Patent Grant
11154618
Field of the Invention
The present disclosure pertains to systems and methods for treating the eye, and more particularly, to systems and methods for delivering a photosensitizer to regions of the eye for eye treatments.
Description of Related Art
Certain photosensitizers may be applied to the eye for eye treatments. For example, photosensitizers can generate cross-linking activity in the cornea. Cross-linking can treat disorders, such as keratoconus. In particular, keratoconus is a degenerative disorder of the eye in which structural changes within the cornea cause it to weaken and change to an abnormal conical shape. Cross-linking treatments can strengthen and stabilize areas weakened by keratoconus and prevent undesired shape changes.
Aspects of the present disclosure relate to systems and methods for delivering a photosensitizer to regions of the eye for eye treatments. In particular, the systems and methods employ formulations that enhance the permeability of eye structures, such as the corneal epithelium, to facilitate delivery of photosensitizers to desired areas.
According to aspects of the present disclosure, a formulation for an eye treatment includes a photosensitizer and a permeability enhancing composition. The permeability enhancing composition includes one or more permeability enhancers. The permeability enhancing composition has a Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) number indicating that the permeability enhancing composition increases a permeability of an area of the eye for the photosensitizer. In some cases, the permeability enhancing composition includes a plurality of permeability enhancers, where the HLB number for the permeability enhancing composition is equal to a sum of products multiplying a percentage of each permeability enhancer in the permeability enhancing composition and a HLB number for the respective permeability enhancer. In other cases, the formulation further includes at least one additive selected from the group consisting of iron, copper, manganese, chromium, vanadium, aluminum, cobalt, mercury, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, 2,3-butanedione, and folic acid. For example, the at least one additive includes iron(II). In further cases, the area of the eye is a corneal epithelium. In yet further cases, the photosensitizer includes riboflavin and the permeability enhancing composition has a HLB number between approximately 12.6 and approximately 14.6. In alternative cases, the area of the eye is an area infected by a pathogen.
According to further aspects of the present disclosure, a method for treating an eye includes applying the formulation above to an area of an eye and photoactivating the photosensitizer by delivering a dose of illumination to the area of the eye. In some cases, the method further includes applying a concentration of oxygen to the cornea. In other cases, applying the formulation includes applying the formulation to an area of the eye infected by a pathogen, whereby photoactivation of the photosensitizer provides an antimicrobial effect on the area infected by the pathogen. In alternative cases, applying the formulation includes applying the formulation to a corneal epithelium.
According to other aspects of the present disclosure, a formulation for a corneal treatment includes a photosensitizer and a non-ionic surfactant. The non-ionic surfactant includes a molecule having a hydrophilic and lipophilic balance that increases the permeability of the corneal epithelium for the photosensitizer. In some cases, the photosensitizer includes riboflavin and the non-ionic surfactant has a Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) number between approximately 12.6 and approximately 14.6. In other cases, the non-ionic surfactant includes Polyoxyethylene (9) lauryl ether. In yet other cases, the formulation includes at least one additive including selected from the group consisting of iron, copper, manganese, chromium, vanadium, aluminum, cobalt, mercury, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, 2,3-butanedione, and folic acid. For example, the at least one additive includes iron(II).
The treatment system 100 includes an illumination system with a light source 110 and optical elements 112 for directing light to the cornea 2. The light causes photoactivation of the cross-linking agent 130 to generate cross-linking activity in the cornea 2. For example, the cross-linking agent may include riboflavin and the photoactivating light may be ultraviolet A (UVA) (e.g., 365 nm) light. Alternatively, the photoactivating light may have another wavelength, such as a visible wavelength (e.g., 452 nm). As described further below, corneal cross-linking improves corneal strength by creating chemical bonds within the corneal tissue according to a system of photochemical kinetic reactions. For instance, riboflavin and the photoactivating light are applied to stabilize and/or strengthen corneal tissue to address diseases such as keratoconus or post-LASIK ectasia.
The treatment system 100 includes one or more controllers 120 that control aspects of the system 100, including the light source 110 and/or the optical elements 112. In an implementation, the cornea 2 can be more broadly treated with the cross-linking agent 130 (e.g., with an eye dropper, syringe, etc.), and the photoactivating light from the light source 110 can be selectively directed to regions of the treated cornea 2 according to a particular pattern.
The optical elements 112 may include one or more mirrors or lenses for directing and focusing the photoactivating light emitted by the light source 110 to a particular pattern on the cornea 2. The optical elements 112 may further include filters for partially blocking wavelengths of light emitted by the light source 110 and for selecting particular wavelengths of light to be directed to the cornea 2 for activating the cross-linking agent 130. In addition, the optical elements 112 may include one or more beam splitters for dividing a beam of light emitted by the light source 110, and may include one or more heat sinks for absorbing light emitted by the light source 110. The optical elements 112 may also accurately and precisely focus the photo-activating light to particular focal planes within the cornea 2, e.g., at a particular depths in the underlying region 2b where cross-linking activity is desired.
Moreover, specific regimes of the photoactivating light can be modulated to achieve a desired degree of cross-linking in the selected regions of the cornea 2. The one or more controllers 120 may be used to control the operation of the light source 110 and/or the optical elements 112 to precisely deliver the photoactivating light according to any combination of: wavelength, bandwidth, intensity, power, location, depth of penetration, and/or duration of treatment (the duration of the exposure cycle, the dark cycle, and the ratio of the exposure cycle to the dark cycle duration).
The parameters for photoactivation of the cross-linking agent 130 can be adjusted, for example, to reduce the amount of time required to achieve the desired cross-linking. In an example implementation, the time can be reduced from minutes to seconds. While some configurations may apply the photoactivating light at an irradiance of 5 mW/cm2, larger irradiance of the photoactivating light, e.g., multiples of 5 mW/cm2, can be applied to reduce the time required to achieve the desired cross-linking. The total dose of energy absorbed in the cornea 2 can be described as an effective dose, which is an amount of energy absorbed through an area of the corneal epithelium 2a. For example the effective dose for a region of the corneal surface 2A can be, for example, 5 J/cm2, or as high as 20 J/cm2 or 30 J/cm2. The effective dose described can be delivered from a single application of energy, or from repeated applications of energy.
The optical elements 112 of the treatment system 100 may include a digital micro-mirror device (DMD) to modulate the application of photoactivating light spatially and temporally. Using DMD technology, the photoactivating light from the light source 110 is projected in a precise spatial pattern that is created by microscopically small mirrors laid out in a matrix on a semiconductor chip. Each mirror represents one or more pixels in the pattern of projected light. With the DMD one can perform topography guided cross-linking. The control of the DMD according to topography may employ several different spatial and temporal irradiance and dose profiles. These spatial and temporal dose profiles may be created using continuous wave illumination but may also be modulated via pulsed illumination by pulsing the illumination source under varying frequency and duty cycle regimes as described above. Alternatively, the DMD can modulate different frequencies and duty cycles on a pixel by pixel basis to give ultimate flexibility using continuous wave illumination. Or alternatively, both pulsed illumination and modulated DMD frequency and duty cycle combinations may be combined. This allows for specific amounts of spatially determined corneal cross-linking. This spatially determined cross-linking may be combined with dosimetry, interferometry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), corneal topography, etc., for pre-treatment planning and/or real-time monitoring and modulation of corneal cross-linking during treatment. Additionally, pre-clinical patient information may be combined with finite element biomechanical computer modeling to create patient specific pre-treatment plans.
To control aspects of the delivery of the photoactivating light, embodiments may also employ aspects of multiphoton excitation microscopy. In particular, rather than delivering a single photon of a particular wavelength to the cornea 2, the treatment system 100 may deliver multiple photons of longer wavelengths, i.e., lower energy, that combine to initiate the cross-linking. Advantageously, longer wavelengths are scattered within the cornea 2 to a lesser degree than shorter wavelengths, which allows longer wavelengths of light to penetrate the cornea 2 more efficiently than shorter wavelength light. Shielding effects of incident irradiation at deeper depths within the cornea are also reduced over conventional short wavelength illumination since the absorption of the light by the photosensitizer is much less at the longer wavelengths. This allows for enhanced control over depth specific cross-linking. For example, in some embodiments, two photons may be employed, where each photon carries approximately half the energy necessary to excite the molecules in the cross-linking agent 130 to generate the photochemical kinetic reactions described further below. When a cross-linking agent molecule simultaneously absorbs both photons, it absorbs enough energy to release reactive radicals in the corneal tissue. Embodiments may also utilize lower energy photons such that a cross-linking agent molecule must simultaneously absorb, for example, three, four, or five, photons to release a reactive radical. The probability of the near-simultaneous absorption of multiple photons is low, so a high flux of excitation photons may be required, and the high flux may be delivered through a femtosecond laser.
A large number of conditions and parameters affect the cross-linking of corneal collagen with the cross-linking agent 130. For example, when the cross-linking agent 130 is riboflavin and the photoactivating light is UVA light, the irradiance and the dose both affect the amount and the rate of cross-linking. The UVA light may be applied continuously (continuous wave (CW)) or as pulsed light, and this selection has an effect on the amount, the rate, and the extent of cross-linking.
If the UVA light is applied as pulsed light, the duration of the exposure cycle, the dark cycle, and the ratio of the exposure cycle to the dark cycle duration have an effect on the resulting corneal stiffening. Pulsed light illumination can be used to create greater or lesser stiffening of corneal tissue than may be achieved with continuous wave illumination for the same amount or dose of energy delivered. Light pulses of suitable length and frequency may be used to achieve more optimal chemical amplification. For pulsed light treatment, the on/off duty cycle may be between approximately 1000/1 to approximately 1/1000; the irradiance may be between approximately 1 mW/cm2 to approximately 1000 mW/cm2 average irradiance, and the pulse rate may be between approximately 0.01 HZ to approximately 1000 Hz or between approximately 1000 Hz to approximately 100,000 Hz.
