Patent Application
20220124135
The techniques described herein relate generally to server-side streaming adaptation in adaptive streaming systems, including by selecting and switching among available video tracks, including selecting and switching between input video tracks in the ISO Base Media File Format (ISOBMFF).
Various types of 3D content and multi-directional content exist. For example, omnidirectional video is a type of video that is captured using a set of cameras, as opposed to just a single camera as done with traditional unidirectional video. For example, cameras can be placed around a particular center point, so that each camera captures a portion of video on a spherical coverage of the scene to capture 360-degree video. Video from multiple cameras can be stitched, possibly rotated, and projected to generate a projected two-dimensional picture representing the spherical content. For example, an equal rectangular projection can be used to put the spherical map into a two-dimensional image. This can be then further processed, for example, using two-dimensional encoding and compression techniques. Ultimately, the encoded and compressed content is stored and delivered using a desired delivery mechanism (e.g., thumb drive, digital video disk (DVD), file download, digital broadcast, and/or online streaming). Such video can be used for virtual reality (VR) and/or 3D video.
At the client side, when the client processes the content, a video decoder decodes the encoded and compressed video and performs a reverse-projection to put the content back onto the sphere. A user can then view the rendered content, such as using a head-mounted viewing device. The content is often rendered according to a user's viewport, which represents an angle at which the user is looking at the content. The viewport may also include a component that represents the viewing area, which can describe how large, and in what shape, the area is that is being viewed by the viewer at the particular angle.
When the video processing is not done in a viewport-dependent manner, such that the video encoder and/or decoder do not know what the user will actually view, then the whole encoding, delivery and decoding process will process the entire spherical content. This can allow, for example, the user to view the content at any particular viewport and/or area, since all of the spherical content is encoded, delivered and decoded. However, processing all of the spherical content can be compute intensive and can consume significant bandwidth.
Online streaming techniques, such as dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), can provide adaptive bitrate media streaming techniques (including multi-directional content and/or other media content). DASH can, for example, allow a client to request one of multiple versions of content that are available in a manner such that the requested content is chosen by the client to meet the client's current needs and/or processing capabilities. However, such streaming techniques require the client to perform such adaptation, which can place a heavy burden on client devices and/or may not be achievable by low-cost devices.
In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, apparatus, systems, and methods are provided for implementing server-side streaming adaptation (SSSA) in adaptive streaming systems using derived selection and switch tracks.
Some embodiments relate to a method implemented by a client device in communication with a server, the method including receiving, from the server, a media description file for media data hosted by the server, the media description file comprising a general media request description; transmitting, to the server, a set of one or more parameters associated with the client device, a communication link between the client device and the server, or both; receiving, from the server, an adapted track comprising a portion of the media data, wherein: the portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the set of one or more parameters; and the portion of the media data is generated by performing a derivation operation to a track comprising the portion of the media data from a group of tracks that each comprise different media data, and adding the portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a portion of the adapted track.
In some examples, the media description file comprises a Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (DASH) manifest file comprising an adaptation set, wherein the adaptation set comprises a single representation with a placeholder Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for the adapted track.
In some examples, the method further includes determining an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters; and transmitting the updated parameter to the server.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving a second portion of the media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter.
In some examples, the second portion of the media data is generated by performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks, and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track.
Some embodiments relate to a method implemented by a server in communication with a client device, the method comprising receiving, from the client device, a set of one or more parameters associated with the client device, a communication link between the client device and the server, or both; accessing multimedia data comprising: a plurality of media tracks, each media track comprising an associated series of samples of media data; and a derived track comprising a set of derivation operations to perform to generate a series of samples of media data; performing a derivation operation of the set of derivation operations to generate a portion of media data for an adapted track, comprising: determining, based on the derivation operation, a group of media tracks from the plurality of media tracks, comprising determining each media track in the group of tracks meets a grouping criteria, wherein the group of media tracks is a subset of the plurality of media tracks; and performing the derivation operation with the determined group of media tracks as inputs, based on the set of one or more parameters, to generate the portion of the adapted track; and transmitting the adapted track comprising the portion of the media data to the client device.
In some examples, the grouping criteria comprises an alternate group value; and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises an alternate group equal to the alternate group value.
In some examples, the grouping criteria comprises a switch group value; and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises a switch group equal to the switch group value.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving a request for a media description file from the client device; and transmitting the media description file to the client device.
In some examples, the media description file comprises a Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (DASH) manifest file comprising an adaptation set, wherein the adaptation set comprises a single representation with a placeholder Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for the adapted track.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving, from the client device, an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters from the client device.
In some examples, the method further includes transmitting, to the client, a second portion of media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter. In some examples, the method further includes performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks; and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track media samples from the plurality of media tracks to generate the derived track with the selected media samples.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus comprising a processor in communication with memory, the processor being configured to execute instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to perform: receiving, from the server, a media description file for media data hosted by the server, the media description file comprising a general media request description; transmitting, to the server, a set of one or more parameters associated with the client device, a communication link between the client device and the server, or both; receiving, from the server, an adapted track comprising a portion of the media data, wherein: the portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the set of one or more parameters; and the portion of the media data is generated by performing a derivation operation to a track comprising the portion of the media data from a group of tracks that each comprise different media data, and adding the portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a portion of the adapted track.
In some examples, the media description file comprises a Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (DASH) manifest file comprising an adaptation set, wherein the adaptation set comprises a single representation with a placeholder Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for the adapted track.
In some examples, the method further includes determining an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters; and transmitting the updated parameter to the server.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving a second portion of the media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter.
In some examples, the second portion of the media data is generated by performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks, and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus comprising a processor in communication with a memory, the processor being configured to execute instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to perform receiving, from the client device, a set of one or more parameters associated with the client device, a communication link between the client device and the server, or both; accessing multimedia data comprising: a plurality of media tracks, each media track comprising an associated series of samples of media data; and a derived track comprising a set of derivation operations to perform to generate a series of samples of media data; performing a derivation operation of the set of derivation operations to generate a portion of media data for an adapted track, comprising: determining, based on the derivation operation, a group of media tracks from the plurality of media tracks, comprising determining each media track in the group of tracks meets a grouping criteria, wherein the group of media tracks is a subset of the plurality of media tracks; and performing the derivation operation with the determined group of media tracks as inputs, based on the set of one or more parameters, to generate the portion of the adapted track; and transmitting the adapted track comprising the portion of the media data to the client device.
In some examples, the grouping criteria comprises an alternate group value; and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises an alternate group equal to the alternate group value.
In some examples, the grouping criteria comprises a switch group value; and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises a switch group equal to the switch group value.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving a request for a media description file from the client device; and transmitting the media description file to the client device.
