristics (such as a low-frequency speaker unit and a high-frequency speaker unit). As another example, the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 may include two transducers (such as two of the low-frequency speaker units), and the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may include two transducers 1653 (such as two of the high-frequency speaker units).

In some alternative embodiments, the speaker 1600 may generate sound with different frequency ranges by other means, for example, transducer frequency division, acoustic route frequency division, or the like. When the speaker 1600 uses a transducer or an acoustic route to divide the sound, the electronic frequency division module 1610 (the part inside the dotted frame) may be omitted. When the speaker 1600 uses a transducer to achieve signal frequency division, the acoustic driver 1640 and the acoustic driver 1650 may convert the input sound source signal into a low-frequency sound and a high-frequency sound, respectively. Specifically, through the transducer 1643 (such as a low-frequency speaker), the low-frequency acoustic driver 1460 may convert the source signal into the low-frequency sound with low-frequency components. The low-frequency sound may be transmitted to the at least two first sound guiding holes 1647 along at least two different acoustic routes. Then the low-frequency sound may be propagated outwards through the first sound guiding holes 1647. Through the transducer 1653 (such as a high-frequency speaker), the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may convert the source signal into the high-frequency sound with high-frequency components. The high-frequency sound may be transmitted to the at least two second sound guiding holes 1657 along at least two different acoustic routes. Then the high-frequency sound may be propagated outwards through the second sound guiding holes 1657.

In some alternative embodiments, an acoustic route (e.g., the acoustic route 1645 and the acoustic route 1655) connecting a transducer and sound guiding holes may affect the nature of the transmitted sound. For example, an acoustic route may attenuate or change the phase of the transmitted sound to some extent. In some embodiments, an acoustic route may include a sound tube, a sound cavity, a resonance cavity, a sound hole, a sound slit, or a tuning network, or the like, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the acoustic route may also include an acoustic resistance material, which may have a specific acoustic impedance. For example, the acoustic impedance may be in the range of 5 MKS Rayleigh to 50 MKS Rayleigh. The acoustic resistance materials may include, but not limited to, plastic, textile, metal, permeable material, woven material, screen material or mesh material, porous material, particulate material, polymer material, or the like, or any combination thereof. By setting the acoustic routes of different acoustic impedances, the acoustic output of the transducer may be acoustically filtered. In this case, the sounds output through different acoustic routes has different frequency components (e.g., phases, amplitudes, frequencies, etc.). More descriptions regarding the acoustic routes may be found elsewhere in the present disclosure (e.g., FIGS. 10D-10F and the descriptions thereof).

In some alternative embodiments, the speaker 1600 may utilize acoustic routes to achieve signal frequency division. Specifically, the source signal may be input into a specific acoustic driver and converted into sound containing high and low-frequency components. The sound signal may be propagated along acoustic routes having different frequency selection characteristics. For example, the sound signal may be propagated along the acoustic route with a low-pass characteristic to the corresponding sound guiding hole to generate low-frequency sound. In this process, the high-frequency sound may be absorbed or attenuated by the acoustic route with a low-pass characteristic. Similarly, the sound signal may be propagated along the acoustic route with a high-pass characteristic to the corresponding sound guiding hole to generate high-frequency sound. In this process, the low-frequency sound may be absorbed or attenuated by the acoustic route with the high-pass characteristic.

The sound guiding holes (e.g., the first sound guiding holes 1647, the second sound guiding holes 1657) may be small holes formed on the speaker with specific openings and allowing sound to pass. The shape of the sound guiding hole may include one of a circle shape, an oval shape, a square shape, a trapezoid shape, a rounded quadrangle shape, a triangle shape, an irregular shape, or any combination thereof. In addition, the number of sound guiding holes connected to the acoustic driver 1640 or 1650 may not be limited to two, which may be an arbitrary value instead, for example, three, four, six, or the like. In some embodiments, the acoustic route between the same acoustic driver and its corresponding different sound guiding hole may be designed according to different situations. For example, by setting the shape and/or size of the first sound guiding hole 1647 (or the second sound guiding hole 1657), or by setting a lumen structure or acoustically damping material with a certain damping in the acoustic route, the acoustic route between the same acoustic driver and its corresponding different sound guiding hole may be configured to have approximately same equivalent acoustic impedance. In this case, as the same acoustic driver outputs two groups of sounds with the same amplitude and opposite phases, these two groups of sounds may still have the same amplitude and opposite phase when they reach the corresponding sound guiding hole through different acoustic routes. In some embodiments, the first sound guiding holes and the second sound guiding holes may have the same or different structures. For example, the number or count of the first sound guiding holes may be two, and the number or count of the second sound guiding holes may be four. As another example, the shapes of the first sound guiding holes and the second sound guiding holes may be the same or different.

