Embodiments of the invention are broadly directed to legible video capture of license plate data. More specifically, embodiments of the invention record video of a scene using systems and methods that increase the likelihood of capturing at least one frame in which a license plate or other identifiable vehicle marking is legible.
Mobile recording systems, such as car-mounted cameras, serve many purposes for law enforcement officers and other first responders, such as documentation of events, collection of evidence, and improvement of training. One important function of recording systems used by law enforcement is the capture of license plate data. Capturing license plate data or other markings of a vehicle, suspect, victim, bystander, fellow officer, or a scene's surroundings may be key in proving guilt or innocence or locating parties of interest. Of course, to be of use in such matters, written characters (e.g., numbers, letters, punctuation, logos, hazardous waste symbols, symbols) captured in recorded images, such as a license plate, must be legible. In many situations, legible video capture of license plate data and other vehicle markings or scene surroundings is made difficult by factors such as high motion, darkness, and/or interference from sources such as light, smoke, or fog.
Typical systems and methods for license plate recognition attempt to improve legibility of license plates through improved illumination of the scene. Improving illumination requires bright lights that may be costly, distracting, power consumptive, ineffective, and/or logistically difficult to implement quickly. Other systems perform advanced processing to improve captured images but may be expensive, slow, and require very high processor dedication. What is needed is an improved system and method for video capture of legible license plate data and other vehicle markings or scene surroundings that does not require additional or enhanced illumination of a scene.
Embodiments of the invention provide systems and methods for legibly capturing license plate data using a video camera. A first embodiment of the invention is directed to a method of scanning for a legible marking on a vehicle using a video camera with two or more recording attributes. Upon acquiring an indication to begin a scan with a video camera, a first recording attribute is adjusted within a first scan range, between a first lower limit and a first upper limit. Thereafter, a second recording attribute is adjusted within a second scan range, between a second lower limit and a second upper limit. A portion of the scan that includes a legible marking on a vehicle is stored in a memory associated with the video camera or otherwise accessible by the video camera.
A second embodiment of the invention is directed to an image capture system including a video camera with at least a first recording attribute and a second recording attribute, a storage device, and a processor. The processor is configured to adjust a first recording attribute within a first scan range between a first lower limit and a first upper limit, adjust a second recording attribute within a second scan range, between a second lower limit and a second upper limit, and store in memory a portion of the scan that includes a legible marking on a vehicle.
A third embodiment of the invention is directed to a method of scanning for a legible marking on a vehicle using a video camera with two or more recording attributes. Upon acquiring an indication to begin a scan with a video camera, a first recording attribute is adjusted within a first scan range, between a first lower limit and a first upper limit. Next, a second recording attribute is adjusted within a second scan range, between a second lower limit and a second upper limit. Thereafter, a determination is made as to whether or not a marking on a vehicle has been legibly captured. Based on this determination, further steps may occur, including initiation of additional scanning or storage of a portion of video data.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Each of the above embodiments may include further recording devices, hardware, or steps not explicitly described. Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments and the accompanying drawing figures.
Embodiments of the invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
The drawing figures do not limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed and described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the invention.
The following detailed description references the accompanying drawings that illustrate specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. The embodiments are intended to describe aspects of the invention in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments can be utilized and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
In this description, references to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” mean that the feature or features being referred to are included in at least one embodiment of the technology. Separate references to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” in this description do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment and are also not mutually exclusive unless so stated and/or except as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the description. For example, a feature, structure, act, etc. described in one embodiment may also be included in other embodiments, but is not necessarily included. Thus, the current technology can include a variety of combinations and/or integrations of the embodiments described herein.
Embodiments of the invention provide systems and methods of capturing video data that adjust recording attributes of one or more video cameras to scan for a legible image of a license plate or other identifying characters or markings on a vehicle. Further, embodiments of the invention determine whether or not a legible image has been captured, and may take additional steps based on the determination. The additional steps may include rescanning the scene or storing the image data.
Turning to the figures, and particularly
In embodiments of the invention, the vehicle recording device 14 and personal recording device 18 are each video cameras operable to record data, including without limitation, audio data and video data. Moreover, the recording devices 14, 18 are also operable to record or generate metadata associated with the recording, such that the data recorded by the devices 14, 18 includes the audio data, the video data, and/or the metadata associated with either or both of the audio and video data. Examples of metadata for an audio or video recording include a location (as determined by a GPS) where the data was recorded, a user who recorded the data or was otherwise associated with the recording device 14, 18 (e.g., an officer driving a police vehicle or an officer wearing the personal recording device 18), the time stamp and/or unique serial number, a trigger for the data recording event (e.g., what prompted a data capture scan by the recording devices), and other data related to the recorded event. Additionally, as further discussed below, the metadata may include or link to data derived from identifying marks on a subject vehicle.
The recording device manager 12 is illustrated in
Exemplary hardware included in embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
Computer-readable media include both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and nonremovable media, and contemplate media readable by a database. For example, computer-readable media include (but are not limited to) RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile discs (DVD), holographic media or other optical disc storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage, and other magnetic storage devices. These technologies can store data temporarily or permanently. However, unless explicitly specified otherwise, the term “computer-readable media” should not be construed to include physical, but transitory, forms of signal transmission such as radio broadcasts, electrical signals through a wire, or light pulses through a fiber-optic cable. Examples of stored information include computer-useable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data representations.
Finally, network interface card (NIC) 124 is also attached to system bus 104 and allows computer 102 to communicate over a network. NIC 124 can be any form of network interface known in the art, such as Ethernet, ATM, fiber, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi (i.e., the IEEE 802.11 family of standards). NIC 124 may connect computer 102 to a local network, optionally via a CAN bus 26, as further described below. The local network may in turn connected to Internet, or in some embodiments computer 102 may itself be directly connected to Internet.
Returning to
A power source 24 may be electronically connected to the vehicle recording device 14 through dedicated wiring. The power source 24 supplies power to each of the electronic components of the vehicle recording device and, in embodiments of the invention, to the recording device manager 12 and/or the personal recording device 18. In embodiments of the invention, the power source 24 is the police vehicle's battery but can be another power source, such as a battery cartridge of the external computing device 22.
