Systems and methods of antenna design for full-duplex line of sight transmission

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10333593
  • Patent Number
    10,333,593
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 2, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Phan; Tho G
    Agents
    • Invention Mine LLC
Abstract
Methods and apparatuses are described for communicating primary signals over a high-speed primary channel, the primary signals having a beam pattern having a full lobe at a center of an axis of propagation and communicating auxiliary signals over a low-speed auxiliary channel, the auxiliary signals having a decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of axis of propagation, the high-speed primary channel and low-speed auxiliary channel operating in full duplex.
Description
BACKGROUND

Antennas with high directional gains are widely used to improve power efficiency in line of sight wireless transmission. As a wireless signal propagates, regardless of the pattern of the transmit antenna, the propagating wave will gradually tend to a planar wave. In line of sight transmissions using directional antennas, only two polarizations may be used to provide two spatial channels. This results in a 2×2 Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) channel. Typically, the two spatial dimensions correspond to horizontal and vertical linear polarizations, or correspond to left-handed and right-handed circular polarizations. In such systems, dual-polarized antennas are widely used. Further, in such line-of-sight transmission setups, it is desirable to have a non-singular channel matrix supporting more than two dimensions.


The number of spatial channels can be increased beyond two, at the cost of using multiple (separate) transmit and multiple (separate) receive antennas, with restrictions on spacing among transmit and/or among receive antennas. In such setups, as the receive antennas detect a plane wave, the channel matrix in the underlying MIMO system may be close to singular. Alternatively, non-line-of-sight MIMO structures may realize additional spatial dimensions without such severe restrictions on their spacing due to the effect of multi-path fading. The reason is that, in conventional MIMO systems (non-line-of-sight), the channel matrix is composed of (independent) complex random numbers, and consequently, the channel matrix will be (with high probability) non-singular. In prior art, to provide a non-singular channel matrix supporting more than two spatial dimensions in line-of-sight transmission setups, it is required to have a large spacing among dual-polarized transmit antennas and a large spacing among dual-polarized receive antennas. Thus it may be desirable to increase the number of spatial dimensions in line-of-sight wireless links without such severe restrictions on antenna spacing.


SUMMARY

Embodiments described herein include methods for providing a 2×2 full-duplex line-of-sight (LoS) transmission scheme, supporting two simultaneous spatial dimensions in each direction without severe restrictions on size and spacing of an antenna.


Described herein are methods and apparatuses for communicating primary signals over a high-speed primary channel, the primary signals having a beam pattern having a full lobe at a center of an axis of propagation and communicating auxiliary signals over a low-speed auxiliary channel, the auxiliary signals having a decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of axis of propagation, the high-speed primary channel and low-speed auxiliary channel operating in full duplex.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more detailed understanding may be had from the following description, presented by way of example in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 depicts exemplary excitations of a parabolic dish antenna, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary shape of a primary channel beam, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary shape of an auxiliary channel beam, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 4 depicts dual polarization in the primary channel and single polarization in the auxiliary channel, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 5 depicts dual polarization in primary channel and single polarization in the auxiliary channel using a monopole with an arm shaped to improve design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 6 depicts placement of antennas for dual polarization in the primary channel and dual polarization in the auxiliary channel using two monopoles with arms shaped to improve design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 7 depicts placement of antennas for dual polarization in the primary channel and dual polarization in the auxiliary channel using two monopoles with arms shaped to improve design objectives, where the axis of symmetry of monopoles is the same as the axis of symmetry of the entire structure.



FIG. 8 depicts placement of antennas for dual polarization in the primary channel and dual polarization in the auxiliary channel, where the two polarizations in the auxiliary channel are obtained using two monopoles with arms shaped to improve the design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 9 depicts monopoles with arms shaped to improve the design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 10 depicts dual polarized Yagi antenna for the primary channel, and dual-polarized shaped dipole for the auxiliary channel, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 11 depicts right-handed and left-handed circular polarization for a single polarized primary channel and single polarized auxiliary channels, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 12 depicts right-handed and left-handed circular polarization for dual-polarized primary channel, and monopoles with shaped arms for dual-polarized auxiliary channels, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 13 depicts symmetries that are responsible for reduction in coupling, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 14 depicts an example for various beams in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 15 depicts another example for various beams in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 16 is a pictorial view showing that are responsible for reduction in coupling, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 17 is a pictorial view for the pattern of the primary channel, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 18 is another pictorial view for the pattern of the auxiliary channel, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 19 depicts an exemplary coupling between the primary channel and the auxiliary channel computed using High Frequency Structural Simulator (HFSS), in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 20 depicts an exemplary shaping the parabolic reflector to improve the design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 21 depicts exemplary corrective circuitry, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 22 depicts exemplary adjustment of alignment of the antennas structures at point A and point B (with respect to each other) to maximize the signal-to-noise ratios, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 23 is a flowchart of a method, in accordance with some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A detailed description of illustrative embodiments will now be provided with reference to the various Figures. Although this description provides detailed examples of possible implementations, it should be noted that the provided details are intended to be by way of example and in no way limit the scope of the application.


