The present disclosure generally relates to systems, devices, and methods for treating cardiac arrhythmias, and more particularly, to systems, devices, and methods for detecting cardiac arrhythmias and coordinating therapy between multiple devices.
Pacing instruments can be used to treat patients suffering from various heart conditions that may result in a reduced ability of the heart to deliver sufficient amounts of blood to a patient's body. These heart conditions may lead to rapid, irregular, and/or inefficient heart contractions. To help alleviate some of these conditions, various devices (e.g., pacemakers, defibrillators, etc.) can be implanted in a patient's body. Such devices may monitor and provide electrical stimulation to the heart to help the heart operate in a more normal, efficient and/or safe manner. In some cases, a patient may have multiple implanted devices.
The present disclosure generally relates to systems, devices, and methods for treating cardiac arrhythmias, and more particularly, to systems, devices, and methods for detecting cardiac arrhythmias and coordinating treatment of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy and defibrillation shock therapy between a leadless cardiac pacemaker and another medical device.
In a first example, a medical device system for delivering electrical stimulation therapy to a heart of a patient may comprise: a leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) configured to be implanted within a heart of a patient and configured to determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias; a medical device configured to determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias and to deliver defibrillation shock therapy to the patient, wherein the LCP and the medical device are housed separately from one another and communicatively coupled, and wherein after the LCP determines an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia, the LCP is configured to modify the defibrillation shock therapy of the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may determine an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia based, at least in part, on one or more received physiological signals or indications of one or more physiological conditions of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the one or more received physiological signals may comprise one or more of: cardiac electrical activity; contractility of the heart of the patient; cardiac output of the heart of the patient; and hearts sounds.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the defibrillation shock therapy may comprise, after the medical device determines an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia: charging a capacitor to a predefined level; and after charging the capacitor to the predefined level, delivering one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient using at least some energy stored in the capacitor.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be configured to: determine whether the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy; and if it is determined that the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy, communicate a suspend message to the medical device and deliver anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the defibrillation shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be configured to affect one or more of the following: modification of an amplitude of the one or more defibrillation pulses; modification of a timing of delivery of the one or more defibrillation pulses; and cessation of delivery of the one or more defibrillation pulses.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the suspend message may cause the medical device to suspend delivering one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient after charging the capacitor to the predefined level.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the suspend message may cause the medical device to cease charging the capacitor.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be further configured to: determine whether a delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia, communicate an abort command to the medical device; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy failed to terminate the arrhythmia, communicate a resume command to the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, after receiving the resume command, the medical device may be configured to deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to determine if the arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy, the LCP may be configured to determine whether: a beat rate of the heart of the patient is less than a threshold beat rate; a regularity of a beat rhythm of the heart of the patient is greater than a threshold regularity; and/or the arrhythmia is monomorphic.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the medical device may determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias based, at least in part, on one or more signals received from the LCP.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be configured to: determine whether the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy; if it is determined that the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy, deliver ATP therapy to the heart of the patient; determine whether the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia, communicate an abort command to the medical device; and if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy failed to terminate the arrhythmia, communicate a shock command to the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the shock command may cause the medical device to deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the medical device may be a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
In another example, a medical device system for delivering electrical stimulation therapy to a heart of a patient may comprise: a leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) implanted within a heart of a patient and configured to determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias; a medical device configured to determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias and to deliver defibrillation shock therapy to the patient, wherein the LCP and the medical device are spaced from one another and communicatively coupled, and wherein after the LCP determines an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia, the LCP is configured to modify the defibrillation shock therapy of the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may determine an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia based, at least in part, on one or more received physiological signals or indications of one or more physiological conditions of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the defibrillation shock therapy may comprise, after the medical device determines an occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia: charging a capacitor to a predefined level; and after charging the capacitor to the predefined level, delivering one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient using at least some energy stored in the capacitor.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be configured to: determine whether the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy; and if it is determined that the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy, communicate a suspend message to the medical device and deliver anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the suspend message may cause the medical device to suspend delivering one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient after charging the capacitor to the predefined level.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the suspend message may cause the medical device to cease charging the capacitor.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be further configured to: determine whether a delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia, communicate an abort command to the medical device; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy failed to terminate the arrhythmia, communicate a resume command to the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, after receiving the resume command, the medical device may be configured to deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the medical device may determine occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias based, at least in part, on one or more signals received from the LCP.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, to modify the shock therapy of the medical device, the LCP may be configured to: determine whether the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy; if it is determined that the cardiac arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy, deliver ATP therapy to the heart of the patient; determine whether the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia; if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy terminated the arrhythmia, communicate an abort command to the medical device; and if it is determined that the delivered ATP therapy failed to terminate the arrhythmia, communicate a shock command to the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the shock command may cause the medical device to deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient.
In still another example, a method for delivering electrical stimulation therapy to a heart of a patient may comprise: determining an occurrence of an arrhythmia; after determining an occurrence of an arrhythmia: with a leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP), determining whether the arrhythmia is susceptible to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy; and with a medical device that is spaced from the LCP and communicatively coupled to the LCP, initiating a shock therapy program; with the LCP, if the arrhythmia is determined to be susceptible to ATP therapy, modifying the shock therapy program of the medical device.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the shock therapy program may comprise delivering one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient, and modifying the shock therapy program of the medical device comprises one or more of: modifying an amplitude of the one or more defibrillation pulses; modifying a timing of delivery of the one or more defibrillation pulses; and ceasing delivery of the one or more defibrillation pulses.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may determine the arrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy if: a beat rate of the heart of the patient is less than a threshold beat rate; a regularity of a beat rhythm of the heart of the patient is greater than a threshold regularity; and/or the arrhythmia is monomorphic.
