Systems and methods for visualizing and programming electrical stimulation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11285329
  • Patent Number
    11,285,329
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 26, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 29, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Methods and systems can facilitate visualizing cathodic and anodic stimulation separately. Alternately, the methods and systems may separately visualize stimulation of different neural elements, such as nerve fibers and neural cells. These methods and systems can further facilitate programming an electrical stimulation system for stimulating patient tissue.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure is directed to the area of implantable electrical stimulation systems and methods of making and using the systems. The present disclosure is also directed to systems and methods for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system.


BACKGROUND

Implantable electrical stimulation systems have proven therapeutic in a variety of diseases and disorders. For example, spinal cord stimulation systems have been used as a therapeutic modality for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. Peripheral nerve stimulation has been used to treat chronic pain syndrome and incontinence, with a number of other applications under investigation. Functional electrical stimulation systems have been applied to restore some functionality to paralyzed extremities in spinal cord injury patients. Stimulation of the brain, such as deep brain stimulation, can be used to treat a variety of diseases or disorders.


Stimulators have been developed to provide therapy for a variety of treatments. A stimulator can include a control module (with a pulse generator), one or more leads, and an array of stimulator electrodes on each lead. The stimulator electrodes are in contact with or near the nerves, muscles, or other tissue to be stimulated. The pulse generator in the control module generates electrical pulses that are delivered by the electrodes to body tissue.


BRIEF SUMMARY

One aspect is a system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The system includes a processor configured to obtain a cathodic volume of activation (“VOA’) for at least one cathode, wherein the cathodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one cathode using a set of stimulation parameters; obtain an anodic VOA for at least one anode, wherein the anodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one anode using a set of stimulation parameters; and determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the cathodic VOA, and a graphical representation the anodic VOA. Optionally, the processor is also configured to, when the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA is modified using modification controls, modify the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA and determine a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified cathodic VOA or anodic VOA; receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the selected one of the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


Another aspect is a method for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The method includes obtaining a cathodic volume of activation (“VOA’) for at least one cathode, wherein the cathodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one cathode using a set of stimulation parameters; obtaining an anodic VOA for at least one anode, wherein the anodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one anode using a set of stimulation parameters; and determining to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the cathodic VOA, and a graphical representation the anodic VOA. Optionally, the method also includes, when the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA is modified using modification controls, modifying the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA and determining a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified cathodic VOA or anodic VOA; receiving direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiating a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the selected one of the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


A further aspect is non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method describe above.


In at least some aspects, the processor is further configured to, or the method further includes a step to, determine to display controls for turning off the display of the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or the graphical representation of the anodic VOA. In at least some aspects, determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA includes determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA for regions that are closer to any one of the at least one cathode than to any one of the at least one anode and determining to display the graphical representation of the anodic VOA for regions that are closer to any one of the at least one anode than to any one of the at least one cathode.


In at least some aspects, determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA includes using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA. In at least some aspects, using different graphical features includes using a third graphical feature for any region in which the cathodic VOA overlaps the anodic VOA.


In at least some aspects, the modification controls include move controls to move the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA relative to the lead. In at least some aspects, the modification controls include stretch or compress controls to stretch or compress the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA. In at least some aspects, the processor is further configured to determine to display a control for presenting an animation of a VOA for a time-varying stimulation.


In at least some aspects, obtaining the cathodic VOA includes obtaining cathodic VOAs for a plurality of different stimulation sets; obtaining the anodic VOA includes obtaining anodic VOAs for the plurality of different stimulation sets; and determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA includes determining to display the cathodic VOAs as a set of contour lines and the anodic VOAs as a set of contour lines.


In at least some aspects, obtaining the cathodic VOA includes obtaining cathodic VOAs for a plurality of different stimulation sets; obtaining the anodic VOA includes obtaining anodic VOAs for the plurality of different stimulation sets; and determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA includes determining to display the cathodic VOAs using a first variation in shading or color and the anodic VOAs using a second variation in shading or color.


Another aspect is a system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The system includes a processor configured to obtain a fiber volume of activation (“VOA’) for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the fiber VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which nerve fibers are activated using the set of stimulation parameters; obtain a cell VOA for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the cell VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which neural cells are activated using the set of stimulation parameters; and determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the fiber VOA, and a graphical representation the cell VOA. Optionally, the processor is further configured to, when the fiber VOA or cell VOA is modified using modification controls, modify the graphical representation of the fiber VOA or cell VOA and determine a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified fiber VOA or cell VOA; receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


Yet another aspect is a method for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The method includes obtaining a fiber volume of activation (“VOA’) for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the fiber VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which nerve fibers are activated using the set of stimulation parameters; obtaining a cell VOA for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the cell VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which neural cells are activated using the set of stimulation parameters; and determining to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the fiber VOA, and a graphical representation the cell VOA. Optionally, the method further includes, when the fiber VOA or cell VOA is modified using modification controls, modifying the graphical representation of the fiber VOA or cell VOA and determining a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified fiber VOA or cell VOA; receiving direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiating a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


A further aspect is non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method describe above.


In at least some aspects, obtaining the fiber VOA includes obtaining fiber VOAs for a plurality of different stimulation sets; obtaining the cell VOA includes obtaining cell VOAs for the plurality of different stimulation sets; and determining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA includes determining to display the fiber VOAs as a set of contour lines and the cell VOAs as a set of contour lines.


In at least some aspects, obtaining the fiber VOA includes obtaining fiber VOAs for a plurality of different stimulation sets; obtaining the cell VOA includes obtaining cell VOAs for the plurality of different stimulation sets; and determining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA includes determining to display the fiber VOAs using a first variation in shading or color and the cell VOAs using a second variation in shading or color.


In at least some aspects, determining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA includes using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA. In at least some aspects, using different graphical features includes using a third graphical feature for any region in which the fiber VOA overlaps the cell VOA.


In at least some aspects, the modification controls include move controls to move the fiber VOA or cell VOA relative to the lead. In at least some aspects, the modification controls include stretch or compress controls to stretch or compress the fiber VOA or cell VOA. In at least some aspects, the processor is further configured to determine to display a control for presenting an animation of a VOA for a time-varying stimulation. In at least some aspects, the processor is further configured to, or the method further includes a step to, determine to display controls for turning off the display of the graphical representation of the fiber VOA or the graphical representation of the cell VOA. In at least some aspects, determining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA includes using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA


Yet another aspect is a system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The system includes a processor configured to determine which of a plurality of anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation or anodic stimulation using a set of stimulation parameters; and determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes and graphical representation of the anatomical elements, indicating which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation, which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by anodic stimulation, and which of the anatomical elements are not activated. Optionally, the processor is further configured to, when the set of stimulation parameters is modified using modification controls, determine which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation or anodic stimulation using the modified set of stimulation parameters and modify the graphical representations of the anatomical elements; receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


Another aspect is a method for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system including an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes. The method includes determining which of a plurality of anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation or anodic stimulation using the set of stimulation parameters; and determining to display a graphical representation of the electrodes and graphical representation of the anatomical elements, indicating which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation, which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by anodic stimulation, and which of the anatomical elements are not activated. Optionally, the method also includes, when the set of stimulation parameters is modified using modification controls, determining which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation or anodic stimulation using the modified set of stimulation parameters and modifying the graphical representations of the anatomical elements; receiving direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters; and initiating a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.


A further aspect is non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method describe above.


In at least some aspects, determining to display the graphical representation of the anatomical elements includes using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the anatomical elements activated by cathodic stimulation and the graphical representation of the anatomical elements activated by anodic stimulation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figures unless otherwise specified.


For a better understanding of the present invention, reference will be made to the following Detailed Description, which is to be read in association with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of an electrical stimulation system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of one embodiment of an electrical stimulation lead;



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of one embodiment of a system for determining stimulation parameters;



FIG. 4 is one embodiment of a user interface for visualizing cathodic and anodic stimulation;



FIG. 5 is another embodiment of a user interface for visualizing cathodic and anodic stimulation;



FIG. 6 is one embodiment of a user interface for visualizing fiber and cell stimulation;



FIG. 7 is another embodiment of a user interface for visualizing fiber and cell stimulation;



FIG. 8 is one embodiment of a user interface for visualizing anatomical element stimulation;



FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a first embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system;



FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a second embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system; and



FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a third embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure is directed to the area of implantable electrical stimulation systems and methods of making and using the systems. The present disclosure is also directed to systems and methods for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system.


Suitable implantable electrical stimulation systems include, but are not limited to, a least one lead with one or more electrodes disposed on a distal end of the lead and one or more terminals disposed on one or more proximal ends of the lead. Leads include, for example, percutaneous leads, paddle leads, cuff leads, or any other arrangement of electrodes on a lead. Examples of electrical stimulation systems with leads are found in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,181,969; 6,516,227; 6,609,029; 6,609,032; 6,741,892; 7,244,150; 7,450,997; 7,672,734; 7,761,165; 7,783,359; 7,792,590; 7,809,446; 7,949,395; 7,974,706; 8,175,710; 8,224,450; 8,271,094; 8,295,944; 8,364,278; 8,391,985; and 8,688,235; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2007/0150036; 2009/0187222; 2009/0276021; 2010/0076535; 2010/0268298; 2011/0005069; 2011/0004267; 2011/0078900; 2011/0130817; 2011/0130818; 2011/0238129; 2011/0313500; 2012/0016378; 2012/0046710; 2012/0071949; 2012/0165911; 2012/0197375; 2012/0203316; 2012/0203320; 2012/0203321; 2012/0316615; 2013/0105071; and 2013/0197602, all of which are incorporated by reference. In the discussion below, a percutaneous lead will be exemplified, but it will be understood that the methods and systems described herein are also applicable to paddle leads and other leads.


A percutaneous lead for electrical stimulation (for example, deep brain or spinal cord stimulation) includes stimulation electrodes that can be ring electrodes, segmented electrodes that extend only partially around the circumference of the lead, or any other type of electrode, or any combination thereof. The segmented electrodes can be provided in sets of electrodes, with each set having electrodes circumferentially distributed about the lead at a particular longitudinal position. For illustrative purposes, the leads are described herein relative to use for deep brain stimulation, but it will be understood that any of the leads can be used for applications other than deep brain stimulation, including spinal cord stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation, or stimulation of other nerves, muscles, and tissues. In particular, stimulation may stimulate specific targets. Examples of such targets include, but are not limited to, the subthalamic nucleus (STN), internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), external segment of the globus pallidus (GPe), and the like. In at least some embodiments, an anatomical structure is defined by its physical structure and a physiological target is defined by its functional attributes. In at least one of the various embodiments, the lead may be positioned at least partially within the target, but in other embodiments, the lead may be near, but not inside, the target.


Turning to FIG. 1, one embodiment of an electrical stimulation system 10 includes one or more stimulation leads 12 and an implantable pulse generator (IPG) 14. The system 10 can also include one or more of an external remote control (RC) 16, a clinician's programmer (CP) 18, an external trial stimulator (ETS) 20, or an external charger 22.


The IPG 14 is physically connected, optionally via one or more lead extensions 24, to the stimulation lead(s) 12. Each lead carries multiple electrodes 26 arranged in an array. The IPG 14 includes pulse generation circuitry that delivers electrical stimulation energy in the form of, for example, a pulsed electrical waveform (i.e., a temporal series of electrical pulses) to the electrode array 26 in accordance with a set of stimulation parameters. The IPG 14 can be implanted into a patient's body, for example, below the patient's clavicle area or within the patient's buttocks or abdominal cavity. The IPG 14 can have eight stimulation channels which may be independently programmable to control the magnitude of the current stimulus from each channel. In at least some embodiments, the IPG 14 can have more or fewer than eight stimulation channels (for example, 4-, 6-, 16-, 32-, or more stimulation channels). The IPG 14 can have one, two, three, four, or more connector ports, for receiving the terminals of the leads.


The ETS 20 may also be physically connected, optionally via the percutaneous lead extensions 28 and external cable 30, to the stimulation leads 12. The ETS 20, which may have similar pulse generation circuitry as the IPG 14, also delivers electrical stimulation energy in the form of, for example, a pulsed electrical waveform to the electrode array 26 in accordance with a set of stimulation parameters. One difference between the ETS 20 and the IPG 14 is that the ETS 20 is often a non-implantable device that is used on a trial basis after the neurostimulation leads 12 have been implanted and prior to implantation of the IPG 14, to test the responsiveness of the stimulation that is to be provided. Any functions described herein with respect to the IPG 14 can likewise be performed with respect to the ETS 20.


The RC 16 may be used to telemetrically communicate with or control the IPG 14 or ETS 20 via a uni- or bi-directional wireless communications link 32. Once the IPG 14 and neurostimulation leads 12 are implanted, the RC 16 may be used to telemetrically communicate with or control the IPG 14 via a uni- or bi-directional communications link 34. Such communication or control allows the IPG 14 to be turned on or off and to be programmed with different stimulation parameter sets. The IPG 14 may also be operated to modify the programmed stimulation parameters to actively control the characteristics of the electrical stimulation energy output by the IPG 14. The CP 18 allows a user, such as a clinician, the ability to program stimulation parameters for the IPG 14 and ETS 20 in the operating room and in follow-up sessions.


