The Internet is a vast source of information. Some of the information can be very useful to researchers, scientists, or other professionals, who would like to be able to collect the relevant data and process it. Unfortunately, this task is made difficult by the fact that the information is spread over trillions of webpages and is presented on those webpages in different formats. Moreover, even if one can select the particular webpages containing the relevant information and download all the information from those webpages, the downloaded information is likely to contain a lot of information that is irrelevant for the particular project.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to several exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, including those illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
According to some embodiments, the operations, techniques, and/or components described herein can be implemented by an electronic device, which can include one or more special-purpose computing devices. The special-purpose computing devices can be hard-wired to perform the operations, techniques, and/or components described herein, or can include digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the operations, techniques and/or components described herein, or can include one or more general purpose hardware processors programmed to perform such features of the present disclosure pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Such special-purpose computing devices can also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the technique and other features of the present disclosure. The special-purpose computing devices can be desktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices, or any other device that incorporates hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques and other features of the present disclosure.
The one or more special-purpose computing devices can be generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as iOS, Android, Blackberry, Chrome OS, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server, Windows CE, Unix, Linux, SunOS, Solaris, VxWorks, or other compatible operating systems. In other embodiments, the computing device can be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, I/O services, and provide a user interface functionality, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things.
By way of example,
Electronic device 110 also includes a main memory 106, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 102 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 104. Main memory 106 also can be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 104. Such instructions, when stored in non-transitory storage media accessible to one or more processors 104, render electronic device 110 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.
Electronic device 110 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 108 or other static storage device coupled to bus 102 for storing static information and instructions for processor 104. A storage device 150, such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or USB thumb drive (Flash drive), etc., is provided and coupled to bus 102 for storing information and instructions.
Electronic device 110 can be coupled via bus 102 to a display 112, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), an LCD display, or a touchscreen, for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 114, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 102 for communicating information and command selections to processor 104. Another type of user input device is cursor control 116, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 104 and for controlling cursor movement on display 112. The input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (for example, x) and a second axis (for example, y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane. In some embodiments, the same direction information and command selections as cursor control may be implemented via receiving touches on a touch screen without a cursor.
Electronic device 110 can include a user interface module to implement a GUI that may be stored in a mass storage device as executable software codes that are executed by the one or more computing devices. This and other modules may include, by way of example, components, such as software components, object-oriented software components, class components and task components, processes, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, databases, data structures, tables, arrays, and variables.
In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic embodied in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, possibly having entry and exit points, written in a programming language, such as, for example, Java, Lua, C, and C++. A software module can be compiled and linked into an executable program, installed in a dynamic link library, or written in an interpreted programming language such as, for example, BASIC, Perl, Python, or Pig. It will be appreciated that software modules can be callable from other modules or from themselves, and/or can be invoked in response to detected events or interrupts. Software modules configured for execution on computing devices can be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, magnetic disc, or any other tangible medium, or as a digital download (and can be originally stored in a compressed or installable format that requires installation, decompression, or decryption prior to execution). Such software code can be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, for execution by the computing device. Software instructions can be embedded in firmware, such as an EPROM. It will be further appreciated that hardware modules can be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or can be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules or computing device functionality described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, but can be represented in hardware or firmware. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage.
Electronic device 110 can implement the techniques and other features described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the electronic device causes or programs electronic device 110 to be a special-purpose machine. According to some embodiments, the techniques and other features described herein are performed by electronic device 110 in response to one or more processors 104 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 106. Such instructions can be read into main memory 106 from another storage medium, such as storage device 150. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 106 causes processor 104 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry can be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.
The term “non-transitory media” as used herein refers to any media storing data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such non-transitory media can comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 150. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 106. Common forms of non-transitory media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge, and networked versions of the same.
Non-transitory media is distinct from, but can be used in conjunction with, transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between storage media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 102. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.
Various forms of media can be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 104 for execution. For example, the instructions can initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to electronic device 110 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 102. Bus 102 carries the data to main memory 106, from which processor 104 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 106 can optionally be stored on storage device 150 either before or after execution by processor 104.
Electronic device 110 also includes a communication interface 118 coupled to bus 102. Communication interface 118 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 120 that is connected to a local network 122. For example, communication interface 118 can be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 118 can be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links can also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 118 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.
Network link 120 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 120 can provide a connection through local network 122 to a host computer 124 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 126. ISP 126 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 128. Local network 122 and Internet 128 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 120 and through communication interface 118, which carry the digital data to and from electronic device 110, are example forms of transmission media.
Electronic device 110 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 120 and communication interface 118. In the Internet example, a server 130 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 128, ISP 126, local network 122 and communication interface 118.
The received code can be executed by processor 104 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 150, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
System 200 comprises a definition component 210 and a translation component 220, both implemented by one or more processors on one or more computing devices executing hardware and/or software-based logic for providing various functionality described herein. As will be appreciated from the present disclosure, system 200 can comprise fewer or additional components that provide various functionalities described herein. Such components are, for clarity, omitted from
Definition component 210 generates and/or modifies ontology 250 and a schema map 240. Exemplary embodiments for defining an ontology (such as ontology 250) are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,962,495 (the '495 Patent), issued Jun. 14, 2011, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference. Among other things, the '495 patent describes embodiments that define a dynamic ontology for use in creating data in a database. For creating a database ontology, one or more object types are created where each object type can include one or more properties. The attributes of object types or property types of the ontology can be edited or modified at any time. And for each property type, at least one parser definition is created. The attributes of a parser definition can be edited or modified at any time.
In some embodiments, each property type is declared to be representative of one or more object types. A property type is representative of an object type when the property type is intuitively associated with the object type. For example, a property type of “Social Security Number” may be representative of an object type “Person” but not representative of an object type “Business.”
In some embodiments, each property type has one or more components and a base type. In some embodiments, a property type may comprise a string, a date, a number, or a composite type consisting of two or more string, date, or number elements. Thus, property types are extensible and can represent complex data structures. Further, a parser definition can reference a component of a complex property type as a unit or token.
An example of a property having multiple components is a Name property having a Last Name component and a First Name component. An example of raw input data is “Smith, Jane.” An example parser definition specifies an association of imported input data to object property components as follows: {LAST_NAME}, {FIRST_NAME}→Name:Last, Name:First. In some embodiments, the association {LAST_NAME}, {FIRST_NAME} is defined in a parser definition using regular expression symbology. The association {LAST_NAME}, {FIRST_NAME} indicates that a last name string followed by a first name string comprises valid input data for a property of type Name. In contrast, input data of “Smith Jane” would not be valid for the specified parser definition, but a user could create a second parser definition that does match input data of “Smith Jane.” The definition Name:Last, Name:First specifies that matching input data values map to components named “Last” and “First” of the Name property.
As a result, parsing the input data using the parser definition results in assigning the value “Smith” to the Name:Last component of the Name property, and the value “Jane” to the Name:First component of the Name property.
Referring to
Based on the identified information, definition component 210 can generate a graphical interface 215. Graphical interface 215 can be presented to users of a computing device via any suitable output mechanism (e.g., a display screen, an image projection, etc.), and can further accept input from users of the computing device via any suitable input mechanism (e.g., a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen interface). Graphical interface 215 features a visual workspace that visually depicts representations of the elements of ontology 250 for which mappings are defined in schema map 240. Graphical interface 215 also includes controls for adding new elements to schema map 240 and/or ontology 250, including objects, properties of objects, and relationships, via the visual workspace. After elements of ontology 250 are represented in the visual workspace, graphical interface 215 can further provide controls in association with the representations that allow for modifying the elements of ontology 250 and identifying how the elements of ontology 250 correspond to elements of schemas 235. Optionally, the graphical interface 215 can further utilize sample data 236 to provide the user with a preview of object model 260 as the user defines schema map 240. In response to the input via the various controls of graphical interface 215, definition component 210 can generate and/or modify ontology 250 and schema map 240.
In some embodiments, graphical interface 215 can provide an interface providing a user with the ability to add structure to an unstructured document stored in data sources 230 by tagging one or more portions (e.g., text) within the document. Defining tags and applying these tags to a portion of the document can create object, properties, or links creating a relationship between one or more objects and/or properties.
Transformation component 220 can be invoked after schema map 240 and ontology 250 have been defined or redefined. Transformation component 220 identifies schema map 240 and ontology 250. Transformation component 220 further reads data sources 230 and identifies schemas 235 for data sources 230. For each element of ontology 250 described in schema map 240, transformation component 220 iterates through some or all of the data items of data sources 230, generating elements of object model 260 in the manner specified by schema map 240. In some embodiments, transformation component 220 can store a representation of each generated element of object model 260 in a database 270. In some embodiments, transformation component 220 is further configured to synchronize changes in object model 260 back to data sources 230.
Data sources 230 can be one or more sources of data, including, without limitation, spreadsheet files, databases, email folders, document collections, media collections, contact directories, and so forth. Data sources 230 can include structured data (e.g., a database, a .csv file, or any tab delimited or fixed-width file), semi-structured data (e.g., an email, an email server, or forms such as a suspicious activity report or currency transaction report), or unstructured data (e.g., encoded files such as PDF, sound, and image files). Data sources 230 can include data structures stored persistently in non-volatile memory. Data sources 230 can also or alternatively include temporary data structures generated from underlying data sources via data extraction components, such as a result set returned from a database server executing a database query.
Schema map 240, ontology 250, and schemas 235 can be stored in any suitable data structure(s), such as XML files, database tables, and so forth. In some embodiments, ontology 250 is maintained persistently. Schema map 240 can or cannot be maintained persistently, depending on whether the transformation process is perpetual or a one-time event. Schemas 235 need not be maintained in persistent memory, but can be cached for optimization.
Object model 260 comprises collections of elements such as typed objects, properties, and relationships. The collections can be structured in any suitable manner. In some embodiments, a database 270 stores the elements of object model 260, or representations thereof. In some embodiments, the elements of object model 260 are stored within database 270 in a different underlying format, such as in a series of object, property, and relationship tables in a relational database.
Embodiments disclosed herein are directed, among other things, to systems and methods that allow the user to define which information is relevant and which is not, and to automatically collect the data from one or more documents. More specifically, the systems and methods allow the user to indicate the desired object characteristics based on one or more sample documents, to indicate one or more target documents, and to automatically obtain and store those objects within the targets documents that correspond to (that are characterized by) the indicated desired characteristics.
The target documents can be webpages or documents unrelated to web. For example, the documents can include files such as HTML, Javascript, PHP, XML, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, PDF, and other types of files. A document can comprise one or more objects. For example, an HTML file can comprise one or more HTML elements; and a Microsoft Excel file can comprise one or more sheets, rows, columns, and cells, each of which can be considered an object. The objects can also include pages, paragraphs, sentences, words, and characters.
In some embodiments, some or all objects within the document can be arranged in a hierarchical manner. For example, the document can conform to a Document Object Model (DOM), where the objects are arranged in a tree, each object having a parent object and/or one or more child objects.
As mentioned above, the objects (e.g., HTML elements 310) can be arranged in a hierarchical manner. In some embodiments, the objects are arranged in a tree, where each element can have only one parent element and any number of child elements. For example, the webpage in
Referring now to
At step 410, the electronic device obtains a sample document and displays it on a display. For example, the user can navigate the browser to the desired webpage, which can be stored locally or on a remote server. The electronic device can then obtain one or more files associated with the webpage (e.g., HTML source code provided in
At step 420, the electronic device receives an input indicating selection of an object within the displayed sample document. For example, the object can be an HTML element, and the user can select the HTML element by left-clicking (clicking with the left button of a mouse) at or near the display location of the HTML element.
In some embodiments, the electronic device can facilitate the selection process by providing a visual indication of an HTML element that is associated with the current position of the mouse pointer. For example, the electronic device can display a frame around the HTML element over which the mouse pointer is hovering, that is, around the area associated with an HTML element located at or near the current position of the mouse pointer. In some embodiments, the electronic device identifies, among all the HTML elements, the HTML that is rendered closest to the mouse pointer position. In some embodiments, the electronic device identifies the closest HTML element among HTML elements that have some visual representation (e.g., a visual representation visible to the user when the webpage is rendered). Such elements can include, for example, elements that, when rendered, include any combination of text, imagery, graphics, individual lines, or any other visual representation.
For example, as depicted in
The visual indication described above informs the user as to which object (e.g., HTML element) would be selected if the user left-clicked at the current position of the mouse pointer. When the user left-clicks at that position, the object is selected, and the method can proceed to step 430. Selected objects can optionally be highlighted by the electronic device, either using the same frame as used to provide visual indication, or another type of highlighting, such as a frame of a different color.
In some embodiments, at step 420 the user can also de-select any of the previously selected objects by selecting (e.g., left-clicking) that object again. In some embodiments, the selection and de-selection of the elements can be performed by the user using any other suitable input devices, such as a touchpad, a touchscreen, a keyboard, etc. In some embodiments, the object selections can be pre-stored in a volatile or non-volatile memory accessible by the electronic device, in which case no manual operation by the user may be required.
At step 430, the electronic device examines one or more previously selected objects and determines a set of one or more commonalities among those objects, that is, a set of one or more object characteristics characterizing each of those objects. Object characteristics can include, for example, the object's hierarchical position, that is, the object's position within the object hierarchy of the sample document. For example, one object characteristic of an HTML element is that element's hierarchical position within the HTML tree of the HTML webpage. Determining which object characteristics are common to the selected HTML elements can include, for example, determining the closest common ancestor (parent, grandparent, grand-grandparent, etc.) of those HTML elements. For example, the closest common ancestor of HTML elements 310a, 310b, 310c, 310d, and 310e is the unordered list element (<ul>).
Object characteristics can also include the object's type, such as the HTML element type (e.g., a hyperlink <a>, a table cell <td>, a paragraph <b>, and so forth). Object characteristics can also include one or more of the object's attributes, such as HTML attributes, which can include, for example, the element's formatting (e.g., font type, size, color, bold, italics, underline, and so forth). Thus, for example, determining which object characteristics are common to the selected HTML elements can include determining whether the HTML elements are of the same type, and if so, which attributes they have in common.
Object characteristics can also include the object's content, such as the content that is within the start and end tags of an HTML element (e.g., the text “Starring”). Thus, determining which object characteristics are common to the selected HTML elements can include determining whether the elements have the same content or, in some embodiments, whether at least some parts of the content (e.g., one or more words) are the same.
While specific examples of object characteristics that can be examined by the electronic device at step 430 were described above, it will be appreciated that the electronic device can examine any combination of these or other characteristics associated with the selected objects. Moreover, in determining the commonalities among the characteristics of the selected objects, the electronic device can use a heuristic approach, for example, assigning different weights to different types of characteristics.
In the example illustrated in
At step 440, the electronic device can provide the user with some indication of the commonalities that were determined at step 430. For example, the electronic device can display a textual representation of the determined commonalities, for example, by displaying, for each commonality a name-value pair, where the name represents the type of shared characteristic (e.g., hierarchical position, object type, content, etc.) and the value represents the shared value.
As another example, the electronic device can determine which other objects within the sample document have the same commonalities (i.e., share the same characteristics as the selected objects) and highlight those objects, for example, using the same type of highlighting as used to highlight the selected objects. Thus, the electronic device can determine and highlight all objects (previously selected or not) within the sample document that share the set of commonalities determined at step 430. Referring to the example illustrated above, after HTML elements 310a and 310b were selected and highlighted (as illustrated in
Based on the feedback provided by this instant indication, the user can easily deduct which commonalities were determined by the electronic device, and make any necessary adjustments by selecting additional objects or deselecting previously selected objects. When the electronic device detects (442) a new selection or de-selection, it can repeat steps 410-440 for the new set of selected objects within the obtained sample document. In the example illustrated in
In some embodiments, the user can also select, at step 420, one or more excluded objects. For example, the user can select those objects with a right-click of a mouse, and the electronic device can highlight the excluded objects with a different type of highlighting, such as a frame of a different color than that used for highlighting the selected objects described above. The electronic device can then add the selected objects to a set of excluded objects and refer to this set at later stages, as discussed below.
In some embodiments, the electronic device can determine commonalities among objects of a plurality of sample documents. For example, after performing step 440 on one sample document, the electronic device can proceed (444) to step 410 where it can obtain another sample document and display it on a display. The other sample document can also be identified to the electronic device by the user—for example, the user can navigate the browser to another webpage, such as an exemplary webpage 800 illustrated in
In some embodiments, the user can identify a list of sample documents (e.g., webpages), and the electronic device can select randomly any document on the list, either systematically or randomly. For example, the user can specify an HTTP address of a webpage containing a list of hyperlinks to a plurality of movie webpages, such as a webpages containing hyperlinks to all major movies made between the years 2000 and 2009 The electronic can then systematically or randomly select one of those hyperlinks (e.g., webpage 800) and display it on the display.
After displaying the other sample document on the display, the electronic device can identify and highlight any objects within the other sample document that share the commonalities (i.e., that are characterized by the same characteristics) previously determined at step 430 based on the previous sample document. As illustrated in
The user can then select, at step 420, additional objects in the other sample document or deselect any of the highlighted objects in the other sample document (not shown). The electronic device can then, at step 430, determine a new set of commonalities shared by all the previously selected objects of the previous sample document and by any objects selected in the other sample document. The electronic device can then proceed to indicate the new set of commonalities at step 440, and the process can be repeated for any number of sample documents and objects. In some embodiments, the electronic device can require that the sample documents have some similarities, for example, that they should all include the same or similar object structure. For example, if the sample documents are HTML webpages, the electronic device can require that the elements in each webpage are arranged in the same or similar tree structure. In other embodiments, the electronic device may set no limitations on the types of sample documents.
When the user decides, based on the indications at step 440, that he or she is satisfied with the set of determined commonalities, the user can instruct the electronic device to proceed to step 450. In some embodiments, the electronic device can proceed to step 450 automatically, unless the user instructs otherwise. In some embodiments, before proceeding to step 450, the electronic device can store the determined set of commonalities and set of excluded objects in a volatile or non-volatile memory (not shown) to be later retrieved from the memory at step 450. In these embodiments, step 450 and the following steps can be performed at a later time and/or by another electronic device, as long as the other electronic device can access the determined set of commonalities and set of excluded objects.
At step 450, the electronic device obtains one or more other target documents. Like the sample document(s) displayed at step 410, the target documents can be of any types and can include any types of objects. In some embodiments, the target documents are of the same type as the document displayed at step 410, and the electronic device can deny processing of other types of target documents.
In some embodiments, obtaining the target documents includes having the user provide the documents, for example, by specifying the address (e.g., a web address or a local path) of the documents. In other embodiments, obtaining the target documents includes accessing a memory (volatile or non-volatile) and obtaining from the memory a list of one or more target document addresses, or an address of a document containing a list of one or more target document addresses. The electronic device can then obtain the target document(s) based on those addresses. In some embodiments, the list of one or more document addresses can be obtained from an output of another method or of another instance of method 400, as will be described below.
At step 460, the electronic device identifies within the target document(s) one or more objects that share the commonalities obtained at step 430, that is, one or more objects that are characterized by the set of characteristics obtained at step 430. For example, if the set of commonalities obtained at step 430 included two commonalities: 1) parent element is <ul>, and 2) element type is a hyperlink, the electronic device can identify within webpage 900 any hyperlinks whose parent element is <ul>. Therefore, in this example, the electronic device identifies HTML elements 910a, 910b, and 910d, but not 910c which is not a hyperlink, as objects sharing the commonalities obtained at step 430.
In some embodiments, identifying whether a particular object shares the commonalities obtained at step 430 can include determining whether the characteristics of the particular object are sufficiently similar to the set of characteristics obtained at step 430. Sufficiently similar can mean, that the number of characteristics shared by the particular object is greater or equal to a predetermined threshold. The predetermined threshold can be equal to the size of the set of characteristics, meaning that all characteristics in the set must be shared by the particular object or, in some embodiments, it can be less than the size of the set of characteristics, meaning, for example, that if most, but not all the characteristics are shared, a particular object can still be identified by the electronic device as sufficiently similar. In some embodiments, the electronic device can assign different weights to different types of characteristics and identify objects for which the total weight of shared characteristics is equal or greater than a predetermined weight threshold. For example, if the set of characteristics (the commonalities) determined at step 430 includes a hierarchical position, the electronic device can assign higher weights to objects whose hierarchical position is closer to that hierarchical position.
In some embodiments, the electronic device can exclude from the identified objects any objects that correspond to (share similar characteristics with) any objects within the set of excluded objects discussed above.
At step 470, the electronic device can store the identified object(s) in a database, such as database 270 or data sources 230. The electronic device can store in the database any information associated with the objects, such as the object's contents (e.g., the string “Jeff Bridges” of element 910a), attributes (e.g., formatting), hierarchical position within the document, and so forth.
In some embodiments, in addition to object information retrieved from the target document, the electronic device can store qualifying information about the object. The user can provide the qualifying information to the electronic device, for example, through a user interface of a browser or browser add-on or extension. The qualifying information can describe, for example, the type or class of object. For example, the database can include different classes of object, such as “a person,” “a movie,” “a city,” and so forth, and the electronic device can assign the object to one of the classes defined in the database.
The qualifying information can also describe a relationship between the stored object and other objects in the database. For example, the user can specify through a user interface that the stored object is a property of another object. For example, a “movie” object can have one or more properties such as “title,” “director,” “year,” “actors,” etc. Thus, for example, when the electronic device stores element 310b (“Kate Winslet”), it can store it with qualifying information that it is an actor property of a previously stored movie object having a title property “Titanic.” As another example, the user can specify through a user interface the class of the stored object (e.g., “a person”) and its relationship (e.g., “acted in”) with another, previously stored object (e.g., a movie object having a title property “Titanic”).
In some embodiments, the qualifying information can be provided by the user at step 420. That is, in addition to selecting one or more objects sharing the desired commonalities, the user can specify the type of these object and/or their relationships with other, previously stored objects. In some embodiments, the user can specify that information using an additional window or a frame appearing alongside with the displayed document (e.g., a webpage). The window or frame can be rendered by a browser or by a pre-installed browser extension or add-on. If the user specifies the qualifying for the selected objects, all the objects identified in target documents at step 460 and stored at step 470 can be stored together with, or in association with, that qualifying information.
In some embodiments, the user can specify, as part of the qualifying information, that the selected objects are references (e.g., hyperlinks) to target documents. In these embodiments, instead of or in addition to storing the identified objects into the database, the electronic device can store the references in memory, and use them for obtaining target documents at step 450 when it runs method 400 in the future. Thus, method 400 can be performed iteratively, where the output of one run can be fed as an input to step 450 of another run. This allows the user to define large numbers of target documents instead of having to manually specify each target document. For example, the user can first specify one target document (e.g., a webpage containing links to multiple movie webpages) and specify that the objects (e.g., movies) collected after the first run of method 400 are references. The user can then run the method a second time, and specify that the target documents are all the webpages collected by the first run. It is appreciated that the number of such iterations is unlimited.
To illustrate the iterative application of method 400,
The user can then select “Reference” as the object type in browser extension window 1020, indicating that the objects collected at this page are references (hyperlinks) to target documents to be used later.
The electronic device can then select (e.g., at random or systematically) one of the hyperlinks and run method 400 again, using that hyperlink as the sample document. For example, the electronic device can select and render a webpage 1030 that corresponds to the hyperlink “1994” and that contains movies made in 1994, as illustrated in
The electronic device can then select (e.g., at random or systematically) additional hyperlinks from webpage 1000, and use them as additional sample documents, allowing the user to refine the definition of the commonalities across multiple sample documents. For example, the electronic device can now select and render a webpage 1040 that corresponds to the hyperlink “2007,” as illustrated in
The electronic device can repeat presenting sample webpages from the list of webpages collected from webpage 1000 in a similar fashion, allowing the user to refine the definition of the commonalities until the user is satisfied with the result. For example, if after a certain number of webpages, the user determines (by observing which objects are automatically highlighted by the electronic device at each presented webpage) that the commonalities determined by the electronic device encompass all movies at all the presented webpages (and therefore are likely to encompass all movies within all webpages referenced in webpage 1000) the user can stop refining the definition, and instruct the electronic device (e.g., via browser extension window 1020) to proceed to the next iteration of method 400. In some embodiments, to further facilitate the definition process, the electronic device can display two or more webpages on the same screen. For example, the browser extension can create two HTML frames, and show a different sample webpage at each frame, side by side, or one on top of the other. In these embodiments, the user's selection of objects on a webpage in one frame can be automatically reflected on the webpage in the other frame, because the processor performs a new determination of commonalities after each selection, and indicates the newly determined commonalities by highlighting all objects sharing the commonalities, on all the webpages rendered on the display.
In some embodiments, the user can indicate in browser extension window 1020 that the selected objects have object type “movie”. The electronic device can identify and store information (e.g., title) for all the identified objects in all the webpages identified on webpage 1000, thereby storing information essentially for all movies of all years. Each movie can be stored, for example, as an object of type “movie” having a property “title” with a value corresponding to the movie's title.
Instead or in addition to storing all movies as “movie” objects, the electronic device can run another iteration of method 400 on all individual movie webpages collected in the previous iteration, e.g., webpages of substantially all movies of all years. The electronic device can select (e.g., at random or systematically) one of the movie webpages and run method 400 again, using that webpage as the sample document. For example, the electronic device can select and render a webpage 1100 corresponding to the movie Transformers, as illustrated in
Embodiments of the present disclosure have been described herein with reference to numerous specific details that can vary from implementation to implementation. Certain adaptations and modifications of the described embodiments can be made. Other embodiments can be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the embodiments disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the present disclosure being indicated by the following claims. It is also intended that the sequence of steps shown in figures are only for illustrative purposes and are not intended to be limited to any particular sequence of steps. As such, it is appreciated that these steps can be performed in a different order while implementing the exemplary methods or processes disclosed herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/923,536, which was filed on Jan. 3, 2014, and the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5109399 | Thompson | Apr 1992 | A |
5329108 | Lamoure | Jul 1994 | A |
5632987 | Rao et al. | May 1997 | A |
5670987 | Doi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5724575 | Hoover et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5781704 | Rossmo | Jul 1998 | A |
5826021 | Mastors et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832218 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845300 | Comer | Dec 1998 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878434 | Draper et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897636 | Kaeser | Apr 1999 | A |
5966706 | Biliris et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6006242 | Poole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6057757 | Arrowsmith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073129 | Levine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091956 | Hollenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6134582 | Kennedy | Oct 2000 | A |
6161098 | Wallman | Dec 2000 | A |
6219053 | Tachibana et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232971 | Haynes | May 2001 | B1 |
6243717 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247019 | Davies | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279018 | Kudrolli et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304873 | Klein et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341310 | Leshem et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366933 | Ball et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369835 | Lin | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6418438 | Campbell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456997 | Shukla | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6510504 | Satyanarayanan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6519627 | Dan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549944 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560620 | Ching | May 2003 | B1 |
6574635 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581068 | Bensoussan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594672 | Lampson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631496 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6714936 | Nevin, III | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6745382 | Zothner | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6775675 | Nwabueze et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6828920 | Owen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839745 | Dingari et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6877137 | Rivette et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6976210 | Silva et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985950 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7036085 | Barros | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043702 | Chi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055110 | Kupka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058648 | Lightfoot et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7111231 | Huck et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7139800 | Bellotti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7158878 | Rasmussen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162475 | Ackerman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168039 | Bertram | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171427 | Witkowski | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7269786 | Malloy et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7278105 | Kitts | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290698 | Poslinski et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7333998 | Heckerman et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7370047 | Gorman | May 2008 | B2 |
7379811 | Rasmussen et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379903 | Caballero | May 2008 | B2 |
7403942 | Bayliss | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7426654 | Adams et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7454466 | Bellotti et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461158 | Rider et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467375 | Tondreau et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7502786 | Liu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7525422 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529727 | Arning et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558677 | Jones | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574428 | Leiserowitz et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579965 | Bucholz | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7596285 | Brown et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617232 | Gabbert et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620628 | Kapur et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627812 | Chamberlain et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634717 | Chamberlain et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7703021 | Flam | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7712049 | Williams et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716077 | Mikurak | May 2010 | B1 |
7725530 | Sah et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725547 | Albertson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725728 | Ama et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730082 | Sah et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730109 | Rohrs et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757220 | Griffith et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770100 | Chamberlain et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7805457 | Viola et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7809703 | Balabhadrapatruni et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818658 | Chen | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7894984 | Rasmussen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899611 | Downs et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912842 | Bayliss | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7917376 | Bellin et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920963 | Jouline et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933862 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962281 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962848 | Bertram | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970240 | Chao et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7984374 | Caro et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001465 | Kudrolli et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8001482 | Bhattiprolu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010545 | Stefik et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015487 | Roy et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024778 | Cash et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036632 | Cona et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8041714 | Aymeloglu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8103543 | Zwicky | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8112425 | Baum et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126848 | Wagner | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8134457 | Velipasalar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145703 | Frishert et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8185819 | Sah et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214361 | Sandler et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8214764 | Gemmell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225201 | Michael | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229947 | Fujinaga | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230333 | Decherd et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8280880 | Aymeloglu et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8290942 | Jones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301464 | Cave et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301904 | Gryaznov | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312546 | Alme | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8352881 | Champion et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364642 | Garrod | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8368695 | Howell et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8397171 | Klassen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412707 | Mianji | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8447722 | Ahuja et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8452790 | Mianji | May 2013 | B1 |
8463036 | Ramesh et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489331 | Kopf et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489641 | Seefeld et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8494984 | Ito et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504542 | Chang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514082 | Cova et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8515207 | Chau | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554579 | Tribble et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554709 | Goodson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577911 | Stepinski et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8589273 | Creeden et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601326 | Kirn | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8620641 | Farnsworth et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8646080 | Williamson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676857 | Adams et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8689108 | Duffield et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713467 | Goldenberg et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8726379 | Stiansen et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8739278 | Varghese | May 2014 | B2 |