The treatment system 100 may generate pulsed light by employing a DMD, electronically turning the light source 110 on and off, and/or using a mechanical or opto-electronic (e.g., Pockels cells) shutter or mechanical chopper or rotating aperture. Because of the pixel specific modulation capabilities of the DMD and the subsequent stiffness impartment based on the modulated frequency, duty cycle, irradiance and dose delivered to the cornea, complex biomechanical stiffness patterns may be imparted to the cornea to allow for various amounts of refractive correction. These refractive corrections, for example, may involve combinations of myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, irregular astigmatism, presbyopia and complex corneal refractive surface corrections because of ophthalmic conditions such as keratoconus, pellucid marginal disease, post-lasik ectasia, and other conditions of corneal biomechanical alteration/degeneration, etc. A specific advantage of the DMD system and method is that it allows for randomized asynchronous pulsed topographic patterning, creating a non-periodic and uniformly appearing illumination which eliminates the possibility for triggering photosensitive epileptic seizures or flicker vertigo for pulsed frequencies between 2 Hz and 84 Hz.
Although example embodiments may employ stepwise on/off pulsed light functions, it is understood that other functions for applying light to the cornea may be employed to achieve similar effects. For example, light may be applied to the cornea according to a sinusoidal function, sawtooth function, or other complex functions or curves, or any combination of functions or curves. Indeed, it is understood that the function may be substantially stepwise where there may be more gradual transitions between on/off values. In addition, it is understood that irradiance does not have to decrease down to a value of zero during the off cycle, and may be above zero during the off cycle. Desired effects may be achieved by applying light to the cornea according to a curve varying irradiance between two or more values.
Examples of systems and methods for delivering photoactivating light are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0237999, filed Mar. 18, 2011 and titled “Systems and Methods for Applying and Monitoring Eye Therapy,” U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0215155, filed Apr. 3, 2012 and titled “Systems and Methods for Applying and Monitoring Eye Therapy,” and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0245536, filed Mar. 15, 2013 and titled “Systems and Methods for Corneal Cross-Linking with Pulsed Light,” the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference.
The addition of oxygen also affects the amount of corneal stiffening. In human tissue, O2 content is very low compared to the atmosphere. The rate of cross-linking in the cornea, however, is related to the concentration of O2 when it is irradiated with photoactivating light. Therefore, it may be advantageous to increase or decrease the concentration of O2 actively during irradiation to control the rate of cross-linking until a desired amount of cross-linking is achieved. Oxygen may be applied during the cross-linking treatments in a number of different ways. One approach involves supersaturating the riboflavin with O2. Thus, when the riboflavin is applied to the eye, a higher concentration of O2 is delivered directly into the cornea with the riboflavin and affects the reactions involving O2 when the riboflavin is exposed to the photoactivating light. According to another approach, a steady state of O2 (at a selected concentration) may be maintained at the surface of the cornea to expose the cornea to a selected amount of O2 and cause O2 to enter the cornea. As shown in
In general, the structure of the cornea includes five layers. From the outer surface of the eye inward, these are: (1) epithelium, (2) Bowman's layer, (3) stroma, (4) Descemet's membrane, and (5) endothelium. During example cross-linking treatments, the stroma is treated with riboflavin, a photosensitizer, and ultraviolet (UV) light is delivered to the cornea to activate the riboflavin in the stroma. Upon absorbing UV radiation, riboflavin undergoes a reaction with oxygen in which reactive oxygen species and other radicals are produced. These reactive oxygen species and other radicals further interact with the collagen fibrils to induce covalent bonds that bind together amino acids of the collagen fibrils, thereby cross-linking the fibrils. The photo-oxidative induction of collagen cross-linking enhances the biomechanical strength of the stroma, and can provide therapeutic benefits for certain ophthalmic conditions, such as keratoconus, or generate refractive changes to correct myopia, hyperopia and/or astigmatism.
As the outer-most barrier of the cornea, the epithelium functions to regulate nutrients, including oxygen, that are admitted into the stromal tissue from the tear film. This regulation is carried out via the epithelium's physiological “pumps” that are driven by osmotic pressure across the epithelium due to differential concentrations of barrier-permeable solutes on either side of the epithelium. When healthy, certain nutrients in the tear film that become depleted within the stroma can permeate the epithelium via osmotic pressure to resupply the stroma. However, while oxygen and some other small molecule nutrients can reach the stroma according to this mechanism, certain photosensitizers cannot pass through the epithelium.
Riboflavin, for example, is a relatively large, hydrophilic molecule that cannot penetrate the tight junctions of the epithelium. The epithelium slows the amount of riboflavin that can penetrate the stroma. Thus, a variety of approaches have been employed to overcome low riboflavin diffusivity and deliver sufficient concentrations of riboflavin to the stroma for performing corneal cross-linking treatments. According to one approach, the epithelium is removed (epithelium debridement) before a riboflavin solution is applied directly to the stroma. Although removing the epithelium allows riboflavin to reach the stroma, the approach is associated with patient discomfort, risks of infection, and other possible complications.
Meanwhile, other approaches avoid epithelial debridement. For example, riboflavin may be provided in a formulation that allows the cross-linking agent to pass through the epithelium. Such formulations are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0286156, filed on May 6, 2009 and titled “Collyrium for the Treatment of Conical Cornea with Cross-Linking Trans-Epithelial Technique, and in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0267528, filed on Jan. 4, 2013 and titled “Trans-Epithelial Osmotic Collyrium for the Treatment of Keratoconus,” the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference. In particular, some riboflavin formulations include ionic agents, such as benzalkonium chloride (BAC), with a specific osmolarity of sodium chloride (NaCl). Although such formulations may enhance permeability of the epithelium, they are disadvantageously corrosive to the epithelium.
Additionally or alternatively, another solution and/or mechanical forces may be applied to enhance the permeability of the epithelium and allow the riboflavin to pass more easily through the epithelium. Examples of approaches for enhancing or otherwise controlling the delivery of a cross-linking agent to the underlying regions of the cornea are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0288466, filed Apr. 13, 2011 and titled “Systems and Methods for Activating Cross-Linking in an Eye,” and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0289886, filed May 18, 2012 and titled “Controlled Application of Cross-Linking Agent,” the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference.
The present disclosure teaches the use of another class of riboflavin formulations. Advantageously, such formulations enhance the permeability of the epithelium sufficiently to allow relatively large hydrophilic riboflavin molecules (or Flavin mononucleotide (FMN), or riboflavin-5′-phosphate, molecules) to pass through the epithelium without debridement, but the permeability is not enhanced to a point where the epithelium becomes damaged. To enhance permeability, such formulations employ a non-ionic agent that is chosen using the Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) system.
The HLB of a permeability enhancer indicates the balance of hydrophilic and lipophilic groups in the molecular structure of the enhancer. Permeability enhancers (or emulsifiers) for the epithelium include a molecule which has both hydrophilic and lipophilic groups. Molecules with HLB number below 9 are considered lipophilic and those above 11 as hydrophilic. Molecules with HLB number between 9 and 11 are intermediate.
For the corneal epithelium, a HLB number that is too great or too small does not help the passage of a photosensitizer through the epithelium. A specific HLB range enhances movement of a photosensitizer through the epithelium. Thus, aspects of the present disclosure employ non-ionic agents that have a hydrophilic/lipophilic balance to achieve optimized diffusivity through the epithelium and the stroma. Advantageously, non-ionic agents are also less corrosive and damaging to the epithelium than ionic agents, such as BAC.
For riboflavin, the HLB range for more effective permeability enhancers has been experimentally determined by the inventors to be between approximately 12.6 and approximately 14.6. A class of permeability enhancers includes various forms of polyethylene glycol (PEG) with different aliphatic chain lengths. According to example embodiments, some riboflavin formulations include specific concentrations of Polidocanol (Polyoxyethylene (9) lauryl ether), which has a HLB number of approximately 13.6.
To calculate the HLB for molecules or combinations of molecules where the hydrophilic portion consists of ethylene oxide only, the formula is:
HLB=E/5, where E=weight percentage oxyethylene content.
In general, the HLB range for enhancers that achieve more effective permeability may vary according to different aspects of the formulation. In particular, the HLB range for more optimal enhancers may vary according to the photosensitizer employed in the formulation. For instance, more optimal permeability might be achieved for other photosensitizers, such as Rose Bengal, by employing enhancers in a HLB range that is different from that for riboflavin (e.g., HLB of approximately 12.6 to approximately 14.6).
Furthermore, the formulation may include other additives that may affect the HLB range for more optimal enhancers. For instance, riboflavin formulations may also include iron ions, such as Fe(II). Additives that may be included in photosensitizer formulations are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0343480, filed May 19, 2014 and titled “Systems, Methods, and Compositions for Cross-linking,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/086,572, filed Dec. 2, 2014 and titled “Systems, Methods, and Compositions for Cross-linking,” the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference. Other additives, for instance, include copper, manganese, chromium, vanadium, aluminum, cobalt, mercury, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, 2,3-butanedione, and folic acid.
Additionally, several permeability enhancers may be combined to achieve a specific HLB that achieves more effective permeability for the epithelium. These may be calculated by taking the percentage of each enhancer, multiplying it by its HLB number, and then summing the results. For instance, in a formulation including 30% enhancer A with a HLB number of approximately 14, 50% enhancer B with a HLB number of approximately 6, and 20% enhancer C with a HLB number of approximately 14, the estimated HLB number can be calculated as:
30%×HLB 14 for A=4.2;
50%×HLB 6 for B=3.0;
20%×HLB 14 for C=2.8;
Estimated HLB number for combination of A+B+C=4.2+3.0+2.8=10.0
Thus, two or more enhancers may be combined to achieve a very specific HLB number, where a single enhancer may provide less optimal permeability. Additionally, combining different enhancers might offer other desirable properties of the final formulation with regard to solubility, viscosity, stability or some other desirable attribute.
Study 1
In a study, a Franz cell was employed to measure diffusivity of riboflavin formulations containing BAC or a non-ionic agent in porcine eyes with or without an epithelia of approximately 100 μm.
