Patent Grant
7588550
Generally speaking, the present invention relates to the purification of a sample fluid. More particularly, the present invention relates to the purification of a sample fluid, blood fluid) by selectively removing components using a microfluidic membraneless exchange device.
Extracorporeal processing of blood is known to have many uses. Such processing may be used, for example, to provide treatment of a disease. Hemodialysis is the most commonly employed form of extacorporeal processing for this purpose. Additional uses for extracorporeal processing include extracting blood components useful in either treating others or in research. Apheresis of plasma (i.e., plasmaphesis) and thrombocytes, or platelets, are the procedures most commonly employed for this purpose.
Many different extracorporeal blood processing processes have been developed, each of which seeks to remove certain components from the blood, depending on the reason for processing the blood. (It will be understood that as used herein, blood, or blood fluid, refers to any fluid having blood components from which extraction of certain components, such as toxins or albumin, is desired.) The most common process utilizes an artificial membrane of substantial area, across which selected blood components are induced to flow. This flow is generally induced by a transmembrane difference in either concentration or pressure, or a combination of the two. Another form of blood processing calls for the separation of certain components from blood by passing the blood over sorbent particles. In yet other forms of blood processing, not practiced as commonly, blood is directly contacted with an immiscible liquid (e.g., a fluorocarbon liquid), with the desired result being the removal of dissolved carbon dioxide and the provision of oxygen. The usefulness of blood processing techniques employing immiscible liquids is limited, however, because these immiscible liquids generally have very limited capacity to accept the blood components that it is desirable to extract.
One common example of a therapeutic use for blood processing is the mitigation of the species and volume imbalances accompanying end-stage renal disease. The population of patients treated in this manner (i.e., through hemodialysis) exceeds 260,000 and continues to grow, with the cost of basic therapy exceeding $5 billion per year excluding complications. The overwhelming majority of these patients (about 90%), moreover, are treated in dialysis centers, generally in thrice-weekly sessions. While procedures have been—and continue to be—refined, the components and the geometry of hemodialysis were largely fixed in the 1970's: a bundle of several thousand, permeable hollow fibers, each about 25 cm long and about 200 μm internal diameter, perfused externally by dialyzing solution, with the device operated principally in a diffusive mode but with a transmembrane pressure applied to induce a convective outflow of water. Upward of 120 liters per week of patient blood are dialyzed against upwards of 200 liters per week of dialyzing solution, often in three weekly treatments that total as little as seven to nine hours per week. These numbers vary somewhat, and competing technologies exist, but the basic approach just described predominates.
Despite the benefits of therapies (e.g., hemodialysis) using the various forms of blood processing described above, the prolongation of life achieved is complicated by the progression and complexity of the disease the therapies are used to treat (few patients on dialysis are ever completely rehabilitated), and by several problems that are innate to the therapies themselves. For example, problems arise with blood processing as a result of the contact of blood with extensive areas of artificial membrane (as in the case of hemodialysis), and well as the contact of blood with sorbents or immiscible fluids as described above. In particular, this contact often induces biochemical reactions in the blood being processed, including the reactions that are responsible for clotting, activation of the complement systems, and irreversible aggregation of blood proteins and cells.
Another problem associated with known blood processing techniques is that the contact of blood with an artificial membrane (or another medium, such as a sorbent or immiscible fluid) is likely to cause the blood-medium interface to become fouled. It is generally known that therapeutic interventions (e.g., those related to end-stage renal disease) are optimally conducted with slow delivery and in as nearly a continuous fashion as possible, in emulation of the continuous action of a natural kidney. However, fouling caused by the contact of blood with the medium limits the time that a device which contains these interfaces can be usefully employed. As a result, portable blood processing devices become impractical, and patients are generally forced to undergo the type of episodic dialysis schedule described above, which creates many negative side effects such as physical exhaustion and excessive thirst. Moreover, even while daily dialysis (e.g., 1.5-2.0 hours, six days per week) or nocturnal dialysis (e.g., 8-10 hours, 6-7 nights per week) improves this situation by extending treatment times, a patient using one of these forms of treatment is still required to remain near a hospital or clinical facility that can administer the dialysis procedure.
In light of the above, it would be desirable to provide techniques for processing blood in which treatment times are extended (with consequently lower rates of flow) and that do not require a patient to remain near a hospital or clinic. Moreover, it would also be desirable to provide techniques for processing blood that eliminate (or at least reduce) the inducement of undesirable biochemical reactions, and where the blood-medium interfaces do not become fouled.
The above and other deficiencies associated with existing blood processing processes are overcome in accordance with the principles of the present invention which are described below. According to one aspect of the invention, a membraneless exchange device for extracting components from a sample fluid is described which includes first, second and third inlet channels, first, second and third exit channels and a microfluidic extraction channel connected to the first, second and third inlet channels and the first, second and third exit channels. Moreover, laminar flows of a first extractor fluid, the sample fluid, and a second extractor fluid are established inside the extraction channel, and sheathing of the sample fluid by the first and second extractor fluids substantially limits contact between the sample fluid and the surfaces of the extraction channel.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a system for performing hemodialysis is provided which includes a membraneless exchange device including first and second dialysate inlet channels, blood inlet and exit channels, first and second dialysate exit channels and a microfluidic dialysis channel connected to the first and second dialysate inlet and outlet channels and the blood inlet and exit channels. Moreover, laminar flows of a first dialysate fluid, blood fluid, and a second dialysate fluid are established in order inside the dialysis channel, and at least some of the components of the blood fluid exits the device through the first and second dialysate exit channels. Additionally, according to the invention, a secondary processor receives the dialysate fluid and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid exiting the device through the first and second dialysate exit channels.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a method for extracting components from a sample fluid is provides which includes establishing laminar flows of a first extractor fluid, the sample fluid and a second extractor fluid inside a microfluidic extraction channel. Sheathing of the sample fluid by the first and second extractor fluids, moreover, substantially limits contact between the sample fluid and the surfaces of the extraction channel. The method further includes withdrawing the first extractor fluid, the sample fluid and the second extractor fluid from the extraction channel such that at least a portion of the sample fluid is removed together with the first extractor fluid and the second extractor fluid and apart from the remainder of the sample fluid.
