Systems and methods of active control of surface drag using selective wave generation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11744157
  • Patent Number
    11,744,157
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 26, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 29, 2023
    9 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Saint Surin; Jacques M
    Agents
    • PCFB, LLC
    • Flanagan; Justin K.
Abstract
A system includes a surface, an actuator, and a controller. The surface has a fluid flowing over the surface. The actuator is coupled to the surface to move the surface relative to the fluid. The controller causes the actuator to cause the surface to generate a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid. The actuator can cause the surface to generate a Love wave.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates generally to the field of fluid flow over surfaces. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods of active control of surface drag using selective wave generation.


Surface drag is a force that acts opposite to the relative motion of an object moving through a fluid. Air, water, and ground transportation platforms experience some measure of surface drag, which can lead to slower speeds and less fuel efficiency.


SUMMARY

One embodiment relates to a system. The system includes a surface, an actuator, and a controller. The surface has a fluid flowing over the surface. The actuator is coupled to the surface to move the surface relative to the fluid. The controller causes the actuator to cause the surface to generate a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid. The actuator can cause the surface to generate a Love wave.


Another embodiment relates to a method. The method includes coupling an actuator to a surface having a fluid flowing over the surface. The method includes causing, by a controller, the actuator to cause the surface to move relative to the fluid to generate a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid.


This summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other aspects, inventive features, and advantages of the devices and/or processes described herein, as defined solely by the claims, will become apparent in the detailed description set forth herein, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a transverse surface wave according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 2A-2B are schematic diagrams representative of Love wave phenomena according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fluid control system that selective generates surface waves according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 4A-4B are schematic diagrams of a surface acoustic wave device that can be used to implement the fluid control system of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a pipe flow system implementing surface wave generation according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a method of selectively generating surface waves according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before turning to the figures, which illustrate the exemplary embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.


Referring generally to the figures, systems and methods described herein can be used to actively control drag on surfaces. Drag is a force acting opposite to the relative motion of any object moving with respect to a surrounding fluid. Drag manipulation technology has a wide range of applications for improving performance of systems that involve fluid flowing over a surface. For example, efficiency and speed can be increased in all manners of air transportation, including commercial aircraft, military aircraft, rockets, unmanned aerial vehicles, and general aviation. Reducing drag also increases efficiency in ground transportation such as in trains, cars, and tractor trailers. Water transportation, including maritime shipping, personal boating, and undersea transportation can similarly be benefited by reducing drag. Reducing drag can also boost efficiency when transporting fluids through pipes such as in natural gas or oil pipelines. Manipulating drag can be valuable across a wide range of Reynolds numbers, including relatively high Reynolds numbers experienced by maritime shipping through water and the relatively low Reynolds numbers experienced by unmanned aerial vehicles. Selectively increasing drag can also be useful for braking, steering, and other control of bodies moving through the fluid, such as movable platforms (e.g., vehicles). Being able to actively control surface drag of an object allows for not only the minimization of surface drag when efficiency or speed is most needed, but it can also allow for better steering and braking capabilities through selectively increasing surface drag.


Air acts as a viscous fluid at sub-sonic speeds. An object moving through air may collect a group of air particles, which the object tends to pull along as the object moves. Air particles close to the surface of the object tend to move with approximately the same velocity as the object due to molecular adhesion. As a flat plate, airfoil, or other object moves through a free stream of air at a given relative velocity, molecular adhesion causes a boundary layer of air having relative velocities below that of the relative free stream velocity to form adjacent the object surface. The boundary layer can be a layer of air surrounding an object in which the relative velocity of the layer of molecules closest to the object is at or near zero, and in which the relative velocity at successively distant points from the object increases until it approaches that of the free stream, at which point the outer limit of the boundary layer is reached. For example, for an airfoil, the boundary layer can include the interface between the airfoil and the air mass surrounding the airfoil. The boundary layer may be relatively small as compared to a size dimension of the object. The difference between the free stream velocity and the relative velocities in the boundary layer region contribute to drag. Thus, increasing the relative velocities in the boundary layer region can reduce drag, and conversely, decreasing the relative velocities in the boundary layer region can increase drag. Drag may be caused by disturbances in flow, retarding flow near a surface. Such disturbances may not be damped as Reynolds number increases, which can lead to interactions that cause increasing disturbances, such as turbulent eddies. Disturbances may flow away from the surface into the outer boundary layer, which can cause continued disturbances. The present solution can control surface drag by controlling the difference between the velocity of the free stream and the relative velocities of the boundary layer, such as by interrupting the generation of disturbances near the surface.


Turbulent flow in boundary layers can contribute towards drag. A turbulent boundary layer can have a large number of eddies that transfer momentum from the faster moving outer portions of the boundary layer to the relatively slower portions closer to the surface. As such, turbulent boundary layers may have more surface friction than laminar boundary layers, which have more smooth flows, and are generally free from these eddies. Making the boundary layer less turbulent can be used to decrease drag, and conversely making the boundary layer more turbulent can be used to increase drag.