The electronic connection between the recording device manager 12, the vehicle recording device 14, and the personal recording device 18 optionally includes a control area network (CAN) bus 26, which “directs traffic” for incoming and outgoing signals based on indicated importance or other factors and follows an algorithm for determining the order in which (or whether) signals are transmitted.
The vehicle recording device 14 is operable to record audio, video, and/or other data. In some embodiments, the vehicle recording device 14 is a video recording device such as one produced by Digital Ally, Inc., including the DVM100, DVM250, DVM250Plus, DVM250Law, DVM400, DV440Ultra, DVM470, DVM500, DVM500Plus, and DVM750. As described below, in some embodiments the vehicle recording device 14 is operable to receive a signal of a triggering event, while in other embodiments the vehicle recording device 14 utilizes the CAN bus 26 and is operable to receive time stamps and metadata in addition to the signal of a triggering event. The vehicle recording device 14 can be incorporated into the police vehicle's rear view mirror, dashboard, spotlight, or other locations associated with the police vehicle 16 or may be a stand-alone unit mounted within or on the police vehicle 16. The vehicle recording device 14 may receive power from the power source 24 through dedicated wiring. In addition to the exemplary vehicle recording devices listed above, a vehicle recording device is further described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,520,069, issued Aug. 27, 2013, entitled “Vehicle-Mounted Video System with Distributed Processing,” the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
The personal recording device 18 is small, portable, wearable, easily concealed, and is operable to record audio, video, thermal, chemical, or other data. The personal recording device 18 can be worn by the officer 20, such as on the officer's shirt, hat, eyeglasses or sunglasses, electronic weapon, breath analyzer, or other device accessed or used by the officer. The personal recording device 18 is operable to receive a signal instructing the device 18 to begin or stop scanning (as discussed in further detail below), a signal indicative of a triggering event, and time stamps and metadata corresponding to the recordings. Additionally, the personal recording device 18 may further include a clock for determining a time corresponding to when a particular item of data was recorded. An exemplary personal recording device is the “FIRSTVU HD” produced by Digital Ally, Inc. and further described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,019,431, issued Apr. 28, 2015, and commonly assigned with the present application, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
Recordings generated by the recording devices 14, 18 and associated metadata may be temporarily or permanently stored in a local memory element (hereinafter “memory”), such as a memory of the particular recording devices 14, 18, and/or a memory of external computing device 22 located in the police vehicle 16. The recording devices 14, 18 may alternatively or additionally be allowed to upload recordings to an external server or storage device. The external server or storage device could be a large-capacity storage device 28, such as a DVR housed in the vehicle, or may be a centralized computing device, such as housed at a police precinct. These examples are not meant to be limiting; any form of data storage and duplication is intended within embodiments of the invention.
An exemplary scenario of the recording system 10 in use is now described for illustrative purposes. The recording system 10 may be used by the police officer 20 to record video data during an event such as a traffic stop. The recording device manager 12 may be mounted near the vehicle recording device 14, such as on the windshield of the police vehicle 16, or may be integrated within a housing of the vehicle recording device 14. Alternatively, the recording device manager 12 may be mounted anywhere within the police vehicle 16 that allows for the recording device manager 12 to communicate (either via a wired or wireless connection) with the vehicle recording device 14. In embodiments of the invention, the vehicle recording device 14 is oriented in a forward direction relative to a front of the vehicle to record the traffic stop, and in yet further embodiments, multiple vehicle recording devices 14 may be mounted in or on the vehicle and oriented in different directions relative to the vehicle, such as backwards towards a rear of the vehicle, and to the left and right sides of the vehicle. The personal recording device 18 is mounted to the police officer's person or is otherwise carried by the police officer 20, such as on a lanyard, belt, or shoulder. In embodiments of the invention, the personal recording device 18 may include a GPS, an RFID, or another type of location or identification feature or sensor (not shown) that informs the recording device manager 12 of the relational location of the personal recording device 18 to the recording device manager 12. Alternatively, the officer may carry on their person a GPS (such as housed within or associated with a mobile communications device), RFID, or other type of location or identification sensor. Recording system 10 may include additional sensors not illustrated in
Embodiments of the invention are not intended to be limited to the traffic stop situation described above. Embodiments may be stationary or mobile camera systems employed by businesses to record the identity of vehicles arriving and departing from a parking lot. Alternatively, embodiments may be employed in maritime settings, such as for tracking of shipping containers. In other embodiments of the invention, a military installation may use a camera system to pre-screen vehicles approaching a secure location. Any system including one or more video recording devices that scan for a legible image of a marking on a vehicle may fall within embodiments of the invention.
Returning to the law enforcement example, in embodiments of the invention, the recording device manager 12 may activate a data capture scan (or simply “scan”) from vehicle recording device 14 and/or personal recording device 18 responsive to a triggering event (also more simply known as a “trigger”). Examples of a triggering event may include, for example, turning on the vehicle's siren and/or signal lights, an indication that the vehicle is parked, an electronic detection of a subject car or a license plate, an accelerometer measurement outside a pre-established norm, a position of the vehicle and/or officer as measured by a GPS, a vehicle crash event, the police vehicle 16 attaining a threshold speed (e.g., 80 m.p.h.), activation of an electronic weapon, opening of the vehicle door, and/or activation of a radar or the radar detecting a subject car's speed at or over a pre-determined speed. In embodiments, the recording device manager 12 may receive a signal from, for example, the vehicle recording device 14, external computing device 22, or police vehicle 16 indicative of a triggering event. In response to receipt of the signal, or based on a type of triggering event as evidenced by the signal, the recording device manager 12 may instruct recording by the vehicle recording device 14 or the personal recording device 18 to begin a scan. As an exemplary scenario, the recording device manager 12 may receive a signal identifying a triggering event of a police vehicle 16 being placed in park while the vehicle signal lights are activated. Upon receipt of the signal, the recording device manager 12 sends a signal to either or both of the vehicle recording device 14 or the personal recording device 18 to instruct the devices 14, 18 to begin a scan. It should be appreciated that other types of triggering events and exemplary scenarios can be employed.