A method for performing hemodialysis is also provided which includes establishing laminar flows of a first dialysate fluid, blood fluid and a second dialysate fluid inside a microfluidic extraction channel, withdrawing the first dialysate fluid, the blood fluid and the second dialysate fluid from the extraction channel such that at least some of the components of the blood fluid are removed together with the first dialysate fluid and the second dialysate fluid and apart from the remainder of the blood fluid, and providing the first and second dialysate fluids and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid to a secondary processor.
In general, however, the present invention is directed toward microfluidic membraneless exchange devices and systems, and methods of making the same, for selectively removing undesirable materials from a sample fluid (e.g., blood fluid) by contact with a miscible fluid (extractor fluid or secondary fluid, e.g., dialysate). A microfluidic device, as considered in this application, has channels whose height is less than about 0.6 mm, where “height” is the dimension perpendicular to the direction of flow and also perpendicular to the interfacial area across which transport occurs. For example, flow patterns and species exchanges occur when blood is flowed as a thin layer adjacent to, or between, concurrently flowing layers of a secondary fluid, without an intervening membrane. The secondary fluid, moreover, is generally miscible with blood and diffusive and convective transport of all components is expected. The following reference which refers to membraneless devices described below is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: Leonard et al., Dialysis without Membranes: How and Why?, Blood Purification 22 (1) 2004 92-100.
Sheathing a core of blood with the miscible fluid, or assuring that the miscible fluid lies between at least a substantial portion of the blood and the enclosing boundaries of the flow path, prevents or at least limits contact of the blood with these boundaries. In turn, this configuration of the two fluids prevents or at least reduces the undesirable activation of factors in the blood, thereby minimizing bioincompatibilities that have been problematic in prior techniques of blood processing.
The invention also eliminates or at least substantially reduces the fouling reactions that have been known to be a major deterrent to the continuous use of an extracorporeal extraction device. In particular, as the primary transport surface in the membraneless exchange device (also referred to herein as a membraneless separator) of the invention is intrinsically non-fouling, a major deterrent to long-term or continuous operation is removed, opening the possibility to the design and construction of small, wearable devices or systems with the recognized benefits of nearly continuous blood treatment. Such a device or system could be very small and worn or carried by the patient (e.g., outside of a hospital or clinic setting), and could be supplied with external buffer reservoirs (in a back-pack, briefcase, or from a reservoir located in the home, located at the place of work, etc.). Further, because fouling would be reduced, and sustained operation at low blood flows over long times would be allowed, such anticoagulation as might be required is likely to have an effect confined to the extracorporeal circuit. As understood by those skilled in the art, avoiding systemic anticoagulation outside of the clinic is highly desirable.
The devices, systems and methods of the invention described herein also have the benefit of being capable of diffusing various blood components having different sizes. In particular, the flow of blood and a miscible fluid with which it is in contact can be controlled for the purpose of achieving the desired separation of components (e.g., separating molecules of low molecular weight only). For example, as explained below, various flow conditions may be used that cause blood cells to move away from the blood-liquid interface, thereby making it is possible to “skim” blood in order to remove substantial amounts of plasma, without cells.
As also discussed below, membraneless contact of a thin layer of blood with a sheathing fluid according to the present invention may be used to cause high rates of exchange per unit area of blood-sheathing fluid contact for all solutes, but with a discrimination among free (unbound) solutes that is less than the square-root of the ratio of their diffusion coefficients. Moreover, while high exchange rates (e.g., of toxic substances) are often desirable, indiscriminate transport is not. Therefore, according to the principles of the present invention, a membraneless exchange device as described herein is used in conjunction with at least one secondary processor (e.g., a membrane device or other type of separator) in order to restrict the removal of desirable substances and effect the removal of undesirable substances from blood. The efficiency of such a secondary separator is greatly increased by the use of the primary separator that is capable of delivering cell-depleted (or cell-free) fractions of blood to it. Therefore, according to another aspect of this invention, transport of molecular components of blood to the sheathing fluid may be indiscriminate. The sheathing fluid, carrying both those molecular components which it is, and is not, desirable to remove from blood, is provided to the secondary separator, such that the fluid entering the secondary separator is substantially cell-free. The secondary separator, meanwhile, regulates the operation of the membraneless separator through the composition of the recycle stream that it returns (directly or indirectly) to the sheath fluid inlets of the membraneless separator. According to the principles of the present invention, moreover, a membrane-based secondary separator used in this manner is able to achieve much higher separation velocities because concentration polarization (i.e., the accumulation of material rejected by the secondary separator on the upstream side of the separator) is limited to proteins and does not involve cells. Moreover, because cells would be retained in the primary separator (i.e., the membraneless exchange device), they would see artificial material only on its conduit surfaces, not on its liquid-liquid contact area, whence bioincompatibilities should be much reduced. As such, it should be understood that the need for anticoagulation may be greatly reduced or eliminated.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages, will be more apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout.