Referring generally to FIGS. 1-6, fluid control systems and methods in accordance with the present disclosure can be used to generate transverse surface waves, including using Love waves, to actively control surface drag corresponding to fluid flowing over surfaces. In some embodiments, a fluid control system includes a surface, an actuator, and a controller. The surface has a fluid flowing over the surface. The actuator is coupled to the surface to move the surface relative to the fluid. The controller causes the actuator to cause the surface to generate a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid. The actuator can cause the surface to generate a Love wave.



FIG. 1 depicts a representation 100 of transverse surface waves, which can be used to modify surface drag. The transverse surface wave can have properties such as a wavelength λ and a frequency ω at which the wave propagates in a direction of propagation (e.g., direction of mean flow), along with an amplitude A according to which the wave moves transverse to (e.g., perpendicular to) the direction of propagation. However, the effectiveness of transverse surface waves has primarily been demonstrated numerically or computationally, and existing implementations may lack feasibility. For example, transverse surface waves can be approximated by a series of discrete plates. However, the motion of one or more plates relative to one another can require significant power, and generate unwanted flow fields at plate interfaces, reducing the desired effect on surface drag. The large number of interfaces can present significant wear, reliability, and deployment issues relative to a continuous surface. A Kagome lattice can mitigate some of these concerns in limited circumstances (e.g., at low frequencies and flow speeds), but involves bulk motion of a membrane, which results in unwanted out-of-plane motion. Electro-active polymer-based implementations have been attempted but suffer from similar issues and are limited in lifetime and adjustability. Existing actuation methods typically do not scale well in power or size as the flow speeds and frequencies increase.


Wave motion that can be created in solid matter, such as Love waves, are characterized by side-to-side surface undulations perpendicular to the direction of propagation, similar to snake-like motion, but decreasing in amplitude with depth. Love waves are a form of surface wave. A Rayleigh wave is a wave that moves up and down perpendicular to the surface, as water waves do. By contrast, Love waves move laterally to their direction of motion while remaining in the plane of the surface. For example, FIG. 2A depicts a representation 200 of Love wave propagation as a function of time, and FIG. 2B depicts a representation 250 of deformations resulting from Love waves at the surface. In order for Love waves to exist, there must be two materials with different properties stacked together. The top layer must have a shear-wave speed less than the shear-wave speed in the underlying material. The shear-wave speed is defined by the square root of the modulus of rigidity (G) divided by the material density (ρ), shown in Equation 1 below:









c
=


G
ρ






(

Equation





1

)







The present solution can enable more effective generation of transverse surface waves, including by generating Love waves to cause resulting surface action. The present solution can enable continuous localized deformation in the desired directions for power-efficient and mechanically robust drag control. For example, the present solution can generate Love waves to cause resulting surface action using a multiple layer stack (e.g., multilayer stack) that includes at least two layers, including a first layer (e.g., the top layer described above) and one or more second layers (the top layer having a shear-wave speed less than that of the one or more second layers, such as the underlying layers described above).


Referring now to FIG. 3, a fluid control system 300 is depicted. The fluid control system 300 can incorporates features of various fluid control systems described herein. The fluid control system 300 includes an actuator 304 coupled to a surface 308 over which a fluid 312 flows. The actuator 304 moves the surface 308 relative to the fluid 312. For example, the actuator 304 can move the surface 308 to generate transverse surface waves, such as by propagating Love waves. The actuator 304 can be disposed in a body 316 defining the surface 308, such that the actuator 304 propagates Love waves in the body 316 to generate transverse surface waves at the surface 312. In some embodiments, the actuator 304 is coupled to a bulk material (e.g., the body 316), and can be actuated at least one of electrostatically or electromagnetically to propagate Love waves. The actuator 304 can avoid causing out-of-plane motion of the surface 308, which may be undesirable for effective drag modification, by using Love waves (e.g., the actuator 304 may cause no out-of-plane motion perpendicular to the surface 308; the actuator 304 may cause at most a minimal amount of out-of-plane motion perpendicular to the surface 308, movement of the surface 308 out of a plane of the surface 308 that is less than a threshold distance, for example, a threshold distance having a size scale that is five viscous length scale units or less relative to a viscous length scale of the fluid 312). The actuator 304 may be of relatively small size as compared to the surface 308; for example, the actuator 304 may be attached to less than a threshold fraction of the surface 308 (e.g., less than 75 percent of the surface 308; less than 50 percent of the surface 308; less than 25 percent of the surface 308; less than 10 percent of the surface 308; less than 5 percent of the surface 308; less than 1 percent of the surface 308).


In some embodiments, the surface 308 can include materials that facilitate transverse wave generation. For example, the surface 308 can include metamaterials designed to create the desired shear-wave speed difference in different layers. The surface 308 can be doped or etched to achieve a desired response to actuation by the actuator 304.


