The field of the invention relates to systems and methods for cataract surgery, and more particularly to systems and methods for tuning a piezoelectric phacoemulsification handpiece. Even more specifically, the field of invention relates to improved systems and methods for determining phase angle between voltage applied to a piezoelectric transducer and the current drawn by the piezoelectric transducer.
A number of medically recognized techniques are utilized for cataractous lens removal based on, for example, phacoemulsification, mechanical cutting or destruction, laser treatments, water jet treatments, and so on.
The phacoemulsification method includes emulsifying, or liquefying, the cataractous lens with ultrasonic power and then removing the emulsified material out of the eye. A phacoemulsification system 5 known in the art is shown in
The hollow needle 15 is generally driven or excited by an applied AC voltage creating a piezoelectric effect in crystals. As is known in the art, this piezoelectric effect may provide either a longitudinal motion or a mix of longitudinal with transversal motions of the needle 15 to affect different desired cutting movements. Referring to
Ultrasonic power of handpiece 10 generally consists of two parts: (1) a sine wave representing the voltage applied to the handpiece 10, and (2) the waveform representing the resultant current into the handpiece.
In purely capacitive circuits, there is a 90-degree phase angle between a sine wave representing the voltage applied to the handpiece 10 and the resultant current into the handpiece 10. In this case, the resultant current waveform leads the applied voltage waveform by 90-degrees (i.e., φ equals −90 degrees). Similarly, in purely inductive circuits, there is a 90-degree phase angle between the current and voltage such that the resultant current waveform lags the voltage waveform by 90-degrees (i.e., φ equals +90 degrees). Finally, for purely resistive circuits, φ equals 0-degrees.
Phacoemulsification handpieces typically operate in a range of frequencies between approximately 25 kHz to about 65 kHz. For each handpiece, an operational frequency window can be characterized by the handpiece impedance and phase. This frequency window is bounded by an upper frequency and lower cutoff frequency such that frequencies outside the upper and lower cutoffs have an electrical phase equal to −90-degrees. The center of this frequency window is typically the point where the handpiece electrical power reaches a maximum value.
The power transfer efficiency of handpiece 10 is defined by the formula (V*I)(cos φ). Accordingly, the most efficient handpiece power operating point occurs when the phase angle between the voltage applied to the handpiece and the resultant current into the handpiece is closest to φ degrees.
In order to maintain optimum handpiece power transfer efficiency, it is important to control the frequency of the phacoemulsification handpiece to achieve a phase value as close to zero (0) degrees as possible. However, controlling optimum power transfer efficiency is complicated by the fact that during operation, the phase angle of an ultrasonic handpiece is also dependent on the load of the transducer. This occurs through the mechanically resonant system including the handpiece needle 15. Specifically, when handpiece needle 15 comes into contact with tissue and fluids within eye 1, a load is created on the piezoelectric crystals with concomitant change in the operating phase angle.
As is well known, for these various surgical techniques, it is necessary to effect constant energy transfer into the tissue of the eye by the phaco handpiece regardless of loading effects. This can be accomplished by determining and measuring the phase angle at all times during operation of the handpiece in order to adjust the driving circuitry to achieve an optimum phase angle. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,852,794 to Staggs et. al, filed Jan. 22, 1997 for a “Multiple Frequency Unambiguous Phase Detector for Phacoemulsification System” (“Staggs”), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety by specific reference hereto. During phacoemulsification, it is possible to provide automatic tuning of a handpiece by monitoring the handpiece electrical signals and adjusting the frequency to maintain consistency with selected parameters.
Phase detection is the process of applying two electrical periodic signals of similar frequency into an electrical circuit that generates a phase difference, expressed in electrical degrees or time, between the two signals referenced to the same point in time. Conventional control circuitry, typically referred to as a phase detector, exists to measure the phase between the voltage and the current. Voltage generated by a phase detector is usually time averaged by an electronic circuit or sampled by an analog to digital (A/D) convertor and then averaged digitally. An averaged signal helps to reject some noise and can be read by a conventional voltage meter or used by a microprocessor. However, as mentioned above, phase shift is dependent on the operating frequency of the handpiece. Additionally, air and time delay in the measurement requires complex calibration circuitry in order to provide responsive tuning of the handpiece.