According to one aspect of the invention, a membraneless exchange device for extracting components from a sample fluid is described which includes first, second and third inlet channels, first, second and third exit channels and a microfluidic extraction channel connected to the first, second and third inlet channels and the first, second and third exit channels. Moreover, laminar flows of a first extractor fluid, the sample fluid, and a second extractor fluid are established inside the extraction channel, and sheathing of the sample fluid by the first and second extractor fluids substantially limits contact between the sample fluid and the surfaces of the extraction channel. In one embodiment of the device, at least 90% of the sample fluid is sheathed by the first and second extractor fluids. In other embodiments, 95% of the sample fluid is sheathed. In yet other embodiments, at least a portion of the sample fluid exits the device with the first extractor fluid through the first exit channel, and advective transport of molecules within said extraction channel is substantially nonexistent. The composition of the first extractor fluid, moreover, is substantially the same as the composition of the second extractor fluid is various embodiments. In other preferred embodiments, the sample fluid flow is between the first and second extractor fluid flows. Moreover, a first diverter is formed from a portion of the first exit channel and a portion of the second exit channel, while a second diverter is formed from a portion of the second exit channel and a portion of the third exit channel. It should also be understood that the device may include a first interface formed between the first extractor fluid flow and the sample fluid flow that is aligned with at least a portion of the first diverter, and may also include a second interface formed between the second extractor fluid flow and the sample fluid flow that is aligned with at least a portion of the second diverter. In various embodiments of the invention, moreover, the sample fluid is blood fluid, in which case it is contemplated that the components extracted from the sample fluid are non-cellular components of the blood fluid. Additionally, the device may use a first pump for controlling the flow of extractor fluid in the extraction channel, and may use a second pump for controlling the flow of sample fluid in the extraction channel. When a first pump is used, it may be an injection pump that controls the flow of extractor fluid into the extraction channel, and a withdrawal pump may be used that controls the flow of extractor fluid out of the extraction channel. In various embodiments, additionally, a source of extractor fluid is connected to said first inlet channel and a source of sample fluid connected to said second inlet channel. It will be understood that the source of sample fluid can be, for example, a human being. In preferred embodiments, moreover, the extraction channel of the device according to the invention has a height of less than 600 μm, and has a width-to-height ratio of at least ten. The device may also be used in a system for extracting components from a sample fluid, where the system also includes a secondary processor that receives the first extractor fluid, the second extractor fluid and at least some of the components of the sample fluid upon exiting the extraction channel. It will be understood that the secondary processor may be, for example, a membrane device or a sorption device.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a system for performing hemodialysis is provided which includes a membraneless exchange device including first and second dialysate inlet channels, blood inlet and exit channels, first and second dialysate exit channels and a microfluidic dialysis channel connected to the first and second dialysate inlet and outlet channels and the blood inlet and exit channels. Moreover, laminar flows of a first dialysate fluid, blood fluid, and a second dialysate fluid are established in order inside the dialysis channel, and at least some of the components of the blood fluid exits the device through the first and second dialysate exit channels. Additionally, according to the invention, a secondary processor receives the dialysate fluid and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid exiting the device through the first and second dialysate exit channels. In various embodiments, the secondary processor filters the dialysate fluid and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid exiting the device through the first and second dialysate exit channels, and returns the filtered fluid to the first and second dialysate inlet channels. In certain preferred embodiments, these components of the blood fluid are substantially non-cellular components of the blood fluid. In other embodiments, sheathing of the blood fluid by the first and second dialysate fluids substantially limits contact between the blood fluid and the surfaces of the dialysis channel. Moreover, the secondary processor may be a membrane device, or may be a sorption device, for example. It will also be understood that the composition of the first dialysis fluid may be substantially the same as the composition of the second dialysis fluid. According to other aspects of the invention, meanwhile, a first diverter is formed from a portion of the first dialysate exit channel and a portion of the blood exit channel, and a second diverter is formed from a portion of the blood exit channel and a portion of the second dialysate exit channel. A first pump for controlling the flow of dialysate fluid in the dialysis channel and a second pump for controlling the flow of blood fluid in the dialysis channel may also be used in accordance with the principles of the present invention. According to several embodiments, the interface between the first dialysate fluid and the blood fluid is varied by adjusting the velocities of the laminar flows of the first dialysate fluid and the blood fluid. In other embodiments, the interface between the blood fluid and the second dialysate fluid is varied by adjusting the velocities of the laminar flows of the blood fluid and the second dialysate fluid. A reservoir for storing a viscosity agent may also be used in the system, where the viscosity agent is mixed with the first and second dialysate fluid to alter the viscosity of the first and second dialysate fluid. Additionally, a detector for detecting a presence of an undesired blood component within the dialysate fluid upon exiting the dialysis chamber may be used. In this case, for example, the detector is a photo detector. According to another aspect of the invention, a first pump for controlling the flow of dialysate fluid in the dialysis channel is adjusted based on said detected presence of an undesired blood component within said dialysate fluid. Moreover, for example, the velocities of the laminar flows of the first dialysate fluid, the blood fluid and the second dialysate fluid are adjusted based on the detected presence of an undesired blood component within the first and second dialysate fluids according to the invention. Additionally, according to the invention, the first and second dialysate fluids may include at least one of the following: a hyper osmolar solution, a solution high in glucose content, or a polyelectrolye osmotic agent.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a method for extracting components from a sample fluid is provides which includes establishing laminar flows of a first extractor fluid, the sample fluid and a second extractor fluid inside a microfluidic extraction channel. Sheathing of the sample fluid by the first and second extractor fluids, moreover, substantially limits contact between the sample fluid and the surfaces of the extraction channel. The method further includes withdrawing the first extractor fluid, the sample fluid and the second extractor fluid from the extraction channel such that at least a portion of the sample fluid is removed together with the first extractor fluid and the second extractor fluid and apart from the remainder of the sample fluid. According to the invention, moreover, establishing laminar flows includes providing first, second and third inlet channels and providing first, second and third exit channels. Additionally, for example, the method includes providing the first and second extractor fluids and the at least a portion of the sample fluid to a secondary processor.
A method for performing hemodialysis is also provided which includes establishing laminar flows of a first dialysate fluid, blood fluid and a second dialysate fluid inside a microfluidic extraction channel, withdrawing the first dialysate fluid, the blood fluid and the second dialysate fluid from the extraction channel such that at least some of the components of the blood fluid are removed together with the first dialysate fluid and the second dialysate fluid and apart from the remainder of the blood fluid, and providing the first and second dialysate fluids and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid to a secondary processor. In various embodiments, the method also includes using the secondary processor to filter the first and second dialysate fluids and the at least some of the components of the blood fluid, as well as returning the filtered fluid from the secondary processor to the extraction channel. In yet other embodiments, the method includes sheathing the blood fluid by the first and second dialysate fluids to substantially limit the contact between the blood fluid and the surfaces of the dialysis channel.
Referring to
for which the zeroth order term,
suffices when
This formula greatly simplifies the estimation of how much mass can be transferred between fluids in a membraneless system. In particular, this formula provides an approximation of the extraction E of a component with a diffusion coefficient D when two liquids flow side-by-side and remain in contact for an interval of time, t.
For example, if one prescribes 90% of maximum extraction (E=0.45), the ratio Dt/B2 must be approximately 0.86. Any combination of diffusivity, layer thickness, and exposure time that produces this value will produce the same extraction. Moreover, it can be shown that the necessary area (2LW) to achieve this extraction equals 0.86 BQ/D, where Q is the blood (and sheath fluid) flow rate. Thus, for urea (D=10−5 cm2/sec) at a blood flow rate of 0.3 cm3/sec, the required area is 2.57 B 104 cm2. If B is taken to be 100 μm, the required area is 257 cm2. This flow corresponds to what might be needed in a wearable artificial kidney. If, instead, a conventional flow of 5 cm3/sec were used, the required area would be 4300 cm2. Thinner films, moreover, would require less area but would result in higher shear rates and pressure gradients. In terms of extraction, any combination of length L and width W that produces the requisite area is equivalent. (If one assumes D for albumin to be 5 10−7 cm2/sec, its extraction would be 0.116, 26% of that for urea, unchangeable at this extraction level for urea).
It should be noted that use of the Loschmidt formula with flowing systems introduces an incongruity that prevents precise estimation of mass transfer rates and clearances, given that it presumes that both fluids are moving at uniform velocity. In particular, it provides an excellent approximation for the sheathed fluid (blood), but ignores the nearly linear decay in velocity with distance from the interface in the sheathing fluid. Nevertheless, the Loschmidt formula is adequate for design purposes when the sheathing layer has a total thickness (2B) that is twice that of its half of the blood layer (as shown in
The shear-induced self-diffusion coefficient of cells, meanwhile, can be estimated by using the expression of Leighton and Acrivos (1987) for concentrated suspensions: Dparticle∝φ2α2{dot over (γ)}2, where φ is the particle volume fraction, α is the particle radius, and {dot over (γ)} is the shear rate. Then, the characteristic displacement of a cell can be expressed as Δy∝√{square root over (Dparticlet)}. Choosing representative values for the layered flow system such that the cell volume fraction φ≅0.45/2=0.225, the average radius a of the red blood cell ≅2.5 μm, and the average shear rate {dot over (γ)} over the blood layer≅3 to 28 s−1 (based on an average velocity range of 0.5 to 5 cm/s), we calculate that Dparticle˜10−8 cm2/s, which is approximately three orders of magnitude smaller than the typical diffusion coefficient of small solutes. Based on this value of the shear-induced diffusion coefficient (and assuming 10 sec of contact between layers), it is estimated that blood cells are displaced by a characteristic distance Δy≅3 τo 9 μm from the central layer, depending on the choice of blood velocity and the concomitant shear rate. As explained in greater detail below, this low distance of cell migration away from the central layer facilitates the removal of cell-free portions of blood by the membraneless separators described herein.
It should be noted that, according to one aspect of the present invention, the removing of undesirable materials from a sample fluid occurs under conditions that prevent advective mixing of blood and the secondary fluid. In its general usage herein, advection is used to describe the transport of fluid elements from one region to another, and is used to distinguish disordered convection from diffusion unaided by convection or diffusion in the presence of only ordered and unidirectional convection. The term advection is therefore used to mean a form of transport within a fluid or between two contacting miscible fluid in which clumps of fluid from two different positions are effectively interchanged. Advection, so defined, can occur in turbulent flows or in unstable laminar flows. Advective mixing, moreover, is often purposefully induced by the application of a moving agitator blade to a fluid. The prevention of advective mixing and the short contact times that lead to small areas of contact (and, in turn, to a small device that has a small size and a limited extracorporeal blood volume) is greatly facilitated by the use of a microfluidic geometry. An increase in channel height raises requisite contact time and tends to reduce the stability of the sheathed flow. When total blood layer thickness is 25, 50, or 100 μm, and the blood flow is 20 ml/min (as it might be with a wearable artificial kidney), the interfacial area needed to cause a substance such as urea (D=10−5 cm2/sec) to reach 90% of equilibrium is, respectively, 18, 36, and 71 cm2.
As mentioned above, the devices, systems and methods of the present invention allow the purification of blood without the use of a membrane by contact of the blood with a miscible fluid under conditions that prevent advective mixing. It will be clear from the detailed description of various embodiments of the invention provided below that the invention is useful in hemodialysis, for example. However, it should also be noted, and understood by those skilled in the art, that the present invention is also useful in other situations where a sample fluid is to be purified via a diffusion mechanism against another fluid (e.g., an extractor fluid).
According to the principles of the present invention, the purification techniques described herein enable the flow of blood, completely or partially surrounded by another liquid (e.g., extractor fluid) such that the streams are contacted in a small channel and are subsequently separated at the end of the channel. The middle stream is, thus, the blood to be purified, while the surrounding stream (or streams) is the extractor fluid. This membraneless contact, or sheathing of blood with layers of a miscible fluid, according to principles of the present invention, may occur along a flow path whose cross-section is either rectangular, preferably of great breadth and limited thickness, or circular. The invention is not limited in this manner.
Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the requisite transport areas, moreover, can be achieved by combinations of channel length, width, and number according to the principles of the present invention. In particular, Area=2 (top and bottom)×width×length×number of channels stacked or otherwise arrayed in parallel. (As used herein, the term “width” refers to a dimension perpendicular to the direction of flow and parallel to the interface between the two liquids, while, as explained above, the term “height” refers to a dimension perpendicular to the direction of flow and also perpendicular to the interface between the two fluids). It is shown herein that the competing requirements of small height (to avoid excessive diffusion times and in-process volumes), short length (to avoid excessive pressure drop) and practical limitations on width of a single device, which suggests the need to array them in parallel, side-by-side or in a stack can be satisfied in practical microfluidic devices.
It will be understood that the particular fabrication process described above is for purposes of illustration only. For example, the dimensions of membraneless separator 300 may be altered without departing from the scope of the present invention. Additionally, for example, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the use of copper foil, and that other fabrication processes not described may also be employed.
As illustrated in
It will be understood by persons skilled in the art that a membraneless separator as described herein is not intended to, nor could it, offer sufficient discrimination between the substances it is intended to remove and those it is intended to leave behind. Accordingly, for example, membraneless separators as described above will only function by themselves in the exceptional circumstance that all the components of plasma are to be removed. For example, a membraneless separator may be used alone when the removal of plasma, usually not in its entirety but without discrimination among its components, is to be removed, and the cellular components of blood are to be left behind.