In yet another example, a medical device system for delivering electrical stimulation therapy to a heart of a patient may comprise: a leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) configured to sense one or more physiological parameters of the heart of the patient; and a medical device communicatively coupled to the LCP, the medical device configured to determine an occurrence of an arrhythmia and deliver electrical shock therapy to the heart of the patient, wherein the electrical shock therapy comprises: charging a capacitor to a predetermined level, and delivering one or more electrical shocks to the heart of the patient after charging the capacitor to the predetermined level; and wherein the medical device is configured to alter the electrical shock therapy based on communications from the LCP.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may be further configured to, based on the one or more sensed physiological parameters, cause the medical device to begin charging the capacitor.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the one or more physiological parameters may comprise one or more of: cardiac electrical activity; contractility of the heart of the patient; cardiac output of the heart of the patient; and hearts sounds.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may cause the medical device to begin charging the capacitor before the medical device determines an occurrence of an arrhythmia.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may be further configured to: communicate an indication of an occurrence of an arrhythmia to the medical device, wherein the medical device is further configured to determine an occurrence of an arrhythmia based, at least in part, on the received indication; and deliver ATP therapy before the medical device delivers electrical shock therapy to the heart of the patient.
Additionally or alternatively, in any of the previous examples, the LCP may be further configured to: determine whether the ATP therapy was successful in terminating the arrhythmia; and if it is determined that the ATP therapy was successful in terminating the arrhythmia, communicate an abort message to the medical device to abort the delivery of electrical shock therapy to the heart of the patient.
The above summary is not intended to describe each embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure. Advantages and attainments, together with a more complete understanding of the disclosure, will become apparent and appreciated by referring to the following description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The disclosure may be more completely understood in consideration of the following description of various illustrative embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit aspects of the disclosure to the particular illustrative embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
The following description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The description and the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
A normal, healthy heart induces contraction by conducting intrinsically generated electrical signals throughout the heart. These intrinsic signals cause the muscle cells or tissue of the heart to contract. This contraction forces blood out of and into the heart, providing circulation of the blood throughout the rest of the body. However, many patients suffer from cardiac conditions that affect this contractility of their hearts. For example, some hearts may develop diseased tissues that no longer generate or conduct intrinsic electrical signals. In some examples, diseased cardiac tissues conduct electrical signals at differing rates, thereby causing an unsynchronized and inefficient contraction of the heart. In other examples, a heart may generate intrinsic signals at such a low rate that the heart rate becomes dangerously low. In still other examples, a heart may generate electrical signals at an unusually high rate. In some cases such an abnormality can develop into a fibrillation state, where the contraction of the patient's heart chambers are almost completely de-synchronized and the heart pumps very little to no blood. Implantable medical device which may be configured to deliver one or more types of electrical stimulation therapy to patient's hearts may help to terminate or alleviate such cardiac conditions.
Telemetry module 102 may be configured to communicate with devices such as sensors, other medical devices, and/or the like, that are located externally to LCP 100. Such devices may be located either external or internal to the patient's body. Irrespective of the location, external devices (i.e. external to the LCP 100 but not necessarily external to the patient's body) can communicate with LCP 100 via telemetry module 102 to accomplish one or more desired functions. For example, LCP 100 may communicate information, such as sensed electrical signals, data, instructions, messages, etc., to an external medical device through telemetry module 102. The external medical device may use the communicated signals, data, instructions and/or messages to perform various functions, such as determining occurrences of arrhythmias, delivering electrical stimulation therapy, storing received data, and/or performing any other suitable function. LCP 100 may additionally receive information such as signals, data, instructions and/or messages from the external medical device through telemetry module 102, and LCP 100 may use the received signals, data, instructions and/or messages to perform various functions, such as determining occurrences of arrhythmias, delivering electrical stimulation therapy, storing received data, and/or performing any other suitable function. Telemetry module 102 may be configured to use one or more methods for communicating with external devices. For example, telemetry module 102 may communicate via radiofrequency (RF) signals, inductive coupling, optical signals, acoustic signals, conducted communication signals, and/or any other signals suitable for communication.
In the example shown in
In some examples, LCP 100 may not include a pulse generator 104. For example, LCP 100 may be a diagnostic only device. In such examples, LCP 100 may not deliver electrical stimulation therapy to a patient. Rather, LCP 100 may collect data about cardiac electrical activity and/or physiological parameters of the patient and communicate such data and/or determinations to one or more other medical devices.
In some examples, LCP 100 may include an electrical sensing module 106, and in some cases, a mechanical sensing module 108. Electrical sensing module 106 may be configured to sense the cardiac electrical activity of the heart. For example, electrical sensing module 106 may be connected to electrodes 114/114′, and electrical sensing module 106 may be configured to receive cardiac electrical signals conducted through electrodes 114/114′. The cardiac electrical signals may represent local information from the chamber in which LCP 100 is implanted. For instance, if LCP 100 is implanted within a ventricle of the heart, cardiac electrical signals sensed by LCP 100 through electrodes 114/114′ may represent ventricular cardiac electrical signals. Mechanical sensing module 108 may include one or more sensors, such as an accelerometer, a blood pressure sensor, a heart sound sensor, a blood-oxygen sensor, and/or any other suitable sensors that are configured to measure one or more mechanical parameters of the patient. Both electrical sensing module 106 and mechanical sensing module 108 may be connected to a processing module 110, which may provide signals representative of the sensed mechanical parameters. Although described with respect to
Electrodes 114/114′ can be secured relative to housing 120 but exposed to the tissue and/or blood surrounding LCP 100. In some cases, electrodes 114 may be generally disposed on either end of LCP 100 and may be in electrical communication with one or more of modules 102, 104, 106, 108, and 110. Electrodes 114/114′ may be supported by the housing 120, although in some examples, electrodes 114/114′ may be connected to housing 120 only through short connecting wires such that electrodes 114/114′ are not directly secured relative to housing 120. In examples where LCP 100 includes one or more electrodes 114′, electrodes 114′ may be generally disposed on the sides of LCP 100 and may increase the number of electrodes by which LCP 100 may sense cardiac electrical activity, deliver electrical stimulation and/or communicate with an external medical device. Electrodes 114/114′ can be made up of one or more biocompatible conductive materials such as various metals or alloys that are known to be safe for implantation within a human body. In some instances, electrodes 114/114′ connected to LCP 100 may have an insulative portion that electrically isolates electrodes 114/114′ from adjacent electrodes, housing 120, and/or other parts of the LCP 100.
