The present disclosure relates in general to the field of electronics, and more specifically to systems and methods for valley switching in a switching power converter.
Many electronic systems include circuits, such as switching power converters or transformers that interface with a dimmer. The interfacing circuits deliver power to a load in accordance with the dimming level set by the dimmer. For example, in a lighting system, dimmers provide an input signal to the lighting system. The input signal represents a dimming level that causes the lighting system to adjust power delivered to a lamp, and, thus, depending on the dimming level, increase or decrease the brightness of the lamp. Many different types of dimmers exist. In general, dimmers generate an output signal in which a portion of an alternating current (“AC”) input signal is removed or zeroed out. For example, some analog-based dimmers utilize a triode for alternating current (“triac”) device to modulate a phase angle of each cycle of an alternating current supply voltage. This modulation of the phase angle of the supply voltage is also commonly referred to as “phase cutting” the supply voltage. Phase cutting the supply voltage reduces the average power supplied to a load, such as a lighting system, and thereby controls the energy provided to the load.
A particular type of a triac-based, phase-cutting dimmer is known as a leading-edge dimmer. A leading-edge dimmer phase cuts from the beginning of an AC cycle, such that during the phase-cut angle, the dimmer is “off” and supplies no output voltage to its load, and then turns “on” after the phase-cut angle and passes phase cut input signal to its load. To ensure proper operation, the load must provide to the leading-edge dimmer a load current sufficient to maintain an inrush current above a current necessary for opening the triac. Due to the sudden increase in voltage provided by the dimmer and the presence of capacitors in the dimmer, the current that must be provided is typically substantially higher than the steady state current necessary for triac conduction. Additionally, in steady state operation, the load must provide to the dimmer a load current to remain above another threshold known as a “hold current” needed to prevent premature disconnection of the triac.
Assuming a resistive load for lamp 142, the dimmer output voltage VΦ
Once triac 106 turns ON, the current iDIM drawn from triac 106 must exceed an attach current iATT in order to sustain the inrush current through triac 106 above a threshold current necessary for opening triac 106. In addition, once triac 106 turns ON, triac 106 continues to conduct current iDIM regardless of the value of the gate voltage VG as long as the current iDIM remains above a holding current value iHC. The attach current value iATT and the holding current value iHC are a function of the physical characteristics of triac 106. Once the current iDIM drops below the holding current value iHC, i.e. iDIM<iHC, triac 106 turns OFF (i.e., stops conducting), until the gate voltage VG again reaches the firing threshold value VF. In many traditional applications, the holding current value iHC is generally low enough so that, ideally, the current iDIM drops below the holding current value iHC when the supply voltage VSUPPLY is approximately zero volts near the end of the half cycle 202 at time t2.
The variable resistor 114 in series with the parallel connected resistor 116 and capacitor 118 form a timing circuit 115 to control the time t1 at which the gate voltage VG reaches the firing threshold value VF. Increasing the resistance of variable resistor 114 increases the time TOFF, and decreasing the resistance of variable resistor 114 decreases the time TOFF. The resistance value of the variable resistor 114 effectively sets a dimming value for lamp 142. Diac 119 provides current flow into the gate terminal 108 of triac 106. The dimmer 102 also includes an inductor choke 120 to smooth the dimmer output voltage VΦ
Ideally, modulating the phase angle of the dimmer output voltage VΦ
Another particular type of phase-cutting dimmer is known as a trailing-edge dimmer. A trailing-edge dimmer phase cuts from the end of an AC cycle, such that during the phase-cut angle, the dimmer is “off” and supplies no output voltage to its load, but is “on” before the phase-cut angle and in an ideal case passes a waveform proportional to its input voltage to its load.