For use with a single frequency, the standard technique for measuring electrical phase has been to read a voltage that is proportional to the signal phase and also to frequency. This technique allows calibration for use with a single frequency. However, changing the frequency would cause the calibration data to be incorrect.
For multiple frequency uses, a typical approach has been to use two discrete analog integrators and an A/D convertor to generate phase data independent of the operating frequency. In particular, one integrator concurrently measures the period of a complete signal cycle while a second integrator measures the time between the voltage and current clock edges. Together the measurements are fed into an A/D convertor for use in a micro-controller (an example of such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,852,794 to Staggs et. al, filed Jan. 22, 1997 for a “Multiple Frequency Unambiguous Phase Detector for Phacoemulsification System”). Nevertheless, this system also involves some hardware calibration. For example, the two matched discrete analog integrators are susceptible to system performance variations due to component tolerances. Reducing variations involves matching component values as closely as possible in order to regulate drift of the individual circuits.
Accordingly, an improved system and method for measuring analog drive voltages and current for ultrasonic power control through phase manipulation is desirable.
The field of the invention relates to systems and methods for cataract surgery, and more particularly to systems and methods for tuning a piezoelectric phacoemulsification handpiece. Even more specifically, the field of invention relates to improved systems and methods for determining phase angle between voltage applied to the piezoelectric transducer and the current drawn by the piezoelectric transducer. In one embodiment, a method for determining the voltage current phase relationship of a piezoelectric phacoemulsification handpiece generally includes the steps of obtaining an analog AC voltage signal corresponding to the operating AC voltage of a piezoelectric handpiece along with an analog AC current signal corresponding to the operating AC current of the piezoelectric handpiece.
From the AC voltage signal, using a reference detection circuit, a digital voltage signal is produced whose logical levels correspond to the AC voltage transitions. Additionally, onset of a voltage cycle is obtained. More particularly, the onset may be determined on an AC voltage transitioning edge.
From the AC current signal, using a reference detection circuit, a digital current signal is produced whose logical levels correspond to the AC current transitions. Additionally, onset of a current cycle is obtained. More particularly, the onset may be determined on an AC current transitioning edge.
A synchronous sample clock is taken that has a frequency that is 2N times faster than the frequency of the operating ultrasonic handpiece (i.e., driving frequency), where N is the number of digital bits allocated to the sample clock.
After the onset of the voltage cycle, the synchronous sample clock measures the time necessary until the onset of the current cycle. This time value equates to the phase time delta between the two signals. Dividing the synchronous sample clock to obtain the driving frequency ensures the signals are synchronous. Further dividing the end count value into 360° results in the phase shift between the two signals in degrees that is independent of the operating frequency.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
In order to better appreciate how the above-recited and other advantages and objects of the inventions are obtained, a more particular description of the embodiments briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that the components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views. However, like parts do not always have like reference numerals. Moreover, all illustrations are intended to convey concepts, where relative sizes, shapes and other detailed attributes may be illustrated schematically rather than literally or precisely.
a is a diagram of a phacoemulsification system known in the art.
b is a diagram of a phacoemulsification handpiece known in the art.
a is a diagram of a phacoemulsification system suitable for performing a method in accordance with the present invention.
b is a functional block diagram of an improved phase measurement counter suitable for performing a method in accordance with the present invention;
c is a plot showing an exemplary timing process between two digital logic level signals;
d is a flowchart of a process in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
a is another functional block diagram of an improved phase measurement counter suitable for performing a method in accordance with the present invention; and
b is a diagram showing a representation of an analog signal as a digital signal.
As described above, conventional phase detection is the process of applying two periodic signals of similar frequency into an electrical circuit that generates a voltage proportional to the phase difference between the two signals. Additionally, automatic tuning of an electrical device, as hereinabove briefly mentioned, may be accomplished by monitoring the two periodic signals and adjusting the frequency to maintain a consistency with selected parameters. For example, the drive voltage of a phacoemulsification handpiece 10 can be increased to compensate while a load is detected at the tip of the handpiece 10 and decreased when the load is removed.