The CP 18 may perform this function by indirectly communicating with the IPG 14 or ETS 20, through the RC 16, via a wireless communications link 36. Alternatively, the CP 18 may directly communicate with the IPG 14 or ETS 20 via a wireless communications link (not shown). The stimulation parameters provided by the CP 18 are also used to program the RC 16, so that the stimulation parameters can be subsequently modified by operation of the RC 16 in a stand-alone mode (i.e., without the assistance of the CP 18).


For purposes of brevity, the details of the RC 16, CP 18, ETS 20, and external charger 22 will not be further described herein. Details of exemplary embodiments of these devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,280, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Other examples of electrical stimulation systems can be found at U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,181,969; 6,516,227; 6,609,029; 6,609,032; 6,741,892; 7,949,395; 7,244,150; 7,672,734; and 7,761,165; 7,974,706; 8,175,710; 8,224,450; and 8,364,278; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0150036, as well as the other references cited above, all of which are incorporated by reference.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a lead 100 with electrodes 125 disposed at least partially about a circumference of the lead 100 along a distal end portion of the lead 100 and terminals 135 disposed along a proximal end portion of the lead 100. The lead 100 can be implanted near or within the desired portion of the body to be stimulated such as, for example, the brain, spinal cord, or other body organs or tissues. In one example of operation for deep brain stimulation, access to the desired position in the brain can be accomplished by drilling a hole in the patient's skull or cranium with a cranial drill (commonly referred to as a burr), and coagulating and incising the dura mater, or brain covering. The lead 100 can be inserted into the cranium and brain tissue with the assistance of a stylet (not shown). The lead 100 can be guided to the target location within the brain using, for example, a stereotactic frame and a microdrive motor system. In at least some embodiments, the microdrive motor system can be fully or partially automatic. The microdrive motor system may be configured to perform one or more the following actions (alone or in combination): insert the lead 100, advance the lead 100, retract the lead 100, or rotate the lead 100.


In at least some embodiments, measurement devices coupled to the muscles or other tissues stimulated by the target neurons, or a unit responsive to the patient or clinician, can be coupled to the IPG 14 or microdrive motor system. The measurement device, user, or clinician can indicate a response by the target muscles or other tissues to the stimulation or recording electrode(s) to further identify the target neurons and facilitate positioning of the stimulation electrode(s). For example, if the target neurons are directed to a muscle experiencing tremors, a measurement device can be used to observe the muscle and indicate changes in, for example, tremor frequency or amplitude in response to stimulation of neurons. Alternatively, the patient or clinician can observe the muscle and provide feedback.


The lead 100 for deep brain stimulation can include stimulation electrodes, recording electrodes, or both. In at least some embodiments, the lead 100 is rotatable so that the stimulation electrodes can be aligned with the target neurons after the neurons have been located using the recording electrodes.


Stimulation electrodes may be disposed on the circumference of the lead 100 to stimulate the target neurons. Stimulation electrodes may be ring-shaped so that current projects from each electrode equally in every direction from the position of the electrode along a length of the lead 100. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, two of the electrodes 125 are ring electrodes 120. Ring electrodes typically do not enable stimulus current to be directed from only a limited angular range around a lead. Segmented electrodes 130, however, can be used to direct stimulus current to a selected angular range around a lead. When segmented electrodes are used in conjunction with an implantable pulse generator that delivers constant current stimulus, current steering can be achieved to more precisely deliver the stimulus to a position around an axis of a lead (i.e., radial positioning around the axis of a lead). To achieve current steering, segmented electrodes can be utilized in addition to, or as an alternative to, ring electrodes.


The lead 100 includes a lead body 110, terminals 135, one or more ring electrodes 120, and one or more sets of segmented electrodes 130 (or any other combination of electrodes). The lead body 110 can be formed of a biocompatible, non-conducting material such as, for example, a polymeric material. Suitable polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, silicone, polyurethane, polyurea, polyurethane-urea, polyethylene, or the like. Once implanted in the body, the lead 100 may be in contact with body tissue for extended periods of time. In at least some embodiments, the lead 100 has a cross-sectional diameter of no more than 1.5 mm and may be in the range of 0.5 to 1.5 mm. In at least some embodiments, the lead 100 has a length of at least 10 cm and the length of the lead 100 may be in the range of 10 to 70 cm.


The electrodes 125 can be made using a metal, alloy, conductive oxide, or any other suitable conductive biocompatible material. Examples of suitable materials include, but are not limited to, platinum, platinum iridium alloy, iridium, titanium, tungsten, palladium, palladium rhodium, or the like. Preferably, the electrodes 125 are made of a material that is biocompatible and does not substantially corrode under expected operating conditions in the operating environment for the expected duration of use.


Each of the electrodes 125 can either be used or unused (OFF). When an electrode is used, the electrode can be used as an anode or cathode and carry anodic or cathodic current. In some instances, an electrode might be an anode for a period of time and a cathode for a period of time.


Deep brain stimulation leads may include one or more sets of segmented electrodes. Segmented electrodes may provide for superior current steering than ring electrodes because target structures in deep brain stimulation are not typically symmetric about the axis of the distal electrode array. Instead, a target may be located on one side of a plane running through the axis of the lead. Through the use of a radially segmented electrode array (“RSEA”), current steering can be performed not only along a length of the lead but also around a circumference of the lead. This provides precise three-dimensional targeting and delivery of the current stimulus to neural target tissue, while potentially avoiding stimulation of other tissue. Examples of leads with segmented electrodes include U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,473,061; 8,571,665; and 8,792,993; U.S. Patent Application Publications Nos. 2010/0268298; 2011/0005069; 2011/0130803; 2011/0130816; 2011/0130817; 2011/0130818; 2011/0078900; 2011/0238129; 2012/0016378; 2012/0046710; 2012/0071949; 2012/0165911; 2012/197375; 2012/0203316; 2012/0203320; 2012/0203321; 2013/0197424; 2013/0197602; 2014/0039587; 2014/0353001; 2014/0358208; 2014/0358209; 2014/0358210; 2015/0045864; 2015/0066120; 2015/0018915; 2015/0051681; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/557,211 and 14/286,797; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/113,291, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a system for practicing the invention. The system can include a computing device 300 or any other similar device that includes a processor 302 and a memory 304, a display 306, an input device 308, and, optionally, an electrical stimulation system 312.


The computing device 300 can be a computer, tablet, mobile device, or any other suitable device for processing information. The computing device 300 can be local to the user or can include components that are non-local to the computer including one or both of the processor 302 or memory 304 (or portions thereof). For example, in at least some embodiments, the user may operate a terminal that is connected to a non-local computing device. In other embodiments, the memory can be non-local to the user.


The computing device 300 can utilize any suitable processor 302 and the term “a processor” can include one or more hardware processors within the computing device or other components of the system or may be local to the user or non-local to the user or other components of the computing device. The processor 302 is configured to execute instructions provided to the processor 302, as described below.


Any suitable memory 304 can be used for the computing device 302. The memory 304 illustrates a type of computer-readable media, namely computer-readable storage media. Computer-readable storage media may include, but is not limited to, nonvolatile, non-transitory, removable, and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Examples of computer-readable storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory, or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (“DVD”) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device.


Communication methods provide another type of computer readable media; namely communication media. Communication media typically embodies computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave, data signal, or other transport mechanism and include any information delivery media. The terms “modulated data signal,” and “carrier-wave signal” includes a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information, instructions, data, and the like, in the signal. By way of example, communication media includes wired media such as twisted pair, coaxial cable, fiber optics, wave guides, and other wired media and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media.


The display 306 can be any suitable display device, such as a monitor, screen, display, or the like, and can include a printer. The input device 308 can be, for example, a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, track ball, joystick, voice recognition system, or any combination thereof, or the like.


The electrical stimulation system 312 can include, for example, any of the components illustrated in FIG. 1. The electrical stimulation system 312 may communicate with the computing device 300 through a wired or wireless connection or, alternatively or additionally, a user can provide information between the electrical stimulation system 312 and the computing device 300 using a computer-readable medium or by some other mechanism. In at least some embodiments, the computing device 300 may include part of the electrical stimulation system, such as, for example, the IPG 14, CP 18, RC 16, ETS 20, or any combination thereof.


The methods and systems described herein may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Accordingly, the methods and systems described herein may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Systems referenced herein typically include memory and typically include methods for communication with other devices including mobile devices. Methods of communication can include both wired and wireless (for example, RF, optical, or infrared) communications methods and such methods provide another type of computer readable media; namely communication media. Wired communication can include communication over a twisted pair, coaxial cable, fiber optics, wave guides, or the like, or any combination thereof. Wireless communication can include RF, infrared, acoustic, near field communication, Bluetooth, or the like, or any combination thereof.


During programming sessions, as well as at other times, it can be helpful to visualize the region that will be stimulated. Stimulation region visualization systems and methods can be used to predict or estimate a region of stimulation for a given set of stimulation parameters. In at least some embodiments, the systems and methods further permit a user to modify stimulation parameters and visually observe how such modifications can change the predicted or estimated stimulation region. Such algorithms and systems may provide greater ease of use and flexibility and may enable or enhance stimulation therapy. The terms “stimulation field map” (SFM), “volume of activation” (VOA), or “volume of tissue activated (VTA)” are often used to designate an estimated region of tissue that will be stimulated for a particular set of stimulation parameters. Any suitable method for determining the VOA/SFM/VTA can be used including those described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,326,433; 8,675,945; 8,831,731; 8,849,632; and 8,958,615; U.S. Patent Application Publications Nos. 2009/0287272; 2009/0287273; 2012/0314924; 2013/0116744; 2014/0122379; and 2015/0066111; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/030,655, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.


Existing VOA/SFM/VTA models are generally based on neural elements, such as neural fibers, that are preferentially activated by cathodic stimulation (e.g., stimulation near a cathode). Anodic stimulation (e.g., stimulation near an anode) can activate different neural elements. Moreover, the threshold for stimulation of many neural elements is different for anodic and cathodic stimulation. As an example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,490, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, demonstrates in FIGS. 1 and 2 that cathodic stimulation activates nerve fibers at much lower stimulation amplitudes than neuronal cells. In contrast, anodic stimulation activates neuronal cells at lower stimulation amplitudes than nerve fibers.


Because anodic stimulation activates neural elements differently from cathodic stimulation, VOA/SFM/VTA models for cathodic stimulation will likely be inaccurate in estimating the effect of anodic stimulation. For a lead producing anodic stimulation or a combination of anodic and cathodic stimulation, it can be helpful to provide a system that displays visualization of the anodic and cathodic stimulation regions and conveys to a user which type of stimulation is being visualized. Alternatively, the visualization can be by neural element type, such as nerve fiber or neural cell or any other suitable selection of neural element type.


In many instances, for monopolar cathodic stimulation, the anode of the electrical stimulation system is located on the case of the implantable pulse generator or at another site relatively distant from the cathode or cathodes on the lead. Monopolar cathodic stimulation may also include instances where the anode is distributed over a large number of (for example, at least four, five, six, seven, or more) electrodes on the lead or where the anode is positioned on the lead at a substantial distance away from the cathode (for example, the anode is near the proximal end of the array of electrodes and the cathode is near the proximal end of the electrodes.) Similarly, monopolar anodic stimulation may include instances where the cathode of the electrical stimulation system is located on the case of the implantable pulse generator or at another site relatively distant from the anode or anodes on the lead or instances where the cathode is distributed over a large number of (for example, at least four, five, six, seven, or more) electrodes on the lead or where the cathode is positioned on the lead at a substantial distance away from the anode (for example, the anode is near the proximal end of the array of electrodes and the cathode is near the proximal end of the electrodes.) Another method for identifying the anodic or cathodic nature of stimulation can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,190,250, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, which observes the angle of an electric field at particular points with respect to the lead.


User interfaces can be provided to visualize anodic or cathodic stimulation or stimulation of nerve fibers, neural cells, or other neural elements. Such user interfaces can be provided on the system illustrated in FIG. 3, the CP 18 or RC 16 of FIG. 1, or any other suitable system or device.



FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a user interface 400 for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. The user interface 400 includes a representation of a portion of the lead 406 with electrodes 408. In the illustrated example, electrode 408a is a cathode and electrode 408b is an anode. It will be understood that any other electrode, or combination of electrodes, could be selected to be a cathode or anode. It will also be understood that in some embodiments, either the cathode or anode may be selected to be an electrode that is distant from the illustrated portion of the lead (for example, the housing of the implantable pulse generator.)


In FIG. 4, an estimated cathodic VOA (or VTA or SFM) 430 and an estimated anodic VOA (or VTA or SFM) 432 are illustrated. The lead 406, cathodic VOA 430, and anodic VOA 432 in the user interface 400 are illustrated in two dimensions. It will be understood, however, that these objects and VOAs are three-dimensional and, in some embodiments, may be displayed three-dimensionally or using perspective display techniques. In at least some embodiments, the user interface 400 can include controls for rotating the lead 406 and VOAs 430, 432 to show these elements at different angles.


In the illustrated embodiment, the cathodic VOA 430 and anodic VOA are distinguished using different types of cross-hatching. Other methods of distinguishing the VOAs 430, 432 can be used in combination with, or as an alternative to, cross-hatching including, but not limited to, different colors, different shading, different symbols, or the like, or any combination thereof. A legend 437 for the VOAs 430, 432 may be provided.