Study 2
In a study, porcine eyes shipped overnight on ice from an abattoir (SiouxPreme, Sioux City, Iowa) were cleaned and soaked for 20 minutes in an incubator set at 37° C. with a 0.22% riboflavin solution with BAC or a 0.22% riboflavin solution with a non-ionic agent. The corneas had epithelia of approximately 100 μm. The epithelia of the corneas were removed after the respective soaks and prior to pan-corneal irradiation with UVA light. The treatment protocol employed applying pulsed UVA light (1 second on; 1 second off) at an irradiation of 30 mW/cm2 and for a dose of 7.2 J/cm2, while the corneas were exposed to 100% concentration of oxygen gas. 200 μm corneal flaps were cut using a femtosecond laser. The extent of the cross-linking in the corneas was evaluated on the basis of fluorimetric analysis (excitation wave 365 nm, emission wave 450 nm) after collagen solubilization with papain.
Study 3
In a study, porcine eyes were treated according to the parameters indicated in
The extent of the cross-linking in the corneas was evaluated on the basis of fluorimetric analysis.
In view of the foregoing, the diffusivity of riboflavin and the initial stromal concentration of riboflavin affects the extent of cross-linking activity. The results from the formulations including the non-ionic agent indicate that hydrophilic-lipophilic properties are a factor, allowing riboflavin to penetrate the epithelium and diffuse into the corneal hydrophilic stroma in quantities and duration appropriate for a clinical application.
Oxygen is a factor in efficient trans-epithelial (epi on) cross-linking. The results of the study show that the application of oxygen with the non-ionic agent provides cross-linking efficiencies similar to standard epi-off cross-linking.
Less oxygen may generally be available in the stroma due to the epithelial thickness as it relates to Fick's law of diffusion and due to photo-induced oxygen consumption in the epithelium. Thus, this study shows that the additional application of oxygen can enhance epi on cross-linking efficiency.
In addition, the absorption of UVA light by riboflavin-saturated epithelium may reduce photon efficiency. However, the results of this study indicate that, when oxygen is also applied, the absorption by riboflavin-saturated epithelium is not a predominate factor.
As described above, some riboflavin formulations include specific concentrations of Polidocanol to enhance permeability of the corneal epithelium. Advantageously, the concentrations of Polidocanol do not cause damage to the epithelium. Such riboflavin solutions may also include additives such as Fe(II).
Polidocanol and optionally additives can be employed in combination with other cross-linking techniques as described above to enhance delivery of riboflavin through the epithelium and achieve the desired amount of cross-linking activity. For instance, the riboflavin formulations with Polidocanol and optional additives can be applied with oxygen. Furthermore, the riboflavin solutions can be employed with different approaches for delivering photoactivating illumination (pulsed illumination, illumination of different patterns, etc.).
Study 4
To identify a new trans-epithelial formulation containing riboflavin, a study was conducted to test riboflavin formulations with Polidocanol as a less toxic and more efficient substitute for riboflavin formulation with benzalkonium chloride (BAC).
Pig eyes shipped overnight on ice from an abattoir (SiouxPreme, Sioux City, Iowa) were rinsed in saline. The eyes with intact epithelium were soaked with one of the test solutions below for 20 minutes in an incubator set at 37° C. by using a rubber ring to hold the solution on top.
For a Group A of the pig eyes, the following riboflavin formulations were used:
The epitheliums of eyes in Group A were removed with a dull blade after the eyes were soaked in one of the solutions and irradiated pan-corneally on air with a top hat beam (3% root mean square) for 4 minutes with 365-nm light source (UV LED NCSU033B[T]; Nichia Co., Tokushima, Japan) at a chosen irradiance of 30 mW/cm2 which was measured with a power sensor (model PD-300-UV; Ophir, Inc., Jerusalem, Israel) at the corneal surface. Corneal flaps (approximately 200 μm thick) were excised from the eyes with aid of an Intralase femtosecond laser (Abbot Medical Optics, Santa Ana, Calif.). The average thickness of the corneal flaps was calculated as a difference between the measurements before and after the excision from the eyes with an ultrasonic Pachymeter (DGH Technology, Exton, Pa.). The flaps were washed with distilled water and dried in a vacuum until the weight change became less than 10% (Rotary vane vacuum pump RV3 A652-01-903, BOC Edwards, West Sussex, UK). Each flap was digested for 2.5 h at 65° C. with 2.5 units/ml of papain (from Papaya latex, Sigma) in 1 ml of papain buffer [BBBS (pH 7.0-7.2), 2 mM L-cysteine and 2 mM EDTA]. Papain digests were diluted 0.5 times with 1×BBBS and fluorescence of the solutions was measured with excitation of 360 nm in a QM-40 Spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology Int., London, Ontario, Canada). The fluorescence of the papain buffer was taken into account by measuring fluorescence in the absence of tissue and subtracting this value from the fluorescence of the samples.
For a Group B of the pig eyes, the following riboflavin solutions were used:
The epitheliums of eyes in Group B were not removed after soaking in one of the solutions and the surfaces were briefly rinsed with a saline buffer before irradiation. The epitheliums were removed after the irradiation. Conditions used for the irradiation and the following treatment of the eyes were the same as for Group A.
For a Group C of the pig eyes, the following riboflavin solutions were used:
The epitheliums of eyes in Group C were not removed after soaking in one of the solutions and the surfaces were briefly rinsed with a saline buffer before irradiation. The eyes were placed in a beaker with an oxygen stream for 2 minutes in the incubation chamber prior to irradiation. Corneas were pan-corneally irradiated with irradiance of 30 mW/cm2, pulsed 1 sec on: 1 sec off for a total time of 8 min (7.2 J). The eyes were exposed to oxygen during all time of the treatment. The epithelium were removed from the cornea after the irradiation with a dull blade. Corneal flaps (approximately 200 μm thick) were excised from the eyes with aid of Intralase femtosecond laser and the following treatment of the flaps was the same as for the Groups A and B.
For a Group D and a Group E of the pig eyes, the following riboflavin solutions were used:
For Group D, the experimental procedure (including the irradiation, oxygen exposure, and the cutting of the flaps) was the same as for Group C.
The epitheliums of eyes in Group E were removed after soaking in one of the solutions for 20 min. The eyes then were placed in a beaker with oxygen stream for 2 minutes in the incubation chamber prior to irradiation. Corneas were pan-corneally irradiated with irradiance of 30 mW/cm2, pulsed 1 sec on: 1 sec off for total time of 8 min (7.2 J). The eyes were exposed to oxygen during all time of the treatment. Corneal flaps (approximately 200 μm thick) were excised from the eyes with aid of Intralase femtosecond laser and the following treatment of the flaps was the same as for the Groups A and B.
For Group A,
For Group B,
For Group C,
As the results of the study show, the inventors have identified Polidocanol as a non-ionic surfactant that is more effective than many other surfactants for enhancing permeability and generating cross-linking activity. Although the use of BAC in riboflavin solutions may help riboflavin to pass through the epithelium, Polidocanol is far more effective and efficient than BAC in enhancing permeability in the epithelium and generating cross-linking activity. Advantageously, non-ionic agents, such as Polidocanol, are less corrosive and damaging to the epithelium than BAC.
Study 5
As described above, several permeability enhancers may be combined to achieve a specific HLB that achieves more optimal permeability for the epithelium. A study was conducted to test combinations of surfactants with different HLB numbers.
Intact epithelium were soaked for 20 min using one of the following solutions:
The epitheliums of the eyes were removed and the eyes were irradiated with 30 mW/cm2 for 4 min continuously on air. Corneal flaps with thickness of 200 μm were cut and the papain digestion and fluorescence analysis was conducted as previously described above.
The surfactant IGEPAL CO-630 has a HLB number of 13 and the surfactant IGEPAL CO-720 has a HLB number of 14, the 1:1 mixture has a HLB number of 13.5. As
Although the examples described herein may relate to the use of riboflavin and Polidocanol as a permeability enhancer for corneal cross-linking treatments, it is understood that other photosensitizers and/or other permeability enhancers (e.g., non-ionic surfactant with an appropriate HLB number) may be employed. Furthermore, other types of treatment are contemplated, such as antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, where enhanced or controlled delivery of a photosensitizer through an epithelium may be advantageous. Some microbes, such as fungi, have dormant phases, while other microbes, such as Acanthamoeba, can create cystic cell membrane barriers. Advantageously, additives that enhance permeability can increase penetration and uptake of photosensitizer by microbes/pathogens and enhance the antimicrobial effect of the photosensitizer. For instance, photosensitizer formulations employing a non-ionic permeability enhancer may be particularly effective for penetrating cysts, ulcers, etc. and treating microbes/pathogens. Other aspects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/137,748, filed Apr. 25, 2016 and titled “Systems and Methods for Photoactivating a Photosensitizer Applied to an Eye,” the contents of which is incorporated entirely herein by reference.
When riboflavin absorbs radiant energy, especially light, it undergoes photo activation. There are two photochemical kinetic pathways for riboflavin photoactivation, Type I and Type II. Some of the reactions involved in both the Type I and Type II mechanisms are as follows:
Common Reactions:
Rf→Rf1*,I; (r1)
Rf1*→Rf,κ1; (r2)
Rf1*→Rf3*,κ2; (r3)
Type I Reactions:
Rf3*+DH→RfH•+D•,κ3; (r4)
2RfH•→Rf+RfH2,κ4; (r5)
Type II Reactions:
Rf3*+O2→Rf+O21,κ5; (r6)
DH+O21→Dox,κ6; (r7)
Dox+DH→D−D,κ7;CXL (r8)
In the reactions described herein, Rf represents riboflavin in the ground state. Rf*1 represents riboflavin in the excited singlet state. Rf*3 represents riboflavin in a triplet excited state. Rf•− is the reduced radical anion form of riboflavin. RfH• is the radical form of riboflavin. RfH2 is the reduced form of riboflavin. DH is the substrate. DH•+ is the intermediate radical cation. D• is the radical. Dox is the oxidized form of the substrate.
Riboflavin is excited into its triplet excited state Rf*3 as shown in reactions (r1) to (r3). From the triplet excited state Rf*3, the riboflavin reacts further, generally according to Type I or Type II mechanisms. In the Type I mechanism, the substrate reacts with the excited state riboflavin to generate radicals or radical ions, respectively, by hydrogen atoms or electron transfer. In Type II mechanism, the excited state riboflavin reacts with oxygen to form singlet molecular oxygen. The singlet molecular oxygen then acts on tissue to produce additional cross-linked bonds.