Processing module 110 can be configured to control the operation of LCP 100. For example, processing module 110 may be configured to receive electrical signals from electrical sensing module 106 and/or mechanical sensing module 108. Based on the received signals, processing module 110 may determine, for example, occurrences and, in some cases, types of arrhythmias. Based on any determined arrhythmias, processing module 110 may control pulse generator module 104 to generate electrical stimulation in accordance with one or more therapies to treat the determined arrhythmia(s). Processing module 110 may further receive information from telemetry module 102. In some examples, processing module 110 may use such received information to help determine whether an arrhythmia is occurring, determine a type of arrhythmia, and/or to take particular action in response to the information. Processing module 110 may additionally control telemetry module 102 to send information to other devices.
In some examples, processing module 110 may include a pre-programmed chip, such as a very-large-scale integration (VLSI) chip and/or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In such embodiments, the chip may be pre-programmed with control logic in order to control the operation of LCP 100. By using a pre-programmed chip, processing module 110 may use less power than other programmable circuits (e.g. general purpose programmable microprocessors) while still being able to maintain basic functionality, thereby potentially increasing the battery life of LCP 100. In other examples, processing module 110 may include a programmable microprocessor. Such a programmable microprocessor may allow a user to modify the control logic of LCP 100 even after implantation, thereby allowing for greater flexibility of LCP 100 than when using a pre-programmed ASIC. In some examples, processing module 110 may further include a memory, and processing module 110 may store information on and read information from the memory. In other examples, LCP 100 may include a separate memory (not shown) that is in communication with processing module 110, such that processing module 110 may read and write information to and from the separate memory.
Battery 112 may provide power to the LCP 100 for its operations. In some examples, battery 112 may be a non-rechargeable lithium-based battery. In other examples, a non-rechargeable battery may be made from other suitable materials, as desired. Because LCP 100 is an implantable device, access to LCP 100 may be limited after implantation. Accordingly, it is desirable to have sufficient battery capacity to deliver therapy over a period of treatment such as days, weeks, months, years or even decades. In other examples, battery 110 may a rechargeable battery, which may help increase the useable lifespan of LCP 100. In still other examples, battery 110 may be some other type of power source, as desired.
To implant LCP 100 inside a patient's body, an operator (e.g., a physician, clinician, etc.), may fix LCP 100 to the cardiac tissue of the patient's heart. To facilitate fixation, LCP 100 may include one or more anchors 116. Anchor 116 may include any one of a number of fixation or anchoring mechanisms. For example, anchor 116 may include one or more pins, staples, threads, screws, helix, tines, and/or the like. In some examples, although not shown, anchor 116 may include threads on its external surface that may run along at least a partial length of anchor 116. The threads may provide friction between the cardiac tissue and the anchor to help fix the anchor 116 within the cardiac tissue. In other examples, anchor 116 may include other structures such as barbs, spikes, or the like to facilitate engagement with the surrounding cardiac tissue.
While it is contemplated that MD 200 may be another leadless device such as shown in
Mechanical sensing module 208, as with mechanical sensing module 108, may contain or be electrically connected to one or more sensors, such as accelerometers, blood pressure sensors, heart sound sensors, blood-oxygen sensors, and/or other sensors which are configured to measure one or more mechanical parameters of the heart and/or patient. In some examples, one or more of the sensors may be located on leads 212, but this is not required. In some examples, one or more of the sensors may be located in housing 220.
While not required, in some examples, MD 200 may be an implantable medical device. In such examples, housing 220 of MD 200 may be implanted in, for example, a transthoracic region of the patient. Housing 220 may generally include any of a number of known materials that are safe for implantation in a human body and may, when implanted, hermetically seal the various components of MD 200 from fluids and tissues of the patient's body.
In some cases, MD 200 may be an implantable cardiac pacemaker (ICP). In this example, MD 200 may have one or more leads, for example leads 212, which are implanted on or within the patient's heart. The one or more leads 212 may include one or more electrodes 214 that are in contact with cardiac tissue and/or blood of the patient's heart. MD 200 may be configured to sense intrinsically generated cardiac electrical signals and determine, for example, one or more cardiac arrhythmias based on analysis of the sensed signals. MD 200 may be configured to deliver CRT, ATP therapy, bradycardia therapy, and/or other therapy types via leads 212 implanted within the heart. In some examples, MD 200 may additionally be configured provide defibrillation therapy.
In some instances, MD 200 may be an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). In such examples, MD 200 may include one or more leads implanted within a patient's heart. MD 200 may also be configured to sense cardiac electrical signals, determine occurrences of tachyarrhythmias based on the sensed signals, and may be configured to deliver defibrillation therapy in response to determining an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. In other examples, MD 200 may be a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD). In examples where MD 200 is an S-ICD, one of leads 212 may be a subcutaneously implanted lead. In at least some examples where MD 200 is an S-ICD, MD 200 may include only a single lead which is implanted subcutaneously, but this is not required.
In some examples, MD 200 may not be an implantable medical device. Rather, MD 200 may be a device external to the patient's body, and may include skin-electrodes that are placed on a patient's body. In such examples, MD 200 may be able to sense surface electrical signals (e.g. cardiac electrical signals that are generated by the heart or electrical signals generated by a device implanted within a patient's body and conducted through the body to the skin) In such examples, MD 200 may be configured to deliver various types of electrical stimulation therapy, including, for example, defibrillation therapy.
In
The medical device systems 300 and 400 may also include an external support device, such as external support devices 320 and 420. External support devices 320 and 420 can be used to perform functions such as device identification, device programming and/or transfer of real-time and/or stored data between devices using one or more of the communication techniques described herein. As one example, communication between external support device 320 and the pulse generator 306 is performed via a wireless mode, and communication between the pulse generator 306 and LCP 302 is performed via a conducted mode. In some examples, communication between the LCP 302 and external support device 320 is accomplished by sending communication information through the pulse generator 306. However, in other examples, communication between the LCP 302 and external support device 320 may be via a telemetry module.