Generally, when the frequency applied to a phacoemulsification handpiece 10 is significantly higher or lower than resonance (e.g., falls outside of typical operation range 25 kHz-65 kHz), the handpiece 10 electrically responds as a capacitor. In particular, there is a 90-degree phase angle between the voltage applied and the resultant current waveforms. Turning to
Solid curve 20 represents a sine wave that corresponds, for example, to the driving voltage of a phacoemulsification handpiece 10. Dashed curve 22 also represents a sine wave that corresponds, for example, to the resultant current of the phacoemulsification handpiece 10. The shift between the two curves represents a 90-degree phase angle.
Similar to the dependence of the phase angle of a phacoemulsification handpiece on frequency, the impedance of the handpiece is correspondingly reactive with the operating frequency.
As mentioned above, for current systems using phase angle as a tuning parameter, varying the operating frequency may affect whether a precise phase measurement is obtained. As a result, additional calibration is required to reduce inaccuracies of phase measurement including additional signal processing and/or circuitry components. However, potential sources of error associated with separate hardware processing may be introduced.
Referring to
Within the control unit 105, the microprocessor computer 109 may provide control outputs to ultrasonic power level controller 111 based on, for example, phase angle. Turning to
The voltage input 401 and current input 402 from a phacoemulsification handpiece (not shown) are converted to appropriate signals using a voltage sensor 403 (e.g., via attenuation, transformer isolation, signal buffering, and similar voltage sensing techniques as those of ordinary skill in the art can appreciate) on the voltage signal to the phacoemulsification handpiece, and a current sensor 404 (e.g., a current sense resistor) and fixed gain amplifier for the handpiece current. Alternatively, current sensor 404 is not limited to measuring the potential difference (i.e., voltage drop) associated with a current through a known resistance, but may also include, for example, measuring the magnetic field surrounding a conductor carrying the handpiece current. Thereafter, an AC voltage signal 405 and an AC current signal 406 are passed to reference detectors 409 (e.g., zero-cross detectors, peak detectors, and trough detectors), which convert the analog representations of the phacoemulsification voltage and current to digital signals 407, 408.
The digital signals 407 and 408 each represent a logical level square wave with transitioning edges at the AC reference value. With reference to
Subsequently, referring back to
A reset generator 412 is also fed into circuit 411 for resetting internal control signals within circuit 411 (not shown) and the master clock 410. Input to the microprocessor computer 109 can provide a manual reset switch to generator 412. More preferably, generator 412 is automatically triggered to reset, for example, master clock 410, by the voltage and current signals upon completion of a phase measurement.
Turning to
The timing of this counter is illustrated in
The output SP is then fed to a system controller (not shown) that can divide the higher speed master clock to obtain the frequency of the operating phacoemulsification drive signals. For example, a master clock running at approximately 9.7 MHz can be divided by 256 (i.e., 8 bits) to obtain the ultrasonic frequency of approximately 38 kHz. Accordingly, dividing the higher speed clock to generate the ultrasonic clock ensures that the phase measurement is synchronous regardless of the driving frequency. This signal represents a measurement between 0 and 359 degrees of phase.
The advantage of using this approach is that the system is provided with a precise real time digital phase signal measurement independent of the frequencies used. Additionally, the system removes the need for any integrator or A/D convertor circuit, therefore, reducing not only cost and components, but also calibration requirements and system performance variations due to component tolerances. The improved measurement technique provides for improved reliability, scalability and tighter system tolerances for power control.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, an improved phase detector additionally includes the steps of averaging multiple phase measurements. Averaging multiple phase measurements provides the benefit of filtering noise and jitter. Turning to
Furthermore, a master phaco frequency clock, which is 2N times faster, than the AC drive frequency where N represents between 2-16 bits used in system 100 as discussed above, is used to determine a time delta between the two signals. Despite the master phaco frequency clock running at an exponentially faster frequency than the AC drive signal, the transitions of the digital logic level signals may not occur on a transitioning edge of the master phaco frequency clock. This may occur, for example, where the digital logical level waveforms are asynchronous with the driving frequency. Accordingly, a single period of the master phaco frequency clock where the transition of the digital logic level signal occurs may define the jitter of the voltage and current transition measurement. With reference to
Therefore, in order to reduce jitter and other noise from the measurements, multiple phase measurements can be taken and averaged before any clock division. For example, using the higher speed master phaco frequency clock, the time delta between 8 voltage and current cycles can be added and divided by the 8 measurements to obtain a jitter-reduced time delta. This averaged time delta can then be used in division, as described above, to represent a 0 to 359 degree phase shift.