Oxygen concentration in the cornea is modulated by UVA irradiance and temperature and quickly decreases at the beginning of UVA exposure. Utilizing pulsed light of a specific duty cycle, frequency, and irradiance, input from both Type I and Type II photochemical kinetic mechanisms can be employed to achieve a greater amount of photochemical efficiency. Moreover, utilizing pulsed light allows regulating the rate of reactions involving riboflavin. The rate of reactions may either be increased or decreased, as needed, by regulating, one of the parameters such as the irradiance, the dose, the on/off duty cycle, riboflavin concentration, soak time, and others. Moreover, additional ingredients that affect the reaction and cross-linking rates may be added to the cornea.
If UVA radiation is stopped shortly after oxygen depletion, oxygen concentrations start to increase (replenish). Excess oxygen may be detrimental in the conical cross-linking process because oxygen is able to inhibit free radical photopolymerization reactions by interacting with radical species to form chain-terminating peroxide molecules. The pulse rate, irradiance, dose, and other parameters can be adjusted to achieve a more optimal oxygen regeneration rate. Calculating and adjusting the oxygen regeneration rate is another example of adjusting the reaction parameters to achieve a desired amount of conical stiffening.
Oxygen content may be depleted throughout the cornea, by various chemical reactions, except for the very thin corneal layer where oxygen diffusion is able to keep up with the kinetics of the reactions. This diffusion-controlled zone will gradually move deeper into the cornea as the reaction ability of the substrate to uptake oxygen decreases.
Riboflavin is reduced (deactivated) reversibly or irreversibly and/or photo-degraded to a greater extent as irradiance increases. Photon optimization can be achieved by allowing reduced riboflavin to return to ground state riboflavin in Type I reactions. The rate of return of reduced riboflavin to ground state in Type I reactions is determined by a number of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, on/off duty cycle of pulsed light treatment, pulse rate frequency, irradiance, and dose. Moreover, the riboflavin concentration, soak time, and addition of other agents, including oxidizers, affect the rate of oxygen uptake. These and other parameters, including duty cycle, pulse rate frequency, irradiance, and dose can be selected to achieve more optimal photon efficiency and make efficient use of both Type I as well as Type II photochemical kinetic mechanisms for riboflavin photosensitization. Moreover, these parameters can be selected in such a way as to achieve a more optimal chemical amplification effect.
In addition to the photochemical kinetic reactions (r1)-(r8) above, however, the present inventors have identified the following photochemical kinetic reactions (r9)-(r26) that also occur during riboflavin photoactivation:
Additional:
Aggregation:
Peroxides:
2O2−→O2+H2O2,κ12 (r25)
OH∘+CXL→inert products,κOH (r26)
As shown in
All the reactions start from Rf3* as provided in reactions (r1)-(r3). The quenching of Rf3* occurs through chemical reaction with ground state Rf in reaction (r10), and through deactivation by the interaction with water in reaction (r9).
As described above, excess oxygen may be detrimental in corneal cross-linking process. As shown in
As described above, a large variety of factors affect the rate of the cross-linking reaction and the amount of biomechanical stiffness achieved due to cross-linking. A number of these factors are interrelated, such that changing one factor may have an unexpected effect on another factor. However, a more comprehensive model for understanding the relationship between different factors for cross-linking treatment is provided by the photochemical kinetic reactions (r1)-(r26) identified above. Accordingly, systems and methods can adjust various parameters for cross-linking treatment according to this photochemical kinetic cross-linking model, which provides a unified description of oxygen dynamics and cross-linking activity. The model can be employed to evaluate expected outcomes based on different combinations of treatment parameters and to identify the combination of treatment parameters that provides the desired result. The parameters, for example, may include, but is not limited to: the concentration(s) and/or soak times of the applied cross-linking agent; the dose(s), wavelength(s), irradiance(s), duration(s), and/or on/off duty cycle(s) of the photoactivating light; the oxygenation conditions in the tissue; and/or presence of additional agents and solutions.
A model based on the reactions (r1)-(r19) has been validated by at least six different methods of evaluating cross-linking activity:
For extensiometry experiments, corneas were soaked with riboflavin for 20 minutes and exposed to UVA photoactivating light in ambient air at an irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 for 7.5 minutes (dose of 1.35 J/cm2), 15 minutes (dose of 2.70 J/cm2), 30 minutes (dose of 5.4 J/cm2), 45 minutes (dose of 8.10 J/cm2), 120 minutes (dose of 21.6 J/cm2), and 150 minutes (dose of 27.0 J/cm2). Extensiometry measurements were taken for 200 μm flaps of the corneas.
For the oxygen depletion experiments, O2 concentrations were measured and calculated at a depth of approximately 100 μm to approximately 200 μm for corneas treated with riboflavin.
For the non-linear optical microscopy fluorescence experiments, the cross-linking profiles based on corneal depth were determined for corneas treated with riboflavin and exposed to UVA photoactivating light at an irradiance of 3 mW/cm2.
For the fluorescence data based on papain digestion method experiments, cross-linking concentrations were evaluated based on fluorescent light intensity.
Brillouin microscopy experiments are described in Scarcelli G et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2013), 54: 1418-1425, the contents of which are incorporated entirely herein by reference. The experiments measured Brillouin modulus values quantifying corneal mechanical properties after various cross-linking treatments.
For the corneal stromal demarcation correlation experiments, corneal stromal demarcation lines were evaluated for treated corneas. A method for these experiments involves slit-lamp examination (slit projection and Scheimpflug camera). See Theo Seiler and Farhad Hafezi, “Corneal Cross-Linking-Induced Stromal Demarcation Line,” Cornea, October 2006; 25:1057-59, the contents of which are incorporated entirely herein by reference. Another method involves corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT). See Luigi Fontana, Antonello Moramarco, “Esperienze personali con CXL accelerate,” UOC Oculistica ASMN-IRCCS Reggio Emilia. Roma, 20 settembre 2014, the contents of which are incorporated entirely herein by reference. A further method involves confocal microscopy. See C. Mazzotta et al., “Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus by of Corneal Collagen In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Humans,” Cornea, vol. 26, no. 4, May 2007, the contents of which are incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Corneal stromal healing involves the deposition of new collagen, which produces haze and scattering. Slit-lamp examination and OCT can detect this hyper-reflectivity and possibly a significant change in the spatial order factor (change in birefringence, i.e., index variation). Corneal stromal demarcation lines indicate the threshold at which the healing response occurs. This conclusion is corroborated by confocal microscopy. The demarcation lines can also be seen as a transition zone between cross-linked anterior corneal stroma and untreated posterior corneal stroma.
The six evaluations described above show a strong correlation between the experimental data and the calculations generated by a model based on the photochemical kinetic reactions identified above. The model is extremely effective and accurate in predicting the results of riboflavin cross-linking treatments applied according to various combinations of parameters. Accordingly, using such a model, systems and methods can more efficiently and predictably achieve a desired profile of cross-linking activity throughout the cornea. The model allows the systems and methods to identify a more optimal combination of parameters for cross-linking treatment. Therefore, the model can be used to determine the set up for different aspects of cross-linking treatment systems as described above.
As shown in
A model based on the photochemical kinetic reactions (r1)-(r26) can generate cross-link profiles for treatments using different protocols as shown in
The cross-link profiles in
As described above, corneal stromal demarcation lines indicate the transition zone between cross-linked anterior corneal stroma and untreated posterior corneal stroma. As also shown in
Correspondingly,
Meanwhile, for the area above the demarcation line for the cross-link profile for each protocol in
The quadratic fit for the two curves in
The model of photochemical kinetic reactions was further evaluated against the results reported by fourteen different studies in total.
TABLE 1 shows further shows data for determination of demarcation line depth for different treatments.
The reported standard deviations reveal variability in the depth of the demarcation line for nominally equivalent clinical protocols. Such variability may be the result of aspects of measurement error, clinical technique, protocol, the riboflavin formulation, and/or the equipment employed. An analysis of the reported variability was performed with the model of photochemical kinetic reactions.
In sum, the line of demarcation is predicted accurately the model of photochemical kinetic reactions. As such, the model of photochemical kinetic reactions may be used to treat corneas, particularly thinner corneas, more safely. However, changes in clinical protocol may result in variability in the depth of the line of demarcation line and potentially clinical outcomes, suggesting the importance of precision in cross-linking treatment methodology. Consistency in protocol, technique and equipment can enhance the predictability of the clinical outcomes.
According to an embodiment,
According to one implementation, the three-dimensional cross-link distribution(s) may be evaluated to calculate a threshold depth corresponding to a healing response due to the cross-links and an effect of the reactive-oxygen species in the selected region of the cornea. Additionally or alternatively, the three-dimensional cross-link distribution(s) may be evaluated to calculate a biomechanical tissue stiffness threshold depth corresponding to a biomechanical tissue response in the selected region of the cornea. The information on the depth of the healing response and/or the biomechanical tissue stiffness in the cornea can be employed to determine how to control aspects of the light source 110, the optical elements 112, the cross-linking agent 130, the applicator 132, the oxygen source 140, and/or oxygen delivery device 142. Certain healing response and/or biomechanical tissue stiffness may be desired or not desired at certain depths of the cornea.
Referring to
According to another embodiment,
Using the photochemical kinetic model 126, a three-dimensional distribution of resulting cross-links throughout the treated corneal tissue can be determined for a combination of treatment parameters. As described above, parameters for cross-linking treatment may include: the concentration(s) and/or soak times of the applied cross-linking agent; the dose(s), wavelength(s), irradiance(s), duration(s), on/off duty cycle(s), and/or other illumination parameters for the photoactivating light; the oxygenation conditions in the tissue; and/or presence of additional agents and solutions. The resulting distribution of cross-links determined from the photochemical kinetic model 126 can be correlated to a particular biomechanical change in the cornea.