Alternatively, a data capture scan may be activated manually based on a user's manual selection, for instance via a police officer's button press of recording device manager 12, vehicle recording device 14, or external computing device 22. A manual selection may be made remotely from a fob carried by police officer 20 or a control integrated into the structure of personal recording device 18. In embodiments of the invention, a manual selection may be made by a remote user, such as by a dispatcher at a police station. As further discussed below, whether initiated via a trigger or via manual indication, a scan serves to adjust one or more recording attributes between a lower limit and upper limit to search for a legible image of a license plate or other vehicle marking.
Embodiments of the invention adjust one or more recording attributes of one or more video recording devices, such as vehicle recording device 14 or personal recording device 18, to scan for at least one frame of a legible image of markings on a vehicle, such as those on a license plate. As in the example illustrated in
Because adjusting the recording attribute(s) of the recording devices 14, 18 to legibly capture the license plate 200,210 may reduce visibility of other elements in the recorded scene, embodiments of the invention may not permanently set the recording attributes to such values. Doing so is unnecessary, as only a single legible frame is needed for identification purposes. Additionally, permanent adjustment of the recording attributes might require significant computation to determine the appropriate values and may render the recording less valuable as a documentation of events in the scene. Rather, in embodiments of the invention, selected recording attributes are only temporarily adjusted to scan for a legible image of a marking on a vehicle, such as a license plate. For example, a recording attribute such as gain may be adjusted across a range of values, searching for a single value within that range at which the license plate is legible. In embodiments of the invention, one or more recording devices 14, 18 perform a scan for legible markings on a vehicle while other recording devices 14, 18 continue recording video data using normal recording attributes. In this way the portion of recorded video occurring during the scan is recorded as usual. It should also be appreciated that embodiments of the invention may employ a dedicated vehicle recording device 14 for capturing the image or scanning the vehicle for markings.
The scan range for a particular attribute includes a lower limit and an upper limit, each of which may be a predetermined limit programmed into memory, may be selected manually by a user, or may be dynamically selected by the recording system 10 based on factors such as the time of day, a sensed ambient light level, or a distance measurement. Such a distance measurement may be, for instance, from the recording device 14, 18 to the subject vehicle 200. Alternatively, a distance measurement may be estimated by an officer 20 and entered via external computing device 22. Manual selections may be presented to the user as multiple choice selections based on the user's evaluation of the visibility of the scene, such as a “low-light” scan range, “high interference” scan range, or “long distance” scan range. These scan ranges are meant only as examples, and are not intended to be limiting in any way.
A recording attribute may be adjusted within a scan range by a continuous “sweep” of the scan range or may be adjusted incrementally by set values. The incremental values by which a recording attribute is adjusted may be uniform increments, which may be predetermined increments programmed into memory or may be selected manually by a user. Alternatively, uniform increments may be dynamically selected by the recording system based on sensed parameters such as the time of day, a sensed ambient light level, or a distance measurement. Like the scan range limits, the increments of adjustment of a recording attribute within a scan range may be presented to the user as multiple choice selections based on their evaluation of the visibility of the scene, such as “low-light” adjustments, “high interference” adjustments, or “long distance” adjustments. Again, these are meant only as examples, and are not intended to be limiting in any way.
In the course of performing a scan for a legible marking on a vehicle, embodiments of the invention may adjust more than one recording attribute within respective scan ranges, each scan range including a respective upper and lower limit. For example, a scan may adjust gain between a minimum level of 30% and a maximum level of 70% and also adjust shutter speed between 0.02 and 0.05 seconds. The adjustments may be done simultaneously, or may be performed independently of one another, with the value of one recording attribute adjusted while the other is held at a static value. Specifically, a first recording attribute may remain at a first value within its first scan range while a second recording attribute is adjusted within its second scan range, and the second recording attribute may remain at a second value within its second scan range while the first recording attribute is adjusted within its first scan range.
In some embodiments, the value of a given recording attribute may be adjusted throughout a scan range multiple times, with the values of other recording attributes held at different static values each time. For instance, gain may be adjusted between a 30% lower limit and a 70% upper limit while the shutter speed is held at 0.025 seconds, and then adjusted again between the same limits while the shutter speed is held at 0.05 seconds. The shutter speed may then be adjusted one or more times while the gain is held at one or more static values. Static values may be predetermined, selected by a user, or determined dynamically by the system upon initiation of a scan. The above examples are not intended to be limiting. In embodiments of the invention, more than two recording attributes may be adjusted simultaneously or independently while other recording attributes are held static. Specifically, a scan may include a third scan range including a third upper limit and a third lower limit. For example, a single scan may adjust shutter speed, gain, and white balance between upper and lower limits. Any combination of increments, selected type and number of recording attributes, upper and lower limits, and independence or simultaneity of adjustments are intended within embodiments of the invention.
In embodiments of the invention, representative image captures from a scan may be presented to a user on a display, as illustrated in
At step 408, a determination is made as to whether or not markings on a vehicle, such as those appearing on a license plate, have been legibly captured. In embodiments of the invention, representative frames from a scan may be presented via a display (such as on external computing device 22) for confirmation and/or selection by a user. As seen in
In other embodiments, step 408 may be performed initially by a computer text recognition algorithm. The algorithm may select representative frames from the scan and extract text from each frame, searching for a string of text that fits the appropriate format of a license plate. Alternatively, the algorithm may run continuously during the scan, and may halt the scan upon recognition of a string of characters in a valid format, such as in a license plate format. Valid formats may be stored in memory. In embodiments of the invention, the computer-recognized screen may be presented to a user along with an image frame from which it was extracted for user confirmation of successful license plate capture. At this point, the system proceeds to step 410 in which data from the license plate may be saved, possibly as metadata relating to the captured video data.