In some examples, the media description file comprises a Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (DASH) manifest file comprising an adaptation set, wherein the adaptation set comprises a single representation with a placeholder Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for the adapted track.
In some examples, the method further includes receiving, from the client device, an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters from the client device.
In some examples, the method further includes transmitting, to the client, a second portion of media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter.
In some examples, the method further includes performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks; and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the features of the disclosed subject matter in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the disclosed subject matter that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto. It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like reference character. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. The drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale, with emphasis instead being placed on illustrating various aspects of the techniques and devices described herein.
Conventional adaptive media streaming techniques rely on the client device to perform adaptation, which the client typically performs based on adaptation parameters that are determined by and/or available to the client. For example, the client can receive a description of the available media (e.g., including different available bitrates), determine its processing capabilities and/or network bandwidth, and use the determined information to select a best available bitrate from the available bitrates that meets the client's current processing capabilities. The client can update the associated adaptation parameters over time, and adjust the requested bitrate accordingly to dynamically adjust the content for changing client conditions.
The inventors have discovered and appreciated deficiencies with conventional client-side streaming adaptation approaches. In particular, such paradigms place the burden of content adaptation on the client, such that the client is responsible for obtaining its relevant processing parameters and processing the available content to select among the available representations to find the best representation for the client's parameters. The adaptation process is iterative, such that the client must repeatedly perform the adaptation process over time. Accordingly, a heavy burden is placed on the client, and it requires the client device to have sufficient minimum-processing capabilities. Such client-side burdens can be further compounded based on certain types of content. For example, some content (e.g., immersive media content) requires the client to perform various compute-intensive processing steps in order to decode and render the content to the user.
To address these and other problems with conventional client-side driven streaming adaptation approaches, the techniques described herein provide for server-side adaptation where a media and/or network server may perform aspects of streaming adaptation that are otherwise conventionally performed by the client device. Accordingly, the techniques provide for a major paradigm shift that moves some and/or all of the adaptation process to the server instead of the client. For example, in some embodiments the techniques can allow the client to simply provide the server with appropriate adaptation information and/or parameters (e.g., indicative of the client's network conditions, processing capabilities, etc.), and the server can generate an appropriate media stream for the client. As a result, the client processing can be reduced to receiving and playing back the media, rather than also performing the adaptation.
In some embodiments, the client device can provide rendering information to the server. For example, in some embodiments the client device can provide viewport information to the server for immersive media scenarios. The server can use the viewport information to construct the viewport for the client at the server-side, instead of requiring the client device to perform the stitching and construction of the viewport. Accordingly, spatial media processing tasks can be moved to the server-side of adaptive streaming implementations.
In some embodiments, the techniques described herein for derived track selection and track switching can be used to enable track selection and switching, at run time, from an alternate track group and a switch track group, respectively for delivery to the client device. Therefore, a server can use a derived track that includes selection and switching derivation operations that allow the server to construct a single media track for the user based on the available media tracks (e.g., from among media tracks of different bitrates). Transformation operations are described herein that provide for track derivation operations that can be used to perform track selection and track switching at the sample level (e.g., not the track level). As described herein, a number of input tracks (e.g., tracks of different bitrates, qualities, etc.) can be processed by track selection derivation operations to select samples from one of the input tracks at the sample level to generate the media samples of the output track. Accordingly, the selection-based track derivation techniques described herein allow for the selection of samples from a track in a group of tracks at the time of the derivation operation. In some embodiments, the selection-based track derivation can provide for a track encapsulation of track samples as the output from the derivation operation(s) of a derived track, where the track samples are selected or switched from a group of tracks. As a result, a track selection derivation operation can provide samples from any of the input tracks to the derivation operation as specified by the transformations of the derived track to generate the resulting track encapsulation of the samples.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth regarding the systems and methods of the disclosed subject matter and the environment in which such systems and methods may operate, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed subject matter. In addition, it will be understood that the examples provided below are exemplary, and that it is contemplated that there are other systems and methods that are within the scope of the disclosed subject matter.
Generally, 3D content can be represented using spherical content to provide a 360 degree view of a scene (e.g., sometimes referred to as omnidirectional media content). While a number of views can be supported using the 3D sphere, an end user typically just views a portion of the content on the 3D sphere. The bandwidth required to transmit the entire 3D sphere can place heavy burdens on a network, and may not be sufficient to support spherical content. It is therefore desirable to make 3D content delivery more efficient. Viewport dependent processing can be performed to improve 3D content delivery. The 3D spherical content can be divided into regions/tiles/sub-pictures, and only those related to viewing screen (e.g., viewport) can be transmitted and delivered to the end user.
In the process 200, due to current network bandwidth limitations and various adaptation requirements (e.g., on different qualities, codecs and protection schemes), the 3D spherical VR content is first processed (stitched, projected and mapped) onto a 2D plane (by block 202) and then encapsulated in a number of tile-based (or sub-picture-based) and segmented files (at block 204) for delivery and playback. In such a tile-based and segmented file, a spatial tile in the 2D plane (e.g., which represents a spatial portion, usually in a rectangular shape of the 2D plane content) is typically encapsulated as a collection of its variants, such as in different qualities and bitrates, or in different codecs and protection schemes (e.g., different encryption algorithms and modes). In some examples, these variants correspond to representations within adaptation sets in MPEG DASH. In some examples, it is based on user's selection on a viewport that some of these variants of different tiles that, when put together, provide a coverage of the selected viewport, are retrieved by or delivered to the receiver (through delivery block 206), and then decoded (at block 208) to construct and render the desired viewport (at blocks 210 and 212).
As shown in
A flat file structure for the content could be used, for example, for a video track for a single movie. For VR content, there is more content than is sent and/or displayed by the receiving device. For example, as discussed herein, there can be content for the entire 3D sphere, where the user is only viewing a small portion. In order to encode, store, process, and/or deliver such content more efficiently, the content can be divided into different tracks.
In operation, the variant tracks include the actual picture data. The device selects among the alternating variant tracks to pick the one that is representative of the sub-picture region (or sub-picture track) 310. The sub-picture tracks 310 are tiled and composed together into the 2D big picture track 308. Then ultimately the track 308 is reverse-mapped, e.g., to rearrange some of the portions to generate track 306. The track 306 is then reverse-projected back to the 3D track 302, which is the original 3D picture.