In this embodiment, the anodic VOA 432 is illustrated in regions or at points where the nearest active electrode is an anode and the cathodic VOA 430 is illustrated in regions or at points where the nearest active electrode is a cathode. In the illustrated embodiment, there is one anode and one cathode. In other instances, there may be more than one anode or cathode. In such instances, the anodic or cathodic VOA corresponding to the nearest anode or cathode will be displayed for each particular region or point. When there are multiple anodes or cathodes, in at least some embodiments, the anodic VOA 432 will represent all of the anodes and the cathodic VOA 430 will represent all of the cathodes. In other embodiments, a different anodic VOA 432 may be presented for each of the anodes (or a subset of the anodes) and a different cathodic CTA 430 may be presented for each of the cathodes (or a subset of the cathodes). In such circumstances, the legend 437 and controls 436, 438 for selecting which VOA to display modify, described below, may include individual controls for each of the different anodic and cathodic VOAs.


In this embodiment, the distances to the active electrodes (e.g., anode and cathode) serve as a proxy for identifying which type of stimulation (anodic or cathodic) will be primarily present in a particular region or point. In other embodiments, other proxies may be used to determine whether the anodic VOA or cathodic VOA will be displayed. For example, the distances may be weighted according to type of stimulation (for example, cathodic stimulation may be weighted more heavily than anodic stimulation if cathodic stimulation is more effective for a given stimulation amplitude), type of neural elements (for example, some tissue may be more receptive to cathodic stimulation than anodic stimulation), stimulation amplitude (for example, stimulation using multiple anodes or cathodes may result in different stimulation amplitudes for the active electrodes), or the like or any combination thereof. In such embodiments, the anodic VOA 432 is displayed for regions or points where the weighted distance to the anode is greater than the weighted distance to the cathode and the cathodic VOA 430 is displayed for regions or points where the weighted distance to the cathode is greater than the weighted distance to the anode.


In other embodiments, as an alternative to, or in addition to, weighting, the proxy may be a non-linear function of the distance (for example, a function of the distance squared or the square root of the distance or a polynomial equation with the distance as a variable.)


The user interface 400 also includes one or more display controls 436 for turning the display of the cathodic VOA 430 and anodic VOA 432 on or off. In the illustrated embodiment, both the cathodic VOA 430 and anodic VOA 432 are displayed. Operation of the cathodic display control 436a can remove display of the cathodic VOA 430. Similarly, operation of the anodic display control 436b can remove display of the anodic VOA 432. In some embodiments, when one of the VOAs is removed, the other VOA remains, as illustrated in FIG. 4, limited to the region nearest the corresponding electrode. In other embodiments, when one of the VOAs is removed, the other VOA may be altered to show the entire shape of the VOA rather than being limited by the distances to the electrodes.


In at least some embodiments, the user interface 400 may include controls for modifying the VOAs 430, 432. Such controls can include a selection control 438 with individual controls 438a, 438b for selecting the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA. The controls can include move controls 440 to move the selected VOA up or down the lead or around the lead clockwise or counter-clockwise. The controls can include stretch controls 442 for stretching the selected VOA up or down the lead, away from the lead, or around the lead in the clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. The controls can include compress controls 442 for compressing the selected VOA up or down the lead, toward from the lead, or inward from the clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. Any other suitable modification controls can be included in the user interface.


In at least some embodiments, the system will determine, based on the modified VOA, changes to the stimulation parameters to approximate the modified VOA. Such changes may include, for example, changing the electrode selection or the stimulation amplitude. As an example, moving or stretching the VOA up or down the lead may include shifting some or all of the stimulation to another electrode (or electrodes) further up or down the lead. As another example, stretching the VOA away from the lead may include increasing the stimulation amplitude.



FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a user interface 500 for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. The user interface 500 includes a representation of a portion of the lead 406 with electrodes 408. In the illustrated example, electrode 408a is a cathode and electrode 408b is an anode. In FIG. 5, an estimated cathodic VOA 430 and an estimated anodic VOA 432 are illustrated including a region 434 where the cathodic VOA 430 and the anodic VOA 432 overlap. The user interface also includes the display controls 436, selection control 438, move controls 440, stretch controls 442, and compress controls 444 described above.



FIG. 6 illustrates another embodiment of a user interface 600 for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. The user interface 600 includes a representation of a portion of the lead 406 with electrodes 408. In the illustrated example, electrode 408a is a cathode and electrode 408b is an anode. In FIG. 6, an estimated fiber VOA 431 and an estimated cell VOA 433 are illustrated including a region 435 where the fiber VOA 431 and the cell VOA 433 overlap. As discussed above, it is found that cathodic stimulation preferentially stimulates fibers, but does provide some stimulation of neural cells. Conversely, anodic stimulation preferentially stimulates neural cells, but also stimulates fibers. Accordingly, the combination of anodic and cathodic stimulation will stimulate both fibers and neural cells, but in different and overlapping regions. In at least some embodiments, the determination of the fiber VOA 431 is at least partially based on a second difference of the scalar potential (for example, an activating function, derivative of the E field, or derivative of the J field.) In at least some embodiments, the determination of the cell VOA 433 is at least partially based on a first difference of the scalar potential (e.g., the E field or the J field.)


In other embodiments, similar to the user interface of FIG. 6, different types of neural elements can be selected for displayable VOAs. For example, large fibers, small fibers, fibers or cells oriented parallel to the lead, fibers or cells oriented perpendicular to the lead, fibers or cells oriented in a particular angular range relative to the lead, specific types of neural cells, neuron terminals, synapses, neurons with different biophysical properties (such as specific ion channel properties), or the like, or any combination thereof. In at least some embodiments, the user interface can display VOAs for two, three, four, or more different types of neural elements. In at least some embodiments, the VOAs can be determined using monopolar cathodic stimulation, monopolar anodic stimulation, or bipolar/multipolar stimulation.


The user interface also includes the display controls 436, selection control 438, move controls 440, stretch controls 442, and compress controls 444 described above. These controls, however, are now directed to displaying or modifying the fiber VOA 431 or cell VOA 433.



FIG. 7 illustrates another embodiment of a user interface 700 for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. The user interface 700 includes a representation of a portion of the lead 406 with electrodes 408. In the illustrated example, electrode 408a is a cathode and electrode 408b is an anode. In FIG. 7, a set of estimated fiber VOA contour lines 441 and a set of estimated cell VOA contour lines 443. In another embodiment, contour lines for anodic and cathodic VOAs (see, FIGS. 4 and 5) can be displayed. Each contour line of a set corresponds to a different stimulation amplitude. In other embodiments, the contour lines can correspond to changing other stimulation parameters, such as electrode selection, pulse width, pulse duration, or the like, or any combination thereof. In another embodiment, instead of contour lines, a map of the region around the lead can be displayed with shading or coloring that varies according to the stimulation amplitude that is needed to stimulate the region. For example, shading can be darkest for lower amplitude and become lighter for higher amplitude or coloring can range from blue for lower amplitude to red for higher amplitude.


The user interface also includes the display controls 436, selection control 438, move controls 440, stretch controls 442, and compress controls 444 described above. These controls, however, are now directed to displaying or modifying the fiber VOA contour lines 441 or cell VOA contour lines 443.



FIG. 8 illustrates another embodiment of a user interface 800 for visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. The user interface 800 includes a representation of a portion of the lead 406 with electrodes 408. In the illustrated example, electrode 408a is a cathode and electrode 408b is an anode. In FIG. 8, instead of illustrating VOAs, anatomical elements (such as previously identified anatomical structures) are illustrated and are marked based on whether a threshold amount of the particular anatomical element is stimulated by the anode or cathode or not stimulated. In the illustrated embodiments, anatomical element 445 is stimulated by the cathode, anatomical element 447 is stimulated by the anode, and anatomical element is not stimulated. In at least some embodiments, the amount of an anatomical structure that is stimulated is determined using the VOAs described above. In at least some embodiments, a user can set the threshold amount for all anatomical elements. In at least some embodiments, a user can set the threshold amount individually for each anatomical element or subset of anatomical elements.


The user interface also includes the display controls 436, selection control 438, move controls 440, stretch controls 442, and compress controls 444 described above. When the display or modify controls are operated, the markings on the anatomical elements will be modified based on the modifications to the cathode or anode VOAs.


In at least some embodiments, any combination of the VOAs and other elements described above for the interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 4 to 8 can be used. In at least some embodiments, multiple VOAs determined using different stimulation conditions or different types of stimulation can be used. For example, any combination of cathodic VOAs, anodic VOAs, fiber VOAs, cell VOAs, terminal VOAs, or the like can be displayed simultaneously or sequentially. Providing these different VOAs can allow a user to compare the stimulation for different conditions. In at least some embodiments, a current, most recent, or user-selected VOA may be highlighted (using, for example, a different color, bold colors or boundaries or contour lines, or shading).


In at least some embodiments, the user can select a time varying stimulation (for example, stimulation that varies from cathodic to anodic stimulation). Any of the user interfaces described above may include controls for defining the time variation. Any of the user interfaces described above may also include controls that provide an animation of the resulting time-varying VOA. For example, an animated time-varying VOA may transition from anodic to cathodic stimulation (or vice versa). The location of the time-varying VOA may remain constant or may shift over time.



FIG. 9 is a flowchart of one embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. In step 902, a set of stimulation parameters is received including a selection of at least one anode and at least one cathode. In step 904, cathodic and anodic VOAs are obtained. The system may calculate the VOAs or may receive the VOAs from another system or may determine the VOAs from look-up tables, databases, or the like or may obtain the VOAs in any other suitable manner.


In step 906, the system displays the electrodes, cathodic VOA, and anodic VOA. For example, any of the user interfaces described above (including, but not limited to the user interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5) can be used for displaying these elements. In step 908, modification controls, such as those illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5, are displayed. In step 910, when the cathodic or anodic VOA is modified using the modification controls, the system determines a modified set of stimulation parameters that will approximate the modified VOA. In optional step 912, a selection of one set of stimulation parameters is received and the system sends the selected set of stimulation parameters to an implantable pulse generator (or other device) to provide stimulation to a patient using the selected stimulation parameters.



FIG. 10 is a flowchart of another embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. In step 1002, a set of stimulation parameters is received including a selection of at least one anode and at least one cathode. In step 1004, fiber and cell VOAs are obtained. The system may calculate the VOAs or may receive the VOAs from another system or may determine the VOAs from look-up tables, databases, or the like or may obtain the VOAs in any other suitable manner.


In step 1006, the system displays the electrodes, fiber VOA, and cell VOA. For example, any of the user interfaces described above (including, but not limited to the user interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7) can be used for displaying these elements. In step 1008, modification controls, such as those illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7, are displayed. In step 1010, when the fiber or cell VOA is modified using the modification controls, the system determines a modified set of stimulation parameters that will approximate the modified VOA. In optional step 1012, a selection of one set of stimulation parameters is received and the system sends the selected set of stimulation parameters to an implantable pulse generator (or other device) to provide stimulation to a patient using the selected stimulation parameters.



FIG. 11 is a flowchart of one embodiment of a method of visualizing stimulation or for programming an electrical stimulation system. In step 1102, a set of stimulation parameters is received including a selection of at least one anode and at least one cathode. Also, a set of anatomical elements is received. In step 1104, the system determines which of the anatomical elements are stimulated, by a threshold amount, by cathodic or anodic stimulation. For example, the system may obtain the cathodic and anodic VOAs and determine which of the anatomical elements have a threshold amount within the respective VOAs.


In step 1106, the system displays the electrodes and anatomical elements indicating which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by cathodic stimulation, which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by anodic stimulation, and which of the anatomical elements are not activated. For example, any of the user interfaces described above (including, but not limited to the user interface illustrated in FIG. 8) can be used for displaying these elements. In step 1108, modification controls, such as those illustrated in FIG. 8, are displayed. In step 1110, when the cathodic or anodic VOA is modified using the modification controls, the system determines a modified set of stimulation parameters that will approximate the modified VOA. In optional step 1112, a selection of one set of stimulation parameters is received and the system sends the selected set of stimulation parameters to an implantable pulse generator (or other device) to provide stimulation to a patient using the selected stimulation parameters.


It will be understood that the system can include one or more of the methods described hereinabove with respect to FIGS. 9-11 in any combination. The methods, systems, and units described herein may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Accordingly, the methods, systems, and units described herein may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. The methods described herein can be performed using any type of processor or any combination of processors where each processor performs at least part of the process.


It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and methods disclosed herein, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These program instructions may be provided to a processor to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute on the processor, create means for implementing the actions specified in the flowchart block or blocks disclosed herein. The computer program instructions may be executed by a processor to cause a series of operational steps to be performed by the processor to produce a computer implemented process. The computer program instructions may also cause at least some of the operational steps to be performed in parallel. Moreover, some of the steps may also be performed across more than one processor, such as might arise in a multi-processor computer system. In addition, one or more processes may also be performed concurrently with other processes, or even in a different sequence than illustrated without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.


The computer program instructions can be stored on any suitable computer-readable medium including, but not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (“DVD”) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device.


The above specification provides a description of the structure, manufacture, and use of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention also resides in the claims hereinafter appended.