As has been described above, computer and/or user determination of successful capture of a legible image of a marking on a vehicle may initiate storage of at least a portion of the scan that includes the legible marking. However, in the event that capture of a legible image is determined to be unsuccessful, the system may perform an additional scan. The additional scan may activate automatically or in response to selection by a user. The additional scan may use recording attributes, scan ranges, and adjustment increments that are identical to those of the prior scan(s). Alternatively, the additional scan may be a modified scan, differing from the prior scan(s) in any or all of these elements.
A modified scan may be beneficial in situations with particularly difficult viewing conditions to provide an increased likelihood of capturing a legible image of a marking on a vehicle. The modified scan may simply select one or more different recording attributes for adjustment, such as gain and frame rate rather than white balance and focal distance. The modified scan may adjust the same recording attributes, but choose different upper and/or lower limits, modifying the scan range of one or more of the recording attributes. Modified upper and lower limits may define a larger scan range in a modified scan for a particular recording attribute, and/or may shift the original scan range. A modified scan may alternatively or additionally change the simultaneity of adjustment of recording attributes. For example, if in a previous failed scan, gain and white balance were adjusted within their respective scan ranges simultaneously, in a subsequent modified scan gain may be held at a static value while white balance is adjusted and vice versa. Any or all of the modifications discussed may be employed in a given modified scan, as well as any other modifications not expressly described.
While reference has been made above to the various components and techniques of embodiments of the invention, the description that follows will provide further examples systems and processes that may be added in embodiments of the invention. The description below is intended to merely exemplify steps that may be taken in practice of operation of embodiments of the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Further steps that may be performed in practice of some embodiments of the invention are illustrated in
Returning to step 506, if the increments of adjustment are not uniform, the process proceeds to step 514, at which the system determines whether or not the system should perform a continuous sweep through across the scan range. If this determination is yes, the system adjusts the first recording attribute in this way at step 516. If the determination at step 514 is no, the system adjusts the first recording attribute using a set of predetermined or random non-uniform increments at step 518.
Each of these regimes of adjustment of the first recording attribute converge at step 520, at which the preceding process (beginning at step 504) is performed once again, this time with respect to the second recording attribute. In step 520, as in step 504, the system determines the upper and lower limits for the second scan range, corresponding to the second recording attribute. Again in steps 522, 524, 528 and 530 (
Specifically, at step 520, the lower and upper limits of the second scan range are determined for a second recording attribute. These limits may be predetermined, selected by a user, or determined dynamically based on sensed parameters such as a sensed light level. At step 522 the system determines whether or not the second recording attribute will be adjusted by uniform increments. If the increments are uniform, the process proceeds to step 524, at which the system determines whether the size of the uniform increments has been predetermined and stored in memory, or if the size needs to be determined based at least partially on sensed factors. If they are predetermined, the system proceeds to step 526, adjusting the second recording attribute between second first upper and lower limits using the uniform increments. If sensed factors must be taken into account, the system does so at step 528 before proceeding to the adjustment at step 526.
Returning to step 522, if the increments of adjustment are not uniform, the process proceeds to step 530, at which the system determines whether or not the system should perform a continuous sweep through across the second scan range. If this determination is yes, the system adjusts the second recording attribute in this way at step 532. If the determination at step 530 is no, the system adjusts the second recording attribute using a set of predetermined or random non-uniform increments at step 534.
Regardless of the determinations made, all of these regimes of adjustment of the second recording attribute converge at step 536. At this step the system determines whether or not a third attribute is to be adjusted within a third scan range. If so, the process proceeds through steps 538, 540, 542, 544, 546, 548, and 550 for determining the method of adjusting the third recording attribute. These steps are performed in the same manner as previously performed for the first and second recording attributes. These steps may be repeated for an arbitrary number of recording attributes, as determined by the system and/or a user.
Specifically, at step 540, the lower and upper limits of the third scan range are determined for a third recording attribute. These limits may be predetermined, selected by a user, or determined dynamically based on sensed parameters such as a sensed light level. At step 542 the system determines whether or not the third recording attribute will be adjusted by uniform increments. If the increments are uniform, the process proceeds to step 544, at which the system determines whether the size of the uniform increments has been predetermined and stored in memory, or if the size needs to be determined based at least partially on sensed factors. If they are predetermined, the system proceeds to step 546, adjusting the third recording attribute between the third upper and lower limits using the uniform increments. If sensed factors must be taken into account, the system does so at step 548 before proceeding to the adjustment at step 546.
Returning to step 542, if the increments of adjustment are not uniform, the process proceeds to step 550, at which the system determines whether or not the system should perform a continuous sweep through across the third scan range. If this determination is yes, the system adjusts the first recording attribute in this way at step 552. If the determination at step 550 is no, the system adjusts the third recording attribute using a set of predetermined or random non-uniform increments at step 554.