Various devices of system 500 may communicate via communication pathway 508. For example, LCPs 502 and/or 504 may sense intrinsic cardiac electrical signals and may communicate such signals to one or more other devices 502/504, 506, and 510 of system 500 via communication pathway 508. In one example, one or more of devices 502/504 may receive such signals and, based on the received signals, determine an occurrence of an arrhythmia. In some cases, device or devices 502/504 may communicate such determinations to one or more other devices 506 and 510 of system 500. In some cases, one or more of devices 502/504, 506, and 510 of system 500 may take action based on the communicated determination of an arrhythmia, such as by delivering a suitable electrical stimulation to the heart of the patient. It is contemplated that communication pathway 508 may communicate using RF signals, inductive coupling, optical signals, acoustic signals, conducted signals, or any other signals suitable for communication. Additionally, in at least some examples, device communication pathway 508 may comprise multiple signal types. For instance, other sensors/device 510 may communicate with external device 506 using a first signal type (e.g. RF communication) but communicate with LCPs 502/504 using a second signal type (e.g. conducted communication). Further, in some examples, communication between devices may be limited. For instance, in some examples, LCPs 502/504 may communicate with external device 506 only through other sensors/devices 510, where LCPs 502/504 send signals to other sensors/devices 510, and the other sensors/devices 510 relay the received signals to external device 506.
In some cases, communication pathway 508 may include conducted communication. Accordingly, devices of system 500 may have components that allow for such conducted communication. For instance, the devices of system 500 may be configured to transmit conducted communication signals (e.g. current and/or voltage pulses) into the patient's body via one or more electrodes of a transmitting device, and may receive the conducted communication signals (e.g. pulses) via one or more electrodes of a receiving device. The patient's body may “conduct” the conducted communication signals (e.g. pulses) from the electrodes of the transmitting device to the electrodes of the receiving device. In such examples, the delivered conducted communication signals (e.g. pulses) may differ from pacing or other therapy signals. For example, the devices of system 500 may deliver electrical communication pulses at an amplitude/pulse width that is sub-threshold to the heart (e.g. non-therapeutic). Although, in some cases, the amplitude/pulse width of the delivered electrical communication pulses may be above the capture threshold of the heart, but may be delivered during a refractory period of the heart and/or may be incorporated in or modulated onto one or more pacing pulses, if desired.
Delivered electrical communication pulses may be modulated in any suitable manner to encode communicated information. In some cases, the communication pulses may be pulse width modulated or amplitude modulated. Alternatively, or in addition, the time between pulses may be modulated to encode desired information. In some cases, conducted communication pulses may be voltage pulses, current pulses, biphasic voltage pulses, biphasic current pulses, or any other suitable electrical pulse as desired.
According to some examples, a medical device system of two or more medical devices may cooperate to deliver electrical stimulation therapy to a heart of a patient. For example, a plurality of medical devices may be configured to detect cardiac arrhythmias, determine whether the arrhythmias are susceptible to a first type of electrical stimulation therapy and if it is determined that the arrhythmia is not susceptible to the first type of electrical stimulation therapy or that the first type of electrical stimulation therapy has failed, to deliver a second type of electrical stimulation therapy. Many of the examples are described in terms tachyarrhythmias, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and defibrillation shock therapy. However, other types of therapy are also contemplated, including cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), bradycardia therapy, neuro stimulation therapy, etc. Each of the various electrical stimulation therapies may use corresponding types of electrical stimulation pulses to achieve a desired result. For instance, ATP therapy may use pacing pulses, whereas defibrillation shock therapy may use defibrillation pulses. In general, the medical devices may use any type of electrical stimulation pulses known in the art to achieve any of the disclosed therapies.
According to some techniques of this disclosure, both of a first device and a second device of a medical device system may determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia, although this is not required. In some examples, the first device may determine the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia based on sensed cardiac electrical signals, and may communicate the determination to the second device. In other examples, the second device may determine the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia based on sensed cardiac electrical signals, and may communicate the determination to the first device. In yet other examples, the first device and the second device may both determine the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia independently based on sensed cardiac electrical signals, and in still other examples, a device other than the first device and the second device may determine the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia and may communicate the determination to the first device and/or the second device. Alternatively, one of the first and second devices may sense cardiac electrical signals, communicate those cardiac electrical signals to the other of the first and second devices, and the other of the first and second devices may use those received cardiac electrical signals to determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia and may communicate that determination back to the first one of the first and second devices. The first and/or second devices may employ one or more techniques for determining occurrences of a tachyarrhythmia based on sensed cardiac electrical signals such as heart rate, a heart rhythm, ECG morphology, etc.
Additionally or alternatively, the first and/or second devices may determine occurrences of tachyarrhythmia based on one or more mechanical parameters of the patient, such as a heart contractility parameter, a heart sounds parameter, a cardiac output parameter, and/or a posture parameter. In some cases, the first and/or second devices may compare a heart contractility parameter to a contractility threshold. If the first and/or second devices determine that the heart contractility parameter is greater than (or, in some examples, less than) the contractility threshold, the first and/or second devices may determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. Additionally or alternatively, the first and/or second devices may compare a heart sounds parameter to a heart sounds threshold. If the first and/or second devices determine that the heart sounds parameter is greater than (or, in some examples, less than) the heart sounds threshold, the first and/or second devices may determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. Additionally or alternatively, the first and/or second devices may compare a cardiac output parameter to a cardiac output threshold. If the first and/or second devices determine that the cardiac output parameter is greater than (or, in some examples, less than) the cardiac output threshold, the first and/or second devices may determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. Additionally or alternatively, the first and/or second devices may compare a posture parameter to a posture threshold (e.g. a vertical posture parameter or a vertical posture threshold or a horizontal posture parameter to a horizontal posture parameter). If the first and/or second devices determine that the posture parameter is greater than (or, in some examples, less than) the posture threshold, the first and/or second devices may determine an occurrence of an arrhythmia.