Claims
  • 1. A system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system comprising an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes, the system comprising: a processor configured to: obtain a cathodic volume of activation (“VOA”) for monopolar cathodic stimulation using at least one cathode, wherein the cathodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one cathode using a set of stimulation parameters;obtain an anodic VOA for monopolar anodic stimulation using at least one anode, wherein the anodic VOA is an estimated volume of tissue activated by the at least one anode using the set of stimulation parameters;determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the cathodic VOA, and a graphical representation the anodic VOA;when the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA is modified using modification controls, modify the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or the graphical representation of the anodic VOA and determine a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or the modified graphical representation of the anodic VOA;receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters; andinitiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to display controls for turning off the display of the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA or the graphical representation of the anodic VOA.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA comprises determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA for regions that are closer to any one of the at least one cathode than to any one of the at least one anode and determining to display the graphical representation of the anodic VOA for regions that are closer to any one of the at least one anode than to any one of the at least one cathode.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein determining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA comprises using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein using different graphical features comprises using a third graphical feature for any region in which the cathodic VOA overlaps the anodic VOA.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the modification controls comprise move, stretch, or compress controls to move, stretch, or compress the cathodic VOA or anodic VOA relative to the lead.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to display a control for presenting an animation of a VOA for a time-varying stimulation.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein obtaining the cathodic VOA comprises obtaining cathodic VOAs for monopolar cathodic stimulation using a plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters;obtaining the anodic VOA comprises obtaining anodic VOAs for monopolar anodic stimulation using the plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters; anddetermining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA comprises determining to display the graphical representations of the cathodic VOAs as a set of contour lines and the graphical representations of the anodic VOAs as a set of contour lines.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein obtaining the cathodic VOA comprises obtaining cathodic VOAs for monopolar cathodic stimulation using a plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters;obtaining the anodic VOA comprises obtaining anodic VOAs for monopolar anodic stimulation using the plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters; anddetermining to display the graphical representation of the cathodic VOA and the graphical representation of the anodic VOA comprises determining to display the graphical representations of the cathodic VOAs using a first variation in shading or color and the graphical representations of the anodic VOAs using a second variation in shading or color.
  • 10. A system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system comprising an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes, the system comprising: a processor configured to: obtain a fiber volume of activation (“VOA′) for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the fiber VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which nerve fibers are activated using the set of stimulation parameters;obtain a cell VOA for a set of stimulation parameters, wherein the cell VOA is an estimated volume of tissue in which neural cells are activated using the set of stimulation parameters;determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes, a graphical representation of the fiber VOA, and a graphical representation the cell VOA;when the fiber VOA or cell VOA is modified using modification controls, modify the graphical representation of the fiber VOA or the graphical representation of the cell VOA and determine a modified set of stimulation parameters corresponding to the modified graphical representation of the fiber VOA or the modified graphical representation of the cell VOA;receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters; andinitiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein obtaining the fiber VOA comprises obtaining fiber VOAs for a plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters;obtaining the cell VOA comprises obtaining cell VOAs for the plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters; anddetermining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA comprises determining to display the graphical representations of the fiber VOAs as a set of contour lines and the graphical representations of the cell VOAs as a set of contour lines.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein obtaining the fiber VOA comprises obtaining fiber VOAs for a plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters;obtaining the cell VOA comprises obtaining cell VOAs for the plurality of different sets of stimulation parameters; anddetermining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA comprises determining to display the graphical representations of the fiber VOAs using a first variation in shading or color and the graphical representations of the cell VOAs using a second variation in shading or color.
  • 13. The system of claim 10, wherein determining to display the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA comprises using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the fiber VOA and the graphical representation of the cell VOA.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein using different graphical features comprises using a third graphical feature for any region in which the fiber VOA overlaps the cell VOA.
  • 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the modification controls comprise move controls to move the fiber VOA or cell VOA relative to the lead.
  • 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the modification controls comprise stretch or compress controls to stretch or compress the fiber VOA or cell VOA.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to display controls for turning off the display of the graphical representation of the fiber VOA or the graphical representation of the cell VOA.
  • 18. A system for programming electrical stimulation of a patient using an implantable electrical stimulation system comprising an implantable pulse generator and a lead having a plurality of electrodes, the system comprising: a processor configured to: determine which of a plurality of anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by monopolar cathodic stimulation using a set of stimulation parameters;determine which of the plurality of anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by monopolar anodic stimulation using the set of stimulation parameters;determine to display a graphical representation of the electrodes and a graphical representation of the anatomical elements, indicating which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by the monopolar cathodic stimulation, which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by the monopolar anodic stimulation, and which of the anatomical elements are not activated;when the set of stimulation parameters is modified using modification controls, determine which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by the monopolar cathodic stimulation or the monopolar anodic stimulation using the modified set of stimulation parameters and modify the graphical representations of the anatomical elements;receive direction to program the implantable pulse generator with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters; andinitiate a signal that provides the implantable pulse generator of the electrical stimulation system with the set of stimulation parameters or the modified set of stimulation parameters for generating electrical stimulation for the patient through the electrodes of the lead.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein determining to display the graphical representation of the anatomical elements comprises using different graphical features to distinguish the graphical representation of the anatomical elements activated by the monopolar cathodic stimulation and the graphical representation of the anatomical elements activated by the monopolar anodic stimulation.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the processor is further configured to determine to display controls for turning off the indication of which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by the monopolar cathodic stimulation or for turning off the indication of which of the anatomical elements are activated by a threshold amount by the monopolar anodic stimulation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/663,895, filed Apr. 27, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (515)
Number Name Date Kind
3999555 Person Dec 1976 A
4144889 Tyers et al. Mar 1979 A
4177818 De Pedro Dec 1979 A
4341221 Testerman Jul 1982 A
4378797 Osterholm Apr 1983 A
4445500 Osterholm May 1984 A
4735208 Wyler et al. Apr 1988 A
4765341 Mower et al. Aug 1988 A
4841973 Stecker Jun 1989 A
5067495 Brehm Nov 1991 A
5099846 Hardy Mar 1992 A
5222494 Baker, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5255693 Dutcher Oct 1993 A
5259387 dePinto Nov 1993 A
5304206 Baker, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5344438 Testerman et al. Sep 1994 A
5361763 Kao et al. Nov 1994 A
5452407 Crook Sep 1995 A
5560360 Filler et al. Oct 1996 A
5565949 Kasha, Jr. Oct 1996 A
5593427 Gliner et al. Jan 1997 A
5601612 Gliner et al. Feb 1997 A
5607454 Cameron et al. Mar 1997 A
5620470 Gliner et al. Apr 1997 A
5651767 Schulman Jul 1997 A
5711316 Elsberry et al. Jan 1998 A
5713922 King Feb 1998 A
5716377 Rise et al. Feb 1998 A
5724985 Snell et al. Mar 1998 A
5749904 Gliner et al. May 1998 A
5749905 Gliner et al. May 1998 A
5776170 MacDonald et al. Jul 1998 A
5782762 Vining Jul 1998 A
5843148 Gijsbers et al. Dec 1998 A
5859922 Hoffmann Jan 1999 A
5868740 LeVeen et al. Feb 1999 A
5897583 Meyer et al. Apr 1999 A
5910804 Fortenbery et al. Jun 1999 A
5925070 King et al. Jul 1999 A
5938688 Schiff Aug 1999 A
5938690 Law et al. Aug 1999 A
5978713 Prutchi et al. Nov 1999 A
6016449 Fischell et al. Jan 2000 A
6029090 Herbst Feb 2000 A
6029091 de la Rama et al. Feb 2000 A
6050992 Nichols Apr 2000 A
6058331 King May 2000 A
6066163 John May 2000 A
6083162 Vining Jul 2000 A
6094598 Elsberry et al. Jul 2000 A
6096756 Crain et al. Aug 2000 A
6106460 Panescu et al. Aug 2000 A
6109269 Rise et al. Aug 2000 A
6128538 Fischell et al. Oct 2000 A
6129685 Howard, III Oct 2000 A
6146390 Heilbrun et al. Nov 2000 A
6161044 Silverstone Dec 2000 A
6167311 Rezai Dec 2000 A
6181969 Gord Jan 2001 B1
6192266 Dupree et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205361 Kuzma Mar 2001 B1
6208881 Champeau Mar 2001 B1
6240308 Hardy et al. May 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253109 Gielen Jun 2001 B1
6289239 Panescu et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301492 Zonenshayn Oct 2001 B1
6310619 Rice Oct 2001 B1
6319241 King Nov 2001 B1
6336899 Yamazaki Jan 2002 B1
6343226 Sunde et al. Jan 2002 B1
6351675 Tholen et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353762 Baudino et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366813 Dilorenzo Apr 2002 B1
6368331 Front et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389311 Whayne et al. May 2002 B1
6393325 Mann et al. May 2002 B1
6421566 Holsheimer Jul 2002 B1
6435878 Reynolds et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442432 Lee Aug 2002 B2
6463328 John Oct 2002 B1
6491699 Henderson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6494831 Koritzinsky Dec 2002 B1
6507759 Prutchi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510347 Borkan Jan 2003 B2
6516227 Meadows et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517480 Krass Feb 2003 B1
6539263 Schiff Mar 2003 B1
6560490 Grill et al. May 2003 B2
6579280 Kovach et al. Jun 2003 B1
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6606523 Jenkins Aug 2003 B1
6609029 Mann et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609031 Law et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609032 Woods et al. Aug 2003 B1
6622048 Mann et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631297 Mo Oct 2003 B1
6654642 North et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662053 Borkan Dec 2003 B2
6675046 Holsheimer Jan 2004 B2
6684106 Herbst Jan 2004 B2
6687392 Touzawa et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690972 Conley et al. Feb 2004 B2
6690974 Archer et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692315 Soumillion et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694162 Hartlep Feb 2004 B2
6694163 Vining Feb 2004 B1
6708096 Frei et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741892 Meadows et al. May 2004 B1
6748098 Rosenfeld Jun 2004 B1
6748276 Daignault, Jr. et al. Jun 2004 B1
6778846 Martinez et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788969 Dupree et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795737 Gielen et al. Sep 2004 B2
6827681 Tanner et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830544 Tanner Dec 2004 B2
6845267 Harrison et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850802 Holsheimer Feb 2005 B2
6895280 Meadows et al. May 2005 B2
6909913 Vining Jun 2005 B2
6937891 Leinders et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937903 Schuler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6944497 Stypulkowski Sep 2005 B2
6944501 Pless Sep 2005 B1
6950707 Whitehurst Sep 2005 B2
6969388 Goldman et al. Nov 2005 B2
7003349 Andersson et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003352 Whitehurst Feb 2006 B1
7008370 Tanner et al. Mar 2006 B2
7008413 Kovach et al. Mar 2006 B2
7035690 Goetz Apr 2006 B2
7043293 Baura May 2006 B1
7047082 Schrom et al. May 2006 B1
7047084 Erickson et al. May 2006 B2
7050857 Samuelsson et al. May 2006 B2
7054692 Whitehurst et al. May 2006 B1
7136518 Griffin et al. May 2006 B2
7058446 Schuler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7082333 Bauhahn et al. Jul 2006 B1
7107102 Daignault et al. Sep 2006 B2
7126000 Ogawa et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127297 Law et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136695 Pless et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142923 North et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146219 Sieracki et al. Dec 2006 B2
7146223 King Dec 2006 B1
7151961 Whitehurst Dec 2006 B1
7155279 Whitehurst Dec 2006 B2
7167760 Dawant et al. Jan 2007 B2
7177674 Echauz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7181286 Sieracki et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184837 Goetz Feb 2007 B2
7191014 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209787 Dilorenzo Apr 2007 B2
7211050 Caplygin May 2007 B1
7216000 Sieracki et al. May 2007 B2
7217276 Henderson May 2007 B2
7218968 Condie et al. May 2007 B2
7228179 Campen et al. Jun 2007 B2
7231254 DiLorenzo Jun 2007 B2
7236830 Gliner Jun 2007 B2
7239910 Tanner Jul 2007 B2
7239916 Thompson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7239926 Goetz Jul 2007 B2
7242984 DiLorenzo Jul 2007 B2
7244150 Brase et al. Jul 2007 B1
7252090 Goetz Aug 2007 B2
7254445 Law et al. Aug 2007 B2
7254446 Erickson Aug 2007 B1
7257447 Cates et al. Aug 2007 B2
7266412 Stypulkowski Sep 2007 B2
7294107 Simon et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295876 Erickson Nov 2007 B1