Present embodiments focusing on line-of-sight (LoS) transmission disclose antenna design methods in conjunction with methods for cancellation of residual self-interference to establish a dual-polarized wireless channel in each direction, while relaxing the restrictions on the spacing among transmit elements, and spacing among receive elements. Such embodiments may include a 2×2 Full-Duplex (FD) line-of-sight MIMO system.


Many directional antennas include a dish structure with a dual-polarized wave emanating from a focal point of the dish. FIG. 1 illustrates four techniques for the placement of a dual-polarized Radio-Frequency (RF) signal at the focal point of a dish. As shown, the four techniques shown in FIG. 1 include Axial (front feed) placement 102, off-axis (offset feed) placement 104, Cassegrain placement 106, and Gregorian placement 108.


In many cases, a second dual-polarized directional antenna is used as a receiver at the other end of the transmission system. In legacy systems, a pair of dual-polarized antennas are used at both ends of the link. Herein for descriptive purposes, the two ends of the link are denoted by A and B. To provide connectivity in both directions, i.e, A-to-B and B-to-A, legacy systems rely on either Time-Division-Duplex (TDD) or Frequency-Division-Duplex (FDD). Embodiments described herein disclose methods for spatial multiplexing of the two channels, i.e., that of A-to-B and B-to-A. In such embodiments, the two channels are concurrent and occupy the same frequency band. One problem encountered in spatial multiplexing of channels is that an excessive amount self-interference may be present. Such self-interference may include interference from a transmitter to its own receiver.


At least one configuration of a directional 2×2 MIMO system, i.e., channels A-to-B and B-to-A, is based on using circular polarization. In such a configuration, left-handed and right-handed circular polarizations are used instead of the vertical and horizontal polarizations.


Self-interference of spatial division duplexing of channels A-to-B and B-to-A may be simplified if the two channels support different data rates. Consider the following two states:

    • State 1: Channel A-to-B (acting as the primary channel) has a higher data rate with respect to the channel B-to-A (acting as the auxiliary channel).
    • State 2: Channel B-to-A (acting as the primary channel) has a higher data rate with respect to the channel A-to-B (acting as the auxiliary channel).


Described embodiments further include the possibility of alternating between the above two states, depending on the amount of data in each direction. In at least one embodiment, the above two states reduce to:

    • State 3: Channel A-to-B (dual polarized, primary channel) carries the main traffic, while channel B-to-A (dual polarized, auxiliary channel) carries control signals, such as signals used for training, frequency/clock synchronization and request for retransmission.
    • State 4: Channel B-to-A (dual polarized, primary channel) carries the main traffic, while channel A-to-B (dual polarized, auxiliary channel) carries control signals, such as signals used for training, frequency/clock synchronization and request for retransmission.


In another embodiment, the above two states further reduce to single polarization in the auxiliary channel:

    • State 5: Channel A-to-B (dual polarized, primary channel) carries the main traffic, while channel B-to-A (single polarized, auxiliary channel) carries control signals, such as signals used for training, frequency/clock synchronization and request for retransmission.
    • State 6: Channel B-to-A (dual polarized, primary channel) carries the main traffic, while channel A-to-B (single polarized, auxiliary channel) carries control signals, such as signals used for training, frequency/clock synchronization and request for retransmission.


Described embodiments support various configurations as summarized below:

    • Channel A-to-B uses dual linear polarization, and channel B-to-A uses dual linear polarization.
    • Channel A-to-B uses dual circular polarization, and channel B-to-A uses dual circular polarization.
    • Channel A-to-B uses dual circular polarization, and channel B-to-A uses dual linear polarization.
    • Channel A-to-B uses dual linear polarization, and channel B-to-A uses dual circular polarization.


Although described embodiments are explained in terms of configurations where at least one of the channels, namely A-to-B and/or B-to-A, is dual polarized, it should be noted that in some embodiments both channels rely on a single polarization.


One aspect of described embodiments is a method to reduce the amount of self-interference through design of an auxiliary antenna and its placement with respect to the primary antenna, which may include a dish for example. Below, methods are described as considering the primary channel to operate in a direction of A-to-B, while the auxiliary channel operates in a direction of B-to-A, and is thus full duplex operation. The primary channel may have a higher Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) with respect to the auxiliary channel, and thereby may carry more data.