The fluid control system 300 includes a controller 320. The controller 320 can include a processor 324 and memory 328. The processor 324 can be a general purpose or specific purpose processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), one or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), a group of processing components, or other suitable processing components. The processor 324 is configured to execute computer code or instructions stored in memory 328 or received from other computer readable media (e.g., CDROM, network storage, a remote server, etc.). Memory 328 can include one or more devices (e.g., memory units, memory devices, storage devices, etc.) for storing data and/or computer code for completing and/or facilitating the various processes described in the present disclosure. Memory 328 can include random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), hard drive storage, temporary storage, non-volatile memory, flash memory, optical memory, or any other suitable memory for storing software objects and/or computer instructions. Memory 328 can include database components, object code components, script components, or any other type of information structure for supporting the various activities and information structures described in the present disclosure. Memory 328 can be communicably connected to processor 324 via controller 320 and may include computer code for executing (e.g., by processor 324) one or more processes described herein. When processor 324 executes instructions stored in memory 328, processor 324 generally configures the controller 320 to complete such activities.


The controller 320 can generate a control signal to control operation of the actuator 304, such as to cause the actuator 304 to move the surface 308 relative to the fluid 312. The controller 320 can select parameters of the control signal, such as frequency and amplitude, based on desired transverse surface wave properties. For example, the controller 320 can select a parameter of the control signal corresponding to an expected change in drag of the fluid 312 relative to the surface 308. The controller 320 can execute a wave function that maps parameter(s) of the control signal to parameters of resulting transverse surface waves generated using operation of the actuator 304, and a drag function that maps the parameters of the resulting transverse surface waves to corresponding changes in drag of the fluid 312 flowing over the surface 308, and can execute the wave function and the drag function to select the parameter(s) of the control signal. As discussed with further reference to FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 5, the controller 320 can generate the control signal to include several control signals having differing parameters, including differing phases.


The controller 320 can control operation of the actuator 304 to control one or more parameters of the surface wave, such as at least one of an amplitude, wavelength, or frequency of the surface wave (e.g., amplitude A, wavelength λ, ω depicted in FIG. 1). For example, the controller 320 can control an amplitude, frequency, or intermittency of movement of the actuator 304 to control the one or more parameters of the surface. The controller 320 can control the one or more parameters of the surface wave based on a parameter of the fluid 312. For example, the controller 320 can control operation of the actuator 304 to achieve target values for the one or more parameters of the surface wave based on a viscous length scale η of the fluid 312, where η is defined according to Equation 3 below, where ν is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid 312, τw is the wall shear stress of the fluid 312 relative to the surface 308, and ρ is the density of the fluid:









η
=

v



τ
w

ρ







(

Equation





2

)







Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4B, a fluid control device 400 is depicted. The fluid control device 400 can be used to implement the fluid control system 300 described with reference to FIG. 3, such as to receive a control signal from the controller 316 and implement functions of the actuator 304 responsive to the control signal, including to generate transverse surface waves that result in desired changes to drag. The fluid control device 400 can be implemented as a surface acoustic wave device. The fluid control device 400 can be relatively thin and continuous, mitigating shortcomings of existing systems, such as multiple plate systems. The fluid control device 400 can be used to generate various surface waves, including transverse surface waves (e.g., via Love wave generation), standing waves, and travelling waves. The fluid control device 400 can also be used to generate Rayleigh waves and Stoneley waves; however, such waves may be less effective for controlling drag as compared to Love waves. Due to the relative small size and electrical current requirements for operation of the fluid control device 400, the fluid control device 400 can be used to achieve desired transverse surface wave generation while reducing power requirements and wear as compared to existing systems.


The fluid control device 400 includes a first layer 404 and a second layer 412. The first layer 404 can be a guiding layer. The first layer 404 can be made from silicon dioxide. The first layer 404 can include a sensor region 408 that can include one or more sensors that detect characteristics of a fluid flowing over the first layer 404 and/or characteristics of motion of the first layer 404. The first layer 404 can have a lower shear-wave speed or phase velocity than the second layer 412, which can enable Love wave generation.


The second layer 412 can be used to generate waves, such as to generate Love waves. The second layer 412 can be a piezoelectric layer. The second layer 412 can include a cut crystal, such as an AT-cut quartz. The second layer 412 can include lithium niobite. The second layer 412 can include PVDF (e.g., polyvinylidene fluoride; polyvinylidene difluoride).