Dimmer 302 includes a timer controller 310 that generates dimmer control signal DCS to control a duty cycle of switch 312. The duty cycle of switch 312 is a pulse width (e.g., times t1-t0) divided by a period of the dimmer control signal (e.g., times t3-t0) for each cycle of the dimmer control signal DCS. Timer controller 310 converts a desired dimming level into the duty cycle for switch 312. The duty cycle of the dimmer control signal DCS is decreased for lower dimming levels (i.e., higher brightness for lamp 342) and increased for higher dimming levels. During a pulse (e.g., pulse 406 and pulse 408) of the dimmer control signal DCS, switch 312 conducts (i.e., is “on”), and dimmer 302 enters a low resistance state. In the low resistance state of dimmer 302, the resistance of switch 312 is, for example, less than or equal to 10 ohms. During the low resistance state of switch 312, the phase cut, input voltage VΦ
When timer controller 310 causes the pulse 406 of dimmer control signal DCS to end, dimmer control signal DCS turns switch 312 off, which causes dimmer 302 to enter a high resistance state (i.e., turns off). In the high resistance state of dimmer 302, the resistance of switch 312 is, for example, greater than 1 kiloohm. Dimmer 302 includes a capacitor 314, which charges to the supply voltage VSUPPLY during each pulse of the dimmer control signal DCS. In both the high and low resistance states of dimmer 302, the capacitor 314 remains connected across switch 312. When switch 312 is off and dimmer 302 enters the high resistance state, the voltage VC across capacitor 314 increases (e.g., between times t1 and t2 and between times t4 and t5). The rate of increase is a function of the amount of capacitance C of capacitor 314 and the input impedance of lamp 342. If effective input resistance of lamp 342 is low enough, it permits a high enough value of the dimmer current iDIM to allow the phase cut, input voltage VΦ
In some lighting applications, a dimmer may not be directly coupled to a lamp. For example, in applications in which a lamp comprises a low-power lamp (e.g., halogen or light-emitting diode (LED) lamp), a switching power converter may be interfaced between the dimmer and the lamp to convert the AC input voltage to a direct current (DC) voltage to be delivered to the lamp.
Dimmer 502 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus for generating a dimming signal to other elements of lighting system 500, the dimming signal representing a dimming level that causes lighting system 500 to adjust power delivered to a lamp, and, thus, depending on the dimming level, increase or decrease the brightness of LEDs 532. Thus, dimmer 502 may include a leading-edge dimmer similar to that depicted in
Lamp assembly 542 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus for converting electrical energy (e.g., delivered by dimmer 502) into photonic energy (e.g., at LEDs 532). For example, lamp assembly 542 may comprise a multifaceted reflector form factor (e.g., an MR16 form factor) with a lamp comprising LEDs 532. As shown in
Bridge rectifier 534 may comprise any suitable electrical or electronic device as is known in the art for converting the whole of alternating current voltage signal VΦ
Power converter 536 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus configured to convert an input voltage (e.g., vREC) to a different output voltage (e.g., vOUT) wherein the conversion is based on a control signal (e.g., a pulse-width modulated control signal communicated from switch state controller 512). Accordingly, power converter 536 may comprise a boost converter, a buck converter, a boost-buck converter, or other suitable power converter.
LEDs 532 may comprise one or more light-emitting diodes configured to emit photonic energy in an amount based on the voltage vOUT across the LEDs 532.
Switch-state controller 512 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus configured to determine one or more characteristics of voltage vREC present at the input of power converter 536 and control an amount of current iREC drawn by power converter 536 based on such one or more characteristics of voltage vREC.
In some embodiments, power converter 536 may comprise a switching power converter, such as a buck converter 536A, as shown in
In operation, inductor current iL may vary over time, with a peak input current proportionate to the “on-time” of switch 608 and with the energy transferred to capacitor 606 proportionate to the “on-time” squared. As shown in
Control signal CS may be generated by switch state controller 512, with a goal of causing switching power converter 536A to transfer a desired amount of energy to capacitor 606, and thus, to LEDs 532. The desired amount of energy may depend upon the voltage and current requirements of LEDs 532. To provide power factor correction close to one, switch state controller 512 may generally seek to control input current iREC so that input current iREC tracks input voltage VREC while holding capacitor voltage VOUT constant. Accordingly, input current iREC and peak inductor current iL may each be proportional to the conduction period of dimmer 502 (e.g., the period of time in which dimmer 502 is on and conducts current).
In implementations in which switch 608 is implemented with a FET, one known problem is that the inherent capacitance of the FET undesirably resonates with inductor 610 after input current in inductor 610 is demagnetized. A known technique to minimize such resonance and to reduce the attendant switching losses is sometimes referred to as “valley switching” in which control signal CS is controlled to turn on switch 608 when the drain-to-source voltage VDS of switch 608 reaches its minimum value.