In some embodiments, the antennas and reflectors are placed for the primary channel to have a beam pattern having a full main lobe, while the auxiliary channel has decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of its axis of propagation. Examples of the beam pattern 200 of the primary channel having the full main lobe and the decoupled beam pattern 300 of the auxiliary channel having the null at the center of the axis of propagation are shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, respectively. At least one design objective in the described embodiments is to reduce the angle of the central null in the auxiliary decoupled beam pattern. As the primary channel has a full lobe at the center of the axis of propagation, the primary channel may function if the two ends of the channel, A and B, are perfectly aligned. However, as the decoupled beam pattern of the auxiliary channel has a null in the center, a small misalignment of the antennas at points A and B may be introduced so that the receiving end does not fall within the null of the corresponding transmitter. Such a misalignment is illustrated by FIG. 22, where the axis of symmetry for the point A antennas 2202 and the axis of symmetry for the point B antennas 2204 have misalignments of approximately 2 degrees. As shown in FIG. 22, the peak energy in the auxiliary beam occurs slightly off the main axis. The null in the beam of the auxiliary channel is a side-effect of the method used to decouple the primary and auxiliary antennas to reduce the self-interference through placement of the auxiliary antenna. Through such constructions of antenna beams, the antenna gain of the auxiliary channel is compromised to reduce self-interference.


Design objectives for embodiments herein are given below, in no particular order:

    • Maximize gain of the primary channel.
    • Maximize gain of the auxiliary channel.
    • Reduce width of the null in the auxiliary channel.
    • Reduce coupling and thereby self-interference.


In some embodiments where the primary channel incorporates dual polarization and the auxiliary channel incorporates a single polarization, the primary channel is based on one of the conventional excitation techniques shown in FIG. 1, and the auxiliary channel uses an auxiliary antenna having a monopole or a dipole orthogonal to the interior of the dish placed along the axis of propagation. FIGS. 4-8 illustrate various possible configurations, in accordance with some embodiments. FIG. 4 illustrates dual polarization in the primary channel and single polarization in the auxiliary channel. As shown, the antenna includes an auxiliary antenna including monopole 402 and a monopole stand 406. In some embodiments, the monopole stand 406 includes a coaxial cable 404 with one wire connected to the body of the dish 408 (used as ground) of the primary antenna, and the other wire connecting the auxiliary RF signal to the monopole antenna 402. At least one embodiment relies on a monopole antenna with the dish structure acting as a ground plane.



FIG. 5 illustrates dual polarization in the primary channel and single polarization in the auxiliary channel using an auxiliary antenna having a monopole with an arm shaped to improve design objectives, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown in FIG. 5, the auxiliary antenna includes a monopole 502 with a shaped arm. Similar to FIG. 4, a monopole stand 506 includes a coaxial cable 504 with a wire attached to the dish 508 for ground and the other end of the cable connecting the auxiliary RF signal to the monopole antenna 502. The shaping of the monopole 502 may be done to improve the design objectives listed above.



FIG. 6 illustrates dual polarization in the primary channel and dual polarization in the auxiliary channel using two monopoles 602 and 604 having arms shaped to improve the design objectives described above. The auxiliary antenna shown in FIG. 6 may further include a single stand holding both monopoles 602 and 604 (not shown). The auxiliary antenna of FIG. 6 may include two coaxial cables (not shown), each having one end connected to the body of the dish 608 of the primary antenna as a ground plane, with the other end of each cable feeding an auxiliary RF signal to the corresponding bent-arm monopole antenna 602 or 604. As indicated by the XYZ axis, monopole 602 is in the YV plane supporting Y-polarization, while monopole 604 is in the XZ plane to support X-polarization.



FIG. 7 illustrates an excitation dual polarized horn 702 connected to the main dish 704 of the primary antenna, and a stand 706 holding dipoles 708 and 710 connected to a concave reflector 712. As shown, the dual polarized auxiliary link uses two monopoles with shaped arms. The axis of symmetry of the monopoles is the same as the axis of symmetry of the entire structure. FIG. 8 illustrates an auxiliary antenna having two monopoles 802 and 804 having v-shaped arms connected to a convex reflector 806, and a circular excitation horn 810 connected to the main dish 812, in accordance with some embodiments.


To further reduce coupling, small deviations from perfect placement caused by reflection of the signals incident on the dish and/or excitation waveguide may be compensated for. Such compensation may be achieved by:

    • Adjusting a shape of the dipole arms, angle between the two dipole arms, and curvature of the dipole arms.
    • Adjusting shape and curvature of the reflector.
    • Adjusting shape and curvature of the dish.


      These degrees of freedom are adjusted accounting for all design criteria previously described.



FIG. 9 illustrates exemplary configurations 902 and 904 for the shape of dipole arms, in accordance with some embodiments. Another degree of freedom may include direction of the v-shaped arms, such as pointing the arms towards or away from the main dish of the primary antenna.