In all other circumstances, according to the principles of the present invention, a membraneless separator will operate in conjunction with a secondary separator that receives the sheath fluid and, optionally, a cell-depleted (or cell-free) part of the bloodstream. For example, to prevent the removal of macromolecules, the secondary separator can be used to generate a stream rich in macromolecules and free of small metabolite molecules and middle molecules that is recycled in sheath fluid to the membraneless separator. Thus, according to the invention, the secondary separator regulates the operation of the membraneless separator through the composition of the recycle stream that it returns to the inlets for sheath fluid of the membraneless separator (as shown in
One substance whose transport (i.e., removal from blood being processed) is typically undesirable is albumin. In each pass through an exchange device according to the invention, for example, albumin would be removed at more than ¼th the rate of small solutes, and albumin (which is confined to the blood space of an animal) would undergo perhaps 10 times as many passes as would urea which is distributed throughout the total body water reservoir. Thus, the fractional removal of albumin, even though its inherent diffusivity is smaller, would exceed the fractional removal of urea. According to the principles of the present invention, therefore, a secondary separator (e.g., a membrane device that permits extraction of urea and water but not albumin) may be used to recycle albumin to the blood. In particular, the sheath fluid received from the recycle stream will be depleted of urea and water, but will be rich in albumin. Thus, the composition of this stream will recruit the further extraction of urea and water but will not recruit further extraction of albumin, given that the difference in albumin concentration between the blood being processed and the sheath fluid will have disappeared.
It will be understood that an important specification of how the membraneless separator operates is the difference between the inlet flow rate and the outlet flow rate of the sheath fluid. For example, when these flows are equal and urea and water are removed by the secondary separator, there will be, at first, an insufficient transfer of water from blood to the sheath fluid to keep up with water removal in the secondary separator. Thus the concentration of proteins, including albumin, will rise in the recycle stream. When this concentration has reached a sufficiently high level, water transfer will be enhanced by a difference in protein osmotic (oncotic) pressure between the blood and the sheath fluid. Thus, the membraneless separator will balance its performance to that of the secondary separator. On the other hand, if the rate of withdrawal of sheath fluid is greater than its rate of supply, sufficient water may be sent to the secondary separator to keep up with its rate of water removal, but protein concentration will rise again until a concentration difference exists in the membraneless separator between the sheath fluid and the blood, causing a diffusion of protein back into the bloodstream. Once again, the membraneless separator will balance its performance to that of the secondary separator.
For example, when the principal goal of the treatment is the removal of highly diffusible (in general, low molecular weight) molecules, assuming a flow of 20 ml/min flow, the contact area in the membraneless separator will be in the range about 17 to 71 cm2. When the principal goal of the treatment is the removal of slowly diffusible molecules (e.g., proteins and especially immunoglobulins), the contact area in the membraneless separator will be larger, in the range of approximately 1,700 to 7,100 cm2 (assuming a flow of 20 ml/min), and the secondary separator will be configured to remove these molecules and to recycle smaller molecules (unless their simultaneous removal is desired).
According to the principles of the present invention, blood that is to undergo processing is provided to (and removed from) membraneless separator 602. Meanwhile, sheathing fluid that is recycled by secondary separator 604 is also provided to (and removed from) membraneless separator 602. As also shown in
It will be understood that secondary separator 604 may use any of many available separation principles known to those skilled in the art, including ultrafiltration and sorption using a wide range of sorbents targeted to particular small and large molecules, chemical reaction, and precipitation. Plasma diafiltration (a variant of hemodiafiltration), for example, may also be used according to the principles of the present invention. The following international publications which refer to hemodiafilters are incorporated by reference herein: WO 02/062454 (Application No. PCT/US02/03741), WO 02/45813 (Application No. PCT US01/47211), and WO 02/36246 (Application No. PCT/US01/45369). According to additional embodiments of the present invention, moreover, when low-molecular weight solutes are to be removed by plasma diafiltration, a stream of sterile buffer is added to the blood to allow a greater volume of fluid, with its accompanying small molecules, to pass through the diafiltration membrane. In conventional diafiltration, this volume may be added before or after the diafilter. In this invention, however, it is advantageous to add it either to the bloodstream or the recycle fluid from the secondary separator 604, which is the primary source of sheath fluid.
A more detailed view of a system 700 which includes membraneless separator 702 and secondary separator 704 in accordance with the principles of the present invention is shown in
According to the principles of the present invention, system 700 also includes blood supply 720, and a plurality of pumps 722, 724 and 726 (which may be either manually or automatically operated, such as by using detection and regulation techniques described below). As shown in
As illustrated by
As explained above, a membraneless separator according to the invention also needs one or more diverters to operate. Thus, according to the principles of the present invention, a first diverter 727 is formed from a portion of sheath exit channel 714 and a portion of blood exit channel 716. Moreover, a second diverter 728 is formed using a portion of blood exit channel 716 and a portion of sheath exit channel 718. It will be understood that, in embodiments of the present invention using more than two layers of sheath fluid, addition diverters will be used.
In certain preferred embodiments of the invention, the sheath fluid provided to separator 702 (from separator 704 and/or optional sheath fluid reservoir 730) by sheath fluid injection pump 724 occupies approximately ⅔ of the cross-section of extraction channel 706, with blood from blood supply 720 in the middle ⅓. In this manner, each half of the blood layer in extraction channel 706 is “serviced” by one of the sheathing layers, and the sheathing layers are traveling at an average velocity that is approximately half that of the blood (even though the interfacial velocities of the blood and sheathing fluids are equal). Thus, the volume of blood and the volume of sheathing fluid that pass through the unit in a given period of time are approximately equal. Although the invention is not limited in this manner, it should be noted that, in the configurations described here, efficiency drops when the volumetric flows of the two fluids (i.e., blood and sheath fluid) are very different from each other.
In order to cause the separation (or skimming) of all or part of the cell-depleted component of the blood being processed, according to various embodiments of the present invention, the inlet and exit flows of the sheath fluid are controlled (via pumps 724 and 726, respectively) such that more sheath fluid is withdrawn from separator 702 than is provided thereto. For example, it is possible to skim 10% of the blood flow by running sheath fluid withdrawal pump 726 at a rate that is 10% higher than the rate of sheath fluid injection pump 724. It will be appreciated that, when this is done, the blood efflux rate is determined and need not be controlled, as it should naturally have an outflow that is 90% of the inflow.
As explained above, when indiscriminate plasma removal is not desired, the plasma that is skimmed from the blood using membraneless separator 702 is processed by secondary separator 704, which regulates the operation of separator 702 through the composition of the recycle stream that it returns to sheath inlets channels 708 and 712 (i.e., a recycle stream is used to limit transport of blood components for which extraction is not desirable). According to the principles of the present invention, a substantial benefit arises because secondary separator 704, whether membraneless or not, is able to achieve high filtration velocities due to the fact that concentration polarization is limited to proteins and does not involve cells. Moreover, because cells are retained in the membraneless separator 702, they would see artificial material only on its conduit surfaces, not on its liquid-liquid contact area, with the result being a reduction in bioincompatibilities and a reduced (or eliminated) need for anticoagulation. Additionally, because the primary transport surface in the system is intrinsically non-fouling, a major deterrent to long-term or continuous operation is removed, opening the possibility of a wearable system with the recognized benefits of prolonged, slow exchange.
It should be understood that any operation of membraneless separator 702 that allows the sheath exit flows to be larger than the corresponding inlet values will induce a convective flow from the blood stream, over and above the diffusive flow. In order to prevent such a convective flow from carrying blood cells with it (as would be the case if the distribution of cells in the blood stream was uniform), it is important that cellular components of the blood have migrated to the center of the blood stream in order to permit significant plasma skimming. As should be appreciated by those skilled in the art, centripetal drift of cells occurs under a variety of flow regimes. According to the invention, therefore, various flow conditions can be used that cause blood cells to move away from the blood-liquid interface. For example, when blood flows in a tube below a wall shear rate (measured as the blood-flow velocity gradient perpendicular to the tube wall) of about 100 reciprocal seconds, this shear rate causes cellular components to migrate the center and leave the sheath as cell-free, essentially pure plasma. (See Goldsmith, H. L. and Spain, S., Margination of leukocytes in blood flow through small tubes, Microvasc. Res. 1984 March; 27(2):204-22.)
It will be appreciated that long-term stability is necessary for satisfactory operation of the microfluidic devices described herein. For example, it is desirable to prevent inappropriate splitting of an exit stream which, uncorrected, could result either in loss of cells or unintended infusion of sheathing solution into the bloodstream. Moreover, the presence of blood cells in the sheath, or extractor fluid may also be undesirable. According to another aspect of the present invention, therefore, on-board electronics and photonics (not shown), which are common features of chip-based microfluidic devices, may be used. In particular, such electronics or photonics could be used to regulate system 700 (i.e., to introduce flow changes) with an electrically activated device (e.g., a piezoelectric valve) that is mounted on the same plate, or “chip,” on which separator 702 is located.
According to one embodiment of the invention, for example, very low concentrations of cells would be permitted and monitored (e.g., before or after the sheath fluid being provided to secondary separator 704) by using any suitable detector, such as a photo detector. An ultramicroscope (a light-scattering device that is particularly sensitive to the presence of dilute particles) is one example of a photo detector which can be used. Based on this monitoring, flow corrections that would provide the system with long-term stability can be made which include, for example, adjusting the blood-sheath fluid interface. In particular, by adjusting the flows to separator 702 to reposition the interface, desired components can be retained in the blood. For example, when an excessive number of blood cells is present, the flow of blood could be decreased (or the flow of extractor fluid increased) in order to shift the blood-sheath fluid interface accordingly.
Additionally, according to another aspect of the invention, on-board electronics can be used to protect against the type of flow imbalances that might cause large blood losses in one direction or massive hypervolemia in the other direction, which are naturally prevented when a membrane is present but which may occur in a membraneless device. It will be understood by those skilled in the art this type of detection and regulation may also be used with in conjunction with the other embodiments of the present invention described above.
As explained above, in all membraneless contact configurations, the fluids (e.g., blood and sheath fluid) must flow in the same direction. In particular, any flow in opposite directions would disrupt the blood-fluid interface and induce undesirable advection. Moreover, since the fluids must flow in the same direction, the most that can be accomplished in one membraneless unit according to the invention is the equilibration of the sheath and blood streams (which, according to Loschmidt's formula provided above, means that if the sheathing fluid is flowed at the same rate as blood, the extraction E of a solute cannot exceed ½). In other words, if the two flows are equal, at most half of any solute can be transferred. Moreover, while greater flows permit larger fractions, E, of a solute to be removed, they require higher circulation rates to the secondary separator and thus force processing of solutes at lower concentrations, which is generally undesirable. Therefore, it is generally desirable for these flows to be nearly equal, within at least a factor of 2 or 3.
This limitation on extraction can be largely overcome, however, by the configurations shown in
According to the invention, subdivision of a given, desired contact area into n units each connected to the other in a countercurrent manner, even though the flow within them is concurrent, is used to allow extraction efficiency to rise according to the formula provided above. Thus, if an area were divided into four units, for example, and each had an extraction efficiency of 50%, the composite unit would have an efficiency of 0.8 or 80%.
Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that many different fabrication techniques can be used in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In recent years, controlled fluid movement and transport among fluids has been achieved in very small channels and at very low rates of flow largely for the purpose of assaying the contents of a minute fluid sample in order to determine, for example, the catabolite concentration in the blood. These devices have been enabled by recently developed microfabrication methodologies. The Holy Grail has been the development of a “Lab on a Chip,” in which several sequential analytical processes are conducted on a single chip that may be, for example, one square centimeter in area. Transport of a chemical or biochemical sample from one process to another and on and off the chip itself requires fluid handling capabilities, and thus, this enabling technology is commonly called “microfluidics.” Microfluidics is essential for nearly all on-chip applications. The synthesis of chemicals in microfluidic geometries is an application that is perhaps closer in concept to the scope of this disclosure because of the need to process a relatively larger amount of fluid. Synthesis includes, perforce, the separations needed between the steps of a chemical reaction sequence. While the aims of synthesizers differ from ours, and embrace some issues that we do not now see as pertinent, all of this work, reported and emergent, is of interest. Specifically, the present invention embraces some of the fabrication techniques and experimental methods developed for the fabrication and characterization of microfluidic device structures, to define upwardly scalable transport to and from blood.