7299096 Balzer et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308302 Schuler et al. Dec 2007 B1
7313430 Urquhart Dec 2007 B2
7324851 DiLorenzo Jan 2008 B1
7346282 Sakanaka et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346382 McIntyre et al. Mar 2008 B2
7388974 Yanagita Jun 2008 B2
7437193 Parramon et al. Oct 2008 B2
7450997 Pianca et al. Nov 2008 B1
7463928 Lee et al. Dec 2008 B2
7499048 Sieracki et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505815 Lee et al. Mar 2009 B2
7548786 Lee et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565199 Sheffield et al. Jul 2009 B2
7603177 Sieracki et al. Oct 2009 B2
7617002 Goetz Nov 2009 B2
7623918 Goetz Nov 2009 B2
7650184 Walter Jan 2010 B2
7657319 Goetz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672734 Anderson et al. Mar 2010 B2
7676273 Goetz et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680526 McIntyre et al. Mar 2010 B2
7734340 De Ridder Jun 2010 B2
7761165 He et al. Jul 2010 B1
7783359 Meadows Aug 2010 B2
7792590 Pianca et al. Sep 2010 B1
7809446 Meadows Oct 2010 B2
7826902 Stone et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848802 Goetz et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860548 McIntyre et al. Dec 2010 B2
7904134 McIntyre et al. Mar 2011 B2
7945105 Jaenisch May 2011 B1
7949395 Kuzma May 2011 B2
7974706 Moffitt et al. Jul 2011 B2
8000794 Lozano Aug 2011 B2
8019439 Kuzma et al. Sep 2011 B2
8175710 He May 2012 B2
8180601 Butson et al. May 2012 B2
8195300 Gliner et al. Jun 2012 B2
8209027 Butson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8224450 Brase Jul 2012 B2
8257684 Covalin et al. Sep 2012 B2
8262714 Hulvershom et al. Sep 2012 B2
8271094 Moffitt et al. Sep 2012 B1
8280514 Lozano et al. Oct 2012 B2
8295944 Howard et al. Oct 2012 B2
8326433 Blum et al. Dec 2012 B2
8364278 Pianca et al. Jan 2013 B2
8391985 McDonald Mar 2013 B2
8429174 Ramani et al. Apr 2013 B2
8452415 Goetz et al. May 2013 B2
8473061 Moffitt et al. Jun 2013 B2
8483237 Zimmermann et al. Jul 2013 B2
8543189 Paitel et al. Sep 2013 B2
8571665 Moffitt et al. Oct 2013 B2
8589316 Lujan et al. Nov 2013 B2
8594800 Butson et al. Nov 2013 B2
8606360 Butson et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620452 King et al. Dec 2013 B2
8675945 Barnhorst et al. Mar 2014 B2
8688235 Pianca et al. Apr 2014 B1
8792993 Pianca et al. Jul 2014 B2
8831731 Blum et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849632 Sparks et al. Sep 2014 B2
8958615 Blum et al. Feb 2015 B2
9020789 Butson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9050470 Carlton et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072905 Kokones et al. Jul 2015 B2
9248272 Romero Feb 2016 B2
20010031071 Nichols et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020032375 Bauch et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020062143 Baudino et al. May 2002 A1
20020087201 Firlik et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099295 Gil et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020115603 Whitehouse Aug 2002 A1
20020116030 Rezei Aug 2002 A1
20020123780 Grill et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020128694 Holsheimer Sep 2002 A1
20020151939 Rezai Oct 2002 A1
20020183607 Bauch et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183740 Edwards et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183817 Van Venrooij et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030097159 Schiff et al. May 2003 A1
20030149450 Mayberg Aug 2003 A1
20030171791 KenKnight et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030212439 Schuler et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040034394 Woods et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044279 Lewin et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044378 Holsheimer Mar 2004 A1
20040044379 Holsheimer Mar 2004 A1
20040054297 Wingeier et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059395 North et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040106916 Quaid et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133248 Frei et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152957 Stivoric et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181262 Bauhahn Sep 2004 A1
20040186532 Tadlock Sep 2004 A1
20040199216 Lee et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040267330 Lee et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021090 Schuler et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033380 Tanner et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049649 Luders et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060001 Singhal et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060009 Goetz Mar 2005 A1
20050070781 Dawant et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075689 Toy et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085714 Foley et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050165294 Weiss Jul 2005 A1
20050171587 Daglow et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050228250 Bitter et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251061 Schuler et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261061 Nguyen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261601 Schuler et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261747 Schuler et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267347 Oster Dec 2005 A1
20050288732 Schuler et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004422 De Ridder Jan 2006 A1
20060017749 McIntyre et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020292 Goetz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060069415 Cameron et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060094951 Dean et al. May 2006 A1
20060095088 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060155340 Schuler et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060206169 Schuler Sep 2006 A1
20060218007 Bjorner et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224189 Schuler et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235472 Goetz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259079 King Nov 2006 A1
20060259099 Goetz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070000372 Rezai et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017749 Dold et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027514 Gerber Feb 2007 A1
20070043268 Russell Feb 2007 A1
20070049817 Preiss et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087003 Sanchez et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078498 Rezai et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070083104 Butson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070123953 Lee et al. May 2007 A1
20070129769 Bourget et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135855 Foshee et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150036 Anderson Jun 2007 A1
20070156186 Lee et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162086 DiLorenzo Jul 2007 A1
20070162235 Zhan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168004 Walter Jul 2007 A1
20070168007 Kuzma et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185544 Dawant et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191887 Schuler et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191912 Ficher et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070197891 Shachar et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203450 Berry Aug 2007 A1
20070203532 Tass et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203537 Goetz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203538 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203539 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203540 Goetz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203541 Goetz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203543 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203544 Goetz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203545 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203546 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213789 Nolan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213790 Nolan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244519 Keacher et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245318 Goetz et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255321 Gerber et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255322 Gerber et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265664 Gerber et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276441 Goetz Nov 2007 A1
20070282189 Dan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288064 Butson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080027514 DeMulling et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080039895 Fowler et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080071150 Miesel et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081982 Simon et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086451 Torres et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103533 Patel et al. May 2008 A1
20080114233 McIntyre et al. May 2008 A1
20080114579 McIntyre et al. May 2008 A1
20080123922 Gielen et al. May 2008 A1
20080123923 Gielen et al. May 2008 A1
20080133141 Frost Jun 2008 A1
20080141217 Goetz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154340 Goetz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154341 McIntyre et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163097 Goetz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183256 Keacher Jul 2008 A1
20080188734 Suryanarayanan et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215118 Goetz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080227139 Deisseroth et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080242950 Jung et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261165 Steingart et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269588 Csavoy et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080300654 Lambert et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080300797 Tabibiazar et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090016491 Li Jan 2009 A1
20090054950 Stephens Feb 2009 A1
20090082640 Kovach et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082829 Panken et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090112289 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118635 Lujan et al. May 2009 A1
20090118786 Meadows et al. May 2009 A1
20090149917 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187222 Barker Jul 2009 A1
20090196471 Goetz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090196472 Goetz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198306 Goetz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198354 Wilson Aug 2009 A1
20090204192 Carlton et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090208073 McIntyre et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210208 McIntyre et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090242399 Kamath et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276008 Lee et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090276021 Meadows et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281595 King et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281596 King et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287271 Blum Nov 2009 A1
20090287272 Kokones et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287273 Carlton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287467 Sparks et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299164 Singhal et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299165 Singhal et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299380 Singhal et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010566 Thacker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010646 Drew et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023103 Elborno Jan 2010 A1
20100023130 Henry et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030312 Shen Feb 2010 A1
20100049276 Blum et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100049280 Goetz Feb 2010 A1
20100064249 Groetken Mar 2010 A1
20100076535 Pianca et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100113959 Pascual-Leon et al. May 2010 A1
20100121409 Kothandaraman et al. May 2010 A1
20100135553 Joglekar Jun 2010 A1
20100137944 Zhu Jun 2010 A1
20100152604 Kuala et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100179562 Linker et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100268298 Moffitt Oct 2010 A1
20100324410 Paek et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331883 Schmitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004267 Meadows Jan 2011 A1
20110005069 Pianca Jan 2011 A1
20110040351 Butson et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066407 Butson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078900 Pianca et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093045 Moffitt Apr 2011 A1
20110130803 McDonald Jun 2011 A1
20110130816 Howard et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130817 Chen Jun 2011 A1
20110130818 Chen Jun 2011 A1
20110172737 Davis et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184487 Alberts et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110191275 Lujan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196253 McIntyre et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213440 Fowler et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238129 Moffitt Sep 2011 A1
20110306845 Osorio Dec 2011 A1
20110306846 Osorio Dec 2011 A1
20110307032 Goetz et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313500 Barker et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016378 Pianca et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027272 Akinyemi et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120046710 Digiore et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120046715 Moffitt et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120071949 Pianca et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078106 Dentinger et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120089205 Boyden et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101552 Lazarewicz et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120109257 Yoo May 2012 A1
20120116476 Kothandaraman May 2012 A1
20120165898 Moffitt Jun 2012 A1
20120165901 Zhu et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165911 Pianca Jun 2012 A1
20120197375 Pianca et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120203316 Moffitt et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120203320 Digiore et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120203321 Moffitt et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207378 Gupta et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120226138 DeSalles et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120229468 Lee et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239115 Lee Sep 2012 A1
20120265262 Osorio Oct 2012 A1
20120265268 Blum et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120302912 Moffitt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303087 Moffitt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120314924 Carlton et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120316615 Digiore et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120316619 Goetz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120330622 Butson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130039550 Blum et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060305 Bokil Mar 2013 A1
20130105071 Digiore et al. May 2013 A1
20130116744 Blum et al. May 2013 A1
20130116748 Bokil et al. May 2013 A1
20130116749 Carlton et al. May 2013 A1
20130116929 Carlton et al. May 2013 A1
20130150922 Butson et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130197424 Bedenbaugh Aug 2013 A1
20130197602 Pianca et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130261684 Howard Oct 2013 A1
20130289380 Molnar et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130289660 Molnar Oct 2013 A1
20130317587 Barker Nov 2013 A1
20130325091 Pianca et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140039587 Romero Feb 2014 A1
20140066999 Carcieri Mar 2014 A1
20140067018 Carcieri et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140067022 Carcieri et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140122379 Moffitt et al. May 2014 A1