The exemplary track hierarchical structure can include aspects described in, for example: m39971, “Deriving Composite Tracks in ISOBMFF”, January 2017 (Geneva, CH); m40384, “Deriving Composite Tracks in ISOBMFF using track grouping mechanisms”, April 2017 (Hobart, AU); m40385, “Deriving VR Projection and Mapping related Tracks in ISOBMFF;” m40412, “Deriving VR ROI and Viewport related Tracks in ISOBMFF”, MPEG 118th meeting, April 2017, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. In
The number of tracks shown in
A derived visual track can be indicated by its containing sample entry of type ‘dtrk’. A derived sample contains an ordered list of the operations to be performed on an ordered list of input images or samples. Each of the operations can be specified or indicated by a Transform Property. A derived visual sample is reconstructed by performing the specified operations in sequence. Examples of transform properties in ISOBMFF that can be used to specify a track derivation, including those in the latest ISOBMFF Technologies Under Consideration (TuC) (see, e.g., N17833, “Technologies under Consideration for ISOBMFF”, July 2018, Ljubljana, SK, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety), include: the ‘idtt’ (identity) transform property; the ‘clap’ (clean aperture) transform property; the ‘srot’ (rotation) transform property; the ‘dslv’ (dissolve) transform property; the ‘2dcc’ (ROI crop) transform property; the ‘tocp’ (Track Overlay Composition) transform property; the ‘tgcp’ (Track Grid Composition) transform property; the ‘tgmc’ (Track Grid Composition using Matrix values) transform property; the ‘tgsc’ (Track Grid Sub-Picture Composition) transform property; the ‘tmcp’ (Transform Matrix Composition) transform property; the ‘tgcp’ (Track Grouping Composition) transform property; and the ‘tmcp’ (Track Grouping Composition using Matrix Values) transform property. All of these track derivations are related to spatial processing, including image manipulation and spatial composition of input tracks.
Derived visual tracks can be used to specify a timed sequence of visual transformation operations that are to be applied to the input track(s) of the derivation operation. The input tracks can include, for example, tracks with still images and/or samples of timed sequences of images. In some embodiments, derived visual tracks can incorporate aspects provided in ISOBMFF, which is specified in w18855, “Text of ISO/IEC 14496-12 6th edition,” October 2019, Geneva, CH, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. ISOBMFF can be used to provide, for example, a base media file design and a set of transformation operations. Exemplary transformation operations include, for example, Identity, Dissolve, Crop, Rotate, Mirror, Scaling, Region-of-interest, and Track Grid, as specified in w19428, “Revised text of ISO/IEC CD 23001-16 Derived visual tracks in the ISO base media file format,” July 2020, Online, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Some additional derivation transformation candidates are provided in the TuC w19450, “Technologies under Consideration on ISO/IEC 23001-16,” July, 2020, Online, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, including composition and immersive media processing related transformation operations.
Two track selection-based derivation transformations, namely “Selection of One” (‘sell’) and “Selection of Any” (‘seln’), were proposed in m39971, “Deriving Composite Tracks in ISOBMFF,” January 2017, Geneva, CH, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. However, both of these transformations were designed for the purpose of image composition of input tracks, and therefore require dimensional information for the composition operation. For example,
The inventors have appreciated problems with such selection approaches that are used for composition operations. For example, such transformation properties (e.g., like the sell and seln transformation properties) do not provide for specifying any selection criteria among input tracks. As another example, the placement parameters relocate and scale the selected image, which may not be needed or desirable. For example, it can be desirable to only select an image or samples from an input track without relocating and/or scaling the image or samples. As a result, the relocation and/or scaling operations add unneeded complexity and/or require providing unnecessary information. Further, such conventional approaches have not been adopted into practice, and therefore ISOBMFF does not include such transformation properties for use.
Track metadata can include information that specifies grouping information. For example,
Some track selection mechanisms can be used to select from groups of tracks. For example,
The attribute_list 704 field is a list that is composed of data that follows to the end of the box and lists attributes. The attributes in the list can be used as descriptions of tracks or differentiation criteria for tracks in the same alternate or switch group. Some attributes can be descriptive attributes that characterize the tracks that they modify. Exemplary descriptive attributes can include, for example, temporal scalability (‘tesc’) where the track can be temporally scaled, fine-grain SNR scalability (‘fgsc’) where the track can be scaled in terms of quality, coarse-grain SNR scalability (‘cgsc’) where the track can be scaled in terms of quality, spatial scalability (‘spsc’) where the track can be spatially scaled, region-of-interest scalability (‘resc’) where the track can be region-of-interest scaled, view scalability (‘vwsc’) where the track can be scaled in terms of number of views, and/or the like. Some attributes can be differentiating, and differentiate between tracks that belong to the same alternate or switch groups. A differentiating attribute can have a pointer that indicates the location of the information that differentiates the track from other tracks with the same attribute. Exemplary differentiating attributes can include, for example, such as codec (‘codec’) with a pointer to a sample entry (e.g., in SampleDescriptionBox of a media track), screen size (‘scsz’) with a pointer to width and height fields (e.g., of a VisualSampleEntry), max packet size (‘mpsz’) with a pointer to a Maxpacketsize field (e.g., in RtpHintSampleEntry), media type (‘mtyp’) with a pointer to a handler type (e.g., in a HandlerBox of a media track), media language (‘mela’) with a pointer to the language field in MediaHeaderBox, bitrate (‘bite’) with a pointer to the total size of the samples in the track divided by the duration in the TrackHeaderBox, frame rate (‘frar’), with the number of samples in the track divided by the duration in the TrackHeaderBox, number of views (‘nvws’) with a pointer to the number of views in the track, and/or the like.
A switch group can be a subset of tracks in an alternate group. For example, an alternate group can specify a set of video tracks, one of which can be played as described herein. A switch group can form a sub-group of the tracks in the alternate group, and can indicate how the tracks within the switch group switch (e.g., according to what parameters). Additionally, the track selection box can provide a number of attributes for selection. As a result, a number of parameters can be specified to help provide information on how the tracks are to be switched. For example, the codec attribute can be used to provide for selection based on different codecs. Another example is screen size, where the switch group can include different tracks for different screen sizes. Such attributes can be used, for example, for bitrate adaption.
Conventional approaches, such as a track section box as discussed in conjunction with
The techniques described herein provide transformation operations for track derivation operations that can be used to perform track selection and track switching. The techniques described herein improve existing track derivation technology by providing for selecting samples from among multiple input tracks. As described further herein, since there can be a number of input tracks to a track derivation operation, a track selection derivation can select one of the input tracks at the sample level (e.g., not the track level) as the output track. Accordingly, the selection-based track derivation techniques described herein allow for the selection of samples of a track from a group of tracks at the time of derivation to generate a new track. The track derivation operations can provide flexibility in terms of the number of input tracks to the derivation operation. In some embodiments, the input tracks are a group of tracks. In some embodiments, just one input track is provided to the derivation operation, which is used to determine the associated group of tracks for the derivation operation.