According to the invention, moreover, microchannel structures for flow experiments may be formed by a rapid-prototyping technique. For example, the required structures may be realized in PDMS (silicone) resin by replica-molding from master structures created in thick negative photo resist (SU-8) by optical lithography. Commercially available, standard grade mixtures of EPON SU-8 photo resist, SU-8-5 (52% solids), SU-8-25 (63% solids), SU-8 50 (69% solids) and SU-8 100 (73% solids), for example, may be spun onto Si wafer substrates at a speed of rotation that depended on the film thickness needed, yielding films that were 10 to 300 μm thick. For example, SU-8 50 spun at 1100 rpm yields a 100 μm film. Prior to exposure, moreover, the spun layer is preferably baked on a precisely leveled hot plate at 95° C. for a time that is dictated by the film thickness (ranging from minutes to hours). These samples are then allowed to cool before further processing. Post-bake exposure, meanwhile, can be done using a direct laser writing system. The photolithographic setup consists of an Ar-ion laser (wavelength λ350 nm), focusing optics, and a computer controlled sample stage. The movement of the stage along all three axes (x, y, z) is achieved by stepping motors. Desired master patterns were created by translating the samples underneath the focused laser beam to expose the outline, and then scanning across the interior so that the intended micro channel was fully exposed. Dynamical focus correction or the sample tilt with respect to the scanning laser beam was the done by on-the-fly adjustments of the distance between the focusing lens and the sample stage. In a preferred embodiment, this exposure is carried out at 95° C. for 15 min. Development, meanwhile, can be carried out in a commercial SU8 developer, again for a time based on film thickness (with the sample being lightly stirred during development). Patterns created in SU-8, meanwhile, are used as molding masters for replication in PDMS. PDMS is prepared from a mixture of PDMS precursor and curing agent (Sylgard 184 kit, Dow Corning) in a 10:1 ratio by weight. Before curing, the mixture is placed in vacuum to evacuate bubbles formed during mixing. It is then poured over the SU-8 master, which had been previously coated with a thin layer (˜50 nm) of chromium to improve the release of the PDMS casting, after curing. Curing is done at 70° C. for approximately twelve hours. Once the SU-8 film is spun, pre-baked and cooled as described above, a Karl Zeiss MJP3P Contact Mask Aligner can be used for exposure, together with standard chromium masks or transparency masks depending on the resolution required. The films are then post-baked, and developed in the manner outlined in the previous section. The same pattern transfer technique is used to produce PDMS replicas.
It is apparent to those skilled in the art that many advantages may be provided in the various embodiments of the present invention described above. For example, the devices, systems and methods according to the principles of the present invention are capable of diffusing various blood components having different sizes, including ‘small’ molecules, ‘middle’ molecules, macromolecules, macromolecular aggregates, and cells, from a blood sample to the extractor fluid. This ability is particularly important considering the fact that different treatments require the removal of different sized particles. For example, in dialysis, one may desire to remove molecules of low molecular weight, while in the treatment of acute liver failure, both small and intermediate-sized molecules are to be removed. In therapeutic apheresis, meanwhile, one generally wishes to remove selected protein macromolecules (e.g., immunoglobulins), while in the treatments for fulminating sepsis, it is toxins of intermediate molecular weight that one generally desires to remove. On the other hand, in proposed anti-viral treatments, one wishes to remove free viral particles, while in the treatment of congestive heart failure, one simply wishes to remove water.
It should also be apparent that a device or system according to the invention may be used to process the blood of a single individual for the purpose of treating any of a large number of disease states. For example, therapies according to the invention may be used in the treatment of acute renal failure, acute liver failure, high antibody levels in myasthenia gravis and other autoimmune diseases. Additional uses include, for example, the removal by either precipitation or sorption of LDL in homozygous hyperlipidemia, in addition to the removal of malignant sepsis or fluid in cases of congestive heart failure, for example. The invention may also be used to aid in the reduction of viral burdens in AIDS patients, as well as for treatment of patients requiring other types of blood purification. Patients with diabetes, patients that have suffered a drug overdose, patients that have ingested a poison, patients suffering from renal failure, patients suffering from acute or chronic liver failure, or patients that have Myasthenia gravis, lupus erythematosis, or another autoimmune disease may also benefit from the devices and systems of the present invention. For example, while an exchange device according to the invention is not a cure for diabetes, it can be useful in the amelioration one or more symptoms of diabetes. Moreover, the device or system of the invention could be useful in clearing the blood of IgG molecules or other molecules, which are causative of an autoimmunity disorder. Additionally, the device or system of the invention can be used in acute dialysis or for extended dialysis. One skilled in the art will also appreciate that patients (or animals, in the case of veterinary use of the present invention) suffering from disorders, diseases and syndromes not listed herein may nonetheless be included in the patient pool intended for the device and system according to the invention.
Additionally, because the membraneless devices and systems described above have a small need for supporting machinery, and may be expected to be much smaller, to avoid high cell concentrations and membrane contact, and to operate throughout at low rates of shear, they are especially compatible with cognate processes. In one embodiment, a wearable (or at least portable) system according to the invention can run between 20 and 24 hours per day at a flow rate of about 20 cc/min, for example. The patient could then have, for example, 4-5 hours each day without the device in place which could be used for personal hygiene (e.g., showers or baths), sports activities, or other activities not amenable to the small system being worn or used. The invention thus addresses a problem recognized by the dialysis community (i.e., the negative side effects such as physical exhaustion, thirst, etc. associated with an episodic dialysis schedule), for which daily or nocturnal hemodialysis is not always a sufficient alternative. In particular, the invention described herein allows the patient to move about in a normal manner (e.g., go to work, school, home, etc.) while being subject to ongoing dialysis.
In addition to the treatment of various disease states, a device or system according to the invention may also be used for extracting blood components that are useful in treating others, as well as for purposes of studying the processes by which molecules and cells segregate and diffuse in blood. For example, it is known to those skilled in the art that diffusion of individual molecular species in blood may not occur independently and may not depend on size in the simple manner dictated by the Stokes-Einstein equation. Moreover, many solutes may partition into multiple forms: free, in complexes, bound to plasma protein, bound to cell-surface moieties, or as intracellular solutes. Relative to the rate of diffusion of the solute, its different forms may or may not be in local equilibrium. These phenomena are likely obscured when a membrane is present because it slows and controls overall transfer rates. Therefore, a membraneless device or system according to the invention can be a useful scientific tool to study these phenomena and a system in which rates are raised enough that partitioning may set limits on how much and how quickly a solute can be removed. A particular example is bilirubin bound to albumin. Another example is inorganic phosphorous which exists as partially ionized salts, as two anionic forms in plasma and in several intracellular forms.