Embodiments above have been explained in the language of using a dish antenna as the primary antenna for beamforming. However, alternative embodiments may utilize other forms of directive antennas, such as Yagi or directional circular polarized antennas. An example for a primary antenna taking the form of a Yagi antenna 1002 is shown in FIG. 10 connected to an auxiliary antenna including two monopoles having shaped arms 1004 and 1006.



FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate examples based on circular polarizations. As shown, FIG. 11 includes a left-hand circular polarization 1102 for the primary channel and a right-hand circular polarization 1104 for the auxiliary channel. In FIG. 12, the primary channel includes both left and right hand circular polarizations 1202 and 1204, and the auxiliary antenna includes two antennas 1206 and 1208 for dual-polarization of the auxiliary channel. In such a configuration, the corresponding signals of the auxiliary antenna may be combined to improve effective Signal-to noise-plus-Interference Ratio (SINR), or reduce the coupling/self-interference. Combination circuitry to perform such a combination may be static or adaptive, using dynamic adjustments.



FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment in which the primary channel includes a parabolic dish and the auxiliary channel includes a monopole or a dipole antenna. As shown in FIG. 13, the auxiliary channel may be a monopole 1302 or a monopole having shaped arms 1304. The axis of symmetry 1306 for the dish is along the Z axis, as indicated by the XYZ axes. The focal point 1308 of the parabolic dish is denoted ‘F’, and the vertex 1310 denoted ‘V’. FIG. 13 further illustrates plane waves 1312 having odd symmetry with respect to the XZ and YZ planes, and field vectors 1314/1316 having odd symmetry with respect to the XZ plane.



FIGS. 14, 15, and 16 are pictorial views of at least one embodiment embodiment where primary antenna including a parabolic dish is excited using a horn antenna. Specifically, FIG. 14 depicts a beam pattern 1402 of the excitation horn 1406 without the reflection in the dish reflector, and the decoupled beam pattern of the auxiliary channel 1404 without reflection in the dish reflector. FIG. 15 illustrates a graphical representation 1502 of the beam pattern 1402 of the excitation horn prior to reflecting from the dish, as well as a graphical representation 1504 of the decoupled beam pattern 1404 of the auxiliary channel after reflecting in the parabolic dish. FIG. 16 illustrates a plane of symmetry 1604 for one of two polarizations of the primary channel, and the corresponding alignment with the plane of symmetry 1606 of the dipole 1602.



FIGS. 17 and 18 depict graphical views of radiation patterns for the primary channel 1700 and auxiliary channel 1800 of the aforementioned embodiments of FIGS. 14, 15, 16, respectively, and FIG. 19 depicts simulation results for the coupling between the primary and auxiliary channels.



FIG. 20 depicts an alternative geometry of a dish 2002, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, the bottom of dish 2002 is flat an in the shape of a circle. Such a geometry may be used to improve the afore-mentioned design objectives.


To further reduce the coupling, a corrective circuit may be added to create a corrective leakage between transmit and receive path(s). FIG. 21 is a block diagram of an exemplary corrective circuit, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, adjustments of “Delay, Phase and Gain” in the corrective paths may be primarily static, while additional circuitry with dynamic adjustments may be deployed to adapt to variations in leakage. Note that such “dynamic variations” are mainly due to the changes in the reflection from the surrounding environment. As line of sight links are typically installed on high altitudes (such as towers or building roofs), the variations in the reflection from the environment may be small.



FIG. 23 is a flowchart of a method 2300, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, method 2300 includes communicating 2302 primary signals over a high-speed primary channel, the primary signals having a beam pattern having a full lobe at a center of an axis of propagation, and communicating 2304 auxiliary signals over a low-speed auxiliary channel, the auxiliary signals having a decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of axis of propagation, the high-speed primary channel and low-speed auxiliary channel operating in full duplex. In some embodiments, the primary signals are communicated using a primary antenna including a dish antenna having an axis of symmetry corresponding to the axis of propagation. In such an embodiment, the auxiliary signals may be communicated via an auxiliary antenna having a monopole placed within the dish antenna, the monopole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna. In alternative embodiments, the auxiliary signals may be communicated via an auxiliary antenna having a dipole placed within the dish antenna, the dipole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish antenna, and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna.


In some embodiments, the primary signals are communicated using single polarization, while alternative embodiments may communicate the primary signals using dual polarization. Similarly, some embodiments may communicate the auxiliary signals using single polarization. While alternative embodiments may communicate the auxiliary signals using dual polarization. In some embodiments, the auxiliary signals comprise control signals, such as signals used for training, frequency/clock synchronization and request for retransmission.


In some embodiments, the axis of propagation is misaligned with respect to a remote axis of propagation, as depicted by FIG. 22.