Referring now to
In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure, certain disadvantages and problems associated with power efficiency in valley switching of switching power converters may be reduced or eliminated.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, an apparatus may include a switching power converter and a controller. The switching power converter may be configured to transfer energy from an input of the power converter to a load coupled to the power converter in conformity with a regulated current, the switching power converter comprising a switch and an energy storage device, wherein the regulated current is a function of a switching period of the switching power converter and a peak current of the energy storage device during the switching period. The controller may be configured to generate a control signal to activate and deactivate the switch in order to control the switching period and the peak current to maintain the regulated current at a desired current level such that: if the switching period decreases below a minimum switching period, the controller increases the switching period by a ringing period of a voltage of the switch and increases the peak current to compensate for the increase of the switching period in order to maintain the regulated current, and if the peak current increases above a maximum peak current, the controller decreases the switching period by a ringing period of the voltage of the switch and decreases the peak current to compensate for the decrease of the switching period in order to maintain the regulated current.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a method may include comprising activating and deactivating a switch of a switching power converter in order to control a switching period and peak current of the switching power converter in order to maintain a regulated current of the switching power converter at a desired current level such that: if the switching period decreases below a minimum switching period, increasing the switching period by a ringing period of a voltage of the switch and increasing the peak current to compensate for the increase of the switching period in order to maintain the regulated current, and if the peak current increases above a maximum peak current, decreasing the switching period by a ringing period of the voltage of the switch and decreasing the peak current to compensate for the decrease of the switching period in order to maintain the regulated current.
Technical advantages of the present disclosure may be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from the figures, description and claims included herein. The objects and advantages of the embodiments will be realized and achieved at least by the elements, features, and combinations particularly pointed out in the claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are examples and explanatory and are not restrictive of the claims set forth in this disclosure.
A more complete understanding of the present embodiments and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
Dimmer 802 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus for generating a dimming signal to other elements of lighting system 800, the dimming signal representing a dimming level that causes lighting system 800 to adjust power delivered to a lamp, and, thus, depending on the dimming level, increase or decrease the brightness of LEDs 832. Thus, dimmer 802 may include a leading-edge dimmer similar to that depicted in
Lamp assembly 842 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus for converting electrical energy (e.g., delivered by dimmer 802) into photonic energy (e.g., at LEDs 832). For example, lamp assembly 842 may comprise a multifaceted reflector form factor (e.g., an MR16 form factor) with a lamp comprising LEDs 832. As shown in
Bridge rectifier 834 may comprise any suitable electrical or electronic device as is known in the art for converting the whole of alternating current voltage signal VΦ
Power converter 836 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus configured to convert an input voltage (e.g., vREC) to a different output voltage (e.g., vOUT) wherein the conversion is based on a control signal (e.g., a pulse-width modulated control signal communicated from switch state controller 812). Although power converter 836 is depicted in
LEDs 832 may comprise one or more light-emitting diodes configured to emit photonic energy in an amount based on the voltage vOUT across the LEDs 832.
Switch-state controller 812 may comprise any system, device, or apparatus configured to determine one or more characteristics of voltage vREC present at the input of power converter 836 and control an amount of current iREC drawn by power converter 836 based on such one or more characteristics of voltage vREC. Functionality of switch-state controller 812 is set forth in more detail below.
In operation, switch state controller 812 may generate control signal CS, with a goal of causing switching power converter 836 to transfer a desired amount of energy to capacitor 806, and thus, to LEDs 832. Accordingly, inductor current iL may vary over time, with a peak input current proportionate to the “on-time” of switch 808 and with the energy transferred to capacitor 806 proportionate to the “on-time” squared. The desired amount of energy may depend upon the voltage and current requirements of LEDs 832. To provide power factor correction close to one, switch state controller 812 may generally seek to control input current iREC so that input current iREC tracks input voltage VREC while holding capacitor voltage VOUT constant. Thus, input current iREC and peak inductor current iL may each be proportional to the conduction period of dimmer 802 (e.g., the period of time in which dimmer 802 is on and conducts current).
