The present application relates to crankcase ventilation (CV) systems that utilize rotating coalescing devices.
During operation of an internal combustion engine, a fraction of combustion gases can flow out of the combustion cylinder and into the crankcase of the engine. These gases are often called “blowby” gases. Typically, the blowby gases are routed out of the crankcase via a CV system. The CV system passes the blowby gases through a coalescer (i.e., a coalescing filter element) to remove a majority of the aerosols and oils contained in the blowby gases. The filtered blowby gases are then either vented to the ambient (in open CV systems) or routed back to the air intake for the internal combustion engine for further combustion (in closed CV systems).
Many CV systems utilize rotating coalescers. Rotating coalescers may include fibrous filters as well as centrifugal separation devices. Performance attributes of rotating coalescer devices may be measured in terms of pressure drop (or rise) through the device and efficiency of oil removal. In rotating coalescers, the oil droplets (e.g., aerosol) suspended and transported by the blowby gases are separated inside the coalescer media through the particle capture mechanisms of inertial impaction, interception, and diffusion onto the fibers. By rotating the media, inertial impaction is enhanced by the additional centrifugal force. In addition to this aspect, after the oil droplets coalesce to form larger drops, the centrifugal force removes the larger drops by overcoming the surface drag force of the media fibers. This aspect increases the collection of and the discharge of the oil from the coalescer by providing improved drainage compared to a stationary coalescer. In turn, the improved drainage from the rotating coalescing filter aids in improving the filtration efficiency as well as greatly reducing the pressure drop across the filter.
Since the rotating coalescer is positioned within a static filter housing, there is typically a slight gap between the rotating components and the stationary housing. For example, a gap may exist between the static inlet of the housing and the rotating inlet opening of the rotating coalescer. This gap can allow unfiltered aerosol contained in the blowby gases to bypass the rotating coalescer if the downstream pressure on the clean side of the rotating media in the radial vicinity of the gap is lower than the upstream pressure on the dirty side of the rotating media in the radial vicinity of the gap. Exemplary gaps are shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,189,310, entitled “APPARATUS FOR REMOVING OIL MIST,” by Hotta (see, e.g., the gaps in
One exemplary embodiment relates to a CV system. The CV system includes a housing having an inlet and an outlet. The inlet is configured to receive blowby gases from an internal combustion engine and to provide the blowby gases to the housing. The outlet is configured to provide filtered blowby gases from the housing and to at least one of an intake of the internal combustion engine and the ambient. The CV system includes a rotating coalescer positioned within the housing. The rotating coalescer includes an endcap and a filter media. The CV system further includes an oil inlet. The oil inlet provides oil to a gap between a stationary portion of the housing and the endcap such that a hydrodynamic seal is formed by the oil positioned in the gap during an operating condition of the rotating coalescer, the hydrodynamic seal preventing a negative recirculation of the blowby gases.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to a CV system. The CV system includes a housing having an inlet and an outlet. The inlet is configured to receive blowby gases from an internal combustion engine and to provide the blowby gases to the housing. The outlet is configured to provide filtered blowby gases from the housing and to at least one of an intake of the internal combustion engine and an ambient. The CV system further includes a rotating coalescer positioned within the housing such that a gap exists between a portion of the rotating coalescer and a stationary portion of the housing. The CV system includes an elastomeric gasket that provides a seal between the rotating coalescer and the stationary portion of the housing. The rotating coalescer may include an endcap and a filter media.
These and other features, together with the organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements have like numerals throughout the several drawings described below.
Referring to the figures generally, rotating coalescer CV systems are described. The described CV systems utilize a contact seal to seal a gap between a static side of a housing and a rotating coalescer inlet. The rotating coalescer may be driven mechanically, electrically, hydraulically, or the like. The contact seal can be formed via a soft solid or a liquid film created by oil. Accordingly, the contact seal is a hydrodynamic or soft seal. The contact seal prevents the blowby gases from bypassing the filter element of the rotating coalescer. The hydrodynamic or soft seal may function as a low-friction bearing for the rotating coalescer. The hydrodynamic or soft seal is effective in rotating coalescer applications where positive recirculation through the gap where the seal forms cannot be guaranteed otherwise. Such situations may occur, for example, where input (i.e., rotational) power for the rotating coalescer is restricted to low amounts. At the same time, the contact seal may be broken during positive blowby gas recirculation circumstances (e.g., as caused by a pumping force created by a rotating coalescer and/or internal radial vanes) because the contact seal is a hydrodynamic soft seal. In some situations, the contact seal may be broken by centrifugal force acting upon the seal itself, such that the drag torque is eliminated when speeds are high enough to sustain positive recirculation.
Referring to
During operation, the rotating coalescer 106 is rotated along its central axis 120 by a central shaft 122 coupled to the rotating coalescer 106. The first and second endcaps 108 and 110 are secured to the central shaft 122 such that when the central shaft 122 rotates, the filter media 112 rotates. As shown in
Still referring to
In an alternative arrangement, a lip seal can be used instead of the V-shaped or U-shaped shaped flexible seal 116. In such arrangements, the rotational speed of the rotating coalescer 106 may be reduced compared to arrangements utilizing the flexible seal 116 because the lip seal can seal a higher pressure differential between P1 and P2 with less contact pressure than the flexible seal 116. The higher pressure differential enables the use of thicker, less porous, and more efficient filter media than in arrangements that utilize the flexible seal 116.
As described in further detail below with respect to
Referring to
As shown in
The hydrodynamic seal is formed from oil. Accordingly, the drain pain 130 includes an oil inlet 204. The oil inlet is coupled to a supply line 206, which is coupled to a pressurized oil supply 208. In some arrangements, the supply line 206 is a flexible tube fed through an opening in the bottom of the housing 104. The pressurized oil supply 208 provides pressurized oil to the oil inlet 204 via the supply line 206. In some arrangements, the pressurized oil supply 208 also drives the rotation of the rotating coalescer 106 (e.g., by spinning a pelton wheel 210). The oil may be lube oil from a lubrication system of the internal combustion engine. The oil inlet 204 supplies oil to the gap 202. The oil supplied by the oil inlet 204 is spread in a substantially uniform manner throughout the gap when the rotating coalescer 106 rotates. The circumferential spreading of the oil may be further improved with the inclusion of a circumferential groove (e.g., circumferential groove 302 as shown in
In some arrangements, a circumferential groove 302 in the vertical component of the drain pan 130 helps to facilitate the formation of the hydrodynamic seal. The circumferential groove 302 completely circumscribes the vertical component of the drain pan 130. In arrangements where the circumferential groove 302 is formed in a plastic drain pan 130, special design considerations are needed. In some arrangements, the opening of the inlet 204 is positioned above a bottom portion 304 of the gap 202, which allows for a short core pin to be used in creating the inlet 204 during injection molding of the drain pan 130. Additionally, a length of the molding pin 306 should remain short to prevent warping of the pin 306 and the oil inlet 204 during the high injection pressures. The pin 306 includes barbs 308 that secure the supply line 206 to the pin 306 and the oil inlet 204.
The hydrodynamic seal formed by the oil within the gap 202 has different characteristics depending at least in part on the temperature of the oil. The warmer the oil, the less viscous the oil becomes. In arrangements where the oil is cold and more viscous (e.g., when the internal combustion engine is cold), the oil causes a higher drag on the rotating coalescer 106 than if less viscous (i.e., warmer) oil fills the gap 202. The higher drag causes the rotating coalescer 106 to rotate at a slower speed than if the warmer, less viscous oil were used. Since the rotating coalescer 106 is rotating at a lower speed, the pumping pressure is reduced, which potentially creates a blowby bypass situation with negative recirculation through the gap 202. However, the more viscous oil forms a stronger hydrodynamic seal than warmer, less viscous oil. Thus, even though there is a lower pumping pressure, which results in a lower P2, the stronger hydrodynamic seal effectively plugs the gap 202 and prevents blowby gases from bypassing the filter media 112. In arrangements where the oil is warm and less viscous than the cold oil, the oil causes a lower drag on the rotating coalescer 106, and the rotating coalescer 106 can rotate at a higher speed. Since the rotating coalescer 106 is rotating at a higher speed, the pumping pressure is increased, which reduces the likelihood of blowby bypass through the gap 202 because of a positive recirculation effect. Accordingly, even though the warmer oil forms a weaker hydrodynamic seal, blowby gas does not bypass the filter media 112 by flowing through the gap 202. In some arrangements while using the warmer oil, the spinning of the rotating coalescer 106 breaks the hydrodynamic seal, which is not required because of positive recirculation caused by the pumping effect created by the rotating coalescer 106. As discussed above, the hydrodynamic seal is formed by oil flowing through the circumferential groove 302 and sealing against the second endcap 110. In other arrangements, the hydrodynamic seal can be formed by a labrynith-shaped groove (i.e., a groove that also includes axial components) or an axial tongue and groove (e.g., as discussed below with respect to
Referring to
In the above-described CV systems (CV system 100, CV system 200, and CV system 400), the seal can be positioned on the inner diameter of the stationary part (e.g., the drain pan 130), the outer diameter of the stationary part, the inner diameter of the rotating part (e.g., the second endplate 110), or the outer diameter of the rotating part. The hydrodynamic seal generally reduces power consumption required to spin the rotating coalescer compared to a conventional rotary shaft seal (e.g., flexible seal 116) and provides for CV systems that have a higher overall efficiency despite the lower power consumption.
Referring to
When the rotating coalescer 106 is rotating, the filter media 112 creates centrifugal “pumping” pressure due to its rotational velocity “w”, which can create higher pressure P2 at the outer (downstream or clean) side of the filter media 112 than P1 at the inner (upstream or dirty) side of the filter media 112 under certain circumstances. This pressure situation exists when certain design criteria of the CV system 500 are met. The design criteria relates to the magnitude of rotational velocity “ω”, flowrate “Q”, dimensions D0, D1, D2, D3, and the average intrinsic permeability of filter media 112 “κ” in the approximately direction of gas flow through the filter media 112. As illustrated in
Referring to the negative recirculation situations, in which the various contact seals prevent negative recirculation over a sufficiently wide range of P1 to P2 differential pressure, it is desirable to utilize filter media having high efficiency characteristics. For example, media with greater number of hydraulic radii, as defined by the dimensionless parameter of
can be expected to be higher in aerosol capture efficiency since physical characteristics of the media that lead to greater hydraulic radii count, such as smaller fiber diameter, lower porosity, or greater thickness also tend to result in greater fine aerosol capture efficiency in rotating porous coalescers. Therefore, the conditions which are consistent with high efficiency operation at lowest possible pressure drop or within allowable pressure drop can be defined. For example, this is described when equation 1 is satisfied (equation 1 relates to annular non-pleated media), and the resulting value for pressure, P1, does not exceed an allowable value established by the engine manufacturer implanting the system.
For various engine applications, this pressure value varies, but is often between approximately −1 kPa and 7 kPa for commercial diesel engines. For annular pleated elements, the following equation applies similarly:
Equation 2 should be satisfied, and the resulting value for pressure, P1, does not exceed an allowable value established by the engine manufacturer implanting the system.
The rotating coalescer 106 can have filter media arrangements that include a single layer or multiplayer construction, in which different physical properties (e.g., fiber diameter, porosity, etc.) are combined in a series. For arrangements that utilize a single layer of media, the intrinsic permeability of the filter media 112 is defined below in equation 3.
In equation 3, κ has dimensional units of length squared, V is the superficial fluid velocity through the media 112, μ is the fluid viscosity, t is the media thickness, and ΔP is the pressure drop across the media 112 from an upstream position to a downstream position.
For single and multilayer media constructions, the average intrinsic permeability through the media 112 is defined by equation 4.
In equation 4, n is the number of layers of media, ti is the thickness of layer “i”, and κi is the intrinsic permeability of layer “i”.
A simple numeric example of the average intrinsic permeability calculation for a three layer multilayer media construction is shown below in Table 1.
Experimentally, the average intrinsic permeability can simply be measured by maintaining air flow through a flat sample of the multilayer porous media under controlled conditions of gas viscosity (μ) and superficial velocity (v) while measuring the pressure drop from the upstream side of the media to the downstream side of the media. The average intrinsic permeability is calculated using equation 1 above.
As noted above, positive recirculation of the blowby gas through the gaps of the above-described CV systems is achieved when P2>P1 (alternatively stated as P2/P1>1). When P2>P1, the seal is non-contacting. This situation can be achieved by intentionally selecting an optimum combination of the following critical parameters for the rotating coalescer 106 and the CV system 100. Table 2 describes the various design parameters that are utilized in calculating the optimal CV system design to achieve the positive recirculation.
As described in further detail below, different design parameter optimizations are utilized depending on whether the filter media 112 is comprised of a pleated porous media or a non-pleated porous media.
In arrangements where the filter media 112 is an annular porous non-pleated media, if the condition of equation 5 is met, P2>P1 is maintained and the seal is non-contacting, which results in positive gas recirculation through the gap.
In other arrangements, the filter media 112 is an annular porous pleated media. For example, a cross-sectional view of a pleated annular filter element 600 is shown according to an exemplary embodiment. As shown in
As shown in equations 5 and 6, different CV system designs having a widely different sizes, operating speeds, and/or flow rates may require filtering media with significantly different intrinsic characteristics. For example, diesel engine CV applications for on-highway and off-highway equipment are typically constrained by practical considerations such as space available in the vicinity of the engine, energy available for inducing rotation of the rotating coalescer, and the strength of economically available materials of construction. Accordingly, it is preferable to design rotating porous or fibrous medium coalescers that may be utilized across multiple different applications and that share a range of common filtering medium properties across a very broad range of engine sizes and rotating coalescer operating speeds and sizes.
A narrower range of values for preferred arrangements of rotating porous medium coalescers can be defined utilizing a dimensionless parameter of
which represents the average number of hydraulic radii through the thickness of the media in the flow direction. Exemplary design parameters and approximate maximum preferred values of Nhyd for annular non-pleated coalescers while operating during non-contact of the seal are set forth below in tables 3 through 6.
Exemplary design parameters and approximate maximum preferred values of Nhyd for annular pleated coalescers operating during non-contact of the seal are set forth below in tables 7 through 10.
As shown above in Tables 3-10, particular embodiments of rotating coalescers for diesel engine crankcase ventilation applications generally indicate that values of Nhyd less than approximately 3000 are required to avoid bypassing unfiltered flow though the clearance existing when the seal is not in contact (i.e., the seal is not preventing negative recirculation), with several cases requiring lesser values than 3000. These embodiments, listed for engine displacements ranging from 3-30 liters and blowby flowrates of 75-750, respectively, are applicable across a wide range of commercial gasoline, diesel, natural gas, or other alternatively fueled engine applications. In situations in which the seal remains in contact during operation, the number of hydraulic radii set forth in tables 3 through 10 is greater than the values listed in tables 3 through 10.
Preferred values of Nhyd tend to depend on the thickness of the employed media. In many arrangements of annular non-pleated media during non-contact of the seal situations, preferential maximum values for Nhyd include: 500 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 700 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 1000 for 1-2 mm thick media, 1300 for 2-4 mm thick media, 1800 for 4-8 mm thick media, 2300 for 8-15 mm thick media, 3000 for 15-30 mm thick media, and 4000 for >30 mm thick media. In many arrangements of annular pleated media, preferential maximum values for Nhyd during operation with a non-contacting seal include: 800 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 950 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 1400 for 1-2 mm thick media, 1700 for 2-4 mm thick media, and 2000 for 4-8 mm thick media, and somewhat larger values for media thicker than 8 mm. Nevertheless, it is possible that certain applications with very different amount of physical installation space available and other competing design objectives would maintain the efficiency benefits from positive recirculation at higher or lower values than those taught above, thus it can be beneficial to simply maintain adherence to criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular non-pleated porous filter elements and pleated porous filter elements, respectively, such that recirculation flow is maintained.
Equation 7 defines the criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular non-pleated porous filter elements, and equation 8 defines the criteria for maximum number of hydraulic radii for annular pleated porous filter elements, above which unfiltered gas would be expected to bypass in the case of non-contacting seals.
Furthermore, fibrous coalescing filtering efficiency is typically higher for elements with media having greater total hydraulic radii count in the flow direction, due to smallness of pore or fiber, or number of opportunities for aerosol droplets and particulate matter to become captured within the medium as flow proceeds through the media from upstream to downstream. Thus, optimum designs for overall aerosol filtering efficiency can be found in the vicinity of the aforementioned maximum hydraulic radii count values. However, allowance for variation in application conditions (e.g., engine wear resulting in blow-by flow rate increases, solid or semi-solid contaminants becoming captured by the filtering medium that further restricts flow through the media, etc.) suggest that optimum values of hydraulic radii count may be less than the maximum values listed above for non-contacting seals. While designs with filter media having significantly lower hydraulic radii count values, such as 10, will almost certainly result in positive recirculation, their overall aerosol filtering efficiencies are not as high as those optimized according to the above-described methodologies. Thus, for certain products that are designed primarily for the objective of highest efficiency, a range of suitable values for the Nhyd can be defined. In many arrangements, preferential ranges of the parameter for annular non-pleated media elements include: 75-500 for 0-0.5 mm thick media, 100-700 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 130-1000 for 1-2 mm thick media, 160-1300 for 2-4 mm thick media, 200-1800 for 4-8 mm thick media, 300-2200 for 8-15 mm thick media, 400-3000 for 15-30 mm thick media, and 600-4000 for >30 mm thick media. For annular pleated media elements, preferential ranges of values for Nhyd include: 120-800 for media with 0-0.5 mm thickness, 140-950 for 0.5-1 mm thick media, 180-1400 for 1-2 mm thick media, 240-1700 for 2-4 mm thick media, and 300-2000 for 4-8 mm thick media, and somewhat larger values for media thicker than 8 mm. These ranges establish values where there exists an optimum tradeoff between: (a) the inefficiency of porous media due to small aerosol size, excessive size of pores or fibers, or excessive porosity and (b) the inefficiency of the rotating coalescing filter system overall due to potential bypass of flow, unfiltered through the gap created by the non-contacting seal clearance.
The relationships set forth in equations 7 and 8 are derived by considering the positive pumping pressure versus the negative pressure drop (dP) across the filter element as set forth below in equations 9 through 13. In equations 9-13, R corresponds to the radius of the noted diameter as defined above.
and by definition:
Accordingly, the objective for annular media rotating CV systems in which the seal is non-contacting (e.g., as described above) is to maintain the relationship set forth above in equation 13.
The above-described systems and methods are not limited to separating oil and aerosols from crankcase blowby gases. The same or similar arrangements and principles can be used in other filtration systems that utilize porous coalescer technology to separate liquid from a gas-liquid mixture.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different configurations, systems and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other configurations, systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible.
It should be noted that any use of the term “exemplary” herein to describe various embodiments is intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, and/or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such term is not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
The terms “coupled” and the like as used herein mean the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being attached to one another.
References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” etc.) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other exemplary embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments, and elements from different embodiments may be combined in a manner understood to one of ordinary skill in the art. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application is a National Phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/036384, filed Jun. 8, 2016, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/173,074 filed Jun. 9, 2015. The contents of both applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/036384 | 6/8/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/200895 | 12/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3362155 | Driscoll | Jan 1968 | A |
3531897 | Weimar | Oct 1970 | A |
4189310 | Hotta | Feb 1980 | A |
4482365 | Roach | Nov 1984 | A |
4487618 | Mann | Dec 1984 | A |
4514193 | Booth | Apr 1985 | A |
4516994 | Kocher | May 1985 | A |
4981502 | Gottschalk | Jan 1991 | A |
5056935 | Singh | Oct 1991 | A |
5466385 | Rogers et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5716423 | Krul et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5863317 | Smith et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6033450 | Krul et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6123061 | Baker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139595 | Herman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183407 | Hallgren et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6499285 | Snyder | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517612 | Crouch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6640792 | Harvey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652439 | Herman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6709477 | Haakansson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6974567 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7235177 | Herman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7811347 | Carlsson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824458 | Borgstrom et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824459 | Borgstrom et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8172917 | Kup et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8268033 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8794222 | Schwandt et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20040214710 | Herman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060096263 | Kahlbaugh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070039300 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070175191 | Ziebold et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070249479 | Eliasson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271884 | Pearson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090000258 | Carlsson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044702 | Adamek et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056292 | Fornof et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067986 | Mignano | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090101013 | Moredock | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090263238 | Jarrah | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100126145 | He et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100180854 | Baumann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100229511 | Steins et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110180051 | Schwandt et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110198280 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247309 | Smith et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252974 | Verdegan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120034083 | Shoji et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120315225 | Porbeni et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130037481 | Lalouch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130167816 | Dawar et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140069432 | Mebasser et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096683 | Azwell et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140326661 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150047582 | Dawar et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075377 | Gorbach et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150173577 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160030875 | Parikh et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160245157 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180030868 | Elsaesser et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180117512 | Janakiraman et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101491793 | Jul 2009 | CN |
104334284 | Feb 2015 | CN |
100 44 615 | Apr 2002 | DE |
203 02 824 | Aug 2004 | DE |
10 2006 024 816 | Dec 2007 | DE |
1 532 352 | May 2005 | EP |
1 645 320 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2933626 | Jan 2010 | FR |
H11-141325 | May 1999 | JP |
WO 2011100712 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012106659 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013025445 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2016046944 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016159951 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016159951 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017189516 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2018002244 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Holdich, R.G., “Fundamentals of Particle Technology,” Chapter 8, Midland Information Publishing, Jan. 1, 2002, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/036384, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/036432, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 24 pages. |
Chinese Office Action from corresponding CN Application No. 2016800326319, dated Mar. 18, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent App. No. 2015800784030 dated Mar. 1, 2019, 19 pages (with translation). |
Office Action for U.S. App. No. 15/561,170 dated Mar. 14, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/047755, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/U2017/029315, issued Aug. 1, 2017, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2015/023290, dated Jun. 29, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2016/048912, dated Nov. 10, 2016, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent App. No. 17790235.0 dated Oct. 25, 2019, 9 pages. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 16/096585, dated Oct. 16, 2019, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180169556 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62173074 | Jun 2015 | US |