In some embodiments, a method for full-duplex point-to-point wireless communications, between points A and B includes points A and B both having a primary antenna with high directivity, and points A and B both having an auxiliary antenna symmetrically integrated within the primary antenna to have a low coupling to the primary antenna. A primary channel uses the antennas with high directivity to carrying main traffic, while an auxiliary channel uses the auxiliary antennas to carry a lower traffic, primarily for control of the primary channel including pilots for carrier synchronization.


In some embodiments, the primary channel includes a dish antenna and the auxiliary channel uses a monopole placed within the dish with its axis orthogonal to the interior of the dish, and aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish. Alternatively, the auxiliary channel may include a dipole placed within the dish with its axis orthogonal to the interior of the dish, and aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish. In some embodiments, the arms of the auxiliary antenna are symmetrically extended to have a projection parallel to the dish opening.


In some embodiments, the primary channel uses a polarization to support a single spatial data stream, and the auxiliary channel uses a single polarization to support a single spatial data stream. Alternatively, the primary channel supports two spatial data streams using dual polarization, and the auxiliary channel supports a single spatial data stream using single polarization. In a further such embodiment, the auxiliary channel may support two spatial data streams using dual polarization.


In some embodiments, the primary channel to supports two spatial data streams using dual polarization, and the auxiliary channel supports a single spatial stream using dual polarization. In such an embodiment, the signals from the two polarizations of the auxiliary channel may be relatively weighted and combined at the RF (Radio Frequency) in the receiving end of the auxiliary channel to reduce self-interference and improve SNR. Alternatively, the signals feeding the two polarizations of the auxiliary channel may be relatively weighted at the RF (Radio Frequency) in the transmitting end of the auxiliary channel to reduce the self-interference at the receiving end of the auxiliary channel to improve SNR. The two polarizations of the auxiliary channel may further be relatively weighted and combined at the RF (Radio Frequency) in the receiving end of the auxiliary channel to reduce self-interference and thus improve SNR.


In some embodiments, filtered versions of the signals in the primary and auxiliary channels are combined at RF (Radio Frequency) to reduce the coupling. In such embodiments, the filter coefficients may be computed by down-converting the primary and the auxiliary RF signals.


In some embodiments, directions of the primary channel and the auxiliary channels are switched depending on the amount of traffic in each direction, wherein, in one phase, the primary channel is from A-to-B and the auxiliary channel is from B-to-A, and in a complementary phase, the primary channel is from B-to-A and the auxiliary channel is from A-to-B. In some embodiments, an axis of symmetry of the two ends A and B are shifted and/or rotated with respect to each other to maximize signal-to-noise ratios at both ends.


In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the described embodiments as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.


The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The described embodiments are defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.


Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.


It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be composed of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.


Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.