The regulated LED current is an average of the inductor current feeding directly to the load. For a buck converter, such LED current iOUT is given by:
Iout=dim*Ifullscale=0.5*Ipk*(TTcrit/TT′)
where dim is a dimmer phase angle normalized to 1 (e.g., has a value between 0 and 1), Ifullscale is a full-scale output current for LEDs 832, Ipk is the peak value of inductor current iL, TTcrit is the critical conduction switching period (e.g., intervals T1 and T2 in FIG. 7) and TT′ is the overall actual switching period (e.g., intervals T1, T2, and T3 in
To regulate output current for a given phase angle of dimmer 802, controller 812 may scale the peak inductor current Ipk and actual switching period TT′. The peak inductor current may thus be given as:
Ipk=(Ifullscale/Dimfullscale)*dim+ipk-offset
where Dimfullscale is the fullscale value of dim (which, in some cases may be 1) and ipk-offset is a current error term that takes into account the difference between a desired average current Iout during a target switching period TT and an actual current of Iout during an actual switching period TT′, to offset effects of actual switching periods TT′ that are quantized to valleys in order to provide accurate load regulation.
Thus, controller 812 may cause peak inductor current Ipk to scale linearly with the dimmer phase angle dim, which also may also cause critical conduction period TTcrit to also vary linearly with dimmer phase angle dim. As a result, actual switching period TT′ may also scale linearly with dimmer phase angle dim for a fixed valley interval T3. Accordingly, an actual switching period TT′ can be quantized to a fixed valley interval T3 while scaling peak inductor current Ipk to achieve load regulation.
For example, in the case of decreases of dimmer phase angle dim, controller 812 may cause peak current Ipk to scale down linearly with dimmer phase angle dim. As actual switching period TT′ scales down linearly with dim for a fixed valley interval T3, it is possible for actual switching period TT′ to decrease to a minimum switching period TTmin (or a maximum switching frequency value) which may be a criterion for increasing the existing number of valleys by one. In doing so, actual switching period TT′ may increase by one inductor-parasitic capacitor (LC) ringing period of the drain-source voltage VDS and may in turn cause a decrease in load current iOUT. Controller 812 may compensate for this transient effect by increasing peak inductor current Ipk in order to maintain constant output current regulation. The same linear peak current profile as a function of dimmer phase angle dim may be carried out with the new peak inductor current Ipk until the minimum switching period is again met which may prompt controller 812 to seek the next valley.
As another example, in the case of increases of dimmer phase angle dim, controller 812 may cause peak current Ipk to scale up linearly with dimmer phase angle dim, such that switching period TT′ scales up linearly with dim for a fixed valley interval T3. In doing so, it is possible for peak current Ipk to increase to a maximum inductor peak current limit which becomes the criterion for decreasing the number of valleys by one. Thus, upon reaching the criterion, actual switching period TT′ may decrease by one LC ringing period of the drain-source voltage VDS and may in turn cause an increase in load current iOUT. Controller 812 may compensate for this transient effect by decreasing peak inductor current Ipk in order to maintain constant output current regulation. The same linear peak current profile as a function of dimmer phase angle dim may be carried out with the new peak inductor current Ipk until the maximum inductor peak current limit is again met which may prompt controller 812 to seek the next valley.
Controller 812 may determine target switching period TT based on dimmer phase angle dim and peak inductor current Ipk. For example, based on a topology of switching power converter 836, a multiplexer 1122 may output one of the interval T2 or the interval of critical conduction period TTcrit. For example, if the topology of switching power converter 836 is a buck converter, as shown in
In valley switching control block 1104, a comparator 1124 may compare actual switching period TT′ to a minimum switching period TTmin and generate a signal indicative of the comparison. Likewise, a comparator 1126 may compare peak inductor current Ipk to a maximum peak inductor current Ipk-max and generate a signal indicative of the comparison. The signal generated by comparator 1126 may be multiplied by −1 by a gain block 1128. Accordingly, an accumulator 1130 may increment by 1 if actual switching period TT′ is less than minimum switching period TTmin, and may decrement by 1 if peak inductor current Ipk exceeds maximum peak inductor current Ipk-max in order to determine the ringing valley N at which switching shall occur. The value N may be multiplied by the LC ringing period of drain-source voltage VDS by gain block 1132, the result being added by combiner 1134 to the intervals T1 and T2 to generate actual switching period TT′. Controller 812 may then generate an appropriate control signal Cs in order to cause switching power converter 836 to operate at the actual switching period TT′ calculated by valley switching control block 1104 with a peak inductor current Ipk calculated by feedback loop 1102.