In some embodiments, the second layer 412 includes a plurality of electrodes 416, which can be energized to generate acoustic waves that result in desired wave motion. The plurality of electrodes 416 may be deposited on the second layer 412 between the first layer 404 and the second layer 412. In some embodiments, the plurality of electrodes 416 include at least one pair of electrode patterns 416a, 416b. The electrode patterns 416a, 416b can be interdigital transducers. For example, as depicted in FIG. 4B, the electrode pattern 416a can include a plurality of interspaced digits of electrodes 420a, and the electrode pattern 416b can include a plurality of interspaced digits of electrodes 420b. Positioning and spacing of the electrode patterns 416a, 416b can be selected to control direction of waves generated using the second layer 412. Sizing of the electrode patterns 416a, 416b can be selected to control amplitude and other parameters of generated waves, and thus control changes to drag.


In some embodiments, a control signal received at the fluid control device 400 (e.g., from the controller 316 described with reference to FIG. 3) includes a first control signal and a second control signal. The first control signal can be used to energize the electrode pattern 416a, and the second control signal can be used to energize the electrode pattern 416b. In some embodiments, the first control signal and second control signal have different phases, which can be selected to generate desired surface waves. In some embodiments, the first control signal and second control signal have different frequencies, such that the electrode patterns 416a, 416b can generate a beat frequency (e.g., based on intermediate frequencies) based on a first frequency of operation of the electrode pattern 416a and a second frequency of operation of the electrode pattern 416b.


As depicted in FIG. 4A, the fluid control device 400 generates a Love wave that propagates in a direction 428 (e.g., occurs at different positions as a function of time along the direction 428). Propagation of the Love wave includes displacement of particles of the first layer 404 in a direction 432 perpendicular to the direction 428, similar to that depicted in FIGS. 2A-2B.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a flow system 500 is depicted. The flow system 500 includes a body through which a fluid 502 is flowing, depicted as pipe 504 having an inner layer 512 disposed on an inner surface 508 of the pipe 504. The inner layer 512 may be implemented using the fluid control system 300 and/or the fluid control device 400. For example, the inner layer 512 may include a piezoelectric material that can be actuated to generate transverse surface waves that modify drag in fluid 502 flowing through the pipe 504.


Referring now to FIG. 6, a method 600 of active control of surface drag using selective wave generation is depicted. The method 600 can be performed using various systems and devices described herein, including the fluid control system 300 and fluid control device 400.


At 605, an actuator is coupled to a surface having a fluid flowing over the surface. The surface can be defined by a body over which the fluid flows, such as a movable platform (e.g., vehicle). The surface can be defined by a body through which the fluid flows, such as a pipe. The fluid can include at least one of air, water, or an oil. In some embodiments, the surface includes a semiconductor material that is doped to achieve a desired response to actuation by the actuator. In some embodiments, the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes. For example, the actuator can include a surface acoustic wave device that includes interdigitated electrode patterns.


At 610, a controller causes the actuator to cause the surface to move relative to the fluid, generating a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid, such as to increase or decrease drag of the fluid relative to the surface. In some embodiments, a transverse surface wave is generated. In some embodiments, a Love wave is generated. In some embodiments, a shear wave is generated. In some embodiments, a standing wave is generated. In some embodiments, the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes that the controller causes to generate a beat frequency based on a first frequency of operation of a first subset of the plurality of electrodes and a second frequency of operation of a second subset of the plurality of electrodes.


As utilized herein, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “substantially”, and similar terms are intended to have a broad meaning in harmony with the common and accepted usage by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter of this disclosure pertains. It should be understood by those of skill in the art who review this disclosure that these terms are intended to allow a description of certain features described and claimed without restricting the scope of these features to the precise numerical ranges provided. Accordingly, these terms should be interpreted as indicating that insubstantial or inconsequential modifications or alterations of the subject matter described and claimed are considered to be within the scope of the disclosure as recited in the appended claims.


The term “coupled,” as used herein, means the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent or fixed) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members coupled directly to each other, with the two members coupled to each other using a separate intervening member and any additional intermediate members coupled with one another, or with the two members coupled to each other using an intervening member that is integrally formed as a single unitary body with one of the two members. Such members may be coupled mechanically, electrically, and/or fluidly.


The term “or,” as used herein, is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list. Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is understood to convey that an element may be either X, Y, Z; X and Y; X and Z; Y and Z; or X, Y, and Z (i.e., any combination of X, Y, and Z). Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z to each be present, unless otherwise indicated.


References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” etc.) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other exemplary embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.


The hardware and data processing components used to implement the various processes, operations, illustrative logics, logical blocks, modules and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose single- or multi-chip processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, or, any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor also may be implemented as a combination of computing devices, such as a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. In some embodiments, particular processes and methods may be performed by circuitry that is specific to a given function. The memory (e.g., memory, memory unit, storage device, etc.) may include one or more devices (e.g., RAM, ROM, Flash memory, hard disk storage, etc.) for storing data and/or computer code for completing or facilitating the various processes, layers and modules described in the present disclosure. The memory may be or include volatile memory or non-volatile memory, and may include database components, object code components, script components, or any other type of information structure for supporting the various activities and information structures described in the present disclosure. According to an exemplary embodiment, the memory is communicably connected to the processor via a processing circuit and includes computer code for executing (e.g., by the processing circuit and/or the processor) the one or more processes described herein.