The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a primary antenna for communication via a high-speed primary channel via signals having a beam pattern having a full lobe at a center of an axis of propagation of the signals; andan auxiliary antenna for communication via a low-speed auxiliary channel via signals having a decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of axis of propagation of the signals, the high-speed primary channel and low-speed auxiliary channel operating in full duplex.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the primary antenna comprises a dish antenna having an axis of symmetry corresponding to the axis of propagation.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the auxiliary antenna comprises a monopole placed within the dish antenna, the monopole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the auxiliary antenna comprises a dipole placed within the dish antenna, the dipole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish antenna, and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the auxiliary antenna comprises symmetrically extended arms for propagation of the signals parallel to an opening of the dish antenna.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the high-speed primary channel is single polarized.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the high-speed primary channel is dual polarized.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the low-speed auxiliary channel is single polarized.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the low-speed auxiliary channel is dual polarized.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the axis of propagation is offset with respect to a second axis of propagation of a remote primary antenna.
  • 11. A method comprising: communicating primary signals over a high-speed primary channel, the primary signals having a beam pattern having a full lobe at a center of an axis of propagation; andcommunicating auxiliary signals over a low-speed auxiliary channel, the auxiliary signals having a decoupled beam pattern having a null at the center of axis of propagation, the high-speed primary channel and low-speed auxiliary channel operating in full duplex.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the primary signals are communicated using a primary antenna, the primary antenna comprising a dish antenna having an axis of symmetry corresponding to the axis of propagation.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the auxiliary signals are communicated via an auxiliary antenna comprising a monopole placed within the dish antenna, the monopole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the auxiliary signals are communicated via an auxiliary antenna comprising a dipole placed within the dish antenna, the dipole having an axis (i) orthogonal to an interior of the dish antenna, and (ii) aligned with the axis of symmetry of the dish antenna.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the primary signals are communicated using single polarization.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the primary signals are communicated using dual polarization.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the auxiliary signals are communicated using single polarization.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein the auxiliary signals are communicated using dual polarization.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the auxiliary signals comprise control signals.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, wherein the axis of propagation is misaligned with respect to a remote axis of propagation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a non-provisional filing of, and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/330,687, entitled “Antenna/Dish Design for Full-duplex Line of Sight Transmission,” filed May 2, 2016, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (200)
Number Name Date Kind
2995752 Shyhalla Aug 1961 A
3082421 Nicholas Mar 1963 A
3184747 Kach May 1965 A
3725920 Kupfer Apr 1973 A
3965475 Deerkoski Jun 1976 A
4268727 Agrawal May 1981 A
4343005 Han Aug 1982 A
4750165 Champagne Jun 1988 A
5383224 Mizoguchi Jan 1995 A
5388124 Laroia Feb 1995 A
5691978 Kenworthy Nov 1997 A
5805116 Morley Sep 1998 A
6255997 Ratkorn Jul 2001 B1
6317092 De Schweinitz Nov 2001 B1
6608864 Strait Aug 2003 B1
6621876 Camp, Jr. Sep 2003 B2
6731908 Berliner May 2004 B2
6745009 Raghothaman Jun 2004 B2
6864852 Chiang et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870515 Kitchener Mar 2005 B2
6917597 Schmidl Jul 2005 B1
7002518 Lin Feb 2006 B2
7065036 Ryan Jun 2006 B1
7091894 Fudge Aug 2006 B2
7096042 Marinier Aug 2006 B2
7184466 Seemann Feb 2007 B1
7187907 Widrow Mar 2007 B2
7221688 Vanness May 2007 B2
7263143 Rothaar Aug 2007 B1
7272366 Haapoja Sep 2007 B2
7286096 Jaffer Oct 2007 B2
7321611 Fullerton Jan 2008 B2
7346100 Kumar Mar 2008 B2
7471204 Safarian Dec 2008 B2
7482058 Ahmed Jan 2009 B2
7522115 Waltman Apr 2009 B2
7627325 McCoy Dec 2009 B2
7693174 Ishibashi Apr 2010 B2
7706744 Rodgers Apr 2010 B2
7817641 Khandani Oct 2010 B1
7920539 Stanford Apr 2011 B2
7944871 Imamura May 2011 B2
7991160 Guccione Aug 2011 B2
8023438 Kangasmaa Sep 2011 B2