Thus, at the time of transition of switching from one valley to another, closed feedback loop 1102 may appropriately increase or decrease peak inductor current Ipk to maintain load regulation within a few switching cycles of control signal Cs (e.g., as limited by a bandwidth of integrator 1112).
Among the advantages of the methods and systems set forth herein are that they may provide a simple and robust control scheme wherein only the inductor current profile is defined based on dimmer phase angle. In addition, in accordance with these methods and systems, there may be minimal transient flicker observed in the output current iOUT when controller 812 causes switching to change from one valley to another, because the compensation carried out by feedback loop 1102 may take immediate action by increasing or decreasing peak inductor current Ipk within a few switching cycles to maintain load regulation. Furthermore, the approach employed by these methods and systems may lead to a reduction in power dissipation of switch 808, as compared to existing approaches.
As used herein, when two or more elements are referred to as “coupled” to one another, such term indicates that such two or more elements are in electronic communication whether connected indirectly or directly, with or without intervening elements.
This disclosure encompasses all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Similarly, where appropriate, the appended claims encompass all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Moreover, reference in the appended claims to an apparatus or system or a component of an apparatus or system being adapted to, arranged to, capable of, configured to, enabled to, operable to, or operative to perform a particular function encompasses that apparatus, system, or component, whether or not it or that particular function is activated, turned on, or unlocked, as long as that apparatus, system, or component is so adapted, arranged, capable, configured, enabled, operable, or operative.
All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical objects to aid the reader in understanding the disclosure and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/980,789, filed Apr. 17, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3790878 | Brokaw | Feb 1974 | A |
4677366 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683529 | Bucher, II | Jul 1987 | A |
4737658 | Kronmuller et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4739462 | Farnsworth et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4937728 | Leonardi | Jun 1990 | A |
4940929 | Williams | Jul 1990 | A |
4977366 | Powell | Dec 1990 | A |
5001620 | Smith | Mar 1991 | A |
5003454 | Bruning | Mar 1991 | A |
5055746 | Hu et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5109185 | Ball | Apr 1992 | A |
5173643 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5264780 | Bruer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5278490 | Smedley | Jan 1994 | A |
5383109 | Maksimovic et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5424932 | Inou et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430635 | Liu | Jul 1995 | A |
5479333 | McCambridge et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481178 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5565761 | Hwang | Oct 1996 | A |
5638265 | Gabor | Jun 1997 | A |
5691890 | Hyde | Nov 1997 | A |
5747977 | Hwang | May 1998 | A |
5757635 | Seong | May 1998 | A |
5764039 | Choi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783909 | Hochstein | Jul 1998 | A |
5798635 | Hwang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808453 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5874725 | Yamaguchi | Feb 1999 | A |
5960207 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
5994885 | Wilcox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6043633 | Lev et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6084450 | Smith et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091233 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6160724 | Hemena et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6229292 | Redl | May 2001 | B1 |
6259614 | Ribarich et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300723 | Wang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304066 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304473 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343026 | Perry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356040 | Preis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6445600 | Ben-Yaakov | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6469484 | L'Hermite et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6510995 | Muthu et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6531854 | Hwang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6580258 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583550 | Iwasa et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6628106 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657417 | Hwang | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6696803 | Tao et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6724174 | Esteves et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6768655 | Yang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781351 | Mednik et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6839247 | Yang et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6882552 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894471 | Corva et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6933706 | Shih | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940733 | Schie et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944034 | Shteynberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956750 | Eason et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6975523 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980446 | Simada et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7072191 | Nakao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099163 | Ying | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7161816 | Shteynberg et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7221130 | Ribeiro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233135 | Noma et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7266001 | Notohamiprodjo et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7292013 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7295452 | Liu | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7411379 | Chu et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7554473 | Melanson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7606532 | Wuidart | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7667986 | Artusi et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7684223 | Wei | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7719246 | Melanson | May 2010 | B2 |