20140277284 Chen et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296953 Pianca et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140343647 Romero et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140353001 Romero et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140358207 Romero Dec 2014 A1
20140358208 Howard et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140358209 Romero et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140358210 Howard et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150005842 Lee et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150018915 Leven Jan 2015 A1
20150021817 Romero et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150045864 Howard Feb 2015 A1
20150051681 Hershey Feb 2015 A1
20150066111 Blum et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150066120 Govea Mar 2015 A1
20150134031 Moffitt et al. May 2015 A1
20150151113 Govea et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160001087 Moffitt Jan 2016 A1
20160022995 Kothandaraman et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160023008 Kothandaraman Jan 2016 A1
20160030749 Carcieri et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160096025 Moffitt et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160136429 Massoumi et al. May 2016 A1
20160136443 Kothandaraman et al. May 2016 A1
20160228692 Steinke et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256693 Parramon Sep 2016 A1
20160346557 Bokil Dec 2016 A1
20160375248 Carcieri et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160375258 Steinke Dec 2016 A1
20170100593 Zottola Apr 2017 A1
20170106197 Wechter et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170252570 Serrano Carmona et al. Sep 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
1048320 Nov 2000 EP
1166819 Jan 2002 EP
1372780 Jan 2004 EP
1559369 Aug 2005 EP
9739797 Oct 1997 WO
9848880 Nov 1998 WO
0190876 Nov 2001 WO
0226314 Apr 2002 WO
0228473 Apr 2002 WO
02065896 Aug 2002 WO
02072192 Sep 2002 WO
03086185 Oct 2003 WO
2004019799 Mar 2004 WO
2004041080 May 2005 WO
2006017053 Feb 2006 WO
2006113305 Oct 2006 WO
20071097859 Aug 2007 WO
20071097861 Aug 2007 WO
2007100427 Sep 2007 WO
2007100428 Sep 2007 WO
2007112061 Oct 2007 WO
2009097224 Aug 2009 WO
2010006304 Jan 2010 WO
2010120823 Oct 2010 WO
2011025865 Mar 2011 WO
2011139779 Nov 2011 WO
2011159688 Dec 2011 WO
2012088482 Jun 2012 WO
2016081099 May 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (271)
Entry
Nowinski, W. L., et al., “Statistical analysis of 168 bilateral subthalamic nucleus implantations by means of the probabilistic functional atlas.”, Neurosurgery 57(4 Suppl) (Oct. 2005),319-30
Obeso, J. A., et al., “Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease.”, N Engl J Med., 345{13I. The Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease Study Group, (Sep. 27, 2001 ),956-63.
Butson et al.. “Current Steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation,” vol. 1, No. 1, Dec. 3, 2007, pp. 7-15.
Patrick, S. K., et al., “Quantification of the UPDRS rigidity scale”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, [see also IEEE Trans. on Rehabilitation Engineering 9(1). (2001),31-41.
Phillips, M. D., et al., “Parkinson disease: pattern of functional MR imaging activation during deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus—initial experience”, Radiology 239(1). (Apr. 2006),209-16.
Ericsson, A. et al., “Construction of a patient-specific atlas of the brain: Application to normal aging,” Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2008, 5th IEEE International Symposium, May 14, 2008, pp. 480-483.
Kaikai Shen et al., “Atlas selection strategy using least angle regression in multi-atlas segmentation propagation,” Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011, 8th IEEE International Symposium, ISBI 2011, Mar. 30, 2011, pp. 1746-1749.
Liliane Ramus et al., “Assessing selection methods in the cotnext of multi-atlas based segmentation,” Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010, IEEE International Symposium, Apr. 14, 2010, pp. 1321-1324.
Olivier Commowick et al., “Using Frankenstein's Creature Paradigm to Build a Patient Specific Atlas,” Sep. 20, 2009, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 993-1000.
Lotjonen J.M.P. et al., “Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images,” NeuroImage, Academic Press, vol. 49, No. 3, Feb. 1, 2010, pp. 2352-2365.
McIntyre, C. C., et al., “How does deep brain stimulation work? Present understanding and future questions.”, J Clin Neurophysiol. 21 (1 ). (Jan.-Feb. 2004 ),40-50.
Sanchez Castro et al., “A cross validation study of deep brain stimulation targeting: From experts to Atlas-Based, Segmentation-Based and Automatic Registration Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 25, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2006, pp. 1440-1450.
Plaha, P. , et al., “Stimulation of the caudal zona incerta is superior to stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in improving contralateral parkinsonism.”, Brain 129{Pt 7) (Jul. 2006), 1732-4 7.
Rattay, F, “Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. vol. 33 (1986),974-977.
Rattay, F., “Analysis of the electrical excitation of CNS neurons”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 45(6). (Jun. 1998),766-772.
Rose, T. L., et al., “Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses [neuronal application]”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37(11 }, (Nov. 1990), 1118-1120.
Rubinstein, J. T., et al., “Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation”, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.. 191, (Sep. 2003), 14-9.
Schwan, H.P., et al., “The conductivity of living tissues.”, Ann NY Acad Sci., 65(6). (AUQ., 1957),1007-13.
Taylor, R. S., et al., “Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors”, Spine 30(1 ). (Jan. 1, 2005), 152-60.
Siegel, Ralph M. et al., “Spatiotemporal dynamics of the functional architecture for gain fields in inferior parietal lobule of behaving monkey,” Cerebral Cortex, New York, NY, vol. 17, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 378-390.
Klein, A. et al., “Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration,” NeuroImage, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, vol. 46, No. 3, Jul. 2009, pp. 786-802.
Geddes, L. A., et ah, “The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist.”, Med Biol Ena. 5(3). (May 1967),271-93.
Gimsa, J., et al., “Choosing electrodes for deep brain stimulation experiments—electrochemical considerations.”, J Neuroscil Methods, 142(2), (Mar. 30, 2005),251-65.
Vidailhet, M. , et al., “Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia”, N Engl J Med. 352(5) (Feb. 3, 2005),459-67.
Izad, Oliver, “Computationally Efficient Method in Predicating Axonal Excitation,” Dissertation for Master Degree, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, May 2009.
Jaccard, Paul, “Elude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion odes Aples et des Jura,” Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles (1901), 37:547-579.
Dice, Lee R., “Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species,” Ecology 26(3) (1945): 297-302. doi:10.2307/ 1932409, http://jstor.org/stable/1932409.
Rand, WM., “Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods,” Journal of the American Statistical Association (American Statistical Association) 66 (336) (1971 ): 846-850, doi:10.2307/2284239, http://jstor.org/stable/2284239.
Hubert, Lawrence et al., “Comparing partitions,” Journal of Classification 2(1) (1985): 193-218, doi:10.1007/BF01908075.
Cover, T.M. et al., “Elements of information theory,” (1991) John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Meila, Marina, “Comparing Clusterings by the Variation of Information,” Learning Theory and Kernel Machines (2003): 173-187.
Viola, P., et al., “Alignment by maximization of mutual information”, International Journal of Com outer Vision 24(2). ( 1997), 137-154.
Butson et al. “StimExplorer: Deep Brain Stimulation Parameter Selection Software System,” Acta Neurochirugica, Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 569-574.
Butson et al. “Role of Electrode Design on the Volume of Tissue Activated During Deep Brain Stimulation,” Journal of Neural Engineering, Mar. 1, 2006, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-8.
Volkmann et al., Indroduction to the Programming of Deep Brain Stimulators, Movement Disorders, vol. 17, Suppl. 3, pp. S181-S187 (2002).
Miocinovic et al. “Cicerone: Stereotactic Neurophysiological Recording and Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement Software System,” Acta Neurochirurgica Suppl., Jan. 1, 2007, vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 561-567.
Schmidt et al. “Sketching and Composing Widgets for 3D Manipulation,” Eurographics. Apr. 2008, vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 301-310.
Volkmann, J. , et al., “Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease”, Mov Disord., 21 Suppl 14. (Jun. 2006),S284-9.
Walter, B. L., et al., “Surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease”, Lancet Neural. 3(12). (Dec. 2004),719-28.
Wei, X. F., et al., “Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes”, J Neural Eng . . . 2(4). (Dec. 2005), 139-47.
ZONENSHAYN, M., et al., “Location of the active contact within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.”, Surg Neurol., 62(3) (Sep. 2004),216-25
Da Silva et al. (A primer on diffusion tensor imaging of anatomical substructures. Neurosurg Focus 15(1): p. 1-4, Article 4, 2003.).
Micheli-Tzanakou, E., et al., “Computational Intelligence for target assesment in Parkinson's disease”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4479. Applications and Science of Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems, and Evolutionary Computation IV,(2001),54-69.
Grill, W. M., “Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 14(4}, (Jul.-Aug. 1995), 375-385.
Miocinovic, S., et al., “Sensitivity of temporal excitation properties to the neuronal element activated by extracellular stimulation”, J Neurosci Methods. 132(1). (Jan. 15, 2004), 91-9.
Hunka, K. et al., Nursing Time to Program and Assess Deep Brain Stimulators in Movement Disorder Patients, J. Neursci Nurs., 37: 204-10 (Aug. 2005).
Moss, J. , et al., “Electron microscopy of tissue adherent to explanted electrodes in dystonia and Parkinson's disease”, Brain, 127{Pt 12). (Dec. 2004),2755-63.
Montgomery, E. B., et al., “Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation and future technical developments.”, Neurol Res. 22(3). (Apr. 2000),259-66.
Merrill, D. R., et al., “Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols”, J Neurosci Methods. 141(2), (Feb. 15, 2005), 171-98.
Fisekovic et al., “New Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems”, Med. Eng. Phys. 2001; 23:391-399.
Zhang, Y., et al., “Atlas-guided tract reconstruction for automated and comprehensive examination of the white matter anatomy,” Neuroimage 52(4) (2010), pp. 1289-1301.
““BioPSE” The Biomedical Problem Solving Environment”, htt12://www.sci.utah.edu/cibc/software/index.html, MCRR Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing,(2004).
Andrews, R. J., “Neuroprotection trek—the next generation: neuromodulation I. Techniques—deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.”, Ann NY Acad Sci. 993. (May 2003),1-13.
Carnevale, N.T. et al., “The Neuron Book,” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2006), 480 pages.
Chaturvedi: “Development of Accurate Computational Models for Patient-Specific Deep Brain Stimulation,” Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, Jan. 2012, 162 pages.
Chaturvedi, A. et al.: “Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: Influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.” Brain Stimulation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 3, No. 2 Apr. 2010, pp. 65-77.
Frankemolle, et al., “Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modeling approach to deep brain stimulation programming,” Brian 133 (2010), pp. 746-761.
McIntyre, C.C., et al., “Modeling the excitablitity of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle,” J Neurophysiol, 87(2) (Feb. 2002), pp. 995-1006.
Peterson, et al., “Predicting myelinated axon activation using spatial characteristics of the extracellular field,” Journal of Neural Engineering, 8 (2011), 12 pages.
Warman, et al., “Modeling the Effects of Electric Fields on nerver Fibers; Dermination of Excitation Thresholds,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 12 (Dec. 1992), pp. 1244-1254.
Wesselink, et al., “Analysis of Current Density and Related Parameters in Spinal Cord Stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 6, No. Jun. 2, 1998, pp. 200-207.
Andrews, R. J., “Neuroprotection trek—the next generation: neuromodulation II. Applications—epilepsy, nerve regeneration, neurotrophins.”, Ann NY Acad Sci. 993 (May 2003), 14-24.
Astrom, M. , et al.,“The effect of cystic cavities on deep brain stimulation in the basal ganglia: a simulation-based study”, J Neural Eng., 3(2), (Jun. 2006),132-8.
Bazin et al., “Free Software Tools for Atlas-based Volumetric Neuroimage Analysis”, Proc. SPIE 5747, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing, 1824 May 5, 2005.
Back, C. , et al., “Postoperative Monitoring of the Electrical Properties of Tissue and Electrodes in Deep Brain Stimulation”, Neuromodulation, 6(4), (Oct. 2003 ),248-253.
Baker, K. B., et al., “Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating”, J Magn Reson Imaging., 20(2), (Aug. 2004),315-20.
Brown, J. “Motor Cortex Stimulation,” Neurosurgical Focus ( Sep. 15, 2001) 11(3):E5.
Budai et al., “Endogenous Opioid Peptides Acting at m-Opioid Receptors in the Dorsal Horn Contribute to Midbrain Modulation of Spinal Nociceptive Neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology (1998) 79(2): 677-687.
Cesselin, F. “Opioid and anti-opioid peptides,” Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology (1995) 9(5): 409-33 (Abstract only).
Rezai et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain” Surgical Management of Pain, Chapter 44 pp. 565-576 (2002).
Xu, MD., Shi-Ang, article entitled “Comparison of Half-Band and Full-Band Electrodes for Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation”, Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology (Annals of Head & Neck Medicine & Surgery), vol. 102 (5) pp. 363-367 May 1993.
Bedard, C. , et al., “Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space”, Biophys J . . . 86(3). (Mar. 2004),1829-42.
Benabid, A. L., et al., “Future prospects of brain stimulation”, Neurol Res.;22(3), (Apr. 2000),237-46.
Brummer, S. B., et al., “Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: II—Estimation of Maximum Surface Redox (Theoretical Non-Gassing) Limits”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-24, Issue 5, (Sep. 1977),440-443.
Butson, Christopher R., et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: Model-Based Analysis of the Effects of Electrode Capacitance on the Volume of Activation”, Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE EMBS, (Mar. 16-19, 2005),196-197.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition,” J Neurophysiol, 91(4) (Apr. 2004), pp. 1457-1469.
Chaturvedi, A., et al., “Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: Accurate Axonal Threshold Prediction with Diffusion Tensor Based Electric Field Models”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS' 06 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ USA, Aug. 30, 2006.
Butson, Christopher et al., “Predicting the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation with Diffusion Tensor Based Electric Field Models” Jan. 1, 2001, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—Mic CAI 2006 Lecture Notes in Computer Science; LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE.
Butson, C. R., et al., “Deep brainstimulation interactive visualization system”, Society for Neuroscience vol. 898.7 (2005).
Hodaie M., et al.. “Chronic anterior thalamus stimulation for intractable epilepsy.” Epilepsia, 43(6) (Jun. 2002), pp. 603-608.
Hoekema, R., et al., “Multigrid solution of the potential field in modeling electrical nerve stimulation,” Comput Biomed Res., 31(5) (Oct. 1998), pp. 348-362.