Turning to
Upon a transition of a digital signal 707 representing an onset of a voltage cycle, measurement circuit 711 begins a counter to determine the time delta SP necessary for the digital signal 708 to transition representing the onset of a current cycle. The counter determines the number of higher speed clock 710 periods occurring between transitions of signals 707 and 708. This resulting time delta SP represents a phase measurement between the two AC waveforms.
The output SP is then fed to a system controller (not shown) that can divide the higher speed master clock to obtain the frequency of the operating phacoemulsification drive signals. Accordingly, dividing the higher speed clock to generate the ultrasonic clock ensures that the phase measurement is synchronous regardless of the driving frequency. This signal represents a measurement between 0 and 359 degrees of phase.
A reset generator 712 is also fed into circuit 711 to reset internal control signals within circuit 711 (not shown) and the master clock 710 upon completion of a phase measurement as discussed above.
Turning to
With reference to
For example, the digital signals 807 and 808 can facilitate phase and amplitude measurements as discussed above. Similar to systems 400 and 700, signals 807 and 808 can be provided to measurement circuit 811. A master clock 810 is used for timing of the phase measurement. In one embodiment, the clock 810 uses a signal that is 2N times faster than the frequency of the AC current signal where N represents between 2-16 bits used in system 100 as discussed above. This master clock 810 can be fed into either measurement circuit 811 or analog samplers 809 for timing of the phase measurement. In one embodiment, the master clock 810 drives the analog samplers 809 to determine the sampling rate of the analog signals. In an alternative embodiment, similar to
The output SP is then fed to a system controller (not shown) that can divide the higher speed master clock to obtain the frequency of the operating phacoemulsification drive signals. Accordingly, dividing the higher speed clock to generate the ultrasonic clock ensures that the phase measurement is synchronous regardless of the driving frequency. Additionally, this division to obtain the desired sampling frequency using signals 807 and 808 aids in removing signal components with a higher frequency that may create undesirable noise, thereby alleviating aliasing concerns. This signal represents a measurement between 0 and 359 degrees of phase.
Furthermore, in another example, measurement circuit 811 can also measure energy and power during operation using the instantaneously sampled components of signals 807 and 808. As one of ordinary skill can appreciate, determining the product of the instantaneous current and voltage during operation can provide instantaneous power measurements, which can be fed to the measurement circuit 811 to calculate additional information such as true power and energy. Therefore, at any time during operation, recreating the analog signals in real-time offers the significant advantage of immediate and precise energy/power measurements.
A reset generator 812 is also fed into circuit 811 to reset internal control signals within circuit 811 (not shown) and the master clock 810 upon completion of a phase measurement, as discussed above, or completion of an energy and power measurement.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the reader is to understand that the specific ordering and combination of process actions described herein is merely illustrative, and the invention may appropriately be performed using different or additional process actions, or a different combination or ordering of process actions. For example, this invention is particularly suited for measuring phase in phacoemulsification systems; however, the invention can be used for any system using phase angle as a tuning parameter. Additionally and obviously, features may be added or subtracted as desired. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2434480 | Anderson | Jan 1948 | A |
3674934 | Gooding et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3857387 | Shock | Dec 1974 | A |
3941122 | Jones | Mar 1976 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4343111 | Inoue | Aug 1982 | A |
4414675 | Comroe | Nov 1983 | A |
4669095 | Hall | May 1987 | A |
4736130 | Puskas | Apr 1988 | A |
4808948 | Patel et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4827911 | Broadwin et al. | May 1989 | A |
4952834 | Okada | Aug 1990 | A |
4954960 | Lo et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4970656 | Lo et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4983901 | Lehmer | Jan 1991 | A |
5001649 | Lo et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5091656 | Gahn | Feb 1992 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5213569 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5242404 | Conley et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249121 | Baum et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5268624 | Zanger | Dec 1993 | A |
5279547 | Costin | Jan 1994 | A |
5318563 | Malis et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331951 | Kepley | Jul 1994 | A |
5342293 | Zanger | Aug 1994 | A |
5370602 | Kepley | Dec 1994 | A |
5388569 | Kepley | Feb 1995 | A |
5403307 | Zelman | Apr 1995 | A |
5405614 | D'Angelo et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406503 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417246 | Perkins et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431664 | Ureche et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453087 | Malinowski | Sep 1995 | A |
5520633 | Costin | May 1996 | A |
5534741 | Smith | Jul 1996 | A |
5547459 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5582578 | Zhong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591127 | Barwick, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5692166 | Milhizer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700240 | Barwick, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5733256 | Costin | Mar 1998 | A |
5738677 | Colvard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739724 | Alexandre et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766146 | Barwick, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797494 | Balling et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800365 | Zhong et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808396 | Boukhny | Sep 1998 | A |
5832412 | Guez | Nov 1998 | A |
5836959 | Seibel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852794 | Staggs | Dec 1998 | A |
5873885 | Weidenbenner | Feb 1999 | A |