7719248 | Melanson | May 2010 | B1 |
7746043 | Melanson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7804480 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7834553 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7872883 | Elbanhawy | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7894216 | Melanson | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8008898 | Melanson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8169806 | Sims et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193717 | Leiderman | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8222772 | Vinciarelli | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8242764 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8369109 | Niedermeier et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441220 | Imura | May 2013 | B2 |
8536799 | Grisamore | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8552893 | Sood et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8593075 | Melanson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8610364 | Melanson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8803439 | Stamm et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8816593 | Lys et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030090252 | Hazucha | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111969 | Konishi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030160576 | Suzuki | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174520 | Bimbaud | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214821 | Giannopoulos et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223255 | Ben-Yaakov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046683 | Mitamura et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040196672 | Amei | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050057237 | Clavel | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078492 | Takahashi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050207190 | Gritter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231183 | Li et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237005 | Maxik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050270813 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275354 | Hausman, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013026 | Frank et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022648 | Ben-Yaakov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060209574 | Makino | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214603 | Oh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070076459 | Limpkin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103949 | Tsuruya | May 2007 | A1 |
20070176583 | Hachiya et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267978 | Shteynberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018261 | Kastner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043504 | Ye et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062584 | Freitag et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062586 | Apfel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080117656 | Clarkin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130336 | Taguchi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080175029 | Jung et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205102 | Makino et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080259655 | Wei et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278132 | Kesterson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310194 | Huang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090058370 | Odaohhara | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059632 | Li et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067204 | Ye et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090108677 | Walter et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090184665 | Ferro | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090295300 | King | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100128501 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100165672 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208500 | Yan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238689 | Fei et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244793 | Caldwell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110018515 | McCloy-Stevens | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110058285 | Wibben | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110110132 | Rausch et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110199793 | Kuang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267856 | Pansier | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276938 | Perry et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291583 | Shen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309760 | Behland et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120146540 | Khayat et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187997 | Liao et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120242242 | Linz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120248998 | Yoshinaga | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120306406 | Grisamore et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320640 | Baurle et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002163 | He et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130069561 | Melanson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130154496 | Maru et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130181635 | Ling | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130307425 | Yan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140009085 | Veskovic | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028213 | Sood et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028214 | Mazumdar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140198540 | Xu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218978 | Heuken et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140252975 | Drakshapalli et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103066872 | Apr 2013 | CN |
0536535 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0636889 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1213823 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1289107 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1962263 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2257124 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2232949 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2469695 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2008053181 | Mar 2008 | JP |
WO0184697 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO2004051834 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2006013557 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006022107 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2007016373 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2008004008 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008152838 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO2010011971 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010065598 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2011008635 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Balogh, Laszlo et al.; “Power-Factor Correction with Interleaved Boost Converters in Continuous-Inductor-Current Mode”; IEEE (0-7803-0982-0/93); 1993; pp. 168-174. |
Ben-Yaakov, Sam et al.; “The Dynamics of a PWM Boost Converter with Resistive Input”; IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, No. 3, Jun. 1999, pp. 613-619. |
Cheng, Hung L. et al.; “A Novel Single-Stage High-Power-Factor Electronic Ballast with Symmetrical Topology”; IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, No. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 759-766. |
Erickson, Robert W. et al.; “Fundamentals of Power Electronics”, Second Edition, Chapter 6, Boulder CO 2001, pp. 131-184. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 42047, Power Factor Correction (PFC) Basics, Aug. 19, 2004, 11 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 42030, Theory and Application of the ML4821 Average Current Mode PFC Controller, Aug. 1997, 19 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note AN4121, Design of Power Factor Correction Circuit Using FAN7527B, 2002, 22 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4800, Low Start-Up Current PFC/PWM Controller Combos, Nov. 2006, 20 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4810, Power Factor Correction Controller, Sep. 24, 2003, 14 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4822, ZVS Average Current PFC Controller, Aug. 10, 2001, 10 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7532, Ballast Control IC, Jun. 2006, 16 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7544, Simple Ballast Controller, 2004, 14 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7711, Ballast Control IC, Mar. 2007, 23 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, KA7541, Simple Ballast Controller, 2001, 14 pages. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, ML4812, Power Factor Controller, May 31, 2001, 18 pages. |
Freescale Semiconductor, AN1965, Design of Indirect Power Factor Correction Using 56F800/E, Jul. 2005, 20 pages. |
Freescale Semiconductor, AN3052, Implementing PFC Average Current Mode Control using the MC9S12E128, Nov. 2005, 8 pages. |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Dimmable Light Ballast with Power Factor Correction, M68HC08 Microcontrollers, Dec. 2005, 72 pages. |
http://toolbarpdf.com/docs/functions-and-features-of-inverters.html, printed on Jan. 20, 2011. |
Garcia, O., et al.; “High Efficiency PFC Converter to Meet EN61000-3-2 and A14”, Industrial Electronics, 2002. ISIE 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on (vol. 3 ), pp. 975-980. |
Hirota Atsushi et al, “Analysis of Single Switch Delta-Sigma Modulated Pulse Space Modulation PFC Converter Effectively Using Switching Power Device,” IEEE, US, 2002, pp. 682-686. |
Infineon, CCM-PFC Standalone Power Factor Correction (PFC) Controller in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM), Version 2.1, Feb. 6, 2007, 22 pages. |
International Rectifer, Application Note AN-1077,PFC Converter Design with IR1150 One Cycle Control IC, rev. 2.3, Jun. 2005, 20 pages. |
International Rectifer, Data Sheet No. PD60230 revC, IR1150(S)(PbF), uPFC One Cycle Control PFC IC Feb. 5, 2007, 16 pages. |
International Rectifer, IRAC1150-300W Demo Board, User's Guide, Rev 3.0, Aug. 2, 2005, 18 pages. |
Lu et al., International Rectifier, Bridgeless PFC Implementation Using One Cycle Control Technique, 2005, 6 pages. |
Lai, Z., et al., A Family of Power-Factor-Correction Controllers, Twelfth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, vol. 1, Feb. 23, 1997-Feb. 27, 1997, pp. 66-73. |
Lee, P. et al., Steady-State Analysis of an Interleaved Boost Converter with Coupled Inductors, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 787-795. |
Linear Technology, LT1248, Power Factor Controller, Apr. 20, 2007, 12 pages. |
Linear Technology, “Single Switch PWM Controller with Auxiliary Boost Converter,” LT1950 Datasheet, Linear Technology, Inc. Milpitas, CA, 2003, 20 pages. |
Madigan, M. et al., Integrated High-Quality Rectifier-Regulators, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, No. 4, Aug. 1999, pp. 749-758. |
Maksimovic, Regan Zane and Robert Erickson, Impact of Digital Control in Power Electronics, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & Ics, Kitakyushu, Apr. 5, 2010, Colorado Power Electronics Center, ECE Department, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 10 pages. |
Mamano, Bob, “Current Sensing Solutions for Power Supply Designers”, Unitrode Seminar Notes SEM1200, 1999, 36 pages. |
Miwa B.A. et al., High Efficiency Power Factor Correction Using Interleaved Techniques, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Seventh Annual Conference Proceedings, Feb. 23-27, 1992, pp. 557-568. |
Noon, Jim “UC3855A/B High Performance Power Factor Preregulator”, Texas Instruments, SLUA146A, May 1996, Revised Apr. 2004, 35 pages. |
NXP, TEA1750, GreenChip III SMPS control IC Product Data Sheet, Apr. 6, 2007, 30 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, AND8123/D, Power Factor Correction Stages Operating in Critical Conduction Mode, Sep. 2003, 20 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, ND8184/D, Four Key Steps to Design a Continuous Conduction Mode PFC Stage Using the NCP1653, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, MC33260, GreenLine Compact Power Factor Controller: Innovative Circuit for Cost Effective Solutions, Sep. 2005, 22 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, NCP1605, Enhanced, High Voltage and Efficient Standby Mode, Power Factor Controller, Feb. 2007, 23 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, NCP1606, Cost Effective Power Factor Controller, Mar. 2007, 22 pages. |
ON Semiconductor, NCP1654, Product Review, Power Factor Controller for Compact and Robust, Continuous Conduction Mode Pre-Converters, Mar. 2007, 10 pages. |
Philips, Application Note, 90W Resonant SMPS with TEA1610 SwingChip, AN99011, 1999, 28 pages. |
Prodic, A. et al, “Dead Zone Digital Controller for Improved Dynamic Response of Power Factor Preregulators,” IEEE, 2003, pp. 382-388. |
Prodic, A., Compensator Design and Stability Assessment for Fast Voltage Loops of Power Factor Correction Rectifiers, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 5, Sep. 2007, pp. 1719-1730. |
Prodic, A., “Digital Controller for High-Frequency Rectifiers with Power Factor Correction Suitable for On-Chip Implementation,” IEEE, US, 2007, pp. 1527-1531. |
Renesas, Application Note R2A20111 EVB, PFC Control IC R2A20111 Evaluation Board, Feb. 2007, 40 pages. |
Renesas, HA16174P/FP, Power Factor Correction Controller IC, Jan. 6, 2006, 38 pages. |
Renesas Technology Releases Industry's First Critical-Conduction-Mode Power Factor Correction Control IC Implementing Interleaved Operation, Dec. 18, 2006, 4 pages. |
Seidel A. R. et al., A Practical Comparison Among High-Power-Factor Electronic Ballasts with Similar Ideas, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2005, pp. 1574-1583. |
ST Microelectronics, AN993, Application Note, Electronic Ballast with PFC Using L6574 and L6561, May 2004, 20 pages. |
ST Microelectronics, L6563, Advanced Transition-Mode PFC Controller, Mar. 2007, 40 pages. |
ST Microelectronics, L6574, CFL/TL Ballast Driver Preheat and Dimming, Sep. 2003, 10 pages. |
ST Microelectronics, Power Factor Corrector L6561, Jun. 2004, 13 pages. |
ST Microelectronics, L6562, Transition-Mode PFC Controller, 2005, STMicroelectronics, Geneva, Switzerland, 16 pages. |
Su, F. et al., Ultra Fast Fixed-Frequency Hysteretic Buck Converter with Maximum Charging Current Control and Adaptive Delay Compensation for DVS Applications, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 4, Apr. 2008, pp. 815-822. |
Supertex, Inc., HV9931 Unity Power Factor LED Lamp Driver, Application Note AN-H52, Mar. 7, 2007, 20 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Report SLUA308, UCC3817 Current Sense Transformer Evaluation, Feb. 2004, 3 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Report, SLUA309A, Avoiding Audible Noise at Light Loads when using Leading Edge Triggered PFC Converters, Sep. 2004, 4 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Note SLUA321, Startup Current Transient of the Leading Edge Triggered PFC Controllers, Jul. 2004, 4 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Report SLUA369B, 350-W, Two-Phase Interleaved PFC Pre-Regulator Design Review, Mar. 2007, 22 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Report SLUS515D, Transition Mode PFC Controller, Jul. 2005, 28 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Interleaving Continuous Conduction Mode PFC Controller, UCC28070, SLUS794C, Nov. 2007, revised Jun. 2009, Texas Instruments, Dallas TX, 45 pages. |
Texas Instruments, SLUS828B, “8-Pin Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) PFC Controller”, UCC28019A, US, revised Apr. 2009, 48 pages. |
Texas Instruments, UCC3817 BiCMOS Power Factor Preregulator Evaluation Board User's Guide, Nov. 2002, 10 pages. |
Texas Instruments, Application Report SPRA902A, Average Current Mode Controlled Power Factor Correctiom Converter using TMS320LF2407A, Jul. 2005, 15 pages. |
Unitrode, Design Note DN-39E, Optimizing Performance in UC3854 Power Factor Correction Applications, Nov. 1994, 6 pages. |
Unitrode Products From Texas Instruments, SLUS482B, Programmable Output Power Factor Preregulator, Apr. 2001, Revised Dec. 2004, 16 pages. |
Unitrode, Design Note DN-66, SLUA196A, Unitrode UC3854A/B and UC3855A/B Provide Power Limiting With Sinusoidal Input Current for PFC Front Ends, Jun. 1995, Revised Nov. 2001, 6 pages. |
Unitrode Products From Texas Instruments, SLUS3951, BiCMOS Power Factor Preregulator, Feb. 2006, 25 pages. |
Wong, L.K. et al., Steady State Analysis of Hysteretic Control Buck Converters, 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC 2008), pp. 400-404. |
Yao G. et al., Soft Switching Circuit for Interleaved Boost Converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 80-86. |
Zhang W. et al., A New Duty Cycle Control Strategy for Power Factor Correction and FPGA Implementation, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 6, Nov. 2006, pp. 1745-1753. |
Zhao, J. et al., Steady-State and Dynamic Analysis of a Buck Converter Using a Hysteretic PWM Control, 2004 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conveference, Auchen, Germany 2004, pp. 3654-3658. |
Zhou, J. et al., Novel Sampling Algorithm for DSP Controlled 2 kW PFC Converter, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 217-222. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/026205, mailed Jul. 13, 2015, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150303796 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61980789 | Apr 2014 | US |