As shown in
The inputs 12, 14 may be expressed in terms of corneal topography (i.e., shape), corneal strength (i.e., stiffness), and/or corneal thickness. For instance, the desired biomechanical change for refractive correction may be determined from a correction specified (by a practitioner) in diopters, e.g., “a 1.5 diopter correction.”
A desired biomechanical change in the cornea can be correlated to a particular distribution of cross-links as determined by the photochemical kinetic model 126. As such, the controller 120 can execute the program instructions 125 to determine the particular distribution of cross-links 16 that can generate the desired biomechanical change specified by the input 14 in a cornea having the initial biomechanical state specified by the input 12. After determining the distribution of cross-links 16 for the desired biomechanical change, the controller 120 can prescribe a set of treatment parameters for achieving the specified distribution of cross-links.
As the studies above establish, however, the distribution of cross-links 16 might be achieved in many cases by more than one set of treatment parameters. For instance, depending on the photochemical kinetic reactions, similar distributions of cross-links may be achieved by applying: (i) a lower dose of photoactivating light for a longer amount of time, or (ii) a higher dose of photoactivating light for a shorter amount of time. Therefore, more than one set of treatment parameters 18 for achieving the distribution of cross-links 16 may be identified.
With more than one possible set of treatment parameters 18, a practitioner can optimize the treatment for certain preferred parameters, such as treatment time or dose of photoactivating light. For instance, the practitioner may optimize the treatment parameters to achieve shorter treatment times. For this preference, the controller 120 may prescribe a set of illumination parameters that provide a larger dose of photoactivating light that yields the distribution of cross-links 16 over shorter illumination durations. Conversely, the practitioner may optimize the treatment parameters to employ smaller doses of photoactivating light. For this second preference, the controller 120 may prescribe a set of illumination parameters that provide a smaller dose of photoactivating light that yields the distribution of cross-links 16 over longer illumination durations.
In general, to achieve the distribution of cross-links 16, the controller 120 may identify any of the different combinations 18 of values for a set of treatment parameters A, B, C, D, E, etc., as described above. The practitioner can set preferences for one or more of these treatment parameters. For instance, the practitioner may initially set a preferred value or range of preferred values for parameter A. In response, the controller 120 can specify combinations of values for the remaining parameters B, C, D, E, etc., that meet the preference for parameter A while achieving the distribution of cross-links 16. The practitioner may make selections for the values of the parameters B, C, D, and/or E, etc., based on further preferences to arrive at an optimized set of treatment parameters 18a. The process of optimizing the treatment parameters may be iterative as the values for the treatment parameters are incrementally tuned to meet preferences having varying priorities.
In some embodiments, the practitioner may manage the optimization process through a series of selections and other inputs via a user interface (not shown) coupled to the controller 120. In some cases, the inputs 12, 14 may also be provided through such a user interface.
The final set of treatment parameters 18a can then be employed to determine how to control aspects of the light source 110, the optical elements 112, the cross-linking agent 130, the applicator 132, the oxygen source 140, oxygen delivery device 142, etc., in order to achieve a desired treatment in selected region of the cornea.
Correspondingly,
As described above, according to some aspects of the present disclosure, some or all of the steps of the above-described and illustrated procedures can be automated or guided under the control of a controller (e.g., the controller 120). Generally, the controllers may be implemented as a combination of hardware and software elements. The hardware aspects may include combinations of operatively coupled hardware components including microprocessors, logical circuitry, communication/networking ports, digital filters, memory, or logical circuitry. The controller may be adapted to perform operations specified by a computer-executable code, which may be stored on a computer readable medium.
As described above, the controller may be a programmable processing device, such as an external conventional computer or an on-board field programmable gate array (FPGA) or digital signal processor (DSP), that executes software, or stored instructions. In general, physical processors and/or machines employed by embodiments of the present disclosure for any processing or evaluation may include one or more networked or non-networked general purpose computer systems, microprocessors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGA's), digital signal processors (DSP's), micro-controllers, and the like, programmed according to the teachings of the example embodiments of the present disclosure, as is appreciated by those skilled in the computer and software arts. The physical processors and/or machines may be externally networked with the image capture device(s), or may be integrated to reside within the image capture device. Appropriate software can be readily prepared by programmers of ordinary skill based on the teachings of the example embodiments, as is appreciated by those skilled in the software art. In addition, the devices and subsystems of the example embodiments can be implemented by the preparation of application-specific integrated circuits or by interconnecting an appropriate network of conventional component circuits, as is appreciated by those skilled in the electrical art(s). Thus, the example embodiments are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and/or software.
Stored on any one or on a combination of computer readable media, the example embodiments of the present disclosure may include software for controlling the devices and subsystems of the example embodiments, for driving the devices and subsystems of the example embodiments, for enabling the devices and subsystems of the example embodiments to interact with a human user, and the like. Such software can include, but is not limited to, device drivers, firmware, operating systems, development tools, applications software, and the like. Such computer readable media further can include the computer program product of an embodiment of the present disclosure for performing all or a portion (if processing is distributed) of the processing performed in implementations. Computer code devices of the example embodiments of the present disclosure can include any suitable interpretable or executable code mechanism, including but not limited to scripts, interpretable programs, dynamic link libraries (DLLs), Java classes and applets, complete executable programs, and the like. Moreover, parts of the processing of the example embodiments of the present disclosure can be distributed for better performance, reliability, cost, and the like.
Common forms of computer-readable media may include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other suitable magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, CDRW, DVD, any other suitable optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, optical mark sheets, any other suitable physical medium with patterns of holes or other optically recognizable indicia, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other suitable memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave or any other suitable medium from which a computer can read.
While the present disclosure has been described with reference to one or more particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Each of these embodiments and obvious variations thereof is contemplated as falling within the spirit and scope of the invention. It is also contemplated that additional embodiments according to aspects of the present disclosure may combine any number of features from any of the embodiments described herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/195,144, filed Jul. 21, 2015, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/255,452, filed Nov. 14, 2015, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/262,919, filed Dec. 4, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/263,598, filed Dec. 4, 2015, the contents of these application being incorporated entirely herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3169459 | Friedberg et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
| 4034750 | Seiderman | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4161013 | Grodzinsky et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4326529 | Doss et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4381007 | Doss | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4665913 | L'Esperance, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
| 4712543 | Baron | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4764007 | Task | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4805616 | Pao | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4881543 | Trembly et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4891043 | Zeimer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4969912 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4994058 | Raven et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5016615 | Driller et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019074 | Muller | May 1991 | A |
| 5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103005 | Gyure et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5171254 | Sher | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171318 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5219895 | Kelman et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5281211 | Parel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5332802 | Kelman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5450144 | Ben Nun | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5461212 | Seiler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5490849 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5512966 | Snook | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5562656 | Sumiya | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5608472 | Szirth et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618284 | Sand | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624437 | Freeman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634921 | Hood et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5766171 | Silvestrini | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779696 | Berry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786893 | Fink et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5814040 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5885275 | Muller | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891131 | Rajan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6033396 | Huang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6099521 | Shadduck | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101411 | Newsome | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104959 | Spertell | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6139876 | Kolta | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6161544 | DeVore et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162210 | Shadduck | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6188500 | Rudeen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218360 | Cintron et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223075 | Beck et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6270221 | Liang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280436 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293938 | Muller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6319273 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322557 | Nikolaevich et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325792 | Swinger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334074 | Spertell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6342053 | Berry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6394999 | Williams et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402739 | Neev | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6478792 | Hansel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6520956 | Huang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520958 | Shimmick et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6537545 | Karageozian et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6571118 | Utzinger et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572849 | Chicaning, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6617963 | Watters et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6673067 | Peyman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6918904 | Peyman | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6946440 | DeWoolfson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7001374 | Peyman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004902 | Luce | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7044945 | Sand | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7073510 | Redmond et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7130835 | Cox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141049 | Stern et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7192429 | Trembly | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7237898 | Hohla et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7270658 | Woloszko et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7302189 | Kawahata | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7331350 | Kochevar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7402562 | DeWoolfson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7455858 | Allemann et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7753943 | Strong | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7871378 | Chou et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7898656 | Yun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7935058 | Dupps, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8092490 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8111394 | Borysow et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8115919 | Yun et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8215314 | Chan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8366689 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8414911 | Mattson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435503 | Thorel et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8466203 | Paik et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8475437 | Mrochen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8545487 | Muller et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8574277 | Muller et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8715273 | Thyzel | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8834916 | Newman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8870934 | Muller et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8882757 | Muller | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8936591 | Mrochen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8945101 | Herekar et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8995618 | Gertner | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9005099 | Blumenkranz et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9005261 | Brinkmann | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9044308 | Muller | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9095414 | Jester et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9125735 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9125856 | Paik et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9155652 | Peyman | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9192594 | Troisi et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9370446 | Peyman | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9427355 | Peyman | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9439908 | Foscini et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9445870 | Chuck et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9452172 | Scherz et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9486284 | Depfenhart et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9498642 | Muller et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9504607 | Russmann | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9555111 | Rubinfield et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 10258809 | Friedman | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10342697 | Friedman | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 20010041856 | McDaniel | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047012 | Desantis, Jr. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055095 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002369 | Hood | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020006394 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013577 | Frey et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022606 | Kochevar et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042638 | Iezzi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049437 | Silvestrini | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099363 | Woodward et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159618 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164379 | Nishihara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187935 | Redmond et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018255 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030908 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135122 | Bambot et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175259 | Karageozian et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189689 | Rathjen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208190 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216728 | Stern et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231285 | Ferguson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001821 | Silver et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002694 | Pawlowski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047913 | Allemann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071778 | Bellmann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093046 | Sand | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111086 | Trembly | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143250 | Trembly | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199079 | Chuck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199158 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204707 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243160 | Shiuey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050038471 | Chan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096515 | Geng | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149006 | Peyman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177149 | Peyman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187599 | Sharkey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261243 | Peyman | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271590 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060058592 | Bouma et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106371 | Muhlhoff et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135957 | Panescu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149343 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177430 | Bhushan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189964 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195074 | Bartoli | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195076 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212070 | Redmond et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276777 | Coroneo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287662 | Berry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070024860 | Tobiason et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027509 | Eisenberg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028928 | Peyman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048340 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055227 | Khalaj et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074722 | Giroux et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088415 | Peyman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090153 | Naito et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099966 | Fabricant | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123845 | Lubatschowski | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135805 | Peyman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142828 | Peyman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161976 | Trembly | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203478 | Herekar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203547 | Costello et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244470 | Barker, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244496 | Hellenkamp | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265603 | Pinelli | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009901 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015660 | Herekar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027328 | Klopotek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033408 | Bueler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063627 | Stucke et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114283 | Mattson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139671 | Herekar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208177 | Mrochen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090024117 | Muller | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054879 | Berry | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069798 | Muller et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105127 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090116096 | Zalevsky et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090130176 | Bossy-Nobs et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149842 | Muller et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149923 | Herekar | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171305 | El Hage | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192437 | Soltz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209954 | Muller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234335 | Yee | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271155 | Dupps, Jr. et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275929 | Zickler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276042 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100028407 | Del Priore et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036488 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057060 | Herekar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069894 | Mrochen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082018 | Panthakey et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094197 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114109 | Peyman | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149487 | Ribak | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100159029 | Lang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173019 | Paik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100189817 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191228 | Ruiz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203103 | Dana et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204584 | Ornberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210996 | Peyman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100271593 | Filar | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286156 | Pinelli | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100317588 | Shoseyov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318017 | Lewis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110044902 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060267 | DeWoolfson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077624 | Brady et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098790 | Daxer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118654 | Muller et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125076 | Kraft et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152219 | Stagni et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190742 | Anisimov | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202114 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208300 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237999 | Muller et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264082 | Mrochen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282333 | Herekar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288466 | Muller et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301524 | Bueler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120035527 | Tearney et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059363 | Bor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059439 | Yoon | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065572 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083772 | Rubinfeld et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120087970 | Newman | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095455 | Rodmond et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120121567 | Troisi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136387 | Redmond et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140238 | Horn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203051 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203161 | Herekar | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209051 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215155 | Muller et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120238938 | Herekar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283621 | Muller | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289886 | Muller et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302862 | Yun et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303008 | Muller et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310083 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310141 | Kornfield et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310223 | Knox et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321585 | Griffith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330291 | Jester et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130023966 | Depfenhart et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058954 | Sutton et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060187 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085370 | Friedman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110091 | Berry | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116757 | Russmann | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158342 | Chan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178821 | Foschini et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211389 | Chuck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245536 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310728 | Seiler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310732 | Foschini et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338650 | Jester et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140024997 | Muller et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025049 | Muller et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039377 | Saks | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058367 | Dantus | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066835 | Muller et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113009 | Muller et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114232 | Hafezi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171926 | Depfenhart | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171927 | Depfenhart | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194957 | Rubinfeld et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249509 | Rubinfeld et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140264980 | Muller | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276361 | Herekar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277431 | Herekar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303173 | Fuschini et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140320819 | Muller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343480 | Kamaev | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140347629 | Donitzky et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349957 | Trigiante | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368793 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140378888 | Scherz et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379054 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150025440 | Muller et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150085252 | Fujimura et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088231 | Rubinfield et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150126921 | Rubinfield et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150209181 | Herekar et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150257929 | Daxer | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305933 | Zhou | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313756 | Skerl et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150320595 | Blumenkranz et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150320599 | Jester et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342784 | Seiler et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150359668 | Kornfield et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150374540 | Lopath et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160000885 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160022493 | Peyman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160059032 | Skerl | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160081852 | Peyman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160135989 | Wellhoefer | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160139390 | Bukshtab et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175147 | Lopath | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175442 | Kamaev et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160236006 | Donitzky et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310319 | Friedman et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310758 | Friedman | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331868 | Grubbs et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338588 | Friedman | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160354468 | Scherz et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160374992 | Paik et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170007395 | Peyman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170043015 | Alageel et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065826 | Rubinfield et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296383 | Friedman | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20190240503 | Friedman | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102008046834 | Mar 2010 | DE |
| 1285679 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1561440 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1790383 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2253321 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| MI2010A001236 | May 2010 | IT |