The present disclosure contemplates methods, systems and program products on any machine-readable media for accomplishing various operations. The embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented using existing computer processors, or by a special purpose computer processor for an appropriate system, incorporated for this or another purpose, or by a hardwired system. Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure include program products comprising machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable media. Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.


Although the figures and description may illustrate a specific order of method steps, the order of such steps may differ from what is depicted and described, unless specified differently above. Also, two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence, unless specified differently above. Such variation may depend, for example, on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. All such variations are within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, software implementations of the described methods could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule-based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps, and decision steps.


It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the fluid control systems and methods of fluid control as shown in the various exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Additionally, any element disclosed in one embodiment may be incorporated or utilized with any other embodiment disclosed herein. Although only one example of an element from one embodiment that can be incorporated or utilized in another embodiment has been described above, it should be appreciated that other elements of the various embodiments may be incorporated or utilized with any of the other embodiments disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system, comprising: a surface having a fluid flowing over the surface;a multiple layer stack comprising at least a first layer facing the fluid and a second layer on an opposite side of the first layer from the fluid, the first layer comprising the surface, the first layer having a different shear-wave speed than the second layer, the first layer made from a different material than the second layer;an actuator coupled to the surface to move the surface relative to the fluid; anda controller that causes the actuator to generate a love wave in a plane of the surface to modify drag in the fluid.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to control at least one of an amplitude, a wavelength, or a frequency of the love wave based on a parameter of the fluid.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the surface is defined by a film covering an inner surface of a body through which the fluid flows.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the body includes a pipe.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the surface is defined by a film covering an outer surface of a body configured to move through the fluid.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the actuator includes a surface acoustic wave device.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the actuator includes a piezo-electric material.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the actuator is attached to less than a threshold fraction of the surface.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes arranged along one or more parallel axes.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the controller drives the plurality of electrodes to generate the love wave to include a standing wave.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the surface includes a semiconductor material that is doped to achieve a desired response to actuation by the actuator.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the actuator does not move the surface out of a plane of the surface.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the first layer has a shear-wave speed lower than a shear-wave speed of the second layer.
  • 15. A system comprising, a surface having a fluid flowing over the surface;an actuator coupled to the surface to move the surface relative to the fluid; anda controller that causes the actuator to cause the surface to generate a surface wave that modifies drag in the fluid,wherein the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes arranged to generate a beat frequency based on a first frequency of operation of a first subset of the plurality of electrodes and a second frequency of operation of a second subset of the plurality of electrodes.
  • 16. A method, comprising: coupling an actuator to a surface having a fluid flowing over the surface, wherein the surface is provided as a first layer of a multiple layer stack, the first layer facing the fluid, the multiple layer stack comprising a second layer on an opposite side of the first layer from the fluid, the first layer comprising the surface, the first layer having a different shear-wave speed than the second layer, the first layer made from a different material than the second layer; andcausing, by a controller, the actuator to generate a love wave in a plane of the surface to modify drag in the fluid.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising controlling, by the controller, at least one of an amplitude, a wavelength, or a frequency of the love wave based on a parameter of the fluid.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the surface is defined by a film covering an inner surface of a body through which the fluid flows.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the body includes a pipe.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein the surface is defined by a film covering a body configured to move through the fluid.