Of course, the first and/or second devices may use a combination of the above described parameters in determining an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. For instance, the first and/or second devices may employ a hierarchical logic to determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. As one example, the first and/or second devices may use a first parameter to make an initial determination of an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia, and may use a second parameter to confirm the initial determination before making a determination of an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. In other examples, the first and/or second devices may use additional parameters in making initial determinations or actual determinations. In other examples, the first and/or second devices may use a strict or weighted voting system using multiple of the parameters in making a determination of an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia.
As one example, three of the parameters may indicate the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia while two other parameters may not indicate an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. The first and/or second devices may then determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia based on the greater number of parameters indicating an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. In other examples, the first and/or second devices may employ other, more complex, voting schemes to determine the occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia.
In some examples, the first and/or second devices may determine physiological parameters and/or occurrences of tachyarrhythmias based on information gathered by each device. For example, the first device may include one or more sensors that gather physiological parameters and/or an electrical sensing module that senses the cardiac electrical activity, and the first device may make one or more determinations based on the gathered information, such as determining whether a tachyarrhythmia is occurring. Alternatively, the first device may receive information, such as physiological parameters or sensed cardiac electrical activity from another device, for example the second device or another device of the system. In such examples, the first device may use the received information in determining physiological parameters and/or occurrences of, for example, tachyarrhythmias. In a similar manner, the second device may determine physiological parameters and/or occurrences of tachyarrhythmias based on information gathered by the second device or information received by the second device from other devices.
In the examples of
Additionally or alternatively, device 1 may determine a heart rhythm regularity parameter based on sensed cardiac electrical signals. The heart rhythm regularity parameter may be a measure of the regularity of the heart rate over time, and may be generated by monitoring the time between successive detected heart beats over a predetermined time period. If the heart rhythm regularity parameter is above a regularity threshold (e.g. sufficiently regular), device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy. If the heart rhythm regularity parameter is below the regularity threshold (e.g. not sufficiently regular), device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is not likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy.
Additionally or alternatively, device 1 may determine a morphology parameter for sensed cardiac signal. The morphology parameter may indicate a difference in signal morphology of detected QRS complexes relative to one or more morphology templates. If device 1 determines that the difference in signal morphology of detected QRS complexes relative to the one or more morphology templates is greater than a morphology threshold, device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy. If device 1 determines that the difference in signal morphology of detected QRS complexes relative to the one or more morphology templates is less than a morphology threshold, device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is not likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy. In at least some of these examples, device 1 may determine whether the morphology of the sensed cardiac signal is monomorphic. If device 1 determines that the morphology of the sensed cardiac signal is monomorphic, device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy.
In some instances, device 1 may have access to both atrial cardiac electrical signals and ventricular cardiac electrical signals. For instance, device 1 may have multi-sensing capabilities, where device 1 is able to identify signals representative of ventricular contraction and signals representative of atrial contraction. In other examples, device 1 may receive information relating to contraction of other heart chambers (e.g. heart chambers other than the heart chamber within which device 1 is implanted) from one or more other devices, such as other LCPs, an S-ICD or other medical devices. When so provided, device 1 may determine whether the ventricular beat rate is greater than the atrial beat rate. If device 1 determines that the ventricular beat rate is greater than the atrial beat rate, perhaps by a threshold amount, device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy. If device 1 determines that the ventricular beat rate is not greater than the atrial beat rate, perhaps by a threshold amount, device 1 may determine that the tachyarrhythmia is not likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy. Of course, device 1 may use a combination of the above described parameters (e.g. heart rate, rhythm regularity, morphology, ventricular versus atrial beat rate) in determining whether the tachyarrhythmia is likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy, possibly using a strict or weighted voting system. In at least some examples, device 1 may determine that a tachyarrhythmia is likely to be susceptible to ATP therapy if the heart rate parameter is less than two-hundred forty beats per minute (240 bpm), the rhythm is sufficiently regular (<10 bpm deviation), and the morphology parameter is less than the morphology threshold (which may indicate morphologically similar QRS complexes).
In some cases, a device 2 may determine the occurrence of the tachyarrhythmia. Regardless of how a device 2 determines the occurrence of the tachyarrhythmia (e.g. either based on sensed cardiac electrical signals and/or based on a received determination of an arrhythmia from another device), device 2 may begin a defibrillation shock therapy program. For example, device 2, upon determining an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia, device 2 may begin charging a capacitor to a predefined energy level, as indicated by boxes 608 and 708. Once the capacitor has charged to the predefined energy level, device 2 may deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient in an attempt to terminate the tachyarrhythmia, as indicated by boxes 610 and 710. The capacitor may be part of a pulse generator module of device 2.
The predefined energy level for the capacitor may represent a specific number of joules of energy. In some cases, device 2 may be programmed with a single specific predefined energy level. In other cases, device 2 may include logic dictating a selection of one of a number of predefined energy levels based on one or more parameters such as a heart rate, the morphology of the tachyarrhythmia, battery level and/or any other suitable parameter. In some cases, device 2 may be configured to deliver defibrillation shocks of increasing energy until the arrhythmia terminates, which may also affect the specific predefined energy level for the capacitor.