Persons skilled in the art will also appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and that the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
The application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/801,366, filed Mar. 15, 2004, pending, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/454,579, filed Mar. 14, 2003, expired, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2885782 | Groves | May 1959 | A |
| 3388803 | Scott | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3506126 | Lindsay, Jr. et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3619423 | Galletti et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3746175 | Markley | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3799873 | Brown | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3884808 | Scott | May 1975 | A |
| 3939069 | Granger et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3989622 | Marantz et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3994799 | Yao et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4066549 | Oeser et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4083786 | Tsuda et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4094775 | Mueller | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4137921 | Okuzumi et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4166800 | Fong | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4181983 | Kulkarni | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4212738 | Henne | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4212742 | Solomon et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4243775 | Rosensaft et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4247393 | Wallace | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4267040 | Schal | May 1981 | A |
| 4269708 | Bonomini et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4279249 | Vert et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4300565 | Rosensaft et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4321192 | Jain | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4347234 | Wahlig et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4384975 | Fong | May 1983 | A |
| 4390519 | Sawyer | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4394370 | Jefferies | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4409332 | Jefferies et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4431019 | Kopp et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4443333 | Mahurkar | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4530449 | Nozawa et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4538603 | Pawelchak et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4539981 | Tunc | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4563489 | Urist | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4568559 | Nuwayser et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4578384 | Hollinger | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4585797 | Cioca | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4596574 | Urist | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4623588 | Nuwayser et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4661246 | Ash | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4663049 | Kolff et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4678566 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4703108 | Silver et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4741337 | Smith et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4744365 | Kaplan et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4765899 | Wells et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765907 | Scott | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4795804 | Urist | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4818542 | DeLuca et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4822278 | Oliva et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4837285 | Berg et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4839130 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4844854 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4849340 | Oberhardt | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4877864 | Wang et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4889119 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4897189 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4898186 | Ikada et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4898734 | Mathiowitz et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4916193 | Tang et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4938763 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4961707 | Magnusson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4968422 | Runge et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4968590 | Kuberasampath et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4975527 | Koezuka et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4997570 | Polaschegg | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5004602 | Hutchinson | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5007939 | Delcommune et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011691 | Oppermann et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011692 | Fujioka et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013649 | Wang et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5037639 | Tung | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5051272 | Hermes et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5077049 | Dunn et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5080665 | Jarrett et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5081106 | Bentley et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084051 | Tormala et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5106748 | Wozney et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108753 | Kuberasampath et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5116738 | Wang et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5128136 | Bentley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133755 | Brekke | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5141905 | Rosen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143730 | Fues et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149691 | Rutherford | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5162430 | Rhee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5166058 | Wang et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5171217 | March et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5185152 | Peyman | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187076 | Wozney et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192741 | Orsolini et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5206028 | Li | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5227157 | McGinity et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5231169 | Constantz et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5250584 | Ikada et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5268167 | Tung | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5268178 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5271961 | Mathiowitz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5278201 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5278202 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5281419 | Tuan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5284470 | Beltz | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5284559 | Lim et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5288496 | Lewis | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5308623 | Fues et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320624 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324307 | Jarrett et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324520 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5350580 | Muchow et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5360610 | Tice et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366508 | Brekke | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366733 | Brizzolara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366734 | Hutchinson | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5376636 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5415532 | Loughnane et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5437857 | Tung | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5460803 | Tung | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5534244 | Tung | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5562895 | Tung | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5577891 | Loughnane et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5656153 | Kameno et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5716852 | Yager et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725776 | Kenley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5744042 | Stange et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5798042 | Chu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5833954 | Chow et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855562 | Moore et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5871360 | Kato | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5885829 | Mooney et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
| 5917322 | Gershenfeld et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944684 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948684 | Weigl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5980481 | Gorsuch | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984891 | Keilman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993786 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6000341 | Tung | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001897 | Dickens | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6056930 | Tung | May 2000 | A |
| 6114408 | Dickens | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117100 | Powers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117122 | Din et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128764 | Gottesman | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6159739 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6187838 | Dickens | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196992 | Keilman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6197494 | Oberhardt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206959 | Dickens | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210759 | Dickens | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6281256 | Harris et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6317766 | Grover | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332985 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6899915 | Yelick et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6398859 | Dickens et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406631 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413498 | Malmagro | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459097 | Zagoskin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472210 | Holy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6488896 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6504172 | Zagoskin et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6511814 | Carpenter | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6527735 | Davankov et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6551842 | Carpenter | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6561997 | Weitzel et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6563311 | Zagoskin | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6582385 | Burbank et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585682 | Haraldsson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602719 | Carpenter | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605822 | Blais et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6614047 | Tzalenchuk et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6670630 | Blais et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6742661 | Schulte et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6743626 | Baum et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6758975 | Peabody et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6784451 | Amin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6793725 | Chow et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796955 | O'Mahoney et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6803599 | Amin et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6897468 | Blais et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6900456 | Blais et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6911664 | Il'ichev et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6930320 | Blais et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7002174 | Il'ichev et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7052907 | Shi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7118676 | Mueth et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7150834 | Mueth et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7309232 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7309323 | Gura et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7351218 | Bene | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 20010048637 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055546 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020052571 | Fazio | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090644 | Weigl et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159920 | Weigl | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172622 | Weigl et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030034306 | Schulte et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009096 | Wellman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016918 | Amin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045891 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040069708 | Laurell et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082903 | Micheli | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225249 | Leonard et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245102 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050082210 | Favre | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101901 | Gura | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121604 | Mueth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050178727 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050201903 | Weigl et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202563 | Dasgupta et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060076295 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070029257 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 20113789 | May 2002 | DE |
| 10-507962 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 11-508182 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 2000-512541 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2001-511520 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2002-509248 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| WO 0236246 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0245813 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 02062454 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080009780 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60454579 | Mar 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10801366 | Mar 2004 | US |
| Child | 11776360 | US |