  • 21. The method of claim 16, comprising: driving, by the controller, a plurality of electrodes of the actuator.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the actuator includes a surface acoustic wave device.
  • 23. The method of claim 16, wherein the actuator includes a piezo-electric material.
  • 24. The method of claim 16, wherein the actuator is attached to less than a threshold fraction of the surface.
  • 25. The method of claim 16, wherein the actuator includes a plurality of electrodes arranged along one or more parallel axes.
  • 26. The method of claim 16, comprising: driving, by the controller, the plurality of electrodes to generate the love wave to include a standing wave.
  • 27. The method of claim 16, comprising: driving, by the controller, a first subset of a plurality of electrodes of the actuator at a first frequency of operation; anddriving, by the controller, a second subset of the plurality of electrodes at a second frequency of operation to generate the love wave at a beat frequency corresponding to the first frequency of operation and the second frequency of operation.
  • 28. The method of claim 16, wherein the surface includes a semiconductor material that is doped to achieve a desired response to actuation by the actuator.
  • 29. The method of claim 16, comprising: moving the surface, by the actuator, out of a plane of the surface by less than a thickness of the surface perpendicular to the plane.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present disclosure claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/773,805, titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ACTIVE CONTROL OF SURFACE DRAG USING SELECTIVE WAVE GENERATION,” filed Nov. 30, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (126)
Number Name Date Kind
1903823 Lougheed Apr 1933 A
2440198 Green Apr 1948 A
3289978 Banaszak Dec 1966 A
3578264 Kuethe May 1971 A
4102519 Crosby, Jr. Jul 1978 A
4309901 Rolinski et al. Jan 1982 A
4516747 Lurz May 1985 A
4526031 Weisend et al. Jul 1985 A
4611492 Koosmann Sep 1986 A
4932612 Blackwelder et al. Jun 1990 A
5037044 Seyfang Aug 1991 A
5106017 Hicks Apr 1992 A
5209438 Wygnanski May 1993 A
5359574 Nadolink Oct 1994 A
5365490 Katz Nov 1994 A
5369345 Phan et al. Nov 1994 A
5374011 Lazarus et al. Dec 1994 A
5445346 Gilbert Aug 1995 A
5531407 Austin et al. Jul 1996 A
5540406 Occhipinti Jul 1996 A
5558156 Tsutsui Sep 1996 A
5558304 Adams Sep 1996 A
5573012 McEwan Nov 1996 A
5598990 Farokhi et al. Feb 1997 A
5755408 Schmidt et al. May 1998 A
5808210 Herb et al. Sep 1998 A
5874671 Lopez Feb 1999 A
5942682 Ghetzler et al. Aug 1999 A
5953773 Asada Sep 1999 A
5957413 Glezer et al. Sep 1999 A
5961080 Sinha Oct 1999 A
5964433 Nosenchuck Oct 1999 A
5988522 Glezer Nov 1999 A
5988568 Drews Nov 1999 A
6016286 Olivier et al. Jan 2000 A
6024119 Kirschner Feb 2000 A
6109565 King, Sr. Aug 2000 A
6123145 Glezer et al. Sep 2000 A
6123296 Mangalam Sep 2000 A
6131853 Bauer et al. Oct 2000 A
6215221 Cabuz et al. Apr 2001 B1
6332593 Kamiadakis et al. Dec 2001 B1
6443394 Weisend, Jr. Sep 2002 B1
6484971 Layukallo Nov 2002 B2
6644598 Glezer Nov 2003 B2
6662647 Schoess et al. Dec 2003 B2
6795763 Yao et al. Sep 2004 B2
6821090 Hassan et al. Nov 2004 B1
6862502 Peltz et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871816 Nugent et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874748 Hanagan Apr 2005 B2
6966231 Sheplak et al. Nov 2005 B2
6979050 Browne et al. Dec 2005 B2
7031871 Severson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7133785 Larson et al. Nov 2006 B2
7204731 Gusler Apr 2007 B2
7251592 Praisner et al. Jul 2007 B1
7375911 Li et al. May 2008 B1
7380756 Enloe et al. Jun 2008 B1
7434170 Novak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7537182 Greenblatt May 2009 B2
7703839 McKnight et al. Apr 2010 B2
7854467 McKnight et al. Dec 2010 B2
7913928 Tiliakos et al. Mar 2011 B2
8006939 McClure Aug 2011 B2
8074938 Hyde et al. Dec 2011 B2
8074939 Hyde et al. Dec 2011 B2
8091950 Corke et al. Jan 2012 B2
8267355 Patel et al. Sep 2012 B1
8286909 Lee Oct 2012 B2
8308112 Wood et al. Nov 2012 B2
8436509 Branch May 2013 B1
8640995 Corke et al. Feb 2014 B2
8783337 Hyde et al. Jul 2014 B2
8794574 Lang Aug 2014 B2
8894019 Alvi Nov 2014 B2
9002484 Hyde et al. Apr 2015 B2
9410527 Hsu Aug 2016 B2
9541106 Patel et al. Jan 2017 B1
9640995 Thorburn May 2017 B2
9834301 Patel et al. Dec 2017 B1
9848485 Corke et al. Dec 2017 B2
9883822 Bhagavat Feb 2018 B2
9908616 Horn et al. Mar 2018 B1
10527074 Corke Jan 2020 B2
10543908 Stefes et al. Jan 2020 B2
11299260 Wine Apr 2022 B2
11519433 Wine Dec 2022 B2
20020079405 Layukallo Jun 2002 A1
20020125376 Karniadakis et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020131474 Suga Sep 2002 A1
20040197519 Elzey et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249257 Tupin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050088057 Kando Apr 2005 A1