The defibrillation shock therapy program may be modified on the fly. For instance, device 1 may communicate information to device 2 which may affect the defibrillation shock therapy program. For example, some tachyarrhythmias may be treatable by delivering ATP therapy to the heart of the patient, which is sometimes preferable to delivering defibrillation shock therapy. In the example shown in
In examples where at least device 2 communicates messages and/or data to device 1, device 2 may transmit any messages and/or data via one or more transmit communication vectors. For example, device 1 and device 2 may include a system such as depicted in
Additionally, in examples where device 1 also transmits messages or data to device 2, device 2 may sense for messages and/or data from device 1 via one or more sense communication vectors. In some examples, the sense communication vector may be the same as the transmit communication vector. However, in other examples, device 2 may sense for messages and/or data from device 1 via a sense communication vector that differs from the transmit communication vector via which device 2 transmits messages and/or data to device 1. For example, if device 2 transmits messages and/or data via a transmit communication vector that includes a shock electrode 308c and an electrode disposed on the housing (e.g. can) of pulse generator 306, device 2 may sense for messages and/or data from device 1 via a sense communication vector that includes sense electrodes 308a and 308b. However, device 2 may use other sense communication vectors for sensing messages and/or data as desired, including all other combinations of electrodes other than shock electrode 308c and the corresponding electrode disposed on the housing (e.g. can) of device 2. Accordingly in such examples, device 2 may sense for messages and/or data from device 1 via any sense communication vector that includes a pair of electrodes which differs from the pair of electrodes that include the transmit communication vector.
In instances where the ATP therapy did terminate the tachyarrhythmia at block 722, device 1 may communicate an “abort” command to device 2 instead of a resume or shock command. After receiving an “abort” command, device 2 may cease the defibrillation shock therapy program, and not deliver defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient. The capacitor may be discharged in a safe manner.
In some cases, instead of relying on device 1 for a resume or shock command in order for device 2 to deliver one or more defibrillation pulses following a suspend command, device 2 may determine on its own whether the delivered ATP therapy terminated the tachyarrhythmia. For example, after receiving a “suspend” command, device 2 may monitor the delivery of ATP therapy by device 1. After device 1 finishes delivering ATP therapy, device 2 may determine on its own whether the ATP therapy was successful. If device 2 determines that the ATP therapy was not successful, device 2 may continue on with any defibrillation shock therapy program and deliver one or more defibrillation pulses. If device 2, however, determines that the ATP therapy was successful, device 2 may abort the defibrillation shock therapy program and safely discharge the capacitor.
In some cases, rather than monitoring the delivery of ATP therapy by device 1, device 2 may be configured to wait a predetermined period of time after receiving a “suspend” command to determine whether the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring. If the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring after the expiration of the predetermined period of time, device 2 may continue with the defibrillation shock therapy program and deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient. If the tachyarrhythmia is not still occurring, device 2 may abort the defibrillation shock therapy program and safely discharge the capacitor. In still other examples, device 2 may employ such a timing mechanism in addition to the command communications between device 1 and device 2 as a backup mechanism.
In yet another alternate example, there may be no communication between device 1 and device 2. For example, device 1 may not send any “suspend” or “resume” or “shock” commands to device 2, and neither device may communicate determinations of tachyarrhythmias to each other. For example, both device 1 and device 2 may independently determine an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. Device 1 may then determine whether the tachyarrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy and, if so, deliver ATP therapy. Device 2 may begin charging a capacitor and, either just before the capacitor is finished charging or after the capacitor has finished charging, device 2 may determine whether the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring. If the arrhythmia is still occurring, device 2 may then deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart. In some examples, device 2 may be configured to wait a predetermined amount of time after the capacitor is finished charging before determining whether the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring. In such examples, the time taken for the capacitor to charge may give device 1 enough time to determine whether to deliver ATP therapy and to attempt to terminate the tachyarrhythmia before device 2 delivers one or more defibrillation pulses. Additionally, withholding the defibrillation until after ATP therapy has been attempted, in at least some instances, may be safer for a patient. In this manner, device 1 and device 2 may operate in concert with each other to deliver coordinated electrical stimulation therapy without actually requiring the sending of communication signals between the devices.
As with the examples of
As with the examples of
As with the examples of
As with the examples of
Unlike the examples of
Referring specifically to the example shown in
Upon receiving a “shock” command, device 2 may continue to charge the capacitor to the predefined energy level, as indicated by box 1208b. Once device 2 has charged the capacitor to the predefined energy level, device 2 may then deliver one or more defibrillation shocks to the heart of the patient in accordance with the defibrillation shock therapy program, as indicated by box 1210.
As with previous examples, instead of relying on device 1 for a “shock” command in order for device 2 to finish charging the capacitor to the predefined energy level, device 2 may be configured to wait a predetermined period of time after receiving the “suspend” command to determine whether the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring. If the tachyarrhythmia is still occurring after the expiration of the predetermined period of time, device 2 may then continue to charge the capacitor to the predefined energy level and then deliver one or more defibrillation pulses to the heart of the patient. If the tachyarrhythmia is not still occurring, device 2 may abort the defibrillation shock therapy program and safely discharge the capacitor. In some instances, device 2 may employ such a timing mechanism in addition to the command communications between device 1 and device 2 as a backup mechanism.
As mentioned previously, the examples of
Another variation on the above described techniques is that instead of taking action based on determinations of tachyarrhythmias, device 1 and/or device 2 may take action based on electrical activity which may precede occurrences of tachyarrhythmias. As one example, device 1 and/or device 2 may analyze cardiac electrical activity to detect T-wave alternans. T-wave alternans have periodic beat-to-beat variation in the amplitude or morphology of the T-wave. Upon determining an occurrence of T-wave alternans (either through direct analysis of the cardiac electrical activity or based on a received determination of an occurrence of T-wave alternans), device 1 and/or device 2 may adjust the electrical stimulation therapy protocol used after determining an occurrence of a tachyarrhythmia. For example, since T-wave alternans are more closely associated with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia than monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, a system comprised of device 1 and device 2 may be configured to eliminate the step of determining whether the determined tachyarrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy. Instead, the system may proceed directly to shock therapy after determining an occurrence of an arrhythmia. In some examples, the system may compare the detected T-wave alternans to a predetermined threshold, for example a difference in amplitude or morphology of the T-waves of consecutive beats, and may only eliminate determining whether a tachyarrhythmia is susceptible to ATP therapy and proceeding directly to shock therapy if the difference in amplitude and/or morphology of the T-waves is greater than the predetermined threshold.