Holsheimer, J., et al., “Identification of the target neuronal elements in electrical deep brain stimulation,” Eur J Neurosci., 12(12) (Dec. 2000), pp. 4573-4577.
Jezernik, S., et al., “Neural network classification of nerve activity recorded in a mixed nerve,” Neurol Res., 23(5) (Jul. 2001), pp. 429-434.
Jones, DK., et al., “Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging,” Magn. Reson. Med., 42(3) (Sep. 1999), pp. 515-525.
Krack, P., et al., “Postoperative management of subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson's disease,” Mov. Disord., vol. 17(suppl 3) (2002), pp. 188-197.
Le Bihan, D., et al., “Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications,” J Magn Reson Imaging, 13(4) (Apr. 2001), pp. 534-546.
Lee, D. C., et al., “Extracellular electrical stimulation of central neurons: quantitative studies,” In: Handbook of neuroprosthetic methods, WE Finn and PG Lopresti (eds) CRC Press (2003), pp. 95-125.
Levy, AL., et al., “An Internet-connected, patient-specific, deformable brain atlas integrated into a surgical navigation system,” J Digit Imaging, 10(3 Suppl 1) (Aug. 1997), pp. 231-237.
Liu, Haiying, et al., “Intra-operative MR-guided DBS implantation for treating PD and ET,” Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4319, Department of Radiology & Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (2001), pp. 272-276.
Mcintyre, C. C., et al., “Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output,” J. Neurophysiol., 88(4), (Oct. 2002), pp. 1592-1604.
Mcintyre, C. C., et al., “Microstimulation of spinal motoneurons: a model study,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology society, vol. 5, (1997), pp. 2032-2034.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Model-based Analysis of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus,” Proceedings of the Second joint EMBS/BM ES Conference, vol. 3, Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cal. No. 02CH37392) IEEEPiscataway, NJ (2002), pp. 2047-2048.
Mcintyre, C. C., et al., “Model-based design of stimulus trains for selective microstimulation of targeted neuronal populations,” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 1 (2001), pp. 806-809.
Mcintyre, C. C., et al., Model-based design of stimulus waveforms for selective microstimulation in the central nervous system,, Proceedings of the First Joint [Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 1999. 21st Annual Conf. and the 1999 Annual FallMeeting of the Biomedical Engineering Soc.] BM ES/EMBS Conference, vol. 1 (1999), p. 384.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of aflerpotentials on the recovery cycle,” J Neurophysiol, 87(2) (Feb. 2002), pp. 995-1006.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Selective microstimulation of central nervous system neurons,” Annals of biomedical engineering, 28(3) (Mar. 2000), pp. 219-233.
Mcintyre, C. C., et al., “Sensitivity analysis of a model of mammalian neural membrane,” Biol Cybern., 79(1) (Jul. 1998), pp. 29-37.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both,” Clin Neurophysiol, 115(6) (Jun. 2004), pp. 1239-1248.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Uncovering the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease through functional imaging, neural recording, and neural modeling,” Crit Rev Biomed Eng., 30(4-6) (2002), pp. 249-281.
Mouine et al. “Multi-Strategy and Multi-Algorithm Cochlear Prostheses”, Biomed. Sci. Instrument, 2000; 36:233-238.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Electric Field and Stimulating Influence generated by Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamaic Nucleus,” Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(3) (Mar. 2004), pp. 589-595.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Electric field generated by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus,” Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, Nashville TN (Oct. 2003), 16 pages.
Mcintyre, Cameron C., et al., “Excitation of central nervous system neurons by nonuniform electric fields,” Biophys. J., 76(2) (1999), pp. 878-888.
McNeal, DR., et al., “Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng., vol. 23 (1976), pp. 329-337.
Micheli-Tzanakou, E. , et al., “Computational Intelligence for target assesment in Parkinson's disease,” Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4479, Applications and Science of Neural Networks. Fuzzy Systems, and Evolutionary Computation IV (2001 ), pp. 54-69.
Miocinovic, S., et al., “Computational analysis of subthalamic nucleus and lenticular fasciculus activation during therapeutic deep brain stimulation,” J Neurophysiol., 96(3) (Sep. 2006), pp. 1569-1580.
Miranda, P. C., et al., “The distribution of currents inducedin the brain by Magnetic Stimulation: a finite element analysis incorporating OT-MRI-derived conductivity data,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 9 (2001 ), p. 1540.
Miranda, P. C., et al., “The Electric Field Induced in the Brain by Magnetic Stimulation: A 3-D Finite-Element Analysis of the Effect of Tissue Heterogeneity and Anisotropy,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Enginering, 50(9) (Sep. 2003), pp. 1074-1085.
Moffitt, MA., et al., “Prediction of myelinated nerve fiber stimulation thresholds: limitations of linear models,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51 (2) (2003), pp. 229-236.
Moro, E, et al., “The impact on Parkinson's disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation,” Neurology, 59 (5) (Sep. 10, 2002), pp. 706-713.
Nowak, LG., at al., “Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements,” Exp. Brain Res., 118(4) (Feb. 1998), pp. 477-488.
Nowak, LG., et al., “Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments,” Exp. Brain Res., 118(4) (Feb. 1998), pp. 489-500.
O'Suilleabhain, PE., et al., “Tremor response to polarity, voltage, pulsewidth and frequency of thalamic stimulation,” Neurology, 60(5) (Mar. 11, 2003), pp. 786-790.
Pierpaoli, C., et al., “Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy,” Magn Reson Med., 36(6) (Dec. 1996), pp. 893-906.
Plonsey, R., et al., “Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems,” Bull Math Biophvs., 29(4) (Dec. 1967), pp. 657-664.
Ranck, J B., “Specific impedance of rabbit cerebral cortex,” Exp. Neurol., vol. 7 (Feb. 1963), pp. 144-152.
Ranck, J B., et al., “The Specific impedance of the dorsal columns of the cat: an anisotropic medium,” Exp. Neurol., 11 (Apr. 1965), pp. 451-463.
Ranck, J B., “Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review,” Brain Res., 98(3) (Nov. 21, 1975), pp. 417-440.
Rattay, F., et al., “A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes,” Hear Res., 153(1-2) (Mar. 2001), pp. 43-63.
Rattay, F., “A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability,” Hear Res., 153(1-2) (Mar. 2001), pp. 64-79.
Rattay, F., “Arrival at Functional Electrostimulation by modelling of fiber excitation,” Proceedings of the Ninth annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (1987), pp. 1459-1460.
Rattay, F., “The influence of intrinsic noise can preserve the temporal fine structure of speech signals in models of electrically stimulated human cochlear neurones,” Journal of Physiology, Scientific Meeting of the Physiological Society, London, England, UK Apr. 19-21, 1999 (Jul. 1999), p. 170P.
Rizzone, M., et al., “Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: effects of variation in stimulation parameters,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry., 71(2) (Aug. 2001), pp. 215-219.
Saint-Cyr, J. A., et al., “Localization of clinically effective stimulating electrodes in the human subthalamic nucleus on magnetic resonance imaging,” J. Neurosurg., 87(5) (Nov. 2002), pp. 1152-1166.
Sances, A., et al., “In Electroanesthesia: Biomedical and Biophysical Studies,” A Sances and SJ Larson, Eds., Academic Press, NY (1975), pp. 114-124.
Si. Jean, P., et al., “Automated atlas integration and interactive three-dimensional visualization tools for planning and guidance in functional neurosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(5) (1998), pp. 672-680.
Starr, P. A., et al., “Implantation of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus: technical approach and magnetic resonance imaging-verified lead locations,” J. Neurosurg., 97(2) (Aug. 2002), pp. 370-387.
Sterio, D., et al., “Neurophysiological refinement of subthalamic nucleus targeting,” Neurosurgery, 50(1) (Jan. 2002), pp. 58-69.
Struijk, J. J., et al., “Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40(7) (Jul. 1993), pp. 632-639.
Struijk, J J., et al., “Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39(9) (Sep. 1992), pp. 903-912.
Tamma, F., et al., “Anatomo-clinical correlation of intraoperative stimulation-induced side-effects during HF-DBS of the subthalamic nucleus,” Neurol Sci., vol. 23 (Suppl 2) (2002), pp. 109-110.
Tarler, M., et al., “Comparison between monopolar and tripolar configurations in chronically implanted nerve cuff electrodes,” IEEE 17th Annual Conference Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 2 (1995), pp. 1093-1109.
Testerman, Roy L., “Coritical response to callosal stimulation: A model for determining safe and efficient stimulus parameters,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 6(4) (1978), pp. 438-452.
Tuch, D.S., et al., “Conductivity mapping of biological tissue using diffusion MRI,” Ann NY Acad Sci., 888 (Oct. 30, 1999), pp. 314-316.
Tuch, D.S., et al., “Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI,” Proc Nall Acad Sci USA, 98(20) (Sep. 25, 2001), pp. 11697-11701.
Veraart, C., et al., “Selective control of muscle activation with a multipolar nerve cuff electrode,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40(7) (Jul. 1993), pp. 640-653.
Vercueil, L., et al., “Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of severe dystonia,” J. Neurol., 248(8) (Aug. 2001 ), pp. 695-700.
Vilalte, “Circuit Design of the Power-on-Reset,” Apr. 2000, pp. 1-25.
Vitek, J. L., “Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: excitation or inhibition,” Mov. Disord., vol. 17 (Suppl. 3) (2002), pp. 69-72.
Voges, J., et al., “Bilateral high-frequency stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson disease: correlation of therapeutic effect with anatomical electrode position,” J. Neurosurg., 96(2) (Feb. 2002), pp. 269-279.
Wakana, S., et al., “Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy,” Radiology, 230(1) (Jan. 2004), pp. 77-87.
Alexander, DC., et al., “Spatial transformations of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20 (11), (2001), pp. 1131-1139.
Wu, Y. R., et al.,, “Does Stimulation of the GPi control dyskinesia bv activating inhibitory axons?,” Mov. Disord., vol. 16 (2001), pp. 208-216.
Yelnik, J., et al., “Localization of stimulating electrodes in patients with Parkinson disease by using a three-dimensional atlas-magnetic resonance imaging coregistration method,” J Neurosurg., 99(1) (Jul. 2003), pp. 89-99.
Yianni, John, et al., “Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions: a prospective audit,” Mov. Disord., vol. 18 (2003), pp. 436-442.
Zonenshayn, M., et al., “Comparison of anatomic and neurophysiological methods for subthalamic nucleus targeting,” Neurosurgery, 47(2) (Aug. 2000), pp. 282-294.
Voghell et al., “Programmable Current Source Dedicated to Implantable Microstimulators” ICM '98 Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, pp. 67-70.
Butson, Christopher R., et al., “Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation”, NeuroImage. vol. 34. (2007),661-670.
Adler, DE., et al., “The tentorial notch: anatomical variation, morphometric analysis, and classification in 100 human autopsy cases,” J. Neurosurg., 96(6), (Jun. 2002), pp. 1103-1112.
Jones et al., “An Advanced Demultiplexing System for Physiological Stimulation”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44 No. 12 Dec. 1997, pp. 1210-1220.
Alo, K. M., et al., “New trends in neuromodulation for the management of neuropathic pain,” Neurosurgery, 50(4), (Apr. 2002), pp. 690-703, discussion pp. 703-704.
Ashby, P., et al., “Neurophysiological effects of stimulation through electrodes in the human subthalamic nucleus,” Brain, 122 (PI 10), (Oct. 1999), pp. 1919-1931.
Baker, K. B. et al., “Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulus evoked potentials: Physiological and therapeutic implications,” Movement Disorders, 17(5), (Sep./Ocl. 2002), pp. 969-983.
Bammer, R, et al., “Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI”, Magn Reson Med., 48(1 ), (Jul. 2002), pp. 128-136.
Basser, P J., et al., “MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging,” Biophys J., 66(1 ), (Jan. 1994), pp. 259-267.
Basser, P J., et al., “New currents in electrical stimulation of excitable tissues,” Annu Rev Biomed Eng., 2, (2000), pp. 377-397.
Benabid, AL., et al., “Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders,” J. Neurosurg., 84(2), (Feb. 1996), pp. 203-214.
Benabid, AL., et al., “Combined (lhalamotoy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease,” Appl Neurophysiol, vol. 50, (1987), pp. 344-346.
Benabid, A L., et al., “Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus,” Lancet, 337 (8738), (Feb. 16, 1991 ), pp. 403-406.
Butson, C. R., et al., “Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation with diffusion tensor based electric field models,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—Mic Cai 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 4191, pp. 429-437, LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE.
Christensen, Gary E., et al., “Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(6), (Dec. 1997), pp. 864-877.
Cooper, S , et al., “Differential effects of thalamic stimulation parameters on tremor and paresthesias in essential tremor,” Movement Disorders, 17(Supp. 5), (2002), p. S193.
Coubes, P, et al., “Treatment of DYT1-generalised dystonia by stimulation of the internal globus pallidus,” Lancet, 355 (9222), (Jun. 24, 2000), pp. 2220-2221.
Dasilva, A.F. M., et al., “A Primer Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Anatomical Substructures,” Neurosurg. Focus; 15(1) (Jul. 2003), pp. 1-4.
Dawant, B. M., et al., “Compuerized atlas-guided positioning of deep brain stimulators: a feasibility study,” Biomedical Image registration, Second International Workshop, WBIR 2003, Revised Papers (Lecture notes in Comput. Sci, vol. (2717), Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany(2003), pp. 142-150.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “3-D functional atalas of subcortical structures for image guided stereotactic neurosurgery,” Neuroimage, vol. 9, No. 6, Iss. 2 (1999), p. S206.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “3D Functional Database of Subcorticol Structures for Surgical Guidance in Image Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI'99, Second International Conference.Cambridge, UK, Sep. 19-22, 1999, Proceedings (1999), pp. 758-767.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “A 3-Dimensional Database of Deep Brain Functional Anatomy, and Its Application to Image-Guided Neurosurgery,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.Lecture Notes In Computer Science; vol. 1935 (2000), pp. 1-8.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “A functional database for guidance of surgical and therapeutic procedures in the deep brain,” Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 3 (2000), pp. 1787-1789.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “Application of a Population Based Electrophysiological Database to the Planning and Guidance of Deep Brain Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—Part 11, Lecture Notes In Computer Science; vol. 2489 (2002), pp. 69-76.
Finnis, K. W., et al., “Subcortical physiology deformed into a patient-specific brain atlas for image-guided stereotaxy,” Proceedings of SPIE—vol. 4681 Medical Imaging 2002: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display (May 2002), pp. 184-195.
Finnis, Krik W., et al., “Three-Dimensional Database of Subcortical Electrophysiology for Image-Guided Stereotatic Functional Neurosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(1) (Jan. 2003), pp. 93-104.
Gabriels, L , et al., “Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: psychopathological and neuropsychological outcome in three cases,” Acta Psychiatr Scand., 107(4) (2003), pp. 275-282.