When the final recording attribute has been adjusted (which in the case of
It should be appreciated that, while the above disclosure is directed mainly to the field of law enforcement, some embodiments of the invention may be employed for any pursuit requiring legible video capture of information. Embodiments of the invention may be used in any setting or field, such as military or road maintenance vehicles, to maximize the likelihood of capturing a legible image of readable characters using a video camera. In embodiments of the invention, readable characters may be identified from sources other than license plates, such as billboards, street signs, bumper stickers, or apparel. Further, though the description above is uses a car as subject vehicle 200,204,208, embodiments of the invention could equivalently be employed to identify a subject boat, trailer, motorcycle, etc. Embodiments of the invention may be used by private individuals or businesses to help prevent fraud, identify visitors, or track shipments. The law enforcement field discussed is merely exemplary and should not be construed as limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4409670 | Herndon et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4789904 | Peterson | Dec 1988 | A |
4863130 | Marks, Jr. | Sep 1989 | A |
4918473 | Blackshear | Apr 1990 | A |
5027104 | Reid | Jun 1991 | A |
5096287 | Kaikinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111289 | Lucas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5289321 | Secor | Feb 1994 | A |
5381155 | Gerber | Jan 1995 | A |
5408330 | Squicciarii et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5446659 | Yamawaki | Aug 1995 | A |
5453939 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473501 | Claypool | Dec 1995 | A |
5473729 | Bryant et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479149 | Pike | Dec 1995 | A |
5497419 | Hill | Mar 1996 | A |
5526133 | Paff | Jun 1996 | A |
5585798 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5642285 | Woo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5668675 | Fredricks | Sep 1997 | A |
5689442 | Swanson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5742336 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
5752632 | Sanderson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5798458 | Monroe | Aug 1998 | A |
5815093 | Kikinis | Sep 1998 | A |
5850613 | Bullecks | Dec 1998 | A |
5878283 | House et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886739 | Winningstad | Mar 1999 | A |
5890079 | Levine | Mar 1999 | A |
5926210 | Hackett et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5962806 | Coakley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978017 | Tino | Nov 1999 | A |
5983161 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996023 | Winter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008841 | Charlson | Dec 1999 | A |
6028528 | Lorenzetti et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6052068 | Price R-W et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6097429 | Seeley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100806 | Gaukel | Aug 2000 | A |
6121881 | Bieback et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141609 | Herdeg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141611 | Mackey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163338 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175300 | Kendrick | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6298290 | Abe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310541 | Atkins | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314364 | Nakamura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324053 | Kamijo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326900 | Deline et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6333694 | Pierce et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6333759 | Mazzilli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370475 | Breed et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
RE37709 | Dukek | May 2002 | E |
6389340 | Rayner | May 2002 | B1 |
6396403 | Haner | May 2002 | B1 |
6405112 | Rayner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449540 | Rayner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452572 | Fan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490409 | Walker | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518881 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525672 | Chainer et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546119 | Ciolli et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560463 | Santhoff | May 2003 | B1 |
6563532 | Strub et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591242 | Karp et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6681195 | Poland et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690268 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697103 | Fernandez et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718239 | Rayer | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727816 | Helgeson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748792 | Freund et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6823621 | Goffried | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831556 | Boykin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856873 | Breed et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877434 | McNulty, Jr. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883694 | Abelow | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6950122 | Mirabile | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7012632 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034683 | Ghazarian | Apr 2006 | B2 |
D520738 | Tarantino | May 2006 | S |
7038590 | Hoffman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071969 | Stimson, III | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7088387 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7119832 | Blanco et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126472 | Kraus et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147155 | Weekes | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7180407 | Guo et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7190822 | Gammenthaler | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7363742 | Nerheim | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371021 | Ross et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7421024 | Castillo | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436143 | Lakshmanan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436955 | Yan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448996 | Khanuja et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456875 | Kashiwa | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496140 | Winningstad et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500794 | Clark | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7508941 | O'Toole, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7511737 | Singh | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7536457 | Miller | May 2009 | B2 |
7539533 | Tran | May 2009 | B2 |
7561037 | Monroe | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7594305 | Moore | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602301 | Stirling et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7602597 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7631452 | Brundula et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7656439 | Manico et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7659827 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680947 | Nicholl et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697035 | Suber, III et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7701692 | Smith et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7778004 | Nerheim et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804426 | Etcheson | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806525 | Howell et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7853944 | Choe | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7944676 | Smith et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7984579 | Brundula et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8077029 | Daniel et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8121306 | Cilia et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8175314 | Webster | May 2012 | B1 |
8269617 | Cook et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8314708 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8350907 | Blanco et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8356438 | Brundula et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373567 | Denson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8373797 | Isii et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384539 | Denny et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8446469 | Blanco et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456293 | Trundle et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8508353 | Cook et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8559486 | Kitayoshi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594485 | Brundula | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606492 | Botnen | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8676428 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690365 | Williams | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8707758 | Keays | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8725462 | Jain et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8744642 | Nemat-Nasser et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8780205 | Boutell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781292 | Ross et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8805431 | Vasavada et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8849501 | Cook et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854199 | Cook et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8887208 | Merrit et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8890954 | O'Donnell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8930072 | Lambert et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8934045 | Kam et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8989914 | Nemat-Nasser et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8996234 | Tamari et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8996240 | Plante | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002313 | Sink et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9003474 | Smith | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9058499 | Smith | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9122082 | Abreau | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9123241 | Grigsby et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9164543 | Minn et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9253452 | Ross et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9518727 | Markle et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9591255 | Sakiewica et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9728228 