In some embodiments, the controller in the speaker 1600 may cause the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 to output sound in the first frequency range (i.e., low-frequency sound), and cause the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 to output sound in the second frequency range (i.e., high-frequency sound). In some embodiments, the speaker 1600 may also include a supporting structure. The supporting structure may be used to carry the acoustic driver (such as the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650, the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640), so that the acoustic driver may be positioned away from the user's ear. In some embodiments, the sound guiding holes acoustically coupled with the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may be located closer to an expected position of the user's ear (for example, the ear canal entrance), while the sound guiding hole acoustically coupled with the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 may be located further away from the expected position. In some embodiments, the supporting structure may be used to package the acoustic driver. The supporting structure of the packaged acoustic driver may be a casing (also referred to as a housing of the speaker 1600 or a portion of the housing) made of various materials such as plastic, metal, and tape. The casing may encapsulate the acoustic driver and form a front chamber and a rear chamber corresponding to the acoustic driver. For example, the casing (or the housing) may include a first sub-housing and a second sub-housing. At least one low-frequency acoustic driver (e.g., the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640) may be located in the first sub-housing that defines a first front chamber and a first rear chamber of the at least one low-frequency acoustic driver. At least one high-frequency acoustic driver (e.g., the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650) may be located in the second sub-housing that defines a first front chamber and a first rear chamber of the at least one high-frequency acoustic driver. In some embodiments, the front chamber may be acoustically coupled to one of the at least two sound guiding holes. The rear chamber may be acoustically coupled to the other of the at least two sound guiding holes. For example, the front chamber of the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 may be acoustically coupled to one of the at least two first sound guiding holes 1647. The rear chamber of the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 may be acoustically coupled to the other of the at least two first sound guiding holes 1647. The front chamber of the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may be acoustically coupled to one of the at least two second sound guiding holes 1657. The rear chamber of the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650 may be acoustically coupled to the other of the at least two second sound guiding holes 1657. In some embodiments, the sound guiding holes (such as the first sound guiding holes 1647 and the second sound guiding holes 1657) may be disposed on the casing.

In some embodiments, the at least one acoustic driver (e.g., the acoustic driver 1640, the acoustic driver 1650, etc.) may further be configured to generate vibrations by a transducer of the at least one acoustic driver. The vibrations may produce a sound wave inside the housing of the speaker 1600 and cause a leaked sound wave spreading outside the housing from a portion of the housing. The sound wave inside the housing may be guided to the outside of the housing through at least one sound guiding hole. The guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave may have substantially same amplitude and substantially opposite phases in the space, so that the guided sound wave and the leaked sound wave can interfere with each other and the sound leakage of the speaker 1600 is reduced. More descriptions of which may be found elsewhere in the present disclosure, for example, FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C and relevant descriptions thereof.

The above description of the speaker 1600 may be merely by way of example. Those skilled in the art may make adjustments and changes to the structure, quantity, etc. of the acoustic driver, which is not limiting in the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the speaker 1600 may include any number of the acoustic driver structures. For example, the speaker 1600 may include two groups of the high-frequency acoustic drivers 150 and two groups of the low-frequency acoustic drivers 1640, or one group of the high-frequency acoustic drives 150 and two groups of the low-frequency acoustic drivers 1640, and these high-frequency/low-frequency drivers may be used to generate sound in a specific frequency range. As another example, the acoustic driver 1640 and/or the acoustic driver 1650 may include an additional signal processor. The signal processor may have the same or different structural components as the signal processor 1620 or 1630.

It should be noted that the speaker and its modules are shown in FIG. 16 may be implemented in various ways. For example, in some embodiments, the system and the modules may be implemented by hardware, software, or a combination of both. The hardware may be implemented by a dedicated logic. The software may be stored in the storage which may be executed by a suitable instruction execution system, for example, a microprocessor or dedicated design hardware. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above methods and systems may be implemented by computer-executable instructions and/or embedded in the control codes of a processor. For example, the control codes may be provided by a medium such as a disk, a CD or a DVD-ROM, a programmable memory device, such as a read-only memory (e.g., firmware), or a data carrier such as an optical or electric signal carrier. The system and the modules in the present disclosure may be implemented not only by a hardware circuit in a programmable hardware device in an ultra-large scale integrated circuit, a gate array chip, a semiconductor such a logic chip or a transistor, a field programmable gate array, or a programmable logic device. The system and the modules in the present disclosure may also be implemented by software to be performed by various processors, and further also by a combination of hardware and software (e.g., firmware).

It should be noted that the above description of the speaker 1600 and its components is only for the convenience of description, and not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. It may be understood that, for those skilled in the art, after understanding the principle of the apparatus, it is possible to combine each unit or form a substructure to connect with other units arbitrarily without departing from this principle. For example, the electronic frequency division module 1610 may be omitted, and the frequency division of the source signal may be implemented by the internal structure of the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640 and/or the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650. As another example, the signal processor 1620 or 1630 may be a part independent of the electronic frequency division module 1610. Those modifications may fall within the scope of the present disclosure.

When the acoustic driver (for example, the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640, the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650) outputs sounds through at least two sound guiding holes (for example, the at least two first sound guiding holes 1647, the at least two second sound guiding holes 1657), the at least two sound guiding holes may output sounds with the same or different sound amplitudes. For example, for the two first sound guiding holes 1647 outputting low-frequency sounds with different sound amplitudes, when an amplitude ratio of a low-frequency sound with a greater amplitude to a low-frequency sound with a less amplitude increases, according to FIG. 15A, an increase of the near-field hearing sound of the speaker may be greater than an increase of the far-field leaked sound, which may achieve an output of a higher hearing sound volume and a lower leaked sound volume in the low-frequency band. As another example, for the two second sound guiding holes 1657 outputting high-frequency sounds with different sound amplitudes, when an amplitude ratio of a high-frequency sound with a greater amplitude to a high-frequency sound with a less amplitude increases, according to FIG. 15A, an increase of the near-field hearing sound of the speaker may be greater than an increase of the far-field leaked sound, which may achieve an output of a higher hearing sound volume output and a lower leaked sound volume in the high-frequency band. Therefore, by reasonably designing the structure of the electronic frequency division module, the transducers, the acoustic routes, or the sound guiding holes, the amplitude ratio of the high-frequency sounds at the sound guiding holes (i.e., the high-frequency dual-point sound source) corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver and the amplitude ratio of the low-frequency sounds at the sound guiding holes (i.e., the low-frequency dual-point sound source) corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may satisfy a certain condition, which may make the speaker have a better sound output effect.

In some embodiments, it is assumed that there is a first amplitude ratio between the low-frequency sound with a greater amplitude and the low-frequency sound with a less amplitude in the low-frequency dual-point sound source, and there is a second amplitude ratio between the high-frequency sound with a greater amplitude and the high-frequency sound with a less amplitude of the high-frequency dual-point sound source. The first amplitude ratio and the second amplitude ratio may be any values. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may not be less than 1, the second amplitude ratio may not be greater than 5, and the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may not be less than 1, the second amplitude ratio may not be greater than 4, and the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may not be less than 1.2, the second amplitude ratio may not be greater than 3, and the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may not be less than 1.3, the second amplitude ratio may not be greater than 2, and the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may not be less than 1.3, the second amplitude ratio may not be greater than 1.5, and the first amplitude ratio may be greater than the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may be in a range of 1-3, and the second amplitude ratio may be in a range of 1-2. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may be at least 1.2 times the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may be at least 1.5 times the second amplitude ratio. In some embodiments, the first amplitude ratio may be at least two times the second amplitude ratio.

The influence of the amplitude ratio between sound sources of the dual-point sound source on the output sound of the speaker may be further described based on the two dual-point sound sources shown in FIG. 17.

As shown in FIG. 17, a dual-point sound source on the left (outputting low-frequency sounds with frequency of ω₁) represents an equivalent of two sound guiding holes corresponding to a low-frequency acoustic driver, and a dual-point sound source on the right (outputting high-frequency sounds with frequency of ω₂) represents an equivalent of two sound guiding holes corresponding to a high-frequency acoustic driver. For simplicity, it is assumed that the high-frequency dual-point sound source and the low-frequency dual-point sound source may have the same spacing d. It should be noted that in an actual speaker, the speaker may be set in combination with the spacing relationship between the low-frequency dual-point sound source and the high-frequency dual-point sound source described elsewhere in the present disclosure (for example, a distance between the low-frequency dual-point sound source is greater than a distance between the high-frequency dual-point sound source), which are not limited here.

The high-frequency dual-point sound source and the low-frequency dual-point sound source may respectively output a group of high-frequency sounds with opposite phases and a group of low-frequency sounds with opposite phases. An amplitude ratio of a point sound source with a greater amplitude to a point sound source with a less amplitude in the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be A₁, and an amplitude ratio of a point sound source with a greater amplitude to a point sound source with a less amplitude in the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be A₂, and A₁>A₂. According to FIG. 17, a position for hearing sound (also referred to as a hearing sound position) is on a line where the high-frequency dual-point sound source is located, and a line connecting the hearing sound position with a point sound source of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be perpendicular to a line where the low-frequency dual-point sound source is located. It should be understood that the selection of the hearing sound position here may be merely used as an example, and is not a limitation of the present disclosure. In some alternative embodiments, the hearing sound position may be any suitable position. For example, the hearing sound position may be located on the center line of a dual-point sound source. As another example, the hearing sound position may be located on the vertical line of a dual-point sound source. As a further example, the hearing sound position may be located on a circle centered on the center of a dual-point sound source.

In some embodiments, an amplitude ratio that meets a requirement may be obtained by adjusting structural parameters of different components in the speaker. For example, the amplitudes of sounds output at sound guiding holes may be changed by adjusting the acoustic impedances of the acoustic routes. For instance, one or more damping materials such as tuning nets, tuning cotton, etc., may be added to the acoustic route 145 or 155 to change its acoustic impedance. Assuming that an acoustic impedance ratio of the front and rear chambers of the low-frequency acoustic driver is a first acoustic impedance ratio, and an acoustic impedance ratio of the front and the back chambers of the high-frequency acoustic driver is a second acoustic impedance ratio, in some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio and the second acoustic impedance ratio may be arbitrary values, and the first acoustic impedance ratio may be greater than, less than, or equal to the second acoustic impedance ratio. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio may not be less than 0.1, and the second acoustic impedance ratio may not be greater than 3. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio may not be less than 0.3, and the second acoustic impedance ratio may not be greater than 2. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio may not be less than 0.5, and the second acoustic impedance ratio may not be greater than 1.5. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio and the second acoustic impedance ratio may be in a range of 0.8-1.2. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio may be in a range of 0.5-1.6, and the second acoustic impedance ratio may be in a range of 0.6-1.5. In some embodiments, the first acoustic impedance ratio may be in a range of 1.0-1.5, and the second acoustic impedance ratio may be in a range of 0.7-1.3.

In some alternative embodiments, an acoustic impedance of an acoustic route may be changed by adjusting a diameter of a sound guiding tube corresponding to the acoustic route in the speaker, so as to achieve the purpose of adjusting the sound amplitude at the sound guiding hole. In some embodiments, a ratio of tube diameters (also referred to as a diameter ratio for brevity) (i.e., a ratio of a tube diameter of a sound guiding tube with a smaller radius to a tube diameter of a sound guiding tube with a larger radius) of the two sound guiding tubes in the low-frequency acoustic driver may be set in the range of 0.8-1.0. In some embodiments, the ratio of the tube diameters of the two sound guiding tubes in the low-frequency acoustic driver may be set in the range of 0.95-1.0. In some embodiments, tube diameters of two sound guiding tubes in the high-frequency acoustic driver may be set to be the same.

In some embodiments, the internal friction or viscous force of the medium in the sound guiding tube may have a significant impact on the propagation of sound. If the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube is too small, it may cause excessive sound loss and reduce the volume of the sound at the sound guiding hole. The influence of the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube on the sound volume may be further described based on the following descriptions about the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube at different frequencies in conjunction with FIGS. 18A and 18B.

FIG. 18A is a graph illustrating variations of parameters of a sound guiding tube for different sound frequencies according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 18A shows a curve of a minimum value of the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube for different sound frequencies. The ordinate is the minimum value of the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube, in centimeter (cm), and the abscissa is the sound frequency, in hertz (Hz). As shown in FIG. 18A, when the sound frequency is in a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, the tube diameter (or equivalent radius) of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 3.5 mm. When the sound frequency is in a range of 60 Hz to 20 kHz, the tube diameter (or equivalent radius) of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 2 mm. Therefore, to reduce the loss of the sound within the audible range of the human ear output by the speaker due to the sound guiding tube with a small diameter, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube corresponding to the acoustic route in the speaker may be not less than 1.5 mm, or not less than 2 mm, or not less than 2.5 mm.

In some embodiments, when the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube is too large, and a frequency of the transmitted sound is higher than a certain frequency, high-order waves may be generated in the sound guiding tube, which may affect the sound that eventually propagates outward from the sound guiding hole. Therefore, the design of the sound guiding tube needs to ensure that no high-order waves are generated in the frequency range of the sound to be transmitted, but only plane waves propagating in the direction of the sound guiding tube. FIG. 18B is a graph illustrating variations of parameters of a sound guiding tube for different sound frequencies according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 18B shows a curve of a maximum value of the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube for different upper cut-off frequencies of sound transmission. The abscissa is the maximum value of the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube, in centimeter (cm), and the ordinate is the upper cut-off frequency of sound transmission, in kilohertz (kHz). As shown in FIG. 18B, when the upper cut-off frequency of sound transmission is 20 kHz, the tube diameter (or equivalent radius) of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 5 mm. When the upper cut-off frequency of sound transmission is 10 kHz, the tube diameter (or equivalent radius) of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 9 mm. Therefore, in order to ensure that the speaker does not generate high-order waves when outputting sounds within the audible range of human ears, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube corresponding to the acoustic route in the speaker may not be greater than 10 mm, or not greater than 8 mm, etc.

In some embodiments, the acoustic impedance of the acoustic route may be changed by adjusting the length of the sound guiding tube corresponding to the acoustic route in the speaker, to achieve the purpose of adjusting the sound amplitude at the sound guiding hole. The length and the aspect ratio (i.e., a ratio of length to diameter) of the sound guiding tube may affect the transmitted sound. Merely by way of example, a sound pressure of the sound transmitted by the sound guiding tube, the length, and the radius of the sound guiding tube may satisfy Equation (17):

|P|=|P₀|exp(−βL), (17)

where P₀denotes the sound pressure of the sound source, L denotes the length of the sound guiding tube, and β may satisfy Equation (18):

$\begin{matrix} β = \frac{1}{a c_{0}} \sqrt{\frac{ω}{2} \cdot \frac{η}{ρ_{0}}}, & (18) \end{matrix}$

where α denotes the radius of the sound guiding tube, c₀denotes a propagation speed of sound, ω denotes an angular frequency of the sound wave, and η/ρ₀denotes the dynamic viscosity of the medium. For different tube diameters of the sound guiding tube, the attenuation degree of sounds with different frequencies may be related to the length and aspect ratio of the sound guiding tube as described in FIG. 19.

As shown in FIG. 19, when the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube is constant, the greater the length (or aspect ratio) of the sound guiding tube is, the greater the attenuation degree of sounds transmitted in the sound guiding tube may be, and the sound in the high-frequency band may have a greater attenuation degree than the sound in the low-frequency band. Therefore, to ensure that the sound attenuation of the speaker is not too large to affect the hearing sound volume, the aspect ratio of the sound guiding tube corresponding to the acoustic route in the speaker may be not greater than 200, or not greater than 150, or not greater than 100, etc.

In some embodiments, due to the interaction between the sound guiding tube and the radiation impedance of the nozzle of the sound guiding tube, a sound of a specific frequency transmitted in the sound guiding tube may form a standing wave therein, causing the output sound to form peaks/valleys at certain frequencies, and affecting the sound output effect. The length of the sound guiding tube may affect the formation of standing waves. FIG. 20 is a graph illustrating a change of a sound pressure of sound output by a sound guiding tube with different lengths according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 20, curves of relative values of sound pressure output by sound guiding tubes of different lengths are shown. According to FIG. 20, the longer the length of the sound guiding tube is, the lower the minimum frequency of the peaks/valleys of sound outputted by the sound guiding tube may be, and the greater the count of the peaks/valleys may be. In order to reduce the influence of the peaks/valleys on the sound output effect, the length of the sound guiding tube may be adjusted to meet certain conditions. In some embodiments, the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 200 mm, so that the output sound is relatively flat in the range of 20 Hz to 800 Hz. In some embodiments, the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 100 mm, so that the output sound is flat and without peaks and valleys in the range of 20 Hz to 1500 Hz. In some embodiments, the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 50 mm, so that the output sound is flat and without peaks and valleys in the range of 20 Hz to 3200 Hz. In some embodiments, the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 30 mm, so that the output sound is flat and without peaks and valleys in the range of 20 Hz to 5200 Hz.

In some embodiments, the length and the tube diameter (or radius) of the sound guiding tube may be adjusted at the same time to satisfy certain conditions. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 0.5 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 150 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 0.5 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 100 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 1 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 200 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 1 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 150 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 2 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 300 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 5 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 500 mm. In some embodiments, the tube diameter of the sound guiding tube may not be less than 5 mm, and the length of the sound guiding tube may not be greater than 350 mm.

In some embodiments, the setting of the amplitude ratio of sound sources of the dual-point sound source may be achieved by adjusting the structure of the sound guiding holes in the speaker. For example, the two sound guiding holes corresponding to each acoustic driver of the speaker may be respectively set to different sizes, different areas, and/or different shapes. As another example, the sizes of the second sound guiding holes corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver and the sizes of the first sound guiding holes corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may be different. As a further example, the sound guiding holes corresponding to different acoustic drivers of the speaker may be set to different counts.

When an acoustic driver (for example, the low-frequency acoustic driver 1640, the high-frequency acoustic driver 1650) outputs sounds through at least two sound guiding holes (for example, the at least two first sound guiding holes 1647, the at least two second sound guiding holes 1657), the at least two sound guiding holes may output sounds with the same or different phases. For example, when low-frequency sounds with different phases are output from the two first sound guiding holes 1647, and an absolute value of the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds approaches 170 degrees, according to the description of FIG. 15B, the speaker may produce a larger hearing sound volume while maintaining the far-field leaked sound volume. As another example, when high-frequency sounds with different phases are output from the two second sound guiding holes 1657, and an absolute value of the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds approaches 170 degrees, according to the description of FIG. 15B, the speaker may produce a smaller leaked sound volume while maintaining the near-field hearing sound volume. Therefore, by reasonably designing the structures of the electronic frequency division module, the transducers, the acoustic routes, or the sound guiding holes, a phase difference between high-frequency sounds at the sound guiding holes (i.e., the high-frequency dual-point sound source) corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver and a phase difference between the low-frequency sounds at the sound guiding holes (i.e., the low-frequency dual-point sound source) corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may meet a certain condition, which may make the speaker have a better sound output effect.

The influence of the phase difference between the dual-point sound source on the output sound of the speaker may be further described based on the two dual-point sound sources shown in FIG. 21.

FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram illustrating two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 21, a dual-point sound source on the left represents an equivalent of two sound guiding holes corresponding to a low-frequency acoustic driver, and a dual-point sound source on the right represents an equivalent of two sound guiding holes corresponding to a high-frequency acoustic driver. For simplicity, it is assumed that the high-frequency dual-point sound source and the low-frequency dual-point sound source may have the same spacing d. It should be noted that in an actual speaker, the speaker may be set in combination with the spacing relationship between the low-frequency dual-point sound source and the high-frequency dual-point sound source described elsewhere in the present disclosure, which is not limited here.

For the sake of simplicity, the high-frequency dual-point sound source and the low-frequency dual-point sound source may respectively output a set of high-frequency sounds with the same amplitude and a certain phase difference and a set of low-frequency sounds with the same amplitude and a certain phase difference. In some embodiments, by reasonably designing the phase difference between the high-frequency sounds output by the high-frequency dual-point sound source and/or the phase difference between the high-frequency sounds output by the low-frequency dual-point sound source, the dual-point sound sources may achieve a stronger leakage reduction ability than a single-point sound source. As shown in FIG. 21, a position for hearing sound (also referred to as a hearing sound position) is on a line where the high-frequency dual-point sound source is located, and a line connecting the hearing sound position with a point sound source of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be perpendicular to a line where the low-frequency dual-point sound source is located. It should be understood that the selection of the hearing sound position here may be merely used as an example, and is not a limitation of the present disclosure. In some alternative embodiments, the hearing sound position may be any suitable position. For example, the hearing sound position may be located on the center line of a dual-point sound source. As another example, the hearing sound position may be located on the vertical line of a dual-point sound source. As a further example, the hearing sound position may be located on a circle centered on the center of a dual-point sound source.

As shown in FIG. 21, a phase difference between a far-ear sound source (i.e., the point sound source on the upper left side) and a near-ear sound source (i.e., the point sound source on the lower left side) in the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be denoted as pi, a phase difference between a far-ear sound source (i.e., the point sound source on the upper right side) and a near-ear sound source (i.e., the point sound source on the lower right side) in the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be denoted as φ₂, and φ₁and φ₂may satisfy Equation (19):

|180°−φ₁|>|180°−φ₂|, (19)

In some embodiments, a phase difference that meets a requirement may be obtained by adjusting structural parameters of different components in the speaker. For example, the phases of sounds output at sound guiding holes may be changed by adjusting sound paths from the transducer to the corresponding sound guiding hole in the speaker. As used herein, a sound path refers to a length of an acoustic route. In some embodiments, a sound path ratio of two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may be in the range of 0.4-2.5, and sound paths of two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver may be the same. In some embodiments, the sound path ratio of the two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may be in the range of 0.5-2, and the sound paths of the two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver may be the same. In some embodiments, the sound path from the transducer to the sound guiding hole may be adjusted by adjusting the length of the sound guiding tube. In some embodiments, a length ratio of two sound guiding tubes (i.e., a ratio of the length of a long sound guiding tube and a length of the short sound guiding tube) corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may be in the range of 0.4-2.5, and the length of the two sound guiding tubes of the high-frequency acoustic driver may be the same. In some embodiments, the length ratio of two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the low-frequency acoustic driver may be in the range of 0.8-1.25, and the length of the two sound guiding tubes corresponding to the high-frequency acoustic driver may be the same.

In some embodiments, the phase difference between at least two sound guiding holes on the speaker corresponding to one acoustic driver may be adjusted by adjusting the sound signal input into the acoustic driver or one or more of the above descriptions. In some embodiments, an absolute value of the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be less than an absolute value of the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be in the range of 0 degrees to 180 degrees, and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be in the range of 120 degrees to 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be in the range of 90 degrees to 180 degrees, and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be in the range of 150 degrees to 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be in the range of 120 degrees to 180 degrees, and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be in the range of 150 degrees to 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be in the range of 150 degrees to 180 degrees, and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be in the range of 150 degrees to 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes may be in the range of 160 degrees to 180 degrees, and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be in the range of 170 degrees to 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the phase difference of the low-frequency sounds output from the two first sound guiding holes and the phase difference of the high-frequency sounds output from the two second sound guiding holes may be both 180 degrees.

It should be noted that the foregoing descriptions of the speaker is merely for example and description, and does not limit the scope of the present disclosure. For those skilled in the art, various modifications and changes may be made to the speaker under the guidance of the present disclosure. However, these modifications and changes are still within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, the phase difference of sound sources of a dual-point sound source in the speaker may be adjusted in any reasonable manner to improve the sound leakage reduction ability of the speaker.

FIGS. 22A to 22D are exemplary graphs of leaked sounds of a speaker with two dual-point sound sources according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 22A, compared to a single-point sound source, the leakage reduction ability may be improved by setting two dual-point sound sources with different amplitude ratios. For example, an amplitude ratio of a low-frequency dual-point sound source may be A₁, and an amplitude ratio of a high-frequency dual-point sound source may be A₂. In a low-frequency range, after adjusting an amplitude ratio of each dual-point sound source (for example, A₁is set to a value greater than 1), an increase of the near-field hearing sound may be greater than an increase of the far-field leaked sound, which may produce a higher near-field hearing sound volume in the low-frequency range. Since in the low-frequency range, the far-field leaked sound of a dual-point sound source is originally very low, after adjusting the amplitude ratio of the dual-point sound source, the slightly increased leaked sound may still be kept low. In the high-frequency band, A₂may be equal to or close to 1 by setting the amplitude ratio of sound sources in the high-frequency dual-point sound source, so that a stronger leakage reduction ability may be obtained in the high-frequency band to meet the needs of open binaural speaker. According to FIG. 22A, a total leaked sound generated by a system composed of the two dual-point sound sources may be kept at a low level in a frequency range below 7000 Hz, and may be smaller than that of a single-point sound source.

As shown in FIG. 22B, compared to a single-point sound source, the leakage reduction ability may be improved by setting two dual-point sound sources with different phase differences. For example, a phase difference of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be φ₁, and a phase difference of the high-frequency dual-point sound source may be φ₂. In the low-frequency band, after adjusting a phase difference of each dual-point sound source, an increase of the near-field hearing sound may be greater than an increase of the far-field leaked sound, which may produce a higher near-field hearing sound volume in the low-frequency range. Since in the low-frequency band, the far-field leaked sound of a dual-point sound source is originally very low, after adjusting the phase difference of the dual-point sound source, the slightly increased leaked sound may still be kept low. In the high-frequency range, φ₂may be equal to or close to 180 degrees by setting the phase difference of sound sources of the high-frequency dual-point sound source, so that a stronger leakage reduction ability may be obtained in the high-frequency band to meet the needs of open binaural speaker.

It should be noted that curves of total reduced leaked sound in FIGS. 22A and 22B are ideal situations, and just to illustrate the principle and effect. Affected by one or more factors such as actual circuit filter characteristics, transducer frequency characteristics, and sound channel frequency characteristics, the actual output low-frequency sound and high-frequency sound may be different from sounds shown in FIGS. 22A and 22B. At the same time, a low-frequency sound and a high-frequency sound may have a certain overlap (aliasing) in a frequency band near the frequency division point, which may cause the actual total reduced leaked sound may not have a sudden change at the frequency division point as shown in FIG. 22A and/or FIG. 22B, but may have a gradual change and transition in the frequency band near the frequency division point (e.g., as shown by a thin solid line in FIG. 22A and/or FIG. 22B). It is understandable that these differences may not affect the overall sound leakage reduction effect of the speaker provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 22C shows sound leakage reduction curves of a dual-point sound source under different diameter ratios of sound guiding tubes. As shown in FIG. 22C, within a certain frequency range (for example, in the range of 800 Hz-10 kHz), the leakage reduction ability of a dual-point sound source may be better than that of a single-point sound source. For example, when a diameter ratio of sound guiding tubes of the dual-point sound source is 1, the dual-point sound source may have a stronger sound leakage reduction ability. As another example, when the diameter ratio of the sound guiding tubes of the dual-point sound source is 1.1, the leakage reduction ability of the dual-point sound source may be better than that of the single-point sound source in the range of 800 Hz-10 kHz. As a further example, when the diameter ratio of the sound guiding tubes of the dual-point sound source is 0.95, the sound leakage reduction ability of the dual-point sound source may be still better than that of the single-point sound source.

FIG. 22D shows sound leakage reduction curves of a dual-point sound source under different length ratios of sound guiding tubes. As shown in FIG. 22D, in the range of 100 Hz-1 kHz, the leakage reduction ability of the dual-point sound source may be set to be better than a single-point sound source by adjusting a length ratio (i.e., a ratio of the length of a longer sound guiding tube to the length of a shorter sound guiding tube) of the sound guiding tubes of the dual-point sound source. For example, the length ratio may be 1, 1.05, 1.1, 1.5, 2, etc. In the range of 1 kHz-10 kHz, by adjusting the length ratio of the sound guiding tubes of the dual-point sound source close to or equal to 1, the leakage reduction ability of the dual-point sound source may be set to be better than a single-point sound source.

In some other embodiments, the sounds output by the dual-point sound source may also have other amplitudes, other phases, or other spacing relationships. In some alternative embodiments, the parameters of the dual-point sound source may be adjusted in other feasible ways to improve the speaker's ability to reduce far-field sound leakage, which is not limited in the present disclosure. For example, it may be set that the low-frequency acoustic driver only outputs sound through one sound guiding hole (that is, it is equivalent to a single-point sound source), and the high-frequency acoustic driver still outputs sound through two sound guiding holes (that is, it is equivalent to a dual-point sound source). In some embodiments, multiple dual-point sound sources may also be used to output sound signals with different frequency components.

It should be noted that the foregoing description of the speaker is merely for example and description, and does not limit the scope of the present disclosure. For those skilled in the art, various modifications and changes may be made to the speaker under the guidance of the present disclosure. However, these modifications and changes are still within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, in order to cause the acoustic driver to obtain a stronger low-frequency effect in a low-frequency range below 300 Hz, the amplitude ratio of the point sound source with a greater amplitude and the point sound source with less amplitude of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be adjusted to be greater, or the phase difference between the two-point sound sources of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be adjusted to closer to 0 degrees, so that the sound output effect of the low-frequency dual-point sound source may be close to the single-point sound source. As a result, the speaker may output low-frequency sounds to the environment to be louder, and may have the effect of enhancing the low-frequency components in the near-field hearing sound. As another example, a single point sound source may be directly set in the low-frequency band to enhance the low-frequency signal output of the speaker. As a further example, according to requirements of the actual near-field hearing sound and far-field leakage reduction, different dual-point sound sources may be set in different frequency bands. A count of frequency sub-bands may be two or more. A dual-point sound source corresponding to each frequency sub-band may be set based on one or a combination of the above methods.

It needs to be known that the description of the present disclosure does not limit the actual use scenario of the speaker. The speaker may be any device or a part thereof that needs to output sound to a user. For example, the speaker may be applied on a mobile phone. FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram illustrating a mobile phone with a plurality of sound guiding holes according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in the figure, the top 2320 of the mobile phone 2300 (i.e., “vertical” to the upper-end face of the mobile phone display) is provided with a plurality of sound guiding holes as described elsewhere in the present disclosure. Merely by way of example, sound guiding holes 2301 may constitute a group of dual-point sound sources (or point sound source arrays) for outputting low-frequency sounds. Two sound guiding holes 2302 may form another group of dual-point sound sources (or point source arrays) for outputting high-frequency sounds. The distance of the sound guiding holes 2301 may be longer than the distance of the sound guiding holes 2302. A low-frequency acoustic driver 2330 and a high-frequency acoustic driver 1140 are provided inside the casing of the mobile phone 2300. The low-frequency sound generated by the low-frequency acoustic driver 2330 may be transmitted outward through the sound guiding holes 2301, and the high-frequency sound generated by the high-frequency acoustic driver 1140 may be transmitted outward through the sound guiding holes 2302. According to other embodiments described in the present disclosure, when the user places the sound guiding holes 2301 and 2302 near the ear to answer the voice information, the sound guiding holes 2301 and 2302 may emit a strong near-field sound to the user, and at the same time may reduce leakage to the surrounding environment. Moreover, by setting up the sound guiding hole on the top of the phone, instead of the upper part of the display of the mobile phone, the space required to set up the sound guiding hole on the front of the phone may be saved, then the area of the mobile phone display may be further increased, the appearance of the phone more may also be concise and beautiful.

The above description of setting the sound guiding hole on the mobile phone is just for the purposes of illustration. Without departing from the principle, those skilled in the art may make adjustments to the structure, and the adjusted structure may still be within the protection scope of the present disclosure. For example, all or part of the sound guiding holes 2301 or 2302 may also be set on other positions of the mobile phone 2300. For example, the upper part of the back shell, the upper part of the side shell, etc., and these settings may still ensure that the user hears a large volume when receiving the sound information, and also prevents the sound information from leaking to the surrounding environment. As another example, low-frequency acoustic driver 2330 and/or high-frequency acoustic driver 1140 may not be necessary, and may also divide the sound output by the mobile phone 2300 through other methods described in the present disclosure, which will not be repeated here.

Beneficial effects of the present disclosure may include but not limited to: (1) a high-frequency dual-point sound source and a low-frequency dual-point sound source may be provided to output sound in different frequency bands, thereby achieving better acoustic output effect; (2) by setting dual-point sound sources with different amplitude ratios, the speaker may have a stronger capability to reduce sound leakage in higher frequency bands, which may meet requirements for an open binaural speaker, thereby obtaining a good sound output effect in a quiet environment; (3) by setting dual-point sound sources with different phase differences, the speaker may have a higher hearing sound volume in lower frequency bands and have a stronger capability to reduce sound leakage in higher frequency bands, which may improve the sound output effect of the open binaural speaker. It should be noted that different embodiments may have different beneficial effects. In various embodiments, the speaker may have any one or a combination of the benefits exemplified above, and any other beneficial effects that can be obtained.

It's noticeable that above statements are preferable embodiments and technical principles thereof. A person having ordinary skill in the art is easy to understand that this disclosure is not limited to the specific embodiments stated, and a person having ordinary skill in the art can make various obvious variations, adjustments, and substitutes within the protected scope of this disclosure. Therefore, although above embodiments state this disclosure in detail, this disclosure is not limited to the embodiments, and there can be many other equivalent embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure, and the protected scope of this disclosure is determined by following claims.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
201410005804.0	Jan 2014	CN	national
201910364346.2	Apr 2019	CN	national
201910888067.6	Sep 2019	CN	national
201910888762.2	Sep 2019	CN	national

Number	Name	Date	Kind
2327320	Shapiro	Aug 1943	A
4987597	Haertl	Jan 1991	A
5430803	Kimura et al.	Jul 1995	A
5692059	Kruger	Nov 1997	A
5757935	Kang et al.	May 1998	A
5790684	Niino et al.	Aug 1998	A
6850138	Sakai	Feb 2005	B1
8141678	Ikeyama et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8256566	Rodgers	Sep 2012	B1
9226075	Lee	Dec 2015	B2
9729978	Qi et al.	Aug 2017	B2
9992568	Slotte	Jun 2018	B2
10149071	Qi et al.	Dec 2018	B2
10334372	Qi et al.	Jun 2019	B2
10897677	Walraevens et al.	Jan 2021	B2
11159870	Zhang et al.	Oct 2021	B2
11197106	Qi et al.	Dec 2021	B2
20030048913	Lee et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20060098829	Kobayashi	May 2006	A1
20060113143	Ishida	Jun 2006	A1
20070041595	Carazo et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20080101589	Horowitz et al.	May 2008	A1
20090095613	Lin	Apr 2009	A1
20090141920	Suyama	Jun 2009	A1
20090190781	Fukuda	Jul 2009	A1
20090208031	Abolfathi	Aug 2009	A1
20090257616	Kaneda et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090285417	Shin et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090290730	Fukuda et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20100054492	Eaton et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100322454	Ambrose et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110150262	Nakama et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20120020501	Lee	Jan 2012	A1
20120070022	Saiki	Mar 2012	A1
20120177206	Yamagishi et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20130051585	Karkkainen et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130329919	He	Dec 2013	A1
20140009008	Li et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140064533	Kasic, II	Mar 2014	A1
20140185822	Kunimoto et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140185837	Kunimoto et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140274229	Fukuda	Sep 2014	A1
20140328491	Slotte	Nov 2014	A1
20140355777	Nabata et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20150030189	Nabata et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150256656	Horii	Sep 2015	A1
20150264473	Fukuda	Sep 2015	A1
20150326967	Otani	Nov 2015	A1
20150381333	Tennant et al.	Dec 2015	A1
20160037243	Lippert et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160329041	Qi et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20170208392	Smithers et al.	Jul 2017	A1
20180182370	Hyde et al.	Jun 2018	A1
20180288518	Schmidt et al.	Oct 2018	A1
20190052954	Rusconi Clerici Beltrami et al.	Feb 2019	A1
20190238971	Wakeland et al.	Aug 2019	A1
20190259367	Chen	Aug 2019	A1
20200059544	Hwang et al.	Feb 2020	A1
20200367008	Walsh et al.	Nov 2020	A1
20210099027	Larsson et al.	Apr 2021	A1
20210219059	Qi et al.	Jul 2021	A1
20210274278	Zhang et al.	Sep 2021	A1

Number	Date	Country
201616895	Oct 2010	CN
201690580	Dec 2010	CN
102014328	Apr 2011	CN
102421043	Apr 2012	CN
202435600	Sep 2012	CN
103167390	Jun 2013	CN
103347235	Oct 2013	CN
204206450	Mar 2015	CN
104869515	Aug 2015	CN
205510154	Aug 2016	CN
2011367	Dec 2014	EP
2006332715	Dec 2006	JP
2007251358	Sep 2007	JP
20050030183	Mar 2005	KR
20090082999	Aug 2009	KR
2004095878	Nov 2004	WO

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	PCT/CN2019/130884	Dec 2019	US
Child	17170936		US
Parent	16419049	May 2019	US
Child	16813915		US
Parent	16180020	Nov 2018	US
Child	16419049		US
Parent	15650909	Jul 2017	US
Child	16180020		US
Parent	15109831		US
Child	15650909		US

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	17170936	Feb 2021	US
Child	17219839		US
Parent	17074762	Oct 2020	US
Child	17170936		US
Parent	16813915	Mar 2020	US
Child	17074762		US

Systems and methods for suppressing sound leakage

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (4)

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (62)

Foreign Referenced Citations (16)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)

Related Publications (1)

Continuations (5)

Continuation in Parts (3)

Entry
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2021131563 dated Jul. 6, 2022, 16 pages.
Notice of Preliminary Rejection in Korean Application No. 10-2022-7010046 dated Jun. 20, 2022, 15 pages.
The Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 19926930.9 dated Apr. 14, 2022, 8 pages.
International Search Report in PCT/CN2014/094065 dated Mar. 17, 2015, 5 pages.
Written Opinion in PCT/CN2014/094065 dated Mar. 17, 2015, 10 pages.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201410005804.0 dated Dec. 7, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Application No. 2016545828 dated Jun. 20, 2017, 10 pages.
The Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 14877111.6 dated Mar. 17, 2017, 6 pages.
First Examination Report in Indian Application No. 201617026062 dated Nov. 13, 2020, 6 pages.
International Search Report in PCT/CN2019/130884 dated Mar. 30, 2020, 5 pages.