| 2000262476 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 1376 | Aug 2011 | KG |
| 2086215 | Aug 1997 | RU |
| 2098057 | Dec 1997 | RU |
| 2121825 | Nov 1998 | RU |
| 2127099 | Mar 1999 | RU |
| 2127100 | Mar 1999 | RU |
| 2309713 | Nov 2007 | RU |
| 2359716 | Jun 2009 | RU |
| 2420330 | Jun 2011 | RU |
| 2428152 | Sep 2011 | RU |
| 2456971 | Jul 2012 | RU |
| 9316631 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| 9403134 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| 199945869 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0074648 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0158495 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 03061696 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2003097096 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2004052223 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2005110397 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006012947 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006093850 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2006128038 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007001926 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007053826 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007081750 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007120457 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007128581 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2007139927 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2007143111 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008000478 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008008914 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008052081 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008060990 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008070185 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008070848 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008095075 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008150291 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009042159 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009073213 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009073600 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009114513 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009145842 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2009146151 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010011119 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010015255 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010023705 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010035081 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010039854 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010065026 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2010093908 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2011012557 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011019940 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011038485 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011050164 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011050360 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011066621 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011094758 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2011116306 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011137449 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2011138031 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012004726 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012047307 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012050592 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012095876 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2012095877 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2012112543 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012112699 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012127330 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012135073 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| 2012145853 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012149570 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012154627 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012158991 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012162529 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012174453 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013027222 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013059837 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013061350 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013062910 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013084061 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2013097885 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013148713 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013148895 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013148896 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013149075 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2014014521 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014060206 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014066636 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014071408 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014081875 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014114359 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2014145666 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014145684 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014152882 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014159691 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2014174544 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2014202736 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2014210152 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2015051832 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015062648 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2015130944 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015138786 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015138794 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015175250 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2015200817 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016078780 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016069628 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016083669 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| 2016106217 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| 2016131796 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| 2016140581 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| 2016142490 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| 2016172695 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| 2016174688 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| 2016183424 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| 2016191342 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2016201447 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Davies J. T., “A Quantitative Kinetic Theory of Emulsion Type. I. Physical Chemistry of the Emulsifying Agent”, 1957, Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Interfaces. Proceedings of 2nd International Congress Surface Activity, pp. 426-438. (Year: 1957). |
| Brummer et al., “The Role of Nonenzymatic Glycation and Carbonyls in Collagen Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus”, Aug. 2011, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 6363-6369. (Year: 2011). |
| Morrison et al., “Cyclodextrin-Mediated Enhancement of Riboflavin Solubility and Corneal Permeability”, 2013, Molecular Pharmaceutics, 10(2), pp. 756-762. (Year: 2013). |
| Mi S., et al., “The adhesion of LASIK-like flaps in the cornea: effects of cross-linking, stromal fibroblasts and cytokine treatment,” presented at British Society for Matrix Biology annual Meeting, Cardiff, UK, Sep. 8-9, 2008 (17 pages). |
| Muller L., et al., “The Specific Architecture of the Anterior Stroma Accounts for Maintenance of Corneal Curvature,” Br. J. Opthalmol., vol. 85, pp. 437-443; Apr. 2001 (8 pages). |
| Mulroy L., et al., “Photochemical Keratodesmos for repair of Lamellar corneal Incisions;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 3335-3340; Oct. 2000 (6 pages). |
| Naoumidi T., et al., “Two-Year Follow-up of Conductive Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Hyperopic Astigmatism,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 32(5), pp. 732-741; May 2006 (10 pages). |
| Nesterov, A. P. “Transpalpebralny Tonometr Dlya Izmereniya Vnutriglaznogo Davleniya.” Feb. 2, 2006. [online] [Retrieved Dec. 17, 2012] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://grpz.ru/images/publication_pdf/27.pdf>. |
| O'Neil A.C., et al., “Microvascular Anastomosis Using a Photochemical Tissue Bonding Technique;” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 39, Issue 9, pp. 716-722; Oct. 2007 (7 pages). |
| O.V. Shilenskaya et al., “Vtorichnaya katarakta posle implantatsii myagkikh IOL,” [online] Aug. 21, 2008 [retrieved Apr. 3, 2013] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.reper.ru/rus/index.php?catid=210> (4 pages). |
| Paddock C., Medical News Today: “Metastatic Melanoma PV-10 Trial Results Encouraging Says Drug Company;” Jun. 9, 2009; retrieved from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/153024.php, on Sep. 26, 2011 (2 pages). |
| Pallikaris I., et al., “Long-term Results of Conductive Keratoplasty for low to Moderate Hyperopia,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 31(8), pp. 1520-1529; Aug. 2005 (10 pages). |
| Pinelli, R. “Corneal Cross-Linking with Riboflavin: Entering a New Era in Ophthalmology.” Ophthalmology Times Europe. vol. 2, No. 7, Sep. 1, 2006, [online], [retrieved on May 20, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.oteurope.com/ophthalmologytimeseurope/Cornea/Corneal-cross-linking-with-riboflavin-entering-a-n/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/368411> (3 pages). |
| Pinelli R., et al., “C3-Riboflavin Treatments: Where Did We Come From? Where Are We Now?” Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, Summer 2007, pp. 36-46; Jun. 2007 (10 pages). |
| Pinelli, R., “Panel Discussion: Epithelium On/Off, Corneal abrasion for CCL contra”, presented at the 3° International Congress of Corneal Cross Linking on Dec. 7-8, 2007 in Zurich (36 pages). |
| Roberto Pinelli et al, “Transepithelial Tensioactive Mediated CXL”, Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, p. 1, URL: http://bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/pdfs/0409_09.pdf, XP055158069. |
| Pinelli R., “Resultados de la Sociedad de Cirugia Refractiva Italiana (SICR) utilizando el C3-R” presented at the Istitutor Laser Microchirurgia Oculare in 2007 in Italy (23 pages). |
| Pinelli et al., “Tensioactive-mediated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking—First Laboratory Report”, 2009, European Ophthalmic Review, 3(2), pp. 67-70. |
| Pinelli R., “The Italian Refractive Surgery Society (SICR) results using C3-R” presented Jun. 22-23, 2007 in Italy (13 pages). |
| Ponce C., et al., “Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography, Scheimpflug Imaging, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal, Keratoconus-suspect and Post-laser in situ Keratomileusis Eyes,” J. Cataract Refract. Surgery, vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 1055-1062; Jun. 2009 (8 pages). |
| Proano C.E., et al., “Photochemical Keratodesmos for Bonding Corneal Incisions;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 2177-2181; Jul. 2004 (5 pages). |
| Randall, J. et al., “The Measurement and Intrepretation of Brillouin Scattering in the Lens of the Eye,” The Royal Society, Abstract only, published 2013 [available online at http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/214/1197/449.short] (1 page). |
| Reinstein, D. Z. et al. “Epithelial Thickness Profile as a Method to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment After Corneal Ectasis.” Journal of Refractive Surgery. vol. 27, No. 5, May 2011 (pp. 356-363). [Abstract only]. |
| Reiss, S. et al., “Non-Invasive, ortsaufgeloeste Bestimmung von Gewebeeigenschaften derAugenlinse, Dichte undProteinkonzentration unter Anwendung der Brillouin-spektroskopie”, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd, vol. 228, No. 12, pp. 1079-1085, Dec. 13, 2011 (7 pages). |
| Reiss, S. et al., “Spatially resolved Brillouin Spectroscopy to determine the rheological properties of the eye lens”, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 2, No. 8, p. 2144, Aug. 1, 2011 (1 page). |
| Rocha K., et al., “Comparative Study of Riboflavin-UVA Cross-linking and “Flash-linking” Using Surface Wave Elastometry,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24 Issue 7, pp. S748-5751; Sep. 2008 (4 pages). |
| Rolandi et al., “Correlation of Collagen-Linked Fluorescence and Tendon Fiber Breaking Time.” Gerontology 1991;27:240-243 (4 pages). |
| RxList: “Definity Drug Description;” The Internet Drug Index, revised Jun. 16, 2008, retrieved from http://www.rxlist.com/definity-drug.htm, on Sep. 26, 2011 (4 pages). |
| Saleh et al. “Fundamentals of Photonics” 1991, pp. 74-77. |
| Scarcelli, G. et al., “Brillouin Optical Microscopy for Corneal Biomechanics”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jan. 2012, vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 185-190 (6 pages). |
| Sheehan M., et al., “Illumination System for Corneal Collagen Crosslinking,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 512-524; Apr. 2011 (13 pages). |
| Shell, J., “Pharmacokinetics of Topically Applied Ophthalmic Drugs,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 207-218; Jan.-Feb. 1982 (12 pages). |
| Sobol E N et al, “Correction of Eye Refraction by Nonablative Laser Action on Thermomechanical Properties of Cornea and Sclera”, Quantum Electronics, Turpion Ltd., London, GB, (200210), vol. 32, No. 10, ISSN 1063-7818, pp. 909-912, XP001170947 [A] 1. |
| Song P., Metzler D. “Photochemical Degradation of Flavins—IV. Studies of the Anaerobic Photolysis of Riboflavin.” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 6, pp. 691-709, 1967 (21 pages). |
| Sonoda S., “Gene Transfer to Corneal Epithelium and Keratocytes Mediated by Ultrasound with Microbubbles,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 558-564; Feb. 2006 (7 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Artificial Stiffening of the Cornea by Induction of Intrastromal Cross-links,” Der Ophthalmologe, vol. 94, No. 12, pp. 902-906; Dec. 1997 (5 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Induction of Cross-links in Corneal Tissue,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 66, Issue 1, pp. 97-103; Jan. 1998 (7 pages). |
| Spoerl E. et al., “Safety of UVA-Riboflavin Cross-Linking of the Cornea,” Cornea, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 385-389; May 2007 (5 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Techniques for Stiffening the Cornea,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 15, Issue 6, pp. 711-713; Nov.-Dec. 1999 (4 pages). |
| Sun, G.J. et al., Abstract for “Properties of 2,3-butanedione and 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione as new photosensitizers for visible light cured dental resin composites”, Polymer 41, pp. 6205-6212, published in 2000 (1 page). |
| “Tahzib N.G. et al., ““Recurrent intraocular inflamation after implantation of the Artiflex phakic intraocular lens for the correction of high myopia,”” J Cataract Refract Surg, Aug. 2006; 32(8)1388-91, (abstract) [online] [Retrived Mar. 4, 2013] Retrieved from PubMed, PMID: 16863981”. |
| Tessier FJ, et al., “Rigidification of Corneas Treated in vitro with Glyceraldehyde: Characterization of Two Novel Crosslinks and Two Chromophores,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, E-Abstract; 2002 (2 pages). |
