In PTP and PTMP millimeter-wave networks, transceivers at remote points are aligned with each other, such that a directional connection is achieved. However, many point-to-point (“PTP”) and point-to-multipoint (“PTMP”) wireless communication networks suffer from a problem of vibration associated with the transmission pole, tower, or other structure that supports the radio transceivers. This problem can arise from a variety of causes, including, among others, wind, vibration from passing vehicles, or shifting ground in which the supporting structure is anchored. Over time, the supporting structure may be subject to metal fatigue or other mechanical stress, which can exacerbate the condition, and increase the effects of the causative factors. If there is too much vibration at one of the transceivers, there will be too much movement in that transceiver for it to maintain communication with one or more of its matched remote transceivers. The result is a breakdown of communication during the time of the vibration. This problem is particularly severe in millimeter-wave communication networks, but the problem is not limited to such networks.
Solutions that have been offered included mechanical means of reducing vibration of the transceivers. One example would be the use of a stronger kind of material in the supporting structure. A second example would be the use of an improved non-corrosive kind of material in the supporting structure. A third example would be the thickening, or otherwise strengthening, of the material in the supporting structure. A fourth example would be adding lines to the supporting structure, such as metal cables, buttresses, and the like. A fifth example would be the driving of the support structure deeper into the ground. A sixth example would be to add a kind of root system in that part of the structure beneath the level of the ground.
These are all mechanical solutions. They can reduce the severity of the problem, but they cannot solve the problem. Even with these solutions, vibrations in transceivers of PTP and PTMP networks continue to create communication difficulties in such networks.
Described herein are systems and methods in PTP and PTMP wireless communication networks, wherein the network is engineered in such a manner as to maintain communication between remote transceivers, even in the face of mechanical vibrations to one or more of such transceivers. Also described herein are methods for maintaining substantially constant transmission power from one remote transceiver to another remote transceiver, even during mechanical vibration of one or more of the remote transceivers.
One embodiment is a millimeter-wave communication system operative to maintain a stable point-to-point communication link under mechanical vibration conditions. In one particular form of such an embodiment, the system includes a millimeter-wave transmitter, a millimeter-wave receiver that is located a distance away from the millimeter-wave transmitter, and a high-gain antenna belonging to the millimeter-wave transmitter and mounted on an elevated structure that vibrates mechanically such that said vibration causes said high-gain antenna to point to a direction which varies up and down by no more than a given number of total degrees X, where the maximum vibration in either direction up or down is X/2. In this particular form of the embodiment, the high-gain antenna is operative to generate a radiation pattern having a horizontal beam-width that is less than X degrees and a vertical beam-width that is substantially X degrees. Also in this particular form of the embodiment, the horizontal beam-width is operative to provide the high-gain antenna with high gain, and the vertical beam-width is operative to allow the millimeter-wave transmitter to maintain stable communication with the millimeter-wave receiver despite the vibration, via said high-gain antenna and using millimeter-waves.
One embodiment is a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement. In one particular form of such an embodiment, the system includes an elevated structure that is susceptible to sway under wind load, and a high-gain antenna that belongs to a millimeter-wave transmitter or a millimeter-wave receiver, that is mounted on said elevated structure, and that is subject to vertical angular movement caused by said sway. In this particular form of such an embodiment, the high-gain antenna is operative to (i) compensate for the vertical angular movement by generating a beam having vertical beam-width that is intentionally wide, and (ii) compensate for loss of gain resulting from the vertical beam-width, by generating the beam with a horizontal beam-width that is narrower than the vertical beam-width.
One embodiment is a method for maintaining a substantially constant transmission power toward a predetermined direction, using a high-gain millimeter-wave beam in a system subject to substantial vertical angular movement. In one particular form of such embodiment, there is mounted a high-gain antenna, having a gain of above 20 dBi, on an elevated structure that is subject to a maximum vertical angular movement of between 3 and 10 degrees. The high-gain antenna radiates a millimeter-wave beam having: (i) a vertical beam-width that is large enough to compensate for the maximum vertical angular movement, and (ii) a horizontal beam-width that is at most one-half of the vertical beam-width, and that is operative to maintain the gain of above 20 dBi.
One embodiment is a method for a method for maintaining a substantially constant transmission power toward a predetermined direction, using a high-gain millimeter-wave beam, in a system subject to substantial vertical angular movement. In one particular form of such embodiment, there is mounted a high-gain antenna, having a gain of above 30 dBi, on an elevated structure that is subject to a maximum vertical angular movement of between 2 and 5 degrees. The high-gain antenna radiates a millimeter-wave beam having: (i) a vertical beam-width that is large enough to compensate for the maximum vertical angular movement, and (ii) a horizontal beam-width that is at most one-half of the vertical beam-width, and that is operative to maintain the gain of above 30 dBi.
The embodiments are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. No attempt is made to show structural details of the embodiments in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the embodiments. In the drawings:
Throughout this written description and the claims, the term “beam” is exactly the same thing as “radiation pattern”. In all cases, the intent is that the transmission of a transmitter mounted on a supporting structure in a PTP or PTMP system, creates a particular configuration or pattern or radiation energy.
Throughout this written description and the claims, the term “central path” is the central line of communication that has been planned and engineered between two transceivers in a PTP or PTMP network. The term “sway”, defined below, refers to causing a deviation up or down from the “central path” or two transceivers.
Throughout this written description and the claims, the term “structure” in conjunction with the word “elevated” means the physical structure that elevates and supports a transceiver in a PTP or PTMP network. The term may appear as “elevated structure”. The term may appear as “supporting structure”, which means here the same thing as “elevated structure”.
PTP is short for “point-to-point”, and signifies a wireless communication system in which there is communication between a transmitter and a receiver which are located remotely from one another, and in which the planned communication path between the transmitter and the receiver is the “central path”.
PTMP is short for “point-to-multipoint”, and signifies a wireless communication system in which there is communication between a transmitter and each of two or more receivers, all of which receivers being located remotely from the transmitter, and in which the planned communication path between the transmitter and a particular receiver is the “central path” for that pair of transmitter and receiver.
Taking
There may be at least two parts to the solution to the problem of vibration. In a first part of the solution, the system has been engineered to tolerate a certain amount of vibration. For example, but not as a limiting case, assume that the supporting structure 109 deviates from the absolute vertical by 5 degrees. This would cause the transmission antenna with reflector dish 105 to direct the signal such that radiation pattern 105r would be centered 5 degrees up from the central path. However, due to system planning and engineering, the receiver 102 remains within radiation pattern 105r, even though such pattern 105r deviates to a maximum of 5 degrees up from the central path.
In a second part of the solution, as the vertical beam-width 105vbw widens, communication between transmitter 101 and receiver 102 becomes possible despite a greater vibration of supporting structure 109. However, at the same time, a wider beam-width 105vbw causes a loss of dBi gain between the transmitter 101 and the receiver 102. To compensate for this loss, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is narrowed, thereby concentrating the radiation energy 105r in the path between the transmitter 101 and the receiver 102. In his way, loss of energy due to vertical beam-width dispersion is at least partly compensated by gain of energy due to horizontal beam-width concentration.
In one embodiment, there is a millimeter-wave communication system 100 operative to maintain a stable point-to-point communication link 103 under mechanical vibration conditions. The millimeter-wave communication system 100 includes a millimeter-wave transmitter 101 that communicates with a millimeter-wave receiver 102 located some distance away from the millimeter-wave transmitter 101. The communication system also includes a high-gain antenna 105, belonging to the millimeter-wave transmitter 101, wherein the transmitter 101 is mounted on an elevated structure 109. The elevated structure 109 vibrates mechanically such that the vibration causes the high-gain antenna to point to a direction which varies up 105du or down 105dd from a central path between the transmitter 101 and the receiver 102, whereby by the maximum vibration is no more than a total of X degrees, meaning no more than X/2 degrees up and no more than X/2 degrees down. The high-gain antenna 105 is operative to generate a radiation pattern 105r having a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is less than X degrees, and a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially X degrees. The horizontal beam-width 105hbw is operative to provide the high-gain antenna 105 with high gain, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is operative to allow the millimeter-wave transmitter 101 to maintain stable communication with the millimeter-wave receiver 102 despite the vibration, via said high-gain antenna 101 and using millimeter-waves.
In a first alternative embodiment of the system just described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, during vibration of the elevated structure, the millimeter-wave receiver 102 does not go outside coverage of the high-gain antenna 101, thereby facilitating stable communication between the transmitter 101 and the receiver 102. One reason for the result that the receiver 102 does not go outside the coverage of the high-gain antenna 101 is that the radiation pattern 105r has a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially the same as the maximum variation in degrees of the direction to which the high-gain antenna 101 points.
In a first possible configuration of the first alternative embodiment just described, the vertical beam-width 105vbw is operative to compensate for the vibration of the elevated structure 109.
In a second alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the vibration of the elevated structure 109 is caused primarily by wind.
In a first possible configuration of the second alternative embodiment just described, the wind causes an upper portion of the elevated structure 109 to move back and forth, away and toward, respectively, the millimeter-wave receiver 102. At the same time, a lower portion of said elevated structure 109 is held fixed by the ground, thereby causing said high-gain antenna 101 to point in a direction which varies up and down.
In one possible variation of the first possible configuration of the second alternative embodiment just described, the vibration in the elevated structure 109 resonates with the wind.
In a third alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the vibration is caused primarily by a mechanically vibrating device located on or nearby the elevated structure 109.
In a fourth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the vibration is a movement of the elevated structure 109.
In a first possible configuration of the fourth alternative embodiment just described, the movement is caused over time, at least in part, by mechanical stresses exerted on the elevated structure 109. Such mechanical stresses, could, but are not necessarily, be caused by the weight of the load on the elevated structure 109 and the elasticity of the elevated structure 109.
In a second possible configuration of the first alternative embodiment just described, the movement is caused, at least in part, by a change of load placed on the elevated structure 109.
In a fifth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the elevated structure 109 is a pole. This pole could be a street light post, a sign post, a utility pole, a pole specifically dedicated to the communication system 100, or another kind of pole.
In a sixth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the elevated structure 109 is a communication tower.
In a seventh alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is between 2 degrees and 4 degrees, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is between 6 degrees and 10 degrees. Since the vertical beam-width 105vbw is between 6 degrees and 10 degrees, necessarily X is between 6 degrees and 10 degrees, since X degrees is the same measure as the degrees of the vertical beam-width 105vbw.
In one possible non-limiting example of the seventh alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the horizontal beam-width is 3 degrees, meaning 1.5 degrees to either left or right of the central path, and the vertical beam-width is 8 degrees, meaning 4 degrees either up or down from the central path. In this non-limiting example, X is also 8 degrees, meaning 4 degrees up or down from the central path.
In a first possible configuration of the seventh alternative embodiment of the millimeter-wave communication system 100, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 dBi and 35 dBi. In one specific non-limiting example, the high-gain is 32 dBi.
In a second possible configuration of the seventh alternative embodiment of the millimeter-wave communication system 100, the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 50 GHz and 80 GHz. In one specific non-limiting example, the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 57 GHz and 64 GHz.
In an eighth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is between 1 degree and 6 degrees, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is between 7 degrees and 12 degrees.
In a ninth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the high-gain antenna 105 is a reflector antenna 105ref.
In a first possible configuration of the ninth alternative embodiment just described, a horizontal size of the reflector antenna 105ref is bigger than a vertical size of the reflector antenna 105ref, thereby facilitating generation of a radiation pattern 105r having a horizontal beam-width 105bhw that is less than X degrees, and a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially X degrees. As explained previously, there is an inverse relationship between dimension size and beam-width, which is to say, the greater the dimension size, the less the beam-width, and the lesser the dimension size, the greater the beam-width.
In a second possible configuration of the ninth alternative embodiment just described, said high-gain antenna 105 is a shaped parabolic antenna, having a vertical shape operative to de-focuses said radiation pattern in the vertical direction, thereby facilitating generation of said radiation pattern having a horizontal beam-width that is less than X degrees and a vertical beam-width that is substantially X degrees.
In a tenth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the high-gain antenna 105 is an array 105arr of patches or slots.
In a first possible configuration of the tenth alternative embodiment just described, there are more patches or slots in a horizontal direction of the array 105arr than there are patches or slots in a vertical direction of the array 105arr, thereby facilitating generation of a radiation pattern 105r having a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is less than X degrees and a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially X degrees.
In a eleventh alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the radiation patter 105r has a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is less than X/2 degrees and a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially X degrees.
In a first possible configuration of the eleventh alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 20 dBi, and the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a second possible configuration of the eleventh alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 30 dBi, and the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a twelfth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the radiation patter 105r has a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is less than X/4 degrees and a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is substantially X degrees.
In a first possible configuration of the twelfth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 25 dBi, and the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a second possible configuration of the twelfth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 35 dBi, and the operating frequency of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a thirteenth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the vibration causes the high-gain antenna 105 to point in a direction which varies up 105du and down 105dd from a central path between a transmitter 101 and a receiver 102 by an amount of between X/2 degrees and X degrees.
In a fourteenth alternative embodiment of the system described for a millimeter-wave communication system 100, the vibration causes the high-gain antenna 105 to point in a direction which varies up 105du and down 105dd from a central path between a transmitter 101 and a receiver 102 by an amount of between X/4 degrees and X degrees.
In one embodiment, there is high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement. The system includes an elevated structure 109 susceptible to sway under wind load, and a high-gain antenna 105 belonging to a millimeter-wave transmitter 101 or a millimeter-wave receiver 102. The high-gain antenna 105 is mounted on the elevated structure 109, and subject to vertical angular movement caused by the sway. The high-gain antenna 105 is operative to: (i) compensate for the vertical angular movement by generating a beam 105r having a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is intentionally wide, and (ii) compensate for loss of gain resulting from the vertical beam-width 105vbw, wherein the high-gain antenna 105 achieves the compensation by generating the beam 105r with a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is narrower than the vertical beam-width 105vbw.
In a first alternative embodiment of the system just described for a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement, during the sway, the beam 105r illuminates a singular angular direction with a power level that does not fluctuate by more than 3 dB despite the sway. In one non-limiting example, the “singular angular direction” is the direction in which the receiver 102 is placed relative to the transmitter 101.
In a second alternative embodiment of the system just described for a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is between 2 degrees and 4 degrees, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is between 6 degrees and 10 degrees. In one non-limiting example, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is 3 degrees, meaning 1.5 degrees up and also 1.5 degrees down from a central path between a transmitter 101 and a receiver 102, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is 8 degrees, meaning 4 degrees up and also 4 degrees down from a central path between a transmitter 101 and a receiver 102.
In a first possible configuration of the second alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of the high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 dBi and 35 dBi. In one non-limiting example, the high-gain is 32 dBi.
In a third alternative embodiment of the system just described for a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is between 1 degree and 4 degrees, and the vertical beam-width 105vbw is between 7 degrees and 12 degrees.
In a fourth alternative embodiment of the system just described for a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is less than one-half of the vertical beam-width 105vbw.
In a first possible configuration of the fourth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of said high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 20 dBi, and the operating frequency of said high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a second possible configuration of the fourth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of said high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 30 dBi, and the operating frequency of said high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a fifth alternative embodiment of the system just described for a high-gain antenna system operative to compensate for vertical angular movement, the horizontal beam-width 105hbw is less than one-quarter of the vertical beam-width 105vbw.
In a first possible configuration of the fifth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of said high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 25 dBi, and the operating frequency of said high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
In a second possible configuration of the fifth alternative embodiment just described, the high-gain of said high-gain antenna 105 is higher than 35 dBi, and the operating frequency of said high-gain antenna 105 is between 30 GHz and 80 GHz.
One embodiment is a method for maintaining a substantially constant transmission power toward a predetermined direction, typically toward a receiver, using a high-gain millimeter-wave beam 105r in a system subject to substantial vertical angular movement. A high-gain antenna 105, having a gain above 20 dBi, is mounted 1011 on an elevated structure 109 that is subject to a maximum vertical angular movement of between 3 degrees and 10 degrees.
Then, the high-gain antenna radiates 1012 a millimeter-wave beam having (i) a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is large enough to compensate for the maximum vertical angular movement of 10 degrees, and (ii) a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is at most one-half of the vertical beam-width 105vbw, so that signal transmitted will maintain the communication gain above 20 dBi.
One embodiment is a method for maintaining a substantially constant transmission power toward a predetermined direction, typically toward a receiver 102, using a high-gain millimeter-wave beam 105r in a system subject to substantial vertical angular movement. A high-gain antenna 105, having a gain above 30 dBi, is mounted 1021 on an elevated structure 109 that is subject to a maximum vertical angular movement of between 2 degrees and 5 degrees in either an up or a down direction from a central path between a transmitter 105 and a receiver 102.
Then, the high-gain antenna radiates 1022 a millimeter-wave beam having (i) a vertical beam-width 105vbw that is large enough to compensate for the maximum vertical angular movement of 5, and (ii) a horizontal beam-width 105hbw that is at most one-half of the vertical beam-width 105vbw, so that signal transmitted will maintain the communication gain above 30 dBi.
In this description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, the embodiments/cases of the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known hardware, materials, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description. In this description, references to “one embodiment” and “one case” mean that the feature being referred to may be included in at least one embodiment/case of the invention. Moreover, separate references to “one embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “one case”, or “some cases” in this description do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment/case. Illustrated embodiments/cases are not mutually exclusive, unless so stated and except as will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the invention may include any variety of combinations and/or integrations of the features of the embodiments/cases described herein. Also herein, flow diagrams illustrate non-limiting embodiment/case examples of the methods, and block diagrams illustrate non-limiting embodiment/case examples of the devices. Some operations in the flow diagrams may be described with reference to the embodiments/cases illustrated by the block diagrams. However, the methods of the flow diagrams could be performed by embodiments/cases of the invention other than those discussed with reference to the block diagrams, and embodiments/cases discussed with reference to the block diagrams could perform operations different from those discussed with reference to the flow diagrams. Moreover, although the flow diagrams may depict serial operations, certain embodiments/cases could perform certain operations in parallel and/or in different orders from those depicted. Moreover, the use of repeated reference numerals and/or letters in the text and/or drawings is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments/cases and/or configurations discussed. Furthermore, methods and mechanisms of the embodiments/cases will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, some embodiments/cases may include multiple iterations of a method or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. For example, when a controller or an interface are disclosed in an embodiment/case, the scope of the embodiment/case is intended to also cover the use of multiple controllers or interfaces.
Certain features of the embodiments/cases, which may have been, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments/cases, may also be provided in various combinations in a single embodiment/case. Conversely, various features of the embodiments/cases, which may have been, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment/case, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. The embodiments/cases are not limited in their applications to the details of the order or sequence of steps of operation of methods, or to details of implementation of devices, set in the description, drawings, or examples. In addition, individual blocks illustrated in the figures may be functional in nature and do not necessarily correspond to discrete hardware elements. While the methods disclosed herein have been described and shown with reference to particular steps performed in a particular order, it is understood that these steps may be combined, sub-divided, or reordered to form an equivalent method without departing from the teachings of the embodiments/cases. Accordingly, unless specifically indicated herein, the order and grouping of the steps is not a limitation of the embodiments/cases. Embodiments/cases described in conjunction with specific examples are presented by way of example, and not limitation. Moreover, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4638322 | Lamberty | Jan 1987 | A |
4933682 | Vaughan | Jun 1990 | A |
4983988 | Franke | Jan 1991 | A |
5194874 | Perrotta | Mar 1993 | A |
5469181 | Yarsunas | Nov 1995 | A |
5589843 | Meredith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6665546 | Slaughter et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7218289 | Trajkovic et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7680516 | Lovberg et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683845 | Wynn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8090411 | Korevaar et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020177405 | Chedester et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050001778 | Le et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050179610 | Le et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20080074338 | Vacanti | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088521 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20140057570 | Leiba | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140370925 | Leiba | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005062428 | Jul 2005 | WO |