An output track or the resulting media data of a derived track can include temporal sequences of contiguous video data samples. As described herein, the derived track can include a sequence of transformation properties that specify how to generate the samples for the derived track (e.g., where each transformation operation specifies how to generate an associated sample of the output track). In some embodiments, the selection-based track derivation techniques described herein can provide for an encapsulation of track samples (e.g., as the output from the derivation operation), where the track samples are selected or switched from a group of tracks as specified by the selection transformation properties. Such a track encapsulation is not provided for by conventional track selection mechanisms, such as those using track grouping mechanisms (e.g., alternate or switch groups, which switch at the track level and not the sample level). As a result, a track selection derivation operations described herein can provide samples from any of the input tracks to the derivation operation as specified by the transformations of the derived track. Further, the resulting derived track can be a new track. As a result, the techniques provide for associating other tracks (e.g., metadata and/or audio tracks) to the output derived track.
In some embodiments, grouping information can be used to indicate which set of tracks should be switched or selected from for a derivation operation. As described herein, the input tracks to the derivation operations can be grouped into alternate or switch groups. For example, the alternate or switch groups, respectively, can be implemented as described in clause 8.3.2, “track header box”, and clause 8.10.3, “track selection box”, in the latest ISOBMFF specification, such as discussed in conjunction with
Such techniques can therefore provide for track switching and selection derivation operations that are not otherwise available with conventional approaches. In some embodiments, such a track encapsulation can allow for a straightforward association of metadata about a selected or switched track with the track encapsulation itself (e.g., by specifying the metadata in the derived track), rather than associating the metadata with a track group from which the track is selected or switched. For example, in order to specify that a track selected from a track group at run time has a region of interest (ROI), it becomes very easy and natural using the techniques described herein to signal the ROI for the derived track. For a static ROI, as one example, the ROI can be signaled in the derived track, such as in the metadata box (e.g., ‘meta’ box) of the derived track. For a dynamic ROI, as another example, a timed metadata track can reference the derived track, such as by using the reference type ‘cdsc.’ In contrast, with conventional techniques there is no direct way to signal such ROI metadata since it cannot be signaled in the derived track. For example, while a static ROI can be signaled in the metadata box of every track in an alternate or switch group using conventional techniques, such signaling incorrectly conveys that every track has the static ROI (rather than just a single track with samples selected from those tracks has the ROI). A similar problem occurs for dynamic ROIs: if a timed metadata track representing a dynamic ROI references an alternate or switch group, the existing track reference in the track reference box requires that the ROI applies to each track in the alternate or switched group. For example, sub-clause 8.3.3 in ISOBMFF states that, when it applies to referencing a track group, “the track reference applies to each track of the referenced track group individually.” Similar to the static ROI case, such a track reference is not the desired functionality since the ROI does not apply to each track, rather it applies to the resulting (single) track of the derivation.
The track selection or switching techniques described herein can be used, for example, for applications that benefit from selective playback, adaptive streaming, and/or other various multimedia processing scenarios, such as those that require switching or selecting media samples from one or more tracks. In some embodiments, the track selection derivation techniques provided herein provide for a derived track encapsulation that enables the creation and execution of track-based media processing workflows. For example, the derived track encapsulation techniques can provide for in-network-based media processing (e.g., as described in w19062, “Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23090-8 Network-based Media Processing,” January 2020, Brussels, BE, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety) which can use derived tracks not just as outputs but also as intermediate inputs in the workflows.
In some embodiments, the derived track encapsulation allows track selection or track switching to be transparent to clients of dynamic adaptive streaming, such as DASH (e.g., as described in w19062), and carried out at corresponding servers or within distribution networks, for instance, implemented in conjunction SAND (e.g., as described in w18609, “Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23009-1:2014 4th edition,” July 2019, Gothenburg, SE, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). Such an approach can, for example, simplify client logics and implementations with respect to shifting dynamic content adaptation from the streaming manifest level to the file format derived track level. This can be done, for example, based on an attribute list as described herein (e.g., with descriptive and differentiating attributes). For example, for adaptive streaming, a DASH manifest file includes an adaptation set that can have a number of representations that each correspond to one track, which allows a client to keep choosing segments from representations of an adaptation set with different qualities according to the client's capabilities in the network. However, such selection does not generate a new track. Rather, a client picks-up segments from a track and consumes the selected content, but does not produce output that results in another track. Further, the client is required to know the various available versions of content and to determine how to select the content. The client may also need to implement logic to request specific portions of the content. For example, if a client is consuming 360-degree content, the client will be viewing the content through a viewport. For 360-degree content, various tiles or portions of the content often need to be stitched and processed to generate the resulting viewport content, and therefore the client needs to choose which tiles need to be downloaded to cover the viewport (often requiring a client to request more content than is needed to cover the viewport), and perform the stitching and other steps to generate the ultimate viewport content. As a result, needing to support such processing at the client-side can be an issue, especially for light client devices.
In contrast, the techniques described herein can implement adaptive streaming at the track level rather than at the manifest level. As a result, the processing can be performed using the techniques described herein at either the client or server side (e.g., to achieve server-side adaptation instead of client-side adaptation). For example, the techniques described herein can eliminate the need for a client to pick-up or choose the representations and/or to perform subsequent processing to generate content (e.g., content for a viewport). Instead, the client can provide a set of parameters to the server (e.g., screen size/resolution, network bandwidth, etc.) to specify the content that can be supported by the client. On the server side, the server can take those parameters and apply the track selection operation to produce a segment for the client and send just that segment to the client.
Accordingly, the encapsulation techniques described herein can provide for eliminating the use of an AdaptationSet and/or restricting its use to just containing a single Representation in DASH since the track selection can be performed outside of the DASH manifest file. With selection-based derived tracks, DASH clients (e.g., as described in w19062) and DASH aware network elements (DANE) (e.g., as specified in w18609) can simply provide values of attributes (e.g., codec ‘cdec’, screen size ‘scsz’, bitrate ‘bitr’, etc.) that are desired and/or required in the derived tracks, such that media origin servers and/or content delivery networks (CNDs) can provide content selection and switching from a group of available media tracks. As a result, the adaptation part of the logic can be moved from the client to the server, such that the client simply provides set-up parameters. Such a paradigm shift can significantly reduce the processing required by the client. In particular, for some clients, especially low-cost clients, it can be desirable to have the server construct the content for the client and to simply send a single stream to the client. Using such techniques, if a client is consuming 360 degree content, the client can simply request a viewport and receive exactly that content from the server. As another example, the techniques can be used for online gaming to provide for the sever to produce the content.
Additionally, the techniques described herein, including the derivation transformations, can also be used for other types of content other than video content. For example, the techniques described herein can be used to provide similar transformations for derived images and derived image items, such as those specified in ISO/IEC 23008-12, Image File Format, e.g., as provided in w16230, “Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23009-5 Server and Network Assisted DASH,” June 2016, Geneva, CH, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In some embodiments, the techniques provide for a transformation operation that can be used to select samples from input tracks and/or to switch between samples in the input tracks that are part of a same alternate group. The transformation operation can include an attribute list, and the attribute list values can be used to select samples from the input group of tracks.
In some examples, a new metadata box can be created, which will be referred to herein in one example as an alternate group selection (AlternateGroupSelection) derivation transformation, although it should be appreciated that this and other exemplary syntaxes and field names are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting, since other naming conventions can be used instead with the techniques described herein. The AlternateGroupSelection derivation transformation can provide for the selection of one (e.g., and only one) sample from the available samples of the input tracks. In some embodiments, the input tracks are from a same alternate group. For example, the input tracks can have a same value (e.g., non-zero value) of the alternate_group field in their track headers. As an illustrative example, the track selection can be made at the time of track derivation according to the alternate_group field as provided in sub-clause 8.3.3, “Track header box” in the ISOBMFF specification.
In some embodiments, the sample selection can be specified according to a list of attributes provided in an attribute list, such as an array of values attribute_list[] that are specified in the transformation operation. Such attribute(s) can be used as descriptions and/or differentiation criteria for selecting one track from the input tracks with all the matched attributes. As an illustrative example, the attributes can be matched one by one (e.g., in the order of appearance in the attributes in the list). In some embodiments, the attribute list can be empty. When the list is empty, the derivation may not impose any additional restriction to the sample selection. In some embodiments, the attributes that are matched can be provided in the TrackSeletionBoxes of the tracks. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the attributes may (or may not) be a subset of the attributes in TrackSeletionBox of each input track.
In some embodiments, the alternate group selection transformation operation can extend the visual derivation base with an attribute list.
In some embodiments, other groups of tracks can be the input to the track derivation operation instead of an alternate group of tracks. For example, the input tracks can be from a switch group, such that the derivation operation can select samples from a switch group of tracks. As an illustrative example, a switch group selection (e.g., SwitchGroupSelection) derivation transformation can provide for selection of one (e.g., and only one) sample from the samples of input tracks from a same switch group. For example, each of the input tracks can contain a track selection box (TrackSeletionBox) that each has a same value (e.g., non-zero value) of the switch_group field in the track selection box. In some examples, the selection can be made at the time of track derivation according to the TrackSeletionBox provided in sub-clause 8.10.3 “Track selection box” in ISOBMFF. In some embodiments, the selection from the switch group can be restricted according to a list of attributes (e.g., description and/or differentiating attributes) provided in an attribute list, such as a parameter array attribute_list[] that can be provided in the derivation transformation. As described herein, the attributes in the list can be used as descriptions and/or differentiation criteria for selecting one track from the input tracks.
In some embodiments, the samples can be selected from input tracks at the client and/or server side of a client-server configuration, such as the encoding device 104 and decoding device 110 in
In some embodiments, the techniques can be used with a single input track instead of a group of input tracks. As discussed herein, if a track is part of an alternate group, then the track will include an alternate_group value. Similarly, a track can include a switch_group value. In some embodiments, rather than including information that specifies the track group or switch group, the techniques can simply look at the alternate group value, and pick one track from that group. So with a single input track, the derivation process can perform the track selection by looking at the grouping information. Accordingly, some embodiments can provide for track derivations for track selection and switching with a single (representative) input track, rather than multiple input tracks.
In some embodiments, the selection can be performed from tracks of an alternate group. As an illustrative example, an alternate group selection transformation for one input track can be referred to for exemplary purposes as an AlternateGroupSelection1 derivation transformation, although this is not intended to be limiting. Such an AlternateGroupSelection1 derivation transformation can provide for selecting one sample from the samples of all tracks in an alternate group provided by the input track (e.g., the alternate group that the input track is in and/or represented by the input track). For example, the alternate group can be all of the tracks, if any, that have a same non-zero value of alternate_group as the input track in their track headers. In some embodiments, as described herein, the selection can be made at the time of track derivation according to the alternate_group provided in sub-clause 8.3.3, “Track header box”, in ISOBMFF.
In some embodiments, the selection can be further restricted according to a list of attributes. For example, a list of attributes can be provided in the parameter attribute_list[] in the derivation transformation. These attributes can be used as descriptions or differentiation criteria for selecting one track from the tracks in the alternate group. The attributes can be matched one by one in the order of the appearance of the attributes in the list. In some embodiments, when the list is empty, the derivation imposes no additional restriction to the selection. In some embodiments, the attributes can be matched to attributes in the TrackSeletionBox of each track. Accordingly, the attributes may or may not be a subset of the attributes in TrackSeletionBox of each and every track in the alternate group.
In some embodiments, the techniques can be provided for selecting from among tracks in a switch group. For an alternate group, the file format is restricted such that any track can only be in one alternate group. However, since a track can be in multiple switch groups, the switch group can be specified as part of the derivation operation. For example, since one track can be part of many switch groups, the techniques can indicate which switch group the derivation operation needs to look at for the selection.
In some embodiments, the SwitchGroupSelectionl derivation transformation provides a selection of one and only one sample from samples of tracks in a switch track group specified by the input track (e.g., the switch track group that the input track is in and/or represented by the input track). The switch track group can be identified by a non-zero value of the parameter switch_group specified in the derivation transformation. As a result, the tracks selected among for the derivation operation can include each track in the switch group, including the input track that contains the same value of the parameter switch_group. For example, the switch_group can be specified by a track selection box TrackSeletionBox in each track. Accordingly, in some examples, the selection can be made at the time of track derivation according to the definition of TrackSeletionBox provided in sub-clause 8.10.3 “Track selection box” in ISOBMFF.
In some embodiments, the selection can be restricted according to a list of description and differentiating attributes provided in a parameter array attribute_list[] in the derivation transformation. These attributes can be used as descriptions or differentiation criteria for selecting one track from the switch track group with all the matched attributes. In some embodiments, as described herein, when the list is empty, the derivation imposes no additional restriction to the selection as described herein. For example, the derivation operation can include matching the attributes in the attribute_list[] to attributes in the TrackSeletionBox of each track. The attributes can be matched one by one in the order of the appearances of the attributes in the list, as described herein. Accordingly, the specified attributes may or may not be a subset of the attributes in TrackSeletionBox of each and every track in the switch track group.
Conventional adaptive media streaming techniques rely on the client-device to perform any adaptation based on adaptation parameters that are available to the client. Not intending to be limiting, for ease of reference such techniques can be referred to generally as client-side streaming adaptation (CSSA), where a client device is responsible for performing streaming adaptation in adaptive media streaming systems.
In conventional adaptive streaming configurations, the streaming client, such as streaming client 1201, implements the adaptation logic for streaming adaptation. In particular, the streaming client 1201 can receive the MPD 1250, and select (e.g., based on the client's adaptation parameters, such as bandwidth, CPU processing power, etc.) a representation for each period of the MPD (which may change over time, given different network conditions and/or client processing capabilities), and retrieve the associated segments for presentation to the user. As the client's adaptation parameters change, the client can select different representations accordingly (e.g., lower bitrate data if the available network bandwidth decreases and/or if client processing power is low, or higher bitrate data if the available bandwidth increases and/or if client processing power is high).
The adaptation logic may include static as well as dynamic adaptation, in selecting segments from different media streams according to some adaptation parameters. This is described, for example, in “MPD Selection Metadata” of w18609, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
As described herein, in conventional configurations, the client device 1310 performs the adaptation logic 1311. The client device 1310 receives the manifest via the manifest delivery function 1330. The client device 1310 also receives adaptation parameters from streaming access engine 1312 and transmits requests for the selected segments to the streaming accessing engine 1312. The streaming access engine is also in communication with media engine 1313.
The inventors have discovered and appreciated deficiencies with conventional client-side streaming adaptation approaches. In particular, such paradigms are designed so that the client both obtains the information needed for content adaptation (e.g., adaptation parameters), receives a full description of all available content and associated representations (e.g., different bitrates), and processes the available content to select among the available representations to find the one that best suits the client's adaptation parameters. The client must further repeatedly perform the process over time, including updating the adaptation parameters and selecting the same and/or different representations depending on the updated parameters. Accordingly, a heavy burden is placed on the client, and it requires the client device to have sufficient processing capabilities. Further, such configurations often require the client to make a number of requests in order to start a streaming session, including (1) obtaining a manifest and/or other description of the available content, (2) requesting an initialization segment, and (3) then requesting content segments. Accordingly, such approaches often require three or more calls. Assuming for an illustrative example that each call takes approximately 500 ms, the initiation process can consume one or more seconds of time.
The inventors have further discovered and appreciated that for some types of content, such as immersive media, the client is required to perform compute-intensive operations. For example, conventional immersive media processing delivers tiles to the requesting client. The client device therefore needs to construct a viewport from the decoded tiles in order to render the viewport to the user. Such construction and/or stitching can require a lot of client-side processing power. Further, such approaches may require the client device to receive some content that is not ultimately rendered into the viewport, consuming unnecessary storage and bandwidth.
To address these and other problems with conventional client-side driven approaches, the techniques described herein provide for server-side selection and/or switching of media tracks. Not intending to be limiting, for ease of reference such techniques can be referred to generally as server-side streaming adaptation (SSSA), where a server may perform aspects of streaming adaptation that are otherwise conventionally performed by the client device. Accordingly, the techniques provide for a major paradigm shift compared to conventional approaches. In some embodiments, the techniques can move some and/or most of the adaptation logic to the server, such that the client can simply provide the server with appropriate adaptation information and/or parameters, and the server can generate an appropriate media stream for the client. As a result, the client processing can be reduced to receiving and playing back the media, rather than also performing the adaptation.
In some embodiments, the techniques provide for a set of adaptation parameters. The adaptation parameters can be collected by clients and/or networks and communicated to the servers to support server-side content adaptation. For example, the parameters can support bitrate adaptation (e.g., for switching among different available representations). As another example, the parameters can provide for temporal adaptation (e.g., to support trick plays). As a further example, the techniques can provide for spatial adaptation (e.g., viewport and/or viewport dependent media processing adaptation). As another example, the techniques can provide for content adaptation (e.g., for pre-rendering, storyline selection, and/or the like).
In some embodiments, the techniques described herein for derived track selection and track switching can be used to enable track selection and switching, at run time, from an alternate track group and a switch track group, respectively for delivery to the client device. Therefore, a server can use a derived track that includes selection and switching derivation operations that allow the server to construct a single media track for the user based on the available media tracks (e.g., from among media tracks of different bitrates). See also, for example, the derivations included in e.g., m54876, “Track Derivations for Track Selection and Switching in ISOBMFF”, October 2020, Online, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In some embodiments, the available tracks and/or representations can be stored as separate tracks. As described herein, transformation operations can be used to perform track selection and track switching at the sample level (e.g., not the track level). Accordingly, the techniques described herein for derived track selection and track switching can be used to enable track selection and switching, at run time, from a group of available media tracks (e.g., tracks of different bitrates) for delivery to the client device. Therefore, a server can use a derived track that includes selection and switching derivation operations that allow the server to construct a single media track for the user based on the available media tracks (e.g., from among media tracks of different bitrates) and the client's adaptation parameters. For example, the track selection and/or switching can be performed in a manner that selects from among the input tracks to determine which of the input tracks best-suits the client's adaptation parameters. As a result, a number of input tracks (e.g., tracks of different bitrates, qualities, etc.) can be processed by track selection derivation operations to select samples from one of the input tracks at the sample level to generate the media samples of the output track that are dynamically adjusted to meet the client's adaptation parameters as they change over time. As described herein, in some embodiments, the selection-based track derivation can encapsulate track samples as the output from the derivation operation(s) of a derived track. As a result, a track selection derivation operation can provide samples from any of the input tracks to the derivation operation as specified by the transformations of the derived track to generate the resulting track encapsulation of the samples. The resulting (new) track can be transmitted to the client device for playback.
In some embodiments, the client device can provide spatial adaptation information, such as spatial rendering information to the server. For example, in some embodiments the client device can provide viewport information (on a 2D, spherical and/or 3D viewport) to the server for immersive media scenarios. The server can use the viewport information to construct the viewport for the client at the server-side, instead of requiring the client device to perform the stitching and construction of the (the 2D, spherical or 3D) viewport. Accordingly, spatial media processing tasks can be moved to the server-side of adaptive streaming implementations.
In some embodiments, the client can provide other adaptation information, including temporal and/or content-based adaptation information. For example, the client can provide bitrate adaptation information (e.g., for representation switching). As another example, the client can provide temporal adaptation information (e.g., such as for trick plays, low-latency adaptation, fast-turn-ins, and/or the like). As a further example, the client can provide content adaptation information (e.g., for pre-rendering, storyline selection and/or the like). The server-side can be configured to receive and process such adaptation information to provide the temporal and/or content-based adaptation for the client device.