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9841259 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20010033661 | Prokoski | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020013517 | West et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019696 | Kruse | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032510 | Tumball et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044065 | Quist et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049881 | Sugimura | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020084130 | Der Gazarian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020131768 | Gammenthaler | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135336 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020159434 | Gosior et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191952 | Fiore et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030040917 | Fiedler | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080713 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080878 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081121 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081934 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081935 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081942 | Melnyk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095688 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106917 | Shelter et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133018 | Ziemkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151510 | Quintana et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184674 | Manico et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030185417 | Alattar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215010 | Kashiwa | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215114 | Kyle | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222982 | Hamdan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008255 | Lewellen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040043765 | Tolhurst | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040143373 | Ennis | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040145457 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150717 | Page et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168002 | Accarie et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199785 | Pederson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223054 | Rotholtz | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243734 | Kitagawa et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267419 | Jing | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030151 | Singh | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046583 | Richards | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050050266 | Haas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068169 | Copley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068417 | Kreiner | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083404 | Pierce et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094966 | Elberbaum | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100329 | Lao et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101334 | Brown et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050134966 | Burgner | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132200 | Jaffe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151852 | Jomppanen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050035161 | Shioda | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185438 | Ching | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206532 | Lock | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206741 | Raber | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228234 | Yang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232469 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243171 | Ross, Sr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258942 | Mansseh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009238 | Stanco et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028811 | Ross, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055786 | Olilla | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082730 | Franks | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060158968 | Vanman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164220 | Harter, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164534 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170770 | MacCarthy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176149 | Douglas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183505 | Willrich | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193749 | Ghazarian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203090 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220826 | Rast | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060225253 | Bates | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244601 | Nishimura | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256822 | Kwong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267773 | Roque | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270465 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271287 | Gold et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274166 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060274828 | Siemens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276200 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278705 | Hedley | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282021 | DeVaul et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287821 | Lin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293571 | Bao et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021134 | Liou | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064108 | Haler | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067079 | Kosugi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091557 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102508 | Mcintosh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117083 | Winneg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132567 | Schofield et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152811 | Anderson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172053 | Poirier | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177023 | Beuhler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195939 | Sink et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199076 | Rensin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213088 | Sink | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229350 | Scalisi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257781 | Denson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257782 | Etcheson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257804 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257815 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260361 | Etcheson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268158 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271105 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274705 | Kashiwa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277352 | Maron et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285222 | Zadnikar | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287425 | Bates | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297320 | Brummette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001735 | Tran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080002031 | Cana et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080002599 | Denny et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080030580 | Kashhiawa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042825 | Denny et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043736 | Stanley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049830 | Richardson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063252 | Dobbs et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084473 | Romanowich | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100705 | Kister et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122603 | Piante et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129518 | Carlton-Foss | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143481 | Abraham et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144705 | Rackin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169929 | Albertson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170130 | Ollila et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175565 | Takakura et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211906 | Lovric | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222849 | Lavoie | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239064 | Iwasaki | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246656 | Ghazarian | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266118 | Pierson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080307435 | Rehman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316314 | Bedell et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002491 | Haler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090002556 | Manapragada et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027499 | Nicholl | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052685 | Cilia et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070820 | Li | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085740 | Klein et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109292 | Ennis | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122142 | Shapley | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135007 | Donovan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090169068 | Okamoto | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189981 | Siann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195686 | Shintani | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207252 | Raghunath | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213204 | Wong | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225189 | Morin | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243794 | Morrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251545 | Shekarri et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252486 | Ross, Jr. et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276708 | Smith et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294538 | Wihlborg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324203 | Wiklof | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045798 | Sugimoto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050734 | Chou | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060747 | Woodman | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097221 | Kreiner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106707 | Brown et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118147 | Dorneich et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122435 | Markham | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123779 | Snyder et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100177193 | Flores | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177891 | Keidar et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188201 | Cook et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191411 | Cook et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194885 | Plaster | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217836 | Rofougaran | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238009 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238262 | Kurtz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242076 | Potesta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265331 | Tanaka | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274816 | Guzik | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100287473 | Recesso et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006151 | Beard | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018998 | Guzik | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110050904 | Anderson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069151 | Orimoto | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084820 | Walter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110094003 | Spiewak et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098924 | Baladeta et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110129151 | Saito | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157759 | Smith et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110187895 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110261176 | Monaghan, Sr. et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281547 | Cordero | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301971 | Roesch et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314401 | Salisbury et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038689 | Ishii | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056722 | Kawaguchi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063736 | Simmons et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120120258 | Boutell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162436 | Cordell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120188345 | Salow | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189286 | Takayama et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195574 | Wallance | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230540 | Calman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257320 | Brundula et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268259 | Igel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120276954 | Kowalsky | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130021153 | Keays | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033610 | Osborn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130035602 | Gemer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080836 | Stergiou et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130096731 | Tamari et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130125000 | Flischhauser et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148295 | Minn et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130222640 | Baek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225309 | Bentley et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130285232 | Sheth | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300563 | Glaze | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343571 | Lee | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140037262 | Sako | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049636 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140092299 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094992 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098453 | Brundula et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140140575 | Wolf | May 2014 | A1 |
20140170602 | Reed | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176750 | Pajak | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192194 | Bedell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195105 | Lambert et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195272 | Sadiq et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210625 | Nemat-Nasser | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218544 | Senot et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140227671 | Olmstead et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140311215 | Keays et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140341532 | Marathe | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355951 | Tabak | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150050003 | Ross et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150050345 | Smyth et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051502 | Ross | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053776 | Rose et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078727 | Ross et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088335 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150103246 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150317368 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150332424 | Kane et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150358549 | Cho | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160042767 | Araya et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160104508 | Chee et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127695 | Zhang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165192 | Saatchi et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160364621 | Hill et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170070659 | Kievsky | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170195636 | Yokomitsu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170230605 | Han et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237950 | Araya et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244884 | Burtey | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170277700 | Davis et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287523 | Hodulik et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180023910 | Kramer | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180050800 | Boykin et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010019451 | Nov 2011 | DE |
2479993 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2273624 | Jun 1994 | GB |
2320389 | May 1998 | GB |
2343252 | May 2000 | GB |
2351055 | Dec 2000 | GB |
2417151 | Feb 2006 | GB |
2425427 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2455885 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2485804 | May 2012 | GB |
20090923 | Sep 2010 | IE |
294188 | Sep 1993 | JP |
153298 | Jun 1996 | JP |
198858 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10076880 | Mar 1998 | JP |
210395 | Jul 1998 | JP |
2000137263 | May 2000 | JP |
2005119631 | May 2005 | JP |
20-0236817 | Aug 2001 | KR |
1050897 | Jul 2011 | KR |
2383915 | Mar 2010 | RU |
107851 | Aug 2011 | RU |
124780 | Feb 2013 | RU |
9005076 | May 1990 | WO |
9738526 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9831146 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9948308 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0039556 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0051360 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0123214 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0249881 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02095757 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03049446 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004036926 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2009013526 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2011001180 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2012037139 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012120083 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2014000161 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014052898 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Automation Systems Article, Know-How Bank Co. Ltd. Takes Leap Forward as a Company Specializing in R&D and Technology Consulting, published Jan. 2005. |
Car Rear View Camera—Multimedia Rear View Mirror—4′ LCD color monitor, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20050209014751/http://laipac.com/multimedia-rear-mirror.htm>, Feb. 9, 2005. |
ATC Chameleon. Techdad Review [Online] Jun. 19, 2013 [Retrieved on Dec. 30, 2015]. Retrieved from Internet. <URL:http://www.techdadreview.com/2013/06/19atc-chameleon/>. |
“Breathalyzer.” Wikipedia. Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Date Page Last Modified: Sep. 14, 2014; <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathalyzer>. |
Dees, Tim; Taser Axon Flex: The next generation of body camera; <http://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/527231-0-TASER-Axon-Flex-The-next-generation-of-body-camera/>, Date Posted: Mar. 12, 2012; Date Printed: Oct. 27, 2015. |
Brown, TP-LINK TL-WDR3500 Wireless N600 Router Review, Mar. 6, 2013. |
Controller Area Network (CAN) Overview, National Instruments White Paper, Aug. 1, 2014. |
Daskam, Samuel W., Law Enforcement Armed Robbery Alarm System Utilizing Recorded Voice Addresses via Police Radio Channels, Source: Univ. of Ky, Off of Res and Eng., Serv (UKY BU107), pp. 18-22, 1975. |
Digital Ally vs. Taser International, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-232 (CJM/TJ); US D. Kan, Defendant Taser International Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Jul. 5, 2016. |
Electronic Times Article, published Feb. 24, 2005. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2010 in European Patent Application No. 06803645.8; Applicant: Digital Ally, Inc. |
W. Fincham, Data Recorders for Accident Investigation, Monitoring of Driver and Vehicle Performance (Digest No. 1997/122), Publication Date: Apr. 10, 1997, pp. 6/1-6/3. |
Frankel, Harry; Riter, Stephen, Bernat, Andrew, Automated Imaging System for Border Control, Source: University of Kentucky, Office of Engineering Services, (Bulletin) UKY BU, pp. 169-173, Aug. 1986. |
Freudenrich, Craig, Ph.D.; “How Breathalyzers Work—Why Test?.” HowStuff Works. Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Posted Date: Unknown; <http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/automotive/breathalyzer1.htm>. |
Hankyung Auto News Article, Know-How Bank's Black Box for Cars “Multi-Black Box,” Copyright 2005. |
Guide to Bluetooth Security: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Dep't of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 800-121, Revision 1 (Jun. 2012). |
ICOP Extreme Wireless Mic, Operation Supplement, Copyright 2008. |
ICOP Model 20/20-W Specifications; Enhanced Digital In-Car Video and Audio recording Systems, date: Unknown. |
ICOP Mobile DVRS; ICOP Model 20/20-W & ICOP 20/20 Vision, date: Unknown. |
Bertomen, Lindsey J., PoliceOne.com News; “Product Review: ICOP Model 20/20-W,” May 19, 2009. |
ICOP Raytheon JPS communications, Raytheon Model 20/20-W, Raytheon 20120 Vision Digital In-Car Video Systems, date: Unknown. |