8031744 Radunovic Oct 2011 B2
8064502 Sawai Nov 2011 B2
8107906 Lum Jan 2012 B2
8175535 Mu May 2012 B2
8184061 Sanford May 2012 B2
8208628 Yener Jun 2012 B2
8238551 Reznik Aug 2012 B2
8280046 Rudolf Oct 2012 B2
8306480 Muhammad Nov 2012 B2
8351874 Dent Jan 2013 B2
8373582 Hoffberg Feb 2013 B2
8385235 Chiu Feb 2013 B2
8401196 Goldberg Mar 2013 B2
8405543 Kluge Mar 2013 B2
8498585 Vandenameele Jul 2013 B2
8587492 Runyon Nov 2013 B2
8628650 Ah Jan 2014 B2
8629650 Mohammadian Jan 2014 B2
8644768 Kluge Feb 2014 B2
8744377 Rimini Jun 2014 B2
8767869 Rimini Jul 2014 B2
8823577 Smid Sep 2014 B2
8836581 Nysen Sep 2014 B2
8836601 Sanford Sep 2014 B2
8836606 Kish Sep 2014 B2
8837615 Baldemair Sep 2014 B2
8842044 Nysen Sep 2014 B2
8860629 Shtrom Oct 2014 B2
8897269 Ji Nov 2014 B2
8918692 Braithwaite Dec 2014 B2
8976641 Choi Mar 2015 B2
9019165 Shtrom Apr 2015 B2
9036749 Choi May 2015 B2
9054795 Choi Jun 2015 B2
9059879 Jaeger Jun 2015 B2
9071313 Monsen Jun 2015 B2
9077071 Shtrom Jul 2015 B2
9077407 Koren Jul 2015 B2
9077421 Mehlman Jul 2015 B1
9093758 Kish Jul 2015 B2
9130693 Reznik Sep 2015 B2
9246234 Rao Jan 2016 B2
9276682 Bharadia Mar 2016 B2
9277591 Amini Mar 2016 B2
9281979 Maltsev Mar 2016 B2
9337885 Mehlman May 2016 B2
9571205 Suarez Feb 2017 B1
9608705 Maru Mar 2017 B2
9622098 Emmanuel Apr 2017 B2
9713010 Khandani Jul 2017 B2
20010010495 Helms Aug 2001 A1
20020032004 Widrow Mar 2002 A1
20020097810 Seki Jul 2002 A1
20030114128 Haapoja Jun 2003 A1
20030189974 Ferry Oct 2003 A1
20030189975 Fullerton Oct 2003 A1
20040022229 Vanness Feb 2004 A1
20040132414 Sendyk Jul 2004 A1
20050020771 Ahmed Jan 2005 A1
20050052330 Mehltretter Mar 2005 A1
20050057420 Lin Mar 2005 A1
20050083863 Umei Apr 2005 A1
20050275576 Fudge Dec 2005 A1
20060045063 Stanford Mar 2006 A1
20060109067 Shtrom May 2006 A1
20060192720 Shtrom Aug 2006 A1
20070026804 Ishibashi Feb 2007 A1
20070026807 Kish Feb 2007 A1
20070036353 Reznik Feb 2007 A1
20070057860 Jaffer Mar 2007 A1
20070063875 Hoffberg Mar 2007 A1
20070080891 De Lustrac Apr 2007 A1
20070082617 McCallister Apr 2007 A1
20070132651 Nilsson Jun 2007 A1
20070254692 McCoy Nov 2007 A1
20080009257 Safarian Jan 2008 A1
20080063113 Gao Mar 2008 A1
20080107046 Kangasmaa May 2008 A1
20080123851 Guccione May 2008 A1
20080129640 Shtrom Jun 2008 A1
20080233966 Scheim Sep 2008 A1
20090092072 Imamura Apr 2009 A1
20090141900 Ye Jun 2009 A1
20090186582 Muhammad Jul 2009 A1
20090213770 Mu Aug 2009 A1
20090253385 Dent Oct 2009 A1
20090284218 Mohammadian Nov 2009 A1
20100003931 Krishnan Jan 2010 A1
20100008406 Sawai Jan 2010 A1
20100020771 Ji Jan 2010 A1
20100022201 Vandenameele Jan 2010 A1
20100086012 Rofougaran Apr 2010 A1
20100165866 Sachse Jul 2010 A1
20100165895 Elahi Jul 2010 A1
20100167662 Kluge Jul 2010 A1
20100232324 Radunovic Sep 2010 A1
20100248714 Kang Sep 2010 A1
20100271987 Chiu Oct 2010 A1
20100321245 Aoki Dec 2010 A1
20110110451 Tsai May 2011 A1
20110143655 Ahn Jun 2011 A1
20110149714 Rimini Jun 2011 A1
20110268100 Gorokhov Nov 2011 A1
20120027113 Gaal Feb 2012 A1
20120068904 Shtrom Mar 2012 A1
20120087424 Brown Apr 2012 A1
20120159279 Braithwaite Jun 2012 A1
20120200158 Takei Aug 2012 A1
20120201153 Bharadia Aug 2012 A1
20120201173 Jain Aug 2012 A1
20120220246 Kushnir Aug 2012 A1
20120281834 Reznik Nov 2012 A1
20120300680 Pietsch Nov 2012 A1
20130010851 Jaeger Jan 2013 A1
20130044791 Rimini Feb 2013 A1
20130089009 Li Apr 2013 A1
20130099974 Wang Apr 2013 A1
20130102254 Cyzs Apr 2013 A1
20130114468 Hui May 2013 A1
20130286903 Khojastepour Oct 2013 A1
20130301487 Khandani Nov 2013 A1
20140126675 Monsen May 2014 A1
20140135056 Wang May 2014 A1
20140169236 Choi Jun 2014 A1
20140204808 Choi Jul 2014 A1
20140210681 Shtrom Jul 2014 A1
20140218248 Schulz Aug 2014 A1
20140219139 Choi Aug 2014 A1
20140225788 Schulz Aug 2014 A1
20140334322 Shtrom Nov 2014 A1
20140348032 Hua Nov 2014 A1
20150029906 Jana Jan 2015 A1
20150043323 Choi Feb 2015 A1
20150043685 Choi Feb 2015 A1
20150049834 Choi Feb 2015 A1
20150063176 Hong Mar 2015 A1
20150070243 Kish Mar 2015 A1
20150078217 Choi Mar 2015 A1
20150139284 Choi May 2015 A1
20150171903 Mehlman Jun 2015 A1
20150188646 Bharadia Jul 2015 A1
20150223173 Khojastepour Aug 2015 A1
20150236750 Choi Aug 2015 A1
20150249997 Clegg Sep 2015 A1
20150263780 Mehlman Sep 2015 A1
20150280893 Choi Oct 2015 A1
20150311599 Shtrom Oct 2015 A1
20150318976 Eltawil Nov 2015 A1
20150333847 Bharadia Nov 2015 A1
20150334745 Zhao Nov 2015 A1
20150341125 Bharadia Nov 2015 A1
20150341879 Shtrom Nov 2015 A1
20160127876 Kish May 2016 A1
20160226653 Bharadia Aug 2016 A1
20160248160 Shtrom Aug 2016 A1
20160249376 Kish Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2180623 Apr 2010 EP
1091437 Nov 1967 GB
10502220 Feb 1998 JP
1020040096404 Nov 2004 KR
1020070072629 Jul 2007 KR
1020120080231 Jul 2012 KR
1994028585 Dec 1994 WO
1996022643 Jul 1996 WO
2011065020 Jun 2002 WO
2003098823 Nov 2003 WO
2004007497 Jan 2004 WO
WO2009156510 Dec 2009 WO
2010005951 Jan 2010 WO
2010051232 May 2010 WO
2011148341 Dec 2011 WO
2012042256 Apr 2012 WO
2016014016 Jan 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
Chen, B., et al., “Quantization Index Modulation: A Class of Provably Good Methods for Digital Watermarking and Information Embedding”, IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 47, No. 4, May 2001, pp. 1423-1443.