For example,
As described further herein, the adaptation parameters can be communicated using various techniques. For example, the adaptation parameters can be provided as query parameters (e.g., URL query parameters), HTTP parameters (e.g., as HTTP header parameters), SAND messages (e.g., carrying adaptation parameters collected by the client and/or other devices), and/or the like. An example of URL query parameters can include, for example: $bitrate=1024, $2D_viewport_x=0, $2D_viewport_y=0, $2D_viewport_width=1024, $2D_viewport_height=512, etc. An example of HTTP header parameters can include, for example: bitrate=1024, 2D_viewport_x=0, 2D_viewport_y=0, 2D_viewport_width=1024, 2D_viewport_height=512, etc.
The client device may subsequently collect adaptation parameters at step 1803. The client device may then send a request for a general and/or placeholder segment with the adaptation parameters at 1804 (e.g., which the server can use to select segments). In response, the server and/or CDN can select segments from the available tracks using the parameters at 1805 and transmit the selected segments at 1806 to the client device, which can be played back at step 1808. The client device may repeat the process at 1807 as shown to provide new/updated adaptation parameters to the server, to receive new segments, and to playback the received content accordingly.
According to some embodiments, the track derivations described herein can be used to select and/or switch tracks to implement CSSD. In some embodiments, when derived switch tracks are used to implement SSSA, the workflow above can be modified as shown in
In
According to some embodiments, in using server-side streaming adaptation, the client device can make one or more static selections (e.g., such as those related to video codec profile, screen size and encryption algorithm), and only leave dynamic media adaptation (e.g., such as those related to video bitrate, network bandwidth) to the server. For example, the client device may collect and pass dynamic adaptation parameters needed for adaptation logic to the server as part of segment requests. The communication of these adaptation parameters can be implemented in mechanisms including URL query parameters, HTTP header parameters, and/or SAND messages, for example, carrying adaptation parameters collected by the client and other DANE's. See, e.g., w16230, “Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23009-5 Server and Network Assisted DASH”, June 2016, Geneva, CH, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In some embodiments, both the streaming client and the server may perform associated aspects of adaptation logic. According to some embodiments, for example, such configurations may include a client device performing adaptation logic to first select a representation in an adaptation set (comprising one or more representations), and then subsequently transmitting adaptation parameters to the server. The server may then use the adaptation parameters and perform adaptation logic thereafter to dynamically select content over time for the client device. As another example, the server may perform the first adaptation, while the client performs one or more subsequent adaptations. As a further example, the client and server may alternate in some fashion over time which device performs the adaptation (e.g., based on available processing power at the client device, network latency, etc.).
Both the media segment delivery function 2020 and the client device 2010 perform an associated portion of the adaptation logic, as demonstrated by the media segment delivery function 2020 including adaptation logic 2010 and the streaming client 2010 including adaptation logic 2020. Accordingly, the client device 2010 receives and/or determines the adaptation parameters via streaming access engine 2012, determines a (e.g., first) segment from an available set of segments presented in the manifest 2041, and transmits a request for the segment to the segment delivery server 2021. The streaming client 2010 can also be configured to determine and update adaptation parameters over time, and to provide the adaptation parameters to the server so that the media segment delivery function 2020 can continue to perform adaptation over time for the streaming client 2010.
In both the server-side and mixed-side configurations, a media presentation description can be exchanged as discussed herein.
In some embodiments, for server-side and/or mixed-side configurations, the adaptation set can be modified such that each adaptation set only includes one representation.
Server-side adaptation can result in bandwidth reductions as well as reductions in overall content processing that may otherwise be required for some types of content, such as for immersive media. Referring back to
At step 2504, the server accesses multimedia data comprising (a) a plurality of media tracks, each media track comprising an associated series of samples of media data; and (b) a derived track comprising a set of derivation operations to perform to generate a series of samples of media data.
At step 2506, the server performs a derivation operation of the set of derivation operations to generate a portion of media data for an adapted track, comprising determining, based on the derivation operation, a group of media tracks from the plurality of media tracks, comprising determining each media track in the group of tracks meets a grouping criteria, wherein the group of media tracks is a subset of the plurality of media tracks; and performing the derivation operation with the determined group of media tracks as inputs, based on the set of one or more parameters, to generate the portion of the adapted track.
According to some embodiments, the grouping criteria comprises an alternate group value and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises an alternate group equal to the alternate group value. According to some embodiments, the grouping criteria comprises a switch group value and determining each media track in the group of tracks meets the grouping criteria comprises determining each media track in the group of tracks comprises a switch group equal to the switch group value.
At step 2508, the server transmits the adapted track comprising the portion of the media data to the client device.
According to some embodiments, the method further includes the server receiving a request for a media description file from the client device and transmitting the media description file to the client device. In some examples, the media description file comprises a Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) (DASH) manifest file comprising an adaptation set, wherein the adaptation set comprises a single representation with a placeholder Uniform Resource Locator (URL) for the adapted track.
According to some embodiments, the method further includes the server receiving, from the client device, an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters from the client device. The method may further include transmitting, to the client, a second portion of media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter.
In some examples, the method includes performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track.
At step 2604, the client device transmits, to the server, a set of one or more parameters associated with the client device, a communication link between the client device and the server, or both the computing device determines, based on the derivation operation, a group of media tracks from the plurality of media tracks.
At step 2606, the client device receives, from the server, an adapted track comprising a portion of the media data, wherein: the portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the set of one or more parameters; and the portion of the media data is generated by performing a derivation operation to a track comprising the portion of the media data from a group of tracks that each comprise different media data, and adding the portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a portion of the adapted track.
According to some embodiments, the method 2600 may optionally include the steps of determining an updated parameter for the set of one or more parameters and transmitting the updated parameter to the server. In some examples, the method 2600 further includes the step of receiving a second portion of the media data of the adapted track, wherein the second portion of the media data is adapted for the client device based on the updated parameter. In some examples, the second portion of the media data is generated by performing a second derivation operation to select a second track comprising the second portion of the media data from the group of tracks, and adding the second portion of the media data to the adapted track to generate a second portion of the adapted track.