In other examples, device 1 and device 2 may take action based on changes to determined physiological parameters instead of determinations of occurrences of tachyarrhythmias. For instance, rather than using any determined physiological parameters to determine occurrences of tachyarrhythmias, as described previously, device 1 and/or device 2 may monitor one or more physiological parameters and take one or more actions directly based on any change in one or more physiological parameters. Such physiological parameters may include, but are not limited to, contractility, heart sounds, cardiac output, and posture.
One example of how such physiological information may be used relates to if cardiac output drops below a predetermined level. In such examples, the system could be configured to eliminate any steps of determining whether an arrhythmia would be susceptible to ATP therapy or any other attempt at classification. Additionally or alternatively, the system may eliminate any steps of attempting ATP therapy and proceed directly to delivering shock therapy when appropriate. Such a modification to the shock therapy protocol may reduce the likelihood of the patient losing consciousness. In another example, the system may determine during pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (a.k.a. electromechanical dissociation) which occurs when a heart rhythm is observed on an electrocardiogram that should be producing a mechanical contraction of the heart, but is not. PEA can be detected by device 1 and/or device 2 by the detection of R-waves but lack of detection of any mechanical cardiac motion (e.g. heart sounds, blood pressure changes, heart wall motion). Since neither shock therapy nor ATP therapy are effective treatments for PEA, the system may switch to a mode where the system is configured to not deliver any electrical stimulation therapy, regardless of any indications of arrhythmias based on sensed electrical activity or other physiological parameters. The system could be also be configured to immediately contact emergency medical personal.
In yet other examples, instead of, or in addition to, communicating the previously described “suspend”, “shock”, and/or “abort” commands, device 1 may be configured to modify the defibrillation shock therapy program of device 2 in other ways. For example, device 1 may communicate a specific predefined energy level to device 2, and device 2 may charge the capacitor to the received predefined energy level instead of the predefined energy level device 2 had determined. In some cases, this may operate to shorten the time for the device to deliver the one or more defibrillation pulses in accordance with the defibrillation shock therapy program. Device 1 may additionally or alternatively communicate commands to device 2 which alter other aspects of the defibrillation shock therapy program, such as the number of defibrillation pulses, the amplitude of the defibrillation pulses, the pulse width of the defibrillation pulses, the phases of the defibrillation pulses, and/or other morphological features of the defibrillation pulses. Device 1 may alter such aspects of the defibrillation shock therapy program based on the heart rate parameter, the morphology parameter, the rhythm regularity parameter, any of the physiological parameters discussed above, or any combination of such parameters.
In some instances, a first implantable medical device, for instance LCP 100, may be implanted in a first chamber of a heart, such as an atrium or ventricle, and may receive signals related to one or more physiological conditions of a patient. The received signals may be signals received at the one or more electrodes of the LCP 100. The received signals may be physiological signals directly sensed by the one or more electrodes of the LCP 100, and/or signals communicated to the LCP from another medical device, such as MD 200.
The LCP 100 may also be configured to determine an occurrence of an arrhythmia, as shown at 1302. LCP 100 may further determine whether the arrhythmia is susceptible to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, as shown at 1304. Another medical device that is spaced from the LCP and communicatively coupled to the LCP, may then initiate a shock therapy program, as shown at 1306. Finally, if the arrhythmia is determined to be susceptible to ATP therapy, LCP 100 may be configured to modify the shock therapy program of the medical device, as shown at 1308.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present disclosure may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific examples described and contemplated herein. For instance, as described herein, various examples include one or more modules described as performing various functions. However, other examples may include additional modules that split the described functions up over more modules than that described herein. Additionally, other examples may consolidate the described functions into fewer modules. Accordingly, departure in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure as described in the appended claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/023,601, filed Jul. 11, 2014, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4333470 | Barthel | Jun 1982 | A |
4531527 | Reinhold, Jr. et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4539999 | Mans | Sep 1985 | A |
4562841 | Brockway et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4585004 | Brownlee | Apr 1986 | A |
4589420 | Adams et al. | May 1986 | A |
RE32378 | Barthel | Mar 1987 | E |
4787389 | Tarjan | Nov 1988 | A |
4884345 | Long | Dec 1989 | A |
4924875 | Chamoun | May 1990 | A |
5000189 | Throne et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002052 | Haluska | Mar 1991 | A |
5014698 | Cohen | May 1991 | A |
5107850 | Olive | Apr 1992 | A |
5113859 | Funke | May 1992 | A |
5113869 | Nappholz et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117824 | Keimel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127401 | Grevoius et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139028 | Steinhaus et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156148 | Cohen | Oct 1992 | A |
5161527 | Nappholz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5193550 | Duffin | Mar 1993 | A |
5205283 | Olson | Apr 1993 | A |
5215098 | Steinhaus et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5217021 | Steinhaus et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5255186 | Steinhaus et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265602 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271411 | Ripley et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273049 | Steinhaus et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275621 | Mehra | Jan 1994 | A |
5292348 | Saumarez et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312445 | Nappholz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313953 | Yomtov et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324310 | Greeninger et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331966 | Bennett et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5360436 | Alt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366487 | Adams et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5378775 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5379775 | Kruse | Jan 1995 | A |
5379776 | Murphy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388578 | Yomtov et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400795 | Murphy et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411031 | Yomtov | May 1995 | A |
5447524 | Alt | Sep 1995 | A |
5448997 | Kruse et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456261 | Luczyk | Oct 1995 | A |
5458623 | Lu et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5503160 | Pering et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509927 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520191 | Karlsson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531767 | Fain | Jul 1996 | A |
5545186 | Olson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5620471 | Duncan | Apr 1997 | A |
5630425 | Panescu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634468 | Platt et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645070 | Turcott | Jul 1997 | A |
5682900 | Arand et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683425 | Hauptmann | Nov 1997 | A |
5712801 | Turcott | Jan 1998 | A |
5713367 | Arnold et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5738105 | Kroll | Apr 1998 | A |
5741312 | Vonk et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755736 | Gillberg et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766225 | Kramm | Jun 1998 | A |
5772692 | Armstrong | Jun 1998 | A |
5776168 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
5779645 | Olson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792065 | Xue et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795303 | Swanson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817133 | Houben | Oct 1998 | A |
5819741 | Karlsson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827197 | Bocek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848972 | Triedman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857977 | Caswell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873897 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891170 | Nitzsche et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5935081 | Kadhiresan | Aug 1999 | A |
5954662 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978707 | Krig et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6108578 | Bardy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151524 | Krig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169918 | Haefner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178350 | Olson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179865 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212428 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223078 | Marcovecchio | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230055 | Sun et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230059 | Duffin | May 2001 | B1 |
6266554 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275732 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308095 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312388 | Marcovecchio et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317632 | Krig et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6405083 | Rockwell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421563 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430435 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434417 | Lovett | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449503 | Hsu | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456871 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477404 | Yonce et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480733 | Turcott | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484055 | Marcovecchio | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493579 | Gilkerson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505067 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512940 | Brabec et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522915 | Ceballos et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522917 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522925 | Gilkerson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526313 | Sweeney et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6584352 | Combs et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6618619 | Florio et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622046 | Fraley et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658283 | Bomzin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658286 | Seim | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671548 | Mouchawar et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687540 | Marcovecchio | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708058 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718204 | DeGroot et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728572 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745068 | Koyrakh et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760615 | Ferek-Petric | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766190 | Ferek-Petric | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6889081 | Hsu | May 2005 | B2 |
6892094 | Ousdigian et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6959212 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978177 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7031764 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039463 | Marcovecchio | May 2006 | B2 |
7162298 | Ideker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7203535 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7228176 | Smith et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260433 | Falkenberg et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7515956 | Thompson | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7565195 | Kroll et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7751890 | McCabe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761150 | Ghanem et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7937135 | Ghanem et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7991471 | Ghanem et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996087 | Cowan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8131360 | Perschbacher et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8170663 | DeGroot et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8352025 | Jacobson | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386051 | Rys | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8457742 | Jacobson | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478399 | Degroot et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8571678 | Wang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8744572 | Greenhut et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8923963 | Bonner et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020002389 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032469 | Marcovecchio | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035335 | Schauerte | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049474 | Marcovecchio et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072778 | Guck et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087091 | Koyrakh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091333 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107552 | Krig et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123768 | Gilkerson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123769 | Panken et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123770 | Combs et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143370 | Kim | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147407 | Seim | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147474 | Seim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183637 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183639 | Sweeney et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198461 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004552 | Plombon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050563 | Suribhotla et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060849 | Hsu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069609 | Thompson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083586 | Ferek-Petric | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083587 | Ferek-Petric | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083703 | Zhu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100923 | Bjorling et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105491 | Gilkerson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109792 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114889 | Huvelle et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120316 | Spinelli et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030181818 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208238 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015090 | Sweeney et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040077995 | Ferek-Petric et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093035 | Schwartz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116820 | Daum et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116972 | Marcovecchio | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127806 | Sweeney et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176694 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050010257 | Lincoln et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050149134 | McCabe et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149135 | Krig et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159781 | Hsu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197674 | McCabe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256544 | Thompson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009831 | Lau et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015148 | McCabe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074330 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122527 | Marcovecchio | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173498 | Banville et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241701 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265018 | Smith et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281998 | Li | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070088394 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088397 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088398 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080045850 | Phillips | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090171408 | Solem | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100069986 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100118798 | Chun et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100228308 | Cowan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110071586 | Jacobson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110190835 | Brockway et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120109235 | Jacobson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109236 | Jacobsen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120172941 | Rys | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120316613 | Keefe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130066169 | Rys et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130231710 | Jacobson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140039570 | Carroll et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140121719 | Bonner et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121720 | Bonner et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140214104 | Greenhut et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101102811 | Jan 2008 | CN |
102458572 | Dec 2014 | CN |
0253505 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0308536 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0360412 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0401962 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0469817 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0506230 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0554208 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0597459 | May 1994 | EP |
0617980 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0711531 | May 1996 | EP |
0744190 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0748638 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0784996 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0848965 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0879621 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0919256 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0993842 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1112756 | Jul 2001 | EP |
9302746 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9401173 | Jan 1994 | WO |
9739681 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9739799 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9825669 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9840010 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9848891 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9853879 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9915232 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0053089 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0059573 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0113993 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0126733 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2011063848 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03047690 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005089643 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006020198 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006020198 | May 2006 | WO |
2006049767 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2007033226 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Duru et al., “The Potential for Inappropriate Ventricular Tachycardia Confirmation Using the Intracardiac Electrogram (EGM) Width Criterion”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology [PACE], 22(7): 1039-1046, Jul. 1999. |
Hughes et al., “The Effects of Electrode Position on the Detection of the Transvenous Cardiac Electrogram”, PACE, 3(6): 651-655, Nov. 1980. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/035057, 17 pages, dated Feb. 1, 2006. |
Kinoshita et al., “Letter to the Editor”, Journal of Electrocardiology, 29(3): 255-256, Jul. 1996. |
Leitch et al., “Feasibility of an Implantable Arrhythmia Monitor”, PACE, 15(12): 2232-2235, Dec. 1992. |
Mazur et al., “Functional Similarity Between Electrograms Recorded from an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Emulator and the Surface Electrocardiogram”, PACE, 24(1): 34-40, Jan. 2001. |
Medtronic, “Marquis™ DR 7274 Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator”, Reference Manual, 426 pgs., Feb. 2002. |
Morris et al., “Detection of Atrial Arrhythmia for Cardiac Rhythm Management by Implantable Devices”, Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 33, Supplement 1, pp. 133-139, 2000. |
Theres et al., “Electrogram Signals Recorded from Acute and Chronic Pacemaker Implantation Sites in Pacemaker Patients”, PACE, 21(1): 11-17, Jan. 1998. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160008615 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62023601 | Jul 2014 | US |