EP Extended European Search Report for EP App. No. 13790076.7, dated Mar. 2, 2016, 8 pages.
EP Extended Search Report for EP App. No. 13790160.9-1874, dated Jan. 16, 2016, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for EP App. 13790948.7, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 9 pages.
Gharavol, E., et al., “Robust Joint Optimization of MIMO Two-Way Relay Channels With Imperfect CSI”, Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on, IEEE, Sep. 28, 2011, pp. 1657-1664, XP032085749, DOI: 10.1109/ALLERTON.2011.6120368, ISBN: 978-1-4577-1817-5.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/040822 dated Jul. 18, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/042136 dated Dec. 9, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/051137 dated Nov. 24, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2014/050968 dated Nov. 19, 2014.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/040818 dated Jul. 24, 2013.
Jain, M., “Practical, Real-Time, Full Duplex Wireless”, MobiCom '11, Sep. 19-23, 2011, Las Vegans, NC, USA, 2011, 12 pages.
Jung II, ., “Achieving single channel, full duplex wireless communication”, Proceedings from the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM—MOBICOM' 10 and MOBIHOC' 10—Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking and 11th ACM International Symposi, Sep. 20, 2010, pp. 1-12, XP002696691.
McMichael, J. G., et al., “Optimal tuning of analog self-interference cancellers for full-duplex wireless communication”. IEEE, Fiftieth Annual Allerton Conference, Oct. 1-5, 2012, p. 246-251.
Persson, D., et al., “Joint Source-Channel Coding for the MIMO Broadcast Channel”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 2085-2090.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Adaptive Non-Linear Digital Cancellation for Full-Duplex Radios”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/864,453, filed Aug. 9, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Cancellation Circuit With Variable Delay and Amplifier”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/876,663, filed Sep. 11, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Feed Foward Signal Cancellation”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/736,726, filed Dec. 13, 2012.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Frequency Independent Analog Cancellation Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/864,459, filed Aug. 9, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Hybrid IF/RF Digital Cancellation Architectures for Full-Duplex Radios”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/915,431, filed Dec. 12, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Interference Cancellation Architectures With Frequency Isolation”, U.S. Appl. No. 62/030,240, filed Jul. 29, 2014.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Method and Apparatus for Mitigating Phase Noise to Improve Self-Interference Cancellation”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/865,943, filed Aug. 14, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Near Band Cancellation”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/970,852, filed Mar. 26, 2014.
Vaze, R., et al., “To Code or Not to Code in Multi-Hop Relay Channels”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, May 20, 2008, XP080418936, 30 pages.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Signal Cancellation Using Feedforward and Feedback”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/760,518, filed Feb. 4, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Self Interference Cancellation Architecture for In-Band Full Duplex Relay Node”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/871,519, filed Aug. 29, 2013.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Techniques for Digital Interference Cancellation”, U.S. Appl. No. 62/002,578, filed May 23, 2014.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Tunable Self Interference Cancellation”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/950,742, filed Mar. 10, 2014.
Provisional Application, entitled: “Tuning Algorithm for Multi-Tap Signal Cancellation Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/754,447, filed Jan. 18, 2013.
Korean Patent Abstract of 1020070072629, dated Jul. 4, 2007, 1 page.
Extended European Search Report for EP App. 14865287.8, dated Jul. 4, 2017. 7 Pages.
Aono T et al: “Wireless secret key generation exploiting reactance-domain scalar response of multipath fading channels”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 53, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2005 (Nov. 1, 2005), pp. 3776-3784, XP001512766, ISSN: 0018-926X, DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2005.858853.
Khandani Amir K: “Two-way (true full-duplex) wireless”, 2013 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, IEEE, Jun. 18, 2013 (Jun. 18, 2013), pp. 33-38, XP032495648, DOI: 10.1109/CWIT.2013.6621588 , [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2013].
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170317809 A1 Nov 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62330687 May 2016 US