Systems and methods for verification of remotely deposited checks

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8959033
  • Patent Number
    8,959,033
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 15, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 17, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Verification of remotely deposited checks may be conducted in a system or for electronically receiving check images from customers and automatically initiating a deposit of funds associated with such check. Verification may comprise analyzing an image to detecting a presence of signatures, e.g. a payor signature and an endorsement, on a received check image so as to validate a check. Verification may further comprise conducting “face recognition” of a received check image to verify it's authenticity and/or detecting MICR line indications that a check is no longer valid.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related by subject matter to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/686,930, filed Mar. 15, 2007, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/686,922, filed Mar. 15, 2007.


BACKGROUND

As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/321,025, checks typically provide a safe and convenient method for an individual to purchase goods and/or services. To use a check, the individual usually must open a checking account, or other similar account, at a financial institution and deposit funds, which are then available for later withdrawal. To pay for goods and/or services with a check, the payor (i.e., the buyer) usually designates a payee (i.e., the seller) and an amount payable on the check. In addition, the payor often signs the check. Once the check has been signed, it is usually deemed negotiable, meaning the check may be validly transferred to the payee upon delivery. By signing and transferring the check to the payee, the payor authorizes funds to be withdrawn from the payor's account at a payor bank on behalf of the payee in return for the goods and/or services provided by the payee.


Checks have certain advantages over other forms of payment, such as cash. For example, while often considered the most liquid type of asset, cash also may be the least secure. Unlike a check, cash is usually freely transferable and does not have to be endorsed. Thus, the owner and possessor of cash is most often the same individual. Because cash is freely transferable, cash that is lost or stolen typically cannot be recovered. Therefore, the risks associated with cash transactions are often unacceptable, particularly with respect to transactions not conducted in person (e.g., by mail) and/or involving large sums of money. A check, on the other hand, provides a payor with more security because the check usually requires a payor to specify both the person and amount to be paid. Furthermore, as noted above, the check is usually not valid until it is properly signed by the payor. These safeguards help to reduce the risk that money will be lost and/or stolen and ensure that the proper payee receives the proper amount of money.


Cash may have other disadvantages as well. For example, because cash is freely transferable, there may be little or no verifiable transaction history. It is often desirable for a payor and/or payee to have physical proof that a particular transaction took place. This typically requires that the payor receive a receipt. However, receipts may contain errors and can be easily misplaced. In contrast, a bank processing a check will ordinarily create a transaction history, which may include the identity of the payee, the amount to be paid, the date of the payment, and the signature of the payor. This enables both a payor and payee to independently verify the accuracy of most transactions involving a payment by check.


While a check may provide a payor with a convenient and secure form of payment, receiving a check may put certain burdens on the payee, such as the time and effort required to deposit the check. For example, depositing a check typically involves going to a local bank branch and physically presenting the check to a bank teller. In addition to the time commitment that may be required, visiting a bank branch may be problematic for the payee if the bank's hours of operation coincide with the payee's normal hours of employment. Thus, the payee may be required to leave work early and/or change work schedules.


A check may pose other burdens for the payee. As noted above, a check may not be freely transferable, thereby limiting the payee's ability to use funds from the check. For example, it is usually difficult to for the payee to purchase goods and/or services using a check issued by the payor. While the check may be endorsed and accepted by a third party, such transactions are often disfavored because the third party may not know the payor and, thus, may not be willing to accept the risk that the payor has insufficient funds to cover the check. Therefore, the payee may not have access to the funds from the check until the payee deposits the check at the bank, the check has cleared and the funds have been credited to the payee's account. The payee may have to wait even longer if the payee chooses to deposit the check by mail.


Systems and methods for remotely depositing checks can advantageously address a variety of the above listed burdens on the payee, and thereby promote the use of checks and the various advantages attached thereto. A variety of high-speed, special purpose check deposit systems for commercial use are available on the market today. Also, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/321,025 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/591,014, future systems may emerge allowing individuals to remotely deposit checks using, for example, a customer controlled home telephone or customer controlled general purpose consumer. Such remote deposit systems may prove advantageous for banks and bank customers alike, in part because they are adapted for today's mobile lifestyles experienced by individuals in military, government, and private sector careers, and in part because they successfully leverage electronic communications advances allowing unprecedented automation, speed, and security in deposit transactions.


However, satisfactory systems for verifying check validity in such systems for remote deposit have so far remained out of reach. Sufficient automation is required for efficient processing of hundreds, even thousands or more remotely deposited checks per day as may be received by a large financial institution. Efficiency and speed must be accomplished without sacrificing accuracy, however, and without opening opportunities for fraud. Therefore, there is a need in the industry for automated approaches to verify the validity of remotely deposited checks.


SUMMARY

The described embodiments contemplate a system, method and computer-readable medium with computer-executable instructions for verifying validity of remotely deposited checks in a system for electronically receiving check images from customers, said check images corresponding to at least one payor check, and for automatically initiating a deposit of funds associated with said payor check into a customer account.


In a first embodiment, the novel method may be directed to detecting the presence of signatures on a received check image. Upon electronically receiving an image of a front side of a payor check and/or a back side of said payor check, an electronic analysis may be automatically performed to determine whether a payor signature is present on the front side of said payor check and whether an endorsement signature is present the a back side of said payor check. The electronic analysis my go further by comparing the detected signatures to signature verification files and performing a variety of other operations as disclosed herein.


In another embodiment, the novel method may include a “face recognition” process that may be performed on an image of a deposited check to verify its authenticity. Upon electronically receiving an image of a payor check, at least a portion of said image can be automatically electronically compared to a payor check verification image, or some other data that specifies with sufficient accuracy the desired properties of a valid check from the payor or a class of payors including a payor in question.


In still another embodiment, a check Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line may be inspected for indications that a check is no longer valid. Upon electronically receiving an image of a payor check, a MICR line portion of said image can be automatically electronically analyzed to determine if said MICR line comprises at least one predetermined feature, and if so, an appropriate action can be taken such as terminating the deposit transaction and notifying a customer that the check will not be deposited.


Additional advantages and features of the invention are described below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purposes of illustration, there is shown in the drawings exemplary embodiments; however, the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a broad view of a system in which the described embodiments may be employed.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method for facilitating deposit of a check from a customer-controlled general purpose computer.



FIG. 3 illustrates a method for processing a check deposit.



FIG. 4 illustrates a method comprising detecting the presence of signatures on a received check image so as to validate a check.



FIG. 5 illustrates an method comprising conducting “face recognition” of a received check image to verify it's authenticity.



FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary method comprising detecting MICR line indications that a check is no longer valid





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and figures to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the invention. Certain well-known details often associated with computing and software technology are not set forth in the following disclosure, however, to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the various embodiments of the invention. Further, those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments of the invention without one or more of the details described below. Finally, while various methods are described with reference to steps and sequences in the following disclosure, the description as such is for providing a clear implementation of embodiments of the invention, and the steps and sequences of steps should not be taken as required to practice this invention.


In general, it is contemplated that the various systems, methods, and computer readable media disclosed herein will be implemented within a system for processing remote deposit of checks. Such a system will generally include subsystems for electronically receiving check images from customers, said check images corresponding to at least one payor check, and for automatically initiating a deposit of funds associated with said payor check into a customer account. Such a system may also beneficially automatically initiate a process for clearing the payor check with a payor bank.



FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are generally directed to a variety of aspects of a system for processing remote deposit of checks as contemplated for use in connection with various embodiments of the invention. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system in which the described embodiments may be employed. System 100 may include account owner 110, e.g., a bank customer who may be located, for example, at the customer's private residence. The account owner 110 may be utilizing a customer-controlled, general purpose computer 111. A general purpose computer 111 is generally a Personal Computer (PC) running one of the well-known WINDOWS® brand operating systems made by MICROSOFT® Corp., or a MACINTOSH® (Mac) brand computer, running any of the APPLE® operating systems. General purpose computers are ubiquitous today and the term should be well understood. A general purpose computer 111 may be in a desktop or laptop configuration, and generally has the ability to run any number of applications that are written for and compatible with the computer's operating system. The term “general purpose computer” specifically excludes specialized equipment as may be purchased by a business or other commercial enterprise, for example, for the specialized purpose of high-speed, high-volume check deposits. A particular advantage of a system as illustrated in FIG. 1 is its ability to operate in conjunction with electronics that today's consumers actually own or can easily acquire, such as a general purpose computer, a scanner, and a digital camera.


General purpose computer 111 may also be “customer-controlled.” A common example of a customer-controlled computer would be a typical computer located in a private residence. The owner of such a computer typically has the power to install programs and configure the computer as they wish, subject to certain security restrictions that may be imposed by the hardware or software manufacturers. A customer-controlled computer need not be located in a private residence, however. For example, computers in college dormitories, in workplace offices, and so forth may also be considered to be “customer-controlled.”


An example of a computer that would not be considered customer-controlled would be an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) that is typically controlled by a bank or other business. Although a customer may access and utilize an ATM machine, the ATM machine is not customer-controlled because the allowed uses of the ATM machine are highly restricted. Relevant factors in determining whether a machine is customer controlled are thus the scope of operations that a customer may perform using the machine, and extent to which the customer can reconfigure the machine in some way by adding software and/or hardware components. In general, any customer ability to add software and/or hardware components is adequate to qualify a computer as customer-controlled.


One of the applications that may run on a general purpose computer 111 in connection with the invention is a browser. Common browsers in use today are, for example, the popular INTERNET EXPLORER® line of browsers made by MICROSOFT® Corp., the FIREFOX® browsers distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project, and the NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR® browsers also distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project. Browsers generally allow users to point to a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), and thereby retrieve information such as a web page. For example, a browser application on computer 111 could retrieve a web page that is kept at server 131, and display the web page to the account owner 110, as is generally known and appreciated in the industry and by the general public.


Another application, or set of applications, that may run on a general purpose computer 111 in connection with the invention comprises “virtual machine” technologies such as the JAVA® virtual machine software distributed by SUN MICROSYSTEMS® Corp, and .NET® Framework distributed by MICROSOFT® Corp. In general, such applications facilitate execution of computer programs in a variety of computing environments. For example, a JAVA® applet is a computer program (which may be alternatively referred to herein as a “software component”) that can execute on any computer running the JAVA® virtual machine software. The applet may be provided to virtual machine software in a “source code” format, and may be compiled by a “just in time” compiler, so as to put the applet in a form that can be executed by the hardware associated with the particular computing device. These technologies are known in the art and may be utilized in connection with a system as illustrated in FIG. 1.


An image capture device 112 may be communicatively coupled to the computer 112. Image capture device may be, for example, a scanner or digital camera. Computer 111 may comprise software that allows the user to control certain operations of the image capture device 112 from the computer 111. For example, modern scanner users may be familiar with the TWAIN software often used to control image capture from a computer 111. Similarly, digital cameras often ship along with software that allows users to move images from the camera to a computer 111, and may also provide additional functions, such as photo editing functions crop and rotate.


Financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may be any type of entity capable of processing a transaction involving a negotiable instrument. For example, financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may be a retail bank, investment bank, investment company, regional branch of the Federal Reserve, clearinghouse bank and/or correspondent bank. A negotiable instrument may be described as a contract that obligates one party to pay a specified sum of money to another party. By way of example, and not limitation, negotiable instruments may include a check, draft, bill of exchange, promissory note, and the like.