| Thornton, I. et. al., “Biomechancial Effects of Intraocular Pressure Elevation on Optic Berve/Lamina Cribrosa before and after Peripapillary Scleral Collagen Cross-Linking.” Invest. Ophthalm,ol. Vis. Sci., Mar. 2009, 50(3): pp. 1227-33. |
| Tomlinson, A. “Tear Film Osmolarity: Determination of a Referent for Dry Eye Diagnosis”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Oct. 2006, vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 4309-4315 (7 pages). |
| Trembly et al., “Microwave Thermal Keratoplasty for Myopia: Keratoscopic Evaluation in Porcine Eyes,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 682-688; Nov./Dec. 2001 (8 pages) |
| Turgunbaev N.A. et al. Fotomodifikatsiya sklery u bolnykh s progressiruyuschei blizorukostyu (predvaritelnoe soobschenie). 2010 [online]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://www.eyepress.ru/article.aspx?7484> (2 pages) |
| “UV-X: Radiation System for Treatment of Keratokonus,” PESCHKE Meditrade GmbH; retrieved from http://www.peschkemed.ch/ on Sep. 27, 2011 (date unknown, prior to Sep. 16, 2008) (1 page) |
| Vasan S., et al., “An agent cleaving glucose-derived protein crosslinks in vitro and in vivo;” Letters to Nature, vol. 382, pp. 275-278; Jul. 18, 1996 (4 pages). |
| Verzijl et al. Crosslinking by Advanced Glycation End Products Increases the Stiffness of the Collagen Network in Human Articular Cartilage. Arthritis & Rheumatism vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 114-123 (10 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Biomechanical and Histological Changes After Corneal Crosslinking With and Without Epithelial Debridement,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 540-546; Mar. 2009 (7 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Collagen Crosslinking of Human and Porcine Sclera,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 689-695; Mar. 2004 (7 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Cross-linking of Scleral Collagen in the Rabbit Using Riboflavin and UVA,” Acta Ophtalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 83(4), pp. 477-482; Aug. 2005 (6 pages). |
| Wollensak G., “Crosslinking Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus: New Hope,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 17(4), pp. 356-360; Aug. 2006 (5 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Hydration Behavior of Porcine Cornea Crosslinked with Riboflavin and Ultraviolet,” A.J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 516-521; Mar. 2007 (6 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Riboflavin/Ultraviolet-A-induced Collagen Crosslinking for the Treatment of Keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, No. 5, pp. 620-627; May 2003 (8 pages). |
| Wollensak, G. et al. “Laboratory Science: Stress-Strain Measurements of Human and Porcine Corneas after Riboflavin-Ultraviolet-A-Induced Cross-Linking.” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. vol. 29, No. 9, Sep. 2003 (pp. 1780-1785). |
| Wong, J. et al., “Post-Lasik ectasia: PRK following previous stablization and effective management with Riboflavin / ultraviolet A-induced collagen cross-linking,” Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, 2006 (1 page). |
| Yang H., et al., “3-D Histomorphometry of the Normal and Early Glaucomatous Monkey Optic Nerve Head: Lamina Cribrosa and Peripapillary Scleral Position and Thickness,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 4597-4607; Oct. 2007 (11 pages). |
| Yang N., Oster G. Dye-sensitized photopolymerization in the presence of reversible oxygen carriers. J. Phys. Chem. 74, 856-860 (1970) (5 pages). |
| Zhang, Y. et al., “Effect of the Synthetic NC-1059 Peptide on Diffusion of Riboflavin Across an Intact Corneal Epithelium”, May 6, 2012, ARBO 2012 Annual Meeting Abstract, 140 Stroma and Keratocytes, program No. 1073, poster board No. A109. |
| Zhang, Y. et al., “Effects of Ultraviolet-A and Riboflavin on the Interaction of Collagen and Proteoglycans during Corneal Cross-linking”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, No. 15, dated Apr. 15, 2011 (pp. 13011-13022). |
| Zderic V., et al., “Drug Delivery Into the Eye With the Use of Ultrasound,” J. Ultrasound Med, vol. 23(10), pp. 1349-1359; Oct. 2004 (11 pages). |
| Zderic V., et al., “Ultrasound-enhanced Transcorneal Drug Delivery,” Cornea vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 804-811; Nov. 2004 (8 pages). |
| Abahussin, M. “3D Collagen Orientation Study of the Human Cornea Using X-ray Diffraction and Femtosecond Laser Technology” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Nov. 2009, vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 5159-5164. |
| Acosta A. et al., “Corneal Stroma Regeneration in Felines After Supradescemetic Keratoprothesis Implantation,” Cornea, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 830-838; Aug. 2006. |
| Averianova, O. S., “Nastoyaschee I buduschee kross-linkage.” Mir Ofalmologii, 2010, [online] [retrieved on Feb. 13, 2014] Retrieved from the internet: http://miroft.org.ua/publications/.html. |
| Baier J. et al., “Singlet Oxygen Generation by UVA Light Exposure of Endogenous Photosensitizers,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 91(4), pp. 1452-1459; Aug. 15, 2006. |
| Ballou, D. et al., “Direct Demonstration of Superoxide Anion Production During the Oxidation of Reduced Flavin and of Its Catalytic Decomposition by Erythrocuprein,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 898-904, Jul. 11, 1969. |
| Barbarino, S. et al., “Post-LASIK ectasia: Stabilization and Effective Management with Riboflavin / ultraviolet A-induced collagen cross-linking,” Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, 2006. |
| Berjano E., et al., “Radio-Frequency Heating of the Cornea: Theoretical Model and In Vitro Experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 196-205; Mar. 2002. |
| Berjano E., et al., “Ring Electrode for Radio-frequency Heating of the Cornea: Modelling and in vitro Experiments,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 41, pp. 630-639; Jun. 2003. |
| Brüel, A., “Changes in Biomechanical Properties, Composition of Collagen and Elastin, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts of the Rat Aorta in Relation to Age,” Atherosclerosis 127, Mar. 14, 1996. |
| Burke, JM et al., Abstract for “Retinal proliferation in response to vitreous hemoglobin or iron”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, May 1981, 20(5), pp. 582-92. |
| Chai, D. et al., “Quantitative Assessment of UVA-Riboflavin Corneal Cross-Linking Using Nonlinear Optical Microscopy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 2011, vol. 52, No. 7, 4231-4238. |
| Chan B.P., et al., “Effects of photochemical crosslinking on the microstructure of collagen and a feasibility study on controlled protein release;” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 4, Issue 6, pp. 1627-1636; Jul. 1, 2008. |
| Chandonnet, “CO2 Laser Annular Thermokeratoplasty: A Preliminary Study,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 264-273; 1992. |
| Chace, KV. et al., Abstract for “The role of nonenzymatic glycosylation, transition metals, and free radicals in the formation of collagen aggregates”, Arch Biochem Biophys., Aug. 1, 1991, 288(2), pp. 473-80. |
| Clinical Trials.gov, “Riboflavin Mediated Corneal Crosslinking for Stabilizing Progression of Keratoconus (CCL),” University Hospital Freiburg, Feb. 20, 2008; retrieved from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00626717, on Apr. 26, 2011. |
| Corbett M., et al., “Effect of Collagenase Inhibitors on Corneal Haze after PRK,” Exp. Eye Res., vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 253-259; Jan. 2001. |
| Coskenseven E. et al., “Comparative Study of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking With Riboflavin and UVA Irradiation in Patients With Keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 371-376; Apr. 2009. |
| “Definity (perflutren) injection, suspension [Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging],” http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=8338, revised Sep. 2008, retrieved via the internet archive from http://web.archive.org/web/20100321105500/http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=8338, on Dec. 14, 2011. |
| Ehlers W., et al., “Factors Affecting Therapeutic Concentration of Topical Aminocaproic Acid in Traumatic Hyphema,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 2389-2394; Nov. 1990. |
| Erskine H., “Avedro Becomes Sponsor of US FDA Clinical Trials of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking,” Press Release, Mar. 16, 2010 (1 page). |
| Fite et al., “Noninvasive Multimodal Evaluation of Bioengineered Cartilage Constructs Combining Time-Resolved Fluorescence and Ultrasound Imaging.” Tissue Eng: Part C vol. 17, No. 4, 2011. |
| Friedman, M. et al. “Advanced Corneal Cross-Linking System with Fluorescence Dosimetry”, Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2012, Article ID 303459, dated May 7, 2012. |
| Frucht-Pery, et al. “Iontophoresis—gentamicin delivery into the rabbit cornea, using a hydrogel delivery probe,” Jun. 20, 2003. |
| Gibson, Q. et al., “The Oxidation of Reduced Flavin Mononucleotide by Molecular Oxygen,” Biochem. J. (1962) 83, 368-377. |
| Givens et al. “A Photoactivated Diazpryruvoyl Cross-Linking Agent for Bonding Tissue Containing Type-I Collagen.” Photochemistry and Photobiology. vol. 78, No. 1, 2003 (pp. 23-29). |
| Glenn J.V., et al., “Advanced Glycation End Product (AGE) Accumulation on Bruch's Membrane: Links to Age-Related RPE Dysfunction;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 441-451; Jan. 2009. |
| Gravitz L., “Laser Show in the Surgical Suite: Lasers and a century-old dye could supplant needles and thread;” technology review, MIT, Mar./Apr. 2009; retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22088/?nlid=1767, on Sep. 26, 2011. |
| Hafezi F., et al., “Collagen Crosslinking with Ultraviolet-A and Hypoosmolar Riboflavin Solution in Thin Corneas,” J. Catract Refract. Surg., vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 621-624; Apr. 2009. |
| Hammer Arthur et al., “Corneal Biomechanical Properties at different Corneal Cross-Linking (CXL) Irradiances,” IOVS, May 2014, vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 2881-2884. |
| Hitzenberger et al., “Birefringence Properties of the Human Cornea Measured With Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography,” Bull. Soc. Beige Ophtalmol., 302, 153-168, 2006. |
| Holmström, B. et al., “Riboflavin As an Electron Donor in Photochemical Reactions,” 1867-1871, Nov. 29, 1960. |
| How to Use DEFINITY: “Frequently Asked Questions;” retrieved from http://www.definityimaging.com/how-faq.html, on Sep. 26, 2011 (3 pages) (date unknown, prior to Apr. 26, 2010). |
| IMEX, “KXL System: Crosslinking Para Cirugia Corneal Bibliografia Cientifica,” Product Literature, Nov. 23, 2010. |
| Kamaev et al., “Photochemical Kinetics of Corneal Cross-Linking With Riboflavin,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Apr. 2012, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 2360-2367 (8 pages). |
| Kampik D. et al., “Influence of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking With Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Irradiation on Excimer Laser Surgery,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 3929-3934; Aug. 2010. |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Collagen Cross-linking in Early Keratoconus With Riboflavin in a Femtosecond Laser-created Pocket: Initial Clinical Results”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Aug. 18, 2009. |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Keratoconus management: UVA-induced collagen cross-linking followed by a limited topo-guided surface excimer ablation,” American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2006 (25 pages). |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Ultraviolet A cornea collagen cross-linking, as a pre-treatment for surface excimer ablation in be management of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia,” American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2005 (28 pages). |
| Kissner Anja, et al., “Pharmacological Modification of the Epithelial Permeability by Benzalkonium Chloride in UVA/Riboflavin Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking,” Current Eye Research 35(8), pp. 715-721; Mar. 2010 (7 pages). |
| Koller, T. et. Al., “Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking,” Journal Cataract and refractive surgery, vol. 35, No. 8, Aug. 2009, pp. 1358-1362. |
| Koller T., et al., “Therapeutische Quervernetzung der Homhaut mittels UVA und Riboflavin: Therapeutic Cross-Linking of the Cornea Using Riboflavin/UVA,” Klinische Monatsblatter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 224, No. 9, pp. 700-706; Sep. 2007 (7 pages). |
| Kornilovsky, I. M. “Novye neinvazivnye tekhnologii lazernoy modifikatsii optiko-refraksionnykk struktur glaza. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya I oftalmologiya.” vol. 9, No. 3, 2006 (pp. 17-26). |
| Krueger, Ronald R., “Rapid VS Standard Collagen CXL with Equivalent Energy Dosing,” presentation slides; available at http://www.slideshare.net/logen/krueger-herekar-rapid-cross-linking (date unknown, prior to Nov. 9, 2009) (26 pages). |
| Massey, V., “Activation of Molecular Oxygen by Flavins and Flavoproteins,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry vol. 269, No. 36, Issue of Sep. 9, pp. 22459-22462, 1994 (4 pages). |
| Marzouky, et. al., Tensioactive-mediated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking—First Laboratory Report, European Ophthalmic Review, 2009, 3(2), pp. 67-70. |
| Lee et al., “Spectrally filtered Raman / Thomson scattering using a rubidium Vapor filter ”, AIAA J. 40, pp. 2504-2510 (2002). |
| Li, C. et al. “Elastic Properties of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms Assessed by Combined Use of Laser Ultrasonics and Low Coherence Interferometry.” Optics Express. vol. 19, No. 11, May 9, 2011 (pp. 10153-10163). |
| Li, C. et al. “Noncontact All-Optical Measurement of Corneal Elasticity.” Optics Letters. vol. 37, No. 10, May 15, 2012 (pp. 1625-1627). |
| Li, P. et al. “In Vivo Microstructural and Microvascular Imaging of the Human Corneo-Scleral Limbus Using Optical Coherence Tomography.” Biomedical Optics Express. vol. 2, No. 11, Oct. 18, 2011 (pp. 3109-3118). |
| Meek, K.M. et al. “The Cornea and Scleera”, Collagen: Structure and Mechanics, Chapter 13, pp. 359-396, 2008 (38 pages). |
| Bottos et al., “Corneal Absorption of a New Riboflavin-Nanostructured System for Transepithelial Collagen Cross-Linking,” PLoS One, 2013; 8(6).e66408, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066408. |
| Chueshov, Promyshlennaya tekhnologiya lekarstv, 2002, tom 2, s, 419. (Russian Only). |
| Sahoo et al., “Nonionic Surfactant Vesicles in Ocular Delivery: Innovative Approaches and Perspectives,” BioMed Research Internatinal, 2014, Article ID 263604, p. 1-12. |
| International Search Report issued in co-pending International Application No. PCT/US2016/043359, ISA/RU, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Written Opinion issued in co-pending International Application No. PCT/US2016/043359, ISA/RU, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Kenneth V. Chace et al., “Effect of Oxygen Free Radicals on Corneal Collagen,” Free Radical Research Communicat, Harwood Academic Publishers, vol. 12-13, No. Pt. 2, dated Jan. 1, 1991, pp. 591-594. |
| Mun Yhung Jung et al., “Photoinduced Generation of 2,3-Butanedione from Riboflavin,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, No. 1, dated Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 170-174. |
| D. Tzeng et al., “Production of Hydroxyl Radicals in Photodynamic Action of Methionine Riboflavin Mixture A Consequence of Iron Catalyzed Haber-Weiss Reaction,” Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica., vol. 30, No. 3, dated Jan. 1, 1989, pp. 171-178. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170021021 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62263598 | Dec 2015 | US | |
| 62262919 | Dec 2015 | US | |
| 62255452 | Nov 2015 | US | |
| 62195144 | Jul 2015 | US |