20050121240 Aase et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050163963 Munro et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050241605 Bedwell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060022092 Miller et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060040532 Ozawa et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060060722 Choi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060236777 Chambers et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070113932 Tiliakos et al. May 2007 A1
20080128027 Hyde et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080128560 Hyde et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080128561 Hyde et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080193307 Elata et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080245520 Hyde et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090173837 Silkey et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100123046 Khozikov et al. May 2010 A1
20100219296 Shelman-Cohen Sep 2010 A1
20110224846 Simon Sep 2011 A1
20110295102 Lakkis et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120193483 Essenhigh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130009016 Fox et al. Jan 2013 A1
20150191244 Rolston Jul 2015 A1
20150257653 Hyde et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160089052 Cho et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160174842 Hyde et al. Jun 2016 A1
20180298762 Shelman-Cohen Oct 2018 A1
20190136881 Amitay et al. May 2019 A1
20200031456 Wine et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200148335 Wine et al. May 2020 A1
20200176664 Wine Jun 2020 A1
20200191177 Wine et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200217337 Loebig Jul 2020 A1
20210348628 Holloway et al. Nov 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1 481 467 Dec 2004 EP
2 012 139 Jan 2009 EP
1053332 Feb 1954 FR
WO-0176934 Oct 2001 WO
WO-02103304 Dec 2002 WO
WO-2006040532 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2012054086 Apr 2012 WO
WO-2016179405 Nov 2016 WO
WO-2016189448 Dec 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (63)
Entry
Smart Materials and Structures, Microsensors, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and electronics for smart structures and systems, Varadan (Year: 2000).
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/063409, dated Feb. 21, 2020, 16 pages.
Ainajjar et al., “Receptivity of high-speed jets to excitation using an array of mems-based mechanical actuators”, SME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Jun. 22-26, 1997, pp. 1-6.
Alfredsson et al., “Large-eddy breakup devices—a 40 years perspective from a stockholm horizon”, Flow Turbulence Combust, 2018, vol. 100, pp. 877-888.
Bird et al., “Compliant kagome lattice structures for generating in-plane waveforms”, 2018, vol. 41, No. 142, pp. 86-101.
Bird et al., “Experimental control of turbulent boundary layers with in-plane travelling waves”, Flow Turbulence Combust, 2018, vol. 100, pp. 1015-1035.
Bird et al., “In-plane forcing of a turbulent boundary layer, through the actuation of a compliant structure”, DRFCM, 2015, pp. 1-2.
Braslow, “A History of suction-type laminar-flow control with emphasis on flight research”, 1999, pp. 1-84.
Bushnell, “Chapter VIII : compliant surfaces introduction”, Viscous Flow Drag Reduction, 1980, pp. 687-390.
Cattafesta et al., “Actuators for active flow control”, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2001, vol. 43, pp. 247-272.
Chamorro et al., “Drag reduction of large wind turbine blades through riblets: evaluation of riblet geometry and application strategies”, Renewable Energy, 2013, vol. 50, pp. 1095-1105.
Corke et al., “Active and passive turbulent boundary layer drag reduction”, AIM Journal, 2018, vol. 56, pp. 3835-3847.
Gad-El-Hak et al., “Separation control: review”, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1991, vol. 13, pp. 5-30.
Gad-El-Hak, “Chapter 9: drag reduction using compliant walls”, Flow Past Highly Compliant Boundaries and in Collapsible Tubes, Eds. Carpenter and Pedley, Mar. 26-31, 2001, pp. 191-229.
Garcia-Mayoral et al., “Drag rReduction by riblets”, Phil Trans. R. Soc A, 2011, vol. 369, pp. 1412-1427.
Gatti et al., “Reynolds-number dependence of turbulent skin-friction drag reduction induced by spanwise forcing”, J. Fluid Mech, 2016, vol. 802, pp. 553-582.
Gatti, “Turbulent drag reduction at moderate reynolds number via spanwise velocity waves”, PAMM, 2012, 133 pages.
Gouder, “Turbulent friction drag reduction using electroactive polymer surfaces”, Doctoral Thesis, Imperial College, May 2011.
Grosjean et al., “Micro balloon actuators for aerodynamic control”, IEEE Proceedings MEMS 98, Jan. 25-28, 1998, pp. 1-6.
Hong et al., “Turbulent drag reduction with polymers in rotating disk flow”, Polymers, vol. 7, pp. 279-1298.
Huang et al., “MEMS transducers for aerodynamics—a paradym shift”, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2000, pp. 1-7.
Hurst et al., “The effect of reynolds number on turbulent drag reduction by streamwise travelling waves”, J. Fluid Mech., 2014, vol. 759, pp. 28-55.
Jones et al., “Modelling for robust feedback control of fluid flows”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, vol. 769, pp. 1-34.
Jung et al., “Suppression of turbulence in wall-bounded flows by high-frequency spanwise oscillations”, Phys_ Fluids A, 1992, vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 1605-1607.
Kang et al., “Active wall motions for skin-friction drag reduction”, Physics of Fluids, 2000, vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 3301-3304.