Overview of the IEEE 802.15.4 standards for Low rate Wireless Personal Area Networks, 2010 7th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), Copyright 2010. |
Lewis, S.R., Future System Specifications for Traffic Enforcement Equipment, S.R. 1 Source: IEE Colloquium (Digest), N 252, Publication Date: Nov. 18, 1996, pp. 8/1-8/2. |
Kopin Corporation; Home Page; Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Posted Date: Unknown; <http://www.kopin.com>. |
Translation of Korean Patent No. 10-1050897, published Jul. 20, 2011. |
Lilliput RV 18-50NP 5″ Rear View Mirror TFT LCD Screen with Camera, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.case-mod.com/lilliput-rv1850np-rear-view-mirror-tft-lcd-screen-with-camera-p-1271.html>, Mar. 4, 2005. |
Motor Magazine Article, Recreating the Scene of an Accident, published 2005. |
New Rearview-Mirror-Based Camera Display Takes the Guesswork Out of Backing Up Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: httb://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/497750>, Press Release, Oct. 30, 2006. |
SIIF Award for Multi Black Box, published Dec. 10, 2004. |
Near Field Communication; Sony Corporation; pp. 1-7, Date: Unknown. |
Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon Dual Lens HD Action Camera, http://www.oregonscientificstore.com/Oregon-Scientific-ATC-Chameleon-Dual-Lens-HD-Action-Camera.data, Date Posted: Unknown; Date Printed: Oct. 13, 2014, pp. 1-4. |
“Stalker Press Room—Using In-Car Video, the Internet, and the Cloud to keep police officers safe is the subject of CopTrax live, free webinar.” Stalker. Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Posted Date: Jul. 31, 2014. |
State of Utah Invitation to Bid State Cooperative Contract; Vendor: ICOP Digital, Inc., Contract No. MA503, Jul. 1, 2008. |
Wasson, Brian; “Digital Eyewear for Law Enforcement.” Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Posted Date: Dec. 9, 2013; <http://www.wassom.com/digital-eyewear-for-law-enforcement.html>. |
X26 Taser, Date Unknown. |
Taser International; Taser X26 Specification Sheet, 2003. |
Digital Ally First Vu Mountable Digital Camera Video Recorder, http://www.opticsplanet.com/digital-ally-first-vu-mountable-digital-camera-video-recorder.html?gclid=CIKohcX05rkCFSIo7AodU0IA0g&ef_id=UjCGEAAAAWGEjrQF:20130925155534:s, Sep. 25, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-4. |
Drift X170, http://driftinnovation.com/support/firmware-update/x170/, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
Dyna Spy Inc. hidden cameras, https://www.dynaspy.com/hidden-cameras/spy-cameras/body-worn-wearable-spy-cameras, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Ecplaza HY-001HD law enforcement DVR, http://fireeye.en.ecplaza.net/law-enforcement-dvr--238185-1619696.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Edesix VideoBadge, http://www.edesix.com/edesix-products, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
GoPro Official Website: The World's Most Versatile Camera, http://gopro.com/products/?gclid=CKqHv9jT4rkCFWZk7AodyiAAaQ, Sep. 23, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 4-9. |
Isaw Advance Hull HD EXtreme, www.isawcam.co.kr, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
Kustom Signals VieVu, http://www.kustomsignals.com/index.php/mvideo/vievu, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-4. |
Lea-Aid Scorpion Micro Recorder Patrol kit,http://www.leacorp.com/products/SCORPION-Micro-Recorder-Patrol-kit.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
Looxcie Wearable & mountable streaming video cams, http://www.looxcie.com/overview?gclid=CPbDyv6piq8CFWeFQAodlhXC-w, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-4. |
Midland XTC HD Video Camera, http://midlandradio.com/Company/xtc100-signup, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Panasonic Handheld AVCCAM HD Recorder/Player, http://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/ag-hmr10.asp, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration dated Jan. 30, 2014, International Application No. PCT/US2013/062415; International Filing dated Sep. 27, 2013, Applicant: Digital Ally, Inc. |
Point of View Cameras Military & Police, http://pointofviewcameras.com/military-police, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
POV.HD System Digital Video Camera, http://www.vio-pov.com/index.php, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
SIV Security in Vehicle Driving Partner, http://www.siv.co.kr/, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
Spy Chest Mini Spy Camera / Self Contained Mini camcorder / Audio & Video Recorder, http://www.spytechs.com/spy_cameras/mini-spy-camera.htm, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Stalker VUE Law Enforcement Grade Body Worn Video Camera/Recorder, http://www.stalkerradar.com/law_vue.shtml, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
SUV Cam, http://www.elmo.co.jp/suv-cam/en/product/index.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
TASER AXON Body On Officer Video/Police Body Camera, http://www.taser.com/products/on-officer-video/axon-body-on-officer-video, Sep. 23, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-8. |
TASER AXON Flex On-Officer Video/Police Video Camera, http://www.taser.com/products/on-officer-video/taser-axon, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-8. |
Taser Cam Law Enforcement Audio/Video Recorder (gun mounted), http://www.taser.com/products/on-officer-video/taser-cam, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Tide Leader police body worn camera, http://tideleader.en.gongchang.com/product/14899076, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
UCorder Pockito Wearable Mini Pocket Camcorder, http://www.ucorder.com/, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
Veho MUVI HD, http://veho-uk.fastnet.co.uk/main/shop.aspx?category=CAMMUVIHD, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-5. |
Veho MUVI portable wireless speaker with dock, http://veho-uk.fastnet.co.uk/main/shop.aspx?category=camcorder, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
Vidmic Officer Worn Video & Radio Accessories, http://www.vidmic.com/, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, p. 1. |
VIEVU Products, http://www.vievu.com/vievu-products/vievu-squared/, Sep. 25, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
WatchGuard CopVu Wearable Video Camera System, http://watchguardvideo.com/copvu/overview, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
Witness Cam headset, http://www.secgru.com/DVR-Witness-Cam-Headset-Video-Recorder-SG-DVR-1-COP.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
WolfCom 3rd Eye, X1 A/V Recorder for Police and Military, http://wolfcomusa.com/Products/Products.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration dated Jan. 14, 2016, International Application No. PCT/US2015/056039; International Filing date Oct. 16, 2015, Applicant: Digital Ally, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,142 Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,142 Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00775, Taser International, Inc. v. Digital Ally Inc., filed Jan. 25, 2017. |
International Association of Chiefs of Police Digital Video System Minimum Specifications; Nov. 21, 2008. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00375, Taser International, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., filed Dec. 1, 2013. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00376, Taser International, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., filed Dec. 1, 2013. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00515, Taser International, Inc. v. Digital Ally Inc., filed Jan. 11, 2017. |
PCT Patent Application PCT/US16/34345 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 29, 2016. |
Digital Ally, Inc. vs. Taser International, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-020232 (CJM/TJ); US D. Kan, Complaint for Patent Infringement, Jan. 14, 2016. |
Digital Ally, Inc. vs. Enforcement video LLC d/b/a Watchguard Video., Case No. 2:16-cv-02349 (CJM/TJ); US D. Kan, Complaint for Patent Infringement, May 27, 2016. |
State of Utah Invitation to Bid State Cooperative Contract; Vendor: Kustom Signals Inc., Contract No. MA1991, Apr. 25, 2008. |
PCT Patent Application PCT/US17/16383 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2017. |
Invalidity Chart for International Publication No. WO2014/000161 Oct. 31, 2017. |
Petition for Post Grant Review No. PGR2018-00052, Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., filed Mar. 19, 2018. |
MPEG-4 Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N4668 dated Mar. 2002. |
European Patent Application 15850436.6 Search Report dated May 4, 2018. |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00375, Axon Enterprise Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., issued Jun. 1, 2018. |
Decision Denying Institution of Post Grant Review for Post Grant Review No. PGR2018-00052, Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., issued Oct. 1, 2018. |
Asian Wolf High Quality Angel Eye Body Video Spy Camera Recorder System, http://www.asianwolf.com/covert-bodycam-hq-angeleye.html, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Brick House Security Body Worn Cameras / Hidden Cameras / Covert Spy Cameras, http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/body-worn-covert-spy-cameras.html?sf=0#sortblock&CMPID=PD_Google_%22body+camera%22&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=%22body+camera%22&mm_campaign=876a94ea5dd198a8c5dc3d1e67eccb34&keyword=%22body+camera%. |
Amazon.com wearable camcorders, http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_0_4?url=search-alias%3Dphoto&field-keywords=wearable+camcorder&x=0&y=0&sprefix=wear, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-4. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated Feb. 4, 2016; International Application No. PCT/US2015/056052; International Filing Date: Oct. 16, 2015; Applicant: Digital Ally, Inc⋅. |
http:/ /www.k-h-b.com/board/board.php?board=products01&comand=body&no=1, Current State of Technology Held by the Company, Copyright 2005. |
City of Pomona Request for Proposals for Mobile Video Recording System for Police Vehicles, dated prior to Apr. 4, 2013. |
http://www.k-h-b.com/sub1_02.html, Copyright 2005. |
Renstrom, Joell; “Tiny 3D Projectors Allow You to Transmit Holograms From a Cell Phone.” Giant Freakin Robot. Printed Date: Oct. 16, 2014; Posted Date: Jun. 13, 2014; <http://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci/coming-3d-projectors-transmit-holograms-cell-phone.html>. |
Request for Comment 1323 of the Internet Engineering Task Force, TCP Extensions for High Performance, Date: May 1992. |
RevealMedia RS3-SX high definition video recorder, http://www.revealmedia.com/buy-t166/cameras/rs3-sx.aspx, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-2. |
Scorpion Micro DV Video Audio Recorder, http://www.leacorp.com/scorpion-micro-dv-video-audio-recorder/, Sep. 26, 2013, Date Posted: Unknown, pp. 1-3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180082142 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |