Patent Grant
9197821
The present invention is generally related to array cameras and more specifically to the transmission of image data from an imager array to an external device such as a processor.
In a typical camera, light enters through an opening (aperture) at one end of the camera and is directed to a focal plane by a lens stack. The lens stack creates an optical channel that forms an image of a scene upon the focal plane. The focal plane includes an array of light sensitive pixels, which are part of a sensor that generates signals upon receiving light via the optical element. Commonly used sensors include CCD (charge-coupled device) sensors and CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) sensors.
Traditional cameras typically use a single focal plane to capture single images, one at a time. The image data from each pixel of the focal plane is then sent directly from the focal plane to a processor. The processor can manipulate the image data, such as to encode the image data, store the image data, forward the image data or modify the image data. In many instances, a standard interface is utilized between the focal plane and processor, which specifies the format in which data is transmitted between the focal plane and the processor.
The Mobile Industry Processor Interface Alliance (MIPI) is a non-profit corporation that has promulgated interface specifications for consistency to promote reuse and compatibility in mobile devices. MIPI has created the Camera Serial Interface 2 (c) interface format (MIPI interface format) for an interface between a camera and a processor.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiment of the invention are involve the transmission and/or reception of image data captured by a camera module including a plurality of focal planes. In several embodiments, the image data is used to generate lines of image data that interleave image data captured by the pixels of different focal planes. In many embodiments, the sensor in the camera module also generates additional data describing the captured image data. In a number of embodiments, the additional data is transmitted with the lines of image data and used by the interface circuitry on a device receiving the lines of image data to identify which pixels in the lines of image data are associated with one or more of the plurality of images captured by the focal planes of the camera module.
One embodiment of the invention includes capturing image data using a plurality of active focal planes in a camera module, where an image is formed on each active focal plane by a separate lens stack, generating lines of image data by interleaving the image data captured by the plurality of active focal planes, and transmitting the lines of image data and the additional data.
A further embodiment also includes additional data providing information for deinterleaving a plurality of images from the captured image data and transmitting the additional data with the lines of image data.
In another embodiment, the additional data describes the imager array.
In a still further embodiment, the additional data includes data selected from the group of additional data describing: the number of focal planes in the imager array; the dimensions of the array of focal planes in the imager array; the number of pixels in each dimension of the active focal planes; the integration time of the pixels in each of the active focal planes; and the gain of the pixels in each of the active focal planes
In still another embodiment, the additional data describing the gain of pixels includes additional data describing the analog gain of the pixels in each of the active focal planes and additional data describing the digital gain of the pixels in each of the active focal planes.
In a yet further embodiment, generating the lines of image data further comprises combining captured image data from the plurality of active focal planes using a predetermined process.
In yet another embodiment, the predetermined process is selected from a plurality of predetermined processes for combining captured image data, and the additional data includes additional data indicating the predetermined process used to combine the captured image data.
In a further embodiment again, each active focal plane comprises an array of pixels including a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and the predetermined process for combining captured image data comprises interleaving image data from a row selected from each of the active focal planes.
In another embodiment again, the predetermined process for combining captured image data comprises using a modulo process, where the modulo process involves combining the image data captured by each of the pixels in the selected rows of the active focal planes by interleaving predetermined numbers of pixels from each of the selected rows.
In a further additional embodiment, the additional data describes at least one of the lines of image data.
In another additional embodiment, the additional data includes data selected from the group consisting of additional data describing: the time at which each active focal plane started capturing the image data; and the row numbers of the rows in each of the active focal planes used to capture the image data used to generate the line of image data.
A still yet further embodiment also includes packetizing the lines of image data and the additional data describing the captured image data to produce at least one packet of data. In addition, transmitting the lines of image data and the additional data further comprises transmitting the at least one packet of data.
In still yet another embodiment the packet of data includes a packet header containing at least a portion of the additional data and a plurality of lines of image data, and the additional data contained in the packet header describes the imager array.
In a still further embodiment again, the packet of data further includes a packet footer indicating the end of the transmission of the plurality of lines of image data.
In still another embodiment again, the packet of data comprises a plurality of lines of image data and a line header associated with each of the plurality of lines of image data, and each line header includes additional data describing the line of image data with which the line header is associated.
In a yet further embodiment again, the line head further comprises additional data describing the imager array.
Yet another embodiment again also includes pausing transmission during frame blanking intervals, transmitting the plurality of lines of image data and the additional data describing the captured image data between frame intervals, and pausing during the transmission of the plurality of lines of image data and the additional data describing the captured image data during line blanking intervals.
A yet further additional embodiment also includes continuously transmitting the lines of image data and the additional data until all of the data is transmitted.
In yet another additional embodiment each lens stack in the camera module has a different field of view.
An embodiment of a method for receiving image data includes receiving image data from a camera module including a plurality of focal planes using interface circuitry, where the image data comprises lines of image data generated by interleaving pixels from a plurality of images captured using the plurality of focal planes, and identifying the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images using the interface circuitry.
In a further embodiment of a method for receiving image data, the camera module also generates additional data describing the captured image data and the method further includes receiving the additional data, and identifying the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images using the interface circuitry further comprises identifying the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images using the additional data.
In another embodiment of a method for receiving image data, the additional data includes data selected from the group consisting of additional data describing: the number of focal planes in the imager array; the dimensions of the array of focal planes in the imager array; the number of pixels in each dimension of the focal planes; the integration time of the pixels in each of the focal planes; and the gain of the pixels in each of the focal planes.
In a yet further embodiment, the additional data describing the gain of pixels includes additional data describing the analog gain of the pixels in each of the active focal planes and additional data describing the digital gain of the pixels in each of the active focal planes.
In yet another embodiment, the received lines of image data are generated using one of a plurality of predetermined processes, and the additional data identifies the predetermined process used to generate the lines of image data.
In a further embodiment again, the interface circuitry includes a processor configured to identify the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images.
An embodiment of a system for receiving image data in accordance with an embodiment of the invention includes interface circuitry configured to receive image data from a camera module including a plurality of focal planes, where the image data comprises lines of image data generated by interleaving pixels from a plurality of images captured using the plurality of focal planes. In addition, the interface circuitry is further configured to identify the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images using the interface circuitry.
In a further embodiment of a system for receiving image data, the camera module also generates additional data describing the captured image data and the interface circuitry is further configured to receive the additional data, and identify the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images using the additional data.
In another embodiment of a system for receiving image data, the additional data includes data selected from the group of additional data describing: the number of focal planes in the imager array; the dimensions of the array of focal planes in the imager array; the number of pixels in each dimension of the focal planes; the integration time of the pixels in each of the focal planes; and the gain of the pixels in each of the focal planes.
In a still further embodiment, the additional data describing the gain of pixels includes additional data describing the analog gain of the pixels in each of the focal planes and additional data describing the digital gain of the pixels in each of the focal planes.
In still another embodiment, the interface circuitry includes a processor configured to identify the pixels in the image data that are part of at least one of the plurality of images.
a-7c conceptually illustrate lines of image data transmitted by interleaving image data from multiple focal planes using modulo processes in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for transmitting and receiving image data captured by an imager array are illustrated. In several embodiments, the imager array is configured to transmit image data to a processor and additional data describing the image data that is being transmitted. A device receiving the image data can use the additional data to reconstruct a plurality of images of a scene captured by the imager array (often referred to as a light field). In several embodiments, the image data and the additional data describing the image data are transmitted as a packet of image data that can include a packet header as well as lines of image data, where each line of image data is preceded by a line header. The lines of image data include the image data captured by focal planes of the imager array and can be utilized to construct a plurality of images of a scene. The line header can include data identifying the particular pixels and focal planes that are included in a line of image data. In embodiments where a packet header is present, the packet header can include embedded data that describes the camera module to enable a processor to construct images from the packet of image data.
In a variety of embodiments, a line of image data can correspond to a row, column or any organization of image data corresponding to particular pixels from an image captured by one or more of the focal planes in the imager array. In many embodiments, a line of image data can include specific pixels from some or all of the focal planes of an imager array.
All of the image data captured by a focal plane in the imager array can constitute a low resolution image (the term low resolution here is used only to contrast with higher resolution images that can be synthesized through super-resolution processing), which the processor can use in combination with other images captured by the imager array to construct a higher resolution image through super-resolution processing. Super-resolution processing is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 entitled “Systems and Methods for Synthesizing High Resolution Images Using Super-Resolution Processes”, filed Dec. 14, 2010, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The processes for transmitting multiple images in accordance with embodiments of the invention are more general, however, than transmitting images to a processor for performing super-resolution processing. Accordingly, processes in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be used to transmit captured image data for multiple images of a scene in a variety of applications including but not limited to slow motion video applications involving registering of images captured from different perspectives, and conventional video applications involving the capture of a sequence of sets of images to synthesize a sequence of high resolution frames using super-resolution processes.
In a number of embodiments, the imager array is configured to transmit image data generated by focal planes via an interface format. The captured image data is transmitted in accordance with the interface format as a packet. These packets can be adapted to accord with any interface format, including but not limited to the MIPI CSI-2 interface format (MIPI interface format).
Imager arrays, interface formats used to transfer captured image data between imager arrays and processors, and processes for formatting captured image data into packets for transfer via an interface format in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
System Architecture
Array cameras in accordance with many embodiments of the invention can include a camera module and a processor. The camera module can include an array of cameras. In various embodiments, an array camera includes a camera module and a processor. A camera module can include an imager array, which is a sensor that includes an array of focal planes. Each focal plane includes an array of pixels used to capture an image formed on the focal plane by a lens stack. The focal plane can be formed of, but is not limited to, traditional CIS (CMOS Image Sensor), CCD (charge-coupled device), high dynamic range sensor elements, multispectral sensor elements and various alternatives thereof. In many embodiments, the pixels of each focal plane have similar physical properties and receive light through the same lens stack. Furthermore, the pixels in each focal plane may be associated with the same color filter. In a number of embodiments, at least one of the focal planes includes a Bayer-pattern filter. In several embodiments, the focal planes are independently controlled. In other embodiments, the operation of the focal planes in the imager array is controlled via a single set of controls.
An array camera in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, the array camera 100 captures images using a plurality of cameras 104, which can have different imaging characteristics. The array camera 100 can separately control each of the cameras to obtain enhanced image capture and/or to enhance processes such as (but not limited to) super-resolution processes that may be applied to the captured images. For example, each pixel of a focal plane may capture different wavelengths of light, or may capture the intensity of light, varying exposure times, start times, or end times. Once the array camera 100 has commenced capturing image data using the pixels on the imager array, the focal planes can commence transmitting the image data captured using the pixels to a receiving device 108. The image data captured by different camera modules can be interleaved for transmission to a receiving device 108 that includes interface circuitry configured to receive image data. In many embodiments, the interface circuitry is implemented in hardware and/or using a processor. The receiving device 108 can then organize the captured image data from the received packet and appropriately combine the image data to reconstruct the image(s) captured by one or more of the focal planes in the imager array.
In the illustrated embodiment, multiple images of a scene can be captured by the camera module 102. As the image data is captured, the camera module 102 transmits (106) the image data to a receiving device 108. The camera module 102 transmits the image data using a small number of local data storage cells on the camera module 102 that store the captured image data following capture by the cameras. The camera module 102 manages the capture and transmission of image data so that the captured image data stored in the storage cells is transmitted by the imager array 102 in the time taken to capture and load the next set of image data into the storage cells. In this way, the camera module can continuously buffer and transmit image data using a number of local data storage cells that is less than the total number of pixels in the camera module.
A line of image data transmitted by an imager array can be considered to equal the number of pixels in a row (column) of a focal plane multiplied by the number of focal planes. In several embodiments, the clock frequency of transmitter circuitry on the imager array is set to a desired output data rate and the internal focal plane pixel rate is set to 1/N the desired output data rate (where N is the total number of focal planes). In many image transmission protocols, once a start of line condition is sent, all of image data is transmitted without interrupt until the end of line. Accordingly, a sufficient number of data storage cells and a buffering mechanism can be developed that starts transmission of pixels once there are sufficient pixels stored such that all of the pixels will have been captured and transmitted by the time the end of the line of image data is reached. If, for example, an imager array including 16 focal planes (as in a 4×4 array) transmits image data from all focal planes, then there is very little data storage utilized prior to the start of focal plane readout, because the data is transmitted at approximately the rate that at which it is being read. If, however, the same imager array only has one active imager, then almost all of the pixels from a row (column) of the focal plane are stored since the buffer is being read 16 times as fast as it is being written. Therefore, the data storage requirement would be one row of pixels (i.e. 1/16th of a line of image data). When eight focal planes are active, half the data from all eight focal planes is buffered before transmission commences to avoid underflow. Therefore, the total number of data storage cells utilized is equal to four rows of pixels or one quarter of a line of image data. The above examples illustrate how the data storage requirements of an imager array can vary based upon the number of active focal planes. In many embodiments, the total number of storage cells within an imager array is less than a quarter of a line of image data. In several embodiments, the total number of storage cells within an imager array is equal to a line of image data. In several embodiments, the total number of data storage cells is between a quarter of a line of image data and a full line of image data. In a number of embodiments, the total number of storage cells is equal to or greater than a line of image data. When the camera module transmits the captured image data, the incorporation of additional data describing the image data enables a peripheral device receiving the image data to reconstruct the images captured by each active camera in the imager array 102.
Imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention are configured to output image data via an interface format that accommodates the transfer of image data captured via multiple focal planes. In several embodiments, the imager array is configured to transmit captured image data in accordance with an interface format that is compatible with standard interface formats, such as (but not limited to) the MIPI CSI-2 interface format (MIPI interface format), the Camera Link interface format, and any of the Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface formats or FireWire interface formats. When image data captured from multiple focal planes is output by the imager array, the device receiving the image data is faced with the task of assembling the image data into a plurality of images of a scene.
Although specific array camera system architectures are discussed above, any of a variety of system architectures for array cameras can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The transmission of image data captured by a plurality of focal planes on an imager array and additional data describing the image data that enables a receiver to reconstruct images from the image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention is discussed below.
Identification of Focal Planes
Due to the fact that imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention can capture image data using more than one focal plane, processes for transmitting the captured image data include mechanisms for identifying the specific focal plane used to capture a specific set of image data. A convention is typically adopted for identifying specific focal planes within an imager array. Focal planes on an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention are conceptually illustrated in
The focal planes on an imager array can be considered to be arranged in a matrix of “M” rows of focal planes, on a row axis notated as “m”, and “N” columns of focal planes, on a column axis notated as “n.” Individual focal planes can be identified based upon their location within the imager array. In certain embodiments, a numbering convention is used in which the focal plane number is defined by the following equation:
Focal plane number=(m+(n*M))+1
where
In the illustrated embodiment, the horizontal index, or row, of focal planes is numbered from 0 to 4. The vertical index, or column, of focal planes is numbered from 0 to 4. Thereby, each row and column has 5 focal planes for a total number of 25 focal planes in the illustrated array of focal planes. In many embodiments, the numbering starts at the top left corner of the imager array. In other embodiments, alternative conventions are used to number the focal planes.
Although specific focal plane numbering conventions are discussed above, any of a variety of different conventions can be utilized to identify a focal plane. Given a specific convention, the identity of a focal plane utilized to capture specific image data can be transmitted with the image data. Processes for transmitting image data with information identifying the focal plane that captured the image data are discussed further below.
Packetizing Image Data Captured by Multiple Focal Planes
In several embodiments, image data from a plurality of focal planes can be packetized by inserting the image data and/or additional data describing the image data into a packet in such a way that a processor can reconstruct images of a scene from the received image data. A conceptual illustration of a packet including image data and additional data describing the image data transmitted by an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In a number of embodiments, the packet header 304 contains embedded data. In many embodiments, the embedded data describes the camera module from which image data is generated in such a way that a processor can determine the structure of the image data in the packet and reconstruct images from the data received from the camera module. In several embodiments, a packet header 304 includes embedded data such as (but not limited to) the number of focal planes in an imager array, the timing of the image capture per focal plane, the identity of the particular focal planes being read out, the total number of pixels in a focal plane, the resolution of an image taken by a focal plane, the timing of the pixel read outs and the gain for the focal plane. As discussed below, the embedded data described above need not be included in a packet header and some or all of the information can be transmitted accompanying image data in different ways including but not limited to locating the additional data elsewhere in the packet and/or transmitting the additional data in a separate packet. Embedded data describing imaging data in accordance with embodiments of the invention is discussed further below.
In the illustrated embodiment, the lines 308 of image data include line headers 310. The line header identifies the focal plane or focal planes and pixels in the imager array that captured the image data contained within the line of image data. A processor can utilize the line header to identify the specific image data contained within the line 310 of image data. In various embodiments, a line header 310 includes information such as (but not limited to) the identify of the focal plane that captured the image data within the line and/or the identity of the specific pixels(s) or group of pixels used to capture the image data contained within the line of data, and a timestamp. Stated another way, a line of image data within a packet formatted in accordance with embodiments of the invention need not correspond to image data captured using a single line of pixels in a single focal plane. Indeed, packets of image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention can include lines of image data containing image data captured by different lines of pixels and/or from different focal planes. Inclusion of the additional data describing the line of image data in the line header allows a processor to receive and process image data from multiple images multiplexed into a single packet or stream of packets. Different types of embedded data that can be included in line headers (or elsewhere) in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Each line 308 of image data can include a line footer 312 to indicate that the line of image data 308 associated with the preceding line header 310 has ended. Also, each packet 302 can include a packet footer 306 to indicate that the image data associated with the previous packet header 304 has ended. In many embodiments, the imager array is configured to generate multiple packets 302 to contain the image data captured by the focal planes and each packet includes multiple lines of image data.
Due to the manner in which image data is captured by different sets of pixels in different focal planes as data is transmitted by the imager array, the processor typically cannot predict the order in which it will receive image data from the imager array. In many embodiments, the processor has no knowledge of the focal plane or focal planes that captured the image data contained within a line of image data without reference to the packet header and/or the line header for the line of image data. However, in other embodiments the imager array imposes constraints with respect to the order in which image data is captured by specific focal planes (see for example the discussion below with respect to
Although the inclusion of specific pieces of information within packet headers and/or line headers is described above, any information that enables the reconstruction of multiple images from image data multiplexed into a single packet or stream of packets can be incorporated into a packet of image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Transmission of image data compatible with the MIPI interface format is discussed further below.
Image Data Transmission Compatible with the MIPI Interface Format
In several embodiments, imager arrays transmit image data and additional data describing the image data in a manner that is compatible with an existing interface format for the transmission of image data by a conventional camera including a single focal plane. A conceptual illustration of image data and additional data describing the image data transmitted as packets compatible with the MIPI CSI-2 standard interface format (MIPI interface format) in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The transmission of the first line of the MIPI container is completed by the transmission of a MIPI footer 406. There is a pause during the MIPI line blanking interval 408, and then the next portion of the MIPI header 412 is transmitted. The next line of the MIPI container includes a line of image data 414. In embodiments where the order in which the lines of image data transmitted by the imager array is not predetermined, the line of image data can be preceded by a line header and followed by a line footer. In embodiments where the lines of image data are transmitted in a predetermined order (see for example the discussion of
The process of transmitting a MIPI footer, pausing during a MIPI line blanking interval, transmitting a portion of the MIPI header, and transmitting lines of image data within the MIPI container continues until all the lines of image data in the packet are transmitted. In several embodiments, an embedded packet footer is transmitted in the MIPI container to indicate that the transmission of the packet is complete. Following the transmission of the packet, the transmission of the MIPI container is completed by transmitting a MIPI footer 406 and a MIPI frame end 416. Although the packet illustrated in
As can readily be appreciated, the process illustrated in
Additional Data Describing an Imager Array
Imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention additional data describing the imager array that can be embedded in a packet header or elsewhere in image data transmitted by the imager array. A processor can utilize the additional data describing the imager array to reconstruct images from the image data contained within the packet. In various embodiments, the additional data describing the imager array is divided into fixed descriptors and dynamic descriptors. Fixed descriptors are pieces of data within a packet header that are fixed values that are specific to an array camera configuration, and which do not change during array camera operation. Dynamic descriptors are pieces of data within the embedded data that can vary during array camera operation. In many embodiments, dynamic descriptors are parameters describing the operational states such as (but not limited to) focal plane exposure time or focal plane processing gain. In several embodiments, an imager array transmits image data and additional data including at least one of the total number of focal planes, the total number of pixels being read out per focal plane in a first dimension, the total number of pixels being read out per focal plane in a second dimension, the integration time of the pixels in each focal plane, and the gain applied to each pixel in each focal plain (which can be divided into analog gain and digital gain). The specific data transmitted describing the imager array typically depends upon the information that is provided to the receiving device about the imager array by other sources. In many embodiments, imaging characteristics such as the integration time can be specified by a receiving device such as a processor and the information is transmitted by the imager array to communicate to the receiving device that the imaging characteristics of the relevant focal planes have been updated in response to the instruction. In many embodiments, an imager array transmits image data and the gain applied to each pixel in each focal plain (which can be divided into analog gain and digital gain), and additional data including the integration time of the pixels in the active focal planes and at least one of the total number of focal planes, the total number of pixels being read out per focal plane in a first dimension, the total number of pixels being read out per focal plane in a second dimension. In other embodiments, any of a variety of combinations of information including additional pieces of information can be transmitted as additional data describing image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
In many embodiments, a transmitter within an imager array includes additional data describing the imager array in the packet header to allow the receiver within a processor to determine the structure of the data in a packet in order for the software in the processor to reconstruct the image data from the camera. The additional data describing the imager array in the packet header is largely dependent upon the specific application and array camera configuration.
In several embodiments, the additional data describing the imager array is transmitted as embedded data within a MIPI container using the embedded 8-bit non image data (data-type=0x12) format specified as part of the MIPI interface standard. The following table provides the structure of various fixed descriptors that can be utilized in additional data describing an imager array transmitted in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. Unless otherwise stated the byte order is MSB first. In several embodiments, one, multiple, and/or all of the following fixed descriptors can be included as embedded data within a packet header:
The following table provides the structure of various dynamic descriptors that can be utilized in the additional data describing an imager array transmitted in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Unless otherwise stated the byte order is MSB first. In several embodiments, one, multiple, and/or all of the following dynamic descriptors can be included as embedded data within a packet header:
Referring to the above tables, each of the descriptors is discussed further below. Furthermore, although a specific number of bytes are used in embodiments throughout the specification for fixed and dynamic descriptors, any number of bytes may be utilized in other embodiments as appropriate to specific applications.
“Data identification (ID)” is a fixed descriptor of 5 bytes that can be used at the start of the embedded data. The value of which can be represented in an ASCII character string such as (but not limited to) “PICAM”.
“Device ID” is a fixed descriptor of 4 bytes that can be used as a device identification word.
“Revision ID” is a fixed descriptor of two bytes in length. “Revision ID” is a silicon revision word and describes the version of the imager array.
“Manufacturer ID” is a fixed descriptor of 8 bytes in length. “Manufacturer ID” is a manufacturer identifier.
“Array format, M, N” is a fixed descriptor of 1 byte in length. “Array format” describes the number of focal planes in the imager array. In several embodiments, the array format specifies values M and N, where M is the number of focal planes per row in the imager array and N is the number of focal plane per column in the imager array.
“Start of focal plane image data capture time tag counter frequency” is a fixed descriptor of 2 bytes in length that indicates the frequency used to generate the start of focal plane image data capture time tag counter frequency values. In several embodiments, the frequency is represented using a 16-bit fixed precision 8.8 format (0 to 255.99609 MHz in 0.00390625 MHz steps). In other embodiments, any of a variety of data values can be utilized to represent the packet time tag values with precision appropriate to the specific application.
“Active focal plane” is a dynamic descriptor of 8 bytes in length. The “active focal plane” descriptor describes the focal planes that are read out in the upcoming packet. Certain embodiments provide for support of as many as 64 focal planes. In other embodiments, the number of focal planes can exceed 64 focal planes and the embedded data indicates the appropriate number of focal planes. Each bit corresponds to a single focal plane within the imager array with a 1 indicating that the packet contains image data captured using the focal plane.
“Total pixels X” is a dynamic descriptor of 2*M*N in length that describes the number of pixels being read out per focal plane in the X axis direction. In several embodiments, each pixel has a 16 bit word associated with it. Inactive focal planes (focal planes not part of the readout) can be set to 0x0000h.
“Total pixels Y” is a dynamic descriptor of 2*M*N in length that describes the number of pixels being readout per focal plane along the Y axis. Inactive focal planes (focal planes not part of the readout) can be set to 0x0000h.
“Integration Time” is a dynamic descriptor of 3*M*N in length that describes the integration time per focal plane (corresponding to the first row of data in the upcoming packet) in units of microseconds. Inactive focal planes (focal planes not part of the readout) are set to 0x000000h.
“Analog Gain” is a dynamic descriptor of 1*M*N in length that describes the analog gain per focal plane (corresponding to the first row of data in the upcoming packet) in linear units. In several embodiments, the gain is represented using an 8 bit fixed point 5.3 format (0 to 31.875x in 0.125 steps) value. Inactive focal planes (focal planes not part of the readout) are set to 0x00h.
“Digital Gain” is a dynamic descriptor of 1*M*N in length that describes the digital gain per focal plane (corresponding to the first row of data in the upcoming packet) in linear units. In several embodiments, the gain is represented using an 7 bit fixed point 3.4 format. Inactive focal planes (focal planes not part of the readout) are set to 0x00h.
“Packing Modulo” is a dynamic descriptor of 2 bytes length that defines the packing modulo process used to interleave pixel data from the active focal planes into a line of image data.
“User” is a dynamic descriptor of variable length that can be utilized to support system capability expansion.
“Padding” is a dynamic descriptor of variable length that allows for expansion of the length of the embedded data section to be equal to a line of the image data with preceding line header and trailing line footer. The value of padding bytes is not specified and is variable depending on the needs of the particular data section.
Although specific pieces of additional data describing an imager array in specific formats are disclosed above, the additional data describing an imager array (if any) transmitted by an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention depends upon the requirements of a specific application. In many embodiments, a combination of the above pieces of additional data and/or other pieces of additional data describing the imager array are transmitted so that a processor receiving the information can reconstruct images from the image data captured by a imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the manner in which image data is transmitted between the imager array and the processors is not limited in any way to transmissions that include a specific set of additional data describing the imager array. Specific sets of additional data describing an imager array including (but not limited to) one or more of the dynamic descriptors identified above can, however, facilitate the reconstruction of images by a processor.
Additional Data Describing a Line of Image Data
Imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention format image data captured by groups of pixels within one or more focal planes into a line of image data and can transmit the line of image data with additional data describing the line of image data to other devices. A single line of image data typically corresponds to image data captured by a row or a column of pixels within each active focal plane in an imager array. In many embodiments, however, a line of image data can correspond to image data captured from pixels in one or more rows of one or more active focal planes (see discussion of
The transmission of a line of image data and a line header containing additional data describing the line of image data by an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is conceptually illustrated in
A variety of different control schemes can be utilized to control the timing of the capture of image data by different pixels within the focal planes of an imager array and with respect to the transmission of the captured image data by the imager array. In several embodiments, image data from a specific focal plane is captured one row (or column) of pixels at a time. As noted above, the focal planes in an imager array can be separately controlled. Therefore, the sequence with which rows of image data are read from each focal plane can vary depending upon control parameters including, but not limited to, exposure time associated with each focal plane. When image data is captured by the pixels, the image data is read out. The image data is not typically transmitted directly from the pixels but is buffered. The amount of data that is buffered typically depends upon the rate at which image data is captured and the rate with which image data can be transmitted off-chip by the imager array. As discussed above, the amount of buffered pixel data can also depend upon the number of active focal planes.
In numerous embodiments, a line of image data may be a row of pixel data from each active focal plane, a column of pixel data from each active focal plane or any other grouping of image data captured by pixels within one or more focal planes. Accordingly, the term “line” is a generic term. In many embodiments, the line of image data includes image data captured from pixels in a single focal plane. In other embodiments, the line of image data includes image data captured from multiple focal planes. Additional data describing the line of image data allows software or hardware on a receiver to determine from which focal plane(s), which row/column and/or which pixels on that focal plane captured specific image data within a line of image data.
In several embodiments, the image data is transmitted using the RAW8 or RAW10 data formats defined within the MIPI interface format, although other data formats can be supported as necessary including formats involving 8 bits per pixel and formats involving 10 bits per pixel.
In a variety of embodiments, the size of image data with accompanying line headers containing additional data describing the image data transmitted by a imager array when capture of a light field occurs (i.e. including all the image data associated with the images of the scene captured by each of the focal planes in the imager array) in bytes can be calculated using the following equation:
((X*N)+P)*Y*k
where
In the case of 10 bits per pixel transmission, each line of data is padded with additional pixels to provide an integer multiple of 4. Padding pixels can have a value of 0x3Fh.
In many embodiments, the additional data describing a line of image data can include one or more of timing information concerning the frame to which the image data from each focal plane belongs, and the row (column) number in each focal plane from which image data in the line of image data is read out. In a number of embodiments, each line of data is preceded by a line header containing the additional information describing the line of image data, which provides the processor with the necessary information about the line data to reconstruct the images captured by the focal planes. The following table provides additional data that can be included in a line header in accordance with an embodiment of the invention to enable reconstruction of images by a processor:
Referring to the above table, each of the descriptors is discussed further below. Furthermore, although a specific number of bytes are used in embodiments throughout the specification for fixed and dynamic descriptors, any number of bytes may be utilized in other embodiments as appropriate to specific applications.
“Start of focal plane image data capture time tag” is equal to or less than 4*M*N bytes in length and describes a (nominally) 32 bit number for each focal plane corresponding the relative start time for the readout of the focal plane. The start of the image data associated with a pixel can be captured from a free running 32 bit counter internal to the transmitter within the imager array counting in units of clock cycles where the frequency of the counter is defined in the embedded data. Inactive focal planes (as defined in the active focal plane field of the embedded data of the packet header) can have their start of focal plane image data capture time tag omitted. Note in 10 bits per pixel transmission mode the individual bytes are expanded to 10 bits and padded with 2 LSBs=00.
“Row Numbers” is equal to or less than 2*M*N bytes in length and describes a (nominally) 16 bit line number for each focal plane indicating from which physical row or line in the focal plane the subsequent image data is from (the appropriate number of bits depends upon the number of lines of pixels and need not be 16 bits). Nonphysical rows or lines (virtual rows or lines) that may be transmitted can have their row or line number set to 0xffffh. Inactive focal planes (as defined in the active focal plane field of the embedded data) can have their line number omitted. In 10 bits per pixel transmission mode, the individual bytes are expanded to 10 bits and padded with 2 LSBs=00.
“Padding” is of variable bytes in length (such as 0 or 2 in certain embodiments). A variable padding range enables the line header to fall on a modulo 5 byte boundary in the case of 10 bits per pixel transmission. In several embodiments, padding words have the value of 0x3Fh.
Although specific pieces of additional data describing a line of image data in specific formats are disclosed above, the additional data describing a line of image data (if any) transmitted accompanying a line of image data by a imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention depends upon the requirements of a specific application. In many embodiments, a combination of the above pieces of additional data and/or other pieces of additional data are transmitted in a line header so that a processor receiving the additional data describing the lines of image data can reconstruct images from the image data captured by a imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the manner in which data is transmitted between the imager array and the processor is not limited in any way to transmissions that include a specific set of additional data describing lines of image data. Specific sets of additional data describing lines of image data can, however, facilitate the reconstruction of images by a processor.
Including Additional Data Describing Imager Array in Line Headers
As discussed above, additional data describing an imager array may be utilized to allow a receiver to determine the structure of image data in a packet and reconstruct images. In certain embodiments, the additional data describing an imager array can be included in a line header that may also contain additional data describing a line of image data. This can be advantageous in certain embodiments where the packet header length may be limited or the separate transmission of additional information describing an imager array is not desirable.
The following table includes additional data describing an imager array that can be included in a line header in accordance with an embodiment of the invention to enable reconstruction of images by a processor:
Referring to the above table, each of the descriptors is discussed further below. Furthermore, although a specific number of bytes are used in embodiments throughout the specification for fixed and dynamic descriptors, any number of bytes may be utilized in other embodiments as appropriate to specific applications.
“Free running mode” is equal to 2 bytes in length and describes a fixed value of ASCII code for “FR”. Note in 10 bits per pixel transmission mode the individual bytes are expanded to 10 bits and padded with 2 LSBs=00.
“Packet counter” is equal to 2 bytes in length and describes an arbitrary packet number counter. This may be initialized to zero upon reset, incremented by one for every packet transmitted in the MIPI interface format and wraps around at 0xffff. Note in 10 bits per pixel transmission mode the individual bytes are expanded to 10 bits and padded with 2 LSBs=00.
“Row Number” is equal to or less than 2*M*N bytes in length and describes a (nominally) 16 bit row (column) number for each focal plane indicating from which physical row or line in the focal plane the subsequent image data is from (the appropriate number of bits depends upon the number of lines of pixels and need not be 16 bits). Nonphysical rows or lines (virtual rows or lines) that may be transmitted can have their row or line number set to 0xffffh. Inactive focal planes (as defined in the active focal plane field of the embedded data) can have their line number omitted. In 10 bits per pixel transmission mode, the individual bytes are expanded to 10 bits and padded with 2 LSBs=00.
“Padding” is of variable bytes in length (such as 0 or 2 in certain embodiments). A variable padding range enables the line header to fall on a modulo 5 byte boundary in the case of 10 bits per pixel transmission. In several embodiments, padding words have the value of 0x3Fh.
Although specific pieces of additional data describing an imager array that can be included in a line header are disclosed above, the additional data transmitted with a line of image by an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention depends upon the requirements of a specific application. In many embodiments, a combination of the above pieces of additional data describing the imager array and/or other pieces of additional data describing the imager array and/or one or more lines of image data are transmitted in a line header so that a processor receiving the information can reconstruct images from the image data captured by the imager array. Accordingly, the manner in which data is transmitted between the imager array and a receiver is not limited in any way to transmissions that include a specific set of additional data in the line headers or packet headers.
Light Field Capture and Transmission Processes
Imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention can capture image data using multiple focal planes and transmit the image data and additional information describing the image data to a processor. As noted above, the need to transmit the image data and additional data describing the image data within a specific container may influence the manner in which the data is transmitted. As noted above, the additional data describing the image data typically depends upon the manner in which the image data is captured and the characteristics of the imager array used to capture the light field.
A process for capturing a light field and transmitting the image data and additional data describing the image data to an external device such as (but not limited to) a processor using an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, a line header including additional data describing the a line of image data is transmitted (606) by the imager array, and then a line of captured image data is transmitted (608). As noted above, the line of image data can include image data from one or more focal planes and the additional data can identify the groups of pixels and/or the focal planes that captured the image data within the line of image data. Upon completion of the transmission of a line of image data, a line footer can optionally be transmitted (610) by the imager array to indicate that the transmission of the line of image data is complete. The process repeats until a determination (612) is made that the capture of the light field (i.e. a plurality of two dimensional images captured from different viewpoints) using the plurality of focal planes is complete. Following the completion of the transmission of image data by the imager array, the imager array can optionally transmit (614) a packet footer that indicates the completion of the packet of data. As noted above, the specific manner in which the image data and the additional data describing the image data is transmitted is often dictated by an interface format (e.g. the MIPI interface format).
In several embodiments, line headers, line footers and/or packet footers are omitted based on the image data being configured to capture a predetermined amount of image data and/or the transmission of the captured image data in a predetermined sequence. Although a specific process for transmitting image data and additional data describing the image data is discussed above with respect to the process illustrated in
Interleaving Image Data from Multiple Focal Planes
In a number of embodiments, image data from multiple focal planes can be interleaved in a predetermined manner to simplify the transmission of image data and reduce the amount of additional data describing the image data that is transmitted accompanying the image data. In many embodiments, imager arrays use a “modulo” scheme for interleaving the captured image data into a packet in a predetermined manner. A modulo scheme involves capturing and transmitting image data from the same group of pixels in each active focal plane (or each focal plane in a group of focal planes) within an imager array, such as the same row, rows, column, or columns. In other embodiments, a modulo scheme can involve specifying the specific row (or column) from a set of focal planes and then reading out corresponding pixels or groups of pixels from each specified row (or column).
Three different modulo processes for capturing and transmitting image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated in
Similarly, a line of image data transmitted in accordance with a second modulo process 728 is conceptually illustrated in
A line of image data transmitted in accordance with a third modulo process 730 is conceptually illustrated in
For each modulo transmission process, the transmission of image data from selected rows in each active focal plane can continue until all of the pixels in all of the focal planes are transmitted. In embodiments where different modulo transmission processes are supported, the imager array can provide additional data indicating the modulo process that is being utilized. In addition, the imager array can provide additional data describing the image data to enable reconstruction of images from the image data including (but not limited to) additional data indicating the active focal planes and/or information with respect to each line of image data specifying the selected rows (columns) in each active focal plane from which the image data is being read out. Although specific transmission processes are discussed above, image data can be transmitted in any order in accordance with embodiments of the invention, and is not limited to interleaving image data from multiple focal planes in a modulo transmission process.
While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation application on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/668,057 filed Nov. 2, 2012, which is a continuation application on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/470,252 filed May 11, 2012, which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/484,920, filed May 11, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4124798 | Thompson | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4198646 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4323925 | Abell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4460449 | Montalbano | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4467365 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 5005083 | Grage | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5070414 | Tsutsumi | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5144448 | Hornbaker | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5629524 | Stettner et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5808350 | Jack et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5832312 | Rieger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5880691 | Fossum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5933190 | Dierickx et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5973844 | Burger | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6002743 | Telymonde | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6069351 | Mack | May 2000 | A |
| 6069365 | Chow et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6124974 | Burger | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6137535 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141048 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6358862 | Ireland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6502097 | Chan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6603513 | Berezin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611289 | Yu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6627896 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6635941 | Suda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6671399 | Berestov | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6750904 | Lambert | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6765617 | Tangen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6771833 | Edgar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6774941 | Boisvert et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6879735 | Portniaguine et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6903770 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6909121 | Nishikawa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6958862 | Joseph | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7199348 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7262799 | Suda | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7292735 | Blake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7295697 | Satoh | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7391572 | Jacobowitz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7606484 | Richards et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7633511 | Shum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7657090 | Omatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7675681 | Tomikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7706634 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8027531 | Wilburn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8044994 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8077245 | Adamo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8106949 | Tan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8126279 | Marcellin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8131097 | Lelescu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8180145 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8189089 | Georgiev | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8213711 | Tam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8231814 | Duparre | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8294099 | Blackwell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8305456 | McMahon | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8360574 | Ishak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8406562 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8514491 | Duparre | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8541730 | Inuiya | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 20010005225 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038387 | Tomooka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020012056 | Trevino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027608 | Johnson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063807 | Margulis | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087403 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020089596 | Suda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094027 | Sato et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101528 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020113867 | Takigawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020113888 | Sonoda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163054 | Suda et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167537 | Trajkovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177054 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030124763 | Fan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140347 | Varsa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179418 | Wengender et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211405 | Venkataraman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008271 | Hagimori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040012689 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047274 | Amanai | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050104 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056966 | Schechner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100570 | Shizukuishi | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114807 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170340 | Tipping et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174439 | Upton | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207836 | Chhibber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213449 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234873 | Venkataraman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251509 | Choi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012035 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036778 | DeMonte | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048690 | Yamamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068436 | Fraenkel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132098 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134698 | Schroeder | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134712 | Gruhlke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050151759 | Gonzalez-Banos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205785 | Hornback et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219363 | Kohler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225654 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286612 | Takanashi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002635 | Nestares et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023314 | Boettiger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033005 | Jerdev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038891 | Okutomi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054780 | Garrood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054782 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072029 | Miyatake et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060087747 | Ohzawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098888 | Morishita | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125936 | Gruhike et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060138322 | Costello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159369 | Young | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060176566 | Boettiger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187338 | May et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210186 | Berkner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060243889 | Farnworth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251410 | Trutna | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274174 | Tewinkle | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002159 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070008575 | Yu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070024614 | Tam | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070040922 | McKee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070041391 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052825 | Cho | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083114 | Yang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070085917 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102622 | Olsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127831 | Venkataraman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139333 | Sato et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146511 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070159541 | Sparks et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160310 | Tanida et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171290 | Kroger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206241 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211164 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216765 | Wong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228256 | Mentzer | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257184 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258006 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258706 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070268374 | Robinson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296835 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080019611 | Larkin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080025649 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030597 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043095 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043096 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080080028 | Bakin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080084486 | Enge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088793 | Sverdrup et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118241 | TeKolste et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131019 | Ng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131107 | Ueno | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080151097 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152296 | Oh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156991 | Hu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080218610 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219654 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080239116 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247638 | Tanida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247653 | Moussavi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090050946 | Duparre et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052743 | Techmer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060281 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086074 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090091806 | Inuiya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090102956 | Georgiev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109306 | Shan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167922 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090179142 | Duparre et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090180021 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200622 | Tai et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207235 | Francini et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225203 | Tanida et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237520 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268192 | Koenck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268983 | Stone | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284651 | Srinivasan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090297056 | Lelescu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302205 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2009 | A9 |
| 20090323195 | Hembree et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324118 | Maslov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002126 | Wenstrand et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100002313 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100002314 | Duparre | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100053342 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100053600 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060746 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2010 | A9 |
| 20100086227 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097491 | Farina et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103259 | Tanida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103308 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118127 | Nam et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142839 | Lakus-becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100157073 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177411 | Hegde et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195716 | Klein et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201834 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100208100 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2010 | A9 |
| 20100220212 | Perlman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223237 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100231285 | Boomer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100244165 | Lake et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281070 | Chan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001037 | Tewinkle | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110032370 | Ludwig | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043661 | Podoleanu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043665 | Ogasahara | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043668 | McKinnon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069189 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110080487 | Venkataraman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110122308 | Duparre | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153248 | Gu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211824 | Georgiev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221658 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241234 | Duparre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242342 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242355 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242356 | Aleksic et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279721 | McMahon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110285866 | Bhrugumalla et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310980 | Mathew | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120012748 | Pain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120026342 | Yu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120044372 | Côté et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069235 | Imai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113413 | Miahczylowicz-Wolski et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198677 | Duparre | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249550 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120287291 | Mcmahon | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314033 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130003184 | Duparre | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130010073 | Do | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130050504 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130057710 | McMahon | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130070060 | Chatterjee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077882 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130088637 | Duparre | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128068 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128069 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130147979 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130265459 | Duparre et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140132810 | McMahon | May 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 840502 | May 1998 | EP |
| 1734766 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 2336816 | Jun 2011 | EP |
| 2006033493 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2007520107 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2011109484 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2013526801 | Jun 2013 | JP |
| 2007083579 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2009151903 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2009151903 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2011063347 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011116203 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011116203 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011063347 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011143501 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012057619 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012057620 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012057621 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012057622 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012057623 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012057620 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012074361 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012082904 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012155119 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2013003276 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013043751 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013043761 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013049699 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013055960 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013119706 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013126578 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2014078443 | May 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Liu et al., “Virtual View Reconstruction Using Temporal Information”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2012, pp. 115-120. |
| Muehlebach, “Camera Auto Exposure Control for VSLAM Applications”, Studies on Mechatronics. |
| Nayar, “Computational Cameras: Redefining the Image”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 30-38. |
| Ng, “Digital Light Field Photography”, Thesis, Jul. 2006, 203 pgs. |
| Ng et al., “Super-Resolution Image Restoration from Blurred Low-Resolution Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2005, vol. 23, pp. 367-378. |
| Nitta et al., “Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative backprojection method”, Applied Optics, May 1, 2006, vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2893-2900. |
| Nomura et al., “Scene Collages and Flexible Camera Arrays”, Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2007, 12 pgs. |
| Park et al., “Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 2003, pp. 21-36. |
| Pham et al., “Robust Super-Resolution without Regularization”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 124, 2008, pp. 1-19. |
| Polight, “Designing Imaging Products Using Reflowable Autofocus Lenses”, http://www.polight.no/tunable-polymer-autofocus-lens-html--11.html. |
| Protter et al., “Generalizing the Nonlocal-Means to Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2009, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 36-51. |
| Radtke et al., “Laser lithographic fabrication and characterization of a spherical artificial compound eye”, Optics Express, Mar. 19, 2007, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 3067-3077. |
| Rander et al., “Virtualized Reality: Constructing Time-Varying Virtual Worlds From Real World Events”, Proc. of IEEE Visualization '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Oct. 19-24, 1997, pp. 277-283, 552. |
| Rhemann et al, “Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell , 2013, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 504-511. |
| Robertson et al., “Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures”, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1999, 5 pgs. |
| Robertson et al., “Estimation-theoretic approach to dynamic range enhancement using multiple exposures”, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Apr. 2003, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 219-228. |
| Roy et al., “Non-Uniform Hierarchical Pyramid Stereo for Large Images”, Computer and Robot Vision, 2007, pp. 208-215. |
| Sauer et al., “Parallel Computation of Sequential Pixel Updates in Statistical Tomographic Reconstruction”, ICIP 1995, pp. 93-96. |
| Shum et al., “Pop-Up Light Field: An Interactive Image-Based Modeling and Rendering System,” Apr. 2004, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143-162. Retrieved from http://131.107.65.14/en-us/um/people/jiansun/papers/PopupLightField—TOG.pdf on Feb. 5. |
| Stollberg et al., “The Gabor superlens as an alternative wafer-level camera approach inspired by superposition compound eyes of nocturnal insects”, Optics Express, Aug. 31, 2009, vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 15747-15759. |
| Sun et al., “Image Super-Resolution Using Gradient Profile Prior”, Source and date unknown, 8 pgs. |
| Takeda et al., “Super-resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, Sep. 2009, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1958-1975. |
| Tanida et al., “Color imaging with an integrated compound imaging system”, Optics Express, Sep. 8, 2003, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2109-2117. |
| Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification”, Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2001, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1806-1813. |
| Taylor, “Virtual camera movement: The way of the future?”, merican Cinematographer 77, 9 (Sep.),, 93-100. |
| Vaish et al., “Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces Using Synthetic Apertures: Stereo, Focus and Robust Measures”, Proceeding, CVPR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—vol. 2, pp. 2331-2338. |
| Vaish et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform”, IEEE Workshop on A3DISS, CVPR, 2005, 8 pgs. |
| Vaish et al., “Using Plane + Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, 8 pgs. |
| Vuong et al., “A New Auto Exposure and Auto White-Balance Algorithm to Detect High Dynamic Range Conditions Using CMOS Technology”. |
| Wang, “Calculation of Image Position, Size and Orientation Using First Order Properties”. |
| Wetzstein et al., “Computational Plenoptic Imaging”, Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2397-2426. |
| Wheeler et al., “Super-Resolution Image Synthesis Using Projections Onto Convex Sets in the Frequency Domain”, Proc. SPIE, 2005, 5674, 12 pgs. |
| Wikipedia, “Polarizing Filter (Photography)”. |
| Wilburn, “High Performance Imaging Using Arrays of Inexpensive Cameras”, Thesis of Bennett Wilburn, Dec. 2004, 128 pgs. |
| Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging Using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Jul. 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 765-776. |
| Wilburn et al., “High-Speed Videography Using a Dense Camera Array”, Proceeding, CVPR'04 Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 294-301. |
| Wilburn et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002, SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2002, 8 pgs. |
| Wippermann et al., “Design and fabrication of a chirped array of refractive ellipsoidal micro-lenses for an apposition eye camera objective”, Proceedings of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, Oct. 15, 2005, 59622C-1-59622C-11. |
| Yang et al., “Superresolution Using Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method”, Source and date unknown, 8 pgs. |
| Zhang et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Camera Array”, Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2004, 12 pgs. |
| Zomet et al., “Robust Super-Resolution”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/46002, Search Completed Nov. 13, 2013, Mailed Nov. 29, 2013, 7 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/48772, Search Completed Oct. 21, 2013, Mailed Nov. 8, 2013, 6 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/56065, Search Completed Nov. 25, 2013, Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/59991, Search Completed Feb. 6, 2014, Mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 8 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Search Completed Mar. 27, 2013, Mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 14 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Search Completed Feb. 18, 2014, Mailed Mar. 19, 2014, 7 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2009/044687, date completed Jan. 5, 2010, date mailed Jan. 13, 2010, 9 pgs. |
| Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US11/36349, mailed Aug. 22, 2011, 12 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/64921, Report Completed Feb. 25, 2011, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 17 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, completed Apr. 2, 2013, 12 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, completed Mar. 9, 2011, 14 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/044014, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 15 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/056151, completed Nov. 14, 2012, 10 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/059813, completed Dec. 17, 2012, 8 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/37670, Mailed Jul. 18, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 5, 2012, 9 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/58093, completed Nov. 15, 2012, 12 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,106, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 12 pgs. |
| Baker et al., “Limits on Super-Resolution and How to Break Them”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2002, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1167-1183. |
| Bertero et al., “Super-resolution in computational imaging”, Micron, 2003, vol. 34, Issues 6-7, 17 pgs. |
| Bishop et al., “Full-Resolution Depth Map Estimation from an Aliased Plenoptic Light Field”, ACCV 2010, Part II, LNCS 6493, pp. 186-200, 2011. |
| Bishop et al., “Light Field Superresolution”, Retrieved from http://home.eps.hw.ac.uk/˜sz73/ICCP09/LightFieldSuperresolution.pdf, 9 pgs.9. |
| Bishop et al., “The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, May 2012, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 972-986. |
| Borman, “Topics in Multiframe Superresolution Restoration”, Thesis of Sean Borman, Apr. 2004, 282 pgs. |
| Borman et al, “Image Sequence Processing”, Source unknown, Oct. 14, 2002, 81 pgs. |
| Borman et al., “Block-Matching Sub-Pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—An Empirical Performance Evaluation”, Proc SPIE, Dec. 1998, 3653, 10 pgs. |
| Borman et al., “Image Resampling and Constraint Formulation for Multi-Frame Super-Resolution Restoration”, Proc. SPIE, Jun. 2003, 5016, 12 pgs. |
| Borman et al., “Linear models for multi-frame super-resolution restoration under non-affine registration and spatially varying PSF”, Proc. SPIE, May 2004, vol. 5299, 12 pgs. |
| Borman et al., “Nonlinear Prediction Methods for Estimation of Clique Weighting Parameters in NonGaussian Image Models”, Proc. SPIE, 1998. 3459, 9 pgs. |
| Borman et al., “Simultaneous Multi-Frame MAP Super-Resolution Video Enhancement Using Spatio-Temporal Priors”, Image Processing, 1999, ICIP 99 Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 469-473. |
| Borman et al., “Super-Resolution from Image Sequences—A Review”, Circuits & Systems, 1998, pp. 374-378. |
| Bose et al., “Superresolution and Noise Filtering Using Moving Least Squares”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, date unknown, 21 pgs. |
| Boye et al., “Comparison of Subpixel Image Registration Algorithms”, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, vol. 7246, pp. 72460X-1-72460X-9. |
| Bruckner et al., “Artificial compound eye applying hyperacuity”, Optics Express, Dec. 11, 2006, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 12076-12084. |
| Bruckner et al., “Driving microoptical imaging systems towards miniature camera applications”, Proc. SPIE, Micro-Optics, 2010, 11 pgs. |
| Bruckner et al., “Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes”, Optics Express, Nov. 22, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24379-24394. |
| Capel, “Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution”, [online], Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.226.2643&rep=rep1 &type=pdf>, Title pg., abstract, table of contents, pp. 1-263 (269 total pages), 2001. |
| Chan et al., “Extending the Depth of Field in a Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, Proceedings—International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 623-626. |
| Chan et al., “Investigation of Computational Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE, ISASSP 2006, pp. 1177-1180. |
| Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim Syst Sign Process, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101. |
| Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim. Syst. Sign Process, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101. |
| Drouin et al., “Fast Multiple-Baseline Stereo with Occlusion”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2005, 8 pgs. |
| Drouin et al., “Geo-Consistency for Wide Multi-Camera Stereo”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, 8 pgs. |
| Drouin et al., “Improving Border Localization of Multi-Baseline Stereo Using Border-Cut”, International Journal of Computer Vision, Jul. 2009, vol. 83, Issue 3, 8 pgs. |
| Duparre et al., “Artificial apposition compound eye fabricated by micro-optics technology”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 2004, vol. 43, No. 22, pp. 4303-4310. |
| Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eye zoom camera”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. |
| Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eyes—different concepts and their application to ultra flat image acquisition sensors”, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems IV, Proc. SPIE 5346, Jan. 2004, pp. 89-100. |
| Duparre et al., “Chirped arrays of refractive ellipsoidal microlenses for aberration correction under oblique incidence”, Optics Express, Dec. 26, 2005, vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 10539-10551. |
| Duparre et al., “Micro-optical artificial compound eyes”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, vol. 1, pp. R1-R16. |
| Duparre et al., “Microoptical artificial compound eyes—from design to experimental verification of two different concepts”, Proc. of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, vol. 5962, pp. 59622A-1-59622A-12. |
| Duparre et al., “Microoptical Artificial Compound Eyes—Two Different Concepts for Compact Imaging Systems”, 11th Microoptics Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pgs. |
| Duparre et al., “Microoptical telescope compound eye”, Optics Express, Feb. 7, 2005, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 889-903. |
| Duparre et al., “Micro-optically fabricated artificial apposition compound eye”, Electronic Imaging—Science and Technology, Prod. SPIE 5301, Jan. 2004, pp. 25-33. |
| Duparre et al., “Novel Optics/Micro-Optics for Miniature Imaging Systems”, Proc. of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6196, pp. 619607-1-619607-15. |
| Duparre et al., “Theoretical analysis of an artificial superposition compound eye for application in ultra flat digital image acquisition devices”, Optical Systems Design, Proc. SPIE 5249, Sep. 2003, pp. 408-418. |
| Duparre et al., “Thin compound-eye camera”, Applied Optics, May 20, 3005, vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 2949-2956. |
| Duparre et al., “Ultra-Thin Camera Based on Artificial Apposistion Compound Eyes”, 10th Microoptics Conference, Sep. 1-3, 2004, 2 pgs. |
| Fanaswala, “Regularized Super-Resolution of Multi-View Images”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/-edubois/theses/Fanaswala—thesis.pdf>, 163 pgs., Aug. 2009. |
| Farrell et al., “Resolution and Light Sensitivity Tradeoff with Pixel Size”, Proceedings of the SPIE Electronic Imaging 2006 Conference, 2006, vol. 6069, 8 pgs. |
| Farsiu et al., “Advances and Challenges in Super-Resolution”, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 47-57. |
| Farsiu et al., “Fast and Robust Multiframe Super Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1327-1344. |
| Farsiu et al., “Multiframe Demosaicing and Super-Resolution of Color Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2006, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 141-159. |
| Feris et al., “Multi-Flash Stereopsis: Depth Edge Preserving Stereo with Small Baseline Illumination”, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 2006, 31 pgs. |
| Fife et al., “A 3D Multi-Aperture Image Sensor Architecture”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, pp. 281-284. |
| Fife et al., “A 3MPixel Multi-Aperture Image Sensor with 0.7Mu Pixels in 0.11Mu CMOS”, ISSCC 2008, Session 2, Image Sensors & Technology, 2008, pp. 48-50. |
| Fischer et al., Optical System Design, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 191-198. |
| Fischer et al., Optical System Design, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 49-58. |
| Hamilton, “JPEG File Interchange Format, Version 1.02”, Sep. 1, 1992, 9 pgs. |
| Hardie, “A Fast Image Super-Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2007, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 2953-2964. |
| Horisaki et al., “Irregular Lens Arrangement Design to Improve Imaging Performance of Compound-Eye Imaging Systems”, Applied Physics Express, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 022501-1-022501-3. |
| Horisaki et al., “Superposition Imaging for Three-Dimensionally Space-Invariant Point Spread Functions”, Applied Physics Express, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 112501-1-112501-3. |
| Kang et al., “Handling Occlusions inn Dense Multi-View Stereo”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 1, pp. I-103-I-110. |
| Kitamura et al., “Reconstruction of a high-resolution image on a compound-eye image-capturing system”, Applied Optics, Mar. 10, 2004, vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1719-1727. |
| Krishnamurthy et al., “Compression and Transmission of Depth Maps for Image-Based Rendering”, Image Processing, 2001, pp. 828-831. |
| Kutulakos et al., “Occluding Contour Detection Using Affine Invariants and Purposive Viewpoint Control”, Proc., CVPR 94, 8 pgs. |
| Lensvector, “How LensVector Autofocus Works”, http://www.lensvector.com/overview.html. |
| Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
| Levoy et al., “Light Field Rendering”, Proc. ADM SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 1-12. |
| Li et al., “A Hybrid Camera for Motion Deblurring and Depth Map Super-Resolution,” Jun. 23-28, 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8 pgs. Retrieved from www.eecis.udel.edu/˜jye/lab—research/08/deblur-feng.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, International Filing Date Nov. 13, 2013, Search Completed Mar. 14, 2014, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 12 pgs. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for Application EP12782935, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 7 pgs. |
| Yang et al., “A Real-Time Distributed Light Field Camera”, Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (2002), pp. 1-10. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140218546 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61484920 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13668057 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 14246948 | US | |
| Parent | 13470252 | May 2012 | US |
| Child | 13668057 | US |