Techniques operating according to the principles described herein may be implemented in any suitable manner. The processing and decision blocks of the flow charts above represent steps and acts that may be included in algorithms that carry out these various processes. Algorithms derived from these processes may be implemented as software integrated with and directing the operation of one or more single- or multi-purpose processors, may be implemented as functionally-equivalent circuits such as a Digital Signal Processing (DSP) circuit or an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), or may be implemented in any other suitable manner. It should be appreciated that the flow charts included herein do not depict the syntax or operation of any particular circuit or of any particular programming language or type of programming language. Rather, the flow charts illustrate the functional information one skilled in the art may use to fabricate circuits or to implement computer software algorithms to perform the processing of a particular apparatus carrying out the types of techniques described herein. It should also be appreciated that, unless otherwise indicated herein, the particular sequence of steps and/or acts described in each flow chart is merely illustrative of the algorithms that may be implemented and can be varied in implementations and embodiments of the principles described herein.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, the techniques described herein may be embodied in computer-executable instructions implemented as software, including as application software, system software, firmware, middleware, embedded code, or any other suitable type of computer code. Such computer-executable instructions may be written using any of a number of suitable programming languages and/or programming or scripting tools, and also may be compiled as executable machine language code or intermediate code that is executed on a framework or virtual machine.
When techniques described herein are embodied as computer-executable instructions, these computer-executable instructions may be implemented in any suitable manner, including as a number of functional facilities, each providing one or more operations to complete execution of algorithms operating according to these techniques. A “functional facility,” however instantiated, is a structural component of a computer system that, when integrated with and executed by one or more computers, causes the one or more computers to perform a specific operational role. A functional facility may be a portion of or an entire software element. For example, a functional facility may be implemented as a function of a process, or as a discrete process, or as any other suitable unit of processing. If techniques described herein are implemented as multiple functional facilities, each functional facility may be implemented in its own way; all need not be implemented the same way. Additionally, these functional facilities may be executed in parallel and/or serially, as appropriate, and may pass information between one another using a shared memory on the computer(s) on which they are executing, using a message passing protocol, or in any other suitable way.
Generally, functional facilities include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically, the functionality of the functional facilities may be combined or distributed as desired in the systems in which they operate. In some implementations, one or more functional facilities carrying out techniques herein may together form a complete software package. These functional facilities may, in alternative embodiments, be adapted to interact with other, unrelated functional facilities and/or processes, to implement a software program application.
Some exemplary functional facilities have been described herein for carrying out one or more tasks. It should be appreciated, though, that the functional facilities and division of tasks described is merely illustrative of the type of functional facilities that may implement the exemplary techniques described herein, and that embodiments are not limited to being implemented in any specific number, division, or type of functional facilities. In some implementations, all functionality may be implemented in a single functional facility. It should also be appreciated that, in some implementations, some of the functional facilities described herein may be implemented together with or separately from others (i.e., as a single unit or separate units), or some of these functional facilities may not be implemented.
Computer-executable instructions implementing the techniques described herein (when implemented as one or more functional facilities or in any other manner) may, in some embodiments, be encoded on one or more computer-readable media to provide functionality to the media. Computer-readable media include magnetic media such as a hard disk drive, optical media such as a Compact Disk (CD) or a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), a persistent or non-persistent solid-state memory (e.g., Flash memory, Magnetic RAM, etc.), or any other suitable storage media. Such a computer-readable medium may be implemented in any suitable manner. As used herein, “computer-readable media” (also called “computer-readable storage media”) refers to tangible storage media. Tangible storage media are non-transitory and have at least one physical, structural component. In a “computer-readable medium,” as used herein, at least one physical, structural component has at least one physical property that may be altered in some way during a process of creating the medium with embedded information, a process of recording information thereon, or any other process of encoding the medium with information. For example, a magnetization state of a portion of a physical structure of a computer-readable medium may be altered during a recording process.
Further, some techniques described above comprise acts of storing information (e.g., data and/or instructions) in certain ways for use by these techniques. In some implementations of these techniques—such as implementations where the techniques are implemented as computer-executable instructions—the information may be encoded on a computer-readable storage media. Where specific structures are described herein as advantageous formats in which to store this information, these structures may be used to impart a physical organization of the information when encoded on the storage medium. These advantageous structures may then provide functionality to the storage medium by affecting operations of one or more processors interacting with the information; for example, by increasing the efficiency of computer operations performed by the processor(s).
In some, but not all, implementations in which the techniques may be embodied as computer-executable instructions, these instructions may be executed on one or more suitable computing device(s) operating in any suitable computer system, or one or more computing devices (or one or more processors of one or more computing devices) may be programmed to execute the computer-executable instructions. A computing device or processor may be programmed to execute instructions when the instructions are stored in a manner accessible to the computing device or processor, such as in a data store (e.g., an on-chip cache or instruction register, a computer-readable storage medium accessible via a bus, a computer-readable storage medium accessible via one or more networks and accessible by the device/processor, etc.). Functional facilities comprising these computer-executable instructions may be integrated with and direct the operation of a single multi-purpose programmable digital computing device, a coordinated system of two or more multi-purpose computing device sharing processing power and jointly carrying out the techniques described herein, a single computing device or coordinated system of computing device (co-located or geographically distributed) dedicated to executing the techniques described herein, one or more Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) for carrying out the techniques described herein, or any other suitable system.
A computing device may comprise at least one processor, a network adapter, and computer-readable storage media. A computing device may be, for example, a desktop or laptop personal computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a smart mobile phone, a server, or any other suitable computing device. A network adapter may be any suitable hardware and/or software to enable the computing device to communicate wired and/or wireles sly with any other suitable computing device over any suitable computing network. The computing network may include wireless access points, switches, routers, gateways, and/or other networking equipment as well as any suitable wired and/or wireless communication medium or media for exchanging data between two or more computers, including the Internet. Computer-readable media may be adapted to store data to be processed and/or instructions to be executed by processor. The processor enables processing of data and execution of instructions. The data and instructions may be stored on the computer-readable storage media.
A computing device may additionally have one or more components and peripherals, including input and output devices. These devices can be used, among other things, to present a user interface. Examples of output devices that can be used to provide a user interface include printers or display screens for visual presentation of output and speakers or other sound generating devices for audible presentation of output. Examples of input devices that can be used for a user interface include keyboards, and pointing devices, such as mice, touch pads, and digitizing tablets. As another example, a computing device may receive input information through speech recognition or in other audible format.
Embodiments have been described where the techniques are implemented in circuitry and/or computer-executable instructions. It should be appreciated that some embodiments may be in the form of a method, of which at least one example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
Various aspects of the embodiments described above may be used alone, in combination, or in a variety of arrangements not specifically discussed in the embodiments described in the foregoing and is therefore not limited in its application to the details and arrangement of components set forth in the foregoing description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any embodiment, implementation, process, feature, etc. described herein as exemplary should therefore be understood to be an illustrative example and should not be understood to be a preferred or advantageous example unless otherwise indicated.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the principles described herein. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
This Application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/083,219, filed Sep. 25, 2020, and entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF SERVER-SIDE STREAMING ADAPTATION IN ADAPTIVE MEDIA STREAMING SYSTEMS,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63083219 | Sep 2020 | US |