Gabriels, LA., et al., “Long-term electrical capsular stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder,” Neurosurgery, 52(6) (Jun. 2003), pp. 1263-1276.
Goodall, E. V., et al., “Modeling study of activation and propagation delays during stimulation of peripheral nerve fibers with a tripolar cuff electrode,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering; [see also IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation], 3(3) (Sep. 1995), pp. 272-282.
Goodall, E. V., et al., “Position-selective activation of peripheral nerve fibers with a cuff electrode,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43(8) (Aug. 1996), pp. 851-856.
Goodall, E. V., et al., “Simulation of activation and propagation delay during tripolar neural stimulation,” Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (1993), pp. 1203-1204.
Grill, WM., “Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: inftuence of tissue electrical properties,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(8) (1999), pp. 918-928.
Grill, W. M., et al., “Neural and connective tissue response to long-term implantation of multiple contact nerve cuff electrodes,” J Biomed Mater Res., 50(2) (May 2000), pp. 215-226.
Grill, W. M., “Neural modeling in neuromuscular and rehabilitation research,” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 4 (2001 ), pp. 4065-4068.
Grill, W. M., et al., “Non-invasive measurement of the input-output properties of peripheral nerve stimulating electrodes,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 65(1) (Mar. 1996), pp. 43-50.
Grill, W. M.,et al., “Quantification of recruitment properties of multiple contact cuff electrodes,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, [see also IEEE Trans on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation], 4(2) (Jun. 1996), pp. 49-62.
Grill, W. M., “Spatially selective activation of peripheral nerve for neuroprosthetic applications,” Ph.D. Case Western Reverse University, (1995), pp. 245 pages.
Grill, W. M., “Stability of the input-output properties of chronically implanted multiple contact nerve cuff stimulating electrodes,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering [see also IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation] (1998), pp. 364-373.
Grill, W. M., “Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 14(4) (Jul.-Aug. 1995), pp. 375-385.
Grill, W. M., et al., “Temporal stability of nerve cuff electrode recruitment properties,” IEEE 17th Annual Conference Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 2 (1995), pp. 1089-1090.
Gross, RE., et al., “Advances in neurostimulation for movement disorders,” Neurol Res., 22(3) (Apr. 2000), pp. 247-258.
Guridi et al., “The subthalamic nucleus, hemiballismus and Parkinson's disease: reappraisal of a neurological dogma,” Brain, vol. 124, 2001, pp. 5-19.
Haberler, C, et al., “No tissue damage by chronic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease,” Ann Neurol., 48(3) (Sep. 2000), pp. 372-376.
Hamel, W, et al., “Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: evaluation of active electrode contacts,” J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry, 74(8) (Aug, 2003), pp. 1036-1046.
Hanekom, “Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. vol. 43 (2005), pp. 47-55.
Haueisen, J , et al., “The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG,” Neuroimage,15(1) (Jan. 2002), pp. 159-166.
D'Haese et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2005 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3750, 2005, 427-434.
Rohde et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22 No. 11, 2003 p. 1470-1479.
Dawant et al., Biomedical Image Registration. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, vol. 2717, 2003, 142-150.
Miocinovic et al., “Stereotactiv Neurosurgical Planning, Recording, and Visualization for Deep Brain Stimulation in Non-Human Primates”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162:32-41, Apr. 5, 2007, XP022021469.
Gemmar et al., “Advanced Methods for Target Navigation Using Microelectrode Recordings in Stereotactic Neurosurgery for Deep Brain Stimulation”, 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Jun. 17, 2008, pp. 99-104, XP031284774.
Acar et al., “Safety Anterior Commissure-Posterior Commissure-Based Target Calculation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Functional Stereotactic Procedures”. Stereotactic Funct. Neurosura., 85:287-291, Aug. 2007.
Andrade-Souza, “Comparison of Three Methods of Targeting the Subthalamic Nucleus for Chronic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease”, Neurosurgery, 56:360-368, Apr. 2005.
Anheim et al., “Improvement in Parkinson Disease by Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Based on Electrode Placement”, Arch Neural., 65:612-616, May 2008.
Butson et al., “Tissue and Electrode Capacitance Reduce Neural Activation Volumes During Deep Brain Stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology, 116:2490-2500, Oct. 2005.
Butson et al., “Sources and Effects of Electrode Impedance During Deep Brain Stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology, 117:44 7-454, Dec. 2005.
D'Haese et al., “Computer-Aided Placement of Deep Brain Stimulators: From Planning to Intraoperative Guidance”, IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, 24:1469-1478, Nov. 2005.
Gross et al., “Electrophysiological Mapping for the Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulators for Parkinson's Disease and Tremor”, Movement Disorders. 21 :S259-S283, Jun. 2006.
Halpern et al., “Brain Shift During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease”, Stereotact Funct. Neurosurg., 86:37-43, published online Sep. 2007.
Herzog et al., “Most Effective Stimulation Site in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease”, Movement Disorders, 19:1050-1099, published on line Mar. 2004
Jeon et al., A Feasibility Study of Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding Deep Brain Probes, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 154:96-101, Jun. 2006.
Khan et al., “Assessment of Brain Shift Related to Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery”, Sterreotact Funct. Neurosurg., 86:44-53, published online Sep. 2007.
Koop et al., “Improvement in a Quantitative Measure of Bradykinesia After Microelectrode Recording in Patients with Parkinson's Disease During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery”, Movement Disorders, 21 :673-678, published on line Jan. 2006.
Lemaire et al., “Brain Mapping in Stereotactic Surgery: A Brief Overview from the Probabilistic Targeting to the Patient-Based Anatomic Mapping”, NeuroImage, 37:S109-S115, available online Jun. 2007.
Machado et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Surgical Technique and Perioperative Management”, Movement Disorders, 21 :S247-S258, Jun. 2006.
Maks et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation Activation Volumes and Their Association with Neurophysiological Mapping and Therapeutic Outcomes”, Downloaded from jnnp.bmj.com, pp. 1-21, published online Apr. 2008.
Moran et al., “Real-Time Refinment of Subthalamic Nucleous Targeting Using Bayesian Decision-Making on the Root Mean Square Measure”, Movement Disorders, 21: 1425-1431, published online Jun. 2006.
Sakamoto et al., “Homogeneous Fluorescence Assays for RNA Diagnosis by Pyrene-Conjugated 2′-0-Methyloligoribonucleotides”, Nucleosides, Nucleotides, and Nucleric Acids, 26:1659-1664, on line publication Oct. 2007.
Winkler et al., The First Evaluation of Brain Shift During Functional Neurosurgery by Deformation Field Analysis, J. Neural. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 76:1161-1163, Aug. 2005.
Yelnik et al., “A Three-Dimensional, Histological and Deformable Atlas of the Human Basal J Ganglia. I. Atlas Construction Based on Immunohistochemical and MRI Data”, NeuroImage, 34:618,-638,Jan. 2007.
Ward, H. E., et al., “Update on deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders,” Neurobiol Dis 38 (3) (2010), pp. 346-353.
Alberts et al. “Bilateral subthalamic stimulation impairs cognitive-motor performance in Parkinson's disease patients.” Brain (2008), 131, 3348-3360, Abstract.
Butson, Christopher R., et al., “Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology. vol. 117.(2006),447-454.
An, et al., “Prefronlal cortical projections to longitudinal columns in the midbrain periaqueductal gray in macaque monkeys,” J Comp Neural 401 (4) (1998), pp. 455-479.
Bulson, C. R., et al., “Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116 (2005), pp. 2490-2500.
Carmichael, S. T., et al., “Connectional networks within the orbital and medial prefronlal cortex of macaque monkeys,” J Comp Neural 371 (2) (1996), pp. 179-207.
Croxson, et al., “Quantitative investigation of connections of the prefronlal cortex in the human and macaque using probabilistic diffusion tractography,” J Neurosci 25 (39) (2005), pp. 8854-8866.
Frankemolle, et al., “Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation programming,” Brain 133 (2010), pp. 746-761.
Freedman, et al., “Subcortical projections of area 25 (subgenual cortex) of the macaque monkey,” J Comp Neurol 421 (2) (2000), pp. 172-188.
Giacobbe, et al., “Treatment resistant depression as a failure of brain homeostatic mechanisms: implications for deep brain stimulation,” Exp Neural 219 (1) (2009), pp. 44-52.
Goodman, et al., “Deep brain stimulation far intractable obsessive compulsive disorder: pilot study using a blinded, staggered-onset design,” Biol Psychiatry 67 (6) (2010), pp. 535-542.
Greenberg, et al., “Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience,” Mol Psychiatry 15 (1) (2010), pp. 64-79.
Greenberg. et al., “Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder,” Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (11) (2006), pp. 2384-2393.
Gutman, et al., “A tractography analysis of two deep brain stimulation white matter targets for depression,” Biol Psychiatry 65 (4) (2009), pp. 276-282.
Haber, et al., “Reward-related cortical inputs define a large striatel region in primates that interface with associative cortical connections, providing a substrate for incentive-based learning,” J Neurosci 26 (32) (2006), pp. 8368-8376.
Haber, et al., “Cognitive and limbic circuits that are affected by deep brain stimulation,” Front Biosci 14 (2009), pp. 1823-1834.
Hines, M, L., et al., “The NEURON simulation environment,” Neural Comput., 9(6) (Aug. 15, 1997), pp. 1179-1209.
Hua, et al., “Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification,” Neuroimage 39 (1) (2008), pp. 336-347.
Johansen-Berg, et al., “Anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression,” Cereb Cortex 18 (6) (2008), pp. 1374-1383.
Kopell, et al., “Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders,” J Clin Neurophysiol 21 (1) (2004), pp. 51-67.
Lozano, et al., “Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression,” Biol Psychiatry 64 (6) (2008), pp. 461-467.
Lujan, et al., “Tracking the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders,” Front Biosci 13 (2008), pp. 5892-5904.
Lujan, J.L. et al., “Automated 3-Dimensional Brain Atlas Fitting to Microelectrode Recordings from Deep Brain Stimulation Surgeries,” Stereotact. Fune!. Neurosurg. 87(2009), pp. 229-240.
Machado. et al., “Functional topography of the ventral striatum and anterior limb of the internal capsule determined by electrical stimulation of awake patients,” Clin Neurophysiol 120 (11) (2009), pp. 1941-1948.
Malone, et al., “Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression,” Biol Psychiatry 65 (4) (2009), pp. 267-275.
Mayberg, H. S., et al., “Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression,” Neuron, 45(5) (Mar. 3, 2005), pp. 651-660.
Mayberg, H. S., et al., “Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression,” J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 9 (3) (1997), pp. 471-481.
McIntyre,C. C., et al., “Network perspectives on the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation,” Neurobiol Dis 38 (3) (2010), pp. 329-337.
Miocinovic, S., et al., “Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation,” Exp Neurol 216 (i) (2009), pp. 166-176.
Nuttin, et al., “Electrical stimulation in anterior limbs of internal capsules in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder,” Lancet 354 (9189) (1999), p. 1526.
Saxena, et al., “Cerebral glucose metabolism obsessive-compulsive hoarding,” Am J Psychiatry. 161 (6) (2004), pp. 1038-1048.
Viola, et al., “Importance-driven focus of attention,” IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 12 (5) (2006), pp. 933-940.
Wakana, S., et al., “Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter,” Neuroimage 36 (3) (2007), pp. 630-644.
Mayr et al., “Basic Design and Construction of the Vienna FES Implants: Existing Solutions and Prospects for New Generations of Implants”, Medical Engineering & Physics, 2001; 23:53-60.
McIntyre, Cameron , et al., “Finite element analysis of the current-density and electric field generated by metal microelectrodes”, Ann Biomed Eng . 29(3), (2001 ),227-235.
Foster, K. R., et al., “Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review.”, Grit Rev Biomed Ena. 17(1 ). {1989),25-104.
Limousin, P., et al., “Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease”, N Engl J Med . . . 339(16), (Oct. 15, 1998), 1105-11.
Kitagawa, M., et al., “Two-year follow-up of chronic stimulation of the posterior subthalamic white matter for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease.”, Neurosurgery. 56(2). (Feb. 2005),281-9.
Johnson, M. D., et al., “Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, [see also IEEE Trans. on Rehabilitation Engineering (2005), 160-165.
Holsheimer, J. , et al., “Chronaxie calculated from current-duration and voltage-duration data”, J Neurosci Methods. 97(1). (Apr. 1, 2000),45-50.
Hines, M. L., et al., “The NEURON simulation environment”, Neural Comput. 9(6). (Aug. 15, 1997), 1179-209.
Herzog, J., et al., “Most effective stimulation site in subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease”, Mov Disord. 19(9). (Sep. 2004), 1050-4.
Hershey, T., et al., “Cortical and subcortical blood flow effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in PD.”, Neurology 61(6). (Sep. 23, 2003),816-21.
Hemm, S. , et al., “Evolution of Brain Impedance in Dystonic Patients Treated by GPi Electrical Stimulation”, Neuromodulation 7(2) (Apr. 2004),67-75.
Hemm, S., et al., “Deep brain stimulation in movement disorders: stereotactic coregistration of two-dimensional electrical field modeling and magnetic resonance imaging.”, J Neurosurg. 103(6): (Dec. 2005),949-55.
Haueisen, J, et al., “The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG”, Neuroimage 15(1) (Jan. 2002),159-166.
Haslinger, B., et al., “Frequency-correlated decreases of motor cortex activity associated with subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease.”, Neuroimage 28(3). (Nov. 15, 2005),598-606.
Hashimoto, T. , et al., “Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons”, J Neurosci. 23(5). (Mar. 1, 2003),1916-23.
Hardman, C. D., et al., “Comparison of the basal ganglia in rats, marmosets, macaques, baboons, and humans: volume and neuronal number for the output, internal relay, and striatal modulating nuclei”, J Comp Neurol., 445(3), (Apr. 8, 2002),238-55.
McNaughtan et al., “Electrochemical Issues in Impedance Tomography”, 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Buxton, Greater Manchester, Apr. 14-17, 1999.
Grill, WM., et al., “Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue”, Ann Biomed Eng. vol. 22. (1994),23-33.
Grill, W. M., et al., “Deep brain stimulation creates an informational lesion of the stimulated nucleus”, Neuroreport. 15I7t (May 19, 2004 ), 1137-40.
Pulliam CL, Heldman DA, Orcutt TH, Mera TO, Giuffrida JP, Vitek JL. Motion sensor strategies for automated optimization of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Apr. 2015; 21(4):378-82.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/029415 dated Jul. 12, 2019.
Kirsch AD, Hassin-Baer S, Matthies C, Volkmann J, Steigerwald F. “Anodic versus cathodic neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: A randomized-controlled study of acute clinical effects.” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 55 (2018) 61-67.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190329049 A1 Oct 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62663895 Apr 2018 US