8742934 | Sarpy et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8745516 | Mason et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8781169 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787939 | Papakipos et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8799799 | Cervelli et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812960 | Sun et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8830322 | Nerayoff et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832594 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8917274 | Ma et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924872 | Bogomolov et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930331 | McGrew et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8937619 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938686 | Erenrich et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
20010051949 | Carey et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020033848 | Sciammarella et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035590 | Eibach et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065708 | Senay et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091694 | Hrle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091707 | Keller | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095658 | Shulman | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116120 | Ruiz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174201 | Ramer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030028560 | Kudrolli et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039948 | Donahue | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093401 | Czahkowski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105759 | Bess et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115481 | Baird et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120675 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144868 | MacIntyre et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163352 | Surpin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182313 | Federwisch et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212718 | Tester | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225755 | Iwayama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003009 | Wilmot | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006523 | Coker | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064256 | Barinek et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085318 | Hassler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095349 | Bito et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111410 | Burgoon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117345 | Bamford et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117387 | Civetta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143602 | Ruiz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148301 | McKay et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153451 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163039 | Gorman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210763 | Jonas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260702 | Cragun et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027705 | Sadri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028094 | Allyn | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080769 | Gemmell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086207 | Heuer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097441 | Herbach et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108231 | Findleton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114763 | Nonomura et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125715 | Franco et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162523 | Darrell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180330 | Shapiro | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182793 | Keenan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183005 | Denoue et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246327 | Yeung et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251786 | Citron et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262493 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262512 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289524 | McGinnes | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010130 | Leff et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026120 | Carolan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026170 | Kreitler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059139 | Robinson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074881 | Vembu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080316 | Gilmore et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080619 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116991 | Calderwood | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129746 | Porter | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139375 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149596 | Surpin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161558 | Tamma et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203337 | White | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218206 | Bourbonnais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218491 | Grossman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218637 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241974 | Chao et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242040 | Rader | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242630 | Koike et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253502 | Raman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265397 | Bryan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271277 | Hu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279630 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011150 | Frank | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016363 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038962 | Fuchs et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050429 | Goldring et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070057966 | Ohno et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061487 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067285 | Blume | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078832 | Ott et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070143253 | Kostamaa et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174760 | Chamberlain et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192265 | Chopin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208497 | Downs et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208498 | Barker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208736 | Tanigawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233756 | D'Souza et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240062 | Christena et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266336 | Nojima et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271317 | Carmel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294643 | Kyle | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005063 | Seeds | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015970 | Brookfield et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040684 | Crump | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051989 | Welsh | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052142 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077597 | Butler | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077642 | Carbone et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104019 | Nath | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104149 | Vishniac et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126951 | Sood et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162616 | Gross et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195417 | Surpin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195608 | Clover | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195672 | Hamel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201339 | McGrew | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222295 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255973 | El Wade et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263468 | Cappione et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267107 | Rosenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270316 | Guidotti et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276167 | Michael | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278311 | Grange et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288306 | MacIntyre et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288475 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301643 | Appleton et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002492 | Velipasalar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027418 | Maru et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030915 | Winter et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031247 | Walter et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055251 | Shah et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088964 | Schaaf et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106242 | McGrew | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106308 | Killian et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119309 | Gibson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125369 | Kloostra et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125459 | Norton et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132921 | Hwangbo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132953 | Reed et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144262 | White et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164387 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164934 | Bhattiprolu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171939 | Athsani et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172511 | Decherd et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177962 | Gusmorino et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179892 | Tsuda et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222400 | Kupershmidt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222760 | Halverson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234720 | George et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090271435 | Yako et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281839 | Lynn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287470 | Farnsworth et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292626 | Oxford | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313223 | Rantanen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313311 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011282 | Dollard et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036831 | Vemuri et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042922 | Bradateanu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057716 | Stefik et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070523 | Delgo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070531 | Aymeloglu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070897 | Aymeloglu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076939 | Iwaki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082541 | Kottomtharayil | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100963 | Mahaffey | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103124 | Kruzeniski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114817 | Broeder et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114831 | Gilbert et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122152 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131457 | Heimendinger | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138842 | Balko et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145909 | Ngo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161565 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161688 | Kesselman et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162176 | Dunton | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191563 | Schlaifer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191884 | Holenstein et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198684 | Eraker et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199225 | Coleman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211550 | Daniello et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211618 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228812 | Uomini | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235606 | Oreland et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250412 | Wagner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280857 | Liu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283787 | Hamedi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293174 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306713 | Geisner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321399 | Ellren et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325581 | Finkelstein et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330801 | Rouh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029498 | Ferguson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047159 | Baid et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060753 | Shaked et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061013 | Bilicki et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074811 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078055 | Faribault et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078173 | Seligmann et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110117878 | Barash et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119100 | Ruhl et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137766 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153384 | Horne et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161096 | Buehler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167710 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170799 | Carrino et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173032 | Payne et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173619 | Fish | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184813 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208724 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218934 | Elser | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219450 | Mcdougal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225198 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258158 | Resende et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258242 | Eidson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270705 | Parker | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270812 | Ruby | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291851 | Whisenant | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310005 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314007 | Dassa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120013684 | Robertson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019559 | Siler et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036013 | Neuhaus et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036434 | Oberstein | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066296 | Appleton et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079363 | Folting et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106801 | Jackson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131512 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144335 | Abeln et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150791 | Willson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159307 | Chung et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159362 | Brown et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173985 | Peppel | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196557 | Reich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120196558 | Reich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208636 | Feige | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221511 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221580 | Barney | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245976 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246148 | Dror | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254129 | Wheeler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120290879 | Shibuya et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323888 | Osann, Jr. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330908 | Stowe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330973 | Ghuneim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006725 | Simanek et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036346 | Cicerone | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046842 | Muntz et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060786 | Serrano et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061169 | Pearcy et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073377 | Heath | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073454 | Busch | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130078943 | Biage et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130097130 | Bingol et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097482 | Marantz et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111320 | Campbell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117651 | Waldman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130101159 | Rosen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150004 | Rosen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151148 | Parundekar et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176321 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179420 | Park et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130224696 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238616 | Rose et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246170 | Gross et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130251233 | Yang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262527 | Hunter et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130263019 | Castellanos et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268520 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279757 | Kephart | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282696 | John et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290011 | Lynn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290825 | Arndt et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297619 | Chandarsekaran et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318060 | Chang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140019936 | Cohanoff | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032506 | Hoey et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033010 | Richardt et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040371 | Gurevich et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047357 | Alfaro et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059038 | McPherson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068487 | Steiger et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095509 | Patton | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108068 | Williams | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108380 | Gotz et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108985 | Scott et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140156527 | Grigg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140157172 | Peery et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164502 | Khodorenko et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189536 | Lange et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195515 | Baker et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267294 | Ma | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267295 | Sharma | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279824 | Tamayo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140333651 | Cervelli et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337772 | Cervelli et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150046870 | Goldenberg et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102014103482 | Sep 2014 | DE |
1672527 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2551799 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2555126 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2778977 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2835745 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2835770 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2838039 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2516155 | Jan 2015 | GB |
2013306 | Feb 2015 | NL |
WO 0009529 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2005104736 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2009051987 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009061501 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2010000014 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010030913 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010030919 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 20130102892 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yudong, HTML page analysis based on visual cues, 2001, pp. 859-864. |
Nierman, Evaluating Structural Simiilarity in XML Documents, 2002, 6 pages. |
Baker et al., “Megastore: Providing Scalable, Highly Available Storage for Interactive Services,” 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR '11), Jan. 9-12, 2011, Asilomar, California, pp. 223-234. |
Bernstein et al., “Hyder—A Transactional Record Manager for Shared Flash,” 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR '11), Jan. 9-12, 2011, Asilomar, California, pp. 9-20. |
Chang et al., “Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data”, Google, Inc., OSDI '06: Seventh Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, Seattle, WA, Nov. 2006 (14 pages). |
Klemmer et al., “Where Do Web Sites Come From? Capturing and Interacting with Design History,” Association for Computing Machinery, CHI 2002, Apr. 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, MN (8 pages). |
Kokossi et al., “D7-Dynamic Ontoloty Management System (Design),” Information Societies Technology (IST) Programme, Jan. 10, 2002, pp. 1-27. |
Miklau et al., “Securing History: Privacy and Accountability in Database Systems,” 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), Jan. 7-10, 2007, Asilomar, California, pp. 387-396. |
Niepert et al., “A Dynamic Ontology for a Dynamic Reference Work”, JCDL' 07, Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Jun. 17-22, 2007, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (10 pages). |
Peng et al., “Large-scale Incremental Processing Using Distributed Transactions and Notifications” Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, USENIX, 2010, pp. 1-14. |
Thomson et al., “The Case for Determinism in Database Systems,” The 36th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Sep. 13-17, 2010, Singapore, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 3, No. 1 (11 pages). |
Anonymous, “A Real-World Problem of Matching Records,” Nov. 2006, <http://grupoweb.upf.es/bd-web/slides/ullman.pdf> (16 pages). |
Anonymous, “BackTult—JD Edwards One World Version Control System,” printed Jul. 23, 2007 (1 page). |
Lim et al., “Resolving Attribute Incompatibility in Database Integration: An Evidential Reasoning Approach,” Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, <http://reference.kfupm.edu.sa/content/r/e/resolving—attribute—incompatibility—in—d—531691.pdf>, pp. 154-163. |
Litwin et al., “Multidatabase Interoperability,” IEEE Computer, Dec. 1986, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 10-18. <http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/˜litwin/mdb-interoperability.pdf>. |
Qiang et al., “A Mutual-Information-Based Approach to Entity Reconciliation in Heterogeneous Databases,” Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Computer Science & Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, Dec. 12-14, 2008, pp. 666-669. |
Zhao et al., “Entity Matching Across Heterogeneous Data Sources: An Approach Based on Constrained Cascade Generalization,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 66, No. 3, Sep. 2008, pp. 368-381. |
“A First Look: Predicting Market Demand for Food Retail using a Huff Analysis,” TRF Policy Solutions, Jul. 2012 (30 pages). |
Acklen, Laura, “Absolute Beginners Guide to Microsoft Word 2003,” Dec. 24, 2003, pp. 15-18, 34-41, 308-316. |
Ananiev et al., “The New Modality API,” http://web.archive.org/web/20061211011958/http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/javase6/modality/, Jan. 2006 (8 pages). |
Bugzilla@Mozilla, “Bug 18726—[feature] Long-click means of invoking contextual menus not supported,” http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show—bug.cgi?id=18726, accessed online on Jun. 13, 2013, (11 pages). |
Chen et al., “Bringing Order to the Web: Automatically Categorizing Search Results,” CHI '00, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2000 (9 pages). |
Dramowicz, Ela, “Retail Trade Area Analysis Using the Huff Model,” Directions Magazine, Jul. 2, 2005, http://www.directionsmag.com/articles/retail-trade-area-analysis-using-the-huff-mode1/123411, accessed online on Dec. 4, 2013 (10 pages). |
GIS-NET 3 Public—Department of Regional Planning. Planning & Zoning Information for Unincorporated LA County. Retrieved Oct. 2, 2013 from http://gis.planning.lacounty.gov/GIS-NET3—Public/Viewer.html (2 pages). |
Griffith, Daniel A., “A Generalized Huff Model,” Geographical Analysis, Apr. 1982, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 135-144. |
Hibbert et al., “Prediction of Shopping Behavior Using a Huff Model Within a GIS Framework,” Healthy Eating in Context, Mar. 18, 2011 (16 pages). |
Huff et al., “Calibrating the Huff Model Using ArcGIS Business Analyst,” ESRI, Sep. 2008 (33 pages). |
Huff, David L., “Parameter Estimation in the Huff Model,” ESRI, ArcUser, Oct.-Dec. 2003, pp. 34-36. |
Liu, Tianshun, “Combining GIS and the Huff Model to Analyze Suitable Locations for a New Asian Supermarket in the Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota USA,” Papers in Resource Analysis, 2012, vol. 14 (8 pages). |
Manske, “File Saving Dialogs,” <http://www.mozilla.org/editor/ui—specs/FileSaveDialogs.html>, Jan. 20, 1999 (7 pages). |
Map of San Jose, CA. Retrieved Oct. 2, 2013 from http://maps.google.com (1 page). |
Map of San Jose, CA. Retrieved Oct. 2, 2013 from http://maps.bing.com (1 page). |
Map of San Jose, CA. Retrieved Oct. 2, 2013 from http://maps.yahoo.com (1 page). |
Microsoft Office—Visio, “About connecting shapes,” <http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio-help/about-connecting-shapes-HP085050369.aspx>, accessed online on Aug. 4, 2011 (6 pages). |
Microsoft Office—Visio, “Add and glue connectors with the Connector tool,” <http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio-help/add-and-glue-connectors-with-the-connector-tool-HA010048532.aspx?CTT=1>, accessed online on Aug. 4, 2011 (1 page). |
“A Quick Guide to UniProtKB Swiss-Prot & TrEMBL,” Sep. 2011, pp. 2. |
Antoshenkov, Gennady, “Dictionary-Based Order-Preserving String Compression,” the VLDB Journal, 1997, vol. 6, pp. 26-39. |
“Apache HBase,” <http://hbase.apache.org/> printed Sep. 14, 2011 in 1 page. |
Bluttman et al., “Excel Formulas and Functions for Dummies,” 2005, Wiley Publishing, Inc., pp. 280, 284-286. |
Canese et al., “Chapter 2: PubMed: The Bibliographic Database,” The NCBI Handbook, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-10. |
Conner, Nancy, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” May 1, 2008, pp. 15. |
Delcher et al., “Identifying Bacterial Genes and Endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer,” BioInformatics, vol. 23, No. 6, 2007, pp. 673-679. |
Devanbu et al., “Authentic Third-party Data Publication,” 2000, pp. 19, http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/˜devanbu/authdbpub.pdf. |
Dreyer et al., “An Object-Oriented Data Model for a Time Series Management System,” Proceedings of the 7th International Working Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Charlottesville, Virginia USA, Sep. 28-30, 1994, pp. 12. |
Elmasri et al., “Fundamentals of Database Systems,” 2004, Fourth Edition, pp. 455-491. |
Goswami, Gautam, “Quite Writly Said!,” One Brick at a Time, Aug. 21, 2005, pp. 7. |
Hansen et al. “Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World”, Chapter 4, pp. 53-67 and Chapter 10, pp. 143-164, published Sep. 2010. |
Kahan et al., “Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared WEB annotations”, Computer Networks 39, pp. 589-608, 2002. |
Keylines.com, “An Introduction to KeyLines and Network Visualization,” Mar. 2014, <http://keylines.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/KeyLines-White-Paper.pdf> downloaded May 12, 2014 in 8 pages. |
Keylines.com, “KeyLines Datasheet,” Mar. 2014, <http://keylines.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/KeyLines-datasheet.pdf> downloaded May 12, 2014 in 2 pages. |
Keylines.com, “Visualizing Threats: Improved Cyber Security Through Network Visualization,” Apr. 2014, <http://keylines.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Visualizing-Threats1.pdf> downloaded May 12, 2014 in 10 pages. |
Kitts, Paul, “Chapter 14: Genome Assembly and Annotation Process,” The NCBI Handbook, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-21. |
Madden, Tom, “Chapter 16: The BLAST Sequence Analysis Tool,” The NCBI Handbook, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-15. |
Manno et al., “Introducing Collaboration in Single-user Applications through the Centralized Control Architecture,” 2010, pp. 10. |
Mentzas et al. “An Architecture for Intelligent Assistance in the Forecasting Process,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 3-6, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 167-176. |
Microsoft—Developer Network, “Getting Started with VBA in Word 2010,” Apr. 2010, <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff604039%28v=office.14%29.aspx> as printed Apr. 4, 2014 in 17 pages. |
Mizrachi, Ilene, “Chapter 1: GenBank: The Nuckeotide Sequence Database,” The NCBI Handbook, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-14. |
Palmas et al., “An Edge-Bunding Layout for Interactive Parallel Coordinates” 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pp. 57-64. |
Rouse, Margaret, “OLAP Cube,” <http://searchdatamanagement.techtarget.com/definition/OLAP-cube>, Apr. 28, 2012, pp. 16. |
Sigrist, et al., “PROSITE, a Protein Domain Database for Functional Characterization and Annotation,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, vol. 38, pp. D161-D166. |
Sirotkin et al., “Chapter 13: The Processing of Biological Sequence Data at NCBI,” The NCBI Handbook, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-11. |
“The Apache Cassandra Project,” <http://cassandra.apache.org/> printed Sep. 14, 2011 in 3 pages. |
“The FASTA Program Package,” fasta-36.3.4, Mar. 25, 2011, pp. 29. |
Wollrath et al., “A Distributed Object Model for the Java System,” Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems, Jun. 17-21, 1996, pp. 219-231. |
Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,571 dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,394 dated Aug. 25, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,187 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/135,289 dated Oct. 14, 2014. |
Official Communication for New Zealand Patent Application No. 624557 dated May 14, 2014. |
Official Communication for New Zealand Patent Application No. 628585 dated Aug. 26, 2014. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14158861.6 dated Jun. 16, 2014. |
Official Communication for New Zealand Patent Application No. 622517 dated Apr. 3, 2014. |
Official Communication for Great Britain Patent Application No. 1404457.2 dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
Official Communication for New Zealand Patent Application No. 627962 dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14159464.8 dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14159464.8 dated Aug. 20, 2014. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14159464.8 dated Sep. 22, 2014. |
Official Communication for New Zealand Patent Application No. 628840 dated Aug. 28, 2014. |
Official Communication in New Zealand Application No. 628495 dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
Official Communication for United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1408025.3 dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,596 dated Jul. 18, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,599 dated Jul. 22, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,160 dated Jul. 29, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,964 dated Sep. 3, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,084 dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,098 dated Aug. 15, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,568 dated Oct. 22, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,006 dated Sep. 10, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,098 dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,138 dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,154 dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,147 dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
Chung, Chin-Wan, “Dataplex: An Access to Heterogeneous Distributed Databases,” Communications of the ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 1, 1990, pp. 70-80. |
Olanoff, Drew, “Deep Dive with the New Google Maps for Desktop with Google Earth Integration, It's More than Just a Utility,” May 15, 2013, pp. 1-6, retrieved from the internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20130515230641/http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/15/deep-dive-with-the-new-google-maps-for-desktop-with-google-earth-integration-its-more-than-just-a-utility/. |
Wikipedia, “Federated Database System,” Sep. 7, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Federated database system&oldid=571954221,.retrieved from the internet on Jan. 27, 2015. |
Official Communication for Great Britain Patent Application No. 1404574.4 dated Dec. 18, 2014. |
Official Communication for Great Britain Patent Application No. 1411984.6 dated Dec. 22, 2014. |
Official Communication for Great Britain Application 1413935.6 dated Jan. 27, 2015. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14180281.9 Jan. 26, 2015. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14187996.5 dated Feb. 12, 2015. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14180142.3 dated Feb. 6, 2015. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14186225.0 dated Feb. 13, 2015. |
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14189344.6 dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
Definition “Identify” downloaded Jan. 22, 2015, 1 page. |
Definition “Overlay” downloaded Jan. 22, 2015, 1 page. |
Hardesty, “Privacy Challenges: Analysis: It's Surprisingly Easy to Identify Individuals from Credit-Card Metadata,” MIT News on Campus and Around the World, MIT News Office, Jan. 29, 2015, 3 pages. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,596 dated Jan. 26, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/319,765 dated Feb. 4, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,160 dated Feb. 11, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,138 dated Feb. 18, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,147 dated Feb. 19, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,084 dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,006 dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,552 dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,103 dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,098 dated Dec. 29, 2014. |
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,860 dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61923536 | Jan 2014 | US |