Financial institution 130 is illustrated as associated with a server 131. Financial institution 130 may maintain and operate server 131 for the purposes of communicating with customers such as 110. Alternatively, such server may be maintained and operated by one or more third party vendors who act under the instructions of the financial institution 130, but possess skills and resources that may be more effective in competent operation of electronics. Such arrangements are well known in the industry and in this case the server 131 is nonetheless considered to be “associated” with the financial institution 130.


Account owner 110 may be an individual who owns account 160, which may be held at financial institution 130. As such, account owner 110 may be described as a customer of financial institution 130. Account 160 may be any type of account for depositing funds, such as a savings account, checking account, brokerage account, and the like. Account owner 110 may communicate with financial institution 130 by way of communication network 120, which may include an intranet, the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a cellular network, a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network, and the like. Account owner 110 may communicate with financial institution 130 by phone, email, instant messaging, facsimile, and the like.


In one contemplated embodiment, network 120 is a publicly accessible network such as the Internet, which can presently be accessed from many private residences and many public places such as college campuses, airports, coffee shops, and restaurants throughout the United States as well as many other countries of the world. A variety of technologies are available to establish secure connections over such a public network, so that data transmitted between computer 111 and a server 131 associated with the institution 130 remains either inaccessible or indecipherable by third parties that may intercept such data. The invention may make use of any such security technologies.


Financial institutions 130, 140 and 150 may communicate with each other via a network 125. Network 125 may be a publicly accessed network such as 120. Alternatively, network 125 may have certain characteristics that differ from network 120, due to the different requirements of bank-to-bank communications. For example, one might envision certain security features and access restrictions being more important in bank-to-bank communications.


In an embodiment, account owner 110 may wish to deposit a check that is drawn from payor account 170 at financial institution 150. Account owner 110 may deposit the check into customer account 160 by converting the check into electronic data, e.g., an image, and sending the data to financial institution 130. Various embodiments of the invention described herein may be carried out by financial institution 130 electronics such as server 131 upon receipt of a check image from computer 111. However, those of skill in computing and software technologies will appreciate that functionality can be distributed across a variety of devices and therefore some of the method steps, subsystems, and computer readable media associated with the invention may in some embodiments be located outside of the range of what would be considered financial institution 130 electronics, e.g., might be located at computer 111 or elsewhere in the network 120.


Account owner 110 may convert the check into a digital image by scanning the front and/or back of the check using image capture device 112. Account owner 110 may then send the image to financial institution 130. Sending the image may be referred to as “presenting” the check. Upon receipt of the image, financial institution 130 may credit the funds to account 160 in a “soft post” operation. In a soft post operation, the funds appear to be available for use by a customer, and may in fact be available for use, but at the very least some indication is retained to note that the funds have not actually been received from the payor bank. When the funds are received from the payor bank, the “soft post” is converted to a “hard post” and the indication is removed, along with any further restriction on the use of the funds. Financial institution 130 may clear the check by presenting the digital image to an intermediary bank, such as a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, a correspondent bank and/or a clearinghouse bank.


For example, the check may be cleared by presenting the digital image to financial institution 140, which may be a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, along with a request for payment. Financial institution 130 and 150 may have accounts at the regional branch of the Federal Reserve. As will be discussed in greater detail below, financial institution 130 may create a substitute check using the image provided by account owner 110 and present the substitute check to financial institution 140 for further processing. Upon receiving the substitute check, financial institution 140 may identify financial institution 150 as the paying bank (e.g., the bank from which the check is drawn). This may be accomplished using a nine-digit routing number located on the bottom left hand corner of the check. A unique routing number is typically assigned to every financial institution in the United States. Financial institution 140 may present the substitute check to financial institution 150 and request that the check be paid. If financial institution 150 verifies the check (i.e., agrees to honor the check), financial institution 140 may then settle the check by debiting funds from financial institution 150 and crediting funds to financial institution 130. Financial institution 150 may then debit funds from account 170.


It will be appreciated that the preceding examples are for purposes of illustration and explanation only, and that embodiments of the invention are not specifically limited to such examples. For example, financial institution 150 may be a correspondent bank (i.e., engaged in a partnership with financial institution 130). Thus, financial institution 130 may bypass the regional branch of the Federal Reserve and clear the check directly with financial institution 150. In addition, account 160 and account 170 may both be held at financial institution 130, in which case the check may be cleared internally.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method for facilitating deposit of a check from a customer-controlled general purpose computer. The various steps of FIG. 2 may be viewed as performed by a server computer associated with a financial institution, in conjunction with a software component that operates from a customer-controlled general purpose computer. Various of the steps are contemplated as performed by the server, while various other steps are contemplated as performed by the software component.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the darker boxes indicate steps that are performed by the server, for example by delivering information to the user through the user's browser application. Making information available on a server to customers with a browser is considered to be effectively “delivering” such information for the purposes of this document. The lighter boxes inside 211 indicate steps that are performed by the software component, as it executes on the customer computer. Those of skill will recognize that alternative configurations are readily achievable by moving functions from server to software component or vice-versa.


The server may first deliver a software component to the customer-controlled general purpose computer 200. This may be done in response to a customer request for the capability of making deposits from his computer. In one embodiment, the financial institution may provide such capability only to customers that meet predetermined criteria of trustworthiness. For example, it can be required that the customer's accounts are in good standing, that the customer relationship has lasted a predetermined amount of time, that the customer has a predetermined number of financial service products with the financial institution (e.g. bank accounts, mortgages, insurance policies, etc.), that the customer has a predetermined level of assets with the financial institution, and so forth.


The software component may be configured to facilitate the deposit transaction in a variety of ways as illustrated herein. In one embodiment, the software component may be compatible with the JAVA® or .NET® technologies described above. Such configurations allow for widespread dissemination and successful operation in a wide variety of computing environments as may exist on customer-controlled general purpose computers.


Where the software component is written for JAVA®, .NET®, or any other such technology, it is useful in step 200 to first determine whether the customer-controlled general purpose computer has an appropriate virtual machine application installed, e.g. JAVA® Virtual Machine (JVM) or .NET® framework. If the computer does not have the appropriate application installed, such application may be automatically installed, or the customer may be directed to a location from which such application may be downloaded and installed. The software component may then be delivered 200, and should work as intended. The various other steps of FIG. 2 may now take place, or may take place at some subsequent time using the software component as previously downloaded.


After downloading or otherwise accepting the software component, and assuming the customer has an appropriate image capture device, the customer now has the capability to make deposits from his general purpose computer. For example, the customer points his browser to a bank website, where a link may be available that causes the bank server to initiate a deposit transaction 201. The customer may be asked to log in using a user name and password.


The customer may next be instructed to identify an account into which the deposit will be made 202. This can be done, for example, by providing a webpage that lists the available accounts, along with an instruction to select an account. Alternatively, a box may be provided into which the customer may type an account number, along with an appropriate instruction to type the number of the desired account. The account may be any account, and need not necessarily be the customer's own account, although it is contemplated that a large number of customer deposits may be made into the transacting customer's account, and embodiments may find it useful to restrict the allowed accounts to the customer's own accounts. In such embodiments, if the customer has just one account with the financial institution, step 202 may be eliminated because the only available allowed account would be the customer's single account.


The customer may next be instructed to identify an amount of a check or other negotiable instrument he wishes to deposit into the selected account 203. In one embodiment, this can be done similarly to step 202 by providing a webpage with a integer entry box into which the customer may type an amount, along with an appropriate instruction to type the amount of the check. The customer may also be instructed to endorse the check 204.


The customer may next be instructed to provide an image of a front side of a check 205, for example, by using an image capture device. In one embodiment, the customer may be instructed to place the check face down on a flatbed scanner, and may further be instructed as to the location and orientation of the check on the scanner. If the customer is instructed to take a digital photograph of the check using a digital camera, the customer may be instructed as to the position and orientation of the check, lighting, angle of camera, distance and focal length (zoom) of camera, and so forth. The software component may be useful at this point in providing a graphical illustration of just how the customer should provide the image. The customer may further be given instructions as to how to activate the image capture device and/or move the image from the device to the general purpose computer.


In one embodiment, it is contemplated that the software component allows for control of transaction flow and transaction data throughout the various aspects the transaction. For example, the software component may open a folder in a storage location, such as the hard drive of the general-purpose computer, and may work in conjunction with any software that interfaces with the image capture device to deposit the image in such folder. This may advantageously be conducted in a secure manner to prevent any unwanted image diversion or tampering. The hard drive of the general-purpose computer is considered to be a storage location that is controlled by said customer-controlled general purpose computer, but other storage locations such as disk drives, networked drives, and so forth may also be effectively controlled by the general purpose computer.


The software component may itself perform operations such as opening a folder and placing the images therein, or may effectively achieve such operations by instructing the customer and/or other applications to do so. All software operates to some extent under the control and with the support of an operating system and/or virtual machine framework running on the general purpose computer, and such support is of course appropriate in embodiments of the invention.


The software component may next cause the image of the check to be presented to the customer for editing, e.g. by asking the customer to crop and/or rotate the check image to a predetermined orientation 206. In embodiments using a scanner, an image of the entire scanner bed, or some otherwise too large image may be generated. If the check was placed in the top left corner of the scanner bed, the customer may be asked to indicate the bottom right corner of the check image, and the image may be automatically cropped to contain only the check image in the rectangular area between the customer's selected point and the top left corner of the scanner bed, thereby removing a portion of the originally obtained image.


An appropriately edited image of the check may be placed in the storage location 207. If further images are necessary 208, steps 205-207 may be repeated as necessary. For example, the customer may be instructed to endorse and provide an image of the back side of a check. To ensure the check is appropriately voided, the customer may be asked to write “void” on the check and re-scan the front of the check. However, it will be appreciated that a “void” instruction could be easily spoofed, for example by photocopying the check and voiding the photocopy, or by placing a transparent material over the check that bears the void. Therefore, regardless of whether the customer is instructed to re-capture an image of a voided check, there is some possibility of representment, i.e. attempting to rescan and represent the check at a later time. Various techniques for “duplicate detection,” may be used to identify and address such attempts, as described in U.S. Patent Application (client reference US-0159.01/USAA 0187).


A log file may be generated 209 to collect data for processing or troubleshooting the deposit transaction. The log file may be placed in the storage location along with the various images of the check.


Once the desired images are collected and edited, they may be delivered to the server for processing the deposit 210. The log file may also be delivered at this time. Once such files are delivered, they may be deleted from the customer's general purpose computer. If the server determines that the delivered images and any corresponding data are sufficient to go forward with the deposit, the customer's account may be provisionally credited with a soft post, and a confirmation page may be delivered to the customer via the customer's browser application 212. The customer may be instructed to destroy, e.g. by shredding, the actual physical check or other negotiable instrument, however as described above such a requirement is unenforceable and some risk of representment remains which can be addressed as described below. Under the current check handling procedures in the United States, the physical check is not necessary in processing a deposit, nor is it necessary to keep the original check in bank or customer records.



FIG. 3 illustrates a method for processing a check deposit. The method of FIG. 3 is designed to complement that of FIG. 2 and to illustrate exemplary steps that may be carried out by a server or other electronics operated by a financial institution before, during, and after the various steps of FIG. 2 are carried out.


In general, as illustrated in FIG. 3, such server may receive a request for deposit at home capability 300A, and in response to such request may deliver a software component to the requesting customer 300B. As with FIG. 2, intermediate steps may comprise determining if the customer is in fact eligible for a remote deposit program, and ensuring the customer has an appropriate virtual machine environment installed on their general purpose computer—in embodiments where the software component requires such an environment.


A transaction may be initiated 301 upon receiving a customer indication that a deposit transaction is desired. The customer is instructed to identify an account per FIG. 2, and as a result the financial institution electronics receive an account identifier (ID) 302. Similarly, financial institution electronics receive check amount 303. At this juncture the software component at the customer computer handles image capture processes, which may or may not involve the financial institution's server and other electronics in some capacity until such time as check image(s) are received 304.


Upon receipt of check images, they may be analyzed 305 to obtain check identification information. For example, an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) process or Digital Signal Processing (DSP) process may be invoked to determine certain information about the check. Such information may be validated 306 by comparing information so obtained against a variety of other data and/or rules governing permissible (or, conversely, impermissible) aspects of checks identification data. A more in-depth discussion of validation procedures that may be implemented in steps such as 305 and 306 is provided below with reference to FIGS. 4, 5, and 6.


If the check identification data obtained in step 305 cannot be validated in step 306, an error may result 317, and the deposit transaction can be flagged, delayed, or aborted 315. If terminated, an error message can be delivered to the customer 314, explaining the action taken and optionally providing a reason that the transaction for the action. If the transaction is flagged, it will be allowed to proceed through the various other steps and result in a soft post 313 to the customer account. If delayed, the soft post 313 will be made only after further scrutiny of the transaction, or will be avoided entirely. In each of the above scenarios, a notification of action taken may also be sent to the customer, optionally including an explanation for the reason the action was taken and steps for correcting the error.


Representment and kiting detection processes may be carried out to determine whether the check was previously deposited or is suspected to be part of a kiting operation 307. As illustrated in FIG. 3, if a representment or kiting operation is detected in 307, the transaction may be flagged, delayed, or terminated 315.


OCR may further be performed on a check amount location 306, and the amount as determined using OCR may be compared against the customer-entered amount received pursuant to step 303. If the amounts do not match, an error 316 can result, terminating the transaction and delivering appropriate information concerning the error to the customer 314. OCR may further be performed on any other aspects of the check image at this time if it is advantageous in specific embodiments to do so.


The server may further receive and modify a deposit transaction log file 310. Alternative versions of the images received may be generated and placed in the log file. Check 21 regulations require a bi-tonal TIFF formatted image, which is generally a low-quality image format as compared to other available image formats. Therefore, it is desirable in some embodiments to retain both a “good” image in an initial format, e.g., in a JPEG format, as well as the modified bi-tonal TIFF required by Check 21. This way, if any troubleshooting is necessary, a good image of the check remains available.


In some embodiments, a bank stamp may be overlaid on the image of the back of the check 311, just as if the check was physically deposited at a bank. Appropriate images may be forwarded to the payor bank for payment 312, and meanwhile, the customer's account may be provisionally credited in the amount of the check 313. A confirmation can be delivered to the customer 314.


At 312, in one embodiment, the bank may forward an image or images to a payor bank. Provisionally crediting the customer account 513 with a “soft post” and delivering a confirmation to the customer-controlled general purpose computer 514 may be done before, after, or contemporaneously with step 312.


In one embodiment, forwarding an image or images to a payor bank 312 may be performed pursuant to an Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) transaction. ACH transactions typically include payment instructions to debit and/or credit an account. Banks often employ ACH service providers to settle ACH transactions. Examples of ACH service providers include regional branches of the Federal Reserve and the Electronic Payments Network (EPN).


In an ACH transaction, the payee's (customer's) bank may be referred to as the originating depository financial institution (ODFI). Upon receipt of appropriate check information, the payee's bank may credit funds to the payee's account and generate an ACH debit entry to the payor's account, which may be presented to the ACH service provider for processing.


The ACH service provider may process the debit entry by identifying the account and bank from which the check is drawn. The bank from which the check is drawn (i.e., the payor's bank) may be referred to as a receiving depository financial institution (RDFI). If the payor's bank verifies the transaction, the ACH service provider may settle the transaction by debiting the payor's bank and crediting the payee's bank. The payor's bank may then debit the payor's account.


A substitute check is typically a paper reproduction of an original check and may be the legal equivalent of the original check. Substitute checks were authorized under The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, commonly known as Check 21. The Act was enacted to facilitate the check clearing process by allowing banks to transmit electronic images of checks (e.g., substitute checks) to other banks rather than physically sending the original paper checks. Check 21 does not require that banks use substitute checks. In fact, many banks may have voluntary agreements to accept certain electronic images of checks even though the images may not qualify as substitute checks under Check 21. If a bank does not have a voluntary agreement and/or refuses to accept an electronic image, the financial institution is required under Check 21 to accept a substitute check in lieu of the original check.


The bank may process the ACH debit entry, substitute check, and/or electronic image. As noted above, the bank may present the ACH debit entry to an ACH service provider (e.g., EPN), which may be responsible for settling the transaction between the payee's bank and the payor's bank. The bank also may convert the digital image into a substitute check and present the substitute check to an intermediary bank (e.g., a regional branch of the Federal Reserve) to complete the check clearing process. If the payor's bank and the payee's bank are the same, the transaction can be handled internally at the payor bank by simply debiting the account of one customer and crediting the account of another. Thus, an intermediate step may comprise identifying if the payor bank and the payee bank are one and the same, or otherwise operating in a closely cooperative manner.


Each of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 provide exemplary methods for analyzing an validating an image of a remotely deposited check received by financial institution electronics as may be carried out in a system comprising features as disclosed in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, and in particular as part of steps 305 and 306 in FIG. 3. However, it should be emphasized that while the various aspects of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 provide useful context for FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, the disclosed aspects of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are in no way required to carry out the steps of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6.


Furthermore, while FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 are illustrated and discussed as methods, it will be acknowledged that they also disclose corresponding systems and computer readable media designed to carry out such methods. FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 may be carried out by electronic subsystems within financial institution electronics such as server 131, which may comprise a variety of other electronics such as routers, switches, and modems. The steps of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 may also be recorded as instructions on computer readable media designed for causing financial institution electronics to carry out the disclosed methods.



FIG. 4 generally contemplates a novel method for detecting the presence of signatures on a received check image. Embodiments may analyze a check for the mere presence of any signature marking, or may go further to compare a detected signature to a signature verification file.


A software component may be electronically sent to a customer controlled general purpose computer 401, said software component configured to facilitate electronically sending an image of a front side of a payor check and/or an image of a back side of said payor check. As described above, said software component is advantageously configured for execution by a virtual machine framework. The software component can manage capture and delivery of check images as discussed above.


An image of a front side of the payor check is thus electronically received 402 by financial institution electronics. An image of a back side of the payor check may also be electronically received 403. Signatures may be present on the front and back sides of a check as is well known. A signature line is typically present on the bottom right of personal checks, and an endorsement location is typically marked off at the top back of personal checks. Of course, other signature locations may be customary in business checks or other negotiable instruments and the invention can be modified as necessary to adapt to appropriate signature locations.


An electronic analysis of the image of a front side of said payor check may be automatically performed 404 to determine whether a payor signature is present. Similarly, if an image of the back of the check is also received, an electronic analysis of the back side may be automatically performed 405 to determine whether an endorsement signature is present.


The electronic analysis performed to determine whether a payor signature is present may comprise determining a presence of any signature marking at a predetermined location on the image of a front side of said payor check. The predetermined location may be, for example, a location in the bottom right corner of a front side of a check typically used as a signature line. Similarly, The electronic analysis performed to determine whether an endorsement is present may comprise determining a presence of any signature marking at a predetermined location on the image of a back side of said payor check. The predetermined location may be, for example, the endorsement area provided on the back side of checks. Such embodiments are possible when many checks generally conform to predetermined size and arrangement specifications. Alternatively, more robustly adaptable embodiments are feasible in which the entirety of a check image may be scanned and any presence of a signature is adaptively discovered.


Alternatively, the electronic analysis performed to determine whether a payor signature is present may comprise comparing, for example, a predetermined portion said image of a front side of said payor check to a payor signature verification image. For example, if the receiving bank has access to a file comprising an image of the payor's signature, such file may be electronically compared to the portion of the check image bearing such signature. Image comparison techniques are generally known in the art and may be set to require various levels of similarity between compared images. As might be expected, one signature often differs from another to some degree, even if both are authentic. Thus, signature matching techniques should be appropriately set to allow for differences. In one embodiment, signature image modification may be performed prior to comparison, so as to more easily identify certain more easily identifiable characteristics of a signature.


In general, the use of a signature verification may entail, in one embodiment, identifying a payor, looking up a payor identifier such as payor name in a database, retrieving a payor signature verification image, and finally comparing said verification image to a payor signature gathered from a predetermined location of a received check image. Similarly, a payee may be identified, the payee signature verification image may be retrieved, and said verification image may be compared to a predetermined location on the received image of the back side of the check.


Similarly, the electronic analysis performed to determine whether an endorsement is present may comprise comparing a predetermined portion said image of a back side of said payor check to an endorsement signature verification image. For example, if the receiving bank has access to a file comprising an image of the customer's signature, such file may be electronically compared to the portion of the check image bearing such signature.


If the payor signature is not present on said image of a front side of said payor check or if said endorsement signature is not present on said image of a back side of said payor check, then a customer may be automatically notified 406. For example, the customer may be automatically notified that said payor check will not be deposited.


If a correctable error is discovered, for example if no endorsement signature is detected, the customer may be automatically instructed correct such error 407. The customer may be automatically instructed to endorse said payor check and to resend said image of a back side of said payor check.


If the payor signature is present on the image of a front side of said payor check and, in embodiments that also check for an endorsement signature, if said endorsement signature is present on said image of a back side of said payor check, then subject to other processing that may occur, the check deposit may be automatically soft posted to a customer account 408.



FIG. 5 generally contemplates a novel method for conducting a “face recognition” on a check to verify it's authenticity. An image of a front side of the payor check is electronically received 501 by financial institution electronics. An image of a back side of the payor check may also be electronically received 502.


At least a portion of said image of a front side of said payor check may be automatically electronically compared to a payor check verification image 503. A payor check verification image may comprise, for example, an image of a previous check drafted by said payor, an image of a signature portion of a previous check drafted by said payor, an image of a name and address portion of a previous check drafted by said payor, and/or an image retrieved from said payor bank.


An electronic analysis of said image of a back side of said payor check may be automatically performed to determine whether an endorsement signature is present on said image of a back side of said payor check 504.


A customer may be automatically notified 505 if the check cannot be validated. For example, a customer may be automatically notified if said at least a portion of said image of a front side of said payor check is not substantially similar to said payor check verification image. In one embodiment, the customer may be notified that the check will not be deposited. In another embodiment, the customer may be given an opportunity to correct any errors that may have been identified.


An amount of said check may be electronically received 506 from said customer, and said image of a front side of said payor check may be automatically electronically analyzed to determine a “second” amount of said check 507. When the amount data received from the customer and the amount as determined by the image analysis are compared, they should match. If they do not match, i.e. if said first amount differs from said second amount, then the customer may be notified of the error 508, for example by automatically notifying a customer that a deposit cannot proceed. The customer may be instructed to correct the error 509, for example by instructing said customer to resend said first amount of said check.



FIG. 6 generally contemplates a novel method for detecting MICR line indications that a check is no longer valid. An image of a front side of the payor check is electronically received 601 by financial institution electronics. An image of a back side of the payor check may also be electronically received 602.


An electronic analysis of a MICR line portion of said image of a front side of said payor check may be automatically performed 603 to determine if said MICR line comprises at least one predetermined feature. Examples of predetermined feature include generally aspects of a MICR line that indicate a check was previously presented to a bank and therefore is likely no longer valid. A predetermined feature may comprise, for example, a number 4 in position 44 on said MICR line. In another embodiment, a predetermined feature may comprise an identification of an amount of said check in said MICR line.


The term “electronic analysis,” as used herein, generally refers to image analysis using Digital Signal Processing (DSP). OCR can be thought of as one form of DSP in which the signals processed are determined to be numbers or letters, and a file is generated with the numerals and/or text that is recognized.


OCR may be performed on the check's MICR line location 305 to determine information such as payor bank routing number, account number, and check number. The bank routing number may then be validated 306 against a list of valid routing numbers to ensure that it corresponds to a legitimate bank, and in some embodiments, to ensure it corresponds to a United States bank. In one embodiment, the OCR is conducted in real time, i.e. prior to confirming the deposit transaction for the customer, so as to validate some initial deposit information immediately, and thereby filter transactions that may result in errors were the OCR to be conducted at some later time. In other embodiments, certain efficiencies may be gained by performing “batch” OCR operations at some later time.


In one embodiment, an OCR process can conveniently be applied to an image of a back side of a check in addition to performing OCR on the image of the front side of said check. One problem that may occur involves customer submission of two front images, instead of one front image and one back image. OCR may be performed on a MICR line location of an alleged image of a back side of said check to confirm that said alleged image of a back side of said check does not bear a MICR line. If no MICR line is present in such location then it is more likely that the alleged image of a back side of said check is in fact the back, and not the front, of the check.


Another advantageous use of OCR is on the endorsement location on the back of a check. By performing OCR, it may be possible in some embodiments to determine that the signature matches that of the payor or drafter of the check. However, often signatures are illegible. Thus in one embodiment it is advantageous to determine that some mark or signature is present in the endorsement location on the back of the check, without conducting any further signature identification procedures.


As with above described embodiments, the electronic analysis may also include determining whether a payor signature is present on said image of a front side of said payor check. Also, an electronic analysis of said image of a back side of said payor check may be automatically performed to determine whether and endorsement signature and/or a return stamp is present. A predetermined portion said image of a front and/or back side of said payor check may be compared to a signature verification image.


If the MICR line comprises said at least one predetermined feature, a customer can be automatically notified of the error, for example in a notification that due to MICR line error, said payor check will not be deposited. Similarly, a customer may be automatically notified that said payor check will not be deposited if said return stamp is present on said image of a back side of said payor check. The presence of a return stamp indicates that a check was already deposited with a bank and therefore is likely no longer valid.


If said MICR line does not comprise said at least one predetermined feature, and subject to any further processing that may occur, the check is verified and a deposit can be automatically soft posted to the customer's account.


The various techniques described herein may be implemented with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the disclosed embodiments, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the disclosed embodiments. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computer will generally include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device and at least one output device. One or more programs are preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.


The described methods and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of program code that is transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via any other form of transmission, wherein, when the program code is received and loaded into and executed by a machine, such as an EPROM, a gate array, a programmable logic device (PLD), a client computer, a video recorder or the like, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code combines with the processor to provide a unique apparatus that operates to perform the processing of the disclosed embodiments.


In addition to the specific implementations explicitly set forth herein, other aspects and implementations will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and illustrated implementations be considered as examples only, with a true scope and spirit of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A server implemented method for processing a check, comprising: receiving, by a server, a request from a customer-controlled device, the customer-controlled-device including a general purpose image capture device, to initiate a session;transmitting, by the server to the customer-controlled device, software facilitating the session for processing the check; andupon determining, by the server, if a customer meets at least one criteria of trustworthiness based on information included in the request, initiating the session by the server, wherein the server is further configured to facilitate the session by:receiving an image of a first side of the check captured by the general purpose image capture device of the customer-controlled device during the session, wherein the image of the first side includes information identifying a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line portion;analyzing in real time the image of the first side during the session;identifying the MICR line portion based on the analysis during the session;determining whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified MICR line portion during the session;in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion, transmitting a notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction; andprocessing the check to complete the deposit transaction.
  • 2. The server implemented method of claim 1, wherein the image of the first side further includes monetary amount information, and the server further facilitates the session by: identifying the monetary amount information based on the analysis;determining whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified monetary amount information; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the monetary amount information, transmitting the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 3. The server implemented method of claim 1, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: receiving an image of a second side of the check captured by the general purpose image capture device of the customer-controlled device, wherein the image of the second side includes an endorsement.
  • 4. The server implemented method of claim 3, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: analyzing in real time the image of the second side;identifying the endorsement based on the analysis;comparing the identified endorsement against an endorsement verification image to determine whether the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image; anddetermining whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the comparison.
  • 5. The server implemented method of claim 4, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: in response to determining that the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image, transmitting the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 6. The server implemented method of claim 3, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: analyzing in real time the image of the second side;identifying the endorsement based on the analysis; anddetermining whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement.
  • 7. The server implemented method of claim 6, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, transmitting the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 8. The server implemented method of claim 1, wherein the server further facilitates the session by: identifying whether the image of the first side includes an endorsement based on the analysis;determining whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, transmitting the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the criteria of trustworthiness comprises at least one of the customer's account standing, the customer's level of assets, the duration of the customer's relationship, or the number of financial service products held by the customer.
  • 10. A server for processing a check, comprising: a processor;an interface in communication with the processor; andwherein the processor is configured to:receive a request from a customer-controlled device, the customer-controlled device including a general purpose image capture device, to initiate a session for processing a check;transmit, from the server to the customer-controlled device, software facilitating the session for processing the check;receive an image of a first side of the check, wherein the image of the first side includes information identifying a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line portion; anddetermine whether a customer meets at least one criteria of trustworthiness based on information included in the request from the customer-controlled device, and when the customer meets the at least one criteria, initiate the session by the processor, wherein the processor is further configured to:analyze in real time the image of the first side during the session;identify the MICR line portion based on the analysis during the session;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified MICR line portion during the session;in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion, cause the transmission of a notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction during the session; andprocess the check to complete the deposit transaction.
  • 11. The server of claim 10, wherein the image of the first side further includes monetary amount information, and the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: identify the monetary amount information based on the analysis;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified monetary amount information; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the monetary amount information, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 12. The server of claim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: receive an image of a second side of the check captured by the general purpose image capture device of the customer-controlled device, wherein the image of the second side includes an endorsement.
  • 13. The server of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the second side;identify the endorsement based on the analysis;compare the identified endorsement against an endorsement verification image to determine whether the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image; anddetermine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the comparison.
  • 14. The server of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: in response to determining that the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image, cause a transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 15. The server of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the second side;identify the endorsement based on the analysis; anddetermine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement.
  • 16. The server of claim 15, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 17. The server of claim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the first side;identify whether the image of the first side includes an endorsement based on the analysis;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 18. The server of claim 10, wherein the criteria of trustworthiness comprises at least one of the customer's account standing, the customer's level of assets, the duration of the customer's relationship, or the number of financial service products held by the customer.
  • 19. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by a processor of a server, the processor of the server executing the instructions to: receive a request from a customer-controlled computing device, the customer-controlled device including a general purpose image capture device, to initiate a session;transmit, from the server to the customer-controlled device, software facilitating the session for processing a check;determine whether a customer meets at least one criteria of trustworthiness based on information included in the request, and when the customer meets the at least one criteria, initiate the session by the processor of the server, wherein the processor of the server is further configured to facilitate the session by executing instructions to:receive an image of a first side of the check during the session, wherein the image of the first side includes information identifying a Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line portion;analyze in real time the image of the first side during the session;identify the MICR line portion based on the analysis during the session;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified MICR line portion during the session;in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion, cause a transmission of a notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction during the session; andprocess the check to complete the deposit transaction.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the image of the first side further includes monetary amount information, and the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: identify the monetary amount information based on the analysis;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified monetary amount information; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the monetary amount information, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: receive an image of a second side of the check captured by the general purpose image capture device of the customer-controlled device, wherein the image of the second side includes an endorsement.
  • 22. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the second side;identify the endorsement based on the analysis;compare the identified endorsement against an endorsement verification image to determine whether the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image; anddetermine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the comparison.
  • 23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: in response to determining that the identified endorsement matches the endorsement verification image, cause a transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 24. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the second side;identify the endorsement based on the analysis; anddetermine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement.
  • 25. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: in response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 26. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19, the processor of the server further executing the instructions to facilitate the session to: analyze in real time the image of the first side;identify whether the image of the first side includes an endorsement based on the analysis;determine whether to process the check for a deposit transaction based on the identified endorsement; andin response to successfully identifying the MICR line portion and the endorsement, cause the transmission of the notification to the customer-controlled device that the check will be processed for the deposit transaction.
  • 27. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the criteria of trustworthiness comprises at least one of the customer's account standing, the customer's level of assets, the duration of the customer's relationship, or the number of financial service products held by the customer.
US Referenced Citations (720)
Number Name Date Kind
3005282 Christiansen Oct 1961 A
3341820 Grillmeier, Jr. et al. Sep 1967 A
3576972 Wood May 1971 A
3593913 Bremer Jul 1971 A
3620553 Donovan Nov 1971 A
3648242 Grosbard Mar 1972 A
3800124 Walsh Mar 1974 A
3816943 Henry Jun 1974 A
4002356 Weidmann Jan 1977 A
4060711 Buros Nov 1977 A
4070649 Wright, Jr. et al. Jan 1978 A
4128202 Buros Dec 1978 A
4136471 Austin Jan 1979 A
4205780 Burns Jun 1980 A
4264808 Owens Apr 1981 A
4305216 Skelton Dec 1981 A
4321672 Braun Mar 1982 A
4433436 Carnes Feb 1984 A
4454610 Sziklai Jun 1984 A
RE31692 Tyburski et al. Oct 1984 E
4523330 Cain Jun 1985 A
4636099 Goldston Jan 1987 A
4640413 Kaplan Feb 1987 A
4644144 Chandek Feb 1987 A
4722444 Murphy Feb 1988 A
4722544 Weber Feb 1988 A
4727435 Otani et al. Feb 1988 A
4774663 Musmanno Sep 1988 A
4790475 Griffin Dec 1988 A
4806780 Yamamoto Feb 1989 A
4837693 Schotz Jun 1989 A
4890228 Longfield Dec 1989 A
4927071 Wood May 1990 A
4934587 McNabb Jun 1990 A
4960981 Benton Oct 1990 A
4975735 Bright Dec 1990 A
5022683 Barbour Jun 1991 A
5053607 Carlson Oct 1991 A
5146606 Grondalski Sep 1992 A
5157620 Shaar Oct 1992 A
5159548 Caslavka Oct 1992 A
5191525 LeBrun Mar 1993 A
5193121 Elischer et al. Mar 1993 A
5220501 Lawlor Jun 1993 A
5227863 Bilbrey et al. Jul 1993 A
5229589 Schneider Jul 1993 A
5237159 Stephens Aug 1993 A
5257320 Etherington et al. Oct 1993 A
5265008 Benton Nov 1993 A
5321816 Rogan Jun 1994 A
5347302 Simonoff Sep 1994 A
5350906 Brody Sep 1994 A
5373550 Campbell Dec 1994 A
5419588 Wood May 1995 A
5422467 Graef Jun 1995 A
5444794 Uhland, Sr. Aug 1995 A
5475403 Havlovick et al. Dec 1995 A
5504538 Tsujihara Apr 1996 A
5504677 Pollin Apr 1996 A
5528387 Kelly et al. Jun 1996 A
5577179 Blank Nov 1996 A
5583759 Geer Dec 1996 A
5590196 Moreau Dec 1996 A
5594225 Botvin Jan 1997 A
5598969 Ong Feb 1997 A
5602936 Green Feb 1997 A
5610726 Nonoshita Mar 1997 A
5611028 Shibasaki Mar 1997 A
5630073 Nolan May 1997 A
5631984 Graf et al. May 1997 A
5668897 Stolfo Sep 1997 A
5673320 Ray Sep 1997 A
5677955 Doggett Oct 1997 A
5678046 Cahill et al. Oct 1997 A
5679938 Templeton Oct 1997 A
5680611 Rail Oct 1997 A
5691524 Josephson Nov 1997 A
5699452 Vaidyanathan Dec 1997 A
5734747 Vaidyanathan Mar 1998 A
5737440 Kunkler Apr 1998 A
5748780 Stolfo May 1998 A
5751842 Riach May 1998 A
5784503 Bleecker, III et al. Jul 1998 A
5830609 Warner Nov 1998 A
5832463 Funk Nov 1998 A
5838814 Moore Nov 1998 A
5863075 Rich Jan 1999 A
5870456 Rogers Feb 1999 A
5870724 Lawlor Feb 1999 A
5870725 Bellinger et al. Feb 1999 A
5878337 Joao Mar 1999 A
5893101 Balogh et al. Apr 1999 A
5897625 Gustin Apr 1999 A
5898157 Mangili et al. Apr 1999 A
5901253 Tretter May 1999 A
5903878 Talati May 1999 A
5903881 Schrader May 1999 A
5910988 Ballard Jun 1999 A
5917931 Kunkler Jun 1999 A
5924737 Schrupp Jul 1999 A
5926548 Okamoto Jul 1999 A
5930778 Geer Jul 1999 A
5937396 Konya Aug 1999 A
5940844 Cahill Aug 1999 A
5982918 Mennie Nov 1999 A
5987439 Gustin Nov 1999 A
6012048 Gustin et al. Jan 2000 A
6014454 Kunkler Jan 2000 A
6021202 Anderson Feb 2000 A
6021397 Jones Feb 2000 A
6029887 Furuhashi Feb 2000 A
6030000 Diamond Feb 2000 A
6032137 Ballard Feb 2000 A
6038553 Hyde Mar 2000 A
6053405 Irwin, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6073119 Borenmisza-wahr et al. Jun 2000 A
6085168 Mori Jul 2000 A
6097834 Krouse Aug 2000 A
6097845 Ng et al. Aug 2000 A
6097885 Rayner Aug 2000 A
6105865 Hardesty Aug 2000 A
6141339 Kaplan et al. Oct 2000 A
6145738 Stinson et al. Nov 2000 A
6151426 Lee Nov 2000 A
6159585 Rittenhouse Dec 2000 A
6170744 Lee Jan 2001 B1
6188506 Kaiserman Feb 2001 B1
6189785 Lowery Feb 2001 B1
6192165 Irons Feb 2001 B1
6195694 Chen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199055 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6236009 Emigh et al. May 2001 B1
6243689 Norton Jun 2001 B1
6278983 Ball Aug 2001 B1
6282826 Richards Sep 2001 B1
6293469 Masson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304860 Martin Oct 2001 B1
6314452 Dekel Nov 2001 B1
6317727 May Nov 2001 B1
6328207 Gregoire et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330546 Gopinathan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6339658 Moccagatta Jan 2002 B1
6363164 Jones et al. Mar 2002 B1
6390362 Martin May 2002 B1
6397196 Kravetz May 2002 B1
6408084 Foley Jun 2002 B1
6411725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411737 Wesolkowski et al. Jun 2002 B2
6411938 Gates et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413305 Mehta Jul 2002 B1
6417869 Do Jul 2002 B1
6425017 Dievendorff Jul 2002 B1
6429952 Olbricht Aug 2002 B1
6439454 Masson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449397 Che-chu Sep 2002 B1
6450403 Martens et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464134 Page Oct 2002 B1
6470325 Leemhuis Oct 2002 B1
6505178 Flenley Jan 2003 B1
6546119 Ciolli et al. Apr 2003 B2
6574609 Downs Jun 2003 B1
6578760 Otto Jun 2003 B1
6587837 Spagna Jul 2003 B1
6606117 Windle Aug 2003 B1
6609200 Anderson Aug 2003 B2
6611598 Hayosh Aug 2003 B1
6614930 Agnihotri et al. Sep 2003 B1
6643416 Daniels Nov 2003 B1
6654487 Downs, Jr. Nov 2003 B1
6661910 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672452 Alves Jan 2004 B1
6682452 Quintus Jan 2004 B2
6695204 Stinson Feb 2004 B1
6711474 Treyz et al. Mar 2004 B1
6726097 Graef Apr 2004 B2
6728397 Mcneal Apr 2004 B2
6738496 Van Hall May 2004 B1
6742128 Joiner May 2004 B1
6745186 Testa et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754640 Bozeman Jun 2004 B2
6755340 Voss Jun 2004 B1
6763226 McZeal Jul 2004 B1
6781962 Williams Aug 2004 B1
6786398 Stinson Sep 2004 B1
6789054 Makhlouf Sep 2004 B1
6796491 Nakajima Sep 2004 B2
6806903 Okisu et al. Oct 2004 B1
6813733 Li Nov 2004 B1
6829704 Zhang Dec 2004 B2
6844885 Anderson Jan 2005 B2
6856965 Stinson et al. Feb 2005 B1
6863214 Garner et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870947 Kelland Mar 2005 B2
6883140 Acker Apr 2005 B1
6898314 Kung et al. May 2005 B2
6902105 Koakutsu Jun 2005 B2
6913188 Wong Jul 2005 B2
6931591 Brown Aug 2005 B1
6934719 Nally Aug 2005 B2
6957770 Robinson Oct 2005 B1
6961689 Greenberg Nov 2005 B1
6970843 Forte Nov 2005 B1
6973589 Wright Dec 2005 B2
6983886 Natsukari et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993507 Meyer Jan 2006 B2
6996263 Jones et al. Feb 2006 B2
6999943 Johnson Feb 2006 B1
7003040 Yi Feb 2006 B2
7004382 Sandru Feb 2006 B2
7010155 Koakutsu et al. Mar 2006 B2
7010507 Anderson Mar 2006 B1
7016704 Pallakoff Mar 2006 B2
7039048 Monta May 2006 B1
7058036 Yu Jun 2006 B1
7062099 Li et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062456 Riehl et al. Jun 2006 B1
7062768 Kubo Jun 2006 B2
7072862 Wilson Jul 2006 B1
7076458 Lawlor et al. Jul 2006 B2
7086003 Demsky Aug 2006 B2
7092561 Downs, Jr. Aug 2006 B2
7104443 Paul et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113925 Waserstein Sep 2006 B2
7114649 Nelson Oct 2006 B2
7139594 Nagatomo Nov 2006 B2
7140539 Crews Nov 2006 B1
7163347 Lugg Jan 2007 B2
7178721 Maloney Feb 2007 B2
7181430 Buchanan et al. Feb 2007 B1
7184980 Allen-Rouman et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197173 Jones et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200255 Jones Apr 2007 B2
7204412 Foss, Jr. Apr 2007 B2
7216106 Buchanan May 2007 B1
7219082 Forte May 2007 B2
7219831 Murata May 2007 B2
7249076 Pendleton Jul 2007 B1
7252224 Verma Aug 2007 B2
7257246 Brodie et al. Aug 2007 B1
7266230 Doran Sep 2007 B2
7290034 Budd Oct 2007 B2
7299970 Ching Nov 2007 B1
7299979 Phillips Nov 2007 B2
7313543 Crane Dec 2007 B1
7314163 Crews et al. Jan 2008 B1
7321874 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7321875 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7325725 Foss, Jr. Feb 2008 B2
7328190 Smith et al. Feb 2008 B2
7330604 Wu et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336813 Prakash et al. Feb 2008 B2
7343320 Treyz Mar 2008 B1
7349566 Jones et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356505 March Apr 2008 B2
7377425 Ma May 2008 B1
7379978 Anderson et al. May 2008 B2
7385631 Maeno Jun 2008 B2
7386511 Buchanan Jun 2008 B2
7391897 Jones et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391934 Goodall et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392935 Byrne et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401048 Rosedale Jul 2008 B2
7403917 Larsen Jul 2008 B1
7406198 Aoki et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421107 Lugg Sep 2008 B2
7421410 Schechtman et al. Sep 2008 B1
7433098 Klein et al. Oct 2008 B2
7437327 Lam Oct 2008 B2
7440924 Buchanan et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447347 Weber Nov 2008 B2
7455220 Phillips Nov 2008 B2
7455221 Sheaffer Nov 2008 B2
7460108 Tamura Dec 2008 B2
7461779 Ramachandran Dec 2008 B2
7461780 Potts Dec 2008 B2
7471818 Price Dec 2008 B1
7475040 Buchanan Jan 2009 B2
7477923 Wallmark Jan 2009 B2
7480382 Dunbar Jan 2009 B2
7480422 Ackley et al. Jan 2009 B2
7489953 Griffin Feb 2009 B2
7490242 Torres Feb 2009 B2
7497429 Reynders Mar 2009 B2
7503486 Ahles Mar 2009 B2
7505759 Rahman Mar 2009 B1
7506261 Satou Mar 2009 B2
7509287 Nutahara Mar 2009 B2
7512564 Geer Mar 2009 B1
7519560 Lam Apr 2009 B2
7520420 Phillips Apr 2009 B2
7520422 Robinson et al. Apr 2009 B1
7536354 deGroeve May 2009 B1
7536440 Budd May 2009 B2
7539646 Gilder May 2009 B2
7540408 Levine Jun 2009 B2
7542598 Jones Jun 2009 B2
7545529 Borrey et al. Jun 2009 B2
7548641 Gilson et al. Jun 2009 B2
7566002 Love et al. Jul 2009 B2
7571848 Cohen Aug 2009 B2
7587066 Cordery et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587363 Cataline Sep 2009 B2
7590275 Clarke et al. Sep 2009 B2
7599543 Jones Oct 2009 B2
7599888 Manfre Oct 2009 B2
7602956 Jones Oct 2009 B2
7606762 Heit Oct 2009 B1
7609873 Foth et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609889 Guo et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619721 Jones Nov 2009 B2
7620231 Jones Nov 2009 B2
7620604 Bueche, Jr. Nov 2009 B1
7630518 Frew et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644037 Ostrovsky Jan 2010 B1
7644043 Minowa Jan 2010 B2
7647275 Jones Jan 2010 B2
7668363 Price Feb 2010 B2
7672940 Viola Mar 2010 B2
7676409 Ahmad Mar 2010 B1
7680735 Loy Mar 2010 B1
7689482 Lam Mar 2010 B2
7697776 Wu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698222 Bueche, Jr. Apr 2010 B1
7702588 Gilder et al. Apr 2010 B2
7720735 Anderson et al. May 2010 B2
7734545 Fogliano Jun 2010 B1
7743979 Fredman Jun 2010 B2
7753268 Robinson et al. Jul 2010 B1
7761358 Craig et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766244 Field Aug 2010 B1
7769650 Bleunven Aug 2010 B2
7792752 Kay Sep 2010 B1
7792753 Slater et al. Sep 2010 B1
7810714 Murata Oct 2010 B2
7818245 Prakash et al. Oct 2010 B2
7856402 Kay Dec 2010 B1
7873200 Oakes et al. Jan 2011 B1
7876949 Oakes et al. Jan 2011 B1
7885451 Walls et al. Feb 2011 B1
7885880 Prasad et al. Feb 2011 B1
7894094 Nacman et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896232 Prasad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7900822 Prasad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7903863 Jones et al. Mar 2011 B2
7904386 Kalra et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912785 Kay Mar 2011 B1
7949587 Morris et al. May 2011 B1
7950698 Popadic et al. May 2011 B2
7958053 Stone Jun 2011 B2
7962411 Prasad et al. Jun 2011 B1
7970677 Oakes, III et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974899 Prasad et al. Jul 2011 B1
7978900 Nepomniachtchi et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996314 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996315 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996316 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
8001051 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
8045784 Price et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046301 Smith et al. Oct 2011 B1
8204293 Csulits et al. Jun 2012 B2
8235284 Prasad et al. Aug 2012 B1
8320657 Burks et al. Nov 2012 B1
8351677 Oakes et al. Jan 2013 B1
8392332 Oakes et al. Mar 2013 B1
8732081 Oakes et al. May 2014 B1
20010004235 Maloney Jun 2001 A1
20010014881 Drummond Aug 2001 A1
20010018739 Anderson Aug 2001 A1
20010027994 Hayashida Oct 2001 A1
20010037299 Nichols et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042171 Vermeulen Nov 2001 A1
20010042785 Walker Nov 2001 A1
20010043748 Wesolkowski Nov 2001 A1
20010047330 Gephart Nov 2001 A1
20010054020 Barth et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020001393 Jones Jan 2002 A1
20020016763 March Feb 2002 A1
20020016769 Barbara et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032656 Chen Mar 2002 A1
20020038289 Lawlor et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020052841 Guthrie May 2002 A1
20020052853 Munoz May 2002 A1
20020065786 Martens et al. May 2002 A1
20020072974 Pugliese Jun 2002 A1
20020075524 Blair Jun 2002 A1
20020084321 Martens et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087467 Mascavage, III et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107809 Biddle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116329 Serbetcioglu Aug 2002 A1
20020116335 Star Aug 2002 A1
20020118891 Rudd Aug 2002 A1
20020120562 Opiela Aug 2002 A1
20020129249 Maillard et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133409 Sawano et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138522 Muralidhar Sep 2002 A1
20020147798 Huang Oct 2002 A1
20020150279 Scott Oct 2002 A1
20020152160 Allen-Rouman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152161 Aoike Oct 2002 A1
20020152164 Dutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152165 Dutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152169 Dutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159648 Alderson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020171820 Okamura Nov 2002 A1
20020178112 Goeller Nov 2002 A1
20020186881 Li Dec 2002 A1
20020188564 Star Dec 2002 A1
20020195485 Pomerleau et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005326 Flemming Jan 2003 A1
20030023557 Moore Jan 2003 A1
20030038227 Sesek Feb 2003 A1
20030055756 Allan Mar 2003 A1
20030055776 Samuelson Mar 2003 A1
20030074315 Lam Apr 2003 A1
20030075596 Koakutsu Apr 2003 A1
20030075916 Gorski Apr 2003 A1
20030081824 Mennie May 2003 A1
20030093367 Allen-Rouman et al. May 2003 A1
20030093369 Ijichi et al. May 2003 A1
20030102714 Rhodes et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105688 Brown Jun 2003 A1
20030105714 Alarcon-Luther et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139999 Rowe Jul 2003 A1
20030159046 Choi et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167225 Adams Sep 2003 A1
20030191615 Bailey Oct 2003 A1
20030191869 Williams Oct 2003 A1
20030200174 Star Oct 2003 A1
20030202690 Jones et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212904 Randle et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217005 Drummond et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225705 Park et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233278 Marshall Dec 2003 A1
20030233318 King et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010466 Anderson Jan 2004 A1
20040012496 De Souza Jan 2004 A1
20040013284 Yu Jan 2004 A1
20040024626 Bruijning Feb 2004 A1
20040024708 Masuda Feb 2004 A1
20040030741 Wolton et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040057697 Renzi Mar 2004 A1
20040058705 Morgan Mar 2004 A1
20040066031 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040069841 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040071333 Douglas et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076320 Downs, Jr. Apr 2004 A1
20040078299 Down-Logan Apr 2004 A1
20040080795 Bean et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040089711 Sandru May 2004 A1
20040093303 Picciallo May 2004 A1
20040093305 Kight May 2004 A1
20040103057 Melbert et al. May 2004 A1
20040103296 Harp May 2004 A1
20040109596 Doran Jun 2004 A1
20040110975 Osinski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117302 Weichert Jun 2004 A1
20040122754 Stevens Jun 2004 A1
20040133511 Smith et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138974 Shimamura Jul 2004 A1
20040148235 Craig Jul 2004 A1
20040158549 Matena Aug 2004 A1
20040165096 Maeno Aug 2004 A1
20040170259 Park Sep 2004 A1
20040210515 Hughes Oct 2004 A1
20040210523 Gains et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040228277 Williams Nov 2004 A1
20040236647 Acharya Nov 2004 A1
20040236688 Bozeman Nov 2004 A1
20040240722 Tsuji et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245324 Chen Dec 2004 A1
20040247199 Murai et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040248600 Kim Dec 2004 A1
20040252679 Williams Dec 2004 A1
20040260636 Marceau Dec 2004 A1
20040267666 Minami Dec 2004 A1
20050001421 Luth et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010108 Rahn et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021466 Buchanan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033645 Duphily Feb 2005 A1
20050033685 Reyes Feb 2005 A1
20050033695 Minowa Feb 2005 A1
20050035193 Gustin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038746 Latimer et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038754 Geist Feb 2005 A1
20050044042 Mendiola Feb 2005 A1
20050044577 Jerding Feb 2005 A1
20050049950 Johnson Mar 2005 A1
20050071283 Randle et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075969 Nielson Apr 2005 A1
20050075974 Turgeon Apr 2005 A1
20050078336 Ferlitsch Apr 2005 A1
20050080725 Pick Apr 2005 A1
20050082364 Alvarez et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086140 Ireland Apr 2005 A1
20050086168 Alvarez Apr 2005 A1
20050091161 Gustin Apr 2005 A1
20050096992 Geisel May 2005 A1
20050097019 Jacobs May 2005 A1
20050097046 Singfield May 2005 A1
20050097050 Orcutt May 2005 A1
20050108164 Salafia May 2005 A1
20050108168 Halpin May 2005 A1
20050115110 Dinkins Jun 2005 A1
20050125338 Tidwell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125360 Tidwell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050127160 Fujikawa Jun 2005 A1
20050131820 Rodriguez Jun 2005 A1
20050149436 Elterich Jul 2005 A1
20050168566 Tada Aug 2005 A1
20050171899 Dunn Aug 2005 A1
20050171907 Lewis Aug 2005 A1
20050177499 Thomas Aug 2005 A1
20050177518 Brown Aug 2005 A1
20050182710 Anderson Aug 2005 A1
20050188306 Mackenzie Aug 2005 A1
20050205661 Taylor Sep 2005 A1
20050209961 Michelsen Sep 2005 A1
20050228733 Bent Oct 2005 A1
20050252955 Sugai Nov 2005 A1
20050267843 Acharya et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050268107 Harris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050269412 Chiu Dec 2005 A1
20050273368 Hutten et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278250 Zair Dec 2005 A1
20050281448 Lugg Dec 2005 A1
20050281471 LeConte Dec 2005 A1
20050281474 Huang Dec 2005 A1
20050289030 Smith Dec 2005 A1
20050289182 Pandian et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002426 Madour Jan 2006 A1
20060004660 Pranger Jan 2006 A1
20060025697 Kurzweil Feb 2006 A1
20060039628 Li et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060039629 Li Feb 2006 A1
20060041506 Mason et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045321 Yu Mar 2006 A1
20060047593 Naratil Mar 2006 A1
20060053056 Alspach-Goss Mar 2006 A1
20060059085 Tucker Mar 2006 A1
20060064368 Forte Mar 2006 A1
20060080245 Bahl Apr 2006 A1
20060085357 Pizarro Apr 2006 A1
20060085516 Farr et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060102704 Reynders May 2006 A1
20060106691 Sheaffer May 2006 A1
20060106717 Randle May 2006 A1
20060108168 Fischer et al. May 2006 A1
20060110063 Weiss May 2006 A1
20060112013 Maloney May 2006 A1
20060115110 Rodriguez Jun 2006 A1
20060115141 Koakutsu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060118613 McMann Jun 2006 A1
20060124730 Maloney Jun 2006 A1
20060144924 Stover Jul 2006 A1
20060144950 Johnson Jul 2006 A1
20060161501 Waserstein Jul 2006 A1
20060164682 Lev Jul 2006 A1
20060167818 Wentker et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060182331 Gilson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060182332 Weber Aug 2006 A1
20060186194 Richardson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206506 Fitzpatrick Sep 2006 A1
20060208059 Cable et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210138 Hilton et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212391 Norman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060214940 Kinoshita Sep 2006 A1
20060215204 Miyamoto et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060215230 Borrey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060222260 Sambongi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229976 Jung Oct 2006 A1
20060229986 Corder Oct 2006 A1
20060238503 Smith Oct 2006 A1
20060242062 Peterson Oct 2006 A1
20060242063 Peterson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060249567 Byrne et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274164 Kimura et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279628 Fleming Dec 2006 A1
20060282383 Doran Dec 2006 A1
20060291744 Ikeda et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016796 Singhal Jan 2007 A1
20070019243 Sato Jan 2007 A1
20070022053 Waserstein Jan 2007 A1
20070027802 VanDeburg et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070031022 Frew Feb 2007 A1
20070038561 Vancini et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041629 Prakash et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050292 Yarbrough Mar 2007 A1
20070053574 Verma et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058851 Quine Mar 2007 A1
20070063016 Myatt Mar 2007 A1
20070064991 Douglas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065143 Didow et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070075772 Kokubo Apr 2007 A1
20070076940 Goodall et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070076941 Carreon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070077921 Hayashi Apr 2007 A1
20070080207 Williams Apr 2007 A1
20070082700 Landschaft Apr 2007 A1
20070084911 Crowell Apr 2007 A1
20070086642 Foth Apr 2007 A1
20070086643 Spier et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094088 Mastie Apr 2007 A1
20070094140 Riney et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100748 Dheer May 2007 A1
20070110277 Hayduchok et al. May 2007 A1
20070118472 Allen-Rouman et al. May 2007 A1
20070122024 Haas et al. May 2007 A1
20070127805 Foth et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129955 Dalmia Jun 2007 A1
20070136198 Foth et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140545 Rossignoli Jun 2007 A1
20070140594 Franklin Jun 2007 A1
20070143208 Varga Jun 2007 A1
20070150337 Hawkins et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156438 Popadic Jul 2007 A1
20070168265 Rosenberger Jul 2007 A1
20070171288 Inoue Jul 2007 A1
20070172107 Jones et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070172148 Hawley Jul 2007 A1
20070179883 Questembert Aug 2007 A1
20070183000 Eisen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183741 Lerman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194102 Cohen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198432 Pitroda et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203708 Polcyn et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208816 Baldwin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214086 Homoki Sep 2007 A1
20070217669 Swift et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233585 Ben Simon et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070235518 Mueller et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070235520 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241179 Davis Oct 2007 A1
20070244782 Chimento Oct 2007 A1
20070246525 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070251992 Sharma et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255652 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070255653 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070255662 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070258634 Simonoff Nov 2007 A1
20070268540 Gaspardo et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271182 Prakash et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278286 Crowell et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288380 Starrs Dec 2007 A1
20070288382 Narayanan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070295803 Levine et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299928 Kohli et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002911 Eisen Jan 2008 A1
20080021802 Pendelton Jan 2008 A1
20080040280 Davis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052182 Marshall Feb 2008 A1
20080059376 Davis Mar 2008 A1
20080063253 Wood Mar 2008 A1
20080068674 McIntyre Mar 2008 A1
20080071721 Wang Mar 2008 A1
20080073423 Heit et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080080760 Ronca Apr 2008 A1
20080086420 Gilder et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086421 Gilder Apr 2008 A1
20080091599 Foss, Jr. Apr 2008 A1
20080097899 Jackson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103790 Abernethy May 2008 A1
20080103967 Ackert et al. May 2008 A1
20080113674 Baig May 2008 A1
20080114739 Hayes May 2008 A1
20080116257 Fickling May 2008 A1
20080117991 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080119178 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080133411 Jones et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147549 Rathbun Jun 2008 A1
20080156438 Stumphauzer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162319 Breeden et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162350 Allen-Rouman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080162371 Rampell et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177659 Lacey et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080180750 Feldman Jul 2008 A1
20080208727 McLauqhlin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214180 Cunningham et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219543 Csulits Sep 2008 A1
20080245869 Berkun et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247629 Gilder Oct 2008 A1
20080247655 Yano Oct 2008 A1
20080249931 Gilder Oct 2008 A1
20080249951 Gilder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262953 Anderson Oct 2008 A1
20080275821 Bishop et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080316542 Mindrum et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090024520 Drory et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090046938 Yoder Feb 2009 A1
20090060396 Blessan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090066987 Inokuchi Mar 2009 A1
20090108080 Meyer Apr 2009 A1
20090110281 Hirabayashi Apr 2009 A1
20090141962 Borgia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166406 Pigg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090167870 Caleca et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090171819 Emde et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090171825 Roman Jul 2009 A1
20090173781 Ramachandran Jul 2009 A1
20090185738 Nepomniachtchi Jul 2009 A1
20090190823 Walters Jul 2009 A1
20090192938 Amos Jul 2009 A1
20090236413 Mueller et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090252437 Li Oct 2009 A1
20090254447 Blades Oct 2009 A1
20090281904 Pharris Nov 2009 A1
20090313167 Dujari Dec 2009 A1
20100007899 Lay Jan 2010 A1
20100027679 Sunahara et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100047000 Park et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057578 Blair et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100061446 Hands et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082470 Walach Apr 2010 A1
20100165015 Barkley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100226559 Najari et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100260408 Prakash et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262522 Anderson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100312705 Caruso et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110112967 Anderson et al. May 2011 A1
20110310442 Popadic et al. Dec 2011 A1
20130021651 Popadic et al. Jan 2013 A9
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 984 410 Mar 2000 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (265)
Entry
Wells Fargo—2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Faro Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco, Mar. 28, 2005, Retrieved from the internet <https:www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005—Check21?year=2005>.
Duvall, Mel, “Remote Deposit Capture”, Baseline, vol. 1, issue 70, Mar. 2007, pp. 1-2.
Affinity Credit Union, “Affinity announces online deposit”, Aug 4, 2005, Affinity Federal Credit Union., p. 1.
“Remote check deposit is the answer to a company's banking problem”, Daily Breeze [Torrance, Calif], Nov. 17, 2006, pp. 1-2.
“SNB Check Capture: SmartClient User's Guide”, Nov. 2006, pp. 1-21.
Wells Fargo—2005 News Releases, “The New WElls Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco, Mar. 28, 2005, Retrieved from the internet <https:www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005—Check21?year=2005>.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/320,998, filed Dec. 29, 2005, Luby et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/321,025, filed Dec. 29, 2005, Luby et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/321,027, filed Dec. 29, 2005, Luby et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,131, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Luby et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,014, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,971, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,247, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,963, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,025, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,003, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,974, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Oaks et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,273, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,262, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,227, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,261, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,998, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,228, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,320, filed Oct. 31, 2006, Walls et al.
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act Effective Oct. 28, 2004: Banks No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org/initiatives/content/check21—content.html, downloaded Dec. 2005, 20 pages.
Fest, G., “Patently Unaware,” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, http:banktechnews.com/article.html?id=20060403T7612618, 5 pages.
The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Clearing and Settlement; The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH),” www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/Retail/retail—02d.html, downloaded Dec. 2005, 3 pages.
Website: Blue Mountain Consulting, URL: www.blumountainconsulting.com, downloaded Apr. 26, 2006, 3 pages.
Website: RemoteDepositCapture.com, URL: www.RemoteDepositCapture.com, 2006, 5 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930, 16 pages.
“Accept “Customer Not Present” Checks,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Adjusting Brightness and Contrast”, www.eaglesoftware.com/adjustin.htm, retrieved on May 4, 2009 (4 pgs).
“Best practices for producing quality digital image files,” Digital Images Guidelines, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40247/1/Images-Best—Practice.pdf, downloaded 2007 (2 pgs).
“Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps—user—guide—005.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pgs).
“Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 pgs).
“Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check2l/solutions.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pgs).
“Customer Personalized Bank Checks and Address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web—pages/faq.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pgs).
“Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office Form 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/directdepositapplication.pdf, Jul. 2007 (2 pgs).
“Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pgs).
“Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker—vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pgs).
“Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www/bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-lc—faq—bymail, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pgs).
“Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/dirdepform.pdf. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pgs).
“How to Digitally Deposit a Check Image”, Smart Money Daily, Copyright 2008 (5 pgs).
“ImageNet Mobile Deposit Provides Convenient Check Deposit and Bill Pay to Mobile Consumers,” Miteksystems, 2008 (2 pgs).
“It's the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inbky.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf Cited in patent No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pgs).
“Lesson 38—More Bank Transactions”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pgs).
“Mitek Systems Announces Mobile Deposit Application for Apple iPhone,” http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories/pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-01- . . . , Nov. 25, 2008 (2 pgs).
“Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
“Refractive index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pgs).
“Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp; Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pgs).
“Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pgs).
“Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon—rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pgs).
“Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running—your business/businessbits/d908484987.brc, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“WallStreetGrapevine.com” Stocks on the Rise: JADG, BKYI, MITK; Mar. 3, 2008 (4 pgs).
“What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html , Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 pg).
Albrecht, W. Steve, “Check Kiting: Detection, Prosecution and Prevention,” The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Nov. 1, 1993 (6 pgs).
Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs).
Amber Avalona-Butler / Paraglide, “At Your Service: Best iPhone Apps for Military Lifestyle,” Jul. 9, 2010 (2 pgs).
Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pgs).
Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs).
Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform Payment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banker ev (42 pgs).
Automated Merchant Systems, Inc., “Electronic Check Conversion,” http://www.automatedmerchant.com/electronic—check—conversion.cfm, 2006, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
Bank Systems & Technology, Untitled Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml? articleID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pgs).
BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pgs).
BankServ, Product Overview, http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pgs).
Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing, Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss 6, (4 pgs).
BLM Technologies, “Case Study: Addressing Check 21 and RDC Error and Fraud Threats,” Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jun. 11, 2007, Retrieved from http://www.remotedepositcapture.com/News/june—11—2007.htm on Feb. 19, 2008 (5 pgs).
Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pgs).
Bruene, Jim; “Check Free to Enable In-Home Remote Check Deposit for Consumers and Small Business”, NetBanker. Com, Financial Insite, Inc., http://www. netbanker.com/2008/02/checkfree—to—enableinhome—rem.html, Feb. 5, 2008 (3 pgs).
Bruene, Jim; “Digital Federal Credit Union and Four Others Offer Consumer Remote Deposit Capture Through EasCorp”, NetBanker—Tracking Online Finance, www.netbanker.com/2008/04/digital—federal—credit—union—a.html, Apr. 13, 2008 (3 pgs).
Bruno, M., “Instant Messaging,” Bank Technology News, Dec. 2002 (3 pgs).
Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pgs).
Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pgs).
Carrubba, P. et al., “Remote Deposit Capture: A White Paper Addressing Regulatory, Operational and Risk Issues,” NetDeposit Inc., 2006 (11 pgs).
Century Remote Deposit High-Speed Scanner User's Manual Release 2006, (Century Manual), Century Bank, 2006, (32 pgs).
Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ . . . , May 23, 2008 (2 pgs).
CNN.com/technology, “Scan, deposit checks from home”, www.cnn.com/2008ITECH/biztech/02/07/check.scanning.ap/index.html, Feb. 7, 2008 (3 pgs).
Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures a New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbankercom/btn—article.html?id=20050502YQ5OFSYG (2 pgs).
Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pgs).
Creativepaymentsolutions.com, “Creative Payment Solutions—Websolution,” www.creativepaymentsolution.com/cps/financialservices/websolution/default.html, Copyright 2008, Creative Payment Solutions, Inc. (1 pg).
Credit Union Journal, “The Ramifications of Remote Deposit Capture Success”, www.cuiournal.com/orintthis.html?id=20080411 EODZT57G, Apr. 14, 2008 (1 pg).
Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 pg).
DCU Member's Monthly—Jan. 2008, “PC Deposit—Deposit Checks from Home!”, http://www.mycreditunionnewsletter.com/dcu/01 08/page1. html, Copyright 2008 Digital Federal Credit Union (2 pgs).
De Jesus, A. et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment: An educational overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing distributed check imaging and processing solutions,” Panini, 2004, pp. 1-22.
De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pgs).
Debello, James et al., “RDM and Mitek Systems to Provide Mobile Check Deposit,” Mitek Systems, Inc., San Diego, California and Waterloo, Ontario, (Feb. 24, 2009), 2 pgs.
DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16pgs).
Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Checks”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pgs).
Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal for Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pgs).
Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pgs).
eCU Technologies, “Upost Remote Deposit Solution,” Retrieved from the internet https://www.eutechnologies.com/products/upost.html, downloaded 2009 (1 pg).
EFT Network Unveils FAXTellerPlus, EFT Network, Inc., www.eftnetwork.com, Jan. 13, 2009 (2 pgs).
ElectronicPaymentProviders, Inc., “FAQs: ACH/ARC, CheckVerification/Conversion/Guarantee, RCK Check Re-Presentment,” http://www.useapp.com/faq.htm, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 pg).
Federal Reserve System, “12 CFR, Part 229 [Regulation CC]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks,” Federal Registrar, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 1-50.
Federal Reserve System, “Part IV, 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks; Final Rule,” Federal Registrar, vol. 69, No. 149, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 47290-47328.
Fidelity Information Services, “Strategic Vision Embraces Major Changes in Financial Services Solutions: Fidelity's long-term product strategy ushers in new era of application design and processing,” Insight, 2004, pp. 1-14.
Fisher, Dan M., “Home Banking in the 21st Century: Remote Capture Has Gone Retail”, May 2008 (4 pgs).
Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pgs).
Garry, M., “Checking Options: Retailers face an evolving landscape for electronic check processing that will require them to choose among several scenarios,” Supermarket News, vol. 53, No. 49, 2005 (3 pgs).
German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pgs).
Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pgs).
Gupta, Maya R. et al., “OCR binarization and image pre-processing for searching historical documents,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 389-397.
Hale, J., “Picture this: Check 21 uses digital technology to speed check processing and shorten lag time,” Columbus Business First, http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2005/03/14focus1html, downloaded 2007 (3 pgs).
Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issue 43, (3 pgs).
Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs).
Hildebrand, C. et al., “Electronic Money,” Oracle, http://www.oracle.com/oramag/profit/05-feb/p15financial.html, 2005, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (5 pgs).
Hillebrand, G., “Questions and Answers About the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, Check 21,” ConsumersUnion.org, http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm, Jul. 27, 2004, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (6 pgs).
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg).
Investment Systems Company, “Portfolio Accounting System,” 2000, pp. 1-32.
JBC, “What is a MICR Line?,” eHow.com, retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about—4684793—what-micr-line.html on May 4, 2009 (2 pgs).
Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC, “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pgs).
Kendrick, Kevin B., “Check Kiting, Float for Purposes of Profit,” Bank Security & Fraud Prevention, vol. 1, No. 2, 1994 (3 pgs).
Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs).
Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pgs).
Kornai Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwritting Recognition, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pgs).
Levitin, Adam J., Remote Deposit Capture: A Legal and Transactional Overview, Banking Law Journal, p. 115, 2009 (RDC).
Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is—n7—v47/ai—14466034/print, 1993 (2 pgs).
Matthews, Deborah, “Advanced Technology Makes Remote Deposit Capture Less Risky,” Indiana Bankers Association, Apr. 2008 (2 pgs).
Metro 1 Credit Union, “Remote Banking Services,” hltp://ww\\i.metro1cu.org/metro1cu/remote.html, downloaded Apr. 17, 2007 (4 pgs).
Mitek systems, “Imagenet Mobile Deposit”, San Diego, CA, downloaded 2009 (2 pgs).
Mitek Systems: Mitek Systems Launches First Mobile Check Deposit and Bill Pay Application, San Diego, CA, Jan. 22, 2008 (3 pgs).
Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pgs).
Moreau, T., “Payment by Authenticated Facsimile Transmission: a Check Replacement Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises,” Connotech Experts-conseils, Inc., Apr. 1995 (31 pgs).
Nelson, B. et al., “Remote deposit capture changes the retail landscape,”Northwestern Financial Review, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi qa3799/is 200607/ai—n16537250, 2006 (3 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Branch Out: Annual Report 2004,” 2004 (150 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Quick Post: Deposit and Payment Forwarding Service,” 2005 (1 pg).
NetDeposit Awarded Two Patents for Electronic Check Process, NetDeposit, Jun. 18, 2007, (1 pg).
Nixon, Julie et al., “Fiserv Research Finds Banks are Interested in Offering Mobile Deposit Capture as an,” Fiserv, Inc. Brookfield, Wis., (Business Wire), (Feb. 20, 2009), 2 pgs.
Online Deposit: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.depositnow.com/faq.html, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).
Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htrn, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (3 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132, Jun. 2003 (20 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from the committee of conference; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (27 pgs).
Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pgs).
Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pgs).
Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 STAT. 1177 (18 pgs).
Rao, Bharat; “The Internet and the Revolution in Distribution: A Cross-Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, “PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Businesses”, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 24, 2006, (2 pgs).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankSery Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pgs).
Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC—overview.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs).
Richey, J. C. et al., “EE 4530 Check Imaging,” Nov. 18, 2008 (10 pgs).
Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 pg).
Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pgs).
Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pgs).
Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pgs).
SoyBank Anywhere, “Consumer Internet Banking Service Agreement,” Dec. 6, 2004 (6 pgs).
Teixeira, D., “Comment: Time to Overhaul Deposit Processing Systems,” American Banker, Dec. 10, 1998, vol. 163, No. 235, p. 15 (3 pgs).
Thailandguru.com: How and where to Pay Bills @ www.thailandguru.com/paying-bills.html (2 pgs).
The Green Sheet 2.0: Newswire, “CO-OP adds home deposit capabilities to suite of check imaging products”, www.greensheet.com/newswire.php?newswire—id=8799, Mar. 5, 2008 (2 pgs).
Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, in ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pgs).
Valentine, Lisa, “Remote Deposit Capture Hot Just Got Hotter,” ABA Banking Journal, Mar. 2006, p. 1-9.
Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pgs).
Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167. No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pgs).
Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005—check21Year=2005 (1 pg).
Wells Fargo Commercial, “Remote Deposit”, www.wellsfargo.com/com/treasury mgmtlreceivables/electronic/remote deposit, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).
White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. Res. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pgs).
Whitney et al., “Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37-2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services”, American Bankers Association, May 18, 2004, http://www.aba/com/NR/rdonlyres/CBDC1 A5C-43E3-43CC-B733- BE417C638618/35930/DSTUFormat.pdf (2 pages).
Wikipedia®, “Remote Deposit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote—deposit, 2007 (3 pgs).
Windowsfordevices.com, “Software lets camera phone users deposit checks, pay bills”, www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS3934956670.html, Jan. 29, 2008 (3 pgs).
Wolfe, Daniel, “Check Image Group Outlines Agenda,” American Banker, New York, N.Y.: Feb. 13, 2009, vol. 174, Iss. 30, p. 12. (2 pgs).
Woody Baird Associated Press, “Pastor's Wife got Scammed—She Apparently Fell for Overseas Money Scheme,” The Commercial Appeal, Jul. 1, 2006, p. A. 1.
Zhang, C.Y., “Robust Estimation and Image Combining” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, 1995 (5 pgs).
Zions Bancorporation, “Moneytech, the technology of money in our world: Remote Deposit,” http://www.bankjunior.com/pground/moneytech/remote—deposit.jsp, 2007 (2 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,143, filed Apr. 3, 2008 (27 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,741, filed Aug. 19, 2010 (235 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,723, filed Aug. 21, 2008 (38 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,127, filed Aug. 21, 2009 (45 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,443, filed Aug. 28, 2009 (41 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,656, filed Dec. 20, 2006 (21 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,494, filed Dec. 30, 2010 (280 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,561, filed Dec. 30, 2010 (275 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,578, filed Dec. 30, 2010 (274 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,594, filed Dec. 30, 2010 (275 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,005, filed Feb. 18, 2009 (37 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/487,537, filed Jul. 13, 2006 (23 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,613, filed Jul. 27, 2009 (48 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,680, filed Jul. 27, 2009 (41 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/137,051, filed Jun. 11, 2008 (29 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,976, filed Jun. 8, 2011 (352 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,007, filed Jun. 8, 2011 (356 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/156,018, filed Jun. 8, 2011 (353 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,924, filed Mar. 15, 2007 (34 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,928, filed Mar. 15, 2007 (36 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,671, filed Mar. 4, 2009 (40 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,930, filed Mar. 4, 2009 (37 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,222, filed May 10, 2007 (35 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,278, filed Oct. 17, 2008 (42 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,925, filed Oct. 23, 2007 (36 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335, filed Oct. 23, 2007 (29 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,839, filed Oct. 25, 2007 (22 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/926,388, filed Oct. 29, 2007 (23 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,297, filed Oct. 30, 2007 (26 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,974, filed Oct. 31, 2006 (31 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,008, filed Oct. 31, 2006 (27 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,227, filed Oct. 31, 2006 (58 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/591,273, filed Oct. 31, 2006 (56 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,537, filed Oct. 31, 2007 (27 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,670, filed Oct. 31, 2007 (47 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,884, filed Oct. 8, 2007 (30 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,569, filed Sep. 28, 2007 (35 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/205,996, filed Sep. 8, 2008 (30 pgs).
Claims as filed on Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,163 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Apr. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,175 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/859,752 (5 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,478 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 20, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,671 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,513 (7 pgs).
Claims as filed Feb. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,477 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Jan. 20, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/010,644 (9 pgs).
Claims as filed Jan. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,865 (11 pgs).
Claims as filed Mar. 15, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,925 (5 pgs).
Claims as filed May 10, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,223 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed May 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/110,077 (9 pgs).
Claims as filed May 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,566 (10 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 (6 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 24, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/257,471 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,963 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,995 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,998 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,804 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Oct. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/868,878 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Sep. 2, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,781 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,001 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Sep. 8, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,007 (3 pgs).
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Jun. 20, 2008 (13 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Dec. 30, 2008 (14 pages).
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Jun. 17, 2009 (16 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Dec. 23, 2009 (22 pages).
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Aug. 27, 2010 (21 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Mar. 1, 2011 (23 pages).
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,930 dated Aug. 16, 2011 (20 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,922 dated Feb. 3, 2009 (10 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,922 dated Aug. 31, 2009 (10 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,922 dated Mar. 12, 2010 (9 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,922 dated Sep. 22, 2010 (10 pages).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,922 dated Sep. 6, 2011 (18 pages).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,945, filed Dec. 20, 2012 (55 pgs).
U.S. Appin No. 13/722,303, filed Dec. 20, 2012 (32 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,405, filed Feb. 15, 2012 (19 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/780,946, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (55 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,909, filed Jan. 16, 2013 (31 pgs).
U.S. Appl. 13/735,678, filed Jan. 7, 2013 (30 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,182, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (74 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,353, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (37 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,883, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (28 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,761, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (56 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,112 filed, Mar. 15, 2013 (62 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,164, filed Oct. 19, 2012 (32 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,405, filed Sep. 14, 2012 (30 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,576 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,602 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/320,998 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Dec. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/321,027 (3 pgs).
Claims as filed Feb. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/765,412 (1 pg).
Claims as filed Feb. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,437 (6 pgs).
Claims as filed Feb. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,048 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Nov. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,268 (4 pgs).
Claims as filed Sep. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,026 (3 pgs).