Karniadakis et al., “Mechanism on transverse motions in turbulent wall flows”, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2003, vol. 35, pp. 45-62.
Kasagi et al., “Toward cost-effective control of wall turbulence of skin friction drag reduction”, Advances in Turbulence XII, 2009, pp. 189-200.
Kline et al., “The structure of turbulent boundary layers”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1967, vol. 30, pp. 741-773.
Laadhari et al., “Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanwise oscillating surface”, Physics of Fluids, 1994, vol. 6, pp. 3218-3220.
Lee et al., “Control of roll moment by MEMS”. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1996, pp. 1797-1803.
Leschziner, “Friction-drag reduction by transverse wall motion—a review”, J. of Mechanics, DOI: 10.1017/ mech.2020_31, 15 pages.
Luhar et al., “A framework for studying the effect of compliant surface on wall turbulence”, J. Fluid Mech., 2015, vol. 768, pp. 415-441.
Mahfoze et al., “Skin-friction drag reduction in a channel flow with streamwise-aligned plasma actuators,” Intl J. of Heat and Fluid Flow, Butterworth Scientific LTD., Guildford, GB, 2017, vol. 66, pp. 83-94.
Marusic et al., “Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow”, Science, 2010, vol. 329, No. 5988, pp. 193-196.
Mathis et al., “Estimating wall-shear-stress fluctuations given an outer region input”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, vol. 715, pp. 163-180.
Melton et al., “Active flow control via discrete sweeping and steady jets on a simple-hinged flap”, Aug. 2018, IM Journal, vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 2961-2973.
Morrison, “MEMS devices for active drag reduction in aerospace applications”, Electronic and Optical Materials, 2014, pp. 153-176.
Naguib et al., “Arrays of MEMS-based actuators for control of supersonic jet screech”, AIM, Jun. 29-Jul. 2, 1997, pp. 1-9.
Panton, “Overview of the self-sustaining mechanisms of wall turbulence”, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 41-383.
Quadrio et al., “Streamwise-traveling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction”, 2009, vol. 627, pp. 161-178.
Quadrio, “The laminar generalized stokes layer and turbulent drag reduction”, J. Fluid. Mech., 2011, vol. 667, pp. 135-157.
Ricco, “Active and passive turbulent drag reduction”, Workshop on Turbulent Skin Friction Drag Reduction, Imperial College London, Dec. 4-5, 2017, pp. 1-60.
Sareen et al., “Drag reduction using riblet film applied to airfoils for wind turbines”, 49th Aerospaces Sciences Meeting, Jan. 4-7, 2011, pp. 1-19.
Schoppa et al., “A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers”, Physics of Fluids , 1998, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1049-1051.
Schroder, “Drag reduction via transversal wave motions”, Institute of Aerodynamics, 2017, pp. 1-22.
Shen, “Turbulent flow over a flexible wall undergoing a streamwise travelling wave motion”, J. Fluid Mech., 2003, vol. 484, pp. 197-221.
Smith et al., “The characteristics of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, vol. 129, pp. 27-54.
Smits et al., “High reynolds number wall turbulence”, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2011, vol. 43, pp. 353-375.
Symeonidis et al., “Drag reduction in wall-bound turbulence via a transverse travelling wave”, J. Fluid Mech., 2002, vol. 457, pp. 1-34.
Tamano, “Turbulent drag reduction due to spanwise traveling waves with wall deformation”, Nov. 20, 2014, OR 1779 Symposium, pp. 1-51.
Thomas et al., “Turbulent drag reduction using pulsed-DC plasma actuation”, J. of Physics D: Appl. Phys., 2019, vol. 52, No. 34001, 13 pages.
Tomiyama et al., “Direct numerical simulation of drag reduction in a turbulent channel flow using spanwise traveling wave-like wall deformation”, Physics of Fluids, 2013, vol. 25, pp. 1-22.
Tsao, “An integrated mems system for turbulent boundary layer control”, IEEE Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, pp. 1-4.
Tsao, “Micromachined magnetic actuators for active fluid control”, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1994, pp. 31-38.
Van Buren et al., “Piezoelectric driven oscillating surface (PDOS)”, RPI, 2014, 6 pages.
Viotti et al., “Streamwise oscillation of spanwise velocity at the wall of a channel for turbulent drag reduction”, Physics of Fluids, 2009, vol. 21, pp. 1-9.
Wang, “Flow over a surface with parallel grooves”, May 2003, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 1114-1121.
Yang et al., “Micro bellow actuators”, IEEE International Solid State Sensors and Actuators Conference, 1997, pp. 1-4.
Zhao et al., “Turbulent drag reduction by traveling wave of flexible wall”, Fluid Dynamics Research, 2004, vol. 34, pp. 175-198.
Zhong et al., “Reduction of pressure losses in a linear cascade using herringbone riblets”, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Aug. 17, 2017, 16 pages.
Hudson, “Love Waves in a Heterogeneous Medium” (1962), The Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astonomical Society, vol. 6, No. 2, Feb. 1962, p. 131-147.
Mazein et al., “Love Wave Chemical Sensors: Design and Optimisation. Case of Organophosphorous Compounds Detection.” (2004) IEEE, p. 31-35.
White, “Surface Elastic Waves” (1970), Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 58, No. 8, Aug. 1970.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200176664 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62773805 Nov 2018 US