5938677 | Boukhny et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5979494 | Perkins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984882 | Rosenschein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997528 | Bisch et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010496 | Appelbaum et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6083193 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086598 | Appelbaum et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117126 | Appelbaum et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6155975 | Urich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161545 | Chow | Dec 2000 | A |
6175180 | Angelini et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193683 | Ludin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203516 | Kepley | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6251113 | Appelbaum et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261297 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6319220 | Bylsma | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6391020 | Kurtz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391042 | Cimino | May 2002 | B1 |
6394974 | Kadziauskas et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425883 | Urich et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428531 | Visuri et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443900 | Adachi et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6452120 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452123 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452883 | Chan | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6487447 | Weimann et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506176 | Mittelstein et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6589204 | Sussman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610052 | Furumoto | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6629948 | Rockley et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6699212 | Kadziauskas et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726679 | Dick et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733491 | Kadziauskas et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6780165 | Kadziauskas et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808396 | Kawaguchi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6884252 | Urich et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896674 | Woloszko et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6908472 | Wiener et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6939317 | Zacharias | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962583 | Kadziauskas et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7077820 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7169123 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193521 | Moberg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7316664 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7485106 | Kadziauskas et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20010003155 | Rockley et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010003295 | Langlotz et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010003385 | Ise | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010039389 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020049555 | Wiener | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052600 | Davison et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072741 | Sliwa et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082793 | Kadziauskas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030097083 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040092921 | Kadziauskas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092922 | Kadziauskas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040193182 | Yaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050020967 | Ono | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054971 | Steen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050209560 | Boukhny et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209621 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050288665 | Woloszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060149301 | Claus | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195077 | Kadziauskas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060264809 | Hansmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070056596 | Fanney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073214 | Dacquay et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078379 | Boukhny et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2242328 | May 1998 | CA |
19940712A 1 | Mar 2001 | DE |
270819 | Jun 1988 | EP |
270819 | Jan 1989 | EP |
336620 | Oct 1989 | EP |
336620 | Dec 1993 | EP |
1351631 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1537840 | Jun 2005 | EP |
63315049 | Dec 1988 | JP |
2204337 | Aug 1990 | JP |
5038343 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6183762 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6189972 | Jul 1994 | JP |
9313496 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2001161740 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002087836 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002233534 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO9520374 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO9808442 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO0051508 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0064388 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0113838 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO02056806A 1 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO2005092023A 2 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/052992, mailed on Jul. 16, 2013, 12 pages. |
Devine M.D., et al., “How to Set the Dials,” Phacoemulsification Surgery, 1991, pp. 7-28. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP07011327, mailed on Aug. 6, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US00/10989, mailed on Jul. 13, 2001, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US02/00471, mailed on Nov. 19, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2004/32690, mailed on Apr. 10, 2006, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US00/10989, mailed on Aug. 9, 2000, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US02/00471, mailed on May 22, 2002, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/32690, mailed on Jan. 25, 2005, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US98/01004, mailed on Jun. 9, 1998, 2 pages. |
“Ocusystem Operation Manual, May 1995, 79 pages,” . |
“Pulsar cuts phaco time, boots efficiency in cataract removal; Ophthalmology Times: Aug. 15, 1986; 1 page, 11 (16), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc,” . |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP01989937, mailed on Jul. 6, 2005, 2 pages. |
Taylor W.F.,et al., “Intraoperative Troubleshooting Of An Advanced Phacoemulsification System,” The Surgial Technologist, 1985, vol. 17 (2), pp. 11-14. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130057253 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |