The present disclosure relates generally to ultrasonic probes used for non-destructive testing and more particularly relates to systems and methods for viewing data generated by rotational scanning in non-destructive testing with reduced storage and computational requirements.
Non-destructive testing such as ultrasonic testing and the like may be used to inspect various types of materials and components. Specifically, ultrasonic testing is a suitable method for finding internal anomalies and/or certain types of material characteristics in most types of sound conducting materials. Such sound conducting materials include most metals and other types of substantially rigid materials. Generally described, an ultrasonic probe detects anomalies or other characteristics upon changes in the reflection of sound waves on a boundary surface of the component or the anomaly. Ultrasonic testing has the advantage of detecting such internal characteristics with a generally high degree of accuracy.
Data generated by ultrasonic testing may be presented in a number of different formats. For example, the scan data may be presented as an A-scan (energy received as a function of time), a B-scan (cross-sectional view), a C-scan (plan view), an S-scan (sectional view), and the like. A one-dimensional or two-dimensional ultrasonic probe may generate the scans. A number of the individual scans may be combined so as to generate three-dimensional views.
As opposed to similar types of ultrasonic devices used in the healthcare field, non-destructive testing tools used in, for example, the oil and gas industry and the like, may be relatively small, handheld, and battery driven. Moreover, such non-destructive testing tools generally need to last in the field for at least a complete shift (about 8 hours or more) without recharging. Generating three-dimensional views, however, requires significant memory and computational power.
There is, thus, a desire for improved systems and methods of non-destructive testing such as ultrasonic testing and the like. Such improved systems and methods may present ultrasonic and other types of non-destructive testing data in a useful and efficient fashion while requiring less computational resources.
The present application relates to a testing system and a related method.
The present application describes a testing system for testing a work piece. The testing system includes an ultrasonic probe outputting at least one beam from a location within the work piece being tested. The testing system includes a control unit for controlling the ultrasonic probe from a location outside of the work piece being tested. The ultrasonic probe and the control unit are configured to obtain at least one of C-scan images and corresponding S-scan images of the same portion of the work piece being tested.
The present application further describes a non-destructive testing system for testing a work piece. The non-destructive testing system includes an ultrasonic probe configured for a first S-scan image at a first direction orientation and the ultrasonic probe configured for a second S-scan image at a second direction orientation different from the first direction orientation.
The present application further describes a method of viewing non-destructive test data in connection with testing a work piece from within the work piece. The method includes obtaining C-scan images and corresponding S-scan images, the C-scan images and the corresponding S-scan images are of the same portion of the work piece being tested. The method includes displaying a plurality of C-scan images on a hand-held display. The method includes selecting one of the plurality of C-scan images. The method includes displaying an S-scan image corresponding the selected C-scan image on the hand-held display.
These and other features and improvements of the present application will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the several drawings and the appended claims.
Referring to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views,
The non-destructive testing system 10 typically may be used to test a work piece 30. The work piece 30 may have one or more anomalies 35 therein. The ultrasonic probe 15 may be configured to produce a number of S-scans 40 (sectional scans). In the S-scans 40, a first axis may represent the distance from an insonification location or a depth in the work piece 30 and a second axis may represent an azimuth or an insonification angle. Other types of scans such as a C-scan (plan view) and the like also may be generated and displayed on the display 25. A number of the S-scans 40 may be combined so as to produce a largely three-dimensional image. As described above, however, displaying such three-dimensional data may be complicated and may require significant amounts of memory and computational power.
The ultrasonic probe 110 may be configured as a translational device 160. Specifically, the ultrasonic probe 110 may include a matrix of transducers arranged as a two-dimensional probe. The probe 110 thus may have discrete element separation in two directions such that a sound beam 170 may be controlled in a three-dimensional volume. Specifically, the beam 170 is rotated about a middle axis, perpendicular to a horizontal plane. The ultrasonic probe 110 thus may rotate the beam 170 about 360 degrees. Resolution in terms of data capture may be at each one degree step for a 360 degree scan or at any desired resolution. The resolution also may be varied for a particular type of application and/or type of work piece 30.
The ultrasonic probe 110 may produce a number of different scans.
The use of the C-scan images 190 in the radar-like view 210 requires only a two-dimensional display of the scan data. As such, less memory and computational power may be required as compared to displaying three-dimensional data. Using the location of the beam cursor 200, one may switch to the S-scan image 220 for further detail according to the position of the beam cursor 200. The non-destructive testing system 100 described herein thus provides three-dimensional data without requiring the power and other resources to display such. The ultrasonic testing probe 110 and the non-destructing testing system 100 described herein thus may be implemented as the hand held device 140.
It should be apparent that the foregoing relates only to certain embodiments of the present application and the resultant patent. Numerous changes and modifications may be made herein by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the general spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims and the equivalents thereof.
This application is a Continuation of, and benefit of priority is claimed herein from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/260,861 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,869,660) filed Sep. 9, 2016, which claimed priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/838,992 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,442,097) filed Aug. 28, 2015, which claimed priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/628,066 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,157,895), filed on Sep. 27, 2012, with benefit of priority also being claimed herein from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/838,992 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,442,097), with benefit of priority also being claimed herein from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/628,066 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,157,895), and the entire disclosures of all of which (U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 15/260,861, 14/838,992 and 13/628,066) are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4324140 | Auld | Apr 1982 | A |
4470122 | Sarr | Sep 1984 | A |
5546807 | Oxaal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
6491634 | Leavitt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540682 | Leavitt et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6645148 | Nguyen-Dinh et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6746402 | Ustuner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7283654 | McLain | Oct 2007 | B2 |
8717843 | Cerofolini | May 2014 | B2 |
8746070 | Tippit, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9157895 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9442097 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9625424 | LePage et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9869660 | Oberdoerfer | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20030089171 | Kenefick et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101820 | Siong | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060052697 | Hossack et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070068907 | Batzinger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090279772 | Sun et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283569 | Ramaswamy et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100220910 | Kaucic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110016979 | Oberdorfer | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110182495 | Sun et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110222754 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239768 | Berke et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247417 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120024067 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120134233 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130340530 | Oberdoerfer | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101726540 | Jun 2010 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from PCT/US2013/056602 dated Dec. 2, 2013. |
Berke M. et al: “Phased array technology for standard ultrasonic testing”, Insight (Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring), British Institute of Non-Destr. Test., Northampton, GBN, vol. 48, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180136172 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15260861 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 15871328 | US | |
Parent | 14838992 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15260861 | US | |
Parent | 13628